HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-01-11 School Committee Minutes _ erti orn a
-^ Town of Reading
n � Meeting Minutes
. RECEIVED
TOWN CLERK
READING. MASS.
Board - Committee - Commission - Council:
School Committee 1616 FEB - 1 P 2 33 '
Date: 2016-01-11 Time: 7:00 PM
Building: School - Memorial High Location: Superintendent Conference Room
Address: 82 Oakland Road
Purpose: General Meeting Session: Open Session
Attendees: Members - Present:
Jeanne Borawski, Linda Snow Dockser, Elaine Webb, Chuck Robinson &Julie
Joyce
Members - Not Present:
Members Gary When, Student Representative Carl Gillies
Others Present:
John Doherty, Superintendent, Craig Martin, Assistant Superintendent,
Director of Student Services Carolyn Wilson, Director of Finance Martha
Sybert, Catherine Spinelli, Daily Chronicle, Student Representative Alex
Nazzaro, RTA President Chris Copeland, Joshua Eaton Principal Eric Sprung,
Barrows Principal Heather Leonard, Parker Principal Jayne Viladenis,RMHS
Principal Adam Bakr, Town Manager Bob LeLacheur, Fincom Members Mark
Dockser, David Neshat, Craig Merry, Anne Johnson Landry, Vanessa
Alvarado and Paula Perry, Selectman Barry Berman, Joanne Senders,
Reading Advocate
Minutes Respectfully Submitted By: Linda Engelson on behalf of the Chair
Topics of Discussion:
I. Call to Order
Chair Robinson called the School Committee to order at 7:02 p.m.
IL Recommended Procedure
A. Public Input
There was none
B. Consent A eg nda
Mr. Robinson reviewed the consent agenda and asked if any members would like
any items removed from the consent agenda.
Mrs. Borawski moved,seconded by Dr. Snow Dockser,to approve the
consent agenda as presented. The motion carried 5-0.
C. Reports
Page 1 1
Student
Ms.Nazzaro reported on the upcoming midterms at RMHS and the Martin Luther
King Celebration at which the high school chorus will be performing.
Liaisons
Dr. Snow Dockser reminded everyone of the Martin Luther King Celebration on
January 18' from 9:30— 11:30 a.m. There will be representatives from the GSA
and A World of Difference Clubs participating in this year's event.
Fincom Chair Dockser called the Finance Committee to order at 7:13 p.m.
D. New Business
Finance Committee Chair Mark Dockser called the Finance Committee to order at
7:13 p.m.
FY2017 Budeet Presentation
The Superintendent set the context in the development of this budget. Dr.
Doherty pointed out that he would like to use the term"recommended"very
loosely. He is not comfortable with the reductions that will have to be made in
this budget. He next reviewed the strategic objectives and district goals;all of
which were a guide to the development of this budget. He reviewed district
enrollment trends which show that our enrollment is holding steady with an
occasional bubble. He also reviewed the Special Education enrollment and other
high needs subgroups enrollments. Fincom has recommended a budget with an
increase of 3.25%. The Superintendent's Recommended Budget being presented
was developed with an increase of 3.5%. This budget has a higher percentage
increase from the Fincom recommendation due to the first year of the
implementation of the new science curriculum.
Superintendent Doherty then provided a financial overview including discussion
on revenues, accommodated costs and per pupil spending information.
Dr. Doherty briefly reviewed Special Education spending and comparisons to
comparable communities. Our Special Education spending is lower than several
surrounding communities because we are investing in in-district programs when
possible rather than outplacing students. In many cases these programs are in the
best interest of the child and have been very successful.
The FY2017 budget drivers include increases in salaries and benefits and special
education tuitions and transportation. Dr. Doherty went on to outline the
increases and decreases represented in the FYI Superintendent's Recommended
Budget. Dr. Doherty reviewed the budget by cost center and category. Additions
to this budget include restoration of the building per pupil amounts to FYI 5
levels,the addition of a .5 teacher at the elementary level,restoring the
pameducators hours to support the elementary secretaries and the addition of a 1.0
FTE Social Worker for the SSP program at Killam.
Page 1 2
He reviewed the budget reductions and said in the development of this budget the
administration worked to ensure the reductions had as little impact as possible.
