Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2010 Annual Report
Town of Reading Massachusetts OF I? 639: /NCOR40 ANNUAL REPORT 2010 �o� OFREyQ' 2010 Annual Report °e Table of Contents 6JS'IX[00.pp0.' , Page No. TOWN MANAGER 2010 Annual Letter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 — 2 1 ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE DEPARTMENTS Accounting Department ...................................... ............................... 3 Finance Department ........................................... ............................... 3-4 Finance: Assessment Division ............................... ............................... 4 Finance: Collection Division ................................ ............................... 4-5 Finance: General Division ................................... ............................... 5 General Finance: Trust Funds ...................:............ ............................... 5-6 Finance: Human Resources Division ....................... ............................... 6 Finance: Technology Division ............................... ............................... 6-7 Finance: Town Clerk .......................................... ............................... 8— 15 Finance: Trust Funds .......................................... ............................... 16-17 Report of the Town Collector ................................. ............................... 18-22 FY 2010 Real Estate Abatements ........................... ............................... 23-24 Financial Statements .......................................... ............................... 25-104 COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT Board of Selectmen ................................................... ............................... 105-108 Conservation Division ........................................ ............................... 109-111 Elder/Human Services ........................................ ............................... 112-118 HealthDivision ................................................ ............................... 119-123 Inspections Division ........................................... ............................... 124 Zoning Board of Appeals ..................................... ............................... 124 Planning Division .............................c ................ ............................... 125-127 Veterans' Services Division .................................. ............................... 128 TownCounsel .................................................. ............................... 129-130 The Arc of Middlesex ......................................... ............................... 131-132 Historical Commission ........................................ ............................... 133 Land Bank Committee ........................................ ............................... 134 Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPQ ............ ............................... 135-141 Mystic Valley Elder Services ................................ ............................... 142-143 Trails Committee ............................................... ............................... 144-146 West Street Historic District Commission ................... .......................:....... 147 HOUSING AUTHORITY Report........................................................... ............................... 148-155 LEGISLATIVE BODY Town Meeting Reports and Voting Results ................ ............................... 156-450 Organization Chart ............................................ ............................... 451 READING PUBLIC LIBRARY Report........................................................... ............................... 452-463 PUBLIC SAFETY Fire Department .......................................................... ............................... 464-469 Police Department ............................................. ............................... 470-478 AnimalControl ................................................ ............................... 474 Parking Enforcement Officer ................................ ............................... 475 Reading Coalition Against Substance Abuse (RCASA) . ............................... 