Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-10-18 Board of Selectmen HandoutTOWN MANAGER'S REPORT Tuesday, October 18, 2005 ♦ We have gotten proposals to replace the American Flag on the common. The flag came down in a severe windstorm, and we need a steeplejack to replace it. The community response was excellent. ♦ We have received an updated Historical inventory from the Historical Commission ♦ We have received 2 donations for the playground at Memorial Park. These donations combined with Town funds will allow us to move forward with this project, hopefully to be completed this fall. ♦ In the draft State Supplemental budget is an additional $325,000 funding for Franklin Street sidewalks and $200,000 in matching funds for recreation improvements. * The Town has long sought the position of a School Resource Officer, and the School Committee recently voted to support such a position at the Subsequent Town Meeting. * Verizon Wireless Store is holding a ribbon cutting at their new store on Walkers Brook Drive – Thursday, at 1:30. * Reading's application for the MWRA supplemental water buy-in is scheduled for action on October 20 at the MWRA Advisory Board, and then on November — for the MWRA Board. + The RPD will be running an Auto Glass etching program to deter auto theft – DPW Garage – October 22, 9 am to 1 PM * The annual Halloween parade is October 23. * Household Hazardous Waste Collection – Wakefield High October 29, 8:30 am to 12 noon * Overnight parking ban starts November 1 ♦ The Police Department is making a Reverse 911 call to the community re: car breaks. ♦ There was a South Main Street utility pole down across part of Main Street yesterday morning. There was a full response from all Town Departments and the issue was resolved before rush hour. + "Farmers Market "Tuesday at Rotary Square through October. 2 to 6 PM * Road reconstruction on Berkley, Gleason, and Greenwood – hopefully beginning next week. %J October 25, 2005 7:00 Adopt an Island Reception - Sr. Ctr. 7:00 Traffic Issues - Avalon Stop sign 7:45 Review Wood End School area operation 8:15 Report of lighting consultant - Jordan's 9:00 Review Town Meeting warrant Review action status reports November 1, 2005 7:00 OFFICE HOURS - Ben Tafoya a 6:30 Highlights snow plowing 7:30 lFollow -up on Dangerous Dogs %J Hearing No parking on north side of Melbourne between Summer and Buckingham Review Memorial Park - status of contacting heirs Consideration of a band stand at Town Hail Hearing Board of Selectmen policies 5 and 6, and Affordable Housing local preference November 7, 2005- Verizon Hearing? November 8, 2005 7:00 Hearing Tax Classification 7:30 Discussion - Siting of Water Treatment Plant 8:00 November 14, 2005 -- TOWN MEETING 11/15/2005 WORKSHOP MEETING 7:00 Addison Wesley Traffic Presentation 7:30 Discussion on dangerous dogs November 17, 2005 -TOWN MEETING ;. November 21, 2005 - TOWN MEETING . d Page I of 1 HechenblefteK, Peter From: Cormier, Jinn Sent: Tueaday, October 18, 20059:30 AM To: Hechenbleikner, Peter The school comm. meeting went well. They voted unanimously to support the 1/2 year inbtiativain Nov. otTown Meeting. VVe are sending out aR-S11 message re: car breaks. We've had a rash of them all unlocked, we're reminding people to lock their cars. VVe started ityesterday. | received some positive feedback last night at the meeting re: this, |f you get any comments, pos. or neg. please let rneknow. Jimmy I[/l8/2005 Page 1 of 1 Hechenblefter, Peter From: Wendy Bulawa [ wendy @thomsoncommunications.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 11:46 AM To: Camille Anthony forwading account; James Bonazoli forwarding account; jduffy @ci.reading.ma.us; btafoya @ci.reading.ma.us; Rick Schubert Multiple Addresses Cc: Reading - Selectmen Subject: Ribbon Cutting - Reading Good morning: I'm sending this email as a follow up to a letter sent early last week inviting members from the Town of Reading Board of Selectmen to attend the official ribbon cutting /grand opening of the new Verizon Wireless store in Reading. The company has opened doors to a new retail location at The Crossings at Walkers Brook; 44 Walkers Brook Drive (adjacent to Home Depot and Jordan's Furniture) and this Thursday, October 20th, will be cutting the ribbon to celebrate! Sandra Brettschneider, Verizon Wireless District Manager will be on hand, and through Verizon Wireless' corporate philanthropic program HopeLine, a donation of cash will be given to the Reading Police Department in support of Domestic Violence Awareness Month. Chief James Cormier will be in attendance. Again, we wanted to invite members from the Selectmen's office to attend if schedules permit so that we may introduce you to our new Reading store manager, Taylor Bunnell and her team. We are excited to become a part of the Reading community, and hope to see you on Thursday at 1:30 p.m. for the ribbon cutting. If you need to reach me with additional questions or to RSVP, please contact me at 617.851.3426 or via email at wendy @thomsoncommunications.com. Regards, Wendy AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Wendy Bulawa - - -for VERIZON WIRELESS New England 617 -851 -3426 wendy@thomsoncommunications.com thomsoncommunications.com www.verizonwireless.com 10/18/2005 Page 1 of 2 Hechenbleikner, Peter From: cnj4@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2005 11:07 AM To: Luisa.Paiewonsky@state.ma.us; Bob. Frey@state.ma. us; jcorey@ci.woburn.ma.us; rick.marquis@fhwa.dot.gov; Schubert, Rick; canthony@cdmtitle.com; jebarnes@mit.edu; bruen-n- bruen@comcast.net; rep. paulcasey@hou.state. ma. us; dac@cummings.com; jcurran@ci.woburn.ma.us; rnrchambercom@aol.com; Ian. Durrant@state.ma.us; rep. mikefesta @hou. state.ma.0 s; jgallagher@mapc.org; mgailerani@ci.stoneham.ma.us; rgrover@ci.stoneham.ma.us; ehamblin@aol.com; rhavern@senate.state.ma.us; rep.bradleyjones@hou.state.ma.us; g-r@comcast.net; anthonykennedy@comcast.net; akinsman@aaasne.com; cleiner@massport.com; woburnbusiness@earthlink.net; pau Iderman @prodigy. net; andy.mofter@fta.dot.gov; rep. patricknatale@hou.state. ma.us; maureen@northsuburbanchamber.com; sueandmikes@comcast.net; psodano@stonesay.com; rstinson@wakefield.ma.us; dansuilivan@assetleasing.com; etarallo@ci.woburn.ma.us; rtisei@senate.state.ma.us; billwhome@juno.com; swoelfel@mbta.com Cc: jbiaustein@mapc.org; mary.burggraff@hou.state.ma.us; melissa.Gallan@hou.state.ma.us; tricia@lynchassociates.net; dcooke@vhb.com; ddizoglio@mbta.com; mdraisen@mapc.org; Margaret.Dwyer@state.ma.us; Adriel.Edwards@state.ma.us; rflorino@ci.stoneham.ma.us; Joshua. G rzegorzewski@fhwa.d ot.gov; Town Manager; Michael. Lindstrom@ state. ma.us; blucas@mapc.org; elutz@hshassoc.com; amckinnon@hshassoc.com; John. Mcvann@fhwa.dot.gov; Kenneth. Miller@state.ma.us; carmen.o'rourke@hou.state.ma.us; jpurdy@louisberger.com; Reilly, Chris; wschwartz@neighborhoodamerica.com; kstein@hshassoc.com; Tafoya, Ben; frederick.vanmagness@hou.state.ma.us; mossywood@juno.com Subject: TERMINATION OF THE FEASIBILITY STUDY Commissioner Luisa Paiewonsky, Manager Bob Frey: It occurred to me recently that no one bothered to define what is meant by "feasibility" (i.e., after 15 Task Force meetings). I sought to remedy that deficiency with a working definition of "feasibility" in my email sent to you on 10/12/05. That email with its attachment showed that this current feasibility study cannot demonstrate "feasibility" because you have provided no engineering methods to compare cost versus benefits regarding accident reduction and congestion mitigation for a given redesigned interchange. That is highly regrettable given the 8 years and at least $lM allotted by the Massachusetts Highway Department (MHD) to the interchange studies. Looking at the agenda for tomorrow's Task Force meeting, I noticed that you have not given me the 20 minutes that I requested in order to explain my recent papers regarding the definition of "feasibility" and related implications for this project. Your agenda conveys the impression that you are attempting to ignore this thorny issue of "feasibility" and push on with your "solutions." You also refer to my work as mere ITF correspondence. Thank you for the professional courtesy. Unless someone has a compelling suggestion to the contrary (complete with references), I strongly urge my colleagues on the Task Force to VOTE to terminate this second feasibility study. This study is fatally flawed. If you insist on going forward with a study having no redeeming value, then be prepared to defend it during the