There will be reductions in teaching staff, Special Education staff,paraeducator
staffing as well as increases in the offsets in all of the revolving accounts. He
continued reviewing the items that are not able to be addressed in this budget
which include free full day kindergarten,restructuring of the elementary schedule,
providing more elective options for our students,restructuring the high school
schedule and programming and the continued need for additional space.
Superintendent Doherty reviewed the identified needs that would require an
additional $1.9 million dollars.
The Committee members asked clarifying questions.
FYI Administration Cost Center
The Superintendent presented the Administration Cost Center. He outlined the
major administration initiatives for this budget which include the leadership for
implementation of the MA Curriculum Frameworks,Educator Evaluation,
technology initiatives,common assessments,the development and
implementation of a long range plan to transition to full day kindergarten and
expanding the preschool program,address building issues at the Killam School,
develop a system to evaluate resource allocation and to re-allocate resources
based on student need, develop a system to measure performance and connect
expenditures to performance measures,review and revise personnel procedures
and policies and to strengthen the human resource systems to better support staff.
Dr. Doherty went on to review the staffing, cost center by function and object.
Budget drivers for this cost center include salaries, an increase in legal services
needed for upcoming collective bargaining sessions,decreases in supplies and
materials due to a transition to a paperless environment,restoring professional
development and increasing in software licensing as we implement position
tracking.
Regular Day Cost Center
Dr. Doherty reviewed the makeup and functions of this cost center. Dr. Doherty
reviewed the drivers to this cost center. As with all cost centers,contractual
collective bargaining salary increases make up a major portion of the budget.
There will also be increases in revolving account offsets and decreases in staffing.
The building per pupil will be restored to the FYI levels and this will be the first
year of three of phasing in of the new science curriculum.
Dr. Doherty reviewed the impact of the proposed regular day reductions. The
reductions include the elimination of the Freshman Advisory Program, a
reduction in the Latin program and reading services at the middle school. The
Health &Wellness Department Chair position and after school library hours are
being eliminated. Grade 3—5 class sizes in 6 classrooms will be increased due to
the elimination of 2.0 FTE elementary positions.
The School Committee asked clarifying questions.
Page 1 3
Mrs. Webb requested a breakdown of donations made for athletics and
extracurricular.
Dr. Doherty said the Special Education and District Wide Pmgmm Cost Centers
will be presented on Thursday night.
III. Routine Matters
a. Bills and Payroll (A)
There were none.
b. Calendar
IV.Information
Mrs. Webb attended the Coolidge Middle School Science Team Reunion to
Remember and Honor John McCarthy at Coolidge over the weekend. It was a
great tribute attended by 150 people.
V. Future Business
VI.Adjournment
The Finance Committee adjourned at 9:02 nom.
Mrs.Borawski moved, seconded by Mn. Joyce to adjourn. The motion
carried 5-0.
The meeting adjourned at 9:03 p.m.
NOTE: The minutes reflect the order as stated in the posted meeting agenda not
the order they occurred during the meeting.
�k k
J F. Doherty, Ed.D.
Page 14
1/19/2016
4
1,�� Overvle.
Q� euci.y ocnd
�� He en es
p nd i �s. �_ ommunitics
(�yy Town Op..Lngeudge(5
Requests
Town Manager
Other Budgets
Robett W.Le Lacd e. JI CFA lost lolal is ud�2xls
Town Manager Shaws Cost
Jgouary 2016 F_Lerprise Fonds
BACKGROUND
Reading BUdget Model
Revenues-estimated by Town Accountant based on historical trends
but does NOT include known one-time amounts(such as interest earned
on construction funds).Estimate is acknowledged to be$0.5 million
below probable levels in order to be conservative.
Accommodated Costs-costs designated as shared by Town and
Schools OR unpredictable with little local influence OR a new priority for
the community,estimated by Town and School staff.
