HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-01-22 Conservation Commission MinutesCLERK
Reading Conservation Commission G , MASS.
Selectmen's Meeting Room, Town Hall
Monday, January 22, 2003 LUG J AR 13 2: 4 I
Present: Doug Greene, Chair; Pat Lloyd, Vice-Chair; Will Finch, Larry Goulet,
Commissioners; Leo Kenney, Consultant; Fran Fink, Administrator; Kelley Meier,
Recording Secretary.
Absent: Thad Berry, Karen Schneller, Commissioner; Harold Hulse, Consultant.
The meeting has been called to order at 7:20 PM.
Old/New Business
Walkers Brook Crossing, DEP 270-352, RGB 2001-14, Pre-Construction submittals
for approval
Brad Latham is present.
Ms. Fink updates Commission about some of the recent changes.
Ms. Lloyd moves to approve the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan. Mr. Finch
seconds. Voted in favor, 4-0-0.
Mr. Kenney arrives at 7:26 PM.
The Commission asked for specifications about which Vortechs model will be used at
each location on the site and for information on the bypass configuration and long-term
maintenance from the manufacturer.
The Commission asked for more information on the proposed pest management plan
(types of traps, locations of traps, frequency of inspection and removal of animals,
poisons used, ways to avoid trapping non-target species, etc.) Mrs. Fink will arrange a
meeting with the Health Director and the pest control consultant. The plan has not been
sent to the Board of Health.
Ms. Lloyd makes motion to authorize the Administrator to approve the Pest Management
Plan with agreement that there will be further discussion with and approval by the Board
of Health. Mr. Finch seconds. Voted in favor, 4-0-0.
Ms. Lloyd makes motion to approve the wetland restoration plan. Mr. Finch seconds.
Voted in favor, 4-0-0.
The contractor presented the proposed construction phasing plan. Phase 1 will include
construction vehicle access routes, installation of construction trailers, erosion control
barriers, temporary detention basins, and clearing and grubbing. Phase 2 is where the big
excavation will take place, retaining walls installed, and pilings and foundations for
buildings. The gas collection layer and cap will be installed. Furrows will be created in
the cap for later utilities. They will use the northwestern portion of-the site as -a staging - - -
area and will cap it last, unless tenants have been identified and are ready to build. Phase
3 will be the utilities, drainage layer, final grading and binder coat on paved areas. The
binder has to be finished by November 30, 2003. The completion of the project will be
April 2004, although some of the plants may or may not be put in due to the time that the
plants or shrubs can be put in. The roadway improvements will be done between April
and November 2003.
Mr. Latham would like the Commission to approve the time frame as shown tonight.
Ms. Lloyd moves to approve the work sequence. Mr. Finch seconds. Voted in favor, 4-
0-0.
8:05 PM - Public Hearing, Notice of Intent, 14 Strawberry Hill Lane, RGB 2002-35
Mark Favaloro, John Ogren, Nicole Hayes, and Mona DeAngelo were present.
Mr. Finch raised the subject of the filing fee under the Town Bylaw. The applicant has
requested a 75% reduction in the fee for work in vernal pool habitat. There was
discussion about the amount of time that might be spent on review and oversight of the
project. After some discussion, Mr. Favaloro withdrew the request to reduce the fee. Mr.
Ogren stated that the project would alter 2,835 square feet of vernal pool habitat on the
site, and the Commission determined that the filing fee for that alteration would be
52,835. Mrs. DeAngelo submitted a check for that amount.
The public hearing was opened at 8:20 PM.
The Commission discussed the HEP analysis prepared by Ms. Hayes.
Mr. Greene distributed copies of a study by DeMaynadier, et al, and questioned Ms.
Hayes's assumptions about the distances that wood frogs migrate. He noted that her
calculated HSI's showed no difference between the site with or without the proposed
house. He presented a revised set of calculations including a sixth variable to account for
the amount of closed tree canopy that did result in a difference with and without the
proposed house.
Ms. Hayes questioned whether the site had enough canopy at present to support a wood
frog population. She stated that she had added a fifth variable to her analysis to account
for changes in shrub canopy after consulting with Mr. McCoy in Pennsylvania, the author
of the model. She had assumed that a shrub canopy would provide half as much habitat
value as a tree canopy in her calculations, and had concluded that the applicant's
proposed addition of a shrub layer in the undisturbed forest on site would mitigate the
loss of the forest where the house was proposed. She went through her assumptions and
calculations in detail and explained that she had rounded certain numbers.
Mr. Finch asked why she had given the existing shrub layer a value of zero when her
previous analysis had documented 25% cover by shrubs. Ms. Hayes answered that the
25% was from one sample plot near the vernal pool, but that much of the site lacks a
shrub layer.
Mr. Finch asked whether the proposed shrubs would survive and cover 100% of the
-remaining forest, given the presence of Norway Maples which are known to release
chemicals that inhibit growth of other species. Ms. Hayes answered that juvenile frogs
really depend upon shrub cover and would benefit from more cover than the site has at
t 1 present.
Mr. Finch said that he understood that wood frogs need a forest canopy at least 20 meters
wide around a vernal pool. Ms. Hayes referred to the presence of forest off-site near the
pool, but acknowledged that the applicant does not control these areas.
Mr. Kenney questioned the rounding of certain numbers in the analysis, for example the
rounding of .067 acres to .06 acres. Ms. Hayes was not sure. Mr. Kenney suggested
using square feet instead of acres because the site is relatively small.
Ms. Lloyd announced that she had an obligation and had to leave the meeting. Due to the
absence of a quorum at that point, the hearing was continued to February 12 at 7:30 PM.
Ms. Fink handed out copies of Section 8-7 of the Town Home Rule Charter which sets
forth the number of votes needed in order for a multi-member board to pass a motion.
Mr. Ogren quoted the section of 310 CMR 10.00 which deals with the same question.
Mr. Favaloro said that the Charter probably overrules the state regulation. Ms. Fink will
check with Town Counsel.
Old/New Business
10 Cory Lane, DEP 270-287, RGB 2001-14, Grant of Conservation Restriction,
request for Certificate of Compliance and request for bond release
This matter requires a quorum and will be placed on the next agenda.
Annual Report of the Conservation Commission
This matter requires a quorum and will be placed on the next agenda.
49 Grey Coach Lane, Notice of Activity and Use Limitation, RTN 3-19494
Ms. Fink reported on information received from NEDT.
The applicant finished cleanup, except for a few puddles underneath the pilings under the
garage. There may be a deed restriction having the floor be kept in good condition.
There is a 45-day comment period. This matter will be brought to next meeting.
Ipswich River/I-93 Restoration project, DEP 270-246, RGB 1992-21, Request for
Certificate of Compliance
BSC submitted a final report on the restoration area and requested a COC. Everything
has been cleaned up and the wetlands have been restored. The Commission might want
to make a site inspection. This matter requires a quorum and will be placed on the next
agenda.
Sanborn Lane between #51 and #67, Comprehensive Permit Application
The applicant brought back a revised site plan. Ms. Fink shows the Commission the
revised plan. She goes over a draft memo to the ZBA dated 1/21/03. This will be sent to
ZBA for their meeting on February 6.
468 West Street, Comprehensive Permit Application
There is a new site plan for this site.
Ms. Fink passed out a memo to the ZBA dated 1/23/03. She goes over the site plan and
the memo. Ms. Fink will send out the memo to them tomorrow.
40-70 West Street, Comprehensive Permit Application
The applicant brought a one-sheet revised plan. They will be back for a hearing
tomorrow night.
Ms. Fink passes out a draft memo to the ZBA dated 1/23/02. Ms. Fink will send out the
memo to them tomorrow
Minor Projects - 33 Dividence Road and 166 Grove Street
This matter requires a quorum and will be placed on the next agenda..
Bedrock Well Exploration, Bare Meadow Conservation Area
Mrs. Fink reported that Peter Tassi had submitted a draft proposal by CDM for,
development of bedrock wells in Bare Meadow. Mr. Tassi requested comments from the
Commission. The Commission asked Mrs. Fink to invite Peter Tassi and Ted McIntire to
the next meeting to discuss the proposal.
The meeting ends at 10:10 PM.