Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007-02-27 Board of Selectmen Packet~o~N OF R~q~ f~ g Towr of Re''adin `moo r s a 16 Lowell Street 63S.IN~o ReadinMA 01867-2685 g~ FAX: (781) 942-9071 Email: townmanageracixeading.ma.us MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Selectmen FROM: Peter I. Hechenbleikner DATE: February 23, 2007 TOWN MANAGER (781) 942-9043 RE: February 27, 2007 Agenda l c) As you can see from the enclosed email, we have reached a settlement on the Diranian matter on Timothy Place. All work will be done by June 1, 2007. 4a). .Process - National. Development - Scott Weiss from National Development will be at the Selectmen's Meeting at 7:30 p.m. The enclosed memo and outline of process has been reviewed by Ben Tafoya, Russ Graham and me. Although the schedule is ambitious, the important thing is to get started on the process. Two matters require Selectmen's attention at this time: Establishment of a Development Advisory Team as suggested and establishment of a public information session on March 22, 2007. 4b) Ubdate - Woodland Street - The Board had a previous hearing on acceptance of Woodland. Street as a public street. You asked to get input from all of the abutters prior to the Board snaking a. decision. We will have that report for you on Tuesday evening. Meanwhile, we have included a draft article in the Warrant for the Annual Town Meeting. Once you receive the report on Tuesday night, you can decide whether or not to include that Warrant Article on the Warrant. 46) Enclosed is the Warrant outline and Draft Warrant. I will work with Town Counsel to complete the Warrant Articles and may have them available for you on Monday at Town Meeting. 4d) Public Hearing - West Street School Zone - Montessori School - We previously discussed this matter at a Selectmen's meeting and the Board agreed to proceed with the public hearing on this matter. The establishment of a School Zone in this location was recommended by the CPDC. If approved, the School Zone regulations will take affect upon occupancy of the building. The building is currently under construction. 4e) Hearing - Ston Sian Walnut at Old Farm Road - Following the previous discussion on this matter, the Board directed to schedule a public hearing on a possible four way stop. at this l ~G I Page 1 of 1 Hechenbleikner, Peter s V - From: Hechenbleikner, Peter Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 11:50 AM To: Cormier, Jim; Fink, Fran Cc: Reading - Selectmen Subject: Diranian - Timothy Place Town Counsel has informed me that Diranian is willing to agree in court to move the encroachments by June 1, 2007. He will post a performance bond in the amount of $15,000 to guarantee the work, and agree to a court settlement to that effect. Town Counsel will represent this to the court tomorrow, and once the bond is posted and court settlement signed we should be all set. So - Jim - no more tickets until/unless he doesn't meet the requirements. Pete !Cz 2/21/2007 Page 1 of 1 Schena, Paula From: Hechenbleikner, Peter Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 3:32 PM To: 'rep. bradleyjones@hou.state. ma.us' Cc: frederick.vanmagness@hou.state.ma.us' Subject: FW: Earmarks -Updated Contacts: BRAD JONES Updated from previous Brad AT Justin from your office asked that we contact you no later than today about potential earmarks for the upcoming state budget. The following are our priorities where we feel we could use some help from the Commonwealth, and where the goals of the community are particularly in sync with those of the Commonwealth. Demolition of the Water Treatment Plant - $950,000. The Town has agreed to buy into the MWRA for water supply, thus alleviating stress on the Ipswich River. The benefits are basin-wide and statewide. The financial impact has fallen 100% on the Town - water/sewer rates are up 35% in FY 2007, and up another 18% in 2008. These funds will alleviate some of that cost to the community, and will assist in opening parts of the Ipswich Riverfront to active and passive recreation. Feasibility and preliminary design of a downtown parking garage - $50,000. As part of the Town's smart growth initiatives, there is a strong effort to concentrate development in our downtown, and lack of parking is a major impediment. Energy Conservation Initiatives - $250,000. The Town has embarked as a community and as a government to reduce energy use. This program will place occupancy sensors in all buildings, school and town, to reduce energy use. It will also re-lamp our oldest un-renovated school building with more energy efficient lighting. School classroom technology - $37,000. This will match $18,000 raised privately by the Reading Technology Fund for improved technology in classrooms K-B. We know that this is going to be a difficult year for the state budget, and greatly appreciate anything that you can do to assist in these endeavors. Peter I. Hechenbleikner Town Manager 2/8/2007 C/3 IMI FEB 22 W (1: 19 NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT r" T:617.527.9800 F:617.965.7361 www.nacdev.com 2310 Washington February 20, 2007 Street Newton Mr. Peter Hechenbleikner Lower Falls Town Manager MA 02462 Town of Reading 16 Lowell Street Reading, MA 01867-2683 Re: Redevelopment Planning Process for the Addison-Wesley Site Dear Pete: As a follow-up to our phone discussion, attached please find an outline of the process proposed for the Town's review of the redevelopment of the Addison-Wesley site. Given the feedback we have received from Town officials and the community, National Development anticipates requesting the placement of an overlay district on the site to allow a mixed-use development, including residential and a limited amount of retail/office space. Proceeding with an overlay district will also allow the underlying Business C zone to remain, so that we preserve the ability to consider the currently allowed office use. We recognize that many members of the community have already dedicated significant time to the Addison-Wesley property and there are many in the community who want to hear more about National's plans for the site. The input that we have received has been that we should hold a forum to present our vision for the property and receive community input. We have been encouraged to present something with substance rather than just solicit ideas. Therefore, we feel it is important to share both background and our preliminary concept plans with the community, and obtain input and feedback as quickly as reasonably possible. Ted is confident that he can conduct a meeting in a way that feels both inclusive and informative, thus fulfilling the purpose of the planned charrette. If you wish to announce something at the February 27th Board of Selectmen meeting, the Selectmen could announce a public information session on the project to be held on March 15 or 22. The Selectmen may also wish to announce the creation of the Town's ad-hoc Development Advisory Committee formed to coordinate and oversee the planning and permitting of the site. Our intent is to work closely with Town officials and to share the information publicly during the process. Our hope is that we can have a relatively quick and cooperative.process that would conclude with a rezoning in the late spring or early fall., q, t I Mr. Peter Hechenbleikner February 20, 2007 Page 2 of 2 During this next month, National Development will be actively marketing the site for potential office users consistent with the current zoning. We will also be working to be able to present some meaningful information on March 15 or 22. Following the public information session, we anticipate working closely with the Development Advisory Committee to refine a concept plan and draft the overlay district zoning language. We appreciate all of your assistance to date and look forward to working with you and the Town on this project. Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to meet on the Wednesday the 21 as discussed. Sincerely, Scott J. Weiss Vice President Enclosure cc: Ted Tye NAToONAL ~ 2- DEVELOPMENT ~o~~ OF RFq~ f~ ► ;5~ Town of Reading moo. x~ ~a 16 Lowell Street 3g:,cc, Reading; MA 01867-2685 FAX: (181).942-9071 TOWN MANAGER Email: townmanager@ci.reading.ma.us (781) 942-9043 MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Selectmen FROM: Peter I. Hechenbleikner DATE: February 23, 2007 RE: February 27, 2007 Agenda 1c) As you can see from the enclosed email, we have reached a settlement on the Diraman matter on Timothy Place. All work will be done by June 1, 2007. 4a). Process - National. Development - Scott Weiss from National Development will be at the Selectmen's Meeting at 7:30 p.m. The enclosed memo and outline of process has been reviewed by Ben Tafoya, Russ Graham and me. Although the schedule is ambitious, the important thing is to get started on the process. Two matters require Selectmen's attention at this time: Establishinent of a Development Advisory Team as suggested and establishment of ~'`~--a~agblic information session on March 22, 2007. 4b) Update - Woodland Street - The Board had a previous hearing on acceptance of Woodland. Street as a public street. You asked to get input from all of the abutters prior to the Board making a. decision. We will have that report for you on Tuesday evening. Meanwhile, we have included a draft article in the Warrant for the Annual Town Meeting. Once you receive the report on Tuesday night, you can decide whether or not to include that Warrant Article on the Warrant. 4c) Enclosed is the Warrant outline and Draft Warrant. I will work with Town Counsel to complete the Warrant Articles and may have them available for you on Monday at Town Meeting. 4d) Public, Hearing - West Street School Zone - Montessori School - We previously discussed this matter at a Selectmen's meeting and the Board agreed to proceed with the public hearing on this matter. The establishment of a School Zone in this location was recommended by the CPDC. If approved, the School Zone regulations will take affect upon occupancy of the building. The building is currently under construction. 4e) Hearing - Stop Sian Walnut at Old Farm Road - Following the previous discussion on this matter, the Board directed to schedule a public hearing on a possible four way stop at this q a . READING - ADDIS®N WESLEY Proposed Town Review Schedule To: Town of Reading cc: Pearson Education From: National Development Item # Component Date: February 16, 2007 Location: Reading Town Hall Schedule Initial Planning Phase ' Feb - April ■ Board of Selectmen Meeting. Feb. 27" o Announce the Public Information Session o Announce the creation of the Town's Development Advisory Team to coordinate and oversee the proposed development The Town Creates an ad-hoc Development Advisory Announce at Team. The DAT will coordinate with National Development Feb 27 h BOS and will oversee the planning and permitting process for the meeting Addison-Wesley site. Members would include: o two members of the Board of Selectmen, o chair of the CPDC, o chair of the Economic Development Committee, o the Town Manager, and o the Town Planner. ■ Public Information Session. Hold an evening forum (7- Mar'22"d 9pm) to review the current (office) zoning, the development constraints and to outline a mixed-use re-development plan. Opportunities will be provided for community input. • Develop Preliminary Plan. Develop a plan and review with March - April the DAT. 2. Conceptual Design Phase April - May • Refine Proposed Plan & Outline Overlay District. April Coordinate with DAT to refine a proposed development plan and to form the parameters of the overlay district including requirements and restrictions. ■ Present Plan and Overlay District to BOS and CPDC. April 23 - May 4 Present plan and overlay district separately or to a joint meeting of the Selectmen and CPDC. • Public Information Session (2"d). Present the proposed May 14 - 25 plan and zoning language for the Overlay District. Summarize the changes made to incorporate community feedback and describe the next steps to implementation. Review Schedule -1 - ReadingAW-ProoessOugin"21607.doo qa, t/ 0 READING - ADDISON WESLEY Proposed Town Review Schedule Date: February16, 2007 Location: Reading Town Hall 3. Preliminary Permitting Phase May - June ■ Submit Zoning Change to town for inclusion on Town May Meeting warrant. Request a Special Town Meeting? ■ BOS, CPDC, Bylaw Committee Public Hearings. Present June to Town Boards and Committees as needed to present plan and Overlay District. ■ Additional Public Information Session(s). Hold additional June sessions as needed. ■ Special Town Meeting June or September 4. Local Permitting Phase Following Town Meeting ■ Site Plan Review ■ Special Permit ■ Order of Conditions ■ Site Eligibility / Comprehensive Permit 5. State Permitting Following Town Meeting ■ ENF / EIR - MEPA ■ Sewer Connection Permit - DEP ■ Access Permit - MassHighway Review Schedule -2- ReadmgAW.Pmcesaomaaa021607.doo Town of Reading r~o x ~o 16 Lowell Street s69.INCORR0 Reading; MA 01861-2685 FAX: (781) 942-9071 Email: townmanageraci.reading.ma.us MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Selectmen FROM: Peter I. Hechenbleikner DATE: February 23, 2007 RE: February 27, 2007 Agenda TOWN MANAGER (781) 942-9043 Ic) As you can see from the enclosed email, we have reached a settlement on the Diranian matter on Timothy Place. All work will be done by June 1, 2007. 4a). Process - National. Development - Scott Weiss from National Development will be at the Selectmen's Meeting at 7:30 p.m. . The enclosed memo and outline of process has been reviewed by Ben Tafoya, Russ Graham and me. Although the schedule is ambitious, the important thing is to get started on the process. Two matters require Selectmen's attention at this time: Establishment of a Development Advisory Team as suggested and establishment of a public information session on March 22, 2007. 4b) Update -Woodland Street - The Board had a previous hearing on acceptance of Woodland. Street as a public street. You asked to get input from all of the abutters prior to the Board making a. decision. We will have that report for you on Tuesday evening. Meanwhile, we have included a draft article in the Warrant for the Annual Town Meeting. Once you receive the report on Tuesday night, you can decide whether or not to include that Warrant Article on ` the Warrant. 4c) Enclosed is the Warrant outline and Draft Warrant. I will work with Town Counsel to complete the Warrant Articles and may have them available for you on Monday at Town Meeting. 4d) Public. Hearine - West Street School Zone - Montessori School, - We previously discussed this matter at a Selectmen's meeting and the Board agreed to proceed with the public hearing on this matter. The establishment of a School Zone in this location was recommended by the CPDC. If approved, the School Zone regulations will take affect upon occupancy of the building. The building is currently under construction. 4e) Hearing - Stop Sign Walnut at Old Farm Road - Following the previous discussion on this matter, the Board directed to schedule a public hearing on a possible four way stop at this Fr~~N OF11Fq~f'rr Town of Readin ~d .r0 16 Lowell Street 63s=rN~oRQ°~"' Reading; MA 01867-2685 FAX: (781) 9429071 Email: townmanager@ci.reading:ma.us MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Selectmen FROM: Peter I. Hechenbleikner DATE: February 23, 2007 RE: February 27, 2007 Agenda TOWN MANAGER (781) 942-9043 lc) As you can see from the enclosed email, we have reached a settlement on the Diranian matter on Timothy Place. All work will be done by June 1, 2007. 4a). Process - National. Development - Scott Weiss from National Development will be at the Selectmen's Meeting at 7:30 p.m. The enclosed memo and outline of process has been reviewed by Ben Tafoya, Russ Graham and me. Although the schedule is ambitious, the important thing is to get started on the process. Two matters require Selectmen's attention at this time: Establishment of a Development Advisory Team as suggested and establishment of a public information session on March 22, 2007. 4b) Update - Woodland Street - The Board had a previous hearing on acceptance of Woodland. Street as a public street. You asked to get input from all of the abutters prior to the Board making a. decision. We will have that report for you on Tuesday evening. Meanwhile, we have included a draft article in the Warrant, for the Annual Town Meeting. Once you receive the report on Tuesday night, you can decide whether or not to include that Warrant Article on . the Warrant. /40'c) Enclosed is the Warrant outline and Draft Warrant. I will work with Town Counsel to complete the Warrant Articles and may have them available for you on Monday at Town \ Meeting. 4d) Public Hearine - West Street School Zone - Montessori School - We previously discussed this matter at a Selectmen's meeting and the Board agreed to proceed with the public hearing on this matter. The establishment of a School Zone in this location was recommended by the CPDC. If approved, the School Zone regulations will take affect upon occupancy of the building. The building is currently under construction. 4e) Hearinu - Stoa Sinn Walnut at Old Farm Road - Following the previous discussion on this matter, the Board directed to schedule a public hearing on a possible four way stop at this ~C/ DRAFT -April 23, 2007 Annual Town Meeting WARRANT OUTLINE 02/23/2007 Art. Mover/ Moderator # Article Description Sponsor Comment Notes 5 1Ainendiw4 FY 2007 Budget (Board of Selectmen 6 Payment of prior years bills Board of Selectmen 7 Approving FY 2008 to FY 2012 Board of Selectmen Capital Improvement Program 8 Accept Chapter 184 sec 52 of the acts Board of Selectmen of 2002 - Senior Tax worker program to Overlav 12 Rescinding section 4.3.4 of the Board of Selectmen General Bylaws requiring the publication of a valuation list every 10 vears q cv " 4 Amend Capital Improvement Board of Selectmen Prop-ram FY 2007 - FY 2011 9 Authorizing debt and appropriating - Board of Selectmen Chapter 90 10 Authorize disposition of surplus Board of Selectmen 15 Establishing a stabilization' fund for FINCOM host retirement health care costs 16 Adoption of Ch 32 section 9(2)(d)(ii) Retirement Board of the Acts of that allows an increase in the amount paid to the spouse surviving an employee's accidental death. if thev have children 17 Debt Authorization - MWRA Board of Selectmen grant/loan program for sewer Inflow and Infiltration removal 18 Debt authorization - Downtown Board of Selectmen 19 Debt Authorization - Financial Board of Selectmen software and hardware 21 Debt Authorization - Tennis Board of Selectmen 24 Amending Zoning Bylaw Section CPDC 2.2.13 - definition of frontage 26 Removal of Town Meeting members Board of Selectmen q c 3 ' 20 Debt Authorization - Fire pumper Board of Selectmen 22 Debt Authorization - field Board of Selectmen 23 Debt authorization - Sunnyside Ave. Board of Selectmen Sewer 25 General Bylaw Amendment - Sight Board of Selectmen Page 1 of 1 Hechenbleikner, Peter From: Ellen Doucette [ecdoucette@brackettlucas.com] Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 10:47 AM To: Reilly, Chris Cc: Hechenbleikner, Peter Subject: Suggested zoning bylaw change - frontage Attachments: Frontage definition - new - draft 12-1-06.doc Chris, Because of an access issue involving a lot in town, the ownership of which is irrelevant for present purposes, I would ask that the CPDC consider changing the definition of frontage as it presently appears in Section 2.2.13 of the zoning bylaw. Attached hereto is my suggested revision. If there are any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. Ellen Ellen Callahan Doucette, Esq. Brackett & Lucas 165 Washington Street Winchester, MA 01890 (781) 729-1500 (781).729-5444 Fascimile 2/23/2007 q G 4f kvk 2~j ZONING BYLAW - SUGGESTED DEFINITION FOR "FRONTAGE" Current definition: 2.2.13. Frontage: The continuous length of a lot line along a street line having a depth into the lot of not less than twenty (20) feet, said depth measured at an angle to said street line of not less than 65 degrees, not burdened by access easement at the time of subdivision, across which access is legally and physically available for pedestrians and vehicles. The end of a street without a cul-de-sac shall not be considered frontage. Suggested revision: ECD suggestions in bold italics 2.2.13. Lot Frontage: The continuous uninterrupted length of a lot boundary line along a street line having a depth into the lot of not less than twenty (20) feet, said depth measured at an angle to said street line of not less than 65 degrees, over and through which, actual legal and physical access to the potential building site by both pedestrian and vehicles shall be required. The presence or existence of an access easement shall not satisfy the requirement for actual legal and physical access. The end of a street without a cul-de-sac shall not be considered frontage. Further comments: what is the purpose of the depth requirement in the frontage definition? Shouldn't it be part of a Lot depth dimensional regulation? vVV Cf.- 6J r Deleted: fe requirement not burdened by an access easement at the time of subdivision, across which access to the is legally and physically available for pedestrians and vehicles. L Gt__r)" COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DRAFT Middlesex, ss. Officer's Return, Reading: By virtue of this Warrant, I, on notified and warned the inhabitants of the Town of Reading, qualified to vote on Town affairs, to meet at the place and at the time specified by posting attested copies of this Town Meeting Warrant in the following public places within the Town of Reading: Precinct 1 J. Warren Killam School, 333 Charles Street Precinct 2 Registry of Motor Vehicles, 275 Salem Street Precinct 3 Reading Police Station, 15 Union Street Precinct 4 Joshua Eaton School, 365 Summer Avenue Precinct 5 Town Hall, 16 Lowell Street Precinct 6 Austin Preparatory School, 101 Willow Street Precinct 7 Reading Library, Local History Room, 64 Middlesex Avenue Precinct 8 Mobil on the Run, 1330 Main Street The date of posting being not less than fourteen (14) days prior to April 3,. 2007, the date set for the Local Election in this Warrant. I also caused an attested copy of this Warrant to be published in the Reading Chronicle in the issue of Thomas H. Freeman, Constable A true copy. Attest: Cheryl A. Johnson, Town Clerk 1 qc~ TOWN WARRANT (Seal) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Middlesex, ss. To any of the Constables of the Town of Reading, Greetings: In the name of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, you are hereby required to notify and warn the inhabitants of the Town of Reading, qualified to vote in elections and Town affairs, to meet in the following place designated for the eight precincts in said Town, namely: Precincts 1. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 RMHS Hawkes Field House. Oakland Road TUESDAY, the THIRD OF APRIL, A.D., 2007 from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. to act on the following Articles, viz: ARTICLE 1 To elect by ballot the following Town Officers: A Moderator for one year; Two members of the Board of Selectmen for three years; One member of the Board of Assessors for three years; Two members of the Board of Library Trustees for three years; Two members of the Municipal Light Board for three years; Two members of the School Committee for three years; and sixty five Town Meeting Members shall be elected to represent each of the following precincts: Precinct 1 Eight members for three years; Precinct 2 Eight members for three years; Precinct 3 Eight members for three years; Precinct 4 Eight members for three years; Precinct 5 Eight members for three years; one member for one year; Precinct 6 Eight members for three years; Precinct 7 Eight members for three years; Precinct 8 Eight members for three years. and to meet at the Reading Memorial High School, 62 Oakland Road, in said Reading on MONDAY, the TWENTY-THIRD DAY OF APRIL A.D., 2007 at seven-thirty o'clock in the evening, at which time and place the following Articles are to be acted upon and determined exclusively by Town Meeting Members in accordance with the provisions of the Reading Home Rule Charter. ARTICLE 2 To hear and act on the reports of the Board of Selectmen, Town Accountant, Treasurer-Collector, Board of Assessors, Director of Public Works, Town Clerk, Tree Warden, Board of Health, School Committee, Contributory Retirement Board, Library Trustees, Municipal Light Board, Finance Committee, Cemetery Trustees, Community Planning & Development Commission, Town Manager and any other Official, Board, or Special Committee. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 3 To choose all other necessary Town Officers and Special Committees and determine what instructions shall be given Town Officers and Special Committees, and to see what sum the Town, will vote to appropriate by borrowing or transfer from available funds, or otherwise, for the purpose of funding Town Officers and Special Committees to carry out the instructions given to them, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 4 To see if the Town will vote to amend the FY 2007 - FY 2011 Capital Improvements Program as provided for in Section 7-7 of the Reading Home Rule Charter and as previously amended, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 5 . To see if the Town will vote to amend one or more of the votes taken under Article 15 of the Warrant of the Annual Town Meeting of April 24, 2006, as amended by Article 5, of the November 13, 2007 Subsequent Town Meeting, and as further amended by Article 4 of the February 26, 2007 Special Town Meeting; and to see what sum the Town will vote to appropriate by borrowing or transfer from available funds, or otherwise, as the result of any such amended votes for the operation of the Town and its government, or take any other action with respect thereto. Finance Committee ARTICLE 6 To see if the Town will vote to authorize the payment during Fiscal Year 2007 of bills remaining unpaid for previous fiscal years for goods and services actually rendered to the Town, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 7 To see if the Town will vote to approve the FY 2008 - FY 2012 Capital Improvements Program as provided for in Section 7-7 of the Reading Home Rule Charter, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE8 To see if the Town will vote to accept the provisions of Chapter 184, Section 52 of the Acts of 2002 which allow the expenses of the Senior Tax Work Program to be charged against the Overlay Reserve, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen 3 ARTICLE 9 To see what sum the Town will vote to appropriate by borrowing, whether in anticipation of reimbursement from the State under Chapter 44, Section 6, Massachusetts General Laws, or pursuant to any other enabling authority or from the tax levy, or transfer from available funds, or otherwise, for highway projects in accordance with Chapter 90, Massachusetts General Laws, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 10 To see if the Town will vote to authorize the Board of Selectmen to sell, or exchange, or dispose of, upon such terms and conditions as they may determine, various items of Town tangible property, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 11 To see what sums the Town will vote to appropriate to establish revolving funds under Chapter 44, Section 53E'/Z for any or all of the following purposes: o Using the receipts generated through the sale of compost and recycling bins to purchase additional compost and/or recycling bins, said expenditures to be administered by the Public Works Director; Administering the consultant fee provision of the Reading General Bylaws Section 5.7, Wetlands Protection, said expenditures to be administered by the Conservation Commission; e Using all or part of the receipts generated from the issuance of Building, Plumbing or Gas, and Wiring and other permits for the Walkers Brook Crossing Development, Archstone Development and/or the Johnson Woods Development to pay the costs of legal expenses, oversight and inspection, plan review, initial property value appraisal and appeals, and general management of the Community Services operations related to that development; and to pay for related expenditures, said expenditures to be administered by the Town Manager; e Operating public health clinics and any related expenses which fund shall be credited with receipts from clinic fees and third party reimbursement administered under the authority of the Health Services Administrator acting with the approval of the Town Manager; and to determine the total amount of expenditures during Fiscal Year 2006 which may be made from each such fund, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 12 To see if the Town will vote to rescind the entirety of Section 4.3.4 of the Town of Reading General Bylaws which provides for the publication of a valuation list every 10 years, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 13 To see if the Town will vote to determine how much money the Town will appropriate by borrowing, or from the tax levy, or transfer from available funds, or otherwise, for the operation of the Town and its government for Fiscal Year 2008 beginning July 1, 2007, or take any other action with respect thereto. Finance Committee ARTICLE 14 To see if the Town will vote to accept the report of the Board of Selectmen upon the laying out as a public way the following described private way under the provision of law authorizing the assessment of betterments, such ways being laid out in accordance with plans duly approved by the Board of Selectmen; and to authorize the Board of Selectmen to take such ways under the provision of law authorizing the assessment of betterments, in fee or rights of easement therein by eminent domain, under the provisions of Chapter 79 of the General Laws, as amended, or acquire said lands in fee or rights of easement therein by purchase, gift or otherwise and to assess betterments therefore, the plans and descriptions for such way being filed in the Office of the Town Clerk in accordance with the statutory requirements; and to see what sum the Town will vote to appropriate by borrowing, or from the tax levy, or transfer from available funds, or otherwise, for the acquisition of said lands or easements therein or for payment of any eminent domain damages and for the construction of said ways, or take any other action with respect thereto. Woodland Street (from John Carver Road easterly to Town owned Birch Meadow property) Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 15 To see if the Town will vote to ARTICLE 16 To see if the Town will vote to ARTICLE 17 To see if the Town will vote to ARTICLE 18 To see if the Town will vote to ARTICLE 19 To see if the Town will vote to ARTICLE 20 To see if the Town will vote to ARTICLE 21 To see if the Town will vote to ARTICLE 22 To see if the Town will vote to ARTICLE 23 To see if the Town will vote to 5 Lf(" t 0 ARTICLE 24 To see if the Town will vote to amend Section 2.2.13 of the Reading Zoning By-Laws so that it will read as follows: 2.2.13. Lot Frontaae: The continuous uninterrupted length of a lot boundary line along a street fine having a depth into the lot of not less than twenty (20) feet, said depth measured at an angle to said street line of not less than 65 degrees, over and through which, actual legal and physical access to the potential building site by both pedestrian and vehicles shall be required. The presence or existence of an access easement shall not satisfy the requirement for actual legal and physical access. The end of a street without a cul-de-sac shall not be considered frontage. Or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 25 To see if the Town will vote to amend the General Bylaws of the Town of Reading by adding the following Section 5.2. 