Operating Budgets-remainder of Revenues less Accommodated Costs,
divided up between Town and Schools in a historical proportional
method(now 64.16%Schools and 35.84%Town with the new Facilities
Department alignment)
1
1/19/2016
•
BACKGROUND
A 4, *'
FY13 -2.1% +3.60% mm x $10 mil. +L8%
FY14 +L5% +3.75% $1.05 mil. +28%
FY15 +0.4% +3.50% $1.7 mi1. .. +16%
M6 +4,4% +2.75% $L5 mil. +2.9%
FY17*• +2.1% +3.39% $2.0 mil. +3.1%
FY18+ +6% -+1.0% $2.Omil. +28%
FY39* +6% -+0.5% $1.75 mil. +29%
1 � $W�pdv p,ll�r � d � udltkluel I k
ixRIFI li�ws'E���uS�iGl rp dEf i�tl�. El o r
dM�f
iC.J�31dld�fM F# � ]�f
i GGOflltlldl�l.-s �ll.'1'Y02$b�
BACKGROUND
Const ed Revenue olpwth
*FY statewMe muufcipalre auegrowfh ofla is Ne t^ nm
MLOere�th the historical Rop 2%era(1982 to 2009 average
+5.2%tyear).-
Stele:MA Proposition 2%;State Aid lags
Loral:limited real estate to develop for Naw Growth:<10%CIP
ExpenM growth hewnd loI contindl
Unfunded state&federal mandates
National Hearth Insurance markets
Energy costs,snow&ice,out of district Special Education...
ource:"Massach usctts Ta xpayers Foundation D '
2
1/19/2016
BALANCING SERVICE WITH RESOURCES
* "RUNNING OUT OF RABBITS"
ExpandimiServicas duringtime f constrained rennue growth
High Quality Employees:deliberate hiring process
Working smarter[technology,collaboration&communication]
Working harder[night meetings,weekends]
Job sharing(between departments,regionalization)
Long term Planning[financial,community econ dev&housing[
Community Outreach for solutions
"Retain/Enhance services l use"
(4100
BALANCING SERVICE WITH RESOURCES
"RUNNING OUT OF RABBITS"
Etbandim Services during a time of constrained revenue growth
High Quality Employees:deliberate hiring process
Working smarter(technology,collaboration&communication)
Working harder[night meetings,weekends(
Job sharing[between departments,regionalization)
Long term Planning(financial,community seen dev&housing[
Community outreach for solutions
"Retain/Enhance services I use"
3
1/19/2016
CONSTRAINED REVENUES - PROP 21/2
�. _eae r �, ,•mmm��mnswauo�rer sea vxrom
ory xu •�cvn q o 3 en
w zcor iz as ae ssx �mz as nn
s.o <w ..n� �un�mnioowmm nwea�awm ro.wom
u.:.-: - ..nv ssx 3zx mza eoe wia memim
ildsai I39] _i0uengpyy yygg ggg gg yygg;p@5 pp B.Ef
� �'���VINI�Ctlf�l Itl6�h61Ia'••••.E s'.: arp �smrt
. esarrap2% ,ogertkies" cspSm7euns §7' °'
im'£x f1m1111oYt,
•
CONSTRAINED REVENUES - TRICKLE DOWN
Education $8,881 $7,740 -12.8%
Environ&Recur 355 212 -40.1%
Health Care 11,810 19,401 +64.3%
Human Service 4,409 4,109 -6.8%
Infrastructure 2,389 2,323 -2.8%
Law/Pub Safety 3,056 2,655 -13.1%
LOOALAID 2,090 1,022 -51.1%
Other 5,513 5,012 -9.1%
TOTALS 38,501 42,473 +10.3%
4
1/19/2016
CONSTRAINED REVENUE GROWTH - LOCAL
Gomoarat ve Lack of New Growth despite all-star Planning efforts
Neighbors*+18%vs.Reading+12%IS300k average annual difference)
iamou
i-,fmn.23%.rtrnnmd 12.o%,wokerl d 1 sk.wnh Reamn[3 E%.S.nnueni Lo%
Souse:MA Departmental Neveoue
/p r
Ardav, Natck
`�• ��at° Bedford INofth Anel er
VV Sg. Belmont rWinchestw
eading
Can g
Carter, bury
�P cord am
J pc`" vers urye ham eldLexington eL'nnfield roughYMansfield dMashfield gtonMilton ster
I 5
1/19/2016
25 PEER COMMUNITIES
r.
4 'a
y
E/ l
DO WE LOOK LIKE OUR`` PEERS?
::. 61!'ISI
Population 25,3277KS/72%
land Area 9.9 sq mi
Road miles 999
Budget $972m
Assessed Val. $4.0 bil.
