Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2017-02-21 Board of Selectmen Handout
DRAFT MOTIONS BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING FEBRUARY 21, 2017 Halsey, Sexton, Berman, Arena, Ensminger I LeLacheur 4a) Move that the Board of Selectmen appoint Carol Roberts as the Board of Selectmen member on the Reading Contributory Retirement Board with a term expiring December 31, 2017. 5c) Move that the Board of Selectmen close the Warrant consisting of _ Articles for the 2017 Annual Town Meeting to take place on April 24, 2017 at the Reading Memorial High School, 62 Oakland Road at 7:30 p.m. 6a) Move that the Board of Selectmen approve the minutes of January 9, 2017 as amended. Move that the Board of Selectmen adjourn the meeting at p.m. Reading A Community of Excellence \i Town of Reading Mission The Town of Reading strives for excellence in all its services — from education to government — and seeks to enhance and enrich the social, intellectual, and leisure life of the community. Municipal Government In support of the Town of Reading Mission, Reading Municipal Government will: • help residents identify with their community by supporting volunteerism and civic engagement, • create opportunities for public discourse about community issues and encourage citizen participation in planning and decision - making • commit itself to community- responsive services that incorporate best practices and a strong orientation to customer service • support open and transparent government with convenient avenues for communication and access • enhance the integrity and livability of its many fine neighborhoods by supporting community initiatives for preservation and improvements • uphold the character of Reading by actively encouraging efforts to document and preserve the history of the community, its historic buildings and areas, and prized open spaces. • embrace diversity by striving to provide varied housing choices and diversifying the municipal workforce by recruiting, hiring, and promoting persons of all backgrounds and races o enhance the social, civic, and intellectual life of residents by offering a broad range of services and programs l Values The municipal government of the Town of Reading will be guided by the following values: Integrity and Transparency • Reading municipal government and its employees and officials will be guided by the highest standards of ethics and integrity. • Municipal business will be conducted in an open manner with opportunities for public discussion and input into decisions. • The community will be kept informed with open communication. • All official business will be conducted in a civil, professional, and mutually respectful manner. Excellence • Excellence will be the standard for all municipal services, with continuous review and evaluation of best practices, incorporating new methods and technologies, striving for efficiency and cost effectiveness CO • Reading municipal government will make decisions based on careful planning consistent with town-wide goals. Diversity is committed to ensure the well-beiaq of all Irs 1 0 (Formatted: Indent: Left: -0.25" Formatted: Bullets and Numbering I .' ................... 11 . ......... .. ......... . Formatted: No bullets or numbering Formatted: Bu Fleted , Level: I + Aligned at 0.25" + Indent at: 0.5" tFormatted: Bullets and Numbering� Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.5", No bullets or numbering Formatted: No bullets or numbering Community The following are values that the community holds in high regards: • Social, Environmental, and Financial Sustainability • Tolerance, Civility and Cultural Diversity • Volunteerism and Civic Engagement • Historic Preservation and Open Space • Recreational, Cultural, and Educational Opportunities 2007 -Top 15 Goals In support of the Community Vision and Mission Customer Service 1. Measure customer satisfaction (Department Heads) • Take one Department of the Town and develop a customer satisfaction feedback mechanism Implement that mechanism on a trial basis 2. Complete new basic web page and begin to add modules (ATM /Finance Director) Initial start -up June 2007 • Add additional modules as permitted — priority on Citizen Request, and mapping 3. Create new electronic interaction with customers for business services (Town Accountant, ATM /Finance Director ) • Volunteer Application Form • Civic Function Permit Form 4. Improve communications (ATM /Finance Director) • Provide for citizen evaluation of boards, committees, and commissions; • develop a community calendar update and maintain in an electronic format, the local history collection, and historical property inventory 5. Evaluate the need for a community standard of civil behavior (Police Chief, Superintendent of Schools, ATM /Finance Director) 4 Do questionnaire of BCC members and Staff �l Evaluate the results • Develop Chairman training Business Process 6. Measure and evaluate. best practices within operating areas (Department Heads) • at least one review per department per year • Train Department heads in the process of looking at their operating areas and identifying best practices • Develop a schedule for identification of at least one best practice per department, and develop a schedule for its implementation 7. Complete the DPW Management Study and develop a schedule for implementation (DPW Director) As part of the study, identify the highest priority items for implementation • include the cost of implementation in the FY 2009 budget request as a priority 8. Complete strategic planning initiatives in at least 2 departments Library Director, Police.Chief) Library Police — first draft by October 1, 2007 9. Begin implementation of a new technology platform (Town Accountant, ATM /Finance Director) i q Secure Town Meeting authorization • Decide on the system or systems to be used Develop a schedule of implementation over up to 3 years • Identify areas where implementation can take place at the same time without impacting the same employees or processes • Report to the Board of Selectmen and Finance Committee quarterly onteh process and schedule Sustainability 10. Expand the commercial property tax base (Town Manager, Community Services Director) • Pursue the cost and funding of a feasibility study and initial design of a parking structure at the upper parking lot in downtown • Consider additional recommendations of the ad hoc Downtown Parking Advisory Committee; • Complete the "peer to peer" contract for advisory services to the Economic Development Committee by June 30, 2007 • Complete the scope of services for the Technical Assistance work on downtown market study by June 30 • With the DAT and the Board of Selectmen and CPDC, move forward with the newly designated developer of the Addison Wesley / Pearson site (AW /P) to consider alternate mixed use development, evaluate the existing zoning to make sure that it is clear as to what level of development the current zoning allows; evaluate the use of 40R for all or a portion of the site; try to reach agreement on a development package for the site; and if feasible, bring revised (overlay) zoning amendments to a special fall Town Meeting • Develop design standards for improvement of South Main Street, and request CPDC sponsorship of necessary zoning bylaw amendments to implement Master Plan recommendations for this area. • Make contact with owners of property for sale and offer to work with then to maximize the beneficial effect of redevelopment of their sites. 11. Reduce Community Dependence on Energy and use of natural resources Facilities Director, Town Accountant, Town Manager) • complete MWRA buy -in while maintaining low per- capita water use • reduce Town government (including schools and RMLD) energy use • Implement anti - idling policy and information for Town vehicles and al Elementary Schools • reduce community energy use — transportation, residential use Community Infrastructure 12. Develop and seek Board of Selectmen approval of master plans for individual public properties, so that decisions may be made for these properties in the context of those overall plans as opportunities arise (DPW Director) • Birch Meadow complex Memorial Park • Northern Area Greenway 13. Work with Arts organizations on the feasibility of an arts center in Reading Community Services Director) el�i As part of the evaluation of the Oakland Road Town -owned property, consider use of the site for an arts center 14. Secure approval and begin to implement the affordable housing planned production plan Community Services Director, Town manager) • Once formal approval is granted, develop an action plan with staff on the first 66 units of affordable housing for the first year • Implement the first phase of that action plan 15. Secure a planning grant and get approval for at least one 40R/40 S project Community Services Director, Town Manager) �l Secure planning grant for a downtown 40 R process • Complete the study and state review for a downtown 40R • Consider zoning bylaw amendments for a downtown 40r development • Evaluate with the Board of Selectmen and CPDC, as well as the developer, the viability of a 40R designation for all or a portion of the Addison Wesley /Pearson property • If deemed to be desirable, pursue funding and development of a 40 R designation for the AW /P property. • Consider zoning bylaw amendments for an AW /P 40 R Note - #'s denote goals; bullets designate action items e\�, r' Estimated Estimated LEGAL BUDGET YTD ACTUAL BUDGET BALANCE Remaining Balance - -- -- - - - LEGAL BUDGET TOTAL $ 158,374 $ 285,000 $ 126,626 56% $ 126,899 $ (273) Town Counsel $ 107,447 $ 210,000 $ 102,553 51% $ 119,626 $ (17,073) $50,000 April TM funding ($25k TLT,• $15k 40B; $10k other) $ 7,544 _ . _ =___ Town Labor Counsel $ 10,183 $ 25,000 $ 14,818 41% $ 7,273 - __� $ 25, OOOAprilTMfunding (encu_mberforFY18) Cable negotiations $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ - $ 9,256 $25,000AprilTMfunding TILT Litigation $ 15,744 $ 25,000 $ 9,256 YTD ACTUAL BUDGET I BALANCE YTD July August September October November December TOWN COUNSEL TOTAL $ 107,447.12 $ 210,000 $ 102,553 51% $ 13,553.57 $ 19,806.60 $ 21,481.74 $ 24,892.00 $ 27,795.21 - Typical issues T $ 60,639.74 $ 145,000 $ 84,360 42% Other Issues other $ 46 807.38 $ 65,000 $ 18,193 72/ Miyares & Harrington Total $ $ 210,000 $ 210,000 Public Policy 68% $ 41408 74 $ 75,000 $ 33,591 55/ Town Meeting Zoning Bylaws T T $ 28,836.54 $ 5,846.60 $ 46,000 $ 8,000 $ 17,163 $ 2,153 $ 307.50 $ 534.00 $ 6,622,00 $ 5,312.60 $ 8,640 24 $ 2,938.50 $ 10 328.30 General Bylaws T $ 382.00 $ 2,000 $ 1,618 $ 382.00 Alcohol & Tobacco T $ 5,767.10 - $ 7,500 $ 1,733 $ 519.50 $ 1,440 00 $ 2,153.10 $ 1,654.50 Elections T $ 266.50 $ 2,500 $ 2,234 $ 266.50 other T $ 310.00 $ 9,000 $ 8,690 $ 41.00 269.00 Management Policy 45% $ 15,901.50 $ 40,000 $ 9,285 40% $ 82.00 General Town issues T $ 4,824.00 $ 16,000 $ 11,176 $ 4,198.50 $ 410.00 $ 123.00 $ 92.50 Public Works T $ 2,596.50 $ 5,000 $ 2,404 $ 2,317.50 $ 74.00 $ 205.00 Public Safety T $ 3,765.50 $ 5,000 $ 1,235 $ 20.50 $ 41.00 - $ 2,330 50 -- $ 1373.50 - - Public Library T - $ 266.50 $ 2,000 $ 1,734 $ 266.50 Building department T $ $ 2,000 $ 2,000 1 � $ 320.50 Facilities T $ 2,510.50 $ 5,000 $ 2,490 $ 1088.00 $ 427.00 $ 675.00 General School issues T $ 1,938.50 $ 5,000 $ 3,062 $ 163100 $ 246.00 $ 61.50 _ Construction projects 20/ $ 21 992.10 $ 35,000 $ 13,008 63/ Public Library! T $ 164.00 $ 7,500 1 $ 7 336 --_ _- - - - I $ 2,500 � $ 2,500 $ 82.00 $ 82.00 - __- Perm Bldg Comm T--- 1 $ - - TLT /RMHS other 1_$ 21,828 10 $ 25,000 $ 3,172 ; - $ 4100 1 $ 11459 60 $ 10 327.50 other other $ $ - ' $- Land Use Issues 10% $ 24 979.28 $ 40,000 $ 6 581 62/ - - -- - Reading Village 40B other $ 6,907.40 $ 10,000 $ 3,093 -- Woburn St. 40B other $ 20.50 $ 2,500 $ 2,480 ,40 $ 101.3 - - 594.50 - $ 2050 $ 1,045 50 - $ 1,506.80 $ 2,359.30 __- _ -_ - -- Lakeview 40B other $- 271 00 $ 2,500 $ 2 229 - $ 234.00 _ ! $ 37.00 - _ _ Oakland Road land other $ 7,217.50 $ 7,500 $ 283 $ 1004 50 I $ 1374.00 $ 1897 50 $ 2,941.50 245 Summer other $ 143.50 $ 500 $ 357 506 Summer Ave other $ 4,8 38j $ --S-1600 $ 184 $ 228 77 - $ 20.50 - $ 102.50 $ 2,600 S0 - $ 943.00 $ 41.00 $ 1023.61 - - -I 86 Bancroft other $ 1558 00 $ 2 000 $ 442 - $ 1,558.00 - - - -- -- -- other other $ 4,045.00 $ 10 000 $ 5,955 $ 691.50 $ 1,900 00 I -_ I $ 4100 _ _ $ 439.50 $ 1,412.50 1_ _ Other Issues 3/ $ 3 165.50 $ 20 000 $ 16 835 16 /T $ 857.00 j T $ 3,165.50 $ 20,000 $ 16,835 $ 1869 00 Miyares & Harrington ! 1 _ I - LABOR COUNSEL TOTAL & $ 10,182.50 $ 25,000 $ 14,818 $_ 10,182.50 $ 25,000 1 $ 14,818 $ 2,047.50 $ 280.00 $ 595.00 $ 87.50 $ 4,252.50 $ 1,440.50 Morgan, Brown Joy - NEW: TILT LITIGATION TOTAL TLT /K &P $ 15,744.17 $ 25,000 $ 9,256 $ 11,619.17 $ 20,000 ' $ 8,381 $ 4,125.00 $ 5,000 $ 875 $ _ -1,702.50 $ 4,125.00 $ 2,532 44 $ -.. 7,384.23 TLT /Master r' 1z' r .