HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-03-29 RMLD Board of Commissioners Minutes Reading Municipal Light Board of Commissioners
Regular Session RECEIVED
230 Ash Street TOWN CLERK
Reading,MA 01867 READING, MASS.
.� March 29,2012
Start Time of Regular Session: 7:30 p.m. ZOIZ APR 2b P 12: 35
End Time of Regular Session: 9:10 P.M.
Commissioners:
Philip B.Pacino,Chairman Gine Snyder,Vice Chair,Secretary
Mary Ellen O'Neill,Commissioner Robert Soli,Commissioner
Marde West,Commissioner
Staff:
Vinnie Cameron,General Manager Beth Ellen Antonio,Human Resources Manager
Jeanne Fall,Executive Assistant Robert Fournier,AccountingBusiness Manager
Kevin Sullivan,Engineering and Operations Manager Jane Parenteau,Energy Services Manager
Citizens' Advisory Board(CAB)
Tony Capobianco,Member
Public:
Jack Devir
Call to Order
Introductions
Vice Chair Pacino opened the meeting by welcoming Ms. West stating that she is the fifty-fifth Conunissioner to serve at the light
department, and the seventeenth whose seat goes back tol895 when it was served by Herb Robinson and the longest serving member
k that seat was Vice Chair Pacino's good friend Allan Ames who served for twenty-seven years.
�pening Remarks/Approval of Meeting Agenda
Vice Chair Pacino called the meeting to order and stated that the meeting of the Reading Municipal Light Department(RMLD)Board
of Commissioners is being broadcast live at the RMLD's office at 230 Ash Street,Reading,MA. Live broadcasts areavailable only in
Reading due to technology constraints. Vice Chair Pacino stated that this meeting was not live. This meeting was videotaped for
distribution to the community television stations in North Reading,Wilmington and Lynnfield.
Reorganization of RMLD Board
Vice Chair Pacino asked if there were my nominees.
Chairman
Ms. Snyder said that she would like to nominate Mary Ellen O'Neill as Chair of the Board because she has shown leadership in the
past, has always been thoughtful and courteous. Ms. O'Neill thanked Ms. Snyder appreciating her vote of confidence. Ms. O'Neill
said that she is unable to consider taking the position on, would like to defer and nominate Phil Pacino to serve as Chairman for the
coming year.
Ms.O'Neill made a motion seconded by Ms. Snyder to nominate Phil Pacino for Chairman.
Vice Chair Pacino asked for further nominations,there were none.
Mr.Soli made a motion seconded by Ms.Snyder that the nominations be closed.
Motion carried 5:0:0.
Chairman Pacino wanted to thank the Commission for their confidence in him going forward. Chairman Pacino said that he would be
fair,promising to listen to everyone's opinion. Chairman Pacino stated that one thing that he must do at this point,and explained that
at the January meeting he was disrespectful to one of the members of the Board. Chairman Pacino void that he has apologized
l ,ivately and at this point would like to apologize publicly.
Vice Chair
Chairman Pacino asked if there were any nominations for the Vice Chair. Mr. Soli said that he would like to nominate Marcie West.
Regular Session Meeting Minutes 2
March 29,2012
Reorganization of RMLD Board
Vice Chair
Mr. Soli made a motion seconded by Ms. Snyder to nominate Ms. West for Vice Chair. Ms. O'Neill stated that she would like t
nominate Gina Snyder to serve as Vice Chair of the RMLD Board for the coming yea.
Ms. O'Neill made a motion seconded by Ms. West to nominate Ms. Snyder for Vice Chau. Chairman Pacino made a motion
seconded by Ms.Snyder that the nominations be closed.
Motion carried 5:0:0.
Chairman Pacino stated that there were two nominations on the Door and would take them in the order of which they were presented.
Motion to elect Ms. West as Vice Chair faded 1:4:0. Chairman Pacino, Man. O'Neill, Snyder and West voted against this
motion. Motion to elect Ma Snyder as Vice Chair carried 4:1:0. Mr.Sou voted against this motion.
Chairman Pacino then congratulated Ms. Snyder on her appointment as Vice Chair. Chairman Pacino explained to Ms. Snyder that
there will be times when she will have to cover for the Chair position when he is unable to make the meetings.
Secretary
Chairman Pacino stated that the next position to vote on is the Secretary position and explained that this position is probably the most
time intensive position. Chairman Pacino commented that last year the position of the Secretary was rotated between two members of
the Board, and suggested that in all fairness, the position be rotated between all five members of the Board. Chairman Pacino asked
the Board their feelings on this suggestion.
Ms.O'Neill said that prior to getting into that discussion she wanted to thank Gina Snyder and Mrs. Fort for the work on the extensive
minutes this year
Ms.O'Neill stated that she is willing to consider rotating, Chairman Pacino said that he did not have a problem taking a tum himself.
Ms.West asked if someone could elaborate a bit on what is involved. Chairman Pacino asked Ms.Full to explain what she does. Ms.
Foil explained that she takes the minutes of the meeting,prepores them into draft form for Mr.Camerons review,then he sends them
in whomever the secretary is. The turnaround is within seven to ten days in order m get the minutes into the Board packet.
Mr. Soli added that the minutes should try to stay within six to eight pages, condensing as needed. Ms. Snyder stated that has rh�
always been possible with the lengthy commentary. Ms. West clarified whether the length of minutes in this packet is not common.
Ms.Snyder replied that is correct
Chairman Panton asked how the Board felt about rotating this assignment and would it be something they want to do. He then polled
the Board for their thoughts. The consensus of the Board was to rotate the Secretary position amongst themselves. Chairman Pacino
stated that they will rotate the Secretary position among the five members and then asked who would like to he the Secretary for this
evening. Ms.Snyder replied that she assumed she was. Mr. Soli requested to be one of the two-month secretarial slots.
RMLD Board of Commissionen Committer and Assignments
The Board discussed the various committee assignments and decided on the following as presented in the attached char.
Budget Committee General Manager Committee Public Relations Committee
Philip Pacino - Chair, Mary Ellen O'Neill, Philip Pacino-Chair,Mary Ellen O'Neill, Mary Ellen O'Neill,Marsie West
Monde West Gina Snyder
Power&Rate Committee Policy Committee
Gina Snyder-Chair,Philip Pacino, Robert Soli,Chair,Gina Snyder,Marsie West
Mary Ellen O'Neill
Audit(Including Town of Reading Audit) Joint Committee-Payment to the Town of
Marsie West,Robert Soli Reading
Philip Pacino,Robert Soli
Two Citizens'Advisory Board Members
One Reading Selectmen
Assignments Assignments
Accounts Payable Payroll-Four Month Rotation
Mary Ellen O'Neill Marsie West,April-July
Philip Psion Philip Pacino,August-November
Marcie West Mary Ellen O'Neill,December-March
Gina Snyder(First Backup) Gina Snyder(First Backup)
Bob Soli(Second Backup)
Regular Session Meeting Minutes 3
Marsh 29,2012
RMLD Board of Commissioners Committees and Assignments
if is. O'Neill made a motion seconded by Ms. West to move that the Board approve the various committee assignments and
%ithammanships as discussed.
Motion carried 5:0:0.
Approval of January 25,2012 and February 29,2012 Board Minutes
Ms. O'Neill asked the Chairman that the Board make two separate motions on these minutes. Chairman Pacino replied yes. Ms.
West stated since she had not been part of those meetings she would be shamming from the vote.
Approval of January 25,2012 Board Minutes
Ms. Snyder made a motion seconded by Ms. O'Neill that the RMLD Board of Commissioners approve the Regular Session meeting
minutes of January 25,2012 with changes as presented.
Chainmen Pacino asked if there was any discussion. Mr. Soli and Ms.O'Neill had changes.
Charman Pacino asked if the seconder would accept and make them as part of the motion. Ms.O'Neill accepted the changes as part
of the motion.
Motion carried 4:0:1.Commissioner West abstained.
Approval of February 29,2012 Board Minutes
Ms. Snyder made a motion second by Ms. O'Neill to move that the RMLD Board of Commissioners approve the
Regular Session meeting minutes of February 29,2012 with changes as presented.
Chairman Pacino asked if there was any discussion. Ms.O'Neill and Mr. Soli suggested changes.
Chairman Pacino asked if the seconder would accept and make them part of the motion.
Motion carried 4:0:1.Commissioner West abstained.
L Iscussion of Renewable Energy Certi0cotes
MCheirman Pacino reported that at this meeting there will be no motions made, however, he is aware that the CAB has made a
recommendation on the Renewable Energy Certificates; it was not fair to comment on that at this point. Chairman Pacino stated that
he would like to see this issue go back to the Power&Ram Committee for discussion.
Chairman Pacino said that it had occurred to him after watching the Selectmen meeting that we don't have a renewable energy policy
and thinks that the Power&Rate Committee could tackle this. Chairman Pacino said that this seems to be the missing piece to this
puzzle in terms of moving forward with this issue. Chairman Pacino asked if there were any other thoughts on this.
Ms.Snyder said that one of the ways that the issue became confused was because we were trying to set policy and is in agreement that
the two things have to be considered together. Ms. Snyder stated that is where the problem started and had wished that they had been
able to complete the process of at least developing the policy.
Chairman Pacino stated that the feeling is that we will refer this back to the Power&Rate Committee,schedule a meeting,and try to
come forward with some kind of recommendation for this committee in the future.
Power Supply Report—February 2012—Ms.Parenteau(Attachment 1)
Ms. Parenteau reported that the RMLD's load for February was approximately 54 million KWhs and that was about a 2% decrease
when compared to February 2011. RMLD's energy cost came in at approximately$2.88 million and that is equivalent to about 5.053
M kilowatt hour.
The Fuel Charge adjustment was act at 5.05 per kilowatt how for the month of February, and the RMLD undercollected by
approximately$348,000 resulting in a Defamed Fuel Cash Reserve balance of$2.1 million. The Fuel Charge remained at 5.05 for the
month of March,and it is currently anticipated to be reduced to 5.0475 for April.
The RMLD purchased about 10.2%of its energy requirements from the ISO New England Spot Market and as a result of the natural
- -,as commodity being down the average cost of that was about$32 per megawatt how. Ms. Parenteau reported on the Capacity side
�
� � RMLD hit a peak demand of 100.4 megawatts on February 29 at 7:00 p.m.and this compares to a peak demand of 108 megawatts
�fnFebruary 1,2011 at 7:00 p.m. Ms. Parenteau noted that we tend to reach our peak demand at 7:00 p.m.during our winter periods.
The RMLD's monthly capacity requirement was 201.3 megawatts of capacity equivalent to SI.34 million or$6.64 a kilowatt month.
Kegular Session Meeting Minutes 4
March 29,2012
Power Supply Report-February 2012-Ms.Parenteau(Attachment 1)
Table 4 shows capacity and energy dollars as well as the amount of energy in kilowatt hours. The February average cost for capaci�
and energy came in at mound$.078/Kwh and that is about one half mill lower than January's average cost. Transmission costs f
February totaled approximately$581,000 and that is approximately a 100/a decrease from January.
Ms.Parenteau stated that she does owe the Board another section on efficiency and is in the process of putting that together. It will be
included in next month's report.
Chairman Pacino asked if there were any questions.
Chairman Pacino asked if there was anything unusual or unexpected in the Power Supply Report.
Ms. Parenteau replied gas prices are down,and RMLD will be issuing an RFP. They are working on getting some indicative pricing.
As of the fust week of April, the Department will be short listing the suppliers based on those prices and negotiating contracts with
suppliers. They hope to go out the first two weeks in May to get final bidding and select a supplier or two.
Ms.Parenteau reported that gas prices hit a ten year low for April whichjust closed this week and believes the monthly gas was below
$3 a MMBTU,noting it is these historically low prices that ESD is trying to take advantage of with authorization from both the CAB
and Power Rate to go out for the RFP process a little sooner than typical.
Engineering and Operations Report-February 2011-Mr.Sullivan(Attachment 2)Gaw Update
Mr. Sullivan reported that the Gaw Update Project remains static at$6.92 million; the project is complete with the final walkthrough
conducted on March 16. Mr. Sullivan stated that he is waiting for information from the Engineer to close out the project. Mr.
Sullivan said as he had promised past Commissioner Hahn he would have the project closed out before FY 13.
Mr. Sullivan reported on the Meter Project,as of today there are approximately 17,000 meters installed throughout the territory, and
we are currently working within the town of Wilmington. The FY12 capital expenditure is about$346,000. In the variance report
Projects 1 -5W9 Reconductoring-Bailardvale Street and 2-High Capacity Tie 4W 18 and 3 W 8 Franklin Street-are now comple
Project 3-Upgrading Old Lynnfield Center URD's-the excavation for the underground bid opening is set for April 11;Pro
jact 4
RTU Replacement - the RTU's (Remote Terminal Units) have been ordered with an expected April install; Project 6 - Capacito
Banks - the installation of the controls into the capacitor banks is in progress, field installation begins on Monday; Project 7 -
SCADA Radio Communication System - has been decided by the E&O Department to put off until FY14; Project 8 - Relay
Replacement Project-the relay bid opening is set for April and the installation will begin FY13 with product from FY12; Project 9-
115kV Disconnect Replacement-Station 4, Gaw, currently two disconnects have been installed, the next one is scheduled for April
and the last one for the week of July 4 when one of our customers is shut down.
There was one new commercial installation this month at 57-59 High Street, Reading and twenty-two residential installations for the
month.
Mr. Sullivan reported that them was nothing of note in Routine Construction for the month. There were 19 cutouts replaced bringing
the total to 197 fiscal year to date.
In the Reliability Report the Customer Average Interruption Duration Index(CAIDI) for the month is at 33 minutes which is down 24
minor" for the month; that low number is primarily due to the type and time of outage during the month of February. The rolling
average for the year is 6 1.1 minutes.
The System Average Interruption Frequency Index (SAIFI) for the month is .23 outage incidents with a rolling average of .45
incidents,both of these figures have been static throughout much of the year.
The Months Between Interruptions (MBTI) is 26.6 months where as in January we were at 27.3 months between interruptions, so
between the SAIFI and the MBTI these numbers arejust wonderful.
Number of calls for the month was 78, outage incidents 12, which is very low; customers affected 558; feeder outages 0; 6 area
outages and 6 service outages. Causes of outages were a menagerie of items,but nothing to note.
Chairman Pacino asked Mr. Sullivan to explain why the SCADA System Project is being pushed off to 2014. Mr. Sullivan repli
that project involves a significant amount of communication. There were six bids that involved communication this year and a
decision was made that it would be best to do things a little al a time rather than to rush into a project like the SCADA Communication
System,further explaining that it is distribution automation through the SCADA Communication System.