*EQV/capita $1571,
Form of Gov't BOS/ ogr
To Mgr &28%Tn Adm
ualrzed Valuations represent the full and fair cash value
all taxable property for each municipality
6
1/19/2016
0
HOW DO WE COMPARE IN EQV PER CAPITA?
------- -- --------
®r
JIM
WHY EQV IS LOW: OUR TAX BASE
EQV/npR $156,654 $186,366 ,-15.8%
Res'IV.pde $144,396 $155,617 - 72%
Olp/capita $13,524 $28,235 -52.1%
inial 11,6]5 16,213
InOusMal '.383 ],d85
Pers prapetly 1.466 d,53]
7
1/19/2016
•
DIFFERENCES IN OUR REVENUE BASE
�x
Tax Levy 60.5% 66.6% ,-less*
Resltlenllal 91.4% 76.9%
R14,1W $53.8 mil. $54.8 m11. on h¢npline
CIP 86% 23.1%
CIP $5.0m11. $1E3mll. 1123mflly
State Fie 13.7% 1105; 'more*
Local Receipts 21.6% 17.5% ^more*
Dther 42% 4.9%
Peer Communities$14.60 SF home tax rate;$21-23 CIP lax rate
Reading$14.70 SF home tax rate and$14.70 CIP tax rate
PER CAPITA VS HOUSEHOLD INCOME
$36.441 MA per capita income*
$67,846 MA median household income*
$86.132 MA median family income*
$67.8461$36.44l a L9 people oar household
Reading 2.6 people per household(PPH)**
DOR uses per capita approach,which understates household wealth for purposes
of property tax discussions for communmes with more than 1.9 PPH
- Peer Communities likey>1.9 PPH but data is unknown versus 2.6 PPH
Reading ranks 9'^of 26 in Student Emellment/Population(more to follow)
MM859 cu
ffi£4P:fi�.
PPPO YP'
GS£9
•
8
1/19/2016
SINGLE FAMILY HOME PROPERTY TAXES
COMPARED TO PER CAPITA INCOME
s33 mo ♦
0
5'+0m
Sa,om ♦�j►
Ss.em /♦� ♦ _.....
530,WO$a0me550,mO5FOm0530.m0$90.QT'1590,RY51W,003330,WJ
Reading property taxes are on a trendline compared to per capita
income;If Reading is above Peer average in PPH then the do
point slides to the right and we are below trendline;$6,824 is
below Peer average$7,357
DO WE SPEND MONEY DIFFERENTLY?
Public SatCN 9.2m 8]�, *Ob".
Culture& 2-]tet 17+d *0.41,
RCcreatien
Education 395:. 39.16 +025
DPW 514 4.So +02%
Human Service 0.6% 0.7% -0.1%
Fixed Costs& 177% 17.8% -0.1%
Debt
01 Funtls) 224% 22.8% -0.4%
G,I G,1 3 65' 4 3`b I0 7',4
i No obvious significant differences-let's look more closely though
9
1/19/2016
J
PUBLIC SAFETY SPENDING
%OF BUDGET VERSUS PER CAPITA INCOME
w.o% —.__...
Public Safety
Tao% p p •
69x ♦ I
3ppp
40.000 SO,IXp 60.W> 70.0(J 80.000 90.ON 1W.6V
Ti
Reading on regression line no real difference:9.2%is above 8.7%Peer average
9 VilthoutAM costs&revenues: 11 of 25 Peers offerALS level service:
CULTURE & RECREATIONAL SPENDING
%OF BUDGET VERSUS PER CAPITA INCOME
<ux -Culture&Recreation
3014 ♦ � �._..
1 s
3swn e . SS.ttO 6;Lm IS,Oro BS.Om O5�
•
10
1/19/2016
EDUCATION SPENDING
%OF BUDGET VERSUS PER CAPMA INCOME
ap% ---- Edwation-
400% r ....-•+�• .----- --_-----
400% :-•---_ -_-- —.-__-- ----
�. 35.M0 450.V SS,OD 65,0]J >AOW 9SOM 55.pat J4s.Nn
eatling on regression line-no real difference;39.3%is slightlyabove 39.1%Peer average
EDUCATION SPENDING
RECONCILE AVERAGE SPENDING LEVELS WITH LOW PER PUPIL SPENDING?
