The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2024-11-19 Select Board Packet Town of Reading Meeting Posting with Agenda This Agenda has been prepared in advance and represents a listing of topics that the chair reasonably anticipates will be discussed at the meeting. However the agenda does not necessarily include all matters which may be taken up at this meeting. Page | 1 2018-07-16 LAG Board - Committee - Commission - Council: Select Board Date: 2024-11-19 Time: 7:00 PM Building: Reading Town Hall Location: Select Board Meeting Room Address: 16 Lowell Street Agenda: Purpose: General Business Meeting Called By: Caitlin Nocella on behalf of the Chair Notices and agendas are to be posted 48 hours in advance of the meetings excluding Saturdays, Sundays and Legal Holidays. Please keep in mind the Town Clerk’s hours of operation and make necessary arrangements to be sure your posting is made in an adequate amount of time. A listing of topics that the chair reasonably anticipates will be discussed at the meeting must be on the agenda. All Meeting Postings must be submitted in typed format; handwritten notices will not be accepted. Topics of Discussion: Zoom Option: Join Zoom Meeting https://us06web.zoom.us/j/84579109555 Meeting ID: 845 7910 9555 Dial by your location • +1 646 558 8656 US (New York) • +1 646 518 9805 US (New York) Find your local number: https://us06web.zoom.us/u/kuZ1eNqz PAGE # 7:00 Overview of Meeting 7:05 Public Comment 7:15 Select Board Liaison Reports and Town Manager’s Report 7:30 Update from the Permanent Building Committee and discussion/ potential vote on Center for Active Living site selection 3 8:00 Volunteer Appointment Subcommittee Appointments 45 8:30 Vote on Select Board Designee for Ad-hoc Commemoration Establishment Committee (ACE) 8:45 Discuss and Vote on Symonds Way land for pickleball 91 Town of Reading Meeting Posting with Agenda This Agenda has been prepared in advance and represents a listing of topics that the chair reasonably anticipates will be discussed at the meeting. However the agenda does not necessarily include all matters which may be taken up at this meeting. Page | 2 9:00 Discuss Section 1.5 of the Select Board Policies; Volunteer Board and Committee Appointments 184 9:15 Discuss and Vote on Health Department ARPA Funds 187 9:30 Future of Pleasant Street Center Building 9:45 Future Agendas 191 10:00 Approve prior meeting minutes 193 November 19th, 2024 Reading Center for Active Living Select Board Update “(Symonds Way) ranks the highest in terms of value between the three locations.“ READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING Owner’s Project Manager Review - DRAFT Report issued to Reading’s Permanent Building Committee October 28, 2024 READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 1 of 31 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 7 Need Analysis & Program Development ....................................................................................................... 7 2015 Study ................................................................................................................................................ 7 2017 Study ................................................................................................................................................ 7 2021 Committee: RECALC ....................................................................................................................... 10 Site Considerations ..................................................................................................................................... 16 Water Treatment Site ............................................................................................................................. 16 Former Walgreens Location .................................................................................................................... 16 Masonic Lodge ........................................................................................................................................ 16 Pleasant Street Center ............................................................................................................................ 17 Oakland Road Lot .................................................................................................................................... 18 Symonds Way .......................................................................................................................................... 18 Project Feasibility ........................................................................................................................................ 19 Pleasant Street Site Analysis ................................................................................................................... 22 Existing Building .................................................................................................................................. 22 Land ..................................................................................................................................................... 22 Construction ........................................................................................................................................ 22 Location ............................................................................................................................................... 23 Cost ..................................................................................................................................................... 23 Oakland Road Site Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 25 Land ..................................................................................................................................................... 25 Construction ........................................................................................................................................ 25 Location ............................................................................................................................................... 25 Cost ..................................................................................................................................................... 25 Symonds Way Site Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 27 Land ..................................................................................................................................................... 27 Construction ........................................................................................................................................ 27 Location ............................................................................................................................................... 27 Cost ..................................................................................................................................................... 27 Project Budget ............................................................................................................................................ 29 Project Schedule ......................................................................................................................................... 30 READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 2 of 31 Communications & Public Outreach ........................................................................................................... 30 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................................... 30 READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 3 of 31 Executive Summary Following a 2015 study by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) indicatfng a significant expected increase in Reading’s senior populatfon, Reading commissioned the University of Massachusetts Boston’s Center for Social and Demographic Research on Aging (UMass) to assist the Town in understanding the needs of this demographic group within the community. A significant finding from the ensuing UMass work indicated a present shortcoming in services and facilitfes to serve this part of Reading’s populatfon. In response to this identffied need, the Town of Reading ’s Select Board established a committee to investfgate specific solutfons for this problem. The committee was known as the Reading Center for Actfve Living Committee (RECALC) and served from 2021 to 2024. During this tfme the committee worked with various community groups and design professionals to document specific needs and establish the necessary parameters for improvements to senior programs within the community. Through conversatfons with user groups and investfgatfons of senior programs in other towns, RECALC clearly established that Reading’s current home for senior programs, the Pleasant Street Center, was not able to address the Town’s needs under its current configuratfon and building footprint. A community wide survey conducted by RECALC indicated strong support for expanding these services with 64% of residents being willing to accept an <$100 tax increase (in 2022 dollars) and 47% willing to pay an <$200 increase to fund these efforts. The committee began looking at potentfal expansion opportunitfes at the current locatfon as well as considering several other potentfal sites. The effort was to leave no stone unturned when finding the best locatfon for the expanded senior programs. In 2024 RECALC engaged with Bargmann Hendrie + Archetype, Inc. architects (BH+A) to conduct a detailed investfgatfon into the project’s feasibility by studying the three most promising sites. These included the current Pleasant Street Center locatfon, a 4.5-acre Town owned lot on Oakland Road (across from the High School), and space within a 15.2 acre piece of Town owned land located at Symonds Way, which currently houses the Burbank Ice Arena and Symonds Athletfc Field. The design team worked with civil engineers and traffic consultants to document and evaluate each of the locatfons and determine where the proposed program could most suitably be implemented. They also provide professional cost estfmates of probable development costs for all three locatfons. These findings were presented to RECALC and resulted in the different sites being rated for suitability by the committee as well as the Council on Aging and the design team. Using a scoring matrix, RECALC members factored in a wide variety of site-related topics including accessibility, neighborhood disruptfon, traffic, parking, development and operatfonal costs, and many more. While all three sites showed potentfal and were able to accommodate at least a number of the stated objectfves, the evaluatfon led to a first, second and third choice among the three. READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 4 of 31 Lowest on the list was the current Pleasant Street locatfon. Although the accessibility of the site was valued, lack of space for all needed programs, historical restrictfons on the existfng facility, limited parking availability and a proposed additfon that could potentfally overwhelm the residentfal neighborhood and historic structure caused it to finish in third place. In second place was the Oakland Road locatfon. This hilly property was able to accommodate the full size of the building but had limited space for future expansion or additfonal outdoor spaces such as a walking trail and flat surface for lawn games. The proximity to residentfal neighbors was also a concern. Benefits of this site included overflow parking during non-school hours at the adjacent High School. The first choice among RECALC and all other groups went to the Symonds way locatfon. The flat site was able to accommodate the full program as well as provide ample space for exterior recreatfonal uses, overflow parking and future expansion. Although the site abuts wetland, the study showed that there was ample buildable land. One outstanding questfon was whether any contaminated soils were located on the site, and if so, if that would alter this property’s positfon as most desirable. In October of 2024, Wilcox & Barton was engaged to explore the possibility of hazardous materials on the site. Their report is expected to be released by the beginning of November. READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 5 of 31 RECALC COA ALL BH+A Average Score Average Weighte d Score % of Max Score Average Score Average Weighte d Score % of Max Score Average Score Average Weighte d Score % of Max Score Average Score Average Weighte d Score % of Max Score Pleasant area of the site 2.9 4.3 29% 3.3 4.9 33% 3.0 4.5 30% 2.0 3.0 20% impact on abutters 3.9 5.8 39% 3.6 5.4 36% 3.6 5.4 36% 3.0 4.5 30% traffic conditions 4.7 4.7 47% 5.5 5.5 55% 5.1 5.1 51% 4.0 4.0 40% parking quantity 2.7 4.1 27% 4.8 7.1 48% 3.9 5.8 39% 2.0 3.0 20% location of parking 7.7 7.7 77% 7.1 7.1 71% 7.2 7.2 72% 8.5 8.5 85% wetlands/floodplains 7.7 7.7 77% 8.9 8.9 89% 8.4 8.4 84% 10.0 10.0 100% site construction cost 4.3 6.4 43% 5.4 8.1 54% 4.9 7.4 49% 7.0 10.5 70% operational costs 5.0 5.0 50% 5.4 5.4 54% 5.2 5.2 52% 3.0 3.0 30% multi-gen use 3.4 3.4 34% 5.5 5.5 55% 4.4 4.4 44% 7.5 7.5 75% outdoor activities 2.3 2.3 23% 2.6 2.6 26% 2.6 2.6 26% 1.0 1.0 10% sustainability impact 4.1 4.1 41% 3.5 3.5 35% 3.9 3.9 39% 4.0 4.0 40% senior center 5.1 7.7 51% 4.8 7.1 48% 4.9 7.4 49% 4.0 6.0 40% Total Score 54 63 44% 60 71 49% 57 67 46% 56 65 45% Oakland area of the site 7.4 11.1 74% 5.9 8.8 59% 6.9 10.3 69% 7.0 10.5 70% impact on abutters 3.4 5.1 34% 3.9 5.8 39% 3.9 5.8 39% 3.5 5.3 35% traffic conditions 5.1 5.1 51% 4.9 4.9 49% 5.1 5.1 51% 8.0 8.0 80% parking quantity 7.3 10.9 73% 8.0 12.0 80% 7.8 11.7 78% 9.5 14.3 95% location of parking 8.0 8.0 80% 8.5 8.5 85% 8.4 8.4 84% 8.0 8.0 80% wetlands/floodplains 7.0 7.0 70% 6.4 6.4 64% 6.8 6.8 68% 9.5 9.5 95% site construction cost 3.9 5.8 39% 4.6 6.9 46% 4.1 6.2 41% 3.0 4.5 30% operational costs 6.1 6.1 61% 6.5 6.5 65% 6.5 6.5 65% 7.5 7.5 75% multi-gen use 8.1 8.1 81% 6.8 6.8 68% 7.5 7.5 75% 6.0 6.0 60% outdoor activities 6.3 6.3 63% 5.5 5.5 55% 5.9 5.9 59% 5.0 5.0 50% sustainability impact 5.7 5.7 57% 6.1 6.1 61% 6.0 6.0 60% 8.5 8.5 85% senior center 7.6 11.4 76% 7.3 10.9 73% 7.6 11.4 76% 8.5 12.8 85% Total Score 76 91 63% 74 89 61% 76 91 63% 84 100 69% Symonds area of the site 8.9 13.3 89% 8.9 13.3 89% 8.9 13.4 89% 8.5 12.8 85% impact on abutters 8.1 12.2 81% 7.1 10.7 71% 7.7 11.6 77% 9.0 13.5 90% traffic conditions 6.6 6.6 66% 6.1 6.1 61% 6.4 6.4 64% 8.0 8.0 80% parking quantity 8.7 13.1 87% 8.6 12.9 86% 8.8 13.2 88% 9.0 13.5 90% location of parking 7.0 7.0 70% 7.6 7.6 76% 7.5 7.5 75% 7.5 7.5 75% wetlands/floodplains 3.9 3.9 39% 4.8 4.8 48% 4.4 4.4 44% 4.5 4.5 45% site construction cost 5.1 7.7 51% 5.1 7.7 51% 5.1 7.7 51% 5.0 7.5 50% operational costs 6.9 6.9 69% 6.1 6.1 61% 6.6 6.6 66% 8.0 8.0 80% READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 6 of 31 multi-gen use 6.3 6.3 63% 5.4 5.4 54% 5.9 5.9 59% 5.5 5.5 55% outdoor activities 8.9 8.9 89% 8.6 8.6 86% 8.9 8.9 89% 9.0 9.0 90% sustainability impact 7.0 7.0 70% 6.6 6.6 66% 6.9 6.9 69% 8.0 8.0 80% senior center 8.1 12.2 81% 8.1 12.2 81% 8.2 12.3 82% 10.0 15.0 100% Total Score 85 105 72% 83 102 70% 85 105 72% 92 113 78% Subjective Score Pleasant 5.9 5.9 29% 8.8 8.8 44% 7.2 7.2 36% 5.0 5.0 25% Oakland 11.0 11.0 55% 11.8 11.8 59% 11.5 11.5 58% 12.5 12.5 63% Symonds 14.0 14.0 70% 17.2 17.2 86% 15.4 15.4 77% 16.5 16.5 83% Final Score - Pleasant 60 69 42% 69 80 48% 64 74 45% 61 70 42% Final Score - Oakland 87 102 62% 86 101 61% 88 103 62% 97 112 68% Final Score - Symonds 99 119 72% 100 119 72% 101 120 73% 109 129 78% After reviewing work completed by the Town of Reading and its consultants, it is the opinion of Turner & Townsend Heery (TTH) that the Town has done an excellent job in studying the needs of the community and putting together a program that is supported by residents and will satfsfy elder demand in the coming decades. The feasibility study and site selectfon conducted by BH+A, together with RECALC, was professional and thorough and documented the value of each of the sites. TTH recommends that the Permanent Building Committee use the same detailed scoring matrix to determine which site they find most suitable after reviewing this report and the details of BH+A’s Feasibility Study (dated 06/12/2024). This recommendatfon can then be made to the Town’s Select Board for final review and approval. Once the site selectfon is finalized, work can begin on the schematfc design, community engagement, and budget development in advance of spring 2025 Town Meetfng. READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 7 of 31 Introduction In October of 2024, Turner & Townsend Heery (TTH) was selected to serve as Owner’s Project Manager (OPM) for the Reading Center for Actfve Living project. During the first few weeks TTH partfcipated in four meetfngs with Town officials and past representatfves of the project to gain insight and understanding of pertfnent issues and to develop a plan for the project’s success. Key issues identffied in these meetfngs included the need to coordinate actfvitfes and public outreach with the concurrent Killam Elementary School project so that both projects could have equal representatfon within the community and enable each project to stand on its own merits without one overshadowing the other. Also discussed was the desire for creatfng a new community space that provided services for all ages while focusing on including dedicated space to serve the growing populatfon of Reading seniors. As the project has been in development for some tfme, Reading expressed it’s eagerness to build on past momentum and move into the schematfc design phase of the project in the hopes of bringing a well- defined and priced project proposal to town meetfng in the Spring of 2025. TTH was asked to review the past work completed on the project and provide feedback to the Permanent Building Committee (PBC) relatfve to its completeness and validity, as well as identffy any recommended areas of investfgatfon or improvement. Key with this review was to provide feedback on the final potentfal building locatfons and assist the PBC with final site selectfon and recommendatfon to the Town’s Select Board. Need Analysis & Program Development 2015 Study In 2015 the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) developed an Economic Development Plan for the Town of Reading that projected the senior populatfon (age 65+) within the Town of Reading to increase by 73% by 2030. This predictfon forecasted an additfonal 2,500 seniors, which would bring the senior populatfon to nearly 7,000 residents, or over ¼ of the Town’s populatfon. In response the Town of Reading initfated several actfons to address the changing demographic needs. One of these was to conduct a study of the needs of the senior populatfon to better understand how to serve this growing group of citfzens. 2017 Study In 2017 the University of Massachusetts Boston’s Center for Social and Demographic Research on Aging (UMass) was commissioned by the Town to conduct a study that would investfgate the needs, interests, preferences, and opinions of the Town’s elder resident populatfon, with respect to living and aging in Reading. This effort was done in collaboratfon with the Town of Reading’s Elder and Human Services Division and the Center for Social and Demographic Research on Aging. The study identffied that over the next few decades the number of residents over 60 would make up as much as 29% of the populatfon. READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 8 of 31 This demographic group was found to live primarily alone in their own homes and have less available income compared to younger demographic groups within the community. READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 9 of 31 The UMass team also conducted four focus groups with a total of 54 key stake holders, and in the Spring of 2022 also sought input from 172 residents during three public forums. These community engagements provided valuable input from Reading citfzens and highlighted concerns over senior’s mental health needs, better community engagement and the multfple limitatfons inherent in Reading ’s current Pleasant Street senior center (PSC). The need for expanded programs and resources to serve this growing demographic group were identffied as well as the need to expand operatfon tfmes and transportatfon methods. The study also benchmarked six area senior centers (Milton, North Andover, Bedford, Natfck, Andover and Westborough). Many of these communitfes faced space shortages with their senior centers, though Reading’s facility lacked the most in terms of space per resident and was nearly ½ the size of centers that were deemed to have sufficient program space. Town Size Populatfon SF/Resident Sufficient Space Reading 6,000 25,500 0.235 No North Andover 7,400 31,000 0.238 No Andover 9,000 36,500 0.246 No Milton 8,500 28,600 0.297 No Westborough 10,000 21,600 0.462 Yes Natfck 36,468 37,000 0.985 No Bedford 14,398 14,400 0.999 No The study concluded that the existfng senior center was grossly limited in its ability to serve the needs of the Reading senior community. Both the programs that can be offered, and the number of partfcipants that can be accommodated are restricted by the Pleasant Street Center’s size and configuratfon.1 The UMass study recommend working with existfng community groups to explore methods of expanding operatfons, facilitfes and accessibility of the center. 1 Community Engagement and Planning: Reading Center for Actfve Living (ReCal) – December 2022 READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 10 of 31 2021 Committee: RECALC Following the recommendatfons of the UMass study, Reading’s Select Board established the Reading Center for Actfve Living Committee (RECALC) to explore the current and future needs of the community and to initfate planning for a potentfal new Senior/Community Center. The committee included representatfves of the Council on Aging (COA) and Reading’s Recreatfon Committee, as well as five members with backgrounds in design, constructfon, finance, community outreach and with various types of involvement with the 60+ community. All meetfngs were open to the public and documented on the Town’s website. One of the first actfons the committee completed was to conduct site visits to fifteen area centers to collect data in a uniform manner about what worked and what didn’t with respect to other senior and community centers. Twelve (12) senior centers and three (3) community centers in 15 local communitfes were visited. In additfon, ReCALC looked at 6 communitfes currently planning/building new centers (Andover, Lexington, Lincoln, Newton, N. Reading, and Wilmington) to better understand the space needs and costs of such facilitfes. The committee also engaged with the community through discussions with related community groups, newsletters, public meetfng partfcipatfon and an extensive survey which was sent out to the entfre community and well represented. READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 11 of 31 These efforts provided valuable knowledge relatfve to the needs and desires of Reading ’s citfzens as well as a benchmark of successful solutfons accomplished within other communitfes. Key findings included the supports an all-age community center with dedicated space for seniors, as well as the amount of financial support citfzens were willing to provide.2 2 2023-02-28_RECALC_Summary_Report_Final READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 12 of 31 READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 13 of 31 The survey also pointed to the need for clear communicatfon and transparency in the development process and how best to engage with Reading’s citfzens. READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 14 of 31 Finally, the survey sought input on the locatfon of a proposed Center for Actfve Learning and what key program spaces and elements would be critfcal to the project’s success. The vast majority of respondents where open to locatfons throughout the Town of Reading. READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 15 of 31 In October of 2022, ReCALC presented it findings to the Select Board. This presentatfon noted several key programmatfc elements identffied for the planned facility including3: • Low/No cost to use • Ample parking, open early and late • Large & small group programs • Indoor exercise space • Café/meal space • Outdoor space for relaxatfon, walking, lawn games As the building program developed, a more specific set of requirements was compiled. These included the following desired spaces and attributes: o Key indoor spaces: ▪ Kitchen/dining ▪ Café ▪ Arts & crafts ▪ Small group actfvitfes ▪ Large group actfvitfes ▪ Games/billiards, etc ▪ Indoor exercise ▪ Bathrooms on every floor ▪ Offices & private 1 on 1 meetfng spaces ▪ Wifi access & computer classes/ dedicated technology room ▪ From select board update:4 • Gym & locker room • Fitness center • Washer & Dryer • Hair Salon • More Storage o Key outdoor spaces: ▪ Picnic spaces ▪ Seatfng areas ▪ Gardening area ▪ Lawn games ▪ Walking track ▪ Pickleball/bocce ball o Other ▪ Wheel chair accessibility ▪ Door to door transportatfon ▪ Low cost ▪ Parking 3 Community Engagement and Planning: Reading Center for Actfve Living (ReCal) – December 2022 4 2022-10-25_Select-Board-Final READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 16 of 31 ▪ Evening and weekend hours ▪ Multfple programs simultaneously ▪ Open to all ages Site Considerations With a solid understanding of programmatfc needs, ReCALC began considering different potentfal sites that might accommodate a facility that could address the needs of Reading citfzens. An attempt was made to consider all potentfal locatfons and identffy which ones were suitable for further study. Together with partfcipatfon from various community groups, the following sites received initfal consideratfon for the proposed center. Water Treatment Site According to project debriefs, the water treatment site was explored for RECAL but was rejected