10 entitled "Sight Triangles:": 5.2.10 Sight Triangles 5.2.10.1 Definition A sight triangle is defined as that area formed by the intersection of property lines and a straight line joining said property lines to the street or right of way at a point 25 feet distant from the point of their intersection. For corner lots, the sight triangle is determined from the point of intersection of their tangents. 5.2.10.2 Corner Lots Except in the Downtown Business District, no building, fence, wall, landscaping, parking of vehicles, signs, or the placement of or growing of any other obstruction between the height of 2'/2 feet and a height of 8 feet shall be located within the sight triangle so as to obstruct visibility in a manner that will jeopardize the safety of vehicles or pedestrians, unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Chief of Police that such vegetation or structure will not restrict visibility in such a way as to hinder public safety. For purposes of this bylaw, the Downtown Business District is defined as that portion of the Business B Zoning District that is generally bounded by the MBTA rail line, Woburn Street and a fine east of Main Street. 5.2.10.3 Exemptions (a) Principal buildings existing on a lot at the time of adoption of this bylaw shall not be required to conform to this bylaw. Shade trees planted by the Town of Reading, mailboxes, street and traffic signs, and utility poles are also exempt from the provisions of this bylaw. (b) Fences of "open-type construction" defined herein as a fence constructed so that its vertical surface area is unobstructed, enabling motorists and pedestrians to have a clear view through such fence (e.g., a fence of chain-link or post and rail -construction). 6 - C, t ( I Or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 26 To see if the Town will vote to pursuant to Section 2-6 of the Reading Home Rule Charter, to declare the seats of certain Town Meeting Members to be vacant and remove certain described persons from their position as Town Meeting Members for failure to take the oath of office within 30 days following the notice of election or for failure to attend one half or more of the Town Meeting sessions during the previous year, or take any other action with respect thereto: Precinct 2 Robert DeMild Jr. John W. Fay Thomas F. O'Donnell Precinct 3 Thomas F. Procopio Precinct 8 Timothy C. Curren Board of Selectmen I 7 and you are directed to serve this Warrant by posting an attested copy thereof in at least one (1) public place in each precinct of the Town not less than fourteen (14) days prior to April 3, 2007, the date set for the Election in said Warrant, and to publish this Warrant in a newspaper published in the Town, or by mailing an attested copy of said Warrant to each Town Meeting Member at least fourteen (14) days prior to the time of holding said meeting. Hereof fail not and make due return of this Warrant with your doings thereon to the Town Clerk at or before the time appointed for said meeting. Given under our hands this 27th day of February, 20.07. Ben Tafoya, Chairman James E. Bonazoli, Vice Chairman Stephen A. Goldy, Secretary Camille W. Anthony Richard W. Schubert SELECTMEN OF READING Thomas H. Freeman a ~f ~ ~ V'OF Town Of Reading ~o0 16 Lowell Street : INCOR4~4~ 186 7-2685 Reading; MA 0 FAX: (781) 942=9071 Email: townmanager@ci.reading.ma.us MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Selectmen FROM: Peter I. Hechenbleikner DATE: February 23, 2007 RE: February 27, 2007 Agenda TOWN MANAGER (781) 942-9043 1 c) As you can see from the enclosed email, we have reached a settlement on the Diranian matter on Timothy Place. All work will be done by June 1, 2007. 4a). Process - National, Development - Scott Weiss from National Development will be at the Selectmen's Meeting at 7:30 p.m. The enclosed memo and outline of process- has been reviewed by Ben Tafoya, Russ Graham and me. Although the schedule is ambitious, the important thing is to get started on the process. Two matters require Selectmen's attention at this time: Establishment of a Development Advisory Team as suggested and establishment of a public information session on March 22, 2007. 4b) Ubdate - Woodland Street - The Board had a previous hearing on acceptance of Woodland Street as a public street. You asked to get input from all of the abutters prior to the Board making a. decision. We will have that report for you on Tuesday evening. Meanwhile, we have included a draft article in the Warrant for the Annual Town Meeting. Once you receive the report on Tuesday night, you can decide whether or not to include that Warrant Article on the Warrant. 46) Enclosed is the Warrant outline and Draft Warrant. I will work with Town Counsel to complete the Warrant Articles and may have them available for you on Monday at Town Meeting. //4d) Public Hearinia - West Street School Zone - Montessori School - We previously discussed this matter at a Selectmen's meeting and the Board agreed to proceed with the public hearing on this matter. The establishment of a School Zone in this location was recommended by the CPDC. If approved, the School Zone regulations will take affect upon occupancy of the building. The building is currently under construction. a 4e) Hearing - Ston Sian Walnut at Old Farm Road - Following the previous discussion on this matter, the Board directed to schedule a public hearing on a possible four way stop at this 't .LEGAL NOTICE 'TOWN OF E' AD-ING To the Inhabitants of the Town of Reading: Please take notice that the $;bard:of Selectmen of the Town of Reading will.`hold the follow-. _Ing.gublic hearings on Tuesday; phruary 27, 2007 in the. ;selectmen's Meeting Room, 16 .owell•. Street, Reading, Massachusetts: West Street School Zone - ~y3ontessori School 8:15 p.m. Stop `Sign - Walnut Street . t.0* 1d Fairn'Road 5;30 p.rn: Ail . iriter.e ted` parties may. a pear in person, xnay submit Eheir coinirle.nts..in writing; or may ertiail ccirriments to town marraerC Peter I. Hechenbleikrier Town Manager yd~ December 18, 2006 TOWN OF.READING 16 Lowell Street Reading, MA 01867-2683 Phone: 781-942-6612 Fax: 781-942-9071 Email: creilly@dreading.ma.us Ben Tafoya Chairman, Board of Selectmen (BOS) 16 Lowell Street Reading, MA 01867 C' , ~ - Ro~, ~r 61 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT RE: RECOMMENDATION FOR 453 WEST STREET SCHOOL ZONE Dear Ben: The Community Planning and Development Commission (CPDC) held three public hearings for a Site Plan Review at 453 West Street. The applicant, Montessori Children's House of Middlesex County, Inc., is proposing to locate a pre-school at that location. Currently the applicant expects an enrollment of 60 students, but the site plan provides enough room to grow to 80 students. Neighborhood concerns over the development were expressed and focused (although not exclusively) on the impact from traffic and parking. The applicant, although not explicitly subject to all site plan review requirements, provided information that satisfied our concerns and as such on December 11, 2006, we provided our approval for that application. A copy of the decision is attached for your information. To address parking, the CPDC attempted to mitigate the issue by ensuring appropriate on-site parking is available, and even requested the inclusion of overflow/temporary parking on-site in the event of an evening classroom meeting. The residents of West Hill Circle are still concerned about the potential for parking on their street. The recourse. for this could be the establishment of a resident only parking area for that street, but we are not recommending this action given the applicants efforts and on-site parking provided. The applicant submitted a traffic study, which was peer reviewed, and as a result a number of recommendations were made which were subsequently incorporated into the plan. We also requested input from the Police Department, and they independently provided speed counter results (attached) showing various ranges of speeds and traffic, for the most part consistent with the traffic study. One concern we had was the Safe Stopping Distance (SSD) required for drivers on West Street given the traffic exiting the site. The traffic study identified what those distances need to be based on the 85`h Percentile observed speed (34 mph for east of the exit and 36 mph for west of the exit), and the site plan demonstrated SSDs consistent with those speeds assuming the recommendations of the traffic study are implemented (they were included in the final plan). However, nbte.that'as of today, the speed limit on that stretch of roadway is 25 mph. qd3l While the plan shows compliance with the SSD, the peer review pointed out concern over the Intersection Site Distance (ISD). ISD is a desirable distance to allow for proper intersection operation. The ISD for speeds in the 35 mph range are longer, and currently the site does not demonstrate compliance to the ISDs. Again, while not a pure safety requirement, we feel strongly that given the measured speeds (as observed by both the traffic study and Reading Police), and the fact that this is a school with the potential for as many as 80 children, a School Speed Zone (SSZ) be established at this site. We included this recommendation as part of our findings in the decision (Findings #5), and recommended that should the BOS decide to establish the SSZ, the applicant contribute to the cost of installation. If you have any questions please let me know. Regards, John Sasso, Chairperson Brant Ballantyne, Secretary Richard Howard Jonathan Barnes Neil Sullivan Community Planning and Development Commission Attachments: (1) Site Plan Review Decision, Montessori Children's House of Middlesex, Inc. - 453 West St. (2) Reading Police Speed Counter Results, 11/27/06 to 12/1/06 CC: Peter Hechenbleikner, Town Manager Chris Reilly, Town Planner CPDC Associates TOWN OF READING September 18, 2006 Site Pan Review Application August 21, 2006 DRT Minutes November 6, 2006 COMMUNITY PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION 1a AL s o lt St s ' Project: Montes,,-ori ChFI the Town Clr,,`~. To This is to certify, at a meeting of the Reading Community Planning and Development Commission commencing on October 23, 2006, continued to November 6, 2006-and closing on December 11, 2006, on by a motion duly made and seconded, it was voted: "We, the CPDC, as requested by the Montessori Children s House of Middlesex, Inc., under the provisions of Section 4.3.3 of the Zoning By-Laws of the Town of Reading, to consider the contemplated site plan development for property addressed at 453 West Street (Assessors Map 99, Lot 11), as shown on the plans entitled "Reading Montessori School," dated August 30, 2006 and lastly revised November 27, 2006, prepared and stamped by Sullivan Engineering Group, LLC; do hereby vote (4-0) to approve the site plan: MATERIALS: November 6, 2006 November 6, 2006 November 7, 2006 November 7, 2006 November 20, 2006 November 21, 2006 16 Lowell Street Reading, MA 01867-2683 Phone: (781) 942-6612 Fax: (781) 942-9070 Email: creilly@ci.reading.ma.us COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Memo from George Zambouras, Town Engineer to Chris Reilly, Town Planner Re: 453 West St.-Reading Montessori School Letter from Jonathan & Jennifer Van esse, Residents to CPDC Re: Montessori School at 453 West St. Letter from William Griffin, Esq. to CPDC Re: Montessori Children's House of Middlesex, Inc. Memo from Lieut. Paul Jackson to Greg Burns, Fire Chief Re: Montessori School-Plot Plans Memo. from Chris Reilly, Town Planner to George Zambouras, Town Engineer Re: 453 West St. Letter from Peter Wolfe, Resident to Chris Reilly, Town Planner and John Sasso, CPDC Chair Letter from Ellen Doucette, Town Counsel to Chris Reilly, Town Planner Re: Application of Chapter 40A, Section 3 -Education Use -Montessori Children's House of Middlesex, Inc., 453 West St., Reading, MA C:\Documents and Settings\phechenbleikner.TOWN\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\ OLK1 AB\ montessorriEinalfiled.doc qj!;,, Decision Community Planning and Development Commission Project. Reading Montessori School -453 West St. October 13 November 3 November 30 Traffic Study by DJK, Inc. December 5, 2006 Email from William Griffin, Esq. to Chris Reilly, Town Planner Re: Access to 453 West St. through Austin Prep. December 6 Traffic Engineering Peer Review by FST, Inc. December 8, 2006 Email from Michelle Halloran, Public Safety Officer to Chris Reilly, Town Planner Re: 453 West St. This approval is subject to the following Findings and Conditions: FINDINGS: 1. The proposed site plan indicates gross floor area of approximately 4,915 square feet. Section 6.1 of the Zoning By-Laws requires 1 parking space.for every 300 gross square feet of similar uses, thereby requiring 17 spaces for the use. MGL Chapter 41, Section 3 allows for regulating parking according to these requirements. The CPDC and Applicant agree that the Applicant may modify the approved site plan, subject to the approval of the Town Planner and Town Engineer, only to accommodate the required parking and mitigate abutter concerns. 2. Due to sporadic use anticipated with the site and consistent with Section 4.3.3.6 of the zoning By-Laws the CPDC waives the requirement for a loading zone. 3. Consistent with Town Counsel guidance dated November 21, 2006, the proposed use of the premises as a nonprofit educational facility serves to exempt such alterations from the express provisions of the Zoning By-Laws pursuant to M.G.L. c. 40A sec 3., although the Commission does retain the right to regulate the proposed activities as set forth in this decision. 4. The requirement for a sidewalk along the frontage is waived, however vertical granite curbing shall be required along that frontage. 5. The CPDC shall recommend to the Selectmen, as Road Commissioners, that School Zone signage should be installed on West Street for the use, and if approved the Applicant should contribute to the cost of the installation. CONDITIONS: Prior to the Issuance of a Building Permit: 1. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, all other requirements and permits shall be sought and received. The Applicant shall bear the burden of ensuring all state and local permitting has been sought and received. Page 2 12/~ V" ~ Decision Community Planning and Development Commission Project: Reading Montessori School -453 West St. 2. Three (3) complete sets of the site plans and AutoCAD plans as modified and approved shall be provided to the Town Planner. 3: There shall be a pre-construction meeting with the Applicant consisting of staff as identified by the Town. The Applicant shall meet with the Building Inspector and Town Planner at least 30 days prior to the issuance of the Building Permit to review compliance with this Decision. During Construction: 4. No construction-related vehicles shall park or operate in the right of way unless specifically for the purpose of necessary construction activities, subject to approval of the Engineering Division. Before Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 5. The Town Engineer's memo dated December 11, 2006 shall be complied with, subject to his or his designee's approval. 6. Lieut. Paul Jackson's memo to Fire Chief Burns dated November 7, 2006 shall be complied with, subject to Lieut. Jackson's approval. Furthermore, subject to the Fire Chief's approval "No Parking" signs shall be installed on the southerly side of the driveway and the Applicant shall provide the Reading Police Department authority to enforce and ticket. 7. Per Zoning By-Laws Sections 4.3.3.61, the fagade of the building shall be consistent with the architecture of the surrounding neighborhood. After Occupancy: 8. A modification of this Decision by request to the CPDC shall be required prior to any change from nonprofit educational use or activities. 9. When required, overflow parking shall be clearly indicated by directional signage. Signed as to the accuracy of the vote: Chris Reilly Town Planner Appeal: The Appeal of any decision of the CPDC hereunder shall be made in accordance with the provisions of Mass. Gen. L. 40A, section 17 within 20 days after filing with the Town Clerk. Page 3 of 12/19/0 G b o%/ 453 West Street from 11/27106 at 4:08pm to 12101/06 at 5:55pm -Average (mean) = 28mph -Number of vehicles that passed over tubes = 16,187 -Fastest speed registered = 50mph Averaae number of vehicles: Per day (3 full days of data) = 4834 Calculated Average Daily Total-based on year of similar data= 4827 Mondav 11/27/06: 1578-installed at 4:08om total cars -Peak AM time = -Peak PM time = 6:15pm (490 cars) -0-15mph travel speed = 53 cars -16-20mph travel speed = 38 -21-25mph travel speed = 218 -26-30mph travel speed = 1034 -31-35mph travel speed = 468 -36-40mph travel speed = 27 -41-45mph travel speed = 0 -46-50mph travel speed = 1 -Average (mean) speed = 28mph -----Traffic Counters Installed-------- -5:00pm = 170 from Wilmington, 204 to Wilmington = -6:00pm = 264 from Wilmington, 212 to Wilmington= -7:00pm = 140 from Wilmington, 155 to Wilmington = -8:00pm = 88 from Wilmington, 110 to Wilmington = -9:00pm = 61 from Wilmington, 68 to Wilmington = -10:00pm = 24 from Wilmington, 50 to Wilmington = -11:00pm = 17 from Wilmington; 15 to Wilmington = Tuesdav 11128/06: 4783 total cars for day -Peak AM time = 8:45 (532cars) -Peak PM time = 6:30 (479 cars) -0-15mph travel speed = 111 cars -16-20mph travel speed = 83 -21-25mph travel speed = 583 -26-30mph travel speed = 2586 -31-35mph travel speed = 1316 -36-40mph travel speed = 96 -41-45mph travel speed = 8 -46-50mph travel speed = 0 -Average (mean) speed = 28mph -12:00am = 8 from Wilmington, 10 to Wilmington = -1:00am = 6 from Wilmington, 6 to Wilmington= -2:00am = 3 from Wilmington, 1 to Wilmington = -3:00am =.1 from Wilmington, 1 to Wilmington = -4:00am = 3 from Wilmington, 2 to Wilmington = -5:00am = 10 from Wilmington, 11 to Wilmington = -6:00am = 20 from Wilmington, 28 to Wilmington = -7:00am = 100 from Wilmington, 86 to Wilmington = -8:00am = 239 from Wilmington, 208 to Wilmington= -9:00am = 241 from Wilmington, 251 to Wilmington = fig. -10:00am = 123 from. Wilmington, 147 to Wilmington = -11:00am= 104 from Wilmington, 97 to Wilmington = -12:00pm = 98 from Wilmington, 109 to Wilmington = -1:00pm = 158 from Wilmington, 151 to Wilmington = -2:00pm = 124 from Wilmington, 154 to Wilmington = -3:00pm = 142 from Wilmington, 176 to Wilmington= -4:00pm = 150 from Wilmington; 181 to Wilmington = -5:00pm = 167 from Wilmington, 205 to Wilmington = -6:00pm = 227 from Wilmington, 235 to Wilmington = -7:00pm = 174 from Wilmington, 169 to Wilmington = -8:00pm = 89 from Wilmington, 97 to Wilmington = -9:00pm = 61 from Wilmington, 70 to Wilmington = -10:00pm = 31 from Wilmington, 49 to Wilmington= -11:00pm = 25 from Wilmington, 35 to Wilmington = Wednesdav 11/29/06: 4928 total cars for day -Peak AM time = 8:45 (514cars) -Peak PM time = 6:15(479 cars) -0-15mph travel speed = 218 cars -16-20mph travel speed = 227 -21-25mph travel speed = 740 -26-30mph travel speed. = 2387 -31-35mph travel speed = 1276 -36-40mph travel speed = 77 -41-45mph travel speed = 3 -46-50mph travel speed = 0 -Average (mean) speed = 27mph -12:00am = 9 from Wilmington, 19 to Wilmington = -1:00am = 5 from Wilmington, 2 to Wilmington= -2:00am = 3 from Wilmington, 1 to Wilmington = -3:00am = 1 from Wilmington, 2 to Wilmington = -4:00am = 3 from Wilmington, 5 to Wilmington = -5:00am = 2 from Wilmington, 2 to Wilmington = -6:00am = 14 from Wilmington, 31 to Wilmington = -7:00am = 94 from Wilmington, 87 to Wilmington = -8:00am = 238 from Wilmington, 195 to Wilmington= -9:00am = 216 from Wilmington, 257 to Wilmington = -10:00am = 127 from Wilmington, 129 to Wilmington = -11:00am= 114 from Wilmington, 115 to Wilmington = -12:00pm = 122 from Wilmington, 121 to Wilmington = -1:00pm = 162 from Wilmington, 160 to Wilmington = -2:00pm = 134 from Wilmington, 197 to Wilmington = -3:00pm = 128 from Wilmington, 191 to Wilmington= -4:00pm = 152 from Wilmington, 200 to Wilmington = -5:00pm = 183 from Wilmington, 219 to Wilmington = -6:00pm = 249 from Wilmington, 240 to Wilmington = -7:00pm = 161 from Wilmington, 158 to Wilmington = -8:00pm = 88 from Wilmington, 108 to Wilmington = -9:00pm = 57 from Wilmington, 84 to Wilmington = -10:00prn = 43 from Wilmington, 53 to Wilmington= -11:00pm = 14 from Wilmington, 33 to Wilmington = L' f Thursdav 11/30/06: 4792 total cars for day -Peak AM time = 8:45 (555 cars) -Peak PM time = 6:30 (484 cars) -0-15mph travel speed = 118 cars -16-20mph travel speed = 134 -21-25mph travel speed = 692 -26-30mph travel speed = 2337 -31-35mph travel speed = 1388 -36-40mph travel speed = 118 -41-45mph travel speed = 5 -46-50mph travel speed = 0 -Average (mean) speed = 28mph -12:00am = 8 from Wilmington, 13 to Wilmington = -1:00am = 6 from Wilmington, 6 to Wilmington= -2:00am = 2 from Wilmington, 2 to Wilmington = -3:00am = 1 from Wilmington, 0 to Wilmington = -4:00am = 9 from Wilmington, 0 to Wilmington = -5:00am = 4 from Wilmington, 4 to Wilmington = -6=am = 18 from Wilmington, 30 to Wilmington = -7:00am = 95 from Wilmington, 88 to Wilmington = -8:00am = 245 from Wilmington, 182 to Wilmington= -9:00am = 221 from Wilmington, 291 to Wilmington = -10:00am = 133 from Wilmington, 120 to Wilmington = -11:00am= 85 from Wilmington, 109 to Wilmington = -12:00pm = 99 from Wilmington, 106 to Wilmington = -1:00pm = 156 from Wilmington, 147 to Wilmington = -2:00pm = 137 from Wilmington, 167 to Wilmington = -3:00pm = 155 from Wilmington, 186 to Wilmington= -4:00pm = 162 from Wilmington, 177 to Wilmington = -5:00pm = 151 from Wilmington, 191 to Wilmington = -6:00pm = 255 from Wilmington, 240 to Wilmington = -7:00pm = 149 from Wilmington, 156 to Wilmington = -8:00pm = 73 from Wilmington, 121 to Wilmington = -9:00pm = 57 from Wilmington, 82 to Wilmington = -10:00pm = 27 from Wilmington, 62 to Wilmington= -11:00pm = 28 from Wilmington, 36 to Wilmington = Fridav 12/01/06: 3566 total cars-removed at 5:55om -Peak AM time = 8:45 (452cars) -Peak PM time = 4:15 (411 cars) -0-15mph travel speed = 123 cars -16-20mph travel speed = 96 -21-25mph travel speed = 607 -26-30mph travel speed = 1778 -31-35mph travel speed = 881 -36-40mph travel speed = 80 -41-45mph travel speed = 1 -46-50mph travel speed = 0 -Average (mean) speed = 27mph -12:00am = 9 from Wilmington, 26 to Wilmington = -1:00am = 12 from Wilmington, 14 to Wilmington= -2:00am = 3 from Wilmington, 1 to Wilmington = -3:00am = 1 from Wilmington, 0 to Wilmington = q6' 1 11 /Ot -4:00am = 5 from Wilmington, 1 to Wilmington = -5:00am 4 from Wilmington, 9 to Wilmington = -6:00am = 16 from Wilmington, 26 to Wilmington = -7:00am = 85 from Wilmington, 78 to Wilmington = -8:00am = 199 from Wilmington; 185 to Wilmington= -9:00am = 208 from Wilmington, 222 to Wilmington = -10:00am = 130 from Wilmington, 141 to Wilmington = -11:00am= 120 from Wilmington, 124 to Wilmington = -12:00pm = 106 from Wilmington, 120 to Wilmington -1:00pm = 142 from Wilmington, 159 to Wilmington = -2:00pm = 127 from Wilmington, 172 to Wilmington = -3:00pm = 179 from Wilmington, 193 to Wilmington= -4:00pm = 176 from Wilmington, 235 to Wilmington = J G Easy Peel Labels Use Aver ® TEMPLATE 5160® ° See Instruction Sheet Feed Paper for Easy Peel Feature LA1~ SAVERY051600 y 1 1 246058A000000010 246058A000000010 246058A000000010 JOHNSON WOODS JOHNSON WOODS JOHNSON WOODS CONDOMINIUM CONDOMINIUM CONDOMINIUM 8 DOAKS LN 8 DOAKS LN 8 DOAKS LN MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 M:ARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 2460590000000930 2460690000000660 2460690000000670 RICHARDS JAMES SLETTERINK ROY A KEUMURIAN STEPHEN G MARY-JOYCE RICHARDS PATRICIA A SLETTERINK 407 WEST ST 404 WEST ST 401 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460800000000010 2460800000000020 2460800000000270 JOUDRIE NEIL D GINIVISIAN PETER G PULLO DAVID A 418 WEST ST SAMUEL A WARNOCK ETAL 430 WEST STREET READING, MA 01867 36 MONTVALE AVE READING, MA 01867 WOBURN, MA 01801 2460800000000280 2460800000000290 - 2460800000000310 PULLO DAVID A CONGDON BRADFORD H FUCCILLO JAMES E 430 WEST STREET SANDRA S CONGDON KENDALL L FUCCILLO READING, MA 01867 436 WEST ST 464 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460800000000320 2460800000000330 246080000000034& SIKTBERG NATHAN VANASSE JONATHAN SPRING JENNIFER 458 WEST ST JENNIFER R VANASSE VINCENT R. SITES READING, MA 01867 454 WEST ST 4 WEST HILL CIR READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460800000000360 2460800000000370 2460800000000380 MACDONNELL PETER F GREENBERG GILBERT S DEGEL EUNICE F (LE) JULIE A MACDONNELL 12 WEST HILL CIR BARBARA D CLARKE ETAL 8 WEST HILL CIR READING, MA 01867 16 WEST HILL CIR READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460800000000390 2460800000000400 2460800000000410 HAGSTROM WILLIAM R. MULLER-HERSHON SUSAN K PRICE EDWARD D MARY T HAGSTROM 22 WEST HILL CIR CHERYL L PRICE 20 WEST HILL CIR READING, MA 01867 26 WEST HILL CIR. READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460800000000420 2460800000000430 246096000000001& ROTONDI JOHN A GALASSO PAUL L SATICOY INWOOD LLC LILLIAN A ROTONDI THERESA C GALASSO 2121 SAN JACINTO SUITE 2900 27 WEST HILL CIR 13 WEST HILL CIR DALLAS, TX 75201 READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460960000000020 2460960000000030 2460960000000040 KENNEY SEAN LAWLOR THERESE M LEWIS DANIEL KAREN KENNEY 532 WEST STREET CECELIA E LEWIS 550 WEST ST READING, MA 01867-2243 530 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460960000000050 2460960000000060 2460960000000070 ZHANG YI WOLFE MARLENE H MORRISON EDITH B (L.E.) DANSU LI 522 WEST ST TIMOTHY G MORRISON 526 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 508 WEST ST 4 READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 C Etiquettes faciles a peter ♦ Consultez la feuille www.avjry.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 5160'D Sens de chargement Onstruction 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel Labels , 4J i • See Instruction Sheet Use Avery® TEMPLATE 51600 ~ iFeed Paper for Easy Peel Featurei 2460960000000080 2460960000000090 MORRISON EDITH B (L.E.) JAYNES KEVIN ETAL TIMOTHY G MORRISON JOHN M FURRIER JR ETAL 508 WEST ST 500 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460960000000110 READING OPEN LAND TRUST C/O J R BOUCHER, CLERK 387 HAVERHILL ST READING, MA 01867 2460960000000200 TOWN OF READING CONSERVATION DEPT 16 LOWELL STREET READING, MA 01867 2460970000000010 HANLEY KAREN L BRIGID A MCNIFF 479 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 2460960000000180 ENOS CLARENCE W HELEN ENOS 480 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 2460960000000210 TOWN OF READING MUNICIPAL LIGHT DEPT 16 LOWELL STREET READING, MA 01867 2460970000000020 S'AVINO DOMENIC JULIE M SULLIVAN-SAV1NO 495 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 2460970000000040 2460970000000050 DINGLE JEFFREY L CARR BURTON E SHARON L DINGLE TRUSTEE CARR TRUST ETA 531 WEST STREET 539 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460970000000070 2460970000000310 SAWYER WILFRED M WALDMAN GEORGE D SAWYER LOULA P 511 WEST ST 555 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460970000000330 SLOSS JAMES ANITAJEAN L SLOSS 527 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 2460980000000010 PENDERGAST DENNIS E BARBARA J PENDERGAST 427 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 2460980000000080 DAHIVI DOUGLAS CARTER LAUREN DA.HM 435 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 2460980000000110 MONTESSORI CHILDRENS HOUSE OF MIDDLESEX, INC. 8 SUMMER ST WOBURN, MA 01801 Etiquettes faciles a peter Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 51600 2460970000000340 TOWN OF READING MUNICIPAL LIGHT DEPT. 16 LOWELL ST READING, MA 01867 2460980000000020 LAFRANCESCA VITO V LAURA A LAFRANCESCA 429 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 2460980000000090 KURKJIAN MARK DIANE KURKJIAN 441 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 2460980000000120 NELSON OTHILIA P 461 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 Sens de chargement SAAMRY@51600 1 2460960000000100 ZURCHER MARK P JENNIFER N ZURCHER 490 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 2460960000000190 BEVILACQUA JOSEPH S FRANCES D BEVILACQUA 548 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 246096A000000010 FITZGERALD DANIEL J JOANNE M FITZGERALD 6 ENOS CIR READING, MA 01867 2460970000000030 SEVIGNY GERARD 0 PO BOX 225 READING, MA 01867 2460970000000060 SOMERS STEPHEN R BERNADETTE M SOMERS 6 CATHERINE AVENUE READING, MA 01867 2460970000000320 HOLLINGSWORTH MARY 517 WEST STREET READING, MA 01867 2460970000000400 TOWN OF READING CONSERVATION COMMISSION 16 LOWELL STREET READING, MA 01867 246098000000007& DONOVAN EDWARD J KRISTEN M DONOVAN 431 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 246098000000010& JOHNSON CAROL JUDITH ARNOLD 443 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 246098000000012A NELSON OTHILIA P 461 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 Consultez la feuille jvww.averycom d'instruction 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel Labels Use Avery@ TEMPLATE 51600 246098000000012B NELSON OTHILIA P KARLA RAE NELSON :461 WEST STREET READING, MA 01867 ® ® See Instruction sheet ; 4 AVERY®s1600 1Feed Paper for Easy Peel Featurel 1 246058A000001620 REDSTONE REALTY LLC 8 DOAKS LN MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 246058A000000080 DEJESUS PAUL 8 GREEN MEADOW DRIVE READING, MA 01867 246058A000001600 REDSTONE REALTY LLC 8 DOAKS LANE MARBLEHEAD, MA 01968 246058A000001550 LATHAM JEAN 155 JOHNSON WOODS DRIVE READING, MA 01867 246058A000001510 ONEILL GERALD ANNE F ONEILL 151 JOHNSON WOODS DRIVE READING, MA 01867 246058A000001460 SHELDON EDWARD PRISCILLA SHELDON 146 JOHNSON WOODS DRIVE READING, MA 01867 246058A000000140 JOHNSON WOODS REALTY 14 GREEN MEADOW DRIVE READING, MA 01867 246098000000013A 246098000000013B THAYER SCOTT E FRANGOLIS JOYCE M DEBRA L THAYER 467 WEST ST 475 WEST ST READING, MA 01867 246058A000000180 IANNACO ROBERT MARY ANN IANNACO 18 GREEN MEADOW DRIVE READING, MA 01867 246058A000000100 DALTON PATRICIA J 10 GREEN MEADOW DRIVE READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 246058A000000090 BOVA STEPHEN M MARY ELLEN BOVA 9 GREEN MEADOW DRIVE READING, MA 01867 246058A000001580 REDSTONE REALTY LLC 8 DOAKS LANE MARBLEHEAD, MA 01968 246058A000001440 HURLEY JOHN LAURIE HURLEY 144 JOHNSON WOODS DRIVE READING, MA 01867 246058A000000070 KELLEY ELLEN M 7 GREEN MEADOW DRIVE READING, MA 01867 246058A000001530 RYAN DONNA 153 JOHNSON WOODS DRIVE READING, MA 01867 246058A000000160 MATHIS ON MICHELLE 16 GREEN MEADOW DRIVE READING, MA 01867 246058A000001560 REDSTONE REALTY LLC 8 DOAKS LN MARBLEHEAD, MA 01945 246058A000001420 RUSSELL MARK MAUREEN RUSSELL 142 JOHNSON WOODS DRIVE READING, MA 01867 246058A000000120 LAVALLE JOHN S MAURA LAVALLE 12 GREEN MEADOW DR READING, MA 01867 246058A000001010 SAVARINO REALTY TRUST EDWARD T MOORE, TRS 101 LONGWOOD ROAD READING, MA 01867 C~- Etiquettes faciles a peter ♦ Gonsultez la feuilie www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 5160® Sens de chargement d'instruction 1-800-GO-AVERY OFJ? ,I Town of Reading 16 Lowell Street s3a. 60 ReQ Q. Reading, MA 01867-2685 FAX: (781) 942=9071 Email: townmanager@ci.reading.ma.us MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Selectmen FROM: Peter I. Hechenbleikner DATE: February 23, 2007 RE: February 27, 2007 Agenda TOWN MANAGER (781) 942-9043 1c) As you can see from the enclosed email, we have reached a settlement on the Diranian matter on Timothy Place. All work will be done by June 1, 2007. 4a) Process - National. Development - Scott Weiss from National Development will be at the Selectmen's Meeting at 7:30 p.m. The enclosed memo and outline of process- has been reviewed by Ben Tafoya, Russ Graham and me. Although the schedule is ambitious, the important thing is to get started on the process. Two matters require Selectmen's attention at this time: Establishment of a.Development Advisory Team as suggested and establishment of a public information session on March 22, 2007. 