Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-11-13 Permanent Building Committee Minutesr Town of Reading RECEIVED �' Meeting Minutes FO�iPd CLERK Yu �I..Oa�' Board - Committee - Commission - Council: - - - q PN 12: 319 Permanent Building Committee Meeting Date: 2024-11-13 Time: 7:30 PM Building: Reading Town Hall Location: Berger Room Address: 16 Lowell Street Session: Purpose: Permanent Building Committee Version: Final Attendees: Members - Present: please see attached Members - Not Present: please see attached Others Present: please see attached Minutes Respectfully Submitted By: Brian Hromadka from Turner & Townsend Heery Topics of Discussion: Please see attached Page I 1 MEETING MINUTES# 02 TmnOr&Townsend Heery AtMdaas In/tlab uew! I'MROM - " � I" Project: Reading Center for Active Living Project No: TfH# HII-2408100 Meeting No: PBC - ReCAL 02 Locebon: Zoom/Town Hall (Hybrid) Date: 2024-11-13 0 7:30PM Recorded By: B. Hromadka Purpose: Reading Center for Active Living Pile: 1809300 - A02-00 Attachments: Role Call Sheet. Meeting Packet AbbrevlLbons: BH+A - Bergmann Hendrie + Archetype, Inc. N COA - Council on Aging gregory—aWlerpyalwo.mm OPM - Owner's Project Manager Irk McCormick PBC - Permanent Building Committee N ReCAL - Reading Center for Active Learning klrk.mr<armltk@hotmall.com RDTC - Reading Dally Times Chronicle arty Ziemlak RCN - Reading Community Television N SBC - Killam School Building Committee n121emlak®gmall.com SO - Schematic Design Mark Dockser TOR - Town of Reading N TTH - Turner & Townsend Heery MEETING MINUTES# 02 TmnOr&Townsend Heery AtMdaas In/tlab Present I'MROM Email I" Detrick Tompkins PT N Chair, PBC, TOR ptompkins0daconstruceon.com (781) 942-9043 ancy Twomey NT N Vice Chair, PBC, TOR nj2meilcomcast.net (781) 942-9043 ohn Coote JC ® Member, PBC, TOR jas.woteGverizon.net (781) 942-9043 rcggry Stapler GS N Member, PBC, TOR gregory—aWlerpyalwo.mm (781) 942-9043 Irk McCormick KM N Member, PBC, TDR klrk.mr<armltk@hotmall.com (781) 942-9043 arty Ziemlak NZ N Member, PBC-ReCAL, COA, TOR n121emlak®gmall.com (781) 942-9043 Mark Dockser MD N Mmber, PBC-ReCAL, Seled Board, TOR mark.docksermtl.reading.ma.us (781) 942-9043 IcheN Nazzaro MN N Associate, PBC, TOR mpnamrolaverizon.net (781) 942-9043 I Greenberg AG ❑ Assodate, PBC, TOR arisgreenberg9gmall.com (781) 942-9043 Add AlbrlOaaa IOO*PreaarA cbmpmw(aaAy anti Tai. Ian Kraunells MK ❑ Town Manager, TOR mkraunelisOneadingma.gov (781) 942-9043 Gyne Wellman JW N Asst. Town Maruger, TOR jwellmand eadingma.gov (781) 942-6637 enna Wood ]WD N Community Services Director, TOR jwaodereadingma.gov (781) 942-6672 oe Huggins JN ❑ Director o/ Facilities, TON jhugglnslreadingma.gov (781) 670-2824 Add Affendaaa Za/tla/s PnNNW Company (/ala) Email Tai. Pape I t pill www.heerv.com win Cabml KC ❑ Assistant Director of Facilities, TOR kczbuzzi@chreatling.ma.us (781) 942-5492 tk Gabrlello KG ❑ Director of Operations, TOR kgabriello@readiryma.gov (781) 942-6696 Inds Kowaleski CK ❑ Elder and Human services Administrator dowalwkl@readingma.gov (781) 942-6796 arilyn Shaplelgh MS 0 Reading Council on Aging shaplaigh.marilyn@gmail.mm (781) 942-6794 ran Hronwtlka SH 0 Turner &Townsend Heery, (OPM) brlan.hromadka@tumtown.cnm (978) 572-6509 husk Adam G ❑ Turner & Townsend Heery (OPM) chudr.adam@tumtown.mm (978) 500-5435 eter Collins PC ❑ Turner & Townsend Heery(OPM) peter.collins@Wmtmm.com (617)823-3265 el Bergmann 111 0 Bergmann Hendrie + Archetype, Inc. Jbargmann@bhplus.cum (617) 350-0450 eremy Tobin IT ❑ Bergmann Hendrie+Archetype , Inc.Jtobin@bhplus.mm (617)350-0450 aria Naztaro CN ® Chair, Klllam school Building Committee carla.naaaro@readinq.kl2.ma.us ob H01mes BHM Z News Editor, RDTC, RCN Oar. jorstribudo, lnRNb PWaent 7RN Rafe Jagar Tal. to assist. JC noted the Importance of considering location OLD BUSINESS KW-1eaAtflp,unenr we DataSfNus 01-06 Open TTH recommended using the same site evaluation tool that was put together by BH+A for ReCAL and provided an overview of how the tool works and how customized input can be provided in the final section of the tool. NT commented about weighting each site location within the evaluation tool. Site locatlons and past survey results related to location were discussed. MD & JWD provided Insights from ReCAL's use of the tool, including consideration of location and Community feedback. NZ provided feedback from COA noting that Symonds Way appeared to be the preferred site. PT solicited feedback on the weighting of each evaluation category. MD recommended looking closer at the operational costs in the future and perhaps bring on an outside consultant to assist. JC noted the Importance of considering location relative to users and the pros and cons of the Pleasant Street site. Various categories were also discussed Including the ability for each evaluator to use the 20 discretionary points to fine tune the survey to their Individual values. The PBC agreed to increase the weighting of traffic (#3) and use categories (#9) by 0.5 points and lower the weighting of operational Costs (#8) and sustainability (#11) by 0.5 points due to the known information on these categories at this time. It was agreed that the final selection would be made after Input from the selection tool was reviewed by the PBC. A vote on the preferred site is planned for their next meeting. Meeting #2 update: www.turneranctownsend.wrn Page 12 M5 www.heerv.com OLD BUSINESS -rMn AWe . pM WN SdN ALL PBC members submitted written feedback on site evaluations. BH+A compiled and tabulated data. Data was evaluated with/without category weightings, with/without removal of individual categories, with/without high/low scores and with/without subjective weightings. The Symonds Way location scored highest in all categories, except for the subjective weightings in which Symonds and Oakland scores were nearly tied. After reviewing the data, the PBC discussed the merits of the sites: PT noted the abutter issue at Oakland Way. JC commented on how Symonds Way was the perfect site, though the longer travel distance to Symonds Way might have a negative Impact on users. PT suggested the PBC refer to the data collected from the Town relative to location which pointed to the distance being less of a concern. NZ noted that many people Initially preferred the Oakland Road location, but when looking at all the factors chose Symonds Way. GS noted that the longer distance would likely have a negligible Impact on access as many people will drive to both sites. MD felt downtown would be preferable, but as there were no suitable sites in that area, Symonds Way was the best option. He also noted that many people travel to other communities to access similar facilities, and travel arrangements will need to be looked at going forward to support the community. JC and MO discussed the future use of the Pleasant Street Center facility. PT and JC discussed the higher costs for the Pleasant Street site and Its lack of outdoor recreational space. NT said she Initially preferred the Oakland