Pop [...n x ow• ewd, xe.gM
WeM.a
wil walpie aAfx
AO Ab x
Mww3x 1&6JJ JA3e
BeMON fSfimr. ofi H.'ru-
µn�Feltl 40 1 KM R3%
.a fu. e
6AJ6 4131
eal.frn 3AN 33.]{f
MmflM ll.JK 4,iNu.
PnYy E.3n 4xa3 35® 1}i% 319%
fag% Jrb *en ;[se
WM Y.M
xalFM�iq f".IA,l xxu Mf a 1, .11
Amxury Js,JK spfs 1c¢x nnx srcmxm ]f.>N 2J1> tom fs 11
Peer Communities have average d5.9%enrollmem
Reading has an above average amount of enrollments
s&our:
S �@yjlldlRtl
f II lyurv9 B.f4Pe..
11
1/19/2016
•
EDUCATION SPENDING
RECONCILE LOW PER PUPIL SPENDING WITH AVERAGE SPENDING LEVELS
55.0% i
SOD% ♦ _..... _.__ ._..
15.09[ {-. ..............�.........._♦�..♦♦ ♦♦ ♦._ _. ♦. . . .
♦♦ ♦ _
90.0% I ' __.. ♦ ♦
35.03( I ♦ � ♦. ♦
>aow "m vow znow Snow zaow zzox z9ow
There'sacorrelation between enrollment and%budget spacing on schools;
4 Reading spends eighty below Clattrendline
•
PUBLIC WORKS SPENDING
%OF BUDGETVERSUS PER CAPITA INCOME
aa" ♦ Public Works
nag ____......._.
sow •
35,IXp SSD�J 65,0.T )5,1\tl BSpW 95 WJ ]
adingon regression line-no real difference;5,1%is slightly above 4.9%Peer average
•
12
1/19/2016
HUMAN SERVICES SPENDING
% BUDGET VERSUS PER CAPRA INCOME
16%
-Human Services
14% ..._
oat 1♦ � ♦ w...........__
YM
35.wL IS,� SS.Lm 65,01 ]S.OtlE 9S.ON 95000 MS.tlp
>does not inclode RG45A
DEBT SERVICE & FIXED COST SPENDING
as OF BUDGET VERSUS PER CAPITA INCOME
xeox ' Debt&Fixed Costs
xx ox . .. .. ♦ __..
max •�
rxox� ♦ 1 ♦ ♦
xw ,
35.LLU .50.0 SSD]0 65,Om ]5.t 85,0'JO 95.WJ IVi.tlp
ReatlingspeMs more;l].S%Is above 1L7%Peet average
13
1/14/2016
GENERAL GOV'T SPENDING
%OF BUDGETVERSUS PER CAPITA INCOME
General Gov't __..
♦ --
30% i y ♦
xWm +a000 wom w.aw mao eaaoo vo,om 1W.0.V
DO WE HAVE ENOUGH RESERVES?
FREE CABH d STABILIZATION FUNDS VERSUS PER CAPITA INCOME
lay" Free Cash &Stabilization
160%
a va o-
1.PA s
oAx
31— <LOW SSCro iv. rr 95,LN 10 a]0
•
14
1/19/2016
lliliw
Ca
!f�`_ Town Ooera[ine Buareel9
�OQ po" Requests.
5e° Level Service
Town Manager
c
Bud
Other Jp� ets
Budgets+ Town Total
Bubgets
Snaund Costs
o Enterprise Funds
FY17 TOWN OPERATING BUDGET
REQUESTS ARE$1.6 MILLION ABOVE FUNDING LEVELS
Merin Svcs $2,211,171 $2484.848 $273 777
pay&class 0 260.000 260.000
PuW.c Svcs 1.403,844 1193p19 89,175
Finance 784,222 792,150 7.928
Police 4,79.,882 5.034.100 276.218
Dispatch 555,664 618.750 63,086
Pic 4,623,785 4.841055 217,270
Public Worts 2.980.102 3.016,676 36.574
Faufbb5 1,594,919 1.792.515 19715%
Public Gbtary 1.488.775 1.620,335 133560
TOTAL $20,39$367 $21963,448 -$16 mil.
`School SPED change attic,$19,200tc Target buagetthat is notshown
kill.
