Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-08-14 Community Planning and Development Commission MinutesOF Town of: Readi ' e . Meeting Minutes: o t�{ti f 639+11VC04Q0�- m�..a. Yet=r;V i Board— Committee-- Commission- Council: communit Plannin and,De ment Commission U11 ;Ftp ?.b Y. 9 p Date: 2017-08-14 Time: 7:30 PM Building: Reading Town. Hall Location: Selectmen Meeting Room Address: 16 Lowell Street Session: Open. Session Purpose: General Business Version:` . Attendees: Members - Present: Chair Nick Safina; Dave Tuttle, John Weston; Karen Gonsalves-Dolan Members - Nof Present: Others Present: Assistant Town Manager Jean Delios, Community Development- Director Julie_ Mercier, John Arena, Nick Bonanno,, Richard Bova, Kevin Roche,:Andrew . Weaver, Dan McCarthy, Daryl Carter, Bob.Morelli, Denise and.-Ed.Peddle, . Mark McCormick; Suzanne Cox; Robert McIsaac, Deb.Powers, Brett Doyle, Deb Vinciguerra, Tony D'Arezzo, Nicole.Harrington, Linda McKim, Philip Christenson, Nancy.Kohl; 11 Mr. Tuttle questioned the durability of the window treatment. Mr.. Doyle replied that the .3M product is durable, UV stable; and will be -installed inside so it is not exposed to the elements. Mr. Safina said he has previously used this. product: -Mr. Weston and Ms. Goncalves-Dolan did not have any concerns. Mr. Safina stated that Pediatric Dental Associates is all set to install the window treatments. Public Hearing, Site Plan Review & Special Permit 292 (a:k.a. 288) Grove Street, Meadowbrook Golf Club Kevin Roche, Bob Morelli, Jack Sullivan, Andrew Weaver,. Dan .McCarthy, Daryl Carter and Rich Bova were present on behalf of'the Application. Mr. Weston read the legal notice Jnto the record. Mr. Kevin Roche,. Meadowbrook Golf Club President, introduced himself and the project team. He read an opening statement and gave a bri.ef.history of Meadowbrook Golf. Club: . Mr. Roche stated that the new structure is in almost the same footprint,and is.slightly:less square footage than the existing sbuilding. There will be no. expansion of the functions or membership. He said the, proposed plan will[ modify the dumpster and delivery area to improve vehicular safety by separating the delivery trucks. The stated that the traffic will , remain the same, and noted the request,for.a waiver from providing"a:Traffic Study. The Club is around 60 acres and the property across the street is under common ownership.He claimed that there are no direct abutterswhowill be affected by the outside lighting, and noted the request for a waiver from providing a Photometric Plan. Mr..Roche concluded that - in addition to,Site Plan.Review, they are -also seeking a Special Permit to continue the pre- existing, non -conforming private club'use in an S-20 residential-zoning:district. Mr. Jack Sullivan from Sullivan Engineering Group -updated the Commission on meetings the - Applicant has held. The Applicant met with'Ms. Julie. Mercier, Community Development Director, who suggested a Development Review Team (DRT) meeting with the Town. After receiving feedback from the DRT, plans were updated and another DRT _meeting was held.. The Applicant filed a Request for Determination of Applicability (RDA) with the Conservation Commission. The public hearing with Conservation was held last week, and was continued to allow time for feedback from the CPDC. A few weeks ago, there was :a neighborhood.. , outreach meeting held with the abutters. Mr. Sullivan reviewed the proposed site plan. The existing structure -will be demolished and a new one constructed in almost the same location. The proposed clubhouse.is-similar to the existing one; but.will conform to.zoning setbacks.. The property, is in the S-20' District and within the Aquifer Protection (AQP) Overlay District.. The AQP District restrictions do not apply as there is very little total impervious surface on the 60 acre site. He pointed out the existing curb cut that members use for access. and egress, as well as an.existing. retaining wall -and- employee. parking that runs along Grove Street. The. employee parking along Grove Street is proposed to be removed. Mr. -Sullivan reiterated that the new building will be in almost the same footprint and almost the same size as the existing building.. The Applicant is not looking to increase membership or the frequency of events, or the -functions on the site.. He stated. that some. pavement will . be removed and a rain garden will, be constructed.: The proposal includes two curb cuts and . a circular drop off of area- for members. -The existing grade will -be cut down 2' from the road to the building. To improve the streetscape. along Grove Street, vertical" granite curbing will be installed. The parking lot will remain essentially the same, but with three handicap spaces, and a handicap ramp. One handicap space will be for a van. The new walkway -will tie into the existing site walkways. New water, sewer and fire protection, services will be extended to the building, and the telephone, electric and cable utilitieswill be installed from the poles underground to the