HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-04-24 Annual Town Meeting Minutes ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
The Precincts listed below met at 7:00 PM to conduct the following business:
Precinct 1 - With a Quorum present elected Sheila Mulroy as Precinct Chair and Roy Benjamin as Precinct
Clerk and voted on Article 25, Town Meeting Member list of removal, see Article 25 for results.
Precinct 2 - With a Quorum present elected Anthony D'Arezzo as Precinct Chair and John Sasso as
Precinct Clerk and voted on Article 25, Town Meeting Member list of removal, see Article 25 for results.
Precinct 3 - With a Quorum present elected Paul Sylvester as Precinct Chair and John Breslin as Precinct
Clerk and voted on Article 25, Town Meeting Member list of removal, see Article 25 for results.
Precinct 4 - With a Quorum present elected Russell Graham as Precinct Chair and Mary Ellen O'Neill as
Precinct Clerk and voted on Article 25, Town Meeting Member list of removal, see Article 25 for results.
Precinct 5 - With a Quorum present elected Anne Landry as Precinct Chair and Patrick O'Sullivan as
Precinct Clerk and voted on Article 25, Town Meeting Member list of removal, see Article 25 for results.
Precinct 6 - With a Quorum present elected Michele Sanphy as Precinct Chair and Kelly Malone as
Precinct Clerk and voted on Article 25, Town Meeting Member list of removal, see Article 25 for results. A
vote was taken to elect Robert L Mandell and Michael Allen Mandell on a tie breaker vote from the April 4,
2017 election.
Precinct 7 - With a Quorum present elected Dan Ensminger as Precinct Chair and John Carpenter as
Precinct Clerk and voted on Article 25, Town Meeting Member list of removal, see Article 25 for results.
Precinct 8 - With a Quorum present elected Damien Mormon as Precinct Chair and Kathleen Golini as
Precinct Clerk and voted on Article 25, Town Meeting Member list of removal, see Article 25 for results.
The meeting was called to order by the Moderator, Alan E. Foulds, at 7:33 PM, there being a quorum
present. The Invocation was given by Philip Pacino, Precinct 5 followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the
Flag. All new members of Town Meeting were sworn-in. The Constables return of the Warrant was read by
the Town Clerk.
The following announcements were made by the Moderator:
As is our tradition at the beginning of the Annual Town Meeting every April, the chair would like to remind
Town Meeting Members, and inform newly elected members about some of the basic rules, and how we
will proceed:
1 When you are recognized please wait until you have the microphone before speaking. In addition to
being heard in the hall we want you to be heard on RCN, as well. The tapes from the cablecast
may be used in verifying the official report.
2 Before speaking, please state your name and precinct.
3 Members are limited to no more than 10 minutes. The Chair will call on people roughly in the order
that they raise their hands ... taking those that have not yet spoken, first.
4 Non-members may speak, but only after members have first had the opportunity to do so. Non-
member proponents of a motion may speak with permission of the body.
5 Remember to stay away from personal attacks or, for the most part, personal references. We are
here to discuss issues and NOT personalities.
6 A couple of years ago we instituted a new practice. We no longer read the motions, as all of you
have a printed copy. The only time we read it is if there is a change from what you have. The
moderator, instead, declares that the motion has been made. We then call on the main proponent
to open discussion. Then we hear relevant reports; Financial articles are reported on by the Finance
Committee, bylaw changes by the Bylaw Committee, and so forth. Then we open debate to all
members.
iioage
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
7 After debate has proceeded for a while, we may have someone "move the previous question", or
simply "move the question". That is a call for debate to end. That motion itself is non-debatable,
and we will proceed directly to the issue of stopping debate. It takes a 2/3 vote. The Chair will not
recognize that motion from a person who has just spoken. In other words, if you want to move the
question and stop debate, that must be the only thing you have risen for.
8 Amendments. We may have people offer amendments to motions on the floor. These will be
accepted. Once an amendment is proposed and seconded, we debate only the merits of the
proposed amendment - not the main motion. When ready, we vote on the proposed amendment,
then we return to debating the main motion, either as is stood before the proposed amendment or,
as amended - depending on how the vote to amend went. When proposing amendments please
provide them to the town clerk on an 8 1/2 by 11 sheet in order to get your wording correct.
9 Town Meeting Members must be sitting in the lower portion of the hall if they want to be
recognized as town meeting members, and have their votes counted.
10 Instructional Motions. Article 3 is placed in the warrant by the Board of Selectmen, and calls for
"Instructional Motions". These motions "instruct" various boards or individuals to do whatever the
motion calls for. Technically State Law does not allow motions to be made when the subject matter
does not first appear in the Warrant. They have traditionally been allowed here because they are
completely "non-binding". Our bylaws stipulate that all Main Motions (which these are) must be
made in writing. Additionally, I ask that they be written on an 8 1/2 by 11 sheet, containing nothing
but the motion. Otherwise they are likely to be lost. The Chair will enforce that rule tonight. In
addition I would ask that whenever practical all such motions be presented to the Moderator at the
beginning of each night's session. At some convenient point the Chair will inform the body what
intended Instructional Motions have been presented. This is being done in fairness to those being
"Instructed", and deserve some semblance of notice, and to Town Meeting Members who, when
making a decision as to whether or not to adjourn for the evening, should know what business is
still before them. Unlike all the regular articles, members have no idea what type of Instructional
Motions will be made.
11 There is often confusion with two particular motions, Indefinite Postponement and tabling. Let me
give you a brief explanation of the difference: Indefinite Postponement is a motion asking that the
body not vote for a particular motion during the life of this town meeting. Although it is thought of
not so much as a vote against a particular issue, but rather a postponement, the result is the
same. Voting in favor of indefinite postponement has the same result as voting against the main
motion. If indefinite postponement carries, the main motion is defeated. A motion to indefinitely
postpone is debatable. Tabling is used for another purpose altogether. Tabling temporarily puts a
motion aside. It can be brought up again by anyone moving to take it from the table, at any time
before the meeting adjourns sine die. This motion is non-debatable, although the chair will allow a
brief explanation as to why the motion to table has been made.
12 Adjournment. There are two types of adjournment. At the end of an evening we adjourn to a time
certain. Tonight, for instance, when we are done for the evening, we, presumably, will adjourn until
Thursday. When we are done with the business of town meeting we adjourn Sine Die, which
translates to"without day." In other words, the meeting is complete.
13 Please use non-audible alarms for your phones and other gadgets.
Finally, I would like to explain how things are likely to proceed over the next few hours, and next few
days. Tonight we lay article 2 and 3 on the table and begin with article 4, and we will proceed as far as we
can. We'll start Thursday evening by going back to article 2 so that we can hear the State of the Town
Address, then we will proceed with the budget. Once completed, we'll go back and work on whatever is
left.
Motion made by John Arena, Board of Selectmen to dispense of the reading of the warrant and all motions
in their entirety.
21v.Ie
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
Motion Carried
ARTICLE 2: To hear and act on the reports of the Board of Selectmen, School Committee, Library
Trustees, Municipal Light Board, Finance Committee, Bylaw Committee, Town Manager, Town Accountant
and any other Town Official, Board or Committee.
Motion made by John Arena, Board of Selectmen to table Article 2
Motion Carried to Table
ARTICLE 3: Move to choose all other necessary Town Officers and Special Committees and
determine what instructions shall be given Town Officers and Special Committees, and to see what sum
the Town will vote to appropriate by borrowing or transfer from available funds, or otherwise, for the
purpose of funding Town Officers and Special Committees to carry out the instructions given to them, or
take any other action with respect thereto.
Finance Committee Report: No report
Bylaw Committee Report: No report
Motion made by John Arena, Board of Selectmen to table Article 3
Motion to Table Carried
ARTICLE 4: Motion made by the Board of Selectmen that the Town vote to amend the FY 2017-
2027 Capital Improvements Program as provided for in Section 7-7 of the Reading Home Rule Charter and
as previously amended, by making these changes:
General Fund
FY2017: -$150.000
$100,000 Administrative Services - Cell Tower Design
$55,000 Facilities - Replace Tile at Joshua Eaton due to leak
$30,000 Facilities - Masonry at Wood End
$15,000 Facilities - Masonry at Parker
-$350,000 Public Services Recreation - Defer Killam Field and parking lot until FY2023
FY2018: -$180.800 (needed to fund RMHS litigation debt)
$190,000 Fire - Breathing Apparatus
$150,000 DPW - Truck#9 Advanced from FY2019
$150,000 Permanent Building Committee Funding
$40,000 Administrative Services - Tech GIS Flyover Planimetrics
$32,400 DPW - Cemetery Ford Sedan advanced from FY2020
$30,000 Fire Department - Hose
+$25,000 School - Large-Scale Technology Projects (now $100,000)
+$25,000 DPW - Sidewalk/Curb Pedestrian Safety (now $100,000)
+$25,000 DPW - Skim Coating/Crack Seal Patching (now $100,000)
$15,000 Fire Department - Multi-Gas Meters
+$2,000 DPW Parks - SKAG 61" Mower now $20,000 (was $18,000)
-$3,000 DPW Cemetery - SKAG 52" Mower now $15,000 (was $18,000)
-$35,000 Police - Vehicle Video Integration defer to FY2019
3 1 P a g e
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
-$40,000 DPW - Screener now $95,000 (reduced from $135,000)
-$50,000 DPW - Yard Improvements Removed
-$70,000 Fire Department - Alarm Truck defer to FY2021 (now $80,000)
-$90,000 DPW - Fire Suppression System Removed
-$115,000 Public Services Recreation - Defer Barrows Backstop and Infield to FY2020 (now $125,000)
-$462,000 Parker Middle School Roof Repairs defer to FY2019
FY2019 -$191.000
Various changes made
FY2020+
Various other changes made
Enterprise Funds - Water
FY2017: None
FY2018: -$150.000
-$150,000 Truck #6 Defer to FY2019
+$373,299 in Debt Service (+$397,299 for water main repairs and -$24,000 for Auburn water tank)
FY2019+
Various changes made (note repairs to Auburn water tank deferred from FY2018 to FY2020, changed to
purchase new water tank at lifetime savings in excess of $1 million)
Enterprise Funds - Sewer
FY2017: +$200.000
+$200,000 West Street/Batchelder Road Sewer Station project - unanticipated ground water issue
FY2018: +S200.000
$200,000 Vacuum truck advanced from FY19 (split with Storm Water EF)
+$312,000 in debt service for sewer station repairs (Charles Street project is increased by $500,000 to
$2.4 million; Sturges sewer station is increased by $675,000 to $1.775 million and deferred until FY2021)
FY2019+
Various changes made
Enterprise Funds - Storm Water
FY2017: None
FY2018: +4175.000
$200,000 Vacuum truck advanced from FY2019 (split with Sewer EF)
-$25,000 general drainage improvements reduced from $75,000 to $50,000
-$27,500 debt service (interest only) as Sturges Park, Main Street & Minot Street (side streets) drainage
projects are delayed to FY2019
FY2019+
Various changes made
Background: This Article is included in every Town Meeting Warrant. The Reading General Bylaw
(section 6.1.3) states"... No funds may be appropriated for any capital item unless such item is included in
the Capital Improvements Program, and is scheduled for funding in the Fiscal Year in which the
appropriation is to be made." Bond ratings agencies also want to ensure that changes to a long-term CIP
are adequately described.
