Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2017-06-27 Board of Selectmen Packet
OFR O � y c Town of Reading Meeting Posting with Agenda ,sag, IY 0 Board - Committee - Commission - Council: Board of Selectmen Date: 2017 -06 -27 Time: 7:00 PM Building: Reading Town Hall Address: 16 Lowell Street Purpose: General Business r Pig_ ! 0VP C 1.._i� rxE.R.DING, MASS. 2011 JUN' 22P1 :5 q 11 Location: Selectmen Meeting Room Agenda: Meeting Called By: Caitlin Saunders on behalf of Chairman John Arena Notices and agendas are to be posted 48 hours in advance of the meetings excluding Saturdays, Sundays and Legal Holidays. Please keep in mind the Town Clerk's hours of operation and make necessary arrangements to be sure your posting is made in an adequate amount of time. A listing of topics that the chair reasonably anticipates will be discussed at the meeting must be on the agenda. All Meeting Postings must be submitted in typed format; handwritten notices will not be accepted. Topics of Discussion: 1) Reports and Comments Selectmen's Liaison Reports and Comments Public Comment Town Manager's /Assistant Town Manager's Report 2) Open Session for topics not reasonably anticipated 48 hours in advance of the meeting 3) Proclamations /Certificates of Appreciation 4) Personnel & Appointments 5) Discussion /Action Items tea. Adopt Hazard Mitigation Plan ti. Change of Officer — Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza i X. Discuss Cell Tower Project (scope, participants, timelines, public process) Review DPW Policies L. Approve Debt Sale f. Extend Sunset Clause for Climate Advisory Committee Appoint Boards & Committees 6) pproval of Minutes May 30t', 2017 7) Licenses, Permits and Approvals a. One Day Liquor License — Reading Rotary Club Installation Dinner b. One Day Liquor License — Meadow Brook Golf Club Clambake 8) Executive Session 9) Correspondence a. Correspondence from National Grid, re: Natural Gas Work in Reading b. Correspondence from Reading Historical Commission, re: 136 Haven St 7:30 7:45 8:00 8:45 9:15 9:25 9:30 This Agenda has been prepared in advance and represents a listing of topics that the chair reasonably anticipates will be discussed at the meeting. However the agenda does not necessarily include all matters which may be taken up at this meeting. Page 1 1 ffff c� Office of the Town Manager 16 Lowell Street 63g [NCO 90 Reading, MA 01867 To: Board of Selectmen From: Robert W. LeLacheur, Jr. CFA Date: June 22, 2017 RE: BOS Agenda for June 27th 781 - 942 -9043 townmanager @ci.reading.ma.us www.readingmagov /town - manager - manager Next week we will begin the meeting with a brief request that the Board adopt the Hazard Mitigation Plan. The plan is about 60 pages and is attached to your packet. The Town is required to revise the HMP on a regular basis, and your adoption will complete that process. Community Development Director Julie Mercier led a few internal staff meetings, and coordinated the work with a consultant. Next we have a request to change managers at Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza. The Police have completed their background investigation, and their report is also in your packet. A review of the proposed cell tower will get a bit more discussion that these previous issues. Although it is not a Public Hearing where you are asked to vote any formal decisions, we did notify the neighborhood to attend. Town Engineer Ryan Percival will lead the discussion, which will range from draft site - specific details, a review of a recent meeting we had with all interested cell carriers, and some public safety concerns. We are'most interested in the Board's view of a timeline and public process going forward. I will review the fact that yesterday we sold debt for water, sewer and RMHS litigation costs. I have only glanced at the results but observed that the cost was only about 1.5% with very competitive cover bids. The latter is usually the best indication that the deal was well run and that the underlying credit is strong. Certainly we had a very positive discussion with a ratings agency leading up to this issue. We will ask the Board to sign quite a lot of documents, which can wait until the end of the meeting. Chair Arena has asked that the Board consider extending the sunset clause of the Climate Advisory Board through December 31, 2017. This will allow them to complete their work for November Town Meeting on the proposed plastic bag ban /limitation. I know they are working with the Bylaw Committee, Administrative Director Matt Kraunelis, and Town Counsel on this issue. If the Board chooses not to extend the committee then they will cease to exist formally as of July 1, 2017. The VASC is schedule to meet on Monday June 26th, and will present their recommendations to the full Board as the last agenda item next week as to the annual appointment process. TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE 2017 1K ABC` —A - ... — --.1 FINAL PLAN Approval Pending Adoption Issued by FEMA May 31, 2017 MAPfC FEMA Hazard Mitigation Planning Grant READING, MA Map 3: Flood Zones Srt<s loF�Sy iCOncf.<d .a NaeInM Arcas' A kp„ <..c Lxs run Sa �I �'wnry v. -r 6xxx o —Z.-�, 2M (Annual 0anmi Ped L<tv nrn PFY,� F ai�ROa0s Y5 S.iigrc} 0 c G0.25 0.5 Miles 08 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE [This page intentionally left blank] TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND CREDITS This plan was prepared for the Town of Reading by the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) under the direction of the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency (MEMA) and the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR). The plan was funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA) Pre - Disaster Mitigation (PDM) Grant Program. MAPC Officers President: Vice President: Secretary: Treasurer: Executive Director: Credits Project Manager and Lead Project Planner: Hazard Mitigation Program Manager: Mapping /GIS Services: Keith Bergman, Town of Littleton Erin Wortman, Town of Stoneham Sandra Hackman, Town of Bedford Taber Keally, Town of Milton Marc. D. Draisen Sam Cleaves Martin Pillsbury Cortni Kerr Eliza Wallace Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency Director: Kurt Schwartz Department of Conservation and Recreation Commissioner: Leo Roy Reading Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Julie Mercier Jean Delios Ryan Percival Kim Honetschlager Chuck Tirone Greg Burns Paul Jackson George Strazzere Community Development Director Assistant Town Manager Town Engineer GIS Coordinator Conservation Administrator Fire/EMD Fire Department Assistant Chief DPW /Highway Division TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE [This page intentionally left blank] TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Table Section Page I. Executive Summary 1 IL Introduction 5 III. Planning Process and Public Participation 9 IV. Risk Assessment 15 V. Hazard Mitigation Goals 84 VI. Existing Mitigation Measures 84 VII. Mitigation Measures from the 2010 Plan 94 VIII. Hazard Mitigation Strategy 98 IX. Plan Adoption and Maintenance 115 X. List of References 119 Appendix A Meeting Agendas 121 Appendix B Hazard Mapping 125 Appendix C Documentation of Public Participation 135 Appendix D Documentation of Plan Adoption 143 LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Table Table Page 1 Plan Review and Update 3 2 Previous Federal /State Disaster Declarations 6 3 Local Hazard Mitigation Team Members 12 4 Attendance at Public Meetings 13 5 Hazard Risks Summary 15 6 Middlesex County Flood Events, 1996- January, 2107 17 7 Summary of Repetitive Losses and Claims 25 8 Hurricane Records for Massachusetts, 1938 -2012 26 9 Tornado Records for Middlesex County 29 10 Middlesex County Thunderstorm Events, 1995 -2014 31 11 Severe Winter Storm Records for Massachusetts 40 12 Middlesex County Heavy Snow Events, 1965 -2014 41 13 Middlesex County Ice Storm Events, 1995 -2014 47 14 Historical Earthquakes, 1727 -2017 49 15 Middlesex County Extreme Cold Occurrences 55 16 Middlesex County Extreme Heat Occurrences 56 17 Middlesex County Drought Occurrences 57 18 Chronology of Major Droughts in Massachusetts 60 19 2005 Land Use 64 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE 20 Relationship of Potential Development to Hazard Areas 66 21 Summa of Reading Developments 2010 -2015 68 22 Critical Facilities and Relationship to Hazard Areas 70 23 Estimated Damages from Hurricanes 80 24 Estimated Damages from Earthquakes 81 25 1 Estimated Damages from Flooding 82 26 Existing Mitigation Measures 92 27 Mitigation Measures from the 2010 Plan 94 28 Mitigation Measure Prioritization 103 29 Potential Mitigation Measures 110 Figure Figure Page 1 Ipswich River Gage Height, March -April 2010 24 2 Massachusetts Wildfires 2001 -2009 54 3 Wind Chill Temperature Index and Frostbite Risk 55 4 1 Heat Index Chart 56 5 Statewide Drought Levels using SPI Thresholds 1850 — 2012 59 6 Change in Frequency of Extreme Downpours, 1948 — 2011 62 7 Massachusetts Extreme Heat Scenarios 63 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Hazard Mitigation planning is a proactive effort to identify actions that can be taken to reduce the dangers to life and property from natural hazard events. In the communities of the Boston region of Massachusetts, hazard mitigation planning tends to focus most on flooding, the most likely natural hazard to impact these communities. The Federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires all municipalities that wish to be eligible to receive FEMA funding for hazard mitigation grants, to adopt a local multi - hazard mitigation plan and update this plan in five year intervals. Planning Process This is an update of the original Reading Hazard Mitigation Plan, which was adopted by Reading on July, 13 2010. Planning for the Hazard Mitigation Plan update was led by the Reading Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team, composed of staff from a number of different Town Departments. This team met on March 24, 2016, and May 23, 2016 and discussed where the impacts of natural hazards most affect the Town, goals for addressing these impacts, updates to the Town's existing mitigation measures and new or revised hazard mitigation measures that would benefit the Town. Public participation in this planning process is important for improving awareness of the potential impacts of natural hazards and to build support for the actions the Town takes to mitigate them. The Town's Community Planning and Development Commission hosted two public meetings, the first on June 6, 2016 and the second on January 23, 2017 and the draft plan update was posted on the Town's website for public review. Key Town stakeholders and neighboring communities were notified and invited to review the draft plan and submit comments. Risk Assessment The Reading Hazard Mitigation Plan assesses the potential impacts to the Town from flooding, high winds, winter storms, brush fire, geologic hazards, extreme temperatures, and drought. Flooding, driven by hurricanes, northeasters and other storms, clearly presents the greatest hazard to the Town. These are shown on the map series (Appendix B). The Reading Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team identified 137 Critical Facilities. These are also shown on the map series and listed in Table 20, identifying which facilities are located within the mapped hazard zones. A HAZUS -MH analysis provided estimates of damages from Hurricanes of category 2 and 4 ($18,614.97 thousand to $66,975.28 thousand) as well as earthquakes of magnitudes 5 and 7 ($187.37 million to $1,916.84 million). Flood damage estimates range from $8.32 million to $12.04 million. TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Hazard Mitigation Goals The Reading Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team identified the following hazard mitigation goals for the Town: 1. Prevent and reduce the loss of life, injury, public health impacts and property damages resulting from all identified natural hazards. 2. Build and enhance local mitigation capabilities to ensure individual safety, reduce damage to public and private property and ensure continuity of emergency services. 3. Increase cooperation and coordination among private entities, Town officials and Boards, State agencies and Federal agencies. 4. Increase awareness of the benefits of hazard mitigation through outreach and education. Hazard Mitigation Strategy The Reading Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team identified a number of mitigation measures that would serve to reduce the Town's vulnerability to natural hazard events. One of the most important of these is the completion of drainage upgrade in the Sunnyside Avenue and Fairview Avenues neighborhood. Another action includes drainage upgrades at West Street, programmed and budgeted by the Town's Capital Improvement Plan, a process instituted following a comprehensive drainage and flooding study in 2013 of the Aberjona and Saugus River watershed areas in Reading. Another important multi- hazard mitigation step will be the construction of a new cellular communications tower allowing for faster and more reliable radio communications and response times for Police, Fire and DPW Departments. Overall, the hazard mitigation strategy recognizes that mitigating hazards for Reading will be an ongoing process as our understanding of natural hazards and the steps that can be taken to mitigate their damages changes over time. Global climate change and a variety of other factors impact the Town's vulnerability and in the future. Local officials will need to work together across municipal lines and with state and federal agencies in order to understand and address these changes. The Hazard Mitigation Strategy will be incorporated into the Town's other related plans and policies. 2 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Plan Review and Update Process Table 1 Plan Review and Update Chapter Reviews and Updates III — Public The Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team placed an emphasis on Participation public participation for the update of the Hazard Mitigation Plan, discussing strategies to enhance participation opportunities at the first local committee meeting. During plan development, the plan was discussed at two public meetings hosted by the Community Planning and Development Commission. The plan was also available on the Town's website for public comment. IV — Risk MAPC gathered the most recently available hazard and land use data Assessment and met with Town staff to identify changes in local hazard areas and development trends. Town staff reviewed critical infrastructure with MAPC staff in order to create an up -to -date list. MAPC also used the most recently available version of HAZUS and assessed the potential impacts of flooding using the latest data. V - Goals The Hazard Mitigation Goals were reviewed and endorsed by the Reading Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team. VI — Existing The list of existing mitigation measures was updated to reflect current Mitigation mitigation activities in the Town. Measures VII & VIII — Mitigation measures from the 2010 plan were reviewed and assessed Hazard as to whether they were completed, in- progress, or deferred. The Mitigation Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team determined whether to carry Strategy forward measures into the 2017 Plan Update or modify or delete them. The Plan Update's hazard mitigation strategy reflects both new measures and measures carried forward from the 2010 plan. The Local Hazard Mitigation Team prioritized all of these measures based on current conditions. IX — Plan This section of the plan was updated with a new on -going plan Adoption & implementation review and five year update process that will assist Maintenance the Town in incorporating hazard mitigation issues into other Town planning and regulatory review processes and better prepare the Town for the next comprehensive plan update. As indicated on Table 25, Reading made progress on implementing mitigation measures identified in the 2010 Hazard Mitigation Plan. Several projects have been completed, including dredging the drainage channel At Morgan Park to remove years of accumulated sediment and improve drainage, removing the obstructions from the West Street area drainage system, cleaning the brook along Main Street near Church of the Nazarenes of sediment and other blockages, re- developing a Main Street property using up to date TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE stormwater detention systems that relieved flooding in the Milepost and Haystack Streets neighborhood, installing new drainage systems in the Hopkins Street neighborhood, updating Conservation Commission regulations and adding new aquifer protection to the Town's zoning bylaw. Other projects were partially completed, most notably drainage improvements in the upper Saugus River watershed that impact the Sunnyside and Fairview Road areas, the flooding near the DPW garage on Line Road and flooding along portions of South Main Street, a state highway and MA DOT responsibility about notification and evacuation procedures. There are also drainage projects scheduled to be completed under the Town's Capital Improvement Program, including drainage improvements for the Lowell Street and Willow Street neighborhoods. These mitigation measures will be continued in this 2017 Plan Update. Moving forward into the next five year plan implementation period there will be many more opportunities to incorporate hazard mitigation into the Town's decision making processes. Though not formally done in the 2010 Plan, the Town will document any actions taken within this iteration of the Hazard Mitigation Plan on challenges met and actions successfully adopted as part of the ongoing plan maintenance to be conducted by the Reading Hazard Mitigation Implementation Team, as described in Section IX, Plan Adoption and Maintenance. rd TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE II. INTRODUCTION Planning Requirements under the Federal Disaster Mitigation Act The Federal Disaster Mitigation Act, passed in 2000, requires that after November 1 2004, all municipalities that wish to continue to be eligible to receive FEMA funding for hazard mitigation grants, must adopt a local multi - hazard mitigation plan and update this plan in five year intervals. This planning requirement does not affect disaster assistance funding. Federal hazard mitigation planning and grant programs are administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in collaboration with the states. These programs are administered in Massachusetts by the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency (MEMA) in partnership with the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR). The Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) subcontracted with the Town of Reading to update its local Hazard Mitigation Plans, which was first adopted in 2010. The local Hazard Mitigation Plan update produced under this grant is designed to individually meet the requirements of the Disaster Mitigation Act for each community while listing regional concerns and hazards that impact the Town or City creating the plan. What is a Hazard Mitigation Plan? Natural hazard mitigation planning is the process of determining how to systematically reduce or eliminate the loss of life and property damage resulting from natural hazards such as floods, earthquakes, and hurricanes. Hazard mitigation means to permanently reduce or alleviate the losses of life, injuries, and property resulting from natural hazards through long -term strategies. These long -term strategies include planning, policy changes, programs, projects, and other activities. Previous Federal /State Disasters The Town of Reading, a part of Middlesex County, has experienced 20 natural hazards that triggered federal or state disaster declarations since 1991. These are listed in Table 2 below. The majority of these events involved flooding, while five were due to hurricanes or nor'easters, and four were due to severe winter weather. 5 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 2 Previous Federal /State Disaster Declarations DISASTER NAME (DATE OF EVENT) TYPE OF ASSISTANCE DECLARED AREAS Hurricane Bob FEMA Public Assistance Counties of Barnstable, Bristol, (August 1991) Project Grants Dukes, Essex, Hampden, Middlesex, Plymouth, Nantucket, Norfolk, Suffolk Hazard Mitigation Grant Counties of Barnstable, Bristol, Program Dukes, Essex, Hampden, Middlesex, Plymouth, Nantucket, Norfolk, Suffolk (16 projects) No -Name Storm FEMA Public Assistance Counties of Barnstable, Bristol, (October 1991) Project Grants Dukes, Essex, Middlesex, Plymouth, Nantucket, Norfolk FEMA Individual Counties of Barnstable, Bristol, Household Program Dukes, Essex, Middlesex, Plymouth, Nantucket, Norfolk Hazard Mitigation Grant Counties of Barnstable, Bristol, Program Dukes, Essex, Middlesex, Plymouth, Nantucket, Norfolk, Suffolk (10 projects) March Blizzard FEMA Public Assistance All 14 Counties (March 1993) Project Grants January Blizzard FEMA Public Assistance All 14 Counties (January 1996) Project Grants May Windstorm State Counties of Plymouth, Norfolk, (May 1996) Public Assistance Project Bristol Grants October Flood FEMA Public Assistance Counties of Essex, Middlesex, (October 1996) Project Grants Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk FEMA Individual Counties of Essex, Middlesex, Household Program Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk Hazard Mitigation Grant Counties of Essex, Middlesex, Program Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk (36 projects) TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE DISASTER NAME (DATE OF EVENT TYPE OF ASSISTANCE DECLARED AREAS 1997 Community Development Counties of Essex, Middlesex, Block Grant -HUD Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk June Flood FEMA Individual Counties of Bristol, Essex, (June 1998) Household Program Middlesex, Norfolk, Suffolk, Plymouth, Worcester Hazard Mitigation Grant Counties of Bristol, Essex, Program Middlesex, Norfolk, Suffolk, Plymouth, Worcester (19 projects) (1998)' Community Development Counties of Bristol, Essex, Block Grant -HUD Middlesex, Norfolk, Suffolk, Plymouth, Worcester March Flood FEMA Individual Counties of Bristol, Essex, (March 2001) Household Program Middlesex, Norfolk, Suffolk, Plymouth, Worcester Hazard Mitigation Grant Counties of Bristol, Essex, Program Middlesex, Norfolk, Suffolk, Plymouth, Worcester (16 ro' ects) February Snowstorm FEMA Public Assistance All 14 Counties (Feb 17 -18, 2003) Project Grants January Blizzard FEMA Public Assistance All 14 Counties (January 22 -23, Project Grants 2005 Hurricane Katrina FEMA Public Assistance All 14 Counties (August 29, 2005) Project Grants May Hazard Mitigation Grant Statewide Rainstorm/Flood Program (May 12 -23, 2006) April Nor'easter Hazard Mitigation Grant Statewide (April 15 -27, 2007) Program Flooding FEMA Public Assistance Bristol, Essex, Middlesex, (March, 2010) FEMA Individuals and Suffolk, Norfolk, Plymouth, Households Program Worcester SBA Loan Hazard Mitigation Grant Statewide Program TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE DISASTER NAME TYPE OF (DATE OF ASSISTANCE DECLARED AREAS EVENT Tropical Storm Irene FEMA Public Assistance Statewide (August 27 -28, 2011) Hurricane Sandy FEMA Public Assistance Statewide (October 27 -30, 2012) Severe snowstorm FEMA Public Assistance; Statewide and Flooding Hazard Mitigation Grant (February 8 -09, 2013 Program Blizzard of 2015 FEMA Public Assistance; Statewide (January 26 -28, Hazard Mitigation Grant 2015) Program Source: database provided by MEMA) FEMA Funded Mitigation Projects The Town of Reading has not received funding from FEMA for mitigation projects under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP). Community Profile The Town of Reading is a medium size community of 9.9 square miles which lies at a transportation hub. With Interstate Route 93 along its western boundary and Interstate 95 along its southern and southeastern boundaries, as well as a commuter rail station, not only Boston but the seashore, retail shopping malls and employment centers are easily accessible. This accessibility plus the New England character of the town make Reading an ideal residential area. First settled in 1639, the town was incorporated in 1644. This committee is only one of many volunteer boards, committees and commissions that assist an elected board of selectmen and a representative town meeting in governing the town. (Narrative is taken from the Community Profile on the website maintained by the Department of Housing and Community Development). The Town is governed by a Board of Selectmen with a Town manager. The Town operates under a representative Town meeting format. The 2010 population was 24,747 people and there were 9,617 housing units. (2010 US Census) The Town maintains a website at http: / /www.readingma.gov/ 8 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE III. PLANNING PROCESS AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MAPC employs a six step planning process based on FEMA's hazard mitigation planning guidance focusing on local needs and priorities but maintaining a regional perspective matched to the scale and nature of natural hazard events. Public participation is a central component of this process, providing critical information about the local occurrence of hazards while also serving as a means to build a base of support for hazard mitigation activities. MAPC supports participation by the general public and other plan stakeholders through Regional and Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Teams, two public meetings hosted by the local Hazard Mitigation Team, posting of the plan to the Town's website, and invitations sent to neighboring communities, Town boards and commissions, the local chamber of commerce, and other local or regional entities to review the plan and provide comment. Planning Process Summary The six -step planning process outlined below is based on the guidance provided by FEMA in the Local Multi- Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance. Public participation is a central element of this process, which attempts to focus on local problem areas and identify needed mitigation measures based on where gaps occur in the existing mitigation efforts of the municipality. MAPC is also able to identify regional opportunities for collaboration and facilitate communication between communities. In plan updates, the process described below allows staff to bring the most recent hazard information into the plan, including new hazard occurrence data, changes to a municipality's existing mitigation measures, and progress made on actions identified in previous plans. • Map the Hazards — MAPC relies on data from a number of different federal, state, and 6. Implement and Update the Plan S. Plan Approval and Adoption 1. Map the Hazards 4. Develop Mitigation Strategies D 2. Assess the Risks & Potential Damages 3. Review Existing Mitigation TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE local sources in order to map the areas with the potential to experience natural hazards. This mapping represents a multi - hazard assessment of the municipality and is used as a set of base maps for the remainder of the planning process. A particularly important source of information is the knowledge drawn from local municipal staff on where natural hazard impacts have occurred, which is collected. These maps can be found in Appendix B. Assess the Risks & Potential Damages — Working with local staff, critical facilities, infrastructure, vulnerable populations, and other features are mapped and contrasted with the hazard data from the first step to identify those that might represent particular vulnerabilities to these hazards. Land use data and development trends are also incorporated into this analysis. In addition, MAPC develops estimates of the potential impacts of certain hazard events on the community. MAPC drew on the following resources to complete the plan: • Town of Reading, General Bylaws • Town of Reading, Zoning Bylaw • Town of Reading Master Plan 2006 • Aberjona River and Saugus River Drainage Study for Town of Reading 2013 • Town of Reading Open Space Plan, 2012 • Town of Reading Capital Improvement Program 2014 • Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2013 • FEMA, Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide; October 1, 2011 • FEMA, Flood Insurance Rate Maps for Middlesex County, MA, 2014 • Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan.2013 • Metropolitan Area Planning Council, GIS Lab, Regional Plans and Data. • New England Seismic Network, Boston College Weston Observatory, http: / /aki.bc.edu /index.htm • NOAA National Climatic Data Center, http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/ • Northeast States Emergency Consortium, http: / /www.nesec.org/ • USGS, National Water Information System, http://nwis.waterdata.usgs.gov/usa/nwis • US Census, 2010 • Review Existing Mitigation — Municipalities in the Boston Metropolitan Region have an active history in hazard mitigation as most have adopted flood plain zoning districts, wetlands protection programs, and other measures as well as enforcing the State building code, which has strong provisions related to hazard resistant building requirements. All current municipal mitigation measures must be documented. • Develop Mitigation Strategies — MAPC works with the local municipal staff to identify new mitigation measures, utilizing information gathered from the hazard identification, vulnerability assessments, and the community's existing mitigation 10 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE efforts to determine where additional work is necessary to reduce the potential damages from hazard events. Additional information on the development of hazard mitigation strategies can be found in Chapter VII. Plan Approval & Adoption — Once a final draft of the plan is complete it is sent to MEMA for the state level review and, following that, to FEMA for approval. Typically, once FEMA has approved the plan the agency issues a conditional approval (Approval Pending Adoption), with the condition being adoption of the plan by the municipality. More information on plan adoption can be found in Chapter IX and documentation of plan adoption can be found in Appendix D. • Implement & Update the Plan — Implementation is the final and most important part of any planning process. Hazard Mitigation Plans must also be updated on a five year basis making preparation for the next plan update an important on -going activity. Chapter IX includes more detailed information on plan implementation. The Local Multiple Hazard Community Planning Team MAPC worked with the local community representatives to organize a local Multiple Hazard Community Planning Team for Reading (Local Committee). MAPC briefed the local representatives as to the desired composition of that team as well as the need for representation from the business community, civic organizations and citizens at large. The Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team is central to the planning process as it is the primary body tasked with developing a mitigation strategy for the community. The local team was tasked with working with MAPC to set plan goals, provide information on the hazards that impact the Town, existing mitigation measures, and helping to develop new mitigation measures for this plan update. The Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team membership can be found in Table 5 below. On March 24, 2016, MAPC and MEMA staff held a meeting with the Local Committee to outline the hazard mitigation planning and updating process at Reading Town Hall. On May 23, 2016, MAPC conducted a meeting of the Reading Local Committee. The meeting was organized by Community Development Director Julie Mercier. The purpose of the meeting was to review and develop hazard mitigation goals, review the status of mitigation measures identified in the 2010 hazard mitigation plan, identify new potential mitigation measures and to gather information on local hazard mitigation issues and sites or areas related to these. The meeting also covered measures to be carried forward from the previous plan and to prioritize new measures. The following Table lists the attendees at each meeting of the team. The agendas for these meetings are included in Appendix A. 11 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE The agendas for these meetings are included in Appendix A. Table 3 Membership of the Rea din Hazard Mitigation Planning Team Name Representing Julie Mercier Community Development Director Jean Delios Assistant Town Manager Ryan Percival Town Engineer Chuck Tirone Conservation Agent Paul Jackson Lieutenant, Fire Department Greg Burns Chief, Fire Department Public Meetings Public participation in the hazard mitigation planning process is important, both for plan development and for later implementation of the plan. Residents, business owners, and other community members are an excellent source for information on the historic and potential impacts of natural hazard events and particular vulnerabilities the community may face from these hazards. Their participation in this planning process also builds understanding of the concept of hazard mitigation, potentially creating support for mitigation actions taken in the future to implement the plan. To gather this information and educate residents on hazard mitigation, the Town hosted two public meetings, one during the planning process and one after a complete draft plan is available for review. Natural hazard mitigation plans unfortunately rarely attract much public involvement in the Boston region, unless there has been a recent hazard event. One of the best strategies for overcoming this challenge is to include discussion of the hazard mitigation plan on the agenda of an existing board or commission. With this strategy, the meeting receives widespread advertising and a guaranteed audience of the board or commission members plus those members of the public who attend the meeting. These board and commission members represent an engaged audience that is informed and up to date on many of the issues that relate to hazard mitigation planning in the locality and will likely be involved in plan implementation, making them an important audience with which to build support for hazard mitigation measures. In addition, these meetings frequently receive press coverage, expanding the audience that has the opportunity to hear the presentation and provide comment. The public had an opportunity to provide input to the Reading hazard mitigation planning process during a meeting on June 6, 2016 held in the Town Hall. The draft plan update was presented at a Community Planning and Development Commission meeting held on January 23, 2017 in Reading Town Hall. Both meetings were publicized as regular meetings of the Community Planning and Development Commission according to the Massachusetts Public Meeting Law. The attendance list for each meeting can be found in Table 4. See public meeting notices in Appendix C. 12 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 4 Reading Public Meetings Name I Representing Meeting #1 June 6, 2016 Nick Safina Community Planning and Development Commission John Weston Community Planning and Development Commission Dave Tuttle Community Planning and Development Commission Karen Goncalves -Dolan Community Planning and Development Commission Jean Delios Assistant Town Manager Julie Mercier Community Development Director Sam Cleaves MAPC Approximately 5 members of the public Meeting #2 January 23, 2017 Nick Safina Community Planning and Development Commission John Weston Community Planning and Development Commission Dave Tuttle Community Planning and Development Commission Karen Goncalves -Dolan Community Planning and Development Commission Jean Delios Assistant Town Manager Julie Mercier Community Development Director Approximately 5 members of the public Local Stakeholder Involvement The local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team was encouraged to reach out to local stakeholders that might have an interest in the Hazard Mitigation Plan including neighboring communities, agencies, businesses, nonprofits, and other interested parties. Notice was sent to the following organizations and neighboring municipalities inviting them to review the Hazard Mitigation Plan and submit comments to the Town: Town of North Reading Town of Lynnfield Town of Wakefield Town of Stoneham Town of Wilmington City of Woburn Reading/North Reading Chamber of Commerce Reading Conservation Commission Reading Daily Times Chronicle 13 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Reading Department Heads See Appendix C for public meeting notices. Town Web Site The draft Reading Hazard Mitigation Plan 2017 Update was posted on the Town's website following the second public meeting. Members of the public could access the draft document and submit comments or questions to the Town. Continuing Public Participation Following the adoption of the plan update, the planning team will continue to provide residents, businesses, and other stakeholders the opportunity to learn about the hazard mitigation planning process and to contribute information that will update the Town's understanding of local hazard. As updates and a review of the plan are conducted by the Hazard Mitigation Implementation Team, these will be placed on the Town's web site, and any meetings of the Hazard Mitigation Implementation Team will be publicly noticed in accordance with Town and state open meeting laws. Planning Timeline March 24, 2016 Kickoff and Review of Scope Meeting with Hazard Mitigation Planning Team, MEMA and MAPC May 23, 2016 Meeting of the Reading Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team June 6, 2015 First Public Meeting with Reading Community Planning and Development Commission January 23,2017 Second Public Meeting with Community Planning and Development Commission March 17, 2017 Draft Plan Update submitted to MEMA following posting and review May 31, 2017 FEMA issued notice of Approval Pending Adoption 14 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE IV. RISK ASSESSMENT The risk assessment analyzes the potential natural hazards that could occur within the Town of Reading as well as the relationship between those hazards and current land uses, potential future development, and critical infrastructure. This section also includes a vulnerability assessment that estimates the potential damages that could result from certain large scale natural hazard events. Update Process In order to update Reading's risk assessment, MAPC gathered the most recently available hazard and land use data and met with Town staff to identify changes in local hazard areas and development trends. MAPC also used FEMA's damage estimation software, HAZUS (described below). Overview of Hazards and Impacts The Massachusetts Hazard Mitigation Plan provides an in -depth overview of natural hazards in Massachusetts. Previous state and federal disaster declarations since 1991 are summarized in Table 2. Table 5 below summarizes the hazard risks for Reading. This evaluation takes into account the frequency of the hazard, historical records, and variations in land use. This analysis is based on the vulnerability assessment in the Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan. The statewide assessment was modified to reflect local conditions in Reading using the definitions for hazard frequency and severity listed below. Based on this, the Town set an overall priority for each hazard. Reading is not a coastal community and therefore not subject to coastal hazards, storm surge or tsunamis. Table 5 - Hazard Risks Summary Hazard Fre u ncy ity Massachusetts Reading Massachusetts Reading Flooding High High Serious Serious Dam failures Very Low NA Extensive NA Hurricane /Tropical Storm Medium Medium Serious Serious Tornadoes Medium Very Low Serious Serious Thunderstorms High High Minor Minor Nor'easter High High Minor Minor Winter- Blizzard /Snow High High Minor Minor Winter -Ice Storms Medium Medium Minor Minor Earthquakes Very Low Very Low Serious Serious Landslides Low Very Low Minor Minor Brush fires Medium High Minor Minor 15 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 5 - Hazard Risks Summary Extreme Temperatures Medium Medium Minor Minor Drought Low Low Minor Minor Coastal Hazards High N/A Serious N/A Tsunami Very Low N/A Extensive N/A Major Urban Fires I Low N/A Serious N/A Source, Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2013, modified for Reading Note: Of the hazards listed in the 2013 Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan, four categories are not applicable to Reading: coastal hazards and tsunami, due to the town's inland location away from the coast; dams, as there are none in Reading and major urban fires, due to the lack of significant wildfire areas in close proximity to development that could pose a significant threat of urban fire. Definitions used in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan Frequency Very low frequency: events that occur less frequently than once in 100 years (less than 1% per year) Low frequency: events that occur from once in 50 years to once in 100 years (1% to 2% per year); Medium frequency: events that occur from once in 5 years to once in 50 years (2% to 20% per year); High frequency: events that occur more frequently than once in 5 years (Greater than 20% per year). Severity Minor: Limited and scattered property damage; limited damage to public infrastructure and essential services not interrupted; limited injuries or fatalities. Serious: Scattered major property damage; some minor infrastructure damage; essential services are briefly interrupted; some injuries and /or fatalities. Extensive: Widespread major property damage; major public infrastructure damage (up to several days for repairs); essential services are interrupted from several hours to several days; many injuries and/or fatalities. Catastrophic: Property and public infrastructure destroyed; essential services stopped; numerous injuries and fatalities. Flood Related Hazards Flooding was the most prevalent serious natural hazard identified by local officials in Reading. Flooding is generally caused by hurricanes, nor'easters, severe rainstorms, and thunderstorms. Global climate change has the potential to exacerbate these issues over time with the potential for changing rainfall patterns leading to heavier storms. Regionally Significant Floods 16 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE There have been a number of major floods that have affected the Metro Boston region over the last fifty years. Significant historic flood events in Reading have included: The Blizzard of 1978 January 1979 April 1987 October 1991 ( "The Perfect Storm ") Considered to be a 100 -year storm. October 1996 June 1998 March 2001 April 2004 May 2006 April 2007 March 2010 December 2010 Local data for previous flooding occurrences are not collected by the Town of Reading. The best available local data is for Middlesex County through the National Climatic Data Center (see Table 6). Middlesex County, which includes the Town of Reading, experienced 86 flood events from 1996 — January, 2017. No deaths or injuries were reported and the total reported property damage in the county was $40.955 million dollars. Damages from the March 2010 floods in Middlesex County totaled $35.2 million, while total damages for all floods since 2005 totaled $40.7 million. There were no deaths or injuries reported. The vulnerability analysis conducted by MAPC estimates a range of damages from flooding of $8.32 to $12.04 million (see Table 25). Table 6 Middlesex County Flood Events, 1996- January, 2017 Location Date Type ( Deaths ( Iniuries Property Damage �0 40.95M WESTERN Flood 0 O.00K MIDDLESEX (ZONE) 10 WESTERN 04/17/1996 Flood 0 10 O.00K MIDDLESEX (Z ONE) i I �MIDDLESEXI(ZONE) ---[041 17/1996 Flood 0 O.00K 10 LPQ:R:'�T:1�0 OUTEAST 09/18/1996 (Flood 0 i0 �O.00K..._. _.........,_.._. NS WESTERN _._ _ ....._ 10/21/1996 �_._ _ _,..... iFlood 0 10 _ ._, _ _ ...._. O.00K MIDDLESEX J!Mll)ESTERN 10/22/1996 Flood 0 0 (O.00K DLESEX (ZONE) WESTERN 03/10/1998 Flood 0 �0 O.00K MIDDLESEX (ZONE) 103/11/ 1998 (Flood...... 