forthcoming public meetings. Members in the audience will ask tough questions (Trust ine-this will happen). In the event that you decide to terminate this study, then you may want to consider an alternative program that offers a clear path to address all the objectives that I have raised. A preliminary description of that program is attached. It also includes a program kick off workshop with several nationally recognized experts in the fields of accident reduction and congestion mitigation. I hasten to point out that neither the first nor the second feasibility studies ever solicited input from such 10/18/2005 Page 2 of 2 nationally recognized experts. During my involvement in these feasibility studies, I have never once encountered even one technical paper written by MHD staff on accident reduction or congestion mitigation. (Would you care to check my file boxes of papers and reports ?) This morning, I examined the LBG proposal from December 19, 2003 and noticed that none of the principal engineers ever worked on a major interchange. It's about time that significant engineering expertise is applied to this program. After all, public safety is worth it, isn't it? Regards, Jeff Jeffrey H. Everson, Ph.D. Principal Investigator, Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Member: PRESERVE, I93/95 Task Force 21 Pine Ridge Circle, Reading, MA 01867 781 - 944 -3632 (home); 781 - 684 -4247 (work); cnj4 @aol.com 10/18/2005 Third Feasibility Study of the I93/95 Interchange October 19, 2005 This document represents a "work in progress" effort on my part to convince the 193/95 Task Force that the second feasibility study is fatally flawed and that a follow -on study is required to rectify the serious deficiencies of this second feasibility study. After 15 meetings spanning a couple of years, I am certain that we are all quite tired of this entire "process." However, since the Massachusetts Highway Department (MHD) has unlimited time (8 years) and money (at least $1M) for this study "process," it is not too much too ask that the interchange and connecting highways be examined as to the nature of the "real problems." The rest of this document offers a path that will optimize both accident reduction and congestion mitigation for the 193/95 interchange and connecting highways extending far enough beyond the interchange so that a truly regional solution can be implemented. The vision for this path will be provided by several of the nation's leading experts on transportation safety and traffic flow. The MHD has never included them in either the first or the second feasibility studies. There is no way that the second feasibility study can develop a regional solution based on the myopic focus provided by the current use of the micro simulation software package (CORSIM). Reasons for a Third Feasibility Study: The second feasibility study (September 2002 — October 2005) is unable to estimate a numerical reduction in accidents for a given redesign of the interchange because the MHD has no methods to make this estimation. An estimate of the numerical reduction in accidents could be translated into a dollar value and compared with the cost to design, build and maintain a modified interchange. Similarly, the MM has no method to estimate a reduction in travel time from home to office for a typical commuter. A reduction in time could be converted into a dollar value and compared with the cost to design, build and maintain a modified interchange. Given these serious deficiencies in study approach by the MHD, this second "feasibility" study is unable to demonstrate feasibility. Consequently, the 193/95 Task Force will be unable to come to consensus on which alternative interchange design makes sense in terms of benefits versus cost. Thus, the Task Force is deprived of any meaningful work and, therefore, this second feasibility study should be terminated immediately. The first feasibility study of the 193/95 interchange suffered from the same study defects and was suspended by Commissioner Cogliano due to a major community protest on the egregious use of eminent domain by the MHD affecting approximately 90 homes in the vicinity of the interchange. Outline of the Third Feasibility Study: The third feasibility study will have the following goals: GOALS • Define a study that includes the 193/95 interchange and connecting roadways to an extent where these connecting roadways no longer influence the interchange and vice versa. • Reduce accidents to a level consistent with traffic volume traversing a redesigned interchange • Decrease travel time for a typical commuter traveling from home -to- office such that this decrease will be consistent and noticeable by commuters. • Develop modified interchange designs and connecting roadway links as needed by considering the effects of accident reduction and congestion mitigation simultaneously. • Develop interchange and highway modifications with regard to sustainability in conjunction with other transportation modes, such as transit and rail. (i.e., Sustainability refers to the well known notion, "If you build it, they will come. ") The third feasibility study will sustain the following objectives: OBJECTIVES Accident Data Issues Determine the usefulness of accident data gathered from 2002 onward. Determine the extent to which accident data can have missing elements and still be useful for a feasibility study. Incorporate changes, if any, to the third feasibility study according to a ruling from the Office of Inspector General (OIG) regarding the alleged fraudulent use of accident data known by the MHD to be worthless during the first and second feasibility studies. Estimation of Accident Reduction Percentage Develop analysis tools to estimate accident reduction percentages based on proposed redesigned interchange /highways. Traffic Flow Simulation • Develop and/or modify software to replicate traffic flow through the interchange and along connecting roadways consistent with the defined study area. • Use software to replicate traffic flow to determine estimated travel reduction time, if any, for a typical commuter traversing a redesigned interchange from home to office. Impacts of both Accident Reduction and Traffic Flow Improvement Develop a procedure to iterate the use of accident reduction prediction software with macro /micro traffic flow simulation software for a given proposed interchange design (i.e., address the problem of accidents and traffic flow in tandem). Develop a method to compare accident reduction benefits and travel time savings benefits for a given redesigned interchange/highway modification versus the cost to design build and maintain a modified interchange/highway segment. Mitigating Impacts due to Rail and Transit • Determine how the effects of a redesigned interchange /highway segment could be made less severe by offsetting affects due to transit or rail services. The third feasibility study will be divided into the three phases: PHASE I Purpose: assess several engineering analysis methods to estimate accident reduction percentages, traffic flow (both on a small and large scale), cost comparison methods of proposed alternative interchange/highway designs, and coupled with the inclusion of other transportation modes. During this phase, the MHD will conduct a formal audit of accident data acquired from 2002 onward and determine how many missing data elements from police reports are acceptable for feasibility study work. Task 1. Workshop The assessment of methods will be initiated by a multi day workshop that will include nationally recognized experts from government, academia and industry in fields of transportation safety and traffic flow. A suggested list of such experts is given below: • Mr. Michael Griffith, Federal Highway Administration • Mr. Joe Bared, Federal Highway Administration • Dr. Richard Dowling, Transportation Research Board, and Dowling Associates • Dr. Rich Margiotta, Cambridge Systematics • Prof. Bhagwant Persaud, Ryerson University • Dr. Ezra Hauer, Prof.. Emeritus, University of Toronto • Prof. David Harkey, University of North Carolina • Mr. Warren Hughes, P.E., Bellomo -McGee • Mr. Doug Harwood, Midwest Research Institute I selected these individuals because, in many cases, I read some of their papers and/or talked with them. They are premier people in their fields. None of their works has been utilized for either the first or second feasibility studies. To the best of my knowledge, none of these experts in traffic flow and transportation safety have ever used