HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-04-21 Zoning Board of Appeals MinutesTOE OF READING
ZONING BOAR Cy' APPEALS
IN TES-APRIL 21, 1994
:MEMBERS PRESENT: U70HN JARS , CHAIRMAN
ARD I TH I ET%70R
JOHN COOTE
ROB I N RL MME
*INDICATES A NON-VOTING MEMBER
meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals was held in the
Selectmen's Meeting Room of the Town Hall, 16 Lowell
Street, Reading, MA at 7:00 P~M
The scheduled public hearing was a continuation from April
4, 1994 in order for the petitioner to gather more
information.
ern Joseph Calareso then submitted a drawing of the
proposed building discussing the overhang needed to protect
the plants and flowers from the elements. He also submitted
a parking plan showing 20 parking spaces and stated that
the parking would conform to zoning.
Mr, Coote then read a memo from Jonathan Edwards stating
that the CPDC had looked favorably upon, this plan. Mr
Edwards was present at the hearing and stated that the CPDC
had, found the concept of the plan to be goods He stated
that a traffic study would have to be done, but the CPDC
felt that the Variance request would not be more
encroaching and the building would have a better appearance
than at present n
Mr. Latham discussed that the site was currently 2 lots
held in common ownership to be made into .1 lot. This could
be done by an Approval Not Required Plan to CP C. Ira
Jarema was concerned about having 2 uses on one lot.
:r. Latham stated that historically it is that way. fie
stated that they were not creating it
r< Ben: Nichols was present at the meeting and felt
strongly that the 50 foot front yard setback should be
upheld. ra Latham stated, that at present the structure
with the canopy was only 18 feet from the lot line, but
that the new structure would be 20 feet from the lot lined
rd 3a.relYa stated that he had tried to find the background
of the housed It was built in 1926 but wasn't on record as
residential from 1942.1989. It was discussed that the house
had always been used, as a residence.
Mrt Latham asked the Board to consider what they were
starting with and what they were trying to do. He stated
that it would be are improvement to the neighborhood, and
also that the area is the gateway to the Town and should be
improved. He again stated that it already had a non-
conforming front yard setback
Mr. arema, stated, that there was no question that the site
would look much ricer. He was concerned about having two
uses on one lot. He suggested: incorporating the house and
moving the building back on the property. r n Latham
f4 X
stated that the applicant had spent a lot of money to
; the residence and that a family member now lured in the
1-i.ausea It would not be practical to tear down the house
"move the building back on the lot.
It was then discussed if the canopy was part of the
building, Mrs Latham stated, that they had thought that the
Board would think so, therefore, they had asked for a 20
foot setback. The actual building would be 38 feet from
the lot line,
.s. ieworka stated that other applicants on. Main Street
had asked to encroach on the front yard setback but that
the Board did not look favorably upon i t4 She also felt
that the parking was impossible now and that it would only
get worse,
re Latham discussed that although the canopy would only be.
20 feet from the lot line, it would actually be 40 feet
from - - in Street o
Mr. C Aareso asked if it would make a difference if they
brought the canopy back 3 more feet and also cut the corner
off the building near Hopkins Street.
re Jarema stated that he would like to discuss with Town
Counsel if a Variance would be :deeded or if a. Special
Permit would be adequate.
It was discussed that the hearing would be continued so
that the applicant could discuss with his engineer the
changes to the plan, and also give the Board time to
discuss the case with Town Counsel
At 8:45 P.M. Mr. Coote moved to continue the hearing until
May in order to check with Town Counsel and, also to allow
the petitioner to make possible alterations to the plan.
Ms. Wieworka seconded and the motion passed with a vote of
p
:t_ o
Mr. jarem stated that Town C nsel a requested the Beard
take , vote t not appeal the Court decision of the Higgot
case
7 t ':55 P.M, John Cc moved that the Board acce-
pts the
ision of the Court L. the .iggot Case and wishes net to
- :.1 s s. iework.- seconded and the motion pissed, with
v to of 2-0-1 with Mr. Jarerna abstaining.
At 9:15 P.M. a motion was made and seconded t adjourn, and
the Board vested unanimously to do so.
Respectfully submitted by area Saporito, Recording
Secretary to the Zoning Board of Appeals.
Signed.
Date,
5
- j
Approved: