HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-02-18 Board of Assessors Minutes"own of Reading
16 Lowell Street
Reading, MA 01867-2693
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
FAX: (617) 942-9070 61 942-902'
ASSESSORS MINUTES
FEBRUARY 18, 1992
MEETING WAS HELD AT 6:00 P.M.
APPOINTMENTS
NONE.
OLD BUSINESS
1. MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETINGS.
1/28/92 APPROVED 3-0-0.
2/4/92 - APPROVED. 2--0-0.
2/11/92 - APPROVED. 3-0-0.
2. ASST. APPRAISER REP'.)RT.
REVIEWED.
3. REVIEW OF MR. IPPOLITO'S APPLICATION.
CHECK LAND FOR ADJUSTMENTS.
4. REVIEW APPLICATIONS FOR ABATEMENT.
REVIEWED.
NEW BUSINESS
1. ARTICLE FOR TOWN MEETING.
NOTED.
CORRESPONDENCE
NOTED.
SIGNINGS
LEVY OF 1992 REAL ESTATE ABATEMENTS $ 1,456.81
F
- - -
r
E
s
W
d
i
f
ASSESSORS MINUTES (CONTD.)
PAGE 2.
FEBRUARY 18, 1992
SIGNINGS (CONTD.)
1991 MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE ABATEMENTS
1992 MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE ABATEMENTS
$
81.66
$
1500.42
LEVY OF 1992 EXEMPTIONS
$24,.775.00
END OF THE MONTH FIGURES JANUARY 1992:
1990 MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE,ABATEMENTS
1991 MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE`ABATEMENTS
$
81.25
1992 MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE ABATEMENTS
$
961`85
LEVY OF 1986 PERSONAL PROPERTY ABATEMENTS
$
3,816.25
LEVY OF 1987 PERSONAL PROPERTY ABATEMENTS
$
24.08
LEVY OF 1989 PERSONAL PROPERTY ABATEMENTS
$
272.61
LEVY OF 1990 PERSONAL PROPERTY ABATEMENTS
$
150.74
LEVY OF 1991 PERSONAL PROPERTY ABATEMENTS
$
2
09.22
209.22
LEVY OF 1992 ABATEMENTS
$
119.78
$9
2,670.45
LEVY OF 1992 PERSONAL PROPERTY ABATEMENT
_
$
66.42
GENERAL BUSINESS WAS CONDUCTED.
MR. NILS L.'NORDBERG, CHAIRMAN, MR. DAVID R. NUGENT AND MR.
WERE PRESENT AT THIS MEETING.
ROBERT I. NORDSTRAND ,
TO BOARD OF ASSESSORS
FROM : JULIE COSENTINO
_ I - :-P -O~.R..E_S_a _.R.E.P.O-R T_ _.._FF B.R U_A.R 8 _ 9-~2----------------
4
INSPECTIONS: FEBRUARY 12, 1992 FEBRUARY 18,.1992
6
- S A U E-S __V E_R_1-F I. c A_1.. I-O N...._._1_N S P.E. C -I-O-N _ -
1 REGULAR REINSPECTION
9 I TOTAL. INSPECTIONS
{
TO DATE: 2376 FULL INSPECTIONS
2 876 EXTERIOR ONLY
7
~,S~ I HAVE BEEN PREPARING INFORMATION FOR THE DATA QUALITY STUDY
W-H- "C"H--M'UST----81_--OONE_ FOR THE 199:3 REVALUATION. THIS INVOLVES
IDENTIFYINGALL FULLY I:NSPECI`ED PROPERI°I_S AND RANDOrILY SELECTING
i„ A GROUP WHICH COMPRISES APPROXIMATELY 5% OF THE RESIDENTIAL DATA BASE.
22
I 23 -COST DIFFERENCE BETWEEN OUR RECORDS ON FILE AND THE FINDINGS OF
i2,4 THE INSPECTION REPORT. THE INSPECTION REPORT FROM EACH RECORD IN THE
G'R*G.U.T,..-.M.US_.T...__.B_E..__PULLED AND COMPARED To .(`HE INFORMA'T'ION WHICH HAS BEEN
2. f, ON FILE TO DETERMINE THE ACCURACY OF THAT INFORMATION. AS OF THIS DATE
360 RECORDS HAVE BEEN IOENTII IED AND EXAMINED. I AM PRESENTLY MAKING
_°_^_G t I CrF ~t-L-L T H E S E~ t E C D R Cl S T H ra E x T..... S.T E-P--.I_N V O L V E-S _ C H A N G_1 N .G--E-A-C-H- -
r,
COPIED RECORD TO REFLECT THE`CHANGES THAT HAVE BEEN NOTED. COST'S WILL
30) THEN- BE RUN TO DETERMINE ANY 10% COST DIFFERENCES. -
31
32
33 DAVE BIL.LARD WAS..HERE ON THURSDAY. HE TOOK NOTE OF THE PROGRESS
34'''-_ -(9N~it DATA Q~7AC7 IY-STitDYvAND A1~PFtOt/ECI-OF___-THE __PROCEDURiES 1`AF EN JO' FAF~. -
35
35
37 -
38 -
39!
r
40
41
42
43 .
44 -
45
46
54
555
6