HomeMy WebLinkAbout1982-11-02 State Election61
STATE ELECTION
NOVEMBER 2, 1982
Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Election was held at the
time and places specified in the Warrant, and was called to order by the Wardens in the precincts as
follows:
Precinct 1
J. Warren Killam School
Louis R. Gardner
Precinct 2
J. Warren Killam School
John J. Andreola
Precinct 3
Joshua Eaton School
Fred C. Kenney, Jr.
Precinct 4
Joshua Eaton School
John H. Crooker
Precinct 5
Alice M. Barrows School
Edward P. Cameron
Precinct 6
Alice M. Barrows School
Phyllis A. Maloney
Precinct 7
Birch Meadow School
Eva C. Swift
Precinct 8
Birch Meadow School
Kenneth C. Latham
who then partially read the Warrant, when on motion of Elizabeth C. Cronin, Eleanor M. Brown,
Francis X. Day, Carol S. Beckwith, Ann Cusato, C. Dewey Smith, Henry A. Murphy, Jr., and John F.
Cronin in precincts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 respectively it was voted to dispense with the further
reading of the Warrant, except the Officer's Return which was then read by the respective Wardens.
The ballot boxes were examined by the Wardens in charge and each found to be empty and all
registered 000.
The polls were then declared open at 7:00 A.M. and were closed at 8:00 P.M. with the
following results:
Whole number of votes cast 9,870
Prec 1 Prec 2 Prec 3 Prec 4 Prec 5 Prec 6 Prec 7 Prec 8 Total
SENATOR IN CONGRESS - Vote for One
Edward M. Kennedy
651
692
564
613
570
727
644
651
5112
Ray Shamie
636
487
388
674
475
559
657
586
4462
Howard S. Katz
10
6
8
9
11
5
15
12
76
Blanks
26
18
21
38
28
24
26
39
220
TOTAL
1323
1203
981
1334
1084
1315
1342
1288
9870
GOVERNOR - LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR -Vote for One
Dukakis & Kerry
657
703
557
626
624
740
642
640
5189
Sears & Lombardi
601
438
355
633
403
525
626
565
4146
Rich & Davies
34
35
33
32
29
23
32
41
259
ShRa Mhell
9
4
11
7
6
8
15
10
70
Asgeirsson & Asgeirsson
58
76
396
TOTAL
1
1203
981
1
Blanks
22
23
25
36
22
18
27
32
205
TOTAL
1323
1203
981
1334
1084
1315
1342
1288
9870
ATTORNEY GENERAL - Vote for One
Francis X. Bellotti
916
901
717
878
788
938
901
891
6930
Richard L. Wainwright
322
243
199
371
243
313
358
309
2358
Michael Reilly
32
28
31
23
11
24
25
12
186
Blanks
53
31
34
62
42
40
58
76
396
TOTAL
1323
1203
981
1334
1084
1315
1342
7 288
9870
SECRETARY - Vote for One
Michael Joseph Connolly
768
802
299
613
254
717
446
645
303
811
379
746
445
715
394
5817
2937
Jody DeRoma Dow
417
Robin D. Zazula
39
38
36
36
36
38
36
44
303
Blanks
99
64
78
135
100
87
115
135
813
TOTAL
1323
1203
981
13 34
1084
1 315
1342
1288
9870
r�
State Election - November 2, 1982
Prec 1 Prec 2 Prec 3 Prec 4 Prec 5 Prec 6 Prec 7 Prec 8 Total
TREASURER - Vote for One
Robert Q. Crane
749
795
611
738
643
824
746
706
5812
Mary J. LeClair
449
328
268
461
339
387
458
443
3133
Freda L. Nason
39
25
32
22
19
29
29
32
227
Blanks
86
55
70
113
83
75
109
107
698
TOTAL
1323
1203
981
1334
1084
1315
1342
1288
9870
AUDITOR - Vote for One
John J. Finnegan
670
719
552
616
567
720
653
609
5106
Michael S. Robertson
496
344
289
523
366
442
507
478
3445
Donald E. Washburn
35
42
34
32
32
37
31
37
280
Blanks
122
98
106
163
119
116
151
164
1039
TOTAL
1323
1203
981
7 334
1084
1315
1342
1288
9870
REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS - Seventh District - Vote for One
Edward J. Markey
835
893
679
826
772
908
909
822
6644
David Basile
454
282
278
441
283
362
392
388
2880
Blanks
34
28
24
67
29
45
41
78
346
TOTAL
1323
1203
981
1334
1084
1315
1342
1288
9870
COUNCILLOR - Fifth District - Vote for One
John F. Markey
746
785
796
776
720
3823
Peter Davekos
457
313
402
418
405
1995
Blanks
120
105
117
148
163
653
TOTAL
1323
1203
1315
1342
1288
6471
COUNCILLOR - Sixth District - Vote for One
Joseph A. Langone III
453
358
673 834 711
473
344
2218
Blanks
453
3190
308 500 373
794
791
1181
TOTAL
662
838
981 1334 1084
734
6016
3399
SENATOR IN GENERAL COURT - First Essex do Middlesex District - Vote for One
54
84
Robert C. Buell
584
434
575
648
591
2832
Stephen J. O'Leary
672
699
647
598
574
3190
Blanks
67
70
93
96
123
449
TOTAL
1323
1203
1315
1342
1288
6471
SENATOR IN GENERAL COURT - Third Middlesex District -Vote for One
John A. Brennan, Jr.
