HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-12-06 Board of Selectmen HandoutPage 1 of 2
Schena, Paula
From: Hechenbleikner, Peter
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 10:04 AM
To: Sousa,John
Cc: Schena, Paula
Subject: RE: Home Compost Bins
This is fine. I'll include it in my report to the BOS tonight.
Pete
From: Sousa, John
Sent: Tue 12/6/2005 9:32 AM
To: Hechenbleikner, Peter
Subject: FW: Home Compost Bins
Peter: Please see the following background information regarding DEP's request
that communities consider increasing the price of a home composting bin from $20
to $25 (to offset the vendor's recent price increase). Ted suggested that 1 check
with you to see if the BOS needs to approve this change.
Thank you,
John
From: McIntire, Ted
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 9:18 AM
To: Sousa, John
Subject: RE: Home Compost Bins
John,
That sounds good to me. You may want to check with the Town Manager and determine if the BOS needs to
approve the change.
Ted
From: Sousa, John
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 9:03 AM
To: McIntire, Ted
Subject: Home Compost Bins
Hello Ted:
Michael forwarded the email along to me from Ann McGovern of DEP regarding a price increase on home
composting bins. Back in September, we ordered 50 BIN-24 models at a unit cost of $38.00. According to Ann's
memo, New England plastics has increased the price for this unit by $7.00 to $45.00 each on future orders. They
kept their price steady for about 7 years. Since our compost bin revolving fund balance is down to about $589.00
(after our September order), it would be a good idea to consider raising our selling price to residents by $5 to
offset most of this increase. This will help us build up the fund for an order next Fall. Do you support the idea of
increasing the price of a bin from $20 to $25 (as recommended by DEP)? We could make the change effective
January 1, 2006. If so, we can have Michael update our website and print materials.
12/6/2005
HOME COMPOSTING BINS (FAC31)
CONTRACT AWARD INFORMATION
Contract Number: FAC31
Contract Duration: 5/15/04-9/30/06
Description:
"Home Composting Bins"
The purpose of the contract is to make available aerobic, rodent resistant home composting bins suitable for urban,
suburban and rural use, along with promotional materials for marketing the bins. The Department of Environmental
Protection (DEP) purchases compost bins to grant to municipalities or regional organizations under DEP's Recycling
Grants Program. All political subdivisions of the Commonwealth have the option to purchase off the state contract.
The vendors have also agreed to provide compost bins to retailers at the prices indicated.
Vendor information and product descriptions:
Bin Name
New Age Composter, BIN-11
Earth Machine
New Age Composter, BIN-24
New Age Composter, BIN-30
(formerly Brave New Composters)
Vendor
New England Plastics Corp.
Norseman Plastics Ltd
126 Duchaine Blvd.
39 Westmore Dr.
New Bedford, MA 02745
Rexdale, Ontario
Contact: Trudy Wood
Canada M9V 3Y6
Phone: (508)998-3111
NE Rep: Art MacKenzie
FAX: (508)995-8895
Phone: (800)267-4391
FAX: (416)745-7140
Capacity
BIN-1 1: 11 cubic feet
11 cubic feet
BIN-24: 24 cubic feet
BIN-30: 30 cubic feet
Shape/Dimensions
Cylindrical
Conical
Diameter: adjustable from 26" to 44"
Diameter: 30" at base, 18" at top;
Height: BIN-11: 28"
Height: 33"
BIN-24: 32"
BIN-30: 34"
Special features
Adjustable diameter;
Sliding door for compost removal
Self-aerating via cone-shaved floor
Recycled content
50% postconsumer recycled HDPE
1 50% postconsumer recycled HDPE
Color
Black
I Black
Warranty
10 year
10 year
Bin Price
BIN-11: $39.00
$32.35
BIN-24: $45.00
BIN-30: $50.00
Minimum order
20 bins; smaller quantities may be picked up at
20 bins
manufacturer's facility or delivered with additional
freight charges. Call vendor for details.
Price to retailers
BIN-11: $39.00
$32.35
BIN-24: $45.00
BIN-30: $50.00
D
Marino, Lillian
From: Cormier, Jim
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2005
To: Marino, Lillian
Subject: 24 Hour License for Reading Shell Station, 87 Walkers Brook Drive
From a public safety perspective, I do not see any major impediments to the
station being open 24 hours.
It does provide a service for the motoring public in an area where fuel availability
is limited after 10:00 p.m. at night. In the past, the store has been open during
the overnite times, and we have not experienced complaints from neighbors or
abutters. Considering its location, it is a reasonable location for a 24 hour
business, close to the highway yet away from residential neighbors.
One concern we do have is the location presents itself as a prime target for late
night crime. We have had numerous reports of larcenies from the cash register,
drive offs and a few armed robberies over the years.
I would only recommend to the business owners that they consider security steps
that include an up to date video system that provides high image quality, and
limited access to the building after a certain hour such as 11:00 p.m. or 12
midnight. After those hours, people who want store products get them through
the tray in the window but do not enter the store, thus protecting the attendant.
They have had these security measures in place in the past but seem to
abandon them after they are successful.
In summary, I don't see any community issues from a public safety perspective;
however, security issues for the business should be explored by the business
operators.
Chief James W. Cormier
Reading Police Department
From:
Marino, Lillian
Sent:
Friday, December 02, 2005 12:43 PM
To:
Cormier, Jim
Subject: 24 Hour License for Reading Shell Station
Chief Cormier:
The Board of Selectmen will have a hearing on December 6, 2005 on the 24 hour
operation of the Reading Shell Station located at 87 Walkers Brook Drive.
Do you have any comments concerning this license?
D
Page 1 of 1
Schena, Paula
From: Joan Langsam Delangsam@brackettlucas.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 2:27 PM
To: Schena, Paula
Cc: Hechenbleikner, Peter
Subject: RE: Avalon and MILD
We have agreed to a form agreement which I should be sending you soon. You can print it out for the BOS's
package however, the BOS can move to approve the Agreement but the motion should state that it will only be
executed upon receipt of a check for $245,000 to the Town of Reading. Raymond Couture has advised me that
Avalon knows of that condition. Joan
From: Schena, Paula [mailto:pschena@ci.reading. ma.us]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 2:13 PM
To: Joan. Langsam
Subject: RE: Avalon and RMLD
Thanks Joan. I'll wait to hear from you. If they are going to approve tonight let me know if there should be any
special wording for the motion.
Paula
From: Joan Langsam [mailto:jelangsam@brackettlucas.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 1:42 PM
To: Schena, Paula
Cc: Hechenbleikner, Peter
Subject: Avalon and RMLD
Paula, I spoke to Peter earlier and I know he is out. I am trying to work out the agreement for the BOS review
tonight with RMLD and Avalon. I still have some issues. Peter asked me to keep you updated. They owe us
$245,000 which no one wants to put in the agreement for MEPA review, so the agreement is that until we receive
a check the BOS does not sign the agreement if it gets resolved. RMLD's attorney agrees with that. Joan
n
12/6/2005
AGREEMENT
. This Agreement is entered into as of the day of November, 2005, by and between
the TOWN OF READING with an address at 16 Lowell Street, Reading, Massachusetts 01867
("the Town"), the READING MUNICIPAL LIGHT DEPARTMENT, with an address of 230
Ash Street, Reading, Massachusetts 01867 ("RMLD"), AVALON WFS, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company with a Massachusetts address at 1250 Hancock Street, Suite 804N,
Quincy, MA 02169 ("Avalon WFS") and AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC., a Maryland
corporation with a Massachusetts address of 1250 Hancock Street, Suite 804N ("AvalonBav").
The Town and RMLD are sometimes collectively referred to as "Reading", and Avalon WFS
and AvalonBay are sometimes referred to collectively as "Avalon").
WHEREAS, Avalon WFS is the owner of that certain parcel of land situated in the City
of Woburn, Town of Reading and Town of Wilmington, County of Middlesex, Cormnonwealth
of Massachusetts, and shown as Lot 1 (the "Avalon WFS Land") on that certain plan entitled
"Modification Plan Definitive Subdivision, Inwood Drive in Woburn, Massachusetts", prepared
by Hayes Engineering, Inc., dated September 14, 2004, and recorded with the Middlesex South
Registry of Deeds (the "Registry") as Plan No. 1510 of 2005 in Book , Page (the
"Subdivision Plan");
WHEREAS, AvalonBay is the owner of a certain parcel of land in Woburn,
Massachusetts shown on Lot 2 on the Subdivision Plan, and the subdivision road shown "as
"Inwood Drive" as show on the Subdivision Plan (the "AvalonBav Land");
WHEREAS, the Avalon WFS Land is improved by, among other improvements, certain
roadways with utilities therein and thereon (the "Access Wavs") as shown on the sketch plan
attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Sketch Plan").