Regular Session Meeting Minutes 5
March 29,2012
Engineering and Operations Report—February 2012-Mr.Sullivan(Attachment 2)Gaw Update
'hairman Pacino asked if there were any questions.
Ms. West asked about the reliability reporting standard indexes used — whether they are compared to what occurs in other
organizations,municipalities,or other investor owned utilities. Mr.Sullivan replied that he has and these numbers are very good. Ms.
West said that it would be worthwhile to advertise. Mr.Sullivan agreed that it is and what he has done is to compare the RMLD to the
RMLD so year over year we try and make a comparison to understand that what we are doing,our maintenance and upgrades are done
in the proper areas and done for the right reasons.
Ms.Snyder asked are there any patterns or any particular areas that get the outages. The average is 26.6 months between outages,but
some customers see outages every 12 months. Mr. Sullivan replied that sometimes that happens and based on that, we make the
decision to target those areas that see frequent outages. Mr. Soli said that as an example, one summer he had four squirrels in three
months knock out his power and then squirrel guards were put in and there's been no problem. Mr. Sullivan said that in Routine
Construction there is a line item for Animal Guard Installation,so what we have done is begun an outage reduction initiative.
Financial Report—February 2012—Mr.Fournier(Attachment 3)
Mr.Fournier reported on the Financial Report for February 2012 which represents the first eight months of this fiscal year.
Mr. Fournier reported that to dare there are no surprises to report and none is foreseen. Net Loan or negative change in Net Assets was
$171,000 decreasing the year to date Net Income to$2.2 million; year to dare budgeted Net Income is$5.1 million resulting in Net
Income under budget at about $2.9 million. Mr. Fournier stated that actual year to date Fuel Expenses exceeded Fuel Revenues by
$951,000. Year to date Base Revenues are under budget by$2.3 million or about 7%. Actual Base Revenues we at$30.7 million
compared to the budgeted amount of$33.1 million Year to date Purchase Power Base expense is under budget by S 1.2 million or
about 6.8%. Actual Purchase Power Base costs were at S161 million compared to the budgeted amount of$I8 million.
Mr. Founder reported that the year to date Operating and Maintenance expenses are under budget by $108,000 or 1.4%. Actual
Operating and Maintenance expenses were at$7.7 million compared to the budgeted amount of$7.8 million. Depreciation Expense
-nd Voluntary Payments to the Towns were on budget. Operating Fund balance was at$9.3 million,Capital Food$3.9 million, Rate
rW abilization Fund$6 million,Deferred Fuel Fund$2.1 million,and the Energy Conservation Fund balance was at$178,000.
Year to date kilowatt how sales were 471 million which is 19.4 million kilowatt hours or 4%behind last year's actual figure.
The Gaw revenues collected year to date were$471,000 bringing the total collected since the inception of the Gaw rate to a Imide over
$1 million.Cumulatively,the five divisions were under budged by S 151,000 or about 1.2%.
Mr.Fournier said that the Capital and Operating budgets will be ready for distribution tomorrow.
Mr.Fournier asked that the Board sign the DPU Annual Report, two copies,in the presence of Ms.Fort so that she could witness and
notarize the signatures.
Chairman Pacino asked Mr.Fournier if there was anything that the Board should be made aware of Mr.Fournier replied that the fust
eight months have been pretty vanilla and we don't see anything happening at the end of this fiscal year or for the rest of the calendar
year.
Chairman Pacino asked if there were any questions.
Ms. O'Neill asked Mr. Fournier, when we usually get the letter of what the return on investment is to the Town of Reading. Mr.
Fournier replied,April. Mr.Cameron said that it should be coming in April and we send it out to everybody.
Ms.O'Neill asked what is the anticipation for this year where the last two years it had gone down slightly. Mr.Cameron replied it is
going up this year.
Mr.Capobianco out of curiosity asked if the Gaw revenues will be eliminated from the bills. Mr.Cameron replied that the plan was to
recoup the costa of the Gaw soil remediation over a three year period, believing the final foul was$2.5 million,we should be a little
ver a million dollar;by the end of this fiscal year. Mr.Fournier sated we areat$I.1 million now. Mr.Cameron said that his belief
hm FY13 is the third year and we will probably not make$2 million, therefore it will probably have to be revisited then he will
ve to discuss it with the Board. Mr. Cameron noted that the cost of remediation was to be recouped in three years and that charge
would disappear from the bills. Mr. Cameron said that if at the end of the third year we did not make the total remediation costs, it
will have to be discussed with the Board.
Kegular Session Meeting Minutes b
March 29,2012
General Manager's Report—Mr.Cameron -
Mr. Cameron reported that the RMLD will be participating in Earth Day from 10am-2pm at the Mattern Cabin on April 21.
Cameron said that Reading Cares and the Reading Climate Advisory Committee will be holding their bike swap at the RMLD AV
Strut complex behind the Power Station, April 27. From I lam-lpm is the bike drop off, and April 28 from 9am-1:30p n is the bike
swap.
Mr.Cameron reported that he had attended the American Public Power Association(APPA)Legislative Rally on March 12.14. This
is a rally that he attends each year visiting Representatives and Senators offices from Massachusetts to discuss relevant issues in the
power industry. Mr..Cameron said that this year APPA asked Mr. Cameron if he would represent New England to see three of the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) Commissioners. Mr. Cameron went with a representative from Santee Cooper,
South Carolina, a director from the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, m well as a representative from Muscatine, Iowa.
Mr.Cameron reported that at these meetings his presentation was on transmission costs in New England,how they are increasing,and
the return on investment that the transmission owners receive an a result of the legislation that was put into effect by the FERC with
respect to retom on equity for the transmission projects put in place.
Mr. Cameron said that two of the Commissioners received those comments well, one of them, Commissioner Moeller, who is not
really interested in changing the rules. Commissioners LaFleur and Noris are interested in looking into the issue of return on
investment for transmission. Mr. Cameron stated that there was discussion on the North American Electric Reliability Corporation
(NERC)rules on Find, Fix,Track and Report(FFTR). This has to do with when something on your system needs repair and can be
easily fixed the FFTR process can be used by utilities without going through the NERC process.
Thera was discussion on the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) concerning their desire to have oversight over the
Independent System Operators(ISOs)in the United States with respect to the trades and swaps that are done in the energy market and
they feel there may be some speculating going on. The ISOs already provide that oversight through the financial assurance programs
in each ISO,but that may not be enough.
Mr. Cameron reported that these three meetings lasted just over an hour and it was good to visit with the FERC Commissioners
because it is something that one does not get to do very often. Mr. Cameron said he also attended meetings at Representativ
Markey's office,but because of a schedule conflict he was unable to visit with Representative Tierney who is a big supporter of pubIhs
power. Mr. Cameron stated he was able to go to Representative Capue to (even though he represents Somerville) who is ve
interested in what public power does even though that area has only an Investor-Owned Utility(IOU). Mr. Cameron reported that he
attended a meeting at Repreecntative Markey's office and that he is a big supporter of climate change legislation. Mr. Cameron said
though they were unable to speak with Representative Markey they did speak with Jeff Duncan his aide, who is one of the most
influential aides in the House of Representatives. Mr. Cameron reported that they have seen him for a few years; Mr. Duncan was
very interested in the transmission cost issue.
Mr. Cameron believes that it was a worthwhile trip and that they were able to get people's attention at the FERC and the legislative
level. Mr.Cameron acknowledged that he owes the Board a written report on the trip. Mr. Cameron stated that CAB member Arthur
Cmakatsane also attended this trip.
Charman Pacino asked if there were any comments,there were none.
Northeast Public Power Association Annual Conference—Annual Conference
September 16 to September 19-Sunday River Resort Bethel,Maine
Mr. Cameron said that the Annual NEPPA Conference is September 16-19 and will be held in Bethel, Maine and would like
permission from the Board to attend this conference. Mr.Cameron stated that Board and CAB members also attend this conference.
Mr. Soli made a motion seconded by Mr. Pacino to authorize Mr. Cameron's attendance September 16-19 at the NEPPA Confttcnce
in Maine.
Motion carried 5:0:0.
Chairman Pacino explained that under the terms of the General Manager's contract, overnight travel is to be approved by the Board.
Chairman Pacino asked if there were any comments,there were none.
Chairman Pacino asked Mr. Cameron if there was anything that the Board should be made aware of. Mr. Cameron replied that t
budget was coming out, and there will he the same write up at the beginning of the budget and that the Board did receive budg
guidelines about a month ago. Mr.Cameron stated that the overall budget goes down but there are some parts of the budget that go up
with respect to the Pension Trust and will be in Board member boxes by March 31.
Regular Session Meeting Minutes 7
March 29,2012
M.G.L.Chapter 30B Bids—Material(Attachment 4)
12-36 Replacement of Rooftop Air Conditioning Units
r. Cameron stated that this bid was advertised using an Invitation to Bid which usually goes to the Board when the cost is believed
to be over$25,000. Mr. Cameron noted the number of bidders with the lowest bidder amount being$19,000. Mr. Cameron said that
he brought it to the Board for consistency,with respect to the fact that it was an Invitation to Bid. The Board does not have to vote if
they do not want to,because it is under 525,000 and we do have a suggested company,to award it to.
Ms. Snyder asked why Alpha Mechanical did not bid. Mr. Cameron replied that Alpha Mechanical was not one of the bidders. Mr.
Sullivan said that it was sent to them. Ms. Snyder asked if these were the units that they keep seeing bills for and keep being repaired.
Mr. Cameron said that these are different units and that the bills you see are for the cooling towers and chillers. These are rooftop
units that are used for cooling certain areas of the building.
Ms.Snyder asked how they are different from the cooling towers. Mr.Cameron stated that the cooling towers are used in conjunction
with the chillers and that these rooftop units are completely different air conditioning units.
Mr. Sullivan said that there are a total of three rooftop units. The unit for the computer room was just replaced. These two that are
being voted on tonight,are for the loading dock and the records room. Ms. Snyder asked what is there now. Mr. Sullivan replied that
there are rooftop units there now, these are replacement for those with the same footprint. Mr. Cameron stated that they are old and
need to be replaced.
Ms. Snyder said that when she went up there she only remembered seeing the big units in the middle and did not see any units other
units around. Mr.Cameron stated that what she saw are the gas fired chillers and these units are on the roof.
Mr.Soli asked if they were Energy Star. Mr. Cameron replied that they are the most energy efficient units you can get without having
to do anything to the footprint.
[�/
Ms.Snyder said that she assumed that was what the note on the EER rating was. Mr. Sullivan stated it was.
4 [ s.Snyder said that one bidder was not up to the EER rating. Mr.Cameron agreed.
Chairman Pacino stated that even though it is less than$25,000 he would like the Board to vote on in
Ms.Snyder made a motion seconded by Ms.O'Neill to move that bid 2012-36 for Replacement of Rooftop Air Conditioning Units be
awarded to Healthy Air Solutions for$19,600 as the lowest qualified and responsive bidder on the recommendation of the General
Manager.
Motion carried 5:0:0.
2012-33 Landscape Service
Mr. Sullivan stated that on February 7 an invitation was placed in the Reading Chronicle, it was sent out to eighteen individual firths,
three responded with the lowest of the three being Eagle Landscaping.
Charman Pacino asked who provides these services now. Mr. Cameron said that he could not think of the name. Ms. O'Neill said
that she believed it was MFB and that they did not bid on it.
Mr. Soli asked what we were paying. Mr. Cameron replied that we are paying more than what the contract is right now and that we
put a budget item in there for about$38,000. Ms. O'Neill asked per year. Mr.Cameron replied per year and that this is coming in at
$22,000 a year.
Ms.O'Neill asked if this contract still includes taking care of the adopt-an-island sites. Mr.Cameron replied,yes.
Chairman Pacino stated that this bid seems to be very low compared to the others and asked what do we know about this company.
Mr.Cameron replied that they are reliable and that we do our background checks. Ms.O'Neill said that she was glad to see a Reading
company actually gel it.
s. Snyder made a motion seconded by Ms. O'Neill to move that bid 2012-33 for Landscape Service be awarded to Eagle
landscaping, Inc. for$66,540 as the lowest qualified and responsive bidder on the recommendation of the General Manager.
(This is a three-year contract.)
Motion carried 5:0:0.
Regular Sess on Meeting Minutes g
March 29,2012
General Discussion
Ms. O'Neill stated that she had a couple of questions related to bids and wanted to know if the bid went out for Station 1.
Cameron replied,yes,the bid went out with numerous bidders we received the bids back which had to go through a comminee.
committee had to look at the technical bids then narrowed it down to four. After that process, we will look at the cost and take the
fust one.
Mr.Cameron asked Mr. Sullivan if they would be getting that by the next meeting. Mr. Sullivan said that it would depend on the cost.
Mr.Cameron said that we can meet with them through that bid process, negotiate cost and that is just to assess the building and we
what needs to be done to it. Ms. O'Neill stated that she and Ms. Snyder have particular concerns and interest in that building and
would like to have some input into that
Ms.O'Neill asked if there would be a bid coming up soon for the Licensed Site Professional (LSP)which is expiring and expressed
that they should take into consideration,depending on how that plays out,what happened at the Gaw Station and evaluate the bids.
Ms.O'Neill said that this will be of concern to her when the bid comes in and if our current provider is one of the bidders and if they
are the lowest it will be a big concern.Mr.Sullivan replied that he was not sure exactly what Ms.O'Neill was referring to.
Ms. Snyder wanted to add on the same topic that with contracts where she works, they often look for a solid record of performance as
part of the specification that they have to submit, so issues that result in orders and things like that, they would have a history of that
kind of thing and have to report it.
Ms. O'Neill noted the fact that we incurred a fine. When it is a responsibility of theirs that needs to be taken into consideration in
evaluation of those bids and wanted Mr.Sullivan to know this ahead of time.
Chairman Pacing,asked if there were any other general discussion items,there were none.
BOARD MATERIAL AVAILABLE BUT NOT DISCUSSED
Rate Comparisons,March 2012
E-Mail responses to Account Payable/Payroll Questions
RMLD Board Meetings
Wednesday,April 25,2012 and Wednesday,May 30,2012
Citizens'Advisory Board Meeting
Thursday,April 19,2012 and Tuesday,April 30,2012
Approval of February 29,2012 Executive Session Minutes(Board members only.)