Blanks
TOTAL
683 877 733
298 457 351
981 1334 1084
2293
1106
3399
REPRESENTATIVE IN GENERAL COURT - Twenty -first Middlesex District - Vote for One
Michael J. Barrett 1053 998 764 1002 861 1111 1090 1031 7910
Nils Nordberg 1 1
Blanks 270 205 216 332 223 204 252 257 1959
TOTAL 1323 7 203 981 1334 1084 1315 1342 1288 9870
DISTRICT ATTORNEY - Northern District - Vote for One
Guy A. Carbone
453
358
278
473
344
396
435
453
3190
L. Scott Harshbarger
794
791
619
758
662
838
820
734
6016
Blanks
76
54
84
103
78
81
87
101
664
TOTAL
1323
1203
981
1334
1084
1315
1342
1288
9870
CLERK OF COURTS - Middlesex County - Vote for One
Edward J. Sullivan
953
925
678
868
720
981
963
908
6996
Blanks
370
278
303
466
364
334
379
380
2874
TOTAL
1323
1203
981
1334
1084
1315
1342
1288
9870
1u.
63
State Election - November 2, 1982
Prec 1 Prec 2 Prec 3 Prec 4 Prec 5 Prec 6 Prec 7 Prec 8 Total
REGISTER OF DEEDS - Middlesex County, Southern District - Vote for One
John F. Zamparelli 917 890 655 835 705 945 921 879 6747
Blanks 406 313 326 499 379 370 421 409 3123
TOTAL 1323 1203 981 1334 1084 1315 1342 1288 9870
COUNTY COMMISSIONER - Middlesex County - Vote for One
Bill Schmidt 911 872 647 819 689 932 905 864 6639
Blanks 412 331 334 515 395 383 437 424 3231
TOTAL 1323 1203 981 1334 1084 1315 1342 1288 9870
QUESTION 1
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION
Do you approve of the adoption of an amendment to the constitution summarized below,
which was approved by the General Court in joint sessions of the house of Representatives and the
Senate on July 2, 1980 by a vote of 171 -4, and on June 21, 1982 by a vote of 144 -44?
SUMMARY
The proposed constitutional amendment would remove the present constitutional prohibition
against the use of public funds to aid or maintain private primary or secondary schools.
It would permit the Commonwealth, cities and towns to make public funds available to
pupils attending private primary and secondary schools in the form of either aid, materials or
services subject, however, to three specific limitations. First, the private school could not be one
that discriminates on the basis of race or color in its admission requirements. Second, the grant of
aid must be consistent with the First Amendment to the United States Constitution which
guarantees the free exercise of religion and prohibits the establishment of religion. Third, individual
pupils would have to request the aid, materials or services. In addition to these three specific
limitations, the amendment would authorize the legislature to enact other laws imposing conditions
or restrictions on the grant of public aid, materials or services.
The proposal would also change the state constitution to allow public money to be spent to
aid infirmaries, hospitals, charitable or regligious undertakings if they are either publicly owned or
under the control of public officials. The state constitution now prohibits such spending unless these
institutions are both publicly owned and under the control of public officials.
Yes
400
349
285
394
327
398
373
363
2889
No
869
804
638
879
689
853
926
858
6516
Blanks
54
50
58
61
68
64
43
67
465
Total
1323
1203
981
1334
1084
1315
1342
1288
9870
QUESTION 2
PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION
Do you approve of the adoption of an amendment to the constitution summarized below,
which was approved by the General Court in joint sessions of the House of Representatives and the
Senate on September 19, 1980 by a vote of 123 -63, and on June 21, 1982 by a vote of 125 -62?
SUMMARY
The proposed constitutional amendment would allow the legislature to enact laws
authorizing the state courts to impose the death penalty on the conviction of crimes to be specified
by law. The proposed amendment would provide that no provision of the state constitution may in
the future be construed as prohibiting the imposition of the punishment of death.
Yes
799
751
559
749
562
686
775
763
5644
No
465
403
376
521
465
569
509
455
3763
Blanks
59
49
46
64
57
60
58
70
463
Total
1323
1203
981
1334
1084
1315
1342
1288
9870
QUESTION 3
LAW PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PEITITON
Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the House of
Representatives or the Senate before July 7, 1982?
