HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-11-14 Conservation Commission Minutesi C)��
Meeting Minutes November I4, 2012
Approved Novenlf:HTY E D
Ti`t' N CLERK
MINUTES RED'.. A: ' ;ASS.
Reading Conservation Commission Meeting
Selectmen's Meeting Room, 7:00 PM1011 DCI' — 3 P 2: 4 1
Wednesday, November 14, 2012
Present: William Hecht, Chairman, Jaime Maughan; Barbara Stewart, Brian Sullivan, Annika
Scanlon, Will Finch
Charles Tirone, Administrator
Kim Saunders, Recording Secretary
Jim Fitzpatrick, Northeast Tree
Justin St Hilarire, 30 LaFayette Circle
Frances Kelliher, 5A Carnation Circle
Sal & Patricia Gentile, 54 Azalea Circle
Sean Malone, Oak Consulting Group
Tom Hughes,
Virginia Adams, 59 Azalea Circle
Nathan Terry, Scout
Ellen Terry, 48 Sherwood Road
Absent:
Call to Order:
There being a quorum the meeting opened at 7:00 PM
Old /New Business
Bills approved
Newspaper ad for the Public Hearing
Motion made by Ms. Stewart to approve the $106.88 newspaper ad fee. Ms. Scanlon
seconded. Vote was 5 -0 -0 (Mr. Sullivan has not arrived as of yet)
COC 270.0599: 23 Buckskin Drive, Map 45 Lot 54, Lot 5A, Swanson
Mr. Hecht stated the project was complete. He suggested leaving the silt fence up until the
planting can be done in the spring. Mr. Tirone will schedule a spring follow up visit. Mr. Finch
asked if the new Town software could be used to schedule this follow up. Mr. Tirone stated he
didn't think so, and he will make a calendar note for the June visit.
Motion made by Ms. Scanlon to issue a Certificate of Compliance with conditions. Ms.
Stewart seconded. Vote was 5 -0 -0.
Salem Five Bank, request to modify the storm water inspection rate
Ms. Scanlon volunteered to review previous inspection reports for Salem Five Bank. The Bank
wants to see if the frequency of the storm water reports can be changed. She will report at next
meeting. The Commission talked about if other companies asked for a modification they will have
to submit a proposal first. Mr. Maughan questioned if a consultant might need to be hired to do the
review.
Meeting Minutes November 14, 2012
Approved November 28, 2012
Sturges Park, improvements follow up
No update as of yet
Cutting signs
The Commission looked at a picture of a sign. They agreed that the sign is good for the "NO mow
zone'; but contact information will be added. The administrator can order three. They will be
posted at the Castine stream area.
Bond Street: tree & wetland clearing follow up
The Commission asked the administrator to make an appointment with homeowner. The
Commission reviewed what they decided at a previous meeting. They will let the homeowner keep
the part of the shed that is structural safe on the property until the house is sold. The bad part of
the shed should be removed. The homeowner should not be mowing. There can be a 3' path to
the shed. But there can be no oil or gas stored in the shed. The administrator will follow up with
the Commission.
Continued RDA 12.14: 64 Glenmere Circle, Map, 15 Lot 89, McCadden
Mr. Fitzpatrick represented the applicant. Mr. Maughan thanked the applicant for deciding to keep
the big pine tree. There will be no stump grinding allowed. The applicant submitted a planting
plan, It was asked that the wood chips be spread to cover the bare ground. The homeowner was
told that he should maintain the blueberry area by the garage; and spread wood chips around there
too.
Motion made by Ms. Stewart to issue a Negative Determination with conditions. Mr. Finch
seconded. Vote was 5 -0 -0.
The Commission signed and Mr. Tirone will amend with the condition of executing the planting
plan.
RDA 12 -14: 30 LaFayette Road, Map, 39 Lot 152. St, Hillaire
The applicant would like to remove brush, trees (including grinding the stumps) overgrown debris;
thorn bushes & trees abutting driveway and replace with grass, re- planting of trees and shrub for
an accurate property boundary. All work is within 100' of a bordering vegetated wetland. The
Commission talked about the site visit; and the difficulties figuring out the wetland line. The
concrete bounds and old OOC's were discussed. The Commission talked about different options
with the applicant. The applicant asked if he would be grandfathered in if the wetland line changed
after a new delineation. Would he have to remove stuff from his property that is already there?
The Commission said no. They suggested the administrator do a site visit at the property.
Motion made by Ms. Stewart to continue the RDA. Ms. Scanlon seconded. Vote was 6 -0 -0.
Mr. Finch stated he might not be eligible to vote on the Azalea Circle projects. He wasn't sure how
much testimony he missed. Ms. Adams stated under the Mullen Rule the tapes from the previous
meetings can be reviewed by Mr. Finch.
Scout Project, Bat Houses at Symonds Way, Terry
Mr. Terry discussed with the Commission for his Eagle Scout project he would like approval to
install approximately 20 bat houses on the perimeter of Symonds Way field. The project will take
place early spring. He will be having volunteers and friends help him one weekend to build the
houses from kits; they will be working at St. Agnes. The holes will be dug and poured with
2
Meeting Minutes November 14, 2012
Approved November 28, 2012
concrete. The posts will be 8' high and be pressure treated. The Commission suggested crushed
stone (or reuse the rocks that are pulled out when digging the holes) so water can drain and the
posts won't rot so fast. The posts should be "ground contact" posts and stainless steel screws
should be used. The Commission suggested that Mr. Terry periodically go back and see which
houses are colonized; and if he is willing, come back to the Commission to show pictures and
update them.