.11a11
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
Presentation given by:
. Bob LeLacheur - See Attached
Finance Committee Reoort - given by Paul McNeice: The Finance Committee recommends the
proposed amendments to the FY 2017 - FY 2027 Capital Improvements Program by a vote of 9-0-0 at
their meeting on March 22, 2017. Placing items in the Capital Improvement Program is a prerequisite but
in itself does not authorize spending funds towards these items.
Bylaw Committee Repo rt: No report
Board of Selectmen Repo rt: The Board of Selectmen on March 7, 2017 voted 5-0 to support this
Article.
Motion Carried
ARTICLE S: Motion made by the Finance Committee that the Town vote to amend the Town's
Operating Budget for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2016, as adopted under Article 12 of the Annual
Town Meeting of March 1, 2016 and amended under Article 11 of the Subsequent Town Meeting of
November 14, 2016; and to see if the Town will vote to raise and appropriate, borrow or transfer from
available funds, or otherwise provide a sum or sums of money to be added to the amounts appropriated
under said Article, as amended, for the operation of the Town and its government:
General Fun - Wages and Expense
AccouWt Lin Description Decrease Increase
B99 - Benefits Health Insurance Premiums -$100,000 $200,000
expenses Retirement Assessment -$100,000
C99 - Capital Administrative Services - Cell Tower $150,000
Expenses design $100,000
Facilities - Joshua Eaton tiles $55,000
Facilities - Masonry at Wood End
$30,000
Facilities - Masonry at Parker $15,000
Defer Killam fields and parking lot
-$350,000
E99 - Vocational Reduced for actual enrollment $501000
Education Minuteman and Essex North -$50,000
G91 - Administrative Vacation/Sick buyback $15,000 $71,175
Services Wages Pay and Class funding used $13,625
Technology OT $5,000
Election Workers (October Special)
$4,000
Operations Specialist -$15,000
Pay and Class funding not used -$23,350
Pay and Class Funding transferred
-$70,450
G92 - Administrative Town Counsel $50,000 (TLT $25,000; $114,650
Services Expenses 40B projects $15,000; other $10,000)
Special Counsel TLT $30,000
Special Counsel cable $25,000
HR Professional Services (Police Lt and
S t nrnoH,ns rocess art II 9 650
5ivage
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
A nt Line D ri tion D r a In
H91 - Public Services Building Inspections -$10,000 $94,550
Wages Economic Development Director -
$45,000
Community Services Director -$57,000
Pay and Class funding used +$17,450
H91 - Public Services Economic Development expenses $3,000 $3,000
Expenses
I91 - Finance Wages Vacation/Sick buyback $2,875 $12,125
Pay and Class funding used $9,250
191 - Public Safety Police Vacation/Sick buyback $70,750 $219,900
Wages Fire Vacation/Sick buyback $69,850
Fire OT (injuries) $40,000
Animal Control Officer $19,000 (not yet
regionalized, see line 192)
Police CPR training $8,500 (as of October
2016 no longer state funded)
Fire OT (active shooter training) $7,000
Pay and Class funding used $4,800
192 --Public Safety Fire Protective Clothing $8,000 $30,000
expenses Police Clothing/Uniforms $7,000
Police Officer Training $5,000
Animal Control Regionalization -$50,000
K91 - Public Works Pay and Class funding used $2,825 $2,825
Wages
K92 - Public Works Highway Outsourced Repairs $25,000 $50,000
Expenses Highway Fuel -$75,000
K93 - Public Works Estimate $250,000 $250,000
Snow & Ice
K94 - Public Works Street Lights - $15,000 $15,000
Street Lights
L91 - Library Wages Vacation/Sick buyback $11,825 $34,325
Pay and Class funding used $22,500
M91 - Core Facilities Security Systems Evaluation - $137,000
accounting entry needed $125,000
Vacation/Sick buyback $12,000
U99-- School Science Curriculum $150,000
Department
Subtotals $660,725 $923,825
Net Operating Expenses $263,100
From Vacation/Sick Stabilization $30.78
Fund (proposal to eliminated in Article
11) $60,000
From Inspections Revolving Fund
(reduce the offset previously budgeted) $323,069.22
From Free Cash
Enterprise Fun - Wages and Ex all
FAnt Line .Des ion Decr In
X99 - Sewer West Street/Batchelder Road Sewer Station $200,000
ex enses
project - unanticipated ground water issue
Subtotals 0 $200,000
61P.. .
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
Net Operating Expenses 200 000
From Sewer Reserves $200.000
Presentation given by:
. Bob LeLacheur - See Attached
Finance Committee Report - niven by Peter Lvdecker: At their meeting on March 22, 2017 the
Finance Committee voted 9-0-0 to recommend this Article to Town Meeting.
Bylaw Committee Report: No report
Board of Selectmen Report: The Board of Selectmen on March 7, 2017 voted 5-0 to support this
Article. At the time, the estimate for snow & ice was only $100,000.
After some discussion a vote was taken:
Motion Carried
ARTICLE 6: Motion made by the Board of Selectmen that the Town vote to raise and appropriate,
transfer from available funds or otherwise provide a sum or sums of money to pay bills remaining unpaid
from prior fiscal years for goods and services actually rendered to the Town as follows:
. Callback Staffing Solutions, LLC in the amount of$90.72
Background: In January 2017 the town became aware of an outstanding invoice for Callback
Staffing Solutions, LLC in the amount of $90.72 for services rendered in lune 2016. The invoice is for the
monthly fee for a new web based scheduling system for the fire department. Unfortunately, the invoice
was sent to the fire department through email and ended up in the junk mail and was not discovered until
the vendor notified the Town in January 2017 that the bill remained outstanding.
Presentation given by:
. Sharon Angstrom - See Attached
Finance Committee Report given by Peter Lvdecker: At their meeting on March 22, 2017 the
Finance Committee voted 9-0-0 to recommend this Article to Town Meeting. This bill is an obligation that
should be paid by the Town, with a source of Free Cash.
Bylaw Committee Report: No report
Board of Selectmen Report: The Board of Selectmen on March 7, 2017 voted 5-0 to support this
Article.
4/5ths Vote Required
Declared Unanimous
158 Town Meeting Members in Attendance
Motion Carried
ARTICLE 7: Motion made by the Board of Selectmen that the Town vote to authorize the Board of
Selectmen to sell, exchange, or dispose of, various items of Town tangible property, upon such terms and
conditions as they may determine.
7 1 P a g e
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
Estimated
Dossier Year Make Model Hours N64,492
value$ Notes
Backhoe 2007 CAT 420 40,000
Screenall 1994 Reed RD40B 27387,000 Diesel
Truck 9 2004 International 700SER 6,500
Truck 24 2000 Ford F450 5,000 Diesel, DumTruck 10 1996 Intematmiral 400SER 3,500
Roller 1998 Leeboy L300 1.5 ton 62431,000 Hydrostatic
1RB 4 in 1 bucket 2009 1RB 4 in 1 bucket 1,000
Mower 1995 Sca 52" SWG 500
Mower 1996 Sca 52" SWG 500
Mower 2008 Turf Tiger 61" STT61V 500
Mower 1989 John Deere 912 1239 500
Fuel Transfer Tank Fuel Transfer Tank 100 100galw/pump
weatherguard Toolbox Weatherguard Toolbox 100
Stone Cement mixer 1993 Stone Mixer 100
Holder V-nose plow Holder V-nose plow 100
Trailer ramps Trailer Ramps 100
Background: As described in Article 4, the current MetroFire trailer will be taken from the town
and given to a community south of Boston once the new one is purchased. We thought it best to note this
intended disposal of capital equipment legally owned by the town, even though no municipal funds were
used for acquisition. The motion under this Article will include the trailer, but in the background we did
want to distinguish it from other items listed in the table above.
Presentation given by:
• Sharon Angstrom - See Attached
Finance Committee Report - ahren by Eric Burkhart: At their meeting on March 22, 2017 the
Finance Committee voted 9-0-0 to recommend this Article to Town Meeting.
