HomeMy WebLinkAbout1993-10-27 ad Hoc School Building Committee MinutesSCHOOL BUILDING COMMITTEE
MEETING MINUTES
OCTOBER 27, 1993
The meeting was called to order at 7:35 PM.
Committee members in attendance were: R. D'Antona, D. Farnham, R. Grasso
J. Lupi, R. Sanstad, L. Selzer and D. Williams. Also in attendance were
Architect D. Finney, R. Radviile and K. Vaccaro, a reporter from the
Chronicle.
Each of the three projects were reviewed as follows:
Joshua Eaton
-D. Finney brought out the condition of the emergency generator currently
in use at the school. There seems to be some doubt as to the operability
of the unit. D. Farnham took the action to have this checked out ASAP by
school maintenance personnel.
-D. Finney brought out the fact that no funds are in the project for re-pair
or replacement of any portion of the tile roof. This was intentional in
view of the assurances by school maintenance personnel that the t~llas
were in relatively good condition. Recent examination by tsoe archiAfi=.xt
indicates that repairs/replacements may have to be made to the In
view of the fact that this is considered an operating expens; r ; :it : r; ea
in the capital plan) a meeting will be set up between Fifirr- Y - d aricl
D'Antona with Dr. Munnelly to appraise the Superintend'(rt cps 'ituation
and discuss the best approach to be taken. D'Antona has ths, ~ Ee:3f? to
schedule this meeting.
-D. Finney pointed out several potential problems involving the
Conservation Commission and a wetlands situation. He was a ?ke- to meet
with the ConsCom Administrator and any other interested parties to
resolve this as quickly as possible. D. Farnham offered his a6sistance, if
required.
Birch Meadow
-J. Lupi, the SBC liaison on the project, reported that the Clerk of the
Works position has been filled and the person is on board.
-It was brought out that in the day-to-day activities at the construction
site, circumstances arise which require a change order process which is
responsive to a quick turnaround situation. In view of the fact that Lupi is
our liaison, a motion was made which "provides Joe Lupi with a change
authorization limit of $5K." it was pointed out that this is relatively
standard in the industry. The vote was 7-0 in favor. Joe will report to
the committee on a regular basis regarding project status.
-It was brought up that the BIM construction did not start as planned due
to some informal communications with the contractor. R. Sanstad will
discuss this situation with the Superintendent and review the
communications process.
-D. Finney circulated a Furniture and Equipment proposal' to the
Superintendent which detailed a planned approach for procuring these
items by Design Partnership in exchange for a fee of $6K. Sanstad took
the action to discuss this with . Dr. Munneily with the thought that school
personnel could perform this service and save the fee.
-A discussion centered on the permit process for new construction. As
identified in the contract, the responsibility for obtaining permits lies
with the General Contractor on the project. , It was stressed to both the
Architect and our liaison that no construction was to begin until the
permits were in hand.
Parker Middle School
-The revised Ed Specs were reviewed again with the most recent changes
incorporated. They were held in abeyance until a future meeting as
additional changes may occur as we work the cost issues.
-D. Finney presented Options #5 & #6 with a detailed explanation and the
cost impact of each. Considerable discussion was held on these options
with no final conclusion being reached. The committee was asked to give
these options additional thought and be prepared to discuss them at the
next meeting.
-D. Farnham presented the results of his sub-committee analysis of
middle school population projections. His data indicates that the
Ensminger study is still valid and the need for additional middle school
classroom space reaches a critical point in September, 1996. At that
time, the student population significantly exceeds the capacity of the two
1~. middle schools.