Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-03-03 Board of Assessors MinutesOFR Town of Reading CIO 16 Lowell Street `~o~. '•,a Reading, MA 01867-2693 639' NCO4Q0¢P BOARD OF ASSESSORS FAX: (617) 942-9070 (617) 942-9027 ASSESSORS MINUTES MARCH 3, 1992 MEETING WAS HELD AT 6:00 P.M. APPOINTMENTS NONE. OLD BUSINESS 1. MINUTES..OF PREVIOUS MEETING. APPROVED. 3-0-0. 2. REVIEW APPLICATIONS FOR ABATEMENT. HOLD. NEW BUSINESS 1. COPY OF C.P.D.C. MASTER PLAN. RECEIVED. 2. COPY OF LETTER FROM WILLIAM DIAMOND - READING RIFLE AND REVOLVER CLUB, INC. RECEIVED. SEND PETER OUR FILE INFORMATION. 3. APPROVAL OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY DUES. APPROVED 6 PEOPLE. SUBMIT TO TOWN MANAGER. 4. DISCUSS ASSESSORS' FILE DRAWERS. CLEAN OUT. 5. DISCUSS PRINTING CAMA BOOK OF ALL PROPERTIES FOR COUNTER USE - ELIMINATE CLERICAL TIME PULLING FIELD CARDS. DISCUSSED. 6. DISCUSS PRICE OF COPIES OF FIELD CARDS - CURRENTLY 50¢. CHECK REVENUE, COST AND COMPARE CHARGES FOR COPY SERVICE. 7. DISCUSS CHARGE FOR REPAIR PLATES FOR EXCISE. BOTH PLATE AND EXCISE. ASSESSOR PAGE 2 • MARCH 3, 1992 C, ORBES~DENCE RECEIVED. SIG` INCS LEVY OF 1992 REAL ESTATE ABATEMENTS 1991 MOTOR VEHICLE 1 992 MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE ABATEMENTS EXCISE ABAT $ 117.28 EMENTS ADVANCE PAYMENTS $ 238.54 _ HOUSE CONN. RESCINDED $2,438,.21 1988 EXCISE ABATEMENTS: $ 226.38 1987 1982 1981 1980 $ 18.75 $ 1979 18.75 $ 6.25 END ON. MONTH.FI LEVY OF 1 RES _ FEB $ 7.50 $ 19.80 $ 990 AB RUARY 1992: EMENTS LEVY OF 199 6.25 1 ABAT LEVY OF 1992 EMENTS ABATEMENT S GENERAL --.;,BUSINE SS WAS $ 73.29 10 291 - CON~CT` ~ -CONDUCTED NILS L. NORDBER . X38, 452.87 G PRESENT FOR , CHAIN, MR. DAVID THIS MEETIN R G. . NUGENT ' AND MR. ROBERT I. NORDSTRAND WERE ADJOURNED. TOWN OF R FADING BOARD OF AS:SE=:SSO 2'': DATA QUALITY STUD FEBRUARY 20, 1992 PREPARED BY JULIE COSENlTNO 1. A LIST WAS RUN OF ALL PROPERTIES FULLY INSPECTED FROM EAi L'I' JANUARY OF 1990 WHEN THE INSPECTION PROCESS BEGAN UNTIL FEBRUARY OF 1992. AS OF THE DATE OF THE RUN WE HAD INSPECTED A TOTAL OF 3248 PROPERTIES OF WHICH 2367 WERE FULL. INSPE:C`I°IONS. THIS, REPRESENTS A 73% ENTRY RATE. ALL OF THE FULLY-INSPECTED PROPERTIES HAVE BEEN BROUGHT UP TO DATE IN THE CAMA SYSTEM. 2. IN ORDER TO GET A 5% SAMPLING OF OUR RESIDENTIAL BASE OF 6600 RECORDS, I PULLED EVERY SEVENTH RECORD OF THE. FULLY IN`PE:C:iI:_D PROPERTIES. 3_ 346 RECORDS WERE SELECTED AND EXAMINED FOR CHANGE$ FOUND DIJF;=i'N(, THE INSPECTION PROCESS. 