� COMCAST 2017 FF0 14 P14 3: 25 February 3, 2017 Board of Selectmen Town of Reading 16 Lowell Street Reading, MA 01867 Re: Digital Preferred packages Dear Chairman and Members of the Board: As part of our continuing effort to keep you informed, we wanted to share, on April 1, 2017 the following packages and services will no longer be available for new subscriptions: • Digital Preferred plus One Premium • Digital Preferred with HBO • Digital Preferred plus Two Premiums • Digital Preferred with HBO and One Premium • Digital Preferred Tier plus Two Premiums • Digital Preferred Tier with HBO and One Premium Customers are receiving this information, in advance, via bill message. Additionally, customers who currently subscribe to one of these packages or services will continue to receive the package or service until they make a change to their service or receive further advance notice. If you have any questions, please visit xfinity.com or contact me at 978 - 993 -7472. Very truly yours, Jcryce'-I1. Lynary Jane M. Lyman, Sr. Manager Government Affairs C� Schena, Paula From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: LeLacheur, Bob Friday, February 17, 2017 5:13 PM Schena, Paula Fwd: Fios TV Notice image002.png; ATT00001.htm; image003.png; ATT00002.htm; Customer Notice - All Other.pdf, ATT00003.htm From: <iill.m.reddish @verizon.com> Date: February 17, 2017 at 5:00:40 PM EST To: <iill.m.reddish @ verizon.com> Subject: Fios TV Notice Dear Municipal Official: This is to notify you of certain upcoming Fios® TV pricing changes. On or after June 1, 2017, the monthly rate for two Fios® TV Premium Services, Brazzers and Reality Kings, will increase by $5.00 from $29.99 to $34.99 per month. Verizon will notify subscribers of the above by means of bill message beginning on or after April 1, 2017. A sample customer notice is attached. Access to the Fios® TV channel lineup is available 24/7 online at verizon.com /fiostvchannels. We realize that our customers have other alternatives for entertainment and our goal is to offer the best choice and value in the industry. Verizon appreciates the opportunity to conduct business in your community. Should you or your staff have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Fios@ TV Premium Channel Rate Notification To continue bringing you quality service, at times we need to raise some of our rates. On or after 30 days from the date of this bill, the monthly rate for two of our Floss TV Premium Services, Brazzers and Reality Kings, will increase by $5. The new monthly rate will be $34.99 for each of these services. As a reminder, as part of your subscription, you can access related Video On Demand content at any time. �J Schena, Paula From: LeLacheur, Bob Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 4:04 PM To: Schena, Paula Subject: FW: [Reading MA] Override Response: BOS packet From: vtsdmailer @vt -s.net [vtsdmailer @vt- s.net] on behalf of pbranch2 @gmail.com [pbranch2 @gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2017 3:53 PM To: Reading - Selectmen Subject: [Reading MA] Override Response: Hello Board of Selectmen, Peter E. Branch (pbranch2 @gmail.com) has sent you a message via your contact form (http: / /www.readingma.gov /user /475 /contact) at Reading MA. If you don't want to receive such e- mails, you can change your settings at http: / /www.readingma.gov /user /475 /edit. Message Dear Sirs: I am outraged at what I read in both The Advocate and Woburn Daily Times. Three months after the decisive defeat of the initial Override; the Selectmen, appear, again, to be wooed by special interest, vocal minority parents demanding language courses (Middle School level) and A.P. courses (High School level). It is reported over 100 parents have written requests for the Town to support these "Can't do Without" programs. May I remind you, the Override defeat was by approximately 2000 votes against the additional spending... Period!! The present educational system Reading offers has an excellent reputation and its mission is fair and equitable for everyone. If self - serving whining parents crave higher standards, as in private school programs, I recommend the Board develop some "Backbone" and direct these parents to use their own personal finances to seek alternative choices for their "entitled" children. Austin Preparatory and Philips Andover quickly come to mind. The majority of Reading citizens should not have to bear the tax burden and superfluous trappings of such demands.; especially, following the Override's clear message to "Stop the Spending "! Let us also be truthful, there was no voter confusion regarding the ballot, as the Selectmen searched for answers in their post- mortem defense. The message was straight forward and still is "No more excess spending and let's make -do within the Town's Budget!! Sincerely, Peter E. Branch 633 Summer Avenue (� )U COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Middlesex, ss. Officer's Return, Town of Reading: By virtue of this Warrant, I , on , 2017 notified and warned the inhabitants of the Town of Reading, qualified to vote on Town affairs, to meet at the place and at the time specified by posting attested copies of this Town Meeting Warrant in the following public places within the Town of Reading: Precinct 1 J. Warren Killam School, 333 Charles Street Precinct 2 Reading Police Station, 15 Union Street Precinct 3 Reading Municipal Light Department, 230 Ash Street Precinct 4 Joshua Eaton School, 365 Summer Avenue Precinct 5 Reading Public Library, 64 Middlesex Avenue Precinct 6 Barrows School, 16 Edgemont Avenue Precinct 7 Birch Meadow School, 27 Arthur B Lord Drive Precinct 8 Wood End School, 85 Sunset Rock Lane Town Hall, 16 Lowell Street The date of posting being not less than fourteen (14) days prior to April 4, 2017, the date set for Town Meeting in this Warrant. I also caused a posting of this Warrant to be published on the Town of Reading website on 2017. Constable A true copy Attest: Laura Gemme, Town Clerk TOWN WARRANT 0� OF$p ,I x M d 0 ,s39. INCORQO�� COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Middlesex, ss. To any of the Constables of the Town of Reading, Greetings: In the name of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, you are hereby required to notify and warn the inhabitants of the Town of Reading, qualified to vote in the Local Elections and Town affairs, to meet in the following place designated for the eight precincts in said Town, namely: Precincts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Reading Memorial High School, Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road TUESDAY, the FOURTH DAY OF APRIL, A.D., 2017 from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. to act on the following Articles, viz: ARTICLE 1 To elect by ballot the following Town Officers: A Moderator for one year; Two members of the Board of Selectmen for three years; Two members of the Board of Library Trustees for three years; One member of the Municipal Light Board for three years; Two members of the School Committee for three years; One member of the School Committee for two years; and Seventy -One Town Meeting Members shall be elected to represent each of the following precincts: Precinct 1 Eight members for three years; Precinct 2 Eight members for three years; and to vote on the following questions: Question 1: MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT BAN Shall the Reading Town Meeting be authorized to adopt an amendment to the Reading Zoning Bylaw prohibiting marijuana establishments, as defined in Section 1 Q) of Chapter 94G of the Massachusetts General 1, Two members for two years; Precinct 3 Eight members for three years; One member for two years; Precinct 4 Eight members for three years; Precinct 5 Eight members for three years; Precinct 6 Eight members for three years; Two members for two years; Precinct 7 Eight members for three years; One member for one year; Precinct 8 Eight members for three years; and One member for one year; and to vote on the following questions: Question 1: MARIJUANA ESTABLISHMENT BAN Shall the Reading Town Meeting be authorized to adopt an amendment to the Reading Zoning Bylaw prohibiting marijuana establishments, as defined in Section 1 Q) of Chapter 94G of the Massachusetts General 1, Laws, except for Registered Medical Marijuana Dispensaries as defined in Section 2.0 of the Zoning Bylaw, from all zoning districts within the Town? YES NO and to meet at the Reading Memorial High School, 62 Oakland Road, in said Reading on MONDAY, the TWENTY- FOURTH DAY of APRIL A.D., 2017 at seven - thirty o'clock in the evening, at which time and place the following Articles are to be acted upon and determined exclusively by Town Meeting Members in accordance with the provisions of the Reading Home Rule Charter. ARTICLE 2 To hear and act on the reports of the Board of Selectmen, School Committee, Library Trustees, Municipal Light Board, Finance Committee, Bylaw Committee, Town Manager, Town Accountant and any other Town Official, Board or Committee. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 3 To choose all other necessary Town Officers and Boards or Committees and determine what instructions shall be given Town Officers and Boards or Committees, and to see what sum the Town will vote to appropriate by borrowing or transfer from available funds, or otherwise, for the purpose of funding Town Officers and Boards or Committees to carry out the instructions given to them, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 4 To see if the Town will vote to amend the FY 2017 -27 Capital Improvements Program as provided for in Section 7 -7 of the Reading Home Rule Charter and as previously amended, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 5 To see if the Town will vote to amend the Town's Operating Budget for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2016, as adopted under Article 12 of the Annual Town Meeting of March 1, 2016 and amended under Article 11 of the Subsequent Town Meeting of November 14, 2016; and to see if the Town will vote to raise and appropriate, borrow or transfer from available funds, or otherwise provide a sum or sums of money to be added to the amounts appropriated under said Article, as amended, for the operation of the Town and its government, or take any other action with respect thereto. Finance Committee ARTICLE 6 To see if the Town will vote to raise and appropriate, transfer from available funds or otherwise provide a sum or sums of money to pay bills remaining unpaid from prior fiscal years for goods and services actually rendered to the Town, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen � �1 ARTICLE 7 To see if the Town will vote to authorize the Board of Selectmen to sell, exchange, or dispose of, various items of Town tangible property, upon such terms and conditions as they may determine; or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 8 To see if the Town will vote to accept the provisions of Section 20 of Chapter 32B of the Massachusetts General Laws, as amended by Section 15 of the Chapter 218 of the Acts of 2016, establishing an Other Post - Employment Benefits Liability Trust Fund; to authorize the Board of Selectmen and Treasurer to execute a declaration of trust creating an expendable trust for the purpose of holding monies appropriated to such fund; to designate the Treasurer as the trustee of such trust; to authorize the transfer of any and all monies currently held for the purpose of paying retiree health and life benefits to such trust; to authorize the trustee to invest and reinvest the monies in such fund in the State Retiree Benefits Trust Fund; and to authorize the participation of the Town of Reading Municipal Light Department in the trust fund in accordance with procedures and criteria established by the trustee. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 9 To hear the report of the School Committee or any other public body that the real property shown as "Oakland Road Parcel' on a plan of land entitled "Plan of Land Oakland Road Town of Reading," prepared by Town of Reading — Department of Public Works, Engineering Division, Jeffrey T. Zager, Director D.P.W., Ryan Percival, P.E., Town Engineer, dated September 13, 2016, is no longer required for public purposes; to see if the Town will vote, pursuant to Chapter 40, Section 15A, of the Massachusetts General Laws, to transfer the care, custody, management and control of said Oakland Road Parcel to the Board of Selectmen; or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 10 To see if the Town will raise and appropriate, transfer from available funds, borrow or otherwise provide a sum or sums of money for the purpose of renovating and expanding the Reading Public Library located at 64 Middlesex Avenue, including the costs of consulting services, audits, plans, documents, cost estimates, bidding services, moving, temporary relocation, and all related expenses incidental thereto and necessary in connection therewith, said sum to be expended by and under the direction of the Town Manager and the Board of Library Trustees; and to see if the Town will authorize the Board of Library Trustees, Board of Selectmen, Town Manager, or any other agency of the Town, to apply for a grant or grants to be used to defray the cost of all, or any part of, said improvements; and to authorize the Board of Library Trustees and /or the Town Manager to enter into any and all contracts and agreements as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this Article. These funds will be additional to the $14.9 million previously approved by vote of Town Meeting on January 28, 2013 and a majority of the voters at a local election on April 2, 2013, and to the $3.5 million previously approved by a vote of Town Meeting on February 13, 2014 and a majority of the voters at a local election on April 1, 2014, and to the $141,224.72 approved by Town Meeting under Article 7 of Subsequent Town Meeting on November 14, 2016; or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 11 To see if the Town will raise and appropriate, transfer from available funds, borrow or otherwise provide a sum or sums of money for the purpose of making extraordinary repairs and /or replacement of sanitary sewer collection systems, including the costs of consulting services, audits, plans, documents, cost estimates, bidding services and all related expenses incidental thereto and necessary in connection therewith, said sum to be expended by and under the direction of the Town Manager; and to see if the Town will authorize the Board of Selectmen, Town Manager, or any other agency of the Town, to apply for a grant or grants, to be used to defray the cost of all, or any part of, said sanitary sewer improvements; and to authorize l�� the Town Manager to enter into any and all contracts and agreements as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this Article, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 12 To see if the Town will vote, pursuant to Section 1030) of Chapter 32 of the Massachusetts General Laws, to accept an increase in the maximum Retirement Cost of Living Base, from $12,000 to $14,000, as accepted by the Reading Retirement Board, such acceptance to be effective as of the date that a certification of the Town Meeting vote is filed with the Public Employee Retirement Administration Commission. Reading Retirement Board ARTICLE 13 To see if the Town will vote to amend the vote taken under Article 12 of Annual Town Meeting on April 30, 2009 so as to abolish the Sick Leave and Vacation buy -back Stabilization Fund, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 14 To see if the Town will vote to approve an Affordable Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan pursuant to Chapter 140 of the Acts of 2001 entitled "AN ACT AUTHORIZING THE TOWN OF READING TO ESTABLISH AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING TRUST FUND ", or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 15 To see if the Town will vote to establish the limit on the total amount that may be expended from each revolving fund established by Article 9 of the Town of Reading General Bylaw pursuant to Section 53E'/ of Chapter 44 of the Massachusetts General Laws for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2017, or take any action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 16 To see if the Town will vote to raise and appropriate, borrow, transfer from available funds, or otherwise provide a sum of money for the operation of the Town and its government for Fiscal Year 2018 - beginning July 1, 2017, or take any other action with respect thereto. Finance Committee ARTICLE 