site, but when reviewing the details found the Symonds Way location better including the notion that Symonds Way would be a recreational hub. JWO confirmed that Symonds Way is very actively used. JW and others agreed that users will go to the facilities that have the desired programs. KM noted that there would likely be abutter objection at Oakland Road which could derail the project. JWD confirmed that there was significant objection from residents in that area including a petition by about 100 residents. Symonds Way abutters had no objections. GS noted that no site was perfect, all had merits, but Symonds Way was a good compromise which was confirmed by the data. MN felt that Oakland Road has good features, but Symonds Way can be a good location fora future community and recreation center and doesn't have some of the challenges that the Oakland Road location has. MS noted that North Andover relocated Its Center from the downtown to the outskirts and without any loss o current users and an increase In additional users. Transportation methods were addressed as part of that change. NT made a motion to recommend the Symonds Way location as the preferred site for the ReCAL facility. KM Seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. The Select Board will review the site recommendation at their meeting on 11/19/24. www-tumerandtownsend.mm Page 13 of 5 www heery com OLD BUSINESS •v -aa ave awe snag r Closed 01-08 WORKING GROUPS The PBC discussed setting up working groups to help support Closed the PBC and bring In other stakeholders to provide input on Closed Rale call was taken by PT. Refer to attached Role Call Sheet. the project. Three maln groups were identified including 02-09 — communications, sustainability and overall design/use. PBC Closed TTH outlined the updated project schedule and the tight time members will consider potential member selections in frame for the schematic design which Is determined by the site preparation for PBC review. Recommendations can be sent to selection and the April town meeting. Three public forums will JWD or JW. Further discussion and participant selection will be scheduled during the schematic design stage for public be targeted for the next meeting. Input. While the schematic design timeframe is tight, the Meeting *2 update: project team feels like It can be accomplished At the end of this The PBC reviewed a list of potential working group members phase the project will have a set cost and overall design. and dimmed some revisions to the list. The Stakeholder and Additional design decisions and explorations can be made Sustainability groups will meet biweekly with the design team during the next design stage. The PBC will monitor the existing following the final site selection. The Communications group timeframe going forward and make adjustments if needed. will begin with weekly meetings. The PBC discussed the merits Refer to meeting packet for full schedule. of how the groups should best be staffed to ensure proper 02-09 — representation In each group. A decision was made to staff Closed 7A meeting of the communications working group was the working groups as follows: scheduled for 11/20 0 ipm. • Communications: JW, KG, MD, N2, CK, MK, Josh Delaune, TTH • Stakeholder: JWD, NT, MN, MK, MS, Jean Prato, Jim Sullivan, Anna Asslni, Si TTH • Sustalnablllty: JH, KC, MK, AG, GS, BH+A, TTH NEW BUSINESS rat -a ar,•o.ee = 02-01 Closed The meeting was called to order by PT at 7:30pm 02-02 Closed Rale call was taken by PT. Refer to attached Role Call Sheet. 