SUMMARY
The proposed law would require that before the construction or operation of any new nuclear
power plant or low -level radioactive waste storage or disposal facility in the Commonwealth, the
legislature must make certain findings and a majority of voters must approve the new facility at a
statewide election.
r
State Election - November 2, 1982
Prec 1 Prec 2 Prec 3 Prec 4 Prec 5 Prec 6 Prec 7 Prec 8 Total
Before the question of building a new nuclear power plant could be submitted to the voters,
the legislature would have to find that (1) the proposed facility is the best means for meeting energy
needs based on certain economic, safety, environmental and social considerations; (2) a federally -
licensed facility exists for the disposal of the high -level radioactive waste that would be generated;
(3) an approved emergency preparedness plan has been developed; (4) radioactive pollution standards
have been promulgated; and (5) a demonstrated, federally- approved technology exists for
decommissioning the proposed power plant.
Before the question of building and operating a low -level radioactive waste storage or
disposal facility or of entering into an agreement with another state to build and operate such a
facility in Massachusetts could be submitted to the voters, the legislature would have to find that
the technology and site designated for the proposed facility are the best available based on certain
economic, safety, environmental and social considerations. The legislature would also have to find
that the obligations imposed on Massachusetts by any interstate agreement were no greater than
those imposed on any other state.
The proposal would not apply to a facility which had obtained all necessary government
approvals before August 5, 1981, nor to any facility for disposal or storage of radioactive wastes
from medical or bio- research applications in Massachusetts.
Yes
834
792
616
759
666
826
859
757
6109
No
431
358
309
510
346
424
429
452
3259
Blanks
58
53
56
65
72
65
54
79
502
Total
1323
1203
981
1334
1084
1315
1342
1288
9870
QUESTION 4
REFERENDUM ON AN EXISTING LAW
Do you approve of a law summarized below, which was approved by the House of
Representatives on November 10, 1981 by a vote of 108 -49, and by the Senate on November 16, 1981
by a vote of 29 -10?
SUMMARY
The law requires that a refundable deposit be paid for certain beverage containers sold in
Massachusetts.
Beverage containers of less than 32 ounces must have a refund value of at least five cents
and larger containers a refund value of at least ten cents. This requirement applies to non -
biodegradable containers of carbonated soft drinks, mineral water, beer and other malt beverages,
but not to containers of other alcoholic beverages, dairy products, natural fruit juices or wine. All
beverage containers subject to deposit must clearly indicate the refund value on the container.
The deposit is paid by the consumer upon purchase and must be refunded when the consumer
returns the empty container to a proper dealer or redemption center, so long as the container does
not contain any material different from its normal contents. Dealers and distributors are also
subject to the same deposit and refund on the beverage containers they handle, and are also entitled
to a handling fee of at least one cent per container.
No containers can be sold in the state if they are joined together by plastic rings or any
other device that cannot be broken down by light or bacteria.
The law provides a bottler a reduction in corporate excise tax of one -tenth of one cent for
each reusable beverage container which the bottler sells in the first three months of 1983. The law
provides for additional unemployment benefits and, if the Legislature appropriates the funds, a job
retraining program for employees of bottlers, canners, or manufacturers of beverage containers who
lose their jobs as a result of this law.
The law takes effect on January 17, 1983.
Yes
795
689
551
859
683
831
861
811
6080
No
506
491
405
443
379
436
460
434
3554
Blanks
22
23
25
32
22
48
21
43
236
TOTAL
1323
1203
981
1334
1084
1315
1342
1288
9870
QUESTION 5
Shall the Secretary of the Commonwealth of
Massachusetts
inform the President and the
Congress of the United States that it is the desire
of the people
of Massachusetts to have the
government of the United States work vigorously to negotiate
a mutual nuclear weapons moratorium
and reduction, with appropriate verification, with the Soviet Union and other nations?
Yes 922 899 682
922 809
973 989 910 7106
No 307 227 229
317 200
249 276 274 2079
Blanks 94 77 70
95 75
93 77 104 685
Total 1323 1203 981
1334 7 084
1315 1342 1288 9870
l
State Election - November 2, 1982
QUESTION 6
E.
Shall licenses be granted
in this
town
for the
sale therein of
alcoholic
beverages by
restaurants
and function rooms having
a seating capacity of not less than one
hundred persons?
273
Yes
860
830
663
856
732 875
902
847
6565
No
426
342
274
428
305 389
406
386
2956
Blanks
37
31
44
50
47 51
34
55
349
Total
1323
1203
981
1334
1084 1315
1342
1288
9870
QUESTION 7
THIS QUESTION IS NOT BINDING
Shall the Representative from this district be instructed to vote in favor of a resolution
requesting the President of the United States to propose to the Soviet Union a mutual nuclear
weapons freeze immediately halting the testing, production, and deployment of all nuclear
warheads, missiles, and delivery systems; and to further propose future reductions in the number of
these nuclear warheads, missiles and delivery systems?
Yes
823
798
604
789
692
873
850
817
6246
No
349
273
257
371
246
284
318
304
2402
Blanks
151
132
120
174
146
158
174
167
1222
Total
1323
1203
981
1334
1084
1315
1342
1288
9870
The votes were publicly announced in open meeting, locked in ballot cases and placed by the
Town Clerk in the vault for safe keeping.
Voted to adjourn 10:15 P. M., November 2, 1982.
IMM A true copy. Attest:
Lawrence Drew
Town Clerk