HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-03-02 Zoning Board of Appeals MinutesOWN
ZONING F
x T
't
Zonini of Appeals was held in the
g Roo,a 1--he "Pown Hal 116 Lowell
5 at 7 o P>i`~`a a
` Y began, € ..Latham, s , C. c3
v_ __t l-ups showing the water.
a IC in 'rat it would stick out on-l-,-
W fee-i- long. The Board felt that th~
I-y
-lo c Cs€i c t the applicant a,- last
p e l '-hat : r should
- c t 4. m the -.1.
>
~a public hearing w on th, p t t`1 o of Dais"i
-ill-ins who were seekinj
---riial Permit under
6>3a1,3 yobf PV.yt yhy}^coni.ng on ? fiy'°-L order o build
1, 209, Street, ng, MA.
a M a Johi Co llins stated ~ n t
c I- ter caps 29
arE
r i^a'L' .E. D 1.s1 ,1. common 1 He
, that a,_ only allegations sip' -he only issue
Was ssue of Lot 29.
submi
Mr. bi 3oks of :--Inf,, to the
ora
Mr.
then stated Co l Iron ~ e
~
L
31
He
stated that he h,-,--*, rforE r C; I
I
-n
had
new i nformatio- > discus se-?, ~ _olan -711-1
co i s
Building Plan I' a 11, 1874 which
L' a
2)
('72)
as separate lot. stated that the
--s
PI
nev
er modified by the f-'Px; of a
Sl
pfd w the Registry o'
therez
h _._-,-3g l en Building t4 11 in h
-'--ate- that he spur some time in h
'5.3,1.2 and sta"-ed 'ha` the
.:"i 4. --w rut4s of owners wJ- L.h ~.1n.'`M'on,...u_L, .LL``j.
lots
d. the Col lino 8 rued dated 1 42 a
.7 that in 1911 ~zCollinC mother had
33 to tI is wK t! got _builYig
70, Y
a
key document Ow V, swa~I' was discussed that ta3.-r`e last decision was ' on
- ',,-n the 1942 deed n lots 2 n 30 he been
at ~c E --t 3
still
Mr. ~;01] ~i claimed t the Ruggles plan was Wor e- F n" to- Mr.
4510a statni that 02Y card, but
'hat the I was -trilling.
- lots u .w re.t 1-
M ! -"wn3e! and given him a copy of the last ~Dcision
Via> 1 this lot.
H ien b - cop: of the Bernard L i _ . d
sated V weed describes the I 0_ ji I at
_ _ as one Loft Msr W e r.
izv2 h was familiar with h
ti : e ~ 1-7 e ; that yea after Zoe=iii went n
a 7 a zed lots 32 and z 7 two nro._ a t
M y m
Mr. Andy E 1 7~, a neighbor, submitted to the Board a.
plan date v e the Coll insF a hired ;fir a But r ics
to put one lot 15 A into two lots.
Mr. -Nashburn stated that tI.; VC I ad this plan at
the U hearing. He l s: i the intent to
TA-- of non-conformin~ Pts some protection under
lase Niewor also stated F 'own 7.-,.A's opini..
last
important t had s a- l c.-is4.. the
on was 3 ega x :
i t d
t: Loth should be
scr
_ If,
II
S
Ijt h__ I---
the
.
_ - y
u"se" su Y itt utter t
6, t
CLL . y 1
99 at.in that tI, in 4'
s t-
-
rate lot.
The le'-te 'I SO
thE
ion. NothMg has
arrar
eversal the- Bo
r
stair'
t h
last eci., _ . 4,3rre ,
re rehut _
or Lhi.e to a
i k.
IE_:,wOr,ka stated tat as I
Lindsey case she was not
N _
n4 o .L that, She also s t a
t
t best job that Y i o u I
_
A
moved to g as Day, i
i i' i x
Col
under e '
7 7 on r•-~ _ - . _
w
a ]Cb y3
a
Sus,
o
T
hat .hey € rd "1 o r Dt be
^d h "E
M - 3t t i... gS.~aZ tyt on to Da p is }.t~. i. I ,.3.. . ' Col i -
-i...-
` y m. i.)'~-- 4 Vp S o a _ ..J _ a.. g~ 4 T I s f
hat is escr-
- i. 5 $ y 1 C,*R3 Street, . e6+: £.1, ik:. y MR. . Susan
4
- Th )n failed with a vote of 0,
i-~~.de and seconded to ad4ourn, and the
-I t E: 3. --1 to do so.
v - _ l u J..+2L 4 1v
Ci G1 Saporito, Recording
_-y to the Z~- _rlt of Appeals.
C~
-~-t
p roptedn t I