HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-02-06 Board of Selectmen Packet2007 MEETING DATES
BOARD OF SELECTMEN
February 3, 2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting - Budget
February 6, 2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting
February 13, 2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting
February 19, 2007
President's Day
February 26, 2007
Special Town Meeting
February 27, 2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting
March 6, 2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting
March 13, 2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting
March 27, 2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting
April 3, 2007
April 10, 2007
April 16, 2007
April 23, 2007
April 24, 2007
April 26, 2007
April 30, 2007
Local Election
Board of Selectmen Meeting
Patriot's Day
Annual Town Meeting
Board of Selectmen Meeting
Annual Town Meeting
Annual Town Meeting
May 1, 2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting
May 3, 2007
Annual Town Meeting
May 15, 2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting
May 22, 2001
Board of Selectmen Meeting
May 28, 2007
Memorial Day
June 5, 2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting
June 12, 2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting
June 26, 2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting
July 4, 2007
Independence Day
July 10, 2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting
July 24, 2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting
August 7, 2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting
August 21, 2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting
September 3, 2007 Labor Day
September 4, 2007 Board of Selectmen Meeting
September 18, 2007 Board of Selectmen Meeting
September 25, 2007 Board of Selectmen Meeting
October 8, 2007 Columbus Day
October 9, 2007 Board of Selectmen Meeting
October 16, 2007 Board of Selectmen Meeting
October 30, 2007 Board of Selectmen Meeting
November 6, 2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting
November 12, 2007
Veterans Day Celebrated
November 13, 2007
Subsequent Town Meeting
November 15, 2007
Subsequent Town Meeting
November 19, 2007
Subsequent Town Meeting
November 20, 2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting
November 22, 2007
Thanksgiving
November 27, 2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting
December 11, 2007 Board of Selectmen Meeting
December 18, 2007 Board of Selectmen Meeting
December 25, 2007 Christmas
DRAFT -April 23, 2007 Annual Town Meeting
WARRANT OUTLINE 02/02/2007
Art. Mover/ Moderator
# Article Description Sponsor Comment Notes
8 Senior Tax worker program to Board of Selectmen
Overlay
9 Authorizing debt and appropriating - Board of Selectmen
Chanter 90
10 Authorize disposition of surplus Board of Selectmen
tangible property
1 I Authorizing Revolving Funds Board of Selectmen
12 j;lhj11-uv1ng FY 2008 Budget FINCOM
13 Street Acceptances - Woodland Road Board of Selectmen
14 Transferring appropriations from Board of Selectmen
prior years appropriation to MWRA
water interconnection project
16 Debt authorization - Downtown Board of Selectmen
Improvement Program
4 Amend Capital Improvement Board of Selectmen
Prnsrram FY 2007 - FY 2011
7 Approving FY 2008 to FY 20012 Board of Selectmen
Capital Improvement Program
15 Establishing a stabilization fund for FINCOM
host retirement health care costs
17 Debt Authorization - Financial Board of Selectmen
software and hardware
18 Debt Authorization - Tennis Court Board of Selectmen
19 Debt Authorization - Fire pumper Board of Selectmen
OHIO!
20 Debt Authorization - field Board of Selectmen
improvements
21 Transfer care, custody and control of School Committee
Plat 73 lot 7 from the School
Committee to the Town of Reading
for library purposes
22 Amending Zoning Bylaw Section CPDC
2.2.13 - definition of frontage
23 Amending Section 5.6 of the general Board of Selectmen
24 General Bylaw Amendment - Sight Board of Selectmen
25 Removal of Town Meeting members Board of Selectmen
From the Office of:
Ellen Callahan Doucette
BRACKETT & LUCAS
165 Washington Street
Winchester, MA 01890
(781) 729-1500
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
This day of Februarv , 2007.
1. PARTIES AND MAILING ADDRESSES
Lucille DelPonte, Administratrix of the Estate of Margaret
Grace Mattera a/k/a Margaret M. Mattera
hereinafter called the SELLER, agrees to SELL certain
property to the TOWN OF READING, acting by and through its
Board of Selectmen hereinafter called the BUYER or PURCHASER,
agrees to BUY, upon the terms hereinafter set forth, the
following described premises:
2. DESCRIPTION
Approximately 2.14 acres of property with buildings thereon
located at 1481 Main Street, Reading MA as more fully
described in a deed from Richard A. Mattera to Richard A.
Mattera and Margaret M. Mattera dated May 25, 1984 recorded
at Middlesex South Registry of Deeds, Book 15628, Page 455,
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
4. TITLE DEED
Said premises are to be conveyed by a good and sufficient
quitclaim deed running to the BUYER, or to the nominee
designated by the BUYER by written notice to the SELLER at
least seven (7) days before the deed is to be delivered as
herein provided, and said deed shall convey a good and clear
record and marketable title thereto, free from encumbrances,
except:
(a) Provisions of existing building and zoning laws;.
(b) Existing rights and obligations in party walls
which are not the subject of written .agreement;
(c)
Such taxes
for the then current year as are
not
due and payable on the date of the delivery
of
such deed;
(d)
Any liens for municipal betterments assessed after
the date of
this agreement;
(e)
Easements,
restrictions and reservations
of
record, if
any, so long as the same do
not
prohibit or
materially interfere with the current
use of said
premises;
(f)
5. PLANS
If said deed refers to a plan necessary to be recorded
therewith the SELLER shall deliver such plan with the deed in
form adequate for recording or registration.
6. REGISTERED TITLE
N/A
7. PURCHASE PRICE
The agreed purchase price for said premises is
($800,000.00) Dollars, of which
$ 5% have been paid as a deposit this day and
$ are to be paid at the time of delivery of the
deed in cash, or by certified, cashier's,
treasurer's or bank check(s).
$ 800,000.00 TOTAL
8. TIME FOR PERFORMANCE; DELIVERY OF DEED
Such deed is to be delivered at 2 o'clock p.m. on the th day
of February, 2007, at the Middlesex South Registry of, Deeds,
unless otherwise agreed upon in writing. It is agreed that
time is of the essence of this agreement.
9. POSSESSION AND CONDITION OF PREMISES
Full possession of said premises free of all tenants and
occupants is to be delivered at the time of the delivery of
the deed, said premises to be then (a) in the same condition
as they now are, reasonable use and wear thereof excepted,
and (b) not in violation of said building and zoning laws,
and (c) in compliance with provisions of any instrument
referred to in clause 3 hereof. The BUYER shall be entitled
personally to inspect said premises prior to the delivery of
the deed in order to determine whether the condition thereof
complies with the terms of this clause.
10. EXTENSION TO PERFECT TITLE OR MAKE PREMISES CONFORM
If the SELLER shall be unable to give title or to make
conveyance, or to deliver possession of the premises, all as
herein stipulated, or if at the time of the delivery of the
deed the premises do not conform with the provisions hereof,
then any payments made under this agreement shall be
forthwith refunded and all other obligations of the parties
hereto shall cease and this agreement shall be void without
recourse to the parties hereto, unless the SELLER elects to
use reasonable efforts to remove any defects in title, or to
deliver possession as provided herein, or to make the said
premises conform to the provisions hereof, as the case may
be, in which event the SELLER shall give written notice
thereof to the BUYER at or before the time for performance
hereunder, and thereupon the time for performance hereof
shall be extended for a period of thirty (30) days. The
Seller shall not be required to expend more than $2,000.00 to
conform to the provisions of this Paragraph.
11. FAILURE TO PERFECT TITLE OR MAKE PREMISES CONFORM, ETC.
If at the expiration of the extended time the SELLER shall
have failed so to remove any defects in title, deliver
possession, or make the premises conform, as the case may be,
all as herein agreed, or if at any time during the period of
this agreement or any extension thereof, the holder of a
mortgage on said premises shall refuse to permit the
insurance proceeds, if any, to be used for such purposes,
then any payments made under this agreement shall be
forthwith refunded and all other obligations of the parties
hereto shall cease and this agreement shall be void without
recourse to the parties hereto.
12. BUYER'S ELECTION TO ACCEPT TITLE
The BUYER shall have the election, at either the original or
any extended time for performance, to accept such title as
the SELLER can deliver to the said premises in their then
condition and to pay therefore the purchase price without
deduction, in which case the SELLER shall convey such title,
3
3 q .,t
except that in the event of such conveyance in accord with
the provisions of this clause, if the said premises shall
have been damaged by fire or casualty insured against, then
the SELLER shall, unless the SELLER has previously restored
the premises to their former condition, either
(a) pay over or assign to the BUYER, on delivery of
the deed, all amounts recovered or recoverable on
account of such insurance, less any amounts
reasonably expended by the SELLER for any partial
restoration, or
(b) if a holder of a mortgage on said premises shall
not permit the insurance proceeds or a part
thereof to be used to restore the said premises to
their former condition or to be so paid over or
assigned, give to the BUYER a credit against the
purchase price, on delivery of the deed, equal *to
said amounts so recovered or recoverable and
retained by the holder of the said mortgage less
any amounts reasonably expended by the SELLER for
any partial restoration.
13. ACCEPTANCE OF DEED
The acceptance of a deed by the BUYER or his nominee as the
case may be, shall be deemed to be a full performance and
discharge of every agreement and obligation herein contained
or expressed, except such as are, by the terms hereof, to be
performed after the delivery of said deed.
14. USE OF MONEY TO CLEAR TITLE
To enable the SELLER to make conveyance as herein provided,
the SELLER may, at the time of delivery of the deed, use the
purchase money or any portion thereof to clear the title of
any or all encumbrances or interests, provided that all
instruments so procured are recorded in accordance with REBA
standards.
15. INSURANCE
Until the delivery of the deed, the SELLER shall maintain
insurance on said premises as presently insured.
16. ADJUSTMENTS
Collected rents, mortgage interest, water and sewer use
charges, operating expenses (if any) according to the
-4
G°
schedule attached hereto or set forth below, and taxes for
the then current fiscal year, shall be apportioned and fuel
value shall be adjusted, as of the day of performance of this
agreement and the net amount thereof shall be added to or
deducted from, as the case may be, the purchase price payable
by the BUYER at the time of delivery of the deed.
Uncollected rents for the current rental period shall be
apportioned if and when collected by either party.
17. PAYMENT OF ASSESSED TAXES AND ADJUSTMENT OF UNASSESSED TAXES
All taxes due as of the closing date shall have been paid by
SELLER. If the amount of said taxes is not known at the time
of the delivery of the deed, they shall be apportioned on
the basis of the taxes assessed for the preceding fiscal
year, with a reapportionment as soon as the new tax rate and
valuation can be ascertained
18. BROKER'S FEE
N/A
19. BROKER(S) WARRANTY
N/A
20. DEPOSIT
N/A
21. BUYER'S DEFAULT; DAMAGES
If the BUYER shall fail to fulfill the BUYER's agreements
herein, all deposits made hereunder by the BUYER shall be
retained by the SELLER as liquidated damages and shall be the
SELLER sole remedy at law and equity.
22. RELEASE BY HUSBAND OR. WIFE
The SELLER's spouse hereby agrees to join in said deed and to
release and convey all statutory and other rights and
interests in said premises.
23. BROKER AS PARTY
N/A
24. LIABILITY OF TRUSTEE, SHAREHOLDER BENEFICIARY, ETC.
-5 1 4 C, ~s
If the SELLER or BUYER executes this agreement in a
representative or fiduciary capacity, only the principal or
the estate represented shall be bound, and neither the SELLER
or BUYER so executing, nor any shareholder or beneficiary of
any trust, shall be personally liable for any obligation,
express or implied, hereunder.
25. WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS
The BUYER acknowledges that the BUYER has not been influenced
to enter into this transaction nor has he relied upon any
warranties or representations not set forth or incorporated
in this agreement or previously made in writing, except for
the following additional warranties and representations, if
any, made by either the SELLER or the broker(s):
26. MORTGAGE CONTINGENCY CLAUSE
N/A
27. CONSTRUCTION OF AGREEMENT
This instrument, executed in multiple counterparts, is to be
construed as a Massachusetts contract, is to take effect as a
sealed instrument, sets forth the entire contract between the
parties, is binding upon and enures to the benefit of the
parties hereto and their respective heirs, devisees,
executors, administrators, successors and assigns, and may be
cancelled, modified or amended only by a written instrument
executed by both the SELLER and the BUYER. The use of the
feminine shall include the masculine and the use of the
masculine shall include the feminine. The rule off
construction which provides for construing contract
provisions in favor of the non-drafting party shall have no
effect, as both'Seller and Buyer, or their representatives,
have participated in the negotiation and drafting of this
Agreement.
