HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-03-23 Community Planning and Development Commission MinutesTown of Reading
Meeting Minutes
Board - Committee - Commission - Council:
IECEIVED
i OWN CLERK
^DING. M�NSS.
Community Planning and Development Commission U6 APR 2 1 P 3 2b
Date: 2015 -03 -23 Time: 7:30 PM
Building: Reading Town Hall Location: Selectmen Meeting Room
Address: 16 Lowell Street
Purpose: General Business
Attendees: Members - Present:
David Tuttle
Nick Safina
John Weston
Members - Not Present:
Jeff Hansen
Others Present:
Jessie Wilison - Community Development Administrator
Marianna Correnet, Student Intern and Recording Secretary
George Katsoufis- Associate CPDC Member
Chuck Tirone- Conservation Adminstrator
Nancy Twomey- Twomey Design
Paul Kerrigan- Raven Family Dental Contractor
Caroyln Parker- 3 Lorion Avenue, Cumberland Farm Representative
Minutes Respectfully Submitted By: Marianna Corrente
Topics of Discussion:
There being a quorum Mr. Safina called the meeting to order at 7:31 PM.
Request for Certificate of Aoorouriateness — 303 Salem Street Cumberland Farms
Service Station
Ms. Parker, a Representative of Cumberland Farms explained the company is seeking
approval for LED Pump Topers that will convey their "Smart Pay" program allowing
customers to see member and non - member pricing. The scroll sign would have the ability to
alternate between the member and non - member pricing anywhere from 0 to 60 seconds.
Right now their pump topers are manually changed causing employees to shut down lanes.
To make it easier for Cumberland Farm employees, the company is seeking to change the
pricing of gas inside the store using LED pump topers and incorporate Smart Pay with
member and non - member sign.
Ms. Parker also mentioned the Smart Pay sign will be 8 seconds long and the brightness will
be at level 6 out of 10. A film could be provided over the sign to make it less bright.
Mr. Tuttle mentioned there is no need for the price to be changing on a continuous basis
and the commission would like to minimize certain advertisement mechanisms.
Page 1 1
Mr. Safina stated a gas station on the corner of Main and South Street has 6 pump toppers
that do not pulse at same rate. This is a concern for him because it can be very distracting
to the customers. Also, there is no guarantee they will change at the same time.
Mr. Safina also stated Cumberland Farm is located in "Business B" which does not allow
scrolling or internally illuminated signs. There would be concern if allowing this variance led
to other businesses seeking the same variances.
Mr. Weston raised another issue that there are residents across the street from Cumberland
Farms that would view the flashing signs causing a distraction to the residential area.
Ms. Wilson spoke on behalf of Mr. Hansen who questioned whether this request was within
the jurisdiction under CPDC since as proposed, the signage is not permitted without a
variance. Certificate of Appropriateness should not be issued unless it conforms to zoning or
relief has been granted by the Zoning Board of Appeals. But the CPDC has issued certain
Certificate of Appropriateness prior to ZBA relief, in the past.
After further discussion CPDC had no objection to LED lights provided the lights did not
change or flash. Mr. Tuttle suggested having conditions on the Certificate of
Appropriateness. Mr. Safina agreed and stated that standard LED pumper toppers shall be
non - flashing static display and the light shall be set at level 3 out of 10 at night time.
Mr. Tuttle moved the CPDC approve the Certificate of Appropriateness for the
pump topper sign at Cumberland Farms on Salem Street as amended. Mr. Weston
second and the motion carried 3 -0 -0.
Reauest for Minor Modification — 200 Ash Street Ravens Familv Den
Ms. Wilson explained to CPDC the applicant for 200 Ash Street, Ravens Family Dental is
requesting approval for final changes to the Site Plan.
Ms. Twomey the architect of Raven Family Dental explained in greater detail the
modification of the site plan. Previously the Commission requested landscaping at the end
of the handicap access ramp, but noticed no one can easily access the ramp which is a
concern for her. To obtain an accessible passage to the ramp, she is proposing to remove
the pavement in front of building and plant a tree in a different location which will provide
relief of landscaping and overall access to the ramp. The town engineer agreed with the
cutting of the asphalt.
