Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021-02-22 Community Planning and Development Commission Minutes � OFRFq� Town of Readingfj C G 1 V k L Meeting Minutes OWN CLERK 2021 MAY 25 AM 1: 2a Board - Committee - Commission - Council: Community Planning and Development Commission Date: 2021-02-22 Time: 7:30 PM Building: Location: Remote Meeting - Zoom Address: Session: Purpose: Meeting Version: Attendees: Members: John Weston, Chair; Pamela Adrian Heather Clish, Tony D'Arezzo-Associate, Linda Harrison Members - Not Present: Nick Safina Others Present: Community Development Director Julie Mercier, Staff Planner Andrew MacNichol, Town Engineer Ryan Percival, Select Board Member Carlo Bacci, Select Board Member Vanessa Alvarado, Mike Warner, Jack Sullivan, Brad Latham, Josh Latham, Beth Shurland, Hamid Jaffarl, Larry Hayes, Mike Lacey, Ann Dillaway, Nancy Twomey, Colm Ellet, Bob Forbes, Greg Phipps, Bob Holmes, Mike Splain, Jackie McCarthy, Lebatique, Carolyn Whiting, Ann Dillaway, David Gilblair, Demetra Tseckares,Jack Devir,John Bobrek, Jennifer Lachmayr Minutes Respectfully Submitted By: Andrew MacNichol Topics of Discussion: MEETING HELD REMOTELY VIA ZOOM Chairman John Weston called the meeting to order at 7:31 PM. Community Development Director Julie Mercier explained the protocols for tonight's meeting that is being held virtually as all hearings throughout the pandemic have been. She presented the Zoom Meeting information to the public for those wishing to join. She explained the features of the Zoom program and how to provide comments for any given application. She added that RCN is broadcasting and recording the meeting. Public Hearing, Site Plan Review 0 Auburn Street, Water Tank Replacement Ms. Adrian read the legal notice for Site Plan Review at 0 Auburn Street into the record. Town Engineer Ryan Percival and Mr. Mike Warner of Weston and Sampson were present on behalf of the application. Mr. Percival began by stating that the planning for the project has been ongoing for a number of years. He stated that the application is to replace the existing steel water tank at 0 Auburn Street with a composite elevated tank (CET). Currently the existing water tower maintains infrastructure for three cellular carriers. However, the existing tank is no longer structurally sound and is deteriorating in a number of ways. The proposed water tank will maintain the same size of 750,000 gallons and will not require painting thus reducing maintenance cost and requirements. It shall sit on top of a concrete pad which also requires little maintenance. Once the tank is complete, the cellular carrier infrastructure will be replaced. The newly designed tank will be able to hold the infrastructure for up to four cellular carriers. 1 Town of Reading c Meeting Minutes IXCOP �� Mr. Warner shared the application and proposed plans on the screen. He shared images of the area and the existing tank. He then shared an image of the existing tank adjacent to an image of the proposed design of the CET tank. Mr. Warner continued that soil sampling was done on-site in 2018 and due to the nature of the existing tank and concrete foundation containing lead paint, concentration of lead within the soil was found to be above the reportable limit. The top twelve inches of any soil with high concentration of lead will be removed from the site and be backed fill with new, clean material. The existing concrete foundation will also be removed in order to create a new level pad. Soil sampling completed outside of the site's fence line were found to exceed reportable levels as well, but in order to preserve as many existing trees as possible, the existing fence line will be extended to enclose the contaminated areas. Mr. Warner explained that the site plan showed the diameter of both the new concrete pad and water tank. He stated that the Town also maintains emergency communication systems on the existing tower. These emergency communications will be relocated to a temporary tower which will be placed to the east of the water tank area. Three potential areas for the temporary tower are shown on the plan. However, the location in the southwest corner of the site has been removed from consideration due to overhead infrastructure in the area. Once the water tank's construction is completed the emergency communication infrastructure will be added to the new tank, along with cellular infrastructure, and the temporary tower will be removed. Mr. Warner explained that site work also includes a new water main and utilities running underground to the tank's pedestal. Once work is done the road will be repaved. Mr. Percival added that some existing trees along Auburn Street and inside the site will need to be removed for access. Depending on the final location of the temporary tower additional trees may need to be removed but they are trying to limit vegetation removal as much as possible. Mr. Percival stated that trees will be replanted in the area once construction is completed. Mr. Warner informed the