Ms. O'Neill wanted to ask for clarification and would prefer that if the only item in Executive Session is the approval of the minutes
that we could add them at end of our regular meeting; 1. Ms.O'Neill would prefer that if there is Executive Session that the meeting
minutes am put in that packet rather than a Board book 2. If we were to approve in the future these minutes in open session that
means that we have released them and don't have to go back in order to release them.
Ms. Foti replied that this is just a vote of the minutes and not a vote to release them. Mr.Cameron said that this was a vote to accept
the minutes not to release them.
Ms.O'Neill asked that since they are done in open session essentially we are doing the same thing. Chairman Pacino asked that this
topic be researched for an official answer. Mr. Cameron replied this is not a vote to release only to approve and the only reason that
they allow you to do this is so you do not have to go into Executive Session. Mr. Cameron stated that you cannot make any
amendments to them and it is just for the ease of not going into Executive Session a vote to release must be done separately and that
would be done in Executive Session.
Ms. O'Neill asked where things were at with releasing Executive Session minute, where the Board had worked really hard to do the
entire back log. Mr. Cameron said that he thought they were done through 2011. Ms. Foti stated that the 2011 Executive Session
minutes have only been approved. Ms. O'Neill asked that maybe we could consider doing some of the 2011. Chairman Pacm
replied that after the end of the fiscal year June 30,the Board should look into taking care of them and getting them done.
Regula Session Meeting Minutes 9
Mach 29,2012
Executive Session
tg t 8:40 p.m. Ms. Snyder made a motion seconded by Ms. O'Neill to move that the Board go into Executive Session to approve the
ecutive Session meeting minutes of February 29, 2012 if changes are required, to discuss Rubin and Rudman billing on bid
execution and to return to the Regula Session for the sole purpose of adjournment.
Motion carried by a polling of the Board.
Mr. Soli,Aye:Ms.Snyder,Aye;Chairman Pacino,Aye;Ms.O'Neill,Aye;Ms.West,Aye.
Motion carried 5:0:0.
Adjournment
At 9:10 p.m.Ms. Snyder made a motion seconded by Mr.Soli to adjourn the Regula Session.
Motion carried 5:0:0.
A true copy of the RMLD Board of Commissioners minutes
as approved by a majority of the Commission.
Gina Snyder,Secretary
RMLD Board of Commissioners
•
To: Vincent Cameron
From: Energy Services
Date: March 21, 2012
Subject: Purchase Power Summary— February, 2012
Energy Services Division(ESD)has completed the Purchase Power Summary for the
month of February, 2012.
ENERGY
The RMLD's total metered load for the month was 53,988,914 kwh,which was a
decrease of 2.44%, compared to the February, 2011 figures.
Table I is a breakdown by source of the energy purchases.
TABLE I
%of
Amount o/ Cost M Total Total$ $as a
Resource Energy Energy Energy Costa %
(kWh) ($IMwh)
i
Millstone M3 3,413,879 $6.99 6.31% $23,855 0.83%
Seabrook 1,875,188 $8.12 8.85% $37,883 1.32%
JP Morgan 8,817,000 $56.49 18.30% $498,084 17.29%
Stonyorook CC 91,631 $46.01 0.17% $4,216 0.15%
NexlEra 10,085,000 $64.88 18.65% $654,268 22.72%
NYPA 2,056,083 $4.92 3.80% $10.116 0.35%
ISO Interchange 5,511,156 $32.12 10.19% $176,997 6.15%
NEMA Congestion 0 $0.00 0.00% 47,105 -0.25%
Coop Resales 88,302 $132.19 0.16% $11,873 0.41%
Stonyorook Peaking 0 $0.00 0.00% $11 0.00%
MacOuade 17,112,000 $73.44 31.64% $1,256,678 43.64%
Baintme Watson Unit 48,525 $95.05 0.091y. $4,612 0.16%
Swift River Projects 2,178,076 $95.75 4.03% $208,549 7.24%
Monthly Total 54,078850 $53.26 100.00% $2,879,937 100.00%
1
n
ATTACHMENT
9
Table 2 breaks down the ISO interchange between the DA LMP Settlement and the RT
Net Energy for the month of February, 2012.
Table 2
Amount Cost %of Total
Resource of Energy of Energy Energy
(kWh) ($/Mwh)
ISO DA LMP- 7,030,225 32.07 13.00%
Settlement
RT Net Energy -11519,069 31.88 -2.81%
Settlement
ISO Interchange 5,511,156 32.12 10.19%
(subtotal)
CAPACITY
The RMLD hit a demand of 100,453 kW, which occurred on February 29, 2012 at 7 pm.
The RMLD's monthly UCAP requirement for February, 2012 was 201,318 kWs.
Table 3 shows the sources of capacity that the RMLD utilized to meet its requirements.
Table 3
Amount of Cost of %of %of
Capacity Capacity Total Total
source (kWe) ($&W-month) Capacity Total Cost$ Cost
Millstone Ata 4,991 $51.71 2.48% $258,106 19.31%
Seabrook 7,910 $49.81 3.93% $393,971 29,47%
Stonybrook Peaking 24,981 $2.02 12.41% $50,414 3.77%
Stonybrook CC 42,925 $3.86 21.32% $165,597 12.39%
NVPA 4,666 $2.81 2.32% $13,101 0.98%
Hydro Quebec 4,274 $4.48 2.12% $19,148 1.43%
ISO-NE Supply Auction 101,051 $3.24 50.19% $327,429 24.50%
Braintree Watson Unit 10,520 $10.36 5.23% $108,951 8.15%
Total 201,318 $6.64 100.00% $1,336,718 100A0%
Table 4 shows the dollar amounts for energy and capacity per source.
Table 4
Cast of
Amt.d
%of I Power
Resource Energy Capatlly Total cost Total Cost (kWh) ($kWh)
Millstone a3 $23,855 $258.106 $281,960 6.59% 3,413,879 $0.0826
Seabrook $37,983 $393,971 $431,955 10.24% 4,575,198 $0.0924
Stonybaok CC $4,216 $185,597 $169,813 4.03% 91,831 $1.8532
Hydm Ouebec s0 $19,148 $19.148 0.45% 0 $0.0000
NestEra $854,268 s0 $854,288 15,52% 10.085.000 $0.0649
NYPA $10,116 $13.101 $23,217 0.55% 2,058,083 $0.0113
ISO Interchange $176,997 $327,429 $504,428 11.96% 5,511,158 $0.0915
NEMA Congestion -$7,105 s0 -$7.105 -0.17% 0 $0.0000
Coop Resales $11,673 s0 $11,573 0.28% 58.302 $0.1322
Smnybrook Peaking $11 $50,414 $50,425 1.20% 0 $0.0000
JP Morgan $498.084 $0 $498,054 11.81% 8,817,000 $0,0565
Macowde $1,258,678 $0 $1,255,678 29.80% 17,112,000 $0.0734
&aintrae Watson Unit $4,512 $106,951 $113,564 2.69% 48,525 $2.3403
SWIt River Projects $208,549 $0 $208,549 4,95% 2,178,076 $0.0957
Monthly Total $2,879,937 $1,338,718 $4,218,655 100.00% 54.078,850 $0,0780
TRANSMISSION
The RMLD's total transmission costs for the month of February were$581,199. This is a
decrease of 9.93%from the January transmission costs of$638,899. In February, 2011
the transmission costs were$744,186.
Table 5 shows costs for the current month vs. last month and last year(February, 2011)
Table 5
Current
Month Last Month(Jan'12) Last Year(Feb'11)
Peak Demand(kW) 100.453 106,558 108,295
Ene,gy(kWh) 54,078,850 59,550,250 55,387.717
Energy($) $2,879.937 $3,338,331 $2.983,760
Capeoty($) $1,336.718 $1.337,348 $1,516,708
Transmission
($) $581,199 $638.899 $744.186
® Total $4,797,854 $5.314.578 $5.244,654
N
{ z
W
�l
Q
6
nnnnannnn
2 32
E E E E E E « E E E Eo EEE E
z° U8888o88o zo 8U88U8888
m ^'
o
o
mmmmmm rn Q; pmoo �
4 4 g
E � o � � f � o " E o0 1 - 0000
o V
U
m S
_u 9t
o- . 00000000 n
E . 000000 . o Eg $ gggggg8
0 o 0
o
mmm rnorno
� m �
U 1 c mm '°�' c
XXm o0 00 �
d) � a �
•� N W
CL`
W m
W m m € m
r m
IM '_ d ` a � d � zddd
iOmEEE Y
E m
— 802888
U 6
m m
d rn 9 o E m y 8 y o m m $ 3 C
E m cx E o `o rna • 2 cm �iddm d
` y E' 2 m m m O L m yy�
O CO. C C C .m. J NU .m. 000 W 1p C OI
w tl .OIC `m m .mC � ; �
N m C m m 5 'm UFm ¢
C w E
.9'c r .rnSc 0c c0 0c . NmE E E E om mom
m
w ? ? 2 2 a 0 3 mm
t¢ a
mp
C C S p°m1
W O N L 0 0 0 o o m
N 020 UUUUU
a
� n
a a`
0 Ja`Pn
L
L
Jar
n
T
_ / ❑
V
oQ
suoiIIiw ui s.ielloo
'AI
N l7 r N
W M {+!
r
coMrT aro � ON/ ONI
w ca w
d « E
` � U
IL W O SOLO W Np 000 N
X ja M ^ OHO LO f+1 W O a7OOg O
W Y co O Il W M O M O O O O OI
V 0000 N 0000 G O00 OOOO ci
� Q
M
CLW o a W as
3 = o ri o 0 0 0
3 A 1V r ao W co m
Y C7
C
V p
m O OO eWe}} NLO �O X000 iy00 V N OOOO S
NIS N N �O Ot OO N O O O O O
O1 d N 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 O O O O O C O O O
U �
U y N N N N N
� LL
C C C C N C m
E m c E E c E c .R
>. E 0) m a a� a rn a .y Im-
E m a
d p a o '9 'w a B .� 'w `o '9 w o '9
_ M m u Co Q m a
d m M W S N m J W S N J W S Co J w S N 0
co
U E co U N J LL� U N co U N J y Y
o u v
u c :° O D m O m U pJ m m
U � m 0 E g y m oozy o o2 1) o o 2 aa) P �
F Ua � LL LL' LL 0 (LXLL UCLWLL as
312312012
10:36 AM
READING MUNICIPAL LIGHT DEPARTMENT
FYY1212 CAPITAL BUDGET VARIANCE REPORT
FOR PE0.1O0 ENDING FEBRUARY 29,2012
ACTUAL YTD ACTUAL ANNUAL
COST COST BUDGET
B PROJECT DESCRIPTION TOWN FEBRUARY THRU 2129112 AMOUNT VARIANCE
E8O C t ttl B%, P l M
1 SW9 Raconduciodng-6animun,ale StmN W 956 160,588 242.649 82.061
2 High Capacity no 4W18 and 3W8 Franklin Street 0 10.505 122.3" 157,766 579927 54,550
,893
3 Upgrading Old Lynn6e1d CO URD.
SCADA Prolecto R 1.640 130,255 128,615
4 RTU Replacement
Distribution A t matlon Protects ALL 197,901 197,901
5 Reclosun B
B Capacior Banka ALL 2.072 11,61/ 105,052 93,438
7 SCADA Radio Communication System ALL 231,386 231,386
Station U d ISU NGAWI 2,603 99,650 93853
8 Relay Replacement Project R
9 115kV Disconnect Replacement R 49.738 88,505 38,847
Navy C norrour Ss-Ca Connections
12 Senior Installations-Car Residential
C,j usual Customers ALL 070 20,650 62,530 31.660
11 Servicelnslallalions-Reaoential Customers ALL 19,615 123,787 206,017 82.250
14 Routine CanatruCtum ALL 234187 1,531,87 1,016,382 (514,685)
Various Routine Gonial
Total Construction Projects 288,206 3038317 3118106 1082.]89
Other Prialact, 8,715 50,000 41,285
15 GIS 157,352 198,800 41,448
16 Trinsom
rardCap pars Annual Purchases 7,855 46,360 38,505
17 Meter Annual Purchases 45,021 361,071 1,740,656 1.319,585
17A Meter Upgrade Project 31,544 36,000 4,4%
18 Purchase Naw Small Vehicle 383000 386,OW
19 Purchase Line Department Vehicle 73000 75,000
20 Purchase Puller Trader 30,00 30,000
21 Roof Top Units 76,690 76,690
22 Engineering Software and Data Conversion 18,000 10,000
23 PloOer 1.395 33,831 40,000 6,169
27 Hardware Upgrades 26,060 91,435 68,375
28 Software and Licensing 18,706 - (18,706)
OTH Cooling Tower Replacement
Total Other Project 48418 848,134 2781,941 2.148,807
TOTAL RMLD CAPITAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES 314,821 2,680.451 6,910,047 3,229,596
29 Force Accounuft.imbursable Projects ALL -
TOTAL FY 12 CAPITAL PROJECT EXPENDITURES 314,621 2,680461 8,910,04] 3829,598
completed projects
Reading Municipal Light Department
Engineering and Operations
Monthly Report
February 2012
l
FY 2012 Capital Plan
E&O Construction -System Proiects
1. 5W9 Reconductoring - Ballardvale Street - Wilmington - Engineering labor.
2. High Capacity Tie 4W18/3W8 Franklin Street- Reading - Pole transfers; install
transformer; install taps; energized new spacer cable.
3. Upgrading of Old Lynnfield Center URDs - Engineering labor.
SCADA Proiects
4. RTU Replacement at Station 4- Reading- No activity.
Distribution Automation (DA) Proiects
5. Reclosers - No activity.
6. Capacitor Banks - Build capacitor banks; Engineering and Senior Tech labor.
7. SCADA Radio Communication System - No activity.
Station Upgrades
8. Relay Replacement Project- Station 4 - Reading - No Activity.
9. 115 kV Disconnect Replacement- Station 4- Reading - No activity.
New Customer Service Connections
12. Service Installations- CommerciaOndustrial Customers-This item includes new
service connections, upgrades, and service replacements for the commercial and
industrial customers. This represents the time and materials associated with the
replacement of an existing or installation of a new overhead service, the connection of
an underground service, etc. This does not include the time and materials associated
with pole replacements/installations, transformer replacement/installations, primary or
secondary cable replacement/installations etc. This portion of the project comes under
routine construction. Notable: Commercial building at 57-59 High Street, Reading.
13. Service Installations - Residential Customers- This item includes new or upgraded
overhead and underground services, temporary overhead services, and large
underground development.