02-09 — Closed TTH outlined the updated project schedule and the tight time frame for the schematic design which Is determined by the site selection and the April town meeting. Three public forums will be scheduled during the schematic design stage for public Input. While the schematic design timeframe is tight, the project team feels like It can be accomplished At the end of this phase the project will have a set cost and overall design. Additional design decisions and explorations can be made during the next design stage. The PBC will monitor the existing timeframe going forward and make adjustments if needed. Refer to meeting packet for full schedule. 02-09 — Closed 7A meeting of the communications working group was scheduled for 11/20 0 ipm. www.tumerandtownsend.mm Pape 14 of 5 www.hftrv.com NFw RUr%TN nest MeeMp: December 10'^, 6pm, Zoom/In person (Hybrid) END OF MINUTES. me em" wmmamea rumor a rownm Re ,S Intem^•tadan of s Cfa W, ane ee M$ rcaanee M,nna Mn meemy. Addldens or m must ae wemlltee In w dna to Me suMor MMM Mree daps arrec 0; oMe,wlse, Me min.Wa will Rand as wnam. wwwAumcrandtownsend-00m Page 15 of 5 www heery cam The Select Board will review the site recommendation at their meeting on 11/19/24 and potentially vote on the site. TTH will prepare a presentation for this meeting. The next PBC meeting will be scheduled for 12/10 @ 6pm. 02-10 PPROVAL OF MINUTES Closed A motion to approve the meeting minutes from 11/04/2024 was made by NT and seconded by MD. David Swyter will be removed from the PBC list. Schematic design will be completed In early 2025. A detailed list of activities is documented in the project schedule. A role call vote was taken. The motion passed unanimously. 02-11 Gosed A motion to adjourn was made by NT and seconded by MD. A role call vote was taken. The meeting adjourned at 9:15 pm. FUTURE AGENDA rrEMS Vision Statement, Working Group Updates, Public Fomm, Invoice Approvals nest MeeMp: December 10'^, 6pm, Zoom/In person (Hybrid) END OF MINUTES. me em" wmmamea rumor a rownm Re ,S Intem^•tadan of s Cfa W, ane ee M$ rcaanee M,nna Mn meemy. Addldens or m must ae wemlltee In w dna to Me suMor MMM Mree daps arrec 0; oMe,wlse, Me min.Wa will Rand as wnam. wwwAumcrandtownsend-00m Page 15 of 5 www heery cam Town of Reading 0 Meeting Posting with Agenda Board -Committee - Commission - Council: Permanent Building Committee Date: 2024-11-13 Time: 7:30 PM Building: Reading Town Hall Location: Berger Room Address: 16 Lowell Street Agenda: Purpose; Permanent Building Committee Meeting for ReCAL Meeting Called By: Genevieve Wood on Behalf of Patrick Tompkins Notices and agendas are to be posted 48 hours In advance of the meetings excluding Saturdays, Sundays and Legal Holidays. Please keep In mind the Town Clerk's hours of operation and make necessary arrangements to be sure your posting Is made in an adequate amount of time. A listing of topics that the chair reasonably anticipates will be discussed at the meeting must be on the agenda. All Meeting Postings must be submktee In typed formai handwritten notices will not be aaepbgd Topics of Discussion: • Discuss Cumulative Site Ranking Results • Discussion and potential vote on recommended site for ReCAL • Assignment of Working Groups a Next Steps • Approval of 11_4_24 meeting minutes Community Services Department is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting Join Zoom Meeting Mal—:1�j4. ,• a :1 • • ...: ac • .... .. a .. l Meeting ID: 835 