WHEREAS, Avalon utilizes the Access Ways for, among other purposes, access to, and
egress from, the Avalon WFS Land and the AvalonBay Land, and to and from Inwood Drive and
for certain utility facilities to serve the Avalon WFS Land and the AvalonBay Land.
WHEREAS, a portion of the Access Ways are currently situated in the Easement Area
(as such term is defined below), as more particularly shown on the Sketch Plan;
WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Order of Taking by the
Town of Reading dated February 3, 1969, and recorded with the Registry in Book 11644, Page
202 (the "Order"), Reading is the holder of an easement (the "Easement") over a portion of the
Avalon WFS Land situated in the Town of Reading, as more particularly described in the Order
and shown on the Sketch Plan (the "Easement Area");
WHEREAS, the Order provides that the Easement was taken "for municipal light
purposes under the provisions of General Laws, Chapt. 40, Section 14, for a High Voltage
transmission line" and includes, among other rights, the right to (i) "construct, erect, operate and
maintain a line or lines ...in, on, along, over, through, across or under" the Easement Area, and
10
(ii) "place, erect, maintain, inspect, add to the number of, and relocate at will, poles,
towers ...from time to time, across, through, or over" the Easement Area;
WHEREAS, on April 13, 1987, the respective rights and obligations of Reading and the
owner of the land which is bound by the Easement were the subject of a ,decision by the
Massachusetts Land Court in the case of Callan v. Town of Reading and the Readinv Municibal
Light Department, Miscellaneous Case No. 120179, dated April 13, 1987 (the "Land Court
Decision");
WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to enter into this Agreement to further clarify the
rights and obligations of the parties with respect to the Order, the Easement and the Easement
Area, relating to the rights of Avalon to maintain and use the portion of the Access Ways within
the Easement Area, as more specifically set forth herein;.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable
consideration this day paid, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
Avalon and Reading hereby agree as follows:
1. Notwithstanding any term or provision of the Order or Land Court Decision to the
contrary, Reading hereby acknowledges and approves the location, as of the date of this
Agreement, of the Access Ways substantially as shown on the Sketch Plan for access to and
egress from the Avalon WFS Land and the AvalonBay Land and for the construction, use,
maintenance, repair and replacement of any and all utilities therein and thereunder.
2. Notwithstanding any term or provision of the Order or Land Court Decision to the
contrary, Reading and Avalon hereby acknowledge and agree that, if in connection with the
exercise of Reading's municipal purposes as described in the Order, Reading requires that the
any portion of the Access Ways within the Easement Area must be relocated, Reading may
require, upon not less than thirty (30) days' prior written. notice to Avalon, that Avalon WFS
relocate, at. Avalon WFS' sole cost and expense, such portion of the Access Ways to another
location within the Easement Area that is reasonably satisfactory to Reading. In such case,
Avalon WFS shall have a reasonable period of time to commence and complete such relocation
of the Access Ways after agreement is reached on the new location. If Avalon WITS fails to do
so, after the giving of notice and the expiration of a reasonable cure period, Reading shall have
the right to relocate the Access Ways at Avalon WFS' cost and expense, provided, that any such
relocation shall be completed in such a manner so as to not unreasonably interfere with Avalon's
right to continually use, maintain, repair and operate the Access Ways as provided herein.
3. Recognizing the fact that access to the Avalon WFS Land and the AvalonBay
Land requires the existence of roadways and related facilities within the Easement Area, and
notwithstanding any term or provision of the Order or Land Court Decision to the contrary,
Reading shall not have the right to require the removal of the Access Ways (as the same may be
relocated pursuant to paragraph 2 above), and Avalon shall have the perpetual right to the
continuous and uninterrupted use thereof.
4. Upon the full execution an delivery hereof, AvalonBay shall pay to RMLD One
Hundred Fifty Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($150,000.00): In consideration of such payment,
Reading agrees that notwithstanding any term or provision of the Order or Land Court Decision
to the contrary, in no event shall Avalon ever be required to make any other payment to Reading
in connection with the exercise by Reading of its rights under the Order, including, without
limitation, any payment for any increased costs as may be incurred by RMLD which may be
attributable to the use, maintenance and operation of the Access Ways (except only for the
obligation under Section 2 above for AVS to reimburse Reading for a required relocation of the
Access Ways in the event Avalon WFS fails to do so after the giving of notice and the expiration
of a reasonable cure period).
5. Each of AvalonBay and Avalon WFS represents and warrants to Reading that (i)
it has the full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to carry out the matters
contemplated hereby; (ii) this Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by
AvalonBay and WFS and all necessary consents required under AvalonBay's and Avalon WFS'
organizational documents, by law or otherwise have been obtained; (iii) this Agreement is the
legal, valid and binding obligation of AvalonBay and Avalon WFS, enforceable in accordance
with its terms and does not violate any contract, judicial order or any thing to which AvalonBay
or Avalon WFS is a party or to or by which AvalonBay or Avalon WITS is subject; (iv) neither
the execution or delivery of this Agreement or the carrying out of the matters contemplated
hereby is subject to the requirement that AvalonBay or Avalon WITS obtain any consent,
approval, authorization or, or make any declaration or filing with, any governmental authority or
third party.
6. Each of the Town and RMLD represents and warrants to Avalon that (i) it has the
full power and authority to enter into this Agreement and to carry out the matters contemplated
hereby; (ii) this Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Town and
RMLD and all necessary consents required under any local, state or federal law, rule, order or
regulation have been obtained; (iii) this Agreement is the legal, valid and binding obligation of
the Town and RMLD, enforceable in accordance with its terms and does not violate any
contract, judicial order or any thing to which the Town or RMLD is a party or to or by which the
Town or RMLD is subject; (iv) neither the execution or delivery of this Agreement or the
carrying out of the matters contemplated hereby is subject to the requirement that the Town or
RMLD obtain any consent, approval, authorization or, or make any declaration or filing with,
any governmental authority or third party.
7. The terms and conditions herein contained shall inure to the benefit of and be
binding upon the parties hereto, and their respective successors and assigns. All rights and
obligations of AvalonBay hereunder shall run with the AvalonBay Land, all rights and
obligations of Avalon WFS hereunder shall run with the Avalon WITS Land, and all rights and
obligations of Reading hereunder shall run with the Easement Area.
8. To facilitate execution, this Agreement may be executed in as many counterparts
as may be convenient or required. It shall not be necessary that the signature of, or on behalf of,
3
Executed as an instrument under seal as of the day of December, 2005
AVALON WFS, LLC
By: AVB Development Transactions, Inc.,
its Manager
By:
Name:
Title:
AVALONBAY COMMUNITIES, INC.
By:
Name:
Title:
THE TOWN OF READING
By Its Board of Selectmen
READING MUNICIPAL LIGHT DEPARTMENT
By:
Name:
Title:
(Y-
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
, ss
On this day of December, 2005, before me, the undersigned notary public, personally
appeared , the of AVB Development
Transactions, Inc., the sole member of Avalon WFS, LLC, proved to me through satisfactory
evidence which was , to be the person whose name is signed on the
preceding or attached document, and acknowledged to me that he/she signed it voluntarily for its
stated purpose as of AVB Development Transactions, Inc., the sole member
of Avalon WFS, LLC.
Notary Public
My commission expires:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
, ss
On this day of December, 2005, before me, the undersigned notary public, personally
appeared , the AvalonBay Communities, Inc.
proved to me through satisfactory evidence which was , to be the person
whose name is signed on the preceding or attached document, and acknowledged to me that
he/she signed it voluntarily for its stated purpose as of AvalonBay
Communities, Inc..
Notary Public
My commission expires:
6
D
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
, ss
On this day of December, 2005, before me, the undersigned notary public, personally
appeared and
the Selectmen of the Town of Reading, proved to me through
satisfactory evidence which was , to be the persons whose name is signed on
the preceding or attached document, and acknowledged to me that he/she signed it voluntarily
for its stated purpose.
Notary Public
My commission expires:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
, ss
On this day of December, 2005, before me, the undersigned notary public, personally
appeared , the of Reading Municipal Light
Department, proved to me through satisfactory evidence which was , to be
the person whose name is signed on the preceding or attached document, and acknowledged to
me that he/she signed it voluntarily for its stated purpose as of Reading
Municipal Light Department.
Notary Public
My commission expires:
GSDOCS\1553428.4 12/1/2005 6:36 PM
7
Page 1 of 3
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: Brad Latham [blatham@latham-lamond.com]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 11:26 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen; canthony@ci.reading. ma.us; James Bonazoli forwarding account; Ben
Tofoya; Rick Schubert Multiple Addresses; jduffy@ci.reading. ma.us; Hechenbleikner, Peter
Subject: Addison-Wesley property and W/S Development
LATH", LATH" & L"OND, P. C.