Board that all required setbacks are maintained and no permanent above ground infrastructure is located in the setback areas. The temporary tower may be placed within the side setback but will be removed once the new water tank is constructed. Mr. Warner reiterated that the new water tank will include infrastructure for and be designed to hold up to four cell carrier antennas. The new tank will be no higher than the existing tank. Mr. Percival clarified that the overflow height of the water tank must be maintained and cannot be exceeded. Mr. Percival explained that the new CET tank's concrete pedestal will be enclosed so that all mowing and maintenance around the tank is a bit easier. A garage door will be located on the pedestal for access and storage. The ladder up the tank will also be internal to improve safety by reducing access by any unwanted bodies as the catwalk is about seventy (70) feet high. The water tank's standard color is cobalt blue and any change in color or design will be limited and also have an additional cost. Mr. Percival continued that the temporary cell tower is a monopole design to minimize disruption to radio frequency when under construction. Mr. Percival stated that Cellular on Wheels (COW'S) were looked at but have rental costs and safety concerns in high wind and/or ice events. COW'S take up more room and must come down during high winds which can disrupt emergency communications thus the monopole was decided on to improve safety. 2 Town of Reading f o� Meeting Minutes Y 9`IAyOP Mr. Warner noted that the rendering did not include depictions of the tank with cell equipment on it. Cell equipment may also result in a slight modification to the ladder location. Mr. Percival appreciated the comment and added that cell carriers can make their infrastructure similar in color so that it blends in with the water tank's color as much as possible. Ms. Adrian asked if there were other tank options explored and if the project had already gone out to bid. Mr. Percival answered that the project has not gone out to bid. Ms. Adrian asked about the schedule for construction. Mr. Percival stated that construction may not ensue till about six months after the bid is released but he is hopeful the project will be completed within a year. Two years would be the expected maximum construction length due to bridging over construction seasons. Ms. Adrian asked if the existing tank is at the end of its life period. Mr. Percival stated it was constructed in 1953 and the catwalk is no longer structurally sound to maintain the cell infrastructure on it. Repairs would include replacing metal, cabling, and more. He continued that a 'break even report' was done a few years prior but nothing has changed since the conclusion of such. Ms. Clish asked if a foundation will be required for the temporary tower and how that will be constructed and removed. She then asked for the Applicants to explain what alternatives were explored and what the context of a 'COW' is. Mr. Percival answered that a laydown area is needed for the temporary cell tower but it would not impact the street and will stay within the site boundaries. He continued that the Town does have a secondary water tank at Bear Hill and is part of the Mystic River Watershed Association which helps with impacts when removing and rebuilding the tank in its current location. Mr. Percival stated numerous locations were looked at for the temporary tower. He explained that a 'COW' is a 'cell on wheels' which is a tower pulled on a trailer. It is not ideal for the current temporary proposal due to the fact that they must be removed in high winds, ice and other scenarios. He stated that the current proposal is for a foundation that is flush to the ground/pinned to the bedrock below, and that is designed to hold the temporary tower. Mr. Percival explained that if ballast is required, a permanent foundation may be needed and grass could be planted over such. Ms. Clish asked what other water tank options were explored, if any. Mr. Percival stated that the CET tank was chosen due to its life expectancy. The tank pedestal does not hold any water and is hollow, which allows it to be cast-in-place concrete. Th CET tank and its pedestal require much less paint and maintenance. Also, the glass-fused-to-steel tank does not rust as easily. Mr. Warner agreed and stated that a coated steel tank, similar to what exists today, can be built on top of the concrete pedestal but maintenance requirements will be much more intensive in the future than the glass-fused-to-steel tank proposed. If a coated steel tank were selected, future cell infrastructure would need to be removed and relocated during any painting/maintenance operations and life expectancy would be reduced. Ms. Harrington asked if it is necessary to move the fence out further. Mr. Warner stated there is a reportable level of 200ppm when it comes to lead and because the concentrations are from lead paint they need to be reported to the State. Most contaminated soils will be