14. Routine Construction-The drivers of the Routine Construction budget category
YTD are listed. This is not an inclusive list of all items within this category.
Pole Settin ransfers $226,318
Maintenance Overhead41-der round $416,594
Pro'' cts Ass' ned as Re wired $374,930
Pole Dame a includes knockdowns Isome reimbursable $35,405
Station Grou $2,967
Hazmat/Oil S ills $3 118
Porcelain Cutout Re lacement Pro ram :,825
Li htin Street Li ht Connections 1 $60,866
Storm Trouble $80,174
Unde round Subdivisions $57,094
Animal Guard Installation $53,664
Miscellaneous Ca ital Costs $217,112
TOTAL $1,531,067
*In the month of February one cutout was charged under this program.
Approximately 18 cutouts were installed new or replaced because of damage
making a total of 19 cutouts replaced this month.
2
Reliability Report
Two key industry standard metrics have been identified to enable the RMLD to measure and
track system reliability. A rolling 12-month view is being used for the purposes of this report.
Customer Average Interruption Duration Index (CAIDI)- Measures how quickly the
RMLD restores power to customers when their power goes out.
CAIDI =Total of Customer Interruption Duration for the Month in Minutes/Total
number of customers interrupted.
RMLD 12 month system average outage duration -61.10 minutes
RMLD 4 year average outage (2006-2009) - 50.98 minutes per outage
On average, RMLD customers that experience an outage are restored in 61.10 minutes.
180.00
1
160.00
N
m 140.00 755,09
c
120.00 - --
v _
100.00
. O 80.00 82.54 57.05
d 54.69 56.31
E 60.00 .4
2 _ .98
40.00
U
20.00
0.00
PQM �sA ��� ��� PCO �Q d+" �o� ,p iso �0d
--4--Monthly.minutes per outage
-- RMLD 12 month system average outal duration 61.10
—RMLD 4 year average outage duration30.96 2008-2009
3
System Average Interruption Frequency(SAIFI)- Measures how many outages each
customer experiences per year on average.
SAIFI = Total number of customer's interrupted/Total number of customers.
RMLD 12 month system average - .45 outages per year
RMLD 4 year average outage frequency - .82
The graph below tracks the month-by-month SAIFI performance.
1.00
0.91
0.90 -- -
.. 0.62 ---_._---- ----..
0.80 0.76 ^
y 0.70 —. _._.—
v -
0.60 - -
0.50
0.50
—
r 0.40
ami 0.30
LL t 0 .21 -023..
0.20 —
0.10 --- ---
0.00
NN NN Nil Nit,
30 cp` 110 01 Q0'd
i
__[
t RMLD monthly outage frequency
:- RMLD 12 month system average outage frequency.45 J
��RMLD 4 year average outage frequency 82(2006 2009)
Months Between Interruptions (MBTI)
Another view of the SAIFI data is the number of months Reading customers have no
interruptions. At this time, the average RMLD customer experiences an outage
approximately every 26.6 months.
4
Dt: March 22,2012 ATTACHMENT 3
To: RMLB,Vincent F. Cameron, Jr., Jeanne Foti
Fr: Bob Fournier /"13(t,IY,
Sj: February 29,2012 Report
The results for the eight months ending February 29, 2012, for the fiscal year
2012 will be summarized in the following paragraphs.
1)Change in Net Assets: (Page 3A)
For the month of February,the net loss or the negative change in net assets was
$171,275, decreasing the year to date net income to $2,252,998. The year to date
budgeted net income was$5,152,642, resulting in net income being under budget
by 2,899,643 or 56.27%. Actual year to date fuel expenses exceeded fuel
revenues by$951,296.
2) Revenues: (Page 11B)
Year to date base revenues were under budget by $2,379,741 or 7.19%. Actual
base revenues were$30.7 million compared to the budgeted amount of$33.1
million.
IV 3) Expenses: (Page 12A)
*Year to date purchased power base expense was under budget by $1,227,727 or
6.79%. Actual purchased power base costs were $16.8 million compared to the
budgeted amount of$18.0 million.
*Year to date operating and maintenance (O&M)expenses combined were under
budget by $108,743 or 1.4%. Actual O&M expenses were$7.7 million compared
to the budgeted amount of$7.8 million.
*Depreciation expense and voluntary payments to the Towns were on budget.
4)Cash (Page 9)
*Operating Fund was at$9,393,162.
*Capital Fund balance was at$3,993,461.
* Rate Stabilization Fund was at$6,069,924.
* Deferred Fuel Fund balance was at$2,103,928.
* Energy Conservation Fund balance was at $178,810.
5)General Information:
Year to date kwh sales (Page 5)were 471,283,857 which is 19.4 million kwh or
3.97%, behind last year's actual figure. GAW revenues collected ytd were
$471,296 bringing the total collected since inception to $1,078,469.
60 6) Budget Variance:
Cumulatively, the five divisions were under budget by $151,980 or 1.2%.
FINANCIAL REPORT
FEBRUARY 29, 2012
ISSUE DATE : MARCH 22, 2012
TOWN OF READIES, MASSACHUSETTS
MUNICIPAL LIONT DEPARTMENT
BUSINESS-TYPE PROPRIETARY POND
STATEMENT! OF NET ASSETS
]/]9/11
PREVIOUS YEAR CURRENT YEAR
ASSETS
CURRENT
UNRESTRICTED CASH (BCH A P.9) ],]]5,949.]8 9,396,161.56
RESTRICTED CASH (SCH A P.91 15,894,798.57 18,319,254.51
RESTRICTED INVESTMENTS (BCH A P.9) 1,100,000.00 0.00
RECEIVABLES, NET (SCE B P.10) 8.660,820.16 7,403,407.33
PREPAID EXPENSES (8 CH 3 P.10) 1,777,303.90 1,949,7]].39
INVENTORY 1.656,277.93 3,405,233.69
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 3).435.149.8] 38.473.780.19
NONCURRENT
INVESTMENT IN ASSOCIATED CO (SCH C P.2) 88,151.16 73,765.66
CAPITAL ASSETS, NET (BCM C P.2) 67,514,565.76 67,8]],740.75
TOTAL NONCURRENT ASSETS 6].603.717.0] 67,946,506.41
TOTAL ASSETS 105.03],866.84 106,420.286.60
LIABILITIES
16 CURRENT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE 6,964.736.44 5,510,734.48
CUSTC&M DEPOSITS 516.980.20 602,249.01
CUSTONSR ADVANCES FOR CONSTRUCTION 330,793.90 194,339.94
ACCRUED LIABILITIES 11139,555.98 1,111,683.70
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 81942 066 52 7619,007.1]
NONCURRENT
ACCRUED RMPLOYSE COMPENSATED ABSENCES 3,010,032.75 2.934,698.58
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES 3.0]0.031.75 ----7,934,698.58
TOTAL LIABILITIES 11,962,099.27 10.563.705.71
3 NET ASSETS
INVESTED IN CAPITAL ASSETS, NET OF RELATED DEBT 67.514,565.76 67,872,740.75
RESTRICTED FOR DEPRECIATION POND (P.9) 4,676.350.65 3,993,451.42
UNRESTRICTED 20,864,851.16 13,990,378.72
TOTAL NET ASSETS (P.3) 93.055 A6i.57 95 856.580.89
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS 105.017,Bfi 6.84 iUA"0,286.60
il)
TOM OF READING, NA88ACHVSETTS
CIRE LIGHT 08 P
NONARTN
NONCURRENT ASSET SCHEDULE
1/]9/1]
BCHSOOLB C
SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS IN A880CIAT8p CO!@ANIEB PREVIOUS YEAR CURRENT YEAR
NEN ENGLAND HYDRO ELECTRIC 13,530.60 15,747.64
NEN ENGLAND HYDRO TRANSMISSION 64,611.66 50,010.01
TOTAL INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATED COMPANIES 00.151 ]fi 73.>fi5.66
SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL ASSETS
LAND 1,]65,84].]3 1,165,842.13
ME
STRUCTURES AND IMPROVENTS fi,805,376.7) 6,639,578.34
EUUIPM N'T AND FURNISHINGS 13,169,355.33 1],931,)36.76
INFRASTRUCTURE 46,193,591.53 47,035,593.43
TOTAL CAPITAL ASSETS, NET 67.514.565.36 67,872,740.75
TOTAL NONCURRENT ASSETS 67.603 A1J.03 fi),946.506.41
I]
TOWN OP RBADINO, NASSACROSETTS
NONICIPAL LIGHT DEPARTHEST
BUSINESS-TYPE PROPRIETARY PONT
STATBMOIT OF
REVERIES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN POND NET A.E.TS
]/39/1]
NONPN 9WNTB LAST YEAR CURRENT YEAR FIT %
LAST YEAR CUMMT YEAR TO DATE TO MTE CHANGE
OPERATING REVEE089+ (SCM D P.11)
BASE REVENUE 3,759,654.33 3,434,875.16 31,094,574.87 30,715,837.36 -1.19%
FUEL REVENUE 3,153,393.61 3,594,141.71 38,301,338.01 35,136,698.66 -11.10\
PURCHASED POWER CAPACITY 43,337.55 (9,856.39) 1,198,799.38 (99,539.97) -107.47%
FORFEITED DISCOUNTS 93,798.41 70,491.05 697,455.41 636,950.33 -9.66%
ENERGY CONSERVATION RNENUE 38,785.14 51,023.19 349,934.25 404,330.89 15.52\
SAN REVB190E 56,334.44 51,893.94 350,069.55 471,396.56 34.33\
NYPA CREDIT (93.675.30) (62,465.74) 1530,066.731 (460.]80.35) -11.50%
=I" OPERATING REVENGES 7.041,505.18 6,130,102.93 61,462,091.75 56,815,193.86 -7.56\
OPERATING BRPENSRS: (SCM E P.13)
PURCHASES POWER BASE 3,363,102.35 1,921,157.89 18,651,919.58 16,855,504.43 -9.63%
POSCRASED PONAA MEL 2,983,759.61 3,679,936.80 37.634,995.12 25,637,704.49 -7.26%
OPERATING 703,749.92 787,674.74 5,653,793.60 5,756,790.43 1.93%
NGINTWASCE 378,177.50 169,649.03 2,918,088.51 1,970,270.71 -33.48%
DEPRECIATION 287,739.05 396,037.47 ].301,63].40 2,368,219.76 2.88%
VOLUNTARY PAYMENTS TO TONNE 110,000.00 113.000.00 075 895.00 900.196.00 3.77%
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 6,636,517.43 6,167,546.01 58,036,404.21 53,478,675.83 -7.85\
OPERATING INC0NE 414,907.75 (37,443.09) 3,436,407.54 3,336,513.04 -2.63%
OPERATING REV NOES (EXPENSES)
CONTRISITIONS IN AID OF CONST 300.00 0,115.30 35,087.43 45,744.54 30.37\
ARMEN ON INESTEME TO READING (180,990.00) 1153,839.751 (1,447,930.00) (1,470,638.00) 1.57%
INTEREST INCOME 2,969.33 3,935.77 70,036.05 64,484.78 -7.93%
INTEREST EXPENSE (1,001.301 (501.39) 110,195.301 (5,739.38) -44.36%
OTHER (LADEN AND AMORT) 51500.88 35,459.71 163,507.15 181,617.14 73.91%
TOTAL NONOPERATINO RN (REP) (173.331.001 (133.031.46) (1,190.554.58) (1,083 519.6]1 -8.991
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS 341.666.75 1171 374.541 3,335,902.96 3,252,990.42 0.76%
NET ASSETS AT BEGINNING OF YGA 90.019,064.61 93,603,582.47 3.07\
056.580 89 3.01\
BET ASSETS AT END OF FEBRUARY 93,055.767.57 95. .