17 To see what sum the Town will vote to raise and appropriate, borrow, transfer from available funds, or otherwise provide a sum of money for highway projects in accordance with Chapter 90 of the Massachusetts General Laws, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 18 To see if the Town will vote to amend the Zoning Bylaw by deleting Section 3.3.6, Permanent Building Committee, in its entirety and inserting in place thereof the following: 3.3.6 Permanent Building Committee There shall be a Permanent Building Committee consisting of five (5) Permanent Members and, notwithstanding any provision of Section 3.3.1.6 to the contrary, up to two (2) Temporary Members for each Project that the Permanent Building Committee undertakes. Permanent and Temporary Members of the Permanent Building Committee shall be appointed by an Appointment Committee consisting of the Chair of the Board of Selectmen, the Chair of the School Committee and the Town Moderator. In addition, the Appointment Committee may appoint not more than three (3) Associate Members whose service on the Permanent Building Committee shall be governed by the third paragraph of Section 3.3.1.6. Permanent and Associate Members shall be volunteers having practical experience and skills in professions that concentrate on the design, construction, management or financing of buildings, including architects; civil engineers; structural engineers; mechanical, electrical and plumbing engineers; building contractors, project managers; property managers; attorneys and building tradespersons. Their terms shall be so arranged that as nearly an equal number of terms as possible shall expire each year. The Permanent Building Committee shall work with the Director of Facilities to compile an assessment of the physical condition of, and an inventory of anticipated repairs and renovations to, all existing Town buildings and shall summarize its findings in an annual report to Town Meeting. The Permanent Building Committee shall adopt a formal building project application process to be followed in order for any proposed project to be considered for evaluation and possible administration. The Permanent Building Committee shall evaluate Project Applications forwarded by the School Committee, the Board of Selectmen or the Library Trustees (the "Sponsoring Agency "). All Sponsoring Agencies shall be notified of this application process and any revisions to it in a timely manner after their adoption. The Permanent Building Committee shall review and administer major Town building design studies and construction projects having expected aggregate costs of $1,500,000 or more, but may decline administration of Projects with little or no actual construction. The Permanent Building Committee's jurisdiction shall not extend to projects of the Reading Municipal Light Department. Once Town Meeting has authorized funds for a Project, the Appointment Committee shall add Temporary Members to the Permanent Building Committee for such Project. Temporary Members shall have the same participation and voting rights as Permanent Members on matters affecting the particular Project for which they were appointed. Temporary Members shall be registered voters of the Town, nominated by the Sponsoring Agency, and shall serve only for the time during which the Permanent Building Committee is exercising its functions with respect to such Project. In the event that a particular project is subject to participant requirements of a state funding authority, the Appointment Committee may appoint additional Temporary members to the Permanent Building Committee for that project; provided, however, that, in no event, shall the aggregate number of Permanent and Temporary Members for a particular project exceed nine (9). Quorum requirements for the Permanent Building Committee shall be the majority of the Permanent and Temporary Members for a particular project. or take any other action in relation thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 19 To see if the Town will vote to amend Sections 5.3.1, 5.3.2, and 5.4.7 of the Zoning Bylaw by: (a) Amending the Table of Uses for Business and Industrial Districts set forth in Section 5.3.1 as shown below, with additions being shown in bold and deletions being struck through: 5.3.1 Table of Uses for Business and Industrial Districts ACCESSORY USES BUS A BUS B BUS C IND PUD -B Overlay PUD -1 Overlay Attached Accessory Apartment RES RES PRD -G PUD -R S -20 Contained Within an Existing Single- Yes Yes No No No No Family Dwelling — no addition to gross Attached Accessory Apartment Contained floor area within an Existing Single Family Dwelling — Yes a No No Detached Accessory Apartment no addition to gross floor area SPA Associated with an Existing Single- � No No No No Family Dwelling SPP No No No Aq-senintpd with New GGRs#u4km4 of a (b) Amending the Table of Uses for Residence Districts set forth in Section 5.3.2 as shown below, with additions being shown in bold and deletions being struck through: 5.3.2 Table of Uses for Residence Districts (c) Amending Section 5.4.7.2 as shown below, with additions being shown in bold and deletions being struck through: 5.4.7.2 Restrictions Accessory Apartments may be allowed in the S -15, S -20 or S -40 Districts, or in a Single Family Dwelling in the Bus -A or Bus -B Zoning Districts as shown in the Tables set forth in Sections 5.3.1 and 5.3.2 5A —and subject to the applicable performance standards set forth below. Cv RES ACCESSORY USES S -15 RES RES PRD -G PUD -R S -20 A -40 A -80 PRD -M S-40 Attached Accessory Apartment Contained within an Existing Single Family Dwelling — Yes a No No No no addition to gross floor area Detached Accessory Apartment (not in an existing Carriage House, Stable or Barn) � SPP No No No Aq-senintpd with New GGRs#u4km4 of a Preservation of a Carriage House, Stable, or Barn for Use as a Detached Accessory SPA SPA SPA No No Apartment Attached Accessory Apartment Contained Within New Construction of or Addition to SPA SPA No No No a Single F family Dwelling (c) Amending Section 5.4.7.2 as shown below, with additions being shown in bold and deletions being struck through: 5.4.7.2 Restrictions Accessory Apartments may be allowed in the S -15, S -20 or S -40 Districts, or in a Single Family Dwelling in the Bus -A or Bus -B Zoning Districts as shown in the Tables set forth in Sections 5.3.1 and 5.3.2 5A —and subject to the applicable performance standards set forth below. Cv Principal Residence Exterior Wall of Principal Dwelling Principal Residence Exterior Wall of Principal Dwelling "No Build Area" -- Off Street Parking /Driveway z yu r Accessory Apartment (detached) (existing building may be expanded provided no portion of the structure is within the "No Build Area ") Off Street Parking /Driveway Build Area" Except as noted, a Detached Accessory Apartment may not be located between any exterior wall of the Principal Single Family Dwelling and any right -of -way Accessory Apartment (Detached) Existing structure may NOT be expanded into the "No Build Area" Except as noted, a Detached Accessory Apartment may not be located between any exterior wall of the Principal Single Family Dwelling and any right -of -way Principal Residence Exterior Wall of Principal Dwelling Exterior Wall of Principal Dwelling Right of Way __Off Street Parking /Driveway Except as noted, a Detached Accessory Apartment may not be located between any exterior wall of the Principal Single Family Dwelling and any right -of -way Build Area" :apt as noted, a Detached :essory Apartment may not ocated between any ,nor wall of the Principal lie Family Dwelling and right -of -way Build Area" ate) t) and (d) Amending Section 5.4.7.3 by adding, after the first sentence thereof, the following: "The SPGA may grant a waiver from the standards set forth in sections 5.4.7.3a through j inclusive where necessary to install features that facilitate access and mobility for disabled persons; however, in no case shall the SPGA waive or allow modifications to requirement k below." (e) Deleting Subsection 5.4.7.3k in its entirety and inserting, in place thereof, the following: k. A Detached Accessory Apartment shall not be located between any exterior wall of a Principal Single Family Dwelling and any right -of -way (the "No Build Area "), unless it is created through the conversion of an accessory structure located within the No Build Area that was constructed or permitted prior to 2017, or through the preservation of a carriage house, stable or barn that was constructed or permitted prior to 2017; provided, however, that such conversion of an accessory structure or preservation of a carriage house, stable or barn for use as an Accessory Apartment shall not result in the addition of gross floor area to that portion of the structure that is within the No Build Area. No Special Permit for an Accessory Apartment shall be issued unless the SPGA finds that the exterior appearance of the Accessory Apartment, and any accessory structure, carriage house, stable or barn modified to accommodate a Detached Accessory Apartment will maintain the essential character of the neighborhood and will be compatible with the Principal Single Family Dwelling on the same lot and with other dwellings on adjoining lots. or take any other action with respect thereto. Community Planning and Development Commission ARTICLE 20 To see if the Town will vote to amend Section 2 of the Zoning Bylaws to prohibit retail sales of marijuana other than by Registered Marijuana Dispensaries by: (a) Inserting into Section 2.0, in appropriate alphabetical order, the following: Marijuana Establishment: A marijuana cultivator, marijuana testing facility, marijuana product manufacturer, marijuana retailer, or any other type of marijuana - related business, subject to regulation under Chapter 94G of the Massachusetts General Laws; provided, however, that a Registered Medical Marijuana Dispensary shall not be deemed to be a Marijuana Establishment. (b) Inserting into the Table of Uses for Business and Industrial Districts, set forth in Section 5.3.1, after the entries for "Convenience Store," the following: PRINCIPAL BUS A BUS B BUS C INfl ` 'PUD=B PUD -t l 1SES Querlay " ©urlay Marijuana Establishment No No No No No No and (c) Inserting into the Table of Uses for Residence Districts, set forth in Section 5.3.2, after the entries for "Roadside Stand," the following: or take any other action in relation thereto. Community Planning and Development Commission ARTICLE 21 To see if the Town will vote to amend Sections 2 and 5.6 the Zoning Bylaw to adopt a temporary moratorium on retail marijuana establishments by: (a) Inserting into Section 2.0, in appropriate alphabetical order, the following: Marijuana Establishment: A marijuana cultivator, marijuana testing facility, marijuana product manufacturer, marijuana retailer, or any other type of marijuana - related business, subject to regulation under Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 94G; provided, however, that a Registered Medical Marijuana Dispensary shall not be deemed to be a Marijuana Establishment. (b) Striking Section 5.6.5.2 in its entirety and inserting, in place thereof, the following: 5.6.5.2 Applicability No Registered Medical Marijuana Dispensary shall be established except in compliance with the provisions of Section 5.6.5. (c) Inserting a new Section 5.6.6 as follows: 5.6.6 Temporary Moratorium on Marijuana Establishments. 5.6.6.1 Purpose. By vote at the State election on November 8, 2016, the voters of the Commonwealth approved a law regulating the cultivation, manufacture, processing, distribution, sale, possession, testing and use of marijuana. The law and the subsequent amendment thereto provides that it is effective on December 15, 2016, and that a new state agency, the Cannabis Control Commission (CCC), is required to issue regulations regarding implementation by March 15, 2018. Section 5.6.5 of the Zoning Bylaw allows Registered Medical Marijuana Dispensaries by Special Permit. The regulation of other types of Marijuana Establishments, however, raises novel and complex legal, planning, and public safety issues. The Town needs time to consider and address these issues, as well as the potential impact of the forthcoming Cannabis Control Commission regulations, by means of a comprehensive planning process to consider amending the Zoning Bylaw to regulate Marijuana Establishments. The temporary moratorium provided in Section 5.6.6 is intended to allow sufficient time for the Town to engage in such a planning process and to adopt suitable Zoning Bylaw provisions in a manner consistent with sound land -use planning objectives. 5.6.6.2 Temporary Moratorium. For the reasons set forth above and notwithstanding any other provision of the Zoning Bylaw to the contrary, the Town hereby adopts a temporary moratorium on the use of land or structures as a Marijuana Establishment. The moratorium shall be in effect through Vol, and August 31, 2018. During the moratorium period, the Town shall undertake a planning process to address the potential impacts of Marijuana Establishments and other related land uses and structures, consider the Cannabis Control Commission regulations regarding Marijuana Establishments when they are issued, and shall consider adopting new provisions of the Zoning Bylaw governing the location, operation and effects of Marijuana Establishments for consideration by the 2018 Annual Town Meeting. (d) Renumbering subsequent provisions of Section 5.6 accordingly; or take any other action in relation thereto. Community Planning and Development Commission ARTICLE 22 To see if the Town will vote to amend Section 10.5 of the Zoning Bylaw (Downtown Smart Growth District) by deleting Section 10.5.10.1 in its entirety, and inserting the following in place thereof: 10.5.10.1 Number of Affordable Units Affordable units shall be provided in projects of more than twelve (12) units, as follows: • Except as otherwise provided by this section, twenty percent (20 %) of all dwelling units constructed in an ownership Development Project shall be Affordable Units. • Except as otherwise provided by this section, twenty -five percent (25 %) of all dwelling units constructed in a rental Development Project shall be Affordable Units. • For Development Projects in which all of the dwelling units are limited to occupancy by elderly persons and /or by persons with disabilities, twenty -five percent (25 %) of the dwelling units shall be Affordable Units, whether the dwelling units are Rental Units or Ownership Units. or take any other action with respect thereto. Community Planning and Development Commission ARTICLE 23 To see if the Town will vote to amend the Town of Reading's official Zoning Map to expand the existing Downtown Smart Growth District (DSGD) to include the entire Business B Zoning District in the downtown area, as shown below: PROPOSED DOWNTOWN SMART GROWTH DISTRICT EXPANSION Legend ® DSGD Overlay District 0 200 400 ® Proposed DSGD Expansion Ft Business B Zoning District Map by Town of Reading Parcels Map date: 2/14/17 � 4 � i L6 � ldc MOM 713 `. n EJ Q L pl'�Q' IDISGI),j 4 a lx Expan'siori ' L b❑ tJ U or take any other action with respect thereto. Community Planning and Development Commission ARTICLE 24 To see if the Town will vote, pursuant to Section 2 -6 of the Reading Home Rule Charter, to declare the seats of certain Town Meeting Members to be vacant and remove certain described persons from their position as Town Meeting Members for failure to take the oath of office within 30 days following the notice of election or for failure to attend one -half or more of the Town Meeting sessions during the previous year, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen and you are directed to serve this Warrant by posting an attested copy thereof in at least one (1) public place in each precinct of the Town not less than fourteen (14) days prior to April 4, 2017, or providing in a manner such as electronic submission, holding for pickup or mailing, an attested copy of said Warrant to each Town Meeting Member. Hereof fail not and make due return of this Warrant with your doings thereon to the Town Clerk at or before the time appointed for said meeting. Given under our hands this St day of 12017.1 , Constable John R. Halsey, Chairman Kevin Sexton, Vice Chairman Barry Berman, Secretary John Arena Daniel Ensminger SELECTMEN OF READING Elio) E OR OR MJ- IT, m I a M I �-,' I I � 1, 1 � r I, E 149 \� 011 I 47h do Im m m ra ME a \ \} O O O t.0 U N 1� LO 4d�- 4dj_ 4d)' ,--1 M d" d" O V N t.0' i& Or, AA- to Ln ,--q t.0 U N 1� LO 4d�- 4dj_ 4d)' LA (A d' d" O V N t.0' i& Or, AA- rll-. TT-i tY W 1� 4d�- 4dj_ 4d)' N O N d" O M N t.0' iA- i � Q 0 l • Cl . . a . • • • w . w • • • • • • . . w • • • • . w • • • w w • . . . . . . .