Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-05-22 ad Hoc School Building Committee MinutesReading School Building Committee c/o Reading Public Schools 82 Oakland Roadu Reading, MA 01867 May 22, 2002 Edward R. Frenette, AIA Symmes Maini & McKee Associates 1000 Massachusetts Avenue \~V Cambridge, MA 02138 U U Dear Mr. Frenette: Thank you for your firm's response to the Reading School Building Committee's recent Request For Qualifications for schematic design services in the proposed renovation of Reading Memorial High School. Unfortunately, your firm is not among the three firms this Committee chose to interview as a next step in the selection process. However, if after these interviews, the Committee does not select one of those firms for the project, we will certainly re-consider your firm's qualifications. We will contact you directly if such a situation arises. The selection process should conclude over the next two to three weeks. Our selection of 3 firms to interview was not simple or easy. Our Architect Selection Subcommittee was given sixteen competent and thorough RFQs to review and report on to the full Committee. It was clear that each responding firm had made a strong effort to demonstrate its ability to perform the work we require. Consequently, the Subcommittee's deliberations were lengthy, and its recommendations to the full Committee, of necessity, passed over many capable candidates. Again, we thank you for your interest in this project. We do appreciate all the time, work, and expense that went in to submitting your response package. If the Committee ultimately does choose another firm, we hope that you will try again, should Reading issue other requests for architectural services in the coming years. S~x3 0:~ Sincerely, Dennis J. LaCroix Member, Reading School Building Committee Chair, Architect Selection Subcommittee cc: R. Graham, SBC Chair H. Harutunian, Superintendent Reading School Building Committee c% Reading Public Schools 82 Oakland Road Reading, MA 01867 May 23, 2002 Mark L. Sirulnik, AIA President Alderman & MacNeish 594 Riverdale Road West Springfield, MA 01089 Dear Mr. Sirulnik: Thank you for your firm's response to the Reading School Building Committee's recent Request For Qualifications for schematic design services in the proposed renovation of Reading Memorial High School. Unfortunately, your firm is not among the three firms this Committee chose to interview as a next step in the selection process. However, if after these interviews, the Committee does not select one of those firms for the project, we will certainly re-consider your firm's qualifications. We will contact you directly if such a situation arises. The selection process should conclude over the next two to three weeks. Our selection of 3 firms to interview was not simple or easy. Our Architect Selection Subcommittee was given sixteen competent and thorough RFQs to review and report on to the full Committee. It was clear that each responding firm had made a strong effort to demonstrate its ability to perform the work we require. Consequently, the Subcommittee's deliberations were lengthy, and its recommendations to the full Committee, of necessity, passed over many capable candidates. Again, we thank you for your interest in this project. We do appreciate all the time, work, and expense that went in to submitting your response package. If the Committee ultimately does choose another firm, we hope that you will try again, should Reading issue other requests for architectural services in the coming years. Sincerely, C 0 PY Dennis J. LaCroix Member, Reading School Building Committee Chair, Architect Selection Subcommittee cc: R. Graham, SBC Chair H. Harutunian, Superintendent Reading School Building Committee c% Reading Public Schools 82 Oakland Road Reading, MA 01867 May 23, 2002 Roger 0. Hoit, AIA Strekalovsky & Hoit, Inc. 51 North Street Hingham, Ma. 02043 Dear Mr. Hoit: Thank you for your firm's response to the Reading School Building Committee's recent Request For Qualifications for schematic design services in the proposed renovation of Reading Memorial High School. Unfortunately, your firm is not among the three firms this Committee chose to interview as a next step in the selection process. However, if after these interviews, the Committee does not select one of those firms for the project, we will certainly re-consider your firm's qualifications. We will contact you directly if such a situation arises. The selection process should conclude over the next two to three weeks. Our selection of 3 firms to interview was not simple or easy. Our Architect Selection Subcommittee was given sixteen competent and thorough RFQs to review and report on to the full Committee. It was clear that each responding firm had made a strong effort to demonstrate its ability to perform the work we require. Consequently, the Subcommittee's deliberations were lengthy, and its recommendations to the full Committee, of necessity, passed over many capable candidates. Again, we thank you for your interest in this project. We do appreciate all the time, work, and expense that went in to submitting your response package. If the Committee ultimately does choose another firm, we hope that you will try again, should Reading issue other requests for architectural services in the coming years. Sincerely, coo Dennis J. LaCroix Member, Reading School Building Committee Chair, Architect Selection