479-483 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Director's Report ................................................ ............................... 484 Administration Division ...................................... ............................... 484-485 Cemetery Division ............................................ ............................... 486 Custodian of Soldiers' and Sailors' Graves ................ ............................... 486 Engineering Division ......................................... ............................... 486-488 Highway Division ............................................. ............................... 488-489 Forestry: Tree Warden's Report ............................. ............................... 489-490 ParksDivision .................................................. ............................... 490 Water Distribution Division .................................. ............................... 490 Sewer Distribution Division .................. ............................... .............. 491 Water Supply Division ........................................ ............................... 491-493 Recreation Division ........................................... ............................... 494-500 SCHOOL DEPARTMENT Superintendent's Report ...................................... ............................... 501-554 Northeast Metropolitan Regional Vocational School ..... ............................... 552-566 BOARDS, COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS Report........................................................... ............................... 567-575 TOWN MANAGER'S ANNUAL LETTER TO: Residents of the Town of Reading Dear Fellow Residents: The Town of Reading Annual Report for the calendar year 2010 is attached. This report details some of the highlights of the many activities in Reading this past year. Some of these activities are very obvious — the improvement of streets, the renovation of Memorial Park — but most of the activity is pretty invisible if done well. Much of the community's attention during the year has been focused on things other than the activities of their local government. The global financial condition, with its effect on local residents has taken much of the attention away from local events. 2010 saw some positive signs of coming out of this deep recession, but there is a great deal more that needs to happen to return to any semblance of where we all were financially two or three years ago. The same is true of your local government, except that it will take a dozen years to recover, and even then we will have lost some of our services that we have all become accustomed to. During 2010, we continued to be an active community, and some of the highlights in 2010 include: • A very successful second annual Reading Fall Street Faire; • The Town has completed a number of major road projects: Juniper Circle, North Street and Pinevale Avenue; and also portions of Bear Hill Road, Arlington Street, Harrison Street, Haverhill Street, Marla Lane and Temple Street; • Property master plans for Joshua Eaton School park/open area and the Town Forest Stewardship have been completed; • Memorial Park improvements have been completed thanks to the generous contribution of Nelson and Rita Burbank and a number of other local residents and businesses; • . Economic Development activities continued strong in spite of a weak economy nationally. Several new businesses including Sam's Bistro, Grumpy Doyle's and The Wine Bunker have been approved, started construction and/or opened in Reading during the year; • Town Meeting approved a Zoning Bylaw amendment to allow A -Frame signs in the Business B Zone to promote a pedestrian friendly community that supports businesses; • In an effort to increase recycling and reduce rubbish disposal cost, changes were made to the Rubbish Rules and Regulations to allow for mandatory recycling on a weekly basis, curbside leaf collection and other user friendly changes; • The Town continues to maintain its sound financial picture even with a weak (but strengthening) local and national economy. 