HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-11-13 Permanent Building Committee Minutesr
Town of Reading RECEIVED
�' Meeting Minutes FO�iPd CLERK
Yu
�I..Oa�'
Board - Committee - Commission - Council: - - - q PN 12: 319
Permanent Building Committee Meeting
Date: 2024-11-13 Time: 7:30 PM
Building: Reading Town Hall Location: Berger Room
Address: 16 Lowell Street Session:
Purpose: Permanent Building Committee Version: Final
Attendees: Members - Present:
please see attached
Members - Not Present:
please see attached
Others Present:
please see attached
Minutes Respectfully Submitted By: Brian Hromadka from Turner & Townsend Heery
Topics of Discussion:
Please see attached
Page I 1
MEETING MINUTES# 02
TmnOr&Townsend
Heery
AtMdaas
In/tlab
uew!
I'MROM
- " �
I"
Project:
Reading Center for Active Living
Project No:
TfH# HII-2408100
Meeting No:
PBC - ReCAL 02
Locebon:
Zoom/Town Hall (Hybrid)
Date:
2024-11-13 0 7:30PM
Recorded By:
B. Hromadka
Purpose:
Reading Center for Active Living
Pile:
1809300 - A02-00
Attachments:
Role Call Sheet. Meeting Packet
AbbrevlLbons:
BH+A - Bergmann Hendrie + Archetype, Inc.
N
COA - Council on Aging
gregory—aWlerpyalwo.mm
OPM - Owner's Project Manager
Irk McCormick
PBC - Permanent Building Committee
N
ReCAL - Reading Center for Active Learning
klrk.mr<armltk@hotmall.com
RDTC - Reading Dally Times Chronicle
arty Ziemlak
RCN - Reading Community Television
N
SBC - Killam School Building Committee
n121emlak®gmall.com
SO - Schematic Design
Mark Dockser
TOR - Town of Reading
N
TTH - Turner & Townsend Heery
MEETING MINUTES# 02
TmnOr&Townsend
Heery
AtMdaas
In/tlab
Present
I'MROM
Email
I"
Detrick Tompkins
PT
N
Chair, PBC, TOR
ptompkins0daconstruceon.com
(781) 942-9043
ancy Twomey
NT
N
Vice Chair, PBC, TOR
nj2meilcomcast.net
(781) 942-9043
ohn Coote
JC
®
Member, PBC, TOR
jas.woteGverizon.net
(781) 942-9043
rcggry Stapler
GS
N
Member, PBC, TOR
gregory—aWlerpyalwo.mm
(781) 942-9043
Irk McCormick
KM
N
Member, PBC, TDR
klrk.mr<armltk@hotmall.com
(781) 942-9043
arty Ziemlak
NZ
N
Member, PBC-ReCAL, COA, TOR
n121emlak®gmall.com
(781) 942-9043
Mark Dockser
MD
N
Mmber, PBC-ReCAL, Seled Board, TOR
mark.docksermtl.reading.ma.us
(781) 942-9043
IcheN Nazzaro
MN
N
Associate, PBC, TOR
mpnamrolaverizon.net
(781) 942-9043
I Greenberg
AG
❑
Assodate, PBC, TOR
arisgreenberg9gmall.com
(781) 942-9043
Add AlbrlOaaa
IOO*PreaarA
cbmpmw(aaAy
anti
Tai.
Ian Kraunells
MK
❑
Town Manager, TOR
mkraunelisOneadingma.gov
(781) 942-9043
Gyne Wellman
JW
N
Asst. Town Maruger, TOR
jwellmand eadingma.gov
(781) 942-6637
enna Wood
]WD
N
Community Services Director, TOR
jwaodereadingma.gov
(781) 942-6672
oe Huggins
JN
❑
Director o/ Facilities, TON
jhugglnslreadingma.gov
(781) 670-2824
Add Affendaaa
Za/tla/s
PnNNW
Company (/ala)
Email
Tai.
