HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025-01-23 School Committee PacketOpen Session 7:00p.m.
Reading Memorial High School Library
Reading, MA
Reading Public Schools
School Committee Meeting Packet
January 23, 2025
Town of Reading
Meeting Posting with Agenda
This Agenda has been prepared in advance and represents a listing of topics that the chair reasonably anticipates will be discussed
at the meeting. However the agenda does not necessarily include all matters which may be taken up at this meeting.
Page | 1
2018-07-16 LAG Board - Committee - Commission - Council:
School Committee
Date: 2025-01-23 Time: 7:00 PM
Building: School - Memorial High Location: School Library
Address: 62 Oakland Road Agenda:
Purpose: Open Session
Meeting Called By: Thomas Wise, Chair
Notices and agendas are to be posted 48 hours in advance of the meetings excluding
Saturdays, Sundays and Legal Holidays. Please keep in mind the Town Clerk’s hours of
operation and make necessary arrangements to be sure your posting is made in an adequate
amount of time. A listing of topics that the chair reasonably anticipates will be discussed at
the meeting must be on the agenda.
All Meeting Postings must be submitted in typed format; handwritten notices will not be accepted.
Topics of Discussion:
7:00 p.m. A. Call to Order
7:00 p.m. Public Hearing: FY26 Budget Hearing
7:20 p.m. B. Public Comment
Focus on Excellence
Consent Agenda
1. Minutes (01-16-2025)
2. Acceptance of FY25 Safe and Supportive Schools Grant Award
Accounts Payable Warrant Reports
1. 01-16-2025
Reports
1. Interim Director of Finance and Operations
2. Superintendent
3. Student
4. Liaison/Sub-Committee
7:30 p.m. E. New Business
1. Review of Elected and Appointed Officials Advocacy Rights for
Ballot Initiatives
7:45 p.m. D. Old Business
1. FY26 Budget Discussion
8:00 p.m. Adjourn
Join Zoom Meeting
https://readingpsma.zoom.us/j/87608952250
Town of Reading
Meeting Posting with Agenda
This Agenda has been prepared in advance and represents a listing of topics that the chair reasonably anticipates will be discussed
at the meeting. However the agenda does not necessarily include all matters which may be taken up at this meeting.
Page | 2
Meeting ID: 876 0895 2250
Find your local number: https://readingpsma.zoom.us/u/kevtzj5din
Consent Agenda
Reading Public Schools
School Committee Meeting Packet
January 23, 2025
Town of Reading
Meeting Minutes
Page | 1
2016-09-22 LAG Board - Committee - Commission - Council:
School Committee
Date: 2025-01-16 Time: 7:00 PM
Building: School - Memorial High Location: School Library
Address: 62 Oakland Road Session: Open Session
Purpose: Open Session Version: Draft
Attendees: Members - Present:
Tom Wise, Erin Gaffen, Sarah McLaughlin (remote), Charles Robinson,
Shawn Brandt and Carla Nazzaro
Members - Not Present:
Others Present:
Assistant Superintendent for Student Services Dr. Jennifer Stys, Assistant
Superintendent for Learning and Teaching Dr. Sarah Hardy, Interim Director
of Finance and Operations Phil Littlehale and Superintendent Dr. Thomas
Milaschewski
Minutes Respectfully Submitted By: Olivia Lejeune on behalf of the chairperson.
Topics of Discussion:
A.Call to Order – Mr. Wise called the meeting to order at approximately 7:01 p.m. to review
the agenda.
Roll Call Attendance – Mr. Robinson – here, Mrs. Nazzaro – here, Mr. Brandt – here, Mrs.
Gaffen – here, Ms. McLaughlin – here, Mr. Wise – here
B.Public Comment – None
Focus on Excellence – None
Consent Agenda
1. Minutes (12-19-2024)
2. Parents Supporting Student Theatre Donation (2)
3. Parker Instruments Donations
4. Friends of Reading Field Hockey Donation
5. Friends of RMHS Cheer Donation
6. RMHS DECA Field Trip Request
7. RMHS Ski Club Field Trip Request (2)
8. RMHS Habitat for Humanity Field Trip Request
9. Acceptance of FY25 METCO Boston Bridges Initiative Grant Award
10. SEEM Collaborative Annual Report, 2023-2024
Page | 2
Payroll Warrant Reports
1. 12-06-2024
2. 12-20-2024
3. 01-03-2025
Accounts Payable Warrant Reports
1. 12-19-2024
2. 12-26-2024
3. 01-02-2025
4. 01-09-2025
Mrs. Gaffen motioned to approve the consent agenda, seconded by Mr. Brandt.
Roll Call Vote – Ms. McLaughlin – yes, Mr. Robinson – yes, Mrs. Nazzaro – yes, Mr. Brandt –
yes, Mrs. Gaffen – yes, Mr. Wise – yes
The vote passed 6-0.
Reports
1.Interim Director of Finance and Operations – No report
2.Assistant Superintendent for Student Services – Dr. Stys shared two upcoming SEPAC
events. On January 22nd, there will be an Understanding the IEP Workshop. On
February 26th, Dr. Hardy, Renee Limauro, and Erin Burchill will present on screeners
and reading, including how they are implemented in Reading.
3.Assistant Superintendent for Learning and Teaching – Dr. Hardy shared a reminder
that preschool registration is now open. Additionally, kindergarten registration is
open, and we are encouraging families to register by January 31st to ensure priority
placement at neighborhood schools, as part of efforts to plan and be proactive. Dr.
Hardy and Dr. Milaschewski recently had the opportunity to visit a classroom at
Killam for the Young Authors Celebration.
4.Superintendent – Dr. Milaschewski shared that the 2024 RPS Community Report will
be distributed within the next week or two. This will mark the release of our third
annual report.
5.Liaison/Sub-Committee
a.Ms. McLaughlin – No report
b.Mr. Robinson – No report
c.Mrs. Nazzaro – The Killam School Building Committee has scheduled a vote
at the April/May Town Meeting, with the timeline moved up from June. The
project is under budget and on target for submission to the MSBA on
February 10th. A cost estimate discussion will take place at the January
22nd meeting. If the vote does not pass, the district will lose MSBA funding.
d.Mr. Brandt – No report
e.Mrs. Gaffen – Mrs. Gaffen shared on behalf of PAIR, the MLK Jr. Day
Celebration will take place on Monday at the PAC and will feature multiple
performances.
Page | 3
f.Mr. Wise – No report
E.New Business
1.FY26 Budget FAQ Process
Dr. Milaschewski reviewed the FY26 Budget FAQ process. Budget-related questions should
be submitted to Olivia.lejeune@reading.k12.ma.us by January 23rd at 11:50 p.m.
An updated budget publication, including FAQs, will be included in the School Committee
packet on January 28th in preparation for the School Committee vote on January 30th.
2.FY26 Budget Presentation & Discussion
Dr. Milaschewski introduced the FY26 budget, highlighting that it is generally a level-service
budget. He reviewed the budget additions made over the last several fiscal years and
outlined two additions for FY26:
1.A 1.0 FTE Kindergarten Teacher:
Based on kindergarten projections for the 2025–2026 school year, an additional
kindergarten teacher is anticipated to accommodate the increased enrollment. Current
projections suggest a higher number of students, though actual enrollment may fall
short of these estimates. Assumptions are based on census data and delayed
enrollments from the previous year.
2.Universal, Tuition-Free Kindergarten:
The move to tuition-free, full-day kindergarten represents a significant achievement for
the committee. Thanks to strategic planning, this initiative is now becoming a reality in
Reading.
Currently, 230 kindergarten students are registered, which is higher than the same period
last year. While no vote is needed at this time, if the additional teacher is not required, the
committee will decide how to strategically reallocate the funding. Dr. Milaschewski also
discussed items for future consideration, emphasizing the importance of ongoing
conversations about additional priorities.
Mr. Littlehale provided a review of the budget by cost centers, starting with the Finance
Committee guidance, followed by the recommended budget by cost center, the capital
plan, and a review of other funding sources. Some key points include:
•This is a transitional budget book with some adjustments made to improve clarity.
Charts from previous years continue to be used, and FTE numbers have been
corrected where errors were identified in the original presentation shared with the
community. These corrections did not impact the budgeted dollar amounts, only the
FTE figures.
•Regular Day Budget: Up 1.6%, driven by turnover savings and the use of offsets.
These offsets have increased, making year-over-year comparisons challenging.
•Special Education: Adjustments were made to correctly allocate items previously
misclassified under regular day. Nine paraprofessional positions funded by the IDEA
grant were moved to the general fund.
Page | 4
•Capital Plan: Mr. Littlehale reviewed the capital plan, which aligns with the Town’s
plan.
A copy of the full presentation can be found here as well as a link to the FY26 budget book.
Mr. Wise motioned to adjourn, seconded by Mr. Robinson.
Roll Call Vote – Ms. McLaughlin – yes, Mr. Robinson – yes, Mrs. Nazzaro – yes, Mr. Brandt –
yes, Mrs. Gaffen – yes, Mr. Wise – yes
The vote passed 6-0.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FYiXzHb2rvg
Meeting Adjourned from regular session at approximately 8:31pm.
TO: Reading School Committee
CC: Dr. Thomas Milaschewski, Superintendent of Schools
Philip Littlehale, Interim Director of Finance and Operations
DATE: January 16, 2025
FR: Katelyn Finnegan, Assistant Business Manager
RE: Acceptance of FY25 Safe and Supportive Schools Grant Award
The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education has awarded the Reading Public Schools with a FY25
Safe and Supportive Schools Grant in the amount of $10,000.
The purpose of this state-funded competitive grant program is to provide financial support to school districts in
organizing, integrating, and sustaining school and district-wide efforts to create safe and supportive school
environments. Additionally, this grant is designed to coordinate and align student support initiatives based on
the findings from completing the Safe and Supportive Schools Framework and Self-Reflection Tool.
The primary priorities of this grant are:
1. Ensuring that each participating school creates an equitable, safe, positive, healthy, culturally
competent, and inclusive whole-school learning environment for all students.
2. Promoting the effective use of systems for integrating services and aligning initiatives that support
students' behavioral health and wellness.
This funding will play a vital role in advancing our district's commitment to fostering environments that support
the academic, emotional, and social well-being of all our students. The grant will enable us to build upon our
current initiatives and strategically implement improvements identified through the framework's self-reflection
process.
Thank you for your support with your vote to accept the FY25 Safe and Supportive Schools Grant Award.
Reading Public Schools
Instilling a joy of learning and inspiring the innovative leaders of tomorrow 82 Oakland Road
Reading, MA 01867
Phone: 781-944-5800
Fax: 781-942-9149
New Business
Reading Public Schools
School Committee Meeting Packet
January 23, 2025
TO: Reading School Committee
FROM: Olivia Lejeune, Executive Assistant to the Superintendent
DATE: January 21, 2025
RE: Review of Elected and Appointed Officials Advocacy Rights for Ballot Initiatives
During the January 23rd School Committee meeting, the school district's legal counsel (Stoneman,
Chandler & Miller, LLP) will join the meeting to provide a review of elected and appointed officials
advocacy rights for ballot initiatives. Please see the attached memo provided by town legal
counsel on this agenda item.
Reading Public Schools
Instilling a joy of learning and inspiring the innovative leaders of tomorrow 82 Oakland Road
Reading, MA 01867
Phone: 781-944-5800
Fax: 781-942-9149
February 7, 2024
Via email only
Matthew Kraunelis
Town Manager
16 Lowell Street
Reading, MA 01867
Re: Public Employee Political Activity
Dear Matt,
I am writing to provide you with guidance regarding the ability of municipal employees
to engage in political activity, as well as the limitations imposed on the Town and public
employees under the Campaign Finance Law, M.G.L. c.55. Attached is a chart summarizing the
ability of elected and appointed officials to participate in certain political matters.1 This letter
expands on the key issues and important distinctions set forth in the chart. This letter is not a
substitute for legal advice and if you have questions about a specific issue, please do not hesitate
to reach out with any additional questions.
Tips for Reading and Using the Chart
Section 23(b)(2)(ii) of c.268a, the Conflict of Interest Law, limits how public employees
engage in political activity in their public roles or while using public resources. Ethics
Commission Advisory 11-1 is an important guidepost for understanding these limits.2
First, the Advisory draws distinctions between three categories of public employees: (1)
elected; (2) appointed policy making official; and (3) appointed non-policy making official. A
policymaking position is one in which the public employee actively participates in determining
the agency’s policies or plans. Executives, department heads, board members and elected public
employees are presumed to be policymakers. A non-policymaking position is one in which the
public employee carries out policies or plans determined by others. A public employee may hold
both an elected and appointed position. In that case, the public employee may be restricted,
depending on the capacity in which they are acting.
Second, the Advisory distinguishes between election-related and non-election-related
political activities. Election related political activities involve actions designed to influence
people to vote for or against candidates or ballot questions. Non-election-related political activity
is activity directed at influencing governmental decision-makers which does not involve an
election. Non-election-related political activities include, for example, supporting or opposing:
town meeting warrant articles, municipal bylaw changes, user fees for public services or school
activities, changes to funding for public services, the renovation or construction of public
1 Attached as Attachment A.
2 Attached as Attachment B.
buildings, roads, bridges, and other public infrastructure, closure of public libraries, schools or
fire stations, and changes to state and local tax rates, laws, regulations, and budgets.