the engineering design services of a heterogeneous group ofpeople without any relevant engineering experience. The results of this workshop will be distilled into a plan of action (i.e., a final report) and made available in CD format. This plan will include a (1) procedure to develop software for prediction of accident reduction percentages for interchanges and connecting highway facilities, (2) development and/or modification of traffic flow simulation software for both micro and macro traffic flow, and (3) development and/or acquisition of methods to compare cost versus benefits regarding interchanges and/or highway facilities. A Request for Response (RFR) will be prepared by the MHD to solicit contract support for the development of tools and capabilities based on items 1 -3 above. Task 2. Formal Accident Data Audit Task 3. Assessment of Accident Data Quality 3 O This Phase entails the actual development of. (1) procedure to develop software for prediction of accident reduction percentages for interchanges and connecting highway facilities, (2) development/modification of traffic flow simulation software for both micro and macro traffic flow, and (3) development and/or acquisition of methods to compare cost versus benefits regarding interchanges and/or highway facilities. During this phase, use of the tools developed during Phase II will be undertaken with respect to the 193/95 interchange and connecting highways. Submitted by: Jeffrey H. Everson, Ph.D. Principal Investigator, Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Member: PRESERVE, I93/95 Task Force 21 Pine Ridge Circle, Reading, MA 01867 781- 944 -3632 (home); 781- 684 -4247 (work); cni4@aol.com rI Date: 10/13/05 To: Peter Hechenbleikner, Town Manager F-rom:John Feudo, Recreation Administra RE: Memorial Playground Donation Please inform the Board of Selectmen that the Atwood family of 361 Charles made a very generous donation ($1000) toward the playground project at Memorial Park. I have attached a letter as well for you. I expect the Memorial Park Playground project to be completed sometime in November. I have attached a photo of the proposed playground. Let me know if you have any questions. M i.,��' Q 3 4� � I� I J• �J Fax: (781) 942 -5441 Website: www.ci.reading.ma.us Dear Residents: Town t o F Reading P /i PUBLIC WORKS (781) 942 -9076 October 14, 2005 The Town of Reading and its contractor, Brox Industries, will begin reconstruction work on Berkeley Street, Gleason Road, and Greenwood Road beginning the end of next week. Work is expected to take about four weeks to complete, weather permitting. Work will commence each day at 7:00 A.M. and end at approximately 4:30 P.M. Please use caution when traveling along the street during the construction period. Vehicles will not be allowed to park on the travel way during construction. Vehicles parked on the street during the hours of construction will be towed at the owners' expense. During this project, on your day for collection of rubbish, all rubbish must be at the curb by 6:30 A.M. Please be advised that due to the State of Emergency in New Hampshire currently brought on by severe flooding, Brox Industries may be forced to assist in the New Hampshire cleanup. If this happens and the contractor cannot begin as originally scheduled, work will be postponed until Spring. The Town of Reading will be working diligently to expedite the work on your street and we thank you for your continued support. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this issue please feel free to contact the Town of Reading Engineering Division at (781) 942 -9082, Monday through Friday between the hours of 8:30 A.M. and 4:45 P.M. Additional infonnation and updates can also be found on the Town's website at: www.ci.reading.ma.us (look for the "What's New" link at the top of the page) i � r The Reading- klorth Reading chamber of (Rommerce t cordially invites you to attend The Outstanding e` 62en .Award 1 inner honoring (f John Morton and Art Triglione .i 1, 1 ;4 The Thompson G9lub 20 Elm Street, Ylorth Reading, MA Saturday, Ylovember /9, 2005 6:00 p.m. Goochtails and Hors d'oeuvres Surf & `turf (90 f f ee and (Dessert $50 per person Entertainment provided by Rure Energy Entertainment featuring Johnny is Tease send your check payable to the: Reading- Vlorth Reading chamber of eommerce R.O. 33ox 771, Reading, MA o/867 Phone 781 -944 -8824 Hechenblefter, Pete From: uo Sent October 1/.2UV5 9:548M To: Corey, John; Marquis, Rick Camille; Barnes, Jonathon'Bruen Darlene; Casey, Paul; Clarke, Dennis; Curran, John; DiBlasi, Joe; Durrant, Ian; Everson, Jeff; Festa, Mike; Gallagher, Jim; Gallerani, Michael; Grover, Robert; Hamblin, Eileen; Havern, Robert; Jones, Bradley; Katsoufis, George; Kennedy, Anthony; Kinsman, Art; Leiner, Craig; Meaney, Paul; Medeiros, Paul; Motter, Andrew; Natale, Patrick; Rogers, Maureen A.; Smith, Susan; Sodano, Paul; Stinson, Richard; Sullivan, Dan; Tarallo, Ed; Tisei, Richard; Webster, Bill; VVuelfe|,Steve Co; Blaustein, J Burggraff, W1 Callan, MeUaoo'ChhsteUu Thda'Coohe Don' DiZbo|io, Dennis; Draisen, Mark; Dwyer, Margaret; Edwards, Adriel; Florino, Ron; Frey, Bob; Grzegorzewski, Josh; Town Manager; Lindstrom, Mike; Lucas, Barbara; Lutz, Elaine; McKinnon, Anne; K4ovmnn.John; Miller, Kenneth; O'Rourka' Carmen; Purdy, Jim; Reilly, Chris; Bill; Stein Tafova' Ben; Van Magness, Frederick; Wood, Gail Subject: Agenda for 10/19 ITF meeting UD [TF20UG10-19 neeting agenda... Hello Again Task Force Members, Just a reminder that the next 93/95 ZTF Meeting is this Wednesday I0/I9 in Stoneham. The agenda is attached: <<ZTF 2005 I0-19 meeting ageuda.doc>» Thanks, Bob Frey Manager of Statewide Planning Office of Transportation Planning Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation (6I7) 973-7449 bob.fzey@otate'ma.uo 1-93 /1-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY TASK FORCE MEETING Wednesday, October 19, 2005 4:30 PM — 6:30 IPM Banquet Room (basement level) Stoneham Town Hall 35 Central Street Stoneham, MA 02180 MEETING AGENDA 1 Welcome 0 2. Administrative Items and Review: ffE (Meeting Summaries, ITIF correspondence) MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION Mitt Romney Kerry Healey John Cogliano Governor Lieutenant Governor Secretary 1-93 /1-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY TASK FORCE MEETING Wednesday, October 19, 2005 4:30 PM — 6:30 IPM Banquet Room (basement level) Stoneham Town Hall 35 Central Street Stoneham, MA 02180 MEETING AGENDA 1 Welcome 4:30 2. Administrative Items and Review: 4:35 (Meeting Summaries, ITIF correspondence) 3. Subcommittee Reports and Materials 4:45 (TDM efforts, safety, 128 mainline congestion, etc.) 4. Review of Problems and Approach to Development 5:15 of Alternatives 5. Evaluation Methods for Alternatives 5:45 (Examples, Initial Concepts, Positives and Negatives) 6. Questions & Answers / Other Business / Next Meetings 6:20 Telephone (617) 973-7000 TDD (617) 973-7306 0 (P Telefax (;6 P7) 523-6454 Town -of- Reading 16 Lowell Street Reading, MA 01867 -2683 Memo to: The Board of Selectmen From: - The Reading Historical Commission Date: October 11, 2005 Subject: Historical Preservation and Inventory Copy HISTORICAL COlVIlOSSION historical &i.reading.ma.us (781) 942 -6661 Fax (7811942 -6071 The members of the Commission would like to provide the Board of Selectmen with a description of the philosophy of historic preservation, as well as a copy of the Historical and Architectural Inventory produced by the Commission. The Inventory is a compendium of the historically and architecturally significant structures in town comprising early commercial buildings, fine residences, and the homes of everyday citizens. Copies of the Inventory are available at the Public Library and addresses are listed on the Town web site. Please circulate the copy among the Board members. Should anyone wish a personal copy of the Inventory, please let us know. It is our hope that this material will augment your understanding of the Commission's role and foster even a greater appreciation of our wonderful Town. 91 A Brief Explanation of Historic Preservation By the Reading Historical Commission October 2005 To help people understand historic preservation and its purpose in the community, we've put together a brief explanation that hopefully will be useful to the public. Many people think preservation is reserved for entities such as national monuments or museums. And indeed, that was the case during the beginning of the historical preservation movement in the early 