1 We all take these efforts and the ongoing delivery of services for granted. The routine and non- routine services continue to be delivered, and the employees and volunteers of the community do the ordinary and extraordinary things that make this Town thrive. All of these things are done by the dedicated men and women who work for the Town of Reading as employees and as volunteers. This Annual Report is dedicated to all of the men and women who work and volunteer for their community of Reading. For those who have need for detailed information about the Town of Reading, we hope this Annual Report will be complete and valuable for you. It provides a good historical record of what has happened in the Town of Reading in calendar year 2010 We welcome any questions, suggestions or comments that you may have with regard to this report, or to the provision of the services within the community. You can address them to me at townmanager(cjci.reading.ma.us, or call at 781 - 942 -9043. Much information is available on the Town of Reading web site at www.readingma.gov and while you are there, please fill out our customer service survey found on the home page. Sincerely, Peter I. Hechenbleikner Town Manager 2 ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE DEPARTMENTS Accounting Department The Accounting Department, under the direction of the Town Accountant, is responsible for maintaining financial records. These records facilitate the preparation of financial reports and schedules that provide meaningful, accurate information for comparability and for management's decision making process. The Accounting Department ensures that all financial transactions are in compliance with legal requirements and are properly recorded on a timely basis. The Town used the auditing firm of Melanson & Heath in FY 2010. Finance Department The Finance Department, under the direction of the Assistant Town Manager/Finance Director, supports a wide variety of financial and administrative functions. The Finance Department staff are designed to be flexible and experienced in many of these divisions as work flows vary throughout the year: Assessors: Assessment of property is the first step in the process of tax revenue collection for the Town of Reading. The Assessment division's function is to provide for the fair and equitable assessment of all taxable real and personal property. A three- member Board of Assessors sets policy. General Finance: Collections is responsible for collecting all taxes and other charges (including ambulance and water /sewer /storm water bills). They also receive and process all deposits (such as schools and recreation). Treasury is responsible for providing the cash for the operation of all Town, School and Light Department functions on a timely basis. In addition, it conducts all borrowing and investing activities, including those on behalf of the Town's Trust Funds (at the direction of the Trust Fund Commissioners). Human Resources: This division supports the Town (under the direction of the Town Manager), Schools (under the direction of the Superintendent), Light Department (under the direction of the RMLD General Manager) and Retiree benefit activities. Technology: The Technology Division provides centralized computer network and telecommunications services as well as distributed internet, audio /video, software and personal computer support and geographic information systems (GIS) mapping for the municipal government (Town Hall, the Library, the Senior Center, Police, Fire/Emergency Management, Public Works, Water, Sewer and Storm Water). This division also coordinates many technology activities with both the School and Light Departments. Town Clerk: The Town Clerk is guided by Federal, State, and local laws and policies in overseeing Elections, voter registration, the census process, Town Meeting, and local licenses as well as historic and legal documents for the Town. 3 Finance: Assessment Division Assessment of property is the first step in the process of tax revenue collection for the Town of Reading. The Assessment Division's function is to provide for the fair and equitable assessment of all taxable real and personal property. The Assessors trend the values each year so that the revaluations done every three years won't result in substantial changes. The Assessors must annually determine the tax levy and