Pape I t pill www.heerv.com
win Cabml
KC
❑
Assistant Director of Facilities, TOR
kczbuzzi@chreatling.ma.us
(781) 942-5492
tk Gabrlello
KG
❑
Director of Operations, TOR
kgabriello@readiryma.gov
(781) 942-6696
Inds Kowaleski
CK
❑
Elder and Human services Administrator
dowalwkl@readingma.gov
(781) 942-6796
arilyn Shaplelgh
MS
0
Reading Council on Aging
shaplaigh.marilyn@gmail.mm
(781) 942-6794
ran Hronwtlka
SH
0
Turner &Townsend Heery, (OPM)
brlan.hromadka@tumtown.cnm
(978) 572-6509
husk Adam
G
❑
Turner & Townsend Heery (OPM)
chudr.adam@tumtown.mm
(978) 500-5435
eter Collins
PC
❑
Turner & Townsend Heery(OPM)
peter.collins@Wmtmm.com
(617)823-3265
el Bergmann
111
0
Bergmann Hendrie + Archetype, Inc.
Jbargmann@bhplus.cum
(617) 350-0450
eremy Tobin
IT
❑
Bergmann Hendrie+Archetype , Inc.Jtobin@bhplus.mm
(617)350-0450
aria Naztaro
CN
®
Chair, Klllam school Building Committee
carla.naaaro@readinq.kl2.ma.us
ob H01mes
BHM
Z
News Editor, RDTC, RCN
Oar. jorstribudo,
lnRNb
PWaent
7RN Rafe
Jagar
Tal.
to assist. JC noted the Importance of considering location
OLD BUSINESS
KW-1eaAtflp,unenr
we DataSfNus
01-06
Open
TTH recommended using the same site evaluation tool that
was put together by BH+A for ReCAL and provided an overview
of how the tool works and how customized input can be
provided in the final section of the tool.
NT commented about weighting each site location within the
evaluation tool. Site locatlons and past survey results related
to location were discussed. MD & JWD provided Insights from
ReCAL's use of the tool, including consideration of location and
Community feedback. NZ provided feedback from COA noting
that Symonds Way appeared to be the preferred site.
PT solicited feedback on the weighting of each evaluation
category. MD recommended looking closer at the operational
costs in the future and perhaps bring on an outside consultant
to assist. JC noted the Importance of considering location
relative to users and the pros and cons of the Pleasant Street
site. Various categories were also discussed Including the
ability for each evaluator to use the 20 discretionary points to
fine tune the survey to their Individual values.
The PBC agreed to increase the weighting of traffic (#3) and
use categories (#9) by 0.5 points and lower the weighting of
operational Costs (#8) and sustainability (#11) by 0.5 points
due to the known information on these categories at this time.
It was agreed that the final selection would be made after Input
from the selection tool was reviewed by the PBC. A vote on the
preferred site is planned for their next meeting.
Meeting #2 update:
www.turneranctownsend.wrn Page 12 M5 www.heerv.com
OLD BUSINESS
-rMn
AWe .
pM WN
SdN
ALL PBC members submitted written feedback on site
evaluations. BH+A compiled and tabulated data. Data was
evaluated with/without category weightings, with/without
removal of individual categories, with/without high/low scores
and with/without subjective weightings. The Symonds Way
location scored highest in all categories, except for the
subjective weightings in which Symonds and Oakland scores
were nearly tied.
After reviewing the data, the PBC discussed the merits of the
sites: PT noted the abutter issue at Oakland Way. JC
commented on how Symonds Way was the perfect site, though
the longer travel distance to Symonds Way might have a
negative Impact on users. PT suggested the PBC refer to the
data collected from the Town relative to location which pointed
to the distance being less of a concern. NZ noted that many
people Initially preferred the Oakland Road location, but when
looking at all the factors chose Symonds Way. GS noted that
the longer distance would likely have a negligible Impact on
access as many people will drive to both sites. MD felt
downtown would be preferable, but as there were no suitable
sites in that area, Symonds Way was the best option. He also
noted that many people travel to other communities to access
similar facilities, and travel arrangements will need to be
looked at going forward to support the community. JC and MO
discussed the future use of the Pleasant Street Center facility.
PT and JC discussed the higher costs for the Pleasant Street
site and Its lack of outdoor recreational space. NT said she
Initially preferred the Oakland site, but when reviewing the
details found the Symonds Way location better including the
notion that Symonds Way would be a recreational hub. JWO
confirmed that Symonds Way is very actively used. JW and
others agreed that users will go to the facilities that have the
desired programs. KM noted that there would likely be abutter
objection at Oakland Road which could derail the project. JWD
confirmed that there was significant objection from residents
in that area including a petition by about 100 residents.
