HomeMy WebLinkAbout1984-03-27 Reading Housing Authority MinutesREADING HORSING AUTHORITY
Minutes of the Special Meeting - March 27, 1984
The Reading Housing Authority met in Special Session at 7 :30 P.M. on Tuesday,
March 27, 1984 at 22 Prank D. Tanner Drive in the Town of Reading, Massachusetts.
Proper notice was posted by the Executive Director in accordance with the provisions
of Chapter 39 of the General Laws as amended.
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman, Mr. Dempster. Those members
also present were Mrs. Swain, Mr. Rand, Mr. Westra and Mr. White, forming a quorum.
Mrs. Pierce, the Executive Director, was also present.
The meeting was also attended by the following:
Ms. Jane Gallahue, Health Director for the Reading Board of Health
Ms. Carole Ryan, RN, Geriatric Outreach Team of Melrose
Ms. Rosaleen Boylan, Cash Manager, Dept. of Mental Health
At this time, a motion was made by Mr. Rand and seconded by Mr. White, and
(Wanimously:
VOTED: That the meeting go into Executive Session
The Chairman thereupon declared said motion carried and said vote in effect.
Discussion at this time concerned an elderly applicant for housing.
A motion was 'then made by Mr. Westra and seconded by Mrs. min, and unanimously:
VOTED: That the meeting return to regular session.
The Chairman thereupon declared said motion carried and said vote in effect.
Mr. Dempster then thanked the above -named persons for attending the meeting,
and said that they Board would review the situation at their next regular meeting,
and r6port back to them.
There being no further business to come before the meeting, and upon a motion
duly made and seconded, it was unanimously voted to adjourn the meeting, and'
(W the Chairman thereupon declared said motion carried, and the meeting was adjourned
at 8:45 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
)Janet Pierce, Executive Director
and Secretary
A MW �t
q- a g s ;
n
J3
i
n
Ya
D
6 � c
y r
(W PRIORITY CATEGORIES
The Regulations Prescribing Standards
and Procedures for Tenant Selection
and Tenant Transfer, promulgated May 5,
1976, set forth a system of chronolog-
ical order selection within priority
categories. Vancancies are offered
to the applicant having the lowest
control number in the him lori.or rity
category on the Waiting List for the
appropriate number %of bedrooms. ..
Once an applicant has been determined
eligible for housing, he /she is as-
signed to a priority selection category.
Assignment to a priority category is
based on information provided by the
applicant and verified by the LHA staff.
The first priority is given to appli-
cants displaced by fire, flood, or
other natural disaster. This category
cannot be used if the displaced appli-
cant is currently living in housing
suitable for his /her household size
and income.
/ The second priority is given to appli-
cants who are being displaced by public
improvements such as highway construc-
tion or urban renewal. The displace-
ment must have occurred within three
years of the date of application.
This category is also used for appli-
cants displaced by termination of
tenancy due to enforcement of or com-
pliance with Article II of the State
Sanitary Code.
The third priority is given to current
residents whom the LHA must relocate
under either of two sets of circum-
stances. One, to transfer residents
(W living in a unit which is substandard
or seriously defective into another
unit within the LHA's housing stock.
Two, to transfer residents displaced
from an LHA rental assistance unit
through no fault of his /her own.
14
TENANT SELECTION
REGULATION
ASSIGNMENT TO CATEGORY
DISPLACED BY NATURAL
FORCES
DISPLACED BY PUBLIC
ACTION
DISPLACED UNDER LHA
LEASE COMMITMENTS
The forth priority shall be given to
current tenants whom the LHA determines
to be either overhoused or underhoused
according to the Bedroom Size Assignment
Policy (Appendix C of the Tenant Selec-
tion Regulation) or where a documented
medical problem necessitates, a move to
a more appropriate unit. Resident .
households occuping a unit too large for
their family size shall be required to
move to a smaller unit if .there are
overcrowded families on the transfer
Waiting List.
For further explanation of this lcategory,
see Tenant Transfer, p.3..