Bylaw Committee Report: No report
Board of Selectmen Report: The Board of Selectmen on March 7, 2017 voted 5-0 to support this
Article
Motion Carried
ARTICLE B: Motion made by the Board of Selectmen that the Town vote to accept the provisions
of Section 20 of Chapter 32B of the Massachusetts General Laws, as amended by Section 15 of the
Chapter 218 of the Acts of 2016, establishing an Other Post-Employment Benefits Liability Trust Fund; to
authorize the Board of Selectmen and Treasurer to execute a declaration of trust creating an expendable
trust for the purpose of holding monies appropriated to such fund; to designate the Treasurer as the
trustee of such trust; to authorize the transfer of any and all monies currently held for the purpose of
paying retiree health and life benefits to such trust; to authorize the trustee to invest and reinvest the
monies in such fund in the State Retiree Benefits Trust Fund; and to authorize the participation of the
Town of Reading Municipal Light Department in the trust fund in accordance with procedures and criteria
established by the trustee.
stooge
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
Background: The state recently enacted legislation that will settle some state-wide questions
about the legal structure of so-called OPEB Liability Trust Funds. The Town of Reading, by vote of Town
Meeting, previously established such a Trust Fund before the state took this action. By adopting the
provisions of Section 20 of Chapter 32B of the Massachusetts General Laws, as amended by Section 15 of
the Chapter 218 of the Acts of 2016, the town's existing OPEB Trust Fund will fall under this new legal
structure.
The second portion of this Article is the annual transfer of funds previously budgeted and held for the
OPEB fund. This practice is followed each year in case health insurance costs are higher than budgeted,
and therefore may be needed to fund a deficit. In FY17, as demonstrated under Article 5, a small surplus
exists in that account so the annual OPEB transfers should be completed as designed: $500,000 in the
general fund, $50,000 in the water fund, $20,000 in the sewer fund and $6,000 in the storm water fund.
This Article will therefore move the total $576,000 of all these OPEB contributions to the trust for Other
Post Employment Benefit liabilities.
The most recent OPEB valuation shows the Town's OPEB liability at $67.2 million, though this figure will be
updated in a few months. The three Enterprise Funds and the Light Department are on an aggressive
twenty year funding schedule, and the General Fund is on a partial funding schedule projected over thirty
years. The latter will transition to a full funding schedule as soon as possible, as is required by law or after
the Pension Fund is fully funded in FY29.
Presentation given by:
• Sharon Angstrom - See Attached
Finance Committee Report - aiven by Vanessa Alvarado: At their meeting on March 22, 2017
the Finance Committee voted 9-0-0 to recommend this Article to Town Meeting.
Bylaw Committee Report: No report
Board of Selectmen Report: The Board of Selectmen on March 7, 2017 voted 5-0 to support this
Article.
Motion Carried
ARTICLE 9: Motion made by the Board of Selectmen that the Town vote to hear the report of the
School Committee or any other public body that the real property shown as "Oakland Road Parcel" on a
plan of land entitled "Plan of Land Oakland Road Town of Reading," prepared by Town of Reading -
Department of Public Works, Engineering Division, Jeffrey T. Zager, Director DPW, Ryan Percival, PE, Town
Engineer, dated September 13, 2016, is no longer required for public purposes; to see if the Town will
vote, pursuant to Chapter 40, Section 15A, of the Massachusetts General Laws, to transfer the care,
custody, management and control of said Oakland Road Parcel to the Board of Selectmen.
Backaround: At November 2016 Town Meeting, three actions were sought regarding the town's
property on Oakland Road in two different Articles:
Article 15 - to discontinue portions of private ways on the property;
Article 16 - to declare, by accepting reports from the School Committee or any other public body,
that the land was no longer needed for public purpose; and
Article 16 - to authorize the Board of Selectmen to sell or otherwise dispose of the land.
911 a, e
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
All three of these actions had previously passed by large margins in a November 2011 Town Meeting, but
current Town Counsel deemed these previous actions as legally insufficient, as was described to November
2016 Town Meeting.
Article 15 passed at November 2016 Town Meeting, clearing the first action listed above. However Article
16 did not pass. A move to reconsider Article 16 in order to accomplish only the second action listed above
also did not pass. Afterwards several Town Meeting members explained they thought Article 15 cleared up
all the technicalities and Article 16 was only to authorize the Selectmen to sell the land.
This Article seeks to complete the second action only - to declare that the land was no longer needed for
public purpose. The School Committee is the only known body that may have any claim to the land, and
both in 2011 and 2016 they voted to declare any and all of their ownership to be surplus to their needs.
This second action is needed in order for the Board of Selectmen to undertake a process that would
include potential buyers of the parcel and any proposed uses. The Board understands and respects that
the November 2016 Town Meeting wanted to see exact proposed uses of the parcel before authorizing any
land transaction, and is committed to a public process to come up with one or more such proposals for a
future Town Meeting, if this Article is approved.
Presentation given by:
• Bob LeLacheur - See Attached
Finance Committee Report - aiven by Mark Dockser: At their meeting on March 22, 2017 the
Finance Committee voted 9-0-0 to recommend this Article to Town Meeting.
Bylaw Committee Report: No report
Board of Selectmen Report: The Board of Selectmen on March 7, 2017 voted 5-0 to support this
Article.
Motion made by Patricia Lloyd, Precinct 8 to amend the motion as follows:
Move to hear the Fepert of the Sehael Gemmittee er any other pub' e beely that the Feal PF8pefty shewn as
"E)ak'and Read PaFeel" en a plan of 'and entitled "Plan of Land Gakland Read Tewn of Read ng," pFepared
by Town of Read ng Department of Pub! e WeFks, Engineering Divisien, geffFey T. ZaijeF, D FeetaF DPW,
Ryan ^ dated c
, s no longer requ red far publie
to see if the Town will vote, pursuant to Chapter 40, Section 15A, of the Massachusetts General Laws, to
transfer the care, custody, management and control of said Oakland Road Parcel to the Board of
Selectmen.
Motion was Withdrawn
Motion made by Patrick O'Sullivan, Precinct 5 to move the question
2/3rd Vote Required
122 Voted in the affirmative
30 Voted in the negative
158 Town Meeting Members in Attendance
Motion to Move the Ouestion Carried
After some discussion a vote was taken:
101 Pa g
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
2/3rd Vote Required
123 Voted in the affirmative
30 Voted in the negative
158 Town Meeting Members in Attendance
Motion Carried as Presented
ARTICLE 10: Motion made by John Arena, Board of Selectmen and Article 10 was tabled
Motion Carried
ARTICLE 11: Motion made by the Board of Selectmen that the Town vote to raise and appropriate,
transfer from available funds, borrow or otherwise provide $2.4 million for the purpose of making
extraordinary repairs and/or replacement of sanitary sewer collection systems, including the costs of
consulting services, audits, plans, documents, cost estimates, bidding services and all related expenses
incidental thereto and necessary in connection therewith, said sum to be expended by and under the
direction of the Town Manager; and to see if the Town will authorize the Board of Selectmen, Town
Manager, or any other agency of the Town, to apply for a grant or grants, to be used to defray the cost of
all, or any part of, said sanitary sewer improvements; and to authorize the Town Manager to enter into
any and all contracts and agreements as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this Article.
Backoround: The purpose of this Article is to authorize debt for the replacement of the Charles
Street sewer pump station. In 2010 the Town hired CDM Smith to assess the condition of and recommend
repairs and improvements to the Town's 12 wastewater pump stations. Based on service area and
evaluated deficiencies, CDM Smith and the Town have prioritized the Charles Street sewer station to be
the next station replaced.
The existing Charles Street sewer pump station is currently a dry/wet pit station, located at the
intersection of Charles Street and Haverhill Street, which services the largest area of Town (approximately
990 properties). The 49 year old station first went online in 1968 with a design capacity of 850 gallons per
minute (GPM) and is approximately 30 feet in depth. The aging station has major corrosion to its steel
walls and steel staircase, and out of code electrical systems, which present a significant operating safety
concern. The existing pumps have become inefficient due to decreased equipment life and pump
cavitation.
The proposed project would be to replace the failing station in its entirety with new submersible pumps;
upgraded controls and electrical; SCADA; and a backup generator capable of running the station in the
event of a power outage. The total estimated cost of this project is $2.4 million.
Presentation given by:
. Bob LeLacheur - See Attached
Finance Committee Report - given by David Neshat: At their meeting on March 22, 2017 the
Finance Committee voted 9-0-0 to recommend this Article to Town Meeting.
Bylaw Committee Report: No report
Board of Selectmen Report: The Board of Selectmen on March 7, 2017 voted 5-0 to support this
Article.
After some discussion a vote was taken:
11 J Pa g
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
2/3rd Vote Required
Declared Unanimous
158 Town Meeting Members in Attendance
Motion Carried
ARTICLE 12: Motion made by John Arena, Board of Selectmen and Article 12 was tabled
Motion Carried
ARTICLE 13: Motion made by the Board of Selectmen that the Town vote to amend the vote taken
under Article 12 of Annual Town Meeting on April 30, 2009 so as to abolish the Sick Leave and Vacation
buy-back Stabilization Fund.
Background: Article 12 at 2009 Annual Town Meeting established a Sick Leave and Vacation buy-
back Stabilization Fund for town government employees, with an initial funding of $25,000. At the time,
the overall liability was studied, since eligibility for sick leave buyback had been eliminated for all new
hires. A strategy of annual funding was drafted internally in order to defense this liability, instead of
funding it on a 'pay as you go' basis.
This strategy was followed for a period of time, but abandoned about four years ago as budgets got very
tight. To set aside such funding above any current need was deemed a bit of a luxury. Thus recent
practice has devolved back to the pay-as-you-go approach, as is seen by requests under Article 5 at this
Town Meeting. The balance of the fund was thought to have been fully drawn down a year ago, but was
repopulated by $30.78 of interest earned as also was seen in Article 5. Since this funding mechanism has
been discontinued as a policy, it is best to also eliminate the Stabilization Fund.
It is important to note that explicit requests for funding of vacation/sick leave buybacks only appear to
Town Meeting when there is otherwise insufficient funding available. For example, there were other town
departments that used vacation/sick leave buyback funds in FY17, but their wage budgets had sufficient
surplus funding to not require a budget transfer. This is typical of Town Hall departments especially as the
vacancy created by retirement usually remains open for a period of time.
Presentation given by:
. Sharon Angstrom - See Attached
Finance Committee Report - aiven by Anne Johnson Landry: At their meeting on March 22,
2017 the Finance Committee voted 9-0-0 to recommend this Article to Town Meeting.
Bylaw Committee Report: No report
Board of Selectmen Report: The Board of Selectmen on March 7, 2017 voted 5-0 to support this
Article.
