HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987-09-09 Zoning Board of Appeals MinutesJa
~J
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
READING, MA
MINUTES - SEPTEMBER 9, 1987
Members Present: John Jarema
Catherine Quimby
Stephen Tucker
Chairman Quimby openend the scheduled public hearing at 7:30 PM, September
9, 1987 in the Selectmen's Meeting Room, 6 Lowell Street, Reading, MA.
The first case heard by the Board was a request for Special Permit by
Christopher E. Bullen under Sections 6.3.1.3., 6.3.3.3., and 6.3.3.4. of
the Zoning By-Laws to allow for the construction of an open deck too close
to the side lot line of the property located at 11 Wilson Street, Reading,
MA.
Catherine Quimby read names of those parties who received copies of
hearing notice and asked Mr. Bullen to state his reasons for the request
before the Board. Mr. Bullen stated he had been told by the builders
doing the job, B & B Construction of Lynnfield, MA, that it was not
necessary to seek prior approval on an open deck. During the first day of
construction, the work was stopped by a town official pending proper
procedures be followed and permits obtained.
Mr. Bullen had checked with the only abuttor to be affected by the
building of the deck, and she had no complaint about the construction
being done. He again reiterated the fact that he had been told by the
builders he did not need a permit for an open deck and assumed they knew
the law. Mr. Bullen had rented the property for three years and had
purchased it in December of 1986. The plan is now on,file with the
Reading Building Inspector's office. John Jarema then read a letter into
the record dated September 8, 1987 from Beth MacKillop, Conservation
Commissioner, relative to the case which stated the requirement of prior
approval of the Conservation Commission under both the State Wetlands
Protection Act, Ch. 131 S 40 and the Reading Wetlands By-Law, Article 32,
before proceeding with construction.
Stephen Tucker then informed Mr. Bullen of the possibility of fees imposed
by the Building Inspector for his not initially seeking a building permit
for the work. John Jarema then moved to grant to Christopher E. Bullen of
11 Wilson Street, Reading, MA, Special Permit for an open deck on the
westerly side of the house not to encroach more than 8 feet on the
northerly property line under Sections 6.3.3.3. and 6.3.3.4. with the
condition that he file for a hearing with the Conservation Commission
Minutes - September 9, 1987
Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
under the State Wetlands Act and Reading Wetlands By-Laws. The Board then
voted unanimously to grant approval, and the hearing was adjourned at
7:50 PM.
Before the next scheduled hearing, the Board had a few minutes to review
and discuss the meeting minutes from the September 1, 1987 general
business meeting. Stephen Tucker then moved and the Board unanimously
voted to accept the minutes as amended.
The Board then moved on to the next scheduled meeting at 8:00 PM, a
request for Special Permit by Paul DellaRocco and Lorraine LaMotta for
property located at 7 Woodbine Street, Reading, MA. Catherine Quimby
opened the hearing by requesting the petitioners state their reason for
request of a Special Permit. Mr. DellaRocco explained that they had
purchased the house in June of 1987 with the intention of expanding the
existing living space. After looking at options available, they decided
the best way to build would be a second story on the house so as not to
take away from an already small lot. This addition would be three new
bedrooms, allowing for more living space in the existing structure. After
checking with the Building Inspector's office they discovered there was a
problem with the lot line on the easterly side of the property. Catherine
Quimby noted that the lot was just under 5,000 square feet, and that it
was a non-conforming structure on a non-conforming lot but was built prior
to existing zoning by-laws. John Jarema added that the certified plot
plan done by Cameron Brothers of Somerville, MA indicated lot to be in
conformance at time of construction.
Stephen Tucker then moved to grant the Special Permit under Sections
6.3.3.3, and 6.3.3.4. for a second story on the,property located at 7
Woodbine Street provided that construction does not increase or further
encroach on any existing lot lines. John Jarema seconded the motion, and
the Board unanimously voted to grant Special Permit.
Catherine Quimby opened the next scheduled hearing at 8:30 PM for the
request of a Limited Use Variance by the Reading Gymnastics Academy (RGA)
to allow portions of the property located at 172 Woburn Street to be used
as a gymnastics school. The property is owned by St. Agnes Church, a
member of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Boston. Chairman Quimby then
began by swearing in the group of citizens attending the hearing who
intended to speak to the Board along with representatives from both the
church and the RGA.