643 MAIN STREET
READING, MASSACHUSETTS
December 5, 2005
Board of Selectmen
Town Hall
16 Lowell Street
Reading, MA 01867
Re: Addison-Wesley Property and WIS Development Proposed Route 28 Improvements
We represent W/S Development in its proposal to create a lifestyle center at the "Addison-Wesley"
property.
A few months ago W/S Development participated in a joint meeting with the Community Planning and
Development Commission ("CPDC") and the Board of Selectmen. The CPDC participated as it is
responsible for land use planning and zoning and the Selectmen participated, as it is responsible as road
commissioners, for public ways.
The Selectmen were uncertain whether roadway and intersection improvements could be made that
would adequately address the impact of the traffic from the proposed lifestyle center and decided to
engage the services of a traffic engineer to study the proposal and report to the Board. The Town
engaged as its traffic consultant, John Diaz of GPI, who is both a licensed Professional Engineer and a
certified Professional Traffic Operations Engineer. The Town had apparently used his services
previously for traffic review.
On October 6, 2005, the Town's traffic consultant issued a preliminary review letter. As a consequence
of comments in that preliminary review, W/S Development made improvements to its traffic proposal
and prepared a revised (supplemental) traffic report. After having reviewed the supplemental traffic
report by W/S Development, the Town's traffic consultant submitted to the Town his final report, dated
November 11, 2005, which stated, in part, that "Overall we feel comfortable that the current design of
the intersection will sufficiently accommodate the anticipated traffic associated with the Addison-
Wesley facility. Furthermore the modifications to the intersection will provide improvements to the
safety of the intersection when compared to the current design.... Therefore, GPI would recommend
that the project be accepted as a feasible project...."
12/6/2005
0
Page 2 of 3
On November 15, 2005, the town traffic engineer, John Diaz, P.E., appeared before the Selectmen at a
scheduled meeting and for more than an hour answered questions from the Selectmen about traffic and
his November 11, 2005 report. At the Selectmen's meeting, in response to questions, Mr. Diaz stated the
following additional facts:
e The thru traffic on Route 28 (both northbound and southbound) will run through the Main/South
Street intersection at an acceptable level of service, even during the peak traffic hours. That is,
traffic flow into and out of the Town will not be disrupted with the potential of two dedicated
through lanes in each direction.
. The intersection will be safer when the improvements proposed by WS Development are made.
We complement the Selectmen for having taken the extraordinary step of having had a traffic review .
before the rezoning process has even begun. Such scrutiny and the future scrutiny that would take place
as part of rezoning and CPDC review would certainly enhance the proposal.
Since the November 1 lth Selectmen's meeting, persons in favor of and opposed to the proposal have
voiced their opinions. Both traffic and non-traffic issues have been aired that would be addressed as part
of the rezoning efforts. Unfortunately, some of the statements that have been made in handouts are in
error. While we do not assert any intention to mislead the public, it is important that we are all dealing
with the following correct information:
. Traffic Flow: 80% of the traffic to the site will come directly from and go directly back to Route
128, staying within 300 feet of Route 128.
. One-Wav Streets: There is no proposal made by the proponent to make any Town street one-way.
That is not necessary.
. Town Control of Future Use: The Town does not lose control over the site by allowing rezoning.
What goes on the site can be tightly controlled by the zoning language. Further, even if Town
Meeting rezones the property, the Community Planning and Development Commission can
control how the site may be used by imposing such conditions in any special permit.
. Downtown: The project will not have a significant impact downtown. People who shop and dine
there will continue to do so. Park Square will offer an alternative for those Reading residents who
would otherwise go the Burlington Mall, as they do now. Hingham has advised the Town
Manager that the Derby Street project was positive, not negative to the downtown.
Main Street Improvements: The proposed improvements to Route 28 will improve the safety of
the intersection. The only widening of Main Street will be at its intersection with South Street and
at the intersection of Routes 28 and 128.
W/S Development is very aware that as this proposal continues through the rezoning process, the Town
retains control. There would have to be multiple public hearings. Many town boards would review the
matter before any final action could be taken. Our client is well aware of the.heavy burden placed on a
proponent when a two-thirds vote of Town Meeting is required for a project.
We thank you for the time that you have taken on this matter. We trust that with further review of
this matter, the other positive consequences of the proposal can be recognized by the Town, such
as significant tax revenue (over one million dollars per year), employment opportunities and the
12/6/2005
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: Patrick Egan [pegan@bermanesq.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 12:59 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: AW Site
Dear Selectmen:
I echo my wife's thoughts contained in her attached email concerning the proposed AW site. We do not believe
that any benefits can outweigh the significant cost to the town's character and problems that would arise,
particularly with increased traffic and congestion and the risk of losing downtown. Thank you for your
consideration of this important issue and your service to the community.
Patrick T. Egan
8 Oak Ridge Road
This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential information and is intended only for the person(s)
named. Any use, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
transmission in error, please notify the sender via e-mail.
-----Original Message-----
From: LisaEgan [mailto:lisaegan@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 12:49 PM
To: 'selectmen@ci.reading. ma. us'
Subject: no to lifestyle mall
Dear Selectmen:
I am writing regards to the lifestyle mall proposed for the AW Site. I strongly urge you to vote "no" for this
development. We have lived in Reading for nearly 5 years. We recently just moved in Sept. to Oak Ridge Road
in Reading. When looking for a new home, we did not consider towns such as Burlington or Woburn because
there is too much congestion, traffic and too much large commercial retail in those towns. We like Reading's
"town feeling" and the town center. We like the fact that there is not a lot of traffic and congestion. We did not
care for North Reading because there is no real town center and there are too many super stores, like Walmart.
Now I fear Reading could have the same problem, should this mall open in town. First, there is plenty of shopping
in all of the adjacent towns to Reading, and I've heard another lifestyle mall is already scheduled to open near
Burlington. Reading is already going to reap many tax benefits from the new shopping center at Jordan's and
Home Depot. We should carefully control the development of retail space rather than opening the floodgates to
every and all businesses. Further, let's work to come up with a creative solution that uses the AW site to benefit
the town while preserving the town's quaint charm and local businesses.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Lisa Egan
8 Oak Ridge Road
Reading MA 781-942-0857
D
12/6/2005
Hechenblefter, Peter
From: jody avtges Bodyavtges@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 1:24 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: I am attending tonite because I worry developers can be deceptive
Dear Selectmen,
Please think carefully before putting in this shopping centers. From what I read, this is
not clear cut at all - and developers are likely to be putting "rosey"
glasses on projections. I hope to attend to learn more. Thank you for your caution on
this. Jody James Avtges , 42 Washington St., Reading, MA 01867
Yahoo! DSL - Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
1
O
Page 1 of 1
Hechenblelkner, Peter
From: heidi bonnabeau [heidijerry@verizon.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 1:31 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Against Lifestyle Center at Addison Wesley
Selectmen,
I am writing to express my concern over the possibility of a Lifestyle Center in Reading. I am completely against
this Lifestyle center. I believe that the property does need to be developed, but why can't we as a town go out
and market ourselves and get the business that we want? Why not a campus for a college, over 55 housing with
a nursing home, or a hotel and office park? We need what is right for Reading. I don't want to live in a mall town-
that is not why I came to Reading.
Lastly, traffic is a major concern. One way in and out is not sufficient to support typical mall traffic. What if their
projections are low? Do we have our own data on mall traffic?
PLEASE SAY NO TO THE DEVELOPERS. THIS PROJECT IS NOT RIGHT FOR READING M! Thank you,
Heidi Bonnabeau
D
12/6/2005
Hechenblefter, Peter
From: jeannette corbett Deannette_corbett@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 1:05 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: shopping plaza
Dear Selectmen,
I am opposed to the development of the shopping plaza at Addison-Wesley site-the
mainreason being that downtown Reading is already a ghost town, other towns like melrose
and Wakefield being vibrant centers.
Jeannette Corbett
3 Bond Street
reading, Ma. 01867
781-944-3181
Yahoo! DSL - Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
1
VID
Page 1 of 2
Schena, Paula
From: Camille Anthony [canthony@ftmc.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 12:35 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Cc: Hechenbleikner, Peter
Subject: FW: PEP News Flash
FYI
Camille Anthony
-----Original Message-----
From: Carl McFadden [mailto:cmcfadden@ftmc.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 11:51 AM
To: Peter Hechenbleikner; Camille Anthony
Subject: Fw: PEP News Flash
fyi
Have fun!!!!