4b) Update - Woodland Street - The Board had a previous hearing on acceptance of Woodland Street as a public street. You asked to get input from all of the abutters prior to the Board making a. decision. We will have that report for you on Tuesday evening. Meanwhile, we have included a draft article in the Warrant for the Annual Town Meeting. Once you receive the report on Tuesday night, you can decide whether or not to include that Warrant Article on the Warrant. 46) Enclosed is the Warrant outline and Draft Warrant. I will work with Town Counsel to complete the Warrant Articles and may have them available for you on Monday at Town Meeting. 4d) Public Hearing West Street School Zone - Montessori School - We previously discussed this matter at a Selectmen's meeting and the Board agreed to proceed with the public hearing on this matter. The establishment of a School Zone in this location was recommended by the CPDC. If approved, the School Zone regulations will take affect upon occupancy of the building. The building is currently under construction. 4e) Heariniz - Stop Sim Walnut at Old Farm Road - Following the previous discussion on this matter, the Board directed to schedule a public hearing on a possible four way stop at this intersection. The Town Engineer will have a recommendation to the Police Chief by your meeting on Tuesday. 40 Following discussion on the Washington Street parking situation, the Town Engineer has developed some possible standards for street width and parking regulations to provide the Board of Selectmen with guidance on this matter in the future. The Town Engineer will review these guidelines with the Board on Tuesday night. 4g) Again, as part of the discussion on the Washington Street parking regulations, there was a question raised as to the location from which measurements are made relative to distances from intersections. The options are to measure the length from the curb or to measure the length from the edge of the right of way. Staff preference is to measure from the edge of the right of way, since that is a location that will not change due to road construction or other matters. 4h) During discussion on Downtown parking, Selectman Camille Anthony suggested that we consider making Vine Street from Mineral Street to High Street one way in the southbound direction, and provide parking on one side of the street. Staff has evaluated that alternative and will be prepared to discuss with the Board on Tuesday evening. 4i) As part of the discussion on Washington Street, there was further discussion on the status of the employees/merchant parking spaces on High Street north of Woburn Street. At the time, these spaces were very sparsely utilized. Chief Cormier will be prepared to review the status of the rental of these spaces. The Board also wanted to discuss whether or not the lottery for these spaces should be re-conducted periodically. 4j) Downtown Parking - Establishment of Reaulations on Sanborn between Woburn and Lowell Street - The enclosed email chain between Safety Officer Michelle Halloran and Marilyn Hossman, Business Administrator at the Congregational Church, outlines a request for parking regulations on Linden Street between Woburn and Lowell Street. The establishment of these regulations require a future public hearing. 4k) Children's Suns - The Board is periodically requested to post "Children" signs in different locations within the community. The attached is the recommendation from the Reading Police Department that does not suggest posting these signs. 41,m) This is just a reminder that the Board of Selectmen through a subcommittee is going to establish proposed standards for multi-way stops, which then can provide guidance to the community and staff on where the Board feels such stop signs are appropriate. The subcommittee of the Board will work with Town staff to develop those guidelines. We have been holding off on a discussion/recommendation on regulations at the intersection of Bancroft and Hartshorn Street until such standards are in place. 4n) Enclosed is material put together by Selectman Rick Schubert on the Interchange of Route 93 and 195. Also attached is the material from Mass Highway regarding the upcoming Task Force meeting. I E;GAL NOTICE TOWN OF READING To the Inhabitants of the Town of Reading: Please take notice that the Bbard:of Selectmen of the Town of Reading will hold the follow- _ang.public. hearings on Tuesday, b.ruary 27, 2007 in the. §Oectmen's Meeting Room, 16 ; . ^ well :Stre.et, Reading; Massachusetts: I West Street School Zone - Montessori School 8:15 p.m. Stop ;Sign - Walnut :Street . ';4t, O Farm' Road 8:30 p.m: All.iriter.e ted parties may. -P-ei pear in person,. may subinit r comrrie.nts. 4n. writing, or. inay email comments to town manaaer.-9ci.reading ina.,us:. Peter I. Hechenbleiki -ief Town Manager `w* . LO3 TOWN OF READING In accordance with the provisions of Chapter 89, Section 9, of the Massachusetts General Laws; the following street (s) are designated as stop streets at the intersection (s). Voted: The Traffic Rules and Regulations: adopted by the Board of Selectmen on March 28, 1995, for the Town of Reading, are hereby amended as follows: By adding to Article 6, Section 6.12, the following: STREET LOCATION REGULATION Walnut Street At Old Farm Road,Westbound drivers Stop Walnut Street At Red Gate Lane-Eastbound drivers Stop DATE OF PASSAGE s TOWN CLERK OF READING TOWN CORPORATE SEAL SELECTMEN'S SIGNATURES L p q TOWN OF READING STOP SIGNS STREET STOPPED AT INTERESCETION OF Walnut Street Old Farm Road-Westbound drivers Walnut Street Red Gate Lane-Eastbound drivers This is to certify that the installation of stop signs at the intersection (s) listed above meets at least one of the following warrants as set forth in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices of the Department of Public Works, Commonwealth of Massachusetts : (check applicable warrant (s) ) 1. Intersection of a less important road with main road where application of the normal right-of-way rule is unduly hazardous. 1 1 2. Unsignalized intersection in a signalized area. 3. A combination of high speed, restricted view, and serious accident record indicates a need for control by the STOP sign. This is to further certify that the street listed above under "Street Stopped" carries the lesser volume of traffic at this intersection. DATED ATTEST CHAIRMAN, BOARD OF SELECTMEN NHS , OFR Town.of Reading. ja 16 Lowell Street. 63sINCORQ~4P; .Reading:, MA 01867-2685 FAX: (781) 942-9071 Email: townmanager&i.reading.ma.us MEMORANDUM TO: Board of Selectmen FROM: Peter I. Hechenbleikner DATE: February 6, 2007 TOWN MANAGER (781) 942-9043 RE: Request for Four Way Stop:- Walnut Street/Old Farm Road/Red Gate Lane As you know, we have on your agenda for February 6 a request from residents that, because of the temporary loss of the Crossing Guard at this location, this intersection by made a four way stop. Red Gate Lane and Old Farm Road are already stops. Based on previous discussion, we are trying to develop some sound engineering criteria for the. ..Board to use in making these determinations. This evening we will have maps and photos showing the intersection. The following statistics may be of value: • The peak a.m. weekday average traffic is 140 vehicles, none of them going over 30 mph. This is based on the counts done by Edwards and Kelsey in March 2005. • The p.m. peak is not an issue related to school children and Crossing Guards. The Engineering Division placed cones at- quadrants of the intersection and has determined that the crosswalk sign headed eastbound (towards Hopkins Street) is visible 352 feet before the intersection'. Cone 1 at the northwest quadrant of the intersection is visible 330 feet from the intersection. Cone 3 at the southeast corner of the intersection is visible at 300 feet and cone 2 at the southwest comer of the intersection is visible at 200 feet: • Going westbound, the crosswalk sign is visible 5.60 feet before the intersection. Cone 1 is visible 500 feet before the intersection, cone 3 is visible 270 feet before the intersection, and cone 2 is visible 320 feet before the intersection. • A vehicle traveling 35 mph needs approximately 270 feet to stop. This is shown graphically on the map. We hope that this information will be helpful to the Board in making the decision as to what to do regarding this intersection. PIHlps i 4 pi - 20 ~i~ 'tJ~ Thanks Kerrin - I will make sure that the Board of Selectmen gets your email for their hearing. Pete From: Doug & Kerrin Morrin [mailto:dkmorrin@mac.com] Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 3:37 PM To: Town Manager Cc: RICHARD MCDONALD Subject: Stop Sign - Walnut Street at Old Farm Road Dear Mr. Hechenbleikner: I am a life long resident of Reading; I grew up on Red Gate Lane and recently purchased a house on Old Farm Road. I have traveled this intersection hundreds, if not thousands of times over the years. Please believe me when I tell you, it is a tremendously dangerous intersection even with the recently installed Pedestrian sign. Cars travel at a very high rate of speed through the intersection of Walnut Street with Old Farm Road and Red Gate Lane. There are many blind spots on this road, making crossing Old Farm Road to Red Gate Lane (the route which our children must take to get to school each morning) particularly hazardous. Anyone crossing Walnut Street at this intersection (whether on foot or by car) faces hazards on both the right and left of the intersection. On the right, overgrown bushes and trees force pedestrians (or cars) to stop at the stop sign on Old Farm Road, creep partially into Walnut Street to see past the shrubbery, and then proceed onto Red Gate Lane. At the same time, from the left side, there is a curve in the road which does not allow you to see a car coming until it is almost upon you. Finally, for those pedestrians walking down Walnut Street, the street has no sidewalks, forcing them to walk on the same winding road as the fast-traveling cars. A stop sign at this intersection would be invaluable to our children, pedestrians, and drivers. Meanwhile, any effect on traffic would be minimal and, regardless, should not outweigh safety. As a town, we should not wait to install a stop sign at this intersection until a serious traffic accident occurs or, worse, a child is killed by a car while walking to school. Please consider my letter seriously. Our town officials should listen to the experts those families who travel this intersection daily. I am not making a halfhearted whimsical request for the stop sign - after years of experience and dread crossing this intersection, I can honestly say it is a necessity. Thank you, Kerrin Morrin ~ ~8 Easy Peel Labels Use Avery® TEMPLATE 51600 2460100000000160 RUSSELL JANE E 118 WALNUT ST READING, MA 01867 2460100000000190 MATRONA JOHN A 86 WALNUT ST READING, MA 01867 4VI ; ® See Instruction Sheet I iFeed Paper for Easy Peel Featurei 2460100000000240 JOYCE TIMOTHY F ETAL TRS THE PADDY NOMINEE TRUST 38 STURGES RD READING, MA 01867 246010000000034& BONNABEAU JEROME J HEIDI M BONNABEAU 50 STURGES RD READING, MA 01867 2460100000000370 LALLY NORMAN A RUTH A LALLY 74 STURGES RD READING, MA 01867 2460100000000400 DOLAN NEL H 33 STURGES ROAD READING, MA 01867 2460110000000020 DEVITO JOSEPH 8 FENNELL ST SOMERVILLE, MA 00000 246011000000004A LORDAN TIMOTHY J WANDA L LORDAN 51 HOPKINS ST READING, MA 01867 2460110000000250 O'SHAUGHNESSY COLLEEN L BERNARD W O'SHAUGHNESSY 56 WALNUT ST READING, MA 01867 2460110000000280 RAFFAELE MICHELE VINCENZA RAFFAELE 17 OLD FARM RD READING, MA 01867 2460100000000170 INES RUPERT M SUSAN E INES 112 WALNUT ST READING, MA 01867 246010000000019A PANDOLFO JOHN M PANDOLFO MARY M 56 STURGES RD READING, MA 01867 2460100000000320 CHIBNIK PAUL A 42 STURGES ROAD READING, MA 01867 2460100000000350 DIDOMENICO PHILIP MARY L DIDOMENICO 62 STURGES RD READING, MA 01867 2460100000000380 MILANO CHRISTOPHER P KATHLEEN M MILANO 53 STURGES RD READING, MA 01867 2460100000000450 HUTCHESON ROBERT E SUSANNE HUTCHESON 69 STURGES RD READING, MA 01867 2460110000000030 KIELY KATHRYN ANN READING WALNUT RLTY TR 46 WALNUT ST READING, MA 01867 246011000000004B MONTGOMERY ROBERT K ARDELLA S MONTGOMERY 45 HOPKINS ST READING, MA 01867 2460110000000260 MCGREGOR STEPHEN A LINDA C MCGREGOR 5 OLD FARM RD READING, MA 01867 2460110000000290 FINN WILLIAM J MELISSA CARLSON FINN 23 OLD FARM RD READING, MA 01867 F4V. SAAMRY@51600 1 2460100000000180 CATALDO WILLIAM P CAROLINE L CATALDO 106 WALNUT STREET READING, MA 01867 246010000000019B STOBBS CHARLES H BARBARA J STOBBS 98 WALNUT ST READING, MA 01867 2460100000000330 SAUNDERSDOROTHEA D & S REALTY TRUST 46 STURGES RD READING, MA 01867 2460100000000360 OSTON STEVEN G DIANE A CHAPIN 66 STURGES RD READING, MA 01867 2460100000000390 SAUNDERS WILLIAM C 41 STURGES RD READING, MA 01867 2460100000000460 ARENT TERESA N ERIC J RZEPKA 63 STURGES RD READING, MA 01867 2460110000000040 OBRIEN JOHN J PATRICIA A OBRIEN 34 WALNUT ST READING, MA 01867 2460110000000040 VIOLANTE ROSEMARY K 38 WALNUT ST READING, MA 01867 2460110000000270 RICCARDELLI GEORGE C ETAL (LE) 11 OLD FARM RD READING, MA 01867 2460110000000300 MOLLOY JOSEPH W PATRICIA A MOLLOY n / 1 29 OLD FARM RD rC j`1 READING, MA 01867 Etiquettes faciles a peter ♦ Consultez la feuille www.avery.com Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 51600 Sens de chargement d'instruction 1-800-GO-AVERY p7v. To: Subject: Date: <andreagarb@comcast.net> FW: Walnut St/Old Farm Rd Intersection Monday, January 29, 2007 10:45:07 PM 207 JAN 31 AN 10: 53 rView Source -----Original Message----- From: Garbarino, Al Sent: Mon 1/29/2007 10:43 PM To: townmanager@ci.readinq.ma.us Cc: Subject: Walnut St/Old Farm Rd Intersection Peter, I am writing this as a follow up to.the voicemail I left you on Friday January 26 regarding the Walnut St/Old Farm Rd intersection. On behalf of the neighborhood, I would like to formally request that the process be initiated to place stop signs at this intersection as soon as possible. With all four corners containing some form of obstruction, the intersection is a hazard, making both driving and walking across a dangerous undertaking. Unfortunately the crosswalks offer little relief as they are not always respected by drivers. As an example, there were several children attempting to cross Walnut St from Old Farm Rd last week to get to school and waited in the crosswalk as 6 cars sped through. Clearly this is a situation that puts Reading residents at risk and one that should be remedied as quickly as possible. Based on conversations I have had with members of the Board of Selectmen, you are the person to speak with to get the process initiated. Unless I hear differently from you, I will assume that this is the case and you will take the appropriate actions. Please let me know if you need any assistance from the members of the neighborhood as we are more than happy to help. My wife or I will also drop off a printed version of this correspondence attached with the signatures of several members of the neighborhood. Thank you in advance for your prompt response to this situation. If you would like to discuss this further, I can be reached during the day at 617-563-9563 or at home at 944-2709. Sincerely, Al Garbarino 32 Old Farm Rd MOX: Email 1 of 574 Nbve to Folder Back to Too ( < Previous I Next > q ~6-% I January 28, 2007 Dear members of the Board of Selectmen and Mr. Hechenbleikner, We would like to express our concern regarding the serious safety hazar(xfor our children being created by the removal of the Walnut Street crossing guard as of Friday, Febrhary 2; 2007. This decision was based on an inaccurate number of 5 childrencrossing this dangerous intersection daily. The following is a partial list of families who use this crossing on a daily or near-daily basis. Name Address # of children impacted 2.~ t 1111 1 v~ i 31aZ olcl G~rrr~ 02 4. 7 V, C(.(:L old g, Y10 U ► i~ ~~v (.~1~~ F11979 k6~ . IV, 10. y.~~' r~~,Y(//~1~tr l ~_rC~UU~tLf 12. We would like to respectfully request your assistance in the reconsideration of this decision untileppropriate measures are taken to secure the safety of this intersection for our children. Thank yo~ Page 1 of 1 Hechenbleikner, Peter From: Susan O'Leary [slooleary@comcast.net] Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 11:19 AM To: Reading - Selectmen Subject: Thank you Dear Selectmen, On behalf of all the parents, thank you for sending out representatives to come and observe the intersection at Old Farm and Walnut. I wanted to inform you that the temporary crossing guard made an inappropriate accusation toward two parents as they walked their children. I can only guess that she is not aware of the stressful situation that the parents have been put in for the past month with the sporadic coverage of this intersection. We were warned by Chief Cormier that even with a cruiser posted that it could be called away at any given moment, so not to depend on the coverage. Although. coverage has been appreciated, there has been at least one or two days that the cruiser was either absent or parked in a driveway on Walnut Street hidden from sight. This cross guard who was at the post this morning and may have been there once before has no right to question how many kids walk and why their parents may be with them. Parents need to decide what is safest for their children in this current situation. The children in this area need a safe and swift resolution to this and I hope that you will assist us in this effort. Thanks again for your time and support. Parents of the Walnut street intersection '140-v 4 2/2/2007 Easy Peel Labels a i s See Instruction Sheet ; Feed Pa er f E P l F t Use Avery® TEMPLATE 5160® 1 p or asy ee ea urel 2460110000000310 2460110000000320 OLIVIERA MANUEL A ETAL WARE EUGENE J SOARES MANUEL M ETAL CLOTILDA M WARE 33 OLD FARM RD 39 OLD FARM RD READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460110000000510 2460110000000520 FAULKNER RICHARD W RAIMO TODD L MARGARET M FAULKNER JULIE A RAIMO 1 GATEWAY CIRCLE 7 GATEWAY CIR READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460110000000540 2460160000000110 CHOI DONGIN DEMARTINES GUY B UNKYONG CHOI MICHELE W DEMARTINIS 12 GATEWAY CIR 33 MAPLE RIDGE RD READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460160000000130 2460160000000140 MONAHAN DAVID W WILDER JAMES R JENNIFER A MURPHY MICHELLE WILDER 2218 MYSTIC VALLEY PKWY 19 MAPLE RIDGE RD MEDFORD, MA 02155 READING, MA 01867 2460170000000080 2460170000000090 GRAMZOW WILLIAM F III MARVIN JOHN D JENNIFER A GRAMZOW EMILIE H MARVIN 119 WALNUT ST 113 WALNUT ST READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460170000000110 246017000000011A DEANGELO MONA C BARRETT HAYLEY A 15 STRAWBERRY HILL LANE JOHN H BARRETT III READING, MA 01867 89 WALNUT ST READING, MA 01867 2460170000000120 2460170000000130 FITZGERALD THOMAS P MALONEY WILLIAM J PATRICIA P FITZGERALD MARIE A MALONEY 81 WALNUT STREET 10 RED GATE LN READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460170000000150 2460170000000160 KODINSKI ERWIN O'NEIL KATHERINE BERNADETTE L KODINSKI BRIAN O'NEIL 22 RED GATE LN 32 RED GATE LN READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460170000000180 2460170000000190 JAMIESON MICHAEL F FITZGERALD JAMES J L THERESA M JAMIESON IDA M FITZGERALD 46 RED GATE LN 52 RED GATE LN READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460170000000210 2460170000000220 CALLAHAN WILLIAM C COHEN NEIL L DONNA M CALLAHAN DIANE L COHEN 55 RED GATE LANE 51 RED GATE LN READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 Etiquettes faciles a peler Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 51601D Sens de chargement SAVERY@51600 1 2460110000000500 CARVALHO DUARTE M DHC REALTY TRUST 55 HAYSTACK RD READING, MA 01867 2460110000000530 FIORE GERALD A JANE M FIORE 11 GATEWAY CIR READING, MA 01867 2460160000000120 AGAMI GEORGE A ALIX AGAMI 29 MAPLE RIDGE RD READING, MA 01867 2460170000000030 DONOVAN MARY A 15 MAPLE RIDGE RD READING, MA 01867 2460170000000100 DRACHLER WILLIAM JENNIFER DRACHLER 107 WALNUT STREET READING, MA 01867 246017000000011B SNELL BRIAN C LINDA E SNELL 99 WALNUT STREET READING, MA 01867 2460170000000140 LANGONE PAUL F LANGONE MARLINDA 16 RED GATE LANE READING, MA 01867 2460170000000170 HOPKINS DAVID F JOANNA M HOPKINS 40 REDGATE LN READING, MA 01867 2460170000000200 DOUCETTE DONNA E SYLVAIN J TREMBLAY 56 RED GATE LANE READING, MA 01867 2460170000000230 WILLSON RICHARD F JOYCE M WILL SON r 'Z 43 RED GATE LN READING, MA 01867 Consultez la feuille www.averycom d'instruction 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel ®abels 0 See Instruction Sheet 1Feed Paper f E P l F n QAVERY®5160® Use AveyTEMPLATE 5160 or asy ee eature 1 2460170000000240 2460170000000250 2460170000000260 MELLO ROBERT R ARAKELIAN ARTHUR DALTON DAVID N JR. BETH M MELLO A & M REALTY TRUST MARIA DALTON 37 RED GATE LN 31 RED GATE LN 43 PENNSYLVANIA AVE READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460170000000270 2460170000000280 2460170000000290 WILSON DAVID A DAHILL MARJORIE E ELWELL JAMES F JR. DEBRA M WILSON 18 VIRGINIA RD CLARE L ELWELL TRUSTEES 14 VIRGINIA RD READING, MA 01867 22 VIRGINIA RD READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460170000000300 2460170000000310 2460170000000320 KELLEY BARBARA GROOT ABRAHAM J HARVEY NORMAN P STEPHEN F LEAHY ELLEN G KEVORKIAN DEBRA A HARVEY 26 VIRGINIA RD 32 VIRGINIA ROAD 34 VIRGINIA RD READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460170000000410 2460170000000420 2460170000000430 ST PIERRE PHILIP P DEANGELO MONA C CANNAROZZO JOANNE MICHELE ST PIERRE 14 STRAWBERRY HILL LN THOMAS CANNAROZZO 8 STRAWBERY HILL LN READING, MA 0 18 STRAWBERRY HILL LN READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460170000000440 2460170000000450 2460170000000460 VENTOLA DAVID P TOCCO-BURNS LAURIE A HASS JAMES P CAROLINE A VENTOLA 26 STRAWBERRY HILL SUSAN MARY TUCKER 22 STRAWBERRY HILL LN READING, MA 01867 25 STRAWBERRY HILL LN READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460170000000470 2460170000000490 2460170000000500 CULBERT ROBERT A ONISKEY MICHAEL H NADEAU GILLES R JENNIFER H CULBERT CAROL A ONISKEY JOYCE H NADEAU 21 STRAWBERRY HILL LN 7 STRAWBERRY HILL LN 3 STRAWBERRY HILL LN READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460180000000130 2460180000000140 2460180000000150 MAGUIRE PETER M LARSON DAVID A JR. REARDON OWEN M ETAL BARBARA A MAGUIRE TAMARA J LARSON OMRISLR REALTY TRUST 2 VIRGINIA RD 6 VIRGINIA RD 40 PENNSYLVANIA AVE READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460180000000160 2460180000000170 2460180000000180 SORENSON WALTER R PRJOLI ROBERT A GRIFFITH ERNEST W FLORENCE L SORENSON ROSEANN PRIOLI 15 RED GATE LN 44 PENNSYLVANIA AVE 21 RED GATE LN READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460180000000190 2460180000000200 2460180000000210 CRESCENZI MARY E DARBY ROBERT D STARBLE CRAIG V 9 RED GATE LN HELEN T DARBY ETAL BENTS J STARBLE READING, MA 01867 71 WALNUT ST 55 WALNUT ST READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460180000000220 2460180000000240 2460180000000310 [ 4~ JACK KEVIN J HOVEY JUDITH BLAIR ARTHUR. CHARLES RJR ANNE M JACK 51 WALNUT ST 4 VIRGINIA CIRCLE READING, MA 01867 MARIA M ARTHUR 15 HOPKINS ST READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 Etiquettes faciles a peter Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 51600 A Sens de chargement Consultez la feuille wwwaverycom Onstruction 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel Labels Use Aver O TEMPLATE 5160® i - See Instruction Sheet i Feed Paper for Easy Peel Feature l i AVERY®5160® r~ y 2460180000000320 2460180000000330 2460180000000340 DAGOSTINO JAMES V ATKINSON GARY M NALWALK THEODORE J CAROL A DAGOSTINO CAROLE C ATKINSON JANE S NALWALK 21 HOPKINS ST 27 HOPKINS STREET 33 WALNUT ST READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460180000000350 2460180000000360 2460180000000400 HARDY RYAN LICHOULAS THEODORE W CURTIS RICHARD H ELIZABETH HARDY 39 WALNUT ST CURTIS LINDA K 35 WALNUT ST READING, MA 01867 15 HOLLY RD READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460180000000410 2460180000000420 2460180000000430 PATTISON RICHARD A JR. PETERSEN SARON L PUGH GEORGE P JANE E PATISON DIRK U PETERSEN BARBARA T PUGH 21 HOLLY RD 25 HOLLY ROAD 29 HOLLY RD READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460180000000440 CUMMINGS MARIE J TRUSTEE 2460180000000460 BURDITT WILLARD J MARIE J CUMMINGS LIVING MEDEIROS DEBORAH J PATRICIA A BURDITT TRUST GEORGE A MEDEI OS 35 HOLLY RD 39 HOLLY RD 36 HOLLY ROAD READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460180000000470 2460180000000480 2460180000000490 CULLEN THOMAS GRAHAM GORDON J ETAL TRS BARRETT ROBERT F DANIELLE CONNOLLY 26 HOLLY RD LUCRETIA L BARRETT 32 HOLLY RD READING, MA 01,867 20 HOLLY RD READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460180000000500 LICHOULAS JAMES T JR. TR LICHOULAS RITA TR DEPIANO WILLIAM J JR JAMES AND THOMAS REALTY SEVEN HOPKINS STREET JEAN DEPIANO TRUST REALTY TR 47 WALNUT ST 7 HOPKINS ST 7 HOPKINS ST READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460240000000820 2460110000000050 2460110000000550 BEAULIEU LAURIER A QUANNAPOWITT PLAYERS LANGTON SCOTT FLORENCE F BEAULIEU PO BOX 12 RENEE TAAKE 62 RED GATE LN READING, MA 01867 69 HAYSTACK RD READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460110000000560 2460110000000570 2460110000000580 CARLEEN EMILY C SUCHY ALBERT F HANK WILLIAM MARK 77 HAYSTACK RD MARY JAYNE SUCHY LINDA A HANK READING, MA 01867 85 HAYSTACK RD 70 WALNUT STREET READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460110000000590 BATES JOSEPH TRUSTEE 2460110000000610. SMITH DONALD A GRAND FLORIDIAN REALTY LI YOU CHIA SMITH WINIFRED A TRUST YOU JIAN XU 4 OLD FARM RD 90 HAYSTACK ROAD 20 OLD FARM RD READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460110000000620 2460110000000630 2460110000000640 MANCHESTER PATRICE GARBARINO ALBERT CUDDY MICHAEL 1 LANTERN LN ANDREA GARBARINO TERESA CUDDY ` ,9/ NORTH READING, MA 01864 32 OLD FARM ROAD 38 OLD FARM RD V~ READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 Etiquettes faciles a peter Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 51600 ♦ Sens de chargement Consultez la feuille www.avery.com d'instruction 1-800-GO-AVERY Easy Peel Labels ' ® ® See Instruction Sheet , Feed Paper f tur E P l F m ©AVERY®5160® Use Avery@ TEMPLATE 51600 e j or asy ee ea 1 2460110000000650 2460110000000670 2460110000000680 CHASE WILLIAM R FAY KENNETH E MORR.IN DOUGLAS S LORRAINE M CHASE CHERYL M FAY KERRIN E MORRI 48 OLD FARM RD 68 OLD FARM RD 74 OLD FARM RD READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 24601.10000000690 2460110000000700 2460110000000710 SCALI ROCCO 0 ETAL BERGLUND WILLIAM A FIORE SCOTT ROSEMARY SCALI ELIZABETH RAYMONDI BETH FIORE 44 HAYSTACK RD 54 HAYSTACK RD 62 HAYSTACK RD READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 2460110000000720 2460110000000730 2460110000000740 CASEY JANET (LE) DEBENEDETTO DAVID M BORNSTEIN ILENE J KAREN M KENNEDY ETAL ROSEMARIE DEBENEDETTO 80 HAYSTACK RD 68 HAYSTACK RD 74 HAYSTACK RD READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 READING, MA 01867 Etiquettes faciles a peter ♦ Consultez la feuille www.averycom Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 5 160® Sens de chargement d'instruction 1-800-GO-AVERY intersection. The Town Engineer will have a recommendation to the Police Chief by your meeting on Tuesday. 4f) Following discussion on the Washington Street parking situation, the Town Engineer has developed some possible standards for street width and parking regulations to provide the Board of Selectmen with guidance on this matter in the future. The Town Engineer will review these guidelines with the Board on Tuesday night. 4g) Again, as part of the discussion on the Washington Street parking regulations, there was a question raised as to the location from which measurements are made relative to distances from intersections. The options are to measure the length from the curb or to measure the length from the edge of the right of way. Staff preference is to measure from the edge of the right of way, since that is a location that will not change due to road construction or other matters. 4h) During discussion on Downtown parking, Selectman Camille Anthony suggested that we consider making Vine Street from Mineral Street to High Street one way in the southbound direction, and provide parking on one side of the street. Staff has evaluated that alternative and will be prepared to discuss with the Board on Tuesday evening. 4i) As part of the discussion on Washington Street, there was further discussion on the status of the employees/merchant parking spaces on High Street north of Woburn Street. At the time, these spaces were very sparsely utilized. Chief Cormier will be prepared to review the status of the rental of these spaces. The Board also wanted to discuss whether or not the lottery for these spaces should be re-conducted periodically. 4j) Downtown Parkina - Establishment of Reuulations on Sanborn between Woburn and Lowell Street - The enclosed email chain between Safety Officer Michelle Halloran and Marilyn Hossman, Business Administrator at the Congregational Church, outlines a request for parking regulations on Linden Street between Woburn and Lowell Street. The establishment of these regulations require a 'future public hearing. 4k) Children's Sians - The Board is periodically requested to post "Children" signs in different locations within the community. The attached is the recommendation from the Reading Police Department that does not suggest posting these signs. 41,m) This is just a reminder that the Board of Selectmen through a subcommittee is going to establish proposed standards for multi-way stops, which then can provide guidance to the community and staff on where the Board feels such stop signs are appropriate. The subcommittee of the Board will work with Town staff to develop those guidelines. We have been holding off on a discussion/recommendation on regulations at the intersection of Bancroft and Hartshorn Street until such standards are in place. 4n) Enclosed is material put together by Selectman Rick Schubert on the Interchange of Route-03--- and 195. Also attached is the material from Mass Highway regarding the upcoming Task Force meeting. intersection. The Town Engineer will have a recommendation to the Police Chief by your meeting on Tuesday. 40 Following discussion on the Washington Street parking situation, the Town Engineer has developed some possible standards for street width and parking regulations to provide the Board of Selectmen with guidance on this matter in the future. The Town Engineer will review these guidelines with the Board on Tuesday night. //'4g) Again, as part of the discussion on the Washington Street parking regulations, there was a question raised as to the location from which measurements are made relative to distances from intersections. The options are to measure the length from the curb or to measure the length from the edge of the right of way. Staff preference is to measure from the edge of the right of way, since that is a location that will not change due to road construction or other matters. 4h) During discussion on Downtown parking, Selectman Camille Anthony suggested that we consider making Vine Street from Mineral Street to High Street one way in the southbound direction, and provide parking on one side of the street. Staff has evaluated that alternative and will be prepared to discuss with the Board on Tuesday evening. 4i) As part of the discussion on Washington Street, there was further discussion on the status of the einployees/merchant parking spaces on High Street north of Woburn Street. At the time, these spaces were very sparsely utilized. Chief Cormier will be prepared to review the status of the rental of these spaces. The Board also wanted to discuss whether or not the lottery for these spaces should be re-conducted periodically. 4j) Downtown Parking - Establishment of Regulations .on Sanborn between Woburn and Lowell Street - The enclosed email chain between Safety Officer Michelle Halloran and Marilyn Hossman, Business Administrator at the Congregational Church, outlines a request for parking regulations on Linden Street between Woburn and Lowell Street. The establishment of these regulations require a future public hearing. 