remediated, however, two samples outside of the existing fence line were found to exceed the 200ppm limit. Due to such, and to reduce impact on the existing trees in the area, it was found that containing the contaminated soils would be best. Ms. Harrington asked if the trees in the area will then remain. Mr. Percival replied in the affirmative. Ms. Harrington asked if any replacement trees could be evergreen species so that screening is maintained throughout the winter. Mr. Percival acknowledged that as a good idea and will work with the Tree Warden on such. Ms. Harrington asked if other manufacturers made tanks that were not so bold in color. Mr. Warner replied that the cobalt is a standard color but could be 3 opN tlrq� Town of Reading c Meeting Minutes Y,IgCOP� changed at an additional cost. He also informed the board that not all manufacturers make CET tanks. Mr. Percival added that there could be potential in the future for the tank to be repainted. Mr. Warner responded that the glass-fused-to-steel is located on both the interior and exterior and is not painted. He stated once the tank is built, its color is not changeable. Mr. Percival clarified the color would need to be finalized during the submittal process. Mr. D'Arezzo asked where the public safety communications will be attached to the water tank. Mr. Percival stated it is located differently than the cellular carriers and will be located on the top of the dome. He clarified that the emergency communications devices are antennas. Mr. D'Arezzo stated this should be shown in the specifications and details of the plan set. Mr. Warner agreed that this can be provided, but final locations are to be determined. Mr. Percival stated the existing antennas are over twenty years old and when the manufacturer recommends a new style it will be specified. Ms. Adrian asked if the property extends to Beacon Street. Mr. Percival replied in the affirmative. Ms. Adrian asked if there is potential to add a pocket park on the eastern side that could include additional plantings and amenities. Mr. Percival stated that the area is heavily treed and an existing driveway that crosses the Town's land would need to maintain its access. He continued that the fenced area will not be available for use due to the contaminated soils but they will look for additional amenities where they can. Ms. Harrington asked if a pocket park was created, would soil testing need to be conducted in the entire area. Mr. Percival replied that soil testing would most likely be needed but would consult with the LSP for determination. Mr. Weston asked if the eastern most soil points were found to be contaminated. Mr. Percival replied in the affirmative and stated that is what resulted in the fence line expansion. Ms. Adrian noted that two large Maples will need to be removed. Mr. Percival stated they will be replaced. Mr. Weston opened the hearing to public comment. Select Board Member Vanessa Alvarado, who is liaison to the project, appreciated the CPDC review. She stated that she has asked for a calendar to be created by staff that would detail the planning schedule and not just the construction schedule. She asked how the temporary tower will differ from the permanent water tank. Mr. Percival stated that cell carrier infrastructure will not be included on the temporary tower, only the Town's emergency communication infrastructure will be. He stated that height limits are required, and for safety, a tier three loading pole will be installed. This will allow the temporary tower to stay up during high wind events. Ms. Alvarado questioned if this practice was more affordable. Mr. Percival stated this is being explored in terms of a rental tower versus buying the equipment, but costs are trying to be reduced. He estimated it could be around $250,000, which is half the cost required If the cell carriers were to be located on the temporary tower. Ms. Alvarado stated a pocket park would be a great idea but extending the fence minimizes land for such. She asked if decontaminating the area has been considered. Mr. Percival stated it has been considered, but they did not want to impact the root line of the existing trees to the east of the site. Ms. Alvarado asked if solar could be installed on the water tank. Mr. Percival stated more equipment requires more maintenance which could drive up costs but there could be other potential locations on the site for such. Ms. Alvarado asked if other municipalities have such. Mr. Percival replied that he has not seen any but that does not mean it hasn't been done. Ms. Alvarado asked if there was potential for a mural to be painted on the lower portion of the water tank. She asked that something more aesthetically pleasing than a chain linked fence be installed around the boarder of the site. She continued that native species should 4 OFR O� e Town of Reading ,,.