10 -1-1-1-11-1.1-1-1. ._.._. _.�O.00K...._. 1-111_ 17 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Location ------- -D- ate Type - -�---D'e--a-,-t-h--s--j-'i-n--i�uries - Property Damage MIDDLESEX (ZONE) i � MIDDLESEX 05/12/1998 Flood 0 0 O.00K (ZONE) �WESTERN 06/14/1998 Flood 0 O.00K MIDDLESEX (ZONE) �-WESTERN Flood d 0 0 O.00K MIDDLESEX (A �WESTERN 06/17/1998 Flood 0 0 O.00K MIDDLESEX (ZONE) WESTERN W 04/22/2000 [F. Flood MIDDLESEX (ZONE) -- --------- WESTERN iMIDDLESEX �04/23 ' /2000 Flood - ------ �O O.00K (ZONE) 10 WESTERN 04/23/2000-- Flood 0 0 O.00K MIDDLESEX (ZONE) - WESTERN 04/-23/2000 Flood 10 0 O.00K MIDDLESEX (ZO N WESTERN ---- -- ---- ---- .. . ....... [0-3-/22/2001 Flood 0 0 00K, MIDDLESEX �WESTERN 03/2 Flood' io 0 -- -------- --- O.00K MIDDLESEX (ZONE) - -- --- ------ WESTERN ---MIDDLESEX �03/22/2001 Flood 10 �.00K� (ZONE) 10 WESTERN 03/23/2001 Flood 10 0 O.00K MIDDLESEX (ZONE iWESTERN ------ --- 03/23/2001 Flood 0 ---- - - O.00K MIDDLESEX (ZONE)] I I WESTERN 03/31/2001 l Flood 10 0 O.00K MIDDLESEX (ZONE) I i 04/01/2001 Flood 10 0 O.00K MIDDLESEX (ZONE) I WESTERN IFlood 100 O.00K MIDDLESEX (ZONE)1 WESTERN - - --- --- IMIDDLESEX (ZONE) 04/01/2004 Flood jo— I 0 --) --] O.00K , WESTERN 04/02/2004 Flood �- 0 0 O.00K MIDDLESEX (ZONE) WESTERN 04/02/2004 Flood 0 0 0.00K MIDDLESEX (ZONE) I��E Flood 0 ----- -------- O.00K MIDDLESEX (Z( 18 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE _.__ _._ __ ____ Location _ __. Date _.__. _ Type Deaths Iniuries _. -.. - -_ -_. Property Damage MIDDLESEX (ZONE)✓ 04/02/2004 Flood0 0 O.00K WESTERN MIDDLESEX (ZONE) 04/15/2004 Flood 0 �0 O.00K _ ._..,._. , . _._.. _._.. WESTERN MIDDLESEX (ZONE) _. 03/29/2005 _ , ...... Flood 0 - -- -._. 0 _,_ O.00K WESTERN MIDDLESEX (ZONE) 10/15/2005 Flood 0 10 _ 100.00K WESTERN MIDDLESEX (ZONE) 10/15/2005 Flood 0 0 I 100.00K SOUTHEAST MIDDLESEX (ZONE) 10/15/2005 Flood 10 0 �125.00K COUNTYWIDE (05/13/2006 Flood 10 10 (0.00K COUNTYWIDE 105/13/2006 )Flood ip - 10 -.. __....._._. �5.00OM _..,.. 1WAKEFIELDmm_.___ ... -- 107 /11/2006 (Flood il__. 0_...... 0 2.00K _._._.. ._...._. CAMBRIDGE 110/28/2006 Flood �0 . _.___ 1o__..__ 15.00K _.. _.....,.__._._.__._ SAXONVILLE 04/16/2007 Flood 0 0 25.00K �FRAMINGHAM 102/13/2008 )Flood .0 � 10�� ��� �� 10.00K 1MEDFORD ���������05/27/2008 (Flood �0 CO 3.00K __ , ,_. _ ..._._. STONEHAM _ .._ 06/24/2008 __ -..__ Flood _._. 0 _ ._ 10 � .._.... ---- , - -- -- -...__ 10.00K 1 WESTLANDS _ �_ . 06 „��� ._.,.. �. / 008 Flood F. e_ ( 0 f 0 �_.. --_ � ,. _ a�_ S.00K 1EVERETT 08/10/2008 )Flood �0 �0 115.00K )SUDBURY _.._.�08/10/20081Flood..�.�10 1O_....___ I40.00K NORTH WOBURN 109/06/2008 Flood 10 10 1 15.00K 1BILLERICA 12/12/2008 Flood 10...._.. "._...10�� 120.00K�.__. .__._ _.. -___ 1HOLLISTON 03/14/2010 Flood �0 10.�____ "�26.430M _...__ _..._.. )FARM HILL 03/29/2010 Flood 0 0 8.810M )FARM HILL (04/01/2010 Flood (0 10 �O.00K .__.__ _.__._._.._.__.._.. )WEST NEWTON 108/28/2011 1Flood 10._...__._ 10.___. _. (S.00K ._._, RIVER PINES 110/14/2011 )Flood 10 _ 10 (O.00K __.... _._.__..__..__ NORTH SOMMERVILLE _._.._..__._.....,._._ 06/08/2012 ..__ Flood �0 _..____, w._._. 0 ___.___._ __ . _._._._ O.00K )BEAVER BROOK 106/23/2012 1WFIood 10 0 � �O.00K 1MELROSE _.__ 106/23/2012 )Flood _....10 .__..__ 1O_.___- 1O.00K ._. ___._ (TUFTS COLLEGE 06/23/2012 )Flood _m_._ (O _.....__.. _ t- 0. - -.. _.fO.00K^ . ,...__.__._.....___...._.,..._, 1TMALDEN ._ - -- -µ f 06/23/2012 Flood 10 10__.._ ^{ 10.00K T _ ..... ........... . . TUFTS COLLEGE _ 06/23/2012 _ _..._ .., Flood . 0 _ 10 15.00K (NEWTON (07/18/2012 Flood IO0_.,,..., 15.00K _._m.._ _.._ 19 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Location Date I - ----- Type Deaths InDuries Property 15amageNORTH WALTHAM 110/29/2012 --------- - 00 - 0 0 K RIVER PINES / /2013 Flood 0 0 OOK [LOWE-L'L--' 167JO-1)2-013 Roocl 10'-'- [6 -07/01/ 2013 F ood 10 j o- O.00K 0 10 ING' --- 1-6-9-j 0-- 1--/-2-6-ii --- Iii'o-od" - -------------- ------ EHiiMiF6'kb CENTER 03/30/2014 Flood iii 0 �35.00K NORTH WALTHAM 03/30/2014 F oo 0 OOK GRANITEVILLE 03/30/2014 Flood 0 OOK ICONCORD 1-0-7-i27/i� 4 Flood 10 --------------- 0 O.00K NORTH - LEXINGTON -- -- -- 1- 0-- 8.- /--3- -1,/- - 2---0- 1- -4 — (Flood 16 - - - ---- ----- - --- [6-.-66- K . . ----- . .... . .. . - - ------ 110/22/2014 - (Flood - -- i 10 -0 -- 120.0 OK 1 NEWTON LOWER IFALLS 10/23/2014 Food 0 I I BOXBOROUGH 112/09/2014 F ood 0 -- [6 O.00K CLEMATISBROOK - -- 112/09/2014 Food 0 12/09/2014 Flood CONCORD 105/31/2015 (Flood 10 ----------------- 10 �O.00K 1NEWTON CENTER -- --- ------- -- i --�' I65i12615 (Flood 0 - - --- - ----- O.00K 108/04/2015 ------ -- ---'- (Flood OOK TP NATICK 08/15/2015 F ood 0 0 - ----- -- --- OOK [.jikxjMi AM - --------- 108/15/2015 .- ------- - 09/30/2015 Flood 0 O.O0K ,FRAMINGHAM 09/30/2015 Flood OOK 1SILVER HILL 109/30/2015 Flood 0 0 --- --- -- --- SOUTH WILMINGTON Fl d O.00K """'1'0 ............... . ... 40.955M Source: Source: NOAA, National Climatic Data Center 20 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Overview of Town -Wide Flooding Reading is divided by topography into three watersheds. Tributary streams that arise in these watersheds flow to the Aberjona, the Saugus and the Ipswich Rivers. The streams are associated with large swamps and marshes that play a significant role in flood storage and control. Flooding from the Ipswich River and its major tributary, Bear Meadow Brook, does not affect many structures because the Town has preserved most of the floodplains as open space. Because most of the development in Reading has been constructed above the floodplains, Reading does not have many serious flooding problems. However, there are areas where flooding occurs during major storms, causing damage to buildings and roadways. Some of the flooding problems may be exacerbated by historical filling of floodplains and routing of streams through culverts in older parts of town. Subdivisions, commercial development, and other large projects permitted in the last 25 years generally includes stormwater management systems designed to detain runoff and thus control downstream flooding. Flood hazard areas tend to be small in scale and clustered in the southern part of town. Walkers Brook and its associated tributaries in southern Reading are the headwaters of the Saugus River in Wakefield. Flooding of property and roadways occur at numerous locations within the watershed and is caused by a combination of system capacity inadequacies and localized capacity deficiencies. A large portion of the basin lies in the moderately dense older portion of the town which affords little or no available land for storage or retention of flood waters. As planned improvements within Reading may impact communities downstream, the mitigation of flood damage to roadways and properties within the watershed is a true urban challenge making resolution of flooding in this watershed the town's highest priority. At the request of the Town of Reading, the consulting firm AECOM performed a study in 2013 (see reference in Section X) to analyze localized flooding and drainage issues within portions of the Aberjona River and Saugus River watersheds. The objectives of this study were to: • Evaluate existing conditions along sections of Walkers Brook (tributary to Saugus River) and the Aberjona River; • Develop alternatives for improvement of the existing channels and conduits; • Identify recommended alternatives; • Provide an estimate of construction costs for recommended alternatives; and • Develop a proposed implementation schedule for the recommended alternatives. AECOM performed a comprehensive site walk of the four study areas with several Town of Reading officials to identify the major problem areas and developed possible alternatives to improve the flooding and drainage issues for each problem area. The Town's general goal for its drainage system is to provide capacity for up to the 25 -year flood event (i.e. 25 -year level of service). 21 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Potential Flood Hazard Areas Information on potential flood hazard areas was taken from two sources. The first was the National Flood Insurance Rate Maps. The FIRM flood zones are shown on Map 3 in Appendix B and their definitions are listed below. Flood Insurance Rate Map Zone Definitions Zone A (1 % annual chance) - Zone A is the flood insurance rate zone that corresponds to the 100 -year floodplains that are determined in the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) by approximate methods. Because detailed hydraulic analyses are not performed for such areas, no BFEs (base flood elevations) or depths are shown within this zone. Mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements apply. Zone AE and AI -A30 (1 % annual chance) - Zones AE and A1-A30 are the flood insurance rate zones that correspond to the 100 -year floodplains that are determined in the FIS by detailed methods. In most instances, BFEs derived from the detailed hydraulic analyses are shown at selected intervals within this zone. Mandatory flood insurance purchase requirements apply. Zones X500 (.2% annual chance) - Zone X500 is the flood insurance rate zone that correspond to the 500 -year floodplains that are determined in the Flood Insurance Study In addition, information on areas subject to flooding was provided by local officials. The Locally Identified Areas of Flooding described below were identified by Town staff as areas where flooding is known to occur. All of these areas do not necessarily coincide with the flood zones from the FIRM maps. Some may be areas that flood due to inadequate drainage systems or other local conditions rather than location within a flood zone. Some of these sites were carried over from the 2010 Hazard Mitigation Plan. The numbers correspond to the numbers on Map 8, "Local Hazard Areas." Estimated damages associated flooding are shown in Table 25: 1. Sunnyside and Fairview Avenues- Flooding in the Sunnyside Avenue and Fairview Avenue area is due to undersized pipes. The recommended alternative involves increasing the size of the undersized pipes to provide a 25 -year level of service for this residential area. A gate structure would be integrated at the downstream end that would mitigate adverse downstream impacts due to the upsizing of the pipes. This site has not been mitigated since the 2010 plan and remains a high priority site. 2. New Crossing at DPW Garage- A brook located in the upper Saugus River water backs up and floods Causeway Road, the access road to the Reading DPW Department, during 0.02 percent chance storms. The stream culvert is undersized and needs replacing. This remains a high priority for the 2017 plan update. 22 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE 3. Track Road at Line Road- The Track Road area is part of the Walker's Creek watershed area. There are three bridges crossing the creek, all of which impede drainage, but the Harvest Road Bridge presents the biggest drainage problems and the Town has targeted it for rebuilding, although the exact date and cost are undetermined. There are also beaver dam issues blocking drainage. The Town plans to stabilize the creek's banks and remove the beavers for now, as well rebuild the bridge in the future. This project remains a high priority for 2017. 4. South Main Street- This is a MA DOT issue as Main Street serves as SR 28 here. The roadway floods after 1.5 inches or rain. The storm drain line serving the area is undersized and needs to be replaced. - Flooding in the area is due to undersized pipes. The flood flow travels overland through the Enterprise Car Rental facility into the Percy Avenue / Main Street wetlands. The recommended alternative consists of adding a new outfall in the vicinity of Minot Street / Main Street and increasing the size of the pipes above the Minot Street / Main Street connection to provide a 25 -year level of service for this area. A gate structure would be integrated at the downstream end that would mitigate adverse downstream impacts due to the upsizing of the pipes. This mitigation action remains incomplete and remains a high priority for the town in the 2017 plan update. 5. Brook and Ash Streets -- This area is part of Walkers Brook beginning at Ash Street and extending northeast to the Town's corporate boundary with Wakefield at the Salem Street / Route 129 rotary, and represents the most downstream portion of Walkers Brook within the Town. Downstream of this area, Walkers Brook feeds into the Saugus River in Wakefield. The drainage ditch for Brook and Ash Streets is over - silted and there are numerous problems with beaver dams within the upper watershed of Walker's Creek that prevents drainage. This site has not been mitigated since the 2010 plan and remains a high priority for the town in the 2017 plan update. 6. Lowell Street at Intervale Terrace- Located within the upper Aberjona watershed, this site has not been mitigated since 2010 but the Town considers this a high priority site for the 2017 plan. Under Reading's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), the stone -lined channel between Intervale Terrace and Lowell Street that backs up during flooding events will be repaired during 2017. 7. Willow Street /Austin Prep- This site has not been mitigated since the 2010 plan. This site floods due to the same drainage infrastructure problem listed in at Site #8, Lowell Street at Intervale Terrace. This is a high priority site for the 2017 plan update and should be remediated when the channel between Intervale Terrace and Lowell Street is improved under the Town's CIP actions for 2017. 8. Oak Ridge /Cherry Lane (was listed in 2010 plan as Pine Ridge /Cherry Hill) - Located behind Joshua Eaton, this site was partially mitigated when drainage work done by Reading on Pennsylvania Avenue relieved runoff to the area. There are still flooding concerns where ditch discharge goes into the open field behind Joshua Eaton and the site remains a medium priority for the 2017 plan update. 23 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE 9. Haverhill Street at the Town line- This site is a drainage culvert located near where Bear Meadow Brook flows under Haverhill Street close to the boundary with North Reading. Localized flooding of 6 -12 inches occurs on Haverhill Street occurs following very large rain events. The culvert needs to be cleaned on a regular basis. This site remains a medium priority for the 2017 plan update. The most severe flooding since the previous plan occurred during March 2010, when a total of 14.83 inches of rainfall accumulation was recorded by the National Weather Service (NWS). The weather pattern that consisted of early springtime prevailing westerly winds that moved three successive storms, combined with tropical moisture from the Gulf of Mexico, across New England. Torrential rainfall caused March 2010 to be the wettest month on record. One indication of the extent of flooding is the gage height at the nearest USGS streamflow gauging station, which is on the Ipswich River in South Middleton. The USGS gage height, shown in Figure 1, exceeded 8 feet on March 16, 2010 and exceeded 7 feet on March 31, 2010. Normal gage height in March is about 4 feet. Figure 1- Ipswich River Gage Heights, March -April 2010 USGS 81181588 IPSNICH RIVER AT SOUTH MIDDLETON, MR 8.8 8.8 7.8 0 0 5.8 0 r 4.8 d � 3.8 2.8 1.8 Mar Mar Mar Mar Rpr Rpr Apr Rpr May 86 13 28 27 83 18 17 24 61 2818 2818 2818 2818 2810 2810 2010 2018 2818 — Gage height X Measured gage height Period of approved data Source, US Geological Service, National Water Information System Repetitive Loss Structures As defined by the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), a repetitive loss property is any property which the NFIP has paid two or more flood claims of $1,000 or more in any 24 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE given 10 -year period since 1978. For more information on repetitive losses see http://www.fema.gov/business/nfip/replps.shtm. There are two repetitive loss structures in Reading, the same as the 2010 plan. Both of the properties are single family residences. Table 7 summarizes the number and type of repetitive loss structures located within Reading and the number of losses and total claims associated with them. Table 7- Summary of Repetitive Losses and Claims 1979- 2017 Source: Department of Conservation and Recreation, FEMA Repetitive Loss data Based on the record of previous occurrences flooding events in Reading are a High frequency event as defined by the 2013 Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan. This hazard may occur more frequently than once in five years, or a greater than 20% chance per year. Dams and Dam Failure Dam failure can occur as a result of structural failure, independent of a hazard event, or as the result of the impacts of a hazard event such as flooding associated with storms or an earthquake. In the event of a dam failure, the energy of the water stored behind even a small dam can cause loss of life and property damage if there are people or buildings downstream. The number of fatalities from a dam failure depends on the amount of warning provided to the population and the number of people in the area in the path of the dam's floodwaters. DCR defines dam hazard classifications as follows: High: Dams located where failure or mis- operation will likely cause loss of life and serious damage to homes(s), industrial or commercial facilities, important public utilities, main highways(s) or railroad(s). 25 Single Other Non - Family Total Residential Residential Residential Number of 2 0 0 2 Properties Number of 4, 0 0 4 Losses Total Claims $27,857.59 0 $27,857.59 Source: Department of Conservation and Recreation, FEMA Repetitive Loss data Based on the record of previous occurrences flooding events in Reading are a High frequency event as defined by the 2013 Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan. This hazard may occur more frequently than once in five years, or a greater than 20% chance per year. Dams and Dam Failure Dam failure can occur as a result of structural failure, independent of a hazard event, or as the result of the impacts of a hazard event such as flooding associated with storms or an earthquake. In the event of a dam failure, the energy of the water stored behind even a small dam can cause loss of life and property damage if there are people or buildings downstream. The number of fatalities from a dam failure depends on the amount of warning provided to the population and the number of people in the area in the path of the dam's floodwaters. DCR defines dam hazard classifications as follows: High: Dams located where failure or mis- operation will likely cause loss of life and serious damage to homes(s), industrial or commercial facilities, important public utilities, main highways(s) or railroad(s). 25 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Significant: Dams located where failure or mis- operation may cause loss of life and damage home(s), industrial or commercial facilities, secondary highway(s) or railroad(s) or cause interruption of use or service of relatively important facilities. Low: Dams located where failure or mis- operation may cause minimal property damage to others. Loss of life is not expected. Dam failure is a highly infrequent occurrence but a severe incident could result in loss of lives and significant property damage. Since 1984, three dams have failed in or very near to Massachusetts, one of which resulted in a death. There are no permitted dams in Reading and there have been no recorded dam breaches in the Town. Based on the record of previous occurrences dam failure in Reading is a Very Low frequency event as defined by the 2013 Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan. This hazard may occur less frequently than once in 100 years (less than 1% chance per year). Wind Related Hazards Wind - related hazards include hurricanes, tropical storms, and tornadoes as well as high winds during Nor'easters and thunderstorms. As with many communities, falling trees that result in downed power lines and power outages are an issue in Reading. Information on wind related hazards can be found on Map 5 in Appendix B Hurricanes and Tropical Storms A hurricane is a violent wind and rainstorm with wind speeds of 74 -200 miles per hour. A hurricane is strongest as it travels over the ocean and is particularly destructive to coastal property as the storm hits the land. The Town's entire area is vulnerable to hurricanes. Hurricanes occur between June and November. A tropical storm has similar characteristics, but wind speeds are below 74 miles per hour. Since 1900, 39 tropical storms have impacted New England (NESEC). Massachusetts has experienced approximately 32 tropical storms, nine Category 1 hurricanes, five Category 2 hurricanes and one Category 3 hurricane. A hurricane or storm track is the line that delineates the path of the eye of a hurricane or tropical storm. There has been one recorded storm tracks through Reading, a tropical storm in 1861. However, Reading experiences the impacts of hurricanes and tropical storms regardless of whether the storm track passes directly through the Town, and numerous hurricanes have affected the communities of eastern Massachusetts (see Table 8) The hazard mapping indicates that the 100 year wind speed in Reading is 110 miles per hour (see Appendix B). Table 8- Hurricane Records for Massachusetts, 1938 — January, 2017 Hurricane Event Date Great New England Hurricane* September 21, 1938 Great Atlantic Hurricane* September 14 -15, 1944 26 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Hurricane Event Date Hurricane Doug Se tember 11 -12, 1950 Hurricane Carol* August 31, 1954 Hurricane Edna* September 11, 1954 Hurricane Diane August 17 -19, 1955 Hurricane Donna September 12, 1960 Hurricane Gloria September 27, 1985 Hurricane Bob August 19, 1991 Hurricane Earl September 4, 2010 Tropical Storm Irene August 28, 2011 Hurricane Sandy October 29 -30, 2012 *Category 3. Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Hurricane intensity is measured according to the Saffir /Simpson scale, which categorizes hurricane intensity linearly based upon maximum sustained winds, barometric pressure, and storm surge potential. These are combined to estimate potential damage. The following gives an overview of the wind speeds, surges, and range of damage caused by different hurricane categories: Scale No. (Category) Winds(mph) Storm Surge (ft.) Potential Damage 1 74-95 4 - 5 Minimal 2 96-110 6 - 8 Moderate 3 111-130 9-12 Extensive 4 131 — 155 13 -18 Extreme 5 > 155 >18 Catastro hic Source: NOAA Hurricanes typically have regional impacts beyond their immediate tracks. Falling trees and branches are a significant problem because they can result in power outages when they fall on power lines or block traffic and emergency routes. Hurricanes are a Town - wide hazard in Reading. Potential hurricane damages to Reading have been estimated using HAZUS -MH. Total damages are estimated at $18,614.97 thousand for a Category 2 hurricane and $66,975.28 thousand for a Category 4 hurricane. Other potential impacts are detailed in Table 21. Based on records of previous occurrences, hurricanes in Reading are a Medium frequency event as defined by the 2013 Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan. This hazard occurs from once in 5 years to once in 50 years, or a 2% to 20% chance per year. Tornadoes A tornado is a violent windstorm characterized by a twisting, funnel - shaped cloud. These events are spawned by thunderstorms and occasionally by hurricanes, and may occur singularly or in multiples. They develop when cool air overrides a layer of warm air, 27 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE causing the warm air to rise rapidly. Most vortices remain suspended in the atmosphere. Should they touch down, they become a force of destruction. Some ingredients for tornado formation include: Very strong winds in the mid and upper levels of the atmosphere • Clockwise turning of the wind with height (from southeast at the surface to west aloft) Increasing wind speed with altitude in the lowest 10,000 feet of the atmosphere (i.e., 20 mph at the surface and 50 mph at 7,000 feet.) Very warm, moist air near the ground with unusually cooler air aloft • A forcing mechanism such as a cold front or leftover weather boundary from previous shower or thunderstorm activity Tornado damage severity is measured by the Fujita Tornado Scale, in which wind speed is not measured directly but rather estimated from the amount of damage. As of February 01, 2007, the National Weather Service began rating tornados using the Enhanced Fujita- scale (EF- scale), which allows surveyors to create more precise assessments of tornado severity. The EF -scale is summarized below: Fu'ita Scale Derived Operational EF Scale F Number Fastest r/4 mile (mph) 3- second gust (mph) EF Number 3- second gust (mph) EF Number 3- second gusts (mph) 0 40-72 45 -78 0 65 -85 0 65 -85 1 73-112 79 -117 1 86 -109 1 86 -110 2 113- 157 118 -161 2 110 -137 2 111 -135 3 158 -207 162 -209 3 138 -167 3 136 -165 4 208 -260 210 -261 4 168 -199 1 4 166 -200 5 261 - 318 262 -317 5 200 -234 1 5 Over -200 Source: Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2013 The frequency of tornadoes in eastern Massachusetts is low; on average, there are six tornadoes that touchdown somewhere in the Northeast region every year. The strongest tornado in Massachusetts history was the Worcester Tornado in 1953 (NESEC). The most recent tornado events in Massachusetts were in Springfield in 2011, Revere in 2014 and most recently in Concord (Middlesex County) on August 23, 2016. The Concord EF -1 tornado damaged 39 homes but no injuries or deaths were reported. (Source: Concord Patch) The Springfield tornado caused significant damage and resulted in 4 deaths in June of 2011. The Revere tornado touched down in Chelsea just south of Route 16 and moved north into Revere's business district along Broadway and ended near the intersection of Routes 1 and 60. The path was approximately two miles long and 3/8 mile wide, with wind speeds up to 120 miles per hour. Approximately 65 homes had substantial damages and 13 homes and businesses were uninhabitable. 28 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Although there have been no recorded tornados within the limits of the Town of Reading, since 1956 there have been 17 tornadoes in surrounding Middlesex County recorded by the Tornado History Project. Two tornados were F3, three were F2 and twelve were F1.These 10 tornadoes resulted in a total of one fatality and six injuries and up to $7.7 million in damages, as summarized in Table 9. The table does not include statistics for the August, 2016 Concord tornado as total property damage is not yet known. Table 9 - Tornado Records for Middlesex County Date Fujita Fatalities Injuries Width Length Damage 10/24/1955 1 0 0 10 0.1 $500-$5000 6/19/1957 1 0 0 17 1 $5K-$50K 6/19/1957 1 0 0 100 0.5 $50-$500 7/11/1958 2 0 0 17 1.5 $50K-$500K 8/25/1958 2 0 0 50 1 $500-$5000 7/3/1961 0 0 0 10 0.5 5K- 50K 7/18/1963 1 0 0 50 1 $5K-$50K 8/28/1965 2 0 0 10 2 $50K-$500K 7/11/1970 1 0 0 50 0.1 $5K-$50K 10/3/1970 3 1 0 60 35.4 $50K-$500K 7/1/1971 1 0 1 10 25.2 $5K-$50K 11/7/1971 1 0 0 10 0.1 50-$500 7/21/1972 2 0 4 37 7.6 500K- 5M 9/29/1974 3 0 1 33 0.1 $50K-$500K 7/18/1983 0 0 0 20 0.4 $50-$500 9/27/1985 1 0 0 40 0.1 $50-$500 8/7/1986 1 0 0 73 4 $50K-$500K Source: The Tornado History Project Buildings constructed prior to current building codes may be more vulnerable to damages caused by tornadoes. Evacuation of impacted areas may be required on short notice. Sheltering and mass feeding efforts may be required along with debris clearance, search and rescue, and emergency fire and medical services. Key routes may be blocked by downed trees and other debris, and widespread power outages are also typically associated with tornadoes. Although tornadoes are a potential Town -wide hazard in Reading, tornado impacts are relatively localized compared to severe storms and hurricanes. Damages from any tornado in Reading would greatly depend on the track of the tornado. Generally the downtown, central and southern portions of the Town near the intersection of Routes 28 (Main Street), 129 (Lowell Street), and Woburn Street, are more densely developed and would likely be subject to more damage in the event of a tornado. Based on the record of previous occurrences since 1950, Tornado events in Reading are a Medium frequency event as defined by the 2013 Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation 29 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Plan. This hazard may occur from once in 5 years to once in 50 years, or a 2% to 20% chance per year. Nor' easters A northeast coastal storm, known as a nor'easter, is typically a large counter - clockwise wind circulation around a low- pressure center. Featuring strong northeasterly winds blowing in from the ocean over coastal areas, nor'easters are relatively common in the winter months in New England occurring one to two times a year. The storm radius of a nor'easter can be as much as 1,000 miles and these storms feature sustained winds of 10 to 40 mph with gusts of up to 70 mph. These storms are accompanied by heavy rains or snows, depending on temperatures. Previous occurrences of Nor'easters include the following: February 1978 Blizzard of 1978 October 1991 Severe Coastal Storm ( "Perfect Storm ") December 1992 Great Nor'easter of 1992 January 2005 Blizzard/N or'easter October 2005 Coastal Storm/Nor'easter April 2007 Severe Storms, Inland & Coastal Flooding/Nor'easter January 2011 Winter Storm/Nor'easter October 2011 Severe Storm/Nor'easter Blizzard of 2013 February 2013 Blizzard of 2015 January 2015 Many of the historic flood events identified in the previous section were precipitated by nor'easters, including the "Perfect Storm" event in 1991. More recently, blizzards in December 2010, October 2011, February 2013 and January 2015 were all large nor'easters that caused significant snowfall amounts. Reading is vulnerable to both the wind and precipitation that accompanies nor'easters. High winds can cause damage to structures, fallen trees, and downed power lines leading to power outages. Intense rainfall can overwhelm drainage systems causing localized flooding of rivers and streams as well as urban stormwater ponding and localized flooding. Fallen tree limbs as well as heavy snow accumulation and intense rainfall can impede local transportation corridors, and block access for emergency vehicles. The entire Town of Reading could be at risk from the wind, rain or snow impacts from a nor'easter, depending on the track and radius of the storm, but due to its inland location the Town would not be subject to coastal hazards. Based on the record of previous occurrences, nor'easters in Reading are high frequency events as defined by the 2013 Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan. This hazard may occur more frequently than once in 5 years (greater than 20% per year). 30 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Severe Thunderstorms While less severe than the other types of storms discussed, thunderstorms can lead to localized damage and represent a hazard risk for communities. Generally defined as a storm that includes thunder, which always accompanies lightning, a thunderstorm is a storm event featuring lightning, strong winds, and rain and /or hail. Thunderstorms sometime give rise to tornados. On average, these storms are only around 15 miles in diameter and last for about 30 minutes. A severe thunderstorm can include winds of close to 60 mph and rain sufficient to produce flooding The Town's entire area is potentially subject to severe thunderstorms. The Town does not keep records of thunderstorms, but estimates that at least six to eight occur each year. Some team members recollected severe thunderstorms during the summer of 2014 but could not recollect specific areas that were impacted, only that some trees were knocked and power was lost. The best available data on previous occurrences of thunderstorms in Reading is for Middlesex County through the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). Between 1995 and May 31, 2016 NCDC records show 286 thunderstorm events in Middlesex County (Table 10). These storms resulted in a total of $3.13 million in property damages. There were 10 injuries and no deaths reported. Table 10 Middlesex County Thunderstorm Wind Events, 1995- January, 2017 ILOCATION IBEGIN_DATE I EVENT _TYPE 'MAGNITUDE DEATHS INJURIES DAMAGE MIDDLESEX CO. [04/04/1995} IThunderstorm in 158 kts. 10 10 IO.00K MIDDLESEX CO. -----' Cji5ji995 Thunderstorm in �0 kts. 0 IO O.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 107/15/1995 IThunderstorm Wind IO kts. 10 IO.00K IMIDDLESEXCO. [09/14/1995 (Thunderstorm Wind I0kts.N �Oµ �2MN IO.00Krn~ [MIDDLESEX CO. ryrt [09/14/1995 ^ IThunderstorm Wind _.....IO kts. ( __._....I 6b, K MIDDLESEX CO. 110/28/1995 IThunderstorm Wind IO kts. IO (O IO.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. 10/28/1995 IThunderstorm Wind (0 kts. IO IO O.00K jMIDDLESEX CO. [10/28/1995 IThunderstorm Wind (0 kts. IO (O IO.00K _._....__,,..,._ [MIDDLESEX CO. _....___ 107/08/1996 IThunderstorm Wind __ 150 kts. IO I0 IO.00K ._,. ...._...__ (MIDDLESEX CO. ...._, i... _...____. . _,__w______. X07/08/1996 __..._ f Thunderstorm Wind ______.- 150 kts. IO CO 1O.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 102/22/1997 IThunderstorm Wind 152 kts. (O 0 O.00K [MIDDLESEX CO. 102/22/1997 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. _ �0 IO JO.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. [07/09/1997 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. Im0 0 1.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. _._.. 105/29/1998yLL [Thunderstorm Wind [50 kts.'._,__.._ to -- - -- 10.._.__._. 10.00K MIDDLESEX CO. [05/29/1998 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. (O IO (O.00K .. (MIDDLESEX CO. �OS/31/1998 _. ...,_.. .__. IThunderstorm Wind 160 kts. �0 �0 IO.00K 1MIDDLESEX CO. [05/31/1998 IThunderstorm Wind (60 kts. IO I1 I10.00K 31 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE LOCATION IBEGIN_DATE f EVENT_TYPE M GNITUDE (DEATHSINIURIES DAMAGE `MIDDLESEX CO. �OS/31/1998 (Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts. (0 �0 �O.00K MIDDLESEX CO....._..._, (05/31/1998 .....__... N (Thunderstorm Wind �SO kts. rn Y �00 �O.00K MIDDLESEX CO. r___ �OS/31/1998 . ._,_ _.. __,.._ ...,_ . __.___.._ w_ (Thunderstorm Wind I70 kts. 10 �0 �O.00K . _.. MIDDLESEXCO ._._..,__-------- _1OS/31/1998 yym �ThunderstormWindW~ f50kts __..__._.._.�0 0 O.00K ._ ,w._�_._.___. iMIDDLESEX CO. _._.._._.....,.... ___....__ 07/23/1998 (Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts. _.... _ _.w. LO . �O.00Kv (MIDDLESEX CO. 09/15/1998 (Thunderstorm Wind I50 kts. �0 EO 1O.00K _ .... MIDDLESEX CO. .. __ .....,T_.. 07/06/1999 _r ..___...m (Thunderstorm Wind I56 kts. �0 !0 ~ �O.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. . 07/06/1999 Thunderstorm Wind I65 kts. IO.,........, [OT mm_ I �O --- _.._ (MIDDLESEX CO. _ .. 07/06/1999 _,.--- .. (Thunderstorm Wind (60 kts. IO _ �0 O.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 07/23/1999 Thunderstorm Wind ... _. �50 kts. (0 L _ 10 10.00K �MIDDLESEX CO. �07/24/1999���� �ThunderstormWindry��50�kts.��� MIDDLESEX CO. 07/25/1999 �Thunderstorm� Win d �50 kts. �0 F �O.00K� MIDDLESEX CO �O8/05/1999 Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts �00 O.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 06/02/2000 Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts. E �0 �� 0 �0 OOK MIDDLESEX CO. 106/02/2000 Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts. E �0 �0— �O.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 06/27/2000 Thunderstorm Wind (SO kts. E �0 �0 �O.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 05/12/2001 (Thunderstorm in �50 kts. E 10 10 �O.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 05/12/2001 Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts. E 10 OK I,-- MIDDLESEX CO. 06/17/2001 Thunderstorm Wind _ _.. O.00K MIDDLESEX CO.���06/20/2001������� Thunderstorm in �.._ .�50 kts. E......_._ �p� (0 O.00K MIDDLESEX CO. (06/30/2001 Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts. E �0 _ �0 �O.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 06/30/2001 Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts E �0 �0 O.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 06/30/2001 (Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts. E �0.�__.._.._._ �0.__.. �O.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. 106/30/2001 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. E �0 (0 O.00K (MIDDLESEX C6 07/01/2001 Thunderstorm Wind (50 kts. E �0 �0 �O.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. 07/01/2001 Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts. E MIDDLESEX CO. 001 (Thunderstorm Wind (50 kts. E 10 �0.00K MIDDLESEX CO. (08/10/2001 Thunderstorm Wind �50kts.E. �0 �0 �O.00K����� MIDDLESEX CO. 08/10/2001 Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts. E (0� �0 �O.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 08/10/2001 Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts. E �0 �0 �O.00K _.__,.. _._.._ MIDDLESEX CO. ...,._ _._...,. (04/19/2002 _ ....... Thunderstorm Wind �52 kts. E �0 _ �0� [5.00K �MIDDLESEX CO. ���ryry �OS/31/2002 �Thunderstorm Win d SO kts. E 10_..__..._.�0� �2.00K�� (MIDDLESEX CO. 06/27/2002 Thunderstorm Wind _ �50 kts. E _ �0 �0 5.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 106/27/2002 Thunderstorm Wind MIDDLESEX CO. ry�07/15/2002 �- (Thunderstorm�Wind- -' - -r0 kts. -E 1-6-- .__._._....�......_...... 0 j2.0OK � MIDDLESEX CO. 07/23/2002 Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts. E �0 _ �0 _ �S.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 07/23/2002 Thunderstorm Wind �65 kts. E (0...._ ........ �0.._._._..35.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 08/02/2002 Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts. E �0 �0 2.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. �O8/02/2002 _.,—.___..._. (Thunderstorm Wind ._..., -,.... �50 kts. E �0 _.._..._. 10 I'll- 2.00K �MIDDLESEX CO. 08 /13/2003 Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts. EG �0 �0 _ �25.00K MIDDLESEX CO _08/22/2003 (Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts EG 10 �0 �5 OOK „ 32 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE iLOCATION B EVE- . . . . . . . . . . . . . INJURIES . . . . . . . DAMAGE MIDDLESEX CO. [08/22/2003 _. .. [Thunderstorm Wind [50 its. EG __m. _ [0 , .....,._ [0 ..__.._w _ . . . ,,. ......_.... (10.00K [MIDDLESEX CO. [08/22/2003 [Thunderstorm Wind [50 kts. EG [0_._,......._. (0 [S.00K [MIDDLESEX CO. [08/22/2003 [Thunderstorm Wind i50 kts. EG CO.m_....__._ �0 w^ p �10.00K MIDDLESEX CO. (07/08/2004 [Thunderstorm Wind [50 kts. EG [0 10 [10.00K [MIDDLESEX CO. 08/20/2004 [Thunderstorm Wind [50 kts. EG [0 10 10.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. [08/20/2004 [Thunderstorm Wind [50 kts. EG [0,.....- _____ -- �0_._..__ �10.00K [MIDDLESEX CO. [08/20/2004 [Thunderstorm Wind0 kts. EG [0 [0 (15.00K [MIDDLESEX CO. /2004 (Thunderstorm Wind [50 its. EG 10 �0 [75.00K MIDDLESEX CO [08/21/2004 [Thunderstorm Wind [50 kts EG [0 [0 [15 OOK [MIDDLESEX CO. (06/29/2005 [Thunderstorm Wind [50 kts. EG �0 _ [0 [10.00K [MIDDLESEX CO. [07/27/2005 [Thunderstorm Wind (50 kts. EG [0 _ - - [0 -------- [S.00K V __ m...... _____ ... [MIDDLESEX CO. _, __ __,_, [07/27/2005 _ f Thunderstorm Wind [50 kts. EG [OM W N T [0 [S.00K --- (MIDDLESEX CO. _ [08/05/2005 _ ....,... ___..... .._. Thunderstorm Wind _... ,..._. _ __._ 150 kts. EG 0 _ �4 -_. 15.00K __._....... ._ . _.._,. CO. �..._ [08/05/2005 _. _ - - - -- (Thunderstorm Wind (50 kts. EG (0 [0 L _ ----- 115.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. (08/05/2005 [Thunderstorm Wind [50 kts. EG �0 �0 _ 15.00K [MIDDLESEX CO. [08/14/2005 (Thunderstorm Wind [50 kts. EG [0 [0 [S.00K ._...... , .__ ._ _._. [MIDDLESEX CO. _, _. '. _ " _ __......_ __ __ 08/14/2005 - , . f [Thunderstorm Wind _. _._... [50 kts. EG _ [0 [0 „rr �S.00K ._ [MIDDLESEX CO. [08/14/2005 [ThunderstormrvWind (SO kts. EG �0 �0 S.00K f MIDDLESEX CO. _.._ .._.. [04/01/2006 -- - -- (Thunderstorm Wind [50 kts. EG �0 [0 [8.00K !__.__._ ___._...__.__...._ . MIDDLESEX CO. _... _ _...._n__._ 105/21/2006 _ , ._. [Thunderstorm Wind [61 kts. EG [0 _ �0 I75.00K _. (MIDDLESEX CO. [05/21/2006 [Thunderstorm Wind ^ 61 kts. EG (0 !0 �20.00K MIDDLESEX CO. ......m__,_... [06/23/2006 n [Thunderstorm Wind (50 kts. EG [p,_...._,_ IO (MIDDLESEX CO. (07/11/2006 [Thunderstorm Wind [50 kts. EG �0 _ [0 [10.00K [MIDDLESEX [07/11/2006 [Thunderstorm Wind [50 kts. EG [0 [0 10.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. [07/11/2006 [Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 10.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. 007/21/2006 �Thunderstorm�Wind N [50 kts. EG LL [0...._...._. ,O .......w,.. [35.00K [MIDDLESEX CO. 07/21/2006 Thunderstorm Wind (50 kts. EG [00 [10.00K __._ _ .. -._. - .,.__- [MIDDLESEX CO. - -- 07/21/2006 (Thunderstorm Wind (50 kts. EG [0 (0 10.00K [MIDDLESEX CO. (07/21/2006 [Thunderstorm Wind [50 kts. EG �0 _ 0 [35.00K [MIDDLESEX CO..._ T. [07/28/2006M [Thunderstorm Wind [50 kts. EG [0 IO [15.00K [MIDDLESEX CO. 07/28/2006 [Thunderstorm Win kts. EG 10 [0 [10.00K—_.__. MIDDLESEX CO. [07/28/2006 [Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 [10.00K [MIDDLESEX CO. 107/28/2006 [Thunderstorm in [50 kts. EG [0 0 I10.00K [MIDDLESEX CO. [08/02/2006 [Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 10 015.00K [MIDDLESEX CO. [05/16/2007 [Thunderstorm Wind [50 kts. EG f 0 (0 j .00K (MIDDLESEX CO. 006/27/2007 [Thunderstorm Windw (50 kts. EG [00 [O.00K [MIDDLESEX CO. [07/06/2007 [Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts. EG [0 [0 [O.00K W V [MIDDLESEX CO. [07/09/2007 [Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 10 O OK [MIDDLESEX CO. [07/09/2007 [Thunderstorm Wind ISO kts. EG (0 [0 O.00K MIDDLESEX CO. [07/15/2007 [Thunderstorm in 050 kts. EG (0 _ [0 [O.00K [MIDDLESEX CO.._....... _ 07/15/2007 [Thunderstorm 'Wind (SO kts. EG ..... _.[0_,__.. [0 OO.00K 33 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE LOCATION BEGIN—DATE EVE MAGNITUDE DEATH DAMAGE DD LES EX CO. 07/15/2007 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0__ m j&7/15/2007 IDDLESEX CO. 7/28/2007 Thunderstorm Wind E OOK MIDDLESEX CO. -- r7 '-`-- -- -----'- 'T� �' '' r'- - '- 0--- r G---- r r~-' MIDDLESEX r`---- ,'-----'-- r'--'- r r r�~- MIDDLESEX CO. 07/28/200 r_-----�'-' /---- r r r�~- r-- r- '' rThunderstorm '--'--� r r r r~~ MIDDLESEX � r'co. |os�r�ozo Thunderstorm Win( |5oms.so MIDDLESEX CO. 05/27/2010 Thunderstorm Wind 50 k s. 8.00K /r---------- ---'/--------- |os/zr/zuzn Thunderstorm Wind -rr'—ms�s|M/ouLcsexCO. -- �ro~m`x r----__—_-_ CO. LESEX '--''- --- ` Thunderstorm 1.00K '------' --- |/r�-vnuerst-o,mvm'u - |rsom ��ss - �r u |�r -_- - ----- uo/�z - v swmoLcScxco. o � �r ' .�u-o. x MIDDLESEX CO. ____ 6/10/2 unue,sm,mwmu m,�cn ---_-_--_- 0 r � oox MIDDLESEX CO. 23/2010 Thunderstorm Wind - r r ^-x _ �r�� - r - 4/20 '� - _ 5r-- K Mll IDDLESEX CO. 0 _ 10 15.00K |�moLESEx 6/24/2010 |nmmemmm vwnu |somzeo z Ouox MIDDLESEX CO. Thunderstorm Wind 50 msas 10 66- K MIDDLESEX CO. r`-`-- understorm ' - r--' -- r'- r r -- /- G-- MIDDLESEX CO. 06/24/2010 Thunderstorm Wind 50 ts. 1.00K |MIDDLESEX CO. ---- ------|��unde,.to,m vvmu---|5 ts.as---�---- r----- r--'-- /�-----'-- r'--- r MIDDLESEX 6/29/2010 r---'—'-- r---- r r r'--- r----X--. r----- r- ----- ''- r'--- MIDDLESEX CO. 07/01/ understorm Wind 50 MIDDLESEX CO. _ 07/01/2010 understorm Wind 55 kts. �__ ---- Thunderstorm Wind --�---' - -------/----a-o-�-o |-m/-u-o-u—sc-x -------/--"-n-aemnnv -m---- r------r �� ---- o �szmx MIDDLESEX CO. 107/01/2010 Thu riderstor 0 __ ____ |m/ouLosxco. |onnz/2o10 Thunderstorm Wind �____-�__ /-ms.ss /' �o i��oox krMIDDLESEX -co--. -----' o ---- r»u^uerstonm Win u |/-5 o--m-s.