30. NOTICES
Any notice required or permitted to be given hereunder shall
be in writing and delivered by hand or mailed postage prepaid
by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested,
addressed to the parties at the addresses set forth on page 1
of this Agreement. Copies of all notices to SELLERS shall
simultaneously be sent to:
William Dalton, Esq.
Dalton & Finegold, LLP
-6 4 Lk~ .
34 Essex Street
Andover, MA 01810
and all notices to BUYER shall simultaneously be sent to:
Peter I. Hechenbleikner, Town Manager
Reading Town Hall
16 Lowell Street
Reading, MA 01867
with a copy to:
Ellen Callahan Doucette, Esq.
Brackett & Lucas
165 Washington Street
Winchester, MA. 01890
Any such notice so mailed or delivered shall be deemed
properly served and delivered for all purposes hereunder at
the time such notice is indicated as stamped by any post
office regularly maintained by the United States Postal
authority.
31. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS
Rider A, attached hereto, is fully incorporated herein by
reference.
This agreement is subject to the issuance by the Middlesex
Probate Court of a License to Sell for the Estate of Margaret
Grace Mattera a/k/a Margaret M. Mattera.
This agreement shall be executed in any number of
counterparts. Each counterpart shall together constitute
only one and the same agreement.
Executed as an instrument under seal on the day and year first
written herein.
SELLER
-7
BUYER
Town of Reading,
by and through
its Board of Selectmen
d .1
Ben Tafoya, Chair
James Bonazoli, Vice Chair
Stephen Goldy, Secretary
Camille Anthony
Richard Schubert
-8
q, ~ "
RIDER "A"
ADDENDUM TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
TITLE MATTERS
Without limitations of any other provisions in this
Agreement, said premises shall not be considered in
compliance with the provisions of this Agreement with
respect to the title unless:
Title to said premises is insurable for the benefit of the
Buyer by an American Land Title Association member title
insurance company in a fee owner's policy of title insurance
at normal premium rates, in the American Land Title
Association form currently in use. Subject only to those
printed exceptions to title normally included in the "jacket"
to such form or policy, and such matters referenced in and
not inconsistent with Paragraph 4 of this Agreement.
Any matter or practice arising under or relating to this
agreement which is the subject of a Title Standard or a
Practice Standard' of the Massachusetts Real Estate Bar
Association shall be governed by said Standard to the extent
applicable.
At the time of the closing, the Seller shall provide the
Buyer with an affidavit in recordable form establishing that
there are no federal taxes due on the Estate of Margaret
Mattera.
At the time of closing, the Seller shall provide the Buyer
with an affidavit in recordable form, clarifying the name of
the decedent as Margaret Grace Mattera a/k/a Margaret M.
Mattera.
2. SELLER'S ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS
(a) Seller states that to the best of her knowledge no
hazardous material has been stored or released on the
premises.
-9
~ C"V *
(b) Seller states, to the best of her knowledge, that there-
is no pending bankruptcy, mortgage foreclosure, or
other proceeding that might in any material way impact
adversely on the Seller's ability to perform on the
closing date.
(c) Seller states that she has been made aware of the
presence of asbestos contained in the siding of the
dwelling which was discovered by an inspection
conducted by the Buyer.
3. BUYERS ADDITIONAL STATEMENTS
The Buyer agrees and understands that the deed into the Buyer
will contain certain conservation restrictions that will run
with the land.
-10 41 0~
IoCoytVIDOY
TOWN OF Fte`ADING
'To . the. Inhabitants of the
Towri of Reading:
Please take notice that,thb.:'.
Board of Selectmen of the Town
of Reading wilt, hold a public .
hearing.on.Tuesd. Y, February .
im at'8:-00:p.m. in.thb.
Selectmen's Meetind Room,. 16:
Lowel'i : 'Str'eet; Reading,
. Massachusetts 'on a policy
edtabtishing an~ ad' hoo Tax
classification Study Committee,....
AII''interested parties !..may
appear ,in ..person, ' may ;submit.
.Aheir comments in. writing;. or
..'..nay email town manager@.,
<i:readina:ma.us:
By order of
-Deter I. H.echenbleikner
Town Manader
1I30. .
qcl ,
Policv establishing- an ad-hoc Tax Classification Committee
There is hereby established a five (5) member ad-hoc Tax Classification Committee
(Committee) to advise the Board of Selectmen on matters related to the tax classification
process. The purposes of the Committee are to advise the Board of Selectmen and the Town
Manager on matters of policy related but not limited to:
• The residential factor;
• The open space discount;
• The residential exemption; '
• The commercial exemption.
The Committee will be created from the date of this hearing until December 31, 2007, unless
such term is modified by the Board of Selectmen. They will deliver final recommendations to the
Board by October 31, 2007.
In selecting the Committee membership of 5 members, the Board of Selectmen shall appoint
all members and shall give consideration to members representing the following interests within
the community:
• Member or designee of the Reading/North Reading Chamber of Commerce;
• Member or designee of the Economic Development Committee;
• Member or designee of the Board of Selectmen;
• Member or designee of the Finance Committee;
• Member or designee of the Community Planning and Development Committee.
The Committee shall be advisory in all matters. Decisions as to whether or not to implement
measures shall rest as appropriate with the Town Manager, the Board of Selectmen, or other
body having jurisdiction in the matter.
This Committee shall administratively fall within the Finance Department. Staff as available
will be assigned by the Town Manager to work with the Committee.
Adopted 2-6-07
P#.
To:
Subject:
Date:
<andreagarb@comcast.net>
FW: Walnut St/Old Farm Rd Intersection
Monday, January 29, 2007 10:45:07 PM
1111 JAN 31 AN 10. 53
rView Sourcel
-----Original Message-----
From: Garbarino, Al
Sent: Mon 1/29/2007 10:43 PM
To: townmanager@ci.readinq.ma.us
Cc:
Subject: Walnut St/Old Farm Rd Intersection
Peter,
I am writing this as a follow up to the voicemail I left you on Friday
January 26 regarding the Walnut St/Old Farm Rd intersection. On behalf of the
neighborhood, I would like to formally request that the process be initiated to
place stop signs at this intersection as soon as possible. With all four
corners containing some form of obstruction, the intersection is a hazard,
making both driving and walking across a dangerous undertaking. Unfortunately
the crosswalks offer little relief as they are not always respected by drivers.
As an example, there were several children attempting to cross Walnut St from
Old Farm Rd last week to get to school and waited in the crosswalk as 6 cars
sped through. Clearly this is a situation that puts Reading residents at risk
and one that should be remedied as quickly as possible.
Based on conversations I have had with members of the Board of
Selectmen, you are the person to speak with to get the process initiated.
Unless I hear differently from you, I will assume that this is the case and you
will take the appropriate actions. Please let me know if you need any
assistance from the members of the neighborhood as we are more than happy to
help.
My wife or I will also drop off a printed version of this
correspondence
attached with the signatures of several members of the neighborhood.
Thank you in advance for your prompt response to this situation. If
you
would like to discuss this further, I can be reached during the day at
617-563-9563 or at home at 944-2709. .
Sincerely,
Al Garbarino
32 Old Farm Rd
INBOX: Email I of 574
M rvbve to Folder lr~k
Back to Ton < Previous I Next >
i
s ,
January 28, 2007
r-
Dear members of the Board of Selectmen and Mr. Hechenbleikner,
We would like to express our concern regarding the serious safety hazard, for our children
being created by the removal of the Walnut Street crossing guard as of Friday,-February 2; 2007.
This decision was based on an inaccurate number of 5 children crossing this dangerous intersection
daily. The following is a partial list of families who use this crossing on a daily or near-daily basis.
Name Address # of children impacted = ~2-
ttA('k 1,3
3. J°Z C>/C( ~CJLr/YI 02
4.
r
1
y6.
r 0/ d 25
8.
n
9. YO LJ 10. A,-'t
I I.
12.
U
We would like to respectfully request your assistance in the reconsideration of this decision
untileppropriate measures are taken to secure the safety of this intersection for our children.
1 n
Thank yo~
DIT,
r~ r
4-6(
_ 1017 i r
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: Susan O'Leary [slooleary@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 11:19 AM
To: Reading - Selectmen
Subject: Thank you
Dear Selectmen,
On behalf of all the parents, thank you for sending out representatives to come and observe the intersection at
Old Farm and Walnut. I wanted to inform you that the temporary crossing guard made an inappropriate
accusation toward two parents as they walked their children. I can only guess that she is not aware of the
stressful situation that the parents have been put in for the past month with the sporadic coverage of this
intersection. We were warned by Chief Cormier that even with a cruiser posted that it could be called away at any
given moment, so not to depend on the coverage. Although coverage has been appreciated, there has been at
least one or two days that the cruiser was either absent or parked in a driveway on Walnut Street hidden from
sight. This cross guard who was at the post this morning and may have been there once before has no right to
question how many kids walk and why their parents may be with them. Parents need to decide what is safest for
their children in this current situation. The children in this area need a safe and swift resolution to this and I hope
that you will assist us in this effort.
Thanks again for your time and support.
Parents of the Walnut street intersection
q
2/2/2007
Board of Selectmen Meeting
December 19, 2006
For ease of archiving, the order that items appear in these Minutes reflects the order in which
the items appeared on the agenda for that meeting, and are not necessarily the order in which
any item was taken up by the Board.
The meeting convened at 7:05 p.m. in the Selectmen's Meeting Room, 16 Lowell Street,
Reading, Massachusetts. Present were Chairman Ben Tafoya, Vice Chairman James
Bonazoli, Secretary Stephen Goldy, Selectman Camille Anthony, Town Engineer George
Zambouras, Recreation Administrator John Feudo, Town Manager Peter Hechenbleikner,
Assistant Town Manager Bob LeLacheur/Finance Director, Paula Schena and the following list
of interested parties: Bill Brown, Thomas Ryan, Attorney Mark Gallant, Dave Talbot, Danielle
Robinson.
Reports and Comments
Selectmen's Liaison Retorts and Corrunents - Vice Chairman James Bonazoli noted that he has
received phone calls regarding being able to buy a cup of coffee before 6:00 a.m., and he asked if
a bylaw change is needed. The Town Manager noted that the bylaw has a provision for the
Selectmen to grant a waiver in the interest of public safety, health and welfare. He cautioned the
Selectmen to be careful how and when to grant a waiver because virtually all commercial
property abuts residential. He also noted that the Town did receive complaints regarding the
Dunkin' Donuts on Washington Street receiving deliveries at 4:00 a.m.
Vice Chairman James Bonazoli thanked Phil Rushworth and Jennifer Hart for inviting him to
their Cultural Connection Meeting. He noted that the Cultural Connection is looking for space.
They have asked him to sit on an advisory committee. He also noted that Cross Street residents
are looking for easier access from Cross Street across to Main Street.
Selectman Camille Anthony noted that she and Stephen Goldy attended the Cheerleader
Reception on Sunday.
Selectman Stephen Goldy noted that the Citizens' Police Academy is accepting applications. He
also announced that he will be i urmning for re-election in the Spring.
Chainnan Ben Tafoya noted that Selectman Richard Schubert lost his sister-in-law Kate Fleming
who was a victim of flooding and he expressed his condolences. He also noted that he spoke
with Selectman Schubert who asked him to armounce that he will be running for re-election.
Chairman Tafoya attended a CPDC Zoning Workshop. There will be hearings on January 8th
regarding the parking overlay district, Jolinson Woods development, and a request by Tambone
to change zoning. He also attended a MAPC Meeting. He noted that the Board received
correspondence from the City of Melrose regarding 9C - water and sewer rate relief. Reading's
sewer cost will increase $170,000 if the cut is not overturned. The Town Manager indicated that
he will draft a letter to the Governor Elect Deval Patrick regarding 9C cuts.
si~t/
Board of Selectmen Meeting - December 19. 2006 - Paae 2
Public Comment - Tom Ryan noted that the handicap parking spot in front of the Post Office has
a one hour parking sign and that is illegal. Handicapped people are exempt from parking
violations. The Town Manager noted that the sign is old and will be taken down.