� i� Meeting Minutes i�s 9:IMCOPwP' be planted and should also be pollinator friendly. Mr. Percival stated that a completely enclosed site with no visibility is not ideal for security purposes. He added that the Tree Warden will look into plant native species. Ms. Jennifer Lachmayr, an abutter of the project, asked about construction impacts to the neighborhood, especially to walkers in the neighborhood. She asked who to contact if there are issues. Mr. Percival stated the construction hours of 7AM-4PM will be followed Monday through Friday. Weekend work is not expected unless absolutely necessary. Dust control will be installed due to exposed soil and noise will be limited to general construction noise. No ledge is expected to be removed but if found, hammering would be minimized to the best extent possible. No generators will need run at night and no lighting Is being added. Mr. Percival added that if there are any issues, residents should reach out to the Engineering Department. Ms. Lachmayr stated that if something more artistic could be thought of it would be much appreciated. She stated she understood that it could drive up costs, which is not ideal, but it would benefit the community. Mr. Percival stated that while he has no answers for such tonight, he will explore the potential. Mr. Warner stated that painting the top portion of the tank is not permissible and could void warranties. Ms. Lachmayr asked what the benefits of housing cellular carriers are, and if income is generated from such. Mr. Percival stated that the carriers have stated the location is a 'macro-site' for them and permanent relocation of the cell infrastructure would be a different discussion. Ms. Lachmayr asked if they are installed on a long-term contract. Mr. Percival replied that three portions of bid will occur for the project: the temporary tower, the new water tank, and a separate bid for cell carriers will be drafted and procured. Leasing revenue arrangements will also be drafted for review. Ms. Lachmayr asked how benefits are determined for such. Mr. Percival stated a rent is generated and expected revenue generation was supplied to the Select Board. He estimated a few hundred thousand dollars can be generated that would go into the Town's General Fund. Ms. Lachmayr asked if there are health risks associated with the cellular infrastructure. Mr. Percival replied that recent studies do not indicate health impacts. Mr. Hamid Jaffari of Reading Municipal Light Department (RMLD) questioned if there are any electrical layouts or plans for the site. He had concerns with temporarily relocating infrastructure. Mr. Percival stated that a radio tower is located on-site that can feed the temporary infrastructure. He stated the radio building will remain in place. He clarified no new cell towers are being added to the site. Mr. Jaffari asked if additional power will be required. Mr. Percival stated If a fourth carrier is added onto the new tank it could result in the need for such. Mr. Jaffari asked if an electrical contractor will be hired. Mr. Warner replied the project has not gone out to bid yet and electrical designers will properly draw and locate needs. Mr. Percival confirmed when created, the plans can be provided to RMLD. Mr. Mark Delaney of 26 Beacon Street opined that the new tank is not more aesthetically pleasing and such language in the plans should not be made on behalf of the neighborhood. He stated if multiple options are available the neighborhood should decide which is preferred. He continued that this has been the first opportunity for public discussion. Mr. Delaney stated that the construction schedule has been expanded numerous times and questioned what the timeline for such will be. Mr. Delaney opined that the proposed fencing is a concern and asked if soil testing was done inside the fence line. He stated the area is the only source of open land in the neighborhood and further restricting the area is not ideal. He stated if the fence line can be reduced it should be. 5 Town of Reading Meeting Minutes n "�P'IM<OP Mr. McCarthy expressed concern that the Request for Proposal has not been completed but the plan notes appear to indicate a contractor has been found. He asked if the cell infrastructure Is not going on the temporary tower where will they go. He stated there are provisions in the agreements between the Town and cell carriers that COW's will be provided on-site which is In opposition of tonight's discussion. Mr. Weston stated that the CPDC will not delve into issues of cellular leasing, as it is outside of the Boards jurisdiction, but understands the concerns raised. He stated the forum tonight is the public process required for the application and all input provided is considered when making decisions. Mr. Percival clarified that the carriers on the existing tank are tenants at will and the Select Board has indicated to let the carriers figure out for themselves what they are going to do for relocation. He continued that unless trees are clear cut there is no space on the site for COW's. Mr. Percival stated that soil remediation requires digging 12" into the soil near tree roots which, if completed, could very