HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-09-02 Tax Classification Task Force MinutesReading 1993 Tax Classification October 26, 1993 Page C-2 of 13
Task Force Report
TAX CLASSIFICATION TASK FORCE MINUTES
Meeting: September 2, 1993 7:30 P.M. Town Hall Conference Room
Present: Steven Cool Pres. Reading Taxpayers Association
David Billard Town Appraiser
David Hurley Pres. Reading Realtors Association
Beth Klepeis Town Finance Director
Bill Burditt Board of Selectmen
Mollie Ziegler Board of Assessors
Dick Coco Chairman Finance Committee
Absent: Bill Goodrich Community Planning & Development Comm.
Leslie McGonagle Chamber of Commerce
Town Manager Peter Hechenbleikner called the meeting to order and
outlined the purpose of the Tax Classification Task Force, which is to
consider the issue of whether to charge different tax rates for different
classifications of real estate property, and to make a report to the Board of
Assessors before the classification hearing. Mr. Hechenbleikner then called
for election of officers. Steven Cool had volunteered to be chairman and was
duly elected by the group. Beth Klepeis volunteered to be secretary and was
also elected.
Chairman Cool proposed dates for subsequent meetings of the task force.
The group decided to meet 9/9 and 9/27 at 7:30 P.M. and on 10/7 if necessary.
The next order of business was to discuss what areas of concern should be
examined and what data wold be needed from the Town's staff people (ie. Dave
Billard and Beth Klepeis).
It was decided that Dave Billard would collect data from comparable or
neighboring communities to see what percentage shares of property exist in
those communities and whether the communities have a split tax rate or not.
He would contact the Department of Revenue municipal data base and would
contact the individual communities as well, if needed. The communities
requested by the task force were: Winchester, Lexington, Needham, North
Andover, Lynnfield, Wakefield, North Reading, and Stoneham. Dave would also
try to ascertain the impact of what other towns are doing, and the ratio of
classification if there is a split rate. If we can find a community similar
to Reading which did split their rate, what was there experience?
The following questions were posed:
(1) Can you have reverse tax rate classification (i.e. residential
tax higher than commercial and industrial)?
(2) Can you have incentives built into classification to make Reading
more attractive to business?
(3) How can we determine what the long range impact of a split tax
rate might be?
(4) Should the issue be held until the commercial property on Walkers
Brook Drive is sold?
(Continued...)
Reading 1993 Tax Classification October 26, 1993 Page C-3 of 13
Task Force Report
It was suggested that we create a list of town services which are
provided for and used by businesses and town services which are provided for
and used by residential property owners.
The group decided to review at its next meeting the package of
information traditionally presented to the Board of Selectmen by the Board of
Assessors at Classification hearings.
Mr. Cool reported to the group that the Reading Tax Payers Association
was having a forum on real estate valuation at the library on October 28,
1993.
The meeting adjourned at 9:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Elizabeth W. Klepeis
Secretary
TAX CLASSIFICATION TASK FORCE MINUTES
Meeting: September 2, 1993 7:30 P.M. Town Hall Conference Room
Present: Steven Cool
David Billard
David Hurley
Beth Klepeis
Bill Burditt
Mollie Ziegler
Dick Coco
Pres. Reading Taxpayers Association
Town Appraiser
Pres. Reading Realtors Association
Town Finance Director
Board of Selectmen
Board of Assessors
Chairman Finance Committee
Absent: Bill Goodrich Community Planning & Development Comm.
Leslie McGonagle Chamber of Commerce
Town Manager Peter Hechenbleikner called the meeting to or-
der and outlined the purpose of the Tax Classification Task
Force, which is to consider the issue of whether to charge dif-
ferent tax rates for different classifications of real estate
property, and to make a report to the Board of Assessors before
the classification hearing. Mr. Hechenbleikner then called for
election of officers. Steven Cool had volunteered to be chairman
and was duly elected by the group. Beth Klepeis volunteered to
be secretary and was also elected.
Chairman Cool proposed dates for subsequent meetings of the
task force. The group decided to meet 9/9 and 9/27 at 7:30 P.M.
and on 10/7 if necessary. The next order of business was to dis-
cuss what areas of concern should be examined and what data wold
be needed from the Town's staff people (ie. Dave Billard and Beth
Klepeis).
It was decided that Dave Billard would collect data from
comparable or neighboring communities to see what percentage
shares of property exist in those communities and whether the
communities have a split tax rate or not. He would contact the
Department of Revenue municipal data base and would contact the
individual communities as well, if needed. The communities
requested by the task force were: Winchester, Lexington;
Needham, North Andover, Lynnfield, Wakefield, North Reading, and
Stoneham. Dave would also try to ascertain the impact of what
other towns are doing, and the ratio of classification if there
is a split rate. If we can find a community similar to Reading
which did split their rate, what was there experience?
The following questions were posed:
(1) Can you have reverse tax rate classification (i.e. residen-
tial tax higher than commercial and industrial)?
(2) Can you have incentives built into classification to make
Reading more attractive to business?
1
(3) How can we determine what the long range impact of a split
tax rate might be?
(4) Should the issue be held until the commercial property on
Walkers Brook Drive is sold?
It was suggested that we create a list of town services
which are provided for and used by businesses and town services
which are provided for and used by residential property owners.
The group decided to review at its next meeting the package
of information traditionally presented to the Board of Selectmen
by the Board of Assessors at Classification hearings.,
Mr. Cool reported to the group that the Reading Tax Payers
Association was having a forum on real estate valuation at the
library on October 28, 1993.
The meeting adjourned at 9:30 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Eliza eth Klepeis
Secre ary
2