The extent to which a public employee may engage in political activity will be
determined by both the position they hold, and the nature of the activity they intend to do. Thus,
before using the chart it is critical to understand the classification of the employee and the nature
of the political activity involved.
Political Activities without Public Resources
Other than political fundraising, public employees are generally not restricted in the
political activities that they can engage in on their own time, provided they do not use any public
resources in connection with the activity. For example, a public school teacher may support a
local ballot question, if she does so on her own time, and without the use of public resources,
including use of her title and town email address. She could attend meetings and speak on her
own behalf. She may even serve on a ballot question committee, so long as she does so without
pay and does not fundraise or act as the agent for the campaign in any matter involving her town.
She may distribute campaign literature, make get-out-the vote telephone calls, conduct campaign
polls and research, drive voters to the polls, and display or hold signs (provided no Town
provided uniform/clothing is worn).
Political Activities with Public Resources
Subject to very limited exceptions (discussed below and in the attached chart), a public
employee may not engage in political activity on his public work time; while acting in his
official capacity or while in his official uniform; in a public building (except where equal access
for such political activity is allowed to all similarly situated persons); or with the use of other
public resources, such as staff time, public office space and facilities, public office equipment
such as computers, copiers, and communications equipment, public websites and links to public
websites, or public office supplies such as official stationery.
Elected and appointed policy making officials have greater leeway when it comes to
political activity. The reason for this is that part of the role of elected public employees and
policymakers is to inform and guide public debate on public issues.
A.Town Meeting Vote
Elected officials can engage in advocacy related to a Town Meeting Vote, without
restriction. However, if an elected official has paid work hours, she may only engage in such
activity as it relates to matters within the purview of their agency. Appointed policy makers may
also engage in advocacy related to a Town Meeting vote in their official capacity and during
work hours provided the activities concern matters within the purview of their agency. For
example, a member of the Conservation Commission could not use her title when advocating in
support of a funding a new school project because the matter is outside the purview of her
agency. In contrast, the School Superintendent may take such action.
Appointed non-policy making public employees cannot engage in political activity
related to a Town Meeting vote in their official capacity during their work hours. The only
exception is that they may engage in non-election related political activities if they are authorized
and directed to do so by an elected or appointed policymaking official concerning maters within
the purview of their agency. For example, a DPW administrative assistant may print and
distribute flyers in support of a Town Meeting article to fund a new DPW building, if the DPW
Director authorizes her to do so.
It is important to note that the Campaign Finance Law does not restrict expenditures
made to influence Town Meeting, and a town may use public resources to inform residents about
a warrant article, as long as the material is primarily directed to influence the Town Meeting.
However, such materials shall not advocate a position on a ballot question, if one is necessary.
Regulators caution that municipal officials should avoid mention of an election in any such
material, to avoid any inference that purpose of the document is to influence the election. In the
event the election precedes Town Meeting, information about the warrant article should not be
distributed to the voters until after the election.
Example 1: Warrant Article
There is a warrant article before Town Meeting that would authorize a study to inform
future school construction projects. Support for or opposition to a warrant article is
classified as non-election related political activity. This means that it is not subject to
campaign finance law, only conflict of interest law.
Outside of work hours and without using public resources, a non-policymaking public
employee, such as a classroom teacher is free to take a position on the article and engage
in advocacy related to the article. A policymaking public employee, such as the
Superintendent of Schools, may engage in activities related to the article during work
hours, as the article is within the purview of their agency, and it is reasonable to expect
that they are able to provide valuable perspective on the condition of the schools. The
Superintendent may produce an analysis of the school facilities, and the School
Department could use public resources to distribute this analysis to Town Meeting to
build support for the article.
Additionally, the Superintendent may authorize and direct subordinates to engage in non-
election-related political activities in favor of a new school in furtherance of the
Superintendent's own lawful advocacy for the new school as an appointed policy-maker
acting within the purview of their own agency.
The School Committee may also vote to support the article and members may use their
titles to advocate for passage.
B.Ballot Question
Elected officials may take positions on ballot questions. Similarly, appointed policy
makers may take positions on ballot questions within the purview of or affecting their respective
agencies. Public bodies may also vote in favor or against a particular ballot question. Public
bodies may use any means by which official actions are usually reported (such as posting on real
and virtual bulletin boards and on websites, and broadcasting public meetings via local public
access cable television) to distribute information about the body’s position.
However, elected and appointed policy makers may only use public resources to inform
the public of matters related to the ballot question or a body’s position. Public resources cannot
be used for advocacy. Thus, neither an individual appointed policy-maker nor a board comprised
of such employees may use their individual titles or their board name in a political advertisement
in favor of or against a ballot question. No public employee may use public resources to send out
a mass mailing, place an advertisement in a newspaper, or distribute to voters, directly or through
others, such as school children, a flyer concerning the substance of a ballot question. By contrast,
while elected officials may not use their board or agency name in an advertisement in support or
opposition of a ballot question, they may use their individual titles in such advertisement.
Policy-making officials are permitted to speak on or act related to ballot questions during
work hours if they are doing so as part of their official responsibilities. This may include
generating an analysis of the impacts of a ballot question, or offering the agency’s position on
the question as long as it does not expressly advocate for a particular vote. Any such materials
would be a public record, and any private group would be entitled to distribute the materials at its
own expense, but the use of public resources to distribute such materials would be prohibited
under most circumstances.
Public resources may also be used to create and distribute materials for a public meeting
or hearing, as long as the primary purpose of the materials are to foster discussion at the meeting.
Public resources may also be used to distribute content neutral notice to voters announcing the
times, and dates of meetings or elections. However, public resources may not be used to inform
only a particular subset of voters about an upcoming election, as it would not be neutral in effect.
A public building used for governmental purposes cannot be used for political
fundraising. But, if “equal access” is provided, there are circumstances under which groups
supporting or opposing a ballot question may use public resources for political activities. Equal
access means that groups supporting or opposing ballot questions are allowed to use government
buildings as long as any other group is given the opportunity to have a similar meeting on the
same terms and conditions. Equal access does not mean that a town is required to offer access to
any group, as long as it applies the policy equally. Equal access does not provide a right to be
placed on a particular meeting agenda. Equal access is triggered by the use of public resources
primarily for political purposes.
In addition to the use of government buildings, if access is provided to other public
resources for political purposes, then equal access must be provided to all groups. Examples
include access to a public park for a rally, use of mailing labels or access to distribute flyers in
school mailboxes.
Example 2: Ballot question
The warrant article passes, and in a future year, a debt exclusion is placed on the ballot to
finance a particular school construction project. As this relates to a question on the ballot
before the voters it is an election related political activity subject to both the campaign
finance law and the conflict-of-interest law.
A non-policymaking public employee, such as a classroom teacher, cannot engage in any
political activities during the school day or while using school resources. A policymaking
public employee may take a position on the ballot question if it is within their agency’s
purview. For example, the Superintendent may speak to the press in support of the
question. Elected officials may identify themselves by their official titles while
campaigning in support of the question. By contrast, a classroom teacher or the
Superintendent are prohibited from identifying themselves by title to endorse the question
in any advocacy materials.
If a campaign committee is created to support the question, any public employee may
contribute personal funds or engage in volunteer work during personal time to support the
committee's activities. However, only an elected public employee may engage in
fundraising activities for the committee.
The Town cannot send out material to residents, even material designed to be facially
neutral, unless it complies with M.G.L. c. 53, §18B, or another authorizing statute. The
Superintendent cannot use school email to send out an email to all school parents
informing them of the time and place of the election, because by sending to a subset of
the electorate, a communication can lose its neutrality.
If a ballot committee wants to hold a rally to “Save Our Schools” at a public school
auditorium, they may be permitted to do so, as long as the opposing side is afforded the
same opportunity to do so on the same terms.
The Superintendent may direct subordinates to create a report projecting the impact of a
yes or no vote on student achievement. The materials cannot support a position, but can
be used to inform the public about the impacts of the vote. A campaign committee can
then, with private funds, send a copy of the report to every household in town. The
Superintendent cannot use school resources to make photocopies of the report to send
home with each student.
***
As evidenced from the above, navigating the landscape of permitted political activities
can be difficult for public employees. I strongly encourage anyone with questions to reach out to
my office for additional guidance.
Sincerely,
Ivria Fried
Attachment A
Public Employee Political Activity
Appointed
Non Policy-Making
Appointed
Policy-Making Elected
Serve on a private ballot
question committee or on
a campaign committee.
Outside of work hours only. Outside of work hours only. Yes.
Contribute to a political
committee or expend
personal funds to support
or oppose a ballot
question or political
candidate
Yes. Yes. Yes.
Advocate or engage in
political activities during
work hours
No.
With respect to ballot questions,
only if the ballot question is
related to the official’s
responsibilities. Otherwise, no.
Yes.
Advocate or engage in
political activities while
acting in an official
capacity or wearing an
official uniform
No.
With respect to ballot questions,
only if the ballot question is
related to the official’s
responsibilities. Otherwise, no.
Yes.
Discuss a ballot question
at public or private
meetings
Outside of work hours only.
Outside of work hours only unless
the ballot question is related to
the official’s responsibilities.
Yes.
Take a position on a
warrant article
Outside of work hours,
provided that staff may
engage in related activities
concerning matters within the
purview of their agency at the
direction of a superior.
Outside of work hours only unless
the matter is related to the
official’s responsibilities.
Yes, provided that elected
officials with set work-
hours may only engage in
activities related to their
official responsibilities
during work hours.
Appointed
Non Policy-Making
Appointed
Policy-Making Elected
Take a position on a
ballot question Yes. Yes. Yes.
Analyze the impact of a
ballot question Yes. Yes. Yes.
Provide copies of an
analysis or position
statement related to a
ballot question
Yes. Yes. Yes.
Hold an informational
forum related to a ballot
question
Outside of work hours only.
Outside of work hours only unless
the ballot question is related to
the official’s responsibilities.
Yes.
Speak to the press about
a ballot question
Outside of work hours only,
except that staff may respond
to inquiries from the press if
directed to do so.
Outside of work hours only unless
the ballot question is related to
the official’s responsibilities.
Yes.
Appear on cable
television Outside of work hours only.
Outside of work hours only unless
the ballot question is related to
the official’s responsibilities.
Yes.
Use an official title in
endorsing or opposing
ballot question
No.
Only if the ballot question is
related to the official’s
responsibilities.
Yes.
Use an official title in
endorsing or opposing a
political candidate
No. No.
Yes, however, elected
boards or other
governmental bodies may
not as a body endorse or
oppose candidate for an
elected office.
Appointed
Non Policy-Making
Appointed
Policy-Making Elected
Use a public building for
advocacy
Only outside of work hours;
must be a building to which
equal access is provided.
With respect to ballot questions,
only outside of work hours unless
the ballot question is related to
the official’s responsibilities; must
be a building to which equal
access is provided. Otherwise, no.
Must be a building to which
equal access is provided.
Attend a political
committee’s campaign
function
Outside of work hours only. Outside of work hours only. Yes.
Host a political
committee’s campaign
function.
Outside of work hours only,
provided that no fundraising
may be done.
Outside of work hours only,
provided that no fundraising may
be done.
Yes, unless the official is
also an appointed official.
Post information on a
government bulletin
board or website
Only if the information is
prepared as part of the
official’s responsibilities.
Yes. Yes.
Distribute information or
advocacy to voters using
public resources (email,
computers, printers or
anything paid for with
public money)
No. No. No.
Distribute information or
advocacy to voters using
private resources
Outside of work hours only. Outside of work hours only. Yes.
Accept donations or
payments for fundraising
purposes
No. No. Yes, unless the official is
also an appointed official.
Sign a fundraising letter
on behalf of a candidate No. No. Yes, unless the official is
also an appointed official.
Attachment B
Old Business
Reading Public Schools
School Committee Meeting Packet
January 23, 2025
Reading Public Schools
Superintendent’s FY26
Recommended Budget
Superintendent’s FY26 Recommended Budget
-Review of FY23, FY24, and FY25 Budget Additions
-FY26 Budget Additions
-1.0 FTE Kindergarten Teacher
-Universal, Tuition-Free Kindergarten
-Considerations for Future Budget Years
-Finance Committee Budget Guidance
-FY26 Recommended Budget
-FY26 Recommended Budget by Cost Center
-Capital Plan Review
-FY26 Budget Timeline
Review of FY23, FY24, and
FY25 Budget Additions
3 Years of Strategic Investments: FY23 Budget Year
5.0 FTE School Adjustment Counselor/METCO Coordinator at each elementary school
Prior to the implementation of the FY23 budget, the elementary schools did not have school
counselors. We know that a student’s sense of connectedness to their school community is
one of the largest factors in determining academic success, and one of our primary strategies
in improving student connectedness and belonging has been to increase student access to
school counselors. Our counselors play a pivotal role in supporting students through
academic, personal, and social challenges, such as navigating peer relationships, balancing
academic priorities and demands, and deepening self-confidence. These roles also serve as
direct liaisons and supports for our Boston resident students and families. As schools
continue to see an increase in social-emotional and academic need following the pandemic,
our school counselors have become increasingly critical in the educational experience of our
students. Through this addition, each elementary school has a full-time School
Counselor/METCO Coordinator. The funding for these roles is split between the district
operating budget and the METCO grant.