Symonds Way abutters had no objections. GS noted that no
site was perfect, all had merits, but Symonds Way was a good
compromise which was confirmed by the data. MN felt that
Oakland Road has good features, but Symonds Way can be a
good location fora future community and recreation center and
doesn't have some of the challenges that the Oakland Road
location has. MS noted that North Andover relocated Its Center
from the downtown to the outskirts and without any loss o
current users and an increase In additional users.
Transportation methods were addressed as part of that
change. NT made a motion to recommend the Symonds Way
location as the preferred site for the ReCAL facility. KM
Seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
The Select Board will review the site recommendation at their
meeting on 11/19/24.
www-tumerandtownsend.mm Page 13 of 5 www heery com
OLD BUSINESS
•v -aa
ave awe
snag
r
Closed
01-08
WORKING GROUPS
The PBC discussed setting up working groups to help support
Closed
the PBC and bring In other stakeholders to provide input on
Closed
Rale call was taken by PT. Refer to attached Role Call Sheet.
the project. Three maln groups were identified including
02-09
—
communications, sustainability and overall design/use. PBC
Closed
TTH outlined the updated project schedule and the tight time
members will consider potential member selections in
frame for the schematic design which Is determined by the site
preparation for PBC review. Recommendations can be sent to
selection and the April town meeting. Three public forums will
JWD or JW. Further discussion and participant selection will
be scheduled during the schematic design stage for public
be targeted for the next meeting.
Input. While the schematic design timeframe is tight, the
Meeting *2 update:
project team feels like It can be accomplished At the end of this
The PBC reviewed a list of potential working group members
phase the project will have a set cost and overall design.
and dimmed some revisions to the list. The Stakeholder and
Additional design decisions and explorations can be made
Sustainability groups will meet biweekly with the design team
during the next design stage. The PBC will monitor the existing
following the final site selection. The Communications group
timeframe going forward and make adjustments if needed.
will begin with weekly meetings. The PBC discussed the merits
Refer to meeting packet for full schedule.
of how the groups should best be staffed to ensure proper
02-09
—
representation In each group. A decision was made to staff
Closed
7A meeting of the communications working group was
the working groups as follows:
scheduled for 11/20 0 ipm.
• Communications: JW, KG, MD, N2, CK, MK, Josh
Delaune, TTH
• Stakeholder: JWD, NT, MN, MK, MS, Jean Prato, Jim
Sullivan, Anna Asslni, Si TTH
• Sustalnablllty: JH, KC, MK, AG, GS, BH+A, TTH
NEW BUSINESS
rat -a
ar,•o.ee
=
02-01
Closed
The meeting was called to order by PT at 7:30pm
02-02
Closed
Rale call was taken by PT. Refer to attached Role Call Sheet.
02-09
—
Closed
TTH outlined the updated project schedule and the tight time
frame for the schematic design which Is determined by the site
selection and the April town meeting. Three public forums will
be scheduled during the schematic design stage for public
Input. While the schematic design timeframe is tight, the
project team feels like It can be accomplished At the end of this
phase the project will have a set cost and overall design.
Additional design decisions and explorations can be made
during the next design stage. The PBC will monitor the existing
timeframe going forward and make adjustments if needed.
Refer to meeting packet for full schedule.
02-09
—
Closed
7A meeting of the communications working group was
scheduled for 11/20 0 ipm.
www.tumerandtownsend.mm Pape 14 of 5 www.hftrv.com
NFw RUr%TN
nest MeeMp: December 10'^, 6pm, Zoom/In person (Hybrid)
END OF MINUTES.
me em" wmmamea rumor a rownm Re ,S Intem^•tadan of s Cfa W, ane ee M$ rcaanee M,nna Mn meemy. Addldens or m
must ae wemlltee In w dna to Me suMor MMM Mree daps arrec 0; oMe,wlse, Me min.Wa will Rand as wnam.
wwwAumcrandtownsend-00m Page 15 of 5 www heery cam
The Select Board will review the site recommendation at their
meeting on 11/19/24 and potentially vote on the site. TTH will
prepare a presentation for this meeting.
