HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-02-05 School Committee Minutes - Finance CommitteeREADING SCHOOL COMMITTEE
Reading, Massachusetts
SCHOOL COMMITTEE /FINANCE COMMITTEE February 5, 1998
Finance Chairman Keigley called the meeting of the Finance
Committee to order at 7:35 p.m. at town hall. Present were
School Committee Members Cavicchi, Twomey and Williams. Also
present was Superintendent Harutunian and Associate
Superintendent Richards. Only 3 members being present and not
constituting a quorum, the School Committee took no action.
Mr. White made a motion to approve the Finance Committee minutes
of January 21 with amendments as noted by Member Grimm. Mr.
McDonald seconded the motion.
SCHOOL BUDGET PRESENTATION
Dr. Harutunian discussed enrollment projections by grade and
distributed to the Committee a copy of the projections and also a
copy of a memorandum from Town Clerk Cheryl Johnson stating that
the Town Clerk records show there were 338 births in Reading in
1997. The memorandum also stated that it should be noted that in
some cases, it takes months for various communities to mail the
Town copies of births. Dr. Hirudinean noted that the projection
for births in 1997 was 314 and as stated in the memorandum actual
births so far are 338.
Dr. Hirudinean answered questions submitted by Finance Committee
member McDonald as listed:
• How many students in the METCO Program and does it pay for
itself?
Dr. Harutunian advised that there are 74 students in the
METCO program. The contract states that Reading maintain
approximately 100 students. Reading receives $268,000 from
METCO, $118,000 to cover books, paper, etc. The remainder
of the money is for monitors etc. Also supplemental $12,000
is for SPED services. There are 13 METCO children in the
SPED program.
Finance Committee Member Grimm asked whether the $12,000 for
SPED covers the services for the METCO students.
Dr. Harutunian advised that the $12,000 does cover the
services.
SCHOOL COMMITTEE /FINANCE COMMITTEE -2- February 5, 1998
• Projected enrollment increase of 64 students at a cost of
$332K in the 1999 Budget, could it be offset by a reduction
in the METCO program?
Dr. Harutunian responded that it probably could not be
offset. He stated that 830 of the budget is staff and there
is no increase in staff for METCO. He stated that METCO
pretty much pays for itself.
• Will any of the increase in Special Needs be offset by
additional state funding?
Dr. Harutunian distributed to the Committee a memorandum
from Dr. Ardi showing that the total increase would be
approximately $66,000.
• Why such a large increase in elementary school staff with
only a 64 student increase in the total enrollment?
Dr. Harutunian advised that of the 13 staff requested, 2 are
K -5 Instructional Specialists, 8 are Regular Educational
Assistants, 1 Science Educational Assistant and 2 Technology
Educational Assistants. Dr. Harutunian advised the
Committee that there has been no increase in Regular
Education Assistants since 1994. He also advised the
Committee that the 2 Technology Educational Assistants will
cut back on repair costs.
Dr. Harutunian answered questions submitted by Finance Committee
Member Grimm as listed:
• How are actual FY98 expenses comparing to Budget? Will the
School Department need additional funds in the Spring to
finish out FY98?
Dr. Harutunian advised that the Custodian Contract has been
settled and will need to go to Town Meeting for money for
settlement. Dr. Harutunian also distributed his memorandum
of February 3, with a draft of this year's FY98 Budget
projected out until the end of June, 1998. We appear to
have an overall balance of $9,560 however, suspect that will
require additional monies at the April Town Meeting because
of Special Education.
SCHOOL COMMITTEE /FINANCE COMMITTEE -3- February 5, 1998
• What was implemented in FY98 from last year's priority list?
Dr. Harutunian distributed to the Committee a list of School
Committee's approved cuts.
• How many more years will the School Department have to pay
the Early Retirement Assessment?
Dr. Harutunian advised that will be paying until the year
2000.
• What are District Awards and why are they doubling?
Dr. Harutunian advised that this is money for recognition of
groups and organizations in the school system that reach
state levels of competition and includes the School
Committee's Excellence in Education award.