by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protectfon and the Conservatfon Commission because it is in a vernal pool habitat and within wetland jurisdictfon. It is also a priority habitat of rare species and estfmated to contain rare wildlife. Due to the complex and undesirable environmental conservatfon conflicts, the site was deemed as an unviable and not explored further. Former Walgreens Location This potentfal site included the former Walgreens locatfon near downtown Reading. The site was investfgated by ReCALC in 2022 with input from an architect. While the proposed locatfon provided promise, availability of the site ended, and thus this locatfon was not explored further. Masonic Lodge A site walkthrough was conducted at the Masonic Lodge in 2024. In a post walkthrough discussion with input from architects, constructfon, and facilitfes professionals, it was determined that the 1970’s facility did not provide an attractfve locatfon for the ReCALC project due to not being able to accommodate space for: a parking lot, drop off area, gym space or outdoor recreatfonal space. In additfon, the facility lacked READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 17 of 31 an elevator and adequate windows, and contained outdated facility systems. It is also unlikely the building would be able to support additfonal stories without major (and costly) interventfons. Due to the host of shortcomings, this site was not explored further. Pleasant Street Center The Pleasant Street Center is located in downtown Reading and houses the current senior center. It includes a parking lot with drop of space and potentfal area for building expansion. The existfng building contains an elevator and lots of natural light and although in need of improvements has been well maintained by the Town of Reading. This site was selected for further study in 2024. READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 18 of 31 Oakland Road Lot The Oakland Road locatfon consists of a 4.5 acre wooded lot owned by the Town of Reading on the edge of a residentfal neighborhood and adjacent to Reading Highschool. It is also near Reading Middle School, the Birch Meadow Elementary School and the YMCA Center, and about 1 mile from the current senior center locatfon. The lot is undeveloped and provides a large enough area to accommodate the programmatfc needs of the planned facility. This site was selected for further study in 2024. Symonds Way The Symonds Way locatfon consists of a 15.2 acre area owned by the Town of Reading that contains the Burbank Ice Arena and Symonds Athletfc Fields. It’s bordered by residentfal lots to the west, wetlands to the south, and the Reading Rifle and Revolver Club to the east. The site is about 2 miles from the existfng senior center and can be easily accessed via Haverhill Street or from Interstate 495. It is also very close to the Killam School. The undeveloped lot is flat and contains sufficient buildable area beyond wetland boundaries that can accommodate the programmatfc needs of the planned facility as well as potentfal for future expansion. This site was selected for further study in 2024. READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 19 of 31 Project Feasibility With three viable sites identffied, ReCALC solicited the services of Bargmann Hendrie + Archetype, Inc. architects (BH+A) to conduct a detailed investfgatfon into the feasibility of each of the sites. BH+A teamed with Pare Corporatfon for civil engineering and traffic consultatfon as well as PM&C for cost estfmatfng services. Drawing on insights gained during the 2015 and 2017 studies, the extensive work completed by ReCALC to date, and additfonal input from various stakeholders, BH+A reviewed and updated the building program to evaluate its implementatfon on all of the three sites. Drawing on their experience with other such facilitfes, BH+A developed conceptual layouts that could test fit the proposed facility at each of the locatfons. As the Oakland Road and Symonds Way sites were undeveloped, the same layout was used at each of these locatfons. Due to the limited space of the Pleasant Street Center site, a very different configuratfon was needed to try and accommodate the desired program. Each evaluatfon considered the desired space of the building program, locatfon and accessibility of the site within Reading, likely traffic and neighborhood impacts as well as antfcipated constructfon issues and overall costs. READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 20 of 31 READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 21 of 31 READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 22 of 31 Pleasant Street Site Analysis The Pleasant Street Center locatfon is the current home of the senior center and is maxed out in its ability to meet public demand. There is no 1st floor bathroom, no 1 on 1 space, a non-functfoning kitchen, and no private offices. There is also no dedicated space for art, fitness, or a social library, and the PSC finds it impossible to run multfple large programs at once within the existfng building. The 140-year-old historical building also has poor access, though it was outiitted with an elevator in later years. Existing Building Constructed in 1885 the 7,000 SF existfng building would need to include an additfon of over 13,000 SF to accommodate the programmatfc requirements for the proposed center. The last major renovatfon was 30 years ago and based on BH+A’s report, it is unclear if all hazardous materials such as lead and asbestos have been removed from the building. Due to the age of building improvements and the need for significant alteratfons to the space, a full upgrade of all major systems will be needed, including building envelope improvements to address current codes. No known exploratfon of the structural conditfon of the facility was contained in the report, so additfonal risks and costs could be encountered here as well. The building was listed on the natfonal register in 1984. This status will create a variety of restrictfons on building modificatfons and due to the proposed size of the additfon could create barriers to a successful project completfon. Land The property is owned by the Town of Reading and zoned A-40 residentfal. Based on BH+A’s analysis, a community center is permitted by special permit. The site is approximately ½ acre in size and mostly flat. Providing the desired gym and parking would be very tfght and completely build out the site. There would also be no space for an indoor track or outdoor recreatfonal space. The maximum parking that could be provided with the closest attainment of programmatfc needs amounts to only 51 spaces, which is nearly two tfmes the number of current spaces, but well below the antfcipated demand. This shortage of available parking space would likely negatfvely impact the abutting residentfal neighborhood. Soil conditfons were not investfgated during the study of the site. While unsuitable soils are less likely in this locatfon, contaminated soils could be possible given the age and previous use of the site. Site development costs would be reduced due to the proximity to Town water and sewer connectfons, though the massive site development would require a significant underground infiltratfon basin to handle rainwater runoff. There are no wetlands restrictfons on the site. The proposed additfon does not comply with setback requirements. A variance would need to be granted. It is likely that abutters would object due to the scale of the building within the residentfal neighborhood. Construction Due to the urban nature of the site, constructfon costs are likely to be higher. As the space is currently fully occupied by the Town, additfonal costs and disruptfon would need to be incurred to provide swing space while constructfon work is underway. This would also double the required moving costs. A phased plan could be considered that would allow contfnued use of the building but given the proposed configuratfon of the building and the limited space on the site, this plan does not seem promising. As the additfon would be built very close to the property line and other abutters, significant disruptfon to neighbors is to be expected during the constructfon phase. READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 23 of 31 Location The locatfon of the PSC is ideal in that it is close to downtown, easily walkable to MBTA public transportatfon, and indicatfve of a 1-2 minute response tfme from emergency personnel. However, given the proposed increase in use at the center, additfonal traffic could negatfvely impact residentfal abutters. Cost Cost for developing the Center for Actfve Learning at this locatfon was estfmated at roughly $33M or $28M with a smaller program than desired. This price does also not account for the desired outdoor recreatfon space included in the review of other potentfal building locatfons. All things considered, the PSC locatfon carries the highest costs among the three sites studied. In reviewing the cost estfmates prepared by PM&C, the costs appear reasonable based on the limited design informatfon. Exterior finish costs may climb if more expensive materials are required by the historical commission, and another year of escalatfon should be added to the estfmates given the change in schedule since the initfal estfmates were prepared. Based on the scope of work proposed, TTH suggests increasing the design and pricing contfngency on this optfon as unexpected increases are generally higher on renovatfon projects. READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 24 of 31 READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 25 of 31 Oakland Road Site Analysis The Oakland Road locatfon is a piece of undeveloped wooded land across from the Reading Highschool. It lies on the outer edge of a residentfal neighborhood and consists of some steep sloped areas and infill. Land The property is owned by the Town of Reading and zoned S-15 residentfal. Based on BH+A’s analysis, a community center is not allowed by may be granted by special permit. The site is approximately 4 ½ acres in size and consists of steep slopes requiring extensive fill and regrading as well as constructfon of retaining walls. There is sufficient space for the desired gym, parking and pickleball courts, but limited space for future expansion and exterior walking trails. Given the terrain, the potentfal exists to create a basement within the building that could provide for additfonal space and/or future expansion space. 93 parking spaces fit comfortably on the site and should accommodate the antfcipated demand nicely. During non-school hours additfonal overflow parking could also be available at the high school. Soils are believed to be generally suitable and uncontaminated, though the design will need to work with the existfng ledge. Boulders are also likely to be encountered which would add to constructfon costs. Site development costs would be moderate to bring Town water and sewer connectfons to the site. Due to site contours, higher site costs for a sub-surface infiltratfon basin would be expected. Tree clearing and grubbing, while not significant, will also raise the costs for constructfng the project on this site. There are no wetlands restrictfons, and the proposed facility would comply with existfng setback requirements. While some disruptfon is antfcipated, the amount of mature trees should help provide a buffer from the new facility to its residentfal neighbors. Construction As this would be a new facility, no disruptfon to the current senior programs is antfcipated. Minimal neighborhood disruptfon during constructfon is expected and some impact on school parking from contractors could present itself, though this may be able to be absorbed by available on street parking spaces. Location The locatfon of the Oakland Road lot is close to Reading High School, Reading Middle School, Birch Meadow Elementary School, and the YMCA. As such, this locatfon may provide a synergy for families and individuals who are already travelling to this area for other purposes. It lies 0.8 miles away from the closest MBTA bus stop and affords a 3–4-minute response tfme from emergency personnel. Minimal increase in traffic is expected though tfming of site visits should be coordinated with school actfvitfes. Despite the visual shielding of the mature trees, some objectfon from abutters is antfcipated due to additfonal noise when the pickleball courts are in use. Cost Costs for developing the Center for Actfve Learning at this locatfon were estfmated at roughly $28M, but with less programmed outdoor space than at the Symonds Way site. This brings it in at a close second in terms of value between the three locatfons. In reviewing the cost estfmates prepared by PM&C, the costs appeared reasonable based on the limited design informatfon. However, another year of escalatfon should be added to the estfmates given the change in schedule since the initfal estfmates were prepared. READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 26 of 31 READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 27 of 31 Symonds Way Site Analysis The Symonds Way consists of a large piece of land that is currently home to the Burbank Ice Arena. The property is abutted by forest and wetlands, a small number of residentfal propertfes, some athletfc fields, and a gun club. Land The property is owned by the Town of Reading and zoned S-40 residentfal. Based on BH+A’s analysis, a community center is not allowed but may be granted by special permit. The site is approximately 15.2 acres in size and mostly flat. There is sufficient space for a gym, parking and pickleball courts, as well as ample space for future expansion and exterior walking trails. Site could also accommodate other public recreatfonal facilitfes in the future. There are over 90 planned parking spaces available and ample overflow parking at the Ice Arena and Athletfc Field should it be required. There is a potentfal for hazardous materials on the site. This should be verified prior to moving forward. It may be possible to keep existfng soils on site though this would have to be explored further should contaminated soils be found. Given the amount of fill present, soils below the building footprint will likely need to be removed and replaced. Site development costs are antfcipated to be high to bring water and sewer to the site, based on initfal engineering reports. However further investfgatfon related to water and sewer infrastructure at the Ice Arena would be beneficial to better define antfcipated site development costs. Site drainage should not present any major hurdles. Tree clearing and grubbing, while not significant, will need to be included in site development costs. Due to the presence of wetlands restrictfons, conservatfon commission approval will be needed, but is not expected to be a problem. The proposed facility would comply with existfng setback requirements. The site is in a flood plain with a 0.2% chance of annual flooding during a 500-year event. Based on further review it may be possible to raise the building above the flood mark without significant expense. Construction No residentfal neighborhood disruptfon during constructfon is antfcipated and there is ample space for constructfon parking. Location The Symonds Way site is close to the Killam School and easily accessible from Haverhill Street and 495. It lies 1.6 miles away from the closest MBTA bus stop and affords a 5–6-minute response tfme from emergency personnel. It is not antfcipated that this site will incur traffic issues or objectfon from abutters. Cost Costs for developing the Center for Actfve Learning at this locatfon were estfmated at roughly $28M and with the most outdoor space of any of the site. This ranks it the highest in terms of value between the three locatfons. In reviewing the cost estfmates prepared by PM&C, the costs appeared reasonable based on the limited design informatfon. However, another year of escalatfon should be added to the estfmates given the change in schedule since the initfal estfmates were prepared. READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 28 of 31 READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 29 of 31 Project Budget While initfal cost estfmates prepared during the feasibility study included some antfcipated overhead costs, a full project budget will need to be prepared during the schematfc design phase that takes into account the selected site, details of the proposed constructfon, antfcipated project schedule, antfcipated overhead and owner expenses as well as a healthy contfngency appropriate for the type of work READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 30 of 31 planned. This effort will be supported by the OPM and will help guard the project from failures and safeguard public funds. Project Schedule The feasibility study prepared by BH+A contained a diagrammatfc schedule appropriate for the project stage and known conditfons. Since this tfme there have been significant changes in events. The present driving actfon item is the selectfon of a final site for the new facility. Once this is established, the OPM can provide a more concrete update and issue the official detailed project schedule. A draft schedule has been already prepared and will be updated as events move forward. Communications & Public Outreach Throughout the past decade of investfgatfons, public outreach and communicatfons have been paramount to the successful development of a new center to meet the needs of Readings senior populatfon and community at large. Much has been accomplished in this area to date. Going forward, regular public outreach sessions will need to resume as well as the creatfon of a public portal that can broadcast the latest in project informatfon and provide a source for questfons and answers relatfve to the project. These communicatfons should be steered by a subset of the permanent building committee and can include various forms of media including a dedicated website, video, newsletters, newspaper artfcles and social media broadcasts. As the project is running concurrently with the Killam school project, it may be beneficial to create a joint communicatfons effort that can keep the public informed on the developments of both projects. Conclusion The Town of Reading has done an exemplary job of identffying developing community needs and investfng the necessary research and outreach to find viable solutfons. The efforts of all partfes involved in the study of a new Center for Actfve Living are to be commended. It is because of these efforts that the Town of Reading is poised to realize significant improvements to elder and community services that will last for generatfons. With the research, planning and feasibility complete, and the Permanent Building Committee in place, a final site will need to be recommended for Select Board approval. Once this is accomplished, the project team can move ahead in developing the plans and budgets necessary to present the project to the Town for final approval. READING CENTER FOR ACTIVE LIVING – OPM REVIEW Page 31 of 31 Appendix Materials reviewed: • 2017 UMass Final Report of Reading Needs for Seniors • 2021 Comparatfve Review of Other Senior Centers • 2021 Comparatfve Review of Other Feasibility Studies • 2022 RECALC Newsletters (1&2) • 2022 RECALC Update to the Select Board • 2022 RECALC Final Report • 2023 RECALC Summary Report • 2024 RECALC Site Presentatfon by BH+A • 2024 RECALC Site Ranking Worksheets & Results • 2024 CAL Feasibility Study by BH+A • 2024 RECALC presentatfon to the Select Board • 2024 COA Emerging Senior Trends November 19, 2024 VASC Recommendations Murphy and Herrick After meeting with various applicants, the VASC recommends the following appointments: • Jean-Paul Plouffe (current associate) to a full position on the Board of Assessors with a term expiring June 30, 2026 • Tim Michel to an associate position on the Conservation Commission with a term expiring June 30, 2026 • Ashley Gross to a full position on the Cultural Council with a term expiring June 30, 2027 and to an associate position on the Trails Committee with a term expiring June 30, 2026 • John Federico to an associate position on the Recreation Committee with a term expiring June 30, 2025 • Brandy Hopkins to a full position on the Town Forest Committee with a term expiring June 30, 2027 and to an associate position on the Trails Committee with a term expiring June 30, 2026 • Frank Capone (current associate) to a full position on the Zoning Board of Appeals with a term beginning January 1st, 2025 and expiring June 30, 2025 The VASC also puts forth the following applicants for the Ad-Hoc Commemoration Establishment Committee (ACE) until the committee sunsets: 1. Tara Gregory 2. David Monahan 3. Edward Dee 4. Monique Gnanaratnam 5. Ryan Johnstone 6. Reginald Nichols (if still interested; will attend 11/19 meeting and say) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Town Clerk fax: 781-942-9070 781-942-9050 website: www.readingma.gov Application for Appointment to Boards, Committees and Commissions Name: Date: (Last) (First) (Middle) Address: Phone (Home): Phone (Work): Phone (Cell): Which number should be listed? Occupation: Number of years in Reading: E-mail address: Place a number next to your preferred position(s) (up to four choices) with number 1 being your first priority. (Please attach a resume if available) ___ Animal Control Appeals Committee ___ Audit Committee ___ Board of Assessors ___ Board of Cemetery Trustees ___ Board of Health ___ Board of Registrars ___ Bylaw Committee ___ Celebration Trust Committee ___ Climate Advisory Committee ___ Commissioners of Trust Funds ___ Community Planning and Development Commission ___ Conservation Commission ___ Constables ___ Council on Aging ___ Cultural Council ___ Custodian of Soldier and Sailor Graves ___ Finance Committee ___ Historic District Commission ___ Historical Commission ___ Housing Authority ___ Human Relations Advisory Committee ___ Permanent Building Committee ___ RCTV Board of Directors ___ Recreation Committee ___ Retirement Board ___ RMLD Citizen Advisory Board ___ Town Forest Committee ___ Trails Committee ___ Veterans Memorial Trust Fund Committee ___ Zoning Board of Appeals ___ Other Please outline relevant experience for the position(s) sought: Town of Reading 16 Lowell Street Reading MA 01867 19 20 21 Town Clerk fax: 781-942-9070 781-942-9050 website: www.readingma.gov Application for Appointment to Boards, Committees and Commissions Name: Date: (Last) (First) (Middle) Address: Phone (Home): Phone (Work): Phone (Cell): Which number should be listed? Occupation: Number of years in Reading: E-mail address: Place a number next to your preferred position(s) (up to four choices) with number 1 being your first priority. (Please attach a resume if available) ___ Animal Control Appeals Committee ___ Audit Committee ___ Board of Assessors ___ Board of Cemetery Trustees ___ Board of Health ___ Board of Registrars ___ Bylaw Committee ___ Celebration Trust Committee ___ Climate Advisory Committee ___ Commissioners of Trust Funds ___ Community Planning and Development Commission ___ Conservation Commission ___ Constables ___ Council on Aging ___ Cultural Council ___ Custodian of Soldier and Sailor Graves ___ Finance Committee ___ Historic District Commission ___ Historical Commission ___ Housing Authority ___ Human Relations Advisory Committee ___ Permanent Building Committee ___ RCTV Board of Directors ___ Recreation Committee ___ Retirement Board ___ RMLD Citizen Advisory Board ___ Town Forest Committee ___ Trails Committee ___ Veterans Memorial Trust Fund Committee ___ Zoning Board of Appeals ___ Other Please outline relevant experience for the position(s) sought: Town of Reading 16 Lowell Street Reading MA 01867 22 November 1, 2024 Dear Select Board, I am writing to express my interest in a volunteer position on the Ad Hoc Commemoration Establishment Committee. As a long-time resident of Reading and someone deeply invested in fostering an inclusive community, I am passionate about acknowledging the legacy of Bill Russell, particularly his impact on civil rights and the challenges he faced during his time in our town. I hold a Bachelor’s degree in International Development and a Master’s degree in Development Practice, equipping me with a strong understanding of community engagement and collaborative initiatives. My local volunteer experience includes serving as the Lead Coordinator for the Reading Girl Scouts and being an active member of PAIR and CATO, roles that include event planning, meeting facilitation, and time-sensitive communication. Additionally, I believe my empathetic and diplomatic approach will contribute positively to the committee's efforts. Bill Russell had a profound impact as a champion of civil rights. His experiences in Reading highlight the importance of recognizing our past and fostering a community that welcomes everyone. I am eager to help create an event that not only honors his memory but also encourages dialogue and understanding within our community. Thank you for considering my application. I look forward to the opportunity to contribute to this important initiative and to honor a figure whose legacy is vital to our shared history. Sincerely, Angela McIntosh Reading, MA 01867 23 Angela McIntosh com ● ● Pronouns: she/her/hers PROFESSIONAL SUMMARY ●Project manager; experience at nonprofit organizations of different sizes, stages, and focus areas ●Skilled at facilitating processes, finding efficiencies, and analyzing information ●Strong analytical thinker and problem-solver, quick learner, and logistics whiz ●Trusted and diplomatic team member who takes a service-oriented approach to work RECENT EMPLOYMENT GMA Foundations Boston, MA Program Associate July 2023 - Present ●Oversee client foundations’ administrative activities and support grantmaking processes ●Prepare materials and logistics for client board meetings; write board meeting minutes ●Maintain data in grants management system ●Conduct grant proposal reviews and prepare summaries Mystic Valley Regional Charter School (via Kennison & Associates)Malden, MA Temporary Project Assistant, Operations Team December 2022 - May 2023 ●Processed 1,400 admissions applications, maintained detailed and accurate applicant data, mailed acknowledgment letters and results to each applicant, and entered registration data for 150 new students ●Audited employee personnel files, designed audit and tracking tools, and addressed gaps with employees Victoria Gourmet Inc Woburn, MA Interim Food Safety Manager September 2021 - May 2022 ●Developed, implemented, verified, and continuously improved the company’s food safety policies and procedures in line with FDA regulations and Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) standards ●Worked with Operations, Planning, and Production personnel daily to monitor processes and products ●Maintained documentation of policies, products, and operations ●Conducted internal audit; represented the company in annual 3rd-party audit for food safety certification GRADUATE INTERNSHIPS AND PART-TIME EXPERIENCE Heifer International Remote Graduate Intern,Living Income Benchmark (LIB)July 2020 - August 2020 Habitat for Humanity International Atlanta, GA / Remote Graduate Intern, Strategy Realization Team August 2019 - July 2020 GreenLight Fund Atlanta Remote Graduate Intern, Scouting Phase Research December 2019 - February 2020 Omprakash Remote EdGE Mentor (As needed) January 2019 - September 2022 Archimedes Project Remote AP is a small startup studio for clean water and sanitation enterprises.September 2013 - May 2019 Director of Special Events, Core Leadership Team ●Planned and ran two social enterprise business plan competitions (Boston, MA and Nairobi, Kenya) ●Produced annual community building and fundraising events to meet the organization’s strategic goals ●Created budgets, promoted events, liaised with sponsors and venues, and managed event volunteers 1 24 Angela McIntosh Archimedes Project (cont.) Program Manager, University Ideation ●Designed program for university students to plan and host social enterprise business plan competitions ●Created detailed planning guide; coached 5 students throughout the process over the span of the program ●Set program goals and tracked progress; evaluated and adjusted program strategy ●Led student recruitment and partnership building with universities and social impact networks Fundraising Coordinator ●Researched, analyzed, and prioritized grant opportunities and potential donors; drafted grant applications ●Incorporated best practices of donor stewardship into fundraising strategy CURRENT VOLUNTEER ROLES Girl Scouts of Eastern Massachusetts (GSEMA)Reading, MA Service Unit Coordinator November 2022 - Present ●Plan and host monthly meetings of troop leaders; send monthly emails with news and resources ●Use personal experience as a Girl Scout and GS Camp Counselor to provide guidance and support to leaders, volunteers, and scouts in town ●Connect Reading Girl Scouts with opportunities in the community and the larger Girl Scout network Partners and Allies for an Inclusive Reading (PAIR)Reading, MA Member of the inaugural volunteer cohort July 2022 - Present ●Participate in monthly discussions and workshops on inclusion across various identities ●Promote and attend community events endorsed or planned by the Office of Equity & Social Justice ●Meet with the Director of ESJ to discuss current events in town and ways to support OESJ’s work EDUCATION Emory University, Laney Graduate School Atlanta, GA Master’s in Development Practice August 2018 - August 2020 Concentration: Program Management MDP is a professional degree that trains students in practical skills for achieving impact while challenging them to think critically about the mechanisms of social change. Highlighted Coursework:Nonprofit Leadership and Management; Diversity and Equity in Development; Business and Society; Monitoring and Evaluation; Qualitative Research Methods; Program Management; Cross-Cultural Communication; Social Network Analysis; Gender and Development College of William and Mary Williamsburg, VA B.A. International Development August 2009 - May 2013 Summer study abroad: Social Entrepreneurship (Central America and Kenya) COMPUTER SKILLS Microsoft Office Applications (Word, Excel, Powerpoint, etc), Google Applications (Gmail, Drive, Docs, etc), Slack, Asana, Vivify, Canva, CRM platforms, video conferencing 2 25 3 4 5 6 7 Town Clerk fax: 781-942-9070 781-942-9050 website: www.readingma.gov Application for Appointment to Boards, Committees and Commissions Name: Date: (Last) (First) (Middle) Address: Phone (Home): Phone (Work): Phone (Cell): Which number should be listed? Occupation: Number of years in Reading: E-mail address: Place a number next to your preferred position(s) (up to four choices) with number 1 being your first priority. (Please attach a resume if available) ___ Animal Control Appeals Committee ___ Audit Committee ___ Board of Assessors ___ Board of Cemetery Trustees ___ Board of Health ___ Board of Registrars ___ Bylaw Committee ___ Celebration Trust Committee ___ Climate Advisory Committee ___ Commissioners of Trust Funds ___ Community Planning and Development Commission ___ Conservation Commission ___ Constables ___ Council on Aging ___ Cultural Council ___ Custodian of Soldier and Sailor Graves ___ Finance Committee ___ Historic District Commission ___ Historical Commission ___ Housing Authority ___ Human Relations Advisory Committee ___ Permanent Building Committee ___ RCTV Board of Directors ___ Recreation Committee ___ Retirement Board ___ RMLD Citizen Advisory Board ___ Town Forest Committee ___ Trails Committee ___ Veterans Memorial Trust Fund Committee ___ Zoning Board of Appeals ___ Other Please outline relevant experience for the position(s) sought: Town of Reading 16 Lowell Street Reading MA 01867 Michel Tim 10/31/2024 104 Scotland Road 781-779-5291 Cell Inspector/Small Business Owner 25 timinspection@gmail.com X I am applying for this position as a resident of Reading for the past 25 years. After working with the conservation board, specifically, with Chuck it became appealing to me to become more involvedwith the conservation board especially as construction is/has increased in Reading and decisiosns are being made within the town. I have also personally dealt with conservation and the open land trust laws/regulatons which would aid me in supporting this board. 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 Board/Committee # Full Mbr s Max # Assoc Members Full/ Asso c Orig. Date Term Ends Appt Auth Term Length Ad Hoc Commemmoration Establishment Committee 10 3 Select Board Member/Designee F 2025 SB 12 mos Ad Hoc Commemmoration Establishment Committee OESJ Designee F 2025 OESJ 12 mos Ad Hoc Commemmoration Establishment Committee Police Dept Ex-Officio F 2025 RPD 12 mos Ad Hoc Commemmoration Establishment Committee School Committee Student Designee F 2025 SC 12 mos Ad Hoc Commemmoration Establishment Committee CATO Member/Designee F 2025 CATO 12 mos Ad Hoc Commemmoration Establishment Committee School Committee Member/Designee F 2025 SC 12 mos Ad Hoc Commemmoration Establishment Committee COA Member/Designee F 2025 COA 12 mos Ad Hoc Commemmoration Establishment Committee BOLT Member/Designee F 2025 BOLT 12 mos Ad Hoc Commemmoration Establishment Committee VACANT F 2025 SB 12 mos Ad Hoc Commemmoration Establishment Committee VACANT F 2025 SB 12 mos Ad Hoc Commemmoration Establishment Committee VACANT A 2025 SB 12 mos Ad Hoc Commemmoration Establishment Committee VACANT A 2025 SB 12 mos Ad Hoc Commemmoration Establishment Committee VACANT A 2025 SB 12 mos New Applicants: Bill Squires David Monahan Colm Eliet Tara Gregory Ryan Johnstone Edward Dee Sandy Matathia Holly Humphreys Angela McIntosh Greg Selvitelli Reginald Nichols Aujanetta Stith London Stith-Nichols Monique Gnanaratnam 20 Board/Committee # Full Mbr s Max # Assoc Members Full/ Asso c Orig. Date Term Ends Appt Auth Term Length Board of Assessors 3 2 Michael Golden F 2017 2027 SB 3 Board of Assessors VACANT F 2026 SB 3 Board of Assessors Brendan Zarechian F 2018 2025 SB 3 Board of Assessors VACANT A 2026 SB 2 Board of Assessors Jean-Paul Plouffe A 2022 2025 SB 2 Conservation Commission 7 4 Chirag Sthalekar F 2024 2027 SB 3 Conservation Commission Craig Catalfamo F 2024 2027 SB 3 Conservation Commission Martha Moore F 2020 2027 SB 3 Conservation Commission Brian Bowe F 2021 2026 SB 3 Conservation Commission Walter Talbot F 2021 2026 SB 3 Conservation Commission Tony Rodolakis F 2023 2025 SB 3 Conservation Commission VACANT F 2025 SB 3 Conservation Commission Carlo Saccone A 2024 2026 SB 2 Conservation Commission VACANT A 2026 SB 2 Conservation Commission Linda Connors A 2023 2025 SB 2 Conservation Commission VACANT A 2025 SB 2 New Applicants: Tim Michel 21 Board/Committee # Full Mbr s Max # Assoc Members Full/ Asso c Orig. Date Term Ends Appt Auth Term Length Cultural Council 7 4 Stephen Theodoridis F 2022 2027 SB 3 Cultural Council VACANT F 2027 SB 3 Cultural Council VACANT F 2027 SB 3 Cultural Council Anna Foulds F 2024 2026 SB 3 Cultural Council VACANT F 2026 SB 3 Cultural Council Elizabeth Rogers F 2023 2026 SB 3 Cultural Council Jayna Stafford F 2024 2025 SB 3 Cultural Council VACANT A 2026 SB 2 Cultural Council VACANT A 2026 SB 2 Cultural Council Megan Fidler-Carey A 2017 2025 SB 2 Cultural Council VACANT A 2025 SB 2 New Applicants: Ashley Gross Recreation Committee 9 4 Catherine Kaminer F 1988 2027 SB 3 Recreation Committee Eric Boemer F 2023 2027 SB 3 Recreation Committee Robert Weiden F 2020 2027 SB 3 Recreation Committee Chuck Robinson (Sch. Com.)F 2021 2026 SC 3 Recreation Committee Laura Noonan F 2024 2026 SB 3 Recreation Committee Richard Hand F 2011 2026 SB 3 Recreation Committee Eric Gaffen F 2018 2025 SB 3 Recreation Committee Melissa Pucci F 2022 2025 SB 3 Recreation Committee Michael Coltman F 2018 2025 SB 3 Recreation Committee Giuseppe Fodera A 2024 2026 SB 2 Recreation Committee Matthew George A 2024 2026 SB 2 Recreation Committee Kevin Leete A 2023 2025 SB 2 Recreation Committee VACANT A 2025 SB 2 New Applicants: John Federico 22 Board/Committee # Full Mbr s Max # Assoc Members Full/ Asso c Orig. Date Term Ends Appt Auth Term Length Town Forest Committee 5 3 Christine Lusk F 2024 2027 SB 3 Town Forest Committee VACANT F 2027 SB 3 Town Forest Committee Jeffrey Lamson F 2020 2026 SB 3 Town Forest Committee Tim Kirwan F 2021 2025 SB 3 Town Forest Committee William Sullivan F 2013 2025 SB 3 Town Forest Committee VACANT A 2026 SB 2 Town Forest Committee William Hughes III A 2022 2026 SB 2 Town Forest Committee Nancy Docktor A 2015 2025 SB 2 New Applicants: Brandy Hopkins Trails Committee 5 3 Benjamin Ream F 2018 2027 SB 3 Trails Committee John Kastrinos F 2022 2027 SB 3 Trails Committee William Finch F 2011 2026 SB 3 Trails Committee David Williams F 2008 2025 SB 3 Trails Committee Kathy Kelly F 2018 2025 SB 3 Trails Committee VACANT A 2026 SB 2 Trails Committee VACANT A 2026 SB 2 Trails Committee Thomas Gardiner A 2008 2025 SB 2 New Applicants: Ashley Gross Brandy Hopkins 23 Board/Committee # Full Mbr s Max # Assoc Members Full/ Asso c Orig. Date Term Ends Appt Auth Term Length Zoning Board of Appeals 5 2 Chris Cridler F 2023 2027 SB 3 Zoning Board of Appeals Patrick Houghton F 2021 2027 SB 3 Zoning Board of Appeals Andrew Grasberger F 2021 2026 SB 3 Zoning Board of Appeals Cynthia B Hartman F 2020 2026 SB 3 Zoning Board of Appeals Damase Caouette - Resigning Effective 1/1/2025 F 2021 2025 SB 3 Zoning Board of Appeals Frank Capone A 2024 2025 SB 1 Zoning Board of Appeals Tara Gregory A 2024 2025 SB 1 Current Associate Seeking Full Vacant New Applicant 24 Fax: (781) 942-5441 PUBLIC WORKS Website: www.readingma.gov (781) 942-9077 Date: November 14, 2024 To: Town of Reading Select Board Cc: Matthew A. Kraunelis, Town Manager From: Jayne Wellman, Assistant Town Manager Re: Pickleball at Symonds Way This memo reflects the current progress for the expenditure of remaining ARPA funds for the design of 8 Pickleball courts at Symonds Way. The remaining ARPA funds in Elder and Human Services included $80,000 that was originally slated for “Supplemental Programming Space.” With the additional funds identified by the Chief Financial Officer, the Select Board voted at its meeting on October 29, 2024 to allocate $87,348.34 for the purposes of designing pickleball courts at Symonds Way. Since that vote, we have worked with the designer, BH+A, on a proposal to do the design work for these courts, included in this packet. Their fee proposal is within the budget, and we are working with an internal team to refine the scope and then develop the contract in time to encumber the funds by December 31, 2024. Additionally, we received the results of the Limited Subsurface Investigation (LSI) report of November 4, 2024. That report is also included in this packet. In summary, no field evidence of contamination was identified during soil boring advancement or monitoring well development. Laboratory analysis of soil samples did not identify contaminant concentrations exceeding or approaching the MCP Reportable Concentrations for S-1 soils, and detected analyte concentrations were consistent with natural background conditions. Based on the proposal, the soil test findings, and previous presentations, I recommend that the Select Board vote to designate the land at Symonds Way (see map) for the purpose of pickleball. Town of Reading 16 Lowell Street Reading, MA 01867-2683 M:\M_Proposals\2024 Proposals\Recreation\Reading Pickleball Courts\2024 1106 Pickleball fee proposal.docx BARGMANN HENDRIE + ARCHETYPE, INC. Architecture | Planning | Interior Design 9 Channel Center Street 617 350 0450 Suite 300 bha@bhplus.com Boston, MA 02210 www.bhplus.com November 6, 2024 Ms. Jayne Wellman Assistant Town Manager 16 Lowell Street Reading, Massachusetts 01867 Re: Fee Proposal for Pickleball Courts related to Reading Center for Active Living (“ReCal”) Dear Ms. Wellman: As requested, please find a fee proposal for the design and construction of Pickleball Courts as related to the Reading Center for Active Living project from Bargmann Hendrie + Archetype, Inc (BH+A). Project Understanding & Scope of Service The scope of work of this contract is to provide services for the design and construction of eight (8) Pickleball Courts at the Symonds Way site in advance of the construction of the Center for Active Living currently being design by BH+A. Four (4) of the courts will be lighted, with provisions to light the other four (4) if needed at a later date. Because they are going in before the building, a transformer and separate service will be needed to support the courts. Scope tasks are as follows. • Undertake geotechnical samples for soil bearing capacity and doing a geotechnical report for Pickleball construction support. • Site plan for Pickleball in coordination with Master Plan for ReCAL building and parking lot and access road. • Design of Pickleball courts, fencing, sidewalls, lighting, and provision of power. • Meeting with Conservation Administrator and Commission. • Meeting with Town Planner regarding access road (road widening is envisioned as part of ReCAL project not the Pickleball project). • Construction Documents for Pickleball Courts and related work including parking area for Pickleball. • Cost estimate will be undertaken at the conclusion of Schematic Design and 50% Construction Documents. Ms. Jayne Wellman Town of Reading November 6, 2024 Page 2 M:\M_Proposals\2024 Proposals\Recreation\Reading Pickleball Courts\2024 1106 Pickleball fee proposal.docx Fees Based on the scope of work described above, we propose the following fee. Sports Landscape, Civil & Permitting (Activitas) $63,000 Electrical Engineering (Allied) $4,500 Master site plan and coordination (BH+A) $10,000 Geotech $4,500 Cost Estimates (2) $5,000 Total $87,000 This fee includes schematic design, design development, and construction documents. Bidding and Construction Administration are included in subsequent proposals once the project is approved. The above is meant to represent our understanding of the architecture and engineering needs for the project. Should you find we have misunderstood the scope of our services, please do not hesitate to advise. We are available to review this proposal at your convenience. Sincerely, Joel Bargmann, AIA Principal 617-456-2227 jbargmann@bhplus.com cc: Jeana Wood, Marketing, Finance LIMITED SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION REPORT SYMONDS WAY PARCEL (0 EAST OF HAVERHILL STREET) READING, MASSACHUSETTS 01867 Prepared for: Bargmann Hendrie + Archetype, Inc. 9 Channel Center Street, Suite 300 Boston, Massachusetts Contact: Mr. Mason Brunnick, (617) 350-0450 Prepared by: Wilcox & Barton, Inc. 2 Home Avenue Concord, New Hampshire 03301 Contact: Mr. John DeMille, (603) 369-4190 x514 November 4, 2024 Wilcox & Barton, Inc. Project No. BHAI0002 CERTIFICATION Limited Subsurface Investigation Report Symonds Way Parcel, Reading, MA i The following personnel have prepared and/or reviewed this report for accuracy, content, and quality of presentation. Document Title: Limited Subsurface Investigation Report Symonds Way Parcel (0 East of Haverhill Street) Reading, Massachusetts 01867 Date/Version: November 4, 2024 Date: November 4, 2024 Amelia E. Midgley Senior Geologist – Project Manager Date: November 4, 2024 John DeMille, LSP Associate Vice President TABLE OF CONTENTS Limited Subsurface Investigation Report Symonds Way Parcel, Reading, MA ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ...........................................................................................1 3.0 PROPERTY BACKGROUND .........................................................................................1 4.0 LIMITED SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION ..............................................................2 4.1 Soil Boring Advancement and Monitoring Well Installation ..................................2 4.2 Soil Sampling and Analysis .....................................................................................2 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ...........................................................3 Tables Table 1 Soil Samples – Summary of Analytical Results Figures Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Plan Appendices Appendix A Soil Boring Logs and Monitoring Well Completion Details Appendix B Wilcox & Barton, Inc. Standard Operating Procedures Appendix C Laboratory Reports Limited Subsurface Investigation Report Symonds Way Parcel, Reading, MA 1.0 INTRODUCTION Wilcox & Barton, Inc. was retained by Bargmann Hendrie + Archetype, Inc. to perform a limited subsurface investigation (LSI) at 0 East of Haverhill Street in Reading, Massachusetts. The LSI was performed to assess for the presence/absence of contamination associated with the following concerns identified in the September 2022 Preliminary Environmental Screening (September 2022 PES), prepared by Weston & Sampson Engineers, Inc. (WSE): • Current and historical operation of a rifle club at the site and adjoining parcels. • Historical operation of a Nike missile facility on adjoining parcels. • Abandoned vehicles located adjacent to the subject property. • Elevated organic vapors and non-native debris/fill material identified in soil at the subject property. The LSI activities were performed by Wilcox & Barton, Inc. in October 2024 and included soil boring advancement, monitoring well installation, and collection of soil samples for laboratory analysis. A summary of the LSI activities is provided in Section 4.0. 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The property consists of 15.2 acres of land and is identified by the Town of Reading Assessing Department as Parcel ID 035.0000-0133.0. The property is vacant and consists of undeveloped wooded land. According to the 2021 United States Geological Survey (USGS) 2021 topographic map for Reading, Massachusetts, the property is located at an elevation between 90 and 100 feet above mean sea level. No surface water bodies are located on the property; however, wetland areas are located on the southern portion of the property and on adjacent properties to the east, west, and south. Surrounding properties are mixed use. The northern portion of the property is bordered by Symonds Way (also referred to as Range Road), beyond which is the Burbank Ice Area. Residential properties abut the western portion of the property. Undeveloped wooded and conservation land border the southern and southeastern portions of the property. The Reading Rifle & Revolver Club (firing range) borders the northeastern portion of the subject property. The location of the property is depicted on Figure 1 – Site Location Map and property features are depicted on Figure 2 – Site Plan. 3.0 PROPERTY BACKGROUND According to the September 2022 PSE prepared by WSE, the northern portion of the property was developed with an unimproved roadway between 1893 and 1915. The roadway provided access to the adjacent Reading Rifle & Revolver Club property beginning circa 1944. The northern portion of the property was cleared of vegetation by 1952 to facilitate development of the Nike B03 missile facility on an adjoining parcel to the north. The roadway on the northern portion of the subject property provided access to the Nike missile facility until 1963, when the facility was decommissioned. The subject property was most recently used by a construction Limited Subsurface Investigation Report Symonds Way Parcel, Reading, MA company for material staging. The roadway on the northern portion of the property continues to provide access to the adjacent Reading Rifle & Revolver Club. The Town of Reading has owned the property since August 2019 and is currently evaluating options to redevelop the property for municipal use. 4.0 LIMITED SUBSURFACE INVESTIGATION 4.1 Soil Boring Advancement and Monitoring Well Installation On October 23, 2024, New England Geotech, LLC, of Jamestown, Rhode Island, advanced soil borings B(MW)-201 through B(MW)-204 at the locations depicted on Figure 2. The borings were advanced using direct-push drilling techniques to depths ranging between 15 and 20 feet below ground surface (bgs). The boring locations were selected based on observations and field screening data documented by WSE in the September 2022 PES. Borings B(MW)-201 and B(MW)-202 were advanced at locations where WSE encountered elevated soil headspace field screening readings. Boring B(MW)-203 was advanced in an area where WSE observed non- native fill materials. Boring B(MW)-204 was advanced on the easternmost portion of the property to evaluate the presence/absence of contamination associated with the historical and/or current operation of adjoining properties as a missile facility and firing range. Shallow soil borings HA-1 through HA-10 were advanced throughout the property using hand tools at the locations depicted on Figure 2. The shallow soil borings were advanced to a depth of approximately 1-foot bgs to evaluate for the presence of potential lead-impacted soil associated with the long-term use of the adjacent property as a firing range. Soil borings B(MW)-201 through B(MW)-204 were completed as permanent monitoring wells MW-201 through MW-204, respectively. The monitoring wells were constructed with 2-inch diameter, thread-coupled, Schedule 40 polyvinyl chloride (PVC) materials. A 10- to 15-foot length of 0.010-inch machine-slotted PVC well screen was installed across the apparent water table interface at each location. Clean silica sand was placed around each well screen, and a hydrated bentonite divider seal was installed above the filter pack. The annular space above the divider seal was backfilled with filter sand. Each well was completed with an approximately 3- foot length of PVC well riser extending above the ground surface. Soil boring logs and monitoring well completion details are included in Appendix A. The monitoring wells were developed using dedicated polyethylene bailers to promote the flow of water through the sand pack and into the well. Well development continued until the wells were dry or until the purge water was clarified. Inspection of the groundwater did not identify visual or olfactory indicators of potential contamination. 4.2 Soil Sampling and Analysis During advancement of soil borings B(MW)-201 through B(MW)-204, soil samples were collected continuously and classified using a modified Burmister Soil Classification System as described in the Wilcox & Barton, Inc. Standard Operating Procedure FP-14, which is included in Appendix B. Soil primarily consisted of fine to coarse sand with varying amounts of silt and Limited Subsurface Investigation Report Symonds Way Parcel, Reading, MA gravel. Soil samples were screened for total organic vapors using a photoionization detector (PID) in accordance with the Wilcox & Barton, Inc. Standard Operating Procedure FP-01, which is included in Appendix B. Total organic vapor concentrations detected in soil samples collected from borings B(MW)-201 through B(MW)-204 did not exceed 5.0 parts per million by volume (ppmv). No visual or olfactory indicators of contamination were observed in the soil samples. During advancement of shallow soil borings HA-1 through HA-10, soil samples were collected and visually inspected for the presence of munitions waste and other indications of potential contamination. No munitions waste or other materials presenting a concern to the quality of the shallow soil at the property were observed. Discrete soil samples were collected from borings B(MW)-201 through B(MW)-204 at depths between 6 and 16.5 feet bgs. The samples were submitted to Pace Analytical Laboratory (Pace) of East Longmeadow, Massachusetts, under standard chain of custody protocols for analysis of extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) Method and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8260. Discrete soil samples were also collected from each of the shallow soil boring locations (HA-1 through HA-10) at depths between ground surface and 1-foot bgs and submitted to Pace for analysis of total lead by EPA Method 6010. No compounds were detected in the soil samples at concentrations exceeding or approaching the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP; 310 CMR 40.0000) Reportable Concentrations for S-1 soils. No EPH compounds of VOCs were detected above laboratory reporting limits in the soil samples collected from borings B(MW)-201 through B(MW)-204. Lead was detected in each of the soil samples collected from shallow borings HA-1 through HA-10 at concentrations ranging between 6.9 and 71 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg). These lead concentrations are consistent with natural background conditions, as described in the MassDEP Technical Update: Background Levels of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Metals in Soil (May 2002). The soil analytical results are summarized in Table 1 – Soil Samples – Summary of Analytical Results and the laboratory report is provided in Appendix C. 5.