5807 1329 Passcode: 455612 One tap mobile +16465588656„83558071329#,,,'455612# US (New York) +16465189805„83558071329#,,,'455612# US (New York) Dial by your location • +1646 558 8656 US (New York) • +1646 518 9805 US (New York) Meeting ID: 835 5807 1329 Passcode: 455612 Find your local number:htfis•7/us06web2oom us7u/kksrMlcwz ne, Agenda has been prepared In advance and represents a listing or topics that Me chair masonablY antidpates will be discussed at toe meeting. However the agenda does not neoessadly Include all matters which may be taken up at this meeting. Page I t Reading CAL -Site Ranking Results 11/128024 P VStJ enEinA GLWocVepwdSJeankvgbgnertieeaWaff4g anWaWH-1112 W WiM9h Rating Realb 9umeary+iU Chet Pee average Average Weighted %of uta Stare a.. Stan Plauanl area of the site 2.9 4.3 29% impact on Obscure 4.1 52 41% Valficcondeions 5.1 8.2 54% parking quantity 3.1 4.7 31% location of parking 6.7 6.7 67% meeandslfloodpleios 8.7 8.7 87% site construction mat 6.1 92 61% operational costs 4.3 22 43% mu8iyen use 4.9 7.3 49% outdoor activities 1.8 1A 18% sustainability Impact 4.7 2.3 47% senior center 3.9 5.8 39% Total Scan S7 67 46% Oakland area of the site 6.0 9.0 Sox impact on estimate 4A 6.0 40% trefecmndPoans 4.8 7.2 46% pending quantity 72 10.8 72% location of parking Bb 6.8 68% saiandaMmdplains 7.0 7.0 70% site construction cost 5.3 8.0 53% operational mars 3.1 3.1 61% multi -gen use 8.1 122 a1% outdoor activities 6.0 8.0 60% sustainability impact 6.0 3.0 80% senior center 0.3 9.5 83% Tool Scare 74 Be 61% Symanda area of the she 6.4 12.7 84% impact an abutters 7.6 11.3 76% tralficmndions 5.9 88 59% parking quantity 8.7 13.0 87% location of parking 8.3 0.3 63% milandsmaodplains 4.1 4.1 41% site construction coal 6.1 92 81% operational costs 6.6 3.3 80% mu&yen use 5.8 8.7 58% outdoor anti 8.1 &1 81% surdembilltyimpact 5.8 2.9 58% senior center BA 12.0 80% Tale, Scor, B7 100 99% Subjective Scan Pleasant 10.8 10.6 53% Oakland 12.4 12.4 62% Symonds 120 12.0 60% Final Score - Pleasant 67 7B 47% Final Scam - Oakland Be 101 61% Final Sam -S ands 93 112 60% 11/128024 P VStJ enEinA GLWocVepwdSJeankvgbgnertieeaWaff4g anWaWH-1112 W WiM9h Rating Realb 9umeary+iU Chet Reading CAL • Site Ranking Analysis 9"J"' cl P13513 Racing C&Woe.WX1SiU Rentlng Spne*da wMWuIn og RadbIao241112 Redeg alb RK&I Rwdb SUn"MeL CIWe pbe summary of scores pleasant oakland symnonds area of the site 2.89 6.00 8.44 impact on abutters 4.11 4.00 7.56 traffic conditions 5.44 4.78 5.89 parking quantity 3.11 7.22 887 location of parking 6.67 6.78 6.33 wedandaMcodplains 8.67 7.00 4.11 site construction cost 8.11 5.33 8.11 operational costs 4.33 6.11 6.56 mul8-gen use 4.89 8.11 5.78 outdooractivites 1.78 6.00 8.11 sustaineblity impact 4.67 6.00 6.78 senior center 3.89 633 8.00 total 57 74 81 WW 17 8 25 pbc removing besttworst scores plmmt oaNland s moods but score removed 48 66 73 spread 18 7 25 worst score removed 55 70 77 spread 15 a 22 tontandworstsomeremoved 46 62 69 spread 15 7 22 ploc removing one category pleasant oakland systonds without area of the site 54 68 73 spread 14 5 19 without impact on abuders 52 70 74 spread 17 4 21 without traffic conditions 51 69 75 spread 18 7 24 whiuut parking quantity 53 66 73 *raw 13 6 19 without location of parking 50 67 75 spread 17 8 25 without wetiandsfflcodplains 46 67 77 spread 19 11 29 without site construction cost 50 68 75 spread 18 7 25 without operatocal costs 52 68 75 spread 15 7 23 without mulfi-gen use 52 66 76 spread 14 10 24 without