TRANSFERS FOR GOOD
CAUSE
All other applicants not appropriate .STANDARD APPLICANT
..for a higher priority category are
placed.in the fifth priority category,
standard applicants.
Standard applicants includes handicapped
persons eligible for conventional Ch.
667 units. Handicapped -applicants
needing a specially modified unit are
placed on the Waiting List for those
particular units.
Exceptional case is not a .priority
category.. It is not a Waiting List.
It is not -'an exception to the require-
ments for eligibility.
Rather, it is a discretionary waiver to
be used by the LHA as an exception to
standard waiting list procedure.in order
to provide immediate housing in those
rare instances where an eligible appli-
cant's current housing situation is so
dire that it presents a clear and pre-
sent-danger to the life of.the appli-
cant or other household member.
The LHA staff must exercise careful
judgment in. evaluating requests for
this discretionary waiver. The burden
of proof is on the applicant.to docu-
ment the.facts of his /her case and
alternative solutions explored. The
LHA must balance the need of an indi-
vidual with the right of all the other
applicants to a unit offer within a
reasonable time.
EXCEPTIONAL CASES
15
(W
The LHA must fully document each case
it deems to be an exceptional case.
The record for each case shall
document all facts of. the situation
and all other housing alternatives
explored by the applicant in order to
prove that providing immediate housing
is, in fact, the only possible
solution to the dire circumstances
threatening the applicant. All
placements made by use of this
discretionary waiver shall be reported
to EOCD on a quarterly basis.
An applicant denied exceptional case
status has the right to appeal the
decision to the Authority within
thirty (30) days receipt of
notification. XX
J
EXCEPTIONAL CASES
CONTINUED
16
James W. Oien
Area Director
EASTERN MIDDLESEX AREA OFFICE 727 -9550
LOWELL ROAD
No. READING, MASSACHUSETTS 01 864
April 5, 1984
Ms. Janet Pierce, Director of Housing
Reading Housing Authority
Frank Tanner Drive
Reading, Mass. 01867
Dear Ms. Pierce,
I am writing to inform you of the psychiatric support services that
are available to Ms. Violet Weston and her daughter, Lois, while they.
live at the Tanner Apartments. The case manager, Carol Ryan, (662 -6808)
will visit Ms. Violet Weston weekly for the first two months, and if all
(W goes well, every other week thereafter. A day program is also available
to her to provide her with increased daily structure and support. Lois'
is also followed by a case manager, Rosaleen Boylan, who can be contacted
at 727 -9550, extension 678.
If any problems develop, I would encourage you to contact the case
managers early on, before a crisis develops. The Eastern Middlesex Crisis
Team can be called if they (the case managers) are inaccessible or if imme-
diate intervention is needed. The Crisis Team is available 24 hours a 'ay
and has mobile outreach capacity. Their number is 246 -4351.
Should Lois require hospitalization, the Crisis Team can be conta#ed
for evaluation and assistance in transferring her to the pre - screening li
services of the New England Memorial Hospital.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
James W. Oien
Area Director
JWO /NM:ctj
cc: Carol Ryan, Geriatric Outreach Team
Rosaleen Boylan, Case Manager
Dale Dydo, Case Management Supervisor
Mary Connors, Crisis Team
JUDITH A. PIANI, B.A.C.C.A., CHM.
SANDRA J. TRAINOR, R.N., M.S.N.
JAMES J. NUGENT, JR., R.S., C.H.O.
TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS 01867
BOARD OF HEALTH
Mrs. Janet Pierce
Executive Director
Reading Housing Authority
22 Tanner Drive
Reading, MA., 01867
52 Sanborn Street, Room 12A
Tel. 942 -0500 - Ext. 31, 32, 39
March 23, 1984
M. JANE GALLAHUE, M.P.H., C.M.O.
Health Director.
MAgY POLYCHRONES
Secretary
Dear Mrs. Pierce:
This letter is to advise you that the Reading Board of Health will be faced
with a very serious health problem relative to Article 2 of the Mass. State
Sanitary Code: "Minimum Standards of Fitness for Human Habitation ".