4k) Children's Signs - The Board is periodically requested to post "Children" signs in different locations within the community. The attached is the recommendation from the Reading Police Department that does not suggest posting these signs. 41,m) This is just a reminder that the Board of Selectmen through a subcommittee is going to establish proposed standards for multi-way stops, which then can provide guidance to the community and staff on where the Board feels such stop signs are appropriate. The subcommittee of the Board will work with Town staff to develop those guidelines. We have been holding off on a discussion/recommendation on regulations at the intersection of Bancroft and Hartshorn Street until such standards are in place. 4n) Enclosed is material put together by Selectman Rick Schubert on the interchange of Route 93 and 195. Also attached is the material from Mass Highway regarding the upcoming Task Force meeting. 1 intersection. The Town Engineer will have a recommendation to the Police Chief by your meeting on Tuesday. 4f) Following discussion on the Washington Street parking situation, the Town Engineer has developed some possible standards for street width and parking regulations to provide the Board of Selectmen with guidance on this matter in the future. The Town Engineer will review these guidelines with the Board on Tuesday night. 4g) Again, as part of the discussion on the Washington Street parking regulations, there was a question raised as to the location from which measurements are made relative to distances from intersections. The options are to measure the length from the curb or to measure the length from the edge of the right of way. Staff preference is to measure from the edge of the right of way, since that is a location that will not change due to road construction or other matters. ~h) During discussion on Downtown parking, Selectman Camille Anthony suggested that we consider making Vine Street from Mineral Street to High Street one way in the southbound direction, and provide parking on one side of the street. Staff has evaluated that alternative and will be prepared to discuss with the Board on Tuesday evening. 4i) As part of the discussion on Washington Street, there was further discussion on the status of the einployees/merchant parking spaces on High Street north of Woburn Street. At the time, these spaces were very sparsely utilized. Chief Cormier will be prepared to review the status of the rental of these spaces. The Board also wanted to discuss whether or not the lottery for these spaces should be re-conducted periodically. 4j) Downtown Parkina - Establishment of Regulations -on Sanborn between Woburn and Lowell Street - The enclosed email chain between Safety Officer Michelle Halloran and Marilyn Hossman, Business Administrator at the Congregational Church, outlines a request for parking regulations on Linden Street between Woburn and Lowell Street. The establishment of these regulations require a future public hearing. 4k) Children's Sims - The Board is periodically requested to post "Children" signs in different locations within the community. The attached is the recommendation from the Reading Police Department that does not suggest posting these signs. 41,m) This is just a reminder that the Board of Selectmen through a subcommittee is going to establish proposed standards for multi-way stops, which then can provide guidance to the community and staff on where the Board feels- such stop signs are appropriate. The subcommittee of the Board will work with Town staff to develop those guidelines. We have been holding off on a discussion/recormnendation on regulations at the intersection of Bancroft and Hartshorn Street until such standards are in place. 4n) Enclosed is material put together by Selectman Rick Schubert on the Interchange of Route 93 and 195. Also attached is the material from Mass Highway regarding the upcoming Task Force meeting. ..,W intersection. The Town Engineer will have a recommendation to the Police Chief by your meeting on Tuesday. 4fj Following discussion on the Washington Street parking situation, the Town Engineer has developed some possible standards for street width and parking regulations to provide the Board of Selectmen with guidance on this matter in the future. The Town Engineer will review these guidelines with the Board on Tuesday night. 4g) Again, as part of the discussion on the Washington Street parking regulations, there was a question raised as to the location from which measurements are made relative to distances from intersections. The options are to measure the length from the curb or to measure the length from the edge of the right of way. Staff preference is to measure from the edge of the right of way, since that is a location that will not change due to road construction or other matters. 4h) During discussion on Downtown parking, Selectman Camille Anthony suggested that we consider making Vine Street from Mineral Street to High Street one way in the southbound direction, and provide parking on one side of the street. Staff has evaluated that alternative and will be prepared to discuss with the Board on Tuesday evening. /4'i) As part of the discussion on Washington Street, there was further discussion on the status of the employees/merchant parking spaces on High Street north of Woburn Street. At the time, these spaces were very sparsely utilized. Chief Conner will be prepared to review the status of the rental of these spaces. The Board also wanted to discuss whether or not the lottery for these spaces should be re-conducted periodically. Ik. 4j) Downtown Parking - Establishment of Reaulations.on Sanborn between Woburn and Lowell Street - The enclosed email chain between Safety Officer Michelle Halloran and Marilyn Hossman, Business Administrator at the Congregational Church, outlines a request for parking regulations on Linden Street between Woburn and Lowell Street. The establishment of these regulations require a future public hearing. 4k) Children's SiRns - The Board is periodically requested to post "Children" signs in different locations within the community. The attached is the recommendation from the Reading Police Department that does not suggest posting these signs. 41,m) This is just a reminder that the Board of Selectmen through a subcommittee is going to establish proposed standards for inulti-way stops, which then can provide guidance to the community and staff on where the Board feels such stop signs are appropriate. The subcommittee of the Board will work with Town staff to develop those guidelines. We have been holding off on a discussion/recommendation on regulations at the intersection of Bancroft and Hartshorn Street until such standards are in place. 4n) Enclosed is material put together by Selectman Rick Schubert on the Interchange of Route 93 and 195. Also attached is the material from Mass Highway regarding the upcoming Task Force meeting. y~ intersection. The Town Engineer will have a recommendation to the Police Chief by your meeting on Tuesday. 40 Following discussion on the Washington Street parking situation, the Town Engineer has developed some possible standards for street width and parking regulations to provide the Board of Selectmen with guidance on this matter in the future. The Town Engineer will review these guidelines with the Board on Tuesday night. 4g) Again, as part of the discussion on the Washington Street parking regulations, there was a question raised as to the location from which measurements are made relative to distances from intersections. The options are to measure the length from the curb or to measure the length from the edge of the right of way. Staff preference is to measure from the edge of the right of way, since that is a location that will not change due to road construction or other matters. 4h) During discussion on Downtown parking, Selectman Camille Anthony suggested that we consider making Vine Street from Mineral Street to High Street one way in the southbound direction, and provide parking on one side of the street. Staff has evaluated that alternative and will be prepared to discuss with the Board on Tuesday evening. 4i) As part of the discussion on Washington Street, there was further discussion on the status of the employees/merchant parking spaces on High Street north of Woburn Street. At the time, these spaces were very sparsely utilized. Chief Cormier will be prepared to review the status of the rental of these spaces. The Board also wanted to discuss whether or not the lottery for these spaces should be re-conducted periodically. 4j) Downtown Parking - Establishment of Reeulations on Sanborn between Woburn and Lowell Street - The enclosed email chain between Safety Officer Michelle Halloran and Marilyn Hossman, Business Administrator at the Congregational Church, outlines a request for parking regulations on Linden Street between Woburn and Lowell Street. The establishment of these regulations require a future public hearing. 4k) Children's Suns - The Board is periodically requested to post "Children" signs in different locations within the community. The attached is the recommendation from the Reading Police Department that does not suggest posting these signs. 41,m) This is just a reminder that the Board of Selectmen through a subcommittee is going to establish proposed standards for multi-way stops, which then can provide guidance to the community and staff on where the Board feels such stop signs are appropriate. The subcommittee of the Board will work with Town staff to develop those guidelines. We have been holding off on a discussion/recommendation on regulations at the intersection of Bancroft and Hartshorn Street until such standards are in place. 4n) Enclosed is material put together by Selectman Rick Schubert on the Interchange of Route 93 and 195. Also attached is the material from Mass Highway regarding the upcoming Task Force meeting. J Page 1 of 2 Schena, Paula From: Hechenbleikner, Peter Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 9:47 AM To: Schena, Paula Subject: FW: Parking at First Congregational Church For Board of Selectmen 2-27-07 From: Halloran, Michelle Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 2:32 PM To: Marilyn Hossman Cc: Cormier, Jim; Hechenbleikner, Peter; Zambouras, George; McIntire, Ted Subject: RE: Parking at First Congregational Church Mrs. Hossman- I will forward your ideas to the other members of the PTTTF (Parking Traffic and Transportation Task Force). I will contact you after getting their comments and feedback. The next PTTTF meeting will be 2/21/07. Also, as we discussed during our meeting, any changes in the parking regulations need to be approved by the Board of Selectmen. I'll be in touch- Officer Michelle Halloran Reading Police Department From: Marilyn Hossman [mailto:office.fccr@verizon.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 2:01 PM To: Halloran, Michelle Subject: Parking Hi Michelle, Thank you for meeting with us last month. After we met your suggestions were presented to our church's Property Committee. In dialogue with our staff and tenants, it was agreed that it would be helpful to all of those who use the church facilities if at least eight spaces on Sanborn Street, at the Woburn Street end, were designated as two-hour (non- permit) parking Monday thru Friday. We are convinced that this would alleviate the current condition of those spaces being used by all-day parkers who arrive beginning at 6:30 am. Although day time parking has always been challenging around the church building, since the new parking went into effect in the areas surrounding us, the situation has become untenable for those who use the church during the day. Those who previously parked nearer to the town's shopping areas and train, have now moved their parking to Sanborn Street in order to avoid the paid parking spaces. Our church members and Creative Arts (CAK) users are regularly not able to find any parking within blocks of the facility. As. there are church meetings and CAK classes going on here during the day we need to have some open spots. We do not feel that the paid, plus two hour permit would do us any good as we have people who need to park all day here and as there is no promise of a space, the staff from our three renters would have no promise of a space if they were taken by the PAID all day people who come early. Would you please advise as to the maximum spaces you would allow for 2 hour parking, and what we need to do 2/7/2007 y~L 13 Legend Parcels Parking Regulations Buildings 30 MIN PARKING 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM MON - SAT _.pa s -t- Railroad 2 HR PARKING 8:00 AM - 5:00 PM MON - SAT Q Driveway -PAID PERMIT 12 HR PARKING O _ t J \ Roads DAILY COMMUTER PARKING (MBTA) Paved RESIDENT PERMIT PARKING L! l ~~1~ i*3a \ Unpaved EMPLOYEE/MERCHANT MONTHLY PARKING 10 am- NO PARKING 6•.00 AM -10:30 AM t NO PARKING i, F-L TO ALLY- o ME •1 ` EST U a I. o NffsROYEE/1UER H _ NTH` THY I dG ~l U i I ,j Ft,3a1G'S - ~ ~ ~t1~+I i QlktRKIN M LO -ANTIMONY i PA C \ d f ~R PA J ~P a5 RKh,IG 8;00 A10 fir I o- ~V - A ES NTrP RMIT. RKING",` L ~rl E Q SIDE PE RKit1 I~ a ~Lt 1 APPROVED PARKING REGULATIONS ~aL J X100 200 300 40Ft N i o i ti -~1S r Q e Map Town Reading. --I s ~ Map date: 8/9106 v Parcels valid 111106. 1 ~~/py , Planimetric features from aerial photos taken in 1998. Data are for planning purposes only. intersection. The Town Engineer will have a recommendation to the Police Chief by your meeting on Tuesday. 40 Following discussion on the Washington Street parking situation, the Town Engineer has developed some possible standards for street width and parking regulations to provide the Board of Selectmen with guidance on this matter in the future. The Town Engineer will review these guidelines with the Board on Tuesday night. 4g) Again, as part of the discussion on the Washington Street parking regulations, there was a question raised as to the location from which measurements are made relative to distances from intersections. The options are to measure the length from the curb or to measure the length from the edge of the right of way. Staff preference is to measure from the edge of the right of way, since that is a location that will not change due to road construction or other matters. 4h) During discussion on Downtown parking, Selectman Camille Anthony suggested that we consider making Vine Street from Mineral Street to High Street one way in the southbound direction, and provide parking on one side of the street. Staff has evaluated that alternative and will be prepared to discuss with the Board on Tuesday evening. 4i) As part of the discussion on Washington Street, there was further discussion on the status of the employees/merchant parking spaces on High Street north of Woburn Street. At the time, these spaces were very sparsely utilized. Chief Cormier will be prepared to review the status of the rental of these spaces. The Board also wanted to discuss whether or not the lottery for these spaces should be re-conducted periodically. 4j) Downtown Parking - Establishment of Reaulations on Sanborn between Woburn and Lowell Street - The enclosed email chain between Safety Officer Michelle Halloran and Marilyn Hossman, Business Administrator at the Congregational Church, outlines A request for parking regulations on Linden Street between Woburn and Lowell Street. The establishment of these regulations require a future public hearing. 4k) Children's Sims - The Board is periodically requested to post "Children" signs in different locations within the community. The attached is the recommendation from the Reading Police D.pwtment that does not suggest posting these signs. 414n) This is just a reminder that the Board of Selectmen through a subcommittee is going to establish proposed standards for multi-way stops, which then can provide guidance to the community and staff on where the Board feels such stop signs are appropriate. The subcommittee of the Board will work with Town staff to develop those guidelines. We have been holding off on a discussion/recommendation on regulations at the intersection of Bancroft and Hartshorn Street until such standards are in place. 4n) Enclosed is material put together by Selectman Rick Schubert on the Interchange of Route 93 and 195. Also attached is the material from Mass Highway regarding the upcoming Task Force meeting. 9r)NCORp~~ Jamed W Cornier Cblef of Police February 23, 2007 SING OLIO EPART FNT OFFICE OF THE CHIEF 15 Union Street, Reading, Massachusetts 01867 Emergency Only: 911. All Other Calls: 781-944-1212 Fax: 781-944-2893 E-Mail: JCormier@ci.reading.ma.us Honorable Board of Selectmen Town of Reading 16 Lowell St. Reading, MA 01867 Ladies and Gentlemen: In response to your request for input from the Police Department regarding "Children at Play" signs, I submit the following. I would discourage the use of "Children at Play" signs for a number of reasons. Citizens often request these signs on their streets in an effort to reduce the risk of automobile-pedestrian accidents. Based on numerous studies, there is no evidence that "Children at Play" signs prevent injury or decrease speeds of vehicles. The erections of these signs give parents and children a false sense of security. Every street where children live would require a sign if requested. The proliferation of these signs would create sign pollution, and reduce the impact of all signs. Municipalities can and should put signs for school zones, playgrounds, and pedestrian crossings. These types of signs give clear and specific messages to drivers about what zones they are entering. The Manual on Uniforin Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) is the standard for placing traffic signs and markings. The MUTCD discourages the use of "Children at Play" signs for the reasons listed above, and others. I concur with the MUTCD, .and recommend against the use of "Children at Play" signs. Thank you for your consideration on this matter. If you have any specific questions, I would be happy to answer them to the best of my abilities. Sincerely, James W. Connier Chief of Police V- 21-- intersection. The Town Engineer will have a recommendation to the Police Chief by your meeting on Tuesday. 4f) Following discussion on the Washington Street parking situation, the Town Engineer has developed some possible standards for street width and parking regulations to provide the Board of Selectmen with guidance on this matter in the future. The Town Engineer will review these guidelines with the Board on Tuesday night. 4g). Again, as part of the discussion on the Washington Street parking regulations, there was a question raised as to the location from which measurements are made relative to distances from intersections. The options are to measure the length from the curb or to measure the length from the edge of the right of way. Staff preference is to measure from the edge of the right of way, since that is a location that will not change due to road construction or other matters. 4h) During discussion on Downtown parking, Selectman Camille Anthony suggested that we consider making Vine Street from Mineral Street to High Street one way in the southbound direction, and provide parking on one side of the street. Staff has evaluated that alternative and will be prepared to discuss with the Board on Tuesday evening. 4i) As part of the discussion on Washington Street, there was further discussion on the status of the employees/merchant parking spaces on High Street north of Woburn Street. At the time, these spaces were very sparsely utilized. Chief Cormier will be prepared to review the status of the rental of these spaces. The Board also wanted to discuss whether or not the lottery for these spaces should be re-conducted periodically. 4j) Downtown Parkiniz - Establishment of ReL-ulations on Sanborn between Woburn and Lowell Street - The enclosed email chain between Safety Officer Michelle Halloran and Marilyn Hossman, Business Administrator at the Congregational Church, outlines a request for parking regulations on Linden Street between Woburn and Lowell Street. The establishment of these regulations require a future public hearing. 4k) Children's Sians - The Board is periodically requested to post "Children" signs in different locations within the community. The attached is the recommendation from the Reading Police Department that does not suggest posting these signs. 41,m) This is just a reminder that the Board of Selectmen through a subcommittee is going to establish proposed standards for multi-way stops, which then can provide guidance to the community and staff on where the Board feels such stop signs are appropriate. The subcommittee of the Board will work with Town staff to develop those guidelines. We have been holding off on a discussion/recommendation on regulations at the intersection of \ Bancroft and Hartshorn Street until such standards are in place. 4n) Enclosed is material put together by Selectman Rick Schubert on the Interchange of Route 93 and 195. Also attached is the material from Mass Highway regarding the upcoming Task Force meeting. qy/m I 11- DevalL.Paftick TimobV P. Murray Bemard Cohen Luisa Paiewonsky Governor Lt Governor Secretary conmissoner W-,HH111GHWAY Traffic - Reading Ms. Michelle Halloran Safety Officer Reading Police Department 15 Union Street Reading, MA 01867 Dear Ms. Halloran, ME I OR MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION S3 N %n w This is in response to your letter dated August 24, 2006 requesting a speed limit study on Haverhill Street in Reading. The District Traffic Engineering Section has reviewed the speed data submitted by the Reading Police Department. The data shows that the 85th percentile speed for each speed zone is between 1 and 5 MPH higher than the posted speed limit in that zone. It also shows that if the speed limit were to be lowered by 5 MPH to the next standard speed limit in any of the established speed zones, between 95 % and 100 % of the motorists would be in violation. There is one exception on Haverhill Street northbound in Area 462, where 77% of the motorists would be in violation. In addition, our field investigation consisting of trial runs and spot speed checks in all established speed zones confirmed the provided speed data and found that the existing Speed Limit Regulation 4 93.3 is appropriate for this roadway. Therefore, this Regulation shall remain in effect. Thank you for bringing.this issue to our attention. If you have any question regarding this matter, please contact the District Traffic Engineer, Raj Kulen, P.E. at (781) 641-8482. Sincerre; 1 Patricia Leavenworth,: P.E. District Highway Director EGV~ev , cc-file, qf .G-• Massachusetts Highway Department. District 4.319 Appleton Street, Arlington, MA 02476 • (781) 641-8300 intersection. The Town Engineer will have a recommendation to the Police Chief by your meeting on Tuesday. 4f) Following discussion on the Washington Street parking situation, the Town Engineer has developed some possible standards for street width and parking regulations to provide the Board of Selectmen with guidance on this matter in the future. The Town Engineer will review these guidelines with the Board on Tuesday night. 4g) Again, as part of the discussion on the Washington Street parking regulations, there was a question raised as to the location from which measurements are made relative to distances from intersections. The options are to measure the length from the curb or to measure the length from the edge of the right of way. Staff preference is to measure from the edge of the right of way, since that is a location that will not change due to road construction or other matters. 4h) During discussion on Downtown parking, Selectman Camille Anthony suggested that we consider making Vine Street from Mineral Street to High Street one way in the southbound direction, and provide parking on one side of the street. Staff has evaluated that alternative and will be prepared to discuss with the Board on Tuesday evening. 4i) As part of the discussion on Washington Street, there was further discussion on the status of the employees/merchant parking spaces on High Street north of Woburn Street. At the time, these spaces were very sparsely utilized. Chief Cormier will be prepared to review the status of the rental of these spaces. The Board also wanted to discuss whether or not the lottery for these spaces should be re-conducted periodically. 4j) Downtown Parkins Establishment of Reuulations.on Sanborn between Woburn and Lowell Street - The enclosed email chain between Safety Officer Michelle Halloran and Marilyn Hossman, Business Administrator at the Congregational Church, outlines a request for parking regulations on Linden Street between Woburn and Lowell Street. The establishment of these regulations require a future public hearing. 4k) Children's Sians - The Board is periodically requested to post "Children" signs in different locations within the community. The attached is the recommendation from the Reading Police Department that does not suggest posting these signs. 41,m) This is just a reminder that the Board of -Selectmen through a subcommittee is going to establish proposed standards for multi-way stops, which then can provide guidance to the community and staff on where the Board feels such stop signs are appropriate. The subcommittee of the Board will work with Town staff to develop those guidelines. We have been holding off on a discussion/recommendation on regulations at the intersection of Bancroft and Hartshorn Street until such standards are in place. 4p) Enclosed is material put together by Selectman Rick Schubert on the Interchange of Route 93 and 195. Also attached is the material from Mass Highway regarding the upcoming Task Force meeting. I-93 / I-95 Interchange Transportation Study (Reading, Stoneham, Woburn) . Information Briefing - February 2007 Study Description The Office of Transportation Planning (Planning) is currently working with an advisory task force to conduct a study that will evaluate and address transportation issues with the I-93 / I-95 Interchange in the Towns of Reading, Stoneham, and the City of Woburn. This interchange is the busiest in the state, processing over 375,000 vehicles on an average weekday. The primary goals of this planning study are to examine and recommend ways to improve traffic flow and safety at the interchange while minimizing impacts in surrounding communities. A full range of alternatives, including interchange improvements and non-highway options, will be developed and analyzed as the study progresses. A recommended plan of future transportation improvements (short-term and long-term), based on the alternatives analysis and community input, will be the end product of this study. Status Planning meets regularly with the I-93/I-95 Interchange. Task Force (ITF), which includes federal and state agencies, legislators, local elected officials, community members and groups, and other interested organizations. The ITF was created to provide a better forum for community involvement and input into the study, and in response to previous efforts by MassHighway (which had generated substantial public interest and debate over potential redesign proposals for the interchange). A consultant team led by the Louis Berger Group (LBG) is conducting this planning study, which officially began in September 2004 and runs through early 2007. Recent meetings with the Task Force have. covered potential alternatives, which include both highway and transit/transportation demand management (TDM) components. Alternatives are currently being developed into preliminary recommendations with the Task Force, and further evaluations and analyses by the consultant team continue. The next Task Force meeting will be held on February 28th in Woburn. A general public informational meeting (the third of three) will be held on March 21st in Woburn. A proposed set of recommendations - that have moved forward through analysis and evaluations with the Task Force - will be presented. Both highway and non-highway strategies are included. There will continue to be substantial opportunity for Task Force and public input leading to the completion of the study, and with the subsequent environmental and design phases. Background In September 2002, MassHighway suspended a previous design feasibility study for this interchange, and Planning was directed to lead a revised effort with an advisory task force. At public meetings for this previous study (in 2001 and 2002), concern was expressed over right-of-way issues. For that study, the alternatives proposed (including ramp flyovers) that best improved traffic flow and safety would have required the most property takings. In the initial Task Force meetings, Planning outlined the revised study process and established the role of the Task Force. Planning and the Task Force worked together to develop a scope of work for the study. In early 2004, after a thorough and systematic consultant selection process with substantial Task Force input, LBG was selected to conduct the study. Information: Visit the study website at www.9395info.com and/or contact: Planning Project Manager LBG Project Manager Bob Frey Jim Purdy (617) 973-7449 (781) 707-7435 ~~0 I-93/1-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY Advancement of Highway Alternatives for the I-93/1-95 Interchange - February 2007 After further evaluations, numerous comments received from the public, and continued work with the Interchange Task Force, the consultant team suggested the components of the "l-13" series of highway designs be developed into one of the long term recommendations for improving traffic operations and safety at the I-93/I-95 interchange. The H3 Alternative has two major components: ® Within the Interchange - Replace the northwest and southeast "loop" ramps of the interchange with "direct connection" ramps for Route 128 NB to I-93 NB and for Route 128 SB to I-93 SB. ® Ramps for Washington Street - Modify the on/off ramps at Washington Street and Route 128 NB (Exit 36). Each component has two variations: Within the interchange - ® Ramps Over - First, replace the northwest loop ramp (128 SB to I-93 SB) with a new ramp that goes over both I-93 and Route 128. Also, replace the southeast loop ramp (128 NB to I-93 NB) with a new ramp that goes over both I-93 and Route 128. • Ramp Under - First, replace the northwest loop ramp (128 SB to I-93 SB) with a new ramp that goes under both I-93 and Route 128. Also (as above), replace the southeast loop ramp (128 NB to I-93 NB) with a new ramp that goes over both I-93 and Route 128. Ramps for Washington Street - ■ Split Ramp - The on-ramp would be split to provide one branch to Route 128 northbound and a second branch to I-93 in both directions, eliminating the weaving movement with Route 128 mainline traffic. ■ Relocated Ramps - Both on and off-ramps would be moved further west of existing location, increasing the weaving distance with Route 128 NB mainline traffic. The off- ramp to Washington St. would begin where Rt.128 passes over the railroad tracks. One commercial property would need to be taken. The interchange variations can be mixed and matched with the Washington Street ramp variations, creating four major options that could potentially move forward: • H3-OS: Two flyover ramps with Split ramp at Washington St. (former H3-13) • H3-OR: Two flyover ramps with Relocated ramps for Washington St. (former H3-A) • H3-US: One flyUnder, one flyover with Split ramp at Washington St. • H3-UR: One flyUnder, one flyover with Relocated ramps for Washington (former H3-C) EOT Planning, LBG Page lof 2 2/7/07 q0 I-93/1-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY Characteristics of the Four H3 Alternatives Washington St Ramps: Relocated Ramps Both New Interchange Ramps as Fly-Overs One Ramp Under/ One Ramp Over ■ Lengthens weave from Washington St, but weave remains ■ One commercial building taking plus strip takings ■ Relatively low cost 1-13-OR (formerly H3-A) ■ Steep 6% upgrade on 128NB to 193 NB ■ Traffic functions well ■ Visual impact of two flyovers approx 25 feet above I-93 ■ Small noise impacts ■ Low wetland impact (7k sf) ■ Takings for relocated ramps ■ Moderate construction difficulty ■ Lowest Cost $88 million + right of way) H3-UR (formerly 1-13-C) ■ Steep 6% upgrade on 128NB to 193 NB; 6% downgrade from 128 SB ■ Traffic functions well ■ Slightly lower noise impact ■ Visual impact of single flyover is less ■ More wetland filling (14k sf) ■ Greater construction difficulty with deep boat section and short tunnel ■ Groundwater issues ■ Higher cost ($176 million + right of way) Split Ramps with 1-93 Connector ■ Eliminates weave from Rte 128 - further improves safety ■ No takings ■ Rebuilds Washington St. bridge and improves congested intersections ■ Costs approximately $40 million more than relocated ramps 1-13-OS (formerly 1-13-13) ■ More desirable 3% upgrade ■ Traffic on 128 NB and Washington St. better than OR ■ Visual Impact of two flyovers approx 25 feet above I-93 ■ Small Noise impacts ■ Additional wetlands under structure (3k+ 31k sf) ■ No takings ■ Moderate construction difficulty ■ Moderate cost ($139 million) H3-US ■ More desirable 3% upgrade; 6% downgrade from 128 SB ■ Traffic on 128 NB and Washington St. better than UR ■ Slightly lower noise impact ■ Visual impact of single flyover is less ■ More wetland filling plus wetland under structure (14k + 31k sf) ■ Greater construction difficulty with deep boat section and short tunnel ■ Groundwater issues Highest cost $228 million) All four alternatives: ■ Improved traffic operations ■ Improved safety; 4 major weaves eliminated ■ 40 mph ramp design avoids takings but needs FHWA approval in Environmental phase. EOT Planning, LBG Page 2of 2 2/7/07 i ti 4 C \y MASSAGHU5F ALTERNATIVE H3 - OS and OFExF T4S;P oF»IG» TRAN[5POt2TATIOH \ \ Eliminate Twa Loop Ramps Reconfigure Washington Street Ramps READING WgURN 3: v ~ (13 N a) 4 pry T, oo ° d ❑ 111 swum R-- t , ~,~~zs, 4~-- v d°Mi ~ p o rte' ILL-, ROME _ 4•'r _y ' tSTIN +a-.