The next PBC meeting will be scheduled for 12/10 @ 6pm.
02-10
PPROVAL OF MINUTES
Closed
A motion to approve the meeting minutes from 11/04/2024
was made by NT and seconded by MD. David Swyter will be
removed from the PBC list. Schematic design will be completed
In early 2025. A detailed list of activities is documented in the
project schedule. A role call vote was taken. The motion passed
unanimously.
02-11
Gosed
A motion to adjourn was made by NT and seconded by MD. A
role call vote was taken. The meeting adjourned at 9:15 pm.
FUTURE AGENDA rrEMS
Vision Statement, Working Group Updates, Public Fomm,
Invoice Approvals
nest MeeMp: December 10'^, 6pm, Zoom/In person (Hybrid)
END OF MINUTES.
me em" wmmamea rumor a rownm Re ,S Intem^•tadan of s Cfa W, ane ee M$ rcaanee M,nna Mn meemy. Addldens or m
must ae wemlltee In w dna to Me suMor MMM Mree daps arrec 0; oMe,wlse, Me min.Wa will Rand as wnam.
wwwAumcrandtownsend-00m Page 15 of 5 www heery cam
Town of Reading
0 Meeting Posting with Agenda
Board -Committee - Commission - Council:
Permanent Building Committee
Date: 2024-11-13 Time: 7:30 PM
Building: Reading Town Hall Location: Berger Room
Address: 16 Lowell Street Agenda:
Purpose; Permanent Building Committee Meeting for ReCAL
Meeting Called By: Genevieve Wood on Behalf of Patrick Tompkins
Notices and agendas are to be posted 48 hours In advance of the meetings excluding
Saturdays, Sundays and Legal Holidays. Please keep In mind the Town Clerk's hours of
operation and make necessary arrangements to be sure your posting Is made in an
adequate amount of time. A listing of topics that the chair reasonably anticipates will be
discussed at the meeting must be on the agenda.
All Meeting Postings must be submktee In typed formai handwritten notices will not be aaepbgd
Topics of Discussion:
• Discuss Cumulative Site Ranking Results
• Discussion and potential vote on recommended site for ReCAL
• Assignment of Working Groups
a Next Steps
• Approval of 11_4_24 meeting minutes
Community Services Department is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting
Join Zoom Meeting
Mal—:1�j4. ,• a :1 • • ...: ac • .... .. a .. l
Meeting ID: 835 5807 1329
Passcode: 455612
One tap mobile
+16465588656„83558071329#,,,'455612# US (New York)
+16465189805„83558071329#,,,'455612# US (New York)
Dial by your location
• +1646 558 8656 US (New York)
• +1646 518 9805 US (New York)
Meeting ID: 835 5807 1329
Passcode: 455612
Find your local number:htfis•7/us06web2oom us7u/kksrMlcwz
ne, Agenda has been prepared In advance and represents a listing or topics that Me chair masonablY antidpates will be discussed
at toe meeting. However the agenda does not neoessadly Include all matters which may be taken up at this meeting.
Page I t
Reading CAL -Site Ranking Results
11/128024
P VStJ enEinA GLWocVepwdSJeankvgbgnertieeaWaff4g anWaWH-1112 W WiM9h Rating Realb 9umeary+iU Chet
Pee
average
Average
Weighted
%of uta
Stare
a..