TORN OF READING, NASSACHUSBTTS
MUNICIPAL LIGHT PROPRIETARY
BUSINESS-TYPE SAND 'TART FUND
STATEMENT OF RBVQRIB&, 8%P@1989 AND CHANGES IN PUNO NET ASSETS
3/39/13
ACTUAL BUDGET %
YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE VARIANCH• CHANGE
OPERATING REVENUES: (SCH P P.11B)
BAS' REVENUE 30,715,837.38 33,095,579.00 (3,379,741.63) -9.19%
FUEL REVENUE 35,136,688.86 38,555,504.00 (3,418,815.14) -11.97%
PURCHASED POWER CAPACITY (89,539.87) (94,363.00) 4,833.13 -5.13%
FORFEITED DISCOUNTS 636,950.33 738,103.00 (91,153.67) -13.53%
ENERGY CONSERVATION REVENUE 404,330.88 368,057.00 36,173.88 9.03%
GAN REVENUE 471,396.56 463,504.00 8,793.56 1.90%
NYPA CREDIT (460.380.38) (400,000.00) (60,380 36) 15.07%
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 56,815,193.86 63,715,384.00 (5,900,190.14) -9.41%
OPERATING EXPENSES: (6CN G P.13A)
PURCHASED POWER BASE 16,855,504.43 18,083,333.00 (1,337,737.57) -6.79%
PURCHASED POKER FUEL 35,637,701.49 37,355,705.00 (1,738,000.51) -6.32%
OPERATING 5,756,790.43 5.983,989.00 (337,198.57) -3.80%
HAINTSNANCS 1,970,370.71 1,851,816.00 110,454.71 6.40%
DEPRECIATION 3,368,319.76 3,400,000.00 (31,780.24) -1.33%
VOLUNTARY PAYMENTS TO TOWNS 900.196.00 _ 901.000.00 (3.814.00) -0.43%
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 53,478,675.82 56,578,743.00 (3,100,066.18) -5.48%
OPERATING INCOME 3,336,518.04 6,136,642.00 (3,800,133.96) -45.63%
NONOPBRATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)
CONTRIBUTIONS IN AID OF CONST 45,744.04 300,000.00 (254,255.16) -84.75%
RETURN ON INVESTMENT TO READING (1,470,638.00) (11480,000.00) 9,363.00 -0.63%
INTEREST INCOME 64,484.78 120,000.00 (55,515.22) -46.26%
INTEREST EXPENSE (5,738.30) (4,000.00) (1,730.30) 43.21%
OTHER (MDS' AND ANORT) 382,617.14 80,000.00 203,617.14 353.37%
TOTAL NONOPERATING REV (EXP) f1.083.519 631 (984.000 001 199.519 611 10.11%
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS 2,353,998.43 5,153,643.00 (2,099,613.58) -56.37%
NET ASSETS AT BEGINNING OF YEAR 93,603,583.47 93,603,583.47 0.00 0.00%
NET ASSETS AT END OF FEBRUARY 95.856.580.89 _ 98.75fi.331.0 @.899.613.581 -3.94%
• ( 1 = ACTUAL UNDER BUDGET
9
(3A)
TOMN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS
xuxxcxeAL LIGHTDEPARTMENT
RECONCILIATION OPFCAPITAL FUNDS
` 1/39/13
SOURCE OF CAPITAL FUNDS:
DEPRECIATION FUND BALANCE 7/1/11 4,197,944.13
CONSTRUCTION FUND BALANCE 7/1/11 0.00
INTEREST ON DEPRECIATION FUND PY 13 7,748.45
DEPRECIATION TRANSFER FY 11 2,368,119.76
FORCED ACCOUNTS REIMBURSEMENT 0.00
SAN SUBSTATION IPY 111 0.00
TOTAL SOURCE OF CAPITAL FUNDS 6,673,912.34
U88 OF CAPITAL FUNDS:
PAID ADDITIONS TO PLANT THRU FEBRUARY 2,680,450.92
PAID ADDITIONS TO GAN THRU FEBRUARY 0.00
TOTAL USE OF CAPITAL FUNDS 3,680,450.91
GENERAL LEDGER CAPITAL FUNDS BALANCE 1/29/11 3.99],461.41
PAID ADDITIONS TO DAN FROM FY 11 0.00
PAID ADDITIONS TO GAN FROM PY 11 531,784.00
PAID ADDITIONS TO DAN FROM FY 10 1,371,876.00
PAID ADDITIONS TO GAN FROM PY 09 3,136,764.00
PAID ADDITIONS TO GAN FROM FY 08 11895,975.00
TOTALS.937.399.00
,
TOM OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS
MUNICIPAL LIGHT DEPARTMENT
SALES OF KILOWATT HOURS
2//29/1]
NORTH MONTH LAST YEAR CURRENT YEAR YTD %
SALES OF ELECTRICITY: LAST YEAR CURRENT YEAR TO DATE TO DATE CHANGE
RESIDENTIAL SALES 21,553,664 19,102,964 185,141,302 1)5,4)),{09 -5.]]%
COMM. AND INDUSTRIAL SALES 31,894,561 30,118,446 284,367,833 275,343,217 -3.17%
PRIVATE STREET LIGHTING 72,796 73,447 575,)]5 583,883 1.42%
TOTAL PRIVATE CONSUMERS 53.521.021 49.29{.85) 470.08{.750 451.404.509 -3.97%
MUNICIPAL SALES:
STREET LIGHTING 239,009 239,338 11910,596 1,913,265 0.14%
MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS 917,228 791,333 6,75],]09 6,459,149 -4.36%
TOTAL MUNICIPAL CONSUMERS 1.156,237 1.0]O,fi71 8.663.305 8.371.414 -3.37%
SALES FOR RESALE 299,007 247,609 2,423.871 3,297,395 -5.21%
SCHOOL 1,334,900 1,310,083 9,570,800 9,210,539 -3.76%
TOTAL EILONATT HOURS SOLO 56.311,245 51,883.300 {90,)42.]]6 {)1.]83,05) -3.97%
151
TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS
BIINICIPAL LIGHT DEPARTMENT
KILOWATT HOURS SOLD BY TOWN
1/]9/12
TOTAL READING LYNN8IRLD NO.RRADINO WILMINGTON
MONTH
RESIDENTIAL 19,102,964 6,055,341 2,531,802 4,594,874 5,911,047
COME R IND 30,118,446 3,906,338 242,659 4,643,589 21,335,860
PVT Si LIGHTS 73,447 13,)3) 11360 22,108 36,242
POB SS LIGHTS 339,338 80,536 32,480 39,963 86,359
MUNI BLDGS 791,333 249,915 132,474 126,364 382,580
BALES/RESALE 247,689 247,689 0 0 0
SCHOOL 1,310,083 464,151 269,)8) 1)1,3]0 404,835
TOTAL 51,883.J00 11,017.607 3.210.561 9.598.218 18,056,913
YEAR TO DATE
RESIDENTIAL 175,4)),409 54,933,316 24,871,283 41,075,196 54,597,514
COME A IND 275,343,217 35,070,011 ],218,17) 42,673,553 195,381,476
PVT ST LIGHTS 583,883 111,312 10,880 171,772 389,919
PUB ST LIGHTS 1,913,265 643,788 359,582 319,203 690,692
MUNI HIGHS 61458,149 1,658,432 11098,981 1,263,292 ],43),438
SALES/RESALE 3,297,395 2,297,395 0 0 0
SCHOOL 9,210,539 3,291,026 3,015,795 1,179,400 2,734,318
TOTAL 4)1.283.85) 98.005.380 30.4)4.)04 86.682.516
LAST YEAR
TO DATE
RBSIDSNTIAL 185,141,203 57,919,838 26,593,941 43,063,148 57,565,274
COMM 6 IND 284,367,823 35,399,357 2,309,891 42,877,297 203,701,378
PVT ST LIGHTS 575,735 111,928 10,680 170,402 282,515
PUB ST LIGHTS 1,910,596 643,488 259,648 317,656 689,804
MUNI SLIDE 6,752,709 1,795,994 1,165,679 1,367,202 2,423,834
SALES/RBSALE 3,423,871 2,423,871 0 0 0
SCHOOL 9,570,800 3,403,348 2,033,723 11345,000 21808,839
TOTAL 490.743.)26 101,69).)24 33,3)3.)63 89.039,705 36).631.534
KILOWATT HOURS SOLD TO TOTAL
TOTAL READING LYNNPIELD NO.RRADING NILNINGTON
MONTH
RESIDENUM 36.82% 11.67% 4.88% 8.86% 11.41%
COMM c IND 58.05% 7.53% 0.47% 0.95% 41.10%
PVT BY LIGHTS 0.14% 0.03% 0.00% 0.04% 0.07%
PUB ST LIGHTS 0.46% 0.16% 0.06% 0.08% 0.16%
MUNI SLOGS 1.52% 0.48% 0.26% 0.24% 0.54%
SALES/RESALE 0.48% 0.48% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
SCHOOL 2.53% 0.09% 0.52% 0.33% 0.79%
TOTAL 300.00% 21.14% 6.19% 18.50% 54.0)%
YEAR TO DATE
RESIDENTIAL 37.24% 11.66% 5.28% 8.72% 11.58%
COME R IND 58.42% 7.44% 0.47% 9.05% 41.46%
PVT ST LIGHTS 0.12% 0.02% 0.00% 0.04% 0.06%
PUB ST LIGHTS 0.41% 0.14% 0.06% 0.07% 0.14%
HUNI SLOGS 1.37% 0.35% 0.33% 0.37% 0.52%
SALES/RESALE 0.49% 0.49% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
SCHOOL 1.95% 0.70% 0.43% 0.25% 0.57%
TOTAL 100.00% 20.00% 6.47% 18.40% 54.33%
LAST YEAR
TO DATE
RESIDENTIAL 37.)]% 1 .20% 5.43% 8.7)% 1.73%
74
COMM c IND 57.95% ).11% 0.40% 8.04% 11.53%
PVT ST LIGHTS 0.13% 0.03% 0.00% 0.03% 0.07%
PUB 9i LIGHTS 0.43% 0.13% 0.05% 0.06% 0.18%
MUNI SLOGS 1.38% 0.3)% 0.14% 0.10% 0.49%
BALES/RESALE 0.49% 0.49% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
SCHOOL 1.92% 0.69% 0.41% 0.25% 0.57%
TOTAL 300.00% 20.71% 6.59% 18.13% 54.5)%
161
TO" OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS
MONTCIPAL LIGHT DEPARTMENT
FORMULA INCOIR
3/39/13
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES (P.3) 56,815,193.86
AGO:
POLE RENTAL 1.455.00
INTEREST INCOME ON CUSTOMER DEPOSITS 793.03
LESS:
OPERATING EXPENSES (P.3) (53,478,675.82)
CUSTOMER DEPOSIT INTEREST EXPENSE (5,738.38)
FORMULA INCOME (LOSS) 3.333,036.68
1)1
TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS
MUNICIPAL LIGHT SPARTMBNS
G@IBML BTATI6TIC6
]/29/1]
MONTH OP MONTH OF t CHANGE YEAR THEM
FEB 2011 FEB 2012 2011 2012 FEB 2011 FEB 2011
SALE OF EMS (P.5) 56,311,245 51,803,300 4.99% -3.97% 490,742,]]6 471,283,857
EWH PURCHASED 55,387,717 54,076,850 4.90% -2.62% 501,785,567 487,656,547
AVE BABE COST PER BWH 0.040059 0.035528 -3.96% -7.81% 0.037171 0.034564
AVE BASE SALE FOR EWH 0.066766 0.066204 11.23% 2.77% 0.063420 0.065175
AVE COST PER RWH 0.094730 0.088785 -5.20% -5.56% 0.091244 0.087117
AVE SALE PER KITH 0.122765 0.116203 -0.55% -2.07% 0.121012 0.118511
FUEL CHARGE RSVBMUE (P.3) 3,153,393.61 2,594,141.71 -7.23% -11.18% ]8,301,3]8.01 25,136,608.06
LOAD FACTOR 70.06% 73.74%
LOAD 108,295 100,453
in
0
<< 01
C) Ua) C 4�Jo
N _C) L (1) ,
.,ob
D
o
N 070+
O
o�D b
J �n
(0 i �•
o�ry
w� n
�C &;O
0
&0 ms
�,
b
6�On
y
00 LO 'ITN O—
O O O O O O
TOUR OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS
NONICI PAL LIGHT DEPARTMENT
SCHEDULE OF CASH AND INVITEDVT TB
3/39/13
SCH8ODL8 A
PREVIOUS YEAR CURRENT YEAR
uERRSTRICT., CAS.:
CASH - OPERATING FUND 7,222,949.38 9,393,163.56
CASH - PETTY CASH 3,000.00 3,000.00
TOTAL UNRESTRICTED CASH7.325,949.]8 9.396.161.56
8ZATBICTBD CASH_:
CASH - DEPRECIATION FIND 4,676,350.65 3,993,461.43
CASH - T09M PAYKEN2 582,500.00 894,000.00
CASH - DEFERRED FUEL RESERVE 2,472,376.36 3,103,938.87
CASH - RATE STABILIZATION FUND 4,382,087.46 6,069,934.65
CASH - UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCTS RESERVE 300,000.00 200,000.00
CASH - SICK LEAVE BENEFITS 2,035,247.33 2,953,598.35
CASH - HAZARD WROTE RESERVE 150,000.00 150,000.00
CASH - CUSTOMER DEPOSITS 516,980.20 60],]49.01
CASH - ENERGY CONSERVATION 274,631.71 178,810.37
CASH - OPEN 614,624.97 1,173,281.95
TOTAL RESTRICTED CASH 15.894.798.57 18.319.254.53
RD INVBSTMBNTe
RATE STABILIZATION • 1,UO0,OOO.00 0.00
SICK LEAVE BUYBACK •• 11000,000.00 0.00
OPEN ••• 200,000.00 0.00
TOTAL RESTRICTED INVBSTHENTS2,200.000.00 0.00
TOTAL CASH BALANCE ]5.330.747.85 37.715.417.08
ERR 2011:
• FREDDIE NAC 1,000,000.00; DTD 09/10/10, INT 3.00%, HATURITY 09/15/30
•• FREDDIE MAC 11000,000.00; DTD 09/10/10, INS 2.00%; MATURITY 09/15/30
••• PReDDIB NAC 300,000.00; DTD 09/10/10; INT 3.004; MATURITY 09/15/30
191
TOWN OF RRADING, HASSACHUSSTTS
MECICDULE PAL LIGHT DEPART
SCHEDULE OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
2/39/12
SCHEDULE B
SCH80UL8 OF ACCOUNTR RECEIVABLE PREVIOUS YEAR COME= YEAR
RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL 5.073,105.53 2,869,268.20
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - OMER 136,454.79 198,822.16
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - LIMS 102,768.97 65,160.95