~'ti ` ~i 12858 \l f.T-1- 8 N3 hbound Ne 121 . \ ~ Chi\' ~ ~ ' 1 9N?•~ID \ ~ ivett 5i ~.r g t 1~ .~.-.J><~_ venue ~i- Olympia N JQ ,rte < LEGEND STONEHAM ROADWAY AT GRADE BRIDGE BOA? SECTION s G BARRIER NUMBER OF TRAVEL LANES , 6 0 0 ~y o a f v RY 1-9311-95 p RELI M I N A artation Study ~•y. January 23, 2007 L 1 interchange Transp IZI r rl f st, m ~ 'G inc. The Louis Berger Group, ~ ALTERNATIVE H3 - UR Eliminate Two Loop Ramps and Relocate Washington Street Ramps a WOBURN U o i E 0 1 f LdoMi~'~wum~'oz~y~,~ i ~c s exit 36 11 I ' i Olympia venue LEGEND AT GRADE ROADWAY BRIDGE - - BOAT SECTION E~ BARRIER @:> NUMBER OF TRAVEL LANES hbound- g ~ fl CSC ~ ~ 1 a 0 m c r . _ tL, A Ly ~ v b~ ll o % I I v a PRELIMINARY O- January 23, 2007 The Louis Berger Group, Inc. SCALE:1•=150' s ~ r~ 4-]~195' MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE - - OF TRANSPORTATION READING Q ~(0 Oil ' ,+2Ar,~ % SF I i §Po =xrt 37 ~ 1114 ! ~ r utl , ~ o F 128 N8 - v ~ oR mp to ~ Q i 00 0 < I, a O~ 1 679/ ;o READING a d STONEHAM STONEHAM U ~i 1-93/1-95 Interchange Transportation Study ~ L ,7 ALTERNATIVE H3- US Eliminate Two Loop Ramps and MASSACHUSETTS S FxEauTiv . OFFICE fl k Reconfigure Washington Street Ramps OF -rRANsPORTATioN ~ l READING WEBURN a rt ° t LdBN11~Y ~WU(f,~~~7 °O' Q ° l`~\``a c5 - ~ t _ - ov pound ~ oast ~ /ss 4 40- Ex t Nb'ftound „mr~ pay 111 r - - FW37 V "0 P ere [ j venue C1yrn 0 Pia s c r~ w G ff~ t0 LEGEND / _I ATGRADEROADWAY STONEHAM BRIDGE p 80A7 SECTION BARRIER e NUMBEROF TRAVEL LANES ARY o P RE L 1 M I v 1-9311-95 23, 2007 January ~ 7 Interchange Transportation Study CZ-1-5 Inc The Louis Berger Group, . 1. i _j t t ! Q~3?u// ~ASSA~U~ iGE QA ~c\i~e ; ~E pS E2~AilO1~i p, TERNXf H3 _ and Two LOOP Ramps s`~~`. Eliminate hington Street Ra \ - - READING Relocate Was a ` \ km call, WOSDRN o t", UMI a \ `2~ ~ t 1j A L j + y C! S t,o,~tiound~n, B p 1CF d IP Exit 37 u T-1-25 Nf)q h unanr+cssntv~''\ ,aan.aa' - \ 1 4`~".~ it p..es.p9 ~!_1"' y ye .5~~ h m EXIT 36 • ~ ~ /r ~ ~ 1 ' 'ot' 8 ti odd --.:a'~~ - T~=-- ----y 'r gq --=""L~` -,.1 4 om£°,'~~'P~jfl _ REA_01NG C ~ ENA Z ~`ymFte venue nr AP~ 11 ~ v y~~,s~ %3 ~'3, 04 STONEHAM LEG UE ROADWAY ATGRA BRIDGE BOAT SECTION v o a Q ~ III BARRIER ? 0 9 I I r~ NUMaER,TRAVELLANE`' \ { o atlOn Study eTransP ' .„r,IMI NARY 23, 2007 lnterchang . PR January ~ ~ I ~ }~.y~Iyp~_1}5~~ GrouP, Inc I The Louis Berger Board of Selectmen Meeting - June 27. 2006 - Page 6 The Town Manager noted that the nonresidents will park at the Anderson Center. The consensus of the Board was to keep all 50 spaces. Vice Chairman James Bonazoli noted that at the previous meeting, Sanbom Street was not discussed. He feels that a hearing should be held for parking changes on Sanborn Street before changing it. Gil Rodrigues asked if the regulations are in effect Monday through Friday or include Saturdays. The Town Manager indicated that it was Monday through Friday. Vice Chainnan James Bonazoli noted that he will add Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. A motion by Goldv seconded by Anthonv to approve changes to the Town of Reading Traffic Rules and Regulations as noted on revised Pages 1. 8, 9, 10. 11, 12, 13. 23, 24. 25, 26,, 27, 30 and 31. all of which is intended to implement the parking regulations from Mondavs through Saturdavs detailed on the map entitled "Proposed Parking Regulations" dated 6- 22-06 and to defer changes to Chapin Avenue 30 minute parking until Julv 25, 2006 was approved by a vote of 5-0-0. Appointment of Town Counsel - The Town Manager noted that a survey was sent out to staff and Boards, Committees and Commissions. He received a good response and the evaluations were good. Brackett & Lucas is doing a good job, they have the resources we need, and they don't over lawyer. Town Counsel expenses are the lowest in the past 20 years. The School Department uses them for contract matters. A motion by Anthonv seconded by Goldv to appoint the firm of Brackett & Lucas of Worcester. MA and Winchester. MA as Town Counsel for a term expiring June 30. 2007 was approved by a vote of 5-0-0. Route 128/93 Follow Un - The Town Manager noted that the Town needs to develop positions and conditions to propose at a hearing that will take place in the Fall. He also noted that if they are talking about an underpass or an overpass, the Town will be in favor of an underpass because it has less impact. The Town will also look at how much of a lane drop that Mass Highway is looking at and where it is being dropped. Selectman Camille Anthony noted that they will want to know the affect on the Town's local roads. Selectman Richard Schubert noted that a handout was given at the last meeting that included non-highway enhancements, and that is what the community wants to support. The Town Manager noted that the "Big Dig" funded the Anderson Transportation Center. Chairman Ben Tafoya noted that there has been incredible growth since 1970 when the highway was built and the problem is not just design. The Town Manager noted that Route 95 was supposed to go into Boston but it never happened. We are trying to manage the growth of the region. One suggestion is to expand the rail service. Y0 Board of Selectmen Meetiniz - June 27. 2006 - Page 7 Selectman Camille Anthony noted that noise barriers need to be included in the list of issues. Chairman Ben Tafoya indicated that he wants to look at the issue of the lane drop, and Selectman Stephen Goldy noted that the impact on the neighborhoods has to be considered. The Town Manager noted that he will go back and develop a list of positions and conditions and bring it back to the Board. Approval of Minutes A. motion by Anthonv seconded by Schubert to approve the Minutes of Mav 23. 2006 was approved by a vote of 5-0-0. A motion by Anthonv seconded by Bonazoli to adiourn the meetine of June 27. 2006 at 10:00 p.m. was approved by a vote of 5-0-0. Respectfully submitted, Secretary yC) / o Review docs for next 93/95 ITF Meeting 2/28 in Woburn Page 1 of 2 2, 21.-CA Hechenbleikner, Peter O. From: Frey, Bob (EOT) [Bob. Frey@state.ma.us] ' / R~ Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 3:54 PM 6 To: Corey, John; Schubert, Rick; Anthony, Camille; Barnes, Jonathan; Bruen, Darlene; Casey, Paul; Clarke, Dennis; Cosgrove, Joe; DiBlasi, Joe; Durrant, Ian; Everson, Jeff; Festa, Mike; Florino, Ron; Gallagher, Jim; Grover, Robert; Grzegorzewski, Josh; Hamblin, Eileen; Havern, Robert; Jones, Bradley; Katsoufis, George; Kennedy, Anthony; Kinsman, Art; Leiner, Craig; Mayo, Rich; McLaughlin, Tom; Meaney, Paul; Medeiros, Paul; Molter, Andy; Natale, Patrick; Ragucci, David; Rogers, Maureen A.; Smith, Suzanne; Stinson, Richard; Sullivan, Dan; Tarallo, Ed; Tisei, Richard; Webster, Bill Cc: Blaustein, Joan; Callan, Melissa (HOU); Chong, Michael; Cooke, Don; DiSarcina, Tony; Draisen, Mark (MAPC); Edwards, Adriel (EOT); Frey, Bob (EOT); Harwood, Tracey (Mayor McLaughlin); Town Manager; Lindstrom, Michael (SEN); Martel, Justin (HOU); McKinnon, Anne; McLaughlin, Thomas; McVann, John; Medeiros, Paul (work); Miller, Kenneth (EOT); O'Rourke, Carmen (HOU); Purdy, Jim; Pyke, Keri; Schwartz, Bill; Stein, Kathy; Tafoya, Ben; VanMagness, Frederick (HOU) Subject: Review docs for next 93/95 ITF Meeting 2/28 in Woburn Attachments: ITF 2007 02-28 meeting agenda.doc; ITF 2007 02-07 summary.doc; 9395 DRAFT report sections.doc Hello Again, As promised, here are some review documents for next week's Task Force meeting: 1) ITF 2/28 Agenda 2) ITF 2/7 Meeting Summary - especially for those of you not in attendance at this last meeting, please review this summary fully in order that we can limit our review of past actions and concentrate on the current agenda items. 3) DRAFT study report sections (Agenda Item #2): This should be viewed as a ROUGH DRAFT, in general outline form, of the major topics to be covered in the report. It also provides a synopsis of the issues discussed at the 2/15 TDM subcommittee meeting. For those of you interested in review of this document, graphics and formatting are removed.for clarity and file size at this point - review should focus on coverage of topics (not necessarily the level of detail, as this will change, too.) «ITF 2007 02-28 meeting agenda.doc>> «ITF 2007 02-07 summary.doc>> «9395 DRAFT report sections.doc>> We will discuss it all at next week's meeting - see you then... Thanks, Bob From: Frey, Bob (EOT) Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 11:37 AM To: ' Corey, John'; 'Schubert, Rick'; 'Anthony, Camille'; 'Barnes, Jonathan'; 'Bruen, Darlene'; 'Casey, Paul'; 'Clarke, Dennis'; 'Cosgrove, Joe', • 'DiBlasi, Joe', • 'Durrant, Ian', • 'Everson, Jeff, • Testa, Mike', ' 'Florino, Ron', ' 'Gallagher, Jim'; 'Grover, Robert; 'Grzegorzewski, Josh'; , 'Hamblin, Eileen'; 'Havern, Robert'; 'Jones, Bradley; 'Katsoufis, George'; 'Kennedy, Anthony'; 'Kinsman, Art'; 'Leiner, Craig'; 'Mayo, Rich'; 'McLaughlin, Tom'; 'Meaney, Paul'; 'Medeiros, Paul'; 'Molter, Andy'; 'Natale, Patrick'; 'Ragucci, David'; 'Rogers, Maureen A.'; 'Smith, Suzanne'; 'Stinson, Richard'; 'Sullivan, Dan'; Tarallo, Ed'; Tisei, Richard'; 'Webster, Bill' yDI 2/22/2007 Review docs for next 93/95 ITF Meeting 2/28 in Woburn Page 2 of 2 Cc: 'Biaustein, Joan'; 'Callan, Melissa (HOU)'; 'Chong, Michael'; 'Cooke, Don'; 'DiSarcina, Tony'; Draisen, Mark (MAPC); Edwards, Adriel (EOT); Frey, Bob (EOT); 'Harwood, Tracey (Mayor McLaughlin)'; 'Hechenblikner, Peter; Lindstrom, Michael (SEN); Martel, Justin (HOU); 'McKinnon, Anne'; 'McLaughlin, Thomas'; 'McVann, John'; 'Medeiros, Paul (work)'; Miller, Kenneth (EOT); O'Rourke, Carmen (HOU); 'Purdy, Jim'; 'Pyke, Keri'; 'Schwartz, Bill'; 'Stein, Kathy'; 'Tafoya, Ben'; VanMagness, Frederick (HOU) Subject: Next 93/95 ITF Meeting 2/28 in Woburn Greetings Task Force Members: Just a reminder that the next meeting of the.1-93/1-95 Interchange Task Force will be: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 4:30 PM - 7:00 PM Shamrock Elementary School Green Street Woburn * * * Agenda and other review materials will be sent later this week * * * Thanks, Bob Bob Frey Manager of Statewide Planning Office of Transportation Planning Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation (617) 973-7449 bob.frey@eot.state.ma.us yo iz 2/22/2007 THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS iff ~Y~~Lv'o EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF TRANSPORTATION -Ll DEVAL L. PATRICK 1-93 /1-95 INTERCHANGE GOVERNOR TRANSPORTATION STUDY TitwoTHY P. MURRAY LIELHENANr GovERNcR BERNARD C011UN TASK FORCE MEETING SECRETARY Wednesday, February 28, 2007 . 4:30 PM - 7:00 PM Shamrock Elementary School Green Street Woburn, MA 01801 MEETING AGENDA 1. Welcome and Administrative Items 4:30 2. Recommendation Package - DRAFT Report Sections 4:45 (Report of TDM subcommittee, land use, congestion, ITS, HOV, costs, etc.) 3. Narrowing Down Preferred Highway Recommendations 5:15 (Over vs. under evaluation and discussion, primary/secondary choice forward, etc.) 4. Preparation for Public Meeting #3 / Other Business 6:15 (Newsletter, other promotions, meeting format, etc.) 5. Extra Session: Additional Coverage of Agenda Items 6:30 Note: If needed, this session will be used for additional discussion of agenda items beyond the basic coverage in their scheduled time slots. TEN PARK PLAZA, BOSTON, MA 02116-3969 qo13 TELEPHONE: (617) 973-7000 TELEFAX (617) 523-6454 • TDD: (617) 973-7306 • WWW.MASS.GOV/EOT I-93/1-95 Interchange Transportation Study Task Force Meeting Wednesday, February 7, 2007 4:30 PM Stoneham Town Hall Stoneham, Massachusetts Attendance Task Force Members and Public who signed in: Jonathan Barnes Reading CPDC Darlene Bruen Dennis Clarke Cummings Properties Jay Corey Ian Durrant MassRIDES Jim Gallagher Eileen Hamblin Board of Realtors George Katsoufis Tony Kennedy Stoneham Selectman Justin Martell Tom McLaughlin Woburn Mayor . Paul Medeiros Rick Schubert Reading Selectman Ed Tarallo Bill Webster THAG Doug Wood-Boyle George Zambouras Reading DPW Executive Office of Transportation staff: Bob Frey Manager of Statewide Planning, Study Project Manager Adriel Edwards Planning Consultant team: Jim Purdy Rick Azzalina Anne McKinnon Keri Pyke Tony DiSarcina Louis Berger Group (Project Manager) Louis Berger Group (Engineering) Howard/Stein-Hudson (Public Participation) Howard/Stein-Hudson (Traffic) Howard/Stein-Hudson (Engineering) Meeting Summarv Welcome and Administrative Items Woburn City Council Woburn City Engineer MAPC Reading Citizen Rep. Rep. Brad Jones Woburn Citizen Rep. Woburn Planning Dir. Daily Times Chronicle Bob Frey welcomed everyone to the latest I-93/I-95 Interchange Transportation Study Task Force meeting and thanked Stoneham for hosting. In accordance with EOT's policy of an open study process, all Task Force meetings are open to the public, but agenda items are discussed first with Task Force members. Bob reminded attendees to refer to the study web site (www.9395info.com) for the latest information. There were no comments on the January 17th meeting summary. Bob indicated that the main purpose of today's meeting is to compare the four highway alternatives and narrow down to two, and discuss how the remaining alternatives would be further evaluated, debated, and carried forward. Office of Transportation Planning Page 1 of 7 Printed: 2/22/2007 ~b I-93/I-95 Interchange Task Force Meeting of February 7, 2007 Review and Update of Process and Proiect Considerations Bob Frey reported on the continued coordination between EOT, the consultant team, and the implementing agencies to facilitate the transition to the environmental phase. He reminded the group that the final decisions on the highway components will be made in the environmental phase. The team had another meeting with FHWA and MassHighway staff, and LBG had further refined the "H3" set of alternatives in response to many of their comments. Issues discussed with those agencies included: ramp design speeds, traffic flow and safety, constructability, wetlands permitting and mitigation, noise barriers, vertical clearance, maintenance issues, ROW and takings, context sensitive design, and design exceptions. The environmental process considers all of these factors to choose the "least environmentally damaging, practicable alternative." FHWA will ultimately determine the acceptability of the highway designs, but will not do so until the environmental phase, after more analyses are done. Bob explained that Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) typically requires agencies to study more than one alternative, especially for large projects like the interchange. Bob reminded the group that LBG will prepare the ENF (Environmental Notification Form) - the first step in the state environmental process - as part of its existing contract. For highway improvements, MassHighway would be the primary funding agency, working through the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) process. Bob also reminded members of the Task Force of their opportunity to stay involved through the environmental process by participating in a Citizens Advisory Committee. Darlene Bruen asked whether FHWA considers task force recommendations. She asked Bob to discuss his experience with FHWA on other projects. Bob said FHWA carefully considers task force and public input, but each project is different. Currently, there is a productive debate underway with some differences of opinion within FHWA and MassHighway, and progress is being made. For example, on the issue of the design speed of the semi-direct ramps, EOT and MassHighway are discussing a design exception. In response to a question from Bill Webster, Bob confirmed that meetings with FHWA and MassHighway have indeed been joint meetings. George Katsoufis asked if refined estimates of the transit mode share, to be completed soon by CTPS, could be incorporated. Bob said the study used the latest assumptions available at the time for its analysis. The environmental study may investigate assumptions again if needed. Deciding on Preferred Hiehwav Recommendations Bob Frey mentioned that EOT and the consultant team had developed a new naming convention for the H3 alternatives. The names are now more descriptive of the changes that each proposes. Following additional evaluation, comments from the public, and continued work with the Task Force,'the consultant team suggested the H3 series of highway should be thought of as having two components: Within the Interchange-Replace the northwest and southeast "loop" ramps of the interchange with "direct connection" ramps for Rte. 128 NB to I-93 NB and for Rte. 128 SB to I-93 SB. • Ramps for Washington Street-Modify the on/off ramps at Washington Street and Rte. 128 NB (Exit 36). Office of Transportation Planning Page 2 of 7 Printed: 2/22/2007 I~ I-93/1-95 Interchange Task Force Each component has two variations: Within the interchange - Meeting of February 7, 2007 ■ Both Ramps Over - Replace the northwest loop ramp (Rte. 128 SB to I-93 SB) with a new ramp that goes over both I-93 and Rte. 128. Replace the southeast loop ramp (Rte. 128 NB to I-93 NB) with a new ramp that goes over both I-93 and Rte. 128. ■ One of the Ramps Under - Replace the northwest loop ramp (Rte. 128 SB to I-93 SB) with a new ramp that goes under both I-93 and Rte. 128. As above, replace the southeast loop ramp (Rte. 128 NB to I-93 NB) with a new ramp that goes over both I-93 and Rte. 128. Ramos for Washington Street - Split Ramp - Through traffic continuing on Rte. 128 NB would stay to the left and traffic bound for Washington Street or I-93 would stay right. The off-ramp to Washington Street would lead to a connector road to I-93 in both directions. The on-ramp from Washington Street would be split to provide one branch to Rte. 128 NB and one branch to the I-93 connector road. In this way, mainline Rte. 128 NB traffic would not have to weave with I-93 or Washington Street traffic. ■ Relocated Ramps - The on- and off-ramps would be moved west of existing location, increasing the weaving distance with Rte. 128 NB traffic. The off-ramp to Washington Street would begin where Rt.128 passes over the railroad tracks. One commercial building would need to be taken, plus some strip takings for access. The interchange variations can be mixed and matched with the Washington Street ramp variations, creating four major options: • H3-OS: Two flyover ramps with Split ramp at Washington St. (former H3-B) • H3-OR: Two flyover ramps with Relocated ramps for Washington St. (former H3-A) • H3-US: One flyUnder, one flyover with Split ramp at Washington St. • H3-UR: One flyUnder, one flyover with Relocated ramps for Washington (former H3-C) All four alternatives: Improved traffic operations Improved safety; 4 major weaves eliminated 40 mph ramp design avoids takings but needs FHWA approval in environmental phase The following table summarizes the characteristics of the four alternatives: Office of Transportation Planning Page 3 of 7 Printed: 2/22/2007 yot& I-93/1-95 Interchange Task Force Characteristics of the Four H3 Alternatives: Washington St Ramps Relocated Ramps Both New Interchange Ramps as Fly-Overs One Ramp Under/One Ramp Over ■ Lengthens weave from. Washington St., but weave remains • One commercial building taking plus strip takings ■ Relatively low cost H3-OR (formerly H3-A) • Steep 6% upgrade on Rte. 128 NB to 1-93 NB ■ Traffic functions well ■ Visual impact of two flyovers approx 25 feet above 1-93 ■ Small noise impacts ■ Low wetland impact (7k s.f.) ■ Takings for relocated ramps ■ Moderate construction difficulty ■ Lowest cost $88 million + right of way) H3-UR (formerly H3-C) ■ Steep 6% upgrade on Rte. 128 NB to 1-93 NB; 6% downgrade from Rte. 128 SB ■ Traffic functions well ■ Slightly lower noise impact ■ Visual impact of single flyover is less ■ More wetland filling (14k s.f.) ■ Greater construction difficulty with deep boat section and short tunnel ■ Groundwater issues ■ Higher cost ($176 million + right of way) Meeting of February 7, 2007 Split Ramps with 1-93 Connector ■ Eliminates weave from Rte 128 - further improves safety ■ No takings ■ Rebuilds Washington St. bridge and improves congested intersections ■ Costs approximately $40 million more than relocated ramps` H3-OS (formerly H3-B) ■ More desirable 3% upgrade ■ Traffic on Rte. 128 NB and Washington St. better than OR ■ Visual Impact of two flyovers approx 25 feet above 1-93 ■ Small Noise impacts ■ Additional wetlands under structure (3k+ 31 k s.f.) ■ No takings ■ Moderate construction difficulty ■ Moderate cost ($139 million) H3-US ■ More desirable 3% upgrade; 6% downgrade from Rte. 128 SB ■ Traffic on Rte. 128 NB and Washington St. better than UR • Slightly lower noise impact ■ Visual impact of single flyover is less ■ More wetland filling plus wetland under structure (14k + 31 k s.f.) ■ Greater construction difficulty with deep boat section and short tunnel ■ Groundwater issues ■ Highest cost (-$228 million) Jonathan Barnes asked why the split ramp versions have two lanes for Rte. 128 NB to I-93 NB and the relocated ramp versions have one lane for this connection. Rick Azzalina explained that it is a lane-balancing issue. Jim Purdy elaborated, saying that traffic operations improve when two lanes are provided for Rte. 128 NB to I-93 NB in the split ramp scheme. The two lanes are not needed for capacity, but to give drivers time to sort themselves out. Since the relocated ramps are longer, drivers have the time they need to sort themselves out before the connector road splits between I-93 NB and I-93 SB. Ed Tarallo asked for confirmation that the team tested traffic operations. Rick Schubert asked for confirmation that the one-lane, ramp would provide sufficient capacity. Jim confirmed that traffic operations were tested and work well for both configurations. Keri Pyke confirmed that one lane provides sufficient capacity. Jonathan Barnes asked about the visual impact of the two-lane ramp. Rick Azzalina said a two-lane ramp would be 14-feet wider than a single-lane ramp. Only a sliver of land over the property line is required for the split ramp scheme, but this would not affect any business. Rick Schubert expressed concern that an accident would cause a back-up on the one-lane ramp. Rick Azzalina said the ramp would include a breakdown lane and would be 22 feet wide. Rick Schubert expressed Office of Transportation Planning Page 4 of 7 Printed: 2/22/200V! 7 I-93/1-95 Interchange Task Force Meeting of February 7, 2007 concern about the elevation of the flyover from Rte. 128 NB to I-93 NB in the H3-OR and 113- OS configurations where the ramp goes over the ramp from Rte. 128 SB to I-93 NB. He expressed concern about its height and proximity to South Street. Bill Webster noted that those ramps would be closer to the property line. Rick Azzalina said that it may be possible to bring the Rte. 128 NB to I-93 NB ramp to I-93 before the Rte. 128 SB to I-93 NB ramp, as it is done in the H3-UR and H3-US configurations. Berger will prepare a cross-section at this location to show the relationship to South Street. Rick Schubert asked what the grades of the Exit 37C ramps are. Jim Purdy will provide this. Dennis Clarke asked about the width of the Rte. 128 NB ramp as it joins I-93 NB. Rick Azzalina said the ramp becomes one lane when it joins I-93 at the tangent. George Katsoufis asked why MassHighway is concerned about a boat section in the interchange area and not the boat section at the Washington Street ramps. Jim Purdy explained that the boat section in the interchange would be considerably deeper than at Washington Street and more difficult to build, being under I-93. Jay Corey commented that the relocated ramp configurations result in a 6% upgrade on the Rte. 128 NB to I-93 NB ramps, whereas the split-ramp scheme results in a more desirable 3% upgrade. Jim Purdy explained that the profiles of the ramps in the relocated ramp configurations are tied to Rte. 128. In the split ramp scheme, the climb can begin sooner. Jim Gallagher noted that the grade difference is also significant in terms of noise and air pollution, as trucks work harder and create more noise and air pollution when they go up steep grades. He referenced recent reports citing the health effects of living near highways and asked if the proposed ramps were closer to houses. He said no ramp should be closer to even one home. Jim Purdy said this is a relevant but complicated matter that has a number of other related issues tied up With it, such as the rate of dispersion of particulates, etc. He will ask the team's air quality consultant, K. M. Cling, for guidance. Rick Schubert asked how the vertical clearance would be accommodated at the Washington Street ramps. Rick Azzalina said the ramp to Rte. 128 from Washington Street is virtually at- grade and the I-93 connector goes under the ramp below grade. Jim Gallagher asked how long drivers have to decide whether to go right for I-93 or left for Rte. 128 when they enter the highway from Washington Street. Rick Azzalina said the ramp at Washington Street is one lane for 500 feet, so drivers have adequate time to decide, and signage will be provided. Ed Tarallo asked if the traffic would back up onto Washington Street. No. The level of service on the ramp is expected to be LOS C and D. Ed Tarallo and Jay Corey stated their preference for the split ramp configurations because of the more desirable grades, lack of business takings, and improved traffic operations. Dennis Clarke and Jim Gallagher also stated their preference for the split ramp configurations. Rick Schubert stressed that for safety considerations and the needs of emergency response vehicles, he prefers the two-lane fly-overs provided for in the split ramp configurations. He contrasted fly-overs with at-grade sections where emergency vehicles have room on the side of the road. He reiterated his concern, however, for the height of the fly-over and its proximity to South Street in the split ramp configurations.. He encouraged creative work from the consultant on this issue, which he considers to be the biggest issue for Reading. There was a consensus amonu those Present that the split-ramp schemes are the preferred alternatives. Office of Transportation Planning Page 5 of 7 Printed: 2/22/2007 / 0 1 I-93/I-95 Interchange Task Force Meeting of February 7, 2007 Darlene Bruen requested more visual aids of the ramps at Washington Street. Jim Purdy said the ramps are almost at-grade and would not be more visible than other surface roadways in the area. Other Items for Recommendation Package Jim Purdy reviewed a handout of the transit and TDM recommendations, noting that the final report and recommendations will refer to the improvements as a package of highway, transit/TDM, and policy recommendations. George Katsoufis noted that the consultant team said that three additional train sets would be needed for the proposed additional service. He said the MBTA is in the process of buying new commuter rail cars (75 bi-level coaches and 38 diesel locomotives) and suggested that this study try to capitalize on the timing of this procurement by including the rolling stock needed in this order to save money (editor's note: the estimate for three additional train sets has since been revised due to the recent expansion of service on the Lowell line). He stressed that he would like to see a political commitment to the transit side of the solution. Bob Frey said he would discuss this with Joe Cosgrove at the MBTA. The revised estimated cost of the transit and TDM measures as proposed are: Estimated Estimated first Total Cost capital costs year operating millions) millions) costs millions) Transit $ 16.9 $ 4.1 $ 21.0 TDM $ 3.3 $ 3.0 $ 6.3 Rick Schubert stated that fully restored service at the Mishawum commuter rail station should be a requirement, not a recommendation. Ed Tarallo agreed and said that the density of the proposed development meets the threshold for the MBTA to consider restoring full service. Jim Gallagher requested that the pedestrian bridge across the tracks to ARTC (described by Paul Meaney at the last Task Force meeting) be included specifically under item 2B. Plans for a pedestrian connection were drawn when plans for the station were being developed. Jay Corey and Rick Schubert said the New Boston Street Bridge, a proposed regional connector, should be also included. Tony Kennedy asked whether parking garages were being considered. He said there are other stations that could use parking improvements and Stoneham could use a park-and-ride lot. Ed Tarallo said Woburn would support a parking deck at ARTC. Ian Durrant asked about providing MBTA bus service to Anderson; there is already an MBTA bus to Mishawum. Bob Frey said these issues could be discussed in more detail at the TDM subcommittee meeting February 16. Finally, Tony Kennedy asked that we tell people at the public meeting how many vehicles are projected to be taken off the road by the increases in transit and TDM measures. Jim Purdy briefly reviewed "Managing Corridor Congestion," a document addressing long-range solutions to "fill the gap" after transit and TDM measures have been implemented to meet future travel demand and help keep regional traffic off local roadways: • ITS (Intelligent Transportation Svstems): information systems to respond to accidents; regulating the rate vehicles enter the highway system; and variable speed limits to optimize traffic flow. Office of Transportation Planning Page 6 of 7 Printed: 2/22/2007 I-93/I-95 Interchange Task Force Meeting of February 7, 2007 Additional long-ranize measure to increase transit use and HOV use: Additional commuter rail and rapid transit parking; expanded bus service in the Rte. 128 corridor; and HOV lanes in the I-93 and Rte. 128 corridors. • Land-use policies that help reduce the overall demand in the I-93 and Rte. 128 corridors, beginning with the MAPC MetroFuture recommendations. Preparation for Public Meeting #3 / Other Business Bob Frey said that the third public informational meeting would be held at the Woburn Memorial High School on March 21. The format would be similar to the two previous public meetings, with an open house starting at 