After some discussion a vote was taken:
Motion Carried
ARTICLE 14: Motion made by the Board of Selectmen that the Town vote to approve an Affordable
Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan pursuant to Chapter 140 of the Acts of 2001 entitled "AN ACT
AUTHORIZING THE TOWN OF READING TO ESTABLISH AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING TRUST FUND".
121 P 9e
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
Background: Chapter 140 of the Acts of 2001 authorized the Town of Reading to establish a
separate fund known as the Affordable Housing Trust Fund (AHTF). The AHTF requires Town Meeting
approval of an annual allocation plan submitted by the Board of Selectmen.
AHTF expenditures require approval by a majority vote of the full combined membership of the Board of
Selectmen and the Reading Housing Authority. AHTF uses include:
♦ Create or preserve affordable housing;
♦ Maintain or operate affordable housing;
♦ Develop new or rehabilitate existing housing as affordable homeownership or rental units;
The purpose of the Affordable Housing Allocation Plan is to provide a framework for the Town to expend
funds on affordable housing. The current AHTF balance of $262,634 reflects revenue generated through
the actions of the CPDC, as well as proceeds from the loss of an affordable unit. There are no Town tax
generated funds in the AHTF. The only expenditure to date from the AHTF, in the amount of $200,000,
was to assist Oaktree development with financing affordable housing at 30 Haven Street.
At the 2012 Annual Town Meeting, approval was given for funding to hire a consultant to assist a staff
initiative to update the Town's Housing Plan, including the five-year "Housing Production Plan". This effort
is important as a defense against unfriendly 40B developments in the community, and requires the Town
to develop a phased plan to produce housing to reach the 10% threshold as required by MGL Ch. 40B.
Reading's Housing Production Plan has been approved by the Board of Selectmen and by the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
The Town commissioned and received a supplemental report on how the AHTF can best be used to support
the "Planned Production" goals of the Housing Plan. This report was received in late winter 2012, and a
presentation was made in April of 2013 to the Board of Selectmen and the Reading Housing Authority. The
report recommends a significant restructuring of the Town's AHTF efforts. The Board of Selectmen
considered these recommendations two years ago, but decided against any changes. Therefore, the
current recommendation is to adopt the AHTF Allocation Plan as shown below as the framework for the
use of Affordable Housing Trust Fund in FY 2018.
Note that Reading as lead community is part of a regional effort (along with North Reading, Wilmington
and Saugus) to share a Regional Housing Services Office (RHSO). The RHSO monitors and administers
affordable housing requirements including tracking and updating the Subsidized Housing Inventory (SHI)
as well as maintaining ready buyer and ready renter lists.
Affordable Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan
FY 2018
Pursuant to Article 14 of the 2017 Annual Town Meeting, an Affordable Housing Trust Fund Allocation Plan
for the Fiscal Year 2018 in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 140 of the Acts of 2001 is as follows:
Available Balance - Unrestricted Funds: $262,634
Available Balance - Restricted Funds: $0
Unrestricted Funds shall be used for the fallowing purposes:
5% up to a maximum of $10,000 for administration of Affordable Housing
Remainder for constructing affordable housing (including loan and grant programs); or
for maintaining and improving affordability of existing housing stock; or for
the purchase of existing housing stock to add it to or maintain it as a part of
the existing affordable housing inventory
Presentation given by:
131 P g
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
• Jean Delios - See Attached
Fence Committee Report - given by Mark Dockser: At their meeting on March 22, 2017 the
Finance Committee voted 9-0-0 to recommend this Article to Town Meeting.
Bylaw Committee Report: No report
Board of Selectmen Report: The Board of Selectmen on March 7, 2017 voted 5-0 to support this
Article.
After some discussion a vote was taken:
Motion Carried
ARTICLE 1S: Motion made by the Board of Selectmen that the Town vote to establish the limit on
the total amount that may be expended from each revolving fund established by Article 9 of the Town of
Reading General Bylaw pursuant to Section 53EIh of Chapter 44 of the Massachusetts General Laws for
the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2017.
Revolving Spending Revenue Allowed Expenditure Year End
Account Authority Source Expenses Limits Balance
Conservation Conservation Fees as Consulting and $25,000 Available
Commission Commission provided for in engineering services for
Consulting Reading General for the review of expenditure
Fees Bylaws Section designs and next year
5.7, Wetlands engineering work for
Protection the protection of
wetlands.
Inspection Town Building, Legal, oversight and $200,000 Available
Revolving Manager Plumbing, inspection, plan review, for
Fund Wiring, Gas and initial property expenditure
other permits appraisals and appeals, next year
for Oaktree, Public Services
Addison- planning and general
Wesley/ Pearson management, curb,
and Johnson sidewalks and
Woods pedestrian safety
developments improvements, records
archiving and other
project related costs.
Public Health Board of Clinic fees, Materials and costs $25,000 Available
Clinics and Health charges and associated with clinics for
Services third party and public health expenditure
reimbursements programs next year
141 Pa g
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
Revolving Spending Revenue Allowed Expenditure Year End
Account Authority Source Expenses Limits Balance
Library Library Charges for lost Acquire Library $15,000 Available
Materials Director and or damaged materials to replace for
Replacement Trustees Library lost or damaged items expenditure
materials next year
Mattera Facilities Rental Fees Utilities and all other $10,000 Available
Cabin Director maintenance and for
Operating operating expenses expenditure
next year
Town Forest Director of Sale of timber; Planning and $10,000 Available
Public Works fees for use of Improvements to the for
upon the the Town Forest Town Forest expenditure
recommends next year
tion of the
Town Forest
Committee
Background: These revolving funds were approved as part of a new General Bylaw by November
2016 Town Meeting, but as of this writing that action has not been affirmed by the AG's office. Thus we
are being perhaps a bit more thorough in our approach in the background described herein and in the
table above. There are no changes in that table from what was approved by Town Meeting in April 2016.
• Conservation Consulting Revolving Fund - These funds are used to receive payments from
applicants, hire expert consultants where required, and return the balance to the applicant. The
balance in the Conservation Consulting Revolving Fund as of February 2017 is $14.
• Inspections Revolvino Fund — This revolving fund was established in 2002 to accept permit fees
associated with the development of the landfill at 'Walker's Brook Crossing', and a few larger projects
(Johnson Farms/Woods and Archstone in 2004; Addison Wesley/Pearson in 2008; and Oaktree in
2010) have been added by Town Meeting since then. The balance available as of February 2017 in this
fund is $660,664 and of that total $190,000 is proposed by the Town Manager as part of the FY18
budget {$15,000 to be used to offset Public Services Overtime; $135,000 to support Economic
Development wages and expenses; and $40,000 to offset Building division wages}.
• Health Clinic Revolving Fund - The Reading Health Division contracts for third party payments for a
number of immunizations. The funds are used to augment the influenza vaccine supply from the State
Department of Public Health to insure vaccine for the homebound clients and first responders. The
Division also uses these funds for materials for other screening clinics. Clinic client fees are also
deposited into this fund to offset vaccine and clinical supply costs. The balance available as of February
2017 in this fund is $69,002. The State has been cutting back on the free Flu and other vaccines to be
distributed to cities and towns, and the Town therefore needs to purchase extra doses. The necessary
amounts used for clinic vaccine, supplies and staff salaries related to the clinics each year directly from
the revolving fund is therefore approximately $25,000.
• Library Materials Replacement Fund — During the course of a year, the Library recovers funds from
patrons who have lost or damaged books or other materials. Previously, those funds went into the
Town's General Fund and at the end of the year went into Free Cash. Once this Revolving Fund was
adopted (beginning in FY 2010), those funds recovered from patrons for lost or damaged materials
151 Page
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial Nigh School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
were available directly to the Library for expenditure to purchase replacement materials and
processing supplies. The balance available as of February 2017 in this fund is $4,718.
• Matters Cabin Operating Fund - The log cabin on the Mattera conservation land was purchased
several years ago, and was renovated by the Vocational School. Some of the use is revenue
generating, and it is anticipated that over time the site will generate enough funding to pay the
operating costs of the cabin - primarily utilities. This Article allows those revenues that are generated
to be used directly for the operating expenses of the cabin. The balance available as of February 2017
in this fund is $228. In response to an instructional motion by Town Meeting, the Town Manager has
moved the responsibility for both the Mattera Cabin and Cemetery garages to be moved to the
Facilities department.
• Town Forest Revolving Fund was created in 2011. The purpose is to allow revenues from controlled
timber harvesting and permit fees to then be spent by the DPW Director upon the recommendation of
the Town Forest Committee, on improvements to the Town Forest, including planning efforts. The
Town Forest Committee has had a forest stewardship plan created (through a grant) to make
recommendations on forest management including controlled timber harvesting. The balance available
as of February 2017 in this fund is $0. It is anticipated that timber harvesting on a limited basis could
begin at any time, and therefore there will be future proceeds which can be used for the purposes of
the revolving fund.
Presentation given by:
• Sharon Angstrom - See Attached
Finance Committee Report - aiven by Paul McNeice: At their meeting on March 22, 2017 the
Finance Committee voted 9-0-0 to recommend this Article to Town Meeting.
Bylaw Committee Report: No report
Board of Selectmen Report: The Board of Selectmen on March 7, 2017 voted 5-0 to support this
Article.
Motion made by Bill Brown, Precinct 8 to amend as follows:
Inspection Town Building, Legal, oversight and $200,000 Available
Revolving Manager Plumbing, inspection, plan review, 100,000 for
Fund Wiring, Gas and initial property expenditure
other permits appraisals and appeals, next year
for Oaktree, Public Services
Addison- planning and general
Wesley/ Pearson management, curb,
and Johnson sidewalks and
Woods pedestrian safety
developments improvements, records
archiving and other
project related costs.