1900's. During the 20th century, the movement gradually stressed the importance of local history relative to an individual community, but also recognized how it contributed to the regional, and ultimately, the national levels. A strong example would be interpreting the Battle of Lexington and Concord as a turning point within the colonies struggle against Great Britain. The patriots who participated were the ordinary men of the times. These men were not only from Lexington and Concord, but from distant villages as well. Among them were the Minutemen and militia contingents from Reading, who engaged the British Regulars as they returned to Boston. Most of the Reading men hiked back to their homes that night not fully realizing the effect of their actions. Although those men are long gone, a number of their homes are scattered throughout Reading, standing as sentinels to our common heritage. All remain in private ownership and house contemporary families two hundred and thirty years after the American Revolution! None are museums, yet they allude to the past by their very being — preservation can be as subtle as continuous use, blending into the collective landscape. Reading's evolution can be identified by various phases of growth and development. The initial settlement (Wakefield) was one of the earliest in the Massachusetts Bay Colony. Primarily it was an agrarian society that continued well into the early 1800's. By 1830, a few shoe making, and cabinet making enterprises began to generate wages for residents. Additionally, several Reading businessmen successfully lobbied to have the railroad come through town in 1845. As a result, other businesses emerged: shoe factories, organ pipe manufacturing, clock assembly, and necktie operations. With people no longer dependent on the land for survival, the advent of the rail lines also made commuting to Boston convenient, transforming Reading as many people chose to live here in the latter part of the 19th century. Eventually, suburbia emerged as farms were subdivided and homes for successive generations and newcomers alike consumed the landscape. Today, we can look around town and see reminders of the past. From the Parker Tavem to the few remaining factories, to the house styles that changed as the town grew, to Reading's municipal buildings and even the town's icon — a typical New England Common. This visual legacy constitutes the character of the town: think about how the Town would look and feel like if that built environment were lost. Historic Preservation cannot and should not portray life as frozen in a time capsule. It would be folly to do so, since understanding the past clearly depicts the process of change. However, by understanding the past, we can appreciate the efforts of those who came before us, shaping the community with their buildings and personalities. Only then, can we put the future into context based on familiar surroundings, shared memories, and the collective experiences which develop an appreciation for a sense of place. All of which can be accomplished through Historic Preservation! The Historical Commission's role is to advocate for historic preservation. For additional information direct inquiries to Reading Historical Commission, Town Hall, 16 Lowell St., Reading, MA 01867. y, t.. E MW., 17 f t ;i4"+ Please join us for the 1 oth annual Adopt An Island Appreciation Night Date: Tuesday, October 25th C Place: This summer, Reading was again filled with the beauty of your hard work! Thank you!!! Please join us as we enjoy an ice cream treat and congratulate the winners of our "Beautiful Islands of Reading" contest. WFUNIMET • be • • • evening. �L Additionally, let us know if you'll be participating in AA1 again next year. Susan Bowe: 781- 944 -7807 Sue Hunter: Bbowe @comcast.net 781-942-7311 almoda.comcast.net if responding via email, please indicate AAI In the heading, thank you! C1 6(f I V 1, x , ;tt globally Vand act _loeaily ° )a the camp gnu l 1, 7ti `t�r I t Isi t ,1t r',t1 f t i S_ l i f { r" i. �' 'ZS� S n i, t 1➢ 1 1 1 , t t , ' f 1 t ``� _ A protect of the ,International Council for 3 '' ., � t ; Y 1 1 k t 4 7 Y t 1 1 }, 1 i t t t.- �n" ".. y{ , Local EnVironinentallnitiatiVesti (ICLEI), the: _... tf l cg sy 7 i . T a `,t,t't .' 4 - zt ` Cainpaign helps local g6v f unents`.implement � . � � �''����� � � `t, z'go" ii, ,r a policies and programs thattreduce global a ,, t � � , fp *''0. ,, p �+�_ 4 l { 1 2 n 1 t t , I t u , y ,,,.. �i, , a {art ,lti 'f, 1� c ,,y, warinuig pollutton, unpro�e air quality ar<dti: t� ; I 11 - L _ ?s.l 1, *],, x,, t+ USCr''Y kki i+`tif,{i: 't �t �i., l 7 i E'llll f ce co trllriliilllties '= t t {1 f i F' �, i 13 j`' i {.. a 1�,� i' / ;�, .� 1. ' + 4 tf t i it f t t f r .^' tF;,t ;.+ sa'�'rS "�' `r`. r' }t .ts'lli k.tl� iY' } t } i t 71.: t rt .i4 4 f i r �°" L ^7. �::l t'a [t l...s 7 i y + ti tit -�, t w ti ,- _<. s t 9 7 , ) '„ :t r i k t t {r. 9 �' ' I) 3 �J '�, '�f ' 9t r i 1 1 1L 1 1 , 1. �` _ ��`, r�PA�RTIClPA�ING ;,CITIE�aANDCOU(TIE5 t —• ��` °�—�% 11 i 1stV t tfx t�' r, t z a +' r i t 1 t,t �i fi�1rxCOndliCt�atlOCal e;-I, S ,o, analysts tt ; " , -,a, ,A, a ,'_' __.. ! jt' Is �i.iF tt 1 , r li ..t t� =rt :1 , t �rl y i� tt t y • f r 7 etiOns tar et t '. {1y { t t rr aA oR l kt _ i rE ^*. - ,a ��n, 3 f " C " `t � 2 r�dopt an emissions q g -< :. lot s e � 1a r, r t3' D ""' ' an Oe Wt ,'._Pla�ti ,to, " hieve tthe target' 'rte' ' t t, J' ;r� t� t t t r k- a a= e a t i4 r t r , t i i x 'i { i ' Y a ^tr "YTl*,,, i "` c i j s i '` }F1' -i }r ,implement the acfiott plan j] , t ` s , L z t} : 1 F �:r f '.J ._r- ^'y'�" .t�`// , rtsRS t{, .5i�iry °`a �; s1S �, 1 is " +t }'r' E,,: ,r c x,�r c l t�, �:s s s f 7'�;<^^` -. 11 t {ft1 Y [ �i ltt5'Tozutor and report oFFn `PtogresS i T i t t' i rt Hitt { i 7 SSj7 o . aq �— . r.,a� ?.. i�,t ,frl- r -j't�, it iX tl ^ �ksf' tai t t �� a ry! t i - ' t ` l , `i 1 ` -s ti ' -i '. �, lit i 7.A55t. ,}�" `-'vab ) 1 4 l4 :ii4 4 fY 1`' ,$ S A j i S i f� Jf 1�4 gvgll- r S 7 t 1 !� c + 7 , , v i i is i '",� s - `� �1CLEIPRO�/IDES r �.,�• °" ' exS�PrA 4,i yrn ,l lr t 1 f.r ryt t s, ' r' ,' ] t et t l 't ' t V '. A -+C� ;) �3 t fvt�iti]t r [• Planning tOtO1S rand.. meth011S Z ,� t s = ` > ' , i 't ') 4 ;. r f r P .,�Y} v Y�.7'ir1 t t x Yr "` r C 'Y L -rl. t t a Sit 1 i, 3' 4' 4 t t ', jk > t,t• Case Stlidtes and ubltcatlOriS r t, O f11 t C't.t , , r Y tt �, �i y �f. Jzt s '7 t I11 ' li { t { 7 zit - �, ` ;'zs �'• tCCFSo'ftware and interactive website 'E K x 1 1 7 =7' 4 ry}.. f 1 4 S 1 1 ).- It ,i 1- 1 tl t i k 1.: ' Technical assistance and trammg workshops = <j n ,�jk.1 lr� �, q 1 t ti i Sf 6`[ p1 7 1 11 - " s j t j ,• ,Ywccess to national and international network o£iocal W Iv­l ry ,1 4 C N tl t 5- ]i } 6 ; kt t t YKt p ( r s 1 t . er rfis 1, �' ., r governments�committed to'protectuig the,)clunate .[IZys� 'i i } is S' t v y a} 1 fl t E'iIr L =grit i ' IS ' iltk it it 51� tJ� k ft r}t� t t �, , N 1 .rt 1 v t -1) :., 1}S 'ti'-+' y��„,�h'il t X�`r N'!>4 1 d It ± t. of , {i tl i ,t t1 Vf AYE v l r;,t , xr) , a,.*, � z . ,�, .. i , u t ,t < t i t y i p4 , fi I., .. ... . y7 1 3 f t✓�4 f t ✓ i �,4 t3 t i t i a ' t V 7' t t , IX i t t Q3 W ' � 'P O° O 1 s 7} 1f F F" a} tZs r t{ a t ' t S { c} t Y� O 1_ . I .. . }} e xa �a�ti -}rt z,8t f1. 1F1 :t t flr�l* s r1L t7 hrt*�it i' ' t i111, 4, {�� t r! Cz ``$ � . -it r a F `i - F ai t c. i } f t "1 s ¢ tit V Lfi I I- f it ,�X,f, "I .'� f t .� qli tt90 S t'`tt }y t tXOIAP, 3,s , � } '+ 'tti , S t {tit I.r } r 1 tit 4 it�i � t 4 a , `. lr , a y 15 N 11 j`4 y Y�'>r a S ,� t u ft a t n't t �A T 7 f ' i OL c ;-L 4���x 1( '��z�Ol -rD �i ;t3 , i Y } t #1 1, Cy k , ' Sl i c >� u..,yp t 1><,t<,.{ t tt 1 t s - ( Y Y= t a 1 ] O. !_ .� 4s '`, s"k t �'r��. tx iL, f"�t. 'ta 6 q t rr( t t '�Y �,, t �, 'Vk] ' t r' h }r tt. ] r i t� 1 , d tt: 1 1 f ,� Ql �. d 11 yts f st �,i`hl l 1t s '. t f >y -Xf i 1. y. S =) f t R t i ;- t ly N m 7tsn L.tA :x`551 -a 7 ",t. ri'4 ,,r f 2 i2 s �t s t I t t t - 1 1 11 t ] . ��//� N.cj' > s .ee 4.C�t s {Yib it .Pi Ca i1 r e rw .1 t E 1 E k t F j)L i- t f =t �T j t L C i 11 ,$ E',7 � uz0A IVIlTITO CL1�1tIATE PROTECTIONS 7Q n over 130 I7S local !_ �.� i° u r I �r ' t .i� 7 r- E t = s St r ,ai t r s z t 1 >:, 'r ?s 41r �� = 1 k�r f} tX , v t( r c i s J t y �] t, i O VCi1 W, 1? `,= F�, ; go�yaernmenfs and over' 500 communties around thewvo- m,the {, } i o y eej[ C� tai t t t s u a 1 rt' " R. 3, w u U C CL f Cities fortCinate, ProtectiontCampaign {Contact us at 510 540, 8843 t ,l �� o v tAr.is„ ilisj) f'!r"?C„`ktr s .ts �,'' �C'i ] , - t r, 1 �" z a i, 1 s t' t, tip v c +_''+ �' O m j, or at icleirusa@ clef olrg For . updated hst o� CCP communities; a E u m L z t "f `� `� 4fit' !1A P Y i tm [ G '< �i S .n 1 -� 2 �,__"tsamp�e resolutiot�ilor other CCP related information visit otlr�website tS p w v► L W $ is4 X, �, 2 is t' (k y� a t i � t; t7 t t 3 - e ti a z 4 u' E 5 J lt1 d im (s�t.