6 PM, a presentation at 7 PM followed by Q&A, then the open house would resume until 9 PM. A newsletter providing succinct information will be sent to the mailing list of people who have been interested in the study and/or have attended a meeting. Task Force members will be provided with newsletters to distribute as was done previously. George Katsoufis requested that we describe and illustrate that there are many different users on Rte. 128. Bob agreed, and said that this information could be pulled from the "white paper" on congestion previously prepared. Jim Gallagher asked if the goal of the public meeting is to present proposed recommendations of the planning study. Jim Purdy said yes, and at the Task Force meeting on February 28, we will review the information to be presented at the public meeting. This might include a recommendation for the OS (two elevated ramps/flyovers) or US scheme (one below-grade ramp/flyunder and one elevated ramp). Bob said it would be ideal to decide on a preferred alternative, but the public meeting will not be deferred if this is not resolved. Mayor Tom McLaughlin suggested inviting the Secretary of Transportation or another top transportation official if a major pronouncement is going to be made. Rick Schubert asked if the Task Force would meet after the March 21 public meeting. Jim Purdy said yes, the Task Force will assist in the review of the public meeting and will review portions of the draft planning report. Tony Kennedy asked if this project will automatically go into the environmental phase. Bob Frey said the ENF will be prepared under the existing LBG contract. After the ENF is filed, a request for proposals would probably be issued to prepare the Environmental Impact Statement/Report for the entire interchange improvement program. Jim Purdy asked Task Force members for opinions on whether the designs from the previous study should be shown to demonstrate the improvements and differences - especially now that takings are avoided in the new designs. George Katsoufis suggested we be prepared to talk about all previous schemes. Dennis Clarke recommended having the previous alternatives available for the Q&A and open house sessions. Rick Schubert agreed and said if the previous designs are part of the presentation, some might think they are still on the table. Schedule for Other Uncomin2 Meetings Bob Frey said the TDM Subcommittee will meet in Boston on February 16. The next Task Force meeting will be held on February 28 at the Shamrock School in Woburn. The meeting adjourned at 6:50 PM. Office of Transportation Planning Page 7 of 7 Printed: 2/22/2007 y I-93/I-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY Executive Summary [one-page synopsis] 1. Introduction DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY Why is it important to improve the 1-9311-95 Interchange? System Interchange Solving the problems at the I-93/1-95 interchange is a high priority for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The I-93/I-95 interchange is the funnel for the "commute-shed" north and northeast of Boston. It is the principal interchange between two of New England's interstate highways, Interstate Route 93- which connects Boston to the northern tier of cities and towns and New Hampshire- and Interstate Route 95- the' major spine which connects all of the states on the eastern seaboard. I-95 (Route 128) is the beltway that serves a large proportion of the metropolitan area's residents with access to major employment and shopping centers. [Figure 14Regional system, interchange map] Very high volumes The interchange processes more traffic than any other in Massachusetts, and more than any in the New England region as well. In 2004 a total of 377,500 vehicles used the interchange on an average weekday. Entering volumes ranged from 83,000 per weekday on Route 128 southbound to 105,000 vehicles on I-93 northbound. Figure 1-2,-Interchange Volumes, 2004: High accident rate The I-93/I-95 interchange is consistently one of the top 10 locations in Massachusetts in terms of number of accidents. This is due in part to the very high traffic volumes that use the interchange, but controlling for volume, the interchange has the highest accident rate of any cloverleaf interchange in Massachusetts. Accidents are discussed in more detail in Section 2. Figure 1-3 Pattern of Accidents at the Interchange, 2604 Needed: A Design that is Sensitive to it Surroundings EOT Planning, LBG 9395 DRAFT report sections.doc Page I O Z~ 2/22/07 q I-93/1-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY [Street level photos The municipal boundaries of the City of Woburn and the towns of Reading and Stoneham come together at the interchange. Residential properties directly abut the highway right of way in these three quadrants. Understandably, residents of these neighborhoods are concerned by the possibility of property takings to expand the interchange and by existing noise, visual, and air quality impacts and local traffic. The area in the southwest quadrant of the interchange and immediately to the west is a major regional business district with shopping, offices, and light industrial and warehouse uses. Direct, reliable local access is of greatest concern to the City of Woburn and the businesses within this area. There are also residential enclaves within this largely business area which share the concerns of the other neighborhoods in the local focus area. Several local streets receive impacts from traffic which diverts from the interstate highways due to congestion. Most affected streets are Route 129, Main Street, South Street and West Street in Reading; Route 28 and Montvale Avenue in Stoneham, and Washington Street, Mishawum Road, and Olympia Avenue in Woburn. [Figure 1 4:Oblique aerial of interchange Background The Commonwealth's Role The Executive Office of Transportation, Office of transportation Planning (EOT Planning) is directing the I-93/I-95 Interchange Transportation Study. EOT is working in cooperation with the Massachusetts Highway Department (MassHighway), which maintains the state's highways, constructs improvements, and collects data on traffic volumes and accidents. The Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is vested by federal and state law with the responsibility of setting priorities for transportation projects and programming the available funding for these projects. Previous MassHighway Design Study From 2000 to 2002, MassHighway directed a design feasibility study of improvements to the I-93/1-95 interchange. This study received strong opposition in all three municipalities owing in part to residential takings that would have resulted from the proposed interchange alternatives. The alternatives studied that best improved traffic flow and safety would have required the most property takings. There was also dissatisfaction with the extent of public involvement in the feasibility study. In September 2002, MassHighway suspended the feasibility study, and EOT Planning was directed to lead a revised effort with an advisory task force. EOT Planning and the EOT Planning, LBG 9395 DRAFT report sections.doc Page 2 2/22/07 I-93/I-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY Task Force worked together to develop a scope of work for the study. In early 2004, after a thorough and systematic consultant selection process with substantial Task Force input, a team led by the Louis Berger Group (LBG) and Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates (HSH) was selected to conduct the study. Roadmap for the Study The I-93/1-95 Interchange Study is a planning study that is not limited to engineering solutions. It considers both the local and regional context of the interchange, and it emphasizes public involvement. The study consists of the following steps: 1. Establish a framework for the study 2. Develop an understanding of the problem 3. Propose alternatives to fix the problem 4. Evaluate the alternatives 5. Make recommendations Establishing a framework for the study results in the definition of specific goals and objectives. Evaluation criteria will result from the defined goals and objectives. These criteria are specific considerations to assess benefits and impacts of alternatives developed during the study. Such criteria commonly include: Traffic congestion, safety, environmental impacts, economicibusiness considerations, neighborhood impacts, land use, and cost. To fully understand the problems, current and future conditions are evaluated. Criteria for evaluation commonly include: mobility, safety, environmental impacts, economic/business considerations, neighborhood impacts, land use, and cost. Then alternatives are developed, analyzed, and evaluated with stakeholders, which lead to recommendations. This standard approach helps to ensure that full, thoughtful, and participatory consideration is given to transportation issues before federal, state, or local resources are committed. With planning studies, this applies not only to potential highway projects but to transit projects and other multi-modal and transportation enhancement efforts as well. It is important to understand that the I-93/I-95 Interchange Study is the first of five phases to remedy problems at the interchange. These steps are shown in Figure The first step following the study will be a detailed environmental analysis based on preliminary design of highway improvements and other transportation actions such as transit and transportation demand management (TDM). Although environmental impacts were considered and conceptual engineering was done in the current planning study, the scope of both these activities is necessarily less than needed to satisfy environmental regulations in the following step. Therefore, the conclusions of the planning study are preliminary and must be tested and further developed in the following step. The recommendations in Chapter 5 reflect this and include specific items requiring further engineering and environmental work. EOT Planning, LBG 9395 DRAFT report sections.doc Page 3 dZ3 2/22/07 L I-93/I-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY [Figure 1=5 `Phases in improving the interchange DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY Public Involvement Process EOT is committed to providing meaningful public involvement throughout the study. This process was led by Howard/Stein-Hudson Associates. The process has two major parts: In-depth work with the Interchange Task Force representing state and local officials, citizens, businesses, and agencies. Two-way communication with the wider public Interchange Task Force The Interchange Task Force (ITF) met approximately monthly with EOT Planning and the Consultants in meeting that were open to the public and frequently reported in newspapers and television. A total of _ meetings were held, including meetings with task-oriented subcommittees of the ITF. Summaries of all meetings were posted soon afterward on the project website. The members of the task force are acknowledged on page Input from the ITF meetings was an important part of the study process, and the consultant team and EOT maintained a list of issues and requests for information that arose in the task force meetings, and responded to these items as the study went forward. As noted in subsequent chapters, the ITF played a substantive role in shaping the study and its outcome. ITF members agreed at an early date on a set of ground rules to govern the meetings, and these norms were observed throughout the study. [ITF meeting photo] [public nneeting,photo] Involving the Wider Public In order to provide information to the wider public and receive input from them, a series of mechanisms was used: ■ Public meetings were held in April and October 2006 and March 2007. The meetings respectively presented information about the problem, alternatives and their evaluation, and proposed recommendations. Meetings were well attended, ranging from 150 - 250 people at each "open house" event. There was ample time at each meeting for questions and responses. ■ Newsletters were prepared in advance of each meeting, distributed at the meetings, and posted to the website. ■ Media Coverage. EOT worked with the media to provide access and information for reporters. ITF meetings and public meetings were regularly reported in detail in the Woburn Chronicle, Stoneham Sun, and in some instances the Boston Globe. EOT Planning, LBG 9395 DRAFT report sections.doc Page 4 2/22/07 1-93/1-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY Website. A study website, www.9395info.com. was established early on and has remained a focal point of public involvement. This website carries all the latest infonnation, including: meeting announcements, background of the study, downloadable project documents and images, including summaries of all meetings, and contact information for the study team and the ITF. The website permits visitors to post comments and view the comments of others. Objectives Early in the study, the ITF worked with the consultants to develop goals and objectives. Selected objectives are listed below. Of major importance were the objectives to work within the existing right-of-way and avoid takings, particularly of residences. • Improve traffic flow in and around the I-93/1-95 interchange. • Improve safety for motorists. • Maintain local access and improve traffic conditions on local streets. • Improve mobility through multi-modal and other transportation strategies • Meet transportation goals without sacrificing quality of life for area communities. o Minimize noise impacts on adjacent residences and other sensitive receptors. o Relieve impacts of cut-through traffic on neighborhoods and business districts. o. Design improvements within the existing right-of-way o Avoid residential and business property takings. o Minimize negative economic effects to tax bases, and enhance local and regional economic activity where possible. o Minimize visual impacts on the communities and enhance the visual environment where possible. o Maintain community and business district connections and access, including automobile, truck, emergency vehicle, bicycle and pedestrian access, and make improvements where possible. o Consider quality of life costs as well as financial costs. • Protect and enhance the natural and cultural environment. • Develop recommendations that can be implemented efficiently. • The study will continue to be conducted through an open and inclusive process. • Provide justification for any additional recommended actions over and above what analyses show is necessary 2. Defining the Problem The problems that need to be addressed at the I-93/1-95 Interchange can be summarized as follows: EOT Planning, LBG 9395 DRAFT report sections.doc Page 5 o~ 2/22/07 q I-93/I-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY Congestion High traffic volumes and substandard roadway geometry result in poor levels of service and substantial congestion in peak travel periods. As a consequence, speeds are reduced, travel though the study area is delayed, and some traffic diverts to local streets to bypass the interchange area. Because of land use growth which is expected to occur over the next 20 years, the already traffic volumes will increase substantially, with demand growing more than 20 percent on the interstate highways and 30 percent or more on the heavily traveled local routes. The principal cause of backups in the interchange area is weaving traffic within the interchange and between it and the adjacent interchanges at Route 28 and Washington St/ Mishawum Road. Both observed and modeled traffic congestion begins at the Route 128 southbound weave under I-93 and cascades around the interchange until gridlock occurs. This situation will become worse with the projected traffic growth. An additional problem is the lane drop from four lanes to three on Route 128 northbound just past I-93, causing backups through the interchange area. Analysis and modeling of Route 128 traffic suggests that traffic will continue to be close to highway capacity in the future, with excess demand diverting or traveling earlier or later to avoid the peak periods. With volumes close to capacity, accidents and breakdowns cause major backups and delays. However, Route 128 does process the large volumes of traffic at reduced speed, and the problems in the study area is not the consequence of traffic backing up from downstream but rather is one of a series of congested areas which has particular importance because it affects traffic to and from I- 93 as well. Any improvement in the interchange area will benefit travel on both highways and not be negated by downstream congestion on Route 128. In effect, every segment of Route 128 is a separate problem area, and improvement of the interchange area will benefit the portion of each trip that includes that section. Safety The I-93/I-95 interchange has one of the highest accident totals in the state on a consistent basis, and, controlling for traffic volumes, it has the highest accident rate of any similar interchange in the state. Major causes of accidents are the congested weaving sections and substandard acceleration and deceleration lanes at on- and off-ramps. Accident clusters occur at these conflict points, particularly where visibility is limited. The key to improving safety at the interchange is to bring as many of these conflict areas up to current geometric standards. Weaves are major conflict points that could be eliminated in some alternatives. Speed differentials between fast and slow lanes increase hazards and may also be improved by modifying the interchange. Context Sensitive Design Context Sensitive Design is a collaborative, interdisciplinary approach that involves all stakeholders to improve or develop a transportation facility that fits its physical setting EOT Planning, LBG 9395 DRAFT report sections.doc Page 6 2/22/07 qV 7L I-93/1-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY and preserves scenic, aesthetic, historic and environmental resources, while maintaining safety and mobility for all users. Through this approach, planners and engineers can incorporate community concerns into the design'of transportation facilities while addressing needed improvements. One of the primary goals of the study - consistent with context sensitive design - is to improve the interchange in a manner that avoids or minimizes takings, particularly residential takings. Improvements are also evaluated in terms of the goals of reducing visual and noise impacts. Impacts on wetlands should also be minimized. Local access must be maintained or improved for businesses and residential neighborhoods. Analysis Tools The study used new traffic counts taken in 2004 and projections of traffic demand for the year 2025 from the regional transportation model maintained by the Central Transportation Planning Staff (CTPS). Traffic flow was analyzed with standard highway capacity software and also with a microsimulation model using CORSIM software. The CORSIM model allowed very detailed simulation of the entire interchange area in which traffic backups could be seen developing over the morning and afternoon peak hours. These tools were then applied to the alternatives for improving the interchange. Safety was analyzed for 2002-2004, using actual accident reports to pinpoint accident locations. This analysis produced accident "scatter diagrams" that showed the clusters of accidents in areas of conflicting traffic movements. 3. Developing Alternatives Approach In order to make well-thought-out decisions that meet the objectives, alternative proposals were developed and evaluated. There was early agreement in the Task Force that the alternatives to be considered had to have two characteristics: Both highway and non-highway actions would be necessary Alternatives should be built up from components Non-highway actions comprise public transportation, and means of transportation demand management - transit and TDM- as well as other measures to manage and reduce congestion. These actions should be part of the final solution because a fundamental part of the problem is high traffic volumes using the interchange, so reducing the volumes will be helpful to any highway solution. Equally important, transit and TDM provide choice for people making trips and thus improve overall mobility. Making transit and TDM a fundamental part of the plan helps to strengthen a balanced transportation system for the region and to meet environmental and energy conservation goals. I EOT Planning, LBG 9395 DRAFT report sections.doc Page 7 2/22/07 qt)-2.1 I-93/I-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY Components. Building alternatives from component parts made the process more transparent because the components could be individually understood by both the consultant team and the task force before combining them into more complex alternatives. Using components was also more efficient because some can be screened out early in the process as shortcomings were identified, leaving the best components to work with. Figure 3-1 Proeess of Developing, Alternatives Figure 3-1 is a diagram of the process used in the study. Developing alternatives proceeded on parallel tracks for highway and non-highway alternatives. On each track, components were explored and screened for suitability. The screened highway components were used to build the highway alternatives; a package of screened transit and TDM components was then combined with the recommended highway alternative. The strategy for developing alternatives was based on an awareness that a successful plan must avoid takings to the greatest extent possible. Therefore, the strategy was to build up the solution within the available right of way - using context sensitive design - instead of potentially applying a more traditional, "cookie cutter" approach featuring a more expansive design. Highway Components Using the screening process, approximately 18 different components were developed and either rejected or advanced for more study. This led to four families of alternatives: • H 1: Extend 4`l' lane on Route 128 northbound to Exit 40 (Route 129) and being 4`" lane on Route 128 southbound at Exit 38 (Route 28). This alternative had several benefits and few impacts and was advanced as an interim measure. • H2: Reconstruct the southbound half of the interchange, removing the weave that starts the cascading back-ups but doing nothing for the northbound half of the interchange, and it was not advanced. • H3: Reconstruct the interchange by removing the northwest and southeast loop ramps, replacing. them with ramps that go over or under the middle of the interchange. This family of alternatives removes all weaves and improves both traffic flow and safety and it was advanced for more development. • 1-14: construct collector distributor (CD) roads alongside Route 128 in both directions. This alternative had benefits, but the balance in traffic volumes on the CD roads was too high. It was not advanced. The R3 family was developed into the four alternatives that are described in the recommendations section below. H3 reduces overall travel time, provides acceptable traffic flow (levels of service), and improves safety by removing all weaves and EOT Planning, LBG 9395 DRAFT report sections.doe. Page 8 2/22/07 q tiay I-93/I-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY . DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY improving on- and off-ramps. Direct local access is maintained, and no residences are taken. [4 diagrams from Newsletter 2] Figure 3-2' Four Alternatives Transit and TDM Components A variety of additional transit services including commuter rail improvements and bus services on Route 128 was developed along with TDM measures to encourage transit use and ridesharing. This package was chosen to be somewhat ambitious but realistic. The resulting list was evaluated using the CTPS regional transportation model to determine how many people would use the new services. The results show that the TDM components were particularly effective, and that together, the Transit/TDM package could increase regional transit ridership by 3,900 trips per day and remove 10,400 vehicle trips from the roadways. Boardings at the Anderson regional Transportation Center could increase by approximately 1,000 per day. 4. Recommendations The recommendation for improving the I-93/I-95 interchange respond to four key points and are based on the extensive process of problem analysis and alternatives development, all in close consultation with the Interchange Task Force. 1. As the region's busiest and most important system interchange, a major investment in infrastructure is warranted 2. The solutions must be sensitive to the three host communities which closely border the interchange 3. As a major part of the regional travel pattern, the solution must be comprehensive and include both highway and non-highway components as a single package. 4. The open public process developed with the ITF must continue through project development and implementation. 4.9 Highways A long-term solution and interim relief are both needed. Of the four major alternatives that resulted from an exhaustive screening process, Alternative H3 has great promise as the best long term solution compatible with sensitivity to the surrounding communities. Alternative H1 is not a long-term solution, but it is compatible with Alternative H3 and can provide interim relief. EOT Planning, LBG 9395 DRAFT report sections.doc Page 9 2/22/07 4 v Z ` I-93/I-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY Alternative H3 has four possible variations depending on the design of the Washington Street ramps and the treatment of the two semi-direct ramps that replace two loop ramps and thus remove weaves from the central interchange. ■ H3-OR (formerly H3-A) has a pair of fly-over ramps and relocates the Washington Street ramps on northbound Route 128 further west to provide a longer and safer weaving distance from Washington Street to I-93. ■ H3-OS (formerly H3-B) has a pair of flyover ramps and splits the Washington on- ramp, one branch going to Route 128 northbound and one branch to an I-93 connector road parallel to Route 128. ■ H3-UR (formerly H3-C) has a fly-under ramp from Route 128 southbound to I-93 southbound, and a flyover ramp from Route 128 northbound to I-93 northbound; it uses the relocated Washington Street ramps. ■ H3-US has one ramp under and one ramp over like the previous variation and the split Washington Street ramps and parallel I-93 connector. Washington Street Ramps: Relocated or Split? The relocated.Washington Street ramps are less costly than the split ramp design. However, it lengthens rather than removing the weave from Washington Street to I-93, it requires a commercial building taking, and this design also necessarily results in a steeper-than-desirable (6%) upgrade in the flyover ramp to I-93 northbound. For these reasons selecting the relocated ramps to achieve cost saving does not appear to be an appropriate trade-off for this major interchange. The split Washington Street ramps with parallel connector road from Route 128 northbound to I-93 is approximately $40 million more expensive than the relocated ramp design, completely removes the weave from the Route 128 mainline and has more desirable grades on the ramp to I-93 northbound. It requires the reconstruction of the Washington Street bridge over Route 128, but this bridge replacement also allows a better Washington Street cross-section that will relieve three highly congested intersections. After deliberation, the Interchange Task Force reached consensus that the split ramps with I-93 connector should be advanced, reducing the alternatives to H3-OS and H3-US. EOT Planning, LBG 9395 DRAFT report sections.doc Page 10 2/22/07 L4O ✓ 0 I-93/1-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY Washington Street Ramp Alternatives 1-13-OR and H3-UR Relocated Ramps ■ Lengthens weave from Washington St, but weave remains ■ One commercial building taking plus strip takings Relatively low cost DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY H3-OS and H3-US Split Ramps with 1-93 Connector ■ Eliminates weave from Rte 128 - further improves safety ■ No takings ■ Rebuilds Washington St. bridge and improves congested intersections ■ Costs approximately $40 million more than relocated ramps Figure 4-1-' Relocated... §hin'a Street Ramps Figure 4-2 Split Washington Street Ramps ,,vith I-93 Cozuiector. 1-9311-95 Interchange Ramps: Both Ramps Over or One Under? The choice of a double flyover versus putting one ramp under and one ramp over is depends on a number of factors. The double fly-over design (143-OS) will be simpler to construct than the H3-US .design in which one ramp goes under both I-93 and Route 128 and the other ramps, goes over them. Double-flyover construction would be less costly, shorter, and less disruptive to the continuous operation of both expressways than the construction of H3-US which has a depressed ramp with short tunnel segments under both highways. Construction of the depressed ramp will also be more expensive than the corresponding overpass because the profile of the fly-under ramp is as much as 50 feet below the ground surface where it goes under 193, and potentially 10 to 15 feet into groundwater, requiring waterproofing, pumped drainage, and foundations to counteract buoyancy. One constructability issue with the. double flyover in H3-OS is that its overpasses cross above the existing I-93 bridge, while in H3-US the single flyover is to one side of the existing bridge where it will be simpler to construct. On balance, construction of H3-OS will be the less difficult. On the other hand, the single flyover ramp in H3-US will have less visual impact on adjoining neighborhoods in Reading and Woburn than the double flyover in H3-OS, although both designs are of the same height. Additional noise impacts due to the interchange modifications are expected to be minor, but because of the existing high level of traffic noise, noise barriers are likely to be warranted. The depressed ramp in H3-US will offer some noise attenuation compared to its elevated counterpart in H3-OS, but noise modeling is needed to determine whether this difference will be perceptible. There would be a larger area of wetland under structure in the double flyover design, but much of this would be under ramps high enough to admit sunlight so that the affected wetland q b3 EOT Planning, LBG 9395 DRAFT report sections.doc Page 11 2/22/07 I-93/1-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY would retain some resource value. For the 113-US alternative with a depressed ramp, a smaller area of wetlands would be affected but these areas would be displaced, not just shadowed. Before a decision is made, these alternatives should both be given careful scrutiny in the environmental phase to explore construction sequences, refine costs, and establish comparative noise, visual, and wetland impacts in detail. Figure 4-3 Alternative H3-OS [Plan] Figure 4-4 Alternative H3-USjP1 an] Table H3-OS Versus H3-US One New Ramp Under 1-93 and Rte 128 /One Ramp Over H3=US ■ Traffic on 128 NB and Washington St. better than UR ■ Slightly lower noise impact ■ Visual impact of single flyover is less ■ More wetland filling plus wetland under structure (14k + 31 k sf) ■ Greater construction difficulty with deep boat section and short tunnel ■ Groundwater issues ■ Higher cost $228 million) Both New Interchange Ramps Over 1-93 and Rte 128 H3-OS ■ Traffic on 128 NB and Washington St. better than OR ■ Small Noise impacts ■ Visual Impact of two flyovers approx 25 feet above I-93 ■ Additional wetlands under structure (3k+ 3lk sf) ■ Moderate construction difficulty ■ No groundwater issues ■ Moderate cost ($139 million) Both alternatives: ■ Improved traffic operations ■ Improved safety; 4 major weaves eliminated ■ 40 mph ramp design avoids takings but needs FHWA approval in Environmental phase EOT Planning, LBG 9395 DRAFT report sections.doc Page 12 2i22ro7 ~ I-93/I-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY Figure 4-5' Bird's Eye Views of H3-OS and H3=US C 6 views in two columns showing Richard Cir, Crosby St, and Walnufi St news Figure 4-6 Street Level Views of H3-OS and H3-US Interim Improvements Both H3 alternatives would have an interim phase of improvements (formerly called Hl). The interim improvements would be relatively simple to construct and would relieve the northbound bottle neck on Route 128 by extending the 4th lane to Exist 40 (Route 129). The interim package would also improve the southbound weave by beginning the 4th lane on Route 128 southbound at the Route 28 on-ramp. This additional lane on Route 128 SB would allow through-traffic to get by the weaving traffic in the interchange and reduce the cascading back-ups in the existing cloverleaf. Although all bridges are wide enough to accommodate the additional northbound lane from I-93 to Route 129 and the auxiliary southbound lane from Route 28 through the 93/95 interchange, the interim package will involve some additional pavement and will attract some additional traffic to Route 128. It therefore needs full environmental review of air quality, noise (and noise barriers), and stormwater management. Discussions in the ITF elicited a proposal from Cummings Properties to provide an on- ramp to I-93 southbound from Cedar Street in Woburn. Preliminary analysis of this ramp suggests that it is a worthwhile interim measure that would be low in cost and would provide relief to the congested intersections on Washington Street and provide a useful measure to manage traffic during reconstruction of the I-93/I-95 interchange and Washington Street ramps. The Cedar Street ramp should therefore be recommended for further development in the environmental phase. This ramp would be included in the interim improvements package and later removed from service during the final stages of I-93/I-95 interchange reconstruction. Potential Highway Costs The conceptual costs estimates for highway improvements are $139 million for H3-OS and $228 million for H3-US. The higher cost of H3-US is due to the construction of the alternative's deep boat sections and short tunnel underpasses. The cost of the interim package alone is estimated at $4 million, which is included in the cost of the full reconstruction alternatives. 