3 Years of Strategic Investments: FY23 Budget Year
1.0 FTE Director of Academic Achievement at the high school
This role has been instrumental in moving several key initiatives forward at RMHS, including:
-Developing five new Innovation Pathways, with significant funding from DESE (Department of
Elementary and Secondary Education) and partnerships with our community, aimed at developing
employable skills in high-demand occupations, connecting learning to authentic and real-world settings,
and aligning school-based opportunities to the ever-expanding interests of our students.
-Scaling our paid senior internship program to include close to 200 students and 60 community partners,
enabling seniors to experience career exploration through a wide range of work-based learning
opportunities.
-Developing partnerships with several local universities to expand dual-enrollment opportunities,
enabling students to gain college credits while taking courses at RMHS.
-Restructuring our school-based Instructional Leadership Team to empower and support our Department
Heads, leading to significant improvements in teaching and learning in classrooms across the school.
-Ms. Callanan was originally hired into this role in 2022, but shifted to the interim principal role in 2023.
As she moved to the interim principal role, Ms. Callanan maintained the job responsibilities associated
with the Director of Academic Achievement position. The Director of Academic Achievement position
was reallocated to an additional Assistant Principal position, which has been maintained in the FY26
budget.
3 Years of Strategic Investments: FY23 Budget Year
1.0 FTE teacher in the English Language Learner department and translation services
.2 FTE increase to English Language Coordinator
We have seen a significant increase of multilingual learners (MLL) in our district over
the past several years, growing from 42 in October 2018 to 74 in October 2023. As
the MLL population continues to grow in the district, the 1.0 FTE teacher in the ELL
department and .20 FTE increase to the EL Coordinator are crucial in ensuring
appropriate group ratios, services, and instruction for our English Language Learners.
.20 FTE staff in the Stepping Stones Program
This position continues to provide five full days of academic support to high school
students’ returning to school from hospital and out-of-school settings. This can be a
challenging transition for students and the additional support has been instrumental in
building out this program.
3 Years of Strategic Investments: FY23 Budget Year
1.0 FTE increase in School Counselors at the middle school level
1.0 FTE Social Worker increase for the REACH program at the middle school level
The REACH (Resiliency, Executive Functioning, Academics, Coping Strategies,
Habits of Mind) program moved from Coolidge Middle School to Parker Middle
School during the 2022-2023 school year, creating a need at the high school and
middle school level for increased support. The investment in these resources has
increased access for social emotional support to students, equalized social
emotional support available to students across both Coolidge and Parker Middle
Schools.
Investing in the 1.0 FTE increase in School Counselors at the middle school and 1.0
FTE social worker for the REACH program contribute valuable resources that
enhance students' access to social and emotional support at the secondary level.
3 Years of Strategic Investments: FY23 Budget Year
1.0 FTE Nurse
The addition of this position has expanded support to students and positions the Director of K-12 Health
Services to oversee the district wide health services and be available to provide direct services to students
as needed. Students now have more access to district wide health programming through the actionable
work of the Director of Health Services.
.40 FTE District Data Specialist
As the district continues to expand analysis of student performance and targeted interventions, increasing
the District Data Specialist role from 0.6 to 1.0 FTE provided for oversight of curriculum applications,
adoption of assessments and benchmarking data diagnostics. The data specialist is charged with compiling
student data from a variety of sources and creating data displays for district and school leaders to ensure
the accurate use of data in decision making, analysis of trends and reporting of progress. For example, the
data specialist created and monitors a data dashboard for each school to track student attendance based
on a need to reduce the number of students who are chronically absent. Additionally, the data specialist
manages assessment platforms and compiles data required for state reporting. The data specialist supports
the district's data-driven approach through statistical analysis of data from student assessments supporting
an environment of continuous improvement.
3 Years of Strategic Investments: FY24 Budget Year
1.5 FTEs of ESL (English as a Second Language) teacher positions
With a high number of MLL students assessing as beginner-level English proficiency in 2022, the district
saw a need for additional teachers. We continue to see an increase in our MLL population with this
addition being utilized to provide weekly recommended instructional hours to students. Supporting the
language development of MLL students is essential to their academic and social progress in school.
2.0 FTE K-8 Math Coaches
These roles were developed to improve math outcomes in our district by providing teachers with access to
consistent, job-embedded coaching and support. K-8 math coaches are integrating externally provided
training into our district while working within our existing frameworks alongside our educators. They
support increased implementation of high-quality curriculum materials, improve instructional practices, and
foster deeper opportunities for rigorous math learning. This includes ensuring vertical and horizontal
alignment, embedding educator professional learning into daily teaching cycles, and offering targeted
training opportunities, collaborative sessions with teacher groups, and personalized 1:1 coaching.
Furthermore, they play a crucial role in onboarding new staff, ensuring sustained implementation of our
curriculum materials beyond the initial adoption phase. We are seeing increased utilization and impact of
the K-8 Math Coaches, as outlined in the 2024 RPS Annual Community Report.
3 Years of Strategic Investments: FY24 Budget Year
5.0 FTE Elementary Assistant Principals
All 5 of our elementary schools now have a full-time Assistant Principal. Prior to the FY24 budget, our elementary schools
each had a full-time teacher who received a stipend to serve as a part-time Assistant Principal. Investing in building
leadership is at the core of improving academic outcomes. A 2012 study of the impact of principals noted that “highly
effective principals raise the achievement of a typical student in their schools by between two and seven months of learning
in a single school year; ineffective principals lower achievement by the same amount.” Given this impact, a recent research
analysis by the Wallace Foundation noted “it is difficult to envision an investment in K-12 education with a higher ceiling on
its potential return than improving school leadership.” While our district continues to invest in professional development
and individualized coaching for principals, our administrative structure at the elementary level posed a barrier to leveraging
the impact of principals on student outcomes. With the significant changes in the field of education, especially within the
last 5 years, the roles of building leaders have become exponentially more challenging. Within Reading, our adoption of
high-quality curriculum materials, our increased enrollment of diverse populations, and our increases in student social-
emotional and academic needs have all added significant responsibilities and expectations to those leading our buildings.
These shifts also highlight the need for principals to act as instructional leaders in their schools. To do so, it was necessary to
provide the staffing required to ensure the responsibilities and management of our buildings was done efficiently and
effectively to create structures for success in our schools. To support all our students, families, educators, and principals,
elementary assistant principals share building-level responsibilities including (but not limited to) teacher evaluations,
programmatic support, family and community engagement, and responding to day-to-day needs, allowing our principals to
enhance their own capacity as leaders of learning communities. Overall, these new roles provide our elementary schools
with the administrative leadership structure necessary to harness the impact of principal leadership on students. This new
structure also creates an internal pipeline of leadership talent to fill principal vacancies as they arise in this district.
3 Years of Strategic Investments: FY24 Budget Year
1.0 FTE Middle School Adjustment Counselor/METCO (Metropolitan Council for
Educational Opportunity) Coordinator
With an increased need to support the social-emotional and behavioral health of our
students, this shared Middle School Adjustment Counselor/METCO Coordinator
position supports the social-emotional and behavioral health of students and the goals
of the METCO program at Coolidge and Parker Middle Schools. This role mirrors the
School Adjustment Counselor/METCO Coordinator roles in our five elementary
schools. This new role has received positive feedback from our students, staff, and
families in the impact it is having on students academically, socially, and emotionally.
The funding for this role is split between the district operating budget and the METCO
grant.
1.0 FTE 1 to 1 Nurse
This 1 to 1 nurse is required to meet an individual student’s medical need for the
student to access the school setting.
3 Years of Strategic Investments: FY24 Budget Year
1.0 FTE RMHS METCO Coordinator
This role helps to support all students, specially Boston resident students as we see an
increase in enrollment. This role has been pivotal in serving as a liaison with students,
families, and staff regarding the academic and social-emotional progress of students. This
role is funded fully through the METCO grant.
1.0 FTE Elementary Special Education Teacher
This position continues to be a requirement to ensure compliance with IEP (Individualized
Education Plan) services. This position at Joshua Eaton provides inclusion and direct
instruction to students who require special education literacy and math instruction.
1.0 FTE Middle School Special Education Teacher
The addition of this position at Coolidge ensures compliance with IEP services. This position
at Coolidge provides inclusion and direct instruction to students who require special
education literacy and math instruction.
3 Years of Strategic Investments: FY24 Budget Year
3.0 FTE High School Counselors
In the last two budget cycles, 3.0 FTE counselors were added at RMHS in the following
capacities:
1.0 FTE allocated full-time to the Stepping Stones program
1.0 FTE allocated to school-wide counseling and social-emotional support for all student
1.0 FTE allocated to the RMHS Guidance Department
2.6 FTE Special Education Team Chairs
To ensure consistency with practice and compliance, the additional team chair positions
allow each school to have at least one full-time special education administrator. This allows
the team chairs to have a direct role in instructional support within special education
classrooms. Additionally, they are responsible for implementing the reading protocol, as
needed, during the evaluation process to ensure all students have access to appropriate
instruction and data collection methods.
3 Years of Strategic Investments: FY24 Budget Year
1.0 Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA)
In alignment with the special education program review recommendations, this additional BCBA provides
support for students enrolled in the SOAR (Social Skills Organizational Skills Academics in Real World
Situations)/EMBARC (Education Meaningful Inclusion, Becoming Independent, Advocacy, Relaxation, and
Leisure Activities 2, Community Integration) programs. This position serves students in Preschool to grade
12. The primary role of the BCBA is to provide consultative support to teams and families regarding
evaluations, behavioral interventions, and data collection.
1.0 Secondary Transition Specialist
In alignment with the special education program review recommendations, this position provides direct
evaluation and transition planning support for students ages 14-22. This position supports teams and
students to identify the skills needed to further their post schooling endeavors. As part of the IEP process
for all students there must be a transition plan beginning at age 14. The transition specialist helps develop
an evaluation protocol and education support to make sure all students who receive special education
services are prepared for their post-secondary transition. Additionally, for students who need more
specific job, leisure and life skills this position helps support community-based learning activities.
3 Years of Strategic Investments: FY25 Budget Year
Speech Language Pathologist from 0.4 FTE to 1.0 FTE
Due to growing caseloads, the need for program expansion, and the demands of IEPs, we increased one
Speech Language Pathologist from 0.4 FTE to 1.0 FTE. An increase to this position was critical to meet the
needs of students and provide improved outcomes outlined in Individualized Education Plans (IEPs).
Elementary LEAD Program Teacher (1.0 FTE)
To meet the needs of students in the LEAD program at Joshua Eaton Elementary School, we added an
additional 1.0 teaching position. Originally a 1-year, .5 role, this investment aimed to ensure consistency
in providing effective instruction aligned with the goals and objectives outlined in student IEPs and
specifically provide direct structured multisensory reading instruction by certified staff..
High School Administrative Assistant (1.0 FTE)
Increasing staffing in the high school main office has provided more support to students, staff, and families
and created more equity in office staffing ratios with other schools in the district.
3 Years of Strategic Investments: FY25 Budget Year
ESSER Funded Positions: 2.0 FTE Secondary Guidance Counselors and 1.0 FTE Middle
School Special Education Teacher.
Positions that were funded through the ESSER grant through FY24 were evaluated to
determine sustaining these roles long term. The FY25 budget included these three positions
which were previously funded by the ESSER grant. The incorporation of these positions into
the operating budget ensures compliance with IEPs and supports the behavioral health of our
students
1 Year 1.0 FTE Parker METCO Coordinator
This role helps to support all students, specially Boston resident students as we see an
increase in enrollment. This role has been pivotal in serving as a liaison with students,
families, and staff regarding the academic and social-emotional progress of students. This
role is funded fully through the METCO grant and was a 1-year position.
FY26 Additions
Tuition-Free Full-Day Kindergarten -RPS History
Year Tuition Cost Notes
2020-2021 $4,450 One of 23 communities across the state
to charge for full day K, RPS was second
highest.
2021-2022 $4,450 One of 24 communities across the state
to charge for full day K, RPS was the
highest.
2022-2023 $3,600 One of 18 communities across the state
to charge for full day K, RPS was the 9th
highest.
2023-2024 $2,650 State-wide data not yet available
2024-2025 $1,450 State-wide data not yet available
Additional 1.0 FTE Kindergarten Teacher
School Name Projected Total
Barrows 77
Birch Meadow 59
Joshua Eaton 76
Killam 91
Wood End 37
Total Projected
Enrollment
340
-Projections are primarily based on census data.
-Students who delayed registration last year have been
included in this year’s projections.
-Given the higher enrollment, we project needing an additional 4
kindergarten classrooms.
-However, due to a larger graduating Grade 5 cohort, the impact is
offset, requiring only 1.0 additional Kindergarten teacher.