Bill Brown noted that the Community Preservation Act Study Committee has a Finance
Committee Member serving on it, and Finance Committee Members are not allowed to serve on
other committees. The Town Manager noted that the previous counsel indicated that it was okay
as long as it is not a standing committee. He will take this matter to Town Meeting for
clarification.
Dave Talbot noted that the 16 Sanborn Street rezoning is not just limited to 16 Sanborn Street.
He asked how many properties are effected, and Chairman Ben Tafoya noted technically many
but realistically next to none due certain conditions. Selectman Camille Anthony suggested that
CPDC have a color coded map to see the impact. Vice Chainman James Bonazoli noted that
Town Meeting will vote on the overlay district and then 16 Sanborn Street.
Town Manager's Report
The Town Manager gave the following report:
• Town Planner Chris Reilly has resigned effective the end of December.
• The West/South Street traffic signal was damaged by curb installation. The Town
Engineer is arranging to have it repaired ASAP.
• The MWRA water interconnection vault on Border Road at West Street will be under
construction after the first of the year.
• Friends and Family Day - June 30, 2007.
• Curbside Holiday Tree Collection - Week of January 8-12, 2007; Compost Center is open
for trees on Saturday, January 13th.
• The Christian Science Church on Lowell Street next to Town Hall is no longer being used.
It could be an interesting site for an arts center in Reading, and I am exploring this option
with representatives of the Arts Connection.
• The Board of Selectmen has received electronically their proposed 2007 meeting calendar.
Discussion/Action Items
Review Action Status Report - The Town Manager noted that he added the Employee Merchant
Parking to the report. Gazebo Circle is out to bid and will be under construction in the Spring.
The bid date for the Downtown improvements is January 31, 2007.
Vice Chainnan James Bonazoli recommended taking off the Addison-Wesley traffic
presentation.
Selectman Camille Anthony noted that the federal government is looking at two flyovers instead
of depressions for the Route 128/93 project. She suggests meeting with the other communities.
Adopt Housing Plan - Town Engineer George Katsoufis was present.
s~~
Board of Selectmen Meetina - December 19, 2006 - Paae 3
The Town Manager noted that the Selectmen need to approve the draft housing plan and then
pass it on to DHCD. He also noted that the purpose is to develop a proactive plan for increasing
affordable housing. The Town needs to produce 66 units/year.
Chairman Ben Tafoya noted that there are short-term and long-tenn issues. He spoke with james
Bond who bought the MF Charles building, and he noted that the critical issue is parking.
Hearing - 24 Hour Permit, Reading Shell Station. 87 Walkers Brook Drive, - The Town Manager
noted that this is an annual event. Attorney Mark Gallant indicated that he was representing
Motiva. He noted that the pen-nit has been issued for the past 16-17 years. The Station is in the
industrial district with no residential abutters, the gas and bathrooms are available 24 hour a day.
They provide gas cans and a list of towing companies. They recently received the order of
conditions to reconstruct the canopy.
Danielle Robinson noted that this has been a Mass. DEP site for 10 years. All wells except one
are below clean up level. The April test was high and Motiva fixed the loose gasket on the tank
top. She also noted that the company is putting up a fence for litter control. The Conservation
Corrnnission is asking them to do work on property they don't own. She noted that the Station
will be closed when the canopy is installed, and she will notify the Town Manager when that
happens.
A motion by Goldv, seconded by Bonazoll to close the hearing on the 24 hour permit for 87
Wallcers Brook Drive was approved by a vote of 4-0-0.
A motion by Goldv seconded by Anthonv to approve an application for 24 hour sales by
Motiva Enterprises, LLC d/b/a Reading Shell Station at 87 Walkers Brook Drive. The
Board of Selectmen funds that, in accordance with Section 5.10.1 of the General Bvlaws:
It is in the interest of the public health, safety and welfare to permit such
operation; and
♦ There is no detrimental effect of such operation on the Town or the immediatelv
abutting neighbors:
The approval of this application is subiect to the following conditions:
1. This approval expires at midnight, December 31, 2007:
2. All signs shall conform to the Zoning By-Laws of the Town of Reading;
3. The gasoline service station shall, in fact, be open 24 hours a dav, seven davs
a week:
4. The operator will ensure that there is a supply of gasoline available at the
station during all hours that the station is open.
5. The operator will provide gas cans for motorists who run out of gasoline on
the road:
6. The operator will prepare and post a list of local towing and repair shops
that are open 24 hours a dav for those who need it.
7. Restroom facilities shall be open 24 hours a dav, seven davs a week.
was approved by a vote of 4-0-0.
sQ,3
Board of Selectmen Meeting - December 19. 2006 - Paae 4
Follow Up hna2ination Station - The Town Manager noted that Leathers' short report is in the
packet. He also noted that there is an issue with keeping the area secure. The Selectmen need to
decide what to do; i.e., demolish, design, etc. He would like to see the first phase of
reconstruction done in 2007.
Selectman Stephen Goldy noted that he wants to see a master plan for the whole Birch Meadow
area. He also noted that hmagination Station caters to a certain age group. He would like to add
onto it for the older age groups. He suggests perhaps a skate park, teen center or hockey rink.
Recreation Administrator John Feudo noted that we need to do a survey to see what the
community wants.
Selectman Camille Anthony asked about the maintenance at Wood End, and John Feudo noted
that there won't be much the first five years - the biggest concern is vandalism.
Vice Chairman James Bonazoli noted that the Recreation Committee recommends demolishing
Imagination Station. They are also looking for money for tennis courts. He feels that there is a
lot of money being spent on the toddler age group, and he feels that the Town should be doing
something for the older age group.
John Feudo noted that if he had his choice, he would choose tennis courts because that services
all age groups. He also noted that the Recreation Committee recommends demolishing
Imagination Station and replacing it with a recreation facility.
The Town Manager noted that he met with Friends of Reading Recreation who are developing a
master plan for Memorial Park. He feels that they could help with visioning of the Birch
Meadow area.
Chairman Ben Tafoya noted that the plaques, signs and art work need to be dismounted and
stored.
A motion by Anthonv seconded by Bonazoli to approve the demolition of ImaLyination
Station, with the preservation off-site of certain artifacts includine plaoues, siLyns and "art
work." and that the Town Manager is directed to proceed with a design process for lavout
and construction of a new Imagination Station at that site. and that the capital planning
process include development of the new Imagination Station on that site was approved by a
vote of 4-0-0.
Review Inforination on the Tax Classification Studv - The Town Manager noted that the
Selectmen requested information on different levels of tax classification. The report of the
Findings of the 1993 Tax Classification Task Force is included in the packet. He suggests
putting together a policy and charge and bring it back to the Selectmen for a hearing.
Options for "No Parkiniz Here to Corner" sip-ns at Washington and Woburn Streets and
Washington and Prescott Streets - The Town Manager noted that the map shows the Police
Chiefs recommendations for both sides of both ends of Washington Street. He will schedule
this for a public hearing.
Sa~f
Board of Selectmen Meeting - December 19. 2006 - Page 5
Sian Release of Easement - Joseph Wav - Selectman Stephen Goldy recused himself from this
agenda item. The Town Manager noted that the Selectmen need to approve the' release of
easement on Joseph Way.
A motion by Bonazoli seconded by Anthonv to approve, as authorized by Town Meetine
under Article 12 of the 2006 Subsequent Town Meeting, the release of a 20' drainase
easement that runs over, under and upon 37 Joseph Wav in Readins and as shown as a 20'
drainaLye easement on a plan of land entitled "Readine Manor in Readine. Mass. for
Hillerest Realtv, Inc., dated March 15, 1954, Dana F. Perkins & Sons, Inc., C.E. and
Survevors, which plan is recorded with the .Middlesex South Re2istrv of Deeds in Book
8281, Paue 201, said easement to be abandoned as shown on "Plan of Land in Reading, MA
Showine Easement Abandonment," prepared by Middlesex Survev Inc. Land Survevors of
131 Park Street, North Reading, MA. 01864 dated September 20, 2006 was approved by a
vote of 3-0-1, with Goldv abstainine.
Licenses - The Town Manager noted that the Selectmen delegated him to approve licenses. He
is approving 44 Common Victualler Licenses, Four Automatic Amusement Devices Licenses, 15
Entertainment Licenses, five Live Entertainment Licenses, nine Class I, II and III Motor Vehicle
Licenses, one Livery License and one Laundromat License. All applications are reviewed by the
Health Division, the Building Inspector, the Police Department and the Tax Collector.
Approval of Minutes
A motion by Anthonv seconded by Goldv to approve the Minutes of November 28, 2006
was approved by a vote of 4-0-0.
A motion by Goldv seconded by Anthonv to adiourn the meetine of December 19. 2006 at
10:00 p.m. was approved by a vote of 4-0-0.
Respectfully submitted,
Secretary
s~~
Board of Selectmen Meeting
January 2, 2007
For ease of archiving, the order that items appear in these Minutes reflects the order in which
the items appeared on the agenda for that meeting, and are not necessarily the order in which
any item was taken up by the Board.
The meeting convened at 7:02 p.m. in the Selectmen's Meeting Room, 16 Lowell Street,
Reading, Massachusetts. Present were Chairman Ben Tafoya, Vice Chairman James
Bonazoli, Secretary Stephen Goldy, Police Chief Jim Connier, Town Manager Peter
Hechenbleikner, Assistant Town Manager/Finance Director Bob LeLacheur, Paula Schena and
the following list of interested parties: Andrea Garbarino, Stanley and Edward Kantorosinski,
Ernie Bay, Phil Pacino, Richard Surrette, Janette Surette, Joyce Buckley, Attorney James
Juliano, Attorney Steven Cicatelli, Attorney Andrew Upton, Bao Ngoc Huynh.
Reports and Comments
Selectmen's Liaison Reports and Comments - Selectman Camille Anthony noted that she had
Office Hours this evening, and she had four neighbors from the Old Farm Road area come in.
They will speak under public comment.
Selectman Stephen Goldy noted that the Reading Recreation brochure is done.
Chairman Ben Tofaya noted that CPDC will be holding hearings regarding the Special Town
Meeting Warrant including parking overlay, and request for map change for Tambone and
Johnson Woods. A subcommittee is meeting tomorrow night to refine the language. There has
been discussion on acceleration of Johnson Woods, and the Town is pushing for an increase in
the number of affordable housing units if they move their schedule up three years.
Public Comment - Andrea Garbarino noted that her neighborhood was notified today that the
Crossing Guard position is being eliminated from the Old Farm Road part of Town. She also
noted that the School did not notify her and that is a safety issue.
The Town Manager noted that there is a shortage of Crossing Guards. The higher priority in that
location is at Franklin Street so they are moving that Crossing Guard there but he has since quit.
He will talk with Police Chief Cormier later tonight when he is here.
Vice Chairman James Bonazoli noted he would like an update of the Crossing Guards.
Town Manager's Report
The Town Manager gave the following report:
• Waste to Energy grant close-out - Additional $14,000 to Town of Reading.
• Curbside Holiday Tree Collection - Week of January 8-12, 2007; Compost Center is open
for trees on Saturday, January 13th.
• MMA Annual Meeting Friday and Saturday - January 12th and 13th.
• BCC training January 31St
'_~I ' I
Board of Selectmen Meeting - Januarv 2. 2007 - Page 2
Regarding the January 16th meeting on goals, the Town Manager will prepare a draft set of
goals. He thinks a Retreat is a good idea but will need plamung. ' Chairman Ben Tafoya noted
that he would like to take some time on January 16th to talk about long-teen goals.
Selectman Camille Anthony noted that 15 goals are too many.
Discussion/Action Items
Hearing - Bagel World Reauest to Overate Beginning at 5:30 a.m. a Variance from Section 5.10
of the General Bvlaws - The Secretary read the hearing notice.