03 L4 EOT Planning, LBG 9395 DRAFT report sections.doc Page 13 2/22/07 I-93/I-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY In addition to the costs for highway improvements,. noise barriers will be required in many locations. The costs of the anticipated barriers, which could be built as part of the interim improvement package, would be approximately $21 million, making the total costs for interim improvements, noise barriers, and interchange reconstruction $249 million for H3-US and $160 million for H3-OS. Transit and TDM Recommendations Throughout the I-93/I-95 Interchange Study, the Task Force, consultants, and EOT have been in agreement that non-highway components must be part of the solution. These include transit (commuter rail, rapid transit, buses on I-93 and Route 128, and local shuttles) as well as Transportation Demand Management or "TDM" (measures such as ridesharing services and information to encourage less use of single occupant vehicles for commuting and other trips). ■ Transit and TDM help meet the objective of mobility by providing more choices other than driving alone ■ These modes help to reduce the number of vehicles using the interchange and its bypass routes and thus to close the gap between highway capacity and future demand ■ These modes will become increasingly important in the future as world fuel prices increase over the coming decades, and as action is taken to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases that recent sound science has shown to cause global climate change. While promoting transit use to an extent sufficient to solve interchange congestion would not be possible in the short or medium term unless there were major increases in service and parking at transit stations, a combination of transit and ridesharing is an important part of the package of solutions to transportation needs in the interchange area. The following components are recommended for further development and study in the environmental phase: 1. Implementing a fully online sign-up system for carpools in the area.. 2. Efforts to increase utilization of the Anderson Regional Transportation Center (RTC) 2A. Creation of a formal park-and-ride program at the Anderson RTC. 2B. Improving access to the Anderson RTC, including a pedestrian bridge from the west side of the railroad tracks. 3. Expanded ongoing marketing of transit services in the study area. 4. Expanded ongoing outreach and incentives for carpooling in the study area through MassRIDES: o An carpool incentive program o Expanded vanpool incentive program o Additional marketing EOT Planning, LBG 9395 DRAFT report sections.doc Page 14 2/22/07 O I-93/1-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY 5. Expansions to peak-period "Route 128" shuttle service from Anderson RTC to Burlington, Lexington, and Waltham, with connecting service to Reading Depot. 6. Addition of off-peak "Route 128" shuttle service. 7. Establishment of a park-and-ride shuttle service from Peabody. 8. Exploring cross-ticketing/fare payment arrangements on privately operated shuttle services. 9. Improved signage and traveler information to promote carpooling and transit: 9A. Installation of static signage on I-93 and I-95 promoting carpooling and . transit. 9B. Installation of electronic signs or Variable Message Signs (VMS) on I-93 and I-95 promoting carpooling and transit. 9C. Use of real-time traffic, transit schedule, and parking information in signs, websites, cell phones, or other media. 10. Increased MBTA reverse-peak and local bus service on Route 354 and extending Route 132 (currently serving Malden, Melrose and Stoneham) to serve the Reading commuter rail station, the Anderson RTC, and nearby employers in Woburn. 11. Enhanced MBTA commuter rail service on existing lines: I IA. Improvements in headways on the Lowell Line between Anderson RTC and Boston to create a shuttle-type service with peak period headways of 15 or 20 minutes. 11B. Additional service north of the Anderson RTC on the Lowell Line; the Haverhill Line, or both. Managing Corridor Congestion It is a fundamental fact that future travel demand will exceed the capacity of Route 128 and I-95 to accommodate it in peak hours, with the result that congested peak hours will become steadily longer and traffic will continue to divert to local roadways. The I-93/I-95 Study recommendations for interchange improvements and transit/TDM measures will be a significant improvement, particularly for trips using the interchange between Route 128 and I-93 and transit trips into Boston. However, adding more capacity on the 8-lane sections of Route 128 and I-93 is not planned even the long run, and is unlikely to happen because of its environmental impacts. Therefore, there will be a future gap between demand for travel in the peak hour and capacity to carry that demand. Three types of longer range improvements should be considered as part of regional transportation planning: 1, v3~ EOT Planning, LBG 9395 DRAFT report sections.doc Page 15 2/22/07 I-93/1-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY • Intelligent Transportation System Improvements o Information systems to respond to accidents and other incidents o Regulation of the rate vehicles enter the system o Variable speed limits.to optimize traffic flow • Additional long-range measures to increase transit use and high occupancy vehicle (HOV) use o Additional commuter rail and rapid transit parking o Expanded bus service in the Route 128 corridor o HOV lanes in the I-93 and Route 128 corridors • Land use policies that help to reduce overall demand in the I-93 and Route 128 corridors, beginning with the MetroFuture recommendations of MAPC Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) ITS refers to a set of techniques to improve transportation systems and mobility through information processing and information availability in real-time. Examples range from variable message boards that alert motorists to accidents ahead on the highway to computer algorithms that calculate optimum traffic speeds based on remote sensors. These systems have the potential to make traffic flow and transit more efficient, and they should thus be part of the regional transportation system. Both short term improvements, like signage, and long-term improvements like variable speed limits and ramp metering should be considered and implemented where appropriate. Assessing the applicability of specific ITS improvements should be the subject of a coordinated study by EOT. It should be kept in mind though, that the motoring public is Lrt of the intelligent transportation system. This means that public acceptance and understanding of how to utilize the system is necessary. Information Systems [report will discuss each of these] • Accident alerts through activated signage and 511 or Star 1 mobile phone service. • Activated signage to report parking availability and next train arrival at Anderson and other transit stations • Should be part of long range ITS study Regulation of Vehicle Entry Computer programs ("algorithms") have been developed and are in use in some places in the United States, which improve the flow of traffic on expressways by metering the rate at which traffic enters the highway. It is often referred to as "ramp metering". • Can help traffic flow on roadways operating near capacity like Route 128 • Needs to be implemented on a wide area basis to be effective • Requires room to store vehicles awaiting entry on ramps • Only works if drivers obey the entry signal; enforcement would be a problem to EOT Planning, LBG 9395 DRAFT report sections.doc Page 16 2/22/07 q I-93/I-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY • Should be part of long range ITS study Variable Speed Limits DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY The amount of traffic that can be processed by a highway varies with the density (spacing) of the vehicles and their speed. Faster is not better in terms of getting the most vehicles through a highway segment, because drivers increase their spacing as they go faster. This can be observed in heavy traffic conditions, in which the "fast lane" on the left often experiences more stop and go than the "slow lane" on the right. Computers using remote sensors can calculate the optimum speed and display it on variable message signs. • In operation in a number of locations in Europe • Very cost-effective way to increase highway capacity without construction • Some safety benefit by reducing stop-and-go accidents • Only works if drivers obey the entry signal; enforcement would-be a problem • Should be part of long range ITS study Extending High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Use in the Longer Term The transit and TDM components of the 93/95 package of recommendations work to relieve the highways and improve mobility by transporting more people in fewer vehicles. There are additional measures that could be implemented in the longer term, based on a forward looking regional HOV study. Increasing the share of HOVs in the regional highway and rail transit systems can contribute significantly to reducing greenhouse gas emissions and conserving energy. HOVs also have benefits for regional air quality. Increasing HOV share increases the capacity of highways to transport people, which is the fundamental measure of mobility. Increasing HOV use (both multi-passenger automobiles and buses) can be accomplished by extending the measures proposed in the 93/95 recommendations package for Transit and TDM. However, one constraint on the acceptability of HOVs is that trip time is limited by the congestion on the highway system. A well-known measure to improve trip time for HOVs is to provide HOV lanes. An example is the bi-directional HOV lane on the Southeast Expressway and the HOV lane on the I-93 approach to Boston.. Route 128 west of I-93 and I-93 from south of the interchange to Boston are the primary candidates for HOV lanes in the long term. (Route 128 east of I-93 will be less congested). Because these highways are closely bordered by homes and businesses, widening to provide HOV lanes will be difficult and expensive in most areas, so the more likely course of action would be to convert one of the existing lanes to HOV-only use. There are three potential forms of HOV systems EOT Planning, LBG 9395 DRAFT report sections.doc Page 17 2/22/07 q 03 I-93/I-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY 1. Fully separated as in I-84 north of Hartford CT - needs very wide highway right- of-way. • Advantage: most efficient with best operating speeds • Disadvantage: requires major right-of-way takings and impacts of multi-level interchanges 2. Left lane restricted to HOVs, but all traffic mixes at the interchanges - this is less efficient but workable when the demand for HOV use increases to the point that significantly more people are carried in the HOV lane than in the general purpose lane converted to HOV use. Nonetheless, developing acceptability by the motoring public is essential. a. Advantage: possible with little or no takings and at low cost b. Disadvantage: HOV traffic must weave across other lanes to enter and exit; public must accept conversion of general purpose lane 3. Express HOV lane with interchanges only at major highways like I-93, Route 3 in Burlington, and Route 2. This system separates the HOV lane by a median or barrier that allows HOVs to enter or leave at longer intervals suited to bus service and longer commuting distances, but it increases the speed and efficiency of the system for these users. A similar system exists on I-271 east of Cleveland OH, but is used for mixed HOV and SOV express traffic. a. Advantages: possible with little or no takings; more efficient than non- express HOV b. Disadvantage: HOV traffic must weave across other lanes to enter and exit but less frequently than above; public must accept conversion of general purpose lane Because of the scale and complexity of the problem and because of its importance to long range mobility, energy conservation, and greenhouse gas reduction, a long- range regional HOV study by EOT is recommended. Land Use Policy Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPQ is developing a regional plan called MetroFuture, based on an extensive public involvement effort with citizens, planning boards, and other local officials. Scenarios have been developed, ranging from no change in policies to extensive changes in growth patterns, housing, education, water conservation, and transportation. A moderate change alternative has been tentatively selected and is being advanced. This "little by Little" alternative encourages development in compact areas that can better be served by transit, and mixed land uses that offer more people short commutes to work and shopping. Why is land use policy a consideration in the I-93/1-95 Interchange transportation Study? The 93/95 study is considering and recommending highway and transit/TDM improvements that can be implemented in approximately ten years or less, and it is also considering longer range measures to increase regional mobility and to manage corridor congestion, as described in the preceding sections. Land use policy is intrinsically a u p3~ EOT Planning, LBG 9395 DRAFT report sections.doc Page 18 2/22/07 6 1-93/I-95 INTERCHANGE TRANSPORTATION STUDY DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY long-range measure, because it takes years of incremental change to significantly effect land use patterns; however, the benefits are also long lasting. 1. Land use is important to regional travel patterns, simply because most of regional travel is between different land uses: journey to work, to school, to shopping, etc. Shortening these trips helps to reduce the number of trips using the interstate highways and the I-93/I-95 and other interchanges. 2. Mixed land use on a compact scale shortens these trips and often permits some of the trips to be made by walking or bicycling. 3. Compact land use patterns for both residential and commercial development are more transit-friendly.. An example is the recently approved 250-unit development at the MBTA Mishawum Station in Woburn. Most land use policy is developed locally with leadership by planning boards and aldermanic land use committees. However, the state encourages local land use policies through efforts such as Commonwealth Capital, sustainable development policies, and MEPA review of projects. The state government can work with local decision-makers (ultimately city councils and through town meetings) to implement policy changes through comprehensive planning and zoning and local projects like school construction. Between the state and local levels, regional cooperation and leadership among all members of the metropolitan planning organizations, including MAPC and other regional planning commissions, is critical to coordinating local land use policies. Therefore, the 93/95 study recommends support for the MAPC MetroFuture initiative, including local consideration in Reading, Stoneham, and Woburn, and state support of its policies through EOT and other state agencies. EOT Planning, LBG 9395 DRAFT report sections.doc Page 19 2/22/07 q D✓ Board of Selectmen Meeting February 3, 2007 For ease of archiving, the order that items appear in these Minutes reflects the order in which the items appeared on the agenda for that meeting, and are not necessarily the order in which any item was taken up by the Board. The meeting convened at 8:30 a.m. in the Town Hall Conference Room, 16 Lowell Street, Reading, Massachusetts. Present were Chairman Ben Tafoya, Vice Chairman James Bonazoli, Secretary Stephen Goldy and Selectman Richard Schubert. Also present were Town Manager Peter Hechenbleikner, Assistant Town Manager/Finance Director Bob LeLacheur, Fire Chief Greg Burns, DPW Director Ted McIntire, ,Police Chief James Cormier, Library Director Ruth Urell, Highway Supervisor Mike deBrigard, School Finance and Human Resource Director Mary DeLai, Finance Coinlnittee Member Michele Williams, School Committee Member David Michaud, Finance Coinmittee Member George Hines. Discussion/Action Items The order of business this morning is to review the enterprise funds, review the Capital Improvements Program, and develop the method to balance the budget. Review Entemrise Budgets - DPW Director Ted McIntire reviewed the water enterprise, the sewer enterprise and the stormwater management enterprise systems. We don't have final rates for water and sewer from the MWRA yet. What drives the water and sewer budget is the debt and capital. The water budget uses $600,000 of reserves, and the sewer projects use no reserves. Review 2008-2012 Capital hnprovements Program - The Capital hnprovements Program was reviewed. The Board asked that staff develop additional infonnation on the need for the new financial computer system. This could be anecdotal as well as statistical information. The Board asked for additional infornation on the artificial turf field - how much additional use do you get out of an artificial field versus a regular turf field. The Board further discussed the need for appropriations for sidewalks, and asked that we begin to look at how to fund the feasibility study and design for structured parking for Downtown. The Assistant Town Manager indicated that he felt in the future we should do the full capital planning in the Fall at the Fall Financial Forum, and reserve the Spring financial discussion for the budget. Final Review of FY 2008 Budaet - With respect to balancing the budget, the School Committee has made several decisions and made several other recommendations in order to balance the budget. They reduced the unanticipated SPED costs by $90,000, suggested using $50,000 for the Medicare Part D reimbursement to offset health insurance costs, and reduce energy costs by $5,000. The total reduction in accommodated costs is $145,000, approximately $30,000 of which accrues to the benefit of the municipal government. They also suggested reducing $85,000 in capital for the savings in doing the Killarn roof. The Board asked to make sure that S~ Board of Selectmen MeetinLy - Februarv 3. 2007 - Pate 2 we talked with the Board of Assessors about moving the Senior Tax Work Program to the overlay. Chairman Ben Tafoya noted that we should not delude ourselves that State Aid will increase as outlined. The Board gave staff the following direction: 1. In the area of reductions, do not reduce Police or Fire overtime or Library materials. 2. For additional programs, add the additional Dispatcher, Nurse Advocacy and, if possible, add back additional funds for Library materials to get as close as possible to the 15%. The consensus of the Board members present was to agree. For the February Town Meeting, we should provide for the Nurse Advocacy Program to begin in the latter part of FY 2007, and also the additional Dispatcher. Staff will work to balance the budget in accordance with these guidelines. Chairman Ben Tafoya thanked the staff and the volunteers for their hard work on this budget. On motion by Goldv seconded by Bonazoli. the Board of Selectmen voted to adjourn their meeting of Februarv 3. 2007 at 11:00 a.m. by a vote of 3-0-0. (Chairman Richard Schubert had left during the meeting). Respectfully submitted, Secretary s~-2- Board of Selectmen Meeting February 6, 2007 For ease of archiving, the order that items appear in these Minutes reflects the order in which the items appeared on the agenda for that meeting, and are not necessarily the order in which any item was taken up by the Board. The meeting convened at 7:03 p.m. in the Selectmen's Meeting Room, 16 Lowell Street, Reading, Massachusetts. Present were Chairman Ben Tafoya, Vice Chairman James Bonazoli, Secretary Stephen Goldy, Selectman Richard Schubert, Police Chief Jiro Cormier, Town Manager Peter Hechenbleikner, Assistant Town Manager/Finance Director Bob LeLacheur, Paula Schena and the following list of interested parties: Bill Brown, Ralph Colorusso, Bob Nordstrand, Al and Andrea Garbarino, Cheryl Fay, Susan O'Leary. Reports and Comments Selectmen's Liaison Reports and Continents - Selectman Stephen Goldy noted that he met with representatives from the Reading Municipal Light Department, the Finance Committee and Town Manager regarding the eaniings distribution. It looks like this year's payment will be higher than last year. Vice Chairman James Bonazoli noted that the Reading Rotary is holding a "Taste of Reading" this weekend at the YMCA. The Friends of Reading Tennis are holding a fundraiser this Friday. He recommended that the last minute articles being placed on the Warrant should have more discussion. Chairman Ben Tafoya thanked staff and volunteers for the time that was put into the budget meetings for the past three Saturdays. Town Manager's Report The Town Manager gave the following report: • Town Counsel filed the lawsuit today in the matter of Diranian (Timothy Place) and got a short order of notice for February 22nd. The Judge will hear her motion for a preliminary injunction at that time. • Chairman Ben Tafoya, Vice Chainnan James Bonazoli, EDC Chairman Russ Graham and I met with representatives of National Development yesterday to talk about the process of moving forward with redevelopment of the Addison-Wesley/Pearson site. The developer indicated that he will be (and did last night) meeting to listen to the community informally. The developer also committed to work with the Town on a process that would work for the Town, the property owner and the developer. To give time to work on an outline of this process, I have put off discussion by the Board with the developer until February 27th. • Boards/Coinlnittees/Coininissions training including ethics training took place on January 31 st with good attendance by staff and Board, Committee and Commission members. • We have received our Affordable Housing inventory from DHCD. When you adjust for the change in Longwood from a 40B to the current development, the Town's Affordable S~ Board of Selectmen Meeting - Februarv 6. 2007 - Page 2 Housing status is as anticipated - approximately 7.5%. There is one unit left off the inventory, and I aim working with the RHA to get it put on. • The Downtown Improvements Project bid date has been moved back to March 13th. • He has received the Inspector General's report on the Sumner Cheney Condominiums. They found excessive profits and the developer owes the Town money. • The Town has been asked by Representative Brad Jones to identify eannarks for the FY 2008 Budget. He suggests money to help with the demolition of the Water Treatment Plant and structured parking for Downtown. • He has accomplished everything the Board of Selectmen directed him to do with the FY 2008 Budget except for additional hours for the Public Health Inspector. He will try to find money for that. The Assistant Town. Manager noted that the Finance Committee has adopted a policy on the Capital hnprovements Plan. Discussion/Action Items Preview of Annual Town Meeting Warrant - The Town Manager reviewed the Warrant for the Annual Town Meeting. He noted that Article 1 is Elections, Article 2 is Reports, Article 3 is Instructional Motions, Article 4 amends the Capital hnprovements Program for FY 2007-2011, Article 5 amends the FY 2007 Budget, Article 6 is payment of prior year's bills, Article 7 is approving FY 2008-2012 Capital hnprovements Program, Article 8 is local acceptance of Senior Tax Worker overlay account, Article 9 is to authorize debt and appropriate funds for highway, Article 10 is disposition of surplus property, Article 11 is to authorize revolving funds, Article 12 is approving FY 2008 Budget, Article 13 is Woodland Road street acceptance, Article 14 is transfer of appropriations for water interchange project, Article 15 is to establish a fund for Medicare, Article 16 is debt authorization for Downtown hnprovements Program, Article 17 is to authorize debt for the financial software and hardware, Article 18 is for a new fire truck, Article 19 is to authorize debt for tennis court improvements, Article 20 is to authorize debt for field improvements, Article 21 is to transfer care, custody and control of Library to the Selectmen, Article 22 is to amend the Zoning By-Laws to change the definition of frontage, Article 23 is to amend the Animal Control Bylaw, Article 24 is the Sight Triangle Bylaw, Article 25 is the Retirement Board local acceptance, and Article 26 is the removal of Town Meeting Members. Sian. Purchase & Sales Aareement for 1481 Main Street - The Town Manager noted that Town Meeting authorized debt for the purchase of the property at 1481 Main Street. The Town received a $400,000 State grant and a donor donated $400,000 so the Town does not have to borrow for this. Town Counsel has negotiated the Purchase & Sales Agreement and the Selectmen need to sign it. A ,motion by Goldv seconded by Schubert to approve the Purchase & Sales Agreement between the Town of Readine and Lucille DelPonte. Administratrix of the Estate of Marearet Grace Mattera a/k/a Margaret M. Mattera for the purchase of the property at 1481 Main Street in Reading, Massachusetts was approved by a vote of 4-0-0. s~~ Board of Selectmen Meeting - Februarv 6. 2007 - Pate 3 Hearing - Policv Establishing an Ad Hoc Tax Classification Studv Committee - The Secretary read the hearing notice. The Assistant Town Manager noted that the last Tax Classification Study Colmnittee from 12 - 14 years ago was too large. The Board of Assessors will serve as advisory. Membership may include representatives from the Chamber of Commerce, Economic Development Committee, Board of Selectmen, Finance Committee and CPDC. The tern would expire December 31, 2007, and a report to the Board of Selectmen by October 31, 2007. Vice Chainnan James Bonazoli suggested having someone who. is a business owner but not a member of the Chamber of Commerce. Chainnan Ben Tafoya indicated that he did not feel a Finance Committee member was necessary on this Committee because the Finance Committee's expertise is expenditures not revenue. The Town Manager noted that the Finance Committee would have an interest in the overall financial picture. Assessor Ralph Colorusso suggested including a resident who is not a member of any Board, Conl nittee or Commission. A motion by Goldv seconded by Schubert to close the hearing on the policv establishing an ad hoc Tax Classification Committee was approved by a vote of 4-0-0. A motion by Goldv seconded by Schubert to approve the voliev establishine an ad hoc Tax Classification Committee. as amended. was approved by a vote of 4-0-0. Request for 4-Wav Stop - Walnut Street and Old Faun Road - The Town Manager noted that the Crossing Guard at this location was moved due to lack of Crossing Guards. Police Chief Jim Cornier noted that there are already stop signs at Red Gate and Old Farn Road. Selectman Stephen Goldy asked if any citations Have been issued in that area, and Chief Cormier noted that he did not have that information but he will get it. Selectman Stephen Goldy noted that he and Chainnan Ben Tafoya were there on Friday. The traffic was moving rapidly on Walnut Street. The crosswalk signs should be helpful. He also noted that there was a good volume of children oil a cold day. Vice Chairman James Bonazoli asked if there was a Crossing Guard, would we still need a stop sign. Chief Corinier indicated that we would not because it does not meet the criteria for a stop sign. Cheryl Fay of 68 Old Farrn Road noted that the children camzot be seen at Old Farm Road and Red Gate. Al Garbarino of 32 Old Farm Road noted that 30-32 children use that crosswalk daily. He requested that the Chief adjust his numbers. ~~3 Board of Selectmen Meetinja - Februarv 6, 2007 - Pajae 4 Andrea Garbarino of 32 Old Farm Road noted that a stop sign is needed there because people do riot respect the crosswalk. Susan O'Leary noted that people can't respect the crosswalk when they can't see someone crossing due to an obstructed view. Selectman Richard Schubert asked when we will be deploying more Crossing Guards, and Chief Cormier indicated that is ul-jknown. Chainnan Ben Tafoya directed the Town Manager to schedule this for a hearing, and to monitor the new crosswalk sighs. Approval of Minutes A motion by Goldv seconded by Bonazoli to approve the Minutes of December 19, 2006, as amended, was approved by a vote of 4-0-0. A motion by Goldv seconded by Bonazoli to approve the Minutes of Januarv 2, 2007, as amended, was approved by a vote of 4-0-0. A motion by Goldv seconded by Bonazoli to approve the Minutes of Januarv 9, 2007 was approved by a vote of 4-0-0. A motion by Goldv seconded by Bonazoli to approve the Minutes of Januarv 23. 