obtain State approval of the tax rate so that bills can be issued in a timely manner. The tax rate for FY 2011 was set at $13.80 per thousand, a $0.05 increase per thousand from the FY 2010 rate. The total assessed value of all properties and accounts for FY 2010 is $3,747,545 (a 2.8% increase from the previous year). The average house in Reading is now valued at $442,655, which is a 2.3% increase from FY 2009, breaking a three year trend of modestly lower values. The breakdown of Reading property for FY 2011 is as follows: Finance: Collection Division The Collection Division is responsible for collecting all taxes and other charges (including ambulance and water /sewer /storm water bills). This Division also receives and processes all deposits (such as schools and recreation). Massachusetts does not allow Towns to pay any charges associated with electronic collection of tax bills — such as a flat fee or credit card fee. Debit card usage is comparatively inexpensive, and an economical method to pay online. Electronic Payments (to March 21, 2011) Assessed Value Share Change Residential $3,373,086,171 90.00% +1.96% Commercial $ 319,505,376 8.53 % +17.98% Industrial $ 9,658.200 0.26% -54.12% Personal $ 45,295,130 1.21 % -1.66% TOTAL $ 3,747,545,877 100.00% +2.79% Finance: Collection Division The Collection Division is responsible for collecting all taxes and other charges (including ambulance and water /sewer /storm water bills). This Division also receives and processes all deposits (such as schools and recreation). Massachusetts does not allow Towns to pay any charges associated with electronic collection of tax bills — such as a flat fee or credit card fee. Debit card usage is comparatively inexpensive, and an economical method to pay online. Electronic Payments (to March 21, 2011) Municipal lien certificates have increased slightly despite the relatively low property sales and mortgage refinancing activities. Foreclosures dropped off from a high in 2008, in sharp contrast to economic measures nationally. El CY11 CY10 CY09 CY08 CY07 CY06 Registered Users 2316 1562 1109 873 508 258 Real Estate 97 206 167 141 95 38 Excise 761 631 402 329 352 220 Water /Sewer /Storm Water 42 347 174 125 75 NA Municipal lien certificates have increased slightly despite the relatively low property sales and mortgage refinancing activities. Foreclosures dropped off from a high in 2008, in sharp contrast to economic measures nationally. El Municipal Lien Certificates (to 3/21/11) *Fee increased 121112010 Foreclosures (Foreclosure deeds recorded at the Registry of Deeds as of 3/21/11) 2011 Issued Fees FYI * 972 $30,275 FY10 859 $24,875 FY09 969 $26,901 FY08 743 $22,350 FY07 698 $21,252 FY06 930 $30,800 FY05 991 $28,327 FY04 1,627 $43,856 *Fee increased 121112010 Foreclosures (Foreclosure deeds recorded at the Registry of Deeds as of 3/21/11) 2011 2 2010 18 2009 11 2008 20 2007 10 2006 1 Real estate taxes collected were $49.2 million — a 1.4% increase from the $48.5 million in the previous year. This low increase (seemingly below that allowed by Prop 2 -1/2) was due to the fact that the MSBA began repaying their share of the RMHS excluded debt — almost $700,000 per year that Reading taxpayers had previously been paying. Personal property taxes collected also increased to $0.61 million from $0.49 million; and Excise tax collections decreased again from $2.79 million in FY09 to $2.59 million in FY10. See the Appendix for more complete details. Finance: General Division This Division is responsible for providing the cash for the operation of all Town and School functions on a timely basis. In addition, it conducts all borrowing and investing activities, including those on behalf of the Town's Trust Funds (at the direction of the Trust Fund Commissioners). Interest earnings for the General Fund during FY10 were $506,030 — only two years ago this figure was about $1.7 million before interest rates began their historic drop. No debt was issued during calendar year 2010. General Finance - Trust Funds: FY 2006 FY 2007 FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 Beginning Balances $7,383,405 $7,620,268 $8,029,097 $8,263,326 $8,501,857 Contributions $ 118,112 $ 96,565 $91,885 $125,896 $292,348 Disbursements ($312,312) ($ 226,608) ($215,912) ($233,641) ($256,135 