The Town Manager noted that 10-12 years ago, the Town adopted a bylaw restricting hours of
sales. That issue carne about when a business wanted to be open 24 hours per day, seven days
per week but it abutted residential property. The Town recently received a complaint about a
business getting deliveries around 2:00 a.m.-3:00 a.m. The Police enforced and then found other
businesses opening before 6:00 a.m. The Town does have one 24 hour store that abuts the
highway.
Bagel World owner Stanley Kantorosinski and his son Edward were present. Stanley
Kantorosinski noted that he has been opening at 5:00 a.m. since 1998 and he has never had any
complaints. All of his deliveries are after 9:00 a.m. He is requesting to open at 5:30 a.m.
The Town Manager noted that the Board of Health recommends no additional hours until Bagel
World meets minimum standard conditions. He also noted that in order to grant a waiver, the
Board needs to prove that they are providing a service for the public health, safety or welfare of
the Town. He noted that there will soon be three additional residences behind Bagel World. He
suggests that the Selectmen close the hearing, and then highly advertise the issue on whether or
not to change the bylaw.
A motion by Goldv seconded by Anthonv to close the hearing for Bagel World's request to
operate beginning at 5:30 a.m. was approved by a vote of 4-0-0.
Hearing - West Street Mobil Reauest to Overate Beginning at 5:00 a.m, a Variance from Section
5.10 of the General Bvlaws - The Secretary read the hearing notice.
The Town Manager noted that this property is a drive through and gas station.
A neighbor to the gas station noted that it is a busy place but it is quiet.
The owner of the property noted that the Town should consider this request, or people will go
elsewhere and the Town will lose business.
A motion by Goldv seconded by Bonazoli to close the hearing for West Street Mobil's
request to operate beginning at 5:00 a.m. was approved by a vote of 4-0-0.
Hearing - No Parking - Both sides of Washington Street 50 South of Woburn Street and 50 feet
North of Prescott Street - The Secretary read the hearing notice.
v
Board of Selectmen Meetinja - Januarv 2. 2007 - Paae 3
The Town Manager noted that this is a follow up from a petition. The concern is to expand the
no parking on comer from 20 feet to 50 feet.
Chairman Ben Tafoya noted that 50 feet on both sides of the street still doesn't eliminate the
bottleneck on the rest of the street. Police Chief Jim Cormier noted that this will allow easier
access.
Emie Bay of 142 Woburn Street noted that moving back 50 feet will take away two 24 hour
parking spaces from residents. He would like only one side moved to 50 feet. He also noted that
the signs have already been moved back from 20 feet to 71 feet. He feels that the problem is
related to the Selectmen taking away 50 commuter spaces. He suggests that the Town ask
people to go to the Woburn Station. Chairman Ben Tafoya noted that the Selectmen did try to
encourage people to go to Anderson Station in Woburn by not selling commuters stickers.
A motion by Goldv seconded by Anthonv to close the hearing on no parking on both sides
of Washington Street 50 feet south of Woburn Street and 50 feet north of Prescott Street
was approved by a vote of 4-0-0.
.A motion by Anthonv seconded by Goldv to amend the Town of Reading Traffic Rules and
ReLyulations by adding to Article 5, Section 5.3:
PARKING PROHIBITED ON CERTAIN STREETS NO PARKING ANY TIME
50 FEET FROM INTERSECTION
Street
WashinLyton Street
Washington Street
was approved by a vote of 4-0-0.
Location
Both sides of street - 50 feet south of
Woburn Street
Both sides of street - 50 feet north of
Prescott Street
Hearing - No Parking on the West Side of Washineton Street from Woburn Street to the
Briarwood Condos - The Secretary read the hearing notice.
The Town Manager noted that the request is to restrict parking on the west side of Washington
Street. There is a letter from the Briarwood Condo Association in favor of no parking.
Phil Pacino, President of the Briarwood Condo Association, noted that he had concerns
regarding access for emergency vehicles and snow removal.
Richard Surrette of 7 Washington Street indicated that this is a good idea. He noted that it is
difficult to get in and out of Briarwood in the Winter.
Janette Surrette of .13 Washington Street noted that the cars completely block the Woburn Street
intersection when the train comes.
S ~3
Board of Selectmen Meeting - Januarv 2. 2007 - Pase 4
Joyce Buckley of 139/141 Woburn Street had concerns for the safety of the children walking to
Parker Middle School. She noted that the fire trucks and trash trucks cannot get down the street.
A motion by Goldv seconded by Anthonv to close the hearing on no parking on the west
side of WashinLyton Street from Woburn Street to the exit drivewav of Briarwood Condos
was approved by a vote of 4-0-0.
A motion by Goldv seconded by Anthonv to amend the Town of Reading Traffic Rules and
ReLyulations by addinLy to Article 5. Section 5.3:
PARKING PROHIBITED ON CERTAIN STREETS
NO PARKING ANY TIME
Street Location
Washington Street On the Westerly side from Woburn Street
to the exit drivewav at Briarwood Condos
was approved by a vote of 4-0-0.
Hearing - Request for Waiver of Drivewav Opening Regulations to allow two Drivewav
Ot)eninj~s on Jolm Street - 43 Salem Street - The Secretary read the hearing notice.
The Town has restrictions on the number of driveways. This property is in violation because it
has one extra driveway. The property owner has* the option of combining two driveways or
appealing to the Board of Selectmen. The Town Manager noted that there is an e-mail in
tonight's handout from Gerard and Mary Beth McDonald who have concerns about the project
but no concerns regarding the driveways.
Attorney James Juliano noted that every plan was submitted to the Engineering and Planning
Divisions. The plan was sighed off on and has not changed. The Conservation Commission has
signed off on the plans. The owner thought everything was in compliance. The current curb cut
was pre-existing.
The Town Manager noted that there is no record of a road permit. He would prefer to get the
curb cut further back from the intersection.
Attorney Steven Cicatelli noted that Mr. Lynch did not move forward without getting permits or
paying fees. He also noted that Mr. High helped him design the plan. He noted that if they put
in a 24 foot opening, then they would have to put in a complete walkway and that would increase
the amount of impervious surface.
The Town Manager recoinmended that the owner provide for improvement to the radius.
A motion. by Anthonv seconded by Bonazoli to close the hearine on the a waiver of the
drivewav openin,2 reealations at 43 Salem Street was approved by a vote of 4-0-0.
Board of Selectmen Meeting - Januarv 2. 2007 - Page 5
A motion by Goldv seconded by Anthonv to. approve the request for a waiver of the
drivewav ovenin"L, reeulations to allow two drivewav openings on John Street as well as a
drivewav on Salem Street for the property located at 43 Salem Street subject to completion
prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancv. and that the deed establishing a 25 foot
radius at the corner of John Street and Salem Street and a bond be posted 2uaranteein2 the
work was approved by a vote of 4-0-0.
Hearing - Change of Manager for Romano's Macaroni Grill. - Attorney Andrew Upton
representing Macaroni Grill and Sao Ngoc Huynh were present.
Mr. Huynh noted that he was made General Manager two months ago and he has managed other
restaurants. Selectman Camille Anthony asked if he has had TIPS training, and Mr. Huynh
indicated that he had TIPS training.
A motion by Goldv seconded by Anthonv to approve the Change of Manager for Romano's
Macaroni Grill from Michael Ross to Bao N2oc Huvnh was approved by a vote of 4-0-0.
Preview Special Town Meeting Warrant - The Town Manager reviewed the Warrant for the
Special Town Meeting. He noted that Article 3 was to amend the Capital Improvements
Program; Article 4 is to amend the FY 2007 Budget; Article 5 is to authorize debt for the
Downtown Improvements project. Vice Chairman James Bonazoli requested that the Nurse
Advocate be included in amending the budget. Article 6 is to amend the Zoning By-Laws
regarding, Sanborn Street parking; Article 7 is to amend the Zoning map; Article 8 is zoning for
the Tarnbone property; Article 9 is to amend the Zoning map; Article 10 is to amend zoning for
Johnson Fan-n; Article 11 is to amend zoning for PRD cluster; Article 12 is to amend the General
Bylaws to allow Finance Committee Members to serve as voting members on subcommittees.
Approval of Minutes
A motion by Anthonv seconded by Goldv" to approve the Minutes of November 14, 2006, as
amended, was approved by a vote of 4-0-0.
A motion by Goldv seconded by Anthonv to approve the Minutes of December 5, 2006, as
amended, was approved by a vote of 4-0-0.
A motion by Goldv seconded by Bonazoli to approve the Minutes of December 12, 2006 was
approved by a vote of 4-0-0.
A motion by Anthony seconded by Goldv to adiourn the meeting of Januarv 2. 2007 at
10:05 p.m. was approved by a vote of 4-0-0.
Respectfully submitted,
Secretary
S &s
Board of Selectmen Meeting
January 9, 2007
For ease of archiving, the order that items appear in these Minutes reflects the order in which
the items appeared on the agenda for that meeting, and are not necessarily the order in which
any item was taken up by the Board.
The meeting convened at 7:02 p.m. in the Selectmen's Meeting Room, 16 Lowell Street,
Reading, Massachusetts. Present were Chairman Ben Tafoya, Vice Chairman James
Bonazoli, Secretary Stephen Goldy, Selectmen Camille Anthony and Richard Schubert,
Police Chief Jim Connier, Town Manager Peter Hechernbleikner, Assistant Town
Manager/Finance Director Bob LeLacheur, Paula Schena and the following list of interested,
parties: Bill Brown, Michele Benson, Ron D'Addario, Ray Porter, Gina Snyder, Daniel
Blodgett, Tracy Sopchak, Ted Tye, Representative Patrick Natale, Jolm Sasso, Jeff Struble, Tom
Laughlin, Russ Graham, Michelle Halloran, Karen Herrick, Joe and Natalie Westerman.
Reports and Comments
Selectmen's Liaison Reuorts and Comments - Selectman Richard Schubert noted that he had
missed the last two meetings due to the death of his sister-in-law Kate Fleming. He also
announced that he will be running for re-election, and he hopes to continue to serve the
community.
Selectman Camille Anthony noted that the Community Preservation Act Study Committee met
on Thursday. She will be contacting towns that do have the Community Preservation Act. She
attended last night's CPDC meeting regarding the zoning change for parking, and she has
concerns regarding this zoning change. Chairman Ben Tafoya noted that the Town is working
on a reap that show what properties will be affected. Selectman Anthony noted that the overlay
is very poorly worked out. Vice Chainnan James Bonazoli suggested that the Selectmen revisit
their plan regarding the parking problem. Chairman Tafoya noted that the Reading Co-Op Bank
is trying to reach a goal, and they thought that this would lessen the concerns of what could
happen to that parcel.
Selectman Stephen Goldy asked why the signs were up on Washington Street before the
Selectmen voted, and the Town Manager noted that was an error.
Vice Chainnan James Bonazoli noted that the. Friends of Reading Tennis are doing a fundraiser.
He requested that the Nurse Advocate be put on the budget wish list, and that the change in the
Hours of Operation bylaw be put on the Special Town Meeting Warrant.
Town Manaeer's Report
The Town Manager gave the following report:
• Imagination Station is slated for the beginning of demolition within the next week or two.
The Recreation Administrator has overseen the removal of plaques and other art work that
can be removed. The site will then be secured by boulders so that encroachment by other
uses does not occur until a master pan for the area can be completed.
s~
Board of Selectmen Meetina - Januarv 9. 2007 - Paae 2
• Curbside Holiday Tree Collection - Week of January 8-12, 2007; Compost Center is open
for trees on Saturday, January 13th from 8:00 a.m. until 2:30 p.m.
Members of the Board of Selectmen, the ATM/Finance Director Bob LeLacheur and I will
be at the MMA Annual Meeting Friday and Saturday - January 12-13.
• Boards/Committees/Commissions training including ethics training will take place on
January 31St
• An Affordable Housing audit by the Inspector General of 1375 Main Street - I have
referred to Town Counsel for review and recommendation.
• The list for the Lottery for street signs is attached.
• The West Street at South Street traffic signal has been repaired - it was damaged by the
contractor installing curbs and sidewalks on that piece of South Street.
Discussion/Action Items
Hiahlialzts - Cities for Climate Protection - Cities for Climate Protection Committee Members
Ray Porter, Gina Snyder, Ron D'Addario, Michelle Benson, Daniel Blodgett and Tracy Sopchak
were present. Ray Porter and Gina Snyder gave a review of the Committee's mission, funding
and public outreach to-date.
