HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-11-03 Zoning Board of Appeals MinutesOFR
rAn
w
Town of Reading
Meeting Minutes
P"LC IVU
TOW 14 C! r",K
READING. Mr.�SS.
Board - Committee - Commission - Council: 1011 APR !g P U- 2q,
Zoning Board of Appeals
Date: 2016-11-03 Time: 7:00 PM
Building: Reading Town Hall Location: Selectmen Meeting Room
Address: 16 Lowell Street
Purpose: General Business
Attendees: Members - Present:
David Traniello, Chairman
John Jarema
Damase Caouette
Robert Redfern
Nick Pernice
Members - Not Present:
Erik Hagstrom
Kathleen Hackett
Others Present:
Michael Panzero, 78 Essex Street, Middleton
Michael Paige, Griffen Engineer
Gary & Annmarie Goodspeed, 155 Wakefield Street
Matthew Leahy, 40 Torre Street
Brad Latham, 643 Main Street
Tony D'Arezzo, 130 John Street
Craig McKenna 38 Autumn Lane
Matt Langis, Phoenix Architect
Andrew Jones, Phoenix Architect
Tom Bergendahl, 90-92 Green Street
Minutes Respectfully Submitted By: Kim Saunders, Recording Secretary
Topics of Discussion:
Mr. Traniello opened the meeting at 7:00 p.m.
Case # 16-15
The Zoning Board of Appeals continued a Public Hearing on petition of Gary & Annmarie
Goodspeed who seeks a Variance under Section 5.5 Accessory Buildings of the zoning bylaws in
order to construct an in -ground pool and accessory building on the property located at 155
Wakefield Street in Reading, Massachusetts.
Mr. Goodspeed briefed the members the reason he is seeking a variance for the cabana. He said
it was built two years ago without an approved building permit. He stated he talked with Glen
Redmond the Building Inspector, and believes he has clarified the concerns that were brought
forward at the last meeting
Mr. Redfern agreed the pool meets the required setbacks.
Page 1 1
Town of Reading
j4 b Meeting Minutes
�o
/�39' 1.4CONQ��P�
Mr. Goodspeed added he became aware of the cabana not meeting setbacks when Mr. Redmond
reviewed the pool application.
Mr. Jarema agreed the distance between the dwelling and the pool meets the setback
requirements. Mr. Redmond measures from the waterline rather than grade deck. He asked if
the cabana could be moved since it does not meet the. required setbacks.
Mr. Goodspeed answered there is a retaining wall on his property that is not shown on the plot
plan. The cabana is as far back as it can get due to the retaining wall.
Mr. Pernice questioned if the retaining wall slopes down. Mr. Goodspeed explained why the
cabana was built in the current location.
Mr. Traniello read an email received from Glen Redmond in regards to this case.
Mr. Traniello questioned if the four criteria to grant a variance was met. He said since the
cabana is already built, the Board has the choice of given approval of the location or request the
owner to move it.
Mr. Traniello opened the meeting for public comment.
Craig Mckenna of 38 Autumn Lane agreed with Mr. Goodspeed, due to the property sloping
there was no other choice on the location of the cabana.
Mr. Redfern questioned the foundation of the cabana and if it could be moved. After Mr.
Goodspeed described how the cabana was built, Mr. Redfern stated he believes the first criteria
were met.
Mr. Caouette questioned when Mr. Redmond did a site visit to the property. Mr. Goodspeed said
he came before the first meeting. He said at the site visit Mr. Redmond said he had no concerns
with the construction.
Mr. Jarema gave his opinion the cabana could be made smaller to meet the setback requirements.
He stated he is having difficulty with the first criteria. Mr. Goodspeed answered if he sought a
permit when he built the cabana; he met the 5' setback requirements.
On a motion made by Mr. Redfern, seconded by Mr. Caouette, the Zoning Board of Appeals
granted a variance for Case # 16-15 for Gary and Annmarie Goodspeed who sought a variance
under section 5.5 Accessory Building of the zoning bylaws in order to construct an accessory
building on the property located at 155 Wakefield Street in Reading, MA
Vote was 4-1-0 (Redfern, Traniello, Caouette, Pernice in favor; Jarema against)
Case # 16-19
Page 1 2
Town of Reading
Meeting Minutes
The Zoning Board of Appeals held a Public Hearing on the application by O. Bradley Latham,
Esq., on behalf of Arborgreen, Inc., pursuant to M.G.L. Ch. 40A §6, for Variances and such
other relief the Board deems necessary under Section 6.3 of the Zoning Bylaw to allow use of the
property, located at 90-92 Green Street in Reading, Massachusetts, as a four (4) family
dwelling.
Attorney Brad Latham introduced Mr. Langlis the architect and Mr. Tom Berghendal the owner
of 90-92 Green Street. He said the existing building and lot predates zoning. The dwelling is a 5
unit building built in 1920. He described the property and said the building needs work. The
owner would like to tear down the existing building and rebuild a 4 unit dwelling. He described
the proposed dwelling and property. He listed the percentage of relief that would need to be
approved by the Board. He asked the Board for comments and concerns.
Mr. Langis from Phoenix Architect reviewed the existing condition of the dwelling. He said the
interior would need to be brought up to code, an egress would need to be added and the exterior
has significant damage. The alteration is considered a level 3, which is 50% of the structure. He
added the proposed building would be structurally sound and be in character in the rest of the
neighborhood.
Mr. Latham asked the Board to consider the renovation to bring the existing dwelling up to code
a basis for hardship. He added Glen stopped the 5`h unit from being rented due to the danger of
the egress.
Mr. Redfern questioned if the proposed units would be rented or sold. Mr. Berghendal answered
he would like to sell, but is hesitant of the real estate market.
