HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994-01-31 School Committee MinutesREADING PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Reading, Massachusetts
SCHOOL COMMITTEE MEETING
REGULAR SESSION MINUTES JANUARY 31, 1994
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Roberta D'Antona called the Regular School Committee
Meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. in the Reading Memorial High
School Staff Center. All members were present with the ex-
ception of Susan Cavicchi. Also present were Superintendent
Robert J. Munnelly, Assistant Superintendent Dennis A.
Richards, School Council Representatives from each of the
schools, and a reporter from the Chronicle.
ROUTINE MATTERS
MINUTES
Matthew Cummings moved to approve the January 10, 1994 Open
Hearing minutes Timothy Twomey seconded the motion. Mr.
Shannon asked to eliminate the fifth paragraph on page 2, Mr.
Stohlman identified that Mrs. Anthony asked how much money has
been established for the Capital Improvements Plan, if a ten
year Capital Improvements Plan has been developed yet, and to
add Dr. Munnelly is developing one for projects in the sixth
paragraph. On page 3, Mr. Stohlman revised the third
paragraph to omit "did not levy the $250,000 last year and
this year we are asking for $500,000." and replace with "the
Town had levied $500,000 less than the cap established by 2
1/2 and plan to do the same this year." Matthew Cummings
moved to approve the amended January 10, 1994 Open Hearing
minutes George Shannon seconded the motion. The vote was 5-
0.
BILLS AND PAYROLLS
The warrant for bills were as follows:
January 24, 1994 - Bills -
January 31, 1994 - Bills -
The warrant for payrolls were as follows:
January 28, 1994
OLD BUSINESS
- Biweekly
$76,630.91
$37,477.78
$114,833.28
Mr. Cummings asked about prioritizing the budget list. Ms.
D'Antona stated the budget has been voted as it was and
further discussion will be taken up again at the February 14
REGULAR SESSION MINUTES 2 JANUARY 31, 1994
School Committee meeting. Chair D'Antona stated the budget as
presented is an absolutely essential budget.
CITIZENS' INPUT
Chair D'Antona welcomed citizen input.
Mr. Nate White raised questions relating to the reimbursement
that Reading Public Schools will receive for each of the 92
METCO students. He noted that the proposed FY95 school
budget, including town -wide spending, is $4,930 per pupil and
that reimbursement from METCO for their students in Reading
averages $1,280 per pupil. Two questions he asked School
Committee to consider: should non - residents be enrolled in the
school system in return for reimbursement of only 26 percent
of their cost; and are the policies known to taxpayers?
SUPERINTENDENT AND SCHOOL COMMITTEE CHAIR REPORTS
Chair D'Antona addressed the minimum target the Education
Reform Act of 1993 has set for each community's support for
education though encouraging a higher standard of spending.
She added when the minimum target for the school budget is
calculated by using the formulas of the Educational Reform
Act, Reading's school and municipal minimum target for spend-
ing is $18,191,444. The FY95 budget voted by the school com-
mittee on January 18, 1994, results in a school and municipal
amount of $18,555,976, aspiring to the higher standard of the
Educational Reform Act, exceeding the minimum target by
$364,832. Continuing, Ms. D'Antona stated, if the minimum
target is calculated in a different way, using the FY94 school
and municipal minimum target plus the increase in staff wages,
the minimum target becomes $18,310,092. In this case the
school and municipal amount exceeds the minimum target by
$245,884.
Presenting both analyses, Ms. D'Antona stated the first direc-
tion would mean larger classes, less school allotments and
Professional Development, etc. The second version, called a
"Level Standards Budget" (an essential budget) includes the
minimum target - Base FY94 plus raises.
She outlined the priority items not included in the school
FY95 budget: 1.5 Specialists, $45,000; Sabbatical, $16,000;
Chemical Holding Tank, $8,000; RMHS Language Lab, $75,000; and
Increases for Substitutes, $5,000.
Chair D'Antona turned the remainder of the School Committee
meeting over to Assistant Superintendent Dennis Richards, who
acted as the Moderator for the Round Table Discussion.
REGULAR SESSION MINUTES 3 JANUARY 31, 1994
ROUND TABLE DISCUSSION
Mr. Richards identified #16 of the 31 questions previously
prepared by the Councils on the discussion questionnaire sheet
as RMHS and not the School Committee. He requested each
school council to name their representatives who were present
and update the committee of their work to date on developing
a School Improvement Plan.
Eaton parent representative, Nancy Stager, noted that they
have asked the parents what they want the Council to include
in their school and community plan.
JoAnne Garelick, teacher and spokesperson for the Birch Meadow
School Council, stated they have been meeting since September,
have sent out a staff /family /parent questionnaire and are in
the process of putting the common themes on a data base.
Barrows Principal Papandreou stated they also have developed
a survey - out of 290 families they only received 50
responses. Parents concern over the elementary nurses was
addressed in a recent school newsletter he added.
Stanley Nissen, representing Reading Memorial High School's
Council, reported Principal Mirkin was not present this
evening because she's attending a statewide meeting of the
Common Core Group formed by Education Reform. He added that
the just completed report of the high school's accreditation
from NEASC was helpful to the high school council and will be
available to read in the library soon.