4, OF THESE 346 PROPERTIES, 95 WERE IDENTIFIED AS HAVING CHANGFI; WHICH COULD PRODUCE A SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCE IN VALUATION. THOSE PROPERTIES WHICH WERE ALTERED AND IPdSPLC:TED DLL TO lHf PERMIT PROCESS WERE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS GROUP OF 95. 5, USING THE CAMA SYSTEM, IMADE COPIES OF EACH OF THE 95 CHOSEN RECORDS. THE ORIGINAL WAS LEFT INTACT WITH THE UP TO DATE INFORMATION UNTOUCHED. THE COPY WAS CHANGED TO REFLECT" THE PROPERTY AS IT WAS ON FILE BEFORE INSPECTION. 6. I RAN COSTS ON BOTH THE ORIGINAL RECORD AND ITS ALTERED COPY USING THE SAME COST TABLES AND YEAR FOR DEPRECIATION. . 7. I CALCULATED THE COST DIFFERENCE FOR EACH PROPERTY AND THEN FOUND THE PER CENT OF COST CHANGE BY COMPARING THL DIFFERENCE TO THE VALUATION ON THE PROPERTY BEFORE INSPECTION. 8. I PLAN TO CONTINUE TO INSPECT THE REMAINDER OF THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES ACCORDING TO A SCHEDULE IN WHICH THE PROCESS WILL. BE COMPLETE BY THE FALL OF 1993. FINDINGS A< 1: ONLY 4 PROPERTIES WERE FOUND TO HAVE A CHANGE. GREATER THAN 10%. ALL FOUR OF THESE INCREASED BY GREiATER. THAN 10%. THFRQ WE RL: NONE.. THAT DECREASED BY MORE THAN 30%. 2: ALL OF THESE 4 PROPERTIES REQUIRED AN INTERIOR INSPECTION To DETERMINE THE GREATER THAN 10% CHANGE, Bo 1o DROPPING THE DIFFERENCE IN CHANGE TO 8%, I FOUND 8 PROPERTIES WHICH HAD CHANGES IN COST OF GREATER THAN 8% BUT LESS THAN 10%. OF THESE, 5 WERE INCREASE`; IN VALUATION, 3 WERE DECREASES, 2: ALL OF THESE 8 PROPERTIES REQUIRED AN INTERIOR INSPFCTTON TO DETERMINE THE 8% 10% CHANGE IN VALUATION. TO BOARD OF nS3E3SO&,, FROM JULIE: CO E.:NTINO PC PROGRESS REPORT MARCH 3, 1992 1. DATA QUALITY STUDY IS COMPLETE. REPORT IS AVAILABLE FOR ASSESSORS' MEETING MARCH 3. 1992 DAVE BIL.LARD HAS SEEN THE REPORT AND SUGGESTED SOME CHANGE . WI-ITCH HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED INTO THIS DRAFT OF THE REPORT, 2. TWO HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS, E MILIO MAURO AND JAMES IHOMAS,, lil'VE STARTED WORKING ON THE INCOMPLETE SKETCHES UNDER MY DIREC'T'ION. AFTER ONE WEEK THEY CONTINUE TO NEED SOME HELP, BUT THEIR WORK IS IMPROVING STEADILY. 3,. I ATTENDED A WORKSHOP AT THE DOi ON THURSDAY MORNING. lHF WORK- SHOP FOCUSED ON DEVELOPMENT OF LAND TABLES FOR THE CAMA SYSTEM, AS WELL AS USE OF THE LAND SCREEN IN THE SYSTEM. IF PRovimt) A BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF HOW A VALUE IS DETERMINED. IT ALSO SUGGESTED WAYS TO BREAK UP A NEIGHBORHOOD INTO D3 FE:RFNT C:l=Eb, THIS IS SOMETHING WE COULD USE IN WORKING ON OUR NEIGHBORHOOD MAP.