---r ---' o |z/mx r-------� r`---- Thunderstorm /--- - - r r ,^~^ MIDDLESEX r-----� r'---- r------'-' r---- 34 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE LOCATION BEGIN _DATE EVENT TYPE MAGNITUDE DEATHS INJURIES DAMAGE (M. ,.......... MIDDLESEX CO. __._.. _.,....._. 107/03/2010 IThunderstorm Wind (50 kts. EG IO IO _.....,,. I15.00K ___._ _ -_.. MIDDLESEX CO. _ __ . -.___. _ 07/03/2010 _ .._,._...m_.. IThunderstorm Wind _........_. 150 kts. EG -, �0 �0 13.00K `MIDDLESEX CO. (07/03/2010 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG IO _ 10 I3.00K MIDDLESEX CO. (07/19/2010 IThunderstorm Wind- ......... .__ . MIDDLESEX CO. (07/19/2010 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts EG IO 10 18 OOK (MIDDLESEX CO. 107/19/2010 ........ IThunderstorm Wind (50 kts. EG 10 ___._ IO 12.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. 107/20/2010 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG IO 10 I5.00K MIDDLESEX CO. (07/27/2010 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts EG m IO ....._. 10_._ ..._, IS.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. 108/03/2010 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG IO 10 15.00K (MIDDLESEX CO....__. ^^ 108/07/2010 _IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG0 10 - .._...._. 15.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 108/07/2010 IThunderstorm Wind I50 kts. EG 0 IS.00K _ (MIDDLESEX CO. 109/09/2010 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG 10 IO 8.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. (09/09/2010 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG _. {0` _.__,...__ 10___..._.. 14 OOK ___. -_.... . ,..- ...,.....,__.,.., (MIDDLESEX CO. ..,._,.._.._._._.__.____-------- 105/09/2009 (Thunderstorm Wind (50 kts. EG 10- 10 12.00K .,.,._.. ..... ------------ _ _.,._. -._ -9 IThunderstorm Wind 150kts.EG I¶0 O__.._.. 115.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 07/07/2009 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kt5. EG IO_ 10 11.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. 107/08/2009 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG IO 10 I20.00K MIDDLESEX CO, -__- (07/26/2009......_ m .... IThunderstorm Wind 1MIDDLESEX CO. (07/26/2009 ._- _....__.....,..._.__.. .. IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG 10 0 115.00K ......_ (MIDDLESEX CO. 107/31/2009 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG 10 IO 130.00K m_ _.- .__,....._ ... 1MIDDLESEX Co. _._.. _, _.._ __.. (07/31/2009 IThunderstorm Wind __, ___._... (50 kts. EG 10 _..._.__ 10____.. _......_.____. �15.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. 107/31/2009 IThunderstorm in (50 kts. EG (O IO .10.00K IMIDDLESEX CO 107/31/2009 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG 10 10 m 13.00K (MIDDLESEX CO.T 7/31/2009 IThunderstorm Wind ....._[50 kts. EG I_...._._0 .- ._._. -_.. 115.00K .,..__ MIDDLESEX CO. 107/31/2009 Thunderstorm Wind (50 kts. EG 10 10 (S.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. (05/04/2010 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG 10 IO 130.00K 1MIDDLESEX CO. 105/04/2010 IThunderstorm Wind __ _.__ (50 kts. EG _ 10 _,._...___ 10 7.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. 106/01/2010 IThunderstorm Wind ISO kts. EG 10___. 10_._..____ 1S.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. (06/03/2010 _IThunderstorm Wind v 150 kts. EGl IO 10 120 OOK (MIDDLESEX CO. 106/03/2010 I_ Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG I 0 0 1.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. (06/05/2010 (Thunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG �0 _. -. -_ -- (O _..._ ...,_. 40.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 06/06/2010 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG IO 1 25.00K 1MIDDLESEX CO. (06/06/2010 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG 10 OOK� _ r (MIDDLESEX CO. _ _- ---- ----- _., . 106/06/2010 . T1III20AOK 1-1 11-1 IMIDDLESEX 1 ll 11 __ 111 06/06/2010 1. _ IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG 10 �0 i11, __._ 50.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. 06/06/2010 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG IO 10 130.00K 1MIDDLESEX CO.� j06/06/2010 IThunderstorm Wind �50 kts. EG I0. 10 110.00K 1MIDDLESEX CO. (06/06/2010 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG IO �0 I100.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. /06/2010 Wind 150 kts. EG 0 0 125.00K _,____..,. ._ _.._. (MIDDLESEX CO. _,.... ___.._., ._ 106/06/2010 __..__....,. IThunderstorm Wind ._.. �50 kts. EG 10 0 11.00K 1MIDDLE$EX CO. 06/06/2010 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts..EG �0 10 30.6 6K 35 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE .. _ . --- -- _ ---- THS INJURIES DAMAGE MIDDLESEX CO. ...,. .......... 006/06/2010 (Thunderstorm Wind _ - - -- _ 150 kts. EG 10 IO 01.00K IMIDDLESEX CO. 06/24/2010 Thunderstorm Wind~ 150 kts. EG (F0 00 m.. I10.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 006/24/2010 Thunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG IOW I0 02.00K MIDDLESEX CO. (06/24/2010 (Thunderstorm Wind __,._.__ 150 kts. EG IO 00 02.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 006/24/2010 (Thunderstorm Wind ISO kts. EG 10 ~~ 00 W_.. _ T 115.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 06/24/2010 __11.1_,1.., _......._. Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 3.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. 006/24/2010 [Thunderstorm Wind ._..___ 050 kts. EG 00. �030.00K� (MIDDLESEX CO. 106/24/2010 (Thunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG 00 00 01.00K .1.1,.,. MIDDLESEX CO. 106/24/2010 .. .-. [Thunders 1 torm _ Wind _.. _.._ 150 kts. EG .. [0 _ _ ._._. IO 015.00K - I IDDLESEX CO. 006/24/2010 Thunderstorm 150 kts. EG (0 IO 01.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 006/24/2010 IThunderstorm Wind �50 kts. EG (O _ IO 015.00K�� [MIDDLESEX CO. 007/12/2010 (Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts. EG (0 _ 00 ���������25.00K _1__111 MIDDLESEX CO. __. _..._ _ (07/12/2010 _..._._.._. _1111, Thunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG 10 00 [S6._6 OK MIDDLESEX CO. 107/19/2010 [Thunderstorm Wind [SO kts. EG 10- 10 025.00K MIDDLESEX CO. _.__.._ 11..11 1111_.... 06/01/2011 _ 1111.._,_ --dl-r----- Thunderstorm Win .. _ 050 kts. EG . I0��� . _1_,111,_.. 10 15.06 K _._...... MIDDLESEX CO. 1111_.. .. __..._... 201 06/01/1 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 3.00K [MIDDLESEX CO. 006/09/2011 IThunderstormWind 150 kts. EG 00 10� 015.00K _,.___.__..,._.__..,...... MIDDLESEX CO. 1111._. .._...__..._ (06/09/2011 1111 Thunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG 00 _ �015.00K _ _ MIDDLESEX CO. 108/02/2011 [Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts. EG 10 IO 01.00K FIDDLESEX CO. 08/19/2011 �OThunderstor..... 50 kts. EG �ry �0 __._. _ �0.__......_. 13.00K � (MIDDLESEX CO.� ��� 108/19/ 2011 - - - -- - -- -[f understorm Wind 150 kts EG _10. 1111_ 00_...__._ 05.00K_._..,..... IMIDDLESEX CO. 108/19/2011 1111, m__ Thunderstorm Wind 1111 .._ �50 kts. EG [0 �0 1111.. 015.00K IMIDDLESEX CO. 008/19/2011 (Thunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG 00 �0 05.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 08/19/2011 Thunderstorm Wind 1_ 50 kts. EG 0 0 O.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. 08/19/2011 Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts. EG IO IO IS OOK MIDDLESEX CO. 6/08/2012 Thunderstorm Wind �50 kts. EG 10 �0 �25.00K [MIDDLESEX CO. 106/23/2012 Thunderstorm Wind 045"kts. EG [0 00 [S.00K -- MI DDLESE X CO. 07/04/2012 IThunderstorm Wind _ �50 kts. EG [0 110.00K� (MIDDLESEX CO. __.,w.. _ 1111_.. 07/18/2012 _ _._ 1111. (Thunderstorm Wind _..___ 050 kts. EG 00_...__. _______. IO 115.00K �MIDDLESEXCO.� ...__..._._ 107 /18 /2012Thunderstorm Wind ._....._170 kts. EG�Ip.._.. �0___..._.,. °0350.00K�� _ _........ MIDDLESEX CO. _ — --------- 09/07/2012 Thunderstorm Wind 050 kts. EGW 10 00 LL 110.00K ,,MIDDLESEX CO. T 09/08/2012„ mmmN Thunderstorm Wind 140 kts. EG0M...____.. �0__. I3.00K MwwN IMIDDLESEX CO. 106/17/2013 (Thunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG IO 00 I25.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 106/17/2013 (Thunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG __._._. [0 10 I20.00K [MIDDLESEX CO. 006/17/2013 (Thunderstorm Wind (45 kts. EG 10 (0 13.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 006/18/2013 Thunderstorm Wind .. 1111 145 kts. EG 00 10_._._____ .66K MIDDLESEX CO. 06/24/2013 (Thunderstorm Wind --.-----1 145 kts. EG V4IO H^00 ✓ ~'03.00K^ MIDDLESEX CO. (07/23/2013 (Thunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG 00 10 I20.00K __M.___,.._ .._.,___..__.__..________._. 1MIDDlESEX CO. _._._._..__.._...__.. 107/29/2013 _. ImThunderstorm Wind 050 kts. EG 0M0 ....__._._.10 `S.00K IMIDDLESEX CO. (07/29/2013 Thunderstorm in (50 kts. EG 10 _..____. .._ .....r IS.00KT~ IMIDDLESEX CO. 007/03/2014 Thunderstorm Wind 150 kts EG IO IO 050 OOK 36 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE LOCATION BEGIN_DATE _ EVENT_TYPE MAGNITUDE DEATHS INJURIES DAMAGE I.w MIDDLESEX CO. . 07/03/2014 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 75.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. 07/07/2014 IThunderstorm Wind 40 kts. EG 0 0 15.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 107/07/2014 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG 0 0 15.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. 107/07/2014 Thu nderstorm Wind �50 kts. EG 0 0 S.00K 1MIDDLESEX CO. 107/07/2014 IThunderstorm Wind �50 kts. EG 10. 10 IS.00K _. ._ ., .,,.,_._ (MIDDLESEX CO. .._....,_ .......�.., 107/07/2014 .. ._._..,, _ ..�._. IThunderstorm Wind �87 kts. EG �....._._ 10 .__..._. 10 _._...._....._.. I100.00K 1MIDDLESEX CO.07/07/2014 ThunderstormWind�ISO kts..EG.._.._IO - .,_.._.. IO......_.. _ IS.00K���� MIDDLESEX CO. 107/07/2014 ......... ... .... ...._ IThunderstorm in . �__� .. 150 kts. EG IO _ 10 [15.00K 1MIDDLESEX CO. 107/07/2014 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts.EGry IO 10 _ �25.00K �_,..,.w ..... .. . .. ..... (MIDDLESEX CO. . _.. _._.._.�.. 107/07/2014 IThunderstorm Wind __.,.... 150 kts. EG IO w .�� _ �0 115.00K _ 1MIDDLESEX CO.07/07/2014._ Thunderstorm Wind �SO�kts. EG� ._�p._� ._...__S.00K,...._._.._ MIDDLESEX CO. 107/07/2014 IThunderstorm Wind50 kts. EG 10 10 I25.00K� (MIDDLESEX CO. ry107/07/2014 � � - IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG �0 - ._.�0.._ _ 15.00K............ ( MIDDLESEX CO. 07/07/2014 ThunderstormJ Wind ISO kts. EG 0 (S.00K�_......_.._ MIDDLESEX CO. I07/15/2014� Thunderstorm Wind ISO kts.EG IO w 10 125.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. [6 7/28/2014 (Thunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG �0� 10 150.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. 109/06/2014 IThunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG ...._.. 10 . 11 I 10.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. ........, 109/06/2014 _. (Thunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG �0 0 S.00K (MIDDLESEX C- O. 109/06/2014 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG [, 0 1- 0 IS.00K `MIDDLESEX CO. 09/06/2014 hThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG 10 �OV m (S.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. 09/06/2014 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG IOM^_..._ .__IO_. _.._.._VM 13.00K (MIDDLESEX CO.G .._.._.._...,_..109 /06/2014^ Thunderstorm Wind......_I50 kts. EG O_._ _- ...10..- —.. -- 110.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. 09/06/2014 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG 10._. ..,._..10 13.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. 109/06/2014 (derstorm Wind Thun 50 kts. EG 0 0 2.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. (09/06/2014 IThunderstorm Wind ISO kts. EG IO _ IO I15.00K MIDDLESEX CO. (09/06/2014 . IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG 10 r (S.00KM (MIDDLESEX CO. 109/06/2014 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG IO IO 11.00K (MIDDLESEX CO. _ __._._.._ 109/06/2014 -- -...._ .. IThunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 0 0 10.00K 1MIDDLESEX CO. 109/06/2014 IThunderstorm Wind 150 kts. EG 0 10.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 5/28/20151 IThunderstorm Wind 45 kts. EG F ol� O.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 5/28/2015 Thunderstorm Wind 50 kts. EG 1 011 0 10.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 8/4/2015 Thunderstorm Wind 40 kts. EG 0 0 O.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 8/4/2015 J Thunderstorm Wind kts. EG �J1 0 01 0 O.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 8/4/2015 Thunderstorm Wind 1I50 kts. EG 0 0 O.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 8/4/2015 Thunderstorm Wind 1I50 50 kts. EG II) 0 0 O.00K _.,.._.. .. -.._ .,........ MIDDLESEX CO. 8/4/2015 u.._...._ _.... _. Thunderstorm Wind kts. EG 0 0 O.00K _._._ MIDDLESEX CO. L�� 8/4/2015 u,.___. _...__ _,_ Thunderstorm Wind I�II0II.11� 1I50 50 kts. EG IIII 0 0 O.00K MIDDLESEX CO. 8/4/2015 Thunderstorm Wind u 50 kts. EG l� 0 u 0 l� O.00K 37 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE ILOCATION MIDDLESEX CO. �Mi - DDLES - EX Co. MIDDLESEX CO. MIDDLESEX CO. MIDDLESEX CO. IM-1, D D LESEX CO IMIDDLESEX CO. I' M I DD L ESEX CO. MIDDLESEX CO. MIDDLESEX CO. IMIDDLESEX CO. DDLESEX CO. IM- -1 D ... D-L,E,S-E,X,--C—O-.----,------ �BEGIN DAT E 8/4/2015 EVENT TYPE Thunderstorm Wind Thunderstorm Wind I d 1,, Thu n d er st o r rn Win d Wind Thunderstorm Wind W" d �Th 1 understorm in Thunderstorm Wind Thunderstorm Wind Thunderstorm 'Win Thunderstorm Wind IF nd Thunderstorm Wind 8/15/2015 8/15/20151�Th.'und'erstor-m'-Win 8/15/2015 8/15/2015lrThunderstorm 8/15/2015 8/15/2015 8/15/2015 8/15/2015 8/15/2015 2/25/2016 2/25/20161[Thunderstorm 2/25/2016 MIDDLESEX CO. I' M DDLESEX CO. ------ ---- — ------ MIDDLESEX CO. MIDDLESE CO. [MIDDLESEX CO.' IDDL S X CO. — -- -------- MIDDLESEX CO. IM IDDLESEX CO. MIDDLESEX CO. MIDDLESEX CO. MIDDLESEX CO. I - D , DLESEX , C , 0. 2/25/2016 11 Thunderstorm Wind Thunderstorm Wind Thunderstorm Wind Thunderstorm Wind hunderstorm Wind hunderstorm Wind - rsto-rm Wind Thunderstorm Wind T . hu I n 11 d , e r , st , o - r 11 m -1 Wi I n d 1-11 Thunderstorm Wind Thunderstorm Wind [Thunderstorm Wind 2/25/2016 2/25/2016 2/25/2016 2/25/2016 2/25/2016 2/25/20161[Thunde 2/25/2016 2/25/201611, 2/25/2016 2/25/2016 3/17/20161 MIDDLESEX CO. 3/17/2016 �Thunderstorm Wind Totals 1MAGNITUD-EjDEATHS INJURIES DAMAGE 1 01 1 01 1 01 1 01 1 01 1 01 1 01 1 01 1 01 k��—j 1 01 O.00K k?!—] 1 01 1 01 1 01 150 kts. EG 111 01 O.00K 01 O.00K 1 01 E!Lj� 1 01 10.00K I 1 01 1 01 1 01 O.00K 45 kts. EG 011 0�10.001< Source: NOAA, National Climatic Data Center Magnitude refers to maximum wind speed. 38 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Severe thunderstorms are a Town -wide hazard for Reading. The Town's vulnerability to severe thunderstorms is similar to that of Nor'easters. High winds can cause falling trees and power outages, as well as obstruction of key routes and emergency access. Heavy precipitation may also cause localized flooding, both riverine and urban drainage related. Based on the record of previous occurrences, severe thunderstorms in Reading are high frequency events as defined by the 2013 Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan. This hazard may occur more frequently than once in 5 years (greater than 20% per year). Winter Storms Winter storms, including heavy snow, blizzards, and ice storms, are the most common and most familiar of the region's hazards that affect large geographic areas. The majority of blizzards and ice storms in the region cause more inconvenience than they do serious property damage, injuries, or deaths. However, periodically, a storm will occur which is a true disaster, and necessitates intense large -scale emergency response. Heavv Snow and Blizzards A blizzard is a winter snow storm with sustained or frequent wind gusts to 35 mph or more, accompanied by falling or blowing snow reducing visibility to or below 1/4 mile. These conditions must be the predominant condition over a 3 hour period. Extremely cold temperatures are often associated with blizzard conditions, but are not a formal part of the definition. The hazard created by the combination of snow, wind and low visibility increases with temperatures below 20 degrees. Winter storms are a combination hazard because they often involve wind, ice and heavy snow fall. The National Weather Service defines "heavy snow fall" as an event generating at least 4 inches of snowfall within a 12 hour period. Winter Storms are often associated with a Nor'easter event, a large counter - clockwise wind circulation around a low- pressure center often resulting in heavy snow, high winds, and rain. The Northeast Snowfall Impact Scale ( NESIS) developed by Paul Kocin of The Weather Channel and Louis Uccellini of the National Weather Service ( Kocin and Uccellini, 2004) characterizes and ranks high impact northeast snowstorms. These storms have large areas of 10 inch snowfall accumulations and greater. NESIS has five categories: Extreme, Crippling, Major, Significant, and Notable. NESIS scores are a function of the area affected by the snowstorm, the amount of snow, and the number of people living in the path of the storm. The largest NESIS values result from storms producing heavy snowfall over large areas that include major metropolitan centers. The NESIS categories are summarized below: IMF TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Category NESIS Value Description 1 1 -2.499 Notable 2 2.5 -3.99 Significant 3 4 -5.99 1 Major 4 6 -9.99 Crippling 5 10.0+ Extreme Source: Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2013 The most significant winter storm in recent history was the "Blizzard of 1978," which resulted in over 3 feet of snowfall and multiple day closures of roadways, businesses, and schools. In Reading blizzards and severe winter storms have occurred in the following years: Table 11- Severe Winter Storm Records for Massachusetts Blizzard of 1978 February 1978 Blizzard March 1993 Blizzard January 1996 Severe Snow Storm March 2001 Severe Snow Storm December 2003 Severe Snow Storm January 2004 Severe Snow Storm January 2005 Severe Snow Storm April, 2007 Severe Snow Storm December 2010 Severe Snow Storm January 2011 Blizzard of 2013 February 2013 Blizzard of 2015 January 2015 Source: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration The average annual snowfall for all of Reading is 48 - 72 inches (see Map 6 in Appendix B). The Town of Reading does not keep local records of winter storms. Data for Middlesex County, which includes Reading, is the best available data to help understand previous occurrences and impacts of heavy snow events. According to the National Climate Data Center (NCDC) records, from 1995 to January, 2017, Middlesex County experienced 156 heavy snowfall events, resulting in no deaths, no injuries, and $4.489 million dollars in property damage. See Table 12 for heavy snow events and impacts in Middlesex County. IN TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 12 - Heavy Snow events and Impacts in Middlesex County 1996 — January, 2017 Date Type Deaths Injuries Property Damage 01/02/1996 Heavy Snow Fo Fo O.00K 01/02/1996 Heavy Snow I O.00K 01/07/1996 Heavy Snow -� 1.400M 01/07/1996 Heavy Snow FO —F0 1.500M 01/10/1996 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 01/12/1996 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 02/02/1996 Heavy Snow FO O.00K 02/16/1996 Heavy Snow [0 O.00K 02/16/1996 Heavy Snow I " FO O.00K 03/02/1996, Heavy Snow 10 �0 O.00K 03/02/1996 Heavy Snow to O.00K 03/07/1996 Heavy Snow [0 O.00K 03/07/1996 Heavy Snow O.00K F Fo04/07/1996 Heavy Snow O.00K He 04/07/1996 [Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 04/09/1996 Heavy Snow �— O.00K 04/09/1996 � Heavy Snow Fo o O.00K 12/06/1996 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 12/06/1996 Heavy Snow —', O.00K Fo 12/07/1996 Heavy Snow 1.360M 03/31/1997 Heavy Snow - O .00K F 03/31/1997 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 04/01/1997 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 04/01/1997 Heavy Snow OF 0 O.00K 11/14/1997 Heavy Snow [0 - O.00K 12/23/1997 Heavy Snow -F-' O.00K 12/23/1997 Heavy Snow Fo o O.00K 01/15/1998 Heavy Snow I _ I O.00K 01/15/1998 Heavy Snow �— O.00K 01/23/1998 Heavy Snow F � O.00K 01/14/1999 Heavy Snow [0 O.00K W TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Date Type De��aths��! Inj�Iuries— Property Damage 01/14/1999 Heavy Snow I I O.00K 02/25/1999 Heavy Snow I O I O O.00K --- O.00K 02/25/1999 Heavy Snow Fo 03/06/1999 Heavy Snow Fo -- Fo-- O.00K 03/06/1999 Heavy Snow- O.00K 03/15/1999 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 03/15/1999 Heavy Snow FO O.00K 01/13/2000 Heavy Snow 10 —�- O.00K 01/13/2000 Heavy Snow I _ —� O OOK 01/25/2000 Heavy Snow -Fo O.00K 01/25/2000 Heavy Snow FF O.00K 02/18/2000 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 02/18/2000 Heavy Snow �IO O.00K 12/30/2000 Heavy Snow l -F�� O.00K 01/20/2001 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 01/20/2001 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 02/05/2001 Heavy Snow F O.00K He 02/05/2001 avy Snow f 0 f 0 O.00K 03/05/2001 (Heavy Snow Fo -r O.00K F Heav03/05/2001 y Snow I _ —I O.00K 03/09/2001 Heavy Snow I O 0 r I �O—.00K 3/09/2001 Heavy Snow O.00K 03/30/2001 Heavy Snow F-(0 - O.00K 12/08/2001 Heavy Snow l 0 �^ O.00K 12/08/2001 Heavy Snow F 'Fo I O.00K 03/20/2002 Heavy Snow �- I O.00K 03/16/2004 Heavy Snow ;IO�- O.00K 03/16/2004 Heavy Snow F F- O.00K 02/24/2005 Heavy Snow F I - I O.00K 12/13/2007 Heavy Snow Fo —Fo-- O.00K 12/13/2007 Heavy Snow IO FO- O.00K 12/16/2007 Heavy Snow F- Fo O.00K 12/16/2007 Heavy Snow Fo o O.00K 42 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Date Type Deaths .Injuries Property Damage 12/19/2007 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K - F 2/19/2007 Heavy Snow ; ro O.00K 01/14/2010 Heavy Snow ' 1 0 I - 28.00K 01/14/2010 Heavy Snow [o 20.00K 01/14/2010 [Heavy Snow Fo 20.00K He 02/22/2010 — Heavy Snow I _ , O.00K Fo2/22/2010 Heavy Snow FF— O.00K 02/22/2010 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 03/01/2010 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 12/19/2010 F Heavy Snow [0 O.00K Fl Heavy Snow I _ I O.00K 12/19/2010 Heavy Snow [o O.00K 12/20/2010 Heavy Snow F O.00K 12/20/2010 Heavy Snow rF 8.00K 12/21/2010 Heavy Snow F� O.00K 12/31/2010 Heavy Snow F O.00K 12/31/2010 Heavy Snow F -Fo O.00K 01/10/2009 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 01/11/2009 [Heavy Snow Fo O.00K He 01/18/2009 F Heavy Snow [0 O.00K 01/18/2009 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 01/18/2009 Heavy Snow FO I O.00K 03/01/2009 Heavy Snow F O.00K 03/01/2009 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 03/02/2009 1 Heavy Snow I F - O.00K 12/09/2009 Heavy Snow FO 15.00K 12/09/2009 Heavy Snow I _ lo- O.SOK 12/19/2009 Heavy Snow 10 O.00K -- F 2/20/2009 (Heavy Snow O.00K 01/18/2010 Heavy Snow FFo O.00K 02/16/2010 Heavy Snow � O.00K 02/16/2010 Heavy Snow O.00K 02/16/2010 Heavy Snow F 15.00K M, TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Date Type Deaths Injuries Property Damage 02/23/2010 Heavy Snow � 8.00K Fol/12/2011 Heavy Snow 10 Fo O.00K 01/12/2011 Heavy Snow ^� ^' O.00K 01/26/2011 Heavy Snow -0- O.00K --- - - - - -- 01/26/2011 - - -- Heavy Snow FO O.00K 01/26/2011 Heavy Snow O.00K 10/29/2011 Heavy Snow FO O.00K 10/29/2011 Heavy Snow r0 F - 30.00K 12/29/2012 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 12/29/2012 Heavy Snow F � O.00K 12/29/2012 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 02/08/2013 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 02/08/2013 Heavy Snow I - I " O.00K 02/08/2013 Heavy Snow F � O.00K 02/23/2013 Heavy Snow r -[0- O.00K 03/07/2013 Heavy Snow I - Fo- O.00K 03/07/2013 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 03/07/2013 Heavy Snow F Fo O.00K 03/18/2013 Heavy Snow F O.00K 03/18/2013 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 03/18/2013 Heavy Snow r O.00K 12/14/2013 Heavy Snow to O.00K 12/14/2013 Heavy Snow F-F- O.00K 12/14/2013 1 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 1 F 2/17/2013 Heavy Snow F O.00K 12/17/2013 Heavy Snow -�- O.00K 12/17/2013 Heavy Snow � -�- O.00K 01/02/2014 Heavy Snow .10 O.00K 01/02/2014 Heavy Snow -F- O.00K 01/02/2014 Heavy Snow � O.00K 01/18/2014 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K F �02/05/2014 Heavy Snow O.00K 02/05/2014 Heavy Snow F-F- O.00K ., TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Date Type Deaths Injuries Property Damage 02/05/2014 avy Snow Fo O.00K He 02/13/2014 Heavy Snow I O.00K F 02/13/2014 Heavy Snow —F0 O.00K 02/13/2014 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 02/18/2014 Heavy Snow Fo Fo O.00K 02/18/2014 Heavy Snow OF - O.00K 11/26/2014 Heavy Snow FO -- Fo — 10.00K 01/24/2015 Heavy Snow 1 0 Fo O.00K 01/24/2015 Heavy Snow [0 O.00K 01/24/2015 Heavy Snow I - I " O.00K 01/26/2015 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K F 01/26/2015 Heavy Snow F O.00K 02/02/2015 Heavy Snow r0 �— O.00K 02/02/2015 Heavy Snow r0 -', O.00K 02/02/2015 Heavy Snow F O.00K 02/08/2015 Heavy Snow r0 F 02/08/2015 Heavy Snow r0 O.00K 02/08/2015 Heavy Snow F O.00K 02/14/2015 Heavy Snow Fo O.00K 02/14/2015 Heavy Snow Fo —, O.00K 02/14/2015 Heavy Snow FO Fo O.00K 2/5/2016 Heavy Snow Fo Heavy Snow r0 - Fo-170.00K Heavy Snow I - FO I Heavy Snow r0 -Fo— Heavy Snow Fo—Fo -- O.00K I S.00K O.00K O.00K 12/5/2016 2/5/2016 1 3/21/2016 14/4/2016 Totals —[—� Fo 4.489M The Town's overall vulnerability to heavy snow and blizzards is primarily related to restrictions on travel on roadways, temporary road closures, school closures, and potential restrictions on emergency vehicle access. Other vulnerabilities include power outages due to fallen trees and utility lines, and damage to structures due to heavy snow loads. 45 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Blizzards are considered to be high frequency events based on past occurrences, as defined by the Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2013. This hazard occurs more than once in five years, with a greater than 20 percent chance of occurring each year. Ice Storms The ice storm category covers a range of different weather phenomena that collectively involve rain or snow being converted to ice in the lower atmosphere leading to potentially hazardous conditions on the ground. Hail size typically refers to the diameter of the hailstones. Warnings and reports may report hail size through comparisons with real - world objects that correspond to certain diameters: Description (Diameter (inches) Pea 0.25 Marble or Mothball 10.50 Penny or Dime 10 75 Nickel 10.88 ,Quarter_ 11.00_�_�_.__.��_e� Half Dollar 1.25 Walnut or Ping Pong Ball 1.50 Golf ball Hen's Egg Tennis Ball Baseball ITea Cup Grapefruit Softball While ice pellets and sleet are examples of these, the greatest hazard is created by freezing rain conditions, which is rain that freezes on contact with hard surfaces leading to a layer of ice on roads, walkways, trees, and other surfaces. The conditions created by freezing rain can make driving particularly dangerous and emergency response more difficult. The weight of ice on tree branches can also lead to falling branches damaging electric lines. Town - specific data for previous ice storm occurrences are not collected by the Town of Reading. The best available local data is for Middlesex County through the National Climatic Data Center (see Table 13). Middlesex County, which includes the Town of TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Reading, experienced four ice storm events from 1995 –2016. No deaths or injuries were reported and the total reported property damage in the county was $6.155 million dollars. Table 13- Middlesex County Ice Storm Events, 1995- January, 2017 -_ - -_ . .___. Location Date Type Deaths injuries Damage Totals: F_ Fo_ lo— 6.155M WESTERN MIDDLESEX (ZONE) 01/09/1998 Ice Storm 0 0 5,00K WESTERN MIDDLESEX [Ice (ZONE) 11/16/2002 Storm 0 o 150.00K NORTHWEST MIDDLESEX COUNTY (ZO... 112/11/2010 Ice Storm 0 0 3.000M WESTERN MIDDLESEX FIceStorm (ZONE) 12/11/2010 0 0 3.000M Totals: � F_ Fo—Fo— 6.155M Source: NOAA, National Climatic Data Center Ice storms are considered to be medium frequency events based on past occurrences, as defined by the Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2013. This hazard occurs once in 5 years to once in 50 years, with 2% to 20% chance of occurring each year. The impacts of winter storms are often related to the weight of snow and ice, which can cause roof collapses and also causes tree limbs to fall which can in turn cause property damage and potential injuries. Winter storms are a potential Town -wide hazard in Reading. The Town's vulnerability is primarily related to restrictions to travel on roadways, temporary road closures, school closures, and potential restrictions on emergency vehicle access. The Town works to clear roads and carries out general snow removal operations, and bans on- street parking during snow removal to ensure that streets can be plowed and public safety vehicle access is maximized. Transit operations may also be impacted, as they were in the 2015 blizzard which caused the closure of the MBTA system for one day and limited services on several transit lines for several weeks. Reading commuter rail operations were significantly impacted. Another winter storm vulnerability is power outages due to fallen trees and utility lines. 47 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Winter storms are considered to be high frequency events based on past occurrences, as defined by the Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2013. This hazard occurs more than once in years, with a greater than percent chance of occurring each year. Geologic Hazards Geologic hazards include earthquakes and landslides. Although new construction under the most recent building codes generally will be built to seismic standards, there are still many structures which pre -date the most recent building code. Information on geologic hazards in Reading can be found on Map 4 in Appendix B. Earthquakes Damage in an earthquake stems from ground motion, surface faulting, and ground failure in which weak or unstable soils, such as those composed primarily of saturated sand or silts, liquefy. The effects of an earthquake are mitigated by distance and ground materials between the epicenter and a given location. An earthquake in New England affects a much wider area than a similar earthquake in California due to New England's solid bedrock geology (NESEC). Seismologists use a Magnitude scale (Richter scale) to express the seismic energy released by each earthquake. The typical effects of earthquakes in various ranges are summarized below. Richter Magnitudes Earthquake Effects Less than 3.5 Generally not felt, but recorded 3.5-5.4 Often felt, but rarely causes damage Under 6.0 At most slight damage to well- designed buildings. Can cause ma'or age to poorly constructed buildings over small regions. 6.1 -6.9 Can be destructive in areas up to about 100 km. across where people live. 7.0-7.9 Major earthquake. Can cause serious damage over larger areas. 8 or greater Great earthquake. Can cause serious damage in areas several hundred meters across. Source: Nevada Seismological Library (NSL ), 2005 According to the State Hazard Mitigation Plan, New England experiences an average of five earthquakes per year. From 1668 to 2010, 544 earthquakes were recorded in Massachusetts (NESEC). Most have originated from the La Malbaie fault in Quebec or from the Cape Anne fault located off the coast of Rockport. The region has experienced larger earthquakes, including a magnitude 5.0 earthquake in 1727 and a 6.0 earthquake that struck in 1755 off the coast of Cape Ann. More recently, a pair of damaging earthquakes occurred near Ossipee, NH in 1940, and a 4.0 earthquake centered in Hollis, Maine in October 2012 was felt in the Boston area. Historical records of some of the more significant earthquakes in the region are shown in Table 14. 48 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 14- Historical Earthquakes in Massachusetts or Surrounding Area Location Date Magnitude MA - Cape Ann 11/10/1727 5 MA - Cape Ann 12/29/1727 NA MA — Cape Ann 2/10/1728 NA MA — Cape Ann 3/30/1729 NA MA — Cape Ann 12/9/1729 NA MA — Cape Ann 2/20/1730 NA MA — Cape Ann 3/9/1730 NA MA - Boston 6/24/1741 NA MA - Cape Ann 6/14/1744 4.7 MA - Salem 7/1/1744 NA MA -Off Cape Ann 11/18/1755 6 MA —Off Cape Cod 11/23/1755 NA MA - Boston 3/12/1761 4.6 MA - Off Cape Cod 2/2/1766 NA MA - Offshore 1/2/1785 5.4 MA— Wareham /Taunton 12/25/1800 NA MA - Woburn 10/5/1817 4.3 MA - Marblehead 8/25/1846 4.3 MA - Brewster 8/8/1847 4.2 MA - Boxford 5/12/1880 NA MA - Newbury 11/7/1907 NA MA - Wareham 4/25/1924 NA MA — Cape Ann 1/7/1925 4 MA — Nantucket 10/25/1965 NA MA — Boston 12/27/74 2.3 VA—Mineral 8/23/11 5.8 MA - Nantucket 4/12/12 4.5 ME - Hollis 10/17/12 4.0 Source: (NESEC). One measure of earthquake risk is ground motion, which is measured as maximum peak horizontal acceleration, expressed as a percentage of gravity (1 g). The range of peak ground acceleration in Massachusetts is from l Og to 20g, with a 2% probability of exceedance in 50 years. Reading is in the middle part of the range for Massachusetts, at 14g to 16g, making it a relatively moderate area of earthquake risk within the state, although the state as a whole is considered to have a low risk of earthquakes compared to the rest of the country. There have been no recorded earthquake epicenters within Reading. ,• TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Although New England has not experienced a damaging earthquake since 1755, seismologists state that a serious earthquake occurrence is possible. There are five seismological faults in Massachusetts, but there is no discernible pattern of previous earthquakes along these fault lines. Earthquakes occur without warning and may be followed by aftershocks. Most older buildings and infrastructure were constructed without specific earthquake resistant design features. Earthquakes are a hazard with multiple impacts beyond the obvious building collapse. Buildings may suffer structural damage which may or may not be readily apparent. Earthquakes can cause major damage to roadways, making emergency response difficult. Water lines and gas lines can break, causing flooding and fires. Another potential vulnerability is equipment within structures. For example, a hospital may be structurally engineered to withstand an earthquake, but if the equipment inside the building is not properly secured, the operations at the hospital could be severely impacted during an earthquake. Earthquakes can also trigger landslides. Earthquakes are a potential Town -wide hazard in Reading. The Town has many older buildings that pre -date current building code which could be vulnerable in the event of a severe earthquake. Potential earthquake damages to Reading have been estimated using HAZUS -MH. Total building damages, including business interruption losses are estimated at $187.37 million for a 5.0 magnitude earthquake and $1,916.84 million for a 7.0 magnitude earthquake. Other potential impacts are detailed in Table 22. According to the Boston College Weston Observatory, in most parts of New England, there is a one in ten chance that a potentially damaging earthquake will occur in a 50 year time period. The Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan classifies earthquakes as "very low" frequency events that occur less frequently than once in 100 years, or a less than I% per year. Landslides According to the USGS, "The term landslide includes a wide range of ground movement, such as rock falls, deep failure of slopes, and shallow debris flows. Although gravity acting on an over steepened slope is the primary reason for a landslide, there are other contributing factors." Among the contributing factors are: erosion by rivers or ocean waves over steepened slopes; rock and soil slopes weakened through saturation by snowmelt or heavy rains; earthquakes create stresses that make weak slopes fail; and excess weight from accumulation of rain or snow, and stockpiling of rock or ore, from waste piles, or from man -made structures. Landslides can result from human activities that destabilize an area or can occur as a secondary impact from another natural hazard such as flooding. In addition to structural damage to buildings and the blockage of transportation corridors, landslides can lead to sedimentation of water bodies. Typically, a landslide occurs when the condition of a 50 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE slope changes from stable to unstable. Natural precipitation such as heavy snow accumulation, torrential rain and run -off may saturate soil creating instability enough to contribute to a landslide. The lack of vegetation and root structure that stabilizes soil can destabilize hilly terrain. There is no universally accepted measure of landslide extent but it has been represented as a measure of the destructiveness. The table below summarizes the estimated intensity for a range of landslides. For a given landslide volume, fast moving rock falls have the highest intensity while slow moving landslides have the lowest intensity. Estimated Volume Expected Landslide Velocity (m3) Fast moving landslide Rock fall) Rapid moving landslide (Debris flow ) Slow moving landslide (Slide) <0.001 Slight intensity <0.5 Medium intensity >0.5 High intensit <500 High inte sity Slight intensity 500- 10,000 High intensity Medium intensity Slight intensity 10,000 — 50,000 Very high intensity High intensity Medium intensity >500,000 Very high intensity High intensit »500,000 Very high intensity Source: A Geomorphological Approach to the Estimation of Landslide Hazards and Risks in Umbria, Central Italy, M. Cardinali et al, 2002 The entire Town has been classified as having a low incidence risk for landslides, less than 1.5 % of the area is involved in land sliding. (Map 4, Appendix B) The Town does not have records of any damages caused by landslides in Reading. Because of this, no specific mitigation measures for landslides have been included in the plan update. Potential damages would depend on how many properties were affected. Given the relatively high assessed value of property in Reading, damages affecting a single residence could exceed $500,000, and damages affecting several homes or business properties could theoretically extend from $1 million to several million. However, there are no data available on landslide damages in Reading, as there are no records of any damages caused by landslides in the town. Should a landslide occur in the future, the type and degree of impacts would be highly localized, and the Town's vulnerabilities could include damage to structures, damage to transportation and other infrastructure, and localized road closures. Injuries and casualties, while possible, would be unlikely given the low extent and impact of landslides in Reading. 51 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Based on past occurrences and the Massachusetts Hazard Mitigation Plan, landslides are of Low frequency, events that can occur once in 50 to 100 years (a 1% to 2% chance of occurring each year). Fire Related Hazards A brush fire is an uncontrolled fire occurring in a forested or grassland area. In the Boston Metro region these fires rarely grow to the size of a wildfire as seen more typically in the western U.S. As their name implies, these fires typically burn no more than the underbrush of a forested area. Wildfire season can begin in March and usually ends in late November. The majority of wildfires typically occur in April and May, when most vegetation is void of any appreciable moisture, making them highly flammable. Once "green -up" takes place in late May to early June, the fire danger usually is reduced somewhat. These fires can present a hazard where there is the potential for them to spread into developed or inhabited areas, particularly residential areas where sufficient fuel materials might exist to allow the fire the spread into homes. The Fire Department responds to approximately 26 brush fires annually. About 10% of these involve significant property damage but none have resulted in any injuries or deaths. Most brush fires are caused by careless disposal of cigarettes and by weather conditions such as lack of rainfall, winds and lightning. The following areas of Town were identified as having the highest potential for brush fires based on past occurrences and their potential for the accumulation of dried vegetation growth. The numbers correspond to the numbers on Map 8, "Hazard Areas ". 10. Undeveloped forested land north of Fairfield Drive. 11. Undeveloped forested land in northeast Reading and Cedar Swamp area. 15. Town Forest -The Town is a 290 acre site located in the northwestern part of town. The Town Forest was created in April, 1930 when over 100,000 red and white pine, spruce, balsam, and scotch pine trees were planted by local Boy Scouts and other interested citizens. ( Source: Town of Reading) 16. Open land area off Grove Street 17. Bear Meadow Conservation Area 18. Camp Curtis- National Guard area 19. Route 93 interstate highway corridor 52 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Wildfires in Massachusetts are measured by the number of fires and the sum of acres burned. The most recent data available for wildfires in Massachusetts, shown in Figure 2 below, indicates that the wildfire extent in Reading consists of .26 - 9 acres burned, with 0- 20 fires from 2001 to 2009. Figure 2 Massachusetts Wildfires 2001 -2009 Source: 2013 Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan Potential vulnerabilities to wildfires include damage to structures and other improvements, and impacts on natural resources such as the Town Forest. Smoke and air pollution from wildfires can be a health hazard, especially for sensitive populations including children, the elderly, and those with respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Potential damages from wildfires in Reading would depend on the extent and type of land affected. There could be the need for post -fire revegetation to restore burned properties, which could cost from a few thousand dollars to tens of thousands for an extensive area. However, there are no data on actual wildfire damages. Based on past occurrences and the Massachusetts Hazard Mitigation Plan 2013, brushfires are of High frequency, events that occur more frequently than once in 5 years (Greater than 20% per year) Extreme Temperatures Extreme temperatures occur when either high temperature or low temperatures relative to average local temperatures occur. These can occur for brief periods of time and be acute, 53 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE or they can occur over long periods of time when there is a prolonged period of excessively hot or cold weather. Reading has four well - defined seasons. The seasons have several defining factors, with temperature one of the most significant. Extreme temperatures can be defined as those, which are far outside of the normal seasonal ranges for Massachusetts. The average temperatures for Massachusetts are: winter (Dec -Feb) Average = 31.8 °F and summer (Jun -Aug) Average = 71 °F. Extreme temperatures are a Town -wide hazard. Extreme Cold For extreme cold, temperature is typically measured using Wind Chill Temperature Index, which is provided by the National Weather Service (NWS). The latest version of the index was implemented in 2001 and it meant to show how cold conditions feel on unexposed skin. The index is provided in Figure 3 below. Extreme cold is also relative to the normal climatic lows in a region. Temperatures that drop decidedly below normal and wind speeds that increase can cause harmful wind -chill factors. The wind chill is the apparent temperature felt on exposed skin due to the combination of air temperature and wind speed. Extreme cold is a dangerous situation that can result in health emergencies for susceptible people, such as those without shelter or who are stranded or who live in homes that are poorly insulated or without heat. The elderly and people with disabilities are often most vulnerable. In Reading, 14.9 percent of the population are over 65 and 4.5% of the population has a disability. 