2007 was approved by a vote of 4-0-0. A motion by Bonazoli seconded by Schubert to uo into Executive Session for the purposes of discussing strateev regarding labor negotiations, not to come back into Open Session was, approved on a roll call vote with all four members voting in the affirmative., Respectfully submitted, Secretary Board of Selectmen Meeting February 13, 2007 For ease of archiving, the order that items appear in these Minutes reflects the order in which the items appeared on the agenda for that meeting, and are not necessarily the order in which any item was taken up by the Board. The meeting convened at 7:00 p.m. in the Selectmen's Meeting Room, 16 Lowell Street, Reading, Massachusetts. Present were Chairman Ben Tafoya, Vice Chairman James Bonazoli, Secretary Stephen Goldy, Selectmen Camille Anthony (arrived at 7:45 p.m.) and Richard Schubert, Town Accountant Gail LaPointe, Human Resources Administrator Carol Roberts, Town Engineer George Zambouras, Town Manager Peter Heehenbleikner, Assistant Town Manager/Finance Director Bob LeLacheur, Paula Schena and the following list of interested parties: Tom Quintal, Adele Blunt, Elaine Webb, Steve Sadwick, Rick Shaffer, Edward Rivers, Robert Tucker, Kevin Allarant, Stephen Crook, Nancy Kearney, Bob Tucker, Gil Rodrigues, Jack Russell, George Katsoufis, Julie Thurlow, Dave Talbot. Reports and Comments Selectmen's Liaison Reports and Comments - Selectman Richard Schubert noted that he attended a meeting of the Interchange Task Force. The next public input session is March 21 st at the Woburn High School. He strongly suggested that Reading residents attend and advocate for certain issues. Selectman Stephen Goldy noted that Friends of Reading Tezuiis held their fundraiser on Friday. On Sunday, there will be a Skate to Late at Castene Field from 4:00 p.m. to 8:00 pan. Hot chocolate and bagels will be served. On March 18th, there will be an adult three on three basketball tournament. Town Manager's Report The Town Manager gave the following report: • Hallmark Development on Walkers Brook Drive - no methadone clinic. • The Main Street hnprovement Project is being excluded from the upcoming transportation bond bill. This is good news as any project within the bill would get delayed until it passed and most likely loose the bulk or all of this year's construction season. So, hopefully, the State doesn't change their mind and the March 13th date will remain firm. • Easement acceptance and releases for 98 Hartshorn Street to be signed. A motion by Goldv seconded by Schubert to approve the Abandonment of Easement and Acceptance of Easement related to the property at 98 Hartshorn Street pursuant to Article 16 of the Mav 1.2006 Town Meetine was approved by a vote of 4-0-0. • Texas Hold'em and raffles need licenses through the Town Clerk's Office. • Rabies Clinic March 31 st - last date for licensing dogs without a fine will be April 2°d 4 Board of Selectmen Meeting - Febi-uarv 13, 2007 - Paae 2 • Town Manager sent to Representative Brad Jones a list of "earmarks" that Reading would like to see in the FY 2008 State Budget. The main item is assistance with the cost of demolition of the old Water Treatment Plant. The Assistant Town Manager noted that he is hoping to have a meeting on April 11th or April 18th to do an overview of the financial system that will show a preview of reports that will be available. Discussion/Action Items Town Accountant Ouarterlv Meetine - Town Accountant Gail LaPointe noted that the audit is complete and will be presented to the Audit Commmittee. She has been providing coverage for the Retirement Board Secretary who is out on maternity leave. She is working on getting the schools on the same purchase order system and looking at a consultant to help implement the financial platform. She performs internal audits of procurement purchases and grant eligibility every now and' then with DPW and the RMLD. She has also presented the fraud policy to employees. Heariniz - Pav/Classification Plan for Community Services Director/Town Planner - The Secretary read the hearing notice. Human Resources Administrator Carol Roberts noted that two towns - Danvers and North Andover have similar set ups. The Town Manager noted that the position is advertised, and a screening coliunittee has been established. Selectman Richard Schubert noted that the Assistant Town Plammer will be critical to this position. He also noted that under 4b5, some familiarity with the Mass. Laws would be helpful. The ability to colmnunicate effectively is also important. Chairman Ben Tafoya noted that the Economic Development Committee is missing from the organizational chart. Steve Sadwick of 138 Prospect Street noted that he is the MAPC representative for the Town of Reading. He is also the Plain-ling Director for the Town of Tewksbury. He supports this reorganization and is offering to help in any way he can. He suggested that the Town advertise with the Mass. Chapter of Local Planners. Elaine Webb noted that she had concerns that the schools may be laying off and reducing staff in FY 2008, yet the Town is adding staff. Selectman Richard Schubert noted that this will give the Town the ability to perform duties in a proactive way. Selectman Camille Anthony asked if the School Committee added any new positions, and Elaine Webb indicated that they did not. The Assistant Town Manager noted that the Finance Committee allocated the resources in the Municipal Budget, and staff figured out how to do this without asking for more money. sc~ Board of Selectmen Meeting - Februarv 13, 2007 - Page 3 A motion by Anthonv seconded by Schubert to close the hearing on the Pav/Classification Plan for Community Services Director/Town Planner was approved by a vote of 5-0-0. A motion by Goldv seconded by Bonazoli to approve the Pay/Classification for the Community Services Director/Town Planner as a Grade 18 was approved by a vote of 5-0-.0. Hearing - Woodland Road Street Acceptance - The Secretary read the hearing notice. The Town Manager noted that the Selectmen stopped at Woodland Road when they did their boardwalk. Some neighbors had discussed making Woodland Road a public way to have the Town bring it up to standards. Town Engineer George Zambouras noted that the Town can make a bettennent to cover the cost of improvements. The cost would be passed along to the abutting property owners based on frontage. Corner lots only pay one quarter of the costs. He also noted that improvements would include a 30' wide road with granite curbing, new drainage at the bottom of the street, no sidewalks and no turn around. The cost will be approximately $94,000 due to the drainage. The corner lots would pay $5,000 and the other lots would pay $13,000 - $27,000. The cost is based on hiring contractors and the cost cannot exceed the estimate. Selectman Stephen Goldy asked if the Town would be setting a precedent by not putting in sidewalks, and George Zambouras noted that it would not because it is a dead end street and the sidewalks would go to nowhere. Ed Rivers of 11 Woodland Street asked about the Town's overnight parking restrictions. Selectman Richard Schubert asked if the drainage will address the current conditions/concerns and if blasting will be needed. George Zambouras indicated that the current conditions/concerns will be addressed. There is no visible ledge but there are boulders that will need to be removed. Nancy Kearney of 91 John Carver Road noted that this is not a betterment that she would support. She also noted that she will lose additional parking, and she has concerns regarding excavation and drainage problems. Bob Tucker of 12 Woodland Street noted that he originally asked for a 20' pavement with no curbs and now the scope has expanded. Selectman Richard Schubert noted that when the Town takes a street, then it is responsible for drainage, etc. If the Town doesn't put in curbs, then there will be more drainage problems and the Town will be held liable. Chairman Ben Tafoya asked if there was anyone in favor of this, and Ed Rivers and Bob Tucker indicated that they were. The Town Manager suggested that the Selectmen close the hearing and send out a questionnaire to the property owners before closing the Warrant. C613 Board of Selectmen Meetins - Februarv 13. 2007 - Page 4 A motion by Anthonv seconded by Schubert to close the hearinLy on Woodland Road street acceptance was approved by a vote of 5-0-0. Review Special Town Meetinia Warrant - The Town Manager reviewed the Warrant for the Special Town Meeting. He noted that Article 5 is to rezone 16 Sanborn Street to Business B and mixed-use zoning. This will affect only that one lot. Article 6 is the parking overlay and this could apply to other properties. Article 7 applies it to Lots 21 and 21 a. CPDC voted 2-2-0 not in favor of Articles 6 and 7. Selectman Richard Schubert noted that Article 5 is appropriate but perception is the issue. He suggests taking all three Articles off the Warrant for the Special Town Meeting and putting Article 5 on the Annual Town Meeting Warrant. This will give adequate time for CPDC and public discussion. Selectman Camille Anthony suggested keeping Article 5 and getting rid of Articles 6 and 7. The Town Manager reminded the Board that they camlot take an Article off the Warrant but they can refer to Committee. Selectman Stephen Goldy noted that he prefers to wait until the Spring Town Meeting to do Article 5. Vice Chainnan James Bonazoli noted that he likes Article 5. He also noted that parking is an issue Downtown and this Article will help everybody. He feels that employees should not have to walls a long way to work. He is in favor of Article 5 at any Town Meeting. Chairinan Ben Tafoya asked if there were tuning issues. The Town Manager noted that the fire was in March 2005 so the Reading Co-Operative Bank has until March 2007 to do something with the property. He noted that the bank has applied to build a three family home because they can't hold the property forever. There is no mechanism to extend the deadline. A motion by Anthonv seconded by Goldv to recommend the subject matter of Article 3 was approved by a vote of 5-0-0. A motion by Goldv seconded by Bonazoli to recommend the subject matter of Article 4 was approved by a vote of 5-0-0. A motion by Bonazoli seconded by Anthonv to recommend the subject matter of Article 5 was approved by a vote of 3-2-0. with Schubert and Goldv opposed. A motion by Bonazoli seconded by Goldv to recommend the subject matter of Article 6 failed by a vote of 2-3-0. with Anthonv. Schubert and Goldv opposed. 5 6 Board of Selectmen Meetinu - Februarv 13. 2007 - Pave 5 A motion by Bonazoli seconded by Anthonv to recommend the subiect matter of Article 7 failed by a vote of 2-3-0, with Anthonv. Schubert and Goldv opposed. A motion by Schubert seconded by Anthonv to recommend the subiect matter of Article S was approved by a vote of 5-0-0. A motion by Schubert seconded by Bonazoli to recommend the subiect matter of Article 9 was approved by a vote of 5-0-0. A motion by Anthonv seconded by Bonazoli to recommend the subiect matter of Article 10 was approved by a vote of 5-0-0. A motion by Goldv seconded by Anthonv to recommend the subiect matter of Article 11 was approved by a vote of 5-0-0. A motion by Goldv seconded by Anthonv to recommend the subiect matter of Article 12 was approved by a vote of 5-0-0. The Town Manager noted that Johnson Woods asked that the timeframe to build be waived, and that is why Article 10 is on the Warrant. Selectman Stephen Goldy noted that since the closing of the Warrant, Ted Moore decided that he didn't want to go with an increase in the number of affordable housing so he asked that the Article be tabled. CPDC voted to table Article 10. Report - Downtown Parking Task Force - Task Force Members Gil Rodrigues, Jack Russell, George Katsoufis, Julie Thurlow, Dave Talbot and Tom Quintal were present. Gil Rodrigues noted that surveys were done. The surveys show that there is a shortage of 280 spaces for employees, and a shortage of 120 customer spaces. The Task Force recommends that the Board of Selectmen seek professional help in seeking structured parking. Jack Russell noted that several people like some ideas more than others but structured parking is number 1. Other avenues that they are looking at include shared employee parking, shared public parking, satellite parking that is employer funded, public shuttle buses, parking zoning changes, and commuter parking. Recommendations on these issues will be made in June. The Town Manager noted that the Task Force has quantified the need. He will have staff take a look at structured parking. George Katsoufis noted that Woburn is using earmark methodology for structured parking. Rick Schaffer asked about peals usage, and George Katsoufis noted that 3:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. weekdays and Saturday mornings are the peals times. Review Action Status Report - The Town Manager reviewed the changes to the Action Status Report to date. G5 S Board of Selectmen Meeting - Februarv 13, 2007 - Pajae 6 • The Town Manager noted that the contract is ready for Gazebo Circle, and Town Counsel has filed the necessary paperwork. • Town Counsel will be issuing a letter regarding the Inspector General's recommendation on affordable housing. • The fine has been paid on Timothy Place, but there has been no corrective action. Town Counsel has filed in court for relief. The property owner has requested a meeting to talk about a financial settlement but the Town Manager indicated that is not what the Board of Selectmen wants. • The Assistant Attorney General came out and toured Memorial Park. She was impressed and will try to put this through as soon as possible. • The Housing Plan is at DHCD. • Camille Anthony will type up notes on the sight triangle bylaw. Approval of Minutes A motion by Goldv seconded by Anthonv to approve the Minutes of Januarv 20. 2007 was approved by a vote of 5-0-0. A motion by Goldv seconded by Anthonv to approve the Minutes of Januarv 27, 2007 was approved by a vote of 5-0-0. A motion by Goldv seconded by Anthonv to approve the Minutes of Januarv 30, 2007 was approved by a vote of 4-0-1. with Bonazoli abstaining. A motion by Goldv seconded Anthonv to adiourn the meeting of Februarv 13, 2007 at 10:40 p.m. was approved by a vote of 5-0-0. Respectfully submitted, Secretary GAP 5 R~~N OF$ 6t`d5 tho O.• z w0 63'9° INCOR4I THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Number: 2007-15 Fee:. $50.00 TOWN OF READING This is to certify that RON ASSINI, c/o. KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, 11 SANBORN STREET, READING, MASS. IS HEREBY GRANTED AN ENTERTAINMENT LICENSE for the following: Disc Jockey for Birthday Party on Friday, February 16; 2007 from 7:00 - 11:00 p.m. WHICH 1S/ARE KEPT ON THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PREMISES: 11 Sanborn Street This license is granted in conformity with the provisions of Chapter 140 of the General Laws as amended by Section 183A of the Acts of 1949 and expires on February 16, 2007, unless sooner suspended or revoked. In Testimony Whereof, the undersigned have hereunto affixed their official sian. A J Date Issued: February 12, 2007 Town of Reading 16 Lowell Street Reading, MA 01867 Fax: (781) 942-9037 Website: www.ci.readine.ma.us February 9, 2007 Dawn Folopoulos Human/Elder Services Re: Reading Response Transportation Program It l c,~~~. n Finance Department Phone: (781) 942-9005 Dear Dawn, At their meeting on January 25, the Trust Fund Commissioners voted to award the 3-year contract for the transportation program to MassTran. They also considered the proposals you had submitted and voted as follows: Promotion - it was the consensus of the Commissioners that the promotion of the program is a part of administering the program. They did not feel that this was a change, but that it should be ongoing, with the program being publicized whenever possible. Rides within Readina - the Commissioners voted to expand the program to include an average of 20 one-way rides to medical appointments within Reading each month, for 240 per year. The in-town rides would be administered under the same qualification guidelines m as the existing out-of-town rides to medical appointments. This limit was based on the information you provided showing the increase from 2005 to 2006 was approximately 200 one-way medical rides provided by the Town's van. Please keep the Commissioners informed of whether these limits are reasonable. In addition, the Commissioners voted to provide a chair car, if needed, based on the ability of our new provider to offer this service. Raise income levels - the Commissioners voted not to change the income levels at this time, based on your report from the Council on Aging that they opted not to fund a pilot program to see what the effects of increasing the income limits would be, as it would help so few people. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions regarding these changes. Sincerely, Nancy J. Heffernan Treasurer/Collector 9~1 bz - W w ~ o G,,M°~~0 ~~ro BRADLEY H. JONES, JR. STATE REPRESENTATIVE MINORITY LEADER Reading Board of Selectmen C/O: Peter Hechenbleikner Town Hall 16 Lowell Street Reading, MA 01867 Dear Board: ~CG°lG.1G 6~c%TG/2l G.1G/ZfCLfLIJG.l ~CLL`G ~(,OLLdG ~vadto~a 02/,~,~- /054 Clc~C,c 20"' MIDDLESEX DISTRICT READING • NORTH READING LYNNFIELD • MIDDLETON TEL. (617) 722-2100 Rep. BradleyJones@hou.state.ma.us www.bradjonesonline.com fV 8 V -n rn February 12, 2007 o~ v The Massachusetts Water Resource Authority Advisory Board recently released the Winter 2007 Edition of their financial pamphlet, The Green Sheet. I just wanted to take a brief moment to share this publication with you. Essentially, the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority was able to reduce a projected nine percent increase in community rates during the next four years to about six percent through restructuring significant amounts of existing debt and by revising several funding operations based on a more aggressive treatment of restrictions within existing bond covenants. I have enclosed a copy of The Green Sheet for your review. Regardless of the Authority's efforts to curtail rate growth, there will still be considerable rate pressure on communities, including the Town of Reading. As I stated in a recent letter to the Board, I am member of the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority Caucus and understand the importance of state funding to help offset the severity of rate increases. I included the $25 million for water and sewer debt relief in my local aid resolution during last session. This figure was included in the final FY 2007 Budget, but Governor Romney vetoed it. Fortunately, my colleagues and I overrode his veto and the money was restored for the FY 2007 Budget. I was disappointed to see this money included in a reduction of $25 million associated with water and sewer debt relief in Governor Romney's 9C cuts. I amglad that the money has been restored, but I understand that this figure is still not ideal. I believe that the first step we need to take to protect ratepayers is to maintain the $25 million figure in the FY 2008 Budget and search hard for other avenues to increase the figure if possible. Please take a few moments to review the enclosed pamphlet as it may help the Town of Reading plan for the future. Should you have any questions about this material, lease feel free to contact me. Sine STRIVING FOR SUSTAINABLE & PREDICTABLE RATES Water and sewer rate revenue requirements are projected to rise by $200 million between FY07 and FY11, resulting in community increases of almost 9% each year. Nearly 60% of the current expense budget is fueled by debt service payments. In the face of these conditions, the Advisory Board recommended the following action plan to the Authority: ❖ Create a Rates Management Committee. ❖ Revisit the levels of reserves as required in the bond covenants. ❖ Develop a debt restructuring plan. STEPS TAKEN ❖ The Authority convened a Rates Management Committee comprised of Members of the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Advisory Board, and staff members from MWRA and the Advisory Board, in consultation with the Authority's Financial Advisor. ❖ The Authority revisited amendments to existing Bond Covenants which resulted in: ■ Reducing the Debt Service reserve to 50% of maximum annual debt service. ■ Eliminating the Community Obligation Revenue Enhancement (CORE) Fund. ■ Replacing a portion of the Renewal and Replacement Fund with Commercial Paper. These changes become effective in 8 to 10 years and will free up $172 million, which could be used to pay down debt or fund new capitol projects. ❖ In mid-January, the Authority restructured $648 million of existing debt. The restructuring will address rate pressures before covenants take hold. RESULTS These proactive actions by the MWRA will establish a path toward achieving sustainable and predictable rates. Rate increases, projected to be close to 9% in the coming years, will be contained to an estimated 5.8% (assuming continued receipt of $18.75 million in Debt Service Assistance). Additionally, this path will: ❖ Provide $200 million in new borrowings to fund the Authority's ongoing capital budget. ❖ Reduce charges by approximately $425 million over the next ten years. ❖ Provide $4.9 million in present value savings. ❖ Maintain and affirm bond ratings from Fitch, Moody's and Standard & Poor's, even while restructuring debt and changing covenants. The combined borrowing of $848 million is the largest bond issue in the Authority's 20-year history. The true interest cost was 4.34%. MWRA ADVISORY BOARD ■ PHONE: 617.742.7561 • FAX: 617.742.4614 • EMAIL: Christine.Hevelone-BvlerCa.mwra.state.ma.us ■ WEB SITE: http://www.mwraadvisoryboard.com ~2. UI C, ~ a February 14, 2007 To The Editor: The Board of Directors of the Reading - North Reading Chamber of Commerce would like to express its support for Reading Cooperative Bank's efforts in obtaining additional parking for its employees. The Board also applauds the Reading Board of Selectmen for their initiatives in crafting Article 5 which provides for a more efficient solution to the Bank's efforts. The Board of the Chamber of Commerce supports the Selectmen's Article 5 and urges the members of Town Meeting to vote for its approval. The success of local business in Reading is one of the.essential components to the success of this town's financial, social, and cultural aspects. Two major components to the success of any business is its ability to attract customers and its ability to service those customers with quality employees. Parking is essential to both of those components. To state there is a severe parking issue in Reading is stating the painfully obvious. There is evidence from Town Meetings dating back to 1971 recognizing the problem. Both merchants and consumers have suffered for over 30 years with this issue and the inertia to solving this matter has been stifling to this town. The Bank is trying to convert to business use a parcel of land on a section of Sanborn Street which is nothing short of commercial. This parcel of land was the site of a residential structure that, unfortunately, was destroyed by fire. The Bank purchased the parcel of land and wants to convert it to parking for its employees. If the Bank is able to convert this parcel of land to parking for its employees it will be able to take nearly 30 employees off the streets. The freeing up of those spaces on the streets will benefit everyone. Surrounding businesses will benefit by being able. to have additional parking for customers who will no longer be competing with these employees for parking. This contribution to solving the parking problem is done at the sole expense of the Reading Cooperative Bank. Article 5 simply includes this parcel of land in the Business B District. This article would negate the need for a parking overlay district and subsequent approval process to convert included land for commercial use. This article should be applauded and not criticized. Opponents to the option of a parking overlay district fearing conversion of residential land to commercial use will no longer have that fear because that land will no longer be affected. The Town needs parking for consumers and employees. If businesses are unable to have these resources necessary to operate they may decide to relocate to other towns. Neither residential property values nor the Town's financial resources will benefit from exiting businesses. Reading needs parking and this initial measure to address the issue needs to happen. Please support the passage of Article 5 at the next Town Meeting. By: The Board of Directors Reading - North Reading Chamber of Commerce The Commonwealth of J44assachusetts c u F Eacecutive Office of EnvironmentaCAffairs ' d 100 Cam6ridge Street, Suite 900 ~Ooston, W,4 02114 Deval L. Patrick GOVERNOR Timothy P. Murray LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR Ian A. Bowles SECRETARY February 13, 2007 Ben Tafoya, Chairman Reading Board of Selectmen 16 Lowell Street Reading, MA 01867 Dear Mr. Tafoya: m Q w On behalf of Secretary Ian A. Bowles, I acknowledge receipt of your correspondence dated January 23, 2007 regarding the DEP Climate Protection Grant Program. Your comments are being forwarded to Mr. David Cash, Assistant Secretary for Policy to assist the agency in formulating the best possible strategies to ensure fimding in support of municipal efforts related to climate protection. Your input on this issue is both valuable and appreciated. Sincerely, A Jim Crowley External Relations Coordinator (C ~6s Tel: (617) 626-1000 Fax: (617) 626-1181 http://www.mgsj.gov/envir S '*1 M GC7 N O February 12, 2007 To: Peter Hechenbleikner Town Manager Dear Peter N. O a . This letter will serve to notify you and all concerned that, effective 2/12/2007, I reluctantly resign from my position on the Reading Planning Commission., due to personal commitments. I want to wish you all the best in your efforts in behalf of all the residents of Reading. Very truly yours, Neil J. Sullivan CC: Board of Selectmen CPDC ?~L RECEIVED TOWN CLERK READING, MASS. 1001 FEB 21 A 4111 :1'9 To: Cheryl A. Johnson, Town Clerk Town of Reading 16 Lowell St. Reading, MA 01867 87 Dana Rd. Reading, MA. 01867 February 21, 2007 Effective as of this date, February 21, 2007, I hereby resign as a member of the following in the Town of Reading: Board of Assessors, Town Meeting (Precinct One), and the Ad Hoc Community Preservation Act Study Committee. Sincerely, Thomas J. Ryan c f c s v CP N 0 g9. MMA Action Alert # 1: February 15, 2007 t~c 3C,( (FEB M)t~ 4 4 TJ / _ Gov. Patrick Files Sweeping "Municipal Partnership Act" to Empower Cities and Towns Following up on his words of partnership at the MMA's Annual Meeting in January, Gov. Deval Patrick today filed a sweeping Municipal Partnership Act with the Legislature. The bill would empower cities and towns to levy a local option meals tax and increase the local hotel/motel tax by 1%, close the telecommunications property tax loophole, provide important relief for communities facing a state-mandated classification shift that would place a greater burden on residential taxpayers, support streamlined coalition bargaining on the GIC insurance issue, have the state invest pension assets for about one-third of the local pension systems, and grant additional management powers in some key fiscal and program areas. This is the most far-reaching municipal empowerment legislation in the past 25 years. The need for the legislation has become even more urgent as the state's fiscal woes have deepened for next year, with a $1 billion state budget gap forecast, and the Governor's fiscal 2008 budget likely to be limited to a modest Chapter 70 increase and level-fimding'of most other aid accounts, including Lottery and Additional Assistance. With a painful budget outlook for both state and local government, the Governor's office consulted with the MMA and many local officials as they drafted this legislation, resulting in many top MMA priorities being included in the bill. Passage of the Municipal Partnership Act will be a major priority for the MMA and all communities this year. Recognizing that many of these provisions would not provide substantial revenue or savings until fiscal 2009 or beyond, fiscal 2008 local aid will continue to be a top priority as well. We will provide all communities with a detailed analysis, and a public information and lobbying kit soon, as we anticipate many interest groups, such as the telecommunications companies, will oppose the legislation. This will take an all- out effort. We do need to get our message out quickly, so PLEASE CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVES AND SENATORS TODAY WITH THIS SIMPLE MESSAGE: You Strongly Support Governor Patrick's Municipal Partnership Act, And You Need Their Commitment To Vote For And Enact The WHOLE Bill Quickly. KEY PARTS OF THE MUNICIPAL PARTNERSHIP ACT WOULD: - Allow local option meals tax: Cities and towns would be authorized to implement a local option tax of up to 2% on meals served in local restaurants. 75% of the tax would remain in the community, and 25% would go into a statewide reserve to fully fund the state's 50% share of local property tax abatements for low-income seniors and others, thus guaranteeing adequate state reimbursement of local Clause 41 tax abatements paid via municipal overlay accounts; • Allow l % more in local option hotel/motel tax: Allow communities to increase the local rate from 4% up to 5%, with 75% of the increase in revenues remaining in the community, and 25% going into the new state reserve for abatements; • Close the telecommunications property tax loopholes: Telephone and telecom companies have manipulated arcane loopholes to avoid their fair share of the personal property tax and shift as much as $140 million onto the backs of local residential and commercial property taxpayers statewide, and this bill would close those loopholes; - Offer coalition bargaining option for health insurance: The bill incorporates existing local option legislation to create a streamlined coalition bargaining process to negotiate with municipal unions regarding accessing the GIC plan; • Delav reduction in allowable tax classification shift: Freeze the maximum business classification shift at 1.83 for 2 years, delaying the scheduled drop to 1.75 that would otherwise be forced in fiscal 2008 tax rates; - Invest undernerforminn pension svstems' assets in state PRIT fund: Those municipal and county retirement systems that are below 80% funded AND lag PRIT performance by 2.25% over a rolling 5-year period after 2006 would be required to transfer their assets to PRIT for investment (the Gov.'s office estimates that this is 1/3 of the systems); • Other sections would: Allow municipal borrowing of up to 30 years if the maximum life of the asset is that long; Streamline the abatement process; Confirm existing municipal authority to impose trash collection fees; Establish a commission to consider ways to grant increased local authority in areas currently requiring home rule petitions and to provide incentives for best municipal practices and reorganization of municipal services; and Create a panel to study the expansion of state technology to local levels. FOR THE TEXT OF THE MUNICIPAL PARTNERSHIP ACT AND MORE INFORMATION, GO TO www. mma. o rg Massachusetts Municipal Association, One Winthrop Square, Boston, Massachusetts 02110; (617) 426-7272 l1 ' Next 93/95 ITF Meeting 2/28 in Woburn Page 1 of 1 %aj V Hechenblelkner, Peter t From: Frey, Bob (EOT) [Bob. Frey@state.ma.us] Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 11:37 AM To: Corey, John; Schubert, Rick;. Anthony, Camille; Barnes, Jonathan; Bruen, Darlene; Casey, Paul; Clarke, Dennis; Cosgrove, Joe; DiBlasi, Joe; Durrant, Ian; Everson, Jeff; Festa, Mike; Florino, Ron; Gallagher, Jim; Grover, Robert; Grzegorzewski, Josh; Hamblin, Eileen; Havern, Robert; Jones, Bradley; Katsoufis, George; Kennedy, Anthony; Kinsman, Art; Leiner, Craig; Mayo, Rich; McLaughlin, Tom; Meaney, Paul; Medeiros, Paul; Motter, Andy; Natale, Patrick; Ragucci, David; Rogers, Maureen A.; Smith, Suzanne; Stinson, Richard; Sullivan, Dan; Tarallo, Ed; Tisei, Richard; Webster, Bill Cc: Blaustein, Joan; Callan, Melissa (HOU); Chong, Michael; Cooke, Don; DiSarcina, Tony; Draisen, Mark (MAPC); Edwards, Adriel (EOT); Frey, Bob (EOT); Harwood, Tracey (Mayor McLaughlin); Town Manager; Lindstrom, Michael (SEN); Martel, Justin (HOU); McKinnon, Anne; McLaughlin, Thomas; McVann, John; Medeiros, Paul (work); Miller, Kenneth (EOT); O'Rourke, Carmen (HOU); Purdy, Jim; Pyke, Keri; Schwartz, Bill; Stein, Kathy; Tafoya, Ben; VanMagness, Frederick (HOU) Subject: Next 93/95 ITF Meeting 2/28 in Woburn Greetings Task Force Members: Just a reminder that the next meeting of the 1-93/1-95 Interchange Task Force will be: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 4:30 PM - 7:00 PM Shamrock Elementary School. Green Street Woburn * * * Agenda and other review materials will be sent later this week * * * Thanks, Bob Bob Frey Manager of Statewide Planning Office of Transportation Planning Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation (617) 973-7449 bob.frey@eot.state.ma.us t N J{ 2/21/2007