much kill all the trees in the eastern portion of the site. He stated if the soil is to be removed, so would all the trees in the area. He continued that the location of the fence line can continue to be explored. Long term sustainability and safety is the intent of the application proposed. The proposal considered minimizing impacts to the neighborhood but alternatives can be explored if desired by the public. Mr. Weston informed the public that he would like to get additional questions into the record but the application should be continued to the next hearing. Select Board Member Carlo Bacci asked how close to the 2018 $4.6 million-dollar price estimation the application is currently. Mr. Percival replied that Fluctuation is expected for construction materials and the price could be a little higher than said 2018 estimate. Mr. Larry Hayes of 29 Beacon Street questioned if the tank itself has been tested for contamination. He asked what the provisions for demolition are to protect the neighborhood. Mr. Mike Lacey of 9 Beacon Street responded that he had similar concerns of lead exposure. He opined that new trees are not a bad idea if the fence line is reduced. He asked what budget was given to landscape considerations. Mr. Percival replied he can provide the breakdown but it is a nominal cost compared to the entire price of the tank. Mr. Lacey asked if the temporary structures could become permanent. He asked if there is a date in the contract that would mandate the removal for such. Mr. Percival replied that nothing temporary will become permanent and that there is no room on the site for COW's. Mr. Lacey asked that landscaping be discussed in further detail at the next hearing. Mr. Percival replied in the affirmative. Ms. Colleen Forbes of 19 Beacon also had concerns with expanding the fenced area. She stated that the existing trees do help screen the fencing, which is helpful, but the expansion is not ideal. Ms. Alvarado expressed thanks to the Town Engineer for the willingness to go through the public process for this application. She stated the Select Board will look to discuss the next steps for the process in March and are happy to help streamline efforts. Mr. Bob Connor asked if a quote could be provided for additional colors for the water tank as a lighter color would be preferred. He asked that plans be shared earlier so that it does not feel like the proposal is being imposed on the neighbors. 6 Q\y.:OPR Town of Reading Meeting Minutes a.,.vcone Mr. Weston stated that the fence location will need to be reviewed at the next hearing and questioned how much of the site requires fencing for functionality. If fencing area can be reduced instead of expanded, it would be ideal. Ms. Ciish made a motion to continue the Site Pian Review Application for O Auburn Street to Monday March 8, 2021 at 8.,30PM. Mr. D'Arezzo seconded the motion and it was approved 5-0-0. Continued Public Hearina, Site Plan Review 1310-1312 Main Street, Reading Animal Clinic Mr. Weston opened the continued public hearing for a Site Plan Review at 1310-1312 Main Street. He asked if the Applicants could provide an update and summary. Mr. Josh Latham was present for the application and on behalf of the business owners. He summarized that the proposal is for a new two-story animal clinic at 1310 Main Street and to maintain the existing building at 1312 Main Street which currently houses the clinic. The two sites would share a large parking area and driveway from Main Street for access. Mr. Latham stated that the plans have undergone review by the Conservation Commission, which has approved the project and will issue an Order of Conditions at the end of the month. Mr. lack Sullivan, project engineer, added that a third-party review was conducted and the wetland buffers were adjusted due to a new delineation. The new buffer resulted in a slight modification to the proposed parking layout in order for it to stay out of the 35' buffer zone. The third-party reviewer also asked that soil conditions be tested to ensure the rain garden will work properly. Mr. Sullivan stated that this testing was completed and soils were shown to be satisfactory. Mr. Sullivan informed the Board that the Fire Department asked to show turning movements for a fire truck on a plan and to show how access to the residential site in the rear will be maintained. A plan showing these requests was submitted and found acceptable to the Fire Department. Mr. Sullivan stated no major site changes have occurred but utilities were relocated to better connect to the new building's utility room. He added that the new building will also be sprinklered. Additional walkways were added to exits of the new building as well. Ms. Demetra Tseckares, project landscaper, stated that hardy native species are proposed due to the use of the site. Mr. D'Arezzo asked if a dog relief area was provided on the plans. Ms. Tseckares replied that an area is marked in the rear of the site for such. Mr. D'Arezzo asked if the additional sidewalks increased