Subcommittee cc: R. Graham, SBC Chair H. Harutunian, Superintendent Reading School Building Committee c% Reading Public Schools 82 Oakland Road Reading, MA 01867 May 23, 2002 Michael J. McKeon, AIA Vice President Kaestle Boos Associate, Inc. 124 Grove Street, Suite 215 Franklin, Ma. 02038 Dear Mr. McKeon: Thank you for your firm's response to the Reading School Building Committee's recent Request For Qualifications for schematic design services in the proposed renovation of Reading Memorial High School. Unfortunately, your firm is not among the three firms this Committee chose to interview as a next step in the selection process. However, if after these interviews, the Committee does not select one of those firms for the project, we will certainly re-consider your firm's qualifications. We will contact you directly if such a situation arises. The selection process should conclude over the next two to three weeks. Our selection of 3 firms to interview was not simple or easy. Our Architect Selection Subcommittee was given sixteen competent and thorough RFQs to review and report on to the full Committee. It was clear that each responding firm had made a strong effort to demonstrate its ability to perform the work we require. Consequently, the Subcommittee's deliberations were lengthy, and its recommendations to the full Committee, of necessity, passed over many capable candidates. Again, we thank you for your interest in this project. We do appreciate all the time, work, and expense that went in to submitting your response package. If the Committee ultimately does choose another firm, we hope that you will try again, should Reading issue other requests for architectural services in the coming years. Sincerely, r] COPY Dennis J. LaCroix Member, Reading School Building Committee Chair, Architect Selection Subcommittee cc: _ R. Graham, SBC Chair H. Harutunian, Superintendent Reading School Building Committee c% Reading Public Schools 82 Oakland Road Reading, MA 01867 May 23, 2002 Martin A. Kretsch, Principal The Office of Michael Rosenfeld, Inc. 543 Massachusetts Avenue West Acton, Ma. 01720 Dear Mr. Kretsch: Thank you for your firm's response to the Reading School Building Committee's recent Request For Qualifications for schematic design services in the proposed renovation of Reading Memorial High School. Unfortunately, your firm is not among the three firms this Committee chose to interview as a next step in the selection process. However, if after these interviews, the Committee does not select one of those firms for the project, we will certainly re-consider your firm's qualifications. We will contact you directly if such a situation arises. The selection process should conclude over the next two to three weeks. Our selection of 3 firms to interview was not simple or easy. Our Architect Selection Subcommittee was given sixteen competent and thorough RFQs to review and report on to the full Committee. It was clear that each responding firm had made a strong effort to demonstrate its ability to perform the work we require. Consequently, the Subcommittee's deliberations were lengthy, and its recommendations to the full Committee, of necessity, passed over many capable candidates. Again, we thank you for your interest in this project. We do appreciate all the time, work, and expense that went in to submitting your response package. If the Committee ultimately does choose another firm, we hope that you will try again, should Reading issue other requests for architectural services in the coming years. Sincerely, r] COPY Dennis J. LaCroix Member, Reading School Building Committee Chair, Architect Selection Subcommittee cc: _ R. Graham, SBC Chair H. Harutunian, Superintendent Reading School Building Committee c% Reading Public Schools 82 Oakland Road Reading, MA 01867 May 23, 2002 Owen Beenhouwer, AIA President Drummey Rosane Anderson, Inc. 141 Herrick Road, P.O. Box 299 Newton Centre, Ma. 02459-0299 Dear Mr. Beenhouwer: Thank you for your firm's response to the Reading School Building Committee's recent Request For Qualifications for schematic design services in the proposed renovation of Reading Memorial High School. Unfortunately, your firm is not among the three firms this Committee chose to interview as a next step in the selection process. However, if after these interviews, the Committee does not select one of those firms for the project, we will certainly re-consider your firm's qualifications. We will contact you directly if such a situation arises. The selection process should conclude over the next two to three weeks. Our selection of 3 firms to interview was not simple or easy. Our Architect Selection Subcommittee was given sixteen competent and thorough RFQs to review and report on to the full Committee. It was clear that each responding firm had made a strong effort to demonstrate its ability to perform the work we require. Consequently, the Subcommittee's deliberations were lengthy, and its recommendations to the full Committee, of necessity, passed over many capable candidates. Again, we thank you for your interest in this project. We do appreciate all the time, work, and expense that went in to submitting your response package. If the Committee ultimately does choose another firm, we hope that you will try.again, should Reading issue other requests for architectural services in the coming years. Sincerely, ri COPY Dennis J. LaCroix Member, Reading School Building