outdoor activities 55 68 73 spread 13 6 18 without sustainability impact 52 68 76 spread 16 6 24 without senior center 53 67 73 spread 15 6 21 9"J"' cl P13513 Racing C&Woe.WX1SiU Rentlng Spne*da wMWuIn og RadbIao241112 Redeg alb RK&I Rwdb SUn"MeL CIWe Reading CAL • Site Ranking Comments 1111212024 SUMMARY OF COMMENTS Reviewer Pleasant Oakland Symonds Positive. Least travel distance for pabans. Negative. Wrong location at edge of town, Negative. During mnetmwtion senior Near to high school will encourage use by Furthest fran center of population. Extra Coote lamer will be closed or moved younger people. Good location for town travel distance will discourage use.Long temporal and interest group meetings. Shod distance for emergency seMces. distances for emergency services. Great location but requires change from Vary flexible but far from the beaten path hall habitat. Not sure of net am for everyone except hockey and Least flexible. Coat to demagah is high. capability. Space and proximity to schools potentially future rec areas. Space and Oockser Some water Issues. Downward location. and the Y. The downside is the amount of full ability to leverage recreation. Lab of development already there and strong irfiasbudurereededandcongestionof neighborhood concern. construction with killam at the same time. Adaptive reuse of existing building (embodied carbon), although this wig Ovedess with existing lawn Least restrictive site In terms of Greenberg make it more difficult to design energy resourceslamengies will limit need to warkstructabilityrOpporthunflity, to createa efidem. Benefit of reusing adding addlexpsnd functions in furore new lawn rec zone location, proumity to tarn center, goo- centric McCormick Possibility of haluail exisfing space Better than Pleasant street but still interim Superior site Nanaro No comments No comments No comments Stapler No comments No moments Noammal am inns No comments No comments No comments Away from a majority of resitlems with limited will lots of mosquitoes and Building IS highly visible aria th canter of g y Potential for diseases from peals, rodence, own. Cldae to Town amenities such as Next best location with proximity, to etc. Could benefit from additional site stores, shopping, restaurants, Tarn schools, other programs, outdoor shared development behind Burbank Ice Arena. Twomeydrug Hall. Potential mulgyanerational aspect activities, YMCA.. Multigenerational No wNkability, limited access for more easily acassed by teems after aspects easily aceessed after srll muligeneationalusewghoul acar, school. lAdded congestion and bafic on Hawarbi Street. P0513 Peskes,20 111] Rowing Sih Ranking Realts Summarywilm0aft au -i l -ea msMiner mjm ncrimuns for Active Living Dare.Tue 11/1124 Public Newsletter #1 (Project Update 14 days Public Newsletter #2 (Status 3days Update/Forum Notice) Thu 11/21/24 Public Forum #1(Site Selection 3 days Reasons, Conceptual Design) Wed 12/18/24 Public Newsletter #3 (Status 3days Update/Forum Notice) Fri 1/24/25 Public Forum #2(Design Update) 2days Public Newsletter#4(Status 3days Update/Forum Notice) Mon 11/18/24 1 Public Forum #3 (Design ♦ Cost Updal2 days Public Outreach Period 126 days spare Town Warrent 4days wn Election(astimated) (day A Town Meeting(estlmatad) (day ecial Election (estimated) 1 day Pre Design PI: Me U[ Work Feasibility Study Final Sire Selection Mon 11/4/24 Tue 4/8125 Mon 11/4/24 Thu 11/21/24 Wed 11/27/24 Fd 11/29/24 Mon 12/16/24 Wed 12/18/24 Mon 1/6/25 Wed 1/8/25 Thu 1/23/25 Fri 