Laserfiche WebLink
If the roadway on Enos Circle does not become public then nothing is <br />guaranteed in the way of access; negotiation will be likely on access issues. <br />Woburn has agreement with owner Ted Moore for access through Longwood. <br />Traffic impacts to West St. will be greatly reduced from office to residential at <br />Inwood. <br />Administrative Review: <br />Pierce Street Bond <br />JB went over letter from Town Counsel on what direction the CPDC should take <br />on uncompleted work required by the court settlement between the CPDC and <br />the Pierce Street developer, Gerald Welch. <br />Phyllis Larkin attended for Mr. Welch; she claimed he has a schedule for the <br />work and will proceed. <br />A letter from the Applicant's Counsel to Town Counsel was reviewed. <br />JD went over the status of engineering review; one issue is the proper way to <br />proceed with the work assuming 25% of the roadway needs work. <br />CPDC can vote to take the bond or vote to make the taking contingent on specific <br />progress. <br />JD explained that DPW doesn't have a sidewalks contract so the work would <br />have to be bid. <br />JB reviewed the settlement, which required the work be done by June 1. <br />NS wanted clarification on existing conditions and what damage occurred from <br />` construction. <br />RH moved to take the bond and wanted discussion on the language; it has to be <br />tied to nonperformance by the Applicant. <br />JD explained that nonperformance is enough reason to take the bond and CPDC <br />should vote to take full amount without contingencies. <br />JB thought the obligation to Town in the agreed settlement was clear and <br />unfulfilled. <br />RH moved to take the bond as set forth in the tri-partite agreement, based on the <br />non-performance of the developer as set forth in the memos to CPDC from Town <br />Counsel and Town Engineer, and take appropriate steps to complete the work <br />using town resources. <br />NS seconded. <br />Voted to approve, 4-0-0 <br />Site Plan Review Regulations <br />JB talked about the by-law requirements and whether they give CPDC the <br />authority to waiver without notice. <br />CR reviewed Burlington's site plan review requirements as reference. <br />JD talked about how the application has not matched the by-law requirements <br />for years. <br />CAMy Documents\CPDC\Agenda-Minutes\Minutes 7.14.03.doc <br />