Committee Chair, Architect Selection Subcommittee cc: R. Graham, SBC Chair H. Harutunian, Superintendent Reading School Building Committee c% Reading Public Schools 82 Oakland Road Reading, MA 01867 May 23, 2002 Jeffrey R. Davis, AIA Tappe Associates, Inc. Six Edgerly Place Boston, Ma. 02116 Dear Mr. Davis: Thank you for your firm's response to the Reading School Building Committee's recent Request For Qualifications for schematic design services in the proposed renovation of Reading Memorial High School. Unfortunately, your firm is not among the three firms this Committee chose to interview as a next step in the selection process. However, if after these interviews, the Committee does not select one of those firms for the project, we will certainly re-consider your firm's qualifications. We will contact you directly if such a situation arises. The selection process should conclude over the next two to three weeks. . Our selection of 3 firms to interview was not simple or easy. Our Architect Selection Subcommittee was given sixteen competent and thorough RFQs to review and report on to the full Committee. It was clear that each responding firm had made a strong effort to demonstrate its ability to perform the work we require. Consequently, the Subcommittee's deliberations were lengthy, and its recommendations to the full Committee, of necessity, passed over many capable candidates. Again, we thank you for your interest in this project. We do appreciate all the time, work, and expense that went in to submitting your response package. If the Committee ultimately does choose another firm, we hope that you will try again, should Reading issue other requests for architectural services in the coming years. Sincerely, n copy Dennis J. LaCroix Member, Reading School Building Committee Chair, Architect Selection Subcommittee cc: R. Graham, SBC Chair _ H. Harutunian, Superintendent Reading School Building Committee c% Reading Public Schools 82 Oakland Road Reading, MA 01867 May 23, 2002 R. John Dore President Dore & Whittier, Inc. 1400 Hancock Street Quincy, Ma. 02169 Dear Mr. Dore: Thank you for your firm's response to the Reading School Building Committee's recent Request For Qualifications for schematic design services in the proposed renovation of Reading Memorial High School. Unfortunately, your firm is not among the three firms this Committee chose to interview as a next step in the selection process. However, if after these interviews, the Committee does not select one of those firms for the project, we will certainly re-consider your firm's qualifications. We will contact you directly if such a situation arises. The selection process should conclude over the next two to three weeks. Our selection of 3 firms to interview was not simple or easy. Our Architect Selection Subcommittee was given sixteen competent and thorough RFQs to review and report on to the full Committee. It was clear that each responding firm had made a strong effort to demonstrate its ability to perform the work we require. Consequently, the Subcommittee's deliberations were lengthy, and its recommendations to the full Committee, of necessity, passed over many capable candidates. Again, we thank you for your interest in this project. We do appreciate all the time, work, and expense that went in to submitting your response package. If the Committee ultimately does choose another firm, we hope that you will try again, should Reading issue other requests for architectural services in the coming years. Sincerely, L1 COPY Dennis J. LaCroix Member, Reading School Building Committee Chair, Architect Selection Subcommittee - cc: - R. Graham, SBC Chair H. Harutunian, Superintendent Reading School Building Committee c% Reading Public Schools 82 Oakland Road Reading, MA 01867 May 23, 2002 Tom C. Peterman McManus Peterman Architects, Inc. 27 Moulton Street Cambridge, Ma. 02138 Dear Mr. Peterman: Thank you for your firm's response to the Reading School Building Committee's recent Request For Qualifications for schematic design services in the proposed renovation of Reading Memorial High School. Unfortunately, your firm is not among the three firms this Committee chose to interview as a next step in the selection process. However, if after these interviews, the Committee does not select one of those firms for the project, we will certainly re-consider your firm's qualifications. We will contact you directly if such a situation arises. The selection process should conclude over the next two to three weeks. Our selection of 3 firms to interview was not simple or easy. Our Architect Selection Subcommittee was given sixteen competent and thorough RFQs to review and report on to the full Committee. It was clear that each responding firm had made a strong effort to demonstrate its ability, to perform the work we require. Consequently, the Subcommittee's deliberations were lengthy, and its recommendations to the full Committee, of necessity, passed over many capable candidates. Again, we thank you for your interest in this project. We do appreciate all the time, work, and expense that went in to submitting your response package. If the Committee ultimately does choose another firm, we hope that you will try again, should Reading issue other requests for architectural services in the coming years. Sincerely, ci COPY Dennis J. LaCroix Member, Reading School Building Committee Chair, Architect Selection Subcommittee cc: - R. Graham, SBC Chair H. Harutunian, Superintendent Reading School Building Committee c% Reading Public Schools 82 Oakland Road Reading, MA 01867 May 23, 2002 Loren M. Belida, AIA Senior Vice President H.L. Turner Group, Inc. 27 Locke Road Concord, NH 03301-5417 Dear Ms. Belida: Thank you for your firm's response to the Reading School Building Committee's recent Request For Qualifications for schematic design services in the proposed renovation of Reading Memorial High School. Unfortunately, your firm is not among the three firms this Committee chose to interview as a next step in the selection process. However, if after these interviews, the Committee does not select one of those firms for the project, we will certainly re-consider your firm's qualifications. We will contact you directly if such a situation arises. The selection process should conclude over the next two to three weeks. Our selection of 3 firms to interview was not simple or easy. Our Architect Selection Subcommittee was given sixteen competent and thorough RFQs to review and report on to the full Committee. It was clear that each responding firm had made a strong effort to demonstrate its ability to perform the work we require. Consequently, the Subcommittee's deliberations were lengthy, and its recommendations to the full Committee, of necessity, passed over many capable candidates. Again, we thank you for your interest in this project. We do appreciate all the time, work, and expense that went in to submitting your response package. If the Committee ultimately does choose another firm, we hope that you will try again, should Reading issue other requests for architectural services in the coming years. Sincerely, LJ- Lury Dennis J. LaCroix Member, Reading School Building Committee Chair, Architect Selection Subcommittee cc: - R. Graham, SBC Chair _ H. Harutunian, Superintendent Reading School Building Committee c% Reading Public Schools 82 Oakland Road Reading, MA 01867 May 23, 2002 Hisham N. Ashkouri, Ph.D., AIA President ARCADD 1185 Washington Street West Newton, Ma. 02465 Dear Mr. Ashkouri: Thank you for your firm's response to the Reading School Building Committee's recent Request For Qualifications for schematic design services in the proposed renovation of Reading Memorial High School. Unfortunately, your firm is not among the three firms this Committee chose to interview as a next step in the selection process. However, if after these interviews, the Committee does not select one of those firms for the project, we will certainly re-consider your firm's qualifications. We will contact you directly if such a situation arises. The selection process should conclude over the next two to three weeks. Our selection of 3 firms to interview was not simple or easy. Our Architect Selection Subcommittee was given sixteen competent and thorough RFQs to review and report on to the full Committee. It was clear that each responding firm had made a strong effort to demonstrate its ability to perform the work we require. Consequently, the Subcommittee's deliberations were lengthy, and its recommendations to the full Committee, of necessity, passed over many capable candidates. Again, we thank you for your interest in this project. We do appreciate all the time, work, and expense that went in to submitting your response package. If the Committee ultimately does choose another firm, we hope that you will try again, should Reading issue other requests for architectural services in the coming years. . Sincerely, .41 U CVrY Dennis J. LaCroix Member, Reading.School Building Committee Chair, Architect Selection Subcommittee cc: R. Graham, SBC Chair H. Harutunian, Superintendent Reading School Building Committee c% Reading Public Schools 82 Oakland Road Reading, MA 01867 May 23, 2002 Frank Siraco, AIA Mount Vernon Group, Inc. 20 Cabot Road Woburn, Ma. 01801 Dear Mr. Siraco: Thank you for your firm's response to the Reading School Building Committee's recent Request For Qualifications for schematic design services in the proposed renovation of Reading Memorial High School. Unfortunately, your firm is not among the three firms this Committee chose to interview as a next step in the selection process. However, if after these interviews, the Committee does not select one of those firms for the project, we will certainly re-consider your firm's qualifications. We will contact you directly if such a situation arises. The selection process should conclude over the next two to three weeks. Our selection of 3 firms to interview was not simple or easy. Our Architect Selection Subcommittee was given sixteen competent and thorough RFQs to review and report on to the full Committee. It was clear that each responding firm had made a strong effort to demonstrate its ability to perform the work we require. Consequently, the Subcommittee's deliberations were lengthy, and its recommendations to the full Committee, of necessity, passed over many capable candidates. Again, we thank you for your interest in this project. We do appreciate all the time, work, and expense that went in to submitting your response package. If the Committee ultimately does choose another firm, we hope that you will try again, should Reading issue other requests for architectural services in the coming years. Sincerely, don Ll LVPY Dennis J. LaCroix Member, Reading School Building Committee Chair, Architect Selection Subcommittee - cc: R. Graham, SBC Chair