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE - ENPLOYES ADVANCES 892.14 092.14
SALES DISCOUNT LIABILITY (304,253.63( (354,121.81(
RESERVE FOR UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS (333.307.75) (306.916 78)
TOTAL ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE BILLED 41605,661.05 3,513,113.86
UNBILLED ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE 4,055,159.11 4,830,294.37
TOTAL ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NET 0.660.020.16 7,903.10].23
SCHEDULE OF PRBPAYNENTS
PREPAID INSURANCE 1,181,163.56 1,296,304.43
PREPAYMENT PURCHASED POWER 222,641.30 345,347.57
PREPAYMENT PASNY 239,666.63 230,330.65
PREPAYMENT WATSON 119,308.71 155,415.85
PURCHASED POWER WORKING CAPITAL 14,523.70 14,533.70
TOTAL PREPAYMENT 1,]77,303.90
1.949.722.19
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE AGING P88ROAAY 3012:
RESIDENTIAL AND CONNBRCIAL 2,869,268.20
LESS: SALES DISCOUNT LIABILITY (354.121 01)
GENERAL LEDGER BALANCE 2,615.146.39
CURRENT 1,999,135.16 76.45%
30 DAYS 312,434.74 11.95%
60 DAYS 106,290.25 4.06%
90 DAYS 54,676.53 2.09%
OVER 90 DAYS 143.609 72 5.45%
TOTAL3,615.146.39 100.00%
TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS
MUNICIPAL LIGHT DEPARTMENT
SCHEDULE OF OPERATING REVENUE
2/39/12
SCHEDULE D
MONTH MONTH LAST YEAR CURRENT YEAR YTD g
SAL88 OF ELECTRICITY: LAST YEAR CURRENT YEAR TO DATE TO DATE CHANGE
RESIDENTIAL SALES 2,891,212.33 2,457,598.14 24,483,018.22 23,088,855.36 -5.69%
COMM AND INDUSTRIAL BALES 3,659,967.96 3,268,535.35 32,161,629.31 30,325,141.39 -5.71%
PRIVATE STREET LIGHTING 10,696.29 5,978.26 04,535.80 53,695.48 -36.48%
TOTAL PRIVATE CONSUMERS 6.561,8]6.5) 5.]32.111.75 56.]39.183.33 53.467.693 23 -5.75%
MUNICIPAL SAL89:
STREET LIGHTING 46,434.68 29,270.34 371,399.86 155,742.21 -31.14%
MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS 111,603.42 93,479.30 828,044.42 783,589.18 -5.37%
TOTAL MUNICIPAL CONSUMERS 158,038.10 122.749.)] 1.199.991.28 1,D39,331.39 -13.35%
SALES FOR RESALE 37,464.16 29,500.55 300,370.92 381,515.05 -6.20%
SCHOOL 155,669.11 144,654.85 1,156,904.35 1,063,986.57 -8.03%
SUB-TOTAL 6,913,047.94 6,029,016.87 59,385,903.08 $5,852,526.24 -5.95%
FORFEITED DISCOUNTS 83,788.41 70,491.05 697,455.41 636,950.33 -8.60%
PURCHASED POWER CAPACITY 42,237.55 (9,856.38) 1,198,798.30 (89,529.87) -107.47%
ENERGY CONSERVATION - RESIDENTIAL 15,096.12 19,118.83 96,919.76 152,117.47 56.95%
ENERGY CONSERVATION - COMMERCIAL 23,699.02 31,904.36 253,014.49 252,113.41 -0.36%
SAW REVENUE 56,324.44 51,893.94 350,869.55 471,296.56 34.32%
NYPA CREDIT 192,678.30) (62,465.74) (520,060.72) (460,280.20) -11.50%
TOTAL REVENUE ],041.505.18 6.130.102.93 fit 462.891.J556,815.193.86 -7.56%
1111
TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS
MUNICIPAL LIGHT DEPARTMENT
SCHEDULE OF OPERATING REVENUE BY TO"
2/19/12
f
TOTAL READING LYNNPIELD NO.READING WILMINGTON
MONTH
RESIDENTIAL 2,457,598.14 781,345.52 324,492.54 590,226.05 761,534.03
INDUS/MUNI BLDG 3,362,014.73 481,978.43 44,188.03 533,794.83 2,302,053.44
PUB.ST.LIGHTS 29,270.34 9,103.57 3,640.44 5,330.26 11,096.07
PRV.ST.LIGHTS 5,978.26 1,091.12 108.10 11891.12 2,887.92
CO-OP RESALE 29,500.55 29,500.55 0.00 0.00 0.00
SCHOOL 144,654.85 51,499.43 29,465.86 19,438.24 44,251.32
TOTAL 6.029,016.0> 1.354,618.6] 4p1.094.97 1.150,fi80.50 ].1]1,0]].78
THIS YEAR TO DATE
RESIDENTIAL 23,008,855.36 7,245,850.47 3,263,364.45 51391,500.18 7,188,140.26
INDUS/MUNI BLDG 31,108,731.57 4,303,986.35 396,832.65 4,967,132.02 11,440,780.55
PUB.ST.LIGHTS 255,742.21 82,128.63 31,727.50 45,704.91 96,181.17
PRV.ST.LIGHTS 53,695.48 10,008.80 981.10 16,593.38 26,112.20
CO-OP RESALE 281,515.05 281,515.05 0.00 0.00 0.00
SCHOOL 1,063,986.57 383,551.75 228,003.70 139,705.39 311,925.73
TOTAL 55,852,526.24 12.307,041.05 3,921.709.38 30,560.635.89 19.063.139.9]
LAST YEAR TO DATE
RESIDENTIAL 24,483,018.22 7,694,474.97 3,487,943.95 5,700,857.42 7,599,741.88
INDUS/MUNI BLDG 32,989,673.73 4,470,671.34 419,905.49 5,125,907.05 22,973,189.85
PUB.ST.LIGHTS 371,399.86 130,002.57 45,263.02 61,308.54 134,905.73
PRV.ST.LIGHTS 84,535.80 15,991.46 1,590.44 26,186.11 40,767.79
CO-OP RESALE 300,370.92 300,370.92 0.00 0.00 0.00
SCHOOL 1,156,904.35 412,537.58 241,727.15 154,136.25 348,501.3)
TOTAL 59.385.901.88 13.034,048.84 4.196 450.05 13.Ofi B.297.)7 31 09) 106.61
PERCENTAGE OF OPERATING INCOME TO TOTAL
TOTAL READING LYNNPIELD NO.READING WILMINGTON
MONTH
RESIDENTIAL 40.16% 12.96% 5.38% 9.79% 12.63%
INDUS/MUNI BLDG 55.76% 7.99% 0.73% 8.85% 38.18%
PUB.ST.LIGHTS 0.49% 0.15% 0.06% 0.09% 0.19%
PRV.ST.LIGHTS 0.10% 0.01% 0.00% 0.03% O.OS\
CO-OP RESALE 0.49% 0.49% 0.00\ 0.00% 0.00%
SCHOOL 1.40% 0.05\ 0.49% 0.32% 0.73%
TOTAL 100.00% 22.47% 6.67% 19.09% 51.77%
THIS YEAR TO DATE
RESIDENTIAL 41.34% 12.97% 5.84\ 9.65% 12.88%
IN0U5/MMS SLOG 55.70% 7.71% 0.71% 8.89% 38.39%
PU9.ST.LIGHTS 0.46% 0.15% 0.06% 0.08% 0.17%
PRV.ST.LIGHTS 0.10% 0.02% 0.00% 0.03% 0.05%
CO-OP RESALE 0.50% 0.50% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
SCHOOL 1.90% 0.69% 0.41% 0.25% 0.55%
TOTAL 100.001 22.04\ 7.03\ 18.90% 53.04\
LAST YEAR TO DATE
RESIDENTIAL 41.22% 12.96% 5.87% 9.60% 12.79%
INDUS/MUNI BLDG 55.55% 7.53% 0.71% 8.63% 38.68%
PUB.ST.LIGHTS 0.63% 0.22% 0.08% 0.10% 1
.10% 0.33
PRV.ST.LIGHTS 0.14% 0.03% 0.00% 0.04% 0.07
CO-OP RESALE 0.51% 0.51% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00
SCHOOL 1.95% 0.69% 0.41% 0.26% 0.59P:
TOTAL 100.00% 21.94% 7.074 18.63\
111A1
TOWN OF READING, NASSACINSRTTS
LIGHT TGNT DEPARTMENT
BODGBT® PALREVENTZ VARIANCB REPORT
2/29/13
SCHEDULE P
ACTUAL BUDGET
YEAR TO OATS YEAR TO DATE VARIANCE • CHANGE
SALES OF ELRCTRICITY�
RESIDENTIAL 13,710,816.69 14,867,955.00 (1,157,138.31) -7.78%
CONN AND INDUSTRIAL SALES
PRIVATE STREET LIGHTING 16,116,382.18 17,086,084.00 (969,701.83) -5.60%
NONICIPAL BUILDINGS
PUBLIC STREET LIGHTING 154,100.27 343,908.00 (189,007.73) -55.19%
SALES FOR RESALE 150,680.12 199,100.00 (40,419.88) -30.30%
SCH00L 575.858.12 598,532.00 (22,673,88) -3.79%
TOTAL BASE SALES 30,715,837.30 33,095,579.00 (2,319,741.63) -7.19%
TOTAL PURL SALES 25,136 608.86 28 555.504.00 (3,418 815.14) -11.97%
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUE 55,852,536.24 61,651,093.00 (5,798,556.76) -9.41%
FORFEITED DISCOUNTS 636,950.33 728,103.00 (91,152.67) -12.52%
PURCHASED POWER CAPACITY (89,529.87) (94,363.00) 4,833.13 -5.12%
ENERGY CONSERVATION - RESIDENTIAL 152,117.47 138,857.00 13,260.47 9.55%
ENERGY CONSERVATION - COM3RCIAL 252,113.41 129,200.00 22,913.41 10.00%
CAN REVENUE 471,196.56 462,504.00 0,792.56 1.90%
NTPA CREDIT (460,280.28) (400.000.00) (60,280.38) 15.01%
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES 56.015,19J.86 62,715.384.00 (5,900,19 0.141 -9.41%
• ( 1 ACTUAL ORDER BUDGET
Niel
TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS
MUNICIPAL LIGNT DEPARTMENT
SCHEDULE MUNICI OP OPERATING EXPENSES
2/29/12
acx9nu1E e
MONTH MONTH LAST YEAR CURRENT YEAR YTD 9
OPERATION EXPENSES: LAST YEAR CURRENT YEAR TO DATE TO DATE CHANGE
PURCHASED POWER BASE EXPENSE 2,263.103 35 1.921,257 89 18.651.819 5B 16.855,504 4] -9.63%
OPERATION SUPER AND RNGIN-TRANS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%
OPERATION SUP AND ENGINEERING EXP 35,434.61 37,763.46 305,648.66 347,486.20 13.69%
STATION SUP LABOR AND MISC 91086.48 8,259.52 72,211.77 75,173.95 4.10%
LINE MISC LABOR AMD EXPENSE 65,495.77 66,396.95 421,687.09 453,338.13 7.51%
STATION LABOR AND EXPENSE 36,500.56 33,860.42 304,718.18 316,713.88 3.94%
STREET LIGHTING EXPENSE 8,839.64 91949.11 59,179.90 78,030.62 31.63%
METER EXPENSE 24,472.19 15,095.89 218,838.66 165,421.84 -24.41%
MISC DISTRIBUTION EXPENSE 27,70.99 26,532.33 220,005.81 221,444.58 0.65%
METER READING LABOR 6 EXPENSE 5,780.35 7,016.91 50,062.26 60,00.98 21.59%
ACCP R COLL LABOR R EXPENSE 101,70.32 110,819.86 858,644.73 922,609.64 7.46%
UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS 15,000.00 16,000.00 120,000.00 128,00D.00 6.67%
ENERGY AUDIT EXPENSE 30,660.79 31,736.69 258,326.71 294,218.82 13.89%
ADAIR R GEN SALARIES 53,649.41 57,334.00 464,706.07 494,40.65 6.40%
OFFICE SUPPLIES R EXPENSE 19,699.82 21,787.31 1)8,36).11 148,428.41 -16.79%
OUTSIDE SERVICES 29,648.85 30,183.94 145,258.19 253,840.04 74.75%
PROPERTY INSURANCE 31,705.39 32,379.12 247,])2.10 250,946.96 1.29%
INGGRIEB AND DAMAGES 3,533.0 2,883.11 20,109.56 10,809.34 -61.55%
EMPLOYERS PENSIONS R BENEFITS 39,812.95 195,495.15 1,063,351.61 877,693.57 -17.46%
MIBC GENERAL EXPENSE 23.613.28 7,630.97 116,348.91 128,591.35 10.52%
RENT EXPENSE 34,381.85 28,543.16 136,260.18 132,434.89 -2.81%
ENERGY CONSERVATION 107,952.20 45,986.94 384,165.00 396,208.79 3.13%
TOTAL OPERATION EXPENSES )03 ]48.93 787 6)4.79 5 653 ]83.60 5 756 790.41 1.
MAINTENANCE EXPENSES.
SAINT OF TPAN9MI89ION PLANT 227.08 227.08 11816.69 1.916.66 0.00%
NAINT OF STRUCT AxD EQUIPMT 22,351.98 7,422.39 1111514.66 195,464.79 75.28%
SAINT OF LINES - ON 98,448.69 88,279.85 898,978.09 1,159,292.06 28.95%
SAINT OF LIMB - GO 9,069.38 10,332.03 92,147.83 125,613.39 36.32%
SAINT OF LINE TRANSFORMERS *1 16,095.15 1,575.16 1,309,140.19 32,762.59 -97.50%
MAINT OF ET LT 6 MIC SYSTEM (0.90) (57.911 (118.78) (408.32) 243.76%
PRINT OF GARAGE AND STOC,,,,X 87,674.29 49,922.88 395,156.37 347,469.70 -12.07%
SAINT OF METERS 3,671.71 6,543.46 11,265.44 56,151.0 399.44%
MAINT OF GEN PLANT 40.640.13 61404.99 98,198.03 53,108.37 -45.91%
TOTAL MAINTENANCE EXPENSES 3]B.Sii.50 169.649.03 2.91810-88,511.970 2)0.)1 -32.48%
DEPRECIATION EXPENSE 287,729.05 296,027.47 2,301.832.40 2,368,219.76 2.88%
PURCHASED POWER FUEL EXPENSE 2,983,759.61 2,879,936.88 27,634,995.12 25,627,704.49 -7.26%
VOLUNTARY PAYMENTS TO TONINS 110.000.00 113,000.00 875,885.00 900.146.00 2.77%
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 6.fi26.51).43 6,16).546.01 59.036.901.21 53,478.675.82 -7.85%
•�
FY 12 total include. GAN -nil taNadi.tion axpen..e totalling $0.00
Total coats to data fot antic. Dtoj.et i. $2,482,825.90.
