Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-10-24 Planning Board MinutesMinutes of the Planning Board Meeting of October 24, 1984. Chairman Rich convened the meeting in the first floor meeting room, 6 Lowell Street (old Library building) at 7:05 P.M. with Board members D. Devine and J. Wood present. Mr. Mitchel arrived shortly thereafter. The Board continues to be composed of 4 members; the vacancy caused by John Shaw's resignation has not yet been filled. Also present were members of the League of Women Voters, Diane Manikowski and Helen Bristowe, as well as Planning Board counsel, Carl Goodman, and C&C Associates counsel, Stephen Viegas. Busy Bee Florist Decision Chairman Rich reported that she had received information relative to the "Busy Bee" decision, a court decision in the case of the Board of Selectmen vs. the Board of Appeals. During discussion, it was noted that the decision had been reached in early Summer, but really didn't become public until October. Technical Assistance - MAPC Metropolitan Area Planning Council has given a verbal report as to what they can provide in assistance to plan for the development of the dump land and associated industrial land. They will provide a written report outlining three possible study proposals and will come to the Board meeting and make a formal presentation. Legal fees Chairman Rich reported that Selectmen Russell, also Chairman of the Law Committee, will be going to FinCom on October 25, 1984, to discuss the warrant article on the Fall Town Meeting Warrant, requesting funding of the Planning Board's legal fees. Ms. Rich asked for a representative from the Planning Board to attend with her. MEPA - Drinkwater Pronert Chairman Rich reported on the Massachusetts Environmental Protection Agency's meeting on the North Reading shore of the Ipswich River. It could be readily seen how close the Town of Reading wellfields is to this site and what negative impacts uncontrolled development in this area could have. Executive Session Upon a motion duly made and seconded, it was unanimously voted by a roll call vote to adjourn to executive session with Attorney Car]. Goodman for the purpose of discussing the Criterion Road situation and litigation in this regard, and to return to public session afterwards. Criterion Road Litigation After adjourning the executive session, the Planning Board public meeting was reconvened with 4 Planning Board members and Attorneys Goodman and Viegas. The points of the settlement in principle were reviewed with exact wording to be drafted by counsel. Mr. Viegas expressed confidence that his client, C&C Associates, would accept the settlement terms. The only change proposed by Mr. Viegas was that a $15,000 escrow account be established to ascertain completion of the roadway and associated items. Mr. Mitchel then moved, Mr. Devine seconded, a motion that would amend item #3 to include an alternative of $15,000 escrow, to be used if the existing action X63 is not completed within ninety (90) days from the date of the first sale. It was unanimously voted. There being no further business before the Board, it was unanimoussly voted to adjourn. Respectfully submitted, John D. Wood, Clerk