Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-09-25 Reading Housing Authority Minutes - Executive SessionREADING HOUSING AUTHORITY MINUTES OF THE EXECUTIVE SESSION MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2000 An Executive Session meeting of the Reading Housing Authority was held on Monday, September 25, 2000 at 6:20 P.M. at the office of the Authority, 22 Frank D. Tanner Drive in the town of Reading, Massachusetts. The meeting was called to order at 6:20 P.M. with the Chair, Mr. Allen, presiding. Also in attendance were Mr. Kelley, Ms. Connors and Mr. Sweet as well as the Executive Director, Ms. Plansky. The Authority's attorney was also in attendance. Executive Session At 6:20, upon a motion duly made by Mr. Sweet and seconded by Ms. Connors, it was VOTED: To adjourn to Executive Session for the purpose of discussing real estate matters and to return to regular session before adjourning by the following roll call vote: Mr. Kelley — aye Ms. Connors — aye Mr. Sweet —aye Mr. Allen - aye The Chairman then declared said motion carried and said vote in effect. 82 Linden Street — Comnrehensive Permit Anneal Mr. Greco reported on the mediation conference call on September 20, 2000 with Housing Appeals Committee, Mr. Lohe; Town Counsel Ted Cohen; Bill Gillis representing the abutters and Mr. Greco. Mr. Greco reported that the 6 units was the only financially viable alternative for the Authority. Without the income from the 6 units, this project would not work. In an effort of all parties to compromise and with the rising costs to the Authority due to time and the appeal, a suggestion was made to have a private developer /contractor buy the property and convert it to 4 units with 1 -2 units being Section 8 project based. Mr. Gillis stated that he believed this would be acceptable to the abutters. If the 4 units are agreeable to the abutters, there are 3 possibilities: 1. The ZBA could grant a permit for the construction/rehabilitation of 4 units in this building by agreement of the neighbors and the Town. This would be agreeable to the Town as it would take them out of a lawsuit; the neighbors seem agreeable because of less density in the neighborhood; RHA would get at least I unit of Section 8 in the building. Mr. Greco believes thattl would also be agreeable to the Seller as he would be getting his asking price' is action would effectively Page 2 9/25/2000 Minutes close down the lawsuit. The only problem is that the numbers are tight with 2 project based Section 8 units, but would work with one. 2. The second option could be a Local Initiatives Program which would require that 25% of the units be set aside for 15 years. This would also be agreeable to the Selectmen and would count for certification toward affordable housing. 3. The third option would be the issuance of a Comprehensive Permit by the Housing Appeals Committee on our current appeal. This would have the advantage of permitting project -based Section 8 to be used under the Comprehensive Permit route for the first time and would assist this Authority and other authorities in new efforts. This is a less likely scenario as the Housing Appeals Committee would be making a landmark decision and might be reluctant to do so. Upon a motion duly made by Mr. Sweet and seconded by Ms. Connors, it was unanimously VOTED: To authorize our attorney, Mr. Greco, to negotiate a settlement at 82 Linden Street of four (4) units which shall be acceptable to the neighbors, the Town; the Authority and the Seller and to attempt to obtain 1 -2 units to be set aside under housing authority programs within the 4 unit- approved building. The Chairman then declared said motion carried and said vote in effect. At 7:20 P.M, there being no further business before the Board, it was VOTED: To adjourn from Executive Session and to return to regular session by the following roll call vote: Mr. Kelley — aye Ms. Connors — aye Mr. Sweet —aye Mr. Allen - aye The Chairman then declared said motion carried and said vote in effect. Respectfully submitted, Margare . Plansky, Secretary and Executive Director