� , t gat ittp ��wWsW iClel OI �US t t t�� - ,, �t = n , ,ji,' , £ f ti , �r i t ' i *1 4 � V r' CO m tt yfS tt�i't S '`x�`�uYitl T7 Y, r t' SJ tdt -�F t f , i ) q r t \ t: {f i '_i i Z 0 ._. .. .. .. yar$ *'4t l i^ f�- BLS s 1 /11 w C �r 0 i 1 u it t s} r ?� i x �� I rt iY i t` (z i 9 t 1� t 1"i, s Y a 1 i x ,,Fb'>< r �L i $yr ] - } t .� , L t i`riT ] t ' � t tt F r z� s` ,� w a 4 . I } s� r, t.L S e �1 a s, 7 i xr s ,= t , v t. z t ti �a- �it... rr- i.�t'L.� ti to t�� tr.t t i �, t �.F s.r 'f t rt s s 7 f; P 6T ) .ir..w '.�.,.d �r,�. -. �„w c �. ire , ......,.. _,.�� ,, ._1......5� r ��..,._.. .. .. __F ....,...:c. �.. _ _J. C ....�, .: t. _�,,. ,_ �� . ri.,�.. . I : - . , , � � , � . . . . . . . . . . CITIES FOR CLIMATE PROTECTION CAMPAIGN CITIES AND COUNTIES. -- - HAVE THE POWER TO REDUCE GLOBAL WARMING POLLUTION `WH'_ILE SAVING MONEY AND IMPROVING SERVICES RETROFIT FACILITIES, TOLEDO, OH made energy efficient retrofits to 20 city facilities, savingt 1? F rs J $700,000 in energy bills and reducing 5,250 tons of global warming pollution in the first year REDUCE, REUSE, `�� RECYCLE SAN, JOSE, CA provides financial incentives for its businesses to ADOPT E N ER* `GY recycle. Together all the city's waste reduction programs have EFFICIENCY reduced the total waste stream by STANDARDS more than 53 %. RIIRI INrTf1m \/T CREATE TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS BOULDER, Co HOP Shuttle Bus pro- vides service to the city's three main activity centers. The HOP Shuttle carries over a million passengers yearly and is strongly supported by ;BUY GREEN POWER 7� =',i AUSTIN, Tk passed`aresoluton 7eauirine that 5% of the mac in n and has Tent's ►urces ry local merchants. a .. = y w °..., ,. �, :' su """'t -, Of %me6;4e l `5 Towns Amherst Arlington Cambridge Medford Stephanie Ciccarello, Wetlands Gene Benson — Sustainable John Bolduc Ms Patricia Barry Administrator/Energy Task Force Arlington 781 -641 -0911 617- 349 -4628 781 393 2137 Coordinator (413) 256 -4045 ebbensonnverizon.net Also spoke with Rosalie Anders Questions ciccarellos @amherstma.gov a. How has the CCP It provided the Town with a structure ICLEI gave community group $$ to CCP is not forcing their pace or Yes, CCP gave the town a baseline, a TO been helpful to program hep and process to address the issue of climate change hire an intern and the town supervised the intern and provided results, and does not embarrass cities and towns that are off pace. They do place to begin. your community? the space. quietly work to help re- energize those towns that stagnated after completing the inventory b. Would you recommend yes Yes, and it provides momentum, Yes- Benefits to CCP membership. It is usefW to have the network to keep Strong Yes, Regional is the answer. All cities and the ro am to Reading? p gY g • awareness in touch with other towns and share towns need to be working together. ideas /information "As long as I am on the job, Medford will be a part of CCP." Pat Barry c. How long did it take your We hired an intern. She completed A summer (student intern) info was Approximately 6 months, however Longer than 1 summer. community to do the the inventory over the summer not all in one place the software has gotten more sophisticated since then. months. baseline data research? d. Who did the work? Both staff and an intern have been Intern 3 or 4 summers ago, looked at the City has a full time One intern along with help from a Intern, committee, Office doing the work. Staff 4 -8 hrs /wk; intern 10 -15 hrs/wk. Rough estimate electricity, heating, schools, municipal buildings. Don't recall Environmental Planner, and currently some of his other duties are full time staffer who has other duties as well. The intern was paid $12.00 staff, other; could you $13,000 /yr what the stipend was. The direction light. For example, if a construction to 15.00 per hour. ICLEI paid for please estimate costs in of the intern was really from an project proposal involves an the intern. Pat was not present at this advisory committee although the environmental review, he would be time and does not know e % of time and dollars? town did choose someone to be the working on that, but as there are no paid staff time that as(' d the contact. ICELI provided the first $$ such construction proposals at this intern. for intern time, he has more time to spend on ( At the beginx P, it appears the Climate Plan. So he is currently that ICLErpaid. interns. working about 2/3 of his time -on the - For whatever s payment Climate issues, but he says that the has stopped. CCP needs are less than weekly. e. Is the software provided Our intern had some difficulty, but Not sure, but the intern did the job Yes Technician said that the software by ICLEI user friendly? the support team at ICLEI is with little trouble. was manageable. extremely helpful f. Was their technical yes See above Yes Pat Barry spoke very highly of ICLEI and CCP. I assume their help assistance timely and was timely and effective. effective? e g. How much were your We are only currently releasing our Climate Action Plan. The estimate Just putting plan together, but did replace most street tights and traffic This has been difficult to define as increased development since the Renovation of municipal buildings with energy retrofits resulted in a savings and energy g for reductions is 35% below our 1997 lights, the lights in the library and a baseline has resulted in more energy $7000, annual savings and a pollution reductions? baseline emissions= approx. 140,635 more energy efficient boiler. At town use overall. reduction in maintenance costs. tons ghg meeting over two years got 2 bylaws: Schools changed from oil to natural To direct the town to purchase the I gas with significant reduction in 2 most fuel efficient vehicles available pollution. Street lights conversion and with some exceptions to follow program to high pressure sodium LEED guidelines for silver level. vapor lights. Traffic,lights converted Haven't really built any buildings to LEDs. Solar panels on City Hall though since then. and 1 elementary school for some energy reduction. h. Where did you make the The colleges in town are doing a lot Project so far, lighting changes not lighting Probably the schools' conversion to most gains in savings and of work towards becoming more quantified as yet natural gas would have saved the energy efficient and sustainable. most in green house gases. reductions? Conversion of UMASS coal plant was nearly 10% alone i. What pitfalls did you find Political, financial, time The first intern resulted in an Some things have not produced the The present pitfall is too much work along the way? inventory but not the next step. They expected savings — possibly due to for the 1 hired staff person. Pat eventually got a second intern to do relevant staff not understanding the works entirely on energy and more work and volunteers came in operations of new systems. environmental issues for the Town of and hope this fall to present a plan to Medford. selectmen. People on town working on it and supportive, but they are volunteers. �. How many members are Approximately ten at the moment — There are lots of people on their list - There are 10 members on the Patricia Barry is a paid specialist for on our committee? Do y the make -up of the group has serve but about 5 -10 attend monthly_ committee, including representatives the town on energy and environment. changed considerably over time. Not meetings. Lots of people do this kind from Cambridge Health Alliance, Medford also has a number of they represent other other committees, but some other of work in the energy and electrical Harvard, Wr, and utility companies. voluntary committees working on committees and/or departments and institutions in town. field, they've arranged cost subsidies Staffing is generally just Community energy and the environment. One in departments in your and helped apply for grants — this has Development, however, DPW staff particular is looking at the feasibility been very helpful. They are sort of attend on occasion. ofwind power in the Medford city /town government? part of the town, under a process environs. called Vision 2020, which was