Motion Does Not Carry
After some discussion a vote was taken:
Motion Carried as Presented
161 Page
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
ARTICLE 16: Motion made by John Arena, Board of Selectmen and Article 16 was tabled
Motion Carried
ARTICLE 17: Motion made by the Board of Selectmen that the Town vote to raise and appropriate,
borrow, transfer from available funds, or otherwise provide a sum of money as provided by the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts (preliminary figure is $594,103) for highway projects in accordance with
Chapter 90 of the Massachusetts General Laws.
Backaround: Reading expects about $600,000 in FY18 Chapter 90 funding for local road repairs.
The motion made at Town Meeting will be to accept the Chapter 90 state assistance at whatever level is
ultimately available, a trend in other communities in order to avoid any uncertainty of the timing of the
final state budget process.
Presentation given by:
• Sharon Angstrom - See Attached
Finance Committee Report - aiven by Peter Lvdecker: At their meeting on March 22, 2017 the
Finance Committee voted 9-0-0 to recommend this Article to Town Meeting.
Bylaw Committee Report: No report
Board of Selectmen Report: The Board of Selectmen on March 7, 2017 voted 5-0 to support this
Article.
2/3rd Vote Required
Declared Unanimous
158 Town Meeting Members in Attendance
Motion Carried
ARTICLE 18: Motion made by the Board of Selectmen that the Town vote to amend the General
Bylaw by deleting Section 3.3.6, Permanent Building Committee, in its entirety and inserting in place
thereof the following:
3.3.6 Permanent Building Committee
There shall be a Permanent Building Committee consisting of five (5) Permanent Members and,
notwithstanding any provision of Section 3.3.1.6 to the contrary, up to two (2) Temporary
Members for each Project that the Permanent Building Committee undertakes. Permanent and
Temporary Members of the Permanent Building Committee shall be appointed by an Appointment
Committee consisting of the Chair of the Board of Selectmen, the Chair of the School Committee
and the Town Moderator. In addition, the Appointment Committee may appoint not more than
three (3) Associate Members whose service on the Permanent Building Committee shall be
governed by the third paragraph of Section 3.3.1.6.
Permanent and Associate Members shall be volunteers having practical experience and skills in
professions that concentrate on the design, construction, management or financing of buildings,
including architects; civil engineers; structural engineers; mechanical, electrical and plumbing
engineers; building contractors, project managers; property managers; attorneys and building
171 Page
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
tradespersons. Their terms shall be so arranged that as nearly an equal number of terms as
possible shall expire each year.
The Permanent Building Committee shall work with the Director of Facilities to compile an
assessment of the physical condition of, and an inventory of anticipated repairs and renovations to,
all existing Town buildings and shall summarize its findings in an annual report to Town Meeting.
The Permanent Building Committee shall adopt a formal building project application process to be
followed in order for any proposed project to be considered for evaluation and possible
administration. The Permanent Building Committee shall evaluate only Project Applications
forwarded by the School Committee, the Board of Selectmen or the Library Trustees (the
"Sponsoring Agency"). All Sponsoring Agencies shall be notified of this application process and any
revisions to it in a timely manner after their adoption.
The Permanent Building Committee shall review and administer major Town building design studies
and construction projects having expected aggregate costs of$1,500,000 or more, but may decline
administration of Projects with little or no actual construction. The Permanent Building Committee's
jurisdiction shall not extend to projects of the Reading Municipal Light Department. The
Permanent Buildina Committee shall present their proiect evaluations to Town Meetina
at the reauest of the Sponsoring Aaencv for consideration and approval.
Once Town Meeting has authorized funds for a Project, the Appointment Committee shall add
Temporary Members to the Permanent Building Committee for such Project. Temporary Members
shall have the same participation and voting rights as Permanent Members on matters affecting the
particular Project for which they were appointed. Temporary Members shall be registered voters of
the Town, nominated by the Sponsoring Agency, and shall serve only for the time during which the
Permanent Building Committee is exercising its functions with respect to such Project. In the event
that a particular project is subject to participant requirements of a state funding authority, the
Appointment Committee may appoint additional Temporary members to the Permanent Building
Committee for that project; provided, however, that, in no event, shall the aggregate number of
Permanent and Temporary Members for a particular project exceed nine (9). Quorum requirements
for the Permanent Building Committee shall be the majority of the Permanent and Temporary
Members for a particular project.
Background: Since their inception, the Permanent Building Committee (PBC) has taken a serious
introspective look at how their committee was established, wishing to develop policies and procedures that
would best fulfill their mission. These discussions have involved several public meetings and a couple of
visits to the Board of Selectmen where the relevant elected boards (Schools & Library) and the Finance
Committee were invited to participate. The PBC has also studied the general bylaw 3.3.6 and over time, in
consultation with all of the above plus the Bylaw Committee and Town Counsel, suggested some changes.
The proposed new bylaw is shown above in its entirety, and below in the current form. A bold and cross-
out explanation of the transition would have led to more confusion than clarity, so instead further below is
a discussion of the proposed changes.
3.3.6 Permanent Building Committee (Current version)
There shall be a Permanent Building Committee consisting of five (5) Permanent Members and, except as
otherwise provided herein, up to two (2) Temporary Members for each project that the Permanent
Building Committee undertakes.
Permanent and Temporary Members of the Permanent Building Committee shall be appointed by an
Appointment Committee consisting of the Chair of the Board of Selectmen, the Chair of the School
Committee and the Town Moderator.
18J Pa, e
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
Permanent Members shall be volunteers having practical experience and skills in professions that
concentrate on the design, construction, management and/or financing of commercial / institutional
buildings such as architects: civil engineers; structural engineers; mechanical, electrical and plumbing
engineers, building contractors, project managers, property managers, attorneys and building
tradespersons. The terms shall be so arranged that as nearly an equal number of terms as possible shall
expire each year. Temporary Members may be appointed for each individual project that the Permanent
Building Committee undertakes.
Temporary Members shall have the same participation and voting rights as Permanent Members on
matters affecting the particular project for which they were appointed. Temporary Members shall be
registered voters of the Town, selected by the Board or Committee that proposes a particular building or
renovation project (the 'Sponsoring Agency) and shall serve only for the time during which the
Permanent Building Committee is exercising its functions with respect to such project. In the event that a
particular project is subject to participant requirements of a state funding authority, the Appointment
Committee may appoint additional members to the Permanent Building Committee for that particular
project; provided, however, that in no event, shall the aggregate number of Permanent and Temporary
Members with full voting rights for a particular project exceed nine (9). Quorum requirements for the
Permanent Building Committee shall be the majority of the Permanent and Temporary Members for a
particular project.
The Permanent Building Committee shall be responsible for the oversight and management of all major
municipal and school building design studies and construction projects having expected aggregate costs
exceeding two million dollars ($2,000,000). The Permanent Building Committee's jurisdiction shall not
extend to projects of the Reading Municipal Light Department. The Permanent Building Committee shall
present all such projects to the Finance Committee for consideration of funding options and shall sponsor
and present all such projects to Town Meeting for its consideration and approval of funding.
The Permanent Building Committee shall work with the School Committee, the Board of Selectmen and
any other Sponsoring Agency. The Sponsoring Agency shall notify the Permanent Building Committee of
its intention to undertake any such projects within eight (8) calendar days of a positive vote or general
affirmation to do so.
The Permanent Building Committee shall work with the Director of Facilities to compile an inventory of the
physical condition and anticipated repairs and renovations of all existing municipal buildings and will
summarize its findings in an annual report to Town Meeting.
Changes - using new bylaw as a reference:
1n paragraph: add explicit Associate member references and cite 'Section 3.3.1.6 Appointment of
Associate Members';
2"d paragraph: add in Associate member reference;
3'd paragraph: add the idea of assessment and not just an inventory of the public buildings. The PBC has a
great deal of relevant expertise to share with the Facilities department;
4`h paragraph: new reference to and requirement of the above mentioned policies and procedures. The
PBC has previously reviewed, for example, detailed 'Project Assessment Process' and 'Project
Administration'flowcharts in a report to Town Meeting;
4`h paragraph: clarify that only elected boards or committees may serve as sponsoring agencies.
Volunteers that created the initial bylaw all agreed that was the original intent;
191 P age
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
5th paragraph: revise the dollar limit from $2.0 million to $1.5 million. This corresponds to state law that
requires a community to hire a formal project manager for projects expected to be at or above the $1.5
million level;
5th paragraph: Note that the PBC may decline projects at or above $1.5 million if they have little or no
actual construction - for example large roof replacements;
6th paragraph: move all references to the Temporary members to this section and clarify the process. PBC
members unanimously believe that Temporary members should only be added after the Project
Assessment is complete and before the Project Administration is started. They prefer to have full
committee independence in that first assessment phase, with representation from a Sponsoring Agency
welcome to attend as a member of the general public.
Items eliminated from the current version of 3.3.6 (as is shown above in italics):
(1)The PBC did not wish to present projects to the Finance Committee for consideration of funding
options, believing that responsibility was shared between staff and the Sponsoring Agency;
(2)The PBC did not wish to sponsor and present all such projects to Town Meeting. The PBC strongly
believes they must maintain an independent distance from some aspects of the entire process;
There was no practical need for the 8 day notification period cited in the current bylaw.
Presentation given by:
. Greg Stepler - See Attached
Finance Committee Report; No report
Bylaw Committee Report - aiven by Jeff Struble: At their meeting on March 27, 2017 the Bylaw
Committee voted 4-0-0 to recommend this Article to Town Meeting, on the condition that the following
sentence is added at the end of the fifth paragraph: "The Permanent Building Committee shall present all
such projects to Town Meeting on behalf of the Sponsoring Agency for consideration and approval of
funding".
The PBC, as explained above under (2), wishes to remain as an independent resource up until Town
Meeting has formally approved a project. They believe the Sponsoring Agency should present their own
request to Town Meeting, and the PBC be called on for their observations and advice.
The two committees may meet in advance of Town Meeting to discuss their differences.
Board of Selectmen Report: The Board of Selectmen on March 7, 2017 voted 5-0 to support this
Article.
After some discussion a vote was taken:
Motion Carried
ARTICLE 19: After some discussion and due to an error in warrant printing and the motion of
Article 19 it was voted to table until next session of this Town Meeting.