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Wilcox & Barton, Inc. conducted an LSI at 0 East of Haverhill Street in Reading, Massachusetts, to assess for the presence/absence of contamination associated with the concerns identified in the September 2022 PES prepared by WSE. The LSI was performed in October 2024 and included soil boring advancement, monitoring well installation, and collection of soil samples for laboratory analysis. No field evidence of contamination was identified during soil boring advancement or monitoring well development. Laboratory analysis of soil samples did not identify contaminant concentrations exceeding or approaching the MCP Reportable Concentrations for S-1 soils, and detected analyte concentrations were consisted with natural background conditions. Based on soil sampling and field screening results, no groundwater samples were collected for laboratory analysis. Limited Subsurface Investigation Report Symonds Way Parcel, Reading, MA Based on the results of the LSI activities, no additional assessment or remediation activities are recommended at this time. If visual or olfactory indicators of contamination are identified during site redevelopment, additional assessment should be performed to evaluate if regulatory notification, remediation, or specific environmental media management or handling activities are required. Limited Subsurface Investigation Report Symonds Way Parcel, Reading, MA TABLES TABLE 1 Soil Samples - Summary of Analytical Results Symonds Way (0 East of Haverhill Street) Reading, Massachusetts RCS-1 C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,000 13 U 12 U 12 U 11 U C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 3,000 13 U 12 U 12 U 11 U C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1,000 13 U 12 U 12 U 11 U Acenaphthene 4 0.13 U 0.12 U 0.12 U 0.11 U Acenaphthylene 2 0.13 U 0.12 U 0.12 U 0.11 U Anthracene 1,000 0.13 U 0.12 U 0.12 U 0.11 U Benzo(a)anthracene 20 0.13 U 0.12 U 0.12 U 0.11 U Benzo(a)pyrene 2 0.13 U 0.12 U 0.12 U 0.11 U Benzo(b)fluoranthene 20 0.13 U 0.12 U 0.12 U 0.11 U Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1,000 0.13 U 0.12 U 0.12 U 0.11 U Benzo(k)fluoranthene 200 0.13 U 0.12 U 0.12 U 0.11 U Chrysene 200 0.13 U 0.12 U 0.12 U 0.11 U Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 2 0.13 U 0.12 U 0.12 U 0.11 U Fluoranthene 1,000 0.13 U 0.12 U 0.12 U 0.11 U Fluorene 1,000 0.13 U 0.12 U 0.12 U 0.11 U Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 20 0.13 U 0.12 U 0.12 U 0.11 U 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.7 0.13 U 0.12 U 0.12 U 0.11 U Naphthalene 4 0.13 U 0.12 U 0.12 U 0.11 U Phenanthrene 10 0.13 U 0.12 U 0.12 U 0.11 U Pyrene 1,000 0.13 U 0.12 U 0.12 U 0.11 U Lead 200 -- -- -- -- Benzene 2 0.0020 U 0.0014 U 0.0018 U 0.0015 U Ethylbenzene 40 0.0020 U 0.0014 U 0.0018 U 0.0015 U Naphthalene 4 0.0039 U 0.0028 U 0.0035 U 0.0030 U Tetrachloroethene (PCE)1 0.0020 U 0.0014 U 0.0018 U 0.0015 U Toluene 30 0.0020 U 0.0014 U 0.0018 U 0.0015 U Trichloroethene (TCE)0.3 0.0020 U 0.0014 U 0.0018 U 0.0015 U Vinyl chloride 0.3 0.0098 U 0.0069 U 0.0088 U 0.0076 U Total Xylenes 100 0.0059 U 0.0042 U 0.0053 U 0.0045 U All results in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) unless otherwise indicated. Only detected and select analytes presented; all others were not detected. MCP Massachusetts Contingency Plan. PID Photoionization Detector. ppmv Parts per million by volume (ppmv). U Not detected at or above the listed laboratory reporting limit. -- Not analyzed or reported. Bold shaded Bold italicized ¥310 CMR 40.1600, rev. 3/1/2024. 7-7.5 / 0.0 10/23/2024 B(MW)-204B(MW)-203B(MW)-202B(MW)-201 6-6.5 / 0.2 10/23/2024 15.5-16.5 / 0.1 10/23/2024 6-6.5 / 0.2 10/23/2024 Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) by MassDEP Method EPH 04-1.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 Total Metals by EPA Methods 6010 and 7471 Detected concentration exceeds MCP Reportable Concentration in Soil (RCS-1). Not detected, laboratory reporting limit exceeds MCP Reportable Concentration in Soil (RCS-1). Sample Date Sample Identification MCP Reportable Concentrations in Soil ¥ Sample Depth (feet) / PID (ppmv) Page 1 of 4 TABLE 1 Soil Samples - Summary of Analytical Results Symonds Way (0 East of Haverhill Street) Reading, Massachusetts RCS-1 C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,000 C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 3,000 C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1,000 Acenaphthene 4 Acenaphthylene 2 Anthracene 1,000 Benzo(a)anthracene 20 Benzo(a)pyrene 2 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 20 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1,000 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 200 Chrysene 200 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 2 Fluoranthene 1,000 Fluorene 1,000 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 20 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.7 Naphthalene 4 Phenanthrene 10 Pyrene 1,000 Lead 200 Benzene 2 Ethylbenzene 40 Naphthalene 4 Tetrachloroethene (PCE)1 Toluene 30 Trichloroethene (TCE)0.3 Vinyl chloride 0.3 Total Xylenes 100 All results in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) unless otherwise indicated. Only detected and select analytes presented; all others were not detected. MCP Massachusetts Contingency Plan. PID Photoionization Detector. ppmv Parts per million by volume (ppmv). U Not detected at or above the listed laboratory reporting limit. -- Not analyzed or reported. Bold shaded Bold italicized ¥310 CMR 40.1600, rev. 3/1/2024. Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) by MassDEP Method EPH 04-1.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 Total Metals by EPA Methods 6010 and 7471 Detected concentration exceeds MCP Reportable Concentration in Soil (RCS-1). Not detected, laboratory reporting limit exceeds MCP Reportable Concentration in Soil (RCS-1). Sample Date Sample Identification MCP Reportable Concentrations in Soil ¥ Sample Depth (feet) / PID (ppmv) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 44 28 71 30 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- HA-3 10/23/2024 0-1 / -- 10/23/2024 HA-4 0-1 / -- HA-1 10/23/2024 0-1 / -- HA-2 10/23/2024 0-1 / -- Page 2 of 4 TABLE 1 Soil Samples - Summary of Analytical Results Symonds Way (0 East of Haverhill Street) Reading, Massachusetts RCS-1 C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,000 C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 3,000 C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1,000 Acenaphthene 4 Acenaphthylene 2 Anthracene 1,000 Benzo(a)anthracene 20 Benzo(a)pyrene 2 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 20 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1,000 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 200 Chrysene 200 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 2 Fluoranthene 1,000 Fluorene 1,000 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 20 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.7 Naphthalene 4 Phenanthrene 10 Pyrene 1,000 Lead 200 Benzene 2 Ethylbenzene 40 Naphthalene 4 Tetrachloroethene (PCE)1 Toluene 30 Trichloroethene (TCE)0.3 Vinyl chloride 0.3 Total Xylenes 100 All results in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) unless otherwise indicated. Only detected and select analytes presented; all others were not detected. MCP Massachusetts Contingency Plan. PID Photoionization Detector. ppmv Parts per million by volume (ppmv). U Not detected at or above the listed laboratory reporting limit. -- Not analyzed or reported. Bold shaded Bold italicized ¥310 CMR 40.1600, rev. 3/1/2024. Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) by MassDEP Method EPH 04-1.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 Total Metals by EPA Methods 6010 and 7471 Detected concentration exceeds MCP Reportable Concentration in Soil (RCS-1). Not detected, laboratory reporting limit exceeds MCP Reportable Concentration in Soil (RCS-1). Sample Date Sample Identification MCP Reportable Concentrations in Soil ¥ Sample Depth (feet) / PID (ppmv) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6.9341931 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- HA-7 10/23/2024 0-1 / -- HA-8 10/23/2024 0-1 / -- HA-5 10/23/2024 0-1 / -- HA-6 10/23/2024 0-1 / -- Page 3 of 4 TABLE 1 Soil Samples - Summary of Analytical Results Symonds Way (0 East of Haverhill Street) Reading, Massachusetts RCS-1 C9-C18 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 1,000 C19-C36 Aliphatic Hydrocarbons 3,000 C11-C22 Aromatic Hydrocarbons 1,000 Acenaphthene 4 Acenaphthylene 2 Anthracene 1,000 Benzo(a)anthracene 20 Benzo(a)pyrene 2 Benzo(b)fluoranthene 20 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene 1,000 Benzo(k)fluoranthene 200 Chrysene 200 Dibenzo(a,h)anthracene 2 Fluoranthene 1,000 Fluorene 1,000 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene 20 2-Methylnaphthalene 0.7 Naphthalene 4 Phenanthrene 10 Pyrene 1,000 Lead 200 Benzene 2 Ethylbenzene 40 Naphthalene 4 Tetrachloroethene (PCE)1 Toluene 30 Trichloroethene (TCE)0.3 Vinyl chloride 0.3 Total Xylenes 100 All results in milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) unless otherwise indicated. Only detected and select analytes presented; all others were not detected. MCP Massachusetts Contingency Plan. PID Photoionization Detector. ppmv Parts per million by volume (ppmv). U Not detected at or above the listed laboratory reporting limit. -- Not analyzed or reported. Bold shaded Bold italicized ¥310 CMR 40.1600, rev. 3/1/2024. Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons (EPH) by MassDEP Method EPH 04-1.1 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260 Total Metals by EPA Methods 6010 and 7471 Detected concentration exceeds MCP Reportable Concentration in Soil (RCS-1). Not detected, laboratory reporting limit exceeds MCP Reportable Concentration in Soil (RCS-1). Sample Date Sample Identification MCP Reportable Concentrations in Soil ¥ Sample Depth (feet) / PID (ppmv) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 18 46 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- HA-9 10/23/2024 0-1 / -- HA-10 10/23/2024 0-1 / -- Page 4 of 4 Limited Subsurface Investigation Report Symonds Way Parcel, Reading, MA FIGURES B(MW)-201B(MW)-203B(MW)-203B(MW)-204HA-1HA-2HA-3HA-4HA-10HA-5HA-9HA-8HA-6HA-7CIVIL · ENVIRONMENTAL · GEOTECHNICALCIVIL · ENVIRONMENTAL · GEOTECHNICALSITE PLANNOTES1.EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NORTH ORIENTATIONDEPICTED ON THIS DRAWING ARE BASED ON PLANSTITLED "SITE PLAN" DATED AUGUST, 2022, BY WESTON &SAMPSON, AND WILCOX & BARTON, INC. SITE VISITS.2.THIS DRAWING IS NOT INTENDED TO BE A BOUNDARYSURVEY.SYMONDS WAY(0 EAST OF HAVERHILL STREET)READING, MASSACHUSETTSDRAWING TITLE10/31/2024LEGENDDATEAPPROVED BYCLIENTLOCATIONSCALEDRAFTED BYDRAWING NO.JOB NO.REVISEDFILE1" = 100'BHAI0002-SPJTDAHLBHAI0002BARGMANN HENDRIE + ARCHETYPE, INC.of0202FIGURE 2SOIL BORING AND MONITORING WELLLOCATIONHAND AUGER SOIL SAMPLELOCATIONTEST PIT LOCATION (ADVANCEDBY WESTON & SAMPSON)SOIL BORING LOCATION(ADVANCED BY WESTON &SAMPSON) Limited Subsurface Investigation Report Symonds Way Parcel, Reading, MA APPENDIX A Soil Boring Logs and Monitoring Well Completion Details CASING SAMPLE CORE TUBE DATE TIME TYPE Steel AL -- -- DIAMETER 3" -- -- -- WEIGHT -- -- -- -- FALL -- -- -- -- PID DEPTH RECOVERY BLOWS PER (ppm) (ft) (ft) 0.5 FOOT RF = 1.0 __0.1 Filter Sand ____ 1 (1 ft bgs-gs)__ 2-inch PVC Riser ____2 (3 ft bgs- 3 ft ags) Bentonite __ (2.5-1 ft bgs)____3 __ ____4 __ ____5 __ 2-inch PVC Screen ____6 __ ____7 __ Apparent ____8 Groundwater __ ____9 __ ____10 __ ____11 __ ____12 __ ____13 __ ____14 __ ____15 __ ____16 __ ____17 __ ____18 __ ____19 __ ____20 __Boring terminated at 20 ft bgs. ____21 __ ____22 __ ____23 __ ____24 __ ____25 __ ____26 __ ____27 __ ____28 __ ____29 __ ____30 AL = acetate liner. __ft (a/b)gs = feet (above/below) ground surface. ____31 __ ____32 RF = Response factor. __ ____33 __ ____34 __ ____35 EXCEL FILENAME: BHAI0002_Boring Logs 3.5/5 0.0 15-20 ft bgs: Tan and gray, fine to coarse SAND, apparent iron staining, wet. PID = Photoionization detector, measuring organic vapors in parts per million (ppm) by volume. 2.5/5 4.5/5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5-5 ft bgs: Tan, fine to coarse SAND, some Gravel, trace roots, apparent iron staining between 3 and 5 ft bgs, dry. 5-7.5 ft bgs: Tan, fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel, apparent iron staining, dry. 10-15 ft bgs: Tan and gray, fine to coarse SAND, trace Silt and Gravel, apparent iron staining, wet. 0-0.5 ft bgs: Brown topsoil. DRILL RIG: Geoprobe 7822DT SAMPLE CLASSIFICATION NO. DRILLER: Maynor & Cody INSPECTOR: E. Daigle BORING CONTRACTOR: New England Geotech LLC TOC ELEVATION: GROUNDWATER MEASUREMENTS:DATE STARTED: 10/23/2024 WATER DEPTH REFERENCE DATE FINISHED: 10/23/2024 CLIENT: Bargmann Hendrie + Archetype, Inc JOB NO: BHAI0002 WILCOX & BARTON, INC.SOIL BORING LOG BORING NO: B(MW)-201 PROJECT: BHAI0002 SHEET NO. : 1 of 1 S-1 7.5-10 ft bgs: Tan and gray, fine to coarse SAND, apparent iron staining, wet. S-2 S-3 S-4 3/5Filter Sand (13-2.5 ft bgs) WELL CONSTRUCTION 3' PVC stickup (13-3 ft bgs) CASING SAMPLE CORE TUBE DATE TIME TYPE Steel AL -- -- DIAMETER 3" -- -- -- WEIGHT -- -- -- -- FALL -- -- -- -- PID DEPTH RECOVERY BLOWS PER (ppm) (ft) (ft) 0.5 FOOT RF = 1.0 __0.3 Bentonite ____ 1 (0.5 ft bgs-gs)__ 2-inch PVC Riser ____2 (1 ft bgs- 3 ft ags)__ ____3 __ ____4 __ ____5 __ 2-inch PVC Screen ____6 Apparent __ Groundwater ____7 __ ____8 __ ____9 __ ____10 __ ____11 __ ____12 __ ____13 __ ____14 __ ____15 0.8 __ ____16 __ ____17 __ ____18 __ ____19 __ ____20 __Boring terminated at 20 ft bgs. ____21 __ ____22 __ ____23 __ ____24 __ ____25 __ ____26 __ ____27 __ ____28 __ ____29 __ ____30 AL = acetate liner. __ft (a/b)gs = feet (above/below) ground surface. ____31 __ ____32 RF = Response factor. __ ____33 __ ____34 __ ____35 CLIENT: Bargmann Hendrie + Archetype, Inc JOB NO: BHAI0002 WILCOX & BARTON, INC.SOIL BORING LOG BORING NO: B(MW)-202 PROJECT: BHAI0002 SHEET NO. : 1 of 1 BORING CONTRACTOR: New England Geotech LLC TOC ELEVATION: GROUNDWATER MEASUREMENTS:DATE STARTED: 10/23/2024 WATER DEPTH REFERENCE DATE FINISHED: 10/23/2024 DRILLER: Maynor & Cody INSPECTOR: E. Daigle DRILL RIG: Geoprobe 7822DT SAMPLE CLASSIFICATIONNO. WELL CONSTRUCTION 3' PVC stickup PID = Photoionization detector, measuring organic vapors in parts per million (ppm) by volume. 0.3 0.6 EXCEL FILENAME: BHAI0002_Boring Logs S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 2/5 4/5 4/5 3/5 0-0.5 ft bgs: Brown topsoil. 5-10 ft bgs: Tan, fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel, moist to 6 ft bgs, wet from 6 to 10 ft bgs. 15-20 ft bgs: Brown, coarse SAND, wet. 14.5-25 ft bgs: Tan, fine SAND and SILT, wet. 10-14.5 ft bgs: Brown and tan, fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel, wet. (11-1 ft bgs) Filter Sand (11-0.5 ft bgs) 0.3 0.5-4 ft bgs: Brown, fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel, dry. 4-5 ft bgs: Tan, fine to coarse SAND, moist. 0.2 0.2 CASING SAMPLE CORE TUBE DATE TIME TYPE Steel AL -- -- DIAMETER 3" -- -- -- WEIGHT -- -- -- -- FALL -- -- -- -- PID DEPTH RECOVERY BLOWS PER (ppm) (ft) (ft) 0.5 FOOT RF = 1.0 __ Filter Sand ____ 1 (6 ft bgs-gs)__ 2-inch PVC Riser ____2 (10 ft bgs-3 ft ags)__ ____3 __ ____4 __ ____5 __ ____6 __ Bentonite ____7 (8-6 ft bgs)__ ____8 __ ____9 __ ____10 __ ____11 2-inch PVC Screen __ ____12 __ ____13 __ ____14 __ ____15 __ ____16 Apparent __ Groundwater ____17 __ ____18 __ ____19 __ ____20 __Boring terminated at 20 ft bgs. ____21 __ ____22 __ ____23 __ ____24 __ ____25 __ ____26 __ ____27 __ ____28 __ ____29 __ ____30 AL = acetate liner. __ft (a/b)gs = feet (above/below) ground surface. ____31 __ ____32 RF = Response factor. __ ____33 __ ____34 __ ____35 CLIENT: Bargmann Hendrie + Archetype, Inc JOB NO: BHAI0002 WILCOX & BARTON, INC.SOIL BORING LOG BORING NO: B(MW)-203 PROJECT: BHAI0002 SHEET NO. : 1 of 1 BORING CONTRACTOR: New England Geotech LLC TOC ELEVATION: GROUNDWATER MEASUREMENTS:DATE STARTED: 10/23/2024 WATER DEPTH REFERENCE DATE FINISHED: 10/23/2024 DRILLER: Maynor & Cody INSPECTOR: E. Daigle DRILL RIG: Geoprobe 7822DT SAMPLE CLASSIFICATIONNO. WELL CONSTRUCTION 3' PVC stickup 5-10 ft bgs: Tan, fine to coarse SAND, some Gravel, dry to 7.5 ft bgs moist from 7.5 to 10 ft bgs. 0-5 ft bgs: Tan, fine SAND and GRAVEL, dry. PID = Photoionization detector, measuring organic vapors in parts per million (ppm) by volume. 1.3 0.3 0.1 0.1 S-1 2.5/5 S-2 2.5/5 S-3 3/5 (20-10 ft bgs) Filter Sand (20-8 ft bgs) EXCEL FILENAME: BHAI0002_Boring Logs S-4 2/5 15-20 ft bgs: Gray and tan, fine SAND, moist to 16 ft, wet 16 to 20 ft bgs. 10-15 ft bgs: Tan and light brown, medium to coarse SAND, some Gravel, apparent iron staining, moist. CASING SAMPLE CORE TUBE DATE TIME TYPE Steel AL -- -- DIAMETER 3" -- -- -- WEIGHT -- -- -- -- FALL -- -- -- -- PID DEPTH RECOVERY BLOWS PER (ppm) (ft) (ft) 0.5 FOOT RF = 1.0 __4.2 Bentonite ____ 1 (0.5 ft bgs-gs)__ 2-inch PVC Riser ____2 (1 ft bgs- 3 ft ags)__ ____3 __ ____4 __ ____5 __ 2-inch PVC Screen ____6 Apparent __ Groundwater ____7 __ ____8 __ ____9 __0.4 ____10 0.4 __ ____11 __ ____12 __ ____13 __ ____14 __ ____15 __Boring terminated at 15 ft bgs. ____16 __ ____17 __ ____18 __ ____19 __ ____20 __ ____21 __ ____22 __ ____23 __ ____24 __ ____25 __ ____26 __ ____27 __ ____28 __ ____29 __ ____30 AL = acetate liner. __ft (a/b)gs = feet (above/below) ground surface. ____31 __ ____32 RF = Response factor. __ ____33 __ ____34 __ ____35 CLIENT: Bargmann Hendrie + Archetype, Inc JOB NO: BHAI0002 WILCOX & BARTON, INC.SOIL BORING LOG BORING NO: B(MW)-204 PROJECT: BHAI0002 SHEET NO. : 1 of 1 BORING CONTRACTOR: New England Geotech LLC TOC ELEVATION: GROUNDWATER MEASUREMENTS:DATE STARTED: 10/23/2024 WATER DEPTH REFERENCE DATE FINISHED: 10/23/2024 DRILLER: Maynor & Cody INSPECTOR: E. Daigle DRILL RIG: Geoprobe 7822DT SAMPLE CLASSIFICATIONNO. WELL CONSTRUCTION 3' PVC stickup PID = Photoionization detector, measuring organic vapors in parts per million (ppm) by volume. 0.6 0.2 EXCEL FILENAME: BHAI0002_Boring Logs S-1 4/5 S-2 3/5 S-3 3/5 0-0.5 ft bgs: Brown topsoil, contains roots. Filter Sand 1.2 0.4 10-15 ft bgs: Gray and tan, coarse SAND, wet. 9.5-10 ft bgs: Gray, crushed asphalt. 9-9.5 ft bgs: Gray, fine to coarse SAND, some silt. 5-9 ft bgs: Brown, fine to coarse SAND, trace Gravel, wet. 2-5 ft bgs: Brown, medium to coarse SAND, some Gravel, apparent crushed cobble at 4 ft bgs, dry then moist at 5 ft bgs. 0.5-2 ft bgs: tan, fine to coarse SAND, contains roots, dry. (11-0.5 ft bgs) (11-1 ft bgs) Limited Subsurface Investigation Report Symonds Way Parcel, Reading, MA APPENDIX B Wilcox & Barton, Inc. Standard Operating Procedures Page 1 of 3 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Title: PID / Jar-Headspace Screening Protocol for Organic Vapors in Soil No: FP-01 Approved: A. McLevy Original Date: 10/15/13 Revised: 8/26/22 Purpose: To screen environmental media in the field for organic vapors via analysis of headspace. Introduction: A photoionization detector (PID) is a portable field meter used to detect the presence of volatile organic compounds in air. The meter responds to compounds that have ionization potentials equal to or less than the energy of the ionization source (lamp). The meter does not differentiate between compounds, and the meter response varies for different compounds. The meter readings are provided in parts-per-million by volume (ppmv) and are quantitative but non-specific. A PID may be used to assess contamination in environmental media via measurement of organic vapors that volatilize (evaporate) from the sample into the headspace of the container holding the sample. This screening procedure does not provide a true determination of compound concentration. However, the PID is useful for screening to determine the presence or absence and relative degree of contamination by volatile organic compounds. The PID is calibrated to an isobutylene standard (100 ppmv) and a response factor (RF) may be applied during or after calibration to equate the isobutylene response to the contaminant of interest. The RF used is recorded in the field notes for each screening event. Generally, the RF should be set at 1.0 unless otherwise specified by the project manager for project specific purposes. Additional direction concerning RFs is provided below. Equipment/Materials: 1. ION Science TIGER equipped with a 10.6 eV lamp, or 2. Mini RAE 2000 or 3000 equipped with a 10.6 eV lamp, or 3. Mini RAE Lite equipped with a 10.6 eV lamp, or 4. Other PID as approved by the Project Manager or Technical Lead. 5. Isobutylene calibration gas, 1-liter Tedlar bag, and connecting tubing and valve 6. Glass jars (250 ml to 500 ml) 7. Aluminum foil 8. Polyethylene Whirl-Pak bags (18 oz) Procedure: The following procedure is used to screen media for the presence of organic vapors with a PID using the jar-headspace method: 1. The meter is calibrated to an isobutylene standard using an RF of 1.0 (alternatively the instrument-specific RF for the contaminant of concern can be used prior to screening for project specific purposes if specified by the project manager – see Response Factor Notes below for additional guidance). 2. Calibration is to be performed in a fresh air environment at a temperature similar to the ambient temperature where the unit will be used and close to the sample temperature where possible. A Standard Operating Procedure FP-01 Page 2 of 3 PID / Jar-Headspace Screening Protocol for Organic Vapors in Soil dedicated 1-liter Tedlar bag is kept with each Wilcox & Barton, Inc. PID meter. Calibration readings are taken from the Tedlar bag after filling with isobutylene. The Tedlar bag should be completely emptied prior to filling, then filled with enough isobutylene to accommodate at least one minute of flow. PID flow rates are generally in the range of 0.2 to 0.5 liters per minute. 3. A clean glass jar is half filled with the sample to be screened. The top of the jar is covered with a sheet of aluminum foil and the cap is screwed on. 4. Alternatively, a Whirl-PakTM bag (or equivalent) is half filled with the sample to be screened. The bag is closed and flipped over three times and the closure tabs are twisted together to ensure a tight seal. 5. Headspace gasses over the sample are allowed to equilibrate for approximately 10 minutes at ambient air temperature. If ambient temperature is below freezing, headspace development can be performed inside a heated vehicle or space. 6. The jar or bag is vigorously shaken for 15 seconds at the beginning and the end of the equilibration period. 7. Jars: The screw cap is carefully removed and the probe of the PID meter is inserted through the foil. Bags: The bag is punctured with the probe of the PID meter. 