building.The.Applicant is working with the -gas commpany to • have a gas line installed, but in the meantime will utilize propane.. Page 1 2 Mr. Sullivan explained that low -impact development stormwater design is proposed. After a discussion with the Conservation Commission, approximately 2,000 square feet of pavement will be removed from the 100' wetland buffer. A rain garden will be installed and a rainwater cistern will collect roof runoff to use for irrigation. He described that during a large "rainfall event, the overflow will go to the rain garden, with an emergency spillway to the wetlands. He noted that the Conservation Commission and Engineering Division expressed concerns with the water currently sheet flowing onto Grove Street. To address their concerns, a trench grate and crushed stone swale will be -added to collect water before it can sheet flow onto Grove Street. Mr. Sullivan stated that the two proposed curb cuts are larger than the Town allows and closer together than the Town allows, and will need Board of Selectmen approval. , Mr. Andrew Weaver, project architect, provided schematic plans of the proposed clubhouse. He said, the proposed lower level will function similar to how it functions today, but with.a new front entrance. The proposed lower level will comprise locker rooms, administrative offices and employee areas. There will be an elevator, and the building will be MAAB & ADA compliant. Mr. Weaver stated that the proposed upper level will include dining -related spaces such as the kitchen and bar/grill area, and for club function spaces and bathrooms. He noted that the building has been .re -oriented so that the outside dining area is at the rear of the building with views to the 9th fairway. There will be a small covered porch with lunchtime dining for pool members. Mr. Weaver provided elevations of the proposed clubhouse. He described the proposed building as traditional New England in style with a shed roof and dormers, horizontal shiplap siding, and with windows and glass onto the golf course. The roof will include a well that will hide the mechanicals from Grove Street. Mr. Weaver concluded with a rendering of the proposed clubhouse depicting it as brown with off-white shingles, and a cupola with a weathervane on the roof. Mr. Tuttle commented that he went through the proposal and that he has been there as a guest. He expressed his disappointment that the plan did not include the entire site. He questioned why the Club would want to be rebuild the clubhouse in the same location and not further onto the property, which would allow the existing clubhouse to remain open while the new,building is built. Mr. Tuttle opined that the proposed building is in the wrong location. Ms. Goncalves-Dolan asked about the existing .square footage and capacity in relation to what is proposed. Mr. Weaver said he did not have exact numbers. Mr. Richard Bova, the contractor, said that the proposed square footage is slightly less than the existing. building which is 14,000 square feet. Ms. Mercier, Community Development Director, asked about the total capacity of the clubhouse. Mr. Morelli replied that the capacity is 140 people. Ms. " Mercier asked more specifically what the capacity of the clubhouse would be if all rooms were full at the same time. Mr. Morelli replied the capacity is.180 people. Mr. Weaver stated that the building code design occupancy loads would actually be much greater based on the assembly use. Mr. Safina commented that assuming the proposed building meets code, the actual building occupancy accounting for chairs and tables, is what informs the parking requirements. Mr. Weston asked for the total occupancy allowed for functions and dining. Mr. Morelli explained the existing layout makes it awkward. to have more than one type of event at a time (i.e. a bridal shower and golfing), and.explained that one goal .of the new building will be to allow events being held at the same time to_be mutually exclusive. Mr. Roche added that the proposed design is more modular and compartmentalized. Mr. Weston stated that he has some issues with the technical site plan, but is. under the impression these things might change, so he withheld comments for the time being. Page 1 3 Mr. Safina questioned the wetland line, and why the proposed building cannot be built on the back portion of the property. He asked about the construction schedule. Mr. Roche - replied that construction will start during the off-season and continue to about May, and that the building will not be ready for next season but the golf members can still use the course. Mr. Morelli said the Club is closed. for the season in November. Mr. Safina requested larger plans showing laydown and staging areas, and where the contractors will park. Mr. Safina asked why the building is being proposed in the same location. Mr. Roche replied that the existing water and utility locations were considered in the cost. He'opined that the proposed location is the most logical from a membership usability standpoint. He noted that outside