54 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE The Town of Reading does not collect data for previous occurrences of extreme cold. The best available local data are for Middlesex County, 1995- 2016, through the National Climatic Data Center (NCDC). There are four extreme cold events on record which caused no deaths and no injuries, property damage (see Table 15). Table 15 — Middlesex County Extreme Cold and Wind Chill Occurrences Date Location Type Deaths Injuries Property Damage Western Extreme Cold /wind 2/15/2015 �❑0 ❑0 Middlesex Chill 0 2/16/2015 Northwest Extreme Cold /wind ❑❑ Middlesex Chill 0 Southeast Extreme Cold /wind 2/16/2015 FMiddlesex Chill ❑ 0 0 2/14/2016 Western Middlesex Extreme Cold /wind Chill ❑❑ 0 Source: NOAA, National Climatic Data Center Extreme Heat While a heat wave for Massachusetts is defined as three or more consecutive days above 90 °F, another measure used for identifying extreme heat events is through a Heat Advisory from the NWS. These advisories are issued when the heat index (Figure 4) is forecast to exceed 100 degree Fahrenheit (F) for 2 or more hours; an excessive heat advisory is issued if forecast predicts the temperature to rise above 105 degree F. Figure 4- Heat Index Chart 55 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Extreme heat poses a potentially greater risk to the elderly, children, and people with certain medical conditions, such as heart disease. However, even young and healthy individuals can succumb to heat if they participate in strenuous physical activities during hot weather. Hot summer days can also worsen air pollution. With increased extreme heat, urban areas of the Northeast are likely to experience more days that fail to meet air quality standards. The Town of Reading does not collect data on excessive heat occurrences. The best available local data are for Middlesex County, through the National Climatic Data Center. From 1995 - 2016, there has been a total of one excessive heat event, with no reported deaths, no injuries, and no property damage resulting from excessive heat (see Table 16). Extreme temperature events are projected to be medium frequency events based on past occurrences, as defined by the Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2013. Both extreme cold and hot weather events occur between once in five years to once in 50 years, or a 2 percent to 20 percent chance of occurring each year. Table 16 — Middlesex County Extreme Heat Occurrences 1995- Janua ry, 2017 DATE EVENT TYPE DEATHS INJURIES DAMAGE 7/6/2010 Excessive Heat 0 0 0 Source: NOAA, National Climatic Data Center Drought Drought is a temporary irregularity in precipitation and differs from aridity since the latter is restricted to low rainfall regions and is a permanent feature of climate. Drought is a period characterized by long durations of below normal precipitation. Drought conditions occur in virtually all climatic zones yet its characteristics vary significantly from one region to another, since it is relative to the normal precipitation in that region. Drought can affect agriculture, water supply, aquatic ecology, wildlife, and plant life. In Massachusetts, droughts are caused by the prevalence of dry northern continental air and a decrease in coastal- and tropical - cyclone activity. During the 1960's, a cool drought occurred because dry air from the north caused lower temperatures in the spring and summer of 1962 -65. The northerly winds drove frontal systems to sea along the Southeast Coast and prevented the Northeastern States from receiving moisture (U.S. Geological Survey). This is considered the drought of record in Massachusetts. Average annual precipitation in Massachusetts is 44 inches per year, with approximately 3 to 4 inch average amounts for each month of the year. Regional monthly precipitation ranges from zero to 17 inches. Statewide annual precipitation ranges from 30 to 61 inches. Thus, in the driest calendar year (1965), the statewide precipitation total of 30 inches was 68 percent of average. 56 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Although Massachusetts is relatively small, it has a number of distinct regions that experience significantly different weather patterns and react differently to the amounts of precipitation they receive. The DCR precipitation index divides the state into six regions: Western, Central, Connecticut River Valley, Northeast, Southeast, and Cape and Islands. Reading is located in the Northeast Region. In Reading drought is a potential Town -wide hazard. The Town of Reading does not collect data on drought occurrences. The best available local data are for Middlesex County, through the National Climatic Data Center. From 1995 - 2016, there has been a total of six drought events, with no reported deaths, no injuries, and no property damage resulting from excessive heat (see Table 17). Table 17 — Middlesex County Drought Occurrences 1995- January, 2017 Date Location Type Deaths Injuries Property Damage Source: NOAA, National Climatic Data Center Under a severe long term drought the Reading could be vulnerable to restrictions on water supply. Potential damages of a severe drought could include losses of landscaped areas if outdoor watering is restricted and potential loss of business revenues if water supplies were severely restricted for a prolonged period. As this hazard has never occurred in Reading, there are no data or estimates of potential damages, but under a severe drought scenario it would be reasonable to expect a range of potential damages from several million to tens of millions of dollars. However, given the resilience of the MWRA water system due to its large amount of storage in the Quabbin and Wachusett Reservoirs, (equivalent to five years of water demand), severe impacts on the Town is unlikely. For example, even during the multi -year drought of record in the 1960s, there were no severe limitations of supply from the regional water system, which at the time was operated by the Metropolitan District Commission. 57 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Five levels of drought have been developed to characterize drought severity: Normal, Advisory, Watch, Warning, and Emergency. These drought levels are based on the conditions of natural resources and are intended to provide information on the current status of water resources. The levels provide a basic framework from which to take actions to assess, communicate, and respond to drought conditions. They begin with a normal situation where data are routinely collected and distributed, move to heightened vigilance with increased data collection during an advisory, to increased assessment and proactive education during a watch. Water restrictions might be appropriate at the watch or warning stage, depending on the capacity of each individual water supply system. A warning level indicates a severe situation and the possibility that a drought emergency may be necessary. A drought emergency is one in which mandatory water restrictions or use of emergency supplies is necessary. Drought levels are used to coordinate both state agency and local response to drought situations. As dry conditions can have a range of different impacts, a number of drought indices are available to assess these various impacts. Massachusetts uses a multi -index system that takes advantage of several of these indices to determine the severity of a given drought or extended period of dry conditions. Drought level is determined monthly based on the number of indices which have reached a given drought level. Drought levels are declared on a regional basis for each of six regions in Massachusetts. County by county or watershed - specific determinations may also be made. A determination of drought level is based on seven indices: 1. Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) reflects soil moisture and precipitation. 2. Crop Moisture Index: (CMI) reflects soil moisture conditions for agriculture. 3. Keetch Byram Drought Index (KBDI) is designed for fire potential assessment. 4. Precipitation Index is a comparison of measured precipitation amounts to historic normal precipitation. 5. The Groundwater Level Index is based on the number of consecutive month's groundwater levels are below normal (lowest 25% of period of record). 6. The Stream flow Index is based on the number of consecutive months that stream flow levels are below normal (lowest 25% of period of record). 7. The Reservoir Index is based on the water levels of small, medium and large index reservoirs across the state, relative to normal conditions for each month. Determinations regarding the end of a drought or reduction of the drought level focus on two key drought indicators: precipitation and groundwater levels. These two factors have the greatest long -term impact on stream flow, water supply, reservoir levels, soil moisture and potential for forest fires. 58 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Previous Occurrences Reading does not collect data relative to drought events. Because drought tends to be a regional natural hazard, this plan references state data as the best available data for drought. The statewide scale is a composite of six regions of the state. Regional composite precipitation values are based on monthly values from six stations, and three stations in the smaller regions (Cape Cod /Islands and West). Figure 5 depicts the incidents of drought levels' occurrence in Massachusetts from 1850 to 2012 using the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) parameter alone. On a monthly basis, the state would have been in a Drought Watch to Emergency condition 11 percent of the time between 1850 and 2012. Table 18 summarizes the chronology of major droughts since the 1920's. a 3 m r, 2 0 t 0 Figure 5 - Statewide Drought Levels using SPI Thresholds 1850 — 2012 Statewide Drought Levels using SPI Thresholds 1850 to 2012 (Actual Drought Levels 2001 to 2012) Month (Source: Mass. State Drought Management Plan 2013) Drought _ Emery Emergency Warning Watch Advisory Formal Drought emergencies have been reached infrequently, with 5 events occurring in the period between 1850 and 2012: in 1883, 1911, 1941, 1957, and 1965 -1966. The 1965- 1966 drought period is viewed as the most severe drought to have occurred in modern 59 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE times in Massachusetts because of its long duration. On a monthly basis over the 162 - year period of record, there is a one percent chance of being in a drought Emergency. Drought Warning Drought Warning levels not associated with drought Emergencies have occurred four times, in 1894, 1915, 1930, and 1985. On a monthly basis over the 162 -year period of record, there is a two percent chance of being in a drought Warning level. Drought Watch Drought Watches not associated with higher levels of drought generally have occurred in three to four years per decade between 1850 and 1950. In the 1980s, there was a lengthy drought Watch level of precipitation between 1980 and 1981, followed by a drought Warning in 1985. A frequency of drought Watches at a rate of three years per decade resumed in the 1990s (1995, 1998, 1999). In the 2000s, Drought Watches occurred in 2001 and 2002. On July 8, 2016, following four continuous months of unusually dry weather, Massachusetts Energy and Environmental Affairs (EEA) Secretary Matthew Beaton declared a Drought Watch for Central and Northeast Massachusetts and a Drought Advisory for Southeast Massachusetts and the Connecticut River Valley. As of January 1, 2017, four of the six statewide regions in Massachusetts were listed in Drought Warning, the second highest drought stage. The Cape Cod and Islands Region were listed in the 4th ranked Drought Advisory stage and the Northeast Region was listed in the third ranked Drought Watch stage. The overall frequency of being in a drought Watch is 8 percent on a monthly basis over the 162 -year period of record. Table 18 - Chronology of Major Droughts in Massachusetts .1 ._ � _ Date Area affected Recurrence Remarks interval (years) 1929 -32 € Statewide Water - supply sources altered in 13 10 to >50 communities. Multistate. Statewide 15 to >50 More severe in eastern and extreme western Massachusetts Multistate. 1957 -59 Statewide 5 to 25 Record low water levels in observation wells, I northeastern Massachusetts. ...... 1961 -69 Statewide ( 35 to >50 Water supply shortages common. Record (l .1 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Date Area affected Recurrence ' Remarks interval (years) ( drought. Multistate. Most severe in Ipswich and Taunton River 1980 -83 Statewide 10 to 30 basins; minimal effect in Nashua River basin. Multistate. Housatonic ( Duration and severity unknown Streamflow 1985 -88 River basin 25 showed mixed trends elsewhere. Probability of Future Occurrences The state has experienced Emergency Droughts five times between 1850 and 2012. Even given that regional drought conditions may occur at a different interval than state data indicates, droughts remain primarily regional and state phenomena in Massachusetts. Emergency Drought conditions over the 162 period of record in Massachusetts are a Low Frequency natural hazard event that can occur from once in 50 years to once in 100 years (I% to 2% chance per year), as defined by the Massachusetts State Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2013. Impacts of Climate Change Many of the natural hazards that Reading has historically experienced are likely to be exacerbated by climate change in future years. This is particularly true for flooding caused by extreme precipitation and extreme heat. These are described in more detail below. Climate Change Impacts: Extreme Precipitation Reading's average annual precipitation is 42 inches. While total annual precipitation has not changed significantly, according to the 2012 report When It Rains It Pours — Global Warming and the Increase in Extreme Precipitation from 1948 to 2011 intense rainstorms and snowstorms have become more frequent and more severe over the last half century in the northeastern United States. Extreme downpours are now happening 30 percent more often nationwide than in 1948 (see Figure 6). In other words, large rain or snow storms that happened once every 12 months, on average, in the middle of the 20th century, now happen every nine months. 61 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Figure 6- Changes in Frequency of Extreme Downpours, 1948 — 2011 Decrease in Frequency Increase In Frequency -100% -50% -10% 10% 50% 100% • • • • , >� • • • • s •� • i'° 00 0 A. • • • �• ! • �•• !0M• j • • 40 ! • • • � OW 0,0 .•• • N ,w • ! .� • . 0 ! • •a. Y� Source: When It Rains It Pours — Global Warming and the Increase in Extreme Precipitation, Environment America Research and Policy Center, July 2012 Not only are these intense storm .events more frequent, they are also more severe: the largest annual storms now produce 10 percent more precipitation, on average, than in 1948. In particular, the report finds that New England has experienced the greatest change with intense rain and snow storms occurring 85 percent more often than in 1948. At the other extreme, changes in precipitation patterns and the projected future rising temperatures due to climate change (discussed below) will likely increase the frequency of short-term (one- to three - month) droughts and decrease stream flow during the summer. Climate Change Impacts: Extreme Heat Recent temperature trends suggest greater potential impacts to come due to climate change. In the report "Confronting Climate Change in the U.S. Northeast," (2007), the Union of Concerned Scientists presented temperature projections to 2099 based on two scenarios, one with lower carbon dioxide emissions, and the other with high emissions. 62 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Figure 7 — Mass. Extreme Heat Scenarios Between 1961 and 1990, Boston ~tv, experienced an average of 11 days per year over 90 °F. That could triple to 30 .m days per year by 2095 under the low 1961-A 90 emissions scenario, and increase to 60 days per year under the high 2010 -2039 emissions scenario. Days over 100 °F could increase from the current 2040 -2069 average of one day per year to 6 days x 200 2099 with low emissions or 24 days with �" f�40 -209 " high emissions By 2099, Massachusetts could have a climate f similar to Maryland's under the low emissions scenario, and similar to the �2079�- 2099�� Carolinas' with high emissions (Figure 12). Furthermore, the number of days with poor air quality could ` Nigher - Emission scenarios quadruple in Boston by the end of the 4-A Lower-Emission Scenatio 21st century under higher emissions 1 scenario, or increase by half under the lower emissions scenario. These IZI extreme temperature trends could have significant impacts on public health, particularly for those individuals with asthma and other respiratory system conditions, which typically affect the young and the old more severely. Source: Union of Concerned Scientists Land Use and Development Trends Existing Land Use The most recent land use statistics available from the state are from aerial photography done in 2005. Table 19 shows the acreage and percentage of land in 20 categories. If the four residential categories are aggregated, residential uses make up 46% of the area of the Town (2,936 acres). Commercial and industrial combined make up 3.9 % of the Town, or 251.15 acres. One public comment stated that they felt that much of the forest category should be listed as forested wetlands. 63 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 19- 2005 Land Use Land Use Type Acres Percent Cropland Pasture Forest Non Forested Wetland Mining 6.37 22.90 2314.45 275.79 6.171 0.1 0.4 36.3 4.3 0.1 Open Land 101.65 1.6 Participation Recreation 174.33 2.7 Spectator Recreation 0 0 Water Recreation 1.237 0 Multifamily Residential 53.756 0.8 High Density Residential 0 0 Medium Density Residential 2430.43 38.1 Low Density Residential 451.87 7.1 Commercial 174.96 2.7 Industrial 76.190 1.2 Urban Open 148.55 2.3 Transportation 128.34 2.0 Waste Disposal 3.71 0.1 Water 0 0 Woody Perennial 11.41 0.2 Totals 6,382.16 100 For more information on how the land use statistics were developed and the definitions of the categories, please go to http://www.mass.jzov/mizis/lus.htm. Economic Elements Reading is a prosperous suburban community with a number of economic development assets: a busy downtown with commuter rail service, direct access to both Routes 129/I- 95 and I -93, and an increasingly well- educated and well paid workforce. The Town remains primarily a residential community however, with little commercial and industrial development. The local job base is small and dominated by lower paying retail and service jobs while most residents commute to work in other communities. The Town's tax base is heavily dependent on residential properties, with only 7% of the tax base attributable to business. There is essentially no additional undeveloped business -zoned land in Reading, but there are opportunities to add to the Town's business tax base through revitalization of the downtown and redevelopment of vacant and underused properties nearer the highways. (Reading Master Plan) •, TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Historic Cultural and Natural Resource Areas Reading has a rich history dating back to its first settlement in 1639 when it also included what would become the current towns of Wakefield and North Reading. In 1769, the Town took on the boundaries it has today, with the meetinghouse built on the town common serving as the political and religious center of the community. The railroad came to Reading in 1845 and brought about the conversion of residential areas to commercial and industrial uses. Today the Town has two historic districts with an inventory of 270 properties, 90 of which are on the National Register of Historic Places. Culturally, the Town has its own symphony orchestra, the Reading Symphony Orchestra, founded in 1931 and has two community theater groups and the Reading Art Association as well. The Parker Tavern is a 1694 saltbox style home now restored and used as a public museum. (Reading Master Plan) Heavily influenced by earlier glaciers, Reading is generally low -lying and is located within the headwaters of the Ipswich and Saugus Rivers. The highest point is Dobbins Hill at 232 feet above sea level and there are numerous glacial features such as drumlins, kames, eskers interspersed with the numerous small ponds, wetlands and floodplains that make up more than 30 percent of the Town's land area. Prior to the adoption of wetland protection bylaws in the 1970s, many low areas in the Town were drained and built out, often contributing to the flooding problems experienced today. Due to its topography, most of Reading's active recreation areas are in the south and central part of town, while the north offers the Town Forest and numerous trails and open areas for hiking, snowshoeing and other natural resource based recreation activities. (Reading Open Space and Recreation Plan) Development Trends Reading evolved from an outlying and isolated collection of farms to a specialized farming community centered on a village center, to a minor center for the manufacture of everyday commodities, to a residential suburb. From 1951 to 1981, Reading's land use changed from being only 32% urban to 51% urban, shifting from agricultural, forest and wetlands to a residential uses. By 2011, 61% of the Town's area was developed, with that trend continuing today. (Reading Open Space and Recreation Plan) Development trends throughout the metropolitan region are tracked by MAPC's Development Database, which provides an inventory of new development over the last decade. The database tracks both completed developments and those currently under construction. The database includes 7 developments in the Town of Reading since 2010, of which 6 are completed and 1 was under construction or planned for beyond 2016. The database also includes several attributes of the new development, including site acreage, housing units, and commercial space. The 7 developments in Reading include a G'E TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE total of 625 housing units, 53,482 square feet of commercial space, and are sited on a total of 45.43acres (see Table 21). In order to characterize any change in the Town's vulnerability associated with new developments, a GIS mapping analysis was conducted which overlaid the development sites with the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map. The analysis shows that two of the developments, Mariano Drive and Perfecto's Cafe, are located within a flood zone. Recent and Potential Future Development MAPC consulted with Town planning staff to determine areas that have been recently developed or may be developed in the future, based on the Town's comprehensive planning efforts and current trends and projects. These areas are described below. Two of these sites are in a flood hazard zone, with both located in an X zone with only a 0.2 % chance of flooding. The only other hazard that varies with location within the town is landslide risk. All of the developments are in the areas defined as "Low Landslide Incidence." Other hazards are categorized at the same level throughout town. For snowfall, all of Reading is in the zone of 48 to 72 inches average annual snowfall. With respect to wind, there is no variation across different sites in the town; the hazard map depicts the entire town of Reading within a 100 -year wind speed of 110 miles per hour. (See hazard maps in Appendix B). Table 20 Relationship of Recent and Potential Development to Hazard Areas Parcel Landslide Flood Zone risk Bethune Avenue Mariano Drive Lyle Estates Randall Road Reading Woods, 1 Jacob Way Oaktree, 30 Haven US Post Office Redevelopment, 136 Haven Street Johnson Woods Phases 1 and II, Johnson Woods Drive Reading Village 40B, 31 -41 Lincoln St and 2 -12 Prescott St Low incidence Low incidence Low incidence Low incidence Low incidence Low incidence Low incidence Low incidence Low incidence •• Brush Fire Area No 18.96% in X: 0.2% Annual No Chance of Flooding No No No No No No No TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Beacon Court, 40B, 45 Beacon Low Street incidence St. Agnes School, 172 -186 Woburn Low Street incidence MF Charles Building, 600 -622 Main Low Street incidence Perfecto's Cafe, 285 Main Street Low incidence 258 -262 Main Street Low incidence Artis Senior Living, 1100 Main Low Street incidence Reading Public Library, 64 Low Middlesex Avenue incidence Criterion Child Enrichment, 186 -190 Low Summer Avenue incidence 67 Line M M 24.22% in X: 0.2% Annual No Chance of Flooding No No 7k re 7,1 re a z 0 H r� V H E x C7 z a W E W E A a 0 N 1�1 0 N 0 0 N �r 0 bA a O O N O E 10 v t CL CO N "� +� v c .O v � W a v cr- qp c C v J W E N O Q O an V, lz a N N Q a>i p _ E C N N v Zn aj X O a X •O O N W cn cu c cn O 0 0 0 Q 0 0 W 00 ct O d cj W W M O Ln Lr1: C LL GC cr O V 00 O O M N V, N IM O N d N tD z tA V1 — 'O� x l0 d' M O ^ ^ %q li l y O r-I O O N L v N Q t0 ri N O p W N O z W H F' > W CL CL O C — \ z v cr- v N O O w cv �o a tx Z U O � > J O w v O 2 4+ '^ L o L p —I 4 ' Z O O E O~ c O' v cc ao LLJ Lf) w v a Q p v=f 10 10 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Critical Infrastructure in Hazard Areas Critical infrastructure includes facilities that are important for disaster response and evacuation (such as emergency operations centers, fire stations, water pump stations, etc.) and facilities where additional assistance might be needed during an emergency (such as nursing homes, elderly housing, day care centers, etc.). There are 137 facilities identified in Reading. These are listed in Table 22 and are shown on the maps in Appendix B. Explanation of Columns in Table 22 Column 1: ID #: The first column in Table 10 is an ID number which appears on the maps that are part of this plan. See Appendix B. Column 2: Name: The second column is the name of the site. If no name appears in this column, this information was not provided to MAPC by the community. Column 3: Type: The third column indicates what type of site it is Column 4: Landslide Risk: The fourth column indicates the degree of landslide risk for that site. This information came from NESEC. The landslide information shows areas with either a low susceptibility or a moderate susceptibility to landslides based on mapping of geological formations. This mapping is highly general in nature. For more information on how landslide susceptibility was mapped, refer to hftp://Pubs.usgs.gov/pp/pl 183/pp 1183. htm I. Column 5: FEMA Flood Zone: The fifth column addresses the risk of flooding. A "No" entry in this column means that the site is not within any of the mapped risk zones on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM maps). If there is an entry in this column, it indicates the type of flood zone. Column 6.13rush Fires- Areas determined by Local Hazard Mitigation Team to be at risk for brush fires •• TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2015 UPDATE Table 22- Critical Facilities and Relationship to Hazard Areas PDM_I NAME TYPE Landslides Within FEMA D Flood Zone 246 -001 Reading Baptist Child Care Low 70 I. Within Day School Locally incidence 246 -002 Christian Child Care Low Flooding Cooperative No incidence No Preschool No No 246 -003 Humpty Dumpty Child Care Low No School Road at incidence 246 -004 Sandra Lane Child Care Low No Nursery School No incidence 246 -005 Sawyer Nursery Child Care Low School incidence 246 -006 Reading Child Care Low Extended -Day incidence Activities Program 246 -007 Little Treasure Child Care Low School House incidence 246 -008 Burbank YMCA Child Care Low Preschool incidence Program 246 -009 Perry, Linda Child Care Low incidence 246 -010 Van Horn, Susan Child Care Low L. incidence 246 -011 Becker, Mary Child Care Low Ellen incidence 246 -012 Blake, Gayle K. Child Care Low incidence 246 -013 Bouchard, Jeanne Child Care Low F. incidence 246 -014 Gingras, Linda H. Child Care Low incidence 246 -015 Melanson, Child Care Low Barbara incidence 246 -016 Reading Extended Child Care Low Day at Killam incidence School 70 I. Within Within Locally Brush Identified Fire Area of Area Flooding No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Track No Road at Line Road No No No No No No No No No TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 22- Critical Facilities and Relationship to Hazard Areas PDM_I NAME TYPE Landslides Within FEMA Within Within D Flood Zone Locally Brush Identified Fire Area of Area Flooding 246 -017 Reading Extended Child Care Low No No No 71 Day at Joshua incidence Eaton 246 -018 Kariger, Diane L. Child Care Low No No No incidence 246 -019 Tinney, Suzann Child Care Low No No No M. incidence 246 -020 Callahan, Louise Child Care Low No No No M. incidence 246 -021 Tucker, Susan Child Care Low No No No incidence 246 -022 Driscoll, Child Care Low No No No Catherine H. incidence 246 -023 Miller, Joan Child Care Low No No No incidence 246 -024 Zaccardo, Patricia Child Care Low No No No incidence 246 -025 Thayer, Debra Child Care Low No No No incidence 246 -026 Gard - Bruce, Anna Child Care Low No No No P. incidence 246 -027 Pustorino, Child Care Low No No No Concetta incidence 246 -028 Brown, Krystal Child Care Low No No No Gayle incidence 246 -029 Melanson, Child Care Low No No No Patricia incidence 246 -030 Evangelista, Child Care Low No No No Alison incidence 246 -031 Reynolds, Dawn Child Care Low No No No incidence 246 -032 Lievenbruck, Child Care Low No No No Nadine incidence 246 -033 McWeeney, Child Care Low No No No Kathryn incidence 246 -034 Bartalini, Rockel) Child Care Low No No No M. incidence 246 -035 Whelan, Child Care Low No No No Katherine M. incidence 246 -036 Giuliotti, Virginia Child Care Low No No No 71 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 22- Critical Facilities and Relationship to Hazard Areas PDM_I NAME TYPE Landslides Within FEMA Within Within D Flood Zone Locally Brush Identified Fire Area of Area Flooding incidence 246 -037 Doucette, Shirley Child Care Low No No No incidence 246 -038 Austin School Low No No No Preparatory incidence School 246 -039 Alice M Barrows School Low No No No incidence 246 -040 Walter S Parker School Low No No No Middle incidence 246 -041 Joshua Eaton School Low No No No incidence 246 -042 J Warren Killam School Low No No No School incidence 246 -043 Birch Meadow School Low No No No Elementary incidence School 246 -044 Reading Police Emergenc Low No No No Department y incidence Operation s Center 246 -045 Reading Town Municipal Low No No No Hall Office incidence 246 -046 Reading Fire Fire Low No No No Department Station incidence 246 -047 Reading Fire Fire Low No No No Department Station incidence 246 -048 Reading Police Police Low No No No Department Station incidence 246 -049 Wood End School Low No No No Elementary incidence School 246 -050 DPW Garage Municipal Low No No No Office incidence 246 -051 Louganis Water Water Low No Water Town Treatment Plant Treatmen incidence Treatmen Forest t Facility t Plant 246 -052 Reading Power Low No No No Municipal Light Substatio incidence substation n 72 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 22- Critical Facilities and Relationship to Hazard Areas PDM_I NAME TYPE Landslides Within FEMA Within Within D Flood Zone Locally Brush Identified Fire Area of Area Flooding 246 -053 Arthur W School Low No No No Coolidge Middle incidence School 246 -054 Reading School Low No No No Memorial High incidence School 246 -055 Reading Senior Senior Low No No No Center Center incidence 246 -056 Camp Curtis Hazardou Low D: Possible But No No Guild, MA s incidence Undetermined Materials Hazard 246 -057 Hodson Oil Hazardou Low No No No s incidence Materials 246 -058 Mass Highway Hazardou Low No No No Dept. Facility s incidence Materials 246 -059 New England Tel Hazardou Low No No No & Tel Company s incidence Materials 246 -060 DPW Garage Hazardou Low No No No s incidence Materials 246 -061 Cumberland Hazardou Low No Track No Farms (Mobil gas s incidence Road at station) Materials Line Road 246 -062 Louganis Water Hazardou Low No Water Town Treatment Plant s incidence Treatmen Forest Materials t Plant 246 -063 Cumberland /Exxo Hazardou Low No No No n (gas station) s incidence Materials 246 -064 Main St Hazardou Low No No No Petroleum, LLC s incidence (Mobil) Materials 246 -065 Reading Hazardou Low No No No Petroleum (gas s incidence station) Materials 246 -066 Reading Car Care Hazardou Low No No No Center (gas s incidence 73 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 22- Critical Facilities and Relationship to Hazard Areas PDM_I NAME TYPE Landslides Within FEMA Within Within D Flood Zone Locally Brush Identified Fire Area of Area Flooding station) Materials 246 -067 Reading Square Hazardou Low No No No Shell (Gas s incidence Station) Materials 246 -068 Reading Service Hazardou Low No No No Inc. Mobil on the s incidence Run Materials 246 -069 Main Street Hazardou Low No No No Sunoco s incidence Materials 246 -070 East Coast Gas Hazardou Low No No No s incidence Materials 246 -071 Motiva Hazardou Low AE: 1% Annual No No Enterprises s incidence Chance of (Texaco gas Materials Flooding; with station) BFE 246 -072 West Street Hazardou Low No No No Mobil (Gas s incidence Station) Materials 246 -073 Amico, Tonya Child Care Low No No No Marie incidence 246 -074 Clock Tower Kids Child Care Low No No No incidence 246 -075 Coffill, Patricia Child Care Low No No No incidence 246 -076 Cunningham, Child Care Low No No No Dawn incidence 246 -077 Dillaway, Ann A. Child Care Low No No No incidence 246 -078 Ellington, Holly Child Care Low No No No incidence 246 -079 Gaunci, Anne Child Care Low No No No Marie incidence 246 -080 Malcolm, Loretta Child Care Low No No No incidence 246 -081 Yang, Yi Fang Child Care Low No No No incidence 246 -082 Nichols, Kristina Child Care Low No Fairchild No incidence Drive 74 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 22- Critical Facilities and Relationship to Hazard Areas PDM_I NAME TYPE Landslides Within FEMA Within Within D Flood Zone Locally Brush Identified Fire Area of Area Flooding 246 -083 Cedar Glen Elderly Low No No No Housing incidence 246 -084 Peter Sanborn Elderly Low No No No Place Housing incidence 246 -085 Reading Housing Elderly Low No No No Authority Housing incidence 246 -086 Longwood Place Elderly Low No No No Housing incidence 246 -087 Sawtelle Family Nursing Low No No No Hospice House Home incidence 246 -088 Daniels House Nursing Low No No No Nursing Home Home incidence 246 -089 Wingate at Nursing Low X: 0.2% Annual No No Reading Home incidence Chance of Flooding 246 -090 EKS 2 Corporation Hazardou Low No No No Shell Station s incidence Materials 246 -091 Auburn Street Water Low No No No Water Tank Storage incidence Tank 246 -092 Bear Hill Stand Water Low No No No Pipe Stand incidence Pipe 246 -093 Batchelder Road Sewer Low No No No Sewer Pumping Pumping incidence Station Station 246 -094 Charles Street Sewer Low No No No Pumping Station Pumping incidence Station 246 -095 Haverhill Sewer Sewer Low No No No Pumping Station Pumping incidence Station 246 -096 Collins Avenue Sewer Low No No No Pumping Station Pumping incidence Station 246 -097 Joseph Way Sewer Low No No No Pumping Station Pumping incidence Station 246 -098 Strout Avenue Sewer Low No No Town 75 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 22- Critical Facilities and Relationship to Hazard Areas PDM_I NAME TYPE Landslides Within FEMA Within Within D Flood Zone Locally Brush Identified Fire Area of Area Flooding Sewer Pumping Pumping incidence Forest Station Station 246 -099 Grove Street Sewer Low No No No Sewer Pumping Pumping incidence Station Station 246 -100 Brewer Lane Sewer Low No No No Sewer pumping Pumping incidence Station Station 246 -101 Small Lane Sewer Sewer Low No No No Pumping Station Pumping incidence Station 246 -102 West Street Sewer Low No No No Sewer Pumping Pumping incidence Station Station 246 -103 Longwood Road Sewer Low No No No Sewer Pumping Pumping incidence Station Station 246 -104 Lothrop Road Water Low No No No Water Booster Booster incidence Station Station 246 -105 Sturgis Park Sewer Low No No No Sewer Pumping Pumping incidence Station Station 246 -106 Revay Well Public Low No No No Water incidence Supply 246 -107 Reading Well # 13 Public Low No No No Water incidence Supply 246 -108 Reading Well # 15 Public Low No No No Water incidence Supply 246 -109 Reading Well # 2 Public Low No No Town Water incidence Forest Supply 246 -110 Reading Well # 3 Public Low No No Town Water incidence Forest Supply 246 -111 Reading B -Line Public Low No No Town Well Water incidence Forest 76 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 22- Critical Facilities and Relationship to Hazard Areas PDM_I NAME TYPE Landslides Within FEMA Within Within D Flood Zone Locally Brush Identified Fire Area of Area Flooding Supply 246 -112 Reading 66 -8 Public Low No No No Well Water incidence Supply 246 -113 Reading Town Public Low No No Town Forest Well Water incidence Forest Supply 246 -114 Reading Well # Public Low No No Town 82 -20 Water incidence Forest Supply 246 -115 Mill Street Bridge Bridge Low AE: Regulatory No No incidence Floodway 246 -116 Rte. 28 Bridge Bridge Low AE: Regulatory No No incidence Floodway 246 -117 MWRA Water Public Low No No No Supply Pipe Water incidence Supply 246 -118 193 over West Bridge Low No No No Street Bridge incidence 246 -119 Apache Pass Municipal Low No No No Mass Highway Office incidence DPW Facility 246 -120 195 over Rte. 28 Bridge Low No No No Bridge incidence 246 -121 Track Road Bridge Bridge Low X: 0.2% Annual Track No #1 incidence Chance of Road at Flooding Line Road 246 -122 Track Road Bridge Bridge Low X: 0.2% Annual Track No #2 incidence Chance of Road at Flooding Line Road 246 -123 Track Road Bridge Bridge Low AE: Regulatory Track No #3 incidence Floodway Road at Line Road 246 -124 Mineral Street Bridge Low No No No Bridge incidence 246 -125 129 Railroad Bridge Low No No No Bridge incidence 246 -126 Reading Internal Medical Low No No No Medicine Offices Facility incidence 246 -127 MWRA Summer Sewer Low No No No 77 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 22- Critical Facilities and Relationship to Hazard Areas PDM_I NAME TYPE Landslides Within FEMA Within Within D Flood Zone Locally Brush Identified Fire Area of Area Flooding Avenue Sewer Pumping Station 246 -128 Hallmark Health Building 246 -129 Reading Municipal Light Department 246 -130 RCTV Inc. Studio 246 -131 Bruce, Sheila 246 -132 Goddard School Station MBTA Train /Bus 246 -133 Station Facility Montessori 246 -134 School Office Nesaratnam, 246 -135 Rathikumary 246 -136 Sousa, Michelle 246 -137 Water Tower Vulnerability Assessment Pumping incidence Station incidence Medical Low Facility incidence Municipal Low Office incidence Broadcast Low Facility incidence Child Low Care incidence Child Care Train Station School Child Care Child Care Water Tower Low incidence Low incidence Low incidence Low incidence Low incidence Low incidence No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No Track Road at Line Road No No No No No No No No No No No The purpose of the vulnerability assessment is to estimate the extent of potential damages from natural hazards of varying types and intensities. A vulnerability assessment and estimation of damages was performed for hurricanes, earthquakes, and flooding. The methodology used for hurricanes and earthquakes was the HAZUS -MH software. The methodology for flooding was developed specifically to address the issue in many of the communities where flooding was not solely related to location within a floodplain. Introduction to HAZUS -MH HAZUS- MH (multiple- hazards) is a computer program developed by FEMA to estimate losses due to a variety of natural hazards. The following overview of HAZUS -MH is taken from the FEMA website. For more information on the HAZUS -MH software, go to http: / /www.fema.gov /plan /prevent/hazus /index.shtm TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE "HAZUS -MH is a nationally applicable standardized methodology and software program that contains models for estimating potential losses from earthquakes, floods, and hurricane winds. HAZUS -MH was developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) under contract with the National Institute of Building Sciences (NIBS). Loss estimates produced by HAZUS -MH are based on current scientific and engineering knowledge of the effects of hurricane winds, floods and earthquakes. Estimating losses is essential to decision - making at all levels of government, providing a basis for developing and evaluating mitigation plans and policies as well as emergency preparedness, response and recovery planning. HAZUS -MH uses state -of -the -art geographic information system (GIS) software to map and display hazard data and the results of damage and economic loss estimates for buildings and infrastructure. It also allows users to estimate the impacts of hurricane winds, floods and earthquakes on populations." There are three modules included with the HAZUS -MH software: hurricane wind, flooding, and earthquakes. There are also three levels at which HAZUS -MH can be run. Level 1 uses national baseline data and is the quickest way to begin the risk assessment process. The analysis that follows was completed using Level 1 data. Level 1 relies upon default data on building types, utilities, transportation, etc. from national databases as well as census data. While the databases include a wealth of information on the Town of Reading, it does not capture all relevant information. In fact, the HAZUS training manual notes that the default data is "subject to a great deal of uncertainty." However, for the purposes of this plan, the analysis is useful. This plan is attempting to generally indicate the possible extent of damages due to certain types of natural disasters and to allow for a comparison between different types of disasters. Therefore, this analysis should be considered to be a starting point for understanding potential damages from the hazards. Estimated Damages from Hurricanes The HAZUS software was used to model potential damages to the community from a 100 year and 500 year hurricane event; storms that are 1% and .0.2% likely to happen in a given year, and roughly equivalent to a Category 2 and Category 4 hurricane. The damages caused by these hypothetical storms were modeled as if the storm track passed directly through the Town, bringing the strongest winds and greatest damage potential. Though there are no recorded instances of a hurricane equivalent to a 500 year storm passing through Massachusetts, this model was included in order to present a reasonable "worst case scenario" that would help planners and emergency personnel evaluate the 79 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE impacts of storms that might be more likely in the future, as we enter into a period of more intense and frequent storms. Table 23 - Estimated Damages from Hurricanes Estimated Damaizes from Earthquakes The HAZUS earthquake module allows users to define an earthquake magnitude and model the potential damages caused by that earthquake as if its epicenter had been at the geographic center of the study area. For the purposes of this plan, two earthquakes were selected: magnitude 5.0 and a magnitude 7.0. Historically, major earthquakes are rare in New England, though a magnitude 5 event occurred in 1963. 