Original Message
From: Reading PEP
To: readingpep@co_mcast.net
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 11:33 AM
Subject: PEP News Flash
PEP NEWS FLASH
SELECTMEN TO DISCUSS THE PROPOSED ADDISON-WESLEY
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT
TUESDAY NIGHT (TONIGHT) AT 9PM
When PEP formed, our mission was to keep Reading parents informed about our public education issues and to
support efforts by the Town and other organizations to ensure that Reading schools have the fiscal resources needed to
meet our educational goals.
While the proposed Addison-Wesley development does not directly effect Reading schools, the outcome will have an
impact on our schools and our town.
Some quick facts:
• The project will generate $1.2 million annually in local property taxes, which will benefit both the
schools and the town
• Potential retailers include: Whole Foods, P. F. Chang's, Legal Seafoods, Ann Taylor, Barnes &
Noble, J. Crew, Chico's, Coldwater Creek and others
• The shopping center will be fashioned after the Derby Street Shoppes in Hingham
• The selectmen are considering a request for re-zoning to allow retail; they are currently split on
sending this issue to Town Meeting for approval
Z
12/6/2005
Page 2 of 2
• A traffic study has been completed
• Local proponents want to see an increase in town revenue through a sustainable development plan,
and would like to see this issue go to town meeting for further discussion
• Local opponents are concerned with traffic flow, out-of-town visitors, competition for local
businesses, the impact on Main Street and other neighborhood issues
This is a major proposal for the town that will impact residents, positively and negatively, in many different ways. We
encourage you to attend the meeting, or at the very least, email the selectmen and inform them of your views!
Camille Anthony canthony_@,ci.reading.ma.us
James Bonazoli jonazoli cr ci.readins.ma.us
Joe Duffy jduffy@ci.reading.ma.us
Ben Tafoya btaf6ya@pj.r-qqding.ma.us
Rick Schubert rchubert@ci.readirng.ma._us
OR
selectmen &i.reading-A
12/6/2005
22
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: Diana Rhudick [drhudick@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 11:55 AM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Addison-Wesley Development
Dear Reading Selectmen:
I would like to add my voice to the chorus of those opposed to rezoning the Addison-Wesley site to allow retail
stores. Although I don't live in that area, I would hate to see it become even more commercial and congested. I
know there are other development possibilities for the site and I realize they would contribute less revenue to the
town, but I feel they would fit the town's character better. We have enough chain stores here already.
Sincerely,
Diana Rhudick
Grove St.
drhudickO..comcast.net
( 310~)
12/6/2005
Hechenblefter, Peter
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Dear Selectmen,
Teresa Teixeira [tetex@comcast.net]
Tuesday, December 06, 2005 11:57 AM
Reading - Selectmen
Proposed Development for Addison-Wesley Complex
My understanding is that the potential developer of the Addison-Wesley complex is also the
owner of the Redstone Plaza in Stoneham, MA. The state of this shopping plaza is
terrible, with several stores having been empty for years. Clearly, the owners have no
interest in revitalizing this older shopping plaza - they could have renovated these
stores or changed them to make them more attractive to retailers. If they are not
interested in changing this plaza so that it can meet the needs of today, why should we
believe that they are going to develop/maintain something in Reading that will last?
I also have concerns about overdevelopment in primarily residential areas of town and
traffic issues.
Thank you for your consideration,
Terri Teixeira
98 Howard Street
1
(9
Hechenblefter, Peter
From: Karen Dussault [kmdussault@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 12:35 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Cc: dussaukm@bausch.com
Subject: Shopping plaza at Addison Wesley
Dear Selectmen,
I live on George St and am ABSOLUTELY opposed to a shopping plaza at Addison Wesley; we
have more than enough shopping centers. I much prefer shopping in Reading Square and
would like to see the square developed more so that I can support local merchants. We DO
NOT need any more chain stores.
Karen Dussault
1
(9
Page 1 of 1
Hechenblefter, Peter
From: LisaEgan [lisaegan@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 12:49 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: no to lifestyle mall
Dear Selectmen:
I am writing regards to the lifestyle mall proposed for the AW Site. I strongly urge you to vote "no" for this
development. We have lived in Reading for nearly 5 years. We recently just moved in Sept. to Oak Ridge Road
in Reading. When looking for a new home, we did not consider towns such as Burlington or Woburn because
there is too much congestion, traffic and too much large commercial retail in those towns. We like Reading's
"town feeling" and the town center. We like the fact that there is not a lot of traffic and congestion. We did not
care for North Reading because there is no real town center and there are too many super stores, like Walmart.
Now I fear Reading could have the same problem, should this mall open in town. First, there is plenty of
shopping in all of the adjacent towns to Reading, and I've heard another lifestyle mall is already scheduled to
open near Burlington. Reading is already going to reap many tax benefits.from the new shopping center at
Jordan's and Home Depot. We should carefully control the development of retail space rather than opening the
floodgates to every and all businesses. Further, let's work to come up with a creative solution that uses the AW
site to benefit the town while preserving the town's quaint charm and local businesses.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Lisa Egan
8 Oak Ridge Road
Reading MA 781-942-0857
9S
12/6/2005
Page 1 of 1
Hechenblefter, Peter
From: Janelle Bonasera [Bonasera@nazareth-academy.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 10:20 AM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Note of concern from a Reading resident
Importance: High
Dear Selectmen,
My husband and I moved to Reading about two years ago and currently live at 19 Boyce Street. We love
the town and have a vested interest in its future, since we plan on raising a family here and making
Reading our home for a long time.
I wanted to express my concern over the proposed shopping center for the Addison Wesley site. I
believe this is not in the best interest for the town and its residents. The proposal will jeopardize many
residents' current way of life and directly affect the overall feel and flow of the town, which is one of the
main reasons why we decided to move here. There are a number of residents on my street who also
agree and are very, very concerned about these plans and how they are handled going forward. We
believe that the impact of this future plan will have more negative outcomes than positive.
Thank you for your attention to our concerns and for your work to safeguard the integrity and quality of life
in Reading for us all.
Respectfully,
Janelle Bonasera
19 Boyce Street
Reading, MA 01867
12/6/2005
US-7
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: Kerry Kreppein [kerrykreppein@hotmaii.com]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 2:19 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Cc: kerrykreppein@hotmaii.com
Subject: Rezoning Addison-Wesley, NO
Dear Selectmen,
I am writing regarding the proposed rezoning for the Addison Wesley site. I am strongly against it. As
I understand it the move would be to snake the area retail and possibly a site for shopping malls, retail
centers, or "lifestyle centers". Whichever way you term it, I feel that is NOT the area for it. I
chose Reading to be my home because of its residential feel and center of town focus. and I feel that
characteristic is being threatened by this proposed rezoning.
I am also curious to know the "pros" of this option, for other than the Addison-Wesley site owners. This
plan seems to be very far down the line of a "yes, rezone" and I am uncomfortable with such a change in
a residential area happening so quickly. Can you let me know the true status of this process, and how I
can be more involved? I have wanted to come to the open forums, but with two small children, I've
been unable to make a 7pm time.
Thank you for your time,
Kerry Kreppein
15 Pratt St
12/6/2005
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: charles restuccia [restuc@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 10:39 AM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Cc: READINGFIRST@comcast.net
Subject: Addison-Wesley Site
We strongly oppose the presently planned shopping mall for this site. The attraction of far flung traffic to the
"cross-road of eastern MA " will have an unbearable burden on our community. See how Cummings Park
advertises its great location at the intersection of 1-95/1-93.
Charles and Carmel Restuccia
46 James Road
12/6/2005
(0)
Page 1 of 1
Hechenblelkner, Peter
From: HarrySim@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 11:37 AM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Shopping Mall
Dear Board:
As long time residents of Reading (39 years), we are strongly opposed to proposed plans for Addison-Wesley
property. The South side of Reading does not need any more congestion. Why not affordable senior housing?
Why not utilize our Main & Haven Street area (Recent rezoning action at Town Meeting is a start). No more
urban sprawl!
Harry and Marilyn Simmons
12/6/2005
U-030
Page 1 of 1
Hechenblefter, Peter
From: Amy Coumounduros [amy.c@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 11:47 AM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Addison-Wesley Re-Development Project
Please send the Addison-Wesley Re-Development matter to Town Meeting so that all issues, both pro and con,
can be discussed.
Thank you in advance for your consideration.
Amy Coumounduros
12/6/2005
6)
Page 1 of 1
Schena, Paula
From: charies restuccia [restuc@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 10:39 AM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Cc: READINGFIRST@comcast.net
Subject: Addison-Wesley Site
We strongly oppose the presently planned shopping mall for this site. The attraction of far flung traffic to the
"cross-road of eastern MA " will have an unbearable burden on our community. See how Cummings Park
advertises its great location at the intersection of 1-95/1-93.