dining will now face the fairway, and that proximity of,the pro shop to.clubhouse is important due to the movement of golf carts: Mr. Weaver added that the routing of the golf course informs the location of all clubhouses, and that if moved, the relationship of the . clubhouse to the golfers would ,change dramatically. Mr. Tuttle noted that golfers are used to walking, and commented that the plans should be complete. Mr. Safina pointed out that golfers use golf carts. Mr. Weston explained that a full plan will help clarify how the space, circulation and parking will be used, which will help the Commission to understand how the changes will impact neighbors and the stormwater design. Mr. Bova stated that the parking lot is not changing. ) Mr. Safina 'mentioned concerns with the loading area and the visual impact of the dumpster area. The rendering provided cuts off the dumpster area. He questioned if a vehicle could do a three point turn in the loading area. Mr. Safina requested the rendering be modified to show the loading curb cut and dumpster. Mr. Weston asked how the on-site retaining walls compare to those off-site. Mr. Sullivan replied that the dumpster is built into the retaining wall and will be enclosed with landscaping to. lessen the visual impact. Mr. Safina asked if the propane tank is at grade level. He questioned if the Town, would allow a gas line if the road is newly paved. Mr. Sullivan said he discussed the gas line with the ;Engineering Division, and they will allow trench work to settle over the winter months before the road is topped in the spring. Mr. Safina acknowledged the Applicant requested a waiver from providing a photometric plan, but he requested that, at the least, lighting, information for the front of the building be provided. Mr. Weaver explained that they will use dark sky friendly luminaires, and that there will be no lighting above the first floor. Mr. Safina asked about the building signage shown on the rendering. Mr. Bova replied that the Applicant is working on the sign permit application. Mr. Weston asked for a parking calculation. Mr. Sullivan replied that there are 96 parking spaces on the site. Mr. Sullivan commented that surveying the entire site; including the wetlands, would be costly to the Applicant, and unlikely to yield helpful new information for the Commission. Mr. Weston replied that his concern is that the space is increasing, but not the parking lot, and that parking from members and visitors currently spills onto Grove Street. He questioned if there will be a cap on usage and functions. Mr. Morelli replied the Club currently posts a sign for the golfers when the parking lot is full. Mr. Weston opined that if this were a new a Club, a Special .Permit would be unlikely to be issued. Mr. Rocheresponded that the size of the proposed building is less than the existing building, and noted that` the only change is the addition of more outdoor seating to give members a different dining experience. They are not expanding the locker rooms or bathrooms, but are simply making. the space more functional and current. He, added that Saturday and Sunday mornings are when the peak activity occurs, and that the parking lot is full on a rotational basis. Mr. Safina opened the public hearing for public comment Mr. Nick Bonanno of 283 Grove Street introduced himself as an abutter and a member. He read the 1902 Corporate Charter for Meadowbrook Golf Course, and gave his. history of how Page 1 4 the Club has expanded over the past 25 years. He opined that even though the membership has technically been full, the Club has expanded and improved its facilities, in other ways. Specifically, Mr. Bonanno noted the following changes: the Club removed the 1711 Foster - Emerson House, constructed a new pro shop, renovated the clubhouse in the mid-1990s to increase the seating capacity for the dining and bar areas, expanded the clubhouse office space, constructed an additional maintenance building, cleaned up the back area for more parking, added an outdoor deck with seating to the clubhouse, and added permanent terraces and BBQ grills around the pool and tennis area. Mr. Bonanno also stated that the proposed deck is 2,000 square feet, and that conversation from the existing, deck is audible to the neighborhood. He asked that the types of events that are held at`the Club.be limited. Mr. Robert John McIsaac of.267 Grove Street introduced himself and stated he is a former member of the Club. He expressed his concern with how dangerous the area has. become due to the traffic, and opined that the proposed, clubhouse location is for convenience. He concurred.with.Mr. Tuttle that the building should be moved off.the road, and asked .the Commission to consider the best location for the neighbors and the Club. Ms. Debbie Powers of 256 Grove Street stated that the building is beautiful, but is too close to the road. She added that the Town Compost Center results in 2,500 vehicles travelling on Grove Street. She asked how the raingarden will work. Mr. Sullivan explained that a raingarden