HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-11-06 Recreation Committee MinutesOrgrg0
OAF
Town of Reading
EC;Eo"tic-
LMeeting
MeetingMinutes
� CLERK
�a'INCOPNOPP
`�>�
Vr
Board - committee - Commission - Council:
ie?3 CEC ?S
Recreation Committee
Date: 2023-11-06
Time: 6:30 PM
Building: Reading Town Hall
Location: Great Room
Address: 49 Pleasant Street
Session:
Purpose: General Monthly Meeting
Version: Final
Attendees: Members - Present:
Michael Coltman (M), Bob Weiden (M), Melissa Pucci (M), Angela Binda(M),
Chuck Robinson (M), Rich Hand (M), Kate Kaminer (M), Eric Gaffen (M),
Peter Lydecker (M), Eric Boemer (A)
Members - Not Present:
Kevin Leete(A), Ben Ream (A)
Others Present:
Jim Sullivan - Recreation Administrator
Chuck Tirone- Conservation Administrator
Genevieve Fiorente - Community Services Director
Carlo Bacci - Select Board Liaison
Virginia Blodgett, 99 Prescott St, Reading
Everett Blodgett, 99 Prescott St, Reading
Steven Cool- 107 Prospect St, Reading
Mary Ann Devlin, 44 Estate Ln, Reading
Barbara Sinisgalli - 54 Haystack Rd, Reading
Judy Coltman - 18 Milton Rd, Reading
Chris Giuliana - 52 Intervale Terrace, Reading
Karen Janowski - 30 Azalea Circle, Reading
Tracy Fitzgerald - 43 Scotland Rd, Reading
Jim Cormier- 14 Willard Rd, Reading
Bob Kaminer- 37 Warren Ave, Reading
Chuck Webberly - Reading Youth Lacrosse President
Donna Sullivan - Abutter of Washington Park
Minutes Respectfully Submitted By: Genevieve Fiorente, Community Services Director
Topics of Discussion:
AGENDA
6:30pm - 7:00pm
Dog Park Discussion with Washington Park Abutters
7:OOpm — 7:30pm
Discuss Pickleball Citizens Petition Article to Town Meeting— Presentation by Reading Pickleball Players
Association (RPPA)
7:30pm — 7:45pm
Update and Discussion of Play Local and Playtime Scheduler for Pickleball reservations
7:45 pm -8:15 pm
Update on Phase II and III of Birch Meadow Master Plan
Page I 1
8:15pm-8:20pm
Veteran's Day -Request for amplified sound -Vote Needed
8:20pm - 8:30pm
Recreation Administrator Report
A.Binda calls the meeting to order at 6:32pm. A. Binda announces that the chair will be coming
shortly. A. Binda introduces S. Cool to give the Dog Park Presentation.
S. Cool gives the Presentation on the Dog Park highlighting two locations for the dog park of
Washington Park and Symonds Way.
V. Blodgett states that she is a member of Parker Tavern and wants to clarify the current
situation. She states that Parker Tavern has been there since 1964 and that the leash law is not
enforced. She adds that dogs run all through the property and gardens and some dog owners
do not pick up dog waste.
G. Fiorente answers that leash laws are under the police jurisdiction and she believes that
Health also has some oversight now. She says that if any off -leash activity is occurring that the
police should be called. She also says that the Recreation Committee can definitely have a
conversation about it and give their recommendations.
D. Sullivan states she is concerned with the entrance to the park being changed and how it
would impact the existing historical monuments.
E. Blodgett says that he is the caretaker and treasurer of Parker Tavern and how they plan to
expand into an outside learning area. He states he is concerned about dog enforcement.
S. Cool states that generally when there is a dog park that owners are good at disposing waste.
He says that the major problem is the people, not the dogs.
B. Kaminer is concerned that the dog park is trying to be put into a tight space. He says that
having it next to the playground is not ideal. He adds that he notices people do pick up after
their dogs.
S. Cool says how there could be a higher privacy fence or double fence. He mentions that dog
parks are not noisy places.
M. Coltman states that the gateway to the park provides nice benches with seating and that the
half -court basketball court is used for parents to park strollers. He says that he thinks it would be
the worst location for a dog park.
C. Robinson asks why there needs to be 2 locations for the grant.
S. Cool answers that only one is required.and he spoke with the grantor about the situation in
Reading and that they mentioned 2 locations is reasonable because you get the $25,000 for
design and they give you feedback.
G. Fiorente states that she heard that the Stanton Foundation may not be giving out grants
anymore after December. S. Cool answers that is right.