Charles and Carmel Restuccia
46 James Road
12/6/2005
C39
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: dangerous dave [ikon_100@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 7:54 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: South Street
Hi:
I have lived in Reading all my life and concider myself a true townie. During my 47 years of living here
I have watched the Town blow land deals and make some truely poor decisions dealing with
development. I also live in the South Street area and have been there all of my life. It is about time the
longtime residents are heard and those who "just moved here" back off because when thier job transfers
them or thier kids get older and they hove, people like me will be left holding the bag and picking up
the pieces.
I am in favor of the zoning change and welcome such a high end and classy use for that
property.
Reading is not Andover, Lexington, Winchester nor is it Woburn, Wakefield or Melrose. If those
opposed to this development want that type of development, well there are several moving companies
listed in the yellow pages along with realtors. Reading is Reading and we should do what is best for our
community as a whole and betterment of said conununity.
For those in my neighborhood and area who are opposed to this, remember one thing:
If you buy a house near or next to railroad tracks, sooner or later the train is coming
by. If you buy a house or a home next to a vacant commercial area, sooner or later they
are going to develop it.
I support the change in zoning and to the board of selectmen: Go for it. It is the right thing to do.
Unsigned
If i put my name to this, i will end up in the police log as a statistic.
Download todav's ton songs at MSN Music from artists like U2. Eminem. & Kelly Clarkson
bum
603
00P
12/6/2005
Page 1 of 1
Hechenblefter, Peter
From: janet bonitatibus ambonitatibus@msn.com]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 4:21 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Addison-Wesley Site
I am just writing to let it be known, that I am opposed to the Addison-Wesley lifestyle center.
I did see the list of stores that may go into the center, none of which I shop at. I love the country
setting and small town feel of Reading. It just seems that we are becoming more of a city than a
nice little town.
I am not sure if all of this is a done deal, but I am against this.
12/6/2005
(Y3
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: Gangfeng xu [gangfeng xu@yahoo.com]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 4:28 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Cc: readingfirst@comcast.net
Subject: the Use of Addison-Wesley Site for Shopping Plaza
Dear Selectmen,
I am a resident on the South Street in Reading and am very concerned about the development of the
Addison-Wesley site for a shopping plaza.
I have been lived in Reading since the fall of 2002 and have been enjoying every minute in this beautiful
town. A shopping plaza at the said site will not fit in the charming residential environment that we all
enjoy. The significant increase of traffic that the shopping plaza will bring to the area will detroy the life
as we know it.
I strongly urge you not to approve the rezoning of the site for such a development. Thanks for your
consideration.
Best regards, .
Gangfeng Xu, PhD
978-604-0459
Yahoo! Personals
Single? There's someone we'd like you to meet.
Lots of someones, actually. Tiv Yahoo! Personals
12/6/2005
ffil
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: kremondi@comcast.net
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 6:34 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Cc: kremondi@comcast.net
Subject: Addison Wesley development
Dear Selectmen:
My husband and I have lived on Pine Ridge Rd. in Reading for the last 13 years. We are raising our
three boys here because we truly value Reading as a quiet, suburban town. Our boys feel safe walking to
Joshua Eaton, playing at Sturges park, riding bikes to friends' houses, etc.
I am VERY concerned about the Addison Wesley site being zoned and developed as a retail space.
I am concerned that adequate study on traffic has not been undertaken, and that the enormous
environmental impact of duinpsters, car noise and pollution, large overhead parking lot lighting, and
lost open space has also not been thoroughly considered.
I understand that the space will at some time be sold, but I urge the town to consider other options: a
town recreational complex of fields,.a pool, tennis courts,ete. possibly to be funded by another 2 1/2
override; a town hospital funded by an already significant endowment and partnered with another larger
hospital; elderly and assisted care living; or a satellite college campus of a larger college or university.
I know that the options presented above are not EASY solutions and would require effort and
creative financing solutions, but I do believe them to be in better interest to the town of Reading. I want
to see Reading preserved as the wonderful town that it is and not to see it become another victim to
suburban sprawl.
Thank you,
Kristen Remondi
165 Pine Ridge Road
12/6/2005
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: Joann Takehara Sanford Oo.take@verizon.netj
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 8:05 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Addison-Wesley proposal - REJECT
I urge you to REJECT the proposed mall at the Addison-Wesley site.
After the fiasco of voting at the site, it is obvious there is no traffic plan that will
allow mall access while still allowing Reading residents to go about their normal
business. Turning Main St into a seven lane highway is not a viable or practical
solution. It is already difficult to enter Reading, given the traffic at the Rte 129 and
Walkers Brook exits; a mall at the Main St. exit will effectively barricade residents from
entering from the highway. And when traffic backs up, cars will be cutting down
surrounding side streets, even more than the current rush hour cut-through traffic.
The Walkers Brook development and the current multiple unit housing developments will be
changing the character of our town in the next years. Please wait to implement further
changes until the impact of these current projects on the town's infrastructure can be
adequately assessed.
Joann M. Takehara
52 Hopkins Street
1
Page 1 of 1
Hechenblefter, Peter
From: djmjm45@comcast.net
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 8:41 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Addison Wesley
I am writing to voice my opposition to the retail proposal at the Addison Wesley site. I do not live in the
inunediate neighborhood, but think the proposal would have a negative impact in regards to traffic and
overall quality of life in the town. Creating a large retail development in the middle of a residential
neighborhood is not the highest and best use for the site
Town officials, with input from the neighborhood, should determine what an acceptable alternative use
is for the site. This info-nation should be communicated to the owner as it will allow the owner to
solicit bids on proposed uses acceptable to the town. Also, has the Board considered any linkage for
allowing a zoning change?
Thank you for your consideration,
John Migliozzi
45 Audubon Road
l7%
12/6/2005
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: jbdietz@comcast.net
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 10:58 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Addison Wesley project
Dear Sirs and Madam,
The numbers in the traffic study presented by the developers of the "Lifestyle Center"
being proposed for the Addison-Wesley site give me great pause.
I have twenty years of experience as a software engineer, working on Traffic Management on
Internet Routers. While Internet data and automobiles are not the same thing, the
engineering discipline needed to solve problems in both of these areas is similar.
The numbers presented in the traffic studies are precise - times to the tenth of a second,
traffic volumes to exact five figure numbers. This is a little disturbing, as though
their calculations were done with exact knowledge rather than the estimates on which they
were based. Yet the traffic study downplays the fact that these are estimates, and does
not go into sufficient detail in describing where these estimates come from.
My major concern is this: Where is the wiggle room? What excess parking capacity and
traffic volume have they accounted for? What is the margin for error? The Reading site
does not have the luxury of space for expansion of satellite parking lots and longer off-
ramps that the developer had in Hingham. The A-W site is bounded by homes on one side and
the busiest interstate highway in the state on the other. If they have underestimated the
volume of traffic, the result may be more money for the store owners, but misery for the
unfortunate residents of Reading who have to fight their way through it every evening and
weekend afternoon.
To be frank, I question the independence of the traffic consultant brought in to evaluate
this proposal. Given that firms evaluate each other's proposals routinely, it seems
likely that they would give each other professional courtesy in the form of latitude when
evaluating.
Adding to the tax base is a potential benefit, but will come as little comfort to those
residents whose property values are adversely affected by the increased traffic volume and
the erosion of the character of our town. Please take all your constituents into account
and reject ,this proposal.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey Dietz
1
(3y
Page 1 of 1
Hechenblefter, Peter
From: crwhit99@aol.com
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 11:55 PM
To: . Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Proposed "Lifestyle Center"
Dear Members of the Reading Board of Selectmen:
I am writing to express my concerns about the traffic impact of the proposed "lifestyle center" at
South Main Street and South Street/Jacob. Based on what happened during the presidential
primary election, I don't believe that the roads in the area can be reasonably modified in order to
efficiently handle the level of traffic that would probably result from building this "lifestyle center."
I am also concerned about likely negative impacts on current local businesses.
While I would welcome a Whole Foods Market store in Reading, I have no interest in the other
stores listed in the Daily Times Chronicle; and I would be opposed to the addition of a Walmart
(not included in the list in the paper but I gather that this could happen, once the zoning has been
changed).
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
Carolyn R. Whiting
17 Chestnut Road
Reading MA 01867
12/6/2005
No
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: Vito Politano [politano@verizon.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 1:03 AM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Dear Town of Reading Selectmen,
My name is Vito Politano and I live on Arrow Circle with my wife Helen and 2 children ages
8 and S. Have been living in Reading since late 1999
I will be unable to attend the Selectmen's Meeting tomorrow since I am out of town for
business, and wanted to email you with my concern and dislikes of this proposed project.
Like many other residence of Reading, I have strong concerns about this project. I feel
that there will be more negative impact then positive.
1. Mainly the increased traffic volume not only at the intersection of the entrance but
throughout the town as people from surrounding towns come through the town from all
directions.