is a depression that is landscaped with wet -tolerant plants. It will collect stormwater run-off, and when the water reaches;a certain level it will flow via an outlet into the wetlands. He noted that this will reduce the amount of water flowing off the property. Ms. Powers asked'for clarification of who owns the wetland and area proposed for the raingarden. After viewing the plan; Mr. Sullivan confirmed the wetland and proposed raingarden are on the Club's property. He agreed to show the lot line on the next plan. Mr. Safina explained that the raingarden helps with on-site infiltration which can. prevent surface flooding. Mr. Ed. Peddle of 273 Grove Street asked why, the plans do not have measurements, and he questioned the occupancy of the proposed rear deck. Mr. Weaver responded that the dimensions are on,the plans, and that the rear terrace occupancy will be 68, which is under what is allowed by code. Mr. Peddle,asked how large the loading area will be and if trucks will extend into the street. Mr. Sullivan answered that the, proposed loading space is 12' x 35', which is what is required in the Zoning Bylaw. Mr. Safina said that trucks backing in and turning is a major concern. Mr. Tuttle commented that if a golfer played nine holes, they would have to cross Grove Street four times. Ms. Suzanne Cox of 259 Grove Street concurred that she is concerned about the traffic -and noise. She added that the outside deck will contribute to the noise, and asked if there will be a time limit on functions. Ms. Jean Delios, Assistant Town Manager, said it regulated by the liquor license. Mr. Morelli replied that the liquor license allows service until 1:00 AM., but last call. at the Club is at 11:00 PM. Ms. Mercier added that the Police Deported reported no complaints at this property. Mr. David Johnson of 255 Grove Street said he had concerns with the volume and speed of traffic. Mr. Safina commented that it must be a timing issue because he drove by the Club. on Saturday at 6:00 PM and the traffic volume was low. Mr. Johnson replied that traffic is more noticeable to neighbors who have to deal with it day -in and day -out. Mr. Safina commented that a full Traffic Report could help identify that the Club is not the cause of the problem. Page 1 5 Mr. Weston said that the sight lines, curb cuts and odd turning movements are a lot for drivers to take in, which creates a' potential safety hazard for the neighborhood. He opined that more detail is needed from the Applicant to determine if the proposal will work. Mr..Safina acknowledged the letters received from abutters. The Commission discussed the process going forward. Mr. Safina stated that the building location is the biggest issue. Mr. Weston noted that the Commission can.only suggest options and raise concerns. Mr. TJ Carroll of 260 Grove Street questioned if the area by the parking had ledge. He said if there is ledge it would be costly for the Applicant to site the building there and disruptive to the neighbors. Mr. Carroll had the following comments/questions: whether Geotech Reports were done for the site; whether the building could be moved to the 15t / 9th holes; problems with the grease trap in the street; problems with.the sight Lines for the dumpster; the rain garden is nice; whether a trench drain could be installed. He concluded by reminding the abutters that they moved into the neighborhood, the Club was already there, and that they should all work together. Mr. Sullivan stated he is going to request a continuance with the Conservation Commission until CPDC has made more progress. . After a discussion, Mr. Sullivan requested to continue the public hearing to September 11, 2017. Mr. Tuttle made a motion to accept the request to continue the public hearing to September 11, 2017. The motion was seconded by Mr. Weston and approved with a 4-0-0 vote. Public Hearina, Definitive Subdivision Plan — `Barton Estates' 48-54 Franklin Street, S&L Homes LLC Bill Lumbard, Rich Stuart and Philip Christiansen, P.E., were present on behalf of the Application. Mr. Weston read the legal notice into the record. Mr. Philip Christiansen, project engineer, presented a proposed site plan of the property located at 48-54 Franklin Street. He explained that the two parcels combined are about 6 acres,�and that the Applicant is proposing a 300' foot roadway ending'in a cul-de-sac bulb, and 6 buildable lots that will meet zoning. The two lots at the end of the cul-de-sac will. be larger due to the wetlands on the property: He explained that two of the existing three homes were demolished recently, so the proposal really creates a net of three new homes to the neighborhood. The home at 54 Franklin Street is still occupied. Mr. Christiansen noted that the 100' wetland buffer line and the trees are marked on the plan as required. He explained that the Applicant is proposing a low -impact development project rather than the standard subdivision layout. The roadway layout will include a 24' width of pavement with 3' stone -dust shoulders on either side, and a sidewalk on one