Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1928-04-10 Finance Committee Minutes Meeting March 5, 1928 (Cont. ) i ,. The annual budget for 1929 was then taken up by,� items and it was voted to recommend the amounts asked for with the following re- ductions: ` ( Collector' s Salaries $2600 to $2000 fir' Assessor' s Expenses 1300 " 1100 Clerical 2600 " 2200 Municipal Bldg. Maint. 3000 " 2800 Fire Station " 1300 " 1000 Police Dept. " 2500 " 2300 Fire Dept. " 2500 " 2300 ;+ Public Lib. Salaries 4430 " 4230 Park Dept. 2600 " 2000 Laurel Hill Cem. Maint. 9300 " 8900 It was voted to authorize the Clerk to append the names of the L entire Finance Committee to the annual report. Members Present at this meeting: Chm. Ruggles, Fairchild, Mount, Knox, Morrison, Briggs, Devaney, Dickie, Fllison, Haley, Moyer, Scott, Sweetser, Meeting adjourned 11. /P Clerk. Meeting April 10, 1928. Meeting was called to order at 8 otclock by the Clerk, under the provisions as provided by Section 2 of Article 6 of the Town By-Laws. `milliam A. Connelly was sworn in as a new member of the Co=ittee. Otis b. Ruggles was elected Chairman. Meeting adjourned at 8.30 P.M. Members present at this meeting: Knox, Morrison, Ellison, Haley, Scott, Sweetser, Killam, Connelly, and `��/Clerk. Meeting June 25, 1928 f The meeting was called to order by Ohm. Ruggles at 8.30 o'clock. The �r meeting was held to act upon the warrant for special town meeting July, 1928. Mr. Charles S. Hasty, of the Board of Selectmen appeared for Art. 2 requesting additional appropriation of $2000 for aid, board and care, and for Art. 3, $300 additional for maintenance of Municipal Bldg. Mr. L. F. Quimby appeared for Art. 8 for appropriation of $200 for lettering stand-pipe. Chm. George F. Horrocks of the Board of Assessors appeared for Art. 14 requesting $300 additional for assessors expenses in order that an alphabetical street list might be completed, Mr. Harry N. Brown, Chairman of the Board of Public Works, together with Mr. Davis, Mr. Putnam and Mr. Higgins of the Board, and Supt. Collins appeared on Articles 4 and 5 relating to Mineral St , bridge. The Board unanimously favored the contract called for under Art. 5, stating their feeling that a wooden bridge would not meet the re- quirements and that it would be a mistake to expend money for that purpose . The matter was discussed at considerable length and it