Mr. Redfern asked about the existing shed in the back of the property. Mr. Berghendal agreed to
remove the shed.
Mr. Latham distributed a document consistent with the arguments he presented. He added the
owner is willing to move back the proposed dwelling.
Mr. Redfern agreed the proposal is an improvement to the neighborhood. He questioned if the
substantial hardship criteria was met.
Mr. Jarema questioned why in 1920 the property was assigned two addresses. He said the
proposed project would need a site review. The approval from the CPDC might increase the
number of waivers for the variance. He said the proposed gross floor area is 51 %. He said there
are a number of issues that need to be resolved in site plan before the ZBA can make a decision.
He questioned the parking in the front of the garage, landscape requirements and loading zone.
He asked if the Board was premature on trying to make decision.
Mr. Latham answered the ZBA would need to approve the location of the building on the lot. He
added if relief is granted alternative conditions can be added. He asked the Board to decide
before going to the CPDC.
Page 1 3
o` OFR'
h
Town of Reading
�,<..Meeting Minutes
6J9; INCOk4OP
Mr. Jarema said maximum lot coverage, front, side and rear setback requirements would need to
be addressed. He questioned if the Board is moving to quick. The existing structure meets the
25% and the proposed is twice the size.
Mr. Caouette asked about the process and which Town Board should approve first. He
suggested moving the dwelling back to provide adequate parking.
Mr. Pernice gave his opinion the proposal should be approved by the ZBA to see if the use is
allowed, then to CPDC for their approval. He questioned why the proposal only has 4 units,
when it is a 5 unit building. Mr. Latham answered the objective of the proposal was to find a
change that was attractive to the Town Boards. He added 5 units would make the rooms smaller.
Mr. Traniello read an email from Mr. Redmond in regards to the case
Mr. Traniello reviewed what issues the Board should be addressing. He added parking should be
a consideration and should not impact public parking.
Mr. Traniello stated the courts do not give guidance from the courts on how to deal with
buildings, but the Board should consider serious public safety issues. He said he had concerns
with the location of the dwelling, setbacks, lot coverage and parking.
Mr. Traniello opened and then closed the Public Comment.
The Board discussed if the parking spaces should be 1.5 per unit.
Mr. Redfern discussed his concern with the parking. He requested the building be moved back.
After the Board expressed their concerns and commented on the proposal, Mr. Latham asked the
Board to continue the public hearing. It was agreed the pubic hearing would need to be
continued to January 5, 2017.
On a motion made by Mr. Caouette, seconded by Mr. Jarema, the Zoning Board of Appeals
approved the request to continue the public hearing to January 5, 2017.
Vote was 5-0-0 (Traniello, Jarema, Caouette, Redfern, Pernice)
Case # 16-20
The Zoning Board of Appeals held a Public Hearing on the petition of MJP Properties Inc. who
seek a Variance under Section 6.3 of the zoning bylaws in order to construct an open deck 10' x
12' as per plan with an 11.3' side yard setback rather than the 15.0' (required) on the property
located at 43 Track Road in Reading, Massachusetts.
Mr. Paige from Griffen Engineering said the petitioner is seeking a variance to construct a 10x12
deck, which would encroach on the setback. He clarified the setback requirement should be 20'
not 15' as noted in the notice.
Mr. Paige listed the criteria for the variance. He gave his opinion the new dwelling is in
character of the neighborhood.
Page 1 4
FR o
r
M +
a
's'l9e'Scott', P
Town of Reading
Meeting Minutes
Mr. Pemice asked the height of the deck. He questioned the topography. Mr. Panzero from MJP
Properties described the new dwelling and the grade of the property.
Mr. Caouette questioned the plot plan that was presented. It was clarified the plot plan showed
the existing dwelling that was razed.
Mr. Jarema questioned why the deck was not considered in the actual construction of the
dwelling. Mr. Panzero answered the future buyers added the deck. Mr. Jarema asked why the
deck could not be moved towards the immediate abutter. Mr. Panzero explained the setup of the
area.
Mr. Jarema stated a dimensional layout would show the completion of the project. He added
new construction could be adjusted.
Mr. Redfern said he is concerned about the abutter's privacy. The deck is high and is over the
existing fence. He questioned if the slider is the secondary access. He gave suggestions to
decrease the encroachment.
Mr. Traniello read the email from Glen Redmond in regards to the case.
Mr. Traniello stated he did not think the four criteria have been met.
Mr. Traniello opened the meeting for public comment.
Matthew Leahy of 40 Torre Street expressed his concern with the proposed deck.
Mr. Traniello closed the meeting for public comment.
Mr. Caouette commented the project should have had more thought before razing the structure.
Mr. Jarema questioned the 2 n means of egress. He questioned if a variance could be granted
with new construction.
After Mr. Traniello discussed with the petitioner his options, Mr. Panzo requested the petition to
be withdrawn without prejudice.
On a motion made by Mr. Caouette, seconded by Mr. Jarema, the Zoning Board of Appeals
granted the petitioners request to withdraw the petition without prejudice.
Vote 5-0-0 (Redfern, Jarema, Traniello, Hagstrom, Pernice)
Other Business
Mr. Traniello reminded the Board of the meeting being held on November 10, 2016.
Adjournment
Page 1 5
aF R
yc Town of Reading
b Meeting Minutes
6Jg'lYCOR4ORP
On a motion by Mr. Redfern, seconded by Mr. Pernice, the Zoning Board of Appeals moved to
adjourn the meeting at 8:50 p.m.
Vote 5-0-0 (Redfern, Jarema, Traniello, Hagstrom, Pernice)
Page 1 6