Chainnan Ben Tafoya asked the Committee to investigate the generic classification for zero
emissions vehicles. He noted that each car maker has at least one.
Ted Tve - National Development - Chairman Ben Tafoya introduced Ted Tye, Managing
Partner of National Development who Pearson has selected to partner with the Weiner Group to
develop the Addison-Wesley/Pearson site.
Mr. Tye noted that National Development has been based in Newton since 1983. They have 150
employees with four principals all living in the area. He also noted that National Development is
known for their design and quality of projects. They have a wall of awards. They are involved
in a broad range of projects including office, commercial, hotels and retail. He noted that
Pearson still owns the property and the property will not become a Lifestyle Center. He is here
to wipe the slate clean. There are no proposals or timeframe for the development but there are
economic needs to be met.
Selectman Stephen Goldy asked where the market is going now. Mr. Tye indicated that the
office market is slow, housing is winding down to condos, retail depends on many factors, senior
housing is something that he would love to see on that site.
Vice Chairman James Boniazoli asked Mr. Tye for examples of good and not so good
development processes. Mr. Tye indicated that Burlington had a very good process. They
developed 30 acres of a 70 acre site. The Town had a subcommittee who met weekly and that
process worked very well. He indicated that community input and leadership from the Board of
Selectmen is needed.
Representative Patrick Natale noted that the biggest issue with the previous proposal was the
traffic.
Board of Selectmen Meeting - Januarv 9, 2007 - Page 3
Review Crossing Guard Denlovment - Police Chief Jim Cormier and Safety Officer Michelle
Halloran were present.
Chief Cornier noted that Crossing Guards stop traffic with a stop paddle but do not direct traffic.
There are 10 posts in the Town and the staffing is currently at 18 but will soon be 17. They have
two spares with limited availability. He noted that it is difficult to auginent with Patrol Officers
and it also gives a false sense of security because they do get calls for service. He noted that
from January 2006 to January 2007, the Patrol Officers covered 260 times.
Chief Cormier reviewed the criteria for selecting Crossing Guard posts. He noted that the Town
is always seeking new Crossing Guards. He is working with the schools to develop safe routes
to school. He also noted that many communities provide Crossing Guards to elementary schools
only. He noted that the lack of Crossing Guards is not a financial problem, it is a staffing
problem.
Vice Chairman James Bon azoli asked if the Town should look at alternatives. Chief Cornier
noted that we have to take a serious look at this. Sometimes neighborhood pockets aren't
realistic because they are always changing. He indicated that there is a need to explore safe
routes to school.
Chairman Ben Tafoya asked how the numbers are arrived at, and Chief Cornier noted that it is
the average number of children per day. This changes from year to year.
A resident from 32 Old Fann Road noted that a Crossing Guard was moved, and he questioned
which location was more dangerous. He also noted that the number of children at Old Farm
Road is closer to 20 children, not five. Chief Cormier noted that Franklin Street and Sunset is a
high traffic area with poor sight lines and a huge tree. There is also more pedestrian flow at
Franklin Street. The resident from 32 Old Farm Road noted that he would help to put up a stop
sign at Old Fann Road.
Michelle Halloran noted that she receives calls every day from people requesting Crossing
Guards but she can't fill the current posts. Chief Connier noted that the goal is to staff all 19
posts'.
Review CPDC Recommendation - West Street School Zone - The Town Manager noted that
CPDC approved the Montessori School with the condition that the Board of Selectmen establish
a school zone. The PTTTF suggests approving the school zone now but don't enforce until the
school is built. They will ask the school to provide the speed sign. He will schedule this for a
hearing on February 13, 2007.
Discussion on Town Planner Position - The Town Manager noted that Town Planner Chris
Reilly resigned and he needs to replace this position. He suggests a Town Plaluner/Community
Services Director and also to hire a Jr. Planner to help manage the workload. The salary and
benefits for the Jr. Planner will come out of the Inspections Revolving Fund.
S~3
Board of Selectmen Meeting - January 9. 2007 - Pate 4
Selectman Richard Schubert asked how CPDC will be staffed, and the Town Manager noted that
it will probably be staffed by the Department Head.
Selectman Stephen Goldy noted that he liked the direction but wants more infonnation on the job
description. The Town Manager noted that if the Board agrees, then he will develop a job
description, do an organization chart, etc. He also noted that CPDC needs resources to
implement the Master Plan. He will advertise for the Plan er/Department Head immediately and
after that person is hired, then hire the Jr. Planner.
Vice Chairman James Bonazoli asked what the Inspections Revolving Fund is being spent on
now, and the Town Manager noted the Assistant Building Inspector's salary, sidewalks,
additional costs for inspections and initial appraisals.
A motion.bv Anthonv seconded by Schubert to direct the Town Manager to move forward
with the Department. Head/Planner and Jr. Planner positions was approved by a vote of 3-
2-0, with Goldv and Bonazoli opposed.
Chairman Ben Tafoya asked about the Hours of Operation bylaw. The Town Manager indicated
that he will find out what other communities do and suggested that it be classified by businesses
and restaurants. The Board decided to meet on January 23, 2007 at 7:30 p.m. to discuss the
possibility of putting an article on the Warrant for the Special Town Meeting.
Approval of Minutes
A motion by Schubert seconded by Goldv to approve the Minutes of November 21, 2006
was approved by a vote of 5-0-0.
A motion by Schubert seconded by Goldv to adiourn the meeting of Januarv 9, 2007 at
10:30 p.m. was approved by a vote of 5-0-0.
Respectfully submitted,
Secretary
5c,q
Board of Selectmen Meeting
January 23, 2007
For ease of archiving, the order that items appear in these Minutes reflects the order in which
the items appeared on the agenda for that meeting, and are not necessarily the order in which
any item was taken up by the Board.
The meeting convened at 7:30 p.m. in the Selectmen's Meeting Room, 16 Lowell Street,
Reading, Massachusetts. Present were Chairman Ben Tafoya, Vice Chairman James
Bonazoli, Secretary Stephen Goldy, Selectmen Camille Anthony and Richard Schubert,
Town Manager Peter Heehenbleikner and the following list of interested parties: Paul Dodge,
Paul Feely (Chronicle), Michael Allard, Mac McEntyre (Advocate), Kevin Allardi, Robert
Beddia, W. J. Hanson, Marlene Wolfe, Arthur Sordillo, Ken Flint, Sherry Hernan, Gloria
Manherz, Tony D'Arezzo..
Discussion/Action Items
Discuss Possible Amendment to Bvlaw - Hours of Operation for Retail - The Town Manager
reviewed his memo of January 23, 2007 on Hours of Retail Sales. He also reviewed a map that
showed the location of 30 facilities licensed by the Board of Health to sell coffee.
Vice Chainnan James Bonazoli reviewed his proposed options for changing the bylaw to allow
coffee establislunents to be open at 5:00 a.m.
Selectman Camille Anthony asked about drive-thrus, and whether they would be permitted.
Selectman Richard Schubert thought that we should take the issue to Town Meeting. He prefers
Option 1 with some of the elements of the Option 2 language. He felt that there should be a
process, and that there should be annual review and approval.
Chairman Ben Tafoya preferred the second option because it gives the Board the option of
allowing places to open earlier, and allows the Board to measure the impact. Much of the review
can be done by staff such as is done for the liquor licenses.
Selectman Stephen Goldy preferred the same option.
Selectman Camille Anthony asked where the grid for Option 1 carne from, and Vice Chainnan
Bonazoli indicated that he did an internet search, and he believed that this is the Chicopee model.
Selectman Anthony asked what the process would be for moving forward with this, and
Chairman Tafoya noted that there are some options here but we need to look at what we are
trying to accomplish.
The Town Manager felt that the best course of action may be to change the bylaw minimally to
allow the Board some options for giving annual permits for public convenience (as opposed to
the strict public health, safety and welfare provisions currently in the bylaw) and then do all
annual process. He stated that many of these establislunents directly abut residences and there
could be some concerns. The Board of Selectmen could then develop rules and regulations based
S~
Board of Selectmen Meeting - Januarv 23. 2007 - Paae 2
upon which applications they would consider. There would be a hearing on the adoption of the
rules and regulations. Part of the rules and regulations may be a requirement that there be a
hearing when consideration is being given initially for ally waiver from the 6:00 a.m. opening,
and notice to attendees could be included.
Marlene Wolfe of 522 West Street asked what the process was and the above comments of the
Town Manager were reiterated. The Town Manager noted that if this is approved by Town
Meeting, it would have to be approved by the Attorney General's Office and this could require
up to 90 days.
The Board agreed to the process as outlined by the Town Manager, and Town Counsel will be
asked to draft the bylaw for inclusion on the February 26, 2007 Special Town Meeting Warrant.
On motion by Goldv seconded by Schubert, the Board of Selectmen voted to adjourn the
meeting of Januarv 23, 2007 at 8:50 p.m. by a vote of 5-0-0.
Respectfully submitted,
Secretary
v
wc
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT
F
STATE HOUSE ® BOSTON 02133
1 >
(617) 725-4000
®y0y°w
DEVAL L. PATRICK
GOVERNOR
TIMOTHY P. MURRAY
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR
January 22, 2007
N
Mr. Ben Tafoya
Reading Board of Selectman
16 Lowell St. o
Reading, MA 01867 ,a.
0
Dear Mr. Tafoya: .
ca.
Please accept my belated thanks for your letter of January
2, 2007. I appreciate your taking the time to write. As you may know,
have restored all of the 9c cuts in full and I am grateful that my
decision will benefit the town of Reading.
I look forward to working with you in the future.
best,
A _
OF F?
Town of Reading
rn
m 16 Lowell Street
0
Reading, MA 01867
639~INCOR4~¢P
Joseph R. Veno, Chairman
Gail LaPointe
Richard P. Foley
January 26, 2007
Alan Foulds
Reading Town Moderator
9 Ide Street
Reading, MA 01867
Dear Alan,
& l cI&s
CONTRIBUTORY RETIREMENT BOARD
Ph: (781) 942-9007 Fx: (781) 942-9037
Daniel B. Seferian
Francis P. Driscoll
Colleen Loughlin, Ret Admin
Please be advised that the Reading Retirement Board is meeting on March 21, 2007 and will
vote on a cost of living increase for our retirees for fiscal year 2008. According to the
provisions of Chapter 127 of the Acts of 1999, the Reading Retirement Board must annually
notify the proper legislative body 36 days before a publicly posted meeting where the Reading
Retirement Board decides whether to elect to grant an increased COLA.
Please call me at (781) 942-9007 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
U
Colleen Loughlin
Retirement Board Administrator
cc: Peter Hechenbleilcner
Town Manager
9k .
6 ( ~ 6j
LATHAM, LATHAM & LAMOND~ P.C.
643 MAIN STREET
READING, MASSACHUSETTS 01867-3096
W W W.LLLLAW.COM
KENNETH C. LATHAM (1939-1996)
0. BRADLEY LATHAM*
JOHN T. LAMOND
SHEILAH GRIFFIN-REICHARDT
JOSHUA E. LATHAM
CHRISTOPHER M. O. LATHAM
*ADMITTED TO PRACTICE IN
MASSACHUSETTS & NEW HAMPSHIRE
TELEPHONE: (781) 944-0505
FAX: (781) 944-7079
January 25, 2007
Peter Hechenbleikner, Town Manager
Reading Town Hall
16 Lowell Street
Reading, MA o1867
Re: Sanborn Street; Employee Parking Overlay District; Comparative Values
Dear Peter:
1%48
v
N
L7'1
1v
You ask whether Reading Co-Operative Bank is in a position to provide two appraisals
comparing potential tax revenue to the Town from the use of 16 Sanborn Street for multifamily
use in one case and for a parking lot in the other case.
The Bank is not in a position to provide such an appraisal. However, we note that the assessed
values placed on 16 Sanborn Street by the Town in FY 2005, with the multifamily building, was
$399500. We note also that the assessed value placed on the land (approximately 8,200 square
feet) that abuts the bank building and that is used by the Bank for parking is $367,800. The
difference is less than $32,000.