Stan
Plauanl
area of the site
2.9
4.3
29%
impact on Obscure
4.1
52
41%
Valficcondeions
5.1
8.2
54%
parking quantity
3.1
4.7
31%
location of parking
6.7
6.7
67%
meeandslfloodpleios
8.7
8.7
87%
site construction mat
6.1
92
61%
operational costs
4.3
22
43%
mu8iyen use
4.9
7.3
49%
outdoor activities
1.8
1A
18%
sustainability Impact
4.7
2.3
47%
senior center
3.9
5.8
39%
Total Scan
S7
67
46%
Oakland
area of the site
6.0
9.0
Sox
impact on estimate
4A
6.0
40%
trefecmndPoans
4.8
7.2
46%
pending quantity
72
10.8
72%
location of parking
Bb
6.8
68%
saiandaMmdplains
7.0
7.0
70%
site construction cost
5.3
8.0
53%
operational mars
3.1
3.1
61%
multi -gen use
8.1
122
a1%
outdoor activities
6.0
8.0
60%
sustainability impact
6.0
3.0
80%
senior center
0.3
9.5
83%
Tool Scare
74
Be
61%
Symanda
area of the she
6.4
12.7
84%
impact an abutters
7.6
11.3
76%
tralficmndions
5.9
88
59%
parking quantity
8.7
13.0
87%
location of parking
8.3
0.3
63%
milandsmaodplains
4.1
4.1
41%
site construction coal
6.1
92
81%
operational costs
6.6
3.3
80%
mu¥ use
5.8
8.7
58%
outdoor anti
8.1
&1
81%
surdembilltyimpact
5.8
2.9
58%
senior center
BA
12.0
80%
Tale, Scor,
B7
100
99%
Subjective Scan
Pleasant
10.8
10.6
53%
Oakland
12.4
12.4
62%
Symonds
120
12.0
60%
Final Score - Pleasant
67
7B
47%
Final Scam - Oakland
Be
101
61%
Final Sam -S ands
93
112
60%
11/128024
P VStJ enEinA GLWocVepwdSJeankvgbgnertieeaWaff4g anWaWH-1112 W WiM9h Rating Realb 9umeary+iU Chet
Reading CAL • Site Ranking Analysis
9"J"' cl
P13513 Racing C&Woe.WX1SiU Rentlng Spne*da wMWuIn og RadbIao241112 Redeg alb RK&I Rwdb SUn"MeL CIWe
pbe
summary of scores
pleasant
oakland
symnonds
area of the site
2.89
6.00
8.44
impact on abutters
4.11
4.00
7.56
traffic conditions
5.44
4.78
5.89
parking quantity
3.11
7.22
887
location of parking
6.67
6.78
6.33
wedandaMcodplains
8.67
7.00
4.11
site construction cost
8.11
5.33
8.11
operational costs
4.33
6.11
6.56
mul8-gen use
4.89
8.11
5.78
outdooractivites
1.78
6.00
8.11
sustaineblity impact
4.67
6.00
6.78
senior center
3.89
633
8.00
total
57
74
81
WW
17
8
25
pbc
removing besttworst scores
plmmt
oaNland
s moods
but score removed
48
66
73
spread
18
7
25
worst score removed
55
70
77
spread
15
a
22
tontandworstsomeremoved
46
62
69
spread
15
7
22
ploc
removing one category
pleasant
oakland
systonds
without area of the site
54
68
73
spread
14
5
19
without impact on abuders
52
70
74
spread
17
4
21
without traffic conditions
51
69
75
spread
18
7
24
whiuut parking quantity
53
66
73
*raw
13
6
19
without location of parking
50
67
75
spread
17
8
25
without wetiandsfflcodplains
46
67
77
spread
19
11
29
without site construction cost
50
68
75
spread
18
7
25
without operatocal costs
52
68
75
spread
15
7
23
without mulfi-gen use
52
66
76
spread
14
10
24
without outdoor activities
55
68
73
spread
13
6
18
without sustainability impact
52
68
76
spread
16
6
24
without senior center
53
67
73
spread
15
6
21
9"J"' cl
P13513 Racing C&Woe.WX1SiU Rentlng Spne*da wMWuIn og RadbIao241112 Redeg alb RK&I Rwdb SUn"MeL CIWe
Reading CAL • Site Ranking Comments
1111212024
SUMMARY OF COMMENTS
Reviewer Pleasant Oakland Symonds
Positive. Least travel distance for pabans.
Negative. Wrong location at edge of town,
Negative. During mnetmwtion senior
Near to high school will encourage use by
Furthest fran center of population. Extra
Coote
lamer will be closed or moved
younger people. Good location for town
travel distance will discourage use.Long
temporal
and interest group meetings. Shod
distance for emergency seMces.
distances for emergency services.
Great location but requires change from
Vary flexible but far from the beaten path
hall habitat. Not sure of net am
for everyone except hockey and
Least flexible. Coat to demagah is high.
capability. Space and proximity to schools
potentially future rec areas. Space and
Oockser
Some water Issues. Downward location.
and the Y. The downside is the amount of
full ability to leverage recreation. Lab of
development already there and strong
irfiasbudurereededandcongestionof
neighborhood concern.
construction with killam at the same time.