1S
1/19/2016
•
FY17 TOWN OPERATING BUDGET
LEVEL SERVICE IS$0.7 MILLION ABOVE FUNDING LEVELS
Idmm 9.., .;.r i 1171 $2,299,416731.1�
pay&call 0 260.000
Public Sacs 1,403.844 1,451
Finance 784.222 788.300
Police 4,757,882 4,875.000
Dispatch 555,664 565,150
File 4,623.785 4654950
Public Works 2,980.102 7,978.455 1,647I
Facilities 1,594,919 1,666,955 72,036
Public Library 1.486]75 1543500 56,725
TOTAL $20,398,367 $21.099,910 'd0.7 mil.
HOW TO BALANCE THE BUDGET?
Town Manager's ConsiLlerst iar$s
1 Donctedd steffe nfork isemk ff affreE onsamne M
2. Sfafffle4mtlorynnmpenseeon
WIA 2%slight help Wall non-unions,three year now Compembleto town unions
Fund additional pay&class impmaements
Equalize 40hr Work weeks as needed(Public Werke&Public Safely)
Not yet done-Personnel Policies coming m a0S summer 2016
3. MelMaln Senk%-for'one lee[Vme'
Any,reductions of staff should be designed t0 have minimal service impact
4. ReduceEllkes.
Realistic but iw['cautiond
Someonedme espenusfunded midyear(ekceptelections which areful funded)
•
16
1/19/2016
FY17 TOWN MGR'S TOWN OPERATING BUDGET
'CUTr 5O.7 MILLION FROM LEVEL SERVICE
(.325%) Manger Service, Highlights
Admin sues E221L311 52,213.175 (&84,200) bz/erneema mmn.op nardeand Do
oe[W¢sdn mre Dmm.amr
pay&class 0 75,000 (185,000) Fundabont L3mpayrepuaenraamlowe
mesio¢Peer level:
Public Svcs 1.403.844 1,385,125 (73,000) t�Plannng lntem:Dllmlpssa
Pa....art.Ran IaM.
Ire9malg PonstpVE 3"Fanner
Finance 784,222 ]81.300 (,000) --'-a to snore mnlosl
Police 4.757,882 4,796250 (18150) Disease oce,stare Cdssing a..
pmdwn:�al 1.
Morammon FLtle eco peyones Do
Forded orcar
Dispatch 555,664 565,150 0
Fine 4.623,785 4,591,950 (63.000) pplat.1,1110.1
Public Works 2,980.102 2,869,255 (109,200) Normal"Fn4nee ..I'Merii@lg Fell
Do sta24Rwy lamre
Machines 1,594,919 1,826955 (40,000) Fund none Wine RBS.IIM pains g SEEM
assn-srwul d IUM over buryeaB
Publd LOd, 1.486 775 1.483.500 (60000) D3 net add sews.surarrad
TOTAL $20,398.367 $20,388.260 ($700,650) 1:1N Il
FY17TOWN MGR'S TOWN OPERATING BUDGET
DEPARTMENT REQUESTS ABOVE('+')LEVEL SERVICE NOT FUNDED
F1`17 Toreen Fs'17 Dept
P9min Svcs 32,213]75 $186,373 Less col on all non unto,sten nor an Make,
Defer new o®i undrou no Rr I¢gal Kral no
Im MRireakiws W Min mg
pay&class 15.000
Public does labor)' 5 34,894 bse mare omen:less orae.1...an,
Finance 78L300 3,850
Police 4,798,250 159.100 Do not add second SRO:less m/nalmng no
gomouonal men Lmdyem)
Dispatch 565,150 53,600 Do not add coral less enjoining
Fire 4,591950 186,105 Do not add Pon amlpmal Mafipimrt
Public Works 2669.255 38,221 can.add sawnd C"s"Mem
PacihBes 1,828,955 125.%0 (ase On:domtoum ynea Wminang
Public Library 1. &'500 76,835 an nonnuease suesmutes n Our do not
Increase Sunday hours
` TOTAL 520.388.280 $864.538
17
1/19/2016
•
FY1S TOWN OPERATING BUDGET
TOWN MANAGER'S BUDGET
Do Noth'nxremirt historierevenue¢rowth
Eliminate Services
Reduce quantity of Services
Reduce quality of Services
Reduce staff'depth'(Public Works,Public Safety,Public Library)
Go Forward:addMonal revenues
$700,000/year for level services;
fla million/year for services We community may well desire;
$TBA for community
ppdesires not qualifying for Dept requested budgets
l i b I f i t [i ,'. § Fi,l tMaisime
4 I g e
.....:.:._.CIS zr ......