Irrespective of any difference in assessed values, it is a well know fact that using the Sanborn
Street lot for residential purposes will place a greater demand on town services, such as police,
fire, trash collection and schooling, than would using the land for a parking lot, and that should
be factored in any financial analysis.
Sincerely,
Lathan, Latham & Lamond, P.C.
U
0. Bradley Latham
cc: John Sasso, Chairman
Community Planning and Development Commission
Reading Town Hall
16 Lowell Street
Reading, MA oi867
go
Ccomcast
January 26, 2007
Via Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested
N
Board of Selectmen
2=
Town of Reading
NO
16 Lowell Street
Reading, MA 01867
17
C51
v
Dear Members of the Board:
Pursuant to G.L. Ch. 166A, Section 10, Comcast is pleased to provide a copy of its Annual
Consumer Complaint Form, or "Form 500", for 2006. The Form 500 contains information on
customer complaints in your community and how Comcast responded, including the time taken to
resolve complaints. For the Form 500, the Massachusetts Cable Division defines a complaint as:
Any written or verbal contact with a cable operator in connection with subscription
in which a person expresses dissatisfaction with an act, omission, product or service
that is (1) within the operator's control, and (2) requires a corrective measure on the
part of the operator.
Conicast has forwarded a copy of the enclosed Form 500 to the Department of
Telecommunications and Energy, Cable Division.
If I can be of further assistance on any matter related to the Form 500, please contact me at
978-207-2264.
Very truly yours,
Jane M. Lyman
Sr. Manager of Government & Community Relations
cc: Massachusetts Cable Division
qX ~
Pond Road,
676 Island
Road,
Form 500 Complaint Data
Comcast C
able Communications
NH 03109-
,
(978) 848-5476
25-Jan-07
Code Key: Manner of Resolution
Code Key: Avg. Resolution Time
Resolved to the satisfaction of both parties.
A
<1> Less than 1 Day <2> 1-3 Days <3> 4-7 Days <4> 8-14
.
B. Resolved, customer dissatisfied. C. Not Resolved.
Days <5> 15-30 Days <6> >30 Days
Manner of Resolution (see code key above for the manner represented
I READING
Avg by the letters below) The number below
each letter indicates the number of complaints
Town
Total
Resolution resolved in that manner.
Year { 2006
Complaints
Time (see
C
B
6640
code above) A.
.
{
Subscribers
-
~1 87
2 0
Appointment Service Call
89
<2>
<2> 23
2 0
Billing
25
-
2
2
<3>
0
0
0
Customer Service
25
<2>>-- 24
1
Equipment
386
386
<2>
0 0
0
Installation
1
<4> { 1
0
Other
- 2 _ -
i <4> ! 2
0 0
0
Reception
118
(
113
<2>
5
Service Interruption
-
-
cz~
144
Form 500 Service
omcast Cable Communication:
676 Island Pond Road,
Interruption Data
Manchester, NH 03109-
25-Jan-07
(978) 848-5476
Code Key: Duration of Ser
vice Interruption
1> Less than 1 Day <2> 1-3 Days <3> 4-7 Days <4> 8-14 Days
<5> 15-30 Days <6> >30 Days )
Town
,
READING
r, , y „ .,r
Year 2006
~ i Subscribers
~ 6640
Date of Service Interruption Duration of Service Interruption (see Code Key above)
READING
09/20/2006 i
<1>
READING
11/10/2006
READING
08/31/2006
<1>
READING
( 08107/2006
READING
07/26/2006
<1>
f
READING
;f 07/26/2006 j)
<1>
READING
07/11/2006
`1> ~
READING
j~ 06/05/2006 I~
<1>
1
QYIJ
187
~L
DEVAL L. PAIRICK
GOVERNOR
TIMOTHY P. MURRAY
LIEMENAW GovERNOR
BLhNAHU COIILN
sEuliL IARY
Wednesday, February 7, 2007
4:30 PM-7:00PM*
Banquet Room (basement level)
Stoneham Town Hall
35 Central Street
Stoneham, MA 02180
THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION
1-93 /1-95 INTERCHANGE
TRANSPORTATION STUDY
TASK FORCE MEETING
MEETING AGENDA
1.
Welcome and Administrative Items
4:30
2
3.
4
5
Review and Update of Process and Project Considerations
(Planning/Environmental/Design, Agency Coordination, Funding, etc)
Deciding on Preferred Highway Recommendations
(Evaluation summary, new naming conventions, primary vs. secondary choices, etc.)
Other Items for Recommendation Package
(Corridor congestion, Transit/TDM issues, Land Use, short vs. long term etc.)
Preparation for Public Meeting #3 / Other Business
(Promotion, meeting format, major points to cover, etc.)
4:40
5:00
5:45
6:15
6. * Extra Session: Additional Coverage of Agenda Items 6:30
Note: If needed, this session will be used for additional discussion of agenda items beyond the
basic coverage in their scheduled time slots.
9Jr`
TEN PARK PLAZA, BOSTON, MA 02116-3969
TELEPHONE: (617) 973-7000 • TELEFAX: (617) 523-6454 • TDD: (617) 973-7306 • WWW.MASS.GOVIEOT
I-93/1-95 Interchange Transportation Study
Task Force Meeting
Wednesday, January 17, 2007
4:30 PM
Reading Senior Center
Reading, Massachusetts
Attendance
Task Force Members and Public who signed in:
Camille Anthony
Reading Selectman
Darlene Bruen
Jay Corey
Woburn City Engineer
Ian Durrant
Jeff Everson
PRESERVE
Jim Gallagher
Eileen Hamblin
Board of Realtors
George Katsoufis
Tony Kennedy
Stoneham Selectman
Justin Martell
Paul Meaney
Woburn Business Assn.
Paul Medeiros
Rick Schubert
Reading Selectman
Suzanne Smith
Richard Stinson
Wakefield DPW
Doug Wood-Boyle
Executive Office of Transportation staff:
Bob Frey Manager of Statewide Planning, Study Project Manager
Adriel Edwards Planning
Consultant team:
Jim Purdy Louis Berger Group (Project Manager)
Rick Azzalina Louis Berger Group (Engineering)
Anne McKinnon Howard/Stein-Hudson (Public Participation)
Sudhir Murthy Traflnfo Communications, Inc. (Traffic Modeling)
Keri Pyke Howard/Stein-Hudson (Traffic)
Meeting Summarv
Welcome and Administrative Items
Woburn City Council
MassRIDES
MAPC
Reading Citizen Rep.
Rep. Brad Jones
Woburn Citizen Rep.
Stoneham Citizen Rep.
Daily Times Chronicle
Bob Frey welcomed everyone to the latest I-93/1-95 Interchange Transportation Study Task Force
meeting, and thanked Reading for hosting. In accordance with EOT's policy of an open study
process, ail Task Force meetings are open to the public, but agenda items are discussed first with
Task Force members. Bob reminded attendees to refer to the study web site (www.9395info.com)
for the latest information. There were no questions on the December 13th meeting summary.
Bob indicated a change in the order of the agenda (as several members needed to leave early). He
also announced a tentative schedule of future meetings: The next Task Force meeting would be
held on February 7 in Stoneham. A subcommittee meeting would be planned for mid-February to
discuss further transit and TDM measures and other miscellaneous topics. Some topics are
generally outside the scope of this study, but could be addressed to some degree in the final report.
Another Task Force meeting would be held on February 28 in Woburn prior to the third public
informational meeting in mid-March in Woburn.
n tU
Office of Transportation Planning Page 1 of 7 Printed: 2/l/2007
I-93/1-95 Interchange Task Force Meeting of January 17, 2007
Recommendations: Process and Proiect Considerations
Bob Frey informed attendees that EOT and the consultant team are continuing to work with the
implementing agencies to ensure a smooth transition to the environmental phase. Bob and Jim
informed attendees that it is required by the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) that
the final decisions on highway components be made in the environmental phase. Final decisions
must be made based on a full analysis, in case further design and analysis identifies a major
problem. For this reason, MEPA also typically requires agencies to study more than one
alternative, especially for large projects like an interchange, even if a planning study recommends
a single, preferred alternative. The MEPA scope, which is based on comments received in the
Environmental Notification Form, dictates how many alternatives must be studied in the
environmental and design stages. This process also gives the public and other agencies not
involved to-date an opportunity to comment. The work that has been done for the planning study,
including all the alternatives that have been considered, will serve as a base for the environmental
phase and will significantly streamline the process. Jim stated that the Task Force will have
enough information in the planning study to make a recommendation as to their preferred highway
improvements (in combination with the various transit and TDM recommendations). Bob agreed,
and emphasized that although "final" decisions are made in a later stage, the Task Force should
make a recommendation at this point. Bob stated that all the recommendations would be packaged
together to elevate their collective priority in the MPO funding process and better ensure that all
components are implemented.
Bob recommended that the group reach closure on the planning study in order to move to the next
stage. EOT will ask LBG to prepare the Environmental Notification Form (ENF) under its current
contract. The planning report will be appended to the ENF to clearly describe the work that has
been done to-date. Tony Kennedy asked if the local conservation commissions will get the ENF
to review. Jim Purdy said localities will receive copies of the ENF to review and comment on, but
there are no permits or approvals required at the local level at this stage. Bob encouraged Task
Force members to stay involved by serving as a Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) during the
environmental process. This would allow the Task Force to participate in resolving outstanding
issues during the in-depth analysis of alternatives in the Environmental Impact Report/Study.
Darlene Bruen was not able to attend the December Task Force meeting. She expressed concern
that a new plan, based on a rejected alternative, was shown at that meeting. Jim Purdy clarified
that the alternative shown in December had not been thrown out previously. 113-C was
demonstrated at the public meeting in October in the interest of time and to prevent confusion, but
all H3 options remained part of the "family" of alternatives under consideration. Also, H3-C was
favored by members of the Task Force, and at the time of the October public meeting, the
simulation of H3-B demonstrated some traffic operations deficiencies. Bob Frey also stressed that
H3-A and H3-B had not been thrown out, and asked members to recall that he indicated at
previous meetings that more than one alternative would need to be examined as part of this study
and included in the report. Also, H3-B was shown at the design station of the open house at the
Reading public meeting and a number of attendees made favorable comments on H3-B.
Comments from the public, FHWA, and MassHighway suggested that it was worth revisiting 113-
B to improve the traffic deficiencies. The revised scheme was shown to the Task Force in
December.
Camille Anthony asked why flyunders were ever considered if they have serious problems. Jim
Purdy clarified that flyunder ramps have not been rejected or declared infeasible. MassHighway
Office of Transportation Planning Page 2 of 7 Printed: 2/1/2007
I-93/I-95 Interchange Task.Force Meeting of January 17, 2007
asked questions about the flyunders that the team is addressing. He added that MassHighway also
reviewed and commented on the two alternatives at Washington Street and found merit in the
split-ramp scheme because it removes the weave on Rte. 128 between Washington Street and I-93
rather than just lengthening it. Bob Frey reiterated that the team and EOT are not favoring one
alternative over another at this point and the team will be meeting again with FHWA and
MassHighway.
Continued Discussion: Cummines Park Area Options
Proposed Cedar Street On-ramp: Keri Pyke reviewed the analysis and conclusions about the
proposed on-ramp at Cedar Street. Three issues were studied: the impacts on the weave on Rte.
128, impacts at the adjacent intersections of Washington Street / Olympia Avenue and
Washington Street / Rte. 128 entrance ramps, and the LOS of the proposed ramp. She said the
weaving section on Rte. 128 would still be LOS F even with the new ramp removing 200-300 cars
in the peak hours, because that reduction is a small percentage of the total vehicles in the weaving
area. On the other hand, the nearby intersections at Olympia and at the entrance ramps would
improve substantially; delay would likely be reduced by approximately 40 seconds. The LOS on
the proposed Cedar Street ramp itself would be LOS B.
Jim Gallagher asked how much traffic the proposed ramp could accommodate before it operated at
LOS F. Keri Pyke said she was not sure, but the ramp would have to be dismantled with later
phases anyway. Keri Pyke said the proposed Cedar Street ramp would be a short term measure
compatible with the H1 improvements. It would not work with the later phases because of the
other ramps that would enter I-93 in that vicinity. Rick Azzalina and Jim Purdy agreed.
