HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-02-23 ad Hoc School Building Committee Minutes' March 2, 1993
SCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
FEBRUARY 23, 1993
The meeting was called to order at 7:10PM.
Those in attendance were: R. D'Antona, D. Farnham, R. Sanstad,
J. Lupi, D. Williams, R. Grosso, B. Poock, R. Graham, M. Cowell,
Paul O'Leary, Dr. Jack Delaney and one visitor.
The meeting was devoted to the evaluation and ranking of the six
(6) architects that had made presentations on February 2 and 9,
1993.
Mr. Lupi presented a rating scheme based on the RFP. Items to be
rated were: 1) Prior experience, 2) Past performance, 3)
Financial stability, 4) Identity and quality of sub consultants,
5) Presentation and 6) References. Scoring was to be 0 - 10 (9-
10 excellent, 7-8 good, 5-6 fair, 0-5 unsatisfactory).
Each member expressed her/his views on each architect. Then Dr.
Jack Delaney, not a voting member of the committee, expressed his
impressions and thoughts on the architects as he had escorted
each of them through the Parker School.
Mr. David Williams reported on his effort on checking the
references of the architects. Then the Committee decided to
rate each category by voting. Roger Sanstad conducted this
polling and he entered the average evaluation from all voting
members. This evaluation resulted in the table attached.
Because the top three were so close, there was at least another
half hour discussion by the members on the top three architects.
Then it was agreed unanimously to vote first for the number three
ranking. The vote was 9 for Earl R. Flansburgh (one voting
member M. Cowell had departed). Then the Committee voted for
first ranking. There were six votes for the Design Partnership
of Cambridge and three votes for DiNisco Kretsch and Associates.
Hence the ranking was determined to be:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
The Design Partnership of Cambridge
DiNisco Kretsch and Associates
Earl R. Flansburgh and Associates
TAMS Consultants, Inc
Symmes, Maini and McKee Associates
Keyes Associates
-2-
Mr. R. sanstad then opened the sealed envelope of the Design
Partnership of Cambridge and read their fee proposal which was in
lines with the Town appropriations.
Mr. Lupi was asked to notify the Consultants in writing of the
ranking.
There was further business discussed on the agenda for the next
meeting March 2, 1993.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 FM
JL/np
t/
February 23, 1993
RANKING SCHEME
PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL
ARCHITECTS
1) Prior Experience
2) Past Performance
3) Financial Stability
4) Identity and quality
of sub consultants
5) Presentation
6) References
HENCE
TAMS
SMA
DKA
K
DPC
ERF
6
6
8
6
8
8
7
6
8
6
9
8
7
7
8
8
9
8
6.5
7
8
6
7.5
7
6
6
9.5
5
8.5
9
7
7
9
4
9
g
39.5
39
50.5
35
51
48
4 5 2 6 1 3
v~