Considerations for Future
Budget Years
Considerations for Future Funding: Preschool &
Elementary Level Priorities
Social Emotional Learning (SEL) Curriculum
The elementary SEL Curriculum, Open Circle, has been in place for many years, but in recent years,
teachers have reported the content of the program does not provide adequate instruction in social-
emotional competencies. A curriculum review in the area of SEL is underway to examine district-wide SEL
practices and supports. Several elementary schools are piloting a new SEL curriculum with the goal of
identifying a curriculum to utilize for SEL instruction. A new SEL curriculum would improve student access
to developmentally appropriate, explicit instruction in SEL and allows schools to build consistent
vocabulary and expectations that support positive school environments.
Additional Tier II Interventionists (math and literacy)
Tier II Interventionists play an important role in ensuring students receive required academic interventions.
In addition to the core, grade-level classroom instruction, some students benefit from additional
instruction, often in small groups to reinforce, practice and reteach material. We are continuously looking
for ways to improve and expand our Tier II model.
Considerations for Future Funding: Secondary
Level Priorities
Health Teacher (Middle Level)
Currently at Coolidge Middle School, the health curriculum is delivered as part of students’ physical
education classes by the two PE teachers. While not required, it is recommended that health classes be
taught by a licensed health teacher, and only one of the Coolidge PE teachers holds that educator license.
Adding a health teacher would improve the quality of instruction in health-related skills, which are
essential to the development of middle school students. This additional teacher would also allow
alignment in the model for health instruction between the two middle schools.
SEL Programming
It is important to foster a robust SEL curriculum and programming in order to meet the social, emotional
needs of our current study population. Partnering with outside organizations builds the capacity of our
students, teachers, and families and caregivers to see outside of themselves. Programming such as
Challenge Day or Urban Improv Rehearsal for Life are great partners who can help build this aspect for
students.
Considerations for Future Funding: Secondary
Level Priorities
RMHS ASL Teacher
RMHS offered ASL as a language course for the first time in 2024-2025. RMHS is already
seeing an increase in interest in ASL and will need to add and adjust staffing in the future to
align to student interest.
RMHS Tier 2 Teacher
RMHS continues to explore various models to provide stronger and more timely Tier 2
interventions for students. For example, in the past, this has included the development and
pilot of the academic lab within the RMHS library. In the future, this model could include a
designated staff member to oversee and facilitate a space for Tier 2 interventions. More
conversations on this topic will continue in the years to come.
Considerations for Future Funding: District Level
Priorities
Additional METCO Coordinator/School Adjustment Counselor (SAC)
The middle school METCO Coordinator/SAC is split between two buildings. Moving to a model where
each of our middle schools had a full-time METCO Coordinator/SAC would provide each of our middle
school students with more access to social-emotional and academic support.
Additional Instructional Coaches
In FY24, we added 2 full-time math instructional coaches. With the addition of two K-8 math instructional
coaches, our educators now have the opportunity to work side-by-side with content experts, tackle real-
time classroom challenges, and continuously sharpen their teaching strategies. This investment has already
started to positively impact student achievement outcomes. It would be ideal to have similar coaching in
other critical content areas and also to expand our math coaching model.
Considerations for Future Funding: District Level
Priorities
Curriculum Materials/Resources
In recent years, RPS has transitioned to implementing high-quality curriculum materials in our schools to
support student learning and teacher effectiveness. Unlike traditional curriculum models, where costs were
largely incurred upfront and focused on print materials, these modern programs include digital components
that require ongoing funding. Digital licenses provide students access to interactive learning platforms,
equip teachers with continually updated digital guides, and offer teaching aids such as lesson presentations
and assessments. To ensure the sustainability of these high-quality programs and maintain their benefits
for students and educators, it is essential to allocate additional funds each year for digital licenses and
related resources. This investment will enable us to uphold the rigor and relevance of our instructional
materials in the years ahead.
Additional Special Education Staff
Updating our special education staffing models is critical as we respond to growing caseloads and meet
student needs in both sub separate and learning centers.
Considerations for Future Funding: District Level
Priorities
Additional Multilingual Learner (MLL) Staff
RPS continues to see an increase in our MLL population. In the years to come, it is critical that we continue to update our MLL
staffing model to provide our students with high-quality instruction and meet state-required time on learning requirements.
Building Substitute
Providing schools with access to a full-time building substitute would be helpful in effectively covering staff absences, meetings,
and peer observations.
RMHS Lift Van
The 18-22-year-old program serves students in a critical stage of transition, focusing on equipping them with essential life skills,
job readiness, and community engagement experiences. Access to consistent, reliable transportation is integral to achieving the
program’s goals, as it allows students to participate in community-based learning opportunities that are vital for their personal and
professional growth. Currently, the program relies on shared access to a van during the school day. However, this arrangement
has proven to be highly challenging. A dedicated van for the 18-22-year-old program would resolve these challenges by:
-Ensuring Consistency: Students could participate in planned activities without disruptions caused by competing demands.
-Reducing Logistical Barriers: Staff would no longer need to coordinate key exchanges or manage scheduling conflicts.
-Maximizing Opportunities: The program could fully implement its community-based learning plans, aligning with best
practices for transition programming.
Considerations for Future Funding: School
Committee Investment Priorities
●Support for High-Need Groups: Build on METCO grant and summer reading
opportunities; focus on high-need groups such as MLL, students with IEPs, etc. to
address learning gaps.
●Program Evaluations: Continue evaluating existing programs to ensure effectiveness
and efficiency.
●Executive Functioning Tools: Investment in tools to support executive functioning skills.
●Busing Needs: Address the need for bussing in general education.
●HVAC Upgrades: Consider HVAC review and upgrades in the capital plan.
●Math Coaches: The addition of these positions has had a clear impact; explore the
possibility of expanding as funds allow.
●Support for Behavioral Needs: Additional support or programming to address behavioral
challenges in the lower grades.
●Half-Day Fridays: Evaluate the impact of half-day Fridays at the elementary level, with a
focus on maximizing time for learning.
Finance Committee Budget
Guidance
Finance Committee Budget Guidance
●October 2024: Finance Committee, operating budget +3.5% for FY26
●Operating Funds $52,029,875
●Special Education Accommodated Costs +4.6%
●Total: $58,491,591
FY26 Recommended Budget
FY26 Recommended Budget
●Operating Funds ($52,029,875):
○An increase of $1,754,392 over FY25 has been allocated to meet the increased costs of all contractual
obligations,mandated services,and investments aligned to the district’s strategic plan.
○The district is committed to meeting all contractual obligations outlined in contracts with all 5 district
bargaining units.All five bargaining units (cafeteria staff,custodians,paraprofessionals,secretaries and
teachers)agreed to new contracts spanning three years,starting in FY25.
●Special Education Accommodated Costs ($6,311,716):
○An increase of $276,388 over FY25 is allocated to Accommodated Costs,which includes out-of-district special
education placement tuition and transportation costs.
●Town of Reading’s Community Priorities ($150,000):
○Monies have been allocated for use toward reducing the FDK tuition fee.
FY26 Budget by Cost
Centers
FY26 Recommend Budget by Cost Center
●Separation by Cost Center
●Dollar amounts compared with prior fiscal years
●% Change year-over-year
Summary of FY26 Recommended Budget by Cost Center Compared with Prior Fiscal Years:
FY26 Recommended Budget by Cost Center
●Expenditures attributed to Cost Center as a portion of overall budget
●Historical expenditure table
FY26 Recommended Budget: Administration
FY25 Appropriated Budget:$1,374,689
FY26 School Committee’s Recommended Budget:$1,447,959
%Change over FY25:5.33%
FY26 Recommended Budget: Special Education
FY25 Appropriated Budget:$17,635,574
FY26 School Committee’s Recommended Budget:$19,191,229
%Change:8.82%
FY26 Recommended Budget: Regular Day
FY25 Appropriated Budget:$33,077,097
FY26 School Committee’s Recommended Budget:$33,615,467
%Change:1.63%
FY26 Recommended Budget: Athletics
FY25 Appropriated Budget:$789,018
FY26 School Committee’s Recommended Budget: $811,079
% Change: 2.80%
FY26 Recommended Budget: Extra Curricular
FY25 Appropriated Budget:$81,186
FY26 School Committee’s Recommended Budget:$85,801
%Change:5.68%
FY26 Recommended Budget: Health Services
FY25 Appropriated Budget:$969,558
FY26 School Committee’s Recommended Budget:$1,042,252
%Change:7.50%
FY26 Recommended Budget: Technology
FY25 Appropriated Budget:$686,736
FY26 School Committee’s Recommended Budget:$712,344
%Change:3.72%
FY26 Recommended Budget: Facilities
FY25 Appropriated Budget:$1,696,953
FY26 School Committee’s Recommended Budget:$1,585,460
%Change:-6.57%
Capital Plan Review
Five-Year Capital Plan
Provided below is a five-year capital project plan for the school district:
FY26 Budget Timeline
FY26 Budget Timeline
At School Committee Meetings:
FY 26 Superintendent's Budget Presentation and Budget Publication
Jan. 14
FY 26 Budget Overview: Cost Centers
Jan. 16
FY 26 Public Budget Hearing
Jan. 23
Updated FY26 Budget Publication, with FAQ, released in SC packet
Jan. 28
FY 26 School Committee Discussion/Vote on Recommended Budget
Jan. 30
In Conversation with the Community:
Finance Committee
Feb. 26
Town Meeting begins
READING PUBLIC SCHOOLS
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget
July 1, 2025 - June 30, 2026
“Ball” by Katherine Dougherty, RMHS Class of ’24 student in Ms. Kathleen M. Dailey’s AP Photography class
Contact Information
Copies of the budget document are available at the Office of the Superintendent and on the Reading Public School’s
website at www.reading.k12.ma.us. For additional information or clarification on the Superintendent ’s FY26
Recommended Budget, please feel free to contact the Central Office Administration for assistance at 781-944-5800.
Also, please reach out directly to the Superintendent or Director of Finance and Operations:
Thomas Milaschewski, Ed.D. Phillip Littlehale
Superintendent of Schools Interim Director of Finance and Operations
781-944-5800 781-670-2880
Thomas.Milaschewski@reading.k12.ma.us Philip.Littlehale@reading.k12.ma.us
School Committee Members
Thomas Wise, Chairperson
Erin Gaffen, Vice Chairperson
Shawn Brandt, School Committee Member
Sarah McLaughlin, School Committee Member
Carla Nazzaro, School Committee Member
Charles Robinson, School Committee Member
Superintendent of Schools
Thomas Milaschewski, Ed.D.
Reading Public Schools
82 Oakland Road
Reading, Massachusetts
Website: http://reading.k12.ma.us
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 2
District Leadership Team
Central Office Administrators
Sarah Hardy, Ed.D., Assistant Superintendent for Learning & Teaching
Phillip Littlehale., Interim Director of Finance and Operations
Michelle Roach, Human Resources Director
Jennifer Stys, Ed.D., Assistant Superintendent of Student Services
Other District Administrators
Erin Burchill, Humanities Curriculum Coordinator
Julian Carr, Network Manager
Catherine Franzetti, Director of School Nutrition
Kevin Gerstner, Facilities Manager
Mary Giuliana, Director of Health Services
Karen Hall, Multilingual Learner (MLL) Department Coordinator
Joseph Huggins, Director of Facilities for Town and School Buildings
Mary Anne Lynn, Interim STEM Curriculum Coordinator
Cindy Marte, Co - Interim METCO Director
Jerika Santiago, Co - Interim METCO Director
Christopher Nelson, Director of Extended Day, Drivers Education, and Adult and Community Education
Alanna Shone, R.I.S.E. Preschool Director
Allison Wright, Special Education Director
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 3
School Administrators
Reading Memorial High School
Jessica Callanan, Principal
Kadi Buckley, Assistant Principal
Meredith Flanagan, Assistant Principal
Jessica Theriault, Assistant Principal
Thomas Zaya, Assistant Principal, Athletics & Extra-curricular Activities
A.W. Coolidge Middle School
Sarah Marchant, Principal
Brienne Karow, Assistant Principal
W.S. Parker Middle School
Jill Story, Principal
Beth Simpson, Assistant Principal
Alice Barrows Elementary School
Alissa Gallegos, Principal
Annemarie Ring, Assistant Principal
Birch Meadow Elementary School
Stephen Burnham, Principal
Lisa Azzarito, Assistant Principal
Joshua Eaton Elementary School
Caitlin Shelburne, Principal
Jessica Swindell, Assistant Principal
J.W. Killam Elementary School
Lindsey Fulton, Principal
Talia Hallett, Assistant Principal
Wood End Elementary School
Nicole Schwartz, Principal
Jessica Hester, Assistant Principal
RISE Preschool
Alanna Shone, Director
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 4
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTORY SECTION 7
Superintendent ’s Message 8
Finance Committee’s Budget Guidelines 9
School Committee’s Budget Guidance & Investment Priorities 9
Mission, Vision, Statement of Equity, and Portrait of a Graduate 10
Budget Development Process and Timeline 11
Budget Review: FY23, FY24, and FY25 Investments 13
FY26 Recommended Budget Investments 19
Major Focus Areas with No Impact to FY25 Recommended Budget 19
Funding Considerations for the Future 20
FINANCIAL SECTION 23
The Superintendent’s FY26 Recommended Budget by Cost Center 25
Administration Cost Center Summary 27
Regular Day Cost Center Summary 29
Special Education Cost Center Summary 32
School Facilities Cost Center Summary 34
District Wide Programs Summaries (Athletics, Extra Curricular, Health Services, Technology) 36
OTHER FUNDING SOURCES 45
Offset Summary 46
Special Revenue Funds 47
Federal and State Grants 49
Five-Year Capital Plan 52
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 5
APPENDICES 53
APPENDIX A: Student Enrollment 54
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 6
INTRODUCTORY SECTION
Light Painting, RMHS Photography Club
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 7
Superintendent’s Message
Dear Reading Community,
As we present the recommended budget for FY26, we want to express our heartfelt gratitude to every member of
our community for your steadfast support of our schools. Your financial contributions, combined with the time,
energy, and advocacy you dedicate, are essential in fostering the success of our students. The pride and
commitment that our Reading community demonstrates toward public education are truly remarkable, and on
behalf of our district, I extend sincere appreciation for your ongoing partnership.
