Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981-02-23 Planning Board MinutesMinutes of the Meeting of February 23, 1981. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:40 PM in Room 19, 52 S------with B. Mitchel, E. Childress, J. Sturm and J--w' present. There were approximately 10 people present from the Johanna Drive area as well as the reporter, Tracey Dwyer, from the Reading Chronicle. The Board voted to consider the Comprehensive Permit item as the first matter for discussion on the evening's agenda. Comprehensive Permit - Horizon Homes The Board reviewed a draft of a letter prepared by the Chairman which is to be sent to the Board of Appeals. as per their request at last Wednesday's Comp permit hearing. With minor revisions, the Board approved distribution of the letter to the Board of Appeals as well as Conservation Commission, Board of Public Works, Board of Selectmen, United Church Homes, Reading Housing Authority, Reading Chronicle, Building Inspector. (INSERT LETTER OF 2/20/81). The Board noted the following concerns not written in the letter that the entire layout for Bay State Road is 24 feet wide, that is not the paved area of the street, - that BPW has stated that this street will have to be entirely pwas anot aclrebuilt in ear if it was conformance the a entire street or- .only t the t aorea~ rj It area of the street to the proposed driveway to the elderly housing project. that this project could be served by a main access off Haverhill Street with the emergency access being Bay State Road (ZBL 4.5.2.9) that there should be a minimum safety width for emergency vehicle access to this development for both fair and foul weather-taking the snow storage problem into consideration - the impact of a 4 story flat roof construction. in this area Zoning Buffer strip The Board moved to reconsider their 1/26/81 vote to submit the buffer strip article on Town Meeting Warrant. They then discussed the sen revisions and unanimously voted to j submit the following article on the 1981 Annual Town Meeting Warrant: Article To see if the Town will vote to amend the zoning By-laws by deleting the existing 5.3.1.3. and inserting in place thereof the following section: 5.3.1.3. As part of all new construction of any building, parking lot, structure, or any extension or addition thereto in a Business C or Industrial District and where such construction abuts within one hundred twenty-five (125) feet of any Residential District, a buffer strip is to be established subject to the following requirements a) Said buffer strip shall have a twelve (12) foot minimum depth and shall contain a curb to prevent parking within the strip, a six (6) foot high fence which shall be located a maximum of two (2) feet from the abutting Residential/Business C and/ or Industrial lot line and shall contain an ever- green hedge on the Business C and/or Industrial side of the fence which is to be at least.three (3) feet in height at the time of planting and will provide a yearround dense visual screen and attain a height of at least seven (7) feet within five (5) years of planting; b) Said buffer strip shall be constructed along the full abutting length of any Residential District lots so affected and lie entirely within the Busi-~( ness C and/or Industrial District; c) Said buffer strip screening, fencing and vegeta- tion shall be maintained in good condition at all times by the owners of the Business C and/or Indus- trial property; and d) Where a roadway separates an abutting Residential district from a Business C and/or Industrial Dis- trict, dimensional controls for said buffer strip shall be implemented from the existing Business C and/or Industrial lot line along the roadway. or take any other action with respect thereto. The Secretary was requested to mare the necessary corrections and submit the Articles for the Annual Town Meeting Warrant before the deadline of March 2, 1981 at 8 PM. - Non-User After discussion, the Board unanimously approved the submission of the following article on the 1981 Annual Town Meeting Warrant: Article To see if the Town will vote to amend the zoning By-laws by deleting the existing 6.3.2.4. and inserting in place thereof.the following: 6.3.2.4. When a non-conforming use is not used fora period of two (2) or more years, its non- conforming status shall not be reestablished and any future use shall be in conformance with this By-law. or take any other action with respect thereto. Parking requirements for restaurants - After discussion, the Board unanimously approved the submission of the following article on the 1981 Annual Town Meeting Warrant; Article To see if the Town will vote to amend the Zoning By-laws by adding the following.requirements after - those established for Retail Stores, Offices and Consumer Service EstablisIments in Section 6.1.1.3 and under the following tables: Principal Use Minimum Number of Minimum Numbe r of Off-Street Parking. Off-Street Lo ading. Spaces Required and Unloading Space: Required Restaurants One Space for one space - 0-2000 each sixty (60) square square feet of feet o: dining area floor . two spaces - 2001-41 square of floc area three spaces-over 4 square of flog area Annual Report - After a brief discussion, the Planning Board unanimously approved the submission of the following as their 1980 Annual Report: Activity of the Planning Board continued'at a brisk pace through' 1980. In addition to fulfilling its statutory duties, the Board on numerou.s.ocoasions served in an advisory capacity to various citizens' groups as well as to other Town boards and commissions.