8. The maximum meter reading is recorded. Maximum response should occur between 2 and 5 seconds. Erratic meter response may occur at high organic vapor concentrations or conditions of elevated headspace moisture. Erratic meter response should be noted in the field logs. Response Factor Notes The table below provides instrument-specific RFs for contaminants commonly encountered at Wilcox & Barton, Inc. project sites. RFs for additional contaminants are available in tables provided by PID manufacturers. Unit-Specific Response Factors for Common Contaminants (10.6 eV Lamp) Benzene Tetrachloroethylene Trichloroethylene ION Science TIGER 0.50 0.60 0.60 Mini RAE 3000 0.47 0.57 0.54 Mini RAE Lite 0.47 0.57 0.54 Mini RAE 2000 0.53 0.57 0.54 Example 1. At underground storage tank closures in Massachusetts, screening values must be recorded “as benzene” for comparison to the 72-hour notification requirement [see 310 CMR 40.0313 (2)]. Therefore, the RF must be set to the appropriate value from the table above during calibration. Alternatively, if the instrument is calibrated using isobutylene and the RF is set to 1.0, field readings must be multiplied by the RF in the table above for comparison to the notification requirement. Indicate the RF and show calculations in the field notes. Report adjusted readings “as benzene.” Example 2. At a site where there is no specific contaminant of interest, but screening is being performed as part of a general site investigation, calibrate the instrument using isobutylene and an RF of 1.0. Indicate the RF and the calibration gas concentration in the field notes. Report adjusted readings “as isobutylene.” Example 3. At a chlorinated solvent site where tetrachloroethylene (PCE) is the primary contaminant of concern, set the RF to the appropriate value from the table above during instrument calibration. Alternatively, if the instrument is calibrated using isobutylene and the RF is set to 1.0, field readings must be multiplied by the RF in the table above for comparison to the notification requirement. Indicate the RF and show calculations in the field notes. Report adjusted readings “as PCE.” Standard Operating Procedure FP-01 Page 3 of 3 PID / Jar-Headspace Screening Protocol for Organic Vapors in Soil Additional Considerations: For soil screening at sites in Massachusetts, MassDEP Interim Remediation Waste Management Policy for Petroleum Contaminated Sites, #WSC-94-400, specifies the use of jars, but the MCP allows alternate procedures when technically justified (see 310 CMR 40.0017). It is the position of Wilcox & Barton, Inc. that the use of a polyethylene bag is an acceptable alternative to a glass jar. This position is supported by EPA (see EPA 510-B-97-0001 Chapter VI - Field Methods for the Analysis of Petroleum Hydrocarbons) and various other states. Field personnel must consult with both the Project Manager and the LSP before using the bag technique at any Massachusetts site. Further, the user should be aware that alternate techniques may affect data usability and that additional justification for use of a polyethylene bag may be requested by MassDEP. For identifying reportable conditions, making risk-based decisions, and soil sampling at 21J Reimbursement in Massachusetts, the jar technique must be used. Page 1 of 5 STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE Title: Soil Logging and Description No: FP-14 Approved: R. Rooks Original Date: 9/7/12 Revised: 4/1/17 Purpose: To ensure that soils observed during field work are classified in a uniform, accurate, and legally- defensible manner using a modified form of the Burmister System of soil classification. Introduction: Soil classification is based upon visual observation and simple manual tests that can be conducted in the field. Wilcox & Barton, Inc. uses a modified form of the Burmister System of soil classification to describe soil samples during surface and subsurface investigation activities. The modified system allows for rapid evaluation of soil type in the field to produce a description that is easy to understand and reproduce for both geological and engineering applications. A proper modified Burmister soil description includes the following eight components, listed in this exact order: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Density or consistency Apparent color MAJOR component Proportional adjective Minor Component Other adjective Apparent moisture Origin Observations are recorded in a bound field notebook or on a soil logging template created specifically for this purpose. Soil should be described to a level of detail that matches the use and intent of the data. For example, if one-inch layers within a stratified deposit are repeated, then the entire unit can be described as alternating layers of material. If, however, a small layer is significant in terms of site hydrogeology, such as a potential contaminant pathway or confining layer, it must be described as such on the appropriate scale. The Burmister classification was developed based on gradational characteristics of cohesionless soils and the plasticity behavior characteristics for cohesive soils. The term "cohesionless" normally applies to materials larger than and including silt-sized particles; however, some silt materials exhibit “apparent cohesion” and may therefore be described as cohesive. For samples in which both cohesionless and cohesive soils are present, the density or consistency descriptor should apply to the major soil component. Equipment/Materials: 1. Equipment typically used during subsurface investigations that allow for visual inspection of the soil (excavator or backhoe; drill rig; hand auger; shovel). 2. Field log or field data sheet Standard Operating Procedure FP-14 Page 2 of 5 Soil Logging and Description Procedure: Soil classification is based upon visual observation and simple manual tests that can be conducted in the field. Wilcox & Barton, Inc. uses a modified form of the Burmister System of soil classification to describe soil samples during surface and subsurface investigation activities. The modified system allows for rapid evaluation of soil type in the field to produce a description that is easy to understand and reproduce for both geological and engineering applications. A proper modified Burmister soil description includes the following eight components, listed in this exact order: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Density or consistency Apparent color MAJOR component Proportional adjective Minor Component Other adjective Apparent moisture Origin Observations are recorded in a bound field notebook or on a soil logging template created specifically for this purpose. Soil should be described to a level of detail that matches the use and intent of the data. For example, if one-inch layers within a stratified deposit are repeated, then the entire unit can be described as alternating layers of material. If, however, a small layer is significant in terms of site hydrogeology, such as a potential contaminant pathway or confining layer, it must be described as such on the appropriate scale. The Burmister classification was developed based on gradational characteristics of cohesionless soils and the plasticity behavior characteristics for cohesive soils. The term "cohesionless" normally applies to materials larger than and including silt-sized particles; however, some silt materials exhibit “apparent cohesion” and may therefore be described as cohesive. For samples in which both cohesionless and cohesive soils are present, the density or consistency descriptor should apply to the major soil component. 1. Density or Consistency The density or consistency of a soil material always refers to its in-place, undisturbed condition. This terminology is a measure of soil density or strength and can be evaluated for both cohesive and cohesionless soils. Density or consistency is typically based on the number of blows required to advance a split spoon sampler in accordance with ASTM D-1586 specifications for the Standard Penetration Test. The summation of the blows necessary to drive the second and third 6-inch increments of penetration during sample recovery is called the Standard Penetration Number (N-value). The N-value is then compared to the ranges below to determine the density or consistency: Non-Cohesive Soils Cohesive Soils N-value Density Description N-value Density Description 0-4 Very loose 0-2 Very soft 4-10 Loose 2-4 Soft 10-30 Medium dense 4-8 Medium stiff 30-50 Dense 8-15 Stiff >50 Very dense 15-30 Very stiff >30 Hard Standard Operating Procedure FP-14 Page 3 of 5 Soil Logging and Description When collecting samples by hand or by Direct Push methods without N-value information, an estimate of density may be made based on the judgment of the individual collecting the sample. A note should be included on the sample log indicating that the recorded density is estimated. 2. Apparent Color Colors are described using basic colors or combinations of colors such as “dark gray”, “gray- brown”, “reddish-brown” or “brown and tan”. Since color interpretation is subjective, the intent is to note the general identifying color of the major constituent to best designate a particular stratum or soil condition. Color charts may be used if necessary to better judge subtle changes in color. The color should be described shortly after collection while the material is still in its natural field moisture condition because color shade is subject to change during drying. 3. MAJOR Component The first step in soil type classification is to identify the major constituent of the soil and to estimate, on a visual basis, the relative percent of its composition. The major component is recorded in capital letters. An estimate of the relative percent composition should be made, and should generally be greater than 30 to 50 % in order for the component to be predominant (see also Field References at the end of the document). Identification of the MAJOR (and minor) components is made according to particle size in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) classifications: Particle Size millimeters inches Sieve size Boulder >300 >12 -- Cobble 75 to 300 3 to 12 -- Gravel 4.75 to 75 3/16 to 3 No. 4 to No. 3 Coarse SAND 2.0 to 4.75 0.08 to 3/16 No. 10 to No. 4 Medium SAND 0.43 to 2.0 0.02 to 0.08 No. 40 to No. 10 Fine SAND 0.08 to 0.43 0.003 to 0.02 No. 200 to No. 40 SILT and CLAY <0.075 <0.003 < No. 200 Because boulders, cobbles and some gravel are not recovered in a split spoon, percentages cannot be accurately determined from the standard penetration test. Instead, the possible presence of these constituents may be evaluated based on drilling behavior (i.e., grinding or “jumping” of the drill bit or refusal of the split-spoon) or by observation of soil cuttings and noted on the boring log. The possible presence of these larger particles should be included under the sample description portion of the log. A description of the manner in which large particle presence was identified (e.g., based on drill stem behavior) should be included in the general notes. If gravel, cobbles and boulders are observed during other investigations such as test pit excavation, the proportions may be listed in percentages or, because of potential difficulty in estimating volumetric proportions of larger particles based on visual examination, it is acceptable to simply reference their presence. When boulders are observed, a note should be made regarding their relative size. For cohesive soil, a second descriptive adjective should be used that further defines the character of the fine particles (those passing a No. 200 sieve). These descriptions are based upon simple field tests conducted on representative samples of the material. The most effective field test is for plasticity, which is the resistance of the soil to crumbling at decreasing water contents. Soil is rolled between the hands into the smallest possible thread until the thread breaks apart. At the Standard Operating Procedure FP-14 Page 4 of 5 Soil Logging and Description point where the thread breaks, the diameter is noted and compared to the associated descriptions below. Description Smallest Rolled Diameter (inches) Overall Plasticity SILT based on texture, not roll diameter Nonplastic Clayey SILT 1/4 Slight SILT & CLAY 1/8 Low CLAY & SILT 1/16 Medium Silty CLAY 1/32 High CLAY 1/64 Very high 4. Proportional Adjective The minor soil constituent types are identified along with the corresponding percent composition of the sample. The soil type is identified based upon particle size as described above. The proportions of the minor components are described with an adjective based upon the visually estimated percentage (see Field References) of the minor components as presented below: Percent Composition Descriptive Adjective 1-10 Trace 10-20 Little 20-35 Some 35-50 And Minor constituents are recorded following the major constituent in order of decreasing proportion and the first letter in each minor constituent is capitalized. For example: • A sample consisting of 40% fine sand, 25% medium sand, 20% coarse sand and 15% gravel would be described as fine SAND, some medium to coarse Sand, little Gravel. • A sample consisting of 50% fine sand, 30% medium sand and 20% clayey silt would be described as fine SAND, some medium Sand, some Clayey Silt. • A sample consisting of 60% clay and silt, 30% coarse sand and 10% gravel could be described as CLAY & SILT, some coarse Sand, trace Gravel. 5. Minor Component The minor component is identified in the same manner as the MAJOR component based on particle size. 6. Other Adjective(s) and Descriptions Following the description of the minor components, other useful information can be reported such as descriptions of soil structure (e.g., angular grains, cemented, blocky), formation characteristics (e.g., stratified, mottled, lenses, clasts), and other characteristics observed (e.g., organic matter, debris, cobbles and boulders). The descriptions should be brief and pertinent to the investigation. Odors and visible staining should be noted. Whenever an odor is noted, a description of the strength and type should be provided (e.g., strong, mild, gasoline-like, diesel- like, sewage, sulfur). Standard Operating Procedure FP-14 Page 5 of 5 Soil Logging and Description 7. Apparent Moisture Following the soil description, an estimate of the moisture content should be selected based on the following conditions. When saturated soil is noted, the logs should reflect that the apparent depth of the water table has been reached. Description Condition Dry No apparent moisture, soil can be blown away (no adhesion). Damp Color change noted, soil cannot be blown away (some adhesion). Moist Moisture apparent, soil can be packed. Wet Free moisture apparent, water can be squeezed or shaken from the sample, water observed in the sample container. 8. Soil Origin As a final, general description of the soil, a note may be added that indicates a known geologic soil formation. This may include referencing the material as Fill, Glacial Till, Glacial Outwash, Peat, Lacustrine Deposit, etc. In addition to the general geologic description, the USCS symbol may also be required for certain projects. The USCS symbol should be capitalized and correspond to the Modified Burmister description given to the soil. A USCS Classification Chart is provided in the Field References below. Limited Subsurface Investigation Report Symonds Way Parcel, Reading, MA APPENDIX C Laboratory Analytical Reports 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 October 30, 2024 Amelia Midgley Wilcox & Barton 2 Home Ave Concord, NH 03301 Project Location: Reading, MA Client Job Number: Project Number: BHAI0002 Laboratory Work Order Number: 24J3550 Enclosed are results of analyses for samples as received by the laboratory on October 24, 2024. If you have any questions concerning this report, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Kaitlyn A. Feliciano Project Manager Page 1 of 59 Table of Contents Table of Contents Sample Summary 4 Case Narrative 5 Sample Results 6 24J3550-01 6 24J3550-02 8 24J3550-03 10 24J3550-04 12 24J3550-05 14 24J3550-06 16 24J3550-07 18 24J3550-08 20 24J3550-09 22 24J3550-10 24 24J3550-11 26 24J3550-12 30 24J3550-13 34 24J3550-14 38 Sample Preparation Information 42 QC Data 43 Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS 43 B390471 43 Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses - EPH 48 B390464 48 Metals Analyses (Total) 50 B390661 50 Page 2 of 59 Table of Contents Table of Contents (continued) Flag/Qualifier Summary 51 Certifications 52 Chain of Custody/Sample Receipt 55 Page 3 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 ANALYTICAL SUMMARY 10/30/2024 Wilcox & Barton 2 Home Ave Concord, NH 03301 ATTN: Amelia Midgley BHAI0002 24J3550 The results of analyses performed on the following samples submitted to CON-TEST, a Pace Analytical Laboratory, are found in this report. PROJECT LOCATION: PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER: PROJECT NUMBER: REPORT DATE: WORK ORDER NUMBER: FIELD SAMPLE #LAB ID:MATRIX TESTSAMPLE DESCRIPTION SUB LAB Reading, MA HA-1 (0-1)24J3550-01 Soil SM 2540G SW-846 6010D HA-2 (0-1)24J3550-02 Soil SM 2540G SW-846 6010D HA-3 (0-1)24J3550-03 Soil SM 2540G SW-846 6010D HA-4 (0-1)24J3550-04 Soil SM 2540G SW-846 6010D HA-5 (0-1)24J3550-05 Soil SM 2540G SW-846 6010D HA-6 (0-1)24J3550-06 Soil SM 2540G SW-846 6010D HA-7 (0-1)24J3550-07 Soil SM 2540G SW-846 6010D HA-8 (0-1)24J3550-08 Soil SM 2540G SW-846 6010D HA-9 (0-1)24J3550-09 Soil SM 2540G SW-846 6010D HA-10 (0-1)24J3550-10 Soil SM 2540G SW-846 6010D B(MW)-201 (7-7.5)24J3550-11 Soil MADEP EPH rev 2.1 SM 2540G SW-846 8260D B(MW)-202 (6-6.5)24J3550-12 Soil MADEP EPH rev 2.1 SM 2540G SW-846 8260D B(MW)-203 (15.5-16.5)24J3550-13 Soil MADEP EPH rev 2.1 SM 2540G SW-846 8260D B(MW)-204 (6-6.5)24J3550-14 Soil MADEP EPH rev 2.1 SM 2540G SW-846 8260D [TOC_1]Sample Summary[TOC] Page 4 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 CASE NARRATIVE SUMMARY All reported results are within defined laboratory quality control objectives unless listed below or otherwise qualified in this report. [TOC_1]Case Narrative[TOC] SW-846 8260D Qualifications: Response factor is less than method specified minimum acceptable value. Reduced precision and accuracy may be associated with reported result. Analyte & Samples(s) Qualified: V-16 1,4-Dioxane S112816-CCV1 Initial calibration verification (ICV) did not meet method specifications and was biased on the low side for this compound. Reported result is estimated. Analyte & Samples(s) Qualified: V-34 Bromomethane 24J3550-11[B(MW)-201 (7-7.5)], 24J3550-12[B(MW)-202 (6-6.5)], 24J3550-13[B(MW)-203 (15.5-16.5)], 24J3550-14[B(MW)-204 (6-6.5)], B390471-BLK1, B390471-BS1, B390471-BSD1, S112816-CCV1 Initial calibration verification (ICV) did not meet method specifications and was biased on the high side. Data validation is not affected since sample result was "not detected" for this compound. Analyte & Samples(s) Qualified: V-36 Carbon Disulfide B390471-BS1, B390471-BSD1, S112816-CCV1 Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12) B390471-BS1, B390471-BSD1, S112816-CCV1 The results of analyses reported only relate to samples submitted to Con-Test, a Pace Analytical Laboratory, for testing. I certify that the analyses listed above, unless specifically listed as subcontracted, if any, were performed under my direction according to the approved methodologies listed in this document, and that based upon my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. Lisa A. Worthington Technical Representative Page 5 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-01 Field Sample #: HA-1 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 08:50 [TOC_2]24J3550-01[TOC] AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Metals Analyses (Total) 44 0.47 10/30/24 2:15 MJHmg/Kg dry 10/28/24SW-846 6010D1Lead [TOC_1]Sample Results[TOC] Page 6 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-01 Field Sample #: HA-1 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 08:50 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) 96.8 10/26/24 8:27 MLR% Wt 10/26/24SM 2540G1% Solids Page 7 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-02 Field Sample #: HA-2 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 08:58 [TOC_2]24J3550-02[TOC] AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Metals Analyses (Total) 28 0.53 10/30/24 2:19 MJHmg/Kg dry 10/28/24SW-846 6010D1Lead Page 8 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-02 Field Sample #: HA-2 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 08:58 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) 91.9 10/26/24 8:27 MLR% Wt 10/26/24SM 2540G1% Solids Page 9 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-03 Field Sample #: HA-3 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 09:05 [TOC_2]24J3550-03[TOC] AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Metals Analyses (Total) 71 0.61 10/30/24 2:24 MJHmg/Kg dry 10/28/24SW-846 6010D1Lead Page 10 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-03 Field Sample #: HA-3 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 09:05 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) 78.2 10/26/24 8:27 MLR% Wt 10/26/24SM 2540G1% Solids Page 11 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-04 Field Sample #: HA-4 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 10:10 [TOC_2]24J3550-04[TOC] AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Metals Analyses (Total) 30 0.94 10/30/24 2:28 MJHmg/Kg dry 10/28/24SW-846 6010D1Lead Page 12 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-04 Field Sample #: HA-4 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 10:10 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) 48.6 10/26/24 8:27 MLR% Wt 10/26/24SM 2540G1% Solids Page 13 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-05 Field Sample #: HA-5 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 10:43 [TOC_2]24J3550-05[TOC] AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Metals Analyses (Total) 6.9 0.53 10/30/24 2:46 MJHmg/Kg dry 10/28/24SW-846 6010D1Lead Page 14 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-05 Field Sample #: HA-5 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 10:43 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) 92.7 10/26/24 8:27 MLR% Wt 10/26/24SM 2540G1% Solids Page 15 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-06 Field Sample #: HA-6 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 10:52 [TOC_2]24J3550-06[TOC] AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Metals Analyses (Total) 34 0.55 10/30/24 2:51 MJHmg/Kg dry 10/28/24SW-846 6010D1Lead Page 16 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-06 Field Sample #: HA-6 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 10:52 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) 89.6 10/26/24 8:27 MLR% Wt 10/26/24SM 2540G1% Solids Page 17 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-07 Field Sample #: HA-7 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 11:39 [TOC_2]24J3550-07[TOC] AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Metals Analyses (Total) 19 0.53 10/30/24 2:56 MJHmg/Kg dry 10/28/24SW-846 6010D1Lead Page 18 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-07 Field Sample #: HA-7 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 11:39 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) 94.7 10/26/24 8:27 MLR% Wt 10/26/24SM 2540G1% Solids Page 19 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-08 Field Sample #: HA-8 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 12:07 [TOC_2]24J3550-08[TOC] AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Metals Analyses (Total) 31 0.47 10/30/24 3:00 MJHmg/Kg dry 10/28/24SW-846 6010D1Lead Page 20 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-08 Field Sample #: HA-8 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 12:07 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) 87.7 10/26/24 8:27 MLR% Wt 10/26/24SM 2540G1% Solids Page 21 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-09 Field Sample #: HA-9 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 12:14 [TOC_2]24J3550-09[TOC] AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Metals Analyses (Total) 18 0.55 10/30/24 3:05 MJHmg/Kg dry 10/28/24SW-846 6010D1Lead Page 22 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-09 Field Sample #: HA-9 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 12:14 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) 89.0 10/26/24 8:27 MLR% Wt 10/26/24SM 2540G1% Solids Page 23 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-10 Field Sample #: HA-10 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 12:19 [TOC_2]24J3550-10[TOC] AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Metals Analyses (Total) 46 0.51 10/30/24 3:10 MJHmg/Kg dry 10/28/24SW-846 6010D1Lead Page 24 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-10 Field Sample #: HA-10 (0-1) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 12:19 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) 87.5 10/26/24 8:27 MLR% Wt 10/26/24SM 2540G1% Solids Page 25 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-11 Field Sample #: B(MW)-201 (7-7.5) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 09:30 [TOC_2]24J3550-11[TOC] AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS ND 0.098 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UAcetone ND 0.00098 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBenzene ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBromobenzene ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBromochloromethane ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBromodichloromethane ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBromoform ND 0.0098 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1V-34, UBromomethane ND 0.039 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U2-Butanone (MEK) ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Un-Butylbenzene ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Usec-Butylbenzene ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utert-Butylbenzene ND 0.00098 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utert-Butyl Ethyl Ether (TBEE) ND 0.020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UCarbon Disulfide ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UCarbon Tetrachloride ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChlorobenzene ND 0.00098 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChlorodibromomethane ND 0.020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChloroethane ND 0.0039 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChloroform ND 0.0098 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChloromethane ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U2-Chlorotoluene ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U4-Chlorotoluene ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) ND 0.00098 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UDibromomethane ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UDichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12) ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1-Dichloroethane ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.0039 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1-Dichloroethylene ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethylene ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.00098 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,3-Dichloropropane ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U2,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1-Dichloropropene ND 0.00098 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Ucis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.00098 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UDiethyl Ether ND 0.00098 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UDiisopropyl Ether (DIPE) ND 0.098 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,4-Dioxane ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UEthylbenzene Page 26 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-11 Field Sample #: B(MW)-201 (7-7.5) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 09:30 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UHexachlorobutadiene ND 0.020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U2-Hexanone (MBK) ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UIsopropylbenzene (Cumene) ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Up-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene) ND 0.0039 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UMethyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) ND 0.020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UMethylene Chloride ND 0.020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ND 0.0039 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UNaphthalene ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Un-Propylbenzene ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UStyrene ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.00098 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UTetrachloroethylene ND 0.0098 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UTetrahydrofuran ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UToluene ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UTrichloroethylene ND 0.0098 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UTrichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.0098 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UVinyl Chloride ND 0.0039 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Um+p Xylene ND 0.0020 10/25/24 7:26 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Uo-Xylene Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 95.5 10/25/24 7:2670-130 Toluene-d8 97.1 10/25/24 7:2670-130 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99.9 10/25/24 7:2670-130 Page 27 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-11 Field Sample #: B(MW)-201 (7-7.5) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 09:30 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses - EPH ND 13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UC9-C18 Aliphatics ND 13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UC19-C36 Aliphatics ND 13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UUnadjusted C11-C22 Aromatics ND 13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UC11-C22 Aromatics ND 0.13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UAcenaphthene ND 0.13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UAcenaphthylene ND 0.13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UAnthracene ND 0.13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(a)anthracene ND 0.13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(a)pyrene ND 0.13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(b)fluoranthene ND 0.13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(g,h,i)perylene ND 0.13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(k)fluoranthene ND 0.13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UChrysene ND 0.13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UDibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 0.13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UFluoranthene ND 0.13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UFluorene ND 0.13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 0.13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11U2-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UNaphthalene ND 0.13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UPhenanthrene ND 0.13 10/28/24 14:47 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UPyrene Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual Chlorooctadecane (COD)54.2 10/28/24 14:4740-140 o-Terphenyl (OTP)52.8 10/28/24 14:4740-140 2-Bromonaphthalene 99.0 10/28/24 14:4740-140 2-Fluorobiphenyl 97.5 10/28/24 14:4740-140 Page 28 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-11 Field Sample #: B(MW)-201 (7-7.5) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 09:30 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) 78.8 10/26/24 8:27 MLR% Wt 10/26/24SM 2540G1% Solids Page 29 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-12 Field Sample #: B(MW)-202 (6-6.5) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 10:33 [TOC_2]24J3550-12[TOC] AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS ND 0.069 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UAcetone ND 0.00069 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBenzene ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBromobenzene ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBromochloromethane ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBromodichloromethane ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBromoform ND 0.0069 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1V-34, UBromomethane ND 0.028 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U2-Butanone (MEK) ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Un-Butylbenzene ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Usec-Butylbenzene ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utert-Butylbenzene ND 0.00069 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utert-Butyl Ethyl Ether (TBEE) ND 0.014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UCarbon Disulfide ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UCarbon Tetrachloride ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChlorobenzene ND 0.00069 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChlorodibromomethane ND 0.014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChloroethane ND 0.0028 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChloroform ND 0.0069 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChloromethane ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U2-Chlorotoluene ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U4-Chlorotoluene ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) ND 0.00069 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UDibromomethane ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UDichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12) ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1-Dichloroethane ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.0028 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1-Dichloroethylene ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethylene ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.00069 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,3-Dichloropropane ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U2,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1-Dichloropropene ND 0.00069 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Ucis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.00069 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UDiethyl Ether ND 0.00069 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UDiisopropyl Ether (DIPE) ND 0.069 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,4-Dioxane ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UEthylbenzene Page 30 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-12 Field Sample #: B(MW)-202 (6-6.5) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 10:33 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UHexachlorobutadiene ND 0.014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U2-Hexanone (MBK) ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UIsopropylbenzene (Cumene) ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Up-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene) ND 0.0028 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UMethyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) ND 0.014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UMethylene Chloride ND 0.014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ND 0.0028 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UNaphthalene ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Un-Propylbenzene ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UStyrene ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.00069 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UTetrachloroethylene ND 0.0069 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UTetrahydrofuran ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UToluene ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UTrichloroethylene ND 0.0069 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UTrichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.0069 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UVinyl Chloride ND 0.0028 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Um+p Xylene ND 0.0014 10/25/24 7:51 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Uo-Xylene Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 103 10/25/24 7:5170-130 Toluene-d8 95.0 10/25/24 7:5170-130 4-Bromofluorobenzene 102 10/25/24 7:5170-130 Page 31 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-12 Field Sample #: B(MW)-202 (6-6.5) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 10:33 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses - EPH ND 12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UC9-C18 Aliphatics ND 12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UC19-C36 Aliphatics ND 12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UUnadjusted C11-C22 Aromatics ND 12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UC11-C22 Aromatics ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UAcenaphthene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UAcenaphthylene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UAnthracene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(a)anthracene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(a)pyrene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(b)fluoranthene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(g,h,i)perylene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(k)fluoranthene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UChrysene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UDibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UFluoranthene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UFluorene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11U2-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UNaphthalene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UPhenanthrene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:06 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UPyrene Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual Chlorooctadecane (COD)64.7 10/28/24 15:0640-140 o-Terphenyl (OTP)63.8 10/28/24 15:0640-140 2-Bromonaphthalene 95.7 10/28/24 15:0640-140 2-Fluorobiphenyl 95.5 10/28/24 15:0640-140 Page 32 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-12 Field Sample #: B(MW)-202 (6-6.5) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 10:33 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) 84.7 10/26/24 8:27 MLR% Wt 10/26/24SM 2540G1% Solids Page 33 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-13 Field Sample #: B(MW)-203 (15.5-16.5) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 11:20 [TOC_2]24J3550-13[TOC] AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS ND 0.088 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UAcetone ND 0.00088 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBenzene ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBromobenzene ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBromochloromethane ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBromodichloromethane ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBromoform ND 0.0088 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1V-34, UBromomethane ND 0.035 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U2-Butanone (MEK) ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Un-Butylbenzene ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Usec-Butylbenzene ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utert-Butylbenzene ND 0.00088 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utert-Butyl Ethyl Ether (TBEE) ND 0.018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UCarbon Disulfide ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UCarbon Tetrachloride ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChlorobenzene ND 0.00088 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChlorodibromomethane ND 0.018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChloroethane ND 0.0035 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChloroform ND 0.0088 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChloromethane ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U2-Chlorotoluene ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U4-Chlorotoluene ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) ND 0.00088 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UDibromomethane ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UDichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12) ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1-Dichloroethane ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.0035 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1-Dichloroethylene ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethylene ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.00088 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,3-Dichloropropane ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U2,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1-Dichloropropene ND 0.00088 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Ucis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.00088 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UDiethyl Ether ND 0.00088 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UDiisopropyl Ether (DIPE) ND 0.088 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,4-Dioxane ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UEthylbenzene Page 34 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-13 Field Sample #: B(MW)-203 (15.5-16.5) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 11:20 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UHexachlorobutadiene ND 0.018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U2-Hexanone (MBK) ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UIsopropylbenzene (Cumene) ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Up-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene) ND 0.0035 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UMethyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) ND 0.018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UMethylene Chloride ND 0.018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ND 0.0035 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UNaphthalene ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Un-Propylbenzene ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UStyrene ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.00088 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UTetrachloroethylene ND 0.0088 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UTetrahydrofuran ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UToluene ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UTrichloroethylene ND 0.0088 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UTrichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.0088 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UVinyl Chloride ND 0.0035 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Um+p Xylene ND 0.0018 10/25/24 8:17 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Uo-Xylene Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 102 10/25/24 8:1770-130 Toluene-d8 96.2 10/25/24 8:1770-130 4-Bromofluorobenzene 102 10/25/24 8:1770-130 Page 35 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-13 Field Sample #: B(MW)-203 (15.5-16.5) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 11:20 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses - EPH ND 12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UC9-C18 Aliphatics ND 12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UC19-C36 Aliphatics ND 12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UUnadjusted C11-C22 Aromatics ND 12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UC11-C22 Aromatics ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UAcenaphthene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UAcenaphthylene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UAnthracene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(a)anthracene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(a)pyrene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(b)fluoranthene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(g,h,i)perylene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(k)fluoranthene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UChrysene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UDibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UFluoranthene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UFluorene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11U2-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UNaphthalene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UPhenanthrene ND 0.12 10/28/24 15:24 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UPyrene Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual Chlorooctadecane (COD)41.9 10/28/24 15:2440-140 o-Terphenyl (OTP)43.0 10/28/24 15:2440-140 2-Bromonaphthalene 87.1 10/28/24 15:2440-140 2-Fluorobiphenyl 85.8 10/28/24 15:2440-140 Page 36 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-13 Field Sample #: B(MW)-203 (15.5-16.5) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 11:20 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) 80.9 10/26/24 8:27 MLR% Wt 10/26/24SM 2540G1% Solids Page 37 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-14 Field Sample #: B(MW)-204 (6-6.5) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 11:55 [TOC_2]24J3550-14[TOC] AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS ND 0.076 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UAcetone ND 0.00076 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME) ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBenzene ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBromobenzene ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBromochloromethane ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBromodichloromethane ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UBromoform ND 0.0076 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1V-34, UBromomethane ND 0.030 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U2-Butanone (MEK) ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Un-Butylbenzene ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Usec-Butylbenzene ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utert-Butylbenzene ND 0.00076 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utert-Butyl Ethyl Ether (TBEE) ND 0.015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UCarbon Disulfide ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UCarbon Tetrachloride ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChlorobenzene ND 0.00076 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChlorodibromomethane ND 0.015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChloroethane ND 0.0030 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChloroform ND 0.0076 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UChloromethane ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U2-Chlorotoluene ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U4-Chlorotoluene ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) ND 0.00076 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UDibromomethane ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,3-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,4-Dichlorobenzene ND 0.015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UDichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12) ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1-Dichloroethane ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dichloroethane ND 0.0030 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1-Dichloroethylene ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Ucis-1,2-Dichloroethylene ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.00076 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,3-Dichloropropane ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U2,2-Dichloropropane ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1-Dichloropropene ND 0.00076 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Ucis-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.00076 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Utrans-1,3-Dichloropropene ND 0.015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UDiethyl Ether ND 0.00076 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UDiisopropyl Ether (DIPE) ND 0.076 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,4-Dioxane ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UEthylbenzene Page 38 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-14 Field Sample #: B(MW)-204 (6-6.5) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 11:55 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UHexachlorobutadiene ND 0.015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U2-Hexanone (MBK) ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UIsopropylbenzene (Cumene) ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Up-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene) ND 0.0030 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UMethyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) ND 0.015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UMethylene Chloride ND 0.015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) ND 0.0030 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UNaphthalene ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Un-Propylbenzene ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UStyrene ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.00076 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UTetrachloroethylene ND 0.0076 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UTetrahydrofuran ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UToluene ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1,1-Trichloroethane ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,1,2-Trichloroethane ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UTrichloroethylene ND 0.0076 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UTrichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2,3-Trichloropropane ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1U1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene ND 0.0076 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1UVinyl Chloride ND 0.0030 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Um+p Xylene ND 0.0015 10/25/24 8:43 MFFmg/Kg dry 10/25/24SW-846 8260D1Uo-Xylene Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 105 10/25/24 8:4370-130 Toluene-d8 97.6 10/25/24 8:4370-130 4-Bromofluorobenzene 101 10/25/24 8:4370-130 Page 39 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-14 Field Sample #: B(MW)-204 (6-6.5) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 11:55 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses - EPH ND 11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UC9-C18 Aliphatics ND 11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UC19-C36 Aliphatics ND 11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UUnadjusted C11-C22 Aromatics ND 11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UC11-C22 Aromatics ND 0.11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UAcenaphthene ND 0.11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UAcenaphthylene ND 0.11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UAnthracene ND 0.11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(a)anthracene ND 0.11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(a)pyrene ND 0.11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(b)fluoranthene ND 0.11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(g,h,i)perylene ND 0.11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UBenzo(k)fluoranthene ND 0.11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UChrysene ND 0.11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UDibenz(a,h)anthracene ND 0.11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UFluoranthene ND 0.11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UFluorene ND 0.11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene ND 0.11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11U2-Methylnaphthalene ND 0.11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UNaphthalene ND 0.11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UPhenanthrene ND 0.11 10/28/24 15:43 SNBmg/Kg dry 10/25/24MADEP EPH rev 2.11UPyrene Surrogates % Recovery Recovery Limits Flag/Qual Chlorooctadecane (COD)62.1 10/28/24 15:4340-140 o-Terphenyl (OTP)60.6 10/28/24 15:4340-140 2-Bromonaphthalene 84.1 10/28/24 15:4340-140 2-Fluorobiphenyl 83.4 10/28/24 15:4340-140 Page 40 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Date Received: 10/24/2024 Work Order: 24J3550Sample Description:Project Location: Reading, MA Sample ID: 24J3550-14 Field Sample #: B(MW)-204 (6-6.5) Sample Matrix: Soil Sampled: 10/23/2024 11:55 AnalystAnalyzedDilutionFlag/QualRLResultsAnalyte Date/Time Units Date PreparedMethod Conventional Chemistry Parameters by EPA/APHA/SW-846 Methods (Total) 87.0 10/26/24 8:27 MLR% Wt 10/26/24SM 2540G1% Solids Page 41 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Sample Extraction Data Prep Method:SW-846 3510C Analytical Method:MADEP EPH rev 2.1 Lab Number [Field ID]Batch DateInitial [mL]Final [mL] B390464 10/25/2420.0 2.0024J3550-11 [B(MW)-201 (7-7.5)] B390464 10/25/2420.0 2.0024J3550-12 [B(MW)-202 (6-6.5)] B390464 10/25/2420.0 2.0024J3550-13 [B(MW)-203 (15.5-16.5)] B390464 10/25/2420.0 2.0024J3550-14 [B(MW)-204 (6-6.5)] Prep Method:% Solids Analytical Method:SM 2540G Lab Number [Field ID]Batch Date B390573 10/26/2424J3550-01 [HA-1 (0-1)] B390573 10/26/2424J3550-02 [HA-2 (0-1)] B390573 10/26/2424J3550-03 [HA-3 (0-1)] B390573 10/26/2424J3550-04 [HA-4 (0-1)] B390573 10/26/2424J3550-05 [HA-5 (0-1)] B390573 10/26/2424J3550-06 [HA-6 (0-1)] B390573 10/26/2424J3550-07 [HA-7 (0-1)] B390573 10/26/2424J3550-08 [HA-8 (0-1)] B390573 10/26/2424J3550-09 [HA-9 (0-1)] B390573 10/26/2424J3550-10 [HA-10 (0-1)] B390573 10/26/2424J3550-11 [B(MW)-201 (7-7.5)] B390573 10/26/2424J3550-12 [B(MW)-202 (6-6.5)] B390573 10/26/2424J3550-13 [B(MW)-203 (15.5-16.5)] B390573 10/26/2424J3550-14 [B(MW)-204 (6-6.5)] Prep Method:SW-846 3050B Analytical Method:SW-846 6010D Lab Number [Field ID]Batch DateInitial [g]Final [mL] B390661 10/28/241.66 50.024J3550-01 [HA-1 (0-1)] B390661 10/28/241.54 50.024J3550-02 [HA-2 (0-1)] B390661 10/28/241.56 50.024J3550-03 [HA-3 (0-1)] B390661 10/28/241.64 50.024J3550-04 [HA-4 (0-1)] B390661 10/28/241.54 50.024J3550-05 [HA-5 (0-1)] B390661 10/28/241.52 50.024J3550-06 [HA-6 (0-1)] B390661 10/28/241.50 50.024J3550-07 [HA-7 (0-1)] B390661 10/28/241.83 50.024J3550-08 [HA-8 (0-1)] B390661 10/28/241.54 50.024J3550-09 [HA-9 (0-1)] B390661 10/28/241.67 50.024J3550-10 [HA-10 (0-1)] Prep Method:SW-846 5035 Analytical Method:SW-846 8260D Lab Number [Field ID]Batch DateInitial [g]Final [mL] B390471 10/25/246.51 10.024J3550-11 [B(MW)-201 (7-7.5)] B390471 10/25/248.57 10.024J3550-12 [B(MW)-202 (6-6.5)] B390471 10/25/247.06 10.024J3550-13 [B(MW)-203 (15.5-16.5)] B390471 10/25/247.56 10.024J3550-14 [B(MW)-204 (6-6.5)] [TOC_1]Sample Preparation Information[TOC] Page 42 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Notes Analyte Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL [TOC_2]Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS[TOC] Batch B390471 - SW-846 5035 [TOC_3]B390471[TOC] Blank (B390471-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 10/25/24 Acetone mg/Kg wet0.10 UND tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME)mg/Kg wet0.0010 UND Benzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND Bromobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND Bromochloromethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND Bromodichloromethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND Bromoform mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND Bromomethane mg/Kg wet0.010 V-34, UND 2-Butanone (MEK)mg/Kg wet0.040 UND n-Butylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND sec-Butylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND tert-Butylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND tert-Butyl Ethyl Ether (TBEE)mg/Kg wet0.0010 UND Carbon Disulfide mg/Kg wet0.020 UND Carbon Tetrachloride mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND Chlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND Chlorodibromomethane mg/Kg wet0.0010 UND Chloroethane mg/Kg wet0.020 UND Chloroform mg/Kg wet0.0040 UND Chloromethane mg/Kg wet0.010 UND 2-Chlorotoluene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 4-Chlorotoluene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)mg/Kg wet0.0010 UND Dibromomethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 1,2-Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 1,3-Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 1,4-Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)mg/Kg wet0.020 UND 1,1-Dichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 1,2-Dichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 1,1-Dichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0040 UND cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 1,2-Dichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 1,3-Dichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0010 UND 2,2-Dichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 1,1-Dichloropropene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND cis-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/Kg wet0.0010 UND trans-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/Kg wet0.0010 UND Diethyl Ether mg/Kg wet0.020 UND Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)mg/Kg wet0.0010 UND 1,4-Dioxane mg/Kg wet0.10 UND Ethylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 2-Hexanone (MBK)mg/Kg wet0.020 UND Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)mg/Kg wet0.0040 UND Methylene Chloride mg/Kg wet0.020 UND 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)mg/Kg wet0.020 UND Naphthalene mg/Kg wet0.0040 UND [TOC_1]QC Data[TOC] Page 43 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Notes Analyte Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL Batch B390471 - SW-846 5035 Blank (B390471-BLK1) Prepared & Analyzed: 10/25/24 n-Propylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND Styrene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0010 UND Tetrachloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND Tetrahydrofuran mg/Kg wet0.010 UND Toluene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 1,1,1-Trichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 1,1,2-Trichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND Trichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)mg/Kg wet0.010 UND 1,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND Vinyl Chloride mg/Kg wet0.010 UND m+p Xylene mg/Kg wet0.0040 UND o-Xylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 UND mg/Kg wet 0.05000 70-130Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 1020.0512 mg/Kg wet 0.05000 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 98.80.0494 mg/Kg wet 0.05000 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 99.80.0499 LCS (B390471-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 10/25/24 Acetone mg/Kg wet0.10 0.2000 40-16095.40.191 tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME)mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.02000 70-1301100.0219 Benzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13096.60.0193 Bromobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13093.80.0188 Bromochloromethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13095.30.0191 Bromodichloromethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13095.50.0191 Bromoform mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-1301000.0201 Bromomethane mg/Kg wet0.010 0.02000 V-3440-16087.30.0175 2-Butanone (MEK)mg/Kg wet0.040 0.2000 40-16097.10.194 n-Butylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13087.40.0175 sec-Butylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13092.50.0185 tert-Butylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13093.70.0187 tert-Butyl Ethyl Ether (TBEE)mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.02000 70-1301010.0201 Carbon Disulfide mg/Kg wet0.020 0.2000 V-3670-13093.50.187 Carbon Tetrachloride mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13090.60.0181 Chlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13095.20.0190 Chlorodibromomethane mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.02000 70-13091.50.0183 Chloroethane mg/Kg wet0.020 0.02000 U70-13099.30.0199 Chloroform mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.02000 70-13096.10.0192 Chloromethane mg/Kg wet0.010 0.02000 40-16085.40.0171 2-Chlorotoluene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13097.20.0194 4-Chlorotoluene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13094.00.0188 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13087.80.0176 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.02000 70-13099.60.0199 Dibromomethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13097.50.0195 1,2-Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13096.80.0194 1,3-Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13093.60.0187 1,4-Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13091.20.0182 Page 44 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Notes Analyte Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL Batch B390471 - SW-846 5035 LCS (B390471-BS1) Prepared & Analyzed: 10/25/24 Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)mg/Kg wet0.020 0.02000 V-3640-1601030.0207 1,1-Dichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13093.50.0187 1,2-Dichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13094.20.0188 1,1-Dichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.02000 70-13087.70.0175 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13091.70.0183 trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13093.30.0187 1,2-Dichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13090.00.0180 1,3-Dichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.02000 70-13099.70.0199 2,2-Dichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13092.70.0185 1,1-Dichloropropene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13097.50.0195 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.02000 70-13094.00.0188 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.02000 70-13092.40.0185 Diethyl Ether mg/Kg wet0.020 0.02000 U70-13090.00.0180 Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.02000 70-13096.10.0192 1,4-Dioxane mg/Kg wet0.10 0.2000 40-1601190.238 Ethylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13096.40.0193 Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13087.20.0174 2-Hexanone (MBK)mg/Kg wet0.020 0.2000 40-16093.00.186 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13096.00.0192 p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13091.00.0182 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.02000 70-1301060.0211 Methylene Chloride mg/Kg wet0.020 0.02000 U70-13087.00.0174 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)mg/Kg wet0.020 0.2000 40-16097.30.195 Naphthalene mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.02000 70-13097.40.0195 n-Propylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13097.40.0195 Styrene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13096.80.0194 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13096.70.0193 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.02000 70-1301060.0211 Tetrachloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13090.50.0181 Tetrahydrofuran mg/Kg wet0.010 0.02000 70-1301040.0208 Toluene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13086.40.0173 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13092.70.0185 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13087.60.0175 1,1,1-Trichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13093.50.0187 1,1,2-Trichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13093.70.0187 Trichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13090.00.0180 Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)mg/Kg wet0.010 0.02000 70-13092.90.0186 1,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-1301040.0209 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13090.90.0182 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13095.00.0190 Vinyl Chloride mg/Kg wet0.010 0.02000 70-13093.30.0187 m+p Xylene mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.04000 70-13095.10.0380 o-Xylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 70-13095.60.0191 mg/Kg wet 0.05000 70-130Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 99.00.0495 mg/Kg wet 0.05000 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 99.10.0495 mg/Kg wet 0.05000 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 98.80.0494 Page 45 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Notes Analyte Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL Batch B390471 - SW-846 5035 LCS Dup (B390471-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 10/25/24 Acetone mg/Kg wet0.10 0.2000 2040-16093.0 2.450.186 tert-Amyl Methyl Ether (TAME)mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.02000 2070-130107 2.220.0214 Benzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13096.5 0.1040.0193 Bromobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13093.4 0.4270.0187 Bromochloromethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13094.3 1.050.0189 Bromodichloromethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13093.2 2.440.0186 Bromoform mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13095.9 4.490.0192 Bromomethane mg/Kg wet0.010 0.02000 20 V-3440-16087.5 0.2290.0175 2-Butanone (MEK)mg/Kg wet0.040 0.2000 2040-16089.2 8.460.178 n-Butylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13085.2 2.550.0170 sec-Butylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13090.5 2.190.0181 tert-Butylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13094.3 0.6380.0189 tert-Butyl Ethyl Ether (TBEE)mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.02000 2070-13098.9 1.800.0198 Carbon Disulfide mg/Kg wet0.020 0.2000 20 V-3670-13090.5 3.230.181 Carbon Tetrachloride mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13091.9 1.420.0184 Chlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13094.9 0.3160.0190 Chlorodibromomethane mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.02000 2070-13090.5 1.100.0181 Chloroethane mg/Kg wet0.020 0.02000 20 U70-13098.2 1.110.0196 Chloroform mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.02000 2070-13097.3 1.240.0195 Chloromethane mg/Kg wet0.010 0.02000 2040-16083.7 2.010.0167 2-Chlorotoluene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13096.4 0.8260.0193 4-Chlorotoluene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13091.0 3.240.0182 1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13086.2 1.840.0172 1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB)mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.02000 2070-13096.8 2.850.0194 Dibromomethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13098.3 0.8170.0197 1,2-Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13094.5 2.400.0189 1,3-Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13092.4 1.290.0185 1,4-Dichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13090.7 0.5500.0181 Dichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12)mg/Kg wet0.020 0.02000 20 V-3640-160103 0.5820.0206 1,1-Dichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13091.9 1.730.0184 1,2-Dichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13090.4 4.120.0181 1,1-Dichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.02000 2070-13086.9 0.9160.0174 cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13091.3 0.4370.0183 trans-1,2-Dichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13092.7 0.6450.0185 1,2-Dichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13089.4 0.6690.0179 1,3-Dichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.02000 2070-13097.5 2.230.0195 2,2-Dichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13092.1 0.6490.0184 1,1-Dichloropropene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13095.2 2.390.0190 cis-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.02000 2070-13093.6 0.4260.0187 trans-1,3-Dichloropropene mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.02000 2070-13091.7 0.7600.0183 Diethyl Ether mg/Kg wet0.020 0.02000 20 U70-13092.2 2.410.0184 Diisopropyl Ether (DIPE)mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.02000 2070-13094.1 2.100.0188 1,4-Dioxane mg/Kg wet0.10 0.2000 2040-160117 1.710.234 Ethylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13094.8 1.670.0190 Hexachlorobutadiene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13085.1 2.440.0170 2-Hexanone (MBK)mg/Kg wet0.020 0.2000 2040-16086.5 7.220.173 Isopropylbenzene (Cumene)mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13094.3 1.790.0189 p-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene)mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13090.3 0.7720.0181 Methyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE)mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.02000 2070-130105 0.8570.0209 Methylene Chloride mg/Kg wet0.020 0.02000 20 U70-13088.6 1.820.0177 4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK)mg/Kg wet0.020 0.2000 2040-16089.9 7.920.180 Naphthalene mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.02000 2070-13092.8 4.840.0186 Page 46 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Notes Analyte Volatile Organic Compounds by GC/MS - Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL Batch B390471 - SW-846 5035 LCS Dup (B390471-BSD1) Prepared & Analyzed: 10/25/24 n-Propylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13094.4 3.130.0189 Styrene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13094.8 2.090.0190 1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13094.1 2.730.0188 1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0010 0.02000 2070-13098.2 7.260.0196 Tetrachloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13088.8 1.900.0178 Tetrahydrofuran mg/Kg wet0.010 0.02000 2070-13098.3 5.730.0197 Toluene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13084.9 1.750.0170 1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13092.7 0.000.0185 1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13085.8 2.080.0172 1,1,1-Trichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13093.4 0.1070.0187 1,1,2-Trichloroethane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13092.2 1.610.0184 Trichloroethylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13087.6 2.700.0175 Trichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11)mg/Kg wet0.010 0.02000 2070-13091.0 2.070.0182 1,2,3-Trichloropropane mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13096.6 7.760.0193 1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13089.5 1.550.0179 1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13093.7 1.380.0187 Vinyl Chloride mg/Kg wet0.010 0.02000 2070-13093.7 0.4280.0187 m+p Xylene mg/Kg wet0.0040 0.04000 2070-13093.8 1.380.0375 o-Xylene mg/Kg wet0.0020 0.02000 2070-13094.8 0.8400.0190 mg/Kg wet 0.05000 70-130Surrogate: 1,2-Dichloroethane-d4 98.60.0493 mg/Kg wet 0.05000 70-130Surrogate: Toluene-d8 98.80.0494 mg/Kg wet 0.05000 70-130Surrogate: 4-Bromofluorobenzene 98.60.0493 Page 47 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Notes Analyte Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses - EPH - Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL [TOC_2]Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses - EPH[TOC] Batch B390464 - SW-846 3510C [TOC_3]B390464[TOC] Blank (B390464-BLK1) Prepared: 10/25/24 Analyzed: 10/28/24 C9-C18 Aliphatics mg/Kg wet10 UND C19-C36 Aliphatics mg/Kg wet10 UND Unadjusted C11-C22 Aromatics mg/Kg wet10 UND C11-C22 Aromatics mg/Kg wet10 UND Acenaphthene mg/Kg wet0.10 UND Acenaphthylene mg/Kg wet0.10 UND Anthracene mg/Kg wet0.10 UND Benzo(a)anthracene mg/Kg wet0.10 UND Benzo(a)pyrene mg/Kg wet0.10 UND Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/Kg wet0.10 UND Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/Kg wet0.10 UND Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/Kg wet0.10 UND Chrysene mg/Kg wet0.10 UND Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/Kg wet0.10 UND Fluoranthene mg/Kg wet0.10 UND Fluorene mg/Kg wet0.10 UND Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/Kg wet0.10 UND 2-Methylnaphthalene mg/Kg wet0.10 UND Naphthalene mg/Kg wet0.10 UND Phenanthrene mg/Kg wet0.10 UND Pyrene mg/Kg wet0.10 UND Naphthalene-aliphatic fraction mg/Kg wet0.10 UND 2-Methylnaphthalene-aliphatic fraction mg/Kg wet0.10 UND mg/Kg wet 4.990 40-140Surrogate: Chlorooctadecane (COD)54.92.74 mg/Kg wet 4.990 40-140Surrogate: o-Terphenyl (OTP)52.22.61 mg/Kg wet 4.990 40-140Surrogate: 2-Bromonaphthalene 73.73.68 mg/Kg wet 4.990 40-140Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 70.03.49 LCS (B390464-BS1) Prepared: 10/25/24 Analyzed: 10/28/24 C9-C18 Aliphatics mg/Kg wet10 29.97 40-14065.119.5 C19-C36 Aliphatics mg/Kg wet10 39.96 40-14078.031.2 Unadjusted C11-C22 Aromatics mg/Kg wet10 84.92 40-14074.763.5 Acenaphthene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.995 40-14061.63.08 Acenaphthylene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.995 40-14056.02.80 Anthracene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.995 40-14069.53.47 Benzo(a)anthracene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.995 40-14072.53.62 Benzo(a)pyrene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.995 40-14069.83.49 Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.995 40-14070.23.50 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.995 40-14069.63.48 Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.995 40-14074.63.73 Chrysene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.995 40-14072.43.61 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.995 40-14071.13.55 Fluoranthene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.995 40-14071.13.55 Fluorene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.995 40-14065.33.26 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.995 40-14071.53.57 2-Methylnaphthalene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.995 40-14058.22.91 Naphthalene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.995 40-14055.12.75 Phenanthrene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.995 40-14068.63.43 Pyrene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.995 40-14071.93.59 Naphthalene-aliphatic fraction mg/Kg wet0.10 4.995 U0-5ND 2-Methylnaphthalene-aliphatic fraction mg/Kg wet0.10 4.995 U0-5ND mg/Kg wet 4.995 40-140Surrogate: Chlorooctadecane (COD)56.92.84 Page 48 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Notes Analyte Petroleum Hydrocarbons Analyses - EPH - Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL Batch B390464 - SW-846 3510C LCS (B390464-BS1) Prepared: 10/25/24 Analyzed: 10/28/24 mg/Kg wet 4.995 40-140Surrogate: o-Terphenyl (OTP)55.92.79 mg/Kg wet 4.995 40-140Surrogate: 2-Bromonaphthalene 94.04.69 mg/Kg wet 4.995 40-140Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 92.54.62 LCS Dup (B390464-BSD1) Prepared: 10/25/24 Analyzed: 10/28/24 C9-C18 Aliphatics mg/Kg wet10 29.96 2540-14074.8 13.922.4 C19-C36 Aliphatics mg/Kg wet10 39.94 2540-14085.6 9.3134.2 Unadjusted C11-C22 Aromatics mg/Kg wet10 84.87 2540-14083.4 10.970.8 Acenaphthene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.993 2540-14071.0 14.13.54 Acenaphthylene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.993 2540-14064.5 14.23.22 Anthracene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.993 2540-14079.0 12.73.94 Benzo(a)anthracene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.993 2540-14081.9 12.14.09 Benzo(a)pyrene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.993 2540-14079.0 12.33.95 Benzo(b)fluoranthene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.993 2540-14079.1 12.03.95 Benzo(g,h,i)perylene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.993 2540-14078.4 11.83.91 Benzo(k)fluoranthene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.993 2540-14084.6 12.54.23 Chrysene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.993 2540-14081.7 12.14.08 Dibenz(a,h)anthracene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.993 2540-14080.4 12.14.01 Fluoranthene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.993 2540-14080.1 11.94.00 Fluorene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.993 2540-14074.8 13.43.73 Indeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.993 2540-14081.1 12.64.05 2-Methylnaphthalene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.993 2540-14068.2 15.83.40 Naphthalene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.993 2540-14065.7 17.63.28 Phenanthrene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.993 2540-14077.9 12.73.89 Pyrene mg/Kg wet0.10 4.993 2540-14081.0 11.94.05 Naphthalene-aliphatic fraction mg/Kg wet0.10 4.993 U0-5ND 2-Methylnaphthalene-aliphatic fraction mg/Kg wet0.10 4.993 U0-5ND mg/Kg wet 4.993 40-140Surrogate: Chlorooctadecane (COD)63.63.18 mg/Kg wet 4.993 40-140Surrogate: o-Terphenyl (OTP)62.03.10 mg/Kg wet 4.993 40-140Surrogate: 2-Bromonaphthalene 96.54.82 mg/Kg wet 4.993 40-140Surrogate: 2-Fluorobiphenyl 94.24.70 Page 49 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 Result Limit Reporting Units Level Spike Result Source %REC %REC Limits RPD RPD Limit Notes Analyte Metals Analyses (Total) - Quality Control QUALITY CONTROL [TOC_2]Metals Analyses (Total)[TOC] Batch B390661 - SW-846 3050B [TOC_3]B390661[TOC] Blank (B390661-BLK1) Prepared: 10/28/24 Analyzed: 10/30/24 Lead mg/Kg wet0.49 UND LCS (B390661-BS1) Prepared: 10/28/24 Analyzed: 10/30/24 Lead mg/Kg wet1.4 194.0 82-118.688.8172 LCS Dup (B390661-BSD1) Prepared: 10/28/24 Analyzed: 10/30/24 Lead mg/Kg wet1.4 194.0 3082-118.691.4 2.87177 Dilution Check (B390661-SRL1) Prepared: 10/28/24 Analyzed: 10/30/24 Source: 24J2890-01 Lead mg/Kg dry2.7 2018.94.11 3.41 Page 50 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 FLAG/QUALIFIER SUMMARY *QC result is outside of established limits. Wide recovery limits established for difficult compound . Wide RPD limits established for difficult compound. #Data exceeded client recommended or regulatory level Percent recoveries and relative percent differences (RPDs) are determined by the software using values in the calculation which have not been rounded. No results have been blank subtracted unless specified in the case narrative section. RL Reporting Limit is at the level of quantitation (LOQ) DL Detection Limit is the lower limit of detection determined by the MDL study MCL Maximum Contaminant Level ND Not Detected Analyte included in the analysis, but not detectedU Response factor is less than method specified minimum acceptable value. Reduced precision and accuracy may be associated with reported result. V-16 Initial calibration verification (ICV) did not meet method specifications and was biased on the low side for this compound. Reported result is estimated. V-34 Initial calibration verification (ICV) did not meet method specifications and was biased on the high side. Data validation is not affected since sample result was "not detected" for this compound. V-36 [TOC_1]Flag/Qualifier Summary[TOC] Page 51 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 CertificationsAnalyte CERTIFICATIONS Certified Analyses included in this Report MADEP EPH rev 2.1 in Soil CT,NC,ME,NH-PC9-C18 Aliphatics CT,NC,ME,NH-PC19-C36 Aliphatics CT,NC,ME,NH-PUnadjusted C11-C22 Aromatics CT,NC,ME,NH-PC11-C22 Aromatics CT,NC,ME,NH-PAcenaphthene CT,NC,ME,NH-PAcenaphthylene CT,NC,ME,NH-PAnthracene CT,NC,ME,NH-PBenzo(a)anthracene