HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-07-19 Board of Health MinutesF
k Town of Reading
s Meeting Minutes
Board - Committee - Commission - Council:
Board of Health
Date: 2017-07-19
Building: Reading Town Hall
Address: 16 Lowell Street
Purpose: General Business
Attendees: Members - Present:
Time: 5:30 PM
TC
1011 f::1,;; 11 P 5. L, ? I
Location: Berger Room
Session: General Session
John Costigan, Chair, Beth Shurland, Nancy Docktor, Associate
Members - Not Present:
Others Present:
Dan Ensminger, BOS Liasion, Andy Friedmann, Kyle Krupa
Minutes Respectfully Submitted By: Darlene Foley
Topics of Discussion:
Board of Health meeting came to order at 5:30 pm on July 17, 2017 in the Berger Room of
Reading Town Hall.
Minutes
Minutes of June 21, 2017 were presented. Motion was made by Shurland to accept the
minutes with corrections, seconded by Docktor. Motion passed 3:0
Chair Report
Costigan reported that Maureen Buzby, Regional Tobacco Control Coordinator had
completed three visits to tobacco establishments. The first was to hand deliver notice of the
public hearing, second in April to hand deliver the new signed tobacco regulations and in
July to ensure everyone was aware of the regulations and answer any questions before the
regulation becomes effective on August 1, 2017. Another visit will occur about a month
after the effective date to check for flavored products. Warning tickets would be issued for
any restricted products found. Fines will be issued for subsequent non-compliance.
The letter to Representative DeLeo was mailed in support of House Bill 2864, an act to
protect youth from the health risks of tobacco and nicotine addiction. The bill is still in the
public health committee and has not been brought to the floor. Costigan will contact
Senator Jason Lewis to get his opinion.
Communication was received from Laura Vlasuk regarding a presentation being sponsored
by the Reading Health Division and East Middlesex Mosquito Control about mosquitoes and
ticks which will be held at the Reading Public Library on July 31St
Page 1 1
Health Agent
Cheryl Sbarra, Legal Aide through MAHB was contacted for clarification regarding the
appointment of a health agent and she provided very clear suggestions. The information
provided was also run by the Attorney General's (AG's) office. Both offices concurred the
Board of Health (BOH) was allowed or qualified to go into executive session. Docktor
requested the Chair to call for an executive session for the sole purpose of discussion of
giving notice. Sbarra had reviewed the Home Rule Charter and stated that while all
personnel issues are handled by the Town Manager, the Board is allowed to go into
executive session. The Attorney General's office stated it was not an executive session to
discuss the qualifying reason; it is an executive session for the sole purpose to discuss
giving notice, meaning the board would be planning an executive session, only to discuss
notice in terms of schedules. The Board would be allowed to discuss notice; however, the
tape must be turned off, the room would be cleared with only board members allowed to
stay, roll call would be taken and someone would take notes.
Ensminger stated he was confused and asked what the board was giving notice for. Docktor
responded the Board may go into executive session purely for the purpose of discussing
giving notice. Ensminger again asked to give notice for what. Docktor responded giving
notice to plan. The Board qualified under the first reason required for an executive session
to be held which is to discuss the reputation, character, physical condition, mental health,
rather than professional competency of an individual, or to discuss the discipline or
dismissal of, or complaints or charges brought against a public officer, employee, staff
member or individual. The individual to be discussed in such an executive session shall be
notified in writing by the public body at least 48 hours prior to the proposed executive
session; provided however that notification may be waived upon written agreement of the
parties. The Board would not be talking about the qualifying reason in this session.
Costigan asked what the reason was for the board to meet. Docktor responded the meeting
would be to plan, due to schedules, vacation and availability of the board.
