HomeMy WebLinkAbout1995-02-13 School Committee MinutesREADING PUBLIC SCHOOLS
READING, MASSACHUSETTS
OPEN HEARING BUDGET MINUTES FEBRUARY 13 1995
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Twomey called the budget hearing to order at 7:30. All
members were present as well as Assistant Superintendent Dennis
Richards. Mr. Twomey thanked everyone for coming. He stated that
the School Budget has been submitted to the Town Manager. He
invited everyone to speak up and voice their concerns. There was
a telephone link up with Mrs. Mirkin fielding the calls.
BILLS AND PAYROLLS
The warrant for bills were as follows:
February 13, 1995 - Bills - $ 142,820.41
The warrants for payrolls were as follows:
February 10, 1995 - Biweekly - $ 142,371.91
Mr. Twomey introduced Jennifer Page, Principal of the Joshua Eaton
School. She in turn introduced three school principals from
Sweden. Bengt Olos Sennero,(upper elementary grades) Mona Nyberg,
and Berit Nordlund ( both grade 7 - 12) were in attendance. Mr.
Twomey thanked them for attending.
Mr. Twomey stated that the draft budget was 9 1/2 to 10% higher
than the last fiscal budget. Four classrooms were being added at
Joshua Eaton and Birch Meadow. This means hiring eight additional
teachers as well as all supplies necessary to outfit the
classrooms.
Mrs. D'Antona stated that two new programs for FY96 would be the
Understanding Handicaps funds and the Information Technology
Coordinator. Mr. Stohlman noted that the technology equipment
budget is separate from the school budget.
Mr. Twomey stated that there was a $ 650,000 - $ 700,000 difference
between the School and what the Town Manager has allotted.
$ 650,000 is large discrepancy.
Mr. Twomey introduced and welcomed Christine Cerretani, High School
Student Representative.
At this point they were going to take questions from the audience.
Chair Twomey asked everyone to state their name before they asked
their question or made their comment.
OPEN HEARING BUDGET MINUTES 2 FEBRUARY 13 1995
Mr. Bob Donovan, President of the Reading Teachers Association
Mr. Donovan recapped the history of cuts for the past ten years.
He stated that the 9.63% increase of this year's budget may seem
exorbitant, it still falls shy of the state average based on per
pupil expenditures. He went on to say that under the mandates of
Ed Reform, education cannot and should not take a back seat any
longer. The Reading School System needs Town support to meet all
the mandated changes of educational reform.
Mr. Twomey stated that the per pupil spending was $ 625 below the
state average. If we could raise the per pupil spending average we
would have $ 2 1/2 million more.
James Biller, Coolidge Middle School Parent
He cautioned the School Committee not to make cuts. He said the
Town Manager is not Town Meeting. Property values will decline
with the decline of education. We need to get the schools back to
where we were before the cuts started. If we cut back Technology,
we do not even have pencils to fall back on. We cannot steal from
the schools to have the town stay afloat.
Mr Twomey outlined the budget process. The budget does go from the
Town Manager to the FinCom then to Town Meeting. He urged people
to attend the FinCom meetings and to call FinCom members.
Bruce MacDonald
He commended the School Committee on their tough approach.
Leadership comes from the School Committee. An override is a
possibility.
Al Hamilton, Parent
Mr. Hamilton noted that in other countries, children by the sixth
grade have mastered a foreign language and Calculus. We are not
hemorrhaging; we are bleeding to death.
Lorraine Horn, Parent
She supports the FY96 School Committee Budget. She asked Tim to
explain a line item. Tim explained that the line item was made up
of Special Education Transportation, Tutors, Nurses and out of town
placements. There are increased costs mandated by the Department
of Education and court systems. These obligations must be
fulfilled.
Mr. Dennis Richards, Assistant Superintendent
Mr. Richards explained that the mandated costs were not just
directly related to Special Education. The School district must
pay costs relating recertification for teachers and, in the future,
costs relating to the Time and Learning Commission. These are just
a few items that the school district must pay for.