The FY26 budget primarily represents a “level-service” approach, but we are thrilled to highlight an exciting
milestone: the transition to universal, tuition-free kindergarten for all students in the district. Just four years ago,
Reading was among the few districts in Massachusetts still charging tuition for full-day kindergarten and had the
second highest tuition fee in the state. We are incredibly grateful for the leadership, advocacy, and foresight of our
Reading School Committee and town leadership in implementing a multi-year plan that has made this possible.
Eliminating tuition not only eases the financial burden on families but also ensures access to a high-quality
kindergarten experience for every student. Alongside this transition, the only new addition in the FY26 budget is a
1.0 FTE Kindergarten teacher to address projected class sizes.
As we look ahead to FY26, our focus remains on building upon the roles, programs, and initiatives implemented
over the past several fiscal years to enhance student outcomes. Within this budget book, you will find updates on
the impact of these investments from FY23, FY24, and FY25, which are already yielding positive results across our
schools. These enhancements are particularly evident in the quality of classroom instruction and the strengthened
sense of belonging and connection among our students. In a few weeks, all Reading community members will
receive the 2024 RPS Annual Community Report that highlights the impact of many of these recent investments on
our students.
Our district remains steadfast in maximizing the impact of every dollar to support the success of our students. With
your continued partnership, we are confident that these investments will further nurture an environment of
academic achievement and personal growth across the district.
In partnership for our students,
Dr. Thomas Milaschewski
Superintendent
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 8
Finance Committee’s Budget Guidelines
In October 2024, the Finance Committee voted for a FY26 School Department budget guideline of 3.5%, over the
FY25 Appropriated Budget. The increase amounted to $1,904,392. This number takes into account the prior year ’s
community priority for Full-Day Kindergarten. It was added to increase the school base, and so as not to lose it as a
“one-time” increase. Special Education Accommodated Costs were increased by 4.6%, or $276,388.
Through the Town’s Community Priority allocation, an additional $150,000 was earmarked for the purpose of
reducing the Full-Day Kindergarten (FDK) tuition fee Offset, bringing the community one step closer to providing
Universal Free FDK, and moving the cumulative School Department budget totals from $56,310,311 in FY25, to
$58,491,591 in FY26; an increase of 3.9%.
School Committee’s Budget Guidance & Investment Priorities
While presenting a level service budget, we also aim to consider investment priorities for the future. Developing a
school district budget that aligns resources with the initiatives outlined in the district ’s strategic plan requires
collaborative discussions on fund allocation. The Reading School Committee provided the following guidance to
support the District ’s Leadership Team in shaping the FY26 Recommended Budget and identifying investment
priorities moving forward:
● Support for High-Need Groups: Build on METCO grant and summer reading opportunities; focus on
high-need groups such as MLL, students with IEPs, etc. to address learning gaps.
● Program Evaluations: Continue evaluating existing programs to ensure effectiveness and efficiency.
● Executive Functioning Tools: Investment in tools to support executive functioning skills.
● Busing Needs: Address the need for bussing in general education.
● HVAC Upgrades: Consider HVAC review and upgrades in the capital plan.
● Math Coaches: The addition of these positions has had a clear impact; explore the possibility of expanding
as funds allow.
● Support for Behavioral Needs: Additional support or programming to address behavioral challenges in the
lower grades.
● Half-Day Fridays: Evaluate the impact of half-day Fridays at the elementary level, with a focus on
maximizing time for learning.
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 9
Mission, Vision, Statement of Equity, and Portrait of a
Graduate
Mission of the Reading Public Schools
Instilling a joy of learning and inspiring the innovative leaders of tomorrow.
Vision of the Reading Public Schools
It is the vision of the Reading Public Schools to instill a joy of learning by inspiring, engaging and supporting our
youth to become the innovative leaders of tomorrow. We will accomplish our vision by focusing on a few key
strategic initiatives that lead to a meaningful and relevant curriculum, innovative instructional practices, strong
analysis and thoughtful dialogue about evidence, a collaborative and team approach to learning and teaching, and a
safe and nurturing learning environment. The overall physical and behavioral well-being of our children will be our
top priority, as students will not learn if they are not physically and psychologically safe. Education will truly be the
shared responsibility of both the schools and the community, with families playing active roles in the schools and
being full partners in ensuring the success of their children. In the interest of the entire Reading community, the
school district and town government shall work cooperatively and collaboratively. As educators and members of our
community, we believe that implementing this vision is our ethical responsibility to the children of the Town of
Reading.
Reading Public Schools’ Statement of Equity
The Reading School Committee, Central Office, Directors, Principals and Leadership of the Teachers’ Association
celebrate the diversity of the Reading Community and beyond by embracing differences to empower every student,
staff member and family of the Reading Public Schools (RPS). We embrace all members of the community no matter
where we live, what we look like, what we believe, what language we speak, who we love, or how we learn,
consistent with the human dignity of all. When we are unwavering in our commitment to equity, we support every
student and staff member in maximizing individual potential. This requires us to identify, analyze, and confront gaps
in opportunities and outcomes for all students.
Reading Memorial High School Portrait of a Graduate
RPS Graduates are leaders of their own learning journey who demonstrate kindness and empathy towards others
and a commitment to wellness. They persevere through challenges, embrace multiple perspectives, and aspire to be
their best selves in the service of others to better our community and our world.
Learn - Grow - Teach - RPS Graduates are critical thinkers and creative problem solvers. They take ownership of their
learning journey and are open to struggle to foster personal growth. They are confident in their beliefs and consider
the thoughts and ideas of others. They embrace collaboration to help teach others and remain curious life-long
learners.
Empathize - Consider Perspectives - Practice Communal Care - RPS Graduates show kindness and empathy towards
others and a commitment to personal wellness and communal care. They are able to persevere through challenges
and demonstrate resilience. They authentically reflect through hearing and understanding the experiences,
perspectives, and needs of people around them. To navigate relationships with generosity and patience, they listen
actively and compassionately.
Engage - Serve - Thrive - RPS Graduates responsibly shape our world through collaboration with their community.
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 10
They engage with and communicate multiple perspectives, aspire to be their best selves in the service of others in
order to thrive, and bring their skills and knowledge to action for the benefit of each other and our world.
Budget Development Process
Within the context of the Budget Guidelines established by the Finance Committee and School Committee, the
District’s Mission, Vision, Statement of Equity, and 2023-2026 District Strategic Plan, the Central Office Leadership
Team committed to conduct a productive and effective FY26 Budget Development Process. The approach taken by
the district leaders was foundational to a successful budget process, outlined below:
● Endeavored to create a fiscally responsible budget responsive to stakeholder needs.
● Strove for alignment with the 2023-2026 District Strategic Plan Objectives:
a. Supportive, Equitable and Safe Learning Environments
b. Coherent instructional Systems
c. School Operations
d. Family and Community Engagement
● Sought to optimize funding and heighten efficiency with expense-related items.
● Engaged stakeholders, including: district and site leadership, School Committee and the town.
● Ensured that the budget development process was open, collaborative and transparent.
Baseline costs were calculated for personnel and non-personnel accounts to ensure compliance with contractual
and legal mandates. Projected enrollment, class sizes, student needs, and known/anticipated spending trends
guided the process. The process taken to build the baseline budget involved the following:
● Aligned budgets with employment contracts and negotiated bargaining agreements.
● Calculated costs based on historical spending trends, known service/material rate changes, and anticipated
requirements.
● Evaluated staffing schedules, student groupings, and caseloads based on student enrollment, class size and
student needs.
● Redeployed existing resources, Grants, and Revolving Accounts to support changes in baseline operating
expense and fund investment priorities.
Personnel and non-personnel resources were maximized to make progress toward addressing strategic objectives
include, but were not limited to the following:
Personnel Non-personnel
● Utilized METCO, Department of Public Health, Special
Education and other Grant funding.
● Accounted for savings generated between outgoing /budget
salaries and new incoming staff.
● Allocate lunchtime/para wages and 30% of daytime custodial
wages to Food Services special revenue fund.
● Considered a multi-year review of past, present, pending,
and projected out of district tuition rates and changes in
placements.
● Reduced/reallocated existing budgets based on historical
spending patterns and anticipated future needs
● Applied School Choice funding.
In summary, the Leadership Team’s approach to the FY26 budget development process was designed to:
● Engage stakeholders in a collaborative process.
● Ensure all contractual and legal obligations will be met.
● Identify spending priorities to support teaching and learning.
● Maximize existing resources through redeployment of existing resources and leveraging all funds.
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 11
● Consider enrollment projections, class sizes and teacher to student ratios, and learners’ needs.
Budget Timeline
The budget cycle is formulated around key dates and touchpoints to have a fully approved budget in place by the
start of the fiscal year.
Date Task Date Task
July-October
November
● Craft enrollment projections
○ FY26 class sizes, groupings,
staffing ratios
● Work on financial forecasts
○ Examine FY24, FY25
expenditures
○ Anticipated FY26 needs,
investments, sustainability
of request
● Build budgets
○ Personnel & non personnel -
person by person, item by
item
● Collaborate on budget priorities
○ Contract
negotiations/settlements
○ Meeting student anticipated
needs
○ Maximizing revenues across
program/level
● Evaluate budget requests
○ Solicit feedback on
necessary FY26 investments
○ Prioritize, align with district
strategic objectives,
determine cost and
rationale for request
● Examine budget data, site/district
○ Personnel: person, position,
step, degree, stipend,
retirement, vacancy
○ Scheduling:
teachers/paraprofessionals
evaluated on effectiveness,
student need
○ Non-personnel: data
examined by line item,
description, expenditure
trend, projected use
December
January
February
April-May
● Finalize budget priorities and requests
● Finalize/publish Superintendent’s
Recommended FY26 Budget Book
● January 16, 2025
○ School Committee Budget Night
○ Q&A on Cost Center Presentations
● January 23, 2025
○ FY26 Public Hearing
○ Questions and Responses published
● January 30, 2025
○ School Committee vote on the
Superintendent ’s Recommended FY26
Budget
● January 31, 2025
○ Publish School Committee’s
Recommended FY26 Budget Book
○ School Committee’s FY26 Budget
submitted to the Town Manager
● February 26, 2025 (tentative)
○ School Committee FY26 Budget
Presentation to Finance Committee
● Town Meeting Vote on FY26 Budget
○ April 28, May 1, May 5, & May 8
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 12
Budget Review: FY23, FY24, and FY25 Investments
Over the past three budget cycles, our district has invested heavily in new positions, programs, and supports to
improve student outcomes - academically, socially, and emotionally - across our schools. Below, we provide a brief
rationale for each of these recent additions and an update of their impact on our students. Collectively, these
additions have significantly enhanced the quality of educational programming in all of our schools.
Position Budget Year
Added
Description
5.0 FTE School Adjustment
Counselor/METCO Coordinator
at each elementary school
FY23
Budget
Prior to the implementation of the FY23 budget, the
elementary schools did not have school counselors. We know
that a student ’s sense of connectedness to their school
community is one of the largest factors in determining
academic success, and one of our primary strategies in
improving student connectedness and belonging has been to
increase student access to school counselors. Our counselors
play a pivotal role in supporting students through academic,
personal, and social challenges, such as navigating peer
relationships, balancing academic priorities and demands, and
deepening self-confidence. These roles also serve as direct
liaisons and supports for our Boston resident students and
families. As schools continue to see an increase in
social-emotional and academic need following the pandemic,
our school counselors have become increasingly critical in the
educational experience of our students. Through this
addition, each elementary school has a full-time School
Counselor/METCO Coordinator. The funding for these roles is
split between the district operating budget and the METCO
grant.
1.0 FTE Director of Academic
Achievement at the high school
FY23
Budget
This role has been instrumental in moving several key
initiatives forward at RMHS, including:
● Developing five new Innovation Pathways, with significant
funding from DESE (Department of Elementary and
Secondary Education) and partnerships with our
community, aimed at developing employable skills in
high-demand occupations, connecting learning to
authentic and real-world settings, and aligning
school-based opportunities to the ever-expanding interests
of our students.