Docktor had received clear guidelines of what the Chair has to do for notifying the person
that is to be discussed. Shurland inquired if a 48 hour notice had to be given for any
executive session. Docktor replied yes; however, this was different because no one else is
affected except the three board members. If the three members decided at this time to
waive that requirement, they may do that in order to plan to go into executive session at a
later date. Ensminger asked if this was run by town counsel. Doctor stated this is what she
was going by in terms of Cheryl Sbarra who had read the Town Charter and the AG's office
in terms of what qualified for executive session. Costigan asked if it was the opinion of the
Board that they should plan an executive session because of information received regarding
the character of an employee. Docktor stated it was strongly encouraged to do so by the
attorney who had the same information the three board members had. Shurland stated they
had to agree to set up a time to meet as a Board for the sole purpose of discussion of giving
notice of a future executive session; that was all that is allowed to be discussed. Shurland
asked if a motion was required to do that. Docktor stated the chair can be directed to make
the motion; he would have RCN turn off the tape, everyone would leave the room, the
door would be closed and he would direct everyone that the board would be returning to
open session. Ensminger asked if the executive session was on the agenda for tonight's
meeting; generally that would be stipulated on the agenda to notify the public. Docktor
stated she is going by what she had been given by the Director of Policy and Law to do in
the next Board of Health Meeting.
Information provided by the AG's office states if a discussion topic was proposed after the
meeting notice was posted and it was reasonably anticipated by the chair more than 48
hours before the meeting, the public body should update its posting to provide the public
with as much notice as possible; although the public body may consider a topic that was not
listed in the meeting notice if it was not anticipated. The Attorney General strongly
encourages public bodies to postpone discussion and actions on topics that are controversial
or may be of particular interest to the public if they were not listed in the meeting notice.
Page 1 2
Docktor stated she was not sure if the Board's schedules were of public interest or
controversial. Docktor stated she was being very careful to make sure the BOH follows all
of the regulations. Costigan made a motion to go into executive session to discuss
scheduling. Shurland seconded the motion. Ensminger stated the motion has to stipulate
the reason for executive session; that being the qualifying reason 1 through 10. Docktor
stated although the reason pertains to #1, they were not discussing item #1; they were
meeting for the sole purpose to discuss scheduling. Meeting was adjourned at 5:50 pm for
executive session and Costigan directed the Board would return afterwards to open session.
At 5:57 pm the meeting reconvened to open session. The second issue addressed was
regarding the health agent appointment. According to Jean Delios at the last meeting the
board was told that they were not allowed to appoint the health agent temporarily; the town
does not allow that. Costigan asked if she had the authority to tell the board that. Docktor
was unable to find anything in the charter about that. According to suggestion from Sbarra
and in an email received on July 18th from Town Counsel, it basically said the charter
dictates all personnel issues are handled by the town manager; the town manager can hire
or not hire. The Board cannot hire; they can only appoint and authorize.
It was the suggestion of Sbarra the Board may temporarily appoint the health agent until
which time the Human Resources Department (HR) concludes its investigation. The
problem with that was according to Donna Pierce, no one from the town, town counsel or
HR had contacted her regarding the letter that was shared with HR and the Town on June
18th. As a Board, they must direct the town to open an investigation into the public health
nurse's allegations and concerns. Shurland asked for clarification about which letter was
being referred to. It was an email the public health nurse sent to Shurland, which was then
forwarded to board members. Costigan then shared the email with Ensminger seeking an
opinion and asking if the town had instituted any procedures. Shurland questioned that
Pierce had not reached out directly to the town. Docktor stated the town needs to reach out
to Pierce directly. Costigan asked why the town would have an issue if nothing was brought
to them. Docktor could only state from her experience working with battered women, child
abuse and elder abuse, that when you have allegations, you must investigate. Costigan
asked if she was saying that the letter he sent to the town liaison was sufficient for
investigation. She stated it was and also was according to the Director of Policy and Law;
in fact directs the town and said she assumes that this was being done. Whether it is the
BOH, the manager through Human Resources or someone else, it needs to be followed up.