total impervious area of the site. Mr. Sullivan replied In the affirmative and that the rain garden has been increased to accommodate such increase of impervious area. Mr. Weston opened the hearing to public comment. Mr. Jaffari of RMLD asked if an electrical contractor has been selected. He also stated Electric Vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure should be considered on-site as there are rebates and incentives for such. Load capacity will need to be calculated and reviewed. Ms. 7 Town of Reading Meeting Minutes D:LKOPP� Beth Shurland, owner of Reading Animal Clinic, responded that she has reached out to Mr. John McDonagh of RMLD in order to submit the plans and start the process. She stated a contractor has not been hired yet but it is in the works. Mr. Jaffari appreciated that such has been initiated. Ms. Adrian stated the planting plan looks good in terms of spacing and color. The Board reviewed the Draft Decision on-screen. Mr. Weston questioned what happens when the users detailed in the easement language change. Mr. Latham explained that the easement language does refer to the addresses of the two sites and runs in perpetuity. It shall be recorded at the Registry of Deeds as well. Mr. D'Arezzo asked if a single dumpster is being shared between the two sites. Mr. Sullivan replied in the affirmative. Mr. Latham replied that wording to share the dumpster can be added to the easement language. Mr. D'Arezzo requested that it is. Mr. Sullivan explained that the drive access must be approved by the Massachusetts Department of Transportation and that the Town cannot dictate turning movements out of such. Mr. Latham agreed and suggested that the site's existing conditions are being improved. Mr. Jaffari informed the Applicants that an electrical easement will be required to be submitted to the RMLD. Mr. D Arezzo moved to close the public hearing for the Site Plan Review at 1310- 1312 Main Street. Ms. Adrian seconded the motion and it was approved 4-0-0. Ms. Clish moved to approve the requested waiver of providing one (1) dedicated loading zone on site for the Site Plan Review at 1310-1312 Main Street. Ms. Adrian seconded the motion and it was approved 4-0-0. Mr. D'Arezzo moved to approve the Site Plan Review application for 1310-1312 Main Street as amended. Ms. Adrian seconded the motion and it was approved 4-0- 0. Continued Public Hearino, Site Plan Review 323 Main Street, Baael World Mr. Weston opened the continued public hearing for a Site Plan Review at 323 Main Street, Bagel World. Mr. John Bobrek, project engineer; Mr. Bill Jacobs, project architect; and, Ms. Emily Pelletier of Bagel World were present for the application. Mr. Bobrek explained that project changes included relocating the dumpster location and additional landscaping. Mr. Bobrek informed the Board that a traffic study was done. Traffic counts were conducted during a Saturday's peak hours and previously a weekday's peak hour traffic counts were collected. It found that 28% of the peak period time had the drive- through at full capacity. The report found that the addition of a second-drive through would provide adequate capacity at the site. Mr. Bobrek stated that the southern driveway is to remain `enter' only. Additional landscaping was added to the rear lot line to help increase screening for the residential abutters. Mr. Jacobs informed that Bagel World will use a new speaker system that reduces 8 a� OrRFgQ Town of Reading �fi{ ;' Meeting Minutes e 'INC00.rv�� both inbound and outbound noise. The system is currently being used at the Peabody location and has been very successful. A new Point of Sales (POS) system will also be provided to help speed up transactions. Mr. Bobrek informed the Board that the Applicant team will meet with the Town's Parking, Traffic, and Transportation Task Force (PTTTF) to review the updated application. Mr. MacNichol stated the meeting would benefit from CPDC input regarding changes they would like to see. Having both the CPDC and PTTTF in agreement would be best. Ms. Clish presented concerns with the two-way driveway to the north. She asked to clarify if the no-right-turn into the southern driveway would be restricted to certain hours. Mr. Bobrek answered that it will be enforced at all times. He continued that the northern driveway is 30' in width which can accommodate the two-way traffic. Mr. Bobrek stated that when the drive-through is fully queued, it will result in customers leaving the site without ordering. Ms. Clish asked if the drive-through full, how will customers access the parallel spaces on the south of the site. Mr. Bobrek responded they could use the passing lane but agreed that for a small amount of time they may be unreachable. Ms. Clish recommended restricting right hand turns into the southern driveway during weekends and/or peak hours only. Mr. Weston stated the idea of an additional drive-through was a good one. He stated he did have concerns with the turning movements of vehicles on-site. One area of concern was the