officially mandated, one ofthe task groups under Vision 2020 is Environment. They got together with sustainable Arlington and finally decided to be one of the Vision 2020 task groups. This is long range planning and implementation. Their liaison is with the recycling program. A couple members are town meeting members. Not so successful has been the ties with the town — no liaison with town buildings. Other Info Our plan will be available soon. Staff interest determines success but Due to its early entry into the energy We're having a big Energy Fair on the time commitment depends on the and environmental arena, Medford the Town Common on October 8th to pace you set. has use of several electric cars. Pat celebrate the release of our plan. Barry has been given the use of a Since Reading has its own light General Motors EV for her travel. plant, it may have funding available (EV = electric powered vehicle) for such initiatives as the CCP plan, from its enterprise fund 2 Towns Newton Salem Shutesbury Williamstown Amelia Ravin Rev. Jeff Burz-Snell Erik Hoffner Ms. Jane Allen, Selectman a. How has the CCP aravinp,cleanair-coolplanet.org Absolutely — a lot of work wouldn't 978 7441551 Definitely. Shutesbury is still in the data 413 458 4251 Yes, the town first set their goal on a 20% reduction in energy usage and program been helpful to have happened without the framework of CCP to work from. collection stage of the process. later lowered their goal to what they your Community? considered a more reasonable goal of 10 %. b. Would you recommend Absolutely. Small caveat — but it does take time to do the inventory Yes, the program gives a rational process to do the work. It also Yes, although Shutesbury will be able to make a more accurate Yes, Ms Jane Allen was very positive in her recommendation for the ro am to Reading, p g and use ICLEI tools. Recommends provides a collaborative to work with recommendation once they have Reading to join CCP. MA? we join if we can find creative ways others. completed the program. to staff/intern. c. How long did it take your Worked on the 2002 inventory, but One year. The interns used the year Still in process More than a summer. Guessing at 1/2 a year. in 2002, they used community to do the also had to redo the 1998 because it got lost. It's not very long, if you 2002 as their baseline. Working 2000-as their baseline. baseline data research? talk ahead of time about general sources. The time for data entry and analysis not long. She did both d. Who did the work? inventories over 3 months. Intern grad student (MIT) paid mostly through work study from Two interns from the Geography Department at Salem State College They have one volunteer coordinator and one graduate student intern. Williamstown obtained a college intern from Williams College. The Intern, committee, Office school. She also found a grant for collected the data. They were given The intern will be paid $500.00 upon intern► was paid by the college as -well staff, other; could you some of the energy plan writing. graduate credit for their work. completion of-the data collection and as by a technology business group in their town. The town did not pay for please estimate Costs in The city paid her maybe $1500 over analysis. $1000.00 grant from the New the intern. time and dollars? 2 years' Mix from planning & public England Grass Roots Environmental buildings depts Fund. e. Is the Software provided Yes. It will take a couple hours to Yes, it was, once we became Yes. The intern says that it's easy to Ms. Jane Allen assumed so. She did not hear of any problems with the b ICLEI user friendl ? Y y. get used to but very straightforward, especially if the person has already accustomed to it. use. program. used any kind of data entry soft ware. The software also switches units of measurement easily. ICLEI was willing to spend a total of a few hours on the phone with her'to learn it. One important item to address — more than one person should be trained to use the software (but one person should be consistently doing the entering). f. Was their technical Yes. ICLEI was very responsive & Yes. Yes, ICLEI has been helpful and Yes. assistance timely and interested in helping. available effective? e Haw much were your g. Newton has been saving $400;000 annually since 1999. Lots of this New lighting in parking garage saves $22,000 annually. In 5 years they This information is not yet available since the project is not complete. They plan to save the cost of supplying air conditioning to their _� a energy savings and was from lighting retrofits & boiler will pay for themselves. Also, library by installing solar panels on the building, improvements. implementing LEDs for their traffic pollution reductions? h. Where did you make the Boilers & lighting 1,2,3 Pledge. This information is not yet available They have raised $13,000 of the most airs in savings g g Amelia will email a spreadsheet detailing the savings Citizens pledge to reduce thermostats 1 degree in the winter and raise since the project is not complete $20,000 needed for their solar panels. Money is being raised by reductions? Schools were 75 percent of thermostats 1 degree in the summer. Massachusetts Technology emissions They also pledge to reduce their Collaborative. The town receives a speed 2 mph when over 60 mph. rebate when citizens purchase green Lastly, they promise to replace 3 power. As a town with a municipal incandescent light bulbs with 3 light department, we are not compact florescent bulbs. qualified for this program. i. What pitfalls did you find Energy plan writing — they are having trouble with getting the Reverend Burz -Snell stressed the. importance of working in Gathering information has taken a long time because the graduate Step 4, implementation, is the most difficult step to accomplish. $$ is the aloe the g way? aldermen to adopt it so mainly it's a collaboration with everyone in town. student intern is busy with issue. political problem. Try to eliminate confrontational schoolwork issues. j. How many members are 9 — 3 appointed by mayor, 3 by Salem has a grass roots citizens' One volunteer, one paid intern Ten members constitute their Members come from on our committee? Do y aldermen, 1 by school committee, 1 by the league of women voters, 1 by group called SAFE, Salem Alliance for the Environment. This group committee. different segments of the they represent other the chamber of commerce. pushed Salem to join CCP and community: from businesses, the committees and/or It is definitely helpful to have a continues to be the impetus for much college, the government, and departments in Our business owner on the committee. of the energy conservation and residents. P Y pollution reduction efforts. I do not city/town government? know their number. k. Add any other pertinent ICLEI needs the staff liaison for Salem is running a program called Gathering signatures from Although, Williamstown is ahead of information gleaned by communications, but that person doesn't really need to spend time on Eco- Circles. SAFE sponsors 6 to 8 week discussion groups focused on townspeople, particularly children was helpful in initiating the program us in Reading, they are really just getting started. With only 8,000 your interview. the project, with committed sustainable living. They are 1 hour a residents, they are finding funding volunteers and committee for week with a set of readings. People projects difficult without outside implementation. come together to think of what is help. Fortunately, they have a College happening and what can be done. within their confines.' Newton did its first inventory in The conversation generates interest 1999, then 2002. With the two and knowledge of what we can do. inventories they have a trend. While We can learn much from Salem's saving $400,000 per year from the progress. work done by CCP, a fulltime electrical engineer spent about 80 percent of his time on CCP. He's now retired and the city is trying to rehire him. Newton has 3 committees on this now. But having an employee spend 80% of his time on this is not required — he just saw the value of saving over half a million dollars a year on energy costs. 