Interest $ 431,064 $ 538,873 $358,255 $346,277 $237,227 Ending Balances $7,620,268 $8,029,097 $8,263,326 $8,501,857 $8,775,298 The Trust Funds disbursed over $1 million in the past five years as shown in the table above. The Hospital Trust Fund continued to provide aid through the Reading Response Program, which provides skilled health care services, respite care, medical transportation and Lifeline Emergency call systems to Reading residents who meet specific health and income guidelines. It disbursed $176,250 in FY 2005; $162,368 in FY 2006; $100,270 in FY07; $95,373 in FY08; $82,469 in 5 FY09 and $93,267 in FY10. The Cemetery Trust Funds distributed $81,000 in FY 2005; $85,000 in FY 2006; $87,000 in FY07; $100,000 in FY08; $105,000 in FY09 and $122,000 in FYI 0. Cemetery Hospital Library Scholarships Veterans Memorial Celebration Historic Preservation Elder Services Loans Ending Ending Ending Balance Balance Balance 1 -year FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 Change $3,463,268 $3,629,468 $3,710,648 +2.2% $4,069,260 $4,156,231 $4,178,520 +0.5% $66,002 $66,622 $60,930 -8.5% $124,106 $123,600 $173,131. +40.0% $103,195 $103,135 $101,165 -1.9% $59,506 $47,086 $47,608 +1.1% $70,287 $66,815 $68,058 +1.9% $285,942 $286,227 $411,930 +43.9% $21,760 $22,672 $23,307 +2.8% Finance: Human Resources Division The Human Resources Division supports the Town (under the direction of the Town Manager), Schools (under the direction of the Superintendent), Light Department (under the direction of the RMLD General Manager) and Retiree benefit activities. Employee benefits administered through this Division include health, dental and life insurance, deferred compensation, flexible spending accounts, the sick -leave bank, the Employee Assistance Program, paid time off, leave of absences and unemployment benefits. Job related injuries covered by worker's compensation or M.G.L. Chapter 41, Section 11 IF (for public safety employees) are also handled by this Division. Worker's compensation is a premium -based program through the Massachusetts Inter -Local Insurance Association (MIIA). The Town is self - insured for job- related injuries to public safety employees. The health insurance program is self - insured through the MIIA Health Benefits Trust with large losses shared by all members of the Trust. Despite a number of significant benefit changes designed to encourage medical cost - efficient behavior for employees, the national upward trend for health insurance costs has caused the five -year budget to increase by about 5.5% per year. Over half of this figure is enrollment, often due to job losses by a spouse in the private sector during the economic downturn since 2007. Finance: Technology Division The Technology Division provides centralized computer network and telecommunications services as well as distributed internet, audio /video, software and personal computer support and geographic information systems (GIS) mapping for the municipal government. This division also coordinates many technology activities with both the School and Light Departments. Annual Town Meeting in April 2007 voted to allow the Town to make $1.25 million of technology improvements to the 20 -year old financial systems infrastructure. The Accounting and Finance Departments have nearly completed this five -year project, on time and well under 0 budget. Staff has found efficiencies and done a lot of work in -house at a minimal cost, which has allowed the scope of the technology improvements to expand and include two significant projects: a far more comprehensive license and permits system that will integrate all other Town technology systems and incorporate all Town departments instead of only Building permits at an additional cost of about $75,000 over the initial budget. Also the possibility to expand a current Police information system to include the Fire department, at a cost that will be well below a Public Safety technology system scheduled for FY15 at $175,000 in the current capital plan. Both of these large projects will be done within the original $1.25 million funding. In addition to these projects, improvements to the Town's website are continuous. A new online cemetery look -up system has been added; document storage is