80 100 Year 500 Year Building Characteristics Estimated total number of buildings 8,647 Estimated total building replacement value (2010$) $3,275 Millions of dollars Building Damages # of buildings sustaining minor damage 190 1,243 # of buildings sustaining moderate damage 13 185 # of buildings sustaining severe damage 0 8 # of buildings destroyed 0 4 Population Needs # of households displaced 0 14 # of people seeking public shelter 0 0 Debris Building debris generated (tons) 3,790 11,470 Tree debris generated (tons) 1,216 2,937 # of truckloads to clear building debris 29 155 Value of Damages (Thousands of dollars) Total property damage (buildings and content) $18,614.97 $66,975.28 Total losses due to business interruption $549.32 $3,333.24 Estimated Damaizes from Earthquakes The HAZUS earthquake module allows users to define an earthquake magnitude and model the potential damages caused by that earthquake as if its epicenter had been at the geographic center of the study area. For the purposes of this plan, two earthquakes were selected: magnitude 5.0 and a magnitude 7.0. Historically, major earthquakes are rare in New England, though a magnitude 5 event occurred in 1963. 80 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table -24 Estimated Damages from Earthquakes 81 Magnitude 5.0 Magnitude 7.0 Building Characteristics Estimated total number of buildings 8,647 Estimated total building replacement value (2010 $) Millions of dollars $3,275 Building Damages # of buildings sustaining slight damage 2,565 220 # of buildings sustaining moderate damage 1,321 1,648 # of buildings sustaining extensive damage 336 2,492 # of buildings completely damaged 82 4,273 Population Needs # of households displaced 351 5,446 # of people seeking public shelter 272 2,703 Debris Building debris generated ( million tons) 0.07 0.60 # of truckloads to clear debris (@ 25 tons /truck) 2,760 24,000 Value of Damages (Millions of dollars) Total property damage $187.37 $1,916.84 Total losses due to business interruption $12.05 $180.43 81 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE The HAZUS -MH flood risk module was used to estimate damages to the municipality at the 100 and 500 return periods. These return periods correspond to flooding events that have a 1% and a 0.2% likelihood of occurring in any given year. Table -25 Estimated Damages from Flooding 100 Year Flood 500 Year Flood Building Characteristics Estimated total number of buildings 8,647 Estimated total building replacement value (2010 $) $3,275 Millions of dollars Building Damages # of buildings sustaining slight damage ( 1 -10 %) 129 149 # of buildings sustaining moderate damage (11 -50 %) 18 37 # of buildings sustaining substantial damage ( >50 %) 0 0 Value of Damages Total property damage (millions of dollars) $8.21 $12.04 Total losses due to business interruption $0.12 $0.57 82 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE V. HAZARD MITIGATION GOALS The Reading Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team reviewed and discussed the goals from the 2010 Hazard Mitigation Plan for the Town of Reading. The Team modified their 2010 goals to reflect a more inclusive and streamlined approach for this plan update. All of the goals are considered critical for the Town and they are not listed in order of importance. 1. Prevent and reduce the loss of life, injury, public health impacts and property damages resulting from all identified natural hazards. 2. Build and enhance local mitigation capabilities to ensure individual safety, reduce damage to public and private property and ensure continuity of emergency services. 3. Increase cooperation and coordination among private entities, Town officials and Boards, State agencies and Federal agencies. 4. Increase awareness of the benefits of hazard mitigation through outreach and education. VI. EXISTING MITIGATION MEASURES The existing protections in the Town of Reading are a combination of zoning, land use, and environmental regulations, infrastructure maintenance and drainage infrastructure improvement projects. Infrastructure maintenance generally addresses localized drainage clogging problems, while large scale capacity problems may require pipe replacement or invert elevation modifications. These more expensive projects are subject to the capital budget process and lack of funding is one of the biggest obstacles to completion of some of these. The Town's existing mitigation measures are listed by hazard type here and are summarized in Table 25 below. Flooding — Existing Town -wide mitigation Reading employs a number of practices to help minimize potential flooding and impacts from flooding, and to maintain existing drainage infrastructure. Existing Town -wide mitigation measures include the following: National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) — Reading participates in the NFIP with 36 policies in force as of the November 30, 2016. FEMA maintains a database on flood insurance policies and claims. This database can be found on the FEMA website at 83 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE hgps: / /www.fema. ov /policy- claim- statistics - flood - insurance /policy- claim - statistics- flood- insurance policy- claim -13 The following information is provided for the Town of Reading: Flood insurance policies in force ( as of November 30, 2016) 36 Coverage amount of flood insurance policies $9,473,200 Premiums paid $47,554 Total losses (all losses submitted regardless of the status) 21 Closed losses (Losses that have been paid) 18 Open losses (Losses that have not been paid in full) 0 CWOP losses ( Losses that have been closed without payment) 3 Total payments (Total amount paid on losses ) $63,750.43 The Town complies with the NFIP by enforcing floodplain regulations, maintaining up- to -date floodplain maps, and providing information to property owners and builders regarding floodplains and building requirements. Massachusetts State Building Code — The Massachusetts State Building Code contains many detailed regulations regarding wind loads, earthquake resistant design, flood - proofing, and snow loads. The Town has adopted the state building code. Street sweeping — The town does most of its street sweeping in -house but hires a contractor in the spring to supplement the towns' efforts. The town has two vacuum sweepers. Every street is swept once in the spring and other problem areas throughout the town are swept several times a year. Catch basin cleaning — The town has an older Vac -All and a catch basin cleaning truck. Every basin is cleaned every other year and all the work is done in- house. Stormwater utility — In 2007 the Town initiated a stormwater utility fee. All property owners receive a bill similar to their water and sewer bills. The fees go to a dedicated fund that the DPW may use for equipment and labor to maintain the drainage infrastructure. Roadway treatments — Because of the towns' reliance on groundwater, a salt and sand mix is used to treat the roads. Straight salt is used only when there are severe icing conditions. Otherwise, the town uses calcium chloride. The use of sand contributes to siltation in streams and within culverts. Plans and Studies: The Town has completed a study related to drainage issues including: 84 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Aberjona River and Saugus River Drainage Study Summary Report, AECOM, 2013. The objectives of this study were to: • Evaluate existing conditions along sections of Walkers Brook (tributary to Saugus River) and the Aberjona River; • Develop alternatives for improvement of the existing channels and conduits; • Identify recommended alternatives; • Provide an estimate of construction costs for recommended alternatives; and • Develop a proposed implementation schedule for the recommended alternatives. The Reading Zoning Bylaw Establishment and Purpose of Districts - The zoning bylaw establishes one overlay district relevant to hazard mitigation: the Flood Plain District. Section 10.1 of the zoning bylaw states that the purposes of the Floodplain District are to: • Ensure public safety through reducing the threats to life and personal injury; • Eliminate new hazards to emergency response officials; • Prevent the occurrence of public emergencies resulting from water quality, contamination and pollution due to flooding; • Avoid the loss of utility services which if damaged by flooding would disrupt or shut down the utility network and impact regions of the community beyond the site of flooding; • Eliminate costs associated with the response and cleanup of flooding conditions; • Reduce damage to public and private property resulting from flooding waters. The Floodplain District is established as an overlay district. The Floodplain District includes all special flood hazard areas within the Town of Reading designated as Zone A and AE on the Middlesex County Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for the administration of the National Flood Insurance Program. Certain uses are allowed as of right and others are allowed under a Special Permit from the Zoning Board of Appeals. FEMA updated its Flood Hazard mapping of Reading in 2010 and these maps were adopted at Town Meeting. Aquifer Protection District- Section 10.3 establishes an Aquifer Protection District. The APD covers the now unused well fields in northwest Reading along the Ipswich River and allows a limited percentage of impervious area to increase groundwater recharge and reduce runoff. Site Plan Requirements - Section 4.6.5.1 requires that all site plans must conform to the subdivision regulation and DEP storm water regulations. Site plans must minimize the area of wetland vegetation displaced and the extent of stormwater flow increase from the site, and soil erosion, and threat of water pollution. M, TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Stormwater Management Bylaw and Regulations- Reading is in the final stages of drafting a stormwater bylaw which it expects to adopt in 2017. The Town has established a stormwater enterprise fund and charges a stormwater fee based on the amount of impervious area found on the lot. Single and two- family homes pay a flat annual fee. The fees are used to clean and maintain the Town's stormwater drainage system. Subdivision Regulations- Section 7.4.4 of the Town's subdivision regulations require that all projects must meet the state's Department of Environmental Protection 1996 Stormwater Management Policy and any subsequent amendments to it. Section 6.2.3, Criteria for Decision, states that all Definitive Subdivision Plans must have available storm drainage capacity to accept stormwater runoff without adversely affecting other developed or undeveloped properties. Public Education on Stormwater -The Town DPW maintains a web page on stormwater management frequently asked questions at: hn://www.readingma.gov/collectoL/pages/storm-water-fags. Open Space and Recreation Plan — The Town's 2013 Open Space and Recreation Plan identifies the Town's open space areas, as well as properties that could be acquired for open space, which serve a number of different purposes including mitigation of flooding and storm damage. Goal Four of the plan is to "Protect open space for wildlife habitat and watershed protection ", with its objectives including to "Conserve and manage stormwater ", "Educate the public on habitat and watershed issues ", Acquire additional open space for wildlife habitat, wetlands protection and aquifer protection" and to "Monitor environmental threats imposed by development with and outside of Reading." Flooding — Existing Site Specific Mitigation 2010 Plan Flooding Areas of Concern mitigation measures and existing status. Sunnyside and Fairview Avenues- Flooding in the Sunnyside Avenue and Fairview Avenue area is due to undersized pipes. The recommended alternative involves increasing the size of the undersized pipes to provide a 25 -year level of service for this residential area. A gate structure would be integrated at the downstream end that would mitigate adverse downstream impacts due to the upsizing of the pipes. This site has not been mitigated since the 2010 plan and remains a high priority site. New Crossing Road at DPW Garage- A brook located in the upper Saugus River water backs up and floods New Crossing Road, the access road to the Reading DPW Department, during 0.02 percent chance storms. Public comment suggested that repairs to the sanitary sewer in the area may have impacted the area's drainage patterns. The stream culvert is undersized and needs replacing. This is a medium priority for the 2017 plan update. M TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Track Road at Line Road- the Track Road area is part of the Walker's Creek watershed area. There are three bridges crossing the creek, all of which impede drainage, but the Harvest Road Bridge presents the biggest drainage problems and the town has targeted it for rebuilding, although the exact date and cost are undetermined. There are also beaver dam issues blocking drainage. The town plans to stabilize the creek's banks and remove the beavers for now, as well rebuild the bridge in the future. This project remains a high priority for 2016. South Main Street- This is a MA DOT issue as Main Street serves as State Route 28 here. The state is considering reconstructing this section of Route 28. The roadway floods after 1.5 inches or rain. The storm drain line serving the area is undersized and needs to be replaced. - Flooding in the area is due to undersized pipes. The flood flow travels overland through the Enterprise Car Rental facility into the Percy Avenue / Main Street wetlands. The recommended alternative consists of adding a new outfall in the vicinity of Minot Street / Main Street and increasing the size of the pipes above the Minot Street / Main Street connection to provide a 25 -year level of service for this area. A gate structure would be integrated at the downstream end that would mitigate adverse downstream impacts due to the upsizing of the pipes. This mitigation action remains incomplete and remains a high priority for the town in the 2017 plan update. Brook and Ash Streets -- This area is part of Walkers Brook beginning at Ash Street and extending northeast to the Town's corporate boundary with Wakefield at the Salem Street / Route 129 rotary, and represents the most downstream portion of Walkers Brook within the Town. Downstream of this area, Walkers Brook feeds into the Saugus River in Wakefield. The drainage ditch for Brook and Ash Streets is over - silted and there are numerous problems with beaver dams within the upper watershed of Walker's Creek that prevents drainage. This site has not been mitigated since the 2010 plan and remains a high priority for the town in the 2017 plan update. Morgan Park- Another site associated with the upper Saugus River watershed area, the open channel that had been flooding the park area following rain events has been cleaned by the Town in 2008 when the new Parker turf field was installed. The site is no longer a priority and will not be carried forward for 2017. 150 West Street and surrounding streets- The West Street drainage system was rebuilt in the last five years and this area is no longer flooding. This site will not be carried forward for 2106 update. Lowell Street at Intervale Terrace- Located within the upper Aberjona watershed, this site has not been mitigated since 2010 but the Town considers this a high priority site for the 2017 plan. The stone -lined channel between Intervale Terrace and Lowell Street that backs up during heavy rain storms is slated for repair under Reading's Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). 87 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Willow Street /Austin Prep- This site has not been mitigated since the 2010 plan. This site floods due to the same drainage infrastructure problem listed in at Site #8, Lowell Street at Intervale. This is a high priority site for the 2017 plan update and should be remediated when the channel between Intervale and Lowell Street is improved under the Town's CIP actions for 2018. Main Street (Church of the Nazarenes) and neighboring streets- This site was mitigated within the last two years and no longer floods. It is no longer a priority for 2017and will not be carried forward. Milepost and Haystack Roads- This site was mitigated when a detention basin was constructed on the lot as part of the Calaruso's Restaurant development in 2011. The site is no longer a priority and will not be carried forward into the 2017 plan. Oak Ridge /Cherry Lane (was listed in 2010 plan as Pine Ridge /Cherry Hill)- Located behind Joshua Eaton, this site was partially mitigated when drainage work by Reading on Pennsylvania Avenue relieved runoff to the area. There are still flooding concerns where ditch discharge goes into the open field behind Joshua Eaton and the site is low priority for the 2017 plan update. Haverhill Street at the Town line- This site is a drainage culvert located near where Bear Meadow Brook flows under Haverhill Street close to the boundary with North Reading. Localized flooding of 6 -12 inches occurs on Haverhill Street occurs following very large rain events. The culvert needs to be cleaned on a regular basis. This site remains a medium priority for the 2017 plan update. Dams There are no permitted dams in Reading. Existing Wind Hazard Mitigation Measures Tree - trimming program — The Town has a Park and Forestry Division with a four person crew, a brush grinder and a bucket truck. The crew does preventative maintenance and clean -up after storms on all Town owned property. The Reading Municipal Light Department also maintains power line areas. Vegetation management plan- The Town conducts an annual survey of all its street trees to check for dead or dying trees or limbs that need to be pruned back. It responds to Reading residents calls on trees that need maintenance and removes hazardous trees as needed. The Parks and Forestry Division also recycles all trees, chips and brush as part of the Town's recycling and composting programs. 88 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Massachusetts State Building Code — The Town enforces the Massachusetts State Building Code whose provisions are generally adequate to protect against most wind damage. The code's provisions are the most cost - effective mitigation measure against tornados given the extremely low probability of occurrence. If a tornado were to occur, the potential for severe damages would be extremely high. Existing Winter Hazard Mitigation Measures Roadway treatments — Because the Town now relies primarily on the MWRA for its drinking water supply it uses little sand and instead uses calcium chloride to treat roadway areas because the use of groundwater for drinking water is now quite limited. Catch basin Cleaning: The Reading DPW clears snow from clogged catch basins to prevent flooding. Massachusetts State Building Code: The Town enforces the Massachusetts State Building Code, which contains regulations regarding snow loads on building roofs. The Town has adopted the state building code. Existing Brush Fire Hazard Mitigation Measures Permits required for outdoor burning - Open burning of brush is allowed by permit only from January 1511 to May 11 t each year provided the following conditions are met: 1. Burning shall be limited to brush, branches, cane, driftwood, and forest debris from other than commercial land clearing operations. No open burning of grass, hay leaves, stumps, tires, or rubbish allowed. 2. Permits are valid for two (2) days and may be purchased for $15.00 in advance at the Reading Fire Department. 3. Permit holders who desire to bum must. each day for permission to burn. No fire shall be started before 10:00 a.m. and all fires shall be fully extinguished by 4:00 p.m. of the same day. Subdivision review - The Fire Department is involved in reviewing subdivision plans from conceptual design through occupancy to ensure that there is adequate access for fire trucks and an adequate water supply. Existing Geologic Hazard Mitigation Measures Massachusetts State Building Code — The State Building Code, updated in 2010, contains a section on designing for earthquake loads (780 CMR 1612.0). Section 1612.1 states that the purpose of these provisions is "to minimize the hazard to life to occupants of all buildings and non - building structures, to increase the expected performance of higher occupancy structures as compared to ordinary structures, and to improve the capability of essential facilities to function during and after an earthquake ". This section goes on to state that due to the complexity of seismic design, the criteria presented are the minimum 89 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE considered to be "prudent and economically justified" for the protection of life safety. The code also states that absolute safety and prevention of damage, even in an earthquake event with a reasonable probability of occurrence, cannot be achieved economically for most buildings. Section 1612.2.5 sets up seismic hazard exposure groups and assigns all buildings to one of these groups according to Table 1612.2.5. Group II includes buildings which have a substantial public hazard due to occupancy or use and Group III are those buildings having essential facilities which are required for post- earthquake recovery, including fire, rescue and police stations, emergency rooms, power - generating facilities, and communications facilities. Existing Multihazard Mitigation Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) allocates funding over 5 year periods for stormwater improvements and flood prevention. Some of the projects in the CIP for drainage infrastructure and flood prevention originated from the comprehensive water and drainage study the Town completed in 2013. Stormwater CIP projects include: Bond Street Drainage Improvements I FY17 1 $ 80,000 Grove Street Drainage I FY17 I $ 150,000 Sturgis Park Bank Stabilization /Headwall I FY18 I $ 200,000 Main Street Drainage I FY18 I $ 900,000 Minot Street Drainage I FY18 I $ 450,000 Saugus River Improvements I FY24 I $ 4,000,000 Aberjona River Improvements I FY24 I $ 2,200,000 Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan (CEMP) Every community in Massachusetts is required to have a Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. These plans address mitigation, preparedness, response and recovery from a variety of natural and man -made emergencies. These plans contain important information regarding flooding, hurricanes, tornadoes, dam failures, earthquakes, and .E TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE winter storms. Therefore, the CEMP is a mitigation measure that is relevant to all of the hazards discussed in this plan. The Town of Reading's current CEMP was updated in 2016. Emergency Management Team (EMT) Reading is a member of the 16- community Mystic Region Emergency Planning Committee. The Mystic REPC meets 10 times during the year and works to conduct and coordinate emergency exercises and procedures throughout the area encompassed by its members. Natural Hazards Public Education- Reading's Public Health Services maintains a link to a Public Health Emergency Prep Guide at: http://www.readingma.gov/sites/readingma/files/file/file/emerg planning guide.12df Table 26- Summary Existing Hazard Mitigation Measures Hazard Area Mitigation Measure Update /comments Flooding Town -wide Participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Effective / 36 policies in force Massachusetts Building Code Effective Flood lain District Updated /Effective Stormwater Management Bylaw and Regulations Adopt in 2017 Street sweeping Effective Catch basin cleaning Effective Zoning: Site Plan Review, Planned Unit Development Stormwater Management, Planned Residential Development, Gateway Smart Growth District Effective Stormwater Enterprise Fund Effective Town cleans & inspects catch basins every other year. Effective Public Education on Stormwater Effective 2013 Open Space and Recreation Plan Effective Existing Site Specific Flooding Mitigation Effective Wind Town -wide Town tree - pruning management follows MGL Chapter 87 Effective Recycling ro ram for brush, trees and chips Effective Vegetation management plan for rights of way Effective State Building Code addresses wind standards Effective for new construction 91 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 26- Summary Existing Hazard Mitigation Measures Hazard Area Mitigation Measure Update /comments Winter- Town -wide Regular snow removal operations and roadway Effective Related treatments Catch basin cleaning to maintain drainage Effective State Building Code addresses snow load Effective for new standards construction Fire Town -wide Outdoor burning permits Effective Fire Town -wide Subdivision review Effective Geologic Town -wide State Building Code addresses earthquake Effective for new standards construction / Town has many older buildings Multi Town -wide Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Effective/Up to hazard date Multi Town -wide Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan Effective /Up to hazard (CEMP) date Multi Town -wide Emergency Management Team (EMT) Effective hazard Multi- Town -wide Public Health Emergency Prep Guide Somewhat hazard effective; links should be updated to include reference to natural hazards planning and response 2006 Master Plan Add Climate Adaptation to next plan update Local Capacity for Implementation Under the Massachusetts system of "Home Rule," the Town of Reading is authorized to adopt and from time to time amend a number of local bylaws and regulations that support the town's capabilities to mitigate natural hazards. These include Zoning Bylaws, Subdivision and Site Plan Review Regulations, Wetlands Bylaws, Health Regulations, Public Works regulations, and local enforcement of the State Building Code. Local Bylaws may be amended each year at the annual Town Meeting to improve the town's 92 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE capabilities, and changes to most regulations simply require a public hearing and a vote of the authorized board or commission, such as the Community Planning and Development Board or Conservation Commission. The Town of Reading has recognized several existing mitigation measures that require implementation or improvements, and has the capacity within its local boards and departments to address these. The Reading Department of Public Works and Engineering Department will address the needs for catch basin cleaning, repairs and upgrades to drainage infrastructure. The Town's Community Planning and Development Commission will address the updates to the Master Plan and implementation of the Zoning Ordinance, Floodplain District, and Subdivision Rules and Regulations. The Conservation Commission will oversee implementation of the Wetlands Bylaw and the Open Space Plan. The Department of Public Works together with the Community Planning and Development Commission and Conservation Commission will coordinate implementation and enforcement of the Stormwater Bylaw. VII. MITIGATION MEASURES FROM THE 2010 PLAN Implementation Status of the Previous Plan At a meeting of the Reading Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee, Town staff reviewed the mitigation measures identified in the 2010 Reading Hazard Mitigation Plan and determined whether each measure had been implemented or deferred. Of those measures that had been deferred, the committee evaluated whether the measure should be deleted or carried forward into this Hazard Mitigation Plan 2017Update. The decision on whether to delete or retain a particular measure was based on the committee's assessment of the continued relevance or effectiveness of the measure and whether the deferral of action on the measure was due to the inability of the Town to take action on the measure. Table 27 summarizes the status of mitigation measures, and mitigation projects completed are described in more detail below. 93 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 27- Mitigation Measures from the 2010 Plan Mitigation Lead Current Status Include in Measure Priority Implementation 2017 Plan/Priority 1. Sunnyside and High DPW Not completed: Fairview Aves. The recommended alternative Yes- High involves increasing the size of the undersized pipes to provide a 25- year level of service for this residential area. 2. New Crossing High DPW Not completed: at the DPW A brook located Garage in the upper Yes- High Saugus River watershed backs up and floods Causeway Road, the access road to the Reading DPW Department, The stream culvert is undersized and needs replacing 3. Track Road at High Not completed: Line Road The town plans to rebuild the Yes- High bridge, remove beavers and stabilize stream banks. 4. South Main High MA DOT- Route Not completed: Street 28 The storm drain Yes -High line serving the area is undersized and needs to be replaced. a, TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Mitigation Lead Current Status Include in Measure Priority Implementation 2017 Plan/Priority 5. Brook and High DPW Not Completed: Yes -High Ash Streets The drainage ditch for Brook and Ash Street is over - silted and there are numerous problems with beaver dams within the upper watershed of Walker's Creek that prevents drainage. 6. Morgan Park High DPW Completed: The open channel No that had been flooding the park area following rain events has been cleaned by the Town when the new Parker School turf field was installed. 7. 150 West High DPW Completed: The Street and West Street No surrounding drainage system streets was rebuilt in the last five years and this area is no longer flooding 8. Lowell Street High DPW Not completed: at Intervale Stone -lined Terrace channel between Yes -High Intervale and Lowell Street that backs up during flooding events TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Mitigation Lead Current Status Include in Measure Priority Implementation 2017 Plan/Priority 9. Willow Medium DPW Not completed: Street /Austin This site floods Yes -High Prep due to the same drainage infrastructure problem Lowell Street at Intervale 10. Main Street Medium DPW Completed: This (Church of the site was No Nazarene) and mitigated within neighboring the last two years streets. and no longer floods. 1 l.Milepost and Medium DPW Completed: This Haystack Roads site was No mitigated when a detention basin was constructed on the lot as part of the Calaruso's Restaurant development in 2011 12. Oak Medium DPW Not completed: Ridge /Cherry this site was Yes - Medium Lane (was listed partially in 2010 plan as mitigated when Pine drainage work Ridge /Cherry by Reading on Hill Pennsylvania Avenue relieved runoff to the area. There are still flooding concerns where ditch discharge goes into the open field behind Joshua Eaton W, TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Mitigation Lead Current Status Include in Measure Priority Implementation 2017 Plan/Priority 13 Haverhill Low Conservation Not completed: Street at the town Commission Localized Yes- Medium line flooding of 6 -12 inches occurs on Haverhill Street occurs following very large rain events. 14. Brush Fires — High Fire Completed: The No Additional Town has firefighting acquired the equipment equipment and (lightweight hose this is not an and portable issue for the small pumps) 2017 plan update 15. Review and Medium Planning /Conser Partially No revise local vation /Engineers completed: The bylaws and ng Conservation regulations on Commission storm water and updated its floodplains regulations in 2012. The Town is reviewing and planning to adopt a stormwater management bylaw in 2017 16. Land Medium Conservation No parcels were Yes Acquisition / acquired since Protection of 2010 and there Open Space are no specific target parcels: Ongoing long term 17. Hunt Medium DPW Completed: No Memorial Park Channel causing flooding was dredged 97 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Mitigation Measure Priority Lead Implementation Current Status Include in 2017 Plan/Priority 18. Hopkins Medium DPW Completed: No Street retention pond and drainage work done 19. Water Low DPW Completed: plant No treatment plant decommissioned with switch to MWRA; minor flooding on access road to it Reading has made considerable progress on implementing mitigation measures identified in the 2010 Hazard Mitigation Plan, including upgrading drainage at Morgan Park, the West Street neighborhood, Main Street near Church of the Nazarene, and the area near Milepost and Haystack Roads. It also added new forest firefighting equipment and adopted a new Open Space and Recreation plan in 2013. The Town completed a comprehensive drainage study for portions of the Aberjona and Saugus River watersheds located within Reading in 2013 and has incorporated drainage system upgrades into a comprehensive and ongoing capital improvement planning and implementation process. The Town also adopted new conservation regulations, and is working to complete its stormwater management bylaw. Overall, nine mitigation measures from the 2010 plan will be carried forward in the plan update, mostly drainage projects that were identified by the 2013 drainage study. Moving forward into the next five year plan implementation period there will be many more opportunities to incorporate hazard mitigation into the Town's decision making processes. The challenges the Town faces in implementing these measures are primarily due to limited funding and available staff time. This plan should help the Town prioritize the best use of its limited resources for enhanced mitigation of natural hazards. 98 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE VIII. HAZARD MITIGATION STRATEGY What is Hazard Mitigation? Hazard mitigation means to permanently reduce or alleviate the losses of life, injuries and property resulting from natural hazards through long -term strategies. These long -term strategies include planning, policy changes, education programs, infrastructure projects and other activities. FEMA currently has three mitigation grant programs: the Hazards Mitigation Grant Program (HGMP), the Pre - Disaster Mitigation program (PDM), and the Flood Mitigation Assistance (FMA) program. The three links below provide additional information on these programs. http://www.fema.gov/government/grant/hmgl2/index.shtm http• / /www.fema.gov /government/ rg ant /pdm /index.shtm httD://www.fema.gov/government/grant/fma/index.shtm Hazard Mitigation Measures can generally be sorted into the following groups: • Prevention: Government administrative or regulatory actions or processes that influence the way land and buildings are developed and built. These actions also include public activities to reduce hazard losses. Examples include planning and zoning, building codes, capital improvement programs, open space preservation, and stormwater management regulations. • Property Protection: Actions that involve the modification of existing buildings or infrastructure to protect them from a hazard or removal from the hazard area. Examples include acquisition, elevation, relocation, structural retrofits, flood proofing, storm shutters, and shatter resistant glass. • Public Education & Awareness: Actions to inform and educate citizens, elected officials, and property owners about the potential risks from hazards and potential ways to mitigate them. Such actions include outreach projects, real estate disclosure, hazard information centers, and school -age and adult education programs. • Natural Resource Protection: Actions that, in addition to minimizing hazard losses also preserve or restore the functions of natural systems. These actions include sediment and erosion control, stream corridor restoration, watershed management, forest and vegetation management, and wetland restoration and preservation. • Structural Projects: Actions that involve the construction of structures to reduce the impact of a hazard. Such structures include storm water controls (e.g., culverts), floodwalls, seawalls, retaining walls, and safe rooms. • Emergency Services Protection: Actions that will protect emergency services before, during, and immediately after an occurrence. Examples of these actions include protection of warning system capability, protection of critical facilities, and protection of emergency response infrastructure. (Source: FEMA Local Multi- Hazard Mitigation Planning Guidance) TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Regional and Inter - Community Considerations Some hazard mitigation issues are strictly local. The problem originates primarily within the municipality and can be solved at the municipal level. Other issues are inter - community issues that involve cooperation between two or more municipalities. There is a third level of mitigation which is regional; involving a state, regional or federal agency or an issue that involves three or more municipalities. Regional Partners In the densely developed communities of the study area, mitigating natural hazards, particularly flooding, is more than a local issue. The drainage systems that serve these communities are a complex system of storm drains, roadway drainage structures, pump stations and other facilities owned and operated by a wide array of agencies including but not limited to the Town of Reading, the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR), the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority (MWRA), Massachusetts Department of Transportation (MA DOT) and the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA). The planning, construction, operations and maintenance of these structures are integral to the flood hazard mitigation efforts of communities. These agencies must be considered the communities regional partners in hazard mitigation. These agencies also operate under the same constraints as communities do including budgetary and staffing constraints and numerous competing priorities. In the sections that follow, the plan includes recommendations for activities to be undertaken by these other agencies. Implementation of these recommendations will require that all parties work together to develop solutions. Inter - Community Considerations Saugus River Watershed — As in the 2010 plan, the Town of Reading recognizes that planned improvements within Reading may impact communities downstream and therefore, the mitigation of flood damage to roadways and properties within the Saugus River watershed is a true urban challenge making resolution of flooding in this watershed the town's highest priority. Main Street, MA SR 28- This section of Main Street is a state highway maintained by MA DOT. The drain line serving the section is undersized and needs to be replaced. There is an undersized granite culvert that runs under State Route 28 that impacts the Fairchild Drive neighborhood during heavy precipitation events that need to be cleaned by MA DOT. Finally, during heavy snow events, MA DOT plows sometimes leave large snow drifts in front of Reading residents' homes and driveways on Route 28, blocking access. One public comment noted that flooding on Track Road impacts houses in neighboring 100 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Wakefield and it related to a MA DOT culvert that crosses State Route 129. Process for Setting Priorities for Mitigation Measures The last step in developing Reading's mitigation strategy is to assign a level of priority to each mitigation measure so as to guide the focus of the Town's limited resources towards those actions with the greatest potential benefit. At this stage in the process, the Local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team had limited access to detailed analyses of the cost and benefits of any given mitigation measure, so prioritization is based on the local team members' understanding of existing and potential hazard impacts and an approximate sense of the costs associated with pursuing any given mitigation measure. Priority setting was based on local knowledge of the hazard areas, including impacts of hazard events, the extent of the area impacted, and the relation of a given mitigation measure to the Town's goals. In addition, the local Hazard Mitigation Planning Team also took into consideration factors such as the number of homes and businesses affected, whether or not road closures occurred and what impact closures had on delivery of emergency services and the local economy, anticipated project costs, whether any environmental constraints existed, and whether the Town would be able to justify the costs relative to the anticipated benefits. Table 28 below demonstrates the prioritization of the Town's potential hazard mitigation measures. For each mitigation measure, the geographic extent of the potential benefiting area is identified as is an estimate of the overall benefit and cost of the measures. The benefits, costs, and overall priority were evaluated in terms of: Estimated Benefits High Action will result in a significant reduction of hazard risk to people and /or property from a hazard event Medium Action will likely result in a moderate reduction of hazard risk to people and /or property from a hazard event Low Action will result in a low reduction of hazard risk to people and /or property from a hazard event Estimated Costs High Estimated costs greater than $100,000 Medium Estimated costs between $10,000 to $100,000 Low Estimated costs less than $10,000 and /or staff time Priority 101 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE High Action very likely to have political and public support and necessary maintenance can occur following the project, and the costs seem reasonable considering likely benefits from the measure Medium Action may have political and public support and necessary maintenance has potential to occur following the project Low Not clear if action has political and public support and not certain that necessary maintenance can occur following the project 102 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 28- Mitigation Measure Prioritization Mitigation Action Geographic ' Estimated Estimated priori tY Covera e Benefit Cost Flood Hazard Mitigation Sunnyside and Fairview Sunnyside and Aves.