CT,NC,ME,NH-PBenzo(a)pyrene CT,NC,ME,NH-PBenzo(b)fluoranthene CT,NC,ME,NH-PBenzo(g,h,i)perylene CT,NC,ME,NH-PBenzo(k)fluoranthene CT,NC,ME,NH-PChrysene CT,NC,ME,NH-PDibenz(a,h)anthracene CT,NC,ME,NH-PFluoranthene CT,NC,MEFluorene CT,NC,ME,NH-PIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene CT,NC2-Methylnaphthalene CT,NC,ME,NH-PNaphthalene CT,NC,ME,NH-PPhenanthrene CT,NC,ME,NH-PPyrene MADEP EPH rev 2.1 in Water CT,NC,ME,NH-PC9-C18 Aliphatics CT,NC,ME,NH-PC19-C36 Aliphatics CT,NC,ME,NH-PUnadjusted C11-C22 Aromatics CT,NC,ME,NH-PC11-C22 Aromatics CT,NC,ME,NH-PAcenaphthene CT,NC,ME,NH-PAcenaphthylene CT,NC,ME,NH-PAnthracene CT,NC,ME,NH-PBenzo(a)anthracene CT,NC,ME,NH-PBenzo(a)pyrene CT,NC,ME,NH-PBenzo(b)fluoranthene CT,NC,ME,NH-PBenzo(g,h,i)perylene CT,NC,ME,NH-PBenzo(k)fluoranthene CT,NC,ME,NH-PChrysene CT,NC,ME,NH-PDibenz(a,h)anthracene CT,NC,ME,NH-PFluoranthene CT,NC,MEFluorene CT,NC,ME,NH-PIndeno(1,2,3-cd)pyrene CT,NC2-Methylnaphthalene CT,NC,ME,NH-PNaphthalene CT,NC,ME,NH-PPhenanthrene CT,NC,ME,NH-PPyrene SW-846 6010D in Soil CT,NH,NY,ME,VA,NCLead SW-846 6010D in Water [TOC_1]Certifications[TOC] Page 52 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 CertificationsAnalyte CERTIFICATIONS Certified Analyses included in this Report SW-846 6010D in Water CT,NH,NY,ME,VA,NCLead SW-846 8260D in Soil CT,NH,NY,MEAcetone CT,NH,NY,MEBenzene NH,NY,MEBromobenzene NH,NY,MEBromochloromethane CT,NH,NY,MEBromodichloromethane CT,NH,NY,MEBromoform CT,NH,NY,MEBromomethane CT,NH,NY,ME2-Butanone (MEK) CT,NH,NY,MEn-Butylbenzene CT,NH,NY,MEsec-Butylbenzene CT,NH,NY,MEtert-Butylbenzene CT,NH,NY,MECarbon Disulfide CT,NH,NY,MECarbon Tetrachloride CT,NH,NY,MEChlorobenzene CT,NH,NY,MEChlorodibromomethane CT,NH,NY,MEChloroethane CT,NH,NY,MEChloroform CT,NH,NY,MEChloromethane CT,NH,NY,ME2-Chlorotoluene CT,NH,NY,ME4-Chlorotoluene NY1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP) NY1,2-Dibromoethane (EDB) NH,NY,MEDibromomethane CT,NH,NY,ME1,2-Dichlorobenzene CT,NH,NY,ME1,3-Dichlorobenzene CT,NH,NY,ME1,4-Dichlorobenzene NY,MEDichlorodifluoromethane (Freon 12) CT,NH,NY,ME1,1-Dichloroethane CT,NH,NY,ME1,2-Dichloroethane CT,NH,NY,ME1,1-Dichloroethylene CT,NH,NY,MEcis-1,2-Dichloroethylene CT,NH,NY,MEtrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene CT,NH,NY,ME1,2-Dichloropropane NH,NY,ME1,3-Dichloropropane NH,NY,ME2,2-Dichloropropane NH,NY,ME1,1-Dichloropropene CT,NH,NY,MEcis-1,3-Dichloropropene CT,NH,NY,MEtrans-1,3-Dichloropropene NY1,4-Dioxane CT,NH,NY,MEEthylbenzene NH,NY,MEHexachlorobutadiene CT,NH,NY,ME2-Hexanone (MBK) CT,NH,NY,MEIsopropylbenzene (Cumene) NH,NYp-Isopropyltoluene (p-Cymene) Page 53 of 59 Table of Contents 39 Spruce Street * East Longmeadow, MA 01028 * FAX 413/525-6405 * TEL. 413/525-2332 CertificationsAnalyte CERTIFICATIONS Certified Analyses included in this Report SW-846 8260D in Soil NH,NYMethyl tert-Butyl Ether (MTBE) CT,NH,NY,MEMethylene Chloride CT,NH,NY4-Methyl-2-pentanone (MIBK) NH,NY,MENaphthalene NH,NYn-Propylbenzene CT,NH,NY,MEStyrene CT,NH,NY,ME1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroethane CT,NH,NY,ME1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane CT,NH,NY,METetrachloroethylene CT,NH,NY,METoluene NY1,2,3-Trichlorobenzene NH,NY,ME1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene CT,NH,NY,ME1,1,1-Trichloroethane CT,NH,NY,ME1,1,2-Trichloroethane CT,NH,NY,METrichloroethylene CT,NH,NY,METrichlorofluoromethane (Freon 11) NH,NY,ME1,2,3-Trichloropropane CT,NH,NY,ME1,2,4-Trimethylbenzene CT,NH,NY,ME1,3,5-Trimethylbenzene CT,NH,NY,MEVinyl Chloride CT,NH,NY,MEm+p Xylene CT,NH,NY,MEo-Xylene Con-Test, a Pace Environmental Laboratory, operates under the following certifications and accreditations: Code Description Number Expires PH-0821Connecticut Department of Public HealthCT 12/31/2024 10899 NELAPNew York State Department of HealthNY 04/1/2025 2516 NELAPNew Hampshire Environmental LabNH 02/5/2025 652North Carolina Div. of Water QualityNC 12/31/2024 MA00100State of MaineME 06/9/2025 460217Commonwealth of VirginiaVA 12/14/2024 2557 NELAPNew Hampshire Environmental LabNH-P 09/6/2025 Page 54 of 59 Table of Contents Page 55 of 59 Table of Contents Page 56 of 59 Table of Contents Page 57 of 59 Table of Contents Page 58 of 59 Table of Contents MADEP MCP Analytical Method Report Certification Form Laboratory Name:Pace New England Project #: Project Location: This Form provides certifications for the following data set: [list Laboratory Sample ID Number(s)] 24J3550 24J3550-01 thru 24J3550-14 Reading, MA Matrices: RTN: Soil CAM Protocol (check all that below) 8260 VOC CAM II A (X) 8151 Herbicides CAM V C ( ) 8330 Explosives CAM VIII A ( ) 6010 Metals CAM III A (X) 7470/7471 Hg CAM IIIB ( ) 8270 SVOC CAM II B ( ) 8081 Pesticides CAM V B ( ) MassDEP VPH (GC/PID/FID) CAM IV A ( ) 6020 Metals CAM III D ( ) 9014 Total Cyanide/PAC CAM VI A ( ) 8082 PCB CAM V A ( ) 6860 Perchlorate CAM VIII B ( ) MassDEP EPH CAM IV B (X) 7010 Metals CAM III C ( ) 7196 Hex Cr CAM VI B ( ) MassDEP APH CAM IX A ( ) TO-15 VOC CAM IX B ( ) MassDEP VPH (GC/MS) CAM IV C ( ) Affirmative response to Questions A throughF is required for Presumptive Certainty status ü A Yes No„ Were all samples received in a condition consistent with those described on the Chain-of-Custody, properly preserved (including temperature) in the field or laboratory, and prepared/analyzed within method holding times? ü B Yes No„ Were the analytical method(s) and all associated QC requirements specificed in the selected CAM protocol(s) followed? ü C Yes No„ Were all required corrective actions and analytical response actions specified in the selected CAM protocol(s) implemented for all identified performance standard non-conformances? ü D Yes No„ Does the laboratory report comply with all the reporting requirements specified in CAM VII A, Quality Assurance and Quality Control Guidlines for the Acquisition and Reporting of Analytical Data? E a Yes No„ VPH, EPH, and APH Methods only: Was each method conducted without significant modification(s)? (Refer to the individual method(s) for a list of significant modifications). E b Yes No„ APH and TO-15 Methods only: Was the complete analyte list reported for each method? ü F Yes No„ Were all applicable CAM protocol QC and performance standard non-conformances identified and evaluated in a laboratory narrative (including all No responses to Qestions A through E)? G Were the reporting limits at or below all CAM reporting limits specified in the selected CAM protocol(s)? ü Yes No„ A response to questions G, H and I below is required for Presumptive Certainty status Were all QC perfomance standards specified in the CAM protocol(s) achieved? Yes ü No„H Data User Note: Data that achieve "Presumptive Certainty" status may not necessarily meet the data usability and representativeness requirements described in 310 CMR 40. 1056 (2)(k) and WSC-07-350. ü I Yes No„ Were results reported for the complete analyte list specified in the selected CAM protocol(s)? I, the undersigned, attest under the pains and penalties of perjury that, based upon my personal inquiry of those responsible for obtaining the information, the material contained in this analytical report is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, accurate and complete. „All Negative responses must be addressed in an attached Environmental Laboratory case narrative. Signature: Printed Name: Position: Date:10/30/24 Technical Representative Lisa A. Worthington Page 1 of 1Page 59 of 59 Table of Contents 1-13 Select Board Policies Correspondence relative to setting meeting agendas may be limited to the Town Manager and Chair. i. The Town Manager shall respond individually to members of the Select Board who email the Town Manager as individual members, unless the individual Board member requests that the Town Manager provide the information to all members of the Board and such communication does not violate the Open Meeting Law. j. If individual Board members request the Town Manager or Town staff take a particular action and it is unclear whether that request is representative of the will of the Board as a whole, the Town Manager may request the Board provide additional instruction or take a formal vote to indicate their preference or instruction for staff action. Section revised March 9, 2004 revised June 5, 2007 revised February 16, 2021 revised August 10, 2021 1.4.2 – Access to Public Records The Select Board is committed to the philosophy that the citizens should have access to public records that are not exempt by law. To this end, the Town Clerk is hereby designated as custodian of public records for the Town of Reading (not including the School or Light Department). The custodian of public records will carry out the duties and responsibilities of a record custodian as required by Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 66, Section 10, and may establish and charge such reasonable fees and establish other regulations in accordance with rules and regulations established by the Supervisor of Public Records, Regulation 950 CMR 32.06, or other applicable laws and regulations. Section revised December 13, 1994 Revised February 16, 2021 Section 1.5 – Volunteer Board and Committee Appointments The Select Board is responsible for appointing volunteers to Boards and Committees in accordance with Article 4 of the Reading Home Rule Charter, as well as those Boards and Committees created by local Bylaw or Select Board Policy. The Select Board recognizes the following two issues related to the consideration of and appointment to the various Boards and Committees: 1. The amount of time taken in the past for this process by the Select Board and volunteers has been extraordinary and not necessarily productive; and 2. The depth of interviews given time constraints does not allow the full Select Board to do a thorough job of interviewing. 1-14 Select Board Policies The Select Board therefore hereby implements the following process in order to address these two issues: 1.5.1 - Volunteer Appointment Subcommittee (VASC) The Select Board shall appoint members to a two-member VASC at the time that Select Board liaison assignments are established. 1. VASC members shall be appointed for staggered onetwo-year terms so arranged that one term shall expire each year. 2. No member of the Select Board shall serve on the VASC for more than two consecutive terms. Notwithstanding this limitation, the Chair and the Select Board shall consider appointing a new member who wishes to serve, over an incumbent reapplying for a second term on the VASC. 3. Following their appointment, the VASC shall appoint a Chair and Secretary to serve for one year. 4.3.Vacancies on the VASC shall be filled promptly by a vote of the Select Board. 5.4.The meetings of the VASC shall be posted and open to the public. 1.5.2 - Process for Annually Appointing Volunteers to Boards and Committees In order to ensure an orderly, transparent and fair process for annually appointing incumbents and new candidates to Boards and Committees, the following guidelines are established: 1. Beginning on May 1 of each year, the Town Manager’s office shall issue invitations to all incumbent members of Boards and Committees, asking them to indicate their desire for reappointment. Responses shall be due not later than May 15. At the same time, the Town Manager’s office shall cause to have advertised the complete list of full and associate positions, whether currently filled or not, that will be open beginning July 1. 2. Following the expiration of the required number of days for advertising open positions (per Sec. 8.10 of the Reading Home Rule Charter), the VASC Chair and the Town Manager’s office shall schedule a minimum of six meeting dates between May 16 and June 15 for the VASC to hold interviews for these positions, covering as many days of the week (Monday- Thursday) as is practicable. 3. In recognition of the value of maintaining personal relationships between the Select Board and its appointees, it shall be the policy of the VASC to invite all incumbents seeking reappointment to attend one of these interview sessions. 4. In recognition of the Select Board’s desire to involve Board and Committee Chairs in the appointment process, the Town Manager’s office shall notify all Committee Chairs of the six VASC meeting dates. 5. The Town Manager’s office shall issue an email to Board and Committee Chairs not later than 5:00 pm the day of each scheduled VASC meeting, with the complete interview packet for that day’s VASC meeting and requesting the attendance of the affected Committee chairs (or designees). Commented [CN1]: Board discussed making it policy to interview all incumbents; already in here. 1-15 Select Board Policies 6. The VASC shall interview any new candidate who is not already an Associate member of that Board or Committee, prior to voting a recommendation on that candidate to the full Select Board. 7. Following the last VASC meeting, the VASC shall transmit to the entire Select Board and to all candidates and Committee Chairs, a slate of recommended candidates for each Board and Committee along with a list of all candidates who had applied for each Board and Committee. A copy of the application form and/or resume for any new candidate shall also be provided to the entire Select Board. 8. The VASC shall present this recommended slate of candidates to the Select Board as a single item on the agenda. Any member of the Select Board may ask for a particular recommendation to be voted on separately. Any person who has been interviewed or recommended by the VASC for a particular position may ask for their particular recommendation to be voted on separately. Any request to remove a name should include a reason. The remaining Board and Committee appointments of the recommended slate shall then be considered and voted on as a single item. 9. Any Board and Committee appointments removed from the consent item will then be scheduled for interview during a later Select Board meeting, and the appointment process to that Board and Committee will be by the full Select Board. 1.5.3 - Process for Filling Vacancies on Boards and Committees during the Year 1. Within five days of learning about a vacancy on a Board or Committee, the Town Manager’s office shall cause to have advertised the complete list of full or associate positions that have become vacant. 2. The Town Manager’s office shall also invite all Associate Members of the affected Board or Commission to apply for any available Full memberships. 3. Following the receipt of all applications and the expiration of the required number of days for advertising (per Sec. 8.10 of the Reading Home Rule Charter), the VASC Chair and Town Manager’s office shall schedule one or more dates for VASC interviews, taking into consideration the schedules of all applicants. 4. The requirements of Sections 1.5.2.4 through 9 shall be applicable to filling vacancies on Boards and Committees during the year. Section revised March 2019 Section 1.6 – Financial Matters 1.6.1 – Acceptance of Gifts and Donations It is the policy of the Select Board to encourage donations and gifts, with the clear understanding that there is no offer on the part of the Town to reciprocate in any manner with regard to provisions of services, enforcement of laws or regulations, or any other consideration by the Town. The Town Manager is hereby authorized to accept any such gifts or donations on the part of the Town, to see to their disposition in accordance with donor’s wishes and applicable law, and to Commented [CN2]: Board discussed VASC meeting only quarterly From:Solarin, Adetokunbo To:Kraunelis, Matthew Cc:Nocella, Caitlin Subject:RE: ARPA Transfer Date:Thursday, November 14, 2024 2:16:34 PM Attachments:20241114135911.pdf Hi Matt, I would like to refine my request. My new proposal is to reallocate the entire amount ( $21,359.91 ) to rodent mitigation. I have met with a company that’s willing and able to provide/implement a safe and humane rodent control program for our town. The name of the company is North Shore Wildlife. The owner of the company gave us a presentation on how the town can mitigate the rat/rodent explosion we’ve been experiencing. He is willing to attend the SB meeting to do a quick presentation if needed. I have attached the company’s business card and a draft contract for rodent control services to this email for review. Thank you, Ade Solarin, MPH, REHS, MCPPO Director of Public Health 16 Lowell Street Reading, MA 01867 asolarin@ci.reading.ma.us Phone: 781-942-6653 Fax # : 781-942-9071 8:00am-5:30pm MWTh; 8:00am-7:00pm T; closed F November 21, 2024 SUBSEQUENT TOWN MEETING December 3, 2024 Tuesday Overview of Meeting 7:00 Public Comment 7:05 Select Board Liaison and Town Manager Reports 7:15 Discuss second water meter pilot program Vote to approve Annual Liquor Licenses HEARING Safety Amendments 2024-10 and 2024- 11 Jones 264 Ash Street Driveway Waiver Percival Vote on Site Selection for Active Living Center Economic Development Update McCarthy December 4, 2024 Wednesday Department Budget Presentations December 10, 2024 Tuesday Department Budget Presentations Library Budget Presentation Lannon Recurring Agenda Items Close Warrant: Annual Town Meeting March Close Warrant: Subsequent Town Meeting September Appoint Town Accountant March Annual HEARING Approve Classification & Compensation May Annual Appointments of Boards & Committees May/June Annual HEARING Approve Tax Classification October Annual Approve Licenses December Annual Arbor Day Proclamation April Annual Liaison: RCTV members Report Annual Liaison: CAB (RMLD) member Report Annual Liaison: MAPC member Report Annual Liaison: Reading Housing Authority Report Annual Liaison: Reading Ice Arena Report Annual Town Accountant Report Qtrly Economic Development Director Semi-ann Parking/Traffic/Transportation Task Force (PTTTF) Town Board & Committee visits Town Department visits Review Select Board Goals Review Town Manager Goals February/March 2025 DRAFT - SELECT BOARD AGENDAS Staff Responsibility Estimated start time January 7, 2025 Overview of Meeting 7:00 Public Comment 7:05 Select Board Liaison and Town Manager Reports 7:15 HEARING Classification Hearing Donahue January 21, 2025 Overview of Meeting 7:00 Public Comment 7:05 Select Board Liaison and Town Manager Reports 7:15 February 4, 2025 Overview of Meeting 7:00 Public Comment 7:05 Select Board Liaison and Town Manager Reports 7:15 February 18, 2025 Overview of Meeting 7:00 Public Comment 7:05 Select Board Liaison and Town Manager Reports 7:15 March 4, 2025 Overview of Meeting 7:00 Public Comment 7:05 Select Board Liaison and Town Manager Reports 7:15 March 18, 2025 Overview of Meeting 7:00 Public Comment 7:05 Select Board Liaison and Town Manager Reports 7:15 Select Board Draft Minutes October 8, 2024 MM via Zoom Public Comment John Sullivan made a comment about tiered water rates in multi-unit buildings specifically at Postmark. Rachel O’Neill, owner of the flower shop in town, made a comment about the parking meters. Eilish Havey, owner of Bunratty’s Tavern, also commented about the parking meters. Julie Centrella, owner of Aine’s Boutique, also commented about the parking meters. Amy Collins, downtown business owner, also commented about the parking meters. Marilyn Shapleigh made a comment objecting from reallocating any ARPA funds from the Senior Center. Anne Marie Ward made a comment about the poor condition of the senior center. John Costigan echoed the previous comments about the senior center. Tara Gregory made a comment about tiered water rates and feels information is being left out of the packet. Linda Snow Dockser thanked the board for forming ACE and asked the board to please get involved and appoint a member of their board to be on ACE. Liaison Reports Herrick attended the Maillet Sommes Morgan grand opening and Arts Fest. She also participated in the Athletic Naming Facility Committee. VASC is trying to set some meetings. She will attend the Lunch N Learn at the PSC tomorrow. Dockser reported on ReCalc noting they now have an OPM on board. The town is now under contract to do some testing down at Symonds Way in October. Haley attended Coffee with a Cop and the POST1917 event for Friends of Reading Seniors 60+. He also attended the Maillet Sommes Morgan ribbon cutting. He and Murphy spent Friday down at the CVS parking lot helping people out with the new kiosks. Murphy reported on the School Committee meeting and the CPDC meeting. She also attended Coffee with a Cop, the Friends of Reading Seniors event and the Maillet Sommes and Morgan opening. Lastly, she spent Friday with Haley helping people with the kiosks and she will go into more detail about that during the agenda item. Bacci also attended the POST1917 event for Friends of Reading Seniors and the CPDC meeting last night. Town Manager Report Kraunelis reported on upcoming events happening around town. Close Warrant for State Election Haley moved to close the warrant for the State Election to be held on November 5th, 2024. The motion was seconded by Herrick and approved with the following roll call vote: Herrick – yes; Dockser – yes; Haley – yes; Murphy – yes; Bacci – yes. HEARING - Approve New Liquor License Haley read the hearing notice. Applicant James Saunders was present for his hearing on a new liquor license for his distillery business down at General Way. Haley moved to close the hearing regarding the new liquor license application. The motion was seconded by Herrick and approved with the following roll call vote: Herrick – yes; Dockser – yes; Haley – yes; Murphy – yes; Bacci – yes. Haley moved to approve an annual Distilled Spirits Farmers Series Pouring Permit for New England Barrel Company, LLC d/b/a New England Barrel Company at One General Way, Unit 40. The motion was seconded by Dockser and approved with the following roll call vote: Herrick – yes; Dockser – yes; Haley – yes; Murphy – yes; Bacci – yes. Town Accountant Quarterly Report Town Accountant Sharon Angstrom gave the board a presentation with her quarterly updates. Multi-Unit Tiered Water Rates Town Accountant Sharon Angstrom and Consultant Matt Abrahams gave the board a presentation on possible solutions for buildings with multi-units given the new tiered water rate system. The board asked staff to come back on October 29th with more information. Update on ARPA Funds Town Accountant Sharon Angstrom gave the board an update on the current amount of money that has not yet been encumbered from the State ARPA funds. She did note the Health Department submitted a proposal for usage of their remaining funds. The board asked to put this on their October 29th meeting for another update and vote to reallocate any left-over funds. Pickleball Presentation and Discussion about Symonds Way Jim Sullivan, Recreation Administrator, gave the board a presentation about putting in pickleball courts at Symonds Way. Eilleen Manning of the Reading Pickleball Players Association noted they have been fund raising and received a sizeable amount of donations to help build the courts. Discuss Select Board Designee for ACE The board members discussed who could be the designee for this newly established committee. All board members noted they do not have the bandwidth to take on another committee at this time. Some members were okay with appointing a designee for this position while others felt it would send a bad message if it wasn’t a Select Board member who was appointed. Update on Downtown Parking Kiosks Assistant Town Manager Jayne Wellman and Deputy Police Chief Christine Amendola gave the board an update on how the kiosks were working now that they have been on for 2 weeks. The board members felt the kiosks are a total disaster given the amount of complaints from the businesses this evening and the talk around town. Most board members would like to put a pause to the kiosks and will take a vote on that at an upcoming meeting. Future Agendas The board discussed future agenda items. Minutes The board started editing prior meeting minutes. No vote was taken. Murphy moved to adjourn the meeting at 11:41 PM. The motion was seconded by Dockser and approved with the following roll call vote: Herrick – yes; Dockser – yes; Haley – no; Murphy – yes; Bacci – yes. Select Board Draft Minutes October 15, 2024 Public Comment John Lippitt would like to see the split tax rate shift to 1.2. Rachel O’Neil, Amy Collins, Lori Haverty, Julie Centrella, Eilish Havey, Alice White, Nick Face and Joe Bean all commented their dissatisfaction with the parking kiosks. Presentation on Tax Classification Victor Santaniello, Town Assessor, gave the board a presentation on this year’s tax classification with some prior history. Presentation of Town Meeting Warrant Article 15 Superintendent Tom Milaschewski and Facilities Director Joe Huggins gave the board some background and explanation on their ask for $3 Million for a new Field House floor at the high school. Haley motioned to support Article 15 of the Subsequent Town Meeting. The motion was seconded by Dockser and approved with a 5-0 vote. Discuss and Vote on Parking Kiosks The board discussed all the negative feedback they have been hearing from the businesses over the past 2 weeks surrounding the kiosks. Haley did not participate in the discussion on Brande Court. Dockser moved to direct the Town Manager to refrain from collecting parking fees pursuant to Article 5.19 of the Traffic and Parking Regulations in the Upper Haven Street Municipal parking lot from October 16, 2024 to January 15, 2025. The motion was seconded by Murphy and approved with a 5-0 vote. Dockser moved to direct the Town Manager refrain from collecting parking fees pursuant to Article 5.19 of the Traffic and Parking Regulations in the Brande Court Street Municipal parking lot from October 16, 2024 to January 15, 2025. The motion was seconded by Murphy and approved with a 4-0 vote. Haley refrained from participating in this vote. Discuss VASC Policies The board discussed their VASC policies and procedures and things they would like to amend in the policy. Future Agendas The board discussed future agenda items. The board motioned to adjourned at 10:33 PM and passed with a 5-0 vote.