• What is the Regular Day Per Pupil assumption used in this
budget? How much of an increase is it over last year?
Dr. Harutunian advised that the FY97 per pupil elementary
allocation was $135 the FY98 per pupil elementary allocation
is $155.
• Personal Services increase 10.390, 23.75 of the proposed
34.55 new positions fall under Regular Day, please
explain /justify each of these positions. Which of these
positions are mandated by Education Reform Laws? Has
employee benefits expenses for each new position been
assumed in the budget?
Dr. Harutunian distributed to the Committee a list of FY99
Staffing requests which included the assignment of the
position, the reason the position is required, State Ed
Reform.
• Why is the Principal pay decreasing?
Dr. Harutunian advised that there are seven principals, the
two new principals that were hired came in at a lower salary
than the two that left.
• Why is Textbook Replacement increasing 37%?
SCHOOL COMMITTEE /FINANCE COMMITTEE -4- February 5 1998
Dr. Harutunian advised that it is line increase only. Have
moved workbook costs into the textbook line item.
• Instructional Equipment - New is increasing 47% and
Replacement by 870, where is all the Photocopy equipment
going?
Dr. Harutunian distributed to the Committee a complete list
of Computer Related Budget Items dated 1/13/98.
• Why are Collaborative expenses in Regular Day? Does the
School Department still belong to two Collaboratives? Why
are there small amounts of SPED expenses in Regular Day
under Instructional Supplies, Textbook Replacement,
Media /Educational Software and Instructional Equipment?
Dr. Harutunian advised that the School Department continues
to belong to two Collaboratives. There are small amounts of
SPED expenses, less than $1,000, are put in regular ed for
.1 and .2 students so that will be able to track.
• What are the $162,000 in Curriculum Initiatives?
Dr. Harutunian distributed to the Committee a memorandum
explaining the Curriculum Initiatives.
• Is the $20,000 increase in Transportation services for
additional bussing of kindergartners?
Dr. Harutunian advised that this is a serious enrollment
problem and there is no elementary solution until 2001. The
increase is for transportation of kindergarten students and
the fall of 1998 will be busing 160 -199 kindergartners.
• Please update us on the status of the METCO program, how
many students, where they are in the system. What is the
School Department policy regarding METCO given the current
enrollment issues? Why are new students being accepted at
Birch Meadow and Coolidge? Does Reading have to accept
METCO students that are Special Need students?
Dr. Harutunian advised that the majority of this question
was answered under Finance Committee Member McDonald's
question. He added that METCO additions are selected and no
additional programs or staff are needed.
SCHOOL COMMITTEE /FINANCE COMMITTEE -5- February 5, 1998
• Has the nurses contract been settled?
Dr. Harutunian advised that it is going to fact finding.
Are contractual service with Winchester Hospital still a
possibility? Does the $30,000 in Contractual Services
represent this possibility?
Dr. Harutunian advised that yes contractual service with
Winchester is still a possibility and distributed a
memorandum dated 1/9 regarding Recommendation for An
Additional School Nurse for FY99.
• The budget calls for one new nurse, where would she be
placed?
Dr. Harutunian advised that this would be determined after
an evaluation.
• Under Athletic Services there is $3,000 for Maintenance of
Fields, isn't the Town maintaining the fields?
Dr. Harutunian advised that the $3,000 was to cover the
stripping of the fields.
Finance Committee member White questioned Dr. Harutunian on why
School Department has not sent out a fact sheet regarding charter
schools.
Dr. Harutunian advised that the Charter School did not fall under
open meeting laws until they receive state approval so he has no
idea what type of response they are getting for possible
enrollment. The director of the charter school is required to
inform the Superintendent of the number of applications by April
1st.
Capital Plan
Dr. Harutunian discussed with the Committee the School
Department's Capital Budget as outlined in the School Committee's
Recommended Budget. He also informed the Committee that the
School Committee had voted last night to endorse the decision of
the School Building Committee to place the Coolidge Project on
the warrant for the March Town Meeting.
The School Department presentation ended at 10:15 p.m.
spectfully submitted,
Harry KI Harutunian, Ph.D.
Superintendent