� • • • • • r LL r U- (0 r LL LO r LL LL M r r LL N r r LL r r LL 0 r U- 0) 0 r LL 0 0 r- 0 r U- 0 0 r U- to co di U) 06 E 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 CV - -b Enterprise Funds FY18 Budgets Enterprise Funds Overview In case of infrastructure emergencies, a certain amount of Target financial reserves must be held aside. Current reserves are well in excess of these levels. Reserves (000s) Feb. `17 Target Surplus Water $3,539 $1,750 $1,789 Sewer* $3,936 $1,750 $2,186 St. Water $914 $350 $564 *includes $200k proposed to be used at April 2017 Town Meeting Water & Sewer MWRA assessments represent a significant portion of the Water (34 %) and Sewer (74 %) budgets. Early FY18 estimates from the MWRA are for +8.9% (Water) and +1.4% (Sewer) or 5.2% combined increase and then +5% to +6% for the next three years. Note that budgets alone do not determine rates, as will be explained further. Given what we know or project about the future, here is the current plan of use of Reserves: Water /sewer rates are set by a combination.of underlying budgets, use of reserves and the volume of water the community uses. Because about half of the total budget costs are fixed, .water conservation efforts cause the town to `sell less water' which places upward pressure on rates. The chart below shows the water usage forecasts we have used to set rates — the sharp rate increase in FYI was almost entirely driven by usage. We have W Res ' W net S Res S net Combo used ; budget used budget {netbudg FY17 $800k' 8.90% none ; 1.10%J 4.90% FY18 $500.k, 4.60% $450k 2.90%1 3.70% FY19 $425k 5.20 % $300k, 4.10% 4.70% FY20 $300k; 4.90 %' $400k 4.60%1 70% FY21 ! $200k +, 5.10 %{ $475k 4.10 %4 70% Water /sewer rates are set by a combination.of underlying budgets, use of reserves and the volume of water the community uses. Because about half of the total budget costs are fixed, .water conservation efforts cause the town to `sell less water' which places upward pressure on rates. The chart below shows the water usage forecasts we have used to set rates — the sharp rate increase in FYI was almost entirely driven by usage. We have In March 2017 the Selectmen will vote new rates for both water and sewer that are effective with the December 2017 billing. Based on the budgets as presented, the use of reserves outlined on the previous page, and the small adjustment due to conservation, the figures will suggest a +5.5% increase in water rates and +2.9% in sewer rates, or a combined +4.2% increase as projected below. Recall. that the rates voted in FY16 eliminated the 10% discount, which explains the apparent drop that year: Change in Annual Combined Water & Sewer Rates 20.0% 15.0 %p 10.0 % 5.0 %p .0.0% -5.0% 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 201 01 2017 2018 - 10.0% Infrastrueture Planning We do a thorough review at least twice each year to make sure our infrastructure repair and replacement planning is still on the best path forward, which is a balance between the condition of infrastructure and the estimated costs of repairs /replacements. The Water fund will repay over $11 million in water main projects through FY27. It is possible that more repair work will be needed and affordable around FY25 as debt service declines. The next two significant projects involve the Auburn Street water tank in the next two years, and meter replacements after that. Auburn had been planned as a repair /repaint project but due to escalating costs, a brand new tank may be the best investment. Telecommunications equipment may be relocated to a nearby stand -alone tower structure for safety, maintenance and revenue reasons. The Sewer fund will seek Town Meeting authorization for $2.4 million in debt to repair the Charles Street sewer station; then $1.8 million for Sturges in FY21 and $3 million in FY26 for three additional sewer stations. Meter replacements are also on the horizon. In FY 18 the Sewer and Storm Water funds will split the $400,000 cost of a vacuum truck, The Storm Water fund was been repairing drainage issues for several years, but recently five larger projects have appeared and need to be considered. The first two ($150,000 for Grove Street and $80,000 for Bond Street) were funded in FY17; the other three projects $1.75 million for Sturges & Main will need to be considered in FY19 and would require an increase in the household charge from $40 to $60 in order to be funded. Enterprise Fund Budgets 'focal 30�° 3°�o °io °l0� `<�2P s� FY18 -21 Overview 89% Mt"dRAWater 19 ,34p 1.4% Approved Percent Proposed Percent Projected Percent Projected Percent Projected Percent No. FY - 2017 Change FY - 2018 Change FY - 2019 Change FY - 2020 Change FY - 2021 Change IMF W1 *Wages 680,425 3.9% 698,675 2.7% 719,635 3.0% 741,224 3.0% 763,461 3.0% W2 *Expenses 809,420 10.2% 858,435 6.1% 884,188 3.0% 910,714 3.0% 938,035 3.0% W3 *GF Offsets 551,888 25.7% 560,000 1.5% 576,800 3.0% 594,104 3.0% 611,927 3.0% W4 Debt4Capital 2,625,429 45.4% 2,336,289 - 11.0% 2,482,539 6.3% 2,666,459 7.4% 2,541,907 -4.7% WL Local Water Costs 4,667,162 28.4% 4,453,399 -4.6% 4,663,162 4.7% 4,912,501 5.3% 4,855,331 -1.2% W5 MWRA Assessment 2,125,000 4.5% 2,314,125 8.9% 2,358,093 1.9% 2,303,857 -2.3% 2,612,574 13.4% WG Gross Water Fund 6,792,162 19.8% 6,767,524 -0.4% 7,021,255 3.7% 7,216,358 2.8% 7,467,905 3.5% W6 Reserves 800,000) (500,000) (425,000) (300,000 ) (200,000) WN Net Water Fund 5,992,162 ;,$,J°lo 6,267,524 „ <#1.8i'a; 6,596,255 ;52°/6( 6,916,358 1,14 9% 7,267,905 1% WV TM Voted Water Fund 6,240,274 19.3% 6,207,524 -0.5% 6,444,455 3.8% 6,622,254 2.8% 6,855,978 3.5% ewer S1 *Wages 300,850 3.4% 305,525 1.6% 314,691 3.0% 324,131 3.0% 333,855 3.0% S2 *Expenses 412,600 5.6% 397,075 -3.8% 408,987 3.0% 421,257 3.0% 433,895 3.0% S3 *GF Offsets 229,953 - 23.6% 232,960 1.3% 239,949 3.0% 247,147 3.0% 254,562 3.0% S4 Debt+Capital 192,940 - 86.5% 753,340 290.5% 586,340 - 22.2% 636,840 8.6% 967,840 52.0% SL Local Sewer Costs 1,136,343 - 52.9% 1,688,900 48.61/6 1,549,967 -8.20/6 1,629,376 5.1% 1,990,152 22.1% S5 MWRA Assessment 4,800,000 2.7% 4,867,200 1.4% 5,105,693 4.9% 5,417,140 6.1% 5,422,557 0.1% SG Gross Sewer Fund 5,936,343 -16.2% 6,556,100 10.4% 6,655,660 1.5% 7,046,516 5.9% 7,412,709 5.2% S6 Reserves (450,000) 300,000 400,000) 475,000 SN Net Sewer Fund 5,936,343 14°Zo 6,106,100 6,355,660 tl*'!°0 6,646,516 o' 6,937,709 4 (' SV TM Voted Sewer Fund 5,706,390 - 15.9% 6,323,140 10.8% 6,415,711 1.5% 6,799,368 6.0% 7,158,147 5.3% om Ine Local Water &Sewer 5,803,505 -4.21/6 6,142,299 5.81/6 6,213,129 1.2% 6,541,876 5.3% 6,845,482 4.6% MWRA Assessments 6,925,000 3.3% 7,181,325 3.7% 7,463,786 3.9% 7,720,997 3A% 8,035,131 4.1% Gross W &S Budgets 12,728,505 -0.3% 13,323,624 4.7% 13,676,915 2.7% 14,262,874 4.3% 14,880,614 4.3% Reserves (800,000) (950,000) (725,000) (700,000) (675,000) Net W &S Budgets 11,928,505 �,�' 12,373,624 ; 12,951,915 13,562,874',.:, 14,205,614 R 6130116 Water 3,539,129 3,039,129 2,614,129 2,314,129 2,114,129 Sewer 4,136,082 3,686,082 3,386,082 2,986,082 2,511,082 m Water 914,435 714,435 514,435 514,435 514,435 er Y7 *Wag es 95,400 - 37.4°/6 97,300 2.0% 100,219 3.0% 103,226 3.0% 106,322 3.0% Y2 *Expenses 130,030 55.9% 120,500 -7.3% 124,115 3.0% 127,838 3.0% 131,674 3.0% Y3 *GF Offsets 91,981 100.0% 93,160 1.3% 95,955 3.0% 98,833 3.0% 101,798 3.0% Y4 Debt4Capital 305,000 103.3% 250,000 - 18.0% 461,250 84.5% 449,000 -2.7% 436,750 -2.7% SWG Storm Water Fund 622,411 61.31/° 560,960 -9.91/6 781,539 39.3% 778,897 -0.31/6 776,544 -0.3% Reserves 250,000 (200,000) (200,000 SWN Net Storm Water 372,411 360,960 -3.1% 581,539 61.1% 778,897 33.9% 776,544 -0.3% SWV TM Voted St Water Fun 530,430 467,800 -11.8% 685,584 680,064 674,746 rev $40 is $380/6 $415k w/o disc. => Itm Room MINAM NS Enterprise Funds: Water FY17 FY18TOWN. FY14 FYIS FY16 FY17 REVISED FY17 MANAGER PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS BUDGET YTD BUDGET ;CHANGE 'Salaries $ 689,436 686,455 $ 677,181 $ 404,344 $ 680,425 59%; $ 698,675 2.68% 48 8920 72 % $ 516,935 5.73% �Overhead Expenses $ 315,703 $ 394,607 $ 426,738 $ 353,801 $ operatonal Expenses $ 237,919 253,667 t $ 289,247 $ 158,343 $ 324,079 49% $ 341,500 5.38%., General Fund Support, $ 413,013 $ 427,470 $ 439,225 $ 551,888 $ - 551,888 100W $ 560,000 1.47% WATER OPERATIONS $ 1,656,072 $ 1,762,198 $ 1,832,392 $ 1,468,376 $ 2045,312 72%' $ 2,117,110 i 3.51%.' :$ 275,0D0 72 22% Capital 990,000 Debt $ 1,635,429 :$ 2,061,289 26.04% 7 , -.01 ;WATER CAPITAL& DEBT i12,33 6 289 11%6' WATER LOCAL COSTS $ 4,670,741 j $ 4,453,399 -4.65% 11265,, i ;MWRA Expenses* $ 1,854,203 $ 11931,4101 2 729 1032,766 $ $ 2,125 000 60%1 $ 2,314125 8.90yo ------ - WATER (GROSS) 1 795,741 $ 6,767,524,i -0.42%, -37.78% �803,579) $ (500,000)' Water Reserves as offset WATER (NET) $ 5,992,162 $ 6,267,524 4,:60:-:/.] *MWf0fpreC0s.t Water Supply is responsible for the administrative management, operation, technical support, maintenance and security of the drinking water supply in accordance with all. Federal, State and local regulations. Water Distribution is responsible for maintaining and operating the municipal water distribution system in accordance with industry standards and all applicable regulations. In addition, this division oversees water meter installation, repair and meter reading as well as the maintenance of all fire hydrants. FY18TOWN FY14 H FY17 REVISED FY17 IS FY16 FY17 MANAGER PCT LS ACTUALS ALS ACTUALS ACTUALS BUDGET YTD J BUDGET CHANGE WTR DIST SUPERVISOR $ 40,001 $ 36,770 1 $ 39,532 $ 24,427 $ 40,350 61% $ 42,075 428% 71,850 62% $ 3, 2.71% $ $ 56,6971 $$ 69,985 44,30 7 800 WTR DIST FOREMAN I 61958 ... .... 114 925 62Y. 118,1 2,76% 00 WTR DIST WORKING $ 111,495 j- !WATER QUALITY/ SUPPLY COORDINATOR! $ $ ?7,140 ; $ 64,842 $ 4 493 $ 68,450 619') 70,000 2.26* 163,950 62Y)$__ 168,50D 2.78%: �WTRDISTEQUIPMENTOPERATOR 136,185 �0152?-- - -33,-3--8- 3- 62%1 87,650 3.24%: 1WTR DliT-S-IiICCEDU�661kii� $ .40,32� 1 $ 62,328 $ 52,541 $ t . L I... .. - 28Y.1, $ 35,000 -6.91%. i 10�526 37,600 1 YVTR DIST LABORER $ 701,281 j $ 72,617 $ 52'650 $ -- WT SEN Iiq 3585 $ 14,479 RADMINA SISTANT .... 00 2 _.24,9 58 %.$ 25,550 2.61W $ $ 20,282 $ 11,181 $ $ IWTRADMINASST 7 $ WTR S*UPPLY PLANT SUPERVISOR $ 86,610 $ 86,221 $ $ - $ $ WTRSUPPLYSNOW REMOVAL.... $ J $ $ -------- (1, 327) $ J WTR SUPPLY-OVERTIME $ 2,821 $ 1,284 $ $ $ (7,000) 0-%, 870) $ - $ $ (7,) 00 DIST SNOW REMOVAL $ $ (7, 000 WTR DIST WAGES OVERTIME $ 40,160 $ 63,634 $ 62,599 $ 2 50% $ 57,500 4.55% $ 3,108 $ 5,000 6 5,500 10.00% WTR DISTOUTOF GRADE WORK $ 6,220 $ 5,627 $ 5,173 $ - AA1TR DIST 0 N-CALL P REM $ 10,813 12,041 $ 11,880 $ 644 $ 11'000 69%� $ L WTR . - DIST WGS LONGEVITY 44,083 $ 35,558 $ $ - $ - WTR DIST WAGES TEMP $ 8,662 $ 9,500 7,193 $ 9,828 $ 6,118 $ 64% . $ 10,000 5.26% WTR DIST SICK LEAVE BUYBACK $ 39,947 $ (5,385): $ 3,821 $ - $ WATER ENT FUND SALARIES $ 689,436 $ 686,455 . $ 677,181 $ 404,344 $ 680,425 59% $ 698,.675L 2.68V. There is no change in staffing levels. Note the Supervisor and Senior Administrative Assistant positions are is split evenly with the Sewer Enterprise Fund. FY18TOWN FY14 - FY15 FY16 FY17 FY17 REVISED 1 FY17 MANAGER PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS BUDGET i YTD BUDGET CHANGE -- ;WTR RETIREMENT ASSESSMENT ! $ 76,417 $ 113,368 $ 118,470 $ 166,923 $ 166,920 WTR HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM ._ $. 142,063 $ 175,517, $ _ 190,283--.$-11 139,374 $. __, 210,000 WTR OPT -OUT HEALTH INS PMNT $ 4,500 ' $ 1,500 $ 9,050 $ $ . $ WATER OPEB CONTRIBUTIONS $ 45,215 $ „ 50,000 $ 50,000 LL -$ 101000 WTR MEDICARE EMPL BENEFITS $ 7,130 $ 8,614 ; $ 10,647 $ $ 9,000. WTR PROP & CASUALTY INS PREM $ 27,669: $ 31,436 ; $ 33,813 $ 31,268 $ 37,000 $ 174,435 4.50 %,' $ 225,000 7.14 %, p%! $ 12,000 33.33% 85 %, $ 38,500 4.05 %. WTR WORKER COMP INS PREM $ 12,710 $ 14,172 - $ 14,475 . $ 16,236 $ 16,000 , --i ? 150 %. iEXP SUPPORT- ADM SVCS . WATER ENT FUND OVERHEAD EXPENSES $ 315,703 ; $ 394,607 $ 426,738 $. 353,801 $ 488920; 72% $ 516,935 573% WTR GEN HAZARD WASTE DISPOSAL $ 7,926 $ 5,017 $ . _ . 3,255., $ _ _ _- $, 10 000 ; 01% $___. 101000 000% WTR PRINTING SERVICES FORMS ETC $ $ $ -. $ - $ 381 $ $ $ - _ 36913 , $_._ _ WTR GEN PRIMACEYASSMNT $ 5,076 $ 5,036 $ 5,064 $ 4,954 $ 5,500. 9p* $ 5000 -- 909% WTR GEN PURCH SVC WAKEFIELD $ 7,406 $ 7,434: $ - $ $ 8 000 0% $ 7,500 -6.25%: WTR GEN PROF DEV/TRAINING $ 5,390: $ 4,047, 3,946 $ 1,309: $ 7,5001 17%j $ 7,500: 0.00% ,WATER CONSERVATION PROMOTION $, 13,631_. $, 22,860 $ 17,048. $ 6,680 $ 40000' 17•/ $ 40000 0.00 ,WTRSUPPLYWELLS $ 6,246 $. 10,629 $ 7,125 $ 1,716 $ 20000: 9 %. $ 15,000 - 25.ODo/,! WTR SUPPLY ELECTRICITY $ 18,693 $ 18,656. $ 19,979 $, 12,385 $ 20,000 62% .$ 21,000 5.00 %; WTR SUPPLY PROF/TECH SV.___._. $ _ 1 197,524 $ 1 13,210 $_.._ _(2,381 $ __- 12,023 $..,._ 300001 10,000 0.00% WTRSUPPLYSUPPLIES /EQUIPMEN $ 2,314 $ 814 4, $ 5,641 $ 2,840 $. 