Adaptive reuse of existing building
(embodied carbon), although this wig
Ovedess with existing lawn
Least restrictive site In terms of
Greenberg
make it more difficult to design energy
resourceslamengies will limit need to
warkstructabilityrOpporthunflity, to createa
efidem. Benefit of reusing adding
addlexpsnd functions in furore
new lawn rec zone
location, proumity to tarn center, goo-
centric
McCormick
Possibility of haluail exisfing space
Better than Pleasant street but still interim
Superior site
Nanaro
No comments
No comments
No comments
Stapler
No comments
No moments
Noammal
am inns
No comments
No comments
No comments
Away from a majority of resitlems with
limited will lots of mosquitoes and
Building IS highly visible aria th canter of
g y
Potential for diseases from peals, rodence,
own. Cldae to Town amenities such as
Next best location with proximity, to
etc. Could benefit from additional site
stores, shopping, restaurants, Tarn
schools, other programs, outdoor shared
development behind Burbank Ice Arena.
Twomeydrug
Hall. Potential mulgyanerational aspect
activities, YMCA.. Multigenerational
No wNkability, limited access for
more easily acassed by teems after
aspects easily aceessed after srll
muligeneationalusewghoul acar,
school.
lAdded congestion and bafic on Hawarbi
Street.
P0513 Peskes,20 111] Rowing Sih Ranking Realts Summarywilm0aft
au -i l -ea msMiner mjm ncrimuns
for Active Living Dare.Tue 11/1124
Public Newsletter #1 (Project Update 14 days
Public Newsletter #2 (Status
3days
Update/Forum Notice)
Thu 11/21/24
Public Forum #1(Site Selection
3 days
Reasons, Conceptual Design)
Wed 12/18/24
Public Newsletter #3 (Status
3days
Update/Forum Notice)
Fri 1/24/25
Public Forum #2(Design Update)
2days
Public Newsletter#4(Status
3days
Update/Forum Notice)
Mon 11/18/24 1
Public Forum #3 (Design ♦ Cost Updal2 days
Public Outreach Period
126 days
spare Town Warrent
4days
wn Election(astimated)
(day
A Town Meeting(estlmatad)
(day
ecial Election (estimated)
1 day
Pre Design PI:
Me U[ Work
Feasibility Study
Final Sire Selection
Mon 11/4/24
Tue 4/8125
Mon 11/4/24
Thu 11/21/24
Wed 11/27/24
Fd 11/29/24
Mon 12/16/24
Wed 12/18/24
Mon 1/6/25
Wed 1/8/25
Thu 1/23/25
Fri 1/24/25
Mon2/10/25:Wed
2/12/25
Fri 2/28/25
Mon 3/3/25
Tue 3/4/25
Tue 4/8/25
Mon 2/24/25
Thu 2/27/25
Tue 4/8/25
Tue 4/8/25
Mon 4/28/25
Mon 4/28/25
Tue 6117/25
Tue 6/17/25
393 days
Tue 12/1/15
Thu 6/1/17
347 days
Mon 11/1/21
Tue 2/20/23
"days
Sun 10/1/23
Mon 12/4/23
140 days
Tue 12/5/23
Mon 6/17/24
So days
Mon 7/1/24
Fri 10/18/24
33 days
Thu 10/3/24
Mon 11/18/24 1
1 day
Thu 10/3/24
Thu 10/3/24 I,
Page 1 of 3
■
2024-11405 Rei L Master PRW Xnaaule
Carter for Actlw Living Date: Tue 11/12/24
Masonic Hall Site Review
1 day
Thu 10/17/24
Thu 10/17/24
Architect Kickoff Meeting
1 day
Thu 10/17/24
Thu 10/17/24
Review of Pas[ Project Materials
10 days
Mon 10/21/24
Fri 1111/24
Owner Update Meeting -COA
1day
Tue 30/22/24
Tue 10/22/24
Exec Comm Planning Mtg 01
Sday
Man 10/28124
Man 10/28/24
Evaluation of Site Options
22 days
Tue 10115/24
Wed 11/13/24
]
Environmental Site Testing
14 days
Tue 10/15124
Fri 11/1/24
Update of Site Selections
10 days
Fri 30/18/24
Thu 10/31/24
PK Mtg 01
1 day
Mon 11/4/24
Man 11/4/24
PBC Makes Final Site Selection
7days
Tue 11/5/24
Wed 11/13/24
i
Town Meeting
I day
Mon 11/11/24
Mon 11/11/24
1 '.
