Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-02-02 Zoning Board of Appeals MinutesW Town of Reading Meeting Minutes Board - Committee - Commission - Council: Zoning Board of Appeals Date: 2025-02-02 Building: Reading Town Hall Address: 16 Lowell Street Purpose: Attendees: Members - Present: Time: 7:00 PM Location: Select Board Meeting Room Session: Version: Final Chris Cridler, Andrew Grasberger, Patrick Houghton, Cynde Hartman, Frank Capone, Taylor Gregory, Anthony Fodera Members - Not Present: Others Present: Amanda Beatrice - Administrative Specialist, Michael Gomez, Mukesh Gajaria, Brian Charest, Lauren Cotraro, Nick Cotraro, Mike Cotaro, Alan Brussard, Paula A, Pelusi, Rich Moore, Roberta Moore, Penny Loshua, Rita Robertson, lames Bradley, Cecelia Russo, Marilyn Geder-Foley, Chris Synnott, Tony D'Arezzo Minutes Respectfully Submitted By: Amanda Beatrice Topics of Discussion: Case #25-04 — 39 Summer Ave Chris Cridler opened the continuance public hearing for Case #25-04 — 39 Summer Ave by reading the legal notice into the record. Cridler noted that the Petitioner requested to withdrew without prejudice for both the Special Permit and Variance request. Cynde Hartman made a motion to approve the Petitions request to withdraw without prejudice the Special Permit and Variance request for Case #25-04— 39 Summer Ave. Andrew Grasberger seconded the motion and it was approved 5-0-0. Vote was 5-0-0 (Cridler, Grasberger, Houghton, Capone, Hartman) Case #25-18-16 Elm Street Chris Cridler opened the public hearing for Case #25-18 — 36 Elm Street by reading the legal notice into the record. The property owner, Mukesh Gajaria, introduced himself and explained that he initially explored adding an attached ADU, but after evaluating the lot with the Architect, decided a two-family dwelling would make better use of the property. Architect Jay Bradley presented the proposal to demolish the existing single-family home and construct a new two-family dwelling. He noted that the current structure has a non -conforming front setback of 11.6 feet and a non -conforming side setback of 6.4 feet, which made adding an ADU difficult. By removing the existing home, the new construction would be able to meet all required setbacks. Page I 1 Town of Reading Meeting Minutes Frank Capone asked whether the project was intended to be owner -occupied or an investment. Bradley responded that it is an investment property, though the timing of a resale is uncertain. Capone also pointed out discrepancies in the lot coverage. Bradley clarified that the revised plot plan shows the correct lot coverage at 24.7 percent. Anthony Fodera asked whether the 24.7 percent included the two decks, and Bradley confirmed that it did. Bradley then reviewed the four Variance Criteria. Regarding hardship, he explained that because the existing home sits so close to the setbacks and has such a small footprint, adding onto it would require removing the right, left, and rear foundation walls to support an addition. He also argued that a two- family home would not be detrimental, as there is a two-family directly behind the property and about 16 similar two-family structures within a two -block area. Cridler asked whether those homes were all in the 5-15 district, and Bradley confirmed they were. He submitted a map highlighting these properties. Andrew Grasberger stated that he did not believe the application met the first Variance Criterion, which relates to soil conditions and topography. He emphasized that the applicant must demonstrate how this lot is materially different from others. Cridler added that all four criteria must be satisfied for the Board to grant a Variance. The Board briefly discussed that they cannot provide guidance on what is or is not allowed, as that is the role of the Building Department. Based on the current application, the Board indicated that a Variance would not be granted. The applicant was given the option to withdraw without prejudice or request a continuance in order to gather additional information. It was clarified that at the next meeting, only the use Variance would be under consideration, as the lot coverage issue had been resolved. Public comment was opened Brian Moore of 5 Elm Street asked where he could find more information about the project and whether the new structure would be non -conforming. The Board explained that information is available on the Town website, at Town Hall, or directly from the applicant. Cridler clarified that the application originally included two Variances, one for lot coverage which has since been corrected, and one for a use Variance to allow a two-family dwelling in a single-family district. Otherwise, the proposed structure meets all setback and coverage requirements. Brian Charest of 8 Elm Street expressed concern about the impact on neighborhood character, noting that he purchased his home 14 months ago specifically because it was a single-family area. Alan Brussard of 184 Green Street asked about the survey boundaries, noting that his property did not appear on the plan. Cridler explained that the plan was prepared and stamped by a licensed surveyor and should reflect the correct markers. Cynde Hartman made a motion to continue Case #25-18 —16 Elm Street at the Petitioners request to March 2, 2026. Andrew Grasberger seconded the motion and it was approved 5-0-0. Vote was 5-0-0 (Cridler, Grasberger, Houghton, Capone, Hartman) Page 1 2 orkt�� Town of Reading $ Meeting Minutes Case #26-04 - 526 Summer Ave Chris Cridler opened the public hearing for Case #26-04 - 526 Summer Ave by reading the legal notice into the record. Michael Gomez, the designer representing the builder & homeowner, explained that they were requesting a Special Permit for the existing non -conforming side -yard setback and a Variance for lot coverage in order to construct a 24 by24 foot garage. The garage would serve as a combined workspace and office for the homeowner, housing his technology equipment and power tools. Gomez also noted that the lot has a steep grade change and falls within the Conservation Buffer Zone at the rear, which is why the addition is positioned toward the front and upper portion of the property. He added that the homeowner strongly prefers keeping both the shed and the full depth of the proposed garage and office. Cridler reminded the applicant that all four Variance Criteria must be satisfied for the Board to grant relief. Cynde Hartman stated that she believed the project met the first criterion, and Patrick Houghton felt they met the second as well. Cridler clarified that the Variance request was necessary because the addition would create a new non -conforming lot coverage. Town staff member Amanda Beatrice confirmed that the proposal would increase lot coverage from the existing 15.7 percent to 30.3 percent, where the maximum allowed is 25 percent. Hartman questioned why the project could not be reduced to meet the 25 percent limit and asked what hardship justified the additional 5.3 percent. Gomez explained that the homeowner built the shed during COVID and uses it for lawn equipment, bikes, and dirt bikes. He said he would revisit the plan with his client. Board members agreed that letters of support from abutters would be helpful. Cynde Hartman made a motion to continue Case #26-04 - 526 Summer Ave at the Petitioners request to March 2, 2026. Andrew Grasberger seconded the motion and it was approved 5-0-0. Vote was 5-0-0 (Cridler, Grasberger, Houghton, Capone, Hartman) 01 02 26 Taylor Gregory made a motion to postpone the review of the January 2, 2026 minutes to the next meeting. Chris Cridler seconded the motion and it was approved 5-0-0. Vote was 6-0-0 (Cridler, Grosberger, Houghton, Capone, Gregory, Fodera) Motion to Adiourn Chris Cridler made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Taylor Gregory seconded the motion and it was approved 5-0-0. Vote was 6-0-0 (Cridler, Grasberger, Houghton, Capone, Gregory, Hartman, Fodera) Page 1 3