- Upgrade undersized Fairview High High High drainage pipes and install Aves. gate structure neighborhood New Crossing@ DPW New Crossing Medium High Medium Garage -. The stream culvert Road area is undersized and needs replacing. Track Road at Line Road- Walker's High High High The town plans to stabilize Creek the creek's banks and watershed remove the beavers for now, neighborhood as well rebuild the bridge in area the future South Main Street -. The Main High High High storm drain line serving the Street /Route area is undersized and needs 28 to be replaced. - Flooding in the area is due to undersized pipes Brook and Ash Streets- The Brook and High High High drainage ditch for Brook and Ash St. Ash Street is over - silted and Neighborhood there are numerous problems with beaver dams within the upper watershed of Walker's Creek that prevents drainage. Stream will be cleaned and beavers relocated. Lowell Street at Intervale Lowell Street High High High Terrace- Old, small stone and Intervale culvert that backs up during Terrace flood events will be replaced neighborhood with larger culvert. Willow Street /Austin Prep- Willow High High High This site floods due to the St. /Austin same culvert problem listed Prep area for Lowell Street at Intervale 103 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 28- Mitigation Measure Prioritization Mitigation Action Geographic ` Estimated Estimated Priority Coverage Benefit Cost Oak Ridge /Cherry Lane- Oak Ridge Medium Low Low Drainage culvert that needs and Cherry cleaning on a bi- annual Lane area basis. Haverhill Street at the Town Haverhill Medium High Medium Line -- This site is a drainage Street area culvert located near where Bear Meadow Brook flows under Haverhill Street close to the boundary with North Reading. Localized flooding of 6 -12 inches occurs on Haverhill Street occurs following very large rain events. The culvert needs to be upgraded. Grove Street- needs drainage Grove Street Medium High Medium system upgrade as the neighborhood culvert draining area is too small. Fairchild Drive- undersized Fairchild Low Low Low granite culvert running Drive under Route 28 needs to be localized cleaned. This is a MA DOT impact responsibility Duck Road/Main Street- Localized Low High Medium area floods during heavy flooding rain events here due to undersized draina a culverts Wind Mitigation Measures` Update the town -owned tree Town -wide High Low Medium inventory and risk assessment data base Brushfire Mitigation Install new cellular tower to carry fire /police and Town -wide High High High emergency radio signals. Winter Storm Hazard Mit` anon Evaluate public buildings for Town -Wide Medium Low Low ability to withstand snow 104 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 28- Mitigation Measure Prioritization Mitigation Action Geographic ' Estimated Estimated Priority Coverage Benefit Cost loads; retrofit if needed to greatest degree feasible. Work with MA DOT to Portions of eliminate drifting and Route 28 Medium Low Low blocking in of houses on localized Route 28 by state plows impact Earth qua Mitigation Determine which buildings may be most vulnerable to earthquake damage and conduct a structural Town -Wide Medium Low Low assessment if needed. Assess the vulnerability of roadways and utilities in high liquefaction Localized Low Low Low susceptibility areas. Dam Mitigation There are no town- NA NA NA NA owned dams in Reading. Extreme Temperature Mitigation Site Design to increase tree plantings near buildings, increase the percentage of trees used Town -Wide Medium Medium Medium in parking areas, and along public ways. Promote Green Building and Cool Roof designs Town -Wide Medium Low Medium Assess placement of cooling centers at Town -wide Medium High schools, senior center and emergency shelters. Drought Miti ation Promote drought tolerant Town -Wide Medium Low Medium 105 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 28- Mitigation Measure Prioritization Mitigation Action Geographic Estimated Estimated Priority Coverage Benefit Cost landscaping and site design measures Climate Resilience /Ada tatioa Incorporate climate resilience /adaptation Town -Wide High Medium High components into the next Master Plan update. Potential Mitigation Measures The potential mitigation measures are provided in this section and summarized in Table 28. Flooding and Drainage Infrastructure Reading completed a comprehensive drainage study for the Aberjona River and the Saugus River in 2013. The objectives of the study were to: • Evaluate existing conditions along sections of Walker's Brook (tributary to Saugus River) and the Aberjona River • Develop alternatives for improvement of the existing channels and conduits; • Identify recommended alternatives • Provide an estimate of construction costs for recommended alternatives; and • Develop a proposed implementation schedule for the recommended alternatives. Many of the flooding and drainage infrastructure projects listed in this plan update originated from the 2013 study and the Town has since adopted a regular five year Capital Improvements Program which is being used to address infrastructure needs including those for drainage, fire and winter storms. Potential flooding and drainage mitigation measures are detailed in Table 29. Wind Hazards The Town would like to update its current public tree inventory and risk assessment database. While the Tree Warden conducts regular "windshield surveys" of the Town's trees near public right of ways and responds to public calls to remove dead or diseased trees, updating the database would make the program more effective and help prevent future wind damage. 106 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Fire Hazards Install new cellular tower to carry fire /police and emergency radio signals. Replacing the current cell tower mounted on the one of the Town's water tanks will allow faster response times and improved communications for all fire coverage, including brush fires, police and emergency provider response. One public comment also suggested that alternatives to replacing the cell tower include a reliance on older radio technology should be considered. Winter Hazards Evaluate public buildings for ability to withstand snow loads; retrofit if needed to greatest degree feasible. Earthquakes Earthquake building assessment — Determine which buildings may be most vulnerable to earthquake damage and conduct a structural assessment if needed. Earthquake infrastructure assessment— Assess the vulnerability of roadways and utilities in high liquefaction susceptibility areas. Extreme Temperatures Site Design guidelines to increase tree plantings near buildings, increase the percentage of trees used in parking areas, and along public ways. Promote guidelines for Green Building and Cool Roof designs. Assess placement of cooling centers at schools, senior center and emergency shelters. Drought Promote guidelines for drought tolerant landscaping and site design measures. Climate Change Incorporate climate resilience /adaptation components into the Town's next Master Plan update. The Master Plan was last updated in 2006. 107 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Introduction to Potential Mitigation Measures Table (Table 29) Description of the Mitigation Measure — The description of each mitigation measure is brief and cost information is given only if cost data were already available from the community. The cost data represent a point in time and would need to be adjusted for inflation and for any changes or refinements in the design of a particular mitigation measure. Priority — As described above and summarized in Table 29, the designation of high, medium, or low priority was done considering potential benefits and estimated project costs, as well as other factors in the STAPLEE analysis. Implementation Responsibility — The designation of implementation responsibility was done based on a general knowledge of what each municipal department is responsible for. It is likely that most mitigation measures will require that several departments work together and assigning staff is the sole responsibility of the governing body of each community. Time Frame — The time frame was based on a combination of the priority for that measure, the complexity of the measure and whether or not the measure is conceptual, in design, or already designed and awaiting funding. Because the time frame for this plan is five years, the timing for all mitigation measures has been kept within this framework. The identification of a likely time frame is not meant to constrain a community from taking advantage of funding opportunities as they arise. Potential Funding Sources — This column attempts to identify the most likely sources of funding for a specific measure. The information on potential funding sources in this table is preliminary and varies depending on a number of factors. These factors include whether or not a mitigation measure has been studied, evaluated or designed, or if it is still in the conceptual stages. MEMA and DCR assisted MAPC in reviewing the potential eligibility for hazard mitigation funding. Each grant program and agency has specific eligibility requirements that would need to be taken into consideration. In most instances, the measure will require a number of different funding sources. Identification of a potential funding source in this table does not guarantee that a project will be eligible for, or selected for funding. Upon adoption of this plan, the local team responsible for its implementation should begin to explore the funding sources in more detail. Additional information on funding sources — The best way to determine eligibility for a particular funding source is to review the project with a staff person at'the funding agency. The following websites provide an overview of programs and funding sources. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) — The website for the North Atlantic district office is http: / /www.nae.usace.army.mil /. The ACOE provides assistance in a number of types of projects including shoreline /stream bank protection, flood damage reduction, flood plain management services and planning services. 108 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency (MEMA) — The grants page http• / /www.mass_gov /dem /programs /mitigate /grants.htm has a useful table that compares eligible projects for the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program and the Flood Mitigation Assistance Program. Abbreviations Used in Table 29 FEMA Mitigation Grants includes: FMA = Flood Mitigation Assistance Program. HMGP = Hazard Mitigation Grant Program. PDM = Pre - Disaster Mitigation Program ACOE = Army Corps of Engineers. DHS/EOPS = Department of Homeland Security /Emergency Operations DEP (SRF) = Department of Environmental Protection (State Revolving Fund) USDA = United States Department of Agriculture MA DOT = Massachusetts Department of Transportation DCR = MA Department of Conservation and Recreation CIP= Capital Improvement Program HMPT= Hazard Mitigation Planning Team CIP= Capital Improvement Plan 109 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 29 — Potential Mitigation Measures Mitigation Lead Time Estimated Potential Funding Measure Priority Implementation Frame Cost Sources FLOODING Sunnyside and Fairview High Public Works Long High -part Reading Capital Aves.- Upgrade undersized Term of larger Improvement drainage pipes and install FY Saugus Plan/Town Bond gate structure 2024 River (CIP) remediatio n package $2.5-4.0 million New Crossing@ DPW Medium Public Works Long High Reading Capital Garage -. The stream culvert Term $300,000 Improvement is undersized and needs FY Plan/Town Bond replacing. 2021 (CIP) Track Road at Line Road- High Public Works Short High MA Small Bridge The town plans to stabilize Term $500,000 Replacement the creek's banks and 2017- Program remove the beavers for now, 2019 as well rebuild the bridge in the future South Main Street /State High Public Works Short High MA DOT/ Reading Route 28 -. The storm drain Term $900,000 CIP /Town Bond line serving the area is FY undersized and needs to be 2018 replaced. - Flooding in the area is due to undersized pipes Brook and Ash Streets- The High Public Works Long High -part Reading Capital drainage ditch for Brook and Term of larger Improvement Ash Street is over - silted and FY Saugus Plan/Town Bond there are numerous problems 2024 River (CIP) with beaver dams within the remediatio upper watershed of Walker's n package Creek that prevents drainage. $2.5-4.0 Stream will be cleaned and million beavers relocated. 110 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 29 — Potential Mitigation Measures Mitigation Lead Time Estimated Potential Funding Measure Priority Implementation Frame Cost Sources Lowell Street at Intervale- High Public Works Long High- part Reading CIP /Town Old, small stone ,culvert that Term of larger Bond backs up during flood events FY Aberjona will be replaced with larger 2024 River culvert. remediatio n package $2.2 million Willow Street /Austin Prep- High Public Works Short High- part Reading CIP /Town This site floods due to the Term of larger Bond same culvert problem listed 2018 Aberjona for Lowell Street at Intervale River remediatio n package $2.2 million Oak Ridge /Cherry Lane- Low Public Works Long Medium Reading DPW Drainage culvert that needs Term $5,000- Budget cleaning on a bi- annual 2017- $10,000 basis. 20124 Bi- annually Haverhill Street at the Town Medium Public Works Medium High Reading CIP /Town Line -- This site is a drainage 2019- $150,000 Bond culvert located near where 2020 Bear Meadow Brook flows under Haverhill Street close to the boundary with North Reading. Localized flooding of 6 -12 inches occurs on Haverhill Street occurs following very large rain events. The culvert needs to be upgraded. Grove Street- needs drainage Medium Public Works Short High Reading CIP /Town system upgrade as the Term $300,000 Bond culvert draining area is too FY small. 2017 and 2018 111 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 29 — Potential Mitigation Measures Mitigation Lead Time Estimated Potential Funding Measure Priority Implementation Frame Cost Sources Fairchild Drive- undersized Low Public Works Long Medium MA DOT granite culvert running under Term $5,000- Route 28 needs to be 2017- $10,000 cleaned. This is a MA DOT 2024 Bi- annually responsibility Duck Road /Main Street- Medium Public Works Medium High Reading CIP /Town area floods during heavy rain 2019- $150,000 Bond events here due to 2020 undersized drainage culverts WIND RELATED HAZARDS Medium DPW Long Low Reading DPW Update the town -owned tree Term Staff time Budget inventory and risk 2017 -2022 assessment data base BRUSHFIRES High Fire Short High CIP Reading Install new cellular tower to Term $500,000 CIP /Town Bond carry fire /police and 2017 -2018 emergency radio signals. WINTER STORMS Evaluate public buildings for Low Building/HMPT Long Low Staff time / Town ability to withstand snow Term Estimated general operating loads; retrofit if needed to 2017 -2024 costs less budget greatest degree feasible. than $10,000 and /or staff time Work with MA DOT to Low Public Works Long Low CIP Staff time / eliminate drifting and Term Estimated Town general blocking in of houses on 2017 -2024 costs less operating budget Route 28 by state plows. than $10,000 and /or staff time EARTHQUAKES 112 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 29 — Potential Mitigation Measures Mitigation Lead Time Estimated Potential Funding Measure Priority Implementation Frame Cost Sources Determine which buildings Low Building/HMPT Long Low Staff time/ Town may be most vulnerable to Term Estimated general operating earthquake damage and TBD costs less budget conduct a structural than assessment if needed. $10,000 and /or staff time Assess the vulnerability of Low Public Long Low Staff time/ Town roadways and utilities in Works /HMPT Term Estimated general operating high liquefaction 2017 -2024 costs less budget susceptibility areas. than $10,000 and /or staff time EXTREME TEMPERATURES Site Design to increase tree Medium Planning / Long Low Staff time / Town plantings near buildings, Conservation Term Estimated general operating increase the percentage of 2017- costs less budget trees used in parking areas, 2024 than and along public ways. $10,000 and /or staff time Promote Green Building and High Building/Planning Long Lo Staff time / Town Cool Roof designs. Term Estimated general operating 2017- costs less budget 2024 than $10,000 and /or staff time w Assess placement of cooling High Fire /HMPT Short Low Staff time / Town centers at schools, senior Term Estimated general operating center and emergency 2017- costs less budget shelters. 2018 than $10,000 and /or staff time DROUGHT 113 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Table 29 — Potential Mitigation Measures Mitigation Lead Time Estimated Potential Funding Measure Priority Implementation Frame Cost Sources Promote drought tolerant Medium Planning / Long Low Staff time/ Town landscaping and site Conservation Term Estimated general operating design measures. 2017- costs less budget 2022 than $10,000 and /or staff time CLIMATE RESILIENCE / ADAPTATION Incorporate climate High HMPT /Planning/ Long Medium Town general resilience /adaptation Conservation/ Term Estimated operating funds / components into the next Public Works/ 2017- costs Staff time Comprehensive Plan. Public Health 2022 between $10,000 to $100,000 114 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE IX. PLAN ADOPTION AND MAINTENANCE Plan Adoption The Reading Hazard Mitigation Plan 2017 Update was adopted by the Board of Selectmen on [ADD DATE]. See Appendix D for documentation. The plan was approved by FEMA on [ADD DATE] for a five -year period that will expire on [ADD DATE]. — To be completed following MEMA and FEMA review. Plan Maintenance Although several of the mitigation measures from the Town's previous Hazard Mitigation Plan have been implemented, since that plan was adopted there has not been an ongoing local process to guide implementation of the plan. Such a process is needed over the next five years for the implementation of this plan update, and will be structured as described below. MAPC worked with the Reading Hazard Mitigation Planning Team to prepare this plan. After approval of the plan by FEMA, this group will meet on a regular basis, at least annually, to function as the Hazard Mitigation Implementation Team, with the Director of Public Works designated as the coordinator. Additional members could be added to the local implementation team from businesses, non - profits and institutions. The Town will encourage public participation during the next 5 -year planning cycle. As updates and a review of the plan are conducted by the Hazard Mitigation Implementation Team, these will be placed on the Town's web site, and any meetings of the Hazard Mitigation Implementation Team will be publicly noticed in accordance with Town and state open meeting laws. Implementation and Evaluation Schedule Mid -Term Survey on Progress— The coordinator of the Hazard Mitigation Implementation Team will prepare and distribute a survey in year three of the plan. The survey will be distributed to all of the local implementation group members and other interested local stakeholders. The survey will poll the members on any changes or revisions to the plan that may be needed, progress and accomplishments for implementation, and any new hazards or problem areas that have been identified. This information will be used to prepare a report or addendum to the local hazard mitigation plan in order to evaluate its effectiveness in meeting the plan's goals and identify areas that need to be updated in the next plan. The Hazard Mitigation Implementation Team, coordinated by the Director of Public Works, will have primary responsibility for tracking progress and updating the plan. Begin to 1repare for the next Plan Update -- Given the lead time needed to secure funding and conduct the planning process, the Hazard Mitigation Implementation Team will 115 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE begin to prepare for an update of the plan in year three. The team will use the information from the Mid -Term progress review to identify the needs and priorities for the plan update and seek funding for the plan update process. Potential sources of funding may include FEMA Pre - Disaster Mitigation grants and the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program. Both grant programs can pay for 75% of a planning project, with a 25% local cost share required. Prepare and Adopt an Updated Local Hazard Mitigation Plan — FEMA's approval of this plan is valid for five years, by which time an updated plan must be approved by FEMA in order to maintain the Town's approved plan status and its eligibility for FEMA mitigation grants. Once the resources have been secured to update the plan, the Hazard Mitigation Implementation Team may decide to undertake the update themselves, contract with the Metropolitan Area Planning Council to update the plan or to hire another consultant. However the Hazard Mitigation Implementation Team decides to update the plan, the group will need to review the current FEMA hazard mitigation plan guidelines for any changes. The Reading Hazard Mitigation Plan Update will be forwarded to MEMA and DCR for review and to FEMA for approval. Integration of the Plans with Other Planning Initiatives Upon approval of the Reading Hazard Mitigation Plan 2017 Update by FEMA, the Local Hazard Mitigation Team coordinator will provide all interested parties and implementing departments with a copy of the plan and will initiate a discussion regarding how the plan can be integrated into that department's ongoing work. The plan will be reviewed and discussed with the following departments during the first six (6) months following plan adoption. During updates of any city department's plans or policies, the relevant portions of this mitigation strategy will be incorporated. • Fire Department • Emergency Management • Police Department • Public Works Department • Engineering • Planning and Community Development • Conservation Commission • Parks and Recreation • Public Health • Building Other groups that will be coordinated with include large institutions, Chambers of Commerce, land conservation organizations and watershed groups. The plans will also be posted on a community's website with the caveat that local team coordinator will review the plan for sensitive information that would be inappropriate for public posting. The posting of the plan on a web site will include a mechanism for citizen feedback such as an e-mail address to send comments. 116 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE The Hazard Mitigation Plan will be integrated into other Town plans and policies as they are updated and renewed, including the Reading Comprehensive Plan, Open Space Plan, Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan, and Capital Investment Program. 117 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE [This page intentionally left blank] 118 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE X. LIST OF REFERENCES Reading Capital Improvement Program, FY 2016 — 2024 Reading Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan, 2016 Reading Master Plan, 2006 http: / /www.readinjzma. o�v/planning- division /pages /the - master -plan Town of Reading: Aberjona and Saugus River Drainage Study Report, AECOM, 2013 Open Space and Recreation Plan for the Town of Reading, Reading Conservation Commission, 2013 http: / /www.readingma.gov /open - space -plan Reading Town By -Laws http: / /www.readingma. gov /town - clerk/pagewlaws- and -re gulations Reading Zoning By -Law http: / /www.readingma. gov/ town- clerk/pages /bylaws- and - regulations Reading Subdivision Regulations http: / /www.readingma• gov /town- clerk/pagees /bylaws- and - regulations Environment America Research and Policy Center, When It Rains It Pours — Global Warming and the Increase in Extreme Precipitation, July 2012 FEMA, Flood Insurance Rate Maps for Middlesex County, MA, 2012 FEMA, Local Mitigation Plan Review Guide; October 1, 2011. MA Emergency Management Agency, State Hazard Mitigation Plan, 2013 http: / /www.mass. o v /eopss /docs /mema/resources /plans /state - hazard -miti atg ion - plan/ section -0l - introduction - cover - and - executive- summary.pdf MA Geographic Information System, McConnell Land Use Statistics, 2005 MA Office of Dam Safety, Inventory of Massachusetts Dams Metropolitan Area Planning Council, Geographic Information Systems Lab New England Seismic Network, Weston Observatory, http: / /aki.bc.edu /index.htm Northeast States Emergency Consortium, website http: / /www.nesec.org/ 119 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE NOAA, National Climatic Data Center, website U. S. Census, 2010, and American Community Survey, 2013 USGS, National Water Information Center, website [This page intentionally left blank] 120 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE APPENDIX A HAZARD MITIGATION PLANNING TEAM MEETING AGENDAS Reading Hazard Mitigation Plan 0. Update V�Mll Thursday, March 24, 2016, 10 a.m. Reading Town Hall AGENDA 10:00 Welcome and Introductions 10:05 Overview of FEMA Hazard Mitigation Planning Presentation by Marybeth Groff from MEMA Questions /Discussion 10:45 Review of Project Scope and Milestones 121 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE See handout materials Sam Cleaves, MAPC 10:55 Questions /Next Steps 11:00 Meeting Adjourn Meeting Agenda Local Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Town of Reading, Berger Room May 23, 2016, 11:00 AM - 12:30 PM Local Team Meeting #2 (Information Gathering) a) Hazard Mitigation Planning Map Series and Digitized Ortho Photo Map b) Review 2010 mitigation actions c) Identify Critical Facilities d) Identify local hazards: i) Flood Hazard Areas ii) Fire Hazard Areas (brushfires /wildfires) iii) Dams iv) Ice jams V) Thunderstorms Vi) Drought Vli)Extreme Temps Viii) Tornadoes ix) High winds X) Snow and Blizzards xi) Ice storms xii) Earthquakes Xiii) Landslides xiv) Future Potential Development Areas e) Review Plan Goals and Objectives- see over 122 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE f) Discuss Public Involvement and Outreach i) Identify local stakeholders ii) Schedule first public meeting g) Identify draft priority projects and funding for update Project Overview MAPC is working with Reading to update its plan to mitigate potential damages of natural hazards such as floods, winter storms, hurricanes, earthquakes and wild fires, before such hazards occur. The federal Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 requires that all municipalities adopt a Pre - Disaster Mitigation Plan for natural hazards in order to remain eligible for FEMA Disaster Mitigation Grants. This FEMA planning program is separate from ongoing homeland security initiatives, and is focused solely on addressing natural hazards, although some of the data collected for this plan may be useful for other aspects of emergency planning as well. Recommended goals to align with State 2013 Plan and FEMA Guidelines: 1. Prevent and reduce the loss of life, injury, public health impacts and property damages resulting from all identified natural hazards. 2. Build and enhance local mitigation capabilities to ensure individual safety, reduce damage to public and private property and ensure continuity of emergency services. 3. Increase cooperation and coordination among private entities, Town officials and Boards, State agencies and Federal agencies. 4. Increase awareness of the benefits of hazard mitigation through outreach and education. 123 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Meeting Agenda Local Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan Town of Reading, Berger Room October 31, 2016, 11:00 AM —12:30 PM Local Team Meeting #3 (Recommendations/Draft Plan) (1) Review and finalize Critical Facilities (2) Review and finalize local hazard identification (3) Review vulnerability analysis (4) Review Existing Mitigation Measures (5) Discuss Potential Mitigation Measures 124 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE APPENDIX B HAZARD MAPPING The MAPC GIS (Geographic Information Systems) Lab produced a series of maps for each community. Some of the data came from the Northeast States Emergency Consortium ( NESEC). More information on NESEC can be found at http: / /www.serve.com/NESEC /. Due to the various sources for the data and varying levels of accuracy, the identification of an area as being in one of the hazard categories must be considered as a general classification that should always be supplemented with more local knowledge. The map series consists of eight maps as described below. The maps in this appendix are necessarily reduced scale versions for general reference. Full sized higher resolution PDF's of the maps can be downloaded from: hgps: / /mEc- org.shareftle.com /d- s67316042bae47d48 Map 1. Population Density Map 2. Potential Development Map 3. Flood Zones Map 4. Earthquakes and Landslides Map 5. Hurricanes and Tornadoes Map 6. Average Snowfall Map 7. Composite Natural Hazards Map 8. Hazard Areas Map]: Population Density — This map uses the US Census block data for 2010 and shows population density as the number of people per acre in seven categories with 60 or more people per acre representing the highest density areas. Map 2: Development — This map shows potential future developments, and critical infrastructure sites. MAPC consulted with Town staff to determine areas that were likely to be developed or redeveloped in the future. The map also depicts current land use. Map 3: Flood Zones — The map of flood zones used the FEMA NFIP Flood Zones as depicted on the FIRMs (Federal Insurance Rate Maps) for Middlesex County as its source. This map is not intended for use in determining whether or not a specific property is located within a FEMA NFIP flood zone. The currently adopted FIRMS for Reading are kept by the Town. For more information, refer to the FEMA Map Service 125 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Center website http://www.msc.fema.gov. The definitions of the flood zones are described in detail on this site as well. The flood zone map for each community also shows critical infrastructure and repetitive loss areas. Map 4: Earthquakes and Landslides — This information came from NESEC. For most communities, there was no data for earthquakes because only the epicenters of an earthquake are mapped. The landslide information shows areas with either a low susceptibility or a moderate susceptibility to landslides based on mapping of geological formations. This mapping is highly general in nature. For more information on how landslide susceptibility was mapped, refer to http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/121183/ppl 183.html. Map S: Hurricanes and Tornadoes — This map shows a number of different items. The map includes the storm tracks for both hurricanes and tropical storms, if any occurred in this community. This information must be viewed in context. A storm track only shows where the eye of the storm passed through. In most cases, the effects of the wind and rain from these storms were felt in other communities even if the track was not within that community. This map also shows the location of tornadoes with a classification as to the level of damages. What appears on the map varies by community since not all communities experience the same wind - related events. These maps also show the 100 year wind speed. Map 6: Average Snowfall - - This map shows the average snowfall. It also shows storm tracks for nor'easters, if any storms tracked through the community. Map 7: Composite Natural Hazards - This map shows four categories of composite natural hazards for areas of existing development. The hazards included in this map are 100 year wind speeds of 110 mph or higher, low and moderate landslide risk, FEMA Q3 flood zones (100 year and 500 year) and hurricane surge inundation areas. Areas with only one hazard were considered to be low hazard areas. Moderate areas have two of the hazards present. High hazard areas have three hazards present and severe hazard areas have four hazards present. Map 8: Hazard Areas — For each community, locally identified hazard areas are overlaid on an aerial photograph dated April, 2010. The critical infrastructure sites are also shown. The source of the aerial photograph is Mass GIS. 126 w F A a 0 N m z m ®+ I F a o I I a a U wo< o �� Qc U- a LLI ;4 CL AG i 11 A 0 N 0 O lie, 1�I eliii4i � N O 00 N E El,1 I O E C5 H � W A N� xr zN A w O z 0 H w ®I I 'Ej ® N rn N I/ I a O C.7 Ey H �A N p"' x� N z �a w 0 3 0 H y 1 o { �f it I® ate' 4� •, Y r 0 M � � G J ggg aR a°¢ ¢a0 U- c t a Q "°w W�� Q MN ®� y 1 o { �f it I® ate' 4� •, Y r 0 M w H A Qi O N €fKf �<���� Co Z� ¢a a � c l w o� z r gm LL co 2 �I I 2 f Iq oT 0 a t Ah Is a1lil M W r7 N O N 8 i 0 0 0 t B H N M 'OR 110 60 f.11l coi =�z as � _ ����� a Q LL W N o o co s� e 8 i 0 0 0 t B H N M \yv W �A 1 � rl � N 6 Jill Ali Is •N� � '^ S ��µM�.n � k �.. w d ' ti ti L dra r rrN In a 1 l 2® 3® r" m " r / 0 /i / .r✓' F� ..Sb ^, \ •�' 111 s" I .✓�l t � � w 'd'" s'a '�i w _ � M M M M N (0 i O 6 Jill Ali Is •N� � '^ S ��µM�.n � k �.. w d ' ti ti L dra r rrN In a 1 l 2® 3® r" m " r / 0 /i / .r✓' F� ..Sb ^, \ •�' 111 s" I .✓�l t � � w 'd'" s'a '�i w _ � M M M M O O O m L cr TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE APPENDIX C DOCUMENTATION OF PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Amanda Linehan, Communications Manager, Metropolitan Area Planning Council 617- 933 -0705, alinehankmapc.org CALENDAR LISTING / MEDIA ADVISORY READING'S NATURAL HAZARDS PLAN UPDATE IS FOCUS OF JUNE 6 PUBLIC MEETING Meeting to present an overview of the update of Reading's Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan and solicit public comments Who: Reading residents, business owners, representatives of non -profit organizations and institutions, and others who are interested in preventing and reducing damage from natural hazards. What: The Reading Emergency Management Team (EMT) will hold a public meeting to present an overview of the pending update of the Town of Reading's Natural Hazards Mitigation Plan. The Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) is assisting the Town on the plan update, and a representative of MAPC will present an overview of the plan update. The Town of Reading adopted its first Hazard Mitigation Plan in 2010, which was approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The plan identifies natural hazards affecting Reading such as floods, hurricanes, winter storms, and earthquakes, as well as actions that the Town can take to reduce the impacts of these hazards. FEMA requires that plans be updated regularly, so MAPC is assisting the Town prepare an updated plan. When: June 6, 2016, 7:30 PM Where: Reading Town Hall, 16 Lowell St, Selectmen's Meeting Room 135 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE MAPC is the regional planning agency for 101 communities in the metropolitan Boston area, promoting smart growth and regional collaboration. More information about MAPC is available at www.mapc.org. Amanda Linehan, Communications Manager, Metropolitan Area Planning Council 617 - 933 -0705, alinehangmapc.org CALENDAR LISTING / MEDIA ADVISORY READING'S DRAFT HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN TO BE PRESENTED AT JANUARY 23 PUBLIC MEETING Meeting to present the 2017 update of Reading's Hazard Mitigation Plan and solicit public comments Who: Reading residents, business owners, representatives of non - profit organizations and institutions, and others who are interested in preventing and reducing damage from natural hazards. What: The Reading Emergency Management Team (EMT) will hold a public meeting to present an overview of the draft Reading Hazard Mitigation Plan Update 2017. The Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) is assisting the Town on the plan update, and a representative of MAPC will present an overview of the plan update. The Town of Reading adopted its first Hazard Mitigation Plan in 2010, which was approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The plan identifies natural hazards affecting Reading such as floods, hurricanes, winter storms, and earthquakes, as well as actions that the Town can take to reduce the impacts of these hazards. FEMA requires that plans be updated regularly, so MAPC is assisting the Town prepare a 2017 updated plan. When: Monday, January 23, 2017, 7:30 PM Where: Reading Town Hall, 16 Lowell St, Selectmen's Meeting Room 136 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE MAPC is the regional planning agency for 101 communities in the metropolitan Boston area, promoting smart growth and regional collaboration. More information about MAPC is available at www.muc.org. READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN — NEIGHBORING COMMUNITIES OF READING, MA Notification / Email Lynnfield- Kathy L. Randele- krandele @town.lynnfield.ma.us North Reading Danielle McKnight — dmckni hg_tgnorthreadingma.gov Stoneham - Erin Wortman- ewortman @stoneham - ma.gov Wakefield Paul Reavis — preavis @ wakefield - ma.gov Wilmin on- Valerie Gingrich- vgingrich @wilmingtonma.gov Woburn Tina Cassidy- tcassidy @cityofwoburn.com Additional Organizations: Reading/North Reading Chamber of Commerce Reading Conservation Commission Reading Department Directors — DPW, PUBLIC BUILDINGS, FIRE, POLICE, TOWN CLERK, RECREATION AND BOARD OF HEALTH. Reading Daily Times Chronicle 137 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE p Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Only collies around once every 5 years! Scheduled for Monday, June 6, 2016 7:30 PM Reading Town Hall — Selectmen's Meeting Room Come, share your thoughts! Saul Cleaves. Senior Regional Planner at MAPC. will present an oveiview of the process and seek stakeholder unput on the follow ing: Local hazards Vulnerable areas Critical facilities & infi•astructure Priority mitigation measures 138 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE WkS nFart; TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE Town of heading Meeting Posting with Agenda MASS. Board - Committee - Commission - Council: Community Planning and Development Commission 201h HAY 25 P 4: 51 l Date: 2016-06 -06 Time: 7:30 PM Building: Reading Town Hall Location: Selectmen Meeting Room Address: 16 Lowell Street Purposc: General Business Meeting Called By: Julie Mercier on Behalf of Jeff Hansen Notices and agendas are to be posted 48 hours in advance of the meetings excluding Saturdays, Sundays and Legal Holidays. Please keep in mind the Town Clerk's hours of operation and make necessary arrangements to be sure your posting is made In an adequate amount of time. A listing of topics that the chair reasonably anticipates will be discussed at the meeting must be on the agenda. All Meeting Postings must be submitted in typed format; handwritten notices will not be accepted, Topics of Discussion: • 7:30PM: Cali to Order • 7:30PM: Hazard Mitigation Plan Update - Over0ow of Process - Stakeholder Input • 6:30PM: Potential Zoning Bylaw Amendments for 2016 Site Plan Review Minor Edits 9:30PM: Planning Updates and Other Topics - Approval of CPDC Minutes of May 9, 2016 - Discussion of meeting with BOS on June 21, 2016 . this Agenda has bcen prepared in advance and represents a llstlr„ of topics that the chair reawnabiy anticpotea will be. discussed at the meeting. However the agenda does not necessurlly Include all matters which may be taken up at this me—.ling. Paige. I k 140 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE }� Town of Reading Meeting Pasting with Agenda - r����i11l�NGCt�E{Q Board - Committee - commission - Council, Community Planning and Development Commission Bill JAN 18 A 81 101 Date: 2017-01 -23 Time: 7:30 PM Building. Reading Town Hall Location: Selectmen Meeting Room Address. 16 Lowell Street Purpose: General Business Meeting Called By: Julie Mercier on Behalf of Nick Salina Notices and agendas are to be posted 46 hours in advance of the meetings excluding Saturdays, Sundays and Legal Holidays. Please keep in mind the Town Clerk's hours of operation and make necessary arrangements to be sure your posting is made in an adequate amount of time. A listing of topics that the chair reasonably anticipates will be discussed at the meeting must be on the agenda. All Meeting Postings must be submitted In typed format, handwritten notice$ will not be accepted. Topics of Discussion: • 7:30PM: Call to Order • 7:30PM: Public Meeting, Hazard Mitigation Plan Update • 8:OOPM: Continued Public Hearing, Definitive Subdivision - "Randall Road Extension" Mark G. Hall, 0 Randall Road & 25 Springvale Road • 9 :OOPM: Public Hearing, Definitive Subdivision - Mass Equity investments LLC, 1260 & 1264 Main Street • 10:o0PM: Planning Updates and Other Topics - Approval of CPDC Minutes of January 9, 2017 I his Agenda ha!; been prepared it advance and moresrrt, a IKting of topics that the chair reasonahly aillidnates w @I be dscusse4 at Me, rneetlrrg. Npwevef the agenda does n;rt neccssarny i tic :ude all matters which may ha taken up at this meeting. Page i t 141 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE [This page intentionally left blank] 142 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE APPENDIX D DOCUMENTATION OF PLAN ADOPTION 143 TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2017 UPDATE [Please print on Town letterhead] CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION BOARD OF SELECTMEN TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS INC A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE TOWN OF READING HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN 2015 UPDATE WHEREAS, the Town of Reading established a Committee to prepare the Town of Reading Hazard Mitigation Plan 2017 Update; and WHEREAS, the Town of Reading Hazard Mitigation Plan 2017 Update contains several potential future projects to mitigate potential impacts from natural hazards in the Town of Reading, and WHEREAS, duly- noticed public meetings were held by the EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT TEAM on June 6, 2016, and February 23, 2017 WHEREAS, the Town of Reading authorizes responsible departments and /or agencies to execute their responsibilities demonstrated in the plan, and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Town of Reading BOARD OF SELECTMEN adopts the Town of Reading Hazard Mitigation Plan 2017 Update, in accordance with M.G.L. 40 §4 or the charter and bylaws of the Town of Reading. ADOPTED AND SIGNED this Date. Name(s) Title(s) Signature(s) ATTEST 144 Devlin Law Offices, L.L. C PH: 617 -514 -2828 jdevlin @devlinlawoffices.com Fax: 617- 514 -2825 www.devlinlawoffices.com May 30, 2017 Attn: Caitlin Saunders, License Administrator Reading "Town Hall 16 Lowell Street Reading, MA 01867 RE: Change of Officer /Beneficial Interest application for an Annual Restaurant All Alcoholic Beverages License of Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza of Reading LLC d /b /a Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza, 48 Walkers Brook Drive, Reading, MA Dear Ms. Saunders: The Applicant is applying for approval of a Change of Officer /Beneficial Interest for its 5 locations. Samuel G. Weiss (LLC manager, VP and secretary) and Patrick F. Marzano (LLC manager, VP and treasurer) have resigned as officers and Charles E. Locke, Jr. (LLC manager, VP, secretary) and Ronald Dinella (LLC manager, VP and treasurer) have replaced them. Furthermore, Douglas L. Schmick, an LLC Manager of Cardboard Box, LLC, an upper -tier company, has died, and he has been replaced by Matthew Miclea. Enclosed please find the following documents with regard to the above - referenced application for Change of Officer and Beneficial Interest of an Annual Restaurant All Alcoholic Beverages Liquor License: 1) Money order or attorney's check payable to the ABCC in the amount of $200. 2) Municipal fee, if any. 3) ABCC Online Application Forms, including: a. Monetary Transmittal Form. b. Change of Beneficial Interest Application. c. Applicant's Statement. d. Beneficial Interest and CORI Forms. 4) Certificate of Authorization naming John C. Bouche manager and authorizing the Manager, Ronald DiNella, to apply for the change of beneficial interest of the above- referenced liquor license. 5) LLC Documents — copy of Certificate of Organization. 6) Proof of Citizenship for the LLC Managers. 1 Harris Street Suite 1 Newburyport, MA 01950 Clients /Anthony's- Officer Change /ABCC/Liquor Does Reading 50 Congress Street Suite 420 ,:Boston, MA 02109 Thank you very much for your time and cooperation. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to call me at extension 101. Enclosure Clients /Anthony's- Officer Change /ABCC/Liquor Docs Reading Sinc elDev yours• oseph in Attorney at law SUMMARY OF TRANSACTION h. Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza of Reading LLC d/b /a Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza Applicant: Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza of Reading LLC (the "Applicant "). Transaction: The Applicant is applying for approval of a Change of Officer /Beneficial Interest for its 5 locations. Samuel G. Weiss (LLC manager, VP and secretary) and Patrick F. Marzano (LLC manager, VP and treasurer) have resigned as officers and Charles E. Locke, Jr. (LLC manager, VP, secretary) and Ronald Dinella (LLC manager, VP and treasurer) have replaced them. Furthermore, Douglas L. Schmick, an LLC Manager of Cardboard Box, LLC, an upper -tier company, has died, and he has been replaced by Matthew Miclea. Cost: There are no costs associated with this transaction. :F' Catterton - Anthony's Officer Change /ABCC/Suinmary Trans — Reading I U-,,M Joe /open /lic. /liquor license &exhibit header sheets The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission 239 Causeway Street Boston, MA 02114 q: www.mass.gov /abcc RETAIL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES LICENSE APPLICATION MONETARY TRANSMITTAL FORM APPLICATION SHOULD BE COMPLETED ON -LINE, PRINTED, SIGNED, AND SUBMITTED TO THE LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY. ECRT CODE: RETA CHECK PAYABLE TO ABCC OR COMMONWEALTH OF MA: $200.00 (CHECK MUST DENOTE THE NAME OF THE LICENSEE CORPORATION, LLC, PARTNERSHIP, OR INDIVIDUAL) CHECK NUMBER IF USED EPAY, CONFIRMATION NUMBER A.B.C.C. LICENSE NUMBER (IF AN EXISTING LICENSEE, CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY) 101600038 LICENSEE NAME [Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza of Reading LLC ADDRESS 48 WALKERS BROOK DRIVE CITY /TOWN Reading STATE MA ZIP CODE 01867 TRANSACTION TYPE (Please check all relevant transactions © Alteration of Licensed Premises F� Cordials /Liqueurs Permit ® New Officer /Director F� Transfer of License 0 Change Corporate Name Issuance of Stock New Stockholder Transfer of Stock. Q Change of License Type Management /Operating Agreement Pledge of Stock Wine & Malt to All Alcohol © Change of Location More than (3) §15 ❑ Pledge of License E] 6 -Day to 7 -Day License Change of Manager New License F"� Seasonal to Annual Other Change in Beneficial Interest THE LOCAL LICENSING AUTHORITY MUST MAIL THIS TRANSMITTAL FORM ALONG WITH THE CHECK, COMPLETED APPLICATION, AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO: ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES CONTROL COMMISSION P. O. BOX 3396 BOSTON, MA 02241 -3396 0 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission 239 Causeway Street Boston, MA 02114 www.mass.gov /abcc AMENDMENT APPLICATION FOR A CHANGE OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST OR TRANSFER /ISSUANCE OF STOCK Please complete this entire application, leaving no fields blank. If field does not apply to your situation, please write NIA. 1. NAME OF LICENSEE (Business Contact) Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza of Reading LLC - .. ABCC License Number 101600038 City /Town of Licensee � Reading . APPLICATION CONTACT ie application contact is required and is the person who will be contacted with any questions regarding this application. First Name: Joseph Middle: Title: Attorney Email: jdevlin @devlinlawoffices.com 3. BUSINESS CONTACT ILast Name: Devlin Primary Phone: 617 -514 -2828 ext.101 Please complete this section ONLY if there are changes to the Licensee phone number, business address (corporate headquarters), or mailing address. Entity Name: Primary Phone: Fax Number: Alternative Phone: Email: (Corporate Street Number: �— Street Name: City/Town: State: � Zip Code: Country: 0 Check here if your Mailing Address is the same as your Business Address Street Number: �� Street Name: City/Town: State: Zip Code: Country: r AMENDMENT APPLICATION FOR A CHANGE OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST OR TRANSFER /ISSUANCE OF STOCK 4. CURRENT OWNERSHIP (Before Change in Beneficial Interest) Please list all individuals or entities with a director indirect, beneficial or financial interest in this license. This pertains to the current licensee (before change in beneficial interest occurs). Name Title / Position % Owned Other Beneficial Interest ANTHONY.BFiUNtfl . LL Manager:, "Prey, QED 0 °Iq SAMUEL G. WEISS LLC Manager, VP, Sec. 0% PATRICK F. MARZANO LLC Manager, VP, Treas. 0% Anthony's Pizza Holding Company Lid LLC Member 100% (same ownership structure as previously approved) PROPOSED OWNERSHIP (After Change in Beneficial Interest) Please list all individuals or entities with a direct or indirect, beneficial or financial interest in this license. An individual or entity has a direct beneficial interest in a license when the individual or entity owns or controls any part of the license. For example, if John Smith owns Smith LLC, a licensee, John Smith has a direct beneficial interest in the license. An individual or entity has an indirect beneficial interest if the individual or entity has 1) any ownership interest in the license through an intermediary, no matter how removed from direct ownership, 2) any form of control over part of a license no matter how attenuated, or 3) otherwise benefits in any way from the license's operation. For Example, Jane Doe owns Doe Holding Company Inc., which is a shareholder of Doe LLC, the license holder. Jane Doe has an indirect interest in the license. A. All individuals listed below are required to complete a Beneficial Interest Contact - Individual form. B. All entities listed below are required to complete a Beneficial Interest Contact - Organization form. C. Any individual with any ownership in this license and /or the proposed manager of record must complete a CORI Release Form. Name Title /Position %Owned Other Beneficial Interest ANTHONY E RUNQ LLC:lVCa "nager:,;Pres, CEO' 0% Charles E. Locke, Jr. LLC Manager, VP, Sec. 0% Ronald DiNella LLC Manager, VP, Treas. 0% Anthony's Pizza Holding Company Lkj LLC Member 100% (same ownership structure as previously approved) 0 APPLICANT'S STATEMENT 1, Ronald DiNella —I the: ❑ sole proprietor; ❑ partner; ❑ corporate principal; LLC /LLP member Authorized Signatory of Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza of Reading LLC ,hereby submit this application for change of beneficial interest Name of the Entity /Corporation Transaction(s) you are applying for (hereinafter the "Application "), to the local licensing authority (the "LLA ") and the Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission (the "ABCC" and together with the LLA collectively the "Licensing Authorities ") for approval. I do hereby declare under the pains and penalties of perjury that I have personal knowledge of the information submitted in the Application, and as such affirm that all statement and representations therein are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I further submit the following to be true and accurate: (1) 1 understand that each representation in this Application is material to the Licensing Authorities' decision on the Application and that the Licensing Authorities will rely on each and every answer in the Application and accompanying documents in reaching its decision; (2) 1 state that the location and description of the proposed licensed premises does not violate any requirement of the ABCC or other state law or local ordinances; (3) 1 understand that while the Application is pending, I must notify the Licensing Authorities of any change in the information submitted therein. I understand that failure to give such notice to the Licensing Authorities may result in disapproval of the Application; (4) 1 understand that upon approval of the Application, I must notify the Licensing Authorities of any change in the Application information as approved by the Licensing Authorities. I understand that failure to give such notice to the Licensing Authorities may result in sanctions including revocation of any license for which this Application is submitted; (5) 1 understand that the licensee will be bound by the statements and representations made in the Application, including, but not limited to the identity of persons with an ownership or financial interest in the license; (6) 1 understand that all statements and representations made become conditions of the license; (7) 1 understand that any physical alterations to or changes to the size of, the area used for the sale, delivery, storage, or consumption of alcoholic beverages, must be reported to the Licensing Authorities and may require the prior approval of the Licensing Authorities; (8) 1 understand that the licensee's failure to operate the licensed premises in accordance with the statements and representations made in the Application may result in sanctions, including the revocation of any license for which the Application was submitted; and (9) 1 understand that any false statement or misrepresentation will constitute cause for disapproval of the Application or sanctions including revocation of any license for which this Application is submitted. Signature: Date: Title: PLLCManager ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES CONTROL COMMISSION BENEFICIAL INTEREST CONTACT - Individual (Formerly known as a Personal Information Form) Please complete a Beneficial Interest - Individual sheet for all individual(s) who have a direct or ind4ct beneficial interest, with or without ownership, in this license. This includes people with a financial interest and people without financial interest (i.e. board of directors for not - for - profit clubs). All individuals with direct or indirect financial interest must also submit a CORI individual with direct beneficial interest is defined as someone who has interest directly in the proposed licensee. For mple, if ABC Inc is the proposed licensee, all individuals with interest in ABC Inc are considered to have direct beneficial interest in ABC Inc (the proposed licensee). An individual with indirect beneficial interest is defined as someone who has ownership in a parent level company of the proposed licensee. For example, if ABC Inc is the proposed licensee and is 100% owned by XYZ Inc, all individuals with interest in XYZ Inc are considered to have an indirect beneficial interest in ABC Inc (the proposed licensee). Salutation First Name Ronald Middle Name Mark Last Name DiNella Suffix Title: Other Social Security Number Date of Birth 5/2/60 Primary Phone: 312- 310 -0470 Email: [MarisaF @acfp.com Mobile Phone: Fax Number .;r. Alternative Phone: Street Number: 200 Street Name: W. Cypress Creek Rd., Ste. 220 City/Town: Fort Lauderdale State: FL Zip Code: 33309 Country: USA ® Check here if your Mailing Address is the some as your Business Address Street Number: Street Name: E City/Town: Zip Code: Country: Types of Interest (select all that apply ❑ Contractual ❑ Director ❑ Landlord ❑ LLCManag ❑ LLC Member ❑ Management Agreement ❑ Officer ❑ Partner ❑ Revenue Sharing ❑ Sole Proprietor ❑ Stockholder ® Other Citizenship / Residency Information Are you a U.S. Citizen? (::Yes ( No Are you a Massachusetts Resident? (7;, Y e s ( No Have you ever been convicted of a state, federal, or military crime? {'` Yes C•? No If yes, please provide an affidavit explaining the charges. 0 Na ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES CONTROL COMMISSION BENEFICIAL INTEREST CONTACT - Individual (continued) If you hold a direct beneficial interest ing the definition above, do you hold a direct ()Direct (:` Indirect in the proposed licensee, please list indirect interest in the proposed licensee? the % of interest you hold. If you hold an indirect beneficial interest in this license, please complete the Ownership / Interest Table below. If you hold an indirect interest in the proposed licensee, please list the organization(s) you hold a direct interest in which, in turn, hold a direct or indirect interest in the proposed licensee. These generally include parent companies, holding companies, trusts, etc. A Beneficial Interest - Organization Form will need to be completed for each entity listed below. Name of Beneficial Interest - Organization I FEIN Cardboard Box LLC - Other Beneficial Interest List any indirect or indirect beneficial or financial interest you have in any other Massachusetts Alcoholic Beverages License(s). Name of License Type of License License Number Premises Address Anthony's ;Coal Fired Pizza . §12 On Premises 062400026 , 201 Constitutiori Auenue, l ttleton ; Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza §12 On Premises 080000222 180 Needham Street, Newton Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza §12 On Premises 090200058 100028 SHOPS WAY, NORTHBOROUGH Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza §12 On Premises 101600038 48 WALKERS BROOK DRIVE, READING Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza §12 On Premises 145600013 119 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, WESTWOOD 4, Does any member of your immediate family have ownership interest in any other Massachusetts Alcoholic Beverages Licenses? Immediate family includes parents, siblings, spouse and spouse's parents. Please list below. Relationship to You I ABCC License Number I Type of Interest (choose primary function) JPercentage of Interest Have you ever been involved directly or indirectly in an alcoholic beverages license that was subject to disciplinary action? If yes, please complete the following: Date of Action I Name of License I State JCity lReason for suspension, revocation or cancellation ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES CONTROL COMMISSION BENEFICIAL INTEREST CONTACT - Individual (Formerly known as a Personal Information Form) Please complete a Beneficial Interest - Individual sheet for all individual(s) who have a direct or indirect beneficial interest, with or without ownership, in this license. This includes people with a financial interest and people without financial interest (i.e. board of directors for not - for - profit clubs). All individuals with director indirect financial interest must also submit a CORI An individual with direct beneficial interest is defined as someone who has interest directly in the proposed licensee. For example, if ABC Inc is the proposed licensee, all individuals with interest in ABC Inc are considered to have direct beneficial interest in ABC Inc (the proposed licensee). An individual with indirect beneficial interest is defined as someone who has ownership in a parent level company of the proposed licensee. For example, if ABC Inc is the proposed licensee and is 100% owned by XYZ Inc, all individuals with interest in XYZ Inc are considered to have an indirect beneficial interest in ABC Inc (the proposed licensee). Salutation First Name Charles Middle Name: Last Name Locke, Jr. Suffix 0 Title: Fother Social Security Number ❑ date of Birth 2/23/68 — Prim Phone: 954 - 439 -4528 Email: MarisaF @acfp.com Mobile Phone: Fax Number Alternative Phone: Street Number: 200 Street Name: W. Cypress Creek Rd., Ste. 220 City/Town: Fort Lauderdale State: Zip Code: 33309 Country: USA Mailing Address Check here if yourMailing Address is the some as your Business Address Street Number: Street Name: City/Town: State: Zip Code: Country: Types of Interest (select all that apply) ❑ Contractual ❑ Director ❑ Landlord ❑ LLC Manager ❑ LLC Member ❑ Management Agreement ❑ Officer ❑ Partner ❑ Revenue Sharing ❑ Sole Proprietor ❑ Stockholder ® Other Citizenship / Residency Information Are you a U.S. Citizen? (: ,Yes (',,No Are you a Massachusetts Resident? (` Yes Cqi� No Have you ever been convicted of a state, federal, or military crime? ('� Yes { ,,No If yes, please provide an affidavit explaining the charges. \ r t `\ ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES CONTROL COMMISSION BENEFICIAL INTEREST CONTACT - Individual (continued) If you hold a direct beneficial interest Using the definition above, do you hold a direct C" Direct (:`= Indirect in the proposed licensee, please list or indirect interest in the proposed licensee? the %of interest you hold. If you hold an indirect beneficial interest in this license, please complete the Ownership/ Interest Table below. If you hold an indirect interest in the proposed licensee, please list the organization(s) you hold a direct interest in which, in turn, hold a direct or indirect interest in the proposed licensee. These generally include parent companies, holding companies, trusts, etc. A Beneficial Interest - Organization Form will need to be completed for each entity listed below. I Name of Beneficial Interest - Organization I FEIN Cardboard Box LLC - Other Beneficial Interest List any indirect or indirect beneficial or financial interest you have in any other Massachusetts Alcoholic Beverages License(s). Name of License Type of License License Number Premises Address Anthony`s Geal Fired Pizza § 1 Z.On Premises' Qfi2400026 20)::Cogstitution:Aventae� Littleton '. Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza §12 On Premises 080000222 180 Needham Street, Newton Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza §12 On Premises 090200058 100028 SHOPS WAY, NORTHBOROUGH Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza §12 On Premises 101600038 48 WALKERS BROOK DRIVE, READING Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza §12 On Premises 145600013 119 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, WESTWOOD Have you ever been involved directly or indirectly in an alcoholic beverages license that was subject.o disciplinary action? If yes, please complete the following: Date of Action I Name of License I State ICity lReason for suspension, revocation or cancellation ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES CONTROL COMMISSION BENEFICIAL INTEREST CONTACT - Individual (Formerly known as a Personal Information Form) Please complete a Beneficial Interest - Individual sheet for all individual(s) who have a direct or indirect beneficial interest, with or without ownership, in this license. This includes people with a financial interest and people without financial interest (i.e. board of directors for not - for - profit clubs). All individuals with direct or indirect financial interest must also submit a CORI An individual with direct beneficial interest is defined as someone who has interest directly in the proposed licensee. For example, if ABC Inc is the proposed licensee, all individuals with interest in ABC Inc are considered to have direct beneficial interest in ABC Inc (the proposed licensee). An individual with indirect beneficial interest is defined as someone who has ownership in a parent level company of the proposed licensee. For example, if ABC Inc is the proposed licensee and is 100% owned by XYZ Inc, all individuals with interest in XYZ Inc are considered to have an indirect beneficial interest in ABC Inc (the proposed licensee). Salutation First Name Matthew Middle Name Eric Last Name Miclea Suffix Title: Other Social Security Number C Date of Birth 6/30/1982 Primary Phone: 847 - 652 -7704 Email: Fmattm@vaultequity.com Mobile Phone: _ Fax Number Alternative Phone: 203 - 274 -4799 Street Number: 599 Street Name: W. Putnam Ave. City/Town: Greenwich Stater Zip Code: 06830 Country: USA Mailing Address N Check here ifyourMailing Address is the some as your Business Address Street Number: Street Name: 4. City/Town: State: Zip Code: Country: Types of Interest (select all that apply) ❑ Contractual ❑ Director ❑ Landlord ❑ LLC Manager ❑ LLC Member ❑ Management Agreement ❑ Officer ❑ Partner ❑ Revenue Sharing ❑ Sole Proprietor ❑ Stockholder ® Other Citizenship / Residency Information Are you a U.S. Citizen? (: '.Yes (,-,,No Are you a Massachusetts Resident? (7, Yes (' No Have you ever been convicted of a state, federal, or military crime? (")Yes (: No If yes, please provide an affidavit explaining the charges. d, ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES CONTROL COMMISSION BENEFICIAL INTEREST CONTACT - Individual (continued) If you hold a direct tieneficial interest Using the definition above, do you hold a direct (7, Direct (: Indirect in the proposed licensee, please list or indirect interest in the proposed licensee? the % of interest you hold. If you hold an indirect beneficial interest in this license, please complete the Ownership /Interest Table below. If you hold an indirect interest in the proposed licensee, please list the organization(s) you hold a direct interest in which, in turn, hold a direct or indirect interest in the proposed licensee. These generally include parent companies, holding companies, trusts, etc. A Beneficial Interest - Organization Form will need to be completed for each entity listed below. Name of Beneficial Interest - Organization I FEIN Other Beneficial Interest List any indirect or indirect beneficial or financial interest you have in any other Massachusetts Alcoholic Beverages License(s). Name of License Type of License License Number Premises Address Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza §12 On Premises 062400026. 201 Constitution Avenue,,Littleton " Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza §12 On Premises 080000222 180 Needham Street, Newton Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza §12 On Premises 090200058 100028 SHOPS WAY, NORTHBOROUGH Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza §12 On Premises 101600038 48 WALKERS BROOK DRIVE, READING Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza §12 On Premises 145600013 119 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, WESTWOOD Familial Beneficial Interest Does any member of your immediate family have ownership interest in any other Massachusetts Alcoholic Beverages Licenses? Immediate family includes parents, siblings, spouse and spouse's parents. Please list below. Relationship to You ABCC License Number Type of Interest (choose primary function) Percentage of Interest n /a� Have you ever been involved directly or indirectly in an alcoholic beverages license that was subject to disciplinary action? If yes, please complete the following: Date of Action I Name of License I State ICity lReason for suspension, revocation or cancellation S i' E VI, E N Cr Xt � % s � 1 tA1 V . Commonwealth of:Massaclliaxsetts Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission "9 :C4ulseway Streets First:i loon Boston, MA 0214:. otiainty Tire AlooholiG Bavciagas (anfrpl Comrriissian has bean cez i ed,by ih Criminal klrstorY Sy.Siurias J3onrd,to nr Gass conviction and pending Criminal t�ltende.r Record lnfvrmg itrn,, Forbe.purposo of apprgving <each shareholder; pwncr, licenscepr applicant fr r an alcoholic lbeverages Iicenae, I understand Ihat a criminal record check wilt be conducted on mo, pursuant to the ahove,'I'he ihfirmad bgiow�ii cQrrect 'the be t of my kn swlcdga, earf'l rrcerr¢anrcnnexartrtu ABCC NUMBER: 10It30003 tir.EKr$T1t{GWNREi .... LICENSEE NAME: Anthony`s Coal Fired Pizza of heading LLC� C1TY/TOWN:. Reading I Y .—.J I LAST NAME: FIRST NAW, MID LENAME, MAIDEN NAME OR ALIAS (IF APPLICABLE ), PLACE, OF BIRTH: ChiCaRo, IL DATE OF BIRTH' I t S.ShI; ( i ID THEFT INDEX PIN (IF APPLICABLE)' MOTHER'S MAIDEN NAME: � DRIVER'S LICENSE NSE ti: � I STATE LIC, ISSUED. �IOr1t�d GEJWDER:. tV]ALEr HEICt4T:� 7 iNEIGHT: 210 EYE COLOR:: BrownT^ CLIRRENTiADDA055t 1300 N,Federai Hfghway, Apt 1221 CITY/ToWN; Fart Lauderdale STATE: E= p: 33301 FORMER ADDRESS: 25623 Windmere Court GITY/TOWN. Lake 5160 9 STATE: iL ZIP:. 61)044 nnTturAWN emu P'RINTEQNAME: ftnald DINeN. APPLICANT /EMPLOYEESir NATU RE: MY COMMISSION # EE 881417 on this / / 7 beforeme, the undersigned notarypublic, person llyappeared Rotaald DiNelli a a name of document signer ;, proved tome through satisfactory evidence of Identification, which were :0 be the:person,whose. name is signed on the preceding or: attached document, and acknowledged to me that:(he) (she} signed It voluntarily for is stated purpose. a -°° MARISA FRANZESE MY COMMISSION # EE 881417 EXPIRES: July 7, 2017 a . �f�t�y,.• Bonded Thru Notary Public underwriters DIVIStONUSEONLY REdlgsrto.o ... De W11E0mv 7hgt1Ma PA l UmbBt a to bd com'6? dW Ey 1Agw,ippiiw6tclhzS 40 betA laved: ah ld.MC 'i e(t VIN :iUmtra7 gy the , WW, ettgck a e 144411.4 tb provjclp nR ajSpjiaTU rite oprwnwrwlwy wa iMtYdv. thrF H+Pa m.Grin is ans4M tha if6YfKT M du �p7iS xequeat'ur�ers, AU, cOM Tpuat farms Owt 144*. tws 694 6. �lairtd to.M fvbmMtd tptn9'tLUr nNYn+[4 of hVrMKtt {6�.7I eQpal814 0� STEVEN GROSSMAN TREASURER A1VD RECEIVER G,- NEJ?r1;L Conunoxt�ith of Massachusetts Al Qhnlic beverages Caa troI Commission. 239.0i ew'4y Sfrt6tjix'st F1oop Sa*ro M 'Q2114 xlna $ ArNSHOROI n1 le. CHAIe4MN The Altuth lio; T3evcraAes Cantiol Commission has been oerti#ied by the Criminal t-iiatory $ystcros B.q;#d io acce",canviction and pending Criminal t ftendcr Itetord liifarmatiob- Fortffie purpose of appraving: ch shardhatd'er; (ir4merY ticecisee gar apptrcant;}or an aic pholic beYeee es ticcrisc, I understand �h t tt criminal r�card ilieck ixrr`il be coiidacted oti ire, pars tttni to the above, The infarm tiiitn below is correct to the " lost of my knowledge. ALI'1x P teriiiee wrADAI a W:,A ABCC M nR: 1t116C1D(338 LICEN5EE NAME' Anthony's:Caal Fired Plzza clfReadingrLl C ��� CITY /TOWCV: MIDDLE NAME, it. `j ReadlnS I iVAN1E OR ALIAS (IF APpLiCABLf );, APPLICANTINFORMA77ON LAST NAME: (Ltrcke FIRST NAME" ECtfarles _ MIDDLE NAME, it. iVAN1E OR ALIAS (IF APpLiCABLf );, PLACE OF BIRTH:: Portsmouth VA T�MAIDEN DATE OF BIRTI 1 "SSN; { In THEFT INDEX PIN (IF APPLlCA8LE)i MOTHER'S MAIDEN•NAW, L+ DRIVER'S LICENSE M j STATE I.K. ISSUED: mortti GENDER: MALE I HEIGiiT:p #r �r~ ] WEIGHT: 22p EYE CpLORa „ W Hazei'1� GI7YffpWNs Parkland STATE: FL ZtRi 33D75. FIDRMER AWRESSt 11205 NW 71st Court GITYJT'OWN. Parkland ZIP: *RIW AND SIGN �(iiNTED NAME; Charles E. LOCkei Jr. .APPLICANT/.EMOLdYEE SiGNATURE:, On this A (4 A � before me, the undersigned notary public, personally: appeared =CharlesE. e, Jr. stne ofi document. signer ), proved to me through satisfactory evidence of ldentitic tiOn, which Were be the person whose name Is.slgned crn the preceding ar atfiaehed document and acknowled ei to me that (he) {she} signed it vo :stated purpose. t71VISION USE0ky lckm of tra eYi The 061 IapnNri.'rbaR index PIN Numb. 4� W be �wnplabaO hY them •ppllmrtF,s tMc ha4a Eaph tAAw;d qry tden {ity Y}Wh PIN:{} ,beu by iha pUi.:CeiNned iRAn4h3 a {a erqutrad:ra. provrda ytI 8}iggaente Ma 6pj{artuetty to :Yndue(a iRii;. IntapnytWn tv.- enswet6a.aaunq -ur tha Cosh pogo t pia "L AtL.WRftsquert.rpimc:Si+at irvdudd:i iti.fleNl:►Nt :. taquPntO W b� wtr<nlWdia iM tXJi +11 mtif 4t M TaMh (82'nbtlU•�611: MARISA FRANZESE MY COMMISSION # EE 881417 EXPIRES: July 7, 2017 Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters r STEVEN GROSSMAN 'I'RE,4SURF.R AND RECEIVER GENERAL Commonwealth of Massachusetts Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission 239 Causeway Street, First Floor Boston, MA 02114 CORI REQUEST FOR /ilhf S. GAINSBORO. F.SQ. C11AIRMAN The Alcoholic [ beverages Control Commission has lwelr certified by the Criminal 1-listory Systems hoard to access conviction and pending Criminal Offender Record Information. For the purpose or approving each shareholder, owner, licensee or applicant for an alcoholic beverages license, I understand that a criminal record check will be conducted on me, pursuant to the above. 'IITe information below is correct to the best of my knowledge. 4BCC LICENSE INFORMATION ABGC NUMBER: 101600038 LICENSEE NAME: Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza of Reading LLC CITY /TOWN: Reading� IF EXISTING LICENSEE) LAST NAME: Miclea FIRST NAME: MAIDEN NAME OR ALIAS (IF APPLICABLE): n/a PLACE OF BIRTH ID THEFT INDEX PIN (IF APPLICABLE): I DATE OF BIRTH: SSN: l �I' MOTHER'S MAIDEN NAME: I����DRIVER'S LICENSE It: I GENDER: MALE HEIGHT: _L� 1 CURRENT ADDRESS: 12730 (B) North Janssen Avenue MIDDLE NAME: Chicago, IL STATE LIC.ISSUED: IliinOis WEIGHT: 190 EYE COLOR: green CITY/TOWN: Chicago STATE: IL ZIP: 60614 FORMER ADDRESS: CITY/TOWN: Lake Villa STATEN IL ZIP: PRINT AND SIGN PRINTED NAME: mat eyv Miclea APPLICANT /EMPLOYEE SIGNATURE: On this �1 1� �L �V �� before me, the undersigned notary public, personally appeared IMatthew Miclea (name of document signer), proved to me through satisfactory evidence of identification, which were �� WQY (S La- VL V to be the person whose name is signed on the preceding or attached document, and acknowledged to me that (he) (she) signed it voluntarily for Zits stated purpose. a , A „ DIVISION USE ONLY REQUESTED BY; SfGNATURCOf COHPAUTHORI rD MPLOVI715 Th. DUI Identify theft Index PIN Numb,, Is to he competed bV those Sppllc ants that have been I5llled an Identify Theft PIN Number by the DOI. Certified allencics arc required to ptovlde oil 1piu -1111 the opp,rtundy to include this infnrinethm to ensure the —11—y of Ilse CORI request prole s. ALL LORI request forms that Intlude till% field are roqulrad In be submiHad te, the DUI via man or by fat to (61)) 6604614. KIMBERLY A GALVIN Official Seal Notary Public - State of Illinois My Commission Expires May 27, 2019 (0`0� CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATI Joe /open /lic. /liquor license &exhibit header sheets 60, () CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION It is hereby certified that Ronald DiNella, manager and officer of Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza of Reading LLC (the "Licensee ") and being duly authorized, is authorized on behalf of the Licensee for the following: To apply to the licensing authority for the Town of Reading and the Massachusetts Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission for a change of officer/beneficial interest of an all alcoholic beverages restaurant license to be held at 48 Walkers Brook Drive, Reading, Massachusetts, d/b /a Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza, and to do all things necessary to effectuate anything connected therewith. To re- appoint John C. Bouche as its manager or principal representative, with as full authority and control of the premises described in the license of the LLC and of the conduct of the business therein relative to the sale of all alcoholic beverages as the licensee itself could in any way have exercised it as if it were a natural person, resident of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and that a copy of this vote duly certiETed by the clerk of the corporation and delivered to said manager or principal representative shall constitute the written authority required by Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 138. A TRUE COPY Anthon 's Coal ' 'zza of Reading LLC By: Ronald DiNe a, being duly authorized C dents /CaC.e rden-Ant.hc>ny':;-Oificec Change /ABCC /Cent of Alithor.zation Newton \A\ V , \ \\ E TIFICATEOF ORGANIZA .Joe /open /lic. /liquor license &exhibit header sheets 5eao 5/30/2017 Mass. Corporations, external master page Corporations Division w ID Number: 001147570 Summary for: ANTHONY'S COAL FIRED PIZZA OF READING LLC Title individual name Address MANAGER ANTHONY BRUNO 200 W. CYPRESS CREEK RD., SUITE 220 FT. LAUNDERDALE, FL 33309 USA MANAGER CHARLES E LOCKE JR. 200 W. CYPRESS CREEK RD., SUITE 220 FT. LAUNDERDALE, FL 33309 USA MANAGER RONALD DINELLA 200 W. CYPRESS CREEK RD.,;'�UITE 220 FT. LAUNDERDALE, FL 33309 USA In addition to the manager(s), the name and business address of the person(s) authorized to execute documents to be filed with the Corporations Division: Title Individual name� Address an hrin• / /nnrn moo,. e4o4o m� nc/(` nrn1A loh /(`nrnCoornhl/`nrnCnmmnry xnv9CCl�l- 11f141A7G7l14.CCA D!`4J TVDC -1 1 /7 5/30/2017 Mass. Corporations, external master page The name and business address of the person(s) authorized to execute, acknowledge, deliver, and record any recordable instrument purporting to affect an interest in real property: Title, Individtial name Addrers REAL PROPERTY ANTHONY BRUNO 200 W. CYPRESS CREEK RD., SUITE 220 FT. LAUNDERDALE, FL 33309 USA REAL PROPERTY CHARLES E LOCKE JR 200 W. CYPRESS CREEK RD., SUITE 220 FT. LAUNDERDALE, FL 33309 USA REAL PROPERTY RONALD DINELLA 200 W. CYPRESS CREEK RD. STE. 220 FT. I LAUDERDALE, FL 33309 USA ., ConfidentialM, merger Consent Data Allowed View filings for this business entity: ALL FILINGS Annual Report Annual Report - Professional Articles of Entity Conversion Certificate of Amendment Comments or notes associated with this business entity: Manufacturing me --- -1— -- — 1 � ---I A I -L- 1n —0--k Y —0— -rVr)f==l 2/2 PROOF OF US CITIZENSHI Joe /open/lic./liquor license &exhibit header sheets I 5ba5 m V READING POLICE DEPARTMENT 15 Union Street •Reading, Massachusetts 01867 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Emergency Only: 911 - All Other Calls: (781) 944 -1212 • Fax: (781) 944 -2893 Web: www.cireading.ma.us /police/ EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Change of Officer/Beneficial Interest - Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza of Reading LLC June 20, 2017 Chief Mark D. Segalla Reading Police Department 15 Union Street Reading, MA 01867 Chief Segalla, As directed by your Office and in accordance with Reading Police Department Policy and Procedures, I have placed together an Executive Summary of the application for Change of Officer/Beneficial Interest for Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza of Reading, LLC d/b /a "Anthony's Coal Fired Pizza" (48 Walkers Brook Drive). Officers, directors, stockholders and manager: 1) This LLC has numerous LLC members, Members of Board of Managers, and Stockholders (see application). 2) Proposed Ownership Changes: - Charles E. Locke, Jr - Ronald DiNella 3) Beneficial Interest Contact Change: - Matthew Miclea I find no reason why the Change of Officer /Beneficial Interest application should not go forward. Respectfully Submitted, L . et. Rich'ard Abate Criminal Division Commander 5bal °FRF9o,.� Town of Reading Public Works Department 16 Lowell Street 9. NCO i�QO�P Reading, MA 01867 -2683 Fax: (781) 942 -5441 ENGINEERING DIVISION Website: www.readingma.gov (781) 942 -9082 NOTICE This notice is to inform you that the Board of Selectmen will be having a preliminary discussion regarding a proposed cell tower adjacent to the Auburn Street water tank. This item is scheduled to start at 8:OOPM on Tuesday, June 27, 2017 at Town Hall in the Selectmen meeting room. The Town is proposing a cell tower to help address many issues including but not limited to; replacement of the water tank, overcrowding and structural deficiencies to the tank due to the cellular equipment, safety hazards, increased public safety coverage, and poor cell coverage. The intent of this meeting is to discuss the scope of the project; possible timeline; participants, including public safety entities, and the involvement of the Public. Abutters have been invited and are welcome to attend. It is important to note that this is one of many meetings open to the Public, and the Selectmen will not be taking a vote on this item at this time. 50\ June 14, 2017 Chief Mark Segalla Reading Police Department 1.5 Union Street Reading, MA 01897 Dear Chief Segalla: I understand that Reading is contemplating the installation of a new communications tower to foster public safety and other public radio communications. I congratulate Reading on this effort and hope that the project is approved and soon is in operation. Communications towers are critical components to municipal infrastructure and unfortunately due to their usual locations they are somewhat out of sight and out of mind, similar to water lines, sewer lines and other types of infrastructure. It is not until a fault occurs in one does the public become aware of both their existence and importance of these invaluable municipal assets. In terms of emergency communications, a broadcast tower is essential to transmit and receive messages to emergency service providers. Each and every day a municipal dispatch center receives a request for a needed emergency service. A caller may be calling to report a traffic accident, a fire, a medical emergency or other requests that are serviced on a daily basis. It is through the use of radio communications that these services are not only dispatched, but managed as well. Having a licensed radio frequency(s) and state of the art communications equipment the call center is able to dispatch and monitor the progress of any incident to ensure the incident is properly being serviced. Shared frequencies, land lines or even cellular communications are no substitute for private public safety radio communications. Given the size and topography of our jurisdictions it essential that agencies have quality tower(s) in place to host their communication capabilities. We at GBPC /BAPERN advise many local agencies on tower siting and specifications. Within the last three years we have worked with the Towns of Hanson, Marshfield and the Plymouth County Sheriff's Department on tower projects. LMO In the case of all three we were able to co- locate some BAPERN area wide and district frequencies on their towers. This enhanced and /or increased our regional coverage used by all jurisdictions in providing or receiving mutual aid. I have referred your potential project to our radio engineers to determine if GBPC /BAPERN could directly benefit from a new tower in Reading. At present, we have some fifty plus locations in Eastern Massachusetts. Fortunately, in many of the locations we have been able to co- locate BAPERN equipment on publicly owned facilities. We are always looking at further collaboration to reduce our reliance and expense at private sector locations. Your project, if approved, will certainly benefit Reading and depending on location may be a boon to regional municipal aid capability as well. Please let me know if there is anything else we can do to assist you with this project? Sincerely, Joseph G. Griffin, Director of Operations GREATER BOSTON POLICE COUNCIL The Greater Boston Police Council (GBPC) can trace it's start back to the late 60's. An informal group of Police Chiefs from some Metro Boston communities had a series of meetings about what we now refer to as mutual aid. Their concerns at the time were man power, training, funding and sharing of assets. The core of the group where Chiefs Bergan of Chelsea, Regan of Cambridge, O'Brien of Somerville, Purcell of Newton, Commissioner McNamara of Boston and some other chiefs from neighboring cities and towns. At that time there was no formal structure, meeting schedule or any financial obligation on the part of the agencies, it was merely a group of chiefs who would meet now and then to discuss timely topics. The period 1968 - 1972 was a period of great civil unrest nation- wide, the focus being namely Americas involvement in Viet Nam. Given the large number of colleges and universities in the area, Boston was a hot bed of dissent. In late '69 there were some very loud protests in the Boston/ Cambridge area, some of which produced violence and destruction. To properly police these disturbances Boston and or Cambridge had to request help from other Eastern Massachusetts Police Agencies. Although many communities sent aid, the large complicating factor was the lack of communication between departments. Back in this time period police agencies generally had one frequency by which to communicate with their officers. Some smaller agencies would even share one frequency. However, when many agencies responded to a designated community needing assistance there was no effective means of communication for command and control. The sole means of radio communication at the time was the Inter City frequency that could communicate from one departments base station to another departments base. Thereby if an officer in say an area of Somerville wanted to communicate with a contingent of officers from Medford, The t00 �� Somerville commander would contact their dispatch center, the dispatch center would then call via the inter -city to Medford dispatch who in turn would contact their officers, would may have already been in Somerville. This was state of art at the time but a very ineffective means of communication, further where there was only one frequency it was very often a case where more than one agency would try to broadcast at the same time another would be trying to transmit. Often a dispatch center receiving a request from the field, would revert to calling the neighboring department on the telephone. Realizing that Law Enforcement was starting into a new era where more and more mutual aid would come into play, this informal group looked at communications or the lack thereof as their number one priority. In 1971 this core group brainstormed and looking at the state of land mobile radio quickly realized that there were just insufficient frequencies in the high band allocation to solve their issues. They therefore petitioned the FCC for a block of frequencies in the Ultra High bands (UFH) so that like - minded Metro Boston agencies could migrate into the planned public safety radio network. At the same time the group formalized and registered as a 501 C (3) non - profit corporation, dues were to be assessed on a per capita basis and as the radio system build out was started, each department was also assessed an annual amount for remote lines (telephone lines to carry the radio signal from a base station to a transmission tower). The OBPC now legally incorporated and directed by an Executive Board of Police Chiefs decided to refer to the new radio collaborative as the Boston Area Police Emergency Radio Network (BAPERN) . After a two to three - year period of planning, design and funding the network started to come on line on a department by department basis around mid to late 1974. The initial group of departments numbered around forty and encompassed in addition to the legacy departments mentioned above agencies such as Quincy, Milton, Dedham, Waltham, Medford, Revere and others. The network was comprised of five frequencies two area wide (would cover all agencies) and three districts (covering smaller foot prints for more localized needs. Over time the network continued to grow. Adding departments and splitting frequencies when distance between agencies made such splitting or sharing possible. From this start back in '74 - '75 the network has grown to a 2017 membership of some 172 Law Enforcement agencies from Amesbury and Salisbury on the New Hampshire border west to Townsend and Groton, southerly following just inside RT. 495 to include Framingham, Ashland and continuing south into Plymouth County including Brockton, Plymouth and Mattapoisett by the canal. Within the next two years our expansion into Bristol County will be complete with Seekonk, Fall River and other agencies. Also included as full members are a host of Federal agencies such as the FBI, UUSP and VA Hospital Police, major medical institutions such as MGH, BID and others along with Harvard, MIT and BC to name a few campus police departments. The system has also grown from the initial five frequencies to a present day sixteen including six tactical frequencies capable of inscription. One of the lessons learned after 9/11 was the need of law enforcement communication networks that were capable of serving multiple departments engaged in multi - agency incident response. The term inter - operable communications was born and as the Department of Justice researched the various models BAPERN stood out as having solved that problem many years ago. Today, as stated, BAPERN serves over one hundred seventy agencies on a network covering virtually all of Eastern Massachusetts providing police services to some three million people. It is still run as a self - supporting non - profit charging member agencies annual dues and remote line fees that are used to fund the day to day operations of the Council as well as the maintenance and constant upgrading of the radio network. &r' Memo To: Board of Selectman Robert W. LeLacheur, Jr., Town Manager From: Jeffrey T. Zager, Director of Public Works Ryan Percival, P.E., Town Engineer Peter Isbell, Water/ Sewer Supervisor Jane Kinsella, Assistant DPW Director Arthur Menezes, Water Department Janine Brussard, Collectors Department Date: June 20, 2017 Re: Public Works Policy Committee In mid -2016 the Public Work's Policy Committee (which consists of the Director of Public Works; Assistant Director; Town Engineer; Water and Sewer Supervisor; and various staff from Engineering, Water Metering and Collectors) was initially formed as a meeting to discuss updating some of the Water Division fees/ policies. We quickly learned that there were more questions than answers, and the group became an effective sounding board. This energetic discussion soon spurred a gap analysis for policies and procedures within the Department of Public Works. Over the past year the committee has met several times and exchanged many ideas and information, but since the Department policies and procedures have not been overhauled in many years, the task has been slow and daunting. Therefore, the committee has tried to compartmentalize the needs of the department to help facilitate the process. The process can be broken up into several keys areas: 1. Developing and answering a list of questions that will hone the Town and Department's philosophy. 