Motion made by Ms. Stewart to approve the Eagle Scout project. Mr. Finch seconded. Vote
was 6 -0 -0.
Continued NO1270.0608, Lot 126, Azalea Circle, Map 23, Kay Street Reading Realty LLC
Mr, Hecht reopened the Public Hearing. Mr. Malone represented the applicant. He talked about
the new plans submitted with the questions the Commission asked for at the previous meeting:
• The number of trees to be removed in the 35' setback is 12 — 4" caliber; none in the 25'
ZNV
• In the 25-35' area more habitat planting will be done
• If there is a vernal pool present was reviewed by Mr. Hughes, Environmental Consultant.
After his review, it is concluded that is unlikely that any vernal pools are located within 100'
of the project site,
• The delineation method was questioned and Mr. Hughes supplied details and enclosed
"Addendum to Notice Intent ". The delineation was discussed with the Commission at a
site visit, with an emphasis on the areas that differed from the prior boundaries
• A 25 retaining wall will be installed along the driveway closest to the wetland line
• The proposed deck has been reduced in size to an 8x8. This will make the deck be 4'
away from the 35' buffer
Mr. Hughes narrated how he delineated the wetland and compared the old line. He went through
why he didn't think a vernal pool is present. How the wetland area will be improved by the planting
plan and removal of invasive. He let the Commission know the DEP had no comments on this
project. The Commission talked about putting in "markers" and "no trees can be touched after
house built" in the OOC's or in the deed.
The concerns /questions that were discussed:
• How much study went into the project if the presentation says "drive" not "circle"
• An easement will need to be granted — not a common driveway
• What land the Greenhouse owners own? Their landscapers maintain the entrance.
• The Town acceptance of the road; any questions should be directed to Town Engineer
• How will the water and sewage be hooked up
• Should a do's and don't list be developed
The Commission discussed if they should vote without a written OOC "s or continue the Hearing.
The abutters stated there was a Condo meeting and some of the abutters who wanted to come
couldn't,
Motion made by Mr. Maughan to continue the Public Hearing. Ms. Stewart seconded. Vote
was 6 -0 -0.
Continued NO1270.0609, Lot 125, Azalea Circle, Map 23, Kay Street
Meeting Minutes November 14, 2012
Approved November 28, 2012
Mr. Malone represented the applicant. He went over the responses submitted to the Commission:
• The confusion with square feet in the N01 should be 68 square feet
• He looked at 4 different alternative plans
• Moved the fence as asked, added more native planting
• Additional drain to help with Mr, Gentile's water build up
• Amount of trees to be removed is 40. Some are grouped, but was counted separately
• Vernal Pool and delineation as in lot 126
Mr. Hughes talked about the delineation and planting plan for this lot:
• The planting will greatly enhance the value of the wetland.
• As of right now the wetland is damaged; Buckthorn is taking over the wetland
• The wetlands are deteriorating
• A variance might not be needed; could be considered a performance standard.
• Compliance with the 25' - no disturbance zone
• Wall comes within 2 or 3'- No pile work will be allowed during construction
• Whole thing will be vegetated — establish the habitat area
Mr. Maughan questioned and discussed: 1) the parking and if an alternative can be constructed —
if the parking can be pulled out of the 35' area 2) variance — what is the public good and 3) what is
the area going to look like 5 years down the road.
The concerns /questions that were discussed:
• maintaining the wetland would be the homeowners responsibility; putting that request in
OOC's or deed
• no cutting trees in OOC's
• pervious pavement must be up kept in OOC's
• cut the parking lot area — making a turn around
• 4' high fence rail is unnecessary; will be removed
• Shrubs being planted to close to the house
• Putting a split rail fence @ 25'
• Putting markers @ 35'
• Making the deck smaller
• 0 &M plan to be typed up with more dates and description with who will be responsible.
• How is the snow going to be removed from this area
• Look at restoration area, could additional native trees be planted
Motion made by Ms. Stewart to continue the Public Hearing. Ms. Scanlon seconded. Vote
was 6 -0 -0.
The applicant will present updated plans to the Commission based on earlier discussions.
Minutes
Motion made by Ms. Stewart to approve the October 24, 2012 minutes as amended. Ms.
Scanlon seconded. Vote was 6 -0 -0.
The Commission asked that September 26, October 16 and November 7 minutes that still need to
be approved be forwarded to them in an email; mailing them is not necessary.
4
Meeting Minutes November 14, 2012
Approved November 28, 2012
Bylaw change discussion - Article 14 —
Mr, Maughan discussed with the Commission why Article 14 is needed. The Town Counsel stated
the Bylaw and Regulations are inconsistent — different laws, different values. The Bylaw fine is
non - criminal. The change will allow the Commission to impose the fine.
It was noted that there is a misleading petition being circulated regarding the regulations.
Mr, Finch talked about the Beaver Dam problem. He spoke to North Reading to see if they could
force someone to upgrade their septic; but North Reading does not do this usually until a house is
sold.
Motion made by Ms. Stewart to adjourn meeting at 11:00 p.m. Mr. Finch seconded. Vote
was 6 -0 -0.
Rpectfullymitted,
I Kim Satanders
Recording Secretary