● Scaling our paid senior internship program to include close
to 200 students and 60 community partners, enabling
seniors to experience career exploration through a wide
range of work-based learning opportunities.
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 13
● Developing partnerships with several local universities to
expand dual-enrollment opportunities, enabling students
to gain college credits while taking courses at RMHS.
● Restructuring our school-based Instructional Leadership
Team to empower and support our Department Heads,
leading to significant improvements in teaching and
learning in classrooms across the school.
Ms. Callanan was originally hired into this role in 2022, but
shifted to the interim principal role in 2023. As she moved to
the interim principal role, Ms. Callanan maintained the job
responsibilities associated with the Director of Academic
Achievement position. The Director of Academic
Achievement position was reallocated to an additional
Assistant Principal position, which has been maintained in the
FY26 budget.
1.0 FTE teacher in the English
Language Learner department
and translation services
.20 FTE increase to English
Language Coordinator
1.5 FTEs of ESL (English as a
Second Language) teacher
positions
FY23
Budget
FY24
Budget
We have seen a significant increase of multilingual learners
(MLL) in our district over the past several years, growing from
42 in October 2018 to 74 in October 2023. As the MLL
population continues to grow in the district, these positions
are crucial in ensuring appropriate group ratios, services, and
instruction for our English Language Learners.
With a high number of MLL students assessing as
beginner-level English proficiency in 2022, the district saw a
need for additional teachers. We continue to see an increase
in our MLL population with this addition being utilized to
provide weekly recommended instructional hours to students.
Supporting the language development of MLL students is
essential to their academic and social progress in school.
.20 FTE staff in the Stepping
Stones Program
FY23
Budget
This position continues to provide five full days of academic
support to high school students’ returning to school from
hospital and out-of-school settings. This can be a challenging
transition for students and the additional support has been
instrumental in building out this program.
1.0 FTE increase in School
Counselors at the middle school
level
1.0 FTE Social Worker increase
for the REACH program at the
middle school level
FY23
Budget
The REACH (Resiliency, Executive Functioning, Academics,
Coping Strategies, Habits of Mind) program moved from
Coolidge Middle School to Parker Middle School during the
2022-2023 school year, creating a need at the high school and
middle school level for increased support. The investment in
these resources has increased access for social emotional
support to students, equalized social emotional support
available to students across both Coolidge and Parker Middle
Schools.
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 14
Investing in these positions contributes valuable resources
that enhance students' access to social and emotional support
at the secondary level.
1.0 FTE Nurse FY23
Budget
The addition of this position has expanded support to
students and positions the Director of K-12 Health Services to
oversee the district wide health services and be available to
provide direct services to students as needed. Students now
have more access to district wide health programming
through the actionable work of the Director of Health
Services.
.40 FTE District Data Specialist FY23
Budget
As the district continues to expand analysis of student
performance and targeted interventions, increasing the
District Data Specialist role from 0.6 to 1.0 FTE provided for
oversight of curriculum applications, adoption of assessments
and benchmarking data diagnostics. The data specialist is
charged with compiling student data from a variety of sources
and creating data displays for district and school leaders to
ensure the accurate use of data in decision making, analysis of
trends and reporting of progress. For example, the data
specialist created and monitors a data dashboard for each
school to track student attendance based on a need to reduce
the number of students who are chronically absent.
Additionally, the data specialist manages assessment
platforms and compiles data required for state reporting. The
data specialist supports the district's data-driven approach
through statistical analysis of data from student assessments
supporting an environment of continuous improvement.
5.0 FTE Elementary Assistant
Principals
FY24
Budget
All 5 of our elementary schools now have a full-time Assistant
Principal. Prior to the FY24 budget, our elementary schools
each had a full-time teacher who received a stipend to serve
as a part-time Assistant Principal. Investing in building
leadership is at the core of improving academic outcomes. A
2012 study of the impact of principals noted that “highly
effective principals raise the achievement of a typical student
in their schools by between two and seven months of learning
in a single school year; ineffective principals lower
achievement by the same amount.” Given this impact, a
recent research analysis by the Wallace Foundation noted “it
is difficult to envision an investment in K-12 education with a
higher ceiling on its potential return than improving school
leadership.” While our district continues to invest in
professional development and individualized coaching for
principals, our administrative structure at the elementary level
posed a barrier to leveraging the impact of principals on
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 15
student outcomes. With the significant changes in the field of
education, especially within the last 5 years, the roles of
building leaders have become exponentially more challenging.
Within Reading, our adoption of high-quality curriculum
materials, our increased enrollment of diverse populations,
and our increases in student social-emotional and academic
needs have all added significant responsibilities and
expectations to those leading our buildings. These shifts also
highlight the need for principals to act as instructional leaders
in their schools. To do so, it was necessary to provide the
staffing required to ensure the responsibilities and
management of our buildings was done efficiently and
effectively to create structures for success in our schools. To
support all our students, families, educators, and principals,
elementary assistant principals share building-level
responsibilities including (but not limited to) teacher
evaluations, programmatic support, family and community
engagement, and responding to day-to-day needs, allowing
our principals to enhance their own capacity as leaders of
learning communities. Overall, these new roles provide our
elementary schools with the administrative leadership
structure necessary to harness the impact of principal
leadership on students. This new structure also creates an
internal pipeline of leadership talent to fill principal vacancies
as they arise in this district.
2.0 FTE K-8 Math Coaches FY24
Budget
These roles were developed to improve math outcomes in our
district by providing teachers with access to consistent,
job-embedded coaching and support. K-8 math coaches are
integrating externally provided training into our district while
working within our existing frameworks alongside our
educators. They support increased implementation of
high-quality curriculum materials, improve instructional
practices, and foster deeper opportunities for rigorous math
learning. This includes ensuring vertical and horizontal
alignment, embedding educator professional learning into
daily teaching cycles, and offering targeted training
opportunities, collaborative sessions with teacher groups, and
personalized 1:1 coaching. Furthermore, they play a crucial
role in onboarding new staff, ensuring sustained
implementation of our curriculum materials beyond the initial
adoption phase. We are seeing increased utilization and
impact of the K-8 Math Coaches, as outlined in the 2024 RPS
Annual Community Report..
1.0 FTE Middle School
Adjustment Counselor/METCO
FY24
Budget
With an increased need to support the social-emotional and
behavioral health of our students, this shared Middle School
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 16
(Metropolitan Council for
Educational Opportunity)
Coordinator
Adjustment Counselor/METCO Coordinator position supports
the social-emotional and behavioral health of students and
the goals of the METCO program at Coolidge and Parker
Middle Schools. This role mirrors the School Adjustment
Counselor/METCO Coordinator roles in our five elementary
schools. This new role has received positive feedback from
our students, staff, and families in the impact it is having on
students academically, socially, and emotionally. The funding
for this role is split between the district operating budget and
the METCO grant.
1.0 FTE RMHS METCO
Coordinator
FY24
Budget
This role helps to support all students, specially Boston
resident students as we see an increase in enrollment. This
role has been pivotal in serving as a liaison with students,
families, and staff regarding the academic and
social-emotional progress of students. This role is funded fully
through the METCO grant.
1.0 FTE 1 to 1 Nurse FY24
Budget
This 1 to 1 nurse is required to meet an individual student ’s
medical need for the student to access the school setting.
3.0 FTE High School Counselors FY24
Budget
In the last two budget cycles, 3.0 FTE counselors were added
at RMHS in the following capacities:
● 1.0 FTE allocated full-time to the Stepping Stones
program
● 1.0 FTE allocated to school-wide counseling and
social-emotional support for all student
● 1.0 FTE allocated to the RMHS Guidance Department
1.0 FTE Elementary Special
Education Teacher
FY24
Budget
This position continues to be a requirement to ensure
compliance with IEP (Individualized Education Plan) services.
This position at Joshua Eaton provides inclusion and direct
instruction to students who require special education literacy
and math instruction.
1.0 FTE Middle School Special
Education Teacher
FY24
Budget
The addition of this position at Coolidge ensures compliance
with IEP services. This position at Coolidge provides inclusion
and direct instruction to students who require special
education literacy and math instruction.
2.6 FTE Special Education Team
Chairs
FY24
Budget
To ensure consistency with practice and compliance, the
additional team chair positions allow each school to have at
least one full-time special education administrator. This allows
the team chairs to have a direct role in instructional support
within special education classrooms. Additionally, they are
responsible for implementing the reading protocol, as needed,
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 17
during the evaluation process to ensure all students have
access to appropriate instruction and data collection methods.
1.0 Board Certified Behavior
Analyst (BCBA)
FY24
Budget
In alignment with the special education program review
recommendations, this additional BCBA provides support for
students enrolled in the SOAR (Social Skills Organizational
Skills Academics in Real World Situations)/EMBARC (Education
Meaningful Inclusion, Becoming Independent, Advocacy,
Relaxation, and Leisure Activities, Community Integration)
programs. This position serves students in Preschool to grade
12. The primary role of the BCBA is to provide consultative
support to teams and families regarding evaluations,
behavioral interventions, and data collection.
1.0 Secondary Transition
Specialist
FY24
Budget
In alignment with the special education program review
recommendations, this position provides direct evaluation and
transition planning support for students ages 14-22. This
position supports teams and students to identify the skills
needed to further their post schooling endeavors. As part of
the IEP process for all students there must be a transition plan
beginning at age 14. The transition specialist helps develop an
evaluation protocol and education support to make sure all
students who receive special education services are prepared
for their post-secondary transition. Additionally, for students
who need more specific job, leisure and life skills this position
helps support community-based learning activities.
Speech Language Pathologist
from 0.4 FTE to 1.0 FTE
FY25
Budget
Due to growing caseloads, the need for program expansion,
and the demands of IEPs, we increased one Speech Language
Pathologist from 0.4 FTE to 1.0 FTE. An increase to this
position was critical to meet the needs of students and
provide improved outcomes outlined in Individualized
Education Plans (IEPs).
Elementary LEAD Program
Teacher (1.0 FTE)
FY25
Budget
To meet the needs of students in the LEAD program at Joshua
Eaton Elementary School, we added an additional 1.0 teaching
position. Originally a 1-year, .5 role, this investment aimed to
ensure consistency in providing effective instruction aligned
with the goals and objectives outlined in student IEPs and
specifically provide direct structured multisensory reading
instruction by certified staff..
High School Administrative
Assistant (1.0 FTE)
FY25
Budget
Increasing staffing in the high school main office has provided
more support to students, staff, and families and created more
equity in office staffing ratios with other schools in the district.
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 18
ESSER Funded Positions: 2.0 FTE
Secondary Guidance Counselors
and 1.0 FTE Middle School
Special Education Teacher.
FY25
Budget
Positions that were funded through the ESSER grant through
FY24 were evaluated to determine sustaining these roles long
term. The FY25 budget included these three positions which
were previously funded by the ESSER grant. The incorporation
of these positions into the operating budget ensures
compliance with IEPs and supports the behavioral health of
our students
1 Year 1.0 FTE Parker METCO
Coordinator
FY25
Budget
This role helps to support all students, specially Boston
resident students as we see an increase in enrollment. This
role has been pivotal in serving as a liaison with students,
families, and staff regarding the academic and
social-emotional progress of students. This role is funded fully
through the METCO grant and was a 1-year position.
FY26 Recommended Budget Investments
The following positions/initiatives have been identified as priorities and are funded in the FY26 budget:
Kindergarten Teacher 1.0 FTE: Due to a projected increase in Kindergarten enrollment, we will be adding an
additional 1.0 FTE Kindergarten teacher. This will ensure that class sizes remain in optional ranges of size.
We will continue to monitor Kindergarten enrollment numbers against projections, and make any necessary
adjustments as the registration season moves forward this winter/spring.
Transition to Universal, Tuition Free Kindergarten: In 2020-2021, Reading was one of only 23 communities in
Massachusetts to charge tuition for full-day kindergarten and had the second highest tuition in the state. In
partnership with the School Committee and the Town of Reading, we developed a multi-year plan to move towards
universal tuition free kindergarten that included dropping the tuition each year since 2020-2021. We believe in the
importance of ensuring that all families have access to a high-quality, accessible early childhood experience and are
thrilled that this budget proposes universal, tuition free kindergarten for the start of the 2025-2026 school year.
*We are continuing to monitor our METCO leadership structure and will inform the community of any METCO
budget related adjustments as we move into the spring of 2025
Major Focus Areas with No Impact to FY25 Recommended
Budget
Accelerating Futures: RMHS Innovation Career Pathways & Dual Enrollment Expansion
Reading Memorial High School was approved by DESE to move forward with two Innovation Career Pathways (ICP)
in the 2023-24 academic year. This program immerses students in intensive coursework and real-world training in
fields like Computer Science, Engineering, Digital Media, Clean Energy, Healthcare, and Social Assistance. With
$625,000 in recent state grants and 175 students enrolled in the 2024–2025 school year, RMHS is opening doors to
rewarding career paths and giving students a head start in today’s economy. Offering Dual Enrollment (DE) through
partnerships with top institutions like UMass Lowell, RMHS students even have the chance to earn college credits,
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 19
bringing them closer to their career dreams while still in high school. With a focus on both education and practical
skills, RMHS is preparing the next generation to thrive in Massachusetts’ vibrant workforce and make meaningful
contributions to their communities. This reflects our ongoing commitment to securing grant funding to support
critical programming in our district.