OPEN HEARING BUDGET MINUTES 3 FEBRUARY 13 1995
Mr. John Arina, Parent, 3 Killam students
He feels the Town should handle the mandates. There is building
construction everywhere. He wanted to know who decides who gets
capital improvement money? He was told that the ultimate
arbitrator are the Town Meeting Members. Financial matters are
discussed at the April Town Meeting.
Mr. Twomey went on to say that per capita, Reading is 121% of the
state average. We are 37th highest in the state as far as property
taxes go. We have no industry.
Mr. Richards explained that the Department of Education is
translating the 1993 Education Reform Law into practice. The
formula for funding does not work well for Reading. Large amounts
of money are received by urban areas and not by towns like Reading.
Randy Gonchar, Killam Parent
Mr. Gonchar stated that the Killam parents are monitoring the
FinCom. It is important for the School Committee to take an active
role. He feels it is important to support the School Committee and
present views to the FinCom and the Town Manager. We should let
them know which direction we want to go. We have to be more
aggressive.
Mrs. Cavicchi stated that she was please that so many people follow
the FinCom. It has been an eye opening experience for them.
Mr. Biller, Parent
Mr. Biller clarified that the new Technology Coordinator position
is not a Town position. He wants the position to stay within the
schools. He does not want to see the position at the Reading
Public Library. That would be like putting the Police Chief at the
Department of Public Works. Technology is a huge amount of work.
It must be managed properly.
A Caller
The caller supported the School Committee's Budget position. The
caller was a proponent of the Understanding Handicaps Program. The
loss of this position would be very costly. The cost of prejudice
is expensive.
Mr. Twomey stated that Understanding Handicaps is not a new
program. It has been handled by volunteers for years. The time
has come to have a paid person direct it.
Mr. Richards agreed with Mr. Biller. The need for a Technology
Director is great. That person should be able to interface with
town personnel but the position must be kept in the schools.
OPEN BUDGET HEARING MINUTES 4 FEBRUARY 13. 1995
Mr. Thomas Meharg, RMHS P.T.O. President Parent
He supports the School Committee budget. He would also like to see
an increase in the per pupil spending. He feels Reading gets a
good bang for the buck but a few more bucks would help out! He
urged everyone to support the School Committee.
Rachel Baumgartner, Parent
The Budget has already been cut. Many cuts have already been made
before the budget is completed. Rachel explained how her daughter
carried around her vocabulary book in a zip lock bag. Updating
Textbooks is not frivolous. Many group support the schools with
private money. She pleaded with the School Committee not to cut
the budget.
Dr. Delaney, Parker Middle School Principal
Dr. Delaney reiterated that many cuts have already been made before
this budget was finalized. For example: $ 15,000 - $ 16,000 was
cut from his budget. The funds would have been spent on items
such as: 6th Grade Social Studies books, 7th - 8th Grade Math
books, Literature books, Foreign Language Books, Sheet Music etc.
Linda Hibretter, Caller, Parent
She is overwhelmed and impressed with the education her children
have received. She applauded the School Committee. She urged
everyone to support the budget.
Mr. Shannon stated that people do not realize that there is an
increase in student population. He said he could show sixty pages
of paper detailing unfunded programs. The School Committee must
have details. The parents have to know what will be cut.
Linda Malloy, Parent
There is no fat left in the budget only meat. She says she is
ashamed of the shape that the text books are in. Education count!
Mary Ann Lucitelli, Caller, Parent
Reading should look at where the money is spent. Did we really
need the new Light Company Building?
Mr. Stohlman stated that the Light Company is not bound by
Proposition 2 1/2. He said there are four options:
1. Cut the Budget
2. Juggle Revenues
3. Use Free Cash
4. Have an Override
The deadline for an override is tomorrow. He does not see how we
can raise the money any other way.
OPEN HEARING BUDGET MINUTES 5 FEBRUARY 13. 1995
Michael Slezak, Parent
The budget process is a political process. He wants the people to
support the budget. The School Committee must take a strong stand.