Killam's spokesperson, Linda Goodemote, advised a lot of time
was spent on the parent survey and a good response was
received. A teacher survey recently went out and they then
will plan to put together their goals.
Eleanor Hardin, a Parker parent, stated their council meets
mostly every other week and have discussed the state of the
school, projects that the staff have started, and thinking
about undertaking a core values process for all of the school
community.
Coolidge parent Laurence Chomsky stated time has beem spent on
the school's budget and areas of need. As part of their
Improvement Plan they have discussed core values, inclusion,
gifted and talented, technology, authentic assessment, staff
development, and budget opportunities.
Principal Lahood announced that Charles Lawrence from Polaroid
has offered his services on how to develop a school plan
through School Councils.
REGULAR SESSION MINUTES 4 JANUARY 31, 1994
Assistant Superintendent Richards presented a handout of the
1993 Massachusetts Educational Reform Act for School Councils
that listed the elements of a school council: size,
composition, selection, and the responsibilities of a school
council: with the assistance of principals to identify needs,
adopt goals, formulate a school improvement plan and review
the school budget. On a second handout Mr. Richards continued
with the summary of key components for the School Improvement
Plan.
In discussion of the Relationship with School Committee and
School Councils and School Councils with each other, School
Committee members stated they hoped the School Councils do not
feel they have any limits as to content and timeframe.
School Council member Stan Nissen stated this is a wide
opportunity for the councils to develop their plan and asked
School Committee to define these plans and encourage consis-
tency.
Several School Council members offered suggestions to prior-
itize concerns, goals and share them with each other. Prin-
cipal Lahood offered sending council minutes to each council
for their information as an initial step. Other suggestions
were joint meetings, one School Committee member keeping tabs
on one School Council, coordinate a committee to meet with a
representative from each council once a month, and to present
their concerns to the Administrative Council for their
discussion at their meetings.
Regarding finances a committee member stated if there are
worthy improvement plans, the School Committee will advocate
for them to get additional funds. Mr. Cummings added that the
additional Education Reform monies this year totalled only
$140,000, not a windfall when covering the growing population.
Parker Principal Delaney stated maintenance needs within the
Town are staggering.
Mr. Twomey stated the process of funding schools is complicat-
ed. There never is enough money to go around. The School
Committee will need to keep reality in mind when making
decisions on how money is to be distributed.
Chair D'Antona informed the audience with the advent of and
the monies that have come to the community through Education
Reform there also comes education requirements for profession-
al development. She stated that all tax money does not go to
the schools and asked the schools to continue to fundraise.
REGULAR SESSION MINUTES 5 JANUARY 31, 1994
When asked who the responsible person is for implementation,
the reply was the principal at each school will be accounta-
ble. It was noted if the plan includes a third party then
other entities in town government may need to be solicitated.
The Assistant Superintendent stated the change is difficult -
it needs to be developed with parents, staff, and School
Councils input. He added each School Council plan will have
to be dealt with individually and that a target date for is
the end of March.
Mr. Nissen asked how the School Committee would like this
information presented and stated that it would be difficult to
have the end of March as a dead line. Until a detailed plan
is developed they would not be able to come up with the cost.
He asked if an interim document with an implementation plan
would be acceptable for the March deadline.
Chair D'Antona asked that the Councils include what is
relevant to their school and added information not related to
their goals will not be expected.
Member George Shannon suggested councils develop for this
year, a fairly basic and simple document - -a living document
that can grow in subsequent years.
Mr. Cummings stated the school community determines if the
plan is successful and depending on the goal if it will be met
or implemented.
Principal Lahood asked if the Inclusion Profile Format they
used would make it easier for School Committee to read the
School Council information. Principal Lahood questioned if
the inclusion plan should be expanded for all students and if
the Inclusion Profile is expanded it would challenge all kids
in all areas.
Chair D'Antona replied that the notion of inclusion is a goal
for this School Committee and if a School Council puts it into
their School Improvement Plan as a priority it would be
considered valid and if they did not it would not fit in with
the goals the School Committee have established.
Dr. Munnelly advised the need to continue accessing
communication and goals established by the Staff Develoment
and Assessment Committees.
Layers of decision making, Principal Delaney continued, need
to be developed, often each group is in conflict with each
other. "How do the School Councils relate to the PTO /PTA ?"
asked Principal Delaney. He noted at Parker they are a very
REGULAR SESSION MINUTES 6 JANUARY 31. 1994
active, contributing group and asked about using that group
for feed back.
Principal Lahood stated changes in school culture will now
come via telecommunications /technology and questioned how they
will be funded.
Birch Meadow Principal Davidson stated they already know the
budget reality and will need more guidance in developing their
plans.
Mr. Nissen noted that Principal Mirkin has spoken on the
reality of per pupil allotment funds.
Assistant Superintendent Richards and Chair D'Antona together
thanked the councils for coming and the opportunity to share
dialogue.
ADJOURN
At 10:00 p.m. Timothy Twomey moved to adjourn from the Round
Table Discussion Meeting. Matthew Cummings seconded the
motion. The vote was 5 -0.
Matthew Cumminas
Roberta D'Antona
George Shannon
Thomas Stohlman
Timothy Twomey
ResPeatulY Submitted
ROM I M6nel
ly, Ed. D.
Superintendent Of Schools
Secretary To The School Committee