Motion to Table Carried
201 Pa , ,
ANNUAL TOWN MEETING
Reading Memorial High School April 24, 2017
Performing Arts Center
On motion by John Arena, Board of Selectmen it was voted that this Annual Town Meeting stand
adjourned to meet at 7:30 PM at the Reading Memorial High School Preforming Arts Center, on Thursday,
April 27, 2017.
Meeting adjourned at 10:00 PM with 158 Town Meeting Members in attendance.
Motion Carried
A true copy Attest:
Laura A Gemme, CMC / CMMC
Town Clerk
211 P z ,.
District Priorities for FYi8
Not All Areas Fully Funded
• Four Focus Areas
• Closing the Achievement Gap
• Literacy
• Mathematics Instruction
• Social Emotional Learning
• Class sizes in 11 (18-22 students)
• Middle school interdisciplinary model
• Ensuring that RMHS Juniors and Seniors have access to
coursework for graduation
• Joshua Eaton School Improvement Plan Process
Cost Centers as a total of the Budget
FECUESTED FYa8 BUDGET
FY18 School Committee Budget Presentation
Summary of FY18 School Department Budget
• siiyoed with goals, mission, and vision of the Reading Public Schools
• $41,401,661 budget (1.61/o Increase)
• 1=,,duction of zo.9 FTE Staff (6.4 FTE Teachers)
cl ,i�s restoration of 7.o FTE middle school teachers ($438,000) from
.ntendent's FYi8 budget by making the following reductions/use of free cash.
u,logy -eplcni,hment purl bases and building based budgets (sc5o,o0o)
_,n p tions in salary saving s through staff turnover(sIHS,000)
f "c a'. fd > >niI lnr.i Pleetinyl l ur n D riga I tmenL h ave belrl S t�2,000in
lundg, dneeCedi
"'I( ihonal scoo,oco in free cash
i� , ,idditional i.o FTE special education teacher at Wood End and I.o FTE
,pe,!al education teacher atJoshua Eaton
, 1,') io, Science Implementation proposed atAprllTown Meeting for FY17
(Approved on 4/24/2017)
Cost Centers as a total of the Budget
REOUESTED FYA BUDGET
Administration Cost Center (2% ofTotal Budget)
• CentraIOffice Admini stratonsand AdministnativeAssistar its
• Legal and Auditing
• Employee Recruiting and Hiring
• Data and Information Management
• District TelecomrnunicationServices
• Annuity Matching Contributions
• Miscellaneous Supplies & Expenses
Regular Day Cost Center (6o% of Total Budget)
• Building Administrators and Secretaries
• Regular Education Teachers ,Tutors, and Paraprofessionals
• School Psychologists and Guidance Counselors
• ELL and Instructional Specialists
• Teacher Mentor and Leadership Stipends
• Cunlculum Matenals
• Professional Development/Tuition Reimbursement
• Substitute Teachers
• Mandatory Student Transportation ( > z miles for K 6)
• Instructional Matenals and Supplies
• nstructional Technology and Equipment
• Library Materials and Technology
• Testing and Assessment Software and Materials
Special Education Cost Center (31% of Total Budget)
Speaal Education Adminishatols and Seaeiaries
• Special Education Teachers and ParapioPessionais
• Therapeutic Specialists (OT, PT, SLP)
• Extended SchoolYeai Program Staff and Expenses
Legal Services
• Home and Hospital Tutorrrg
Consultative and Evaluative Servires
• Adaptive Equipment and Tr hnnIoq_y
• Testing and Assessment Software, Materials, and Services
• Instrurtional Matenakand Supplies for students on IEPs
• Transportation
• out of Ulstrrct Twtion
Uther District Programs (4% of Total Budget)
Athletics
H5.Assistant Principal it, , FTE), Scaetary, and Coaches
• Officials, E✓ent Detail, and Conal Mawton
• Equipment and Field hepaira id Mairlenar[e
• (auliryRentals(Pool, Ice Arena, G ymnast is Fa(il ity)
• Transportation
F wpmmnt and Supplies
Extracurricular
Assistant Principal (o 25 -TE)dud Advisor Sti pen ds
Fees, Meir,berships, Royalties, and Tionsponation
• Supplies&Equipment
Uther District Programs-Continued (4% of Total Budget)
Health Services
• Dnectorand SchoolNurses
• School Physician
• Medical Supplies and Equipment
Networking&Technology Infrastructure/Maintenance
• NetworkManagerand Technology Support
• Computer Technicians
• Inter net Ser vice
• Software and Licensing
• Network, Infrastructure, and Telecommunications Repairand
Maintenance
• Network, Infrastructure, and Telecommunication Supplies and
Equipment
School Building Maintenance (3% of Total Budget)
• Custodial Manager for schools
• School Custodial Staff
• Custodial Equipment and Supplies
• Cleaning Services (RMHS, Coolidge)
What's Not In the Budget?
Supported by fees, tuition, donations and grants
• Field Trip Expenses • Students' Supplies
• Additional Technology • Additional coaches for
Hardware athletics
• Food Services • Additional advisors for drama,
• Non-Mandatory Student and oand, and other activities
METCOTransportation • Additional tutor support
• Before and After School • Pesearch and Developmentto
Programs improve teaching and learning
• Enrichment Programs acrd remain competitive with
other schools
• Some professional • A Portion of Athletics,
development Extracurricular, Pre-School,
and Full Day Kindergarten
Budget Reductions
FYi3 Year)
Amount of 3.o FTE 6.3 FTE 6.4 FTE 15.7 FTE
Teacher FTE
Reductions
Amount of other
staff FTE
reductions 1.5 FTE g.o FTE 1.0 FTE 4.5 FTE 16.o FTE
Amount of
personnel
reductions 14,000 170,000 135,000 374,000 650,000 1,353,000
Amount of non-
personnel
reductions/offset
increases 323,030 70,360 174,160 714,620 171,200 212,000 1,765,370
Total Budget
Reductionsfrom
level service (323,030) (94360) (344,160) (849,62o) (645,100) (8610000) (3,128370)
Breakdown of Reductions
Offset Increases $323,030 $70,360 $58,410 $412,000 $256,700 (860100)
Non-Personnel $0 $0 $115,750 $165,620 $94,500 $163,405
Reductions
Detail Non- Technalagy . Sub.Teacher • 1SPEDOOD • Cleaning Service
Personnel Prof.Dw.. • VHS . Misc. • Technology Hardware
Reductions Mix. • EMARC . H.S.Stipend • Prof.Dev.
Per Pupil
Tarixonatlon
Grant Wdting
• Mix.
Personnel $24,000 $170,000 $135,000 $394,000 $650,000
Reductions
Detail Personnel 1.6 FTE 3.0 FTE 9.o FTE • 6.3FTE • 6.4 FTE Teachers
Reductions Paraeduonors Teachers Paraeducators Teachers • 1 FTE Technician
• 1.0 FTE • 1 FTE Instructional Coach
Paraeducator • 1.o Adm.Assist.
• 15upervisor of Students
Assumptions Used in Developing Budget
Budget Development Begins in October
Use salaries of actual employees (as of November, 2o16)
ose returning employees salaries for leave of absence
retired employees salary if we know employee Is retiring at end ofyear
BUI',d In CO[.A adjustment for collective bargaining
KCvie"v students who potentially need additional special education services
and build assumed costs into budget
Ose other known contractual cost adjustments (i.e. transportation, tuition,
athletic facility rental, technology services)
Budget other known additional costs (i.e. additional special education staff
at Wood End and Joshua Eaton)
Variances that Impact Budget During Year
Not Budgeted
• Staff Turnover
• Staff FTE transferred from one school to another
• f Example: CoolidgeSpecial Education FIE transferred to RMHS next yea r
• Change in DESE classification
• Unanticipated Special Education Out of District Placement
• 5t di on leave where we have to hire an additional position
• Example Administrator Position
• Example: School Psychologist
Annual School Budget Turned Back to Free Cash
Turned back to %Turned back to
Year Free Cash Total Budget Free Cash
FY-io s 286,158 35,996,247 079%
FY'ii s 77,137 36,390,308 0,22%
FY'13 $ 24,113 37,054,393 007%
FY'15 s 248,131 40,317,973 o62%
FY-z6 s 118,8081 39,473,353 030%
Budget Drivers for FY18 Budget
-� r and Ix iiefit obligations to employees per the collective bargaining agreement.
l -,I ce hargaining agreements are ending this year and the School Committee Is
the process of negotiating new agreements with each collective bargaining
unit�
I
n
l ;alaiy and herefit increases in line with COLA adjustments for collective
bargaining units
x eases in Iegularday mandatory transpr ortation (Fostudents in Grades i
he rive over miles from their school).
11 ui the offsets forthe athletics, extra-curricular, use of school properties, and
len revolving accounts due to fluctuating revenues and projected declining
i I auount balances These decreases In offsets contributed to an Increased
wivveen the level service budget and the funding recommended by the
neading Finance Committee.
r"I, in athletic expenses, including an increase in rental fees for pool as well as an
nuease in athletic transportation.
n the offset for the METCO grant due to an increase in transportation costs.
o FTE Special Education Teachers (Wood End, Joshua Eaton)
FYs.8 Budget by Cost Center
I — Actual Actual Actual Adopted Requested !