Proposed Normac Road ramp: Keri Pyke explained that the ramp at Normac Road is not feasible
for the relocated ramp scheme, as the ramp would not allow for a sufficient acceleration lane onto
Rte. 128. Unsafe merges would result. For the split-ramp scheme at Washington Street, a
Normac Road ramp would not be an option (as a second on-ramp would create further problems
on 128). In any case, the analysis shows that cut-through traffic in the adjacent neighborhood
would be a potential consequence, even if the ramp were limited to on-traffic. Darlene Bruen
asked if the group is ready to take this option off the table. There was general agreement among
task force members present to drop the Normac Road option and retain the proposed Cedar Street
on-ramp as an interim measure.
Developing Recommendations
Jim Purdy reviewed H3-B Revision 3, which was refined in response to comments from the
public, FHWA, and MassHighway. The original H3-B scheme resulted in a queue beginning at
the diverge to the connector road to Washington Street and I-93 and also at the split to I-93 north
and south. The queue from there extended back onto Rte. 128 northbound. 1-13-13 Revision 3
addresses this queuing problem by making the connector road 3 lanes with 2-lane ramps to I-93
SB and I-93 NB. Three lanes also remain on the mainline. The Washington Street Bridge would
have to be rebuilt, which is an opportunity to widen it and improve the local intersections. On Rte.
128 SB, the revised scheme has a 2-lane ramp to I-93 SB instead of a 1-lane ramp, and a 1-lane
ramp to I-93 NB; this solved the other queuing problem with the original version of H3-B.
Previously, the split ramp system was called a C-D road, but now it is more accurately being
called the I-93 connector. This connector must be used by travelers on Rte. 128 northbound
Office of Transportation Planning Page 3 of 7 Printed: 2/1/2007
fJy'`~
I-93/I-95 Interchange Task Force Meeting of January 17, 2007
headed for the Washington Street exit or I-93 northbound or southbound. Travelers on Rte. 128 ,
northbound cannot use the connector road to bypass Rte. 128 traffic because there is not the option
to continue on to Rte. 128 northbound. Rte. 128 northbound through-traffic stays on the mainline,
which will be three lanes with no weaves. Travelers entering the system from Washington Street
will have the option to go to Rte. 128 northbound (of course) but there is not one continuous lane
from before the Mishawum bridge to Rte. 128 northbound on the connector road. Therefore, the
nomenclature "C-D road" was dropped.
Jim Purdy said the H3-C alternative was refined slightly by providing two lanes in the below-
grade ramp frorn Rte. 128 SB to I-93 SB.
George Katsoufis asked where the southbound problem merge was in the original H3-B. Jim
Purdy said the problem was at the diverge point for I-93 SB-there was insufficient distance for
traffic to sort out. Jay Corey asked why 2-lane ramps are needed in H3-B and not in 113-C. Jim
Purdy said 2 lanes aren't needed for capacity but to improve the traffic diverges. In 113-C, the
southbound diverge is further downstream, so there is more distance for traffic to sort itself out.
Camille Anthony asked if H3-C has weaves in Reading. Yes, between I-93 and Rte. 28 in both
directions, but these sections are long enough to handle the weaving volumes. Darlene Bruen
asked what are the differences now between 113-13 and H3-C.
6 113-11 includes the I-93 connector road and split Washington Street ramps, and it uses two
flyovers to connect Rte. 128 and I-93.
113-C includes relocating the Washington Street ramps west and features one fly-over and
one fly-under to connect Rte. 128 SB with I-93.
Jay Corey asked if a hybrid alternative could be considered that would have H3-C with the split-
ramp at Washington Street. Jim Purdy said yes, the alternatives can now be viewed as having
interchangeable components.
Jim Purdy reviewed the evaluation summary of H3-B and 113-C. With many of the measures of
Traffic Impacts-safety, mobility, highway design, and access-the two alternatives are similar in
impact, with H3B having the safety advantage of removing the Washington Street weave from
Rte. 128. H3-C would require taking one industrial building and some partial surface takings
while H3-B does not involve property takings. Jay Corey asked about signage and the number of
decisions a driver would have to make. Jim Purdy said the two alternatives (H3-B and H3-C) are
similar in terms of driver decisions - both change the current system by removing a loop ramp in
each direction. For example, on Rte. 128 southbound the driver first sees an off-ramp to I-93 in
both directions and then chooses to stay left for I-93 southbound or right for I-93 northbound.
Darlene said that she was under the impression that H3B would require more decisions. Rick
Azzalina said that there are actually slightly more decisions to make with 113C because of the
mainline weave areas that are eliminated with H3B. Both are simpler than H4. Jim Purdy said
there is not a gravity solution for the fly-under ramps in H3-C and pumping would be required at
the interchange and possibly at the connector to Washington Street ramps.
Jim Gallagher asked for clarification of which ramps would operate at LOS E and Fin the peak
hours.
Office of Transportation Planning Page 4 of 7 Printed: 2/1/2007
S
I-93/I-95 Interchange Task Force
Ramps that would overate at LOS E:
Meeting of January 17, 2007
1-13-13: Rte 128 SB off to Rte. 28 and weave between Rte. 28 and I-93 - both peak hours.
H3-B and H3C: Weave on Rte. 128 SB between 1-93 SB on-ramp and Mishawum Road off
ramp - both peak hours.
H3-B and H3C: I-93 SB off-ramp to Rte 128 SB - both peak hours
H3-C: Rte. 128 NB off-ramp to Washington Street - both peak hours
H3-B and H3-C: On ramp from Mishawum Rd to Rte 128 SB - LOS F in both peak hours.
Jeff Everson asked if the effect of these alternatives on congestion to Waltham has been
considered, opining that the improvements would add to congestion on Rte. 128. Jim Purdy said
the modeling was done within the study area, and Rte. 128 traffic is not able to grow to reach to
2025 demand because the roadway is constrained throughout most of its length. Bob Frey said the
interchange improvements can make a difference and will improve overall travel time for drivers
on Rte. 128, and referenced the "Benefits of Reducing Congestion" document on the study web
site. Jeff Everson felt that rear-end accidents would increase due to increased stop-and-go traffic.
He requested that this issue be addressed in detail in the planning report.
Tony Kennedy and Camille Anthony requested that the existing conditions be shown on the
following graphics for comparison. Jim agreed that this would be done, especially for the graphics
to be used at the public meeting.
Jim Purdy reviewed the impacts of H3-B and H3-C using additional criteria:
• Travel time through the interchange would be the same for H3-B and H3-C in the AM
peak period. Travel time would be shorter with H3-B in the PM peak due to the 93
connector road. Also, comparing the travel time of 3 major moves revealed mostly
similarities.
• The total exiting volume would be the same for both alternatives.
• The speed differential across lanes, which can be a safety concern if it is large, would be
essentially the same for both H3-B and 113-C.
• The delay time through the interchange would be essentially the same.
• Congestion: H3-C experiences slightly higher congestion in the PM peak.
• Noise: Although a full noise study cannot be done until the design of the improvements is
advanced, KM Chng, noise consultant, estimates that the changes in noise would be small.
Some quadrants may improve a little and some may become slighter noisier; however H3-
C is expected to be marginally better in terms of noise impact.
• Visual: Both alternatives will have a moderate visual impact, with more impact from the
double-flyovers of H3-B.
• Wetlands: H3-B would disturb approximately 34,000 s.f. and H3-C would disturb
approximately 15,000 s.f. [It was later determined that much of the H3-B impact is from
elevated ramps above the wetland rather than direct fill.]
• The economic development potential is considered the same for both alternatives.
• Difficulty of construction: H3-C would be more difficult to build because of the
underpasses.
Office of Transportation Planning Page 5 of 7 Printed: 2/1/2007
I-93/I-95 Interchange Task Force
Meeting of January 17, 2007
Capital cost: H3-B would cost about $123.9 million; H3-C, about $94 million. Again, the
takings required for relocated Washington Street ramps in H3-C would add to the cost.
[Note: subsequent to the meeting, more work was done on H3-C to make it more comparable to
H3-B, which will increase cost.]
Jim Purdy showed a series of simulations that illustrated how the two alternatives might appear
from a bird's eye view. H3-B and H3-C are about the same height; H3-B occupies a wider view
from Walnut Street in Reading and is closer to homes on Richard Circle.. Camille Anthony
requested a comparison of these schemes to the previous MassHighway schemes in terms of the
height and incursion into the adjacent neighborhoods.
Bob Frey suggested that the Task Force focus on four individual components in these alternatives:
• Split ramp at Washington Street
• Relocated ramp at Washington Street
• Both ramps over existing highways
• One ramp under existing highways
The consultant tedm'will "mix and match" components and evaluate them using the criteria
discussed earlier.
Rick Schubert asked about the visual impact evaluation. He said many of the concerns he heard at
the public meetings related to visual impacts. The ramp from Rte. 128 NB to I-93 NB appears to
be close to South Street and fairly high. Tony Kennedy requested more simulations from
Stoneham. Jim Purdy said the visual-impact analysis would be expanded to address some of these
questions.
Additional Items for Recommendations
Bob Frey indicated that CTPS had just produced a draft memo addressing the question, "What
level of investment in transit is needed to make a substantial difference in traffic volumes at the
interchange?" The numbers provided should be considered draft until further notice:
• To make an "appreciable" difference in LOS in the I-93 corridor to Boston would require a
reduction of 6,900 vehicles during the 3-hour AM peak hour.
• This translates into 7,900 person trips.
• If area commuter railroad lines absorbed this number of person trips, they would be over-
capacity.
• Parking would be a problem and would constrain commuter rail use.
George Katsoufis asked why CTPS assumed that all of the shifts would be from auto to transit
what about carpool/vanpool? He asked if CTPS would provide an estimate of the percentage
6,900 vehicle trips represents of the total so we can then look at a variety of measures to consider.
Jim Gallagher asked how land use and walkable transit stations fit in here, especially if the supply
of parking spaces is inadequate. Jim Purdy addressed the question of the role of land use policy in
this study with a chart that posited ways to meet future demand: increase the capacity of the
interchange a little and meet some of the demand through transit and TDM. Yet, there would still
be a shortfall and demand would exceed capacity. These "extra" vehicles would either use local
Office of Transportation Planning Page 6 of 7 Printed: 2/1/2007
I-93/1-95 Interchange Task Force Meeting of January 17, 2007
streets instead of the highway or extend the length of the peak period (or both). Land use policy
could play a role in reducing this unmet demand for driving.
Task Force members discussed some challenges and barriers to transit use and carpooling. Jay
Corey said incentives are critical to getting people to use transit. Adriel Edwards said
disincentives to driving may be necessary, too. Rick Schubert felt the State's policies are
sometimes in conflict with each other - for example encouraging economic growth, but
discouraging certain types of growth. Bob commented that in Massachusetts, most land use
decisions are made at the local level. Paul Medeiros expressed frustration at what he felt was a
lack of commitment from the State on whether Mishawum would be re-opened as a full-time
station with the development of the site with residential units. Paul Meaney said the MBTA lost
credibility with him when they closed Mishawum after they said it could stay open. He also
asserted that a pedestrian bridge to Anderson RTC should be provided to enable more people to
get to the station by foot. Jim Purdy said a big question is how much people want the State
involved in local land use issues. Darlene Bruen said the goal is for the State and localities to
work together better.
Paul Meaney noted that a development proposed at the Mishawum station has been approved.
The project will include 210 residential units, 50,000 s.f. of office space, and parking for 596 cars.
In addition, the Middlesex County Court temporary relocation planned in the area will be about
350,000 s.f. The impact of these projects should be included.
Schedule for Upcoming Meetings
Bob Frey said the third public informational meeting would be held in Woburn in mid-March.
The next Task Force meeting will be held on February 7 at Stoneham Town Hall. Thy meeting
adjourned at 6:45 p.m.
Office of Transportation Planning Page 7 of 7 Printed: 2/1/2007
9~~
I-934-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY
Advancement of Highway Alternatives for the I-93/1-95 Interchange - February 2007
After further evaluations, numerous comments received from the public, and continued work
with the Interchange Task Force, the consultant team suggested the components of the "1-13"
series of highway designs be developed into one of the long term recommendations for
improving traffic operations and safety at the I-93/I-95 interchange.