J
J
zz
po
\O SP4
P
JP
9
.I
18
1/19/2016
FY17 TOWN TOTAL BUDGETS
OPERATING+ACCOMMODATED
Admin S. $2,737.117 $2,658,775 3.9%
say&class 0 75,000 +JOD,
Public Swi 1.606,500 1.621.125
Flnance 645,775 781.300 TED
P.I. 4,597A25 4]96.250 a43%
Dispatch 536,925 565,150 +5.3%
Flre 4,473.105 4,591,950 +2.79,
Public Works 3.281,662 3,349,665 +2.1%
'FedliOse 2,977,012 3.140,680 +55%
Public Library 1,436.634 1,483.50D +33%
TOTAL {22,492,]55 $23,083,395 +2 5% ,eeeredE�PN3 iM"
.= FFFi FII MdNdp HP dd d6 Y n I' F {dY3Y
cl
,ti-AI,{i1 Edd 3 CP YdEili EE�p6f 3,[u6N6.
[ddSQ4�SlA d P kd'.g{Yd9PfPdf 3 d
all
FY17 FACILITIES BUDGET
*Facilities $2.977.012 $3,140.680 +5.5%
COBE 2,684.178 2.853,790 +6.3%
"O4eraung 1,252,626 1.340,065 +IO%
Accommobateb 1,435044 1,5]$725 +5.4%
Town Bullbings 292,835 286.890 -2:11%
(Operating)
School Buntings 1,218,653 Scbao10u0get
(Operetlngi TBA
es SCbooi Buildings
,"the Town absorbed$36.729 in adCOonal co Na0 +3.25%
`rokOln Tde Town's FY17 opelathgbWget (som¢tlue to Mat(a2 Cabin&Ne Cem.GaravAeJ
19
1/19/2016
>6A
Rt
. s
.0
e
.c
G3
Otf a%?
Nra:
pmt
BN& 41
m tlF.
N�I 49y$P €t f.
FY17 TOWN &SCHOOL SHARED COSTS
A PORTION OME ACCOMMODATED COSTS
urv,m e. a14a6s.;n.: a:e.9ensao ws%
Pereion&OPER 4.037,154 4,198,000 -3.8%
NeaM/Life Ins, 9.761.089 10.560.500 i8.2%
ONer 1,167.500 1,230.000 r5.4%
Ca0ltsl&Dsm 7.400.791 6,970.000 5.8%
Vocational EJuca4on 490,350 518.350 +57%
FINCOM Reserws 150.000 150.000 0%
State AsSessmemr 628.284 644000 .25%
TOTAL $23,835,188 $24,2]0,850 v2.T%
,vla>ene .11rte .rt tom Slate 9r6
20
1/19/2016
m � F
0
FY17 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS
Webr(ntt7 $5.500,300 E5. .662 X7.4%
sewer(ne0 5.871.731 6,090721693 X26%
Combined E31,372.031 11.929,355 +q,g%
Stormweterhum $350.800 $38],411 a9.0%
Assumes use of$3251,water reserves and!$1151,storm water reserves
in P r17;
Water/Sewer budgets/rates u0 about 5%combined;$40/household
charge for storm water holds
21
1/19/2016
FY1S- FY20 ENTERPRISE FUND BUDGETS
ri
Werer(nap 164% a6.6% a4.3% E1lmlllion
Sewer(netj a63% r-6.3% a8.7% E3I6N
Combined +6.3% +6.5% +6.5% $2 million
SNrm Wetx E80/{wuse0010 E80/M1ouseM1olU $80/IIovSBM1OW E110k
(n0
FY16 $6.5 million of Capital Pidjectsfinanced as dialed
Water$11 million water tank:$0.6 million Grove st.repairs
Skater 53.0 minion sewer stamen repairs Chanes St.and sWrges)
Storm Water.Ell milliondrainage(Main all Mint 5l Salida Park.Grove 6t)
LL
89Yt) p{' IdAPo�BIIitN"; III'I.tl1Yh91lGf[3EIfii 'R'AW
or
...
_" a ...............�.r :. f .
•
I
22