6,000! 47/1 $,_. 6,000 0.00 %. WTR SUPPLY TELEPHONE $ 894.,. $ ,1, 109 , $ 850 - $ „ -. _ . _ 524 $ 2 500 - _21 %t $ -- - 0.00% - --- _ _ WTRSUPPLYWATER /SEWER _ $ _ _ .. 215,' $ 161! $ 233 $ 119 $ 500 24%! $ 500 OOOM: WTR DIST ELECTRICITY $ 8,584 $ 10,700 $ 11,112 $ 6,694 $ 10,000 67%: 11,000 10.00% 'WTR DISTNATURALGAS $ 261 $ 261 $ 262. $ 154. $ 500 31%q _ 500 000 %. WTR FUELOIL $ 3,000: 0 %; $ .7100-00% WTRGASOLINE $ - t, $ - $ - $ 7,514 $ - _$ 12,000 10000%: ;WTRDISTPOLICEDETAIIS $_ 15,102 $ 14,752 $- 13,025,$ 8,901..$ _._ 17,500 _ 51 %; $_ 17,500 000 /; WTR DIST WATER SYSTEM $ 14,170 ! $ 7,150 $ 8 243 $ 11,190 Z $ 101090. J 1129' $ 15 000 50 00/ !WTR DISTMAIN PIPE /HYDRANT $ $ $ 9,990 $ 2,800 „$ ._ 10500)` 27Y� $ ^ 10000 476/' WTRDISTSERVICEPIPE/METER $ 50,891 „ _4,307 52,975 j $ 28,122 $ 3,174 $. 7000 45/, $ 10,000 4286/; '.WTRDISTCROSSCONNINSP $_ . 51580 ,$_ ..$_ .. 5,420 (!i $ 6,512 $ $ 8000 26/ $ _ 8,000 OOp/ $._.. ;_$..._8491.$_._ 4485_:$_ _ _.$.._.- ___._.1.� 'WTRDISTPROFDEV/TRAINING WTR DISTSFTWR LIC & SUPP $ 9,400_;.$,_ 4989 $. 20,041 $ 3,324 $., 7,500) 44 %1$ 7,500 000 %! WTRHOTTOPSUPPLIES $ $ $ $ 13,009 $ $ 10000 iWTRDiSTGENSUPPLIES /SERVIC $ 2S282r$ 22339 -$__.. 54012 51 $32S00µ 259' $ 7.69% WTRDISTMAINPIPE /HYDRANT ! $ 21,897 $ 26,317 $ 33,279 $. 10,944 $ 32,5001 34% $ 30,000 - 7.69 %, /TRDISTSERVICE METERS $__- $ . 37,038 $ 33819 $ ._. 50000] 68 %i$__ 50,001) 000% 'WR DIST UNIFORMS AND CLOTHING $ 4,.l..85_: $ _._99471$ S - $ $... _.:. $. _ _ ..".._ ------- . �WTRDISTUCENSES $ -- 1,143 ; $ 690 $ 11986 $ 4,152 $ 5,079: 82%' $ 5,000 - 1.55 %. 'WATER ENT FUND OPS EXPENSES $ 237,919. $ 253,667? $ 289,247_ $ 158,343 - $......324,079 49%. $_. 341500 'WAGE SUPPORT-ADM SVCS $ $ 3 30,351 $ 8 80,588. $ 8 821804 $ $._ 28,472 $ $ 28,472 G M MM! $ 28,900 1 150 %. iEXP SUPPORT- ADM SVCS . $ . ? , ,35710 $_ _ _. 36,69.2_ $ $___,.__18x480 ,_$. 1 18:480; 1 100% $_ 1 18,750 1 146 %I . $ $ 1 ._..__ . ? $ - - $ $ . $ $ . . $ IEXP SUPPORT- ACCOUNTING $ $ . 1 190 $ ; ; $ $ $ $ $ I. $ $ 147/ WAGESUPPORTFINANCE _ . $ $__ 3 33817: $ 3 36913 , $_._ _ _ 37,928 $ _24490 $ $__, 2 ___24850 1 1.49/ ,EXPSUPPORT- FINANCE $ $ 2 22,859 $_ 2 23,856 $ 2 24,512 $ $ 5,025 $ $ 5,0251 1 100/; $ 5 5,100 1 WAGE SUPPORT HUMAN RESOURCES $ $ 5 5 173._1 $ $ _ __ _ _ .. .. _._.... $ $_.. __.__ $ $ .__._ _. -- - EXP SUPPORT -HUMAN RESOURCE $ $ 2 2,390 ; $ $ $ $ $ $ $ �. $ $. " ".. . WAGE SUPPORT- TECHNOLOGY $ $ 3 33,547: $ $ $ $ $ $ $ ! ! $. ,EXPSUPPORTTECHNOLOGY , $_.. . $ . $,--- _ _._ $ $ __.. $ $. __ 1 . -� , $ _ .32,112.. $ -__... $ 117,536 $ $ 364,918 $ $ 364,918 1 100/1 $ 3 370,250 1 146/ WAGESUPPORT- ENGINEERING $ $ 1 _ 1 197,524 $ 1 110,481 $ $ $ $ $ $_ WAGE SUPPORT- HIGHWAY . $ 7 7105. $_ _ .. 7354 y,$ . ._ 7,556 $ $.._..:.... $ $__. _._ _ : :.5_ _ __ _ _t ..__- --.. $ $ 2 _ . 21,135: $ 2 21,716 $ $ 110,503 $ $ 110,503 1 1 100/: $ 1 112,150 1 149% WATER ENT FUND GEN'L FUND SUPPORT : $„ _ _ 413,O1iV $ _ _ 427,470 $,,_ , ,.439225 $ $ 551888 $ $_ _ 551,888,1 5 500'6 $ 5 560,000 1 147% WTR SUPPLY MWRA $ $ 1 1,854,203: $ 1 1,931,4101 $ 2 2,032,766: $ $ 1,265,729: $ $ 2,125,000! 6 60 %. $ 2 2,314,125' 8 8.90 %: WATER ENTFUNOMWRA ..... _ $ $ $ 1 1,931410,; $._ 2 2,0 1 12729$215, $ i $ 2 234125 8 8.93 overhead expenses are higher because of annual pension assessments plus a slightly higher utilization of health insurance. Local operational expenses are generally flat except for increases in utility costs. Overhead costs were all increased by about 1.5% according to a methodology developed by the Town Accountant. The annual MWRA assessment is based on latest estimates, and the highest projected increase in several years. Future assessment projections head back to a 5% annual rate. Water Enterprise Fund Capital + Debt Approved Proposed Projected =1 Legend: Debt (issued); debtni (not issued); debtna (not yet approved) FY78 -29 Water Ent Fund Caitai b Debt FY- FY -2017 FY-2018 FY -2019 FY-2020 FY -2021 FY -2022 FY -2023 FY -2024 FY -2025 FY -2026 FY-2027 TOTAL Total Capu&Debt 2,601,482 2,336,289 2,482,539 2,666,459 2,541,907 2,566,170 2,261,533 2,167,896 1,711,765 1,706,928 1,536,678 22,971,414 Water CAPITAL 990,000 275,000 570,000 305,000 75,000 159,000 114,000 75,000 75,000 135,000 135,000 2,178,000 Watts sueeh/ MWRA($3.1Bmilpartaljoin) 2 Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt MWR4($7.8milfulljoin) 3 Debt I Debt Debt Debt Debt I Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt WTP demo 8 chlodne($800k) Well Abandonment 4 Debt Debt 225,000 225,000 Replace Pickup Truck #3 (2003) 39,000 39,000 Water Distribution WM:HaverhilMoward ($2.285m) 5a Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt WM: MWRA ban to be used 5b Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt WMPhase 1 R#1$4.012miyf0yr 6a Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt WM Phase 1 R#2 $1.165miVlOyr 6b Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt WM Capital 320,000 WM Phase 1 R#2 $3.46 miViDyr 6c deMni debbti debini debtni debtni debini I debut I debtni debini debtni WM Reading Phase 2 $6.5mil THA WM Reading Phase 3 $7.5miYM VA#Reading Phase 4 $15mi7?BA WM., Larch Lane WM: Grove St (1500 ft) 575,000 Unidirectional Flushing Program 45,000 1 30,000 30,0001 30,000 35,000 35,000 195,000 WM Lining Program 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 1 50,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 100,000 100,000 9001000 Meter Replacements $850k17yr debtna debtna debtna debtna debtna debtna debtna Tank Inspect & Design: Auburn 1 2nd connection I 60,000 7 - 340,000 25,000 NEW Tank: Auburn $3.5 mIYI0yr I I Bear Hill Storage Tank ($2.0 mill - remove pending MWRA Emerald3 Lothrop Booster debtna debtna debirra debtna debtna cabin debtna debtna - 400,000 SCADA Upgrade (every 5 yrs) 25,000 25,000 Replace Pickup Truck #12 (1997) 42,000 42,000 Repias&4ar-#2 135,000 150,000 Replace TrudM 150,000 Replace Backhoe #420E 135,000 Replace Uglily Truck #5 Replaoe Pickup #15 1 1 42,000 1 42,000 WaWDEST 1,611,482 2,061,289 1912,539 '2-17,669 2,361,459 2,466,007 2,407,170 2,147,533 2,092,896 1,636,765 1,571928 1,401,678 22,404,896 .bin MWRA(parthd$3.18rrr) 2 229,719 224,069 211,269 204,869 -198,469 192,069 9 178,975 5 156,186 1,931,619 JotnMWRA(fuM$T.6m)0 3 535,491 540,600 494,650 480,050 465,450 445,950 431,550 417,150 402750 366,350 370,825 4,792575 Demo WfP /chbrh%ds($0.6rra 4 83,bw 81,220 81220 WM:HavetHUHwrd ($2285m) 5a 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 925,000 WM: MWRA loan to be used 5b 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,ODO WM Phase 1 R#1$4.012miU10yr Sa 401 ,200 401,200 401,200 401,200 401,200 401,200 401,200 401,200 2,808,400 WM Phase 1 R#211.165mlf /10yr 6b 156,412 159,400 154,600 144,000 140,300 135,700 131,100 126,5DO 121,900 117,300 1,231,700 WUPhase1R#2$3.46millf0yr 6c 449,800 439,420 429,040 418,660 408,280 397,900 387,520 377,140 366,760 356,380 4,030,900 KV Reading Phase 2 $6.5m# 7BA WM Reading Phase 3 $7,WYMA t41NReeding Phase 4 $15mN?BA Meter Replacements$850kt7yr 155,429 150,571 145,714 140,857 136,000 131,143 126,286 986,000 NEW Tank: Auburn 13.5 mtU10yr 490,000 476,000 462 000 448,000 434,000 420,000 406,000 392000 4,270,000 Repayment ofPdnci ai: 1,356,200 1,702,200 1,597,200 1,942,200 2,063,629 2,058,629 1,853, 29 1,853,629 1,452,429 1, 2, 9 1,322,429 19,344,600 Join MWRA(paBA $3.18m) 2 160,000 160,000 160,000 160,000 160,000 160,000 160,000 60,000 160,000 150,000 150,000 1,580,000 Join MWRA(fu8 $7.8m)4D 3 390,000 390,000 365,000 365,000 365,000 360,000 360,000 360,000 360,000 360,000 355,000 3,990,000 Demo WTP /chbdnate($0.8m) 4 80,000 $0,000 80,000 WM:Ha4erhi118Hwrd ($2285m) 5a 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 185,000 925,000 WM: MWRA ban to be used 5b 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 100,000 WM Phase 1 R #t $4.012mlUi0yr 6a 401,200 401,200 401,200 401,200 401,200 401,200 401,200 401,200 2,808,400 WM Phase 1 R#2 $1.165mlifi0yrI 6b 120,000 120,000 120,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 115,000 1,045,000 WU aae102$146nrWflyr I 6c 346000 000 346,000 346000 346, 000 346, 000 346,000 346,000 346,000 346,000 3,460,000 WM Reading Phase 2 $6.5mi1 TBA KV Reeding Phase 3 $7.SmiYM WM Reading Phase 4$I&WY BA Meter Replacements$850kf/yr 121,429 121,429 121,429 121,429 121,429 121,429 121,429 850,000 NEW Tank: Auburn $3.5 mtUlOyr 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 3,500,000 Interest on Long Term Debt 255,282 359,089 315,339 419,259 403,279 348,542 293,904 239,267 184,336 129,499 79,250 3,060,296 Join MWRA(par8al $3.18m) 2 69,719 64,069 57,669 51,269 44,869 38,469 32,069 25,669 18,975 12,375 6,188 351,619 Join MWRA(fuN $7.8m) 0 3 145,491 100,600 129,650 115,050 100,450 85,950 71,550 57,150 42,750 28,350 15,825 802,575 Demo WTPkhbrinate($0.8m) 4 3,660 1,220 1,220 WM:HaverhiNRHwrd ($2.285m) 5a - - - an a uses WM Phase RM $4.012mtW0yr 6e WM Phase 1 R#2 $1.165mIV10yr 6b 36,412 39,400 34,600 29,900 25,300 20,700 16,100 11,500 6,900 2,300 186,700 WM Phase IR#2$3.46mW10yr 6c 103,800 93,420 83,040 72660 62280 51,900 41,520 31,140 20,760 10,380 570,900 WUReading Phase 2 $6.5mr7TBA WM Reeding Phase 3 $7.561(r BA WM Reading Phase 4 $15miUTBA Meter Replacements$850k17yr 140,000 34,000 29,143 24,286 19,429 14,571 9,714 4,857 136,000 NEW Tank: Aubum $3.5 miV1 126,000 112000 98,000 84,000 70,000 56,000 42,000 770,000 Enterprise Funds: Sewer (SEWER LOCAL COSTS j ? ; $ 1,136,343 j 3 i $ 1,688,900 1 1 48.63 %1 MMWRA Expenses* FY37 i FY18 TOW N 140 %1 FY14 HIS FY16 FY17 REVISED FY17 MANAGER PCT $ 6,556,100 ! ACTUALS = ACTUALS ACTUALS , ACTUALS j BUDGET YTD BUDGET ,CHANGE' iSalanes $ 292,211 $ 280,277 ; $ 300,861 $ 178,893 $ 300,850 59 %' $ 305,525 ; 155% ;Overhead Expenses $ 109,718 ! $ 118,276. $ 126,576 1 $ 100,088 , $ 139,600 i 72%1 -- .. 152,075 1 8.94%; 'Operatonal Expenses $ 152,060 1 $ 166,240 $ 122,360 $ 77,849 $ 273,000 29% $ 245,000 j 10 2M 'General Fund Support: $ 283,056 i $ 292,965 $ 301,022 $ 229,953 ! $ 229,953 100% $ 232,960 1.31 %; SEWER OPERATIONS $ 837,046 ? $ 8571759-i $ 850,819 $ 586,783 $ 943,403 i 72 %� $ 935,560 i - 0.83 %: Ca Ital 275 %' SEWER SKILLED LABORER $ $ 110,000 1 ' $ 250,000 127.27%! ;Debt i $ 82,940 ' $ 503,340 506.87 %; SEWER CAPITAL &DEBT $ 63,782 I $ 37,475 :; $ 192,940 $ 753,340 290 45% (SEWER LOCAL COSTS j ? ; $ 1,136,343 j 3 i $ 1,688,900 1 1 48.63 %1 MMWRA Expenses* $ 4,499 328 1 $ 4,642,124 $ 4,624,378 j $ 2,861,957 j $ 4,80010001 60 %1 $ 4,867 200 I 140 %1 FY14 SEWER (GROSS) $ 5,936,343 ' $ 6,556,100 ! 10.44% _ Sewer Reserves as offset $ $ (45Q000) _ 100.00W ACTUALS ACTUALS SEWER (NET) '; $ 5,936,343 ; $ 6,106,100 22.86% *MWRA forecast The Sewer Division is responsible for operating the municipal sewer collection systems in accordance with all applicable state, federal and MWRA regulations for the collection and discharge of wastewater. This ranges from maintaining and repairing over 100 miles of sewer mains and 12 pumping stations to responding to customer service needs for individual sewer and drainage problems. _- _ -- FY18TOWN FY14 HIS FY16 ( FY17 FY17 REVISED FY17 MANAGER PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS I ACTUALS BUDGET YTD i BUDGET CHANGE 'SEWER SUPERVISOR $ 39,731 $ '36,770 $ 41275 $ 24,581 $ 403501 61%1$ 42,075 1 428 %. 'SEWER WORKING FOREMAN 1_.. $_ -- 2,4071 $ 52,785 $ 56764 i $ 36,182 $._ . 58600' 62Y1 $ 277/_ SEWER EQUIPMENT OPERATOR $ 55,624 j $ 49,669 $ 58,688 ! $ 36,425 $ 59,050 62/! $ 60,675 275 %' SEWER SKILLED LABORER $ ! $. . - : $ - .$ 1,586. SEWER LABORER $ 64,682 ; $ 60,340 $ 63,782 I $ 37,475 $ 74,500 ; 50 %� $ 73,000 -2.01V.' ;SWR SENIOR ADMINASSISTANT $ $ 10,790 $ 23,6371 $ 14,479 $ 24900: 58 %i $ 25550 261W SWRADMIN ASST $ 20,282 $ 11,181 $ - , is $ _ „$ SEWER SNOW REMOVAL $ (5,365) $ (1,954) $ - $ $ (2,500), 09/1 $ (2,500)1 000% !SEWEROVERTIME $ 47,992 $ 47,763 $ 1 1 47,799 $ 25,112 $_ _ 39,500_;. 64%1 $._ 40,000 127 %, SEWER OUT OF GRADE WORK $ 4,836 $ 3,138 $ 2,935 $ 1,961 $ 3,500 56 %: $ 3,500 0.00 % SEWER WGSON -CALL PREMIUM $ 3,020 $ .., 1,869 $, 2,160 $ 1,092 $ 2,950. 37 %.$_ 3,000 169%, .SEWER WAGES LONGEVITY $ 9,000 :, $ 7,925 $ $ $ _ $ SEWERS I C K LEAVE BUYBACK $ $ $ 3,821 $ $ $ ;SEWER ENT FUND SALARIES $ 292,211 $ 280,277 $ 300,861 j $ 178,893 ; $ 300,850: 59 %i $ 305,525 1.55%: There is no change in staffing levels, Note the Supervisor and Senior Administrative Assistant positions are is split evenly with the Water Enterprise Fund. SEWER ENT FUND GEN'L FUND SUPPORT .$ 283,056 $ . 292,965 $ 301,022 ; $ 229,953 ,$ ._ 229,953 100%: $ 232,960 i 1.31 %' $ 4,499,328 $ 4,642,124 $ 4,624,378 , $ .... ...... FYIBTOWN i ;SEWER MWRA SEWERENTFUNDMWRA ___.__ - -_,. _.5..__4499,328' , $ .- 4,642124:.$ FY14 FY15 $ _ 4800,000. 60%1 FY16 I FYll FY17REVISED € FY17 MANAGER PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS BUDGET ( YTD + BUDGET 'CHANGE: i.... _ .. .... ..... ......._ ... .. ... jSEWERRETIREMENTASSESSMENT $ 28,460 f $ ,. 33,800 $ 35,320 $ 43,612: $ 43,600 100 %� $ _ _ 45575: 453%` 65,000': 1607%I 'SEWERHEALTH INSURANCE PREM $ 56,429 $ 42,116 $ 53,565 .$ 39,733 $ 56,000 71 %j $ 20,000 000 %.; SEWER OPEB CONTRIBUTIONS $ 7,901 $ 20,000 $ 20,000'x.; $ $ .. 20,000 ; 0 %i, $. SEWER MEDICARE EMPLBENEFITS $ 1,550 $ . 2,211 $ 2,262 $. $ 2,000 i 0%($ 2,5001 2500 %: SEWER PROP &CASUALTY INS PREM $ 878 $ 897 $ _.,. 1,966 $ 1,568 $... _. 2,000 78/ $ 2,500 25.00%; SEWER DEDUCTIBLES /CLAIMS $ Z,500 $ 5,389: $ ,. _.. $ .... _ "...: ?. .. $ . . _ SEWER WORKER COMP INS PREM .. $ 12,000 $ 13,864 $ 13,463 ! $ 15,176 $ 16,000 ! 95% $ 16,500: 3.13%. `SEWER ENT FUND OVERHEAD EXPENSES $ 109,718 $ 118,276 ! $ 126,576 $ 100,088' $ 139,600 72%($ 152,075 8.94%: SWR PRINTING SERVICES FORMS ETC $ 440. $ $ 381: $ $ $ SEWER LEGAL COUNSEL _ $ $ $ $ $ 2'000: 0 %` $ 100.00% SEWER PURCHASED SERVICES $ 20,555 $ 20,449 $ 7,216 $ 3,608 $ 21,0DO 17 %: $ 20,000' - 4.76%. SEWER ELECTRICITY $ 26,380: $ 28,393 $ 23,501: $ 13,454 $ 30,000 I 45% $ 30,000 , 0.00• SEWER STATION REPAIR $ 14,053 11,605 $ _... 23,205 ! $ 4,714 $ 25,000 19% $ 22500 10.00%I MANHOLE MAINTENANCE .. $ _$ 1,925 $ -. '$ $ -. $ 10,000; 0• $ 7,500 2500% INFLOW /INFILTRATION PREVENTION $ 38,099 1 $., 54,833 $ 2,567 $ 14,906 $ 100,000 I 1S%i $ 75,000 2500% 'SEWER HAZARD WASTE DISPOSAL $ 5 975 i $ 12 000; $ - _ 12 00D $ 5,231 $ ,- 12,000 ; 44W $ 12,0001 000% ,...__ _. SEWER POLICE DETAILS _ $ . 3,071 i $ . 3,488 ' $ 1,205 1 $ I 2,797 ` 56/ $ . 41 %: 5,000 1 000 18,000 000/ 3EWERCONTSVC PUMP STATIONS _ .. µ $ ___ 101981 _$ 10,057 $ ___ 11103 $ ,- $ _7,462 400 $ __._. $ 181000 15 000 3 %' $- $ L 15,000 000 SEWER SYSTEM INSPECTIONS $ 3968 $ 2076 $ 6030 :j SE . WERPROFDEV/TRAINING $_.. 1_700! $ 1035' $_..__ 7560 -F $ „1,004 $ .. -.... 20001 _.. / .$ 2,0001 000%! _. _... SEWER SOFTWARE SUPPORT $ . „ 5,063 1 $ 4,433 $ 12,783 $ 4,000 $ . - _ 7,500 { 53 %,. $. _ 7500 000 /', 000 000/ SEWER PUMP STATION SUPPLIES $..._ 2,681 ; $ 61265 $ _ S 184 ; $_ .