2. I find it very hard to believe that traffic studies performed today can predict traffic
volume for tomorrow, history has shown that these studies are more often wrong.
3. Timing traffic signals and imposing traffic restrictions is not the answer to traffic
volume, this just backs up traffic.
4. Do we really need another mall, what impact will this have on the existing businesses
in town
As you can see my main issue is traffic volume, and turning route 28 Main Street into a
route 1. It is already frustrating dealing with the traffic volume when riding through the
center on a Saturday, I can not imagine what this will be like when you add more volume.
I think you as selectmen for the town of Reading need to really think about where the town
is heading and what changes have taken place in the past 5 years.
Thanks in advance for your time.
Vito Politano
1
O
Page 1 of 1
Hechenblefter, Peter
From: Diane A. Weggel [d-weggel@mindspring.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 2:10 AM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Proposed shopping center traffic pattern
I have serious concerns regarding the proposed shopping center on the Addison-Wesley site. I am particularly
concerned about the increased traffic congestion and accident risk that is certain to result from this proposed mall.
I have been a Reading resident for almost 60 years. I attended Joshua Eaton School, Parker Junior High
and graduated from Reading Memorial High School. I have been driving between Reading and Boston via various
routes since 1963. As an RN at Massachusetts General Hospital, I drove to work from South Street at all hours,
in all sorts of weather, on every day of the week for 27 years. Over the years the trip became potentially
quicker as access changed from Rte. 28 to Routes 128 and 93. However, on each trip as I leave the corner of
South and Main streets I always look at the Rte. 128 bridge over Rte. 28 to check the amount of traffic
congestion.
Two lanes of traffic accessing Rte. 128 South will further aggravate the present nightmare of merges and
accident risk at this site, already described as the worst in Massachusetts for accidents". Returning north on 128
to northward onto Rte. 28, is even more difficult, because of the lane drop on 128 between Rtes. 93 and 28.
None of the latter should be news to Reading residents.
The "artist's sketches" of the proposed increase from four to seven lanes of traffic, as well as the lovely fall mall
scene, are fabrications of an artist, not a traffic engineer. Only an artist could increase four lanes to seven without
taking any land or buildings.
To me, an indication that someone is trying to foist something on residents of South Street is the
surreptitiousness with which trucks came in the stealth of night to paint lines on our designated historic
road. Another indication is that even abutters were not notified of the latest meetings regarding the proposed
additional lanes that will affect far more than South Street.
This Mall has been portrayed on Channel 5 as a fait accompli. Is this misrepresentation from the Town, or from
the developers, or both? Whichever, it is not behavior that establishes trust.
I think that the certainty of increased traffic volume at this intersection is reason enough to conclude that this
proposed development is not in the best interest of Reading.
Diane Weggel
12/6/2005
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: Joe Westerman Poseph.westerman@verizon.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 7:47 AM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: A-W Project
The proposed A-W project is not a direction that I want my town to follow.
There are several reasons that I believe this would be a negative for Reading including
the added traffic load, the eventual dissolution of the South Street neighborhood area,
and an increase in crime. Very little has been said about the additional crime that
accompanies retail developments and to ignore those implications would be a grave
injustice to Reading's residents. In addition to the obvious shoplifting that will occur,
_larcenies, burglaries would rise if what we've seen at Jordan's is an indication.
We have West St, Rte 129, Rte 28, and North Ave which are all main roads
entering or passing through Reading. The affect of our cumulative
additional developments should be examined to assess to what extent we've created and will
continue to create a Gridlock Community. I checked the Boston globe community assessment
for Reading and noted that our Smog index exceeds the state average. Overloading our
roads will increase this pollution and the tax benefits received from AW will not
compensate that detrimental health effects from increased pollution. An A-W traffic study
has been conducted but that study was actually a proposal for access to the AW site the
mindset that we can change other roadway directions and whatever we need to alter as long
as our project continues.
Certainly the developer can change what's on their land, but this traffic study shows a
leaching approach that will erode the adjacent neighborhoods however as Summer Ave is
proposed as being changed into a One way road, I can't help but to wonder how far the
leaching will go and how much will be lost 20 years from now as that project will continue
to evolve and grow.
Whether the developer will agree, development sprawl continues to consume lands adjacent
to developments years later and if we nee to see evidence collaborating this, we need
look no further than the North Shore Shopping Center in Peabody which had its starts as an
early version of a Lifestyle center which is a cute marketing term for multiple adjacent
strip malls.
As you may surmise, I do think retail or mixed retail development is a good use of the AW
Land.
Thank You,
Joseph Westerman
17 Avon St.
1
0
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From:
hugebasil@comcast.net
Sent:
Tuesday, December 06, 2005 8:03 AM
To:
Reading - Selectmen
Cc: readingfirst@comcast.net
Subject: Addison-Wesley Site
I am a resident of Reading, living near the Addison-Wesley site. I am absolutely opposed to rezoning
that site and putting a shopping mall there. We already have more than enough places to shop in
Reading and nearby. The congestion is not worth the tax revenue.
You already made a huge error allowing low income housing into the old Spence Farm site which will
bring in minimal revenue but cost the town a huge amount in extra police, water, fire protection,
classroom space, added congestion and traffic, and other tax payer provided services. The assisted
living complex you refused to allow into that space would have provided jobs, tax revenue, and required
very few additional tax payer dollars. Please don't make an even bigger mistake this time.
Richard Dennis
9 Machitosh Road
D
12/6/2005
Page 1 of 1
Hechenblefter, Peter
From: cmissert@comcast.net
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 8:38 AM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: please vote "No" for me concerning Life Style/Addison site
To my Selectmen,
Please vote "no" for myself and my wife concerning the proposed Lifestyle Center at the Addison
Wesley site. If you have gone to that location on a voting day, you would see-that the location and
community cannot handle the traffic flow. Putting a Lifestyle Center there would be even worse. I'm all
for tax revenue coming to our town, but not if it costs us our small town/bedroom community look and
feel. We already have one major "Center" off of the North Ave Exit between Reading and Wakefield.
Why would you want to push more Big Mall sprall down our throats?? Look at Main Street in Andover
as our goal for Reading. (I don't want another Mishawam Road, Washington St (Woburn), or Commerce
Way in my back yard).
A Life Center at that location is a BAD idea. Please vote no for it, as our representative.
Thank you.
Paul and Carolyn Missert
97 Red Gate Lane
12/6/2005
(P_~
Page 1 of 2
Hechenblefter, Peter
From: Michael Giacalone [Michael@GiacaloneCPA.com]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 9:32 AM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Addison-Wesley site
Dear Selectmen,
I am writing to all of you in response to the proposed development at the Addison-Wesley site. My
family moved into Reading in 1996. At that time, the town was what we had envisioned it to be: small
coinlnunity, nice local businesses, and people who were happy and knew each other. Since then, there
has been considerable building within the town both residential and commercial. I daresay that my wife
and I have been disappointed in how the town has been maturing. We can accept the Home
Depot/Jordans site because that was an undesirable site for residential development.
However, the proposal at the Addison site is unacceptable. This proposal is asking to put yet another
STRIP MALL in a residential community. There is already enough retail in the area: first, our own
Down Town Reading; Red Stone Shopping Plaza in Stoneham; the malls in Woburn, Burlington, and
Peabody; the area in Woburn near Staples on Washington Street. In addition to the over saturation of
retail shopping, there would be adverse effects to our local businesses that have enough to do to prosper
in this economy as it is. What this developer is asking the Town for permission for is to place a STRIP
MALL right up against residential homes that will do nothing but destroy the quite LIFESTYLE that the
people in this community are accustomed to and want. That reason is why we live here.
In addition to the impact to the abutting properties, the negative impact will be felt by the entire town as
a result of the negative impacts on traffic. I was doing errands up town this past Saturday morning at
about 10:30am. The traffic at that time was nuts and it was just with our local shops, bank, and post
office! ! If this development should go through, how can any study truthfully and in good faith try to
make this community believe that there will not be a negative impact? I have even seen one report
suggest that Summer Avenue be made a one way going from Main Street to West Street. That makes no
sense. A change like that would cut off and make it far more difficult for the residents of the West
Street side of town to gain access to the Main Street side of town. Not to mention the chaos it would
create for the many families which have children attending the Joshua Eaton School and the residents
on/near Summer Avenue gaining access to the Main Street side of town.
Has any thought been given to how the surrounding neighborhoods would be impacted by the trash that
would be facing their properties? How about the negative impact of the commercial deliveries? The
lighting? All the Selectmen need to do is look at the Home Depot site to see those negative impacts.
We are even receiving complaints from residents of Wakefield!