Expended Expended Expended Budget Budget Change
FY'iy FYY5 FY'u6 FY a7 FY a8
Administration 1 932,578 892,223 924,880 963,694 926,857 -3.8%
Regular Day 22,5og,776 23,185,397 23,784,253 24,692,271 24,908,278 0.9%
Special 91547,257 10,2S4,281 10,94s,627 12,223,473 12,595,752 30%
Education
School Facilities 1,187,224 1,162,825 1,246,555 1,231,510 1,225,000 -0.5%
Dlstrlctwide 2374292 i,6u.893 3,554,200 1,626,728 1,745,774 7-3%
Programs
G nra dTotal 35,551,026 37,208,399 38,455,516 40,737,666 41,4oi,66i 1.6%
FY18 Budget Reductions-Decreases in Offsets
Resulting in Budget Reduction Increases
Revolving Account Reduction Amount
Athletics
Full Day Kindergarten
M $50,000
Use of School Properties s6o,000
Extracurricular
METCO $40,000
i Budget / • Personnel
i Amount
Administration
i.o School Business Assistant Sgo,000
Regular
D-Rquz Elementary Classroom SioS,000
Teachers
• 3.8 High 5choolTeachers Sz73,000
RegularDw—
DistHct�
z Supervisor of Students S3q,000
i Technician SSo,000
----Special Education
0.6 RISE Preschool Teacher f3o,000
Da i Instructional Coach s78,000
Special �ion
0.5 Special Education f4o,000
Total
Administrator
zo.g S65o,o00
i Budget / • •
' • Reductions
Cost cent�-- ---fieduction Amount
FacilitiesCleaning Services-RMH6 8o,aoo
DistrictWide
Technology Hardware/Computer 35,000
Services
Day D Expenses �o,000
Special EducationPDTotal
Expenses ao,oao
Science Kk Coordination 8,yo5
fn63 405
FY18 Budget
Increases
Cost Center Reduction
F Amount
AthleticsIncrease User Fee 466,goo
Increase RISETuition s6o,000
Regular
DayIncrease Kindergarten 450,000
Tuition
4166,goo
t • •
Budget Summary Budget Breakdown Salary Breakdown
Pr0fesional6alaries s 19.488,093 Represented $ 34-49,783 90%
Cledcal5alaries
$ Bt¢,646 TotalSalaries- s 34,588.214 83% Non-Represented $ .caR.cai to%
Other Salaries s 1188,476
Contracc6ervices s 1,169,605 Other Expense $ 68114c7 t7% Thal salaries s G 88,11y
Supplies&Materials
$ 758,977
Total Budget S 41,4o1,661
Other Expenses s a.18a86c
Grand Total s 4a,4oy661 •Twaisabnez'rsnnaf orrseuemeun sa,ass,000
Expenses by Cost Center
Administration s 109,365 (legal,audit,employee physicals,recruiting expenses,photocopier leases,licensing)
(text and materials,supplies,professional development,mandated transportation,classroom
Regular Day $ 1,103,363 technology)
Special Education $ 4,598,419 (transportation,Out of District Tuition,adaptive text and materials)
(Health,Extra-Curricular,athletics,technology
District Wide s 576,498 infrastructure)
Facilities $ ac.8u1 (contracted cleaning services and supplies)
Total Other Expenses s 6,813447
Risks with FY-18 Budget
ri ,inttState/Federal Funding — the ultimate amounts through various
I and State Funding can change from year to year as well as during the
li and require continuous assessment as well as an assessment for
Sustainability after the grant ends.
unl (IimaLe Transformation Grant - funding for Data Analyst, Director, i
ry ds, software license, consulting, materials and professional development will
eed to be reviewed for sustainability afterthe grant ends.
a'dc iI EnIitlement Grants (Title a, Title 2A, Title IV, IDEA) have funding
�.r.�is/amounts that may shift under new administration which could result In less
funds for Reading
ut; If governor or legislature needs to make midyear budget cuts, It could have
an effect on state aid
0 iirenkerfunding is not guaranteed and can change year to year and mid-year
Risks with FY18 Budget
Leaves of Absence
pivgecs on a paid leave but at the same time we are paying for substitutes
i,-i as ly, long teen), may have teachers covering as well if a substitute cannot
U, ( r -'hiie this is budgeted it Is difficult to predict nurnber of occurrence s.
I a>Lrators c,ho are on paid medical leave may require a back-fill in which we
I v"o salaries lorone position (-e. Assistant Principal out and backfilled).
�CGir oducation coverage can result in having multiple Individuals covering a
_—'e. We have had instances in which we are paying 3 times - employee on paid
-� A , substitute coverage and consulting services. This has happened when we
,I school psychologist on a leave of ahsence and cannot provide a long term
io, �i schoo: psychologist. Therefore, we have had to hire a school adjustrnent
:. .neioi to provide counseling for students and use contracted services to hire a
licensed school psychologist to do testing.
Risks with FY18 Budget
changes in staffing needs
ISwine(,dsforspecialeducation mayresult 'rntheneedto 'mcrease
�nni)e� of teachers, speualists, para educators (i.e. RISE in FYib, JE
m 4m)d End .n 1 Yc7) - these Items are riot budgeted and salary savings
are used to fund.
Risks with FY18 Budget
,)et al Education is fluid and changes can occur throughout the
year within the following categories:
• Out of district placements
I m,,portation costs (in-district and out of district)
heualty Consultations (including vision, hearing)
•
Leyal Costs
Risks with FY18 Budget
Homeless population
ia fluid item that changes throughoutthe school year and has a direct Impact
rI cgular day transportation costs. While we do receive partial reimbursement
n. [lie State, the reimbursement is not received until the following year and goes
ba( l<to the Town.
Care / Awaiting Foster Care
;r,trict has an obligation to provide transportation forthis population. As this is a
jupulatlon it is difficult to determine the total cost of transportation associated
i Also cornpllcations arise regarding 'district of origin" New regulation in
�n
I funding sources haee not been fully defined between regulators and DCF is to
jhow costs will be. split (cost sharing).
Risks with FY18 Budget
Joshua Eaton — Level 3 Status
dditi�,nal resources needed to address the Level 3 status that were able
�o r,e funded due to Bilary savings (includes additional curricular work,
�.uF_unng, purchase of additional curriculum materials, 'rnciease team chair
w -ull time FTE, add i.o Special Education Teacher).
Risks with FY18 Budget
" i uwjai of Existing contracts and/or services can have an Impact and
i i: ultimate cost is not known until the contracts are finalized
- ,ting r r,.rmr lease e,pims on June 30, 2017 and is in process of heir g
„d. fl ioi is a need state r ortract that changes the structure of the leases
I ,,,c ocaL <I ii lain tenanee and it is unknown what the new cost will be and it
�, „ if fuult .o keep the sante level of copiers at the same cost.
,ray iticipaied changes in enrollment in Regular Day and Special
Education
A re Dui crs rented to teachers, specialists and para educators could be
oywred inhere ate changes in enrollment
i; ,L 1 1 pool eni ollniu rit is imparted based on children when they reach age 3,
regardless of school year
Risks with FY18 Budget
-ul rently there is no defined succession plan within the central office
staffing
i',ohieniaoc If there is turnover or if individuals go out on leave as there is no trained
if to tal<e overthe day to day responsibilities
poi enUy there is no in-depth cross-training of functions within the central
i< r- staffing (no depth or transferring of Knowledge) due to the staffing
oi if'i Some examples include backups for Director of Finance, Network
.rl"n,_iVi, Borne of our web based applications (i.e. Redil<er and Baseline
Edge).
,n, corat.c If thorn is turnover or if individuals go out on leave as there is no trained
individual to take overthe day to day responsibilities
_r,ncern as there are areas in which segregation of duties could existence
Risks with FYA Budget
I sited administrative staffing covering multiple functions
�1 ganging regulatory environment which often results In additional
"()I I< for existing personnel
rI Ii -,, ords Lao changes - identification of specific individuals, increased
n Ii ni s:rat i I burden in trad<ing and logging requests, shortened time frame to
li ,fr 1cspond, inoease in numberand frequency of requests-
�nited landing available for professional development which will limit
Ability to achieve district goals (closing the achievement gap,
literacy, math)
pact of Coolidge Grade 6 class sizes exceeding 30 students next year.
Response to Questions
School Committee Budget and Process
5 cost centers and a chart of accounts mandated by the
ivlossachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary
Education
yltt schools, one preschool, 4400 students, and several
departments
Nrocess is thorough and transparent
Upen to suggestions for improvement
Budget Review Process
• Internal budget development begins in October
• iJubli( process begins in early January, concludes with Town
Meeting
I'Ublic, elected, and appointed officials have opportunities to ask
questions, which are answered, documented and published.
Uver iso questions asked and documented this year
• ui',n ibuted atTown Meeting and available on RPS Website
vVhy did the School Committee present an unbalanced budget, disregarding
We 1.4% ceiling increase that Selectmen, Town Manager, Town Accountant,
and School Committee had agreed to last fall?
xUlool Committee does not commit to a specific ceiling
give to manage within Finance Committee guidance
. ofe on an unbalanced budget was to to preserve middle school
anguage teacher positions
Decision was made based on
• overwhelming community input
i revocable nature of this structuring
• possible oven ide election within a year
Why was there no challenge to the School Committee's choice to cut select
positions (7 middle school teachers) when some FYi8 accounts already had
enough surplus ($259K) to retain those same teachers?
liis is a structural change that requires full funding
i ' w amount needed to fund the 7.o FTE Middle School language
teacher positions is $438,000.
Why does the School Committee continue the practice, year after year, of budgeting ever
higher numbers in certain areas when actual expenditures are far less?Why, without
School Committee votes, was money moved from one account to supplement others that
went over budget?
-i etdeveloped eachyearis based on historical analysis of spending on
mat line item and other Known changes
>k periirtendent of Schools allowed to transfer funds within a cost center as
student needs dictate
i rums need to be transferred from one cost center to another, School
�ommlttee approval Is required
always change from the time the budget Is developed In October
to the end of the fiscal year In June
u tiie end of the year, there are always some accounts in deficit and other in
surplus
! ,ri the last several years, School Department has stayed within the budget
hat Town Meeting has voted
Since 2004, the School Committee has added, not
cut, more than 6o full time personnel .
vlajonty of those positions have been in special education
Uue to changes in a student's Individual Education Plans
[), ,moping more in district special education programs which saves funds
i, , out of distncttuition and transportation, but requires more staffing
internally
all savings over for school department budget and
accommodated costs
:jmce 2004, the School Committee has increased spending
by $1.2 million for the same number of students.