- . 5,984 $ __ 7000 85/ $ _ 7 _ _ SEWER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM $ _ 8790 $ ._. 6,912 $ 6,595' $ 8,186 $ 10000 • 82/ $ 10000 000/ SEWER CHEMICALS $- 5,782 ` $ _ 4560. $. 2,694 $ 2,609 $_ 7,500 '. 35/ $ _ 71500 000 / __.._..... _. _ _ _ SEWERGASOLINE $ _ $ $ $ 3,145 $ $ 5 000 10000 SEWERUNIFORMS $ 255 $ 135 $ 337 $ 349 $ 1,000 ! 35/I $ 1,000 000 /!. LICENSES ,SEWER ENTFUNDOPS EXPENSES _$-- ,.__- 152060 i $ 166,240 r$__- 122360 _$__ : „_ -_ 77,849 j, -$ __ 273000_ }__ 29°%(_$,_..__245,000_L 10, - 26%: I MAGESUPPORT- ADMSVCS $ 24458 $ $ 73660 $ 11,863 $ 11863 i 100%1 $ 12,040 149% i EXPENSE SUPPORT-ADM SVCS $ _ _ _._$_ _71,688 - 33,710 $ --------- 34637 $ _7,700 $ -___ 7,700 1 100%'$- 7,825 1624 ;WAGE SUPPORT ACCOUNTING ;.$ 10,050 i $ $. ..1 $ - $ $. :EXPENSESUPPORTA000UNTING- s ; $ 181 .._ .__. -_ 31,940.1 $ __,___ 1- $ -_ _ -_$ 34,920 -v_. $ $._.___ 35,880 $ _ 10,204 $_.__ $ 102041 s -- 100%•. $: -- - - -;, t 10,350 143 % WAGESUPPORT- FINANCE EXPENSE SUPPORT- FINANCE - _! $ - 21.5811S 1 22,524 $ 23,143 I $ $ 2094 $ 2094? 100• /_ $ : $. 2,125 148Y WAGE SUPPORT HUMAN RE50URCES ...`i $. 4,886 $ _... $ ... _ .. ?. _... 3 ; i $ 1XPENSE,SURPORT_HUMAN RESOURCE . _$._.. . __ 2256. $...__ .. _._ _ _ $_...._ _ _ -_ 5_ $ _._..._ _ .: ?_. _ -- - -- --- WAGESUPPORT- TECHNOLOGY :$ ." 31,669: $ $ ! $ . - $. $ $. I EXPENSESUPPORT- TECHNOLOGY $., 301314 $ .,_,__._ .- , $_ _..I $ . .... -. S ._._ ... 100°/`$ - L28%- WAGESUPPORT -DPW• $ 50,120 $. 51,875 $ 53,302 $ 152,050 $ 152,050: .154,000 WAGE SUPPORT-ENGINEERING _ $ ,- 63,410 $ 65,630. $ _ 67,435 $ 1 .1 __ _ $, -.,, ... WAGE SUPPORT - HIGHWAY $ 2,553 $ 2,643 - $ 2,716 $ -- -'- .. $ I - i $_ mou c nc ain : 1 7A.1 SEWER ENT FUND GEN'L FUND SUPPORT .$ 283,056 $ . 292,965 $ 301,022 ; $ 229,953 ,$ ._ 229,953 100%: $ 232,960 i 1.31 %' $ 4,499,328 $ 4,642,124 $ 4,624,378 , $ 2,861,957 $ 4,800,000 ; 60 %; $ 4,867,200 1.40%: ;SEWER MWRA SEWERENTFUNDMWRA ___.__ - -_,. _.5..__4499,328' , $ .- 4,642124:.$ .4624,378 $ ._2,861,957 $ _ 4800,000. 60%1 Local overhead expenses are higher because of annual pension assessments plus a higher utilization of health insurance. Local operational expenses are generally flat except for decreases in some maintenance costs. Overhead costs were all increased by about 1.5% according to a methodology developed by the Town Accountant. The annual MWRA assessment is based on latest estimates, and the lowest projected increase.-in several years. Future assessment projections head back to a 6% annual rate. Note in the Sewer Fund that the assessment is 74% of total costs, and therefore a driver of budgets. Sewer Enterprise Fund Capital + Debt SI 82940 Approved Proposed Projected => Legend: Debt (Issued) and debtna (not Yet approved FY17 -34 Sewer Ent Fund Capital &Debt FY -2017 FY -2018 FY -2019 FY -2020 FY -2021 FY -2022 FY -2023 FY -2024 FY -2025 FY•2026 FY -2027 TOTAL Sewer Capital 110,000 250,000 92,000 190,000 50,000 50,000 117,000 105,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 1,939,000 Sewer Debt 82,940 503,340 494,340 446,840 917,840 893,840 777,000 753,000 1,369,667 1,020,867 981,067 9,865,140 Total Capital & Debt 192,940 753,340 586,340 636,840 967,840 943,840 894,000 858,000 1,444,667 1,095,867 1,056,067 11,804,140 Sewer CAPITAL 110,000 250,000 92,000 190,000 50,000 50,000 117,000 105,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 1,939,000 Main: Poets Comer ($350k) Sewer Main Lewis; Charles; Howard Sewer Main projects 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 1,425,000 Station: Chas St. $2.4mil debt 2 debtna debtna debtna debtna debtna debtna debtna debtna Station: Sturges $1.775 mil deb 3 debtna debtna debtna debtna debtna debtna debtna Station: Joseph's Way $850k 4 debtna debtna debtna Station: Brewer Lane $850k 4 debfna debtna debtna Station: Collins Ave. $1.4m 4 debtna debtna debfna Portable Generator- Collins 30,000 30,000 Station: Small Lane $400k 5 Station: Grove St. $900k 5 Portable Generator -Grove 25,000 25,E Station: Strout Ave. $1.Orm 5 Station: Longwood Rd. $2.Omil 6 Station: Pitman Drive $1.5mil 6 Meter Replacements $850k 3 140,000 debtna debtna debtna debtna debtna debtna debtna Backhoe 430D Vacuum Truck (split with StWtr) Pickup #8 (2004) 200,000 140,000 200,000 Pickup #1 (2006) 35,000 35,000 Pickup #6 (2011) 42,000 42,000 Pickup #11 2011 42,000 42,000 Sewer DEBT 82,940 503,340 494,340 446,840 917,840 893,840 777,E 753,000 1,369,667 1,020,867 981067 9,865,140 MWRA Inflow & Infiltration 1 82,940 131,340 131,340 92,840 92,840 92,840 624,140 SewerStafions$2.4miU8yrs 2 - 372000 363,000 354,0001 345,000 336,000 --T65,0-00-1 327,000 318,000 309,000 2,724,000 SwrSfalMeter$2.625mil/7yrs 3 480,000 450,000 435,000 420,000 405,000 390,000 3,045,000 Sewer Stagons$3.1miV6 4 1 640,667 615,867 591,067 3,472,000 Sewer Stations $2.3md TBA 5 Sewer Stabons $3.5mg TBA 6 Repayment of Principal: 1 82,940 431,340 431,340 392,840 767,840 767,840 675,000 675,000 1,191,667 891,667 891,667 8,749,140 MWRA Inflow & Infiltration 1a MWRA Inflow & Infiltration tb MWRA Inflow & Infiltration 1c MWRA inflow & Infiltration P7 1 44,440 1 44,440 MWRA Inflow & Infiltration P8 1 38,500 38,500 38,500 115,500 MWRA Inflow & Infiltration P9 1 92,840 92,840 92,840 92,840 92,840 464,200 Sewer Sta6ons$2.4mWyrs 21 308000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 2,400,000 SwrStalMeter$2625mIY7yrs 3 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 375,000 2,625,000 Sewer Stagons$3.tmiil6yrs 4 516,667 516,667 516,667 3,100,000 Sewer Stations $3.5m# TBA 5 Interest on Long Term Debt: 72,000 63,000 54,000 150,000 126,000 102,000 78,000 178,000 129,200 89AM 1,116,000 MWRA Inflow & Infiltration 1 Sewer Stafions$2.4miftrs 2 72000 63,000 54,000 45,000 36,000 27,000 18,000 9,000 324,000 SwrStaNeter$2625m&7yrs 3 105,000 90,000 75,000 60,000 45,000 30,000 15,000 420,000 Sewer Stahons$3.WNyrs 4 124,000 99,200 74,400 372,000 Sewer Stations $35mi1 TBA I1 5 _ SI Enterarise Funds: Storm Water WATER LOCAL COSTS Storm Water Reserves as offset T._ $ (250,0)1 $ (?� �) 20.00'% WATER The Storm Water Division consists of some activities conducted under the general fund budget, and some in the enterprise fund budget. As a whole, the Division is responsible for the construction, maintenance and repair of all catch basins and storm drainage systems. FYIS TOWN FY34 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY17 REVISED I FY17 MANAGER PCT _ . ACTUALS I ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS BUDGET 's YTD BUDGET CHANGE? :STMWTR SKI LLED LAB ORER. __- .L $_.._ 39,7971$ 81,MA I $ 85,664: $ Y _ 53,992 $__ 87:900 _61% $ 90,300 STM WTR LABORER -_.. _ _:. $ _.._.. 564. $ i.$ --- . - -` -- I $_.._._ 'STMWLRASSTCIVILENGINEER _i $ ._ 54667 $ 56,482 $. - 40414 _$ - 1 $ 1-11 .... . STMWTR- OVERTIME $. 2794 a.$ 40433$.. 2384!$ .. _969 $.. 4,000 24%$... __.. 4000 000%I _. .. OUTOFGRADEWORK $ 15241 $ 1000 i $ 299 i $ 444' $ 3,500'' 13%, $ 3,000 - 14,29% ,ST WTR SALARIES $_ _.. 13S,245 !. $ _ ... 143,923.., $ 128,760..:. $ ... _.. _SS,405_: $_ .. _ 95.400... 58%: $.... _- 97,300 1,99%; There is no change in staffing levels. Note that in FY1 7 an engineering position was removed from this fund and placed in the General Fund. On the following pages, offsetting support payments were instituted by the Town Accountant in line with practices followed by the other Enterprise Funds. FY17 FY18TOWN FY14 FY15 FY17 FY17 REVISED FY16 FY17 REVISED PCT ; FY17 MANAGER PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS I ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS BUDGET YTD BUDGET 'CHANGE' Salaries $ 135,245 $ 143,923 $ 128,760 i $ 55,405 $ 95,400 ; 58% $ 97,300 - 199% Overhead Expenses $ 20,175 $ 36,091: $ 38,444. $ 19,138 $ 43,030 ; 44% $ 33,500 - 2215 %, ,Operatonal Expenses $ 9,388 $ 9,672 $ 6,801 $ 18,111 " $ 87,000 21% $ 87,000 000% General Fund Support $ - $ - $ $ - i $ 91,981 j $ 91,981 , 100 %j $ 93,160 128 %'; ST WTR OPERATIONS 164+808 $ .189,686 $ 174,006 i $ 184,635 $ 317,411 58 %a $ 310,960 - 2.03% Capital „__ 25000.- 56/ $ 2000/; - STM WTR EQUIPMENT RENTAL $ 305,000 1 $ 250,000 -18 03% 5000 i_„ _0%. $ _ _ 5,000 _ 000• _._ WTR PROF/ TECH SSERVICES.- $ ' -,_�.,.$ -.- „d$._ 000 %. ;SEWER CAPITAL 8t. DEBT 5X90 ! _ _ ., _.._._ ..___.. I 1 $ _ .._ __....._ . - _ 305,000 _ _- , $ .._......_. �...�_ 2 50,000 ? _ �. -18 03% 1 WATER LOCAL COSTS Storm Water Reserves as offset T._ $ (250,0)1 $ (?� �) 20.00'% WATER The Storm Water Division consists of some activities conducted under the general fund budget, and some in the enterprise fund budget. As a whole, the Division is responsible for the construction, maintenance and repair of all catch basins and storm drainage systems. FYIS TOWN FY34 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY17 REVISED I FY17 MANAGER PCT _ . ACTUALS I ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS BUDGET 's YTD BUDGET CHANGE? :STMWTR SKI LLED LAB ORER. __- .L $_.._ 39,7971$ 81,MA I $ 85,664: $ Y _ 53,992 $__ 87:900 _61% $ 90,300 STM WTR LABORER -_.. _ _:. $ _.._.. 564. $ i.$ --- . - -` -- I $_.._._ 'STMWLRASSTCIVILENGINEER _i $ ._ 54667 $ 56,482 $. - 40414 _$ - 1 $ 1-11 .... . STMWTR- OVERTIME $. 2794 a.$ 40433$.. 2384!$ .. _969 $.. 4,000 24%$... __.. 4000 000%I _. .. OUTOFGRADEWORK $ 15241 $ 1000 i $ 299 i $ 444' $ 3,500'' 13%, $ 3,000 - 14,29% ,ST WTR SALARIES $_ _.. 13S,245 !. $ _ ... 143,923.., $ 128,760..:. $ ... _.. _SS,405_: $_ .. _ 95.400... 58%: $.... _- 97,300 1,99%; There is no change in staffing levels. Note that in FY1 7 an engineering position was removed from this fund and placed in the General Fund. On the following pages, offsetting support payments were instituted by the Town Accountant in line with practices followed by the other Enterprise Funds. l5� FY38 TOWN I FY17 FY17 REVISED FY27: MANAGER PCT ; - ACTUALS ACTUALS I _FY16 ACTUALS ACTUALS ; BUDGET i YTD . BUDGET .CHANGE: STMWTR PENSION ASSESSMENT _ $ 2,309 ; $ 13,060 1 $ 13,648 $ 10,030 $ 10,030.1 100° /I $ 10,500 469% - �STMWTR HEALTH INS PREMIUMS $ 10,841 $ 15,6171 $ 16,917 $ 9,108 $ 25,000; 36•x; $ . -- ---. 40,0 0%: STMWTR OPEB CONTRIBUTIONS !$ 5,783:_$ 6,000',. $, 61900 !$ 60001 0%,$_ 6,000 000 %; 'STMWTR MEDICARE BENEFITS ; $ .. 1,242; $ 1414 $ 1880 ; $ - $ 2,000 i 0%i $ 2000. 0.00' /; STWTR ENTFUNDOVERHEAD EXPENSES $ 20,175 $ .. , _36,091 $ 38,444.! $ 19,138. $ _ 43,030: 449/.' $_ -_..:. _33,500 2215%' DR AtNAGEMAINTENANCE $ 6,522 $ 7,555 $ 6,801.$ 13,950 $_ „__ 25000.- 56/ $ 2000/; - STM WTR EQUIPMENT RENTAL $. _ - <.$ ._ ." $__.. - �. $ _7, 5000 i_„ _0%. $ _ _ 5,000 _ 000• _._ WTR PROF/ TECH SSERVICES.- $ 1,517 $_. -,_�.,.$ -.- „d$._ -_... Ski_ TA, 5X90 000% ,STM M54 PERMITTING -__.; $ __.. -.: : $..._. i -$ ...._ _..y $ -_ -__ 50,0001- 0•�. $.__ 000 ..50,000 000%: ,.. ,. .. .. _. 'PROFESSIONALDEV /TRAINING ,.$ ; $ _.. 1,375 $ 600 $ - $ 1,004. $ 2000'.. 50% $ ,. 2,000 000% :STM WTRGASOUNE $ - $ $ _ - 1 $ 3,157 ! $ -'. $ . 5,000 , 100:00%!. 'STM WTR CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $ _ 700 $ $ ' $ - $ - ' $ 'STWTR ENT FUND OPSEXPENSES $ _ 9,388 $ 9,672:- $ 6,801'. $ .18,111., $ 87,000 21% :.$ - 87,000 0.00%: WAGE SUPPORT-ADM SVC $ $ $ / 4,820 1.58% EXPENSE SUPPORT- ADMI N SUPPORT $ - ; $ - $ - $ 3,080 $ 1001%: $ 3,125 1.46%' 'WAGE SUPPORT-FINANCE -: $ - ; $ $ - $ 4, 0 82 ; $ 4,082 100%:. $ 4,145 1.54%,. _. EXPENSE SUPPORT-FINANCE !. $ - ;$, - $ - _ $ 838 $ 838 100% $ _ 850 1.43%: IWAGESUPPORT DPW..__ • $ -_ $.. ,.$,,,_, . _..-_ $ ...60,820..$._ _ .60,820':.. 10011.- $. -__. 61,580 1,25% - .... -.. 'WA_ ESUPPOR -- HIGHWAY $ _.. - $ ... - $ - $ 18,416 ; $ 18,416 -; 100% $ 18,640 1.22 %: STWTR ENT FUND GEN'L FUNDSUPPORT $ - -_.$ - ,$..___. .__,.'.....$ .._91,981_$ 91,981. 100'x.$ „_ ,.,93,160 1.28%.' l5� Storm Water Enterprise Fund Capital + Debt Approved Proposed Projected = => FY17.31 Storm Water Ent. Fund Capital & FY -2017 FY -2018 FY -2019 FY -2020 FY -2021 FY -2022 FY -2023 FY -2024 FY -2025 FY -2026 FY -2027 TOTAL Storm Water Capital 305,000 250,000 50,000 50,000 50,OOD 50,000 75,000 600,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 2,030,000 Storm Water Debt - 411,250 399,000 386,750 374,500 362,250 - 1,195,714 1,151,429 1,107,143 9,373,750 Total Capital & Debt 305,000 250,000 461,250 449,000 436,750 424,500 437,250 600,000 1,270,714 1,226,429 1,182,143 11,403,750 Storm Water CAPITAL 305,000 250,000 50,000 50,000 501000 50,000 75,000 600,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 2,030,000 Drainage Improvm. (projects) 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 1,050,000 25,000 MS4 Permit: Consult & Lab test 25,000 Bond St outfall and drainage 80,000 80,000 Grove St drainage L 150,000 150,000 Sturges Park $250kl5yr 1 debtna debtna debtna debtna debtna Main St Drain repair $1 miV5yr 1 debtna debtna debtna debtna debtna Minot St (side streets) $500k15yr 1 debtna debtna debtna debtna debtna Saugus River Design/Permit 200,000 200,000 Saugus River Improv. (1) $2mil 2 debtna debtna debtna Saugus River Improv. (II) $2mil 3 debtna debtna debtna Aberjona River Design/Permit 150,000 150,000 Aberjona River Improv. $2.2mil 4 200,000 debtna debtna debtna Vacuum Truck (split with Sewer) 200,000 Sweeper Elgin Pelican 11 175,000 175,000 Storm Water DEBT 411,250 399,000 386,750 374,500 362,250 1,195,714 1,151,429 1,107,143 9,373,750 Drainage Projects $1.75 mil SaugusRiverimprov.l 1 411,250 399,000 386,750 374,500 362,250 I 1,933,750 2 F-W-5,714 371,429 357,143 2,400,000 Saugus River Improv. it 3 385,714 371,429 357,143 2,400,000 Abedona River Improv. 4 424,286 408,571 392,857 2,640,000 Repayment of Principal: Drainage Projects $1.75 mil Saugus Riverlmprov.) 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 885,714 885,714 885,714 7,064,286 1 1,750,000 21 285,714 285,714 285,714 2,000,000 Saugus River Improv. (11 ) 3 285,714 285,714 285,714 2,000,000 Abedona River Improv. 4 314,286 314,286 314,286 2,200,000 Interest on Long Term Debt: Drainage Proje&$1.75mA Saugus Rkwhiripr l 61,250 61,250 49,000 49,000 36,750 36,750 24,500 24,500 12,250 12,250 1 310,000 100,000 265,714 221,429 1,423,750 1 183,750 2 85,714 71,429 400,000 S&xpsRiverimprov. 