(xxl
TONS OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS
MUNICIPAL LIGHT DEPARTMENT
BUDGETED OPERATING EXPENSE VARIANCE REPORT
3/39/13
SCHEDULE G
ACTUAL BUDGET \
OPERATION EXPENSES: YEAR TO DATE YEAR TO DATE VARIANCE • CHANGE
PURCHASED POWER EASE EXPENSE 16.055.501.1] 38.OBJ.3]].00 (1,327,727.57) -6.79%
OPERATION SUPER AM ENGIN-TRANS 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%
OPERATION SUP AND ENGINEERING EXP 347,486.30 387,831.00 59,655.30 30.73%
STATION SUP LABOR AND RISC 75,173.95 40,044.00 35,139.95 87.73%
LIM MISC LABOR AND EXPENSE 453,338.13 467,35D.00 (14,011.87) -3.00%
STATION LABOR AND EXPENSE 316,713.68 391,630.00 35,083.88 8.60%
STREET LIGHTING EXPENSE 78,030.63 56,437.00 31,603.63 38.39%
METER EXPENSE 165,431.84 100,054.00 65,367.84 65.33%
NISC DISTRIBUTION EXPENSE 331,444.58 330,193.00 (8,747.43) -3.80%
MRTER READING LABOR A EXPENSE 60,870.98 49,933.00 10,938.98 31.91%
ACCT A COLL LABOR 6 EXPENSE 931,689.64 940,973.00 (18,381.36) -1.94%
UNCOLLECTIBLE ACCOUNTS 128,000.00 138,000.00 0.00 0.00%
ENERGY AUDIT EXPENSE 394,318.02 374,956.00 19,263.83 7.01%
ADMIN A GEN SALARIES 494,447.65 486,775.00 7,672.65 1.50%
OFFICE SUPPLIES 6 EXPENSE 148,438.41 177,113.00 (30,784.59) -16.34%
OUTSIDE SERVICES 353,840.84 338,880.00 (85,039.16) -35.09%
PROPERTY INSURANCE 350,946.96 310,016.00 (59,069.04) -19.05%
INJURIES AND DAMAGES 10,809.34 37,349.00 (26,539.66) -71.06%
EMPLOYEES PENSIONS i BENEFITS 877,693.57 1,034,691.00 (156,997.43) -15.17%
NISC GENERAL EXPENSE 128,591.35 154,503.00 (25,910.65) -16.77%
RENT EXPENSE 132,434.08 141,336.00 (8,901.13) -6.30%
ENERGY CONSERVATION 396,308.79 435,839.00 (39,630.31) -9.09%
TOTAL OPERATION EXPENSES 5.756.790.13 5.903.989.00 (337.198.57) -3.80%
MAINTENANCE EXPENSES:
SAINT OF TRANSMISSION PLANT 1,816.66 2,000.00 (183.34) -9.17%
MAINT OF STRUCT AND EQUIPMENT 195,464.79 71,533.00 123.931.79 173.35%
MIST OF LIKES - ON 1,158,392.06 936,447.00 331.045.06 35.03%
MAINT OF LINES - UO 135,613.39 142,533.00 (16,919.61) -11.87%
MINT OF LINE TRANSFORMER •• 32,762.59 134,406.00 (101,643.41) -75.62%
MAIM OF ST LT 4 SIG SYSTEM (408.32) 6,361.00 (6,769.32) -106.43%
MINT OF GARAGE AND STOCKROOM 347,469.70 426,653.00 (79,183.30) -18.56%
MAIM OF MINES 56,151.47 56,939.00 (707.53) -1.38%
MAINT OP GEN PLANT $3,108.37 84,944.00 (31,835.63) -37.48%
TOTAL MAINTENANCE EXPENSES 3.970.270.71 1.851.816.00 118.454.71 6.40%
DEPRECIATION EXPENSE 3,368,219.76 3,400,000.00 (31,780.34) -1.33%
PURCHASED POWER PML EXPENSE 35,637.704.49 37,355,705.00 (1,738,000.51) -6.32%
VOLUNTARY PAYMENTS TO TOWNS 900,106.00 904,000.00 (3,814.00) -0.42%
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 53,478,675.03 56.578.743.00 13.100,066.181 -5.48%
• ( ) . ACTUAL UNDER BUDGET
•• FY 13 total include. GAN .oil r.Medietion exp•naaa totalling 00.00
Total coat. to data !or ..tire pro)..[ ie 62.493,835.00.
So
MA)
TOM OF BRAIDING, MASSACHUSETTS
MUNICIPAL LIGHT DBPARTMWT
BUDGETED OPERATING EXPENSE VARIANCE REPORT
2/29/12
RESPONSIBLE REMAINING
SENIOR 2012 ACTUAL BUDGET REMAINING
OPERATION EXPENSES: MANAGER ANNUAL BUDGET YEAR TO DATE BALANCE BUDGET
PURCHASED POWER BASE EXPENSE JP 27,402,177.00 16,855,504.43 10,546.672.57 38.49%
OPERATION SUPER AND ENGIN-TRANS RE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00%
OPERATION SUP ARD ENGINEERING EXP as 438,974.00 347,486.20 91,487.80 20.84%
STATION SUP LABOR AND MISC XS 62,909.00 75,173.95 (12,264.95) -19.50%
LINE MISC LABOR ARD EXPENSE XS 692,484.00 453,338.13 239,145.87 34.53%
STATION LABOR AND EXPENSE XS 441,924.00 316,713.88 125,210.12 28.33%
STREET LIGHTING EXPENSE ES $5,338.00 78,030.62 7,307.38 8.56%
METER EXPENSE ES 152,130.00 165,421.84 (13,291.84) -8.74%
NISC DISTRIBUTION EXPENSE JD 352,508.00 221,444.58 131,063.42 37.18%
ENTER HEADING LABOR 6 EXPENSE XS 76,220.00 60,870.98 15,349.02 20.14%
ACCT 6 COLL LABOR a EXPENSE RP 1,427,255.00 922,689.64 504,565.36 35.35%
UNCOLLSCTIBLE ACCOUNTS RP 192,000.00 128,000.00 64,000.00 33.33%
ENERGY AUDIT EXPENSE JP 414,098.00 294,218.82 119,879.18 28.95%
ADMIN 6 GEN SALARIES VC 745,939.00 494,447.65 231,491.35 33.71%
OFFICE SUPPLIES 6 EXPENSE VC 265,700.00 148,428.41 117,271.59 44.14%
OUTSIDE SERVICES VC 454,250.00 253,840.84 200,409.16 44.12%
PROPERTY INSURANCE JD 465,000.00 250,946.96 214,053.04 46.03%
INJURIES AND DAMAGES ,TD 55,859.00 10,809.34 45,049.66 80.65%
EMPLOYEES PENSIONS 6 BENEFITS JD 1,441,637.00 877,693.57 563,943.43 39.12%
MISC GENERAL EXPENSE VC 203,091.00 128,591.35 74,499.65 36.68%
RENT EXPENSE JD 213,000.00 131,434.88 79,565.12 37.53%
ENERGY CONSERVATION Jp 643,769.00 396,208.79 247,580.21 38.46%
TOTAL OPERATION EXPENSES 8,823.105.00 5,756,790.43 3,066.314.57 34.75%
HAINIENANCE EXPENSES: 0
RAINT OF TRANSMISSION PLANT E8 3,000.00 11816.66 1,183.34 39.44%
RAINT OF STRUCT AND SOUIPHT E8 107,072.00 195,464.79 (08,392.79) -82.55%
RAINS OF LINES - ON XS 1,419,953.00 11158,292.06 261,660.94 18.43%
RAINS OF LINES - UO RB 214,037.00 125,613.39 88,423.61 41.31%
HAINT OF LINE TRANSFORMERS • XS 188,500.00 32,762.59 1$5,737.41 82.62%
HAINT OF ST IT 6 SIG SYSTEN • .R1 9,636.00 (408.32) 10,044.32 104.24%
RAINS OF GARAGE AND STOCKROOM JD 662,139.00 347,469.70 314,669.30 47.52%
MAINT OF ESTERS KS 85,444.00 56,151.47 29,292.53 34.28%
MAINT OF GEN PLANT RF 127,620.00 53,108.37 74,511.63 58.39%
TOTAL MAINTENANCE EXPENSES 2.817.401.00 1,970.270.71 847.130.29 30.07%
DEPRECIATION EXPENSE RP 3,600,000.00 2,368,219.76 1,231,780.24 34.22%
PURCHASED POMeR FUEL EXPENSE JP 39,768,817.00 25,627,704.49 14,141,112.51 35.56%
VOLUNTARY PAYMENTS TO TOWNS RP 1,356,000.00 900,186.00 455,814.00 33.61%
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 83 767 500.00 53,478,675.82 30,280,824.18 36.16%
•• PY 12 total include. GAN Boil remediation expanses totalling $0.00
Total coats to date for entire project is $2,402.825.80.
Ilxel
TONN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS
NONICIPAL LIGHT DEPARTMENT
PROFESSION" SERVICES
02129/2012
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BY PROJECT
ITEM OBPARTMBNT ACMIA, BOUGHT VARIANCE
1 ANIM AND PENSION TRUST AUDIT PEES ACCOUNTING 34.940.00 32,350.00 3,690.00
2 PENSION ACTUARIAL EVALUATION ACCOUNTING 0.00 0.00 0.00
3 LEGAL- FERC/I80 ISSUES ENERGY SERVICE 0.00 12,000.00 (12.000.00)
4 LEGAL- PUREE SUPPLY ISSUES ENERGY SERVICE 39.590.55 30,000.00 9.590.55
5 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES ENERGY SERVICE 9.484.33 16,000.00 (81515.68)
6 NERC COMPLIANCE E 6 0 13,890.00 11.900.00 1,190.00
9 LOAD CAPACITY STUDY/GIS ENGINEERING 9.380.00 11,250.00 (11970.00)
B LEGAL SERVICES- GENERAL OR 99,139.64 33,336.00 65,803.64
9 LEGAL SERVICES-GENERAL NR 37,865.90 28,000.00 (134.10)
10 LEGAL SERVICES-NEGOTIATIONS NR 10,193.91 0.00 10,173.91
11 LEGAL GENERAL SLUG. NAINT. 2,312.5D 1.000.00 1,312.50
12 SURVEY RIGHT OF NAY BLDG. SAINT. 0.00 3,336.00 (3,336.00)
13 ENVIRONIUSUTAL BLDG. MAIM. 0.00 3,336.00 (3.336.00)
14 STATION 1 STRUCTURAL PEASABILITY BLDG. MAIM. 0.00 50,000.00 (50,000.00)
15 DWOLITION OF CONTROL CENTER BLDG. MAIM. 3,905.69 100,000.00 (96.394.31)
16 INSURANCE CONSULTANT GEN. BENEFIT 6.458.33 3,336.00 3,123.33
17 LEGAL GEN. BENEFIT 0.00 l 336.00 (3 336.00)
TOTAL 353,840.84 338, 80.00253,840.84 338, 80.00 185019.16
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES BY VENDOR
ACTUAL
ROXARNE INSURANCE 6.041.66
RUBIN AND ROUNDUP 136,196.58
UTILITY SERVICES INC. 14,381.67
NSLANSON BIRTH 8 COMPANY 44,153.62
OUNCAN AND ALLEN 61814.99
CHOATE HALL ANU STMART 38.039.81
PROFESSIONAL EWIRONMEITAL SERVICES 2,340.00
CDM 91280.00
CERIC 4,169.33
COVINO ENVIRONNBMAL ASSOCIATION 2,523.19
TOTAL 253.040
st
(13)
RMLD
BUDGET VARIANCE REPORT
FOR PERIOD ENDING FEBRUARY 29, 2012
DIVISION ACTUAL BUDGET VARIANCE CHANGE
ENGINEERING AND OPERATIONS 3,222,651 2,786,745 435,906 15.64%
ENERGY SERVICES 737,572 769,131 (31,559) -4.10%
GENERAL MANAGER 556,203 483,863 72,340 14.95%
FACILITY MANAGER 1,901,291 2,412,377 (511,086) -21.19%
BUSINESS DIVISION 6,054,116 6,171,698 (117,581) -1.91%
SUB-TOTAL _ 1_,2 471,832 12.623 813 (151,980) -1.20%
PURCHASED POWER - BASE 16,855,504 18,083,232 (1,227,728) -6.794
PURCHASED POWER - FUEL 25,627,704 27,355,705 (1,728,001) -6.324
TOTAL 54,955,041 58,062 750 (3 107 708) -5.354
RMLD
D8P8AR8D PpBL CASH RESERVE ANALY5I8
02/29/13
GROSS MONTELY
DATE CNAROEB REVENUES NYPA CREDIT TOTAL
DEFERRED DEFERRED
Jun-11
Ju1-11 4,131,396.03 4,049,745.45 3,055,224.78
(]9,163.651 (160,815.03) 2,894,409.]5
Aug-11 3,795,607.97 3,924,543.80 (52,328.]4) 76,605.09 2,9]1,014.84
exp-11 3,914,869.40 3,166,562.64 (58,869.90) 192,823.34 3,163,838.18
Got-11 2,955,398.39 2,852,952.53 (45,133.69) (14],5]9.55) 3,016,258.63
Nov-11 2,643,246.46 2,544,526.70 (47,451.31) (146.171.07) 2,970,067.56
D..-11 2,968,917.38 2,889,822.54 (63,455.95) (142,550.79) 2,]2],536.]]
Jan-12 3,338,331.18 3,114,395.49 (51,411.30) (275,346.99) 2,452,189.78
FRb-12 2,879,936.88 2,594,141.71 (62,465.]4) (348,260.91) 2,103,928.87
RMLD
STAFFING REPORT
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE, 2012
ACTUAL
12 BUD JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN PED
TOTAL 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 12
GENER&L H&M&GRR
GENERAL MANAGER 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
HUMAN RESOURCES 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
COMMUNITY RELATIONS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
BBBINEBB
ACCOUNTING 2.00 1.50 1.50 1.50 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
CUSTOMER SERVICE ' 7.75 8.75 8.75 8.75 8.75 8.75 8.75 8.75 8.75
MGM INFORMATION SYS ' 6.25 5.25 5.25 5.25 5.25 5.25 5.25 5.25 5.25
MISCELLANEOUS 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
TOTAL 17.00 16.50 16.50 16.50 17.00 17.00 17.00 17.00 17.00
NG*NEERING & OPRRATIONS
AGM E&O 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
ENGINEERING 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
LINE 21 20 20 20 20 20 20 21
METER 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
STATION 8 B 8 8 8 8 8 7 7
TOTAL 40 39 39 39 39 39 39 39 39
PROJECT
BUILDING 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
GENERAL BENEFITS 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
TRANSPORTATION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D
MATERIALS MONT 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
TOTAL 8 B 8 B 8 8 8 B B
ENERGY SERVICES
ENERGY SERVICES • 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5
TOTAL 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.5 4.5 4.5
AMID TOTAL 74.5 73 73 73 73.5 73.5 73.5 72.5 72.5
CONTRACTORS
UO LINE 2 2 2 22 2 2 2 2
TOTAL 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
GRAND TOTAL 76.5 75 75 75 75.5 75.5 75.5 74.5 74.5
part time employee
'q part time employee and a coop student
•A part time employee and a temp
RMLDkeadmg Mt;.kipal LightaMpotncat
ati+eta . ae r„a •aaariaat ATTACHNIENT4
230 Ash Strep
PO.Boa IMO
Reading MA 01867-0250
Tel:(7al)9041340
I'm(791)902-2409
web:www.rmid.com
March la,2012
Town of Reading Municipal Light Board
Subject: Replacement of Rooftop Air Conditioning Units
On February 7,2012 a bid invitation was placed as a legal notice in the Reading Chronicle requesting
proposals for Replacement of Rooftop Air Conditioning Units for the Reading Municipal Light Department.
An invitation to bid was sent to the following:
Aaron Clayton Commercial All Seasons Cooling&Heating Alpha Mecbanical Services,
HVAC&Refrigeration Inc.
Atlantic Mechanical Berry&Loud Company,Inc. Breen&Sullivan Mechanical
Contractors Services,Inc.
Brooks& Brooks HVAC CAM HVAC Carrier Air Conditioning
Service
Colonial HVAC Controlled System HVAC,Inc. Cooling Unlimited,Inc.
Cranney Companies Emcore Service N.E. Enoch C.Shaw
Commaire/Balco
Essex County Craftsmen,Inc. Falite Bros.,Inc. George T. Wilkinson,Inc.