The H3 Alternative has two major components:
■ Within the Interchange - Replace the northwest and southeast "loop" ramps of the
interchange with "direct connection" ramps for Route 128 NB to I-93 NB and for Route
128 SB to I-93 SB.
■ Ramps for Washington Street - Modify the on/off ramps at Washington Street and
Route 128 NB (Exit 36).
Each component has two variations:
Within the interchange -
■ Ramps Over- First, replace the northwest loop ramp (128 SB to I-93 SB) with anew
ramp that goes over both I-93 and Route 128. Also, replace the southeast loop ramp (128
NB to I-93 NB) with a new ramp that goes over both I-93 and Route 128.
■ Ramp Under -First, replace the northwest loop ramp (128 SB to I-93 SB) with anew
ramp that goes under both I-93 and Route 128. Also (as above), replace the southeast
loop ramp (128 NB to I-93 NB) with a new ramp that goes over both I-93 and Route 128.
Ramps for Washington Street -
■ Split Ramp - The on-ramp would be split to provide one branch to Route 128 northbound
and a second branch to I-93 in both directions, eliminating the weaving movement with
Route 128 mainline traffic.
■ Relocated Ramps - Both on and off-ramps would be moved further west of existing
location, increasing the weaving distance with Route 128 NB mainline traffic. The off-
ramp to Washington St. would begin where Rt.128 passes over the railroad tracks. One
commercial property would need to be taken.
The interchange variations can be mixed and matched with the Washington Street ramp
variations, creating four major options that could potentially move forward:
• H3-OS: Two flyover ramps with Split ramp at Washington St. (former H3-B)
• H3-OR: Two flyover ramps with Relocated ramps for Washington St. (former H3-A)
• H3-US: One flyUnder, one flyover with Split ramp at Washington St.
• H3-UR: One flyUnder, one flyover with Relocated ramps for Washington (former H3-C)
T
EOT, LBG Page 1 of 1 2/1/07 ,
tlc~q
TRACKING OF LEGAL SERVICES - FY 2007
Monthlv
Hours
Month
Monthlv
Monthlv
Hours
Cumulative
Available
Monthlv
Monthlv
Cumulative
Available
Hours
Hours
Used vs
Remainder
$
$
Cost
Remainder
Allocated
Used
Allocated
of 112 vear
Allocated
Used
Year
July
51.2
48.6
(2.60)
(2.60)
258.6
$6,667
$6,318
$6,318
$73,686
Includes Heir search
August
51.2
44.8
(6.40)
(9.00)
213.8
$6,667
$8,189
$14,507
$65,497 for Memorial Park
September
51.2
34
(17.20)
(26.20)
179.8
$6,667
$4,875
$19,382
$60,622
October
51.2
51.5
0.30
(25.90)
128.3
$6,667
$6,635
$26,017
$53,987
November
51.2
35.9
(15.30)
(41.20)
92.4
$6,667
$4,667
$30,684
$49,320
December
51.2
24.4
(26.80)
(68.00)
68
$6,667
$3,180
$33,864
$46,140
307.2
239.2
(68.00)
$40,002
$33,864
$33,864
$46,140
January
51.2
(51.20)
(119.20)
375.2
$6,667
$33,864
$46,140
February
51.2
(51.20)
(170.40)
375.2
$6,667
$33,864
$46,140
March
51.2
(51.20)
(221.60)
375.2
$6,667
$33,864
$46,140
April
51.2
(51.20)
(272.80)
375.2
$6,667
$33,864
$46,140
May
51.2
(51.20)
(324.00)
375.2
$6,667
$33,864
$46,140
June
51.2
(51.20)
(375.20)
375.2
$6,667
$33,864
$46,140
Subtotal
307.2
0
$40,002
$0
Total
614.4
239.2
-375.2
$80,004
$33,864
$46,1401
STRIVING FOR SUSTAINABLE & PREDICTABLE RATES
Water and sewer rate revenue requirements are projected to rise by $200 million between FY07 and FYI 1,
resulting in community increases of almost 9% each year. Nearly 60% of the current expense budget is
fueled by debt service payments. In the face of these conditions, the Advisory Board recommended the
following action plan to the Authority:
❖ Create a Rates Management Committee.
Revisit the levels of reserves as required in the bond covenants.
Develop a debt restructuring plan.
STEPS TAKEN
The Authority convened a Rates Management Committee comprised of Members of the Board of
Directors, the Chairman of the Advisory Board, and staff members from MWRA and the Advisory
Board, in consultation with the Authority's Financial Advisor.
❖ The Authority revisited amendments to existing Bond Covenants which resulted in:
■ Reducing the Debt Service reserve to 50% of maximum annual debt service.
■ Eliminating the Community Obligation Revenue Enhancement (CORE) Fund.
Replacing a portion of the Renewal and Replacement Fund with Commercial Paper. These
changes become effective in 8 to 10 years and will free up $172 million, which could be
used to pay down debt or fund new capitol projects.
❖ In mid-January, the Authority restructured $648 million of existing debt. The restructuring will
address rate pressures before covenants take hold.
RESULTS
These proactive actions by the MWRA will establish a path toward achieving sustainable and predictable
rates. Rate increases, projected to be close to 9% in the coming years, will be contained to an estimated
5.8% (assuming continued receipt of $18.75 million in Debt Service Assistance). Additionally, this path
will:
Provide $200 million in new borrowings to fund the Authority's ongoing capital budget.
Reduce charges by approximately $425 million over the next ten years.
❖ Provide $4.9 million in present value savings.
Maintain and affirm bond ratings from Fitch, Moody's and Standard & Poor's, even while
restructuring debt and changing covenants.
The combined borrowing of $848 million is the largest bond issue in the Authority's 20-year history. The
true interest cost was 4.34%.
MWRA ADVISORY BOARD
• PHONE: 617.742.7561 • FAX: 617.742.4614 • EMAIL: Christine.Hevelone-Bvler a,mwra.state.ma.us
WEB SITE: http://www.mwraadvisoryboard.com
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
H Juliann
Thanks for writing.
Hechenbleikner, Peter
Monday, January 29, 2007 8:43 AM
'Anne LeBlanc - iMac'
Feudo, John
RE: Don't Rip down Imagination Station!
L ( C, i'o
Unfortunately we have to take Imagination Station down. There are too many hazards for
people to use it. The stone material on the ground is not a cushioning material and is
dangerous if kids fall on it. Parts of Imagination Station boards are splintery and could
hurt kids. The metal slides are not permitted any more - they get too hot in the summer
and could burn kids.
We are working on a plan to build a new Imagination Station. We will need help from kids
to help us design it. It will be very expensive to do, but I hope we will re-build one
that is as nice, and safer for all of our kids to play on.
Pete Hechenbleikner
Town Manager
-----Original Message-----
From: Anne LeBlanc - iMac [mailto:amleblanc@mac.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 20078:24 PM
To: Town Manager
Subject: Donut Rip down Imagination Station!
Dear The Town Manager,
I think its crazy to rip down Imagination Station. If you have to rip it down then
you should rebuild it afterwards. I have been waiting a long time for it to re-open but
today I saw that it was being ripped down. If you still don't want to rebuild it then just
fix what ever is wrong with it and rebuild what you already ripped down. Please tell me
what is wrong with it.
Listen to me and please don't rip it down!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thank you very much.
From,
Juliann LeBlanc age 9
1
J
Page 1 of 1
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: Bo or Gina [bogina03@earthlink.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 8:13 PM
To: E V Blodgett
Cc: Sharon Thomas; Kendal Stackhouse; Fran Scott; Reilly, Chris; Mary Ellen O'Neill; McIntire, Ted;
Ann Marie Marcellino; Town Manager; Ron D'Addario; Betty Cronin; Daniel Blodgett; Sue.Berger;
Michele Benson; Anthony, Camille; Adams, Virginia
Subject: Global Warming Changing Course
FYI - New Seminar Offering on Global Warming
<!--[endif]--> The Reading Advisory Committee for Cities for Climate Protection (ACCCP) is
delighted to sponsor a 4-week seminar on "Global Warming: Changing the C02URSE". Developed by
the Northwest Earth Institute (NWEI) in Portland Oregon, the course will begin on Tuesday, February
27th and run for 4 consecutive Tuesdays culminating with a celebration evening on Tuesday, April 3rd
The location will be the upstairs lounge at the Reading Senior Center, 49 Pleasant Street. The time is
somewhat flexible according to the wishes of the participants, but will run approximately from 7 p.m. to
8 p.m.. The cost of the course is $15.00, which covers the informative reading material provided by the
NWEI.
The four sessions titled "Off Course," "Collision Course," "Changing Course," and lastly,
"Setting a New Course," each contain 6 to 7 readings by acclaimed authors on the subject. At each
session, participants discuss the readings and share their personal experiences. Ideas are shared in a
friendly, dynamic setting. All views are respected; we are all learners gaining from hearing and sharing
the ideas of others.
If you would like to join our group, please telephone Ron D'Addario at 781-439-9146. If you use
the answering machine, please leave your name and number, and someone will return your call.
The (ACCCP) is also excited to announce that it will sponsor Earth Day events on April 21st and 22nd
The days are in the planning stage at this time. If you would like to participate in these events, or if you
have something that pertains to the Earth Day mission of fostering sustainability for our planet, please
contact our committee from our website at www.ci.reading.ma.us/climate. You may also reach us
through a link within our town website at www.ci.reading.ma.us.
1/31/2007
~ I c a
Hechenbleikner, Peter
From: patricia.a.harty@verizon.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2007 12:48 PM
To: undisclosed-recipients
Subject: Verizon letter
Dear Municipal Leader,
It was great seeing many of you at the recent Massachusetts Municipal Association
Conference earlier this month. Many of you stopped by the Verizon booth to discuss our
FiOS products and services, the Massachusetts Cable Choice and Competition Act and what it
would mean for municipalities and consumers.
In our view, everyone benefits from this legislation: consumers, municipalities, and the
industry. As described below, the bill creates a fair system to encourage cable
competition and support local access programming. We heard a lot of excitement about our
efforts to bring real cable competition to Massachusetts. In fact, the number one
question we received at the MMA conference was "when is FiOS coming to our town?"
It Puts Consumers First:
For too long, consumers have had little choice when choosing a cable provider. Where
there's cable competition, consumers win. The FCC says where wire-to-wire cable
competition exists, rates are 17 percent lower.
Other studies say the savings can exceed 25 percent. Under the Act, monopoly power ends
and consumers will guide the future of the cable television industry.
It Encourages Increased Broadband Investment:
Massachusetts can keep its place as a national leader in technology and communications
through this legislation. This legislation incents competitors to invest, deploy
technology and compete by eliminating barriers to entry and reducing the time and cost of
launching new services.
Additionally, the bill not only streamlines the process for new entrants, but enables
established providers to compete in each others' territories more easily.
It Provides Support for Communities:
Franchise fees: Franchise fees will be set by each municipality, up
to the federal maximum of 50. Cities and towns will retain complete control over these
fees and how much consumers will pay in their communities:
PEG Support: The legislation provides consistent capital for local
access studios. If an incumbent agreement is in place, the new provider will match the
per subscriber fee paid to the town. If there is no incumbent, or when the incumbent
agreement expires, all providers will pay up to 1% of gross revenues on the cable TV
service to support local access capital needs. This fee is also set by the municipality.
Local Channels: New entrants must provide the same number of PEG
access channels provided by an incumbent cable operator. All operators will be required
to interconnect their networks so the same local programming is available on all cable
networks in a given community.
Communities retain complete control of the content of those channels.
Public Rights-of-Way: This legislation does not change municipal
control or management of public rights-of-way. New cable-operators must provide
municipalities with indemnification against damage caused by construction of the cable
network.
Existing Licenses: Current contracts are grandfathered unless both
sides agree to terminate an existing agreement.
FiOS TV is not cable TV. It's better:
Verizon is the only company in the nation bringing fiber connections for video, Internet
and phone service directly to the home of consumers. The Verizon network is future-proof,
offering enough capacity for new television services and unlimited future technology
applications. " V
Existing cable networks cannot keep pace with technology innovation as more technology
companies develop applications tailored for the FiOS network.
1 JJ