1/24/25 Mon2/10/25:Wed 2/12/25 Fri 2/28/25 Mon 3/3/25 Tue 3/4/25 Tue 4/8/25 Mon 2/24/25 Thu 2/27/25 Tue 4/8/25 Tue 4/8/25 Mon 4/28/25 Mon 4/28/25 Tue 6117/25 Tue 6/17/25 393 days Tue 12/1/15 Thu 6/1/17 347 days Mon 11/1/21 Tue 2/20/23 "days Sun 10/1/23 Mon 12/4/23 140 days Tue 12/5/23 Mon 6/17/24 So days Mon 7/1/24 Fri 10/18/24 33 days Thu 10/3/24 Mon 11/18/24 1 1 day Thu 10/3/24 Thu 10/3/24 I, Page 1 of 3 ■ 2024-11405 Rei L Master PRW Xnaaule Carter for Actlw Living Date: Tue 11/12/24 Masonic Hall Site Review 1 day Thu 10/17/24 Thu 10/17/24 Architect Kickoff Meeting 1 day Thu 10/17/24 Thu 10/17/24 Review of Pas[ Project Materials 10 days Mon 10/21/24 Fri 1111/24 Owner Update Meeting -COA 1day Tue 30/22/24 Tue 10/22/24 Exec Comm Planning Mtg 01 Sday Man 10/28124 Man 10/28/24 Evaluation of Site Options 22 days Tue 10115/24 Wed 11/13/24 ] Environmental Site Testing 14 days Tue 10/15124 Fri 11/1/24 Update of Site Selections 10 days Fri 30/18/24 Thu 10/31/24 PK Mtg 01 1 day Mon 11/4/24 Man 11/4/24 PBC Makes Final Site Selection 7days Tue 11/5/24 Wed 11/13/24 i Town Meeting I day Mon 11/11/24 Mon 11/11/24 1 '. Exec Comm Planning Mtg 02 Sday Tue 11/12/24 Tue 11/12/24 } PBC Mtg 02 1day Wed 11/13/24 Wed 11/13/24 Select Board Approves Site Selection 3days Thu 11/14/24 14 �r Town Meeting 1 day Thu 11/14/24 Thu Thu 11/14/2/14/24 Town Meeting 1 day Mon 11/18/24 Mon 11/18/24 I' Schematic Design 71 days Wed 11/13/24 Thu 2/27/25 Establlsh Design Working Group 5days Wed 11/13/24 Tue 11/19/24 'CI Establish 5ustalnabilRy Working Grou S days Wed 11/13/24 Tue 11/19/24 I I Draft Project Budget 40 days Tue 11/19/24 Mon 1/13/25 Schematic Design 58 days Tue 11/19/24 Thu 2/8/25 — I-- Geotech Site Investigation 12days Tue 11/19/24 Wed 12/4/24 Design/Sustainability, WG 01 1day Tue 12/3/24 Tue 12/3/24 Design/Sustainability WG 02 1day Wed 12/18/24 Wed 12/18/24 Design/Sustainability WG 03 1day Thu 1/2/25 Thu 1/2/25 Design/Sustainability, WG 04 Sday Fri 1117/25 Fri V17/25 Page 2 of 3 202411-08RPromSchedule Gedlnp Carter for Active Living DaucTuell/IVo ®® nY namepuaiion EinbM1 he -25 Fla T3 etr'E3 '/8'23 x4Ataul Ws 117 SO Design Review 9 days Mon 2/10/25 Thu 2/20/25 ne SO Cast Estimate 12 days Fri 2/7/25 Mon 2/24/25 719 Edli Estimate Peview and Reconation 3 days Tue 2/25/25 Thu 2/27/25 128 PBC Community Outreach 104 days Wed 13/13/24 Man 4/7/25 121 BtabPsh Cammu nication Working Gr S days Wed 11/13/24 Tue 11/19/24 122 Set Up Project Website 10 days Wed 11/20/24 Tue 12/3/24 123 Prepare Press Release g2 (Project 5 days Wed 11/20/24 Tue 11/26/24 Update, Forum Notice) tN Prepare Press Release B3 (Project 12 days Thu 12/19/24 Fri 1/3/25 Update, Forum Notice) 125 Prepare Press Release M4 (Project 10 days Mon 1/27/25 Fri 2/7/25 Update, Forum Notice) 1n Engage in Public Outreach 25 days Tue 3/4/25 Mon 4/7/25 127 Design Development 96 days Wed4/30/25 Wed 9/10/25 128 Design Development 66 days Wed 4/30/25 Wed 7/30/25 to DD Design Review 30 days Thu 7/31/25 Wed 8/13/25 134 DD Cost Estimate 15 days Thug/21/25 Wed 9/10/25 131 Site Plan Approvals 40 days Wed 6/11/25 Tue 9/5/25 132 Contractor 60 days Thu 9/11/25 Wed 12/3/25 Solicitation/Prequalification 133 Construction Documents 105 days Thu 9/11/25 Wed 2/4/26 131 Bid & Award 50 days Thu 2/5/26 Wed 4/15/26 135 Permitting 30days Thu 4/16/26 Wed 5/27/26 13e Construction 400 days Thu 5/28/26 Wed 12/8/27 137 Commissioning 20 days Thu 12/9/27 Wed 1/5/28 138 Deaver Mow In 10 days Thu 1/6/28 Wed 1/19/28 739 awe Out 270 days Thu 1/6/28 Wed 1/17/29 Page 3 of 3