Hall Sheet Metal Works,Inc. Healthy Air Solutions Honeywell Business Solutions
Huntington Controls James Devaney Fuel Company Johnson Controls
Lake Industries Limbach Company Lohrman HVAC
Mechanical Management, Inc. Mercury Mechanical Systems, Merrimack Valley Corp.
Inc.
Monahan rechnologies,Inc. Nexgen Mechanical,Inc. NMA Construction
P.J. Dionne Co. R.H. Young Heating and Air Renaud HVAC&Controls, Inc.
Conditioning,Inc.
Roger :\. Tremblay Snowden Mechanical Stttacco Plumbing& I leafing
Contractors. Inc.
; mthern Air. Inc. Stebbins huffy total Temperature Control.
j�S
Inc.
rrane Company
2012-36 Replacement of Rooftop Air Conditioning Units.doc
RMLDRl,AmxeMua '�a1 I'Igh'I Pe'im
2 W A,h%I.,.PO.Bor Is)
Reading.MA O r862O:,) •
Bids were received from CAM HVAC,Cranny Companies, Essex County Craftsmen, Inc., Falite Bros., Inc.,
Hall Sheet Metal Works,Inc., Healthy Air Solutions,Huntington Controls, Mercury Mechanical Systems,Inc.,
Monahan Technologies,Inc.,and F.J. Dionne Co.
the bids were publicly opened and read aloud at 11:00 a.m. March 7,2012 in the Town of Reading Municipal
Light Department's General Managers Conference Room,230 Ash Street,Reading, Massachusetts.
The bids were reviewed,analyzed and evaluated by the General Manager and the staff.
Move that bid 2012-36 for Replacement of Rooftop Air Conditioning Units be awarded to:
Healthy Air Solutions for$19,600.00
Item 1 Healthy Air Solutions $19,600.00
as the lowest qualified and responsive bidder on the recommendation of the General Manager.
The FY2012 Capital Budget amount for this item is$30,000.00.
cent F.Cam on,Jr.
Jtiseph J. Donahoe
i
Crag wen
S
2012-16 Replacement of Rooftop Air Conditioning Units.doe
� m
m ml Z
z
N
�h
C
0
C O
O O 0 o c
O N O
O
w p
8
OI O O C
O N O d
N
� K
� N
G C O
�I� �► C N
M
Q
O �
O N rc
O � j
n
Y h OE A C y
QN G
C _
a al m E H m E m d
m
- Z
Reading Municipal Light rD pu`m.
RMLDns
230 230 Ash Sneer
Roa 150
Reading•MA 01867-0250
Tel:(781)9aa.1340
Fu:(781)%2-2409
Web:www.rmld.cum
March 14,2012
Town of Reading Municipal Light Board
Subject: Landscape Service
On February 7, 2012 a bid invitation was placed as a legal notice in the Reading Chronicle requesting
proposals for Landscape Service for the Reading Municipal Light Department.
An invitation to bid was emailed to the following:
Consider It Done Donlon-Draper,Inc.
Pe Eagle Landscaping
Earle,Kevin EZ Landscaping
GTA Landscaping
Hurst Landscaping Linehan Landscaping&Fuel
P B Lubelczyk,Edward
Macs Landscaping Maloney,Pat
McCarthy,Paul
MFB, Inc. NECC Corp.P Rodrigues,Orlando
RMK Sawyer StrongLandscaping P 8 TM Landscaping
Bids were received from Eagle Landscaping, Inc., James M. Linehan DBA David Linehan & Song
and 7M
I.I.C.LC
The bids were publicly opened and read aloud at 11:00 a.m. March 7, 2012 in the Town of Reading Municipal
Light Department's General Manager's Conference Room,230 Ash Street, Reading,Massachusetts.
the bids were reviewed,analyzed and evaluated by the General Manager and the staff.
2012-111,mdxnps•G•n is e.Jsn-
RMLDRa'Jinµ\luny;Pal liµh t`1 P+nn„n
.YI A.hµlint.P1).Puµ 1511 •
RCWing,hl:\n14n111'NI
Move that bid 2012-33 for Landscape Service be awarded to:
Eagle Landscaping, Inc. for$66,540.00
$66,540.00
Item 1 Eagle Landscaping,Inc.
as the lowest qualified and responsive bidder on the recommendation of the General Manager. (This is a
three-year contract.)
The FY2012 Operating Budget amount for this item is$38,000.00.
k �a4--,,nt
F.Ca eron,Jr.
J. Donaho
Cra Owen
2n12-i3 Lands\npe Gn im.duc
> �
\ \ z »
» °
a
_ \ °
± 7
Ag k
� I \ }
. CO
-
} -Cfi C3
/
!
/ } \ \ \ { ` } s
; a ! a } ! !
|
■
,
at )|�
§� \| §| § |§ | |
�
; | lit !4| )§| i§| || |
§\ )is )(| |§§ ) 41
||
at
§]� �[§ \�
�
Answer to Payables 2/27/12
I Page 1 of I
Answer to Payables 2/27/12
Vincent Cameron
LSent: Wednesday,February 29,2012 2:11 PM
To: RMLD Board Members Group
4: Bob Fournier;Steve Kazanjlan;Jeanne Fob
Categories:Red category
Snyder
1. Bay State Envelope-Did we get the envelopes we wanted +did they lake back the ones with the note? (The
PO from 2008.)
Yes. The order was straightened out.
2. ERC-What are pop up wipes + what for?
These are cleansing wipes. The are used by employees to clean their hands after working on equipment that is
greasy or dirty.
40
https://t)wa.rmid.com/owa/?ae=Item&t=1 PM.Note&id=RgAAAACOkZlrlkKLQ6uBL6Pyd... 2/29/2012
Payroll Questions - February 24, 2012 Page I of 1
Payroll Questions - February 24, 2012
Vincent Cameron
sant: Wednesday,February 29, 2011 2:18 PM
To: RMLD Board Members Group
Cc: Bob Fournier;Steve Kman1lan; Jeanne Fotl
Cataeorlas:Red Category
Hahn
1. Finne-Why a minimum with no OT?
A minimum is an overtime call-in that guarantees three hours pay. The minimum line represents
five minimum call-ins that Mr. Finnie worked during this pay period. The fifteen hours were paid at the
overtime rate.
2. Schibilio-Which CAB meeting did he attend?
The meeting was on 2/16/2012. We have an Electrical /Meth.Technician on duty when there is
a meeting in the building, except for a RMLO Board meeting or a meeting held in the cafeteria.
•
https://owa.nnid.com/owa/Tae=ltem&t=[PM.Note&id=RgAAAACOkZ[r[kKLQ6uBL6Pyd... 229/2012
Account Payable Questions- March 2, 2012
Page 1 of I
Account Payable Questions - March 2, 2012
Vincent Cameron
Sant: Tuesday, March 05, 2012 9:23 AM
To: RMLD Board Members Group
Cc: Bob Fournier; Steve Ka:anliar, Wendy Markiewicz; Jeanne Fob
categories:Red category
Snyder
1. Fischbach & Moore - What happened on 1/29 to result in double time billing?
An underground cable faulted in a manhole on West Street on Sunday, 1/29/12, near the ReadinglWilmington
town line. The cable needed to be repaired immediately. Fischbach &
the work. Moore was paid the double time rate to do
O'Neill
1. Kiley - Employee should be encouraged to submit expenses more expeditiously.
Yes, I will remind the employee,
fes..
]'lips:i o%a.rmld.cum,uww?ac-=Item&t-IPM.Notc&id -RgAAAACpkZlrlkKLQ6uBL6Pyd... 3 6,2012
March 9 Payables Warrant Questions
Page I of 1
March 9 Payables Warrant Questions
Vincent Cameron
Tent; Friday, March lfi, der; Mta5�West; Mary Ellen O'Neill; Phil Padw
To: Bob Sot;Gina Snyder;
Cc: Bob Faumler; Steve Kazan)lan; Wendy Marklewia; Jeanne Fatl
Categorle: Red Category
Attachments:DOC.PDF(379 KS)
Snyder
1. JP Morgan - Please explain accounting on this.
RMLD purchased 5082 Mwhs of on-peak power at a price of $61.85/Mwh which when
multiplied equals $314, 321.70 plus 3735 Mwhs of off-peak power at a price of
$49.20/Mwhs which when multiplied equals $183,762.00. The sum of the on/off peak is
the invoice cost of $498,083.70.
2. Woronoco + Indian River - Woronoco notes say it includes Indian River, but
there's a separate wire to Indian River. Please explain.
RMLD internal notation which indicates that when Ener y Servicesdal verifiesions for theWoramount
of energy received from projects with the ISO-NB,
theand Indian river are totalized.
3. Asplundh - Please indicate locations for these bills + indicate who
supervised.
Attached are the sheets with the detail of the work. These sheets did not make it
to the payables pile but we had them. Blasetti and Greenwood were the supervisors
on the crews.
4 . Office Depot - Why did RMLD buy 2 cartons of dish detergent. Shouldn't the
53.11 credit be applied to the 53.11 charge?
The RMLD buys dish detergent for the cafeteria area. This is the least expensive
source. The credit is issued on a separate invoice because what was sent had to be
sent back.
O'Neill
1. Asplundh - Check should be held until "weekly operation form" is filled out
properly.
The weekly operation form is filled out and attached.
2. Reading Chronicle - No copy of published ad for RFQ 2012-28? Also, isn't it
preferable to have "topi, " cf bid in ad headline; not just number?
We have a _opy on file. I had it attached to the payable. We usually put the
n. ,b,�r at the healing and the name and description in the first. parr4raph.
3. Rubin and Rudman - In axecut ive session if ce•:essary, what -were tetal 1e7al
to executa bid? What an be done in future to Lower ,' ch _sets'.
I ai LL =_xc! ai
he _-11L "s . -al a,,J -o 'he bid in execu'_i-:a = .ssi'c.
https://owa.rmld.com/owa; ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAAACOkZlrlkKLQ6uBL6Pyd... 3/20/2012
Page I ur I
Answer to Payables March 19, 2012
Vincent Cameron
Sent: Tuesday,March 20, 2012 11:48 AM
To: RMLD Board Members Group
cc: Bob Fournier; Steve Kaxan)lan;
Cstegortee: Red Category Wendy Markiewi ; Jeanne Fob
Attachments:Green Power MDPU Prm..pdr(114 KB)
O'Neill
1. Rubin and Rudman - Please discuss in Executive Session if necessa
Presentation was necessary. ry and why the PP
The RMLD, along with representatives from Braintree and ENE, used Rubin and Rudman to
set up a meeting with the Massachusetts Department of Public Utility commissioners (Berwick,
Westbrook, and Cash) to present our systems energy conservation and renewable
energy initiatives. I gave the RMLD Board a report on this at the last RMLD Board meeting
during the GM Report.
Snyder
1. JCM Realty- What is being done on electric use?
I spoke to the building owner and will meet with him to discuss the lighting within the building.
F'^ 2. NGRID - Please explain accounting notes.
NGRID lost a check from RMLD. We resent the check, which they misapplied the check to only
one account. We straightened it out in this payment.
3. Reading W/S/SW 230 Ash Street - Both bills have 38.52 storm water? What is the storm
water billing based on + is the impervious service serve. (RCN) removed? What is at 571
West Street?
That is what we are charged for impervious service charge for the 208 Ash Street lot, which is
beside the garage. 571 West Street is the back end of the RMLD's right of way out of the Gaw
Substation. We have a service there.
4. Rubin and Rudman - Please provide copy of power point.
It is attached.
5. Sterling - What was the error and can the 20,000 sheets be used?
Yes, we are using them. A few stock numbers changed, but they can still be used.
6. Wilmington Family Counseling - What is this for?
This is the Employee Assistance Program the RMLD provides for its employees.
haps:, uwu.nnld.com uwa4ae=Item&t=IPM.Note&id=RgAAA.4COkZlrlkKLQ6uBL6Pyd... 320,2012
a � .
/
� � £
o
2
Co /
� 7
C:
° q W
o q = : k
em / (n2 / /
(D O E 2: (no CU
m 2
U CU
Q) 0 ' k q ( q 0�
@
•� 7 o $ \ � C) � /
o £ a) 4- 7 U3,
Fn o R \ -0 o
�3 0 I a
2o � � = oE O
� U) 2
._ g ± e g -0 _ S m
� o q O
@ ± 2 2 3 E � 3 =
UJ % k ƒ ƒ ƒ f f
�
§ Q
\ /7676
/ C cu (n
_» ( /
k E f/
cn CL }
c Eo
gCL /
o { ;Ig 7 ƒ
7 > 2 # / {
_ % k zf C ®
e / a e # f
cu _ ! _ � 22
a) LO a /
® _ ¥
c \ 0 . 2
2 7 \ \ } « / < /
-
} \ I » #& \
FU {E / /
(\ k
( \ \ \ \ )
\ \ J2 \ } } \ � \ \ cn
� / }
Q » / -0E0uE } U)
$ t = » & kk2 ` / } \ * / {
\ \ / = 2j / / } § § k / \ \
\ \ j \
N
r
T
2
c
d (>9 L
CO 2 L c�o9
i
0 C E o
V O
CL
a) N Y
CD N U LO N
V/ O C: ON N
w, N (9 N O
�' E m E N a
O L
c w O
m Ln N Lr) O O
O bqo
p t L Q'
•� N N CO N 7 .-. W
mN C 0
C c 00 O C N 0
yo �, c E o
L ON N O LO ./
3 a) O N O N c0 M C
O O a y bq
O U U >1 L O O)
N 0 " c O
li U d 0 2 0 7 O
E C O I T N O E
^�^` 'a O)> LO N
WA ,N EO 'O L O N c 07
W >, @ r C
N N @ O
L C N N LLJ N N a
> a m ca ca a m
Q) m � � o � 30
C:) c o O � Z >1
M O C N LO �_N C 0)
E o ci c_ c a) a
CO U U) 0 > N N
> O
U O
Q EA N 0 (n fl_ S
E
0
a
n
_T
O M
V �
m
,A N
7
`W N
N
O
�1 N
N
0
L 0
Q� c
3 0
O
a
aLL
0 = m
� c
cc
0 0
c �
JI
mm
c U
oa
a
(ncu
N
c
O
O >
L a)
O v a m a)
cn m
U- D «� >
cL Q
v ° � > �Q
Q � EU
i U O X
a)
t+ C (a O � -
_ = U _
(n vi a) ccn
.ca
cu -r-
O ° c
U) u) c E
� � � .c 0o
a) 0 o
J LO
Q U
a) OU .
U a)
X L m L 0)
a) a)
H c a) cu C: O