(-",,Leslie McGonagle, owner of the RGA, spoke on behalf of the school stating
-'its benefit to the children of Reading and the fact that before the
building was in use by the RGA, vandalism and property damage were a
Minutes - September 9, 1987
Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 3
problem at the building. She also stated that she had received a letter
from John Jarema informing her of the approaching date on which the
current Variance would lapse, but failed to seek renewal of the Variance
because the RGA was planning on relocating and had, in fact, gone as far
as signing a purchase and sale agreement with the owner of another
building. Due to unforeseen problems, this deal never materialized. The
existing Variance, however, has since expired. Mr. Jarema then noted that
the RGA should have renewed the Variance and could have done so very
easily. Since it was allowed to lapse, the case would have to be looked
at as a brand new case.
Mr. Jarema then asked if the representative of the owners of the building
was present, and requested he speak on behalf of the owners. A
representative of the Archdiocese of Boston then spoke, stating the future
plans for an elderly housing facility to occupy the school site. Work was
currently being reviewed with the Housing Authority, with at least another
year of planning involved. Therefore, they felt a short-term extension
through June 1988 would be acceptable pending final approval of the
Archdiocese which was in the works at present. John Jarema stated that
any Variance of less than one year would be inappropriate, and that a
;'condition be included in the Variance so as not to interrupt classes
scheduled while awaiting a continuance. The meeting was then opened to
abuttors. Mr. Jim Valentine of 166 Woburn Street stated he did not find
the RGA to be an unwelcomed neighbor, and although he would applaud
elderly housing would like to see the building in use and hoped the Board
would vote favorably on the granting of the Variance. Mr. Bill Summers of
65 Prescott Street then spoke relative to the trash and empty beverage
containers the students at the RGA continually left on and around his
property. After hearing this complaint, both the church and school
representatives stated their hopes that in the future, Mr. Summers would
contact them directly if the problem occured. They would see that the
problem was eliminated.
Stephen Tucker noted that a definite date by which the Variance, if
granted, would expire had not yet been reached. He suggested October 1,
1988 as the expiration date. John Jarema added that in its seeking to
grow, the RGA had jeopardized those who gain the most benefit from the
school--the children who use it. Ms. McGonagle again apoologized for her
failing to renew the existing Variance. Catherine Quimby then read into
the record the conditions which were originally imposed by the Board in
December of 1981. John Jarema mentioned the 40-student condition i.e.,
"the maximum number of students attending gymnastic classes in the
building at any one time shall be 40" and his feeling that this condition
was not always followed. Ms. McGonagle then stated that there was never
an occasion when more than 40 students was attending class at one time.
-tl ~E
There was, however, more than 40 students in the building most times as
`--_'there were also students warming up, eating lunch, etc. The wording was
not clear on this issue, and the Board agreed there should be wording
added to the effect that..... attending gymnastics classes in the building
Minutes - September 9, 1987
Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 4
at any one time shall be limited to 80 in the building, but 40 on the
floor or as determined by state code. Other changes suggested by the
Board to the existing conditions was to strike II. (e) pertaining to
exterior signs, to strike III. Quinquennial Review and replace
with--annual review date to be 10/1/88, and also to change the breach of
conditions to state to the effect that upon agreement of both parties, the
Variance could be terminated. This would give the church the ability to
continue to utilize space through expiration date of Variance.
After discussion, the Board felt the Variance should be granted this
evening to make legal the current occupancy and use by the RGA and to
include in the conditions a statement to the effect that "execution of
Variance and lease take place during a reasonable period of time" which
would protect both the tenant and the Town of Reading. John Jarema then
made a motion to grant a one-year Limited Use Variance to be reviewed on
October 1, yearly, to the Reading Gymnastics Academy and the Roman
Catholic Archdiocese of Boston for property located at 172 Woburn Street,
Reading, MA, subject to those conditions previously stated. The motion
was seconded, and the Board unanimously voted to grant the Limited Use
Variance as so amended. John Jarema requested that the church forward a
;copy of the lease for the file as soon as it became available. The
hearing was closed at 9:30.
The Board then discussed general business including the need for
up-to-date abuttors lists, assessors cards to be included in weekly
packages to Board members, and future availability of Board members for
scheduled meetings. The meeting was then adjourned at 9:50 PM.