Darcy Hildreth, Parent, Special Needs Student
As a parent she only wants to educate her child. She is tired of
hearing Education versus Special Education. She did not ask to
have a handicapped child. She applauded Mr. Richards. Finally,
someone stood up and stated that not all mandated issues are for
Special Education. She feels that Education should not be pitted
against Special Education. The School Committee has $ 15,000 in
the budget for the Understanding Handicaps position but will not
spend the money on Special Ed. She wants money spent on the
Transitional Kindergarten.
Gretchen O'Halloran, Parent
She feels the budget should be presented in its entirety, with no
cuts. People do not realize that the budget has already been
slashed.
Mr. Cummings added that people do not go to the FinCom Meetings.
Mary Kay Watts, Parent Special Needs Student
Cable Television makes it possible to make people aware of the
school situation. People move to Reading for the schools. The
schools were good in the eighties. What happened?
Caller, Unidentified
Coolidge needs paint, RMHS needs ceiling tiles, RMHS has asbestos.
Where exactly are our taxes going? The custodians do not do
anything. Her taxes go up but she sees no improvement in the
schools.
Mr. Shannon explained that a lot of the tax dollars go to salaries.
The custodian work force was cut by 600. There is no money for
repairs and maintenance.
Laura Wilson, Parent
She asked why there is not an override on the ballot? She was told
that the Selectmen place items on the ballot.
Mr. Stohlman announced that he has mentioned an override at the
last three School Committee meetings.
Mr. Twomey explained that an override requires a huge amount of
work. Wanting an override and getting an override passed are two
separate issues.
Mr. MacDonald
He concurred that an override is a very difficult political
process.
OPEN HEARING BUDGET MINUTES 6 FEBRUARY 13, 1995
Mr. Shannon claims an override will not happen. You must have a
citizens group to do the work and that is not going to happen in
the next 24 hours.
Steve Connor, parent, member several interest groups in town
He feels a school only override will not work. It must be town
wide to work.
Mr. Arena, parent
He asked Mr. Shannon what number he would take seriously. Mr.
Shannon said to propose a budget $ 450K - $ 650K short highlighting
what will be cut out. If it does not pass, people will see why.
MR. STOHLMAN MOVED: THAT IN ORDER TO AVOID ADDITIONAL CUTS IN
SCHOOL OR MUNICIPAL SERVICES OR DEPLETION OF FREE CASH RESERVES,
THE SELECTMEN CONSIDER A PROPOSITION 2 1/2 OVERRIDE IN THE AMOUNT
OF $ 1,000.000.
MR. STOHLMAN LEFT AT THAT POINT BECAUSE OF CHILD CARE NEEDS.
BEFORE HE LEFT HE WAS IN FAVOR OF THE MOTION. IT WAS 9:45 P.M.
Mrs. D'Antona said she had been very quiet all evening, that she
came to listen. She said an override requires tremendous amounts
of work. She would be in support of an override but the time for
an override is not now. Throwing the Technology plan in
haphazardly would not work.
Mr. Twomey stated that since Mr. Stohlman is no longer present at
the meeting that his motion must fail.
MR. SHANNON MOVED FOR AN OVERRIDE. MRS. CAVICCHI SECONDED THE
MOTION. THE VOTE WAS 3 - 2. MR. TWOMEY AND MRS. D ' ANTONA VOTED
AGAINST.
Mr. Twomey stated that the increase is small this year, only a
fraction of what will be needed in years to come. In order to have
a successful override you must have an enormous commitment. So far
no one has come forward to do all the work. Mr. Twomey feels the
time is just not right.
Adjourn
Mr. Twomey moved to adjourn. Mr. Shannon seconded the motion. The
vote was 5 - 0 - 1. (Mr. Stohlman was not present)
SUSAN CAVICCHI
MATTHEW CUMMINGS
ROBERTA D'ANTONA
GEORGE SHANNON
TIMOTHY TWOMEY
R pectful1 ubiFitted,
9VG:�C
Dennis Richards
Interim Superintendent