side. The road will, hot -have curbs, so water will flow off the roadway into infiltration areas and swales and will recharge on-site, rather than into catch basins where it will be conveyed off- site. Mr. Christiansen explained that the soil is sand and gravel and drains very quickly, so it is difficult to meet the State's stormwater regulations. The proposed system will drain to the low points and then flow naturally. He stated that the Applicant is seeking waivers for the pavement width, sidewalk on one side, elimination of curbing and the catch basin. Mr. Christiansen said that a water main will be brought in, and the first four lots will be on public sewer by gravity, while the last two lots will have sewer pumps. Mr. Christiansen presented the road cross section. The roadway structure is designed'more • or less as required by the rules in that there will be a, total of 30' of drive -able surface (24' Page 1 6 + 3' shoulders). The overall layout will be 60', with a cul-de-sac radius of 50'. He requested feedback from the Commission on the proposed low -impact development design. Mr. Tuttle noted that as more than an acre of the property will be disturbed, the project will need to comply with the MS4 stormwater management requirements. Mr. Christiansen replied that they will file.with the EPA as required; and will meet the Conservation Commission's stormwater requirements. Mr. Safina questioned what will prevent the roadway edges from failing apart, and how they will be maintained. Mr. Christiansen noted that the Town of West Newbury does not require curbs, and that New Hampshire. has not used, anything but.swal.es in over 50 years - Mr. Safina said he was in favor of the low -impact development design and reduced roadway design. He questioned what would happen if the shoulder was driven on. Mr. Christiansen replied the shoulder likely will not be driven on, but may be used for parking. He opined that he does not anticipate much use of the shoulder in a 6-1ot subdivision, and he noted that highway regulations only require 11-12' per travel lane. Mr. Weston mentioned: the memo received from the Town Engineering Division states they are not in favor of this type of design. He questioned whether. the road would be adopted by the Town, and requested that the Applicant work with the Town Engineer to come up with a mutually agreeable design. He commented that the houses are large with small driveways, so there will likely be vehicles parked on the roadway and perhaps the soft shoulder. Mr. Safina suggested adding curbs. . Mr. Christiansen requested help scheduling a meeting with the Engineering -Division. Ms. Mercier agreed.to coordinate it. Mr. Weston, questioned the width of the inside and outside radius for Fire safety. Ms. Mercier confirmed that Fire would need a 45' radius, and the proposal. is a 50' radius. L Ms. Goncalves-Dolan had no comments. Mr. Tuttle asked about the lines around the house sites. Mr. Christiansen replied that the homes have to be built up above the groundwater level, so the lots will be regraded at roughly a 3:1 slope at the steepest: Mr. Safina opened .the public hearing for public comment. Ms. June Ewing of 17 Partridge Road asked about the frontage on Franklin Street and the lack of sidewalks. She commented .that it is very tough to walk along Franklin Street. Mr. Christiansen said there are no sidewalks proposed on Franklin Street. Mr. Safina asked if Franklin Street is on the Complete Streets list, and Ms. Mercier agreed to check. Mr. Richard Gomez of 62 Franklin Street questioned how the proposed subdivision would affect the traffic, and noted that it is very hard to get mail -with the traffic because the"cars come very close to the sides. He requested handicap signage. Mr. Safina commented that ""he is not sure that a 6 -lot subdivision, which is a net of 3 homes, will add much to the traffic volume. Mr. Richard Coray of 32 Eastway asked .for clarification on how the homes will be situated in relation to his home. He asked about the wetlands and the. number of trees to be cut down. Ms. Mercier noted that wetlands and trees will be discussed at the Conservation Commission meeting on August 23, 2017. Mr. Christiansen said that no trees will be cut down within the 100' wetland buffer without Conservation approval. He stated that the Conservation Administrator has requested a trail easement. Mr. McGonagle of 20 Eastway said the Applicant cannot promise an easement' across his land. Page 1 7 l Ms. Nancy Kohl of 607 Pearl Street expressed concerns with the amount of traffic accidents that occur on her corner. She questioned where the snow will be stored, and whether snow piles will impede sight lines. Ms. Kohl concluded that 6 new homes will increase the traffic. Mr. Phil Vinciguerra of 589 Pearl Street stated that he was misled by the owner who originally said only 2. lots were proposed.'He said his property currently floods and asked how 6 lots would- impact him. Mr. Safina assured Mr. Vinciguerra that there is protection as a homeowner from stormwater runoff. ,Engineering