1 3 100,000 85,714 71,429 400,000 onaRiverlm v. 4 110,000 94,286 78,571 440,000 OF H Town of Reading Meeting Minutes f ..IN ORpO� Board - Committee - Commission - Council: Board of Selectmen Date: 2017 -01 -09 Building: Pleasant Street Senior Center Address: 49 Pleasant Street Purpose: General Business Attendees: Members - Present: Time: 7:30 PM Location: Great Room Session: Open Session Version: Chairman John Halsey, Vice Chairman Kevin Sexton, John Arena Members - Not Present: Barry Berman and Daniel Ensminger Others Present: CPDC Chair Nick Safina, Dave Tuttle, Karen Gonca Ives- Dolan,Town Manager Bob LeLacheur, Assistant Town Manager Jean Delios, Community Development Director Julie Mercier Susan Bernstein, Caffe Nero Bruce Kidder, Caffe Nero Jay Gentile, Caffe Nero Jim Freeman, 505 Main Street Michael Doyon, 172 Main Street Tom Connery, 101 Beaver Road Minutes Respectfully Submitted By: Secretary Topics of Discussion: The Community Planning and Development Commission and the Board of Selectmen held a joint meeting to discuss recreational marijuana, accessory apartments, and potential expansion of the downtown 40R District. Public Hearing Zoning Bylaw Amendments April 2017 Annual Town Meeting .Recreational Marijuana Proposed Amendments: • Insert section 5.6.6 Temporary Moratorium on Marijuana Establishments and amend section 5.6.5.2 Applicability • Section 2.0 Definitions & Section 5.3.1 Table of Uses for Business and Industrial Districts & Section 5.3.2 Table of Uses for Residence Districts: add `Marijuana Establishment' and prohibit it in all districts, and amend section 5.6.5.2 Applicability CPDC Chairman Safina read the legal notice into the record. He stated that there are two zoning articles that will be discussed for the April Town Meeting Warrant in regards to recreational marijuana. He asked Ms. Mercier for an overview of the process to date. Page 1 1 Board of Selectmen Minutes - January 9, 2017 - page 2 Ms. Mercier noted that in late November the Board of Selectmen met with Town Counsel to review options in light of the outcome of the State ballot initiative at the November election. Though the State voted in favor of the initiative as a whole, the Town of Reading did not. The options that Town Counsel prepared for consideration included a moratorium, a full prohibition and a prohibition of just retail establishments. The Selectmen discussed the options and voted to send the moratorium and full prohibition to the Community Planning and Development Commission. The Community Planning and Development Commission then voted, at that same meeting, to hold a public hearing on both articles. CPDC Chairman Safina asked for clarification on the process for the articles. He asked whether the moratorium would be needed if the full prohibition passed at Town meeting. Mr. LeLacheur clarified that the Selectmen will have to decide how to frame the issue for the April ballot - before Town meeting. As the Town Meeting warrant needs to close in late February, both articles will be on the warrant; however, the article(s) presented at Town Meeting will likely depend on the results of the election. CPDC Chairman Safina asked whether the recent delay announced by the Legislature would affect the dates in the moratorium article, specifically what would happen if a Town moratorium expired before the Cannabis Control Commission and its regulations were established. Selectmen Chairman Halsey replied that the Town could structure a ballot question to match up with the State, if that is what the Selectmen choose. He commented that one goal of the public hearing is to find out what the public thinks so that the Selectmen can determine how best to act. He noted that advertising the public hearing for the moratorium protects the Town, whereas doing nothing would leave the door open. Selectman Arena opined that the vote would allow the residents to understand there is more than one decision to be made, and will allow the Town time to see where the law is going. He suggested bringing both articles. forward. The moratorium is a delay with a defined end date. However, as it seems unlikely the State will come up with regulations for marijuana within that time frame, he advised having a prohibition in place as well. He noted that a prohibition could be viewed as a form of moratorium, and could be overturned if needed when regulations acceptable to the Town are promulgated. Selectman Sexton noted that it is unknown how the State will react to any of these options. The State might disapprove the prohibition and require the Town to allow something. Chairman Halsey stated that his understanding was that the ballot initiative allowed the option of a prohibition or a moratorium by vote of the voters. Mr. Tuttle opined that instating a moratorium seems like the obvious first step, which could result in a decision to prohibit. However, absent regulations from the CCC, a prohibition could be challenged. The moratorium is more straightforward, as it simply states that the Town does not know enough and needs time for planning purposes. Selectmen Chairman Halsey reminded everyone that there likely is not another election after April 4th but before the State establishes the .CCC and its regulations. The Town needs to figure out what to put on the ballot for April. Mr. Tuttle opined that it is a tangled mess. The prohibition is a zoning action; a moratorium says the Town does not know enough from a planning /zoning point of view to allow these establishments. CPDC Chairman Safina opined that it will need to be made clear that a prohibition would not be for personal recreational use, growing, possessing in one's home, etc. Mr. Arena noted % that it is just a prohibition of retail use, testing, and commercial growing. Page 1 2 �p Board of Selectmen Minutes - January 9, 2017 - page 3 Selectman Arena said that a prohibition is really just a pause, and can be overturned at a future Town Meeting. The moratorium will end in August 2018, and there is no confidence any of the issues surrounding the use and how to regulate it will be resolved by that date. Mr. LeLacheur clarified that the August 2018 date was chosen based on the December 2016 start date. It is what Town Counsel believes to be the longest possible moratorium. He said that he will ask Town Counsel whether the State's 6 -month delay should be added to extend the Town's moratorium beyond August 2018. He agreed with Mr. Tuttle that there is a risk the Attorney General will overturn a prohibition. Having the voters vote on both articles could yield better protection for the Town. CPDC Chairman Safina asked how the ballot question would be presented to the voters. Mr. LeLacheur cautioned that it may have to be two stand -alone questions, versus an and /or question, which might be hard to explain to the voters. Chairman Halsey expressed concern with having two ballot questions, but that decision does not need to be made tonight. Mr. LeLacheur commented that in his discussions with other town managers and mayors it does not seem that other communities view a No vote on Question 4 as tied to allowing a commercial facility in their towns. However, most towns in the area are considering a moratorium /prohibition ballot question, but are not as far along as Reading. Mr. Halsey pointed out that neighboring communities voted similar to Reading. Selectmen Chairman Halsey reiterated that there is flexibility with a prohibition vote. Mr. Tuttle expressed hesitancy that the definitions are embedded into the articles and are not a stand -alone article. He suggested an independent article for definitions in case neither article passes. This way the definitions will at least get into the Zoning Bylaw, and will add clarity to what is intended under the Medical Marijuana bylaw. Mr. LeLacheur clarified that the ballot will be voted on first by the voters; then the outcome of that vote will be taken to Town Meeting. Town meeting will vote on amending the Zoning Bylaw. There may be a need to split out definitions into a separate article. Chairman Halsey agreed with Mr. Tuttle's suggestion to add an article for definitions. CPDC Chairman Safina opened the public hearing for public comment. There was none. CPDC Chairman Safina opined that the articles are written simply enough and commented on the Town's success with the medical marijuana moratorium. After discussion, the CPDC agreed to continue the public hearing. Mr. Tuttle moved to continue the public hearing until February 13 2017. The motion was seconded by Ms. Goncalves -Dolan and approved with a 3 -0 -0 vote Discussion of potential changes to zoning for Accessory Apartments Ms. Mercier explained that the recent construction of a detached accessory apartment in Town has raised some concern regarding the intent behind the accessory apartment bylaw. She noted that it is very difficult for zoning bylaws to anticipate all possible scenarios, but that some changes to the bylaw might help better align intent with realization and make it easier for Town Boards to preserve the character of single - family neighborhoods. Ms. Mercier showed a diagram of what was intended for an accessory apartment. Chairman Safina added that the intent was to allow a detached accessory apartment to be next to or behind the primary structure, and to allow an attached accessory apartment to be within or adjacent to the primary structure. Page 1 3 Board of Selectmen Minutes - January 9, 2017 - page 4 Selectman Arena noted that a recent accessory apartment approved by the Zoning Board does not reflect the diagram. He listed a few of the elements that surprised him: built in front of the main structure, at the front of the property, with a two car garage and a separate driveway. Selectmen Chairman Halsey added that the accessory apartment has a two -car garage and a carport, and appears to be the primary residence. Selectman Arena opined that an accessory apartment should appear secondary to a primary single - family structure, should be complementary to it, and should utilize the same driveway and parking areas. However, even if a detached accessory apartment that complies with these requirements is only allowed in the rear of the property, it could still become a problem if it dominates the primary structure. CPDC Chairman Safina agreed that in practice the language allowed something different than what was intended.. He stated that the proposed language may clear up concerns. It allows for an existing structure to be converted, but not expanded, and it puts the CPDC as the Special Permit Granting Authority rather than the ZBA. The CPDC is better suited to issues related to neighborhood character and impacts to abutters. He suggested that additional graphics be added to the bylaw. Selectmen Chairman Halsey stated that he understands allowing the conversion of an existing structure, but questioned why the Town allows new detached accessory apartments at all. Chairman Safina replied that not every property is conducive to an addition, and there is a level of privacy that comes with a detached accessory apartment. He noted that anyone can live in an accessory apartment, related or not. The lot shape of a property may mean an owner cannot expand the primary structure, but can add a detached accessory apartment. Selectman Arena pointed out an. apparent conflict between the word "accessory" and the diagram in the bylaw. The word "accessory" suggests it should be subsidiary to the main house. The intent was not for it to be independent with a separate driveway and parking area, rather to be a space for parents and family members to age in place. Selectman Sexton questioned existing structures and setbacks if a garage were proposed. Ms. Mercier said the language changed recently, and explained what was approved at the Town Meeting in November 2016. Mr. Sexton asked if an existing garage that is tight to a lot line would be allowed to be used as an accessory apartment. Ms. Mercier explained that under the current bylaw, Zoning Board of Appeals approval would be needed, and that they would use the Performance Standards in the bylaw as a basis for what could be approved. . Selectman Arena asked for clarification of what would be allowed in an existing structure in the front yard. Ms. Mercier stated that an existing structure could be converted to an accessory apartment but would not be allowed to be added onto. Mr. Arena asked about the potential for more than one story. Ms. Mercier explained that structures that meet zoning setbacks are allowed to be more than one story, and could be used as an accessory apartment as long as the total square footage meets bylaw requirements. CPDC Chairman Safina opined that neighborhood character would need to be maintained. Mr. Tuttle stated that the zoning bylaw allows one curb cut per lot. Ms. Mercier said that as long as a curb cut meets requirements, the whole lot can be paved. Mr. Tuttle questioned the separate walkway shown on the diagram leading to the attached ; accessory apartment. CPDC Chairman Safina said the intent was to show that the entrance to an accessory apartment needs to be on the side of the property. Page 1 4 Board of Selectmen Minutes - January 9, 2017 - page 5 Selectman Arena expressed concern that the current language might encourage more detached accessory apartments, because it does not prohibit them, which could cause anxiety for the neighborhood. He opined that 1,000 square feet can get big if it does not include a garage. Ms. Delios explained that the Special Permit process was added to allow the neighborhood to be notified and weigh in on the proposal. The Special Permit process is a burden to the applicant, but allows another whole layer of review. She said that no abutters attended the Zoning Board of Appeals hearing about the aforementioned detached accessory apartment. Selectman Arena asked what criteria are used to determine whether a detached accessory apartment can be granted. Ms. Delios pointed out the Performance Standards under Section 5.4.7.3. She noted that the proposed language includes slight revisions to the Performance Standards so that some criteria cannot be waived. Detached accessory apartments will not be allowed in the front yard unless they are created through conversion of an existing accessory structure. Selectmen Chairman Halsey asked about the language limiting what is allowed between building facades and right -of -ways. The definitions of front yard and facade were discussed and it was agreed the language should be modified to better capture corner lot scenarios. Selectmen Chairman Halsey opined that allowing accessory apartments is a good idea, but the Town has to be careful not to set an alarming precedent. CPDC Chairman Safina opened the meeting to public comment. There was none. Mr. Tuttle moved that the CPDC hold a public hearing on proposed amendments to the Accessory Apartments bylaw on February 13, 2017. The motion was seconded by Ms. Goncalves -Dolan and approved with a 3 -0 -0 vote. Discussion of potential 40R District Expansion Ms. Mercier explained that recent vacancies and activity downtown have spawned renewed interest among Town officials, staff and local developers in considering an expansion to the existing Downtown Smart Growth (40R) District. She reminded the Commission that both the Main Street corridor and Business B zone were deemed priority areas for rezoning and /or redevelopment at the public forums in 2016. CPDC