4 Town of Reading, Massachusetts Sample Resolution Particination in the cities for Climate Protection Campaisn WI-IEREAS, scientific consensus has developed that Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases released into the atmosphere have a profound effect on the Earth's climate; and WHEREAS, in 2003 the American Geophysical Union adopted a statement noting that human activities are increasingly altering the Earth's climate and that natural influences cannot explain the rapid increase in near - surface temperatures observed during the second half of the 20`s century; and WHEREAS, in 2001, at the request of the Administration, the national academy of Sciences (NAS) reviewed and declared global warming a real problem caused in part by the actions of humankind; and WHEREAS, the 2001 Third Assessment Report from the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the 2000 U.S. Global Change Research Program's (USGCRP) First National Assessment indicate that global warming has begun; and WHEREAS, 162 countries including the U.S. pledged under the united Nations' Framework convention on Climate Change to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions; and WHEREAS, energy consumption, specifically the burning of fossil fuels, accounts for more than 80% of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions; and WHEREAS, local governments influence communities' emissions by exercising key powers over land use, transportation, construction, waste management, and energy management; and Whereas, local government actions taken to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and increase energy efficiency provide multiple local benefits by decreasing air pollution, creating jobs, reducing energy expenditures, and saving money for the local government, its businesses, and its residents; and WHEREAS, the Cities for Climate Protection Campaign sponsored by ICLEI Local Governments for Sustainability, has invited the Town of Reading to become a partner in the Campaign; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Town of Reading commits to participate in the cities for Climate Protection Campaign and, as a participant, pledges to take a leadership role in promoting public awareness about the causes and impacts of climate change. The Town of reading will undertake the Cities for Climate Protection Program 5 milestones to reduce both green house gas and air pollution emissions throughout the community, specifically: • conduct a greenhouse gas emissions' inventory and forecast to determine the source and quantity of greenhouse gas emissions in the jurisdiction; • establish a greenhouse gas emissions' reduction target' • develop an action plan with both existing and future actions which when implemented will meet the local greenhouse gas reduction target; • implement the action plan; and • monitor to review progress; and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Town of Reading requests assistance from ICLEI's Cities for Climate Protection Campaign (CCP) as it progresses through the milestones. Recommendation for the "Cities for Climate Protection" Program Presented to the Town of Reading Massachusetts Board of Selectmen on October 18'h, 2005 by the Ad Hoc Committee to evaluate participation in the Cities for Climate Protection Program Mission The mission of the Ad Hoc Committee to evaluate participation in the Cities for Climate Protection Program as adopted by the Board of Selectmen on June 7, 2005 is as follows: Evaluate participation in the "Cities for Climate Protection" program and advise the Board of Selectmen as to whether the Town should participate in this program. 6 Point Charter and Data Review .Specifically, the committee addressed each of 6 points addressed in their charter as outlined in the remainder of this document. Charter Step 1: Develop a work plan and schedule for accomplishing the Mission of the Committee, and review it and key decision points with the Board of Selectmen- The Committee met beginning in late August and through September and October to accomplish the following tasks: 1 Learned about the Cities for Climate Protection program (CCP program) in a meeting with the local representative of the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICf ,EI) to find out about the CCP program 2 Reviewed the CCP website and information on the program 3 Met with a representative of the Reading Master Plan committee 4 Developed a questionnaire for use when interviewing participating towns 5 Called citieshowns enrolled in the CCP program to find out about their experience with the CCP program and attended some energy fairs 6 Reviewed information from the towns and the internet 7 Evaluated costs and benefits 8 Prepared this presentation and report Charter Step 2• Become thorouWAy familiar the Cities for Climate Protection proms The International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) has established a Cities for Climate Protection" program, which works with cities, towns, and counties to reduce the pollution that causes global warming. The program outlines 5 milestones that a town can work through to protect climate from the influence of human activities by reducing green house gas emissions mainly through energy efficiency measures. The five milestones are: i. Conduct a local emissions inventory of greenhouse gas emissions, including, as available: capturing emissions from all municipal operations (e.g., city owned and/or operated buildings, streetlights, transit systems, wastewater treatment facilities) and from all community- related activities (e.g., residential and commercial buildings, motor vehicles, waste streams, industry). The inventory provides a benchmark against which the town can measure progress. This first step is accomplished by obtaining records from local utilities and putting the information into software provided by ICLEI. The software can make assumptions about energy use where data are not available. ii. Adopt an emissions reduction target. This is done by the town by passing a resolution - there are no requirements to this step, it is a target for the town's own aspirations. iii. Identify potential local actions that achieve the target. Town staff and the volunteer committee develop these. Depending on the baseline year chosen, some improvements may already have occurred (e.g., change of school buildings from oil to gas heat). iv. Implement action plan policies and actions. Towns have done this project by project, starting with the easier projects. v. Quantify and report benefits created. The software helps to continue to measure progress. In the United States currently there are 159 cities, towns, and comities participating in the program at present. Those cities and towns located in Massachusetts include, Amherst, Arlington, Barnstable, Boston, Brookline, Cambridge, Falmouth, Gloucester, Lenox, Lynn, Medford, Natick, Newton, Northampton, Salem, Shutesbury, Somerville, Springfield, Watertown, Williamstown, and Worcester. Charter Step 3 • Discuss with other communities who participate in the campaign., the advantages and disadvantages of participation. See the results for Question 4 and the attachment. Charter Step 4• Understand the budget and/or staff cost in participating in the pro rg_am. The Ad Hoc Committee spoke with the following eight Massachusetts towns: 1. Amherst 2. Arlington 3. Cambridge 4. Medford 5. Newton 6. Salem 7. Shutesbury 8. Williamstown Following is a summary of the information provided by these towns: Experience with ICLEI: • Consistently positive • ICLEI has been supportive • Some early members got funding from ICLEI • ICLEI software is easy to use • ICLEI technical support is available • ICLEI has no hidden agenda and they genuinely seem to only want to help • ICLEI doesn't hold towns accountable to targets • Some towns have gone inactive and so we weren't able to contact anyone, but ICLEI hasn't finger pointed Costs There is a $600 per year membership fee, otherwise costs vary: • Some towns have used interns, and costs have varied from no cost - volunteer efforts, and a low of $500 to full-time municipal employees doing the program as part of their job. • . Some of the towns reassured us that this can be achieved without major staff time, although ICLEI stresses the need for staff support (see next paragraph) for continuity and data storage. Benefits /Savings The benefits from the program include both real cost savings for the town and the benefits of improving the environment right here in Reading. Some towns contacted by the 3 committee are too early in the program to have quantified benefits at this point but here follows a summary of the savings of other towns: • Newton is saving $400,000 per year ($79,000 in kilowatt hour savings). • Medford underwent a conversion from heating oil to natural gas in their City Hall in 1999. Additionally, most indoor