As a board, they may direct the town to follow up on the concerns of the public health
nurse. Docktor stated this would be a way of clearing a lot up.
Costigan stated he had brought that up with the Town Manager and it was the opinion of
the Town Manager there was nothing in the letter that was of substance to start an
investigation. Docktor replied there was enough substance that two lawyers have weighed
in very differently from the town manager. She stated it would be nice to clear the air and
move forward as this was holding up a lot of what the board would like to do. It would be
good to move forward and let them do what they do; it was not the purview of the Board,
but they could direct them to follow up on those concerns. Costigan said he would restate
their case.
Shurland asked what the process was for the board to request an investigation and what if
the request was refused. Costigan responded that he thought it had already been decided
that there was no cause for an investigation. Docktor said as a Board they could make a
simple request to the town; the email from Cheryl Sbarra could be shared with town counsel
and the town manager. Sbarra had stated it was an issue for town counsel.
Docktor stated the letter shared by Costigan from Town Counsel was given to a lawyer to
reduce the legalese for her in terms of what it said. It basically said the Board could vote
not to delegate; they did not have to appoint. They could appoint anyone to give them the
health reports temporarily, whether it was Bob Bracey, who technically is still the Health
Agent. If he is not on the town payroll, the town inspector John Fralick could be temporarily
Page 1 3
appointed by the board to give them the reports as their agent. No one could do anything
without the authority of the Board.
Docktor asked if Costigan had received all of the health reports from Bob Bracey who was
still the health agent. Costigan responded he had not received any reports since the last
one all board members had received. It was a concern that the Board has a health agent
who is not giving them their reports, which in turn makes them unable to do their job,
because they have a health agent who is not reporting to them. Docktor asked Darlene
Foley to give them the reports. Foley stated she did not have a lot of information to report.
She had just received in the past of week a number of inspections that John Fralick had
done. Shurland asked what happens to the inspection reports when received. Foley stated
they normally go to the health agent for review. If any issues are noted they would be
addressed. When she receives the reports, they are recorded, entered into laser fiche and
filed. During this process she obtains some background information so if someone calls she
is able to direct them to the proper person. Prior to those inspections recently received
very few items had come across her desk. Docktor stated the concern that for the past two
months the board had not been receiving any reports. Costigan said he spoke briefly with
Bracey who assured him there was nothing of any emergency that required the Board; but
he had not had a report in over a month. Shurland asked who is doing the work of the
public health nurse. Costigan stated he was hoping to ask Jean Delios at this meeting. No
one had notified Costigan, so that was a concern that the board had no information and are
unable to do their job. They needed the reports from the health agent and also wanted to
know what was going on with the public health nurse as those reports are very essential.
Docktor asked Costigan if he had any sense of where that was, if the position had been
posted or what had been done. Costigan had not been informed but will inquire.
Docktor asked if the board could get from the health agent all correspondence/emails that
had occurred between the health agent, Laura Vlasuk and town management. Costigan
asked if this was something the Board had the authority to do that could be obtained under
freedom of information. Docktor stated Vlasuk was on record saying she was reporting to
everyone, so she couldn't imagine there would be anything that shouldn't be open to the
Board. Costigan did not know that answer to that and he was uncomfortable requesting
that information because he didn't know if it was their purview to. Docktor responded it
was their purview because it was about the health department. They would like to have any
email communications between the health agent and town management, with a list of
meetings and their agendas twenty-four hours before their next meeting. Shurland stated
the Board is mandated by the State to make sure inspections are being done. If they
cannot get the reports they can't obey the laws that they are mandated to obey. Costigan
stated the inspections are being done. Shurland said that the board has no proof of that.