being pushed out to all departments in the Town and possibly to the Schools; a new mass communications system (both for emergency and non - emergency communication with residents and businesses in the Town) is being designed and will be rolled out by the summer of 2011. A new Assessor's property appraisal system is also in the plans for 2011. While much of the technology work thus far has been infrastructure- related and affected internal staff, over the next two or three years the general public will finally see the results of the investment by Town Meeting a few years ago. The high - quality information that now flows internally among staff will be pushed out to the public, and the results will be a marked improvement in two -way communications that will be available 24/7/365. 7 TOWN CLERK Elections In 2010 there were five Elections in the Town of Reading, a Special State Senate Election to fill the Senate seat due to the loss of Senator Ted Kennedy in January, a Local Election in April, a Special Local Election after a petition was filed in appeal of Town Meeting vote in June, a State Primary Election in September, and a State Election in November. Election Turnout On January 19, 2010 there were 10,992 votes cast in the Special Senate Election with 608 Absentee Ballots, totaling in a 66.6 % turn out. On April 6, 2010 there were 2,218 votes cast in the Local Election with 52 Absentee Ballots, totaling in a 13.4 % turn out. On June 23, 2010 there were 2,052 votes cast in the Special Local Election with 78 Absentee Ballots, totaling in a 12.3 % turn out. On September 14, 2010 there were 3,078 votes cast in the State Primary Election with 111 Absentee Ballots, totaling in a 18.4 % turn out. On November 2, 2010 there were 11,046 votes cast in the State Election with 652 Absentee Ballots, totaling in a 65.5 % turn out. Board of Registrars Registrars Krissandra Holmes, Gloria Hulse, Harry Simmons, and Town Clerk Laura A. Gemme registered 948 voters; made 2,944 voter changes (name, address, status); and deleted 465 voters in 2010. There were over 8,600 signatures certified on nomination and petition papers for the 2010 election year. Registrars also offered assistance to voters on election days. Census The Annual Town Census was conducted in January, entirely by mail, with a total of 10,746 forms mailed to residences. The local census assists Town Clerks in putting together the Street List (resident book) and the Jury List. Major functions served by an annual local census are: • Information collected for municipal purposes • Schoolneeds • Growth and planning needs • Resident identification for police and fire • Collection of dog information • Veteran Information • Information for the Jury Commissioners E:3 Determining inactive voter status for voter purge as required by the National Voter Registration Act. Town Meeting Town of Reading held an Annual and Subsequent Town Meeting in 2010. The Annual Town Meeting was held in three nights on April 26, 2010, April 29, 2010 and May 3, 2010. The Subsequent Town Meeting was held in two nights on November 8, 2010 and November 15, 2010. At the Annual Town Meeting, Article 13 was motioned for a Roll Call Vote, the vote was as follows: Precinct Last Name First Name �][jE�J=j Address Term Vote 1 Andrews Francis J 75 Dana Road 2012 Y Arena John J 26 Francis Street 1 Benjamin Roy A Jr 105 Colonial Drive 2011 Y Clarke Sheila M 536 Haverhill Street 2013 - -- 1 Connery Thomas William 101 Beaver Road 2012 N 1 Crawford Lynne A 10 Eastway 2011 Y an- Chabra Lin 56 Colonial Drive 2012 Y 1 D'Entremont Keith J 392 Haverhill Street 2011 N 1 D'Entremont Roger J 398 Haverhill Street 2011' N Dockser Mark L 110 Beaver Road 2011 - -- 1 Docktor Nancy A 371 Pearl Street 2012 N Andrew K 10 Field Pond Drive 1 Huntington- Stager Nancy 42 Autumn Lane 2012 N 1 Lee David Francis Jr 55 Beaver Road 2012 - -- 1 Mounteer Ellen 99 Colonial Drive 2011 Y 1 Mulroy Sheila M 107 Eastway 2013 Y 1 O'Keefe Ronald Thomas Jr 44 Batchelder Road 2013 N 1 Patterson Joseph E 18 Granger Avenue 2013 Y 1 Perry Paula J 40 Beaver Road 2011 Y Steven L 40 Beaver Road 1 Rigney James F 22 Brewer Lane 2013 Y 1 Stacer James E 42 Autumn Lane 2012 Y 1 Webb Douglass E 309 Pearl Street 2013 Y 1 Webb Elaine L 309 Pearl Street 2011 Y Precinct Last Name