- This report highlights some of the key accomplishments of the year, and indicates the major areas in which effort is continuing toward long-range goals. The Board published an extensively revised edition of the Zoning By-law text and map, including all revisions through June 30, 1980. The text has been electronically stored using the Reading Memorial High Schbol's new word-processing equipment, in order to expedite future amendments. The map consists of 35 sheets of 39 detailed maps, which will be up- dated and annotated as the Town grows and changes. The Planning Board consulted with the Board of Selectmen on the establishment and appointment of the. seven-member Indus- trial Development Commission, which will advise the Town in matters relating to the most cost-effective future use of Town-owned parcels such as the Dump, as well as the regula- tion and encouragement of industrial growth. The Board.acted as advisor to the West Side Citizens' Committee which succeeded in-amending the Zoning By-law to provide for a buffer strip between abutting Business C and Residential districts (Article 51 of 1980 Annual Town_Meeting). Improvement of public transportation continued to be an impor- tant goal for the Board, which enlisted the expertise of the Central Transportation Planning Staff (MAPC) to prepare a report evaluating seven options. Their study encompassed both the Depot area and the municipal incinerator site. Though further action on the latter was deferred by Town Meeting until competing uses are resolved, the Board will continue to pursue this option as well as others relating to Depot parking improvement or expansion. After soliciting input from other Town Boards and local businessmen and merchants, the Planning Board proposed con- struction of a parking lot on Town.-owned land at Union and Middle Street. This lot would have provided 42 parking spaces, the intent of which was to relieve congestion in the downtown parking district. In the light of Proposition 2 1/2, Town Meeting decided to indefinitely postpone consid- eration of this proposal. The Board advised a petitioner on the wording of a success- ful By-law revision permitting canopies in front yards of drive-up service facilities in Industrial Districts. Subsequently, the Board advised the Board of Appeals where an applicant sought relief in a Business District. The Board made clear its and Town Meeting's intent that the inclusion of canopies in front yards was to be limited to Industrial Districts only and not to be allowed in Business Districts. Proposals for new construction and renovation in the. Town continue to be monitored by the-Board. Some of the projects studied were: l) A new five-story office building in the Addison- Wesley complex; 2) A nursing home on Salem Street near Gallahue Market; 3) Expansion of 128 Sales, Inc. into'a portion of the Dump Site; 4) Proposals for provision of elderly housing. The Planning Board has consulted with MAPC, Reading Housing Authority, United Church Homes, League of Women Voters, Board of. Selectmen and several Town agencies in this regard; 5) Participated and advised the School Department as to plans for coping with declining school enrollment and resulting surplus schools; 6) Continued to study traffic safety including recommen- dations in response to a proposed site for a new fire station; 7) Pursued the ongoing issue of optimal utilization of Town property. The Board also monitored and intervened in proposed develop- ments in abutting towns which might have adverse impact on Reading. For example, the rezoning of Russell Farm for t business use was withdrawn from consideration by the Woburn City Council; and the Board requested a State study of West Street traffic congestion and safety arising from growing industrialization in Woburn and Wilmington, The Reading and North Reading Planning Boards submitted an application to MAPC for a sub-regional study. The scope of this proposed project was to determine the effects of increased industrial development in the North Reading Concord r Street area and its impact on the Town of Reading wellfields, which lie in dose proximity to this development F ` f Respectfully submitted, John Zorabedian, Jr., Chairman Barry J. Mitchel, Clerk Joseph C. Sturm Ellen C. Childress John Shaw The Board asked that the next meeting's agenda include dis- cussion of the schedule of fees and expenses for the Planning Board. The next meeting of the Board will be held on THURSDAY, MARCH 5, 1981. The next--meeting of the Comprehensive Permit hearings will be WEDNESDAY, C--H-25, 1981 at 8 PM in the Community Center Auditorium. ~ Upon a motion duly made and seconded, the Board unanimously voted to adjourn at 10:10 PM. R--- BJM