Ms. Twomey also stated there will be two dumpsters on location due to state regulations.
They will be emptied when no one is in the parking lot. Also the Conservation Administrator
has asked the company to put in additional bollards and fencing to define the snow storage.
Mr. Safina asked how they access the dumpster. Mr. Karriagan the Contractor of Ravens
Family Dental stated they can only access the dumpster if there are no cars in the parking
lot. The dumpster company arrives at 6:30 in the morning to remove any rubbish. But the
employees can access the dumpster at the end of the day if needed. He also mentioned the
location of the dumpster is on the left side in the north parking lot which works well for
them.
Mr. Weston mentioned the overall site plan is exactly what CPDC was looking for and has no
objections to the current proposed minor modifications.
Mr. Safina questioned if the tree is outside the property line they should not be penalized if
it is knocked down by town plowing.
Page 1 2
Ms. Twomey said there is a side walk in between the tree and lawn so there are barriers to
prevent that from happening.
Ms. Wilson stated the tree warden does want warranty and approved of their request.
Mr. Tuttle moved the CPDC to determine that the proposed modification at 200 Ash
Street Raven Family Dental is a minor modification. Mr. Weston seconded and the
motion carried 3 -0 -0.
Mr. Tuttle moved the CPDC approve the minor modification at 200 Ash Street for
Ravens Family Dental as amended. Mr. Weston second and the motion carried 3 -0-
0.
Subdivision Bond Reduction Reauest_- Sailor Toms Wa
Mrs. Wilson explained to CPDC that the developer for Sailor Toms Way is requesting a
reduction in the bond amount as the majority of the improvements have been completed for
the subdivision. The CPDC retains $5000 and the Developer request is to reduce the bond
to $500 to cover the replacement of a tree. The town engineer supplied a memo and agrees
to this reduction. The tree warden will also inspect the tree.
The CPDC had no comments or concerns.
Mr. Tuttle moved the CPDC to approve the subdivision bond reduction request for
Sailor Toms Way as amended. Mr. Weston second and the motion carried 3 -0 -0.
iew Planned Residential Development Lanauaae for Zonina Amendmen
Ms. Wilson explained that the Consultant and the Zoning Advisory Committee drafted an
updated language in Planned Residential Development (PRD) section as a part of the
comprehensive update to the zoning bylaw and is seeking CPDC review /comments.
Mr. Katsoufis said there is some ambiguity concerning definitions in the Planned Residential
Development zoning amendments. There should be a simpler version on definitions with
PRD and FAR (Floor Area Ratio). He also discussed section 4.10.2, overlay districts and
special permit process.
Mr. Tuttle suggested they should strike out section 4.10.1 because it already defined in the
new zoning Bylaw. Also, to have a consistent procedure of special permits, so the board can
have a chapter of administrative purposes.
Mr. Katsoufis agreed that it will help the town and the developer know the baseline process
to obtain a special permit.
Mr. Weston raised a concern that there are different kinds of special permit with different
procedures as well. The amendment must be clear that this section is referring to overlays
and planned developments.
Mr. Weston also mentioned reading through the proposed amendments in this section is to
ensure the. layout is user friendly.
Mr. Kafousis explained the difference between PRD and Planned Unit Development (PUD),
also concerning different applicants using it.
Mr. Weston also noted the reoccurring use of the word "developer" and mentioned there are
different types of applicants as well.
Mr. Tuttle mention there is some confusion in section 4.10.3.3 preliminary plan versus
4.10.3.3.8 final plan concerning copies of plans.
Page 1 3
Ms. Wilson stated the amendment should include a change so that the Community Service
department maintains a copy of the preliminary and final plan instead in the Town Clerk's
Office.
Mr. Tirone the Conservation Administrator also made comments about PRD concerning
wetlands in the FAR section. He suggested to replace "as wetlands" to "and" so it can
include the riverfront area.