lighting was upgraded from magnetic to electronic ballasts and efficient lighting replaced previous lights. This conversion and the lighting upgrades created an estimated reduction of 133 tons of eCO2 per year, reduced energy costs by more than $7,000, and created a significant reduction in maintenance costs. • Salem, Massachusetts installed new and more efficient lighting in their public parking garage. The cost was approximately $100,000 with an annual energy savings of $22,000. In 5 years the new lighting will more than pay for itself. • Williamstown, Massachusetts has raised $13,000 toward purchasing solar panels for its library. The solar panels at a cost of $20,000 will soon power the library's air conditioning at very little cost. The $13,000 was raised by reimbursement by the Massachussetts Technology Collaborative which funds communities whose consumers select tax - deductible renewable energy choices. • Burlington, Vermont, according to the Executive Summary of the CCP report for the city states, "Energy efficiency measures installed in municipal buildings in Burlington since 1990 have already saved the city approximately $307,000 and 2200 tons of CO2 annually:" • Brockton, Massachusetts is nearing completion of its Brightfield project that will span a 27 -acre site with 1000s of solar panels to produce l megawatt of clean and cheap electricity, enough to power 120 homes. "It is expected to be New England's largest solar array." In addition, the city has installed an 8 kilowatt solar panel on the roof of its high school. The panel will produce enough electricity to power the school's science lab. According to ICLEI, "Every year, actions taken by the US CCP local governments cut 20 million tons of global warming pollution and cut $400 million from energy and fuel costs for local communities." Leadership Generally the towns contacted were doing this with volunteer committees and town staff supporting. The town needs to have a staff person as a municipal contact, and as a liaison to the committee. But most of the leadership and direction for the program in the towns we contacted came from the volunteer committees. All the towns we contacted recommended joining CCP! 4 Recommendations Charter Step 5: Make a recommendation to the Board of Selectmen; We recommend joining the Cities for Climate Protection program run by ICLEI for the following reasons: • It's an established program with a well- defined approach and a history of success • It provides the software to develop the inventory and technical support for using the software • CCP provides training and a network with other member communities through conferences • CCP is comprehensive, the program addresses all three areas where individuals have the most control over climate change: energy, transportation and waste • It focuses efforts that are generally assigned to multiple town. departments • It cuts across municipal, commercial and residential boundaries • The program should result in savings in energy costs to the town and residents • The CCP offers both regional and national networking opportunities The Ad Hoc Committee to evaluate participation in the Cities for Climate Protection Pro rg_am recommends that the. Board of Selectmen do the following: • Adopt a resolution to join ICLEI's Cities for Climate Protection program • Set up a permanent committee on energy and environment of 5 -10 (e.g., 7) members • Hire an intern (paid or volunteer, we are investigating options) to assist with, at a minimum, the first milestone • Assign a staff person from the town as the contact for the program Members of this committee look forward to conducting the first milestone (evaluation) while at the same time seeking early reduction(s) of emissions Next Steps Given approval to proceed, the Ad Hoc Committee to evaluate participation in the Cities for Climate Protection Program next steps will be to: • Develop a. draft policy to set up an energy and environment committee .• Develop a draft resolution for the Selectmen for Reading to join the CCV program • Develop a draft implementation timeline for discussion Charter Step 6: Present results at T ' own Meeting we hope to do during the November town meeting. Our Charter is set to expire November 30, 2005. Conclusions Now is the right time for the town of Reading to join the CCP: • The program will help the town and its citizens to conserve energy at a time when: o Energy costs are rising and budgets are constrained o Energy is a high visibility topic o Future development projects will add to traffic, waste and energy > 93/95 interchange > Addison Wesley site > 40B low income housing projects • Many of the aspirations of the program fit well and can be incorporated into the Master Plan currently under review • The program will help Reading to reduce Green House Gas emissions and air pollutant emissions resulting in cleaner air and a more sustainable community • Participating in the program is something we can do to address mounting evidence of negative human impact on climate change Attachments • Summary of questionnaire results • ICLEI program brochure • Sample Town of Reading Resolution r SIGN -IN SHEET FOR THE BOARD OF SELECTMEN MEETING DATE • NAME ADDRESS (Pleas rint) / P,,-V Presentation Overview e Hospital Trust (brief history) * Committee's "Mission" * Process Overview * Summary Findings & Recommendations * Next Steps 1 History of Hospital Trust a Result of donated funds 1924: Gilman Parker, $35,000 1937: Anne Grouard, $75,000 1949: Steven Foster, $3,875 a Current value = $3.8 million* Expertly managed by Trust Fund Commissioners: Bob Cummings, John Daly, and Dana Hennigar 3 -�i -A TA 10, Purpose of the Wills / Trust In combination with other funds, aid Reading in the establishing a hospital ... In the meantime (1) direct that any part of trust (interest) income may be used for the defraying of medical hospital service elsewhere for needy citizens of Reading ... K W% 15,18119an to formally deploy funds via 1988 "Cy Pres"'Agreement Judge approved use of some annual interest to fund "Reading Response" 'Reading Response Provides needy citizens with medical transportation, Lifeline, home care — 60-80 citizens served per year — $150,000/yr. deployed (from interest) .1 MISSION To review the feasibility of developing a hospital or like medical facility/services to be funded by the Hospital Trust 3 Al Committee Members • Nelson Burbank - Vice Chairman • Bruce Cerullo - Chairman • John Daly - Hospital Trust Commissioner • Peter Hechenbleikner - Town Manager • George Hines - Former Selectman • Bob LeLacheur — Finance Committee • Colleen Seferian - Board of Health • Neil Sullivan - CPC Committee's PROCESS o Understand original Wills and 1988 Cy Pres 0 "Top level" review of Reading Response Confer with Dept. of Public Health Gain input from knowledgeable citizens 8 S Coommitteels, PROCESSm continued Preliminary assessment of current offerings / future plans of 8 area hospitals and health care providers a "Free advice" from 5 different health care consultants a Strict adherence to a decision tree 9 Fe of Funds - "Decision Tree" —Us 4 se o Trust Funds Hospital IS Hospital IS NOT Feasible Feasible Other Bricks & New (improved) Maintain "Reading Mortar Options Program & Services Response" as is Emergency Care Urgent Care 10 5 Findings ... Recommendations ... M Use of Funds - Feb. 1, 2005 Selectmen agreed ... building a Hospital is NOT Feasible Use of Trust Funds Hos IS ' Hospital IS NOT F s� Feasible Other Bricks & New (Improved) ain in "Reading ep Mortar Options Program &Services Monse" as is Emergency Care Urgent Care 5urgi- Center 12 0 use o Funds - October 18, 25 We - rule out other "bricks and mortar" options Use of Trusf Funds Hos Hospital IS NOT F s Feasible 011h B ' ks & New (Improved) Maintain "Reading Mort tions Program & Services Response" as is Em genc Care Urg Care urgi -Cent c 13 Key Decision "For All? vs. the Needy?YY Feasible is & New (Improved) Maintain "Reading ions ' Program &Services Response" as is Services for "All" Services for the "Needy" 14 NIF Key Decision #2 ... ConduNeeds Hospital IS NOT Feasible New (Improved) Maintain "Reading ns Program Services Response" as is Services for "All" Ser'v'ices for the "Needy" 15 Feedback from the Board of Selectmen ® Endorse recommendation to rule out "Bricks and Mortar" and focus on Programs /Services ® Weigh -in on the question of "All" versus "the Needy" ® Provide initial feedback on "Needs Assessment" Focused Assessment = $25 — 50K Broad Needs Assessment = $50 —100k+ 16 17 E