will review the stormwater design. Mr. John Ewing of 17 Partridge Road stated that he is not in favor of any roadway without a curb. He questioned why a retention pond is not required for the project. He noted that many Franklin Street residents already pump water out of their basements, and wanted reassurance that his property will not be impacted. Mr. Christiansen. clarified that the foundations will not be built in groundwater, and explained how the proposed stormwater design is an improvement over the retention pond design. Mr. Christiansen confirmed the homes will be more than 100' from the existing brook, and noted that the Conservation Commission has approved the wetlands line. A resident stated that a hard surface is preferable to a soft shoulder. Mr. Christiansen responded that dense packed stone Is not soft. Mr. Weston stated that the Commission isnot ignoring the traffic complaints from the residents,. but that the proposed subdivision should produce only a small volume of additional traffic to the area. He asked whether there are other roads in Town with this type of stormwater design. Ms. Mercier responded that recent subdivisions have taken more of a hybrid approach. Mr. Weston noted.that he drives down. Franklin Street sometimes, and that it is narrow in some places. He -commented .that there are a lot of ways to improve road .safety, but that it is unlikely everyone will like them, -and it is not really up to the Commission to -do-this. He pointed out that the.Commission will consider impacts to intersections and potential conflict points, but that as regards Franklin Street, this location is probably the best place for a new road intersection. Mr. Carlo Casciani of 44 Eastway noted that his friend was required to put in pavers for his driveway to limit the amount of impervious surface on .his property. Mr. Weston explained that the Aquifer Protection District limits overall impervious surface. Mr. Safina explained how infiltration works, and noted that the Commission wants'to get to a point where the Town will adopt and maintain the road. Mr. Christiansen said TP40 is the standard the State uses, and added that the,proposal meets the regulation. Mr. Weston commented that the State's stormwater regulations continue to get more restrictive. Mr. Casciani asked for clarification on the 100' wetland buffer line. Mr. Christiansen replied that Conservation.will' "review the whole road, the two lots at the rear of the property, and snow storage areas. A resident requested that the Board of Selectmen review the speed limit on Franklin Street. Ms. Goncalves-Dolan requested additional information.regarding snow storage. Mr. Weston stated he did not think snow can be pushed 'into the 100' wetland buffer. Mr. Ewing questioned if the proposed development meets zoning. Mr. Safina stated that the lots meet the zoning requirements but the Applicant. has requested waivers from some of the Town's Subdivision Regulations. He noted that the Subdivision Regulations are outdated, and that the Commission is willing to look into alternatives if they result in 'less.of an impact to the Town. Page 1 8 Mr. Tuttle opined that the safety issue is with Pearl Street. Mr. Weston informed the members he will not be, available at the August 28th meeting. Mr. Tuttle made a motion to accept the request to continue the public hearing to August 28, 2017. The motion was seconded by Ms. Goncalves=Dolan and approved with a 4-0-0 vote. Planning Updates.and Other Topics Mr. Safina confirmed that the Citgo sign was corrected. Ms. Mercier informed the Commission that the Town contacted the owner of Burger King at 357 Main Street and the owner of 258 Main Street to remind them to maintain their properties while they are vacant. Minutes 6/26/17 Mr. Tuttle made a motion to approve the minutes of June 26, 2017. The motion was seconded. by Mr. Safina and approved with a 4-0-0 vote. Minutes 07/10/17 Mr. Tuttle made a motion to approve the minutes of July 10, 2017. The motion was seconded by Mr. Weston and approved with, a 4-0-0 vote Minutes 07/24/17 Mr. Tuttle made a_ motion to approve the minutes of July 24, 2017. The motion was seconded by Mr. Weston and approved with a 4-0-0 vote:; Mr. Tuttle made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 10:43 PM. The motion was seconded by Mr. Weston and approved with a 4-0-0 vote. Documents reviewed at the meeting: CPDC Agenda 8/14/2017 CPDC Minutes of 6/26/2017, 7/10/2017 & 7/24/2017, Meadowbrook. Golf Club: a) Site Plan and Special Permit Application b) Site Plans c) Architectural. Plans d) Landscape Plan e) Rendering f) Drainage Report g) Site Photos h) Memo from Interim Health Agent i) Memo from Engineering Division j) Memo from Conservation Administrator k) Draft Decision dated 8/14/17 48-54 Franklin Street, 6 -Lot Definitive Subdivision: a) Form B: Subdivision Application b) Form G: Designer's Certificate c) Definitive Subdivision Plans d) Supporting Reports e) - Memo from, Interim Health Agent f) Memo from Engineering Division' g) Draft Decision dated 8/14/17 Page 1 9 T' 1