H. Harutunian, Superintendent Reading School Building Committee c% Reading Public Schools 82 Oakland Road Reading, MA 01867 May 23, 2002 W. Eric Kluz, AIA HKT Architects, Inc. 35 Medford Street Somerville, Ma. 02143 Dear Mr. Kluz: Thank you for your firm's response to the Reading School Building Committee's recent Request For Qualifications for schematic design services in the proposed renovation of Reading Memorial High School. Unfortunately, your firm is not among the three firms this Committee chose to interview as a next step in the selection process. However, if after these interviews, the Committee does not select one of those firms for the project, we will certainly re-consider your firm's qualifications. We will contact you directly if such a situation arises. The selection process should conclude over the next two to three weeks. Our selection of 3 firms to interview was not simple or easy. Our Architect Selection Subcommittee was given sixteen competent and thorough RFQs to review and report on to the full Committee. It was clear that each responding firm had made a strong effort to demonstrate its ability to perform the work we require. Consequently, the Subcommittee's deliberations were lengthy, and its recommendations to the full Committee, of necessity, passed over many capable candidates. Again, we thank you for your interest in this project. We do appreciate all the time, work, and expense that went in to submitting your response package. If the Committee ultimately does choose another firm, we hope that you will try again, should Reading issue other requests for architectural services in the coming years. Sincerely, COP Dennis J. LaCroix Member, Reading School Building Committee Chair, Architect Selection Subcommittee cc: R. Graham, SBC Chair H. Harutunian, Superintendent Reading School Building Committee c% Reading Public Schools 82 Oakland Road Reading, MA 01867 May 23, 2002 Edward R. Frenette, AIA Symmes Maini & McKee Associates 1000 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 Dear Mr. Frenette: Thank you for your firm's response to the Reading School Building Committee's recent Request For Qualifications for schematic design services in the proposed renovation of Reading Memorial High School. Unfortunately, your firm is not among the three firms this Committee chose to interview as a next step in the selection process. However, if after these interviews, the Committee does not select one of those firms for the project, we will certainly re-consider your firm's qualifications. We will contact you directly if such a situation arises. The selection process should conclude over the next two to three weeks. Our selection of 3 firms to interview was not simple or easy. Our Architect Selection Subcommittee was given sixteen competent and thorough RFQs to review and report on to the full Committee. It was clear that each responding firm had made a strong effort to demonstrate its ability to perform the work we require. Consequently, the Subcommittee's deliberations were lengthy, and its recommendations to the full Committee, of necessity, passed over many capable candidates. Again, we thank you for your interest in this project. We do appreciate all the time, work, and expense that went in to submitting your response package. If the Committee ultimately does choose another firm, we hope that you will try again, should Reading issue other requests for architectural services in the coming years. Sincerely, copy Dennis J. LaCroix Member, Reading School Building Committee Chair, Architect Selection Subcommittee cc: R. Graham, SBC Chair H. Harutunian, Superintendent Reading School Building Committee c/o Reading Public Schools 82 Oakland Road Reading, MA 01867 May 22, 2002 Edward R. Frenette, AIA Symmes Maid & McKee Associates 1000 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 COPY Dear Mr. Frenette: Thank you for your firm's response to the Reading School Building Committee's recent Request For Qualifications for schematic design services in the proposed renovation of Reading Memorial High School. Unfortunately, your firm is not among the three firms this Committee chose to interview as a next step in the selection process. However, if after these interviews, the Committee does not select one of those firms for the project, we will certainly re-consider your firm's qualifications. We will contact you directly if such a situation arises. The selection process should conclude over the next two to three weeks. Our selection of 3 firms to interview was not simple or easy. Our Architect Selection Subcommittee was given sixteen competent and thorough RFQs to review and report on to the full Committee. It was clear that each responding firm had made a strong effort to demonstrate its ability to perform the work we require. Consequently, the Subcommittee's deliberations were lengthy, and its recommendations to the full Committee, of necessity, passed over many capable candidates. Again, we thank you for your interest in this project. We do appreciate all the time, work, and expense that went in to submitting your response package. If the Committee ultimately does choose another firm, we hope that you will try again, should Reading issue other requests for architectural services in the coming years. Sincerely, `S cc: R. Graham, SBC Chair H. Harutunian, Superintendent Dennis. J. LaCroix Member, Reading School Building Committee Chair, Architect Selection Subcommittee