C. Tirone specifies why two areas are identified as one area may be too wet. He says both
could fall through. He goes on to say that Stanton looks at both areas in the process.
C. Robinson asks N it is a grant mandate to have two
C. Tirone and S. Cool both indicate no.
Page 1 2
A.Binda says that there is a historical wall at Washington. She states that while the idea didn't
seem bad, she has to agree that seeing the dog park instead of the actual open entrance to the
park would not be great. A. Binda asks if the dog park could be smaller and if there is any
flexibility?
S. Cool states that a small dog park could be moved to the other side of the basketball court.
A.Binda says that she has been to dog parks and it is quieter and more controlled than some
may think. A.Binda goes on to say she doesn't object out of hand but she is not a fan of the dog
park right at the main entrance.
M. Coltman asks why not at the Town Forest?
S. Cool states that there are no sidewalks, there are coyotes and the area is remote.
M. Coltman asks if the town is developing lot 5.
S. Cool answers yes.
R. Hand asks if they are taking a basketball court away at Washington Park. S. Cool answers it
is just the half court.
E. Boemer says that there seems to be a chase for money without a formal plan.
S. Cool states that F. Maltez applied for this grant and built the Chelsea dog park with the same
process. He also mentions that M. Wetzel did the same.
B. Weiden asks if this is something the Select Board wants to pursue.
S. Cool replies yes.
C. Bacci states that the Select Board supports a dog park as long as it is the right location and
has support from neighbors. He says that S. Cool came to the Select Board and that no formal
consideration was made at that time.
K. Kaminer says that she supports the effort to build a dog park in Reading but not at
Washington Park for the following reasons:
- dog park is a smaller area in comparison to other towns
- dog park is too close to the children's playground
- parking issues
S. Cool states that dog park participation is scattered and that he hasn't seen a parking pinch at
other locations he has visited.
C. Robinson says that he has coached baseball for several years and can attest to the lack of
parking.
G. Fiorente says that the consensus seems to be that Washington Park isn't the best for the dog
park and asks S. Cool if he can just focus on Symonds Way?
C. Robinson adds that he does not think the Town Forest location has been vetted enough.
A.Binda says that there seems to be a general consensus that is in support of a dog park but
not at Washington Park and she hopes it moves forward with the right location.
Page 1 3
M. Devlin presents the Reading Pickleball Players Association (RPPA) petition to Town Meeting
in which they are asking the town for $200,000 to come out of the Burbank Ice Arena Revolving
Fund.
Conversation ensues about the $100,000 anonymous donation mentioned in the presentation.
K. Kaminer asks since the $100,000 donation is coming in, can you raise the remaining
$100,000?
M. Devlin states that they need the location to fundraise more.
K. Kaminer asks what is more difficult? Do we need the location or the money?
E. Gaffen says that the $100,000 donation sounds promising but we do not know details. He
says that organizations typically come forward with donations to the Recreation Committee and
there is a process that follows.
M. Devlin states that she thinks this is solid.
C. Robinson asks is this $100,000 going toward temporary courts or permanent courts because
the understanding is that the discussion right now is for temporary courts.
M. Coltman states that he doubts the anonymous donor would fund temporary courts.
K. Janowski states she is a member of SWEC and COA and mentions that pickleball is an
important opportunity to reach all citizens especially those who are 60+.
C. Webberly introduces himself as the President of Youth Lacrosse and says that he thinks that
Symonds Way is a good site for pickleball. He adds that he is very opposed to the fact that
certain groups were encouraged to leap frog the process of SWEC. He goes on to say that the
area would be losing a great amount of parking with temporary courts. He also states that
Burbank sits on town owned land and anything built in that area would need to be bid out.
E. Gaffen says that one question would be who would update the courts. He states that it
sounds like the town would. He adds that this would need to follow process through town
procurement. E. Gaffen asks N the town had a sense of what they are ready to bid out?
A. Binda says that she has seen the presentation by RPPA and it has changed several times.
She states that FINCOM voted 3-6 against the courts because of the lack of process. She
states that as a Recreation Committee member and Town Meeting member she is upset to hear
of all the competing interests that have not been addressed.
E. Boemer states that when passion gets in the way of decision making and process than there
is a problem. He says that he would not vote for it.
B. Walden states that this is a town meeting decision and makes a motion to end the
discussion. K. Kaminer seconds.
Short discussion occurs.
E. Geffen says that he would like to give everyone the opportunity to keep talking and would
hate to end the conversation.
B. Weiden rescinds motion.
Page 14
T. Fitzgerald says that pickleball is a wonderful outlet but states that there is a large need for
fields in this town.