first turning movement that leads to the rear of the site where the ordering system is. He found that the swing radii of the area did not work and stated they should be slightly expanded in order to prevent bottle necking. The other area of concern was the ordering area itself around the proposed landscaped island. He opined that drivers will turn wider than the area shown and suggested expanding slightly to the north. Mr. Weston stated that the existing queue data presented is not exactly the demand. He opined that if you increase the total queue area you will then increase the demand or amount of people willing to travel to the site. Mr. Weston expressed concern that if queue length blocks the middle parking area at the front of the building, patrons will not be able to get in or out of the spaces. Mr. Bobrek responded that four to five additional feet were found in the area which will help patrons pull in and out. He stated that Bagel World could separate the front parking area from the drive-through by a chain. Mr. Weston stated that this idea would not help as customers would then not be able to access the drive-through from either driveway. Mr. Weston shared a revised plan on-screen that showed some of his previous suggestions. He stated the plan may result in the loss of one or two more parking spaces in the southeast corner. He questioned if the north-eastem parking spaces could be modified to be perpendicular instead of parallel, as this would allow an additional space or two in the area. Mr. Weston also suggested reducing the driveway width in order to add some additional parking in the front. Mr. Bobrek replied that the plans and suggestions are very helpful. He did add that it was unlikely that the ordering system in the landscaped Island could be moved due to the required queue length Bagel World needs from the POS to the pick-up window. Mr. Jacobs asked if the discussed suggestions result in allowing entry in both driveways. Mr. Weston clarified that the southern driveway should allow entry and the northern driveway should be exit only as it exists today. Mr. Weston opined keeping the front parking as diagonal spaces as well. Ms. Clish asked if separating the drive-throughs by structures, signage or pavement marking is needed. Mr. Bobrek responded that it is a good thought but something 9 ofµnrq�o Town of Reading Meeting Minutes na:e°en°P� permanent like curbing would impact plowing and more. He opined pavement markings could be provided and match the arrows shown on the plan set. Ms. Mercier asked if the diagonal parking spaces in the front of the building could be opposite of one another, as in the bottom spaces angle one way while the top space angle the opposite way. She opined this would allow patrons to access the area from either side. Mr. Weston added that perpendicular spaces would allow such as well and be easier to get out of. Mr. Jaffari asked if Bagel World is considering electric vehicle charging stations on-site. Mr. Jacobs replied they are not at this time. Mr. D'Arezzo asked if the drive-through lane queue spill onto Main Street, will drivers be able to access the third lane to drive around the building. Ms. Pelletier answered this is why they proposed no-right hand turn into that driveway. Mr. Bobrek added they will continue to explore the options discussed tonight. Ms. Adrian made a motion to continue to Site Plan Review application for 322 Main Street to Monday March 8, 2021 at 9:30PM. The motion was seconded by Ms. Clish and approved 5-0-0. Other Business Stormwater Bylaw Update Ms. Mercier updated the Board that the language of the amendments was updated based on the CPDC's previous comments. Town Counsel suggested language which Ms. Mercier shared on-screen. The new language allows the Conservation Commission to have flexibility on the submission requirements for applications. The Board agreed the new language is beneficial and clearer. Ms. Mercier informed the Board that they were asked to sponsor the amendment at Annual Town Meeting in April 2021. Minutes Due to the late time of the meeting the Board elected to review the meeting minutes at a future hearing date. Adiournment Ms. Adrian made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 11:17 PM. The motion was seconded by Ms. Clish and approved with a 5-0-0 vote. Documents Reviewed at the Meeting: • CPDC Agenda 2/22/21 • CPDC Minutes of 1/11/21 • 0 Auburn Street, Site Plan Review o Complete Permit Set, dated 02//21 o Draft Decision,dated 2/22121 • 1310-1312 Main Street, Site Plan Review o Response Letter,dated 1/25/21 o Site Plan Set, dated 1/12/21 o Fire Apparatus Plan,dated 2/17111 o List of Plants to accompany Landscape Plan o Email from Conservation Administrator, dated 2/8/21 o Draft Decision,dated 2122/21 • 323 Main Street,Site Plan Review o Site Plan,dated 2/10/21 o Traffic Impact Analysis, dated 2/8/21 10 rR� Town of Reading \e r Meeting Minutes JJYrIKO o Draft Decision,dated 2/22/21 • Stormwater Bylaw Update o Stormwater Bylaw warrant Article,dated 2/17/21 11