Funding Considerations for the Future
The FY26 recommended budget makes great strides toward moving our district forward and we are grateful for the
community’s ongoing support. As demonstrated above by the approach and process we took to develop the FY26
recommended budget, certain items were prioritized to achieve the greatest and most immediate impact on
student outcomes. In addition to what’s funded in the FY26 recommended budget, our team continues to explore
many other priorities that have emerged throughout the budget process. Those items are outlined below (not in
order of importance/priority):
Preschool and Elementary Level Priorities:
Social Emotional Learning (SEL) Curriculum: The elementary SEL Curriculum, Open Circle, has been in place for
many years, but in recent years, teachers have reported the content of the program does not provide adequate
instruction in social-emotional competencies. A curriculum review in the area of SEL is underway to examine
district-wide SEL practices and supports. Several elementary schools are piloting a new SEL curriculum with the goal
of identifying a curriculum to utilize for SEL instruction. A new SEL curriculum would improve student access to
developmentally appropriate, explicit instruction in SEL and allows schools to build consistent vocabulary and
expectations that support positive school environments.
Additional Tier II Interventionists (math and literacy): Tier II Interventionists play an important role in ensuring
students receive required academic interventions. In addition to the core, grade-level classroom instruction, some
students benefit from additional instruction, often in small groups to reinforce, practice and reteach material. We
are continuously looking for ways to improve and expand our Tier II model.
Secondary Level Priorities:
Health Teacher (Middle Level): Currently at Coolidge Middle School, the health curriculum is delivered as part of
students’ physical education classes by the two PE teachers. While not required, it is recommended that health
classes be taught by a licensed health teacher, and only one of the Coolidge PE teachers holds that educator license.
Adding a health teacher would improve the quality of instruction in health-related skills, which are essential to the
development of middle school students. This additional teacher would also allow alignment in the model for health
instruction between the two middle schools.
SEL Programming: It is important to foster a robust SEL curriculum and programming in order to meet the social,
emotional needs of our current study population. Partnering with outside organizations builds the capacity of our
students, teachers, and families and caregivers to see outside of themselves. Programming such as Challenge Day or
Urban Improv Rehearsal for Life are great partners who can help build this aspect for students.
RMHS ASL Teacher: RMHS offered ASL as a language course for the first time in 2024-2025. RMHS is already seeing
an increase in interest in ASL and will need to add and adjust staffing in the future to align to student interest.
RMHS Tier 2 Teacher: RMHS continues to explore various models to provide stronger and more timely Tier 2
interventions for students. For example, in the past, this has included the development and pilot of the academic
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 20
lab within the RMHS library. In the future, this model could include a designated staff member to oversee and
facilitate a space for Tier 2 interventions. More conversations on this topic will continue in the years to come.
District Level Priorities:
Additional METCO Coordinator/School Adjustment Counselor (SAC): The middle school METCO Coordinator/SAC is
split between two buildings. Moving to a model where each of our middle schools had a full-time METCO
Coordinator/SAC would provide each of our middle school students with more access to social-emotional and
academic support.
Additional Instructional Coaches: In FY24, we added 2 full-time math instructional coaches. With the addition of
two K-8 math instructional coaches, our educators now have the opportunity to work side-by-side with content
experts, tackle real-time classroom challenges, and continuously sharpen their teaching strategies. This investment
has already started to positively impact student achievement outcomes. It would be ideal to have similar coaching
in other critical content areas and also to expand our math coaching model.
Curriculum Materials/Resources: In recent years, RPS has transitioned to implementing high-quality curriculum
materials in our schools to support student learning and teacher effectiveness. Unlike traditional curriculum models,
where costs were largely incurred upfront and focused on print materials, these modern programs include digital
components that require ongoing funding. Digital licenses provide students access to interactive learning platforms,
equip teachers with continually updated digital guides, and offer teaching aids such as lesson presentations and
assessments. To ensure the sustainability of these high-quality programs and maintain their benefits for students
and educators, it is essential to allocate additional funds each year for digital licenses and related resources. This
investment will enable us to uphold the rigor and relevance of our instructional materials in the years ahead.
Additional Special Education Staff: Updating our special education staffing models is critical as we respond to
growing caseloads and meet student needs in both sub separate and learning centers.
Additional Multilingual Learner (MLL) Staff: RPS continues to see an increase in our MLL population. In the years
to come, it is critical that we continue to update our MLL staffing model to provide our students with high-quality
instruction and meet state-required time on learning requirements.
Building Substitute: Providing schools with access to a full-time building substitute would be helpful in effectively
covering staff absences, meetings, and peer observations.
RMHS Lift Van: The 18-22-year-old program serves students in a critical stage of transition, focusing on equipping
them with essential life skills, job readiness, and community engagement experiences. Access to consistent, reliable
transportation is integral to achieving the program’s goals, as it allows students to participate in community-based
learning opportunities that are vital for their personal and professional growth. Currently, the program relies on
shared access to a van during the school day. However, this arrangement has proven to be highly challenging. A
dedicated van for the 18-22-year-old program would resolve these challenges by:
● Ensuring Consistency: Students could participate in planned activities without disruptions caused by
competing demands.
● Reducing Logistical Barriers: Staff would no longer need to coordinate key exchanges or manage scheduling
conflicts.
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 21
● Maximizing Opportunities: The program could fully implement its community-based learning plans,
aligning with best practices for transition programming.
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 22
FINANCIAL SECTION
Wood End Students with children’s book author, Olympian, and advocate Ibtihaj Muhammad
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 23
FINANCIAL SECTION
In summary, the FY26 Budget is defined into the following sections:
● Operating Funds ($52,029,875):
○ An increase of $1,754,392 over FY25 has been allocated to meet the increased costs of all
contractual obligations, mandated services, and investments aligned to the district ’s strategic plan.
○ The district is committed to meeting all contractual obligations outlined in contracts with all 5
district bargaining units. All five bargaining units (cafeteria staff, custodians, paraprofessionals,
secretaries and teachers) agreed to new contracts spanning three years, starting in FY25.
● Special Education Accommodated Costs ($6,311,716):
○ An increase of $276,388 over FY25 is allocated to Accommodated Costs, which includes
out-of-district special education placement tuition and transportation costs.
● Town of Reading ’s Community Priorities ($150,000):
○ Monies have been allocated for use toward reducing the FDK tuition fee.
The leadership team used financial, staffing and student outcome data to identify trends, analyze resource
allocations, and make strategic decisions. In addition to contractual obligations and mandated services, spending
trends and projected student needs were factored into the allocation of funds when developing the FY26
Recommended Budget. In the section to follow, the district’s finances are summarized and detailed by the Cost
Center. The following information can be found within each subsection:
1. Summary of FY26 Recommended Budget by Cost Center Compared with Prior Fiscal Years
2. A chart summarizing the Cost Center expenses by category, expressed as a percentage
3. A table summarizing the Cost Center compared with prior fiscal years
4. Detailed information for the FY25 Appropriated and FY26 Recommended Budgets by org and
object codes, in comparison with actual expenditures for FY22, FY23 and FY24, for each Cost Center
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 24
The Superintendent’s FY26 Recommended Budget by Cost Center
During the current fiscal year, the administration is authorized to transfer funds within any Cost Center. The transfer
of funds between Cost Centers occurs when a recommendation is made and substantiated by the District Finance
Director at the time of the quarterly financial report presentations. The School Committee must approve the
transfer through a majority vote.
The table below provides a comparison of the dollar amounts of the recommended budget as compared with prior
fiscal years. The actual expended amounts for FY22, FY23, FY24, the Appropriated FY25 Budget and the School
Committee’s FY26 Recommended Budget are noted. The totals are separated by eight Cost Centers: Administration,
Regular Day, Special Education, School Facilities, Athletics, Extra Curricular, Health Services, and Technology. The
table below also provides the percentage change between the FY26 Recommended Budget and the FY25
Appropriated Budget by Cost Center:
Summary of FY26 Recommended Budget by Cost Center Compared with Prior Fiscal Years:
Proportion of Spending, FY26 Recommended Budget by Cost Center Compared with Prior Fiscal Years:
The pie chart below provides a visual representation of expenditures attributed to each Cost Center in the School
Committee’s FY26 Recommended Budget.
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 25
Cost Center Percentage to Total Budgets and Expenditures:
In the table below, personnel and non-personnel actual expenditures are reflected for FY22 through FY24, the FY25
Appropriated Budget and the FY26 Recommended Budget. Budgets have the following makeup:
● Personnel: professional salaries, clerical salaries, and other salaries (i.e. paraprofessionals and substitutes)
● Non-personnel: contracted services, supplies and materials and other expenses categories (i.e. dues,
memberships, professional development, technology and equipment)
FY26 Recommended Budget by Categories of Spending Compared with Prior Fiscal Years:
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 26
Administration Cost Center Summary
FY25 Appropriated Budget: $1,374,689
FY26 School Committee’s Recommended Budget: $1,447,959
% Change over FY25: 5.33%
Primary Function: The Administration Cost Center includes the salaries and expenses for Central Office and some
District-wide administration which includes the following primary functions: School Committee, Superintendent,
Assistant Superintendent, Business and Finance, Human Resources, and District-wide Data and Information
Management. The Administration Cost Center currently accounts for 2.48% of the total district budget. The FY26
Recommended Budget for the Administration Cost Center summary follows, with a comparison provided for
previous years. A 0% change indicates the budget for that line was “level funded” providing the same funding as in
the previous year.
FY26 Recommended Budget by Categories of Spending Compared with Prior Fiscal Years:
The pie chart below shows the components of the Administration budget by percentage.
Cost Center (Administration) Percentage to Total Budgets and Expenditures:
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 27
Budget Detail, Administration Cost Center:
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 28
Regular Day Cost Center Summary
FY25 Appropriated Budget: $33,077,097
FY26 School Committee’s Recommended Budget: $33,615,467
% Change: 1.63%
Primary Function: The Regular Day Cost Center encompasses all personnel and non-personnel expenses related to
delivering core, general education instructional programs to our students. Personnel costs for school principals,
instructional and support staff, as well as non-personnel costs related to curriculum materials; professional
development; instructional materials, supplies, and equipment; instructional technology; library materials and
technology; and other instructional services are captured in this Cost Center budget. The Regular Day Cost Center
budget accounts for 57.47% of the total School Committee’s FY26 Recommended Budget. The FY26 Recommended
Budget for the Regular Day Cost Center summary is as follows, with a comparison provided for previous years.
FY26 Recommended Budget by Categories of Spending Compared with Prior Fiscal Years:
Cost Center (Regular Day) Percentage to Total Budgets and Expenditures:
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 29
Budget Detail, Regular Day Cost Center:
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 30
Budget Detail, Regular Day Cost Center (continued):
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 31
Special Education Cost Center Summary
FY25 Appropriated Budget: $17,635,574
FY26 School Committee’s Recommended Budget: $19,191,229
% Change: 8.82%
Primary Function: The Special Education Cost Center encompasses all personnel and non-personnel expenses
necessary to deliver special education and related services to students in our school community. As mandated by
the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) and Section 504 of the Americans with Disabilities Act, we
strive to provide programs and services to allow our students with disabilities to be educated in the least restrictive
environment that enables them to make effective progress. In FY26, the Special Education Cost Center makes up
32.81% of the School Committee’s FY26 Recommended Budget.
FY26 Recommended Budget by Categories of Spending Compared with Prior Fiscal Years:
Cost Center (Special Education) Percentage to Total Budget and Expenditures
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 32
Budget Detail, Special Education Cost Center:
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 33
Budget Detail, Special Education Cost Center (continued):
School Facilities Cost Center Summary
FY25 Appropriated Budget: $1,696,953
FY26 School Committee’s Recommended Budget: $1,585,460
% Change: -6.57%
Primary Function: The Town of Reading’s Facilities Department supports the Reading Public Schools. The School
Building Facilities budget funds the salaries and expenses necessary to clean and maintain our eight school
buildings, preschool program, and central office spaces, which makes up 85% of the square feet of all municipal
buildings, or a total of 935,000 square feet. The Facilities Department also provides the necessary services to
facilitate building use for internal and external users. The School Building Facilities budget accounts for 2.71% of the
School Committee’s FY26 Recommended Budget.
FY26 Recommended Budget by Categories of Spending Compared with Prior Fiscal Years:
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 34
Cost Center (School Facilities) Percentage to Total Budget and Expenditures
Budget Detail, School Facilities Cost Center:
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 35
Athletics Cost Center Summary
FY25 Appropriated Budget: $789,018
FY26 School Committee’s Recommended Budget: $811,079
% Change: 2.80%
Primary Function: The Athletics program budget funds the salaries and expenses necessary to operate the High
School athletics program. The Athletics budget accounts for 1.39% of the School Committee’s FY26
Recommended Budget.