Chairman Safina showed the areas under consideration and explained that the discussion is about finding ways to take advantage of zoning alternatives and potential 40R expansion to spur economic development in underutilized pockets of the downtown. Selectmen Chairman Halsey asked about the area being considered. Selectman Sexton commented that mention of the lots not being deep enough came up at the July forum. Ms. Mercier explained that the area under consideration corresponds to the existing Business B Zoning District, which includes some split -zoned properties behind Main Street. However, no solely residentially -zoned properties are within the area being considered. Mr. Tuttle commented on what was proposed in the past for the 40R District. CPDC Chairman Safina questioned if the property at 400 Main Street should be included to allow mixed use of the property. Ms. Mercier clarified that 400 Main Street is within the area under consideration. Selectmen Chairman Halsey stated that allowing an overlay does not infringe on property rights, it expands options for the property. He asked that parcel lines be shown for discussion purposes. Page 1 5 Board of Selectmen Minutes - January 9, 2017 - page 6 Selectman Arena said that the term 'Overlay District' has a negative connotation to people who are unfamiliar with planning parlance because it sounds like another layer of regulations. He commented that language should be chosen carefully for the Town Meeting presentation. Mr. Tuttle commented that after some discussion at the zoning forums, people eventually understood. He noted that many people do not realize the area is currently constrained by the Business B Zoning. He opined that it is better for the Town to create an overlay instead of expanding the 40R District, as 40R is constrained by the State and might not work here. Selectman Arena made a suggestion to rename the Overlay District something like "Business B + ", so it sounds positive, and then add in the 40R language later. Mr. Tuttle replied that it might be okay to do it that way. CPDC Chairman Safina disagreed noting that the 40R language allows for Design Standards that complement zoning and govern the Plan Approval process, which gives the Commission teeth. Selectmen Chairman Halsey asked why Mr. Tuttle does not think that 40R and the type of project that is currently at 30 Haven Street would be applicable in this area. Mr. Tuttle responded that there are too many issues with parking, road access and lot size in the downtown, but that the 30 Haven Street project has a parking lot behind the building and a garage under the building. CPDC Chairman Safina pointed out that this area has the advantage of grade change, which could allow for underground parking. Selectmen Chairman Halsey stated that the Town should not limit itself. Developers should be given opportunities to be creative. Mr. Tuttle suggested adopting the tenets of 40R without involving the State. Selectmen Chairman Halsey asked for clarification about how that would work. Selectman Arena asked if the Design Standards could just be added into the "Business B +" area. Chairman Safina said they would be considered Design Guidelines not Design Standards, and would be outside of zoning unless adopted as part of the 40R District. CPDC Chairman Safina gave an example of how the proposed Reading Village 40B project would have been required to look if it had been a 40R project. Selectmen Chairman Halsey said residents have told him they now regret denying the original proposal to extend the 40R District across the railroad tracks. Having 40R there would have given the Town more control over development in that area. He added that the 40R District language exists for this purpose, and asked why the Town needs to reinvent its own local leverage. He opined that an extension of the 40R District would invite economic development. Mr. Tuttle said he is 100% in favor of what Selectmen Chairman Halsey suggested, but hopes it will work the second time around. He said opportunities need to be added to spawn change. He suggested asking for the biggest extension the Town can approve. Selectmen Chairman Safina suggested creating different Design Standards for different areas. Selectman Arena asked if 40R compels the Town to enforce the regulations. CPDC Chairman Safina replied that the Town can waive anything, but needs to consider the edges and what happens to abutting properties under a maximum build condition. He cautioned that the Commission should be careful when determining where the edge of the District should be. Selectmen Chairman Halsey opined that creating opportunities for property owners is the goal, and that if 40R does not work, it can be reversed. The triangular area bounded by Haven Street, High Street and Main Street was discussed. Mr. LeLacheur asked about potential negative impacts to the existing apartment buildings in that area. CPDC Chairman Safina commented that these apartments are affordable for residents, though not on the Subsidized Housing Inventory, and that redevelopment would likely mean the Town would lose some of its more affordable units. Mr. Halsey stated that Page 1 6 , 0(/ 0 O-U Board of Selectmen Minutes — January 9, 2017 - page 7 40R includes an affordability component, and that higher value units would generate a better revenue stream for the Town which would help all boats rise. Selectman Arena asked about historical properties in the area. He commented that it is better to expand the 40R District that is already in place. Chairman Halsey said the 40R expansion creates many opportunities for the Town, residents and business owners. CPDC Chairman Safina asked if an affordability component can be added to other zoning districts. Ms. Mercier replied in the affirmative, through inclusionary zoning. Ms. Delios explained that the State has modified the 40R Regulations to allow different affordability requirements for projects depending on tenancy. She explained that 20% can be required for homeownership projects and 25% can be required for rental projects. Mr. LeLacheur asked if Design Standards were included when the 40R District first went to Town Meeting. CPDC Chairman Safina replied in the affirmative, and commented that these same Standards may not be entirely applicable to the triangular area. He mentioned the possibility for sub - districts, especially for the Green /Gould Street area, within the 40R District. Selectmen Chairman Halsey requested that preparation begin so the 40R expansion can go forward. Ms. Mercier said that modifications to the Design Standards are not part of the Zoning Bylaw and can come later if needed. Mr. Tuttle added that the Design Standards can be negotiated with a project proponent as long as there is something appealing to attract development. CPDC Chairman Safina opened the meeting for public comment. Mr. Rich Haggerty of 531 Main Street thanked the Town for having this discussion. He said that the downtown area needs opportunities and that he is always thinking of ways to redevelop his property. He opined that the proposal will be positive for tax revenue, and will bring people downtown to patronize the businesses. He noted the merits and drawbacks of 40R versus a regular overlay. 40R allows for expedited permitting but requires a difficult level of affordability. Mr. Haggerty asked if the Town has considered different affordability requirements for small projects in the 40R District. Ms. Delios said that the CPDC cannot waive the affordability requirement, but that Chapter 40R does have a provision for projects under a certain threshold. Ms. Mercier agreed to look into the threshold and add it to the 40R language amendment. Mr. Haggerty said he agrees parking is an issue downtown, but parking might be solved with development. Attorney Brad Latham spoke on behalf of the Chamber of Commerce. He recommended the Town proceed with two different warrant articles for the areas under consideration. He agreed with a 20% affordability requirement for ownership projects. He noted that 40R allows for two sub - districts within an area, which could be added at a later Town Meeting. Mr. Jim Freeman of 505 Main Street thanked the Town for initiating the changes. He noted that he is a developer and is looking for a win -win with the Town. He said the eastern edge of the Business B Zoning District is a sensitive area and that some of the properties it abuts are investor -owned and might welcome being included, while others will not. He questioned if those properties should be included in the District. f Page 7 Board of Selectmen Minutes - January 9, 2017 - page 8 CPDC Chairman Safina responded that it is unclear whether the residential properties could be included or not, but that the Standards could address what happens along that edge. Mr. Tuttle added that the adjacent zoning in that area is A -40, which allows flexible multi - family residential uses. Mr. Mike Doyon, member of the Chamber of Commerce, opined that nothing negative will result from this proposal. The mixed -use will bring in a variety of people and new revenue. Mr. Arena asked the public to be sure to attend future hearings and meetings on the issue, and to show support at Town Meeting. CPDC Chairman Safina reminded everyone that 30 Haven is a good example of how a 40R project will work in the downtown area. Selectmen Chairman Halsey commented that while the State seems to want maximum build -out, he believes residents just want opportunities. CPDC Chairman Safina asked if the warrant articles will be ready by the end of February. Ms. Mercier indicated that they are already in progress. Selectmen Chairman Halsey agreed that having two articles is good strategy, as there might be a different vision for each district. He asked for the results from the CPDC by February 21St, and offered to add a meeting if needed. Selectman Arena requested that the vision for each area be provided for the public before Town Meeting. He suggested thinking about what is wanted and what might result. Mr. Tuttle moved that the CPDC hold a public hearing on proposed amendments to the Downtown Smart Growth District language and map on February 13, 2017. The motion was seconded by Ms. Goncalves -Dolan and approved with a 3 -0 -0 vote. Mr. Arena moved to adiourn the Board of Selectmen meeting at 9:37 p.m. The motion was seconded by Mr. Sexton and approved with a 3 -0 -0 vote. Respectfully submitted, Secreta ry Page 1 8 a� 0 ao Q �n coo cn a� O to U 0 0 � •� U U o a� O p N �C/D 4-z7 s� 2 y p 0 O U H U U U u V O U U U U aj U U� 44 Q ' O O O U p v w cK cd cd cd O O 141 141 P., P-., O U 4� ' u O O �w -N °.� � X33 x U x 1-4 H cn cn � x U O v ti p B'o 05 �U �bA 3O x uo 3a�xc u U C � N G " � •O m o � y �U U -, , c� �i U O U OTJ o U Q, O G' d' • Op b�A s-i � U b x � x Reading Human Rights Resolution Signatures Monica Acker Camille Anthony Susan Axelson Rebecca Bailey Laetitia Ballestas Chris Baptiste Anna Barnes Jonathan Barnes Cynthia Bates Rachel Baumgartner Stephen Baumgartner Cynthia Beebe Shelley Bell Jose Mik Benoit Jean Bianchetto Lee Bianchetto Lisa Bibeau Marlena Bita Sarah Blumenshine Shawn Brandt Octavia Brauner John Breithaupt Matthew Brown Lora Brown Patsy Burke Bryn Burkhart Eric Burkhart Lynn Cain Peter Carcia Joan Frances Carcia Joe Carnahan Meghan Carnahan Jarra Carney Rob Carney Eric Carpenter Erick Carpenter Judith Carpentier Samantha Carreiro Heidi Casamasima Brianne Cate Susan Chandler Ruth Clark Amy Cole Alice Collins Reading Human Rights Resolution Signatures Eileen Collins William Concannon Elisabeth Concannon Geoffrey Coram Jennifer Corwin AnneMarie Cory David Cory Jennifer Crommett Nicole Crosby Cheryl Cruikshank Aimee Cullen Andrew Cunniff Elizabeth Cunniff Dawn Cunningham Joan Cushing Ronald D'Addario Pam Daskalakis Robin Decker Kaley Dee Mark Dockser Ruth Doucette Ann Eagleston Joy Eaton Nemergut Christopher Fadale William Finch Richard Foley Michelle Freeman Geoff Freeman Andrew Friedmann Alison Friedmann Eric Gaffen Erin Gaffen Susan Gaskell Melissa Gentile Monique Gnanaratnam Kristen Godsoe Josh Goldlust Kate Goldlust Lisa Goldsmith Kate Grant Tom Grant Linh Green Ayse Green Donald Green MD Reading Human Rights Resolution Signatures Jamie Hale Jackie Hanley Marie Hanson Charlotte Harlan Denise Henneberry Amy Hennessy Melissa Henri Lynda Hersey Jennifer Hillary Matthew Hillary Emily James Hubert James Sandy Jane Alma Jeleskovic Fedja Jeleskovic Carolyn Johnson Anne Johnson Landry Karen Kalafatas Dianne Kennedy Chris Kerr Linda Kiene Kiene Linda King Beth Klepeis Joy Kruppa Roger Kruppa Ryan Landry Gretchen Latowsky Jason LeBovidge Jennifer LeBovidge Susan Lederer Soni Lee Bill Lee Sandy Lethin Jason Lewis John Lippitt Nancy Littlehale Valerie Loughman Tim Lynch Harriet Lyons Kristen MacGlashing Cathy Mandolese Henry Marcy Henry Marcy Ronald Marfione Reading Human Rights Resolution Signatures Patricia Marfione AnneMarie Mark Emily Maughan Suzanne McCance Laurel McCarthy Gina McCormick Kirk McCormick Nina McGlinchey AnneMarie McGrath Nare Mekhitarian Kaidyn Mercurio L eeAnn Mercurio Salvatore Mercurio Phyllis Mercurio Brenda Miccio Nancy Miller Beth Moier Anna Molettieri Kelly Moosman Erin Moreira Alan Mosier Tom Mottl Lizzie Mullen Phyllis Mullins Kirstin Murray Joe Myers Amy Nagy Rich Nastasi Sarah Nastasi Jackie Nazzaro Stephen Nazzaro Brian Nowicki Andy Nye George Ohlson Tina Ohlson Anique Olivier -Mason Jim Olson Sara Ortins Colleen O'Shaughnessy Carolina Pape Christine Parks Erin Patterson Karen Patterson Brown Paula Perry Reading Human Rights Resolution Signatures Paul Perry Joanne Perry Sandy Pothier Diana Powell Casey Prescott Evelyn Pyle Robert Pyle Ashley Quinn Nancy Radville Amanda Randall- Capobiano Robin Regazzini Salvatore Restuccia Diana Rhudick Kevin Richardson Leila Richardson Victoria Rimkunas Julie Ross Amanda Rotondo Marionna Sabia Patrick Sabia Michele Sanphy Allison Santilli Dana Santucci S. Sawyer Alyssa Scaparotti Indrani Sen Frank Silvestri Marilyn Simmons Harry Simmons Shelia Sith Nancy Solomon Joan Spence Priscilla Squires Bill Squires Nagel Stone David Stone Stephanie Sullivan Margaret Sweeney Melissa Synnott Chris Synnott Mark Taitz Ann Taylor Terri Teixeira Geri Tolman Reading Human Rights Resolution Signatures Jessie Tran Demetra Tseckares Paula Tucci Jennifer Valentino Sherri VandenAkker Lori Vinciguerra Ralph Louis Vinciguerra Dave Wall Julie Wall Tricia Wallace William Wallace Thomas Walsh Betsy Walsh Louise Ward Amy Ward Michael Weaver Stacy Weaver Parker Webb Alex Webb Christopher Webb Benjamin Webb Douglass Webb Rochelle Webb Liz Whitelam Carolyn Whiting Theresa Wiggins Frank Wiggins Hannah Wiggins Lynna Williams Laura Wilson Matt Wilson Dru Wood- Beckwith Nancy Zemlak Dowd Medical Associates (Pediatrics and GYN) Reading PC Repair Village Parenting, LLC