Exec Comm Planning Mtg 02
Sday
Tue 11/12/24
Tue 11/12/24
}
PBC Mtg 02
1day
Wed 11/13/24
Wed 11/13/24
Select Board Approves Site Selection 3days
Thu 11/14/24
14
�r
Town Meeting
1 day
Thu 11/14/24
Thu Thu 11/14/2/14/24
Town Meeting
1 day
Mon 11/18/24
Mon 11/18/24
I'
Schematic Design
71 days
Wed 11/13/24
Thu 2/27/25
Establlsh Design Working Group
5days
Wed 11/13/24
Tue 11/19/24
'CI
Establish 5ustalnabilRy Working Grou S days
Wed 11/13/24
Tue 11/19/24
I I
Draft Project Budget
40 days
Tue 11/19/24
Mon 1/13/25
Schematic Design
58 days
Tue 11/19/24
Thu 2/8/25
— I--
Geotech Site Investigation
12days
Tue 11/19/24
Wed 12/4/24
Design/Sustainability, WG 01
1day
Tue 12/3/24
Tue 12/3/24
Design/Sustainability WG 02
1day
Wed 12/18/24
Wed 12/18/24
Design/Sustainability WG 03
1day
Thu 1/2/25
Thu 1/2/25
Design/Sustainability, WG 04
Sday
Fri 1117/25
Fri V17/25
Page 2 of 3
202411-08RPromSchedule
Gedlnp Carter for Active Living
DaucTuell/IVo
®®
nY namepuaiion
EinbM1
he -25 Fla T3 etr'E3 '/8'23
x4Ataul
Ws
117 SO Design Review 9 days Mon 2/10/25 Thu 2/20/25
ne
SO Cast Estimate
12 days
Fri 2/7/25
Mon 2/24/25
719
Edli
Estimate Peview and Reconation
3 days
Tue 2/25/25
Thu 2/27/25
128
PBC Community Outreach
104 days
Wed 13/13/24
Man 4/7/25
121
BtabPsh Cammu nication Working Gr
S days
Wed 11/13/24
Tue 11/19/24
122
Set Up Project Website
10 days
Wed 11/20/24
Tue 12/3/24
123
Prepare Press Release g2 (Project
5 days
Wed 11/20/24
Tue 11/26/24
Update, Forum Notice)
tN
Prepare Press Release B3 (Project
12 days
Thu 12/19/24
Fri 1/3/25
Update, Forum Notice)
125
Prepare Press Release M4 (Project
10 days
Mon 1/27/25
Fri 2/7/25
Update, Forum Notice)
1n
Engage in Public Outreach
25 days
Tue 3/4/25
Mon 4/7/25
127
Design Development
96 days
Wed4/30/25
Wed 9/10/25
128
Design Development
66 days
Wed 4/30/25
Wed 7/30/25
to
DD Design Review
30 days
Thu 7/31/25
Wed 8/13/25
134
DD Cost Estimate
15 days
Thug/21/25
Wed 9/10/25
131
Site Plan Approvals
40 days
Wed 6/11/25
Tue 9/5/25
132
Contractor
60 days
Thu 9/11/25
Wed 12/3/25
Solicitation/Prequalification
133
Construction Documents
105 days
Thu 9/11/25
Wed 2/4/26
131
Bid & Award
50 days
Thu 2/5/26
Wed 4/15/26
135
Permitting
30days
Thu 4/16/26
Wed 5/27/26
13e
Construction
400 days
Thu 5/28/26
Wed 12/8/27
137
Commissioning
20 days
Thu 12/9/27
Wed 1/5/28
138
Deaver Mow In
10 days
Thu 1/6/28
Wed 1/19/28
739
awe Out
270 days
Thu 1/6/28
Wed 1/17/29
Page 3 of
3