FY26 Recommended Budget by Categories of Spending Compared with Prior Fiscal Years:
Cost Center (Athletics) Percentage to Total Budget and Expenditures
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 36
Budget Detail, Athletics Cost Center:
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 37
Student Participation in Athletics:
Note: “*” depicts sports that have not had their season yet.
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 38
Extra Curricular Cost Center Summary
FY25 Appropriated Budget: $81,186
FY26 School Committee’s Recommended Budget: $85,801
% Change: 5.68%
Primary Function: The Extra-Curricular Activities Program budget funds the salaries, stipends, and a small portion of
the expenses necessary to offer extra-curricular activities at the high school. The Extra Curricular budget accounts
for 0.15% of the School Committee’s FY26 Recommended Budget.
FY26 Recommended Budget by Categories of Spending Compared with Prior Fiscal Years:
Cost Center (Extra Curricular) Percentage to Total Budget and Expenditures
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 39
Budget Detail, Extra Curricular Cost Center:
Student Participation in Extracurriculars:
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 40
Health Services Cost Center Summary
FY25 Appropriated Budget: $969,558
FY26 School Committee’s Recommended Budget: $1,042,252
% Change: 7.50%
Primary Function: The Health Services budget pays for the salaries and expenses for servicing the daily medical
needs of the district’s student population. School nurses provide mandated health screenings, illness assessments,
first aid, daily medication and treatments, and support of students with chronic health issues including allergies,
asthma, diabetes, and gastrointestinal, autoimmune, and neurological disorders. We communicate with families
and providers to develop and maintain accommodation plans and individualized student health care plans to
support medical needs at school. The Health Services budget accounts for 1.78% of the School Committee’s FY26
Recommended Budget.
FY26 Recommended Budget by Categories of Spending Compared with Prior Fiscal Years:
Cost Center (Health Services) Percentage to Total Budget and Expenditures
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 41
Budget Detail, Health Services Cost Center:
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 42
Technology Cost Center Summary
FY25 Appropriated Budget: $686,736
FY26 School Committee’s Recommended Budget: $712,344
% Change: 3.72%
Primary Function: The Districtwide Networking and Technology Maintenance budget funds the salaries and
expenses required to operate and maintain our technology infrastructure including our wide area network, wireless
networks, servers, computer hardware and peripheral devices, clocks and bells systems and telecommunications
equipment. The Technology budget accounts for 1.22% of the School Committee’s FY26 Recommended Budget.
FY26 Recommended Budget by Categories of Spending Compared with Prior Fiscal Years:
Cost Center (Technology) Percentage to Total Budget and Expenditures
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 43
Budget Detail, Technology Cost Center:
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 44
OTHER FUNDING SOURCES
Elementary and Middle School Students Participating in the 2024 Hour of Code
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 45
Offset Summary
Several fee-based Special Revenue Funds and Grants have been allocated to offset direct and indirect costs of the
operating budget. In the charts below, the reader will find a summary of current year and FY26 Recommended
Budget Offsets by Special Revenue Fund compared with FY25’s Appropriated Budget and the allocation of FY26
Recommended Offsets by Cost Center:
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 46
Special Revenue Funds
The district maintains thirty-four separate special revenue funds that were created and are required to be
maintained in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws and Department of Revenue Division of Local Service’s
guidance for Costing Municipal Services. Special Revenue Funds are established to dedicate a specific source of
revenue from fees or charges to pay expenses associated with providing the services for which the payment was
made. Special Revenue Funds also consist of donation accounts. The sources of revenue for these funds vary by the
nature of the fund and includes sales of meals, participation fees, user fees, ticket sales, donations, and tuition. The
type of expenditure for the funds also varies by the nature of the fund and include salaries, supplies and materials,
technology, contracted services, software licenses and other expenses. The FY24 and FY25 beginning year balances
are provided in the table below with the calculated FY24 Gain/Loss:
Special Revenue Funds
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 47
A description of each category of the district ’s special revenue funds is outlined below:
● Athletics: Fees are paid by families for students’ participation in athletics.
● Community Education, Drivers Education, Summer Programs: Fees are paid by families for students to
participate in drivers’ education and summer programs. Fees paid by individuals for participation in
Community Education events and courses.
● Drama and Band: Fees are paid by families for students’ participation in after school drama and bands
programs.
● Extended Day: Fees are paid by families for students to participate in extended day programs before and
after-school.
● Extracurricular Activities: Fees are paid by families for students to participate in afterschool band and fine
and performing arts activities.
● Full-Day Kindergarten: Fees are paid by families for enrollment in the Full-Day Kindergarten program.
● Guidance: Fees are paid by families for students to take PSAT, SAT and AP tests.
● R.I.S.E. Preschool: Fees are paid by families for enrollment in the R.I.S.E. preschool program.
● Special Education Tuition: Fees paid by another public school district for students to attend special
education programs in Reading.
● School Choice: Allows families to enroll their children in schools in communities other than the city or town
in which they reside. Tuition is paid by the sending district to the receiving district.
● School Lunch: Revenues are generated through state and federal reimbursements and lunch-time a la carte
sales.
● Transportation: Fees are paid by families for students to ride existing bus routes, based on seats available.
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 48
● Use of School Property: Some community organizations which use school facilities pay a fee for space
and/or custodial coverage.
● Lost Books: Fees are collected and used to replace lost or damaged books.
● Gifts/Donations: Restricted donations for specific purposes and unrestricted donations for general use are
made to the School Committee for approval and acceptance in accordance with School Committee Policy
Federal and State Grants
In addition to the Operating and Special Revenue Funds, our district is supported in FY25 by state, federal, and
private grants. Grant expenditures are tracked monthly and reviewed periodically with grant coordinators. A list of
the grants, descriptions, and award amounts are provided below compared with prior year awards. Grants are
approved by the School Committee as funding is awarded. The FY25 Quarter 2 balances for each grant awarded
between FY24 and FY25 are provided in the table below:
Descriptions and acceptable uses of each State and Federal grant follows below:
State Grants:
● METCO: The Metropolitan Council for Educational Opportunity is a state funded, voluntary educational
desegregation program designed to eliminate racial imbalance through the busing of children from Boston,
MA and Springfield, MA to suburban public schools in thirty-eight communities. These funds pay for
program coordination, transportation, instructional services, and community engagement related to Boston
resident students attending Reading Public Schools through participation in the METCO program.
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 49
● METCO BBI: The METCO Boston Bridges Initiative grant was awarded to support two 2024 Reading METCO
program activities. The grant will specifically fund our Boston Kite and Bike Festival in May 2024, along with
funding our Franklin Park Zoo Lights event in the Fall of 2024.
● METCO REI: Fund the implementation of Racial Equity and Inclusion (REI) initiatives within the METCO
program.
● Northeast Food for Schools: This opportunity has been proposed to increase the capacity to procure
local unprocessed/minimally processed foods, and foods from local producers (including farmers,
food hubs, and fishermen).
● Department of Public Health: Provides for mandated screenings, professional development, and substitute
coverage for nurses.
● Innovation Career Pathways Support: Designed to give students coursework and experience in a
specific high-demand industry, such as information technology, engineering, healthcare, life sciences
and advanced manufacturing. Also, to create strong partnerships with employers in order to expose
students to career options and help them develop knowledge and skills related to their chosen field
of study before they graduate high school.
● Skills Capital Technology and Equipment: Used to support Innovation Career Pathways in Advanced
Manufacturing and Information (Computer Science and Digital Media). Skills Capital funding is for
equipment to build out and bolster programming. A majority of the grant will be used to fund
approximately half of the digital autopsy table (Anatomage Virtual Cadaver Table) that will bolster
programming in science classes by providing students hands-on experiences on a daily basis while in
school.
● Special Earmark- Anatomy Table: Fund a portion of the digital autopsy table (Anatomage Virtual Cadaver
Table).
● MyCAP: Provide supplementary support to school districts currently engaged in or interested in beginning
implementation of My Career and Academic Plan. MyCAP is a student-driven process designed to ensure all
students graduate from high school college and career ready. The MyCAP process requires schools to create
a scope and sequence to implement MyCAP. And the grant provides planning team members the
supplementary support necessary to attend professional development and team meetings outside-of-
school hours.
● High-Quality Instructional Materials (HQIM) Professional Development and Purchase Opportunity
(PDPO): Provide funding for districts to effectively implement HQIM in alignment with their district's
instructional vision and the DESE Educational Vision for deeper learning. Reading Public Schools grant
application outlined two professional development opportunities to strengthen our implementation of
Illustrative Math (IM) in grades K-6.
Federal Grants:
● Title I: Assists schools with high numbers or high percentages of children from low-income families to help
ensure that all children meet challenging state academic standards. These funds are allocated to
paraprofessional and extended school year instructional services.
● Title II A: Provides supplemental resources to school districts to support systems of support for excellent
teaching and learning. The priorities of Title IIA are to: increase student achievement consistent with the
challenging State academic standards; improve the quality and effectiveness of teachers, principals, and
other school leaders; Increase the number of teachers, principals, and other school leaders who are
effective in improving student academic achievement in schools; and provide low-income and minority
students greater access to effective teachers, principals, and other school leaders. These funds are allocated
to provide professional development for teachers.
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 50
● Title IV: Ensures that all students have access to a high-quality educational experience. The priorities of Title
IV are to: support well-rounded educational opportunities; support safe and healthy students; and support
effective use of technology. These funds pay for technology integration activities and materials for teachers
and classrooms.
● IDEA 240: Provides appropriate special education services for eligible students and to maintain state/local
effort in special education. These funds pay for special education paras, BCBA, and professional
development.
● IDEA 262: Ensures that eligible 3, 4, and 5-year-old children with disabilities receive a free and appropriate
public education that includes special education and related services designed to meet their individual
needs in the least restrictive environment. These funds pay for early childhood instruction and professional
development.
● IDEA IEP (Part B): Support schools and districts to implement the IEP improvement project, with an
emphasis on transitioning to the utilization of the newly revised forms and process.
● Chronic Absences: Provide funds to support schools and districts with a goal of reducing chronic
absenteeism. The source of this funding was Federal ESSER III State Set-Aside (CFDA 84.425U).
● Implementing Strategies to Reduce or Eliminate Time out Rooms: Support schools and districts as
they implement strategies, interventions, and supports to reduce or eliminate the use of time-out
rooms and increase the amount of time that students spend learning alongside their peers. Expected
outcomes include: improved student emotional and behavioral regulation (self- and/or co-regulation)
and overall school climate, as well as increased collaboration and communication among school staff,
parents, and the community.
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 51
Five-Year Capital Plan
A Capital Project is a project that helps maintain or improve a Town asset. It is a new construction, expansion,
renovation, or replacement project for an existing facility or facilities. Typically, the project will have a total cost of at
least $10,000 and a life span of five or more years. Provided below is a five-year capital project plan for the school
district:
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 52
APPENDICES
RMHS Band and Color Guard at the NESBA Finals, earning a Division II Gold Medal
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 53
APPENDIX A: Student Enrollment
Student Enrollment
On October 1 of each year, Reading Public Schools are required to record, verify, and report the total number of
students enrolled by grade to DESE. DESE and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts use October 1 enrollment to
calculate Foundation Enrollment and Chapter 70 Funding. October 1 enrollment is also used by the district ’s
administration to project class sizes and to identify trends in enrollment for subsequent years, which forms the
baseline upon which the district’s personnel and non-personnel operating budget is developed. The reported
October 1 enrollment can be found below:
October 1st enrollment represented an increase of 10 students over projected enrollment. Please note that
historically, RISE enrollment has not been calculated into the total enrollment. Enrollment figures are being
compared to FY24 numbers reported to the School Committee on November 30, 2023. At that time, RISE numbers
were not included in the total enrollment calculation, but RISE enrollment has been included in the total FY24
enrollment for the purposes of comparing FY24 numbers to FY25 numbers. With this updated FY24 calculation, the
FY25 Actual vs.
FY24 Actual shows a decrease of 27 students.
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 54
The schools with the largest increases in enrollment over projections are RISE (+15%, 16 students), Barrows
Elementary School (+2%, 8 students), Birch Meadow Elementary School (+1%, 2 students), and Coolidge Middle
School (+2%, 6 students).
While our kindergarten enrollment was lower than projected, we did see increases in the following grades:
preschool, first grade, second grade, third grade, fourth grade, seventh grade, eighth grade, eleventh grade, and
twelfth grade.
The category with the largest increase was students enrolled through School Choice, which rose from 26 students
last year to 51 this year (+25 students). Another category reflecting an increase in enrollment was Multi-Lingual
Learners. Reading Public Schools’ Multi-Lingual Learner population grew from 72 students last year to 86 this year,
with Portuguese continuing to be the predominant language spoken, followed by Spanish.
Boston resident student enrollment remained the same, with a total of 100 students enrolled across various grade
Levels.
The FY25 special education enrollment increased by 10 students compared to FY24. The FY25 total includes
students in the 18-22 year-old program, which was not included in the FY24 report.
The tables below note our official October 1st student enrollments by grade for Special Education, School Choice,
Multi-Lingual Learners and Boston Residents:
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 55
Additional Student Enrollment Data:
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 56
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 57
The Superintendent ’s FY26 Recommended Budget 58
The Superintendent’s FY26 Recommended Budget 59