Friedmann stated the board was legally responsible to the State, not the Selectmen, Town
Manager or anyone else. The board members have to make sure state laws and regulations
are being obeyed; that is why the reports were always received. Costigan stated he had
been assured that there were no emergencies. Docktor stated that was not sufficient
because they need to review the reports. It was not Bracey's position to say not to worry
about it; he has to give the board the information. Shurland reiterated that not having a
public health nurse, not having diseases reported was troubling because that was one of the
board's jobs as well as food inspections. She inquired if someone was getting those reports,
where were they going, how they were being managed. She felt something had to change;
they could not keep going month after month because they didn't have an appointed health
agent.
Docktor had previously inquired why a police officer was sent to the last Board of Health
meeting and asked if Costigan had received any answers. Costigan stated that according to
the town manager he wanted to make sure everyone was safe. Docktor inquired what the
threat to public safety was. Costigan said that was not clear. Docktor inquired if he was
told why no one on the board was notified of the possible threat for their safety and
Costigan replied the town manager did not mention that. Shurland felt that was distressing
because if the public safety was at risk, the board should know before walking into a room.
Page 1 4
Since she has been a member of the board, this was the first meeting where a police officer
was in attendance for their safety. Costigan believed there was a rumor that a lot of people
were going to attend the meeting. As it was an open meeting, the members felt it was even
more of a concern that the board was not notified of what the threat was. Costigan didn't
take the threat that seriously. The members felt that it was not the police officer's presence
that was disturbing, but the idea that he needed to be there. The members also felt there
needs to be a follow up with Town Manager regarding the lack of communication.
Costigan asked if the members had read the communication from town counsel. Town
Counsel's opinion was that the town manager could appoint a health agent because it was
not restricted in the town charter. Docktor stated that the appointee by the town manager
would have a title but no authority to act for the Board of Health and that Board of Health
records could not be given to a person without authority. If the board were to lose the
current health agent, they could appoint John Fralick to give them the reports. They could
not do anything temporarily because of what they were told about personnel restrictions.
Costigan asked for clarification on that. Friedmann stated according to Reading Health
Regulations the Board appoints the health agent who then acts on their behalf on state
mandated requirements. The Board was in agreement that as the hiring authority, the town
manager could appoint with the title of health agent, but without the board voting to give
authority to the health agent to act on their behalf, it was a title only. Docktor stated the
Charter authorizes the town manager to appoint an employee to work under the board but
to reserve to the board the authority to delegate its powers as described in MGL Chapter
111. Costigan opined that the Board should consider doing so. Docktor had reservation in
doing so without all of the other issues being resolved before they could move forward.
Ensminger asked for clarification of the last statement regarding the issues; Shurland said
the board could not discuss it.
Pesticide Regulations
The updated draft regulations were sent to town counsel for review. Costigan discussed the
section regarding town owned land, specifically the tree lawn and sidewalk with the town
manager who did not denote any problems with what was written but wanted to further
review the document. Shurland inquired about the time line to complete the approval
process, including sending the final draft to Jane Kinsella, Public Works Department and the
scheduling of a public hearing.
Open Discussion
Shurland discussed a recent report she had read with statistics provided by RCASA
regarding the number of overdose deaths in Reading. From December 2000 through June
2017 there were 80 overdose deaths, 63 of which were due to opioids. They did not have a
year by year breakdown. She felt this was a very important issue for the board to take on
collaboratively with others such as RCASA, RPD, Library, School Committee, YMCA, mental
health professionals and to include young people, or those who are addicted or know people
who are addicted. Friedmann stated that RCASA would be releasing further data in
September. This issue will be put on the agenda for September.
Docktor stated the website of the Marblehead Board of Health had a wonderful resource
page and noted another web page gave clear cut directions for administering Narcan which
may be something that could be done on Reading's web page. It was noted that the
Gloucester Police Department also has a really unique program. Being a volunteer board
they are somewhat limited in what they can do but they can provide education and have
resources available on the web page.
Page 1 5
Next meeting is scheduled for August 16, 2017.
Meeting adjourned at 6:35 pm.
Materials Distributed:
Draft minutes of June 21, 2017
Page 1 6