1e School department budget was $29 million dollars in FY2004 (14 years
;o �, Lhen on average, the School Department budget grew annually at a
I-, ,_uOunded growth rate of about 2.5%, which is in line with inflation and
tide levy limit allowed by Proposition 2.5%.
Since 2004, the School Committee has grown the
METCO program by at least 30 or more students.
�ddltlOn
Of the elementary program several years ago.
ME FCO program is budget positive
• ME: TCO grant
• Chapter70funds
• Local control over enrollment
The Schools have added Special Education students
trom other districts, bringing in additional revenue.
/rt times, we have capacity in our Special Education programs and
u e able to accommodate students from outside of Reading who
have specific learning needs.
le sending district pays the Schools for the services provided.
This is budget positive.
i he Schools have seen a reduction in the number of students
requiring Special Education services and a reduction in students
requiring out-of-district placements, saving money.
• 1 i;orouyh and highly regulated process that determines whether a
student is entitled to Special Education services.
ivot every student requires the same amount or level of services.
• 1 a :.ne extent that we can, educating Reading students in Reading
rools is the best educational choice and is financially beneficial.
aL, have seen these reductions, and they are budget positive.
he schools have added significant revenue by expanding
the for-pay extended day program, RISE pre-school, and
optional full-day kindergarten program.
is (ost of these programs for regular education students is covered
by the fees paid by parents.
I iaw, all revenue received for these programs must be used only for
maintaining these programs.
v: are not allowed to use revenue from these programs to support
the school operating budget.
The schools "use grant position staffing to
morph into FTEs when the grant expires."
, I , r, r-ve add positions it is based on our bestjudgement about what our
students need and/or legal mandates.
gone in open public meetings with full transparency.
-,.;y new positions would be detailed in our annual budget.
The school department grants "full benefits to
part time employees at only zo hrs per week."
• Benefits are under accommodated costs and are part of the
Municipal budget.
• i tie policy on eligibility for health insurance benefits is under the
direction of the Town of Reading.
The schools "disregarded correlating costs for benefits
(paid for by the town side) when school staffing numbers
increase."
�, is the case with municipalities across the Commonwealth,
cscalatiny health insurance costs are a major driver of our
structural deficit.
,_ 1I
Questions and Thank You
12/17/2018
FINANCE COMMITTEE
CHAIRMAN COMMENTS
ON FY' 18 BUDGET
MARK DOCKSER
MAY 1.2017
SUMMARY
• R"18 Budget requires cuts in services for both town and schools
• Reading is efficiently managed
• Cuts in past year;stronger cum for 2018
• Recommended use of Free Cash has been reduced this year by—50%to$1.2 MM
• 'Ramy day'account-best used for one time expenditures rather than to fund on-going positions
Use of modest amount of these stabilization funds is both responsible and sustainable
• Still strong Free Cash and stabilization funds balance—>7%(FinComm policy target)
• We reviewed budget in depth with town and school departments and believe it
• Managing risks In the budget
• Is a responsible budgetgiven the constraint on revenues
1
12/17/2018
CHALLENGES- FY'18 AND BEYOND
I. Costs that are out of our control continue to rise faster than our revenues
2. Choice: annual decline in level of services or raise additional tax revenue
3. Not raising additional revenues now through an override will have a strong impact in
lower community values
4. Teamwork required: Cooperation between the municipal and school sides allow the
middle school to retain 7 FTE positions in the foreign language program,but for one
year only
COSTS BEYOND OUR CONTROU
LIMITED REVENUE GROWTH
• Uncontrollable costs rising at a rate much faster than our r nues
• Cosrchuhh oraxnefia-4s«x
• Revenues:Rop2 Ya«new8row[M1�-3%emvrth
• Stare Ald has nmcainedoseta beepingupyecudunded mandacesmninueand residentswic,thetab
• Prop2 'h-Property Taxlncmuelimimtionra2.5%peryear
• EssobluM1M in l Sao during dme of strong revenue gnvth
• C muniti OlandaMapporrunhybrbusinescgmx'shabktowndnueaooiyre weVro ,
Ra gisank bedroomcommunity,92%msideftMaMverylimk lambrnewbusinmgw
Marrytwms override Prop2'/-eery l0 ymsa...ithasbeenl4yeara.inceR i,passedanoperad,
ovenh,e
2
iz/v/2018
HAVEN'TWE HAD LOTS OF OVERRIDES ALREADY FOR
NEW SCHOOLS AND MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS?
• Debt Exclusion vs.Override
• Debt Exdusion:limiwd time rax to finance an asset purchase
• Usually S-IOyearsduradon. Ne buildings,large capital proleda
• Examples: High Scht 1pmje (caring o0 soon). Library lug starting
• Override:permanemtax increase to supportopereung budget
DECLINE IN SERVICES OR INCREASE IN REVENUES
• Demand for services exceeds our means(revenues)
• Without new revenues,services will continue to decline and at an increasing race
• New revenues to address this can include new business growth and many other
ideas....but only means large enough to cover$1 mm+is an override
3
u/v/2018
NEW REVENUESAND COMMUNITYVALUES
• Reading needs an override. As a Fincomm member,it is my strong belief that not passing
an override will harm our community values—both in terms of delivering on the promise
of Reading as a community identified by in residents for having great schools,exemplary
public safety,a strong and thriving library and other public services;and also in terms of
how other people view these values and how they translate directly into home values.
• Ask any real estate agent in town about this...good schools and good services are the
basis of our high and rising property values. But they are being challenged eduction in
the quality of schools and services leads to lower property values.
COOPERATION: MAINTAIN MIDDLE SCHOOL
LANGUAGE....FOR THIS YEAR
• Teamwork has created a"bandaid"that will allow the middle school foreign language
program to continue in its current form for FY 18.
• Faced with the need w cut an additional$438k in school programs to meet the FmComm
guidelines for FY 18,municipal and school departments agreed to budget reducoons and
holdbacks to cover most of the$438k-
•
438k• FmComm at its meeting on 3/22/2017 recommended the use of an additional$100k in Free
Cash(to a total of$1.2 MM)by a vote of 9-0-0 to support this in the school budget
• Risk in achieving this within school department Fr 18 budget is reasonable
• To maintain this beyond FY 18 will require additional town revenues.
4
12/17/2018
FY 18 BUDGET
• What we are bringing to Town Meeting this evening is a recommended budget of
$104,551,681,an increase of 1.6%. This compares to an increase last year of 2.6%and
previous years that averaged—3.3%.
• We believe this budget will support the town in FY'I8 as outlined by the municipal and
school departments and is a responsible budget given the constraints on revenues.
THANKYOU
5
12/17/2018
Presentation
May 1, 2017
2017 Survey of 25 Peer Communities
Source:J.Wilson, Reading ED Liaison
• Correlation of population, demographic,
residential, commercial and policy data of 25 peer
communities
• Comparison of employment, employment growth
and employment relative to population is
particularly illuminating
1
12/17/2018
2017 Survey of 25 Peer Communities
Source:J.Wilson, Reading ED Liaison
e.ane
et � •
5 iMNee BurBngmn
e
� 'm° gelling
u •
Fn �p • Banven
ul � w,mr.wn
u� wxr "✓ sn�..M n
. �1• 'MF.flela a.ee...
N � e Y f f �nfnn
4L •
Wa r�h
w.,.a • x.
® 2015 Avenge Month/Employment
2017 Survey of 25 Peer Communities
Source:J.Wilson,Reading ED Liaison
r �
Qwrlingron
C
E
N
M
N �
d
e
N
2015 Avenge Montly Employment
2
12/17/2018
2017 Survey of 25 Peer Communities
Source:J.Wilson, Reading ED Liaison
� � wrlln{Nn
e
M,
o �
a
E
w�w.Fmolwm.m
N �yowM.�6E mylayRs
O m EmpvYmmViom vO
Nd
N
wm 2015 Average Month Employment
2017 Survey of 25 Peer Communities
Source:J.Wilson, Reading ED Liaison
t eumnawn
P
Ymma[mu[mpwae
O
E
• w.lmeen
e m [mpgmmVmuro
d
N
2015 Average Montly Employment
3
12/17/2018
2017 Survey of 25 Peer Communities
Source:l.Wilson,Reading ED Liaison
r
QBurgrybn
m �
E
E
N ® • WakeOeM26 4, �uryAxz qeT..t
wmmUzoSda Yc,
b
N 0.n
eea6l,
2015 Average MontlyEmployment
Average Weekly Wages
Avera a Wood We es
% Ranking Chart
1010 2016 Chan e
W aee F%xY
wxwB F..naa smess w.�.wn Higher CIP average
eek generally have
eBn su ea: a.ewm m.wB ' higher average weekly wages.
Fx Bw
si�e�ca FB exS
seeue se>B»
Reading west for average
FBIH wpm m F.B5o weekly
y wwages in
both 2010-2015.
Faau FIBw
Although the goal may not be
specifcally to create jobs attracting
the'nghV CIP can increase
wuu F�xw availability ofjobs and improve upon
Monnawm sw Bu se�� o.em msex wages.
swuB nnme
sw�m
Msnmrsw
N)BM BxxB '
Fx11x MYlon i50PoB
FSwe i5p05B &imaA
5)w WOtt
ar...:w sF Bw
UMNm FS xw Fx W
Fx G53 F15B0
w.v
tm,tttt It- UD.12 402%
4
12/17/2018
Size matters: Commercial Size &Valuation
Source:V. Santaniello, Reading Assessor, 2016 Data
UNDER$500k,
$24,445,800
10
., .,�; • $500K TO$1M,
OVER$10M, $39,637,800
$114,155,100
2016 Commercial
Class Value: 281.4M
�$1M TO$2M,
$43,081,600
$2M TO$900
$60,136,900
CIP growth means medium-large business
Next Steps for Priority Development Areas
M�
LLA
eL
• sbRlnhlaGrypmce[soFplenningN mftrReaEing
• Focus on wmmer<lel/IMusofti—santl..Ing
• Goal of sollcXing lnWtham raWents/building consensus annM slop
• Rllgnlry[Mpna pdnrlMs antl need br new pmmeNallroM6
5