At present, there is a person currently living at 309B Haven Street in the
first floor apartment in the name of Violet P. Weston. Mrs. Weston is cur -
,n rently required to use a bathroom.in the cellar which consists of a water'
closet only. The shower is not. in working condition. The .bathroom is not he: ated
and free from chronic dampness. At the last inspection on 3/16/84, there ',was
no hot water, although Mrs. Weston was able to heat water in a kettle.
Mrs. Weston's landlord will be totally remodelling this apartment in order to
provide the.necessary facilities in accordance with the State Sanitary Code.
The landlord will be curtailing the services for this dwelling for an extended
period of time. When this condition arises, Mrs. Weston's apartment will be
unfit for human habitation in that state. The interior of the apartment is in
need of extra.service repairs: The ceiling in the living room is flaking and
peeling and in the danger of falling once renovations begin. The same condi-
tion exists within.the bedroom.- The windows are not airtight and free from
chronic dampness.
I feel that when the renovating is due to start, Mrs. Weston's dwelling will
be unfit for human habitation. Mrs. Weston is 76 years old and will be in
need of housing within the near future.
Very truly yours,
JJT:P
J
JOSEPH J. TABBI, R.S.
HEALTH INSPECTOR
Eastern Middlesex
Mental Xealtb Clinic
and the
Eastern Middlesex
Mental Xealtb
Association, Inc.
Green Street Center
for Geriatric Care
179 Green Street
Melrose, Mass. 02176
Telephone 665 -9154
Serving:
Melrose
North Reading
Reading
Stoneham
Wakefield
An affiliate of the
National and Massa -
chusettsMental Health
4ssociations in partner-
ship with theMassa-
chusetts Department
of Mental Health
April 5, 1984
To: Janet Pierce
Director, Reading Housing Authority
Tanner Drive
Reading,.MA.. 01867
Re: Violet Weston
I. As a follow -up to our meeting with the Board on Match 27,
I offer the following information regarding my efforts to find
suitable housing for Mrs. Weston:
II. In considering housing options, several alternatives had to
be explored. Who is in need of housing: Mrs. Weston, alone, or
Mrs. Weston and daughter, Lois; was it temporary or permanent?
If Lois were to live with her mother, how could Mrs. Weston
afford a $x+50. /month apartment (not subsidized) if Lois were
hospitalized and not receiving SSI payments? And Mrs. Weston
is adamant that she will not consider moving without Lois going
with her. (Mrs. Weston is also Lois' legal guardian.)
III. (1) Mrs. Weston has a Section 8 Housing Certificate for a one -
bedroom apartment. This certificate expires May'l, 1984,
and has been extended twice;
(2) She is calling ads in the paper with no results;
(3) Ruth Turnquist, outreach worker for the Reading Council, is
also looking for her;
(4) Her name is on the list with Ted Watson, Green St. Apts.,
but no apartments are available;
(5) She placed an ad in the Chronicle for a one - bedroom] apart-
ment, with no results;
(6) She is first on the Section 8 two - bedroom list;
(7) I have contacted all the Councils on Aging inquirinjg if they
know of any apartments in their areas -no results;
(8) I called several YMCA's looking for a room. They want $40.-
60. /week per person, and have no kitchen facilities;
(9) Mrs. Weston (and her daughter) are not eligible fo either
Peter Sanborn or Cedar Glen apartments because (a) 'their
situation is not considered a priority, (b) the waiting list
at Cedar Glen is 3 -5 years, (c) Peter Sanborn cannon take the
daughter, Lois;
(10) Mrs. Weston's only relative is a sister -in -law who 'is unable
to provide shelter for Mrs. Weston;
(11) Temporary shelter was also considered. The only facility
Mrs. Weston could afford is Well Spring House, Gloucester.
This is time limited (approximately 1 month). However, there
is a problem with a temporary placement while repairs are
being done. On Mrs. Weston's return to the house on Haven St.,
her rent would be increased to $425. /month. Failure to pay
this increase (she currently pays $71. /month) would result in
eviction within two weeks.