C. Webberly says that he agrees and that there needs to be a comprehensive look at the site.
He states that organizations cannot get on the fields until late at night after the High School and
in the fall, there is a loss of daylight.
C. Bacci states that the ice arena would not be in favor of a field where the temporary pickleball
courts are being proposed.
C. Webberly answers that a small field could go in that area that would benefit several
organizations. He states that Burbank Ice Arena is violating the term of their lease and that they
cannot sublet it. He goes on to say that we do not know what would be best on this area of land
and the town should have released an RFI.
K. Kaminer asks if there is a member of the Ice Arena on SWEC.
G. Fiorente answers that there is not.
E. Boemer asks who approached the RPPA about the idea. J. Coltman states Carl McFadden.
C. Giuliana says he has been here for 30 years and sees the fields empty a lot. He states that
this is not just a senior citizen issue and that people of all ages can benefit from pickleball.
E. Gaffen says that this has not been identified as a senior citizen issue and agrees that
pickleball is great for people aging in place as well as everyone else. He goes on to say that he
thinks everyone on the Recreation Committee supports the idea of pickleball at Symonds Way
but there is also an emphasis that process is important as also stated by FINCOM.
M. Coltman states that pickleball has been in the Town of Reading since 2012 and the
community has been advocating for courts since then. He says that pickleball has grown every
year and now with Birch Meadow out of the picture, there is no place to go.
G. Fiorente explains the current Capital Plan and how several other parks, playgrounds, fields
and courts have not been prioritized for a long time. She says that many organizations have
come forward with donations to improve fields and parks.
C. Webberly says that Reading Youth Lacrosse has come forward a few times to donate to the
Town. C. Webberly also states that Reading Youth Lacrosse pays field fees per child to the
town and needs to abide by the resident policy and submit rosters.
K. Janowski asks what the Recreation Committee is trying to do.
A.Binda states that SWEC should finish their work and make recommendations to the Select
Board. She says that she thinks the process should play out with the RFI and that it is too
problematic right now as discussed at FINCOM.
C. Robinson states that he spent 9 years on FINCOM as advisory to Town Meeting. He says
that just because FINCOM doesn't recommend it doesn't mean people will not vote for it.
J. Cormier states that pickleball is growing at Memorial Park and he plays with his two college
aged kids.
J. Sullivan states that he started back in May and that residents had approached him about not
being able to get on the courts. He says that this has been discussed in prior meetings and he
Page 1 5
has also continued his research with playlocal and playtime scheduler. He goes on to say that
he has reached out to several other towns who have eliminated playtime scheduler because of
the amount of non-residents who were coming to the court. He goes on to say that most
surrounding towns just offer open play without the option to reserve.
J. Sullivan discusses data he was given by the playtime scheduler staff that shows that an
overwhelming majority of non-residents book on this app. He shares a visual graph with the
committee.
M. Coltman says that there are people who make reservations on playlocal but do not book on
playtime scheduler. He says that half of the reservations are probably just playlocal
reservations.
C. Robinson says that the data presented is very concerning given the presentation that was
just given by RPPA.
A.Binda says that there needs to be an understanding between wants vs. needs. She states
how she is able to go on playtime scheduler and sees that the same people are booked on
multiple days for multiples hours at time. She asks for a better understanding of the
expectations of play.
E. Boemer states that these are horrific numbers and even if they were down slightly, it is still
really bad.
R. Hand asks what the next steps are.
J. Sullivan states that he plans to come up with solutions and rely a lot on other towns
experience.
M. Coltman asks to be a part of the conversation since he knows things that could be important
in regard to pickleball.
G. Fiorente presents a request for amplified sound on Saturday, November 111" for the Veterans
Day Ceremony from 1 1:00am-1 2:00pm.
R. Hand makes a motion to approve the amplified sound request for Veterans Day as presented
by G. Fiorente. A. Binds seconds. All in favor 8-0.
G. Fiorente gives an update on the Birch Meadow Master Plan Phase II presentation that will be
presented at Town Meeting.
J. Sullivan gives an update on the Recreation Division. He says that the Downtown Trick or
Treat was a great success and that programming is taking off. He says he is in the process of
also collecting Fall field fees from organizations.
E. Geffen asks if there is a WI grade boys team.
J.Sullivan states how Recreation has never had a 5" grade boys team before. He explains how
he and E. Shambo were trying to coordinate something for a few who had reached out.
A.Binda makes a motion to adjourn at 9:50pm. C. Robinson seconds. All in favor 8-0
Page 1 6