2. Researching comparable communities to develop a decision matrix for the future fee structure in the Department. 3. Compiling policies that were never formally adopted by the Board of Selectmen when the Selectmen absorbed the duties of the Board of Public Works (i.e. Driveway Rules and Regulations). These Policies have been historically practiced by both the Department and the Board. 4. Performing a system wide lead audit of the water distribution system- this is more than 50% complete. Although the audit is arduous due to the thorough approach we have taken, we expect Page 1 of 2 e 56 \i the Town will have a higher degree of certainty of the remaining lead in the system when the audit is complete. Developing policies and fees. This methodology will provide the guidelines used to shape and refresh the Department's operations and increase our effectiveness to serve the public. Moving forward the Board can expect periodic updates as well as recommendations from this committee. June 22, 2017 For Immediate Release For Further information, contact; Karen Jameson Interim Treasurer 16 Lowell Street Reading, MA 01867 Tel: (781) 942 -6634 Reading $6,645,000 Bonds Net 1.503 %; $1,490,000 Notes Net 1.074% Karen Jameson, Interim Town Treasurer, received competitive bids from bond and note underwriters on Wednesday, June 21, 2017 for a $7,370,000 10 -year bond issue and a $1,490,000, 165 -day bond anticipation note issue. Fifth Third Securities, Inc. was the winning bidder on the Bonds with an average interest rate of 1.503 %. Eastern Bank was the winning bidder on the Notes with a net interest cost of 1.074 %. The Town received a total of 9 bids on the Bonds and 3 bids on the Notes. Bond and Note proceeds will be used to finance various municipal purposes. Prior to the sale, S &P Global Ratings, a municipal credit rating agency, affirmed the Town's AAA underlying long -term debt rating, the highest attainable rating. The agency cited the Town's very strong economy, strong management with good financial policies, very strong budgetary flexibility, very strong liquidity and very strong debt and contingent liability position as positive credit factors. The bids for the Bonds and Notes were accepted at the offices of the Town's Financial Advisor, FirstSouthwest, a Division of Hilltop Securities, Inc., at 54 Canal Street in Boston. -end- PARITY Result Screen Page I of I a. m. - ED:ST! : E Upcoming Calendar Overview Compare Summary Bid Results Reading (Town) $7,370,000 General Obligation Municipal Purpose Loan of 2017 Bonds The following bids were submitted using PARITY@ and displayed ranked by lowest TIC. Click on the name of each bidder to see the respective bids. *Awarding the Bonds to a specific bidder will provide you with the Reoffering Prices and Yields. 198 1 -1 tademaj, �, -2002 -Dk�,al H-C, All rights feserved, .— --------- -1-11k, � https:llw-%,vw.newissuchome.i-deal.com/Parity/asp/main.,i.sp?fi-aiiie=content&page=p,cirityR... 6/21/2017 W PARITY Bid I"mm Page I of I Upcoming Calendar Overview Resulk Excel Fifth Third Sec ties, Inc. - Cincinnati , OH's Bid •:rNT47 "�• Leading (Town) $7,370,000 General Obligation Municipal purpose Loan of 2017 Bonds For the aggregate principal amount of $7,370,000.00, we will pay you $8,263,155.10, plus accrued interest from the date of issue to the date of delivery. The Bonds are to bear interest at the following rate(s): Maturity Date Amount $ Coupon % Yield % Dollar Price 06/15/2018 810M 4.0000 0.8300 103.019 06/15/2019 805M 4.0000 0.9600 105.883 06/15/2020 795M 4.0000 1.0600 108.539 06/15/2021 1 795M 4.0000 1.1600 110.956 06/15/2022 795M 4.0000 1.2700 113.078 06/15/2023 795M 4.0000 1.4000 114.812 06/15/2024 795M 4.0000 1.5100 116.387 06/15/2025 795M 4.0000 1.6000 117.866 06/15/2026 1 495M 4.0000 1.7600 118.489 06/15/2027 490M 4.0000 1.8600 119.371 Total Interest Gost: 4 0,buts,- 1'1U.b/ Premium: $893,155.10 Net Interest Cost: $614 TIC: 1.503659 Time last Bid Received On:06/21/2017 This proposal is made subject to all of the terms and conditions of the Official Bid Form, the Official Notice of Sale, and the Preliminary Official Statement, all of which are made a part hereof, Bidder: Fifth Third Securities, Inc., Cincinnati , OH Contact: Geoff Kobayashi Title: Telephone: 513-534-5535 Fax: Issuer Name: Town of Reading Accepted By: Date: Company Name: Accepted By: Date: J 1931 -2002 i -fleal ( LC, All nghts r <:se.rved, Iiad marks littps : / /www.newissucliome. i- deal.com/ Parity / asp /main. asp ?fraiiie = content &page= parityBi... 6/21/2017 5�3 PARITY Bid Form Page 1. of l Upcoming Calendar Overview Result Excel Janney Montgomery Scott LLC - P ' adelphia , PA's Bid r�1i IP' Reading (Town) $7,370,000 General Obligation Municipal purpose Loan of 2017 Bonds For the aggregate principal amount of $7,370,000.00, we will pay you $8,205,262.70, plus accrued interest from the date of issue to the date of delive ry. The Bonds are to bear interest at the following rate(s): Maturity Date Amount $ Coupon % Yield % Dollar Price 06/15/2018 810M 2.0000 0.8300 101.114 06/15/2019 805M 4.0000 0.9500 105.903 06/15/2020 795M 4.0000 1.0600 108.539 06/15/2021 795M 4.0000 1.1600 110.956 06/15/2022 795M 3.0000 1.2400 108.438 06/15/2023 795M 4.0000 1.4000 114.812 06/15/2024 795M 4.0000 1.5100 116.387 06/15/2025 1 795M 4.0000 1.6000 117.866 06/15/2026 495M 4.0000 1.76001 118.489 06/15/2027 490M 4.0000 1.90001 118.970 I otal interest Lost: 4) 1 "+001 1 1 L.Ve Premium: $835,262.70 Net Interest Cost: r 2 TIC: Time Last Bid Received On:06/21/2017 11:27:17 EDST This proposal is made subject to all of the terms and conditions of the Official Bid Form, the Official Notice of Sale, and the Preliminary Official Statement, all of which are made a part hereof. Bidder: Janney Montgomery Scott LLC, Philadelphia , PA Contact: Lauren Carter Title: Telephone:215- 665 -6521 Fax: 215- 557 -8648 Issuer Name: Town of Reading Accepted By: Date: Company Name: Accepted By: Date: 1 si 11- '2.002 i- Ck °>ril H -C . All rights tese vc cl Tr<ad 11iaa , S littps : / /www,newisstieliome.i- deal.com /Parity /asp /main. asp ?frame= content &page= parityBi. 6/21/2017 Town of Reading, Massachusetts $6,645, 000 Gen ligation Municipal Purpose Loan of 2017 Bonds 5, 000 RMHS R ovation Project (1) Dated June 30, 2017 Ch. 44, s. 7(1), auth 121912016 Pricing Summary Maturity Type of Bond Coupon Yield Maturity Value Price Dollar Price 06/15/2018 Serial Coupon 4.000% 0.830% 140,000.00 103.019% 144,226.60 06/15/2019 Serial Coupon 4.000% 0.960% 135,000.00 105.883% 142,942.05 06/15/2020 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.060% 135,000.00 108.539% 146,527.65 06/15/2021 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.160% 135,000.00 110.956% 149,790.60 06/15/2022 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.270% 135,000.00 113.078% 152,655.30 06/15/2023 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.400% 135,000.00 114.812% 154,996.20 06/15/2024 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.510% 135,000.00 116.387% 157,122.45 06/15/2025 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.600% 135,000.00 117.866% 159,119.10 06/15/2026 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.760% 135,000.00 118.489% 159,960.15 06/15/2027 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.860% 135,000.00 119.371% 161,150.85 Total $1,355,000.00 $1,528,490.95 Bid Information ParAmount of Bonds ........................................................................................................................ ............................... $1,355,000.00 ReofferingPremium or ( Discount) ..................................................................................................... ............................... 173,490.95 GrossProduction .............................................................................................................................. ............................... $1,528,490.95 Total Underwriter's Discount (0. 192%) ..................... .... ... ........... ............................................ ...... ...- ... .... ...... ...... .... ....... $(2,595.55) Bid( 112. 612%) ................................................................................................................................. ............................... 1,525,895.40 TotalPurchase Price ......................................................................................................................... ............................... $1,525,895.40 BondYear Dollars ............................................................................................................................. ............................... $7,373.54 AverageLife ...................................................................................................................................... ............................... 5.442 Years AverageCoupon ............................................................................................................................... ............................... 4.0000000% Net Interest Cost ( NIC) .......... ............................... ................................................... ............................... .......................... 1.6823160% TrueInterest Cost ( TIC) .................................................................................................................... ............................... 1.5469387% FirstSouthwest, a Division of Hilltop Securities Inc. Public Finance t5p,5 Town of Reading, Massachusetts $6,645 000 General Obligation Municipal Purpose Loan of 2017 Bonds 00 a e rovements A -1 & A -2 (0) Dated June 30, 2017 Ch. 44, s. 8, auth 412212013 Pricing Summary Maturity Type of Bond Coupon Yield Maturity Value Price Dollar Price 06/15/2018 Serial Coupon 4.000% 0.830% 86,500.00 103.019% 89,111.44 06/15/2019 Serial Coupon 4.000% 0.960% 85,000.00 105.883% 90,000.55 06/15/2020 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.060% 85,000.00 108.539% 92,258.15 06/15/2021 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.160% 85,000.00 110.956% 94,312.60 06/15/2022 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.270% 85,000.00 113.078% 96,116.30 06/15/2023 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.400% 85,000.00 114.812 % 97,590.20 06/15/2024 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.510% 85,000.00 116.387% 98,928.95 06/15/2025 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.600% 85,000.00 117.866% 100,186.10 06/15/2026 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.760% 85,000.00 118.489% 100,715.65 06/15/2027 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.860% 85,000.00 119.371% 101,465.35 Total $851,500.00 $960,685,29 Bid Information ParAmount of Bonds ......................................................................................................................... ............................... $851,500.00 ReofferingPremium or ( Discount) ...................................................................................................... ............................... 109,185.29 GrossProduction ................................................................................................................................ ............................... $960,685.29 Total Underwriter's Discount (0. 192%) ............................................................................................... ............................... $(1,631.08) Bid( 112. 631%) ................................................................................................................................... ............................... 959,054.21 TotalPurchase Price .......................................................................................................................... ............................... $959,054.21 BondYear Dollars .............................................................................................................................. ............................... $4,641.02 AverageLife ....................................................................................................................................... ............................... 5.450 Years AverageCoupon ................................................................................................................................. ............................... 3.9999999% NetInterest Cost ( NIC) ....................................................................................................................... ............................... 1.6825311% TrueInterest Cost ( TIC) ...................................................................................................................... ............................... 1.5471120% FirstSouthwest, a Division of Hilltop Securities Inc. Public Finance 56o Town of Reading, Massachusetts $6,645, 000 General Obligation Municipal Purpose Loan of 2017 Bonds 000 Water 'n Improvements Phase 1 (0) Dated June 30, 2017 Ch. 44, s. 8(5), auth 912912014 Pricing Summary Maturity Type of Bond Coupon Yield Maturity Value Price Dollar Price 06/15/2018 Serial Coupon 4.000% 0.830% 230,000.00 103.019% 236,943.70 06/15/2019 Serial Coupon 4.000% 0.960% 225,000.00 105.883% 238,236.75 06/15/2020 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.060% 225,000.00 108.539% 244,212.75 06/15/2021 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.160% 225,000.00 110.956% 249,651.00 06/15/2022 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.270% 225,000.00 113.078% 254,425.50 06/15/2023 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.400% 225,000.00 114.812% 258,327.00 06/15/2024 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.510% 225,000.00 116.387% 261,870.75 06/15/2025 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.600% 225,000.00 117.866% 265,198.50 06115/2026 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.760% 225,000.00 118.489% 266,600.25 06/15/2027 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.860% 225,000.00 119.371% 268,584.75 Total - - $2,255,000.00 - $2,544,050.95 Bid Information ParAmount of Bonds ........... ..... .... ....... ... ..... .... .:..... ........ ... .... ....... ............ ..... .... ........ ..... ........... .... ... .. ..... ....... ...... ... ....... . $2,255,000,00 Reoffering Premium or ( Discount) ..................................................................................................... ............................... 289,050.95 GrossProduction .............................................................................................................................. ............................... $2,544,050.95 Total Underwriter's Discount (0. 192%) ............................................................................................. ............................... $(4,319.53) Bid( 112. 627%) ................ .... ... ..... ..... ....... ....... ........ ........... ..... ... ......... .... ..... ....... .... ........... ...... .... ... ...... ...... ........ ........... I. 2,539,731.42 TotalPurchase Price ......................................................................................................................... ............................... $2,539,731.42 BondYear Dollars ........................................................................................................................... ............................... $12,286.04 AverageLife ...................................................................................................................................... ............................... 5.448 Years AverageCoupon ............................................................................................................................... ............................... 4.0000000% NetInterest Cost ( NIC) ...................................................................................................................... ............................... 1.6824805% TrueInterest Cost ( TIC) .................................................................................................................... ............................... 1.5470712% FirstSouthwest, a Division of Hilltop Securities Inc. Public Finance 5�1 Bid Information Town of Reading, Massachusetts ............................... $2,183,500.00 ReofferingPremium or ( Discount) ..................................................................................................... ............................... 245,983.52 $6,645, 000 G aL0121jQation Municipal Purpose Loan of 2017 Bonds Total Underwriter's Discount (0. 192%) ............................................................................................. ............................... $(4,182.57) $2,183,500 Sewer tion (I) Dated June 30, 2017 TotalPurchase Price ......................................................................................................................... ............................... $2,425,300.95 BondYear Dollars ............................................................................................................................. ............................... $9,682.52 Ch. 44, s. 7(1), auth 412712017 ............................... 4.434 Years AverageCoupon ............................................................................................................................... ............................... 4.0000000% NetInterest Cost ( NIC) ...................................................................................................................... Pricing Summary TrueInterest Cost ( TIC) ................... .... .... ..... ....... ..... ....... ...... ....... .... ...... ........ ......... .... ...... .... ............. .... ......... I............... 1.3952531% Maturity Type of Bond Coupon Yield Maturity Value Price Dollar Price 06/15/2018 Serial Coupon 4.000% 0.830% 278,500.00 103.019% 286,907.92 06/15/2019 Serial Coupon 4.000% 0.960% 275,000.00 105.883% 291,178.25 06/15/2020 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.060% 275,000.00 108.539% 298,482.25 06/15/2021 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.160% 275,000.00 110.956% 305,129.00 06/15/2022 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.270% 270,000.00 113.078% 305,310.60 06/15/2023 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.400% 270,000.00 114.812% 309,992.40 06/15/2024 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.510% 270,000.00 116.387% 314,244.90 06/15/2025 Serial Coupon 4.000% 1.600% 270,000.00 117.866% 318,238.20 Total - - $2,183,500.00 - $2,429,483.52 Bid Information ParAmount of Bonds ........................................................................................................................ ............................... $2,183,500.00 ReofferingPremium or ( Discount) ..................................................................................................... ............................... 245,983.52 GrossProduction. - - - ... .... .................. ................... . ...... ...... .. .. ... .............. .... ........ .............. ........ .. ................ $2,429,483.52 Total Underwriter's Discount (0. 192%) ............................................................................................. ............................... $(4,182.57) Bid( 111. 074%) ............... ....... .... ........... ... ...... ..... .... .... ........ ... .... ...... ..... ...... ... ......... ..... ............... ...... ..... ................... I...... 2,425,300.95 TotalPurchase Price ......................................................................................................................... ............................... $2,425,300.95 BondYear Dollars ............................................................................................................................. ............................... $9,682.52 AverageLife ...................................................................................................................................... ............................... 4.434 Years AverageCoupon ............................................................................................................................... ............................... 4.0000000% NetInterest Cost ( NIC) ...................................................................................................................... ............................... 1.5027066% TrueInterest Cost ( TIC) ................... .... .... ..... ....... ..... ....... ...... ....... .... ...... ........ ......... .... ...... .... ............. .... ......... I............... 1.3952531% FirstSouthwest, a Division of Hilltop Securities Inc. Public Finance 5e,% Town of Reading, Massachusetts neral Obligation Bonds & 490,000 General Obli e 30, 2017 /� /J'I � Blended Results !� s(✓ (r- 1 VAbWset4r4 Proof Of Bond Yield @ 1.4567471% G Y.y✓C-(,4 � Date Cashflow PV Factor Present Value Cumulative PV 06/30/2017 1.000000ox 12/15/2017 1,620,361.46 0.9933695x 1,609,617.69 1,609,617.69 06/15/2018 867,900.00 0.9861864x 855,911.18 2,465,528.86 12/15/2018 118,200.00 0.9790552x 115,724.33 2,581,253.19 06/15/2019 838,200.00 0.9719756x 814,709.95 3,395,963.14 12/15/2019 103,800.00 0.9649472x 100,161.52 3,496,124.66 06/15/2020 823, 800.00 0.9579696x 789,175.35 4,285,300.01 12/15/2020 89,400.00 0.9510424x 85,023.19 4,370,323.20 06/15/2021 809,400.00 0.9441654x 764,207.47 5,134,530.68 12/15/2021 75,000.00 0.9373381x 70,300.36 5,204,831.03 06/15/2022 790, 000.00 0.9305601x 735,142.50 5,939,973.53 12/15/2022 60,700.00 0.9238312x 56,076.55 5,996,050.08 06/15/2023 775,700.00 0.9171509x 711,433.95 6,707,484.03 12/15/2023 46,400.00 0.9105189x 42,248.08 6,749,732.10 06/15/2024 761,400.00 0.9039349x 688,256.03 7,437,988.13 12/15/2024 32,100.00 0.8973985x 28,806.49 7,466,794.62 06/15/2025 747,100.00 0.8909093x 665, 598.36 8,132, 392.98 12/15/2025 17,800.00 0.8844671 x 15, 743.51 8,148,136.50 06/15/2026 462,800.00 0.8780715x 406,371.47 8,554,507.97 12/15/2026 8,900.00 0.8717221 x 7,758.33 8,562,266.30 06/15/2027 453,900.00 0.8654186x 392,813.50 8,955,079.80 Total $9,502,861.46 $8,955,079.80 Derivation Of Target Amount ParAmount of Bonds ........................................................................................................................ ............................... $8,135,000.00 ReofferingPremium or ( Discount) ..................................................................................................... ............................... 820,079.80 OriginalIssue Proceeds .................................................................................................................... ............................... $8,955,079.80 FirstSouthwest, a Division of Hilltop Securities Inc. Public Finance 5e� Certificate of Award 1, the Treasurer of the Town of Reading, Massachusetts, hereby award the $6,645,000 General Obligation Municipal Purpose Loan of 2017 Bonds dated June 30, 2017 (the "Bonds") to the bidder submitting the bid attached hereto in accordance with the terms set forth in the attached bid and in the Notice of Sale dated June 14, 2017, relating to the Bonds, subject to the approval of this award by the Board of Selectmen. Date: June 21, 2017 ............ AM 66455275.1 M VOTE OF THE BOARD OF SELECTMEN I, the Clerk of the Board of Selectmen of the Town of Reading, Massachusetts (the "Town "), certify that at a meeting of the Board held June 27, 2017, of which meeting all members of the board were duly notified and at which a quorum was present, the following votes were unanimously passed, all of which appear upon the official record of the board in my custody: Voted: that the sale of the $6,645,000 General Obligation Municipal Purpose Loan of 2017 Bonds of the Town dated June 30, 2017 (the "Bonds "), to Fifth Third Securities, Inc. at the price of $7,449,981.97 and accrued interest, if any, is hereby approved and confirmed. The Bonds shall be payable on ,Tune 15 of the years and in the principal amounts and bear interest at the respective rates, as follows: Further Voted: to approve the sale of a $1,490,000 1.25 percent General Obligation Bond Anticipation Note of the Town dated June 30, 2017, and payable December 15, 2017 (the "Note "), to Eastern Bank at par and accrued interest plus a premium of $1,201.93. Further Voted: that in connection with the marketing and sale of the Bonds, the preparation and distribution of a Notice of Sale and Preliminary Official Statement dated June 14, 2017, and a final Official Statement dated June 21, 2017 (the "Official Statement "), each in such form as may be approved by the Town Treasurer, be and hereby are ratified, confirmed, approved and adopted. Further Voted: that in connection with the marketing and sale of the Note[s], the preparation and distribution of a Notice of Sale and Preliminary Official Statement dated June 16, 2017, and a final Official Statement dated June 21, 2017, each in such form as may be approved by the Town Treasurer, be and hereby are ratified, confirmed, approved and adopted. Further Voted: that the Town Treasurer and the Board of Selectmen be, and hereby are, authorized to execute and deliver continuing and significant events disclosure undertakings in compliance with SEC Rule 15c2 -12 in such forms as may be approved by bond counsel to the Town, which undertakings shall be incorporated by reference in the Interest Interest Year Amount Rate Year Amount Rate 2018 $735,000 4.00% 2023 $715,000 4.00% 2019 720,000 4.00 2024 715,000 4.00 2020 720,000 4.00 2025 715,000 4.00 2021 720,000 4.00 2026 445,000 4.00 2022 715,000 4.00 2027 445,000 4.00 Further Voted: to approve the sale of a $1,490,000 1.25 percent General Obligation Bond Anticipation Note of the Town dated June 30, 2017, and payable December 15, 2017 (the "Note "), to Eastern Bank at par and accrued interest plus a premium of $1,201.93. Further Voted: that in connection with the marketing and sale of the Bonds, the preparation and distribution of a Notice of Sale and Preliminary Official Statement dated June 14, 2017, and a final Official Statement dated June 21, 2017 (the "Official Statement "), each in such form as may be approved by the Town Treasurer, be and hereby are ratified, confirmed, approved and adopted. Further Voted: that in connection with the marketing and sale of the Note[s], the preparation and distribution of a Notice of Sale and Preliminary Official Statement dated June 16, 2017, and a final Official Statement dated June 21, 2017, each in such form as may be approved by the Town Treasurer, be and hereby are ratified, confirmed, approved and adopted. Further Voted: that the Town Treasurer and the Board of Selectmen be, and hereby are, authorized to execute and deliver continuing and significant events disclosure undertakings in compliance with SEC Rule 15c2 -12 in such forms as may be approved by bond counsel to the Town, which undertakings shall be incorporated by reference in the Bonds and Notes, as applicable, for the benefit of the holders of the Bonds and Notes from time to time. Further Voted: that we authorize and direct the Treasurer to review and update the Town's post- issuance federal tax compliance procedures with such changes, if any, as the Treasurer and bond counsel deem necessary in order to monitor and maintain the tax - exempt status of the Bonds. Further Voted: that each member of the Board of Selectmen, the Town Clerk and the Town Treasurer be and hereby are, authorized to take any and all such actions, and execute and deliver such certificates, receipts or other documents as may be determined by them, or any of them, to be necessary or convenient to carry into effect the provisions of the foregoing votes. I further certify that the votes were taken at a meeting open to the public, that no vote was taken by secret ballot, that a notice stating the place, date, time and agenda for the meeting (which agenda included the adoption of the above votes) was filed with the Town Clerk and a copy thereof posted in a manner conspicuously visible to the public at all hours in or on the municipal building that the office of the Town Clerk is located or, if applicable, in accordance with an alternative method of notice prescribed or approved by the Attorney General as set forth in 940 CMR 29.03(2)(b), at least 48 hours, not including Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays, prior to the time of the meeting and remained so posted at the time of the meeting, that no deliberations or decision in connection with the sale of the Bonds or Notes were taken in executive session, all in accordance with G.L. c.30A, § §18 -25, as amended. Dated: June 21, 2017 Clerk of the Board of Selectmen AM 66596436.1 ��a f THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Number: 2017 -4 Fee: $0.00 TOWN OF READING This is to certify that TIMOTHY KELLEY, CO- PRESIDENT OF THE ROTARY CLUB IS HEREBY GRANTED A SPECIAL ONE -DAY LICENSE TO SERVE ALL ALCOHOL AT THE READING ROTARY CLUB INSTALLATION DINNER TO BE HELD ON JUNE 23, 2017 AT ST. AGNES CHURCH, 186 WOBURN STREET BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 6:00 P.M. TO 10:00 P.M. Under Chapter 138, Section 14, of the Liquor Control Act. Holders of one day licenses shall provide a bartender and /or servers who are trained and authorized to make decisions regarding continued service of alcoholic beverages to attendees. There shall be no self service of any alcoholic beverage at any event approved as a one day license. This permission is granted in conformity with the Statutes and Ordinances relating thereto and expires at 10:00 p.m., June 23, 2017, unless suspended or revoked subject to the following conditions: 1. Liquor to be purchased from authorized distributor. 2. Liquor to be stored on site only before and a event. Y Date Issued: June 22, 2017 THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Number: 2017 -5 Fee: $50.00 TOWN OF READING This is to certify that DARIO MORELLI, 292 GROVE STREET, READING IS HEREBY GRANTED A SPECIAL ONE -DAY LICENSE FOR THE SALE OF BEER AND WINE TO BE SERVED ON THE PREMISES FOR THE MEADOW BROOK GOLF CLUB CLUB SOCIAL WITH CLAMBAKE TO BE HELD ON JUNE 24, 2017 ON THE POOL DECK AND ADJACENT LAWN AREA AT 292 GROVE STREET BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 11:00 A.M. TO 6:00 P.M. Under Chapter 138, Section 14, of the Liquor Control Act. Holders of one day licenses shall provide a bartender and /or servers who are trained and authorized to make decisions regarding continued service of alcoholic beverages to attendees. There shall be no self service of any alcoholic beverage at any event approved as a one day license. This permission is granted in conformity with the Statutes and Ordinances relating thereto and expires at 6:01 p.m. on June 24, 2017 unless suspended or revoked subject to the following conditions: 1. Liquor to be purchased from authorized di utor. Li uor to stored on site only before an ere . Date Issued: June 22, 2017 J\)D June 21, 2017 Re: Natural Gas Work in Reading. ( work order # 1150628 ) Dear City Officials, National Grid is committed to safely and reliably delivering energy to our community. That's why we are replacing the natural gas main at 201 to 276 Forest ST., Reading, MA. As part of this project, we will also replace the natural gas service piping that connects the main to the customer's gas meters. Approximately 28 premises are within the construction limits. Construction is expected to begin on June 22, 2017 and anticipated to last to August 4, 2017 weather permitting. We will work hard to complete this project promptly and with minimal disruption to the community Visit ngrid.com /mainline to view a YouTube video on this gas main replacement process. A second video explaining the replacement of the service pipe to customer homes is available at ngrid.com /serviceline. Enclosed is a notification that will be distributed to all affected constituents. We're here for you if you have any questions about this project. Please contact me at 1- 781 - 907 -3419 We look forward to working with you as we upgrade our community's infrastructure. Sincerely, Grace Sawaya Manager, Community & Customer Management National Grid 40 Sylvan RD Waltham, MA 02451 June 21, 2017 re: work order # 1150628 NANCY SOUZA OR CURRENT OCCUPANT 203 FOREST ST HH READING MA 01867 -1401 Dear Resident/Business Owner, Energy plays a critical role in our day -to -day lives and ensures the well -being of our community. That's why we are investing in infrastructure upgrades that will help us to provide safe and reliable natural gas to our customers for years to come. We will be working in your neighborhood. National Grid and RJ Devereaux Corp will be performing infrastructure upgrades in the area of 201 to 276 Forest ST., Reading, MA. Date: On or about June 22, 2017 Completion time: Approximately August 4, 2017 Construction days and hours: 7:00 a.m. - 4:00 p.m. Monday thru Saturday. What you can expect during construction. Typical natural gas main replacement and service construction includes: • Marking out underground utilities within the project scope area (e.g., water, sewer, gas, electric, etc) • Excavation of the street and laying of new gas main • Relaying National Grid customer's individual gas services and connecting that service to the new main • Meters may need to be relocated to the outside of the home or business. • Temporary or permanent restoration of disturbed areas in accordance with the town ordinance Visit ngrid.com /mainline to view a video about the gas main replacement process on YouTube. We'll contact you when we are ready to connect your gas service to the new natural gas main. A representative from National Grid or the contractor crew will reach out to the affected homes and businesses at least 24 -48 hours in advance to scheduling the work. Every National Grid employee and contractor doing work for us are required to carry ID. For the crew to connect your gas service to the new main, they will need access to your home and appliances. Typical service line work will take one business day and during this time you will experience a temporary interruption of natural gas service. When the work is complete, a gas technician will be dispatched to turn on your gas meter relight your gas appliances. Visit ngrid.com /serviceline to view an example of this process. Everything you need to know about upgrading the natural gas main on your street. PROJECT DETAILS What can I expect during this project? (Phases listed are typical, but may vary depending on the job). • PHASE 1: includes mark outs of utilities within the street within the project scope. • PHASE 2: National Grid and /or our qualified contractor crew will conduct the necessary work on the gas main within the street. PHASE 3: Once the main work is complete, crews will begin coordinating the service line work. Affected residents and business owners will be contacted by a member of the crew at least 24 -48 hours in advanced so that the work on their service line can be coordinated. This work typically takes one day to complete, and the owner may be asked to provide National grid access during construction. A trained technician of National Grid will relight your gas appliances once the work on the service line is complete. Every National Grid employee carries a photo ID card and any contractor doing work for us is also required to carry ID. PHASE 4: The crew will begin closing out the project and will restore the area to in accordance with all regulations and permits. Note: If you are not a customer and do not have a natural gas service line, Phase 3 is for notification only. GAS SAFETY Who should I contact if I smell gas on the street or in my home during the project? Please call 1- 800 - 233 -5325 immediately from a safe location outside your home or from a neighbor's home. METERS Will my meter be affected by the project? Some main replacement projects do require the crew to move the meters. If the letter you received indicates that your meter will be moved as part of the project, a representative from National Grid will assess the work that is needed at your location. If it's part of this project, why will my meter have to be moved outside? Moving the meter outside helps to improve safety and also allows easier access for National Grid to access the meter in the future. What if my meter is already outside? If your meter is already outside your service may still be interrupted for a brief period of time. SCHEDULE If I cannot be home during the proposed construction dates, may I make alternative arrangements for the crews to access my home? You can coordinate a time with the crew foreman. Why are there no crews working when construction is scheduled to begin today? Last minute schedule changes are sometimes possible. If there is a long -term schedule change, National Grid will notify your local Department of Public Works and will also send you additional communications. CONSTRUCTION If questions arise while the crew is working on the street, who can I contact? You may ask to speak with the crew foreman or you can call the National Grid representatives number provided on the project notification letter. Will I be able to park on the street during construction? Restriction notifications posted throughout the designated work zone and crews will notify residents if temporary parking restrictions will be required. There are road closure signs on my street. Will I be able to get to my house? At times there may be restricted access but every effort will be made to allow residences access to their homes during construction. You may approach the crew foreman or flag person if you require additional information. Town of Reading 16 Lowell Street Reading, MA 01867 -2683 HISTORICAL COMMISSION (781) 942 -6661 historical Oci .reading.ma.us June 15, 2017 Nick Safina, Chair Reading Community Planning and Development Commission 16 Lowell Street Reading, MA 01867 -2683 RE: Reading Historical Commission Follow Up Comments: Historic U.S. Post OfficePrroperty, 136 Haven Street, Reading 40R Application For Development Dear Mr. Safina, I'm writing on behalf of the Reading Historical Commission (RHC) regarding the application for development under MGL Chapter 40R, at the site of the U.S. Post Office at 136 Haven Street, Reading. This 40R application is scheduled for a hearing before the CPDC on June 26, 2017. The RHC had previously transmitted its comments regarding the Developer's initial application to develop this property, on February 20, 2017. With this letter, RHC transmits to you our recent letter to Brona Simon, Executive Director of the Massachusetts Historical C'onnAssion, containing our comments concerning the revised application scheduled to he presented to you on June 26`". We hope our commentary in the attached will be helpful to you. Should you have any questions or wish to discuss this further with the RHC, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you very much. Sincerely yours, Qj Jonathan Barnes On behalf of the Reading Historical Commission Cc: Julie Mercier, Community Development Director Reading Historical Commission Encl: 1 mo Town of Reading 16 Lowell Street Reading, MA 01867 -2683 Brona Simon, Executive Director Massachusetts Historical Commission 220 William T. Morrissey Boulevard Boston, MA 02125 HISTORICAL COMMISSION (781) 942 -6661 historical Qci.reading.ma.us June 15, 2017 RE: Reading Historical Commission Follow Up Comments: Historic U.S. Post Office Property, 136 Haven Street�WReading _ 46R Application For Development, MHC #„ RC.53331 Dear Ms. Simon, Please accept this follow up to our previous February 23, 2017 letter concerning the above - referenced 40R project for the property at 136 Haven Street, Reading, Massachusetts. By that earlier letter, the RHC submitted its comments to this Developer's initial application materials for the redevelopment of the former U.S. Post Office property, which is listed on both the State and Reading Historical and Architectural Inventory. As you know, this property is subject to an MHC Protective Covenant, and the Developer has recently submitted for MHC's approval, revised application materials for the property. The RHC has reviewed these revised materials, and submits these updated comments for your consideration. As previously stated, the RHC supports the redevelopment of this property in accordance with the Town's "Downtown Smart Growth District' zoning bylaw. This application conforms with that bylaw, and the RHC supports it in general. The most recent plan design changes are responsive to the concerns and issues raised previously by both, the RHC and the MHC. Many redesign features of this plan are very positive, and the RHC appreciates and strongly endorses these redesign features: • The proposed residential block addition is now pulled back entirely off of the original historic building, and is now further back from the front of the original building and from the Haven Street sight line. • The overall massing of the proposed residential block addition has been =0 further reduced with a smaller footprint, and the penthouse level corners have been pulled in from the building edges. These reductions, coupled with the further pull back of the residential block from the front of the historic building and corresponding further "pull back" of the penthouse level, greatly improve the proportion and scaled relationship of this residential addition with respect to the original historic building as well as with the surrounding neighborhood. Several modifications to the exterior of the residential addition also serve to minimize the overall massing, and better complement and integrate the aesthetic and historic relationship of this building with the historic fabric of the downtown. As previously stated, the RHC acknowledges and appreciates the preservation of the original Post Office building fagade with minimal modifications to the building's entrances and window bays, as well as preserving the entrance stairs, balcony and balustrades and most of the landscape structures on Haven Street. However, the RHC continues to advocate that the P.O. boxes inside the original Post Office building should be retained and displayed in an appropriate manner. The RHC feels that the latest design goes a long way to preserve and respect the prominence and "place" of the original historic Post Office building, and much of the overwhelming massing, size and scale of the initial submission has been adequately addressed. From an historical preservation perspective, the RHC believes that this revised design has minimal adverse impact on the original historic building. The RHC respects the MHC's oversight authority for this project, subject to Protective Covenant. We hope these comments will be helpful and we look forward to your determination and any further recommendations. Should you have any questions or wish to discuss this further with the RHC, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely yours, Jonathan Bames On behalf of the RHC Cc: Ryan Maciej, MHC CPDC RHC =0