Mr. Tirone explained in further detail the riverfront area and how it affects FAR and the
parcel of a lot.
Mr. Weston mentioned including the riverfront area the calculations of FAR will change as
well.
Mr. Tirone also mentioned the amendment needs to include a distance from the wetland or
riverfront from the development.
Ms. Wilson stated that setting density should be left with CPDC, and letting the developer
seek approval for location of improvements to the Conservation Commission.
After much discussion CPDC agreed that the calculation of density including riverfront area
should be worked out in a proper manner.
The commissioners also discussed section 4.10.2.1 and 4.10.4.3.1 suggesting additional
alternations to each section.
Ms. Wilson stated CPDC will continue to review PRD zoning amendments on April 6th.
Review Section 1 — Purpose of Zoning Amendments
The ZAC recommended to look at the Town of Lexington's purpose statement for their
bylaw.
Mr. Tuttle stated he is surprised that statement doesn't mention the act of '79 and the state
of Massachusetts.
Mr. Safina mentioned it is a nice statement and there won't be any problems with town
meeting but there might be some change in language which will lead to further discussion.
Overall, the statement does not state an actual purpose.
Mr. Weston noted Section 2A is referencing the bullet points that is already stated in Zoning
Bylaw.
Mr. Tuttle suggested to implement the purpose statement and include the bullet points
language after it.
Mr. Safina agreed and also suggested to look how the bullet points parallel with the Master
Plan goals.
Ms. Wilson stated this topic will be on the agenda for April 18th meeting for further
discussion.
Continue Review of Site Plan Review Regulations
Page 1 4
Mrs. Wilson explained planning staff has revised the Guidelines after the CPDC discussion at
the last meeting. The guidelines propose an overall description of the process including a
Checklist for Site Plan Review and Minor Site Plan Review.
Mr. Safina suggested incorporating a checkbox which includes an option for Minor Site Plan
review.
Mr. Weston also suggested adding a single page behind the application a checklist for a
easier administrative process and also some blank spaces to determine other requirements
that may be added.
Mr. Safina mentioned the CPDC should make revisions on submitting plans as well.
Mr. Weston also questioned if 14 copies is still necessary for site plan review.
Ms. Wilson confirmed only one Department would like to have it electronically. But other
departments, staff and board members would continue to want hard copies. She also
stated, there will be a public hearing to adopt these regulations on May 4th
Mr. Tuttle suggested the material should be available for review at the next meeting.
Planning Updates and Other Businesses
Ms. Wilson explained the property owner of 87 Walkers Brook Drive have submitted a
request to the Board of Selectmen to reduce the 24 hour operation of Dunkin Donuts. She
explained only Dunkin Donuts will operate 4am -10pm while the Shell Station will continue to
stay open for 24 hours. The Board of Selectmen asked CPDC for any feedback or comments
concerning this request.
Mr. Salina suggested any signage that states 24 hours of operation of Dunkin Donuts should
be removed.
Mrs. Wilson agreed and mentioned their illuminated free standing sign, wall sign and menu
board should be turned off at the end of their operation as well.
Mrs. Wilson also explained the following updates:
• There will be a public session for zoning workshop topics on April 13th. It will contain
a brief PowerPoint presentation with a question and answers session with the public.
It would provide feedback from town meeting members and residents which will
maintain public interaction.
• The next CPDC meeting will have a full agenda. Some agenda items will include:
review of aquifer protection district, plan residential, commercial communication
structures, plan unit development, minor modification request of Johnson woods. The
climate action committee will also be formalizing a plan for a recycle bin behind CVS.
• The economic development action plan will have its first public forum on April 1St
• Pizza World has resubmitted their application for 306 Main Street. They will be in
front of CPDC on May 4th for a site plan review and is requesting to have their fee
waived.
• The town will be updating their hazard mitigation plan in the near future.
Approval of Minutes
It was decided to the table the minutes for next meeting.
Page 1 5
Mr. Tuttle moved to adjourn at 10:01PM. Mr. Weston seconded and the motion carried 3 -0-
0.
Page 1 6