Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1985-03-11 Board of Public Works Minutes - Executive Session Executive Session Meeting of March 11, 1965 Page 1 A meeting of the Board of Public Works convened in Executive Session in Room 16, Municipal Building at 9:00 P.M. Present were Chairman Barker, Secretary Hampson, Board Members Wood, Polychrones and Griffin and Assistant Superintendent's McIntire and Redford. Also present were Town Counsel H. Theodore Cohen, and James O'Leary and Frank Gorgone of the Finance Committee. Chairman Barker stated the purpose of this session is to meet with Town Counsel to discuss the rubbish collection contract. The Department has been working extremely hard in this area for the past week. Atty. Cohen stated that he has reviewed the rubbish collection specifications. The only thing that was not in the specifications was a possible 30 day cut-off period in the event we somehow got entrapped by Vining, saying they want to come back. Asst. Supt. Redford has informed Town Counsel that no contractor would accept that kind of contract, however, you do have other options. Vining has never been terminated, they have only been suspended. Atty. Cohen stated he met with Vining's Attorney, Tom Troy, on February 21. They are now saying the earliest we can get in front of a Grand Jury is April. At this point, I don't think this makes much difference, I think Vining just wants to get out of Reading. Vining's attorney made a comment that the contract invited fraud. They have come up with two haulers, Hiltz and Paulino. They are both ' willing to handle the trash collections under the terms of the existing contract with some minor stipulations. Both of these contractors have been found to be acceptable by the Department. Vining's justification is that we can only prove the five days they were being followed by the Police Department. Atty. Cohen stated we have come up with a figure of about $60,000.00 that the Town is out of pocket. This includes the cost of the police investigation, legal fees, containers for Waste Management and c Executive Session Meeting of March 11, 1985 Page 2 excess tonnage. Excess tannage amounted to approximately $23,000.00. The Town is presently holding $37,000.00 in payments to Vining. Atty. Cohen stated in all our discussions, my understanding is the future contract is the most important. At the time of our discussions, it was stated they might be willing to make a deal regardless of what the District Attorney is doing. He called Atty. Troy today and he would have come tonight, if Atty. Cohen insisted, but he was not as informed as Atty. McCann. Atty. Cohen stated I think if we can arrange to have the trash picked up within the next 2 172 years under the terms of the current contract and get back some of the money, we should be in good shape. Mr. Polychrones asked what if Vining doesn't go along with this unless Chief Marchand drops his charges? Atty. Cohen replied I think the last time we discussed this, the Chief felt he has done what he was supposed to do, I don't think he has any real problems with this. Mr. Griffin asked what would Waste Management's extra fee for collection be? Asst. Supt. Redford replied about $10,000.00 a month. Asst. Supt. McIntire stated Mr. 8anfield also mentioned the price of $100,000 a year, which is a little less. Mr. Griffin stated regarding the settlement, I don't think this figure is negotiable. The Town's expenditure for investigation and the fact that we may be pressed into a $10,000 additional monthly cost, should be part of the negotiation up front. My feeling is we should negotiate for $50,000 - $60,000. Mr. Hampson stated I don't think you are going to get very serious bidders on March 20th. Executive Session Meeting of March 11, 1985 Page 3 Mr. Polychrones stated if we go back to Vining, our services will not be interrupted at all. Mrs. Wood stated I have a feeling we are starting another Pitt Pipeline case. 0o you get this feeling? 0o you have any feel or knowledge about Vining selling out? Atty. Cohen replied I have heard nothing about that. Asst. Supt. McIntire asked, assuming on March 25 we have not settled with Vining, we are going to open bids on March 20. Are we going to have any legal problem negotiating with Waste Management to continue. Atty. Cohen replied you should put in the specifications that the commencement date of April 1st, may at the option of the Board, be postponed up to 30 days, for the reasons set forth in the "Invitation to Bid" or in the best interests of the Town. Mr. Polychrones moved to negotiate to bring Vining back and allow them to return to the Town under the proper conditions. The motion was seconded. Mrs. Wood moved to table the motion. Mrs. Wood moved to take the motion off the table. Mr. Polychrones moved to withdraw his motion. The motion was seconded and voted 5:0. Mr. Griffin moved to put a minimum of a $60,000 fee, in addition to a pick-up contract, for the settlement of the case against Vining. The motion was seconded and defeated 2:3 (Mr. Polychrones, Mr. Hampson, and Mr. Barker opposed). Executive Session Meeting of March 11, 1985 Page 4 Mr. Hampson moved that Town Counsel be allowed to continue his current vein of negotiations and let him at his discretion negotiate the amounts in the best interests of the Town, subject to the Board's approval. The motion was seconded and voted 4: 1 (Mr. Griffin opposed). Frank Gorgone of the Finance Committee stated if the Police Chief files charges, the D.A. will have to prosecute. We should not let Vining back in Town. Sim O'Leary stated I agree with Frank and I don't think we should let Vining back into the Town. Mr. Griffin stated if this goes beyond April 1, I would like the negotiations to start at $60,000 with the stipulation this can be negotiated down to 450,000. Mrs. Wood amended Mr. Hampsons motion to negotiate the minimum amount of $23,000. The amendment was seconded and voted 4: 1 (Mr. Griffin opposed). It was moved, seconded and voted 5:0 to insure trash collection on April 1st. It was moved, seconded and voted 5:0 to go out of Executive Session at 10:05 P.M. Respectfully submitted, (�5� Sec re ry