This town is going to have enough to deal with concerning whatever changes will be imposed upon us
by the looming "improvements" to the 128/93 interchange. Homes and our community will be
permanently and negatively impacted. The developer is trying to do all it can to lessen the impact of
that project on itself by wanting to push its site as far back and as close to the abutting residences as it
can. That is hardly something as I see as something that would improve the surrounding residences.
I am further confused as to why this is the only project that has been presented to the town. Are there
not other more desirable alternative? Has anyone thought of less invasive options like an over 55
community? How about an adjunct college campus? Those options are less invasive to the surrounding
.01 A
12/5/2005
Page 2 of 2
neighborhoods and the entire community. In fact, they may even help to boost the local community
without even negatively impacting our infrastructure. I would expect that the people in those options
would need to go out for lunches and dinners at local establishments, utilize the local banks, shop at the
Atlantic Super Market, and use the businesses in our own down town center. We would probably enjoy
the same real estate tax revenue and increased property values due to the nature of those activities.
Is it not the responsibility of our elected officials to seek out other more desirable suitors for this site? Is
it not the responsibility of our Town Manager, a hired position, to do the same? I do not think that the
people in charge of this town should just sit back and tell the community that this is the only avenue we
have. Clearly, the community does not want it and it is the moral and fiduciary responsibility of our
hired and elected officials to find a better solution to this problem.
My family lived in a town that was filled with commercial activity before moving to Reading. That is
why we moved out of that town and came to this one. Do not make us feel like we made the wrong
choice.
Do not allow this development to proceed. There must be better alternatives.
Thank you,
Michael Giacalone
D
12/5/2005
Page 1 of 1
Hechenblelkner, Peter
From: Fante, Ronald L. [rfante@mitre.org]
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2005 8:18 AM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Addison Wesley
I would like to express my opposition to a Shopping Plaza on the Addison Wesley site.Do we want Reading to
become another Woburn?
Ronald Fante
26 Sherwood Rd.
Reading,MA 01867
781-944-6585
12/5/2005
9
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: Mary Avery [mavery@mindspring.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 10:59 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Oppose LifestyleShopping Center
I want to voice my opposition to the proposed LIFESTYLE SHOPPING CENTER. I have lived on South Street for
58 years, thru many changes, including the coming of Rt. 128.
This latest proposed change is preposterous and one that will ruin the entire South end of Reading, as I see it.
Rezoning for a shopping mall will open the door for anything and forever change our tranquil neighborhood.
The mall developers will not be the neighbors Addison Wesley was. The traffic will be horrendous, as their plan
shows. We are already about to be inundated with the expected traffic from the West Street project and being a "
128A" at rush hour.
This impacts all of Reading. Please don't accept the traffic plan and rezoning. Defeat the shopping center and put
your effort into downtown Reading and local business.
Mary D. Avery
0
12/5/2005
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: Arlene303O@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 7:39 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Shopping Plaza/Add ison-WesleySite
To Whom It May Concern-
I have been a resident of Reading for 3 years now and I really love this community. I
love the small town feel and the shops in the town center. I am writing to you today
because of how strongly I feel a shopping center at the Addison-Wesley site would be a
detriment to our town. I love shopping and having great stores close by but I don't want
the extra traffic or congestion or the driving out of the town's local shops. Please
consider this a "NO" vote on the proposed shopping center.
Sincerely,
Arlene DeLuca
90 Green St., #1
Read i ng
VID
12/5/2005
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: bruce.woodbury [bruce.woodbury@comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 3:02 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Addison-Wesley Site
Greetings.We are opposed to the developement of a shopping plaza at this site.Bruce & Brenda Woodbury.
12/5/2005
Page 1 of 1
Hechenblelkner, Peter
From: Dave Heron [dbheron@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 20052:35 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Opposition to Rezoning the Addison-Wesley Site
I would like to go on record of opposing the rezoning of the Addison-Wesley site as it would be detrimental to the
overall Reading lifestyle.
Thank you,
David B. Heron
288 Charles Street
Reading, MA
12/5/2005
D
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: Alice R Modica [armodica@comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 12:05 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Addison-Wesley Site
Please put us on the list of those who strongly object to developing the Addison-Wesley site into a
"lifestyle center." We are seniors living on the other side of Reading and fear this town will become just
another city.
Alice and Michael Modica
12/5/2005
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: MCarter811 @comcast.net
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 10:27 AM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: ADDISON WESLEY SITE
After watching the traffic discussion on the proposed Addison-Wesley site, I would like to express
opposition for this project.
During the meeting, a traffic study was presented. From the TV viewpoint, the diagram looked
extremely distorted and I feel does not truly represent the problems in the area. It is obvious the person
who presented it has not traveled any of the affected roadways often. Ramps exiting 128 from either
direction will become gridlocked adding to the already busy, conjested South Street area.
The surrounding residents of the area (I live north of town and have been told I would not be
affected) will be forced to live with never ending traffic trying to reach their homes which will not be
accessible from Rt 28 or West Street without experiencing delay.
I feel the election was the perfect arena to predict the problems which would arise. Remember the
restriction for the election, no left turn onto South Street from 28N? Did you travel down 28S to vote or
did you walk the two mile traffic backup? Maybe you took an alternate route and came from behind
Wayside from Wakefield to vote and parked on the side street? What did the extra police details
cost? Did you try to cross South St with your child's stroller?
The proposed project will make life difficult for the entire Reading community. Will the
downtown area become a ghost town? Will the merchants be forced out of business? Will I be able to
get home to the North of the center?
I work in South Stoneham, sometimes because of traffic delays it takes 40 minutes for me to get to
work then an additional 40 minutes to get home. The town has allowed Walker's Brook to be
constructed, we'll soon be forced to encounter the 128/93 interchange which all of us realize WILL
HAPPEN.
Too much traffic already on West Street, Lowell Street (from the Wilmington line to the square),
Walkers Brook, Haverhill Street (exit 40 off 128) will paralize the entire town.
PLEASE DO NOT ALLOW THIS PROJECT TO BE BUILT.
Marilyn Carter
32 Field Pond Drive
Reading
12/5/2005
D
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: Christine Brungardt [cebrungardt@comcast.net]
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 9:32 AM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Cc: Christine Brungardt
Subject: Things to think about regarding the Addison-Wesley development
e The developers are calling it quaint New England - it is not, it is a strip mall in the shape of a
rectangle filled with chain stores with a parking lot in the middle
• Cars from Woburn, Wilmington, North Reading, Stoneham, Wakefield will cut through our
Reading neighborhoods
e Our Main St. will become as busy as Wilmington's Route 38.
e Malls create ghost towns instead of downtowns because they drive out local businesses. If our
local businesses only lose some of their regulars or you just shop there less frequently than you
used to, they will be in big trouble. Calaresos and the Atlantic will have a hard time competing
against a Whole Foods. If you need to pick up a gift and you are at the mall anyway, you are not
shopping at Sense of Wonder.
. Increased commute times coining home from work as you are now battling mall traffic coming off
the dual off-ramp and the multiple lights that come with it.
It will be heck driving across Main St.or turning against traffic on Main St. Wasn't this one of the
justifications of not wanting a Wendys?
e Home values will go down if we change our town's reputation into a shopping town with lots of
traffic instead of a shall quiet community with great schools
Thank you,
Christine Brungardt
324 South St.
11 year resident
D
12/5/2005
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: lorijay348@comcast.net
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 8:50 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Pearson Education property
To the Board of Selectmen:
I am a resident of South Street, and am writing to voice my opposition to a proposed retail development on the
Pearson Education property. Although I am an abutter to the property, my concern is not only with my own
neighborhood, but the town as a whole.
Having worked in the retail industry for almost 20 years, both in stores and in corporate office positions, it is my
opinion that this property is an inappropriate location for a high-volume retail development. The potential negative
impact on the quality of life in the town of Reading is enormous, primarily because the existing infrastructure in the
town is insufficient to support the amount of traffic that will be generated.
In the years that I've worked in store management, in various locations throughout New England, I have never
encountered a multi-store, or even single-store, development, that has only one means of entry and exit for
customer, employee, and support/delivery vehicles. For that reason alone, I believe that any proposed traffic
mitigation proposal will still prove to be inadequate.
There are many other options to be explored as potential uses for this property: office, hotel, recreation,
residential, to name a few. Keeping the best interests of the community in mind, these and other options should
be researched and pursued by Pearson, before turning to retail as a solution.
Sincerely,
Lori Doughty
348 South Street
Reading, MA 01867
781-944-1396
12/5/2005
Hechenblefter, Peter
From: Carl J. Hedberg [cjhedberg36@mindspring.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 2:57 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Addison-Wesley
Dear Sirs,
I am just now becoming aware of the magnitude of the proposed development of the Addison-
Wesley property. I must voice my deep concern over the impact it will have on our town. I
know you are well informed as to these issues so I won't re-hash them. Even though I live
well away from the area, I drive through it constantly and even now there is considerable
traffic. I just want to go on record as being opposed to said plan.
Carl J. Hedberg
134 High Street
1
97)
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: Michael Pelosi [m.pelosi@comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 2:29 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Addison Wesley development
What is a "Lifestyle Center"? Sounds like another strip mall to me. If I want to go to a mall I can go to Woburn or
Burlington. Reading is already inundated with traffic we don't need this.The development on Walkers Brook
Drive should generate enough tax dollars. Let's keep Reading somewhat unique from the surrounding
communities.
Michael Pelosi
6)
12/5/2005
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: George E. MacPherson [gem11@comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 2:05 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Development at Addison-Wesley Site
Dear Board of Selectmen,
We would like you to consider another use of the Addison-Wesley property than the
proposed Shopping Center. Please protect our down town shopping proprietors and not
turn our center into a "ghost town".
With your creative thinking some one should be able to come up with a use for this property
other than more retail stores.
Maybe the State of Massachusetts or the U S Government could find these fine buildings to
be of use to them,
Please no more shopping Malls!!!!!
Ann & George MacPherson
161 Belmont Street
Reading, MA 01867
FREE Emoticons for
, rVx;1-
~~y 2GS' {r At
12/5/2005
your email! Click Here!
60,
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: bdimambro [bdimambro@comcast.net]
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005 11:46 AM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Proposed shopping plaza
Reading does not need another shopping plaza.
Enough.
B. DiMambro
10-W A
ILO Owl)
12/5/2005
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: James V. D'Agostino [dagdad@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 1:51 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Addison Wesley Development Proposal
We are opposed to the retail store development proposal for this site for several reasons.
The traffic impacts can not be adequately mitigated despite what the developer's consultant may propose. The
access to the site is just not suitable. This is a residential setting, in no way comparable to the Hingham
downtown location.
Deliveries to this site would impact on the South st.residences which are in close proximity to the borders of the
site. Trash disposal and other service activities,
and lighting, would intrude on the neighboring homes.
The stores would bring traffic on holidays, when residents are entitled to enjoy peaceful surroundings.
The Police activities will be further taxed by traffic and
calls for assistance by the tenants of the development.
Please oppose this development.
Thank you.
James D'Agostino
Carol D'Agostino
21 Hopkins St.
Reading
NY
V
12/6/2005
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: Deborah Gilburg [debgilburg@comcast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 2:07 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Addison-Wesley Redevelopment
Greetings:
I am writing to express my desire to see the re-zoning request for the Addison-Wesley
redevelopment project be approved for vote by Town Meeting by the Board of Selectmen.
I understand there are a lot of important issues at stake, and that the project will have
a variety of impacts, positive and negative, on Reading residents. As such, I believe
that it is imperative that the Board of Selectmen do not unilaterally quash this project,
but allow further and more informed discussion to arise at Town Meeting.
This town is in sore need of income other than residential taxes, and does not need any
more housing developments to burden our tax base and our schools. Please let Town Meeting
at least consider the proposal and perhaps find ways to meet, negotiate or mitigate
resident concerns.
Sincerely,
Deborah Gilburg
103 Oak Street
1
Hechenblefter, Peter
From:
tunacat@comcast.net
Sent:
Tuesday, December 06, 2005 2:40 PM
To:
Reading - Selectmen
Subject:
A-W
To the Selectmen:
I strongly urge you to reject the proposal for the shopping plaza at
the Addison-Wesley site. The town needs to consider not just what is
possible but what is desirable and in the long-term best interest of the
commuity. Large-scale retail development on this site is will erode
the surrounding neighborhoods and entire town. When I think of what makes me proud to be
a citizen of Reading I think of our excellent library, the award winning drama club at the
high school, the math team at Coolidge, the cultural institutions of our town, my
neighbors. These
are the things I tell people about our town. I don't want to see our
town become known for traffic and shopping.
Sincerely,
Angela Binda
I
- It
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: Bob & Lynn Householder [blhouseholder@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 2:46 PM
To:. Reading - Selectmen
Subject: addison-wesley site .
Hello-
I am writing to let you know that we are AGAINST the building of the lifestyle mall at the Addison-Wesley
site. It will cause unimaginable traffic issues and tie ups as well as change our neighborhood. We love our small
community and all that the town has to offer. We do not want a mall in town, particularly at this site. Please do
not allow this proposal to pass and keep fighting for our wonderful town.
Thanks for listening.
Lynn Householder
12 Curtis St
12/6/2005
~K
Hechenblefter, Peter
From: bethany.montgomery@verizon.net
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 3:36 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: tonight's town meeting
Dear Selectmen, As Reading residents my husband and I wanted to express our vote to have
the Addison Wesley site plans proceed under your careful guidance. We believe this is an
opportunity for the town that should not be passed by. We need to expand our tax base
beyond the residential burden and do so in thoughtful ways. This seems like a sound
concept to us as long as traffic flow and respect for existing neighborhoods is addressed.
Sincerely
Charlie Mathewson
Bethany Montgomery
16 Harriman Ave.
1
&s
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: RLichl@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 3:25 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Addison Wesley site
Dear Selectmen,
Please register us as opposed to any rezoning for commercial/retail use. It is inconsistent with the
neighborhood. Is spot zoning of this type illegal? Thank you.
Sincerely,
James and Rita Lichoulas
7 Hopkins Street
Reading MA
(100-Ov
12/6/2005
Hechenblefter, Peter
From: Atlantic Framing Co. [scott@atianticframing.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 3:41 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Addison-Wesley
Please know your handling of the future development of the addison-Wesley site will have
profound effects on the Town of Reading. As a small downtown business owner I urge
caution. Once in motion, these developments may be hard to control and can not be undone.
The downtown is on the rebound and poised for well planned future growth. Shopping
lifestyle centers may not be in the long term interest of the town as a whole, only the
short term financial goals of the developer. Thank You, Scott Kajander
Atlantic Framing Co.
75 Haven Street, Reading, MA 01867
781-944-4169
R. Scott Kajander
Tuesday-Friday: 9:30-5:30
Thursday: 1:00-7:00
Saturday: 9:30-3:00
1
Schena, Paula
From: Diane Chapin [dichapin@corricast.net]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 4:27 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Addison Wesley Property
To Peter and Selectmen,
Please stop this shopping plaza idea before it goes any further. The impact on my home and
neighborhood would be massive. Haven't even recovered from the housing eyesore on Spence
Farm property, plus we all know the issue of 93/128 will be back again. Would you want
this mall in your immediate neighborhood?
Sincerely,
Diane Chapin
66 Sturges Road
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: Mary L. Didmenico [didmenm@wyeth.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 5:06 PM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Park Square @ Reading
Peter and Selectmen,
My name is Mary DiDomenico and I live on Sturges Rd. I would like to express my concern regarding the
proposed plan of action at the old Addison Wesley site. My husband and I OBJECT to such a plan for a number
of reasons. ( e.g.traffic,drunks,crime etc.) I chose Reading 20 years ago because it is a great bedroom
community and not because I wanted to have the Mall of America in my backyard. Peter and Selectmen, please
don't sell Reading out.
Regards
Mary
12/6/2005
E~TY~G
OF 5'E-tE
Y~ r~~ ~p_ vss
SIGN"
(please
C ~jto i
V h j
Alo/
~Qv
BOAV-ID E~,~CT 1
S1G IN s p~
(please pr r~
oo~
It-tat
J_q
-rb
-CU
~ MEETING
L
BUR ~ S
TF T~gO~ F E
Vii} 51 DATE ADD"-
u
(Please P
Jn
AAj_
cc,
' SELECTMEN MEETING
SIGN-IN SHEET FOR THE BOARD OF
DATE:
u
NAME ADDRESS
(Please print)
D L t r
124
)n Ylkl e,
/~dC,~
io seP ~ W eAl2rMAA/
v.
A;- P05:r AD -
J/ t11A.1c*'Aos? 1719.
33
1.7 A-vo►v S+,
°A ?DNS
Y L4
Wea57151Z
J
5>~7 Cie.
~ -2- Ste-
1
4,4-+
~j~ShaN /KA ~a~33 -~L
.
ECT
A A)
(please prin.) li
~..~lf 4 ~ ~ 1 ~ _ (1 ~ ( f-0
'Z
1A
f~ f p
QJ(1 ,~tJ~-. lS tX Cya tr,
o 6
_ _~1~=-+`1 ~ - `a~ -
. "51
"
JDSN UR
&sb,~
NSY
• EL'~~T~N MEE N
AgD OF Sr,.. ,
EST Fag T~I'~ zooio
N -IN
5'H p ATE
les15C p , - 1
~L00 i .
.I
r,