First Name MI Address Term Vote 2 Bastiani Anthony O'Rourke 27 Chequessett Road 2011 Y 2 Connearney Joseph T Sr 26B Carnation Circle 2011 - -- 2 Coumounduros Peter G 24 Smith Avenue 2013 - -- 2 Ford Christine 195 Salem Street 2012 Y 2 lozzo Denise M 30 Johanna Drive 2013 Y 2 Janowski Karen T 30 Azalea Circle 2012 Y 2 Lam Wei E 150 Pleasant Street 2011 Y 2 Malinski Lizabeth Ann 26 Harrison Street 2012 - -- 2 McDonald Gerard 14 John Street 2011 Y 2 McNeice Paul F 20 Johanna Drive 2011 Y 2 Moore Richard J 5 Elm Street 2012 Y 2 Morelli Robert R 236 Salem Street 2012 - -- 2 Nelson Ian A 266 Haverhill Street 2013 Y 2 O'Rourke Thomas B 50 Chequessett Road 2012 Y 2 O'Sullivan David H 18 Thorndike Street 2011 - -- 2 Peters Reginald T 73 Bay State Road 2011 Y 2 Rice Brooks E 16 Eaton Street 2013 - -- 2 Ricklev Anthonv L 95 Timberneck Drive 2013 Y 2 Robertson Paul F 9 Elm Street 2013 N 2 Robertson Rita C 9 Elm Street 2012 N 2 Ryan Priscilla 42 John Street 2013 Y 2 Snow Georae A 237 Salem Street #2 2011 - -- John B 134 Belmont Street 2011 - -- 2 Sullivan Kim Marie 1 Charles Street #C 2012 - -- 3 Blanchard Norman W 276 Ash Street 2011 - -- 3 Brungardt Christopher L 324 South Street 2012 Y 3 Craven David A 22 Beech Street 2011 - -- 3 Crook Steohen L 137 Pleasant Street 2012 Y 3 D'Alessio Joseph M 58 Curtis Street 2012 Y 3 Downinq William H 14 Avon Street 2013 - -- 3 Driscoll ' Francis P 7 Ordway Terrace 2012 Y 3 Duran Jeanne Macdonald 13 Cross Street 2011 Y 3 Eagleston Richard W Jr 51 Cross Street 2011 N 3 Fratto Kara Marie 129 Pleasant Street 2013 N III Precinct Last Name 11 First Name MI Address Term Vote 3 Hank Linda A 70 Walnut Street 2013 Y 3 Hank William M 70 Walnut Street 2013 Y 3 Hurley Lawrence A 274 Ash Street 2011 - -- 3 Jones Randall W 1 Cross Street 2011 N 3 Oston Steven G 66 Sturges Road 2013 Y 3 Rojas Eileen S.K. 8 Bolton Street 2012 Y 3 Safina Nicholas J 221 South Street 2012 Y C 323 South Street 2011 Y 3 Tibbetts Kathleen M 512 Summer Avenue 2011 Y 3 Tuttle David B 27 Heather Drive 2012 Y 3 Tuttle Jason D 27 Heather Drive 2013 Y 3 Westerman Joseph P 17 Avon Street 2012 Y 4 Abate Richard P 280 Woburn Street 2013 Y 4 Barnes Jonathan E 41 Pratt Street 2012 Y 4 Cameron Lynne H 39 Ellis Avenue 2012 Y 4 Coco Richard H 4 Fremont Street 2012 N 4 Curtis Richard H 15 Holly Road 2013 N 4 Fratto Marie J 58 Oak Street 2011 N 4 Goldy Stephen A 42 Berkeley Street 2013 - -- 4 Graham Nancy M 26 Holly Road 2011 Y 4 Graham Russell T 68 Maple Ridge Road 2011 Y 4 Grimes Andrew W 103 Oak Street 2013 Y 4 Hartzler Glen M 119 West Street 2012 Y 4 Hookinson Michelle M 21 Sherwood Road 2012 Y 4 Lautman David 132 Oak Street 2011 Y 4 Lenox James G 10 Sylvan Road 2012 Y 4 Louahlin Thomas J 24 Oak Street 2012 Y 4 McDonald Richard E 80 Red Gate Lane 2013 Y 4 Simmons Harry M 17 Pine Ridge Road 2011 Y 4 Tafoya Ben 40 Oak Street 2011 Y 4 Twomey Nancy J 23 California Road 2011 Y 4 Vinciguerra Lori L 98 Pine Ridge Road 2012 Y 4 Vinciguerra Ralph L 98 Pine Ridge Road 2013 Y 4 West Marsie K 3 Whitehall Lane 2011 Y 11 Precinct Last Name First Name MI Address Term Vote 4 Wilson Matthew L 385 Summer Avenue 2013 Y 4 Young Meghan A 40 Oak Street 2013 Y 5 Adams Charles L 13 Riverside Drive 2013 Y 5 Anderson Linda L 9 School Street 2012 Y W 26 Orchard Park Drive 2011 Y 5 Barnes Donnan S 11 Bancroft Avenue 2012 Y 5 Binda Angela F 10 Orchard Park Drive 2011 . Y 5 Cotter Bernard Daniel Sr 49 Riverside Drive 2012 - -- Christina L 129 Hioh Street 2013 Y 5 Dirocco Gina M 33 Knollwood Road 2011 Y 5 Dustin Paul C 3 Orchard Park Drive 2011 - -- Kenneth J 43 Chute Street 5 Fuller Robert L 450 Summer Avenue 2013 Y 5 Garrison Bo S 11 Jadem Terrace 2012 Y A 9 Orchard Park Drive 2013 - -- 5 Higgott Eleanor K 18 Buckingham Drive 2012 N- 5 Jones Janice M 22 Mt. Vernon Street 2013 Y J 84 Woburn Street 5 Mabius Lawrence E 59 Riverside Drive 2012 Y 5 Nihan Gary M 33 Dudley Street 2011 Y 5 O'Sullivan Patrick P 78 Sunnyside Avenue 2013 N 5 Pacino Philip B 5 Washington Street 2013 N 5 Rushworth Philip 36 Knollwood Road 2012 Y 5 Shaffer Frederick S 67 Woburn Street 2011 N 5 Snyder Gina M 11 Jadem Terrace 2012 Y 5 Talbot David A 75 Linden Street 2013 Y 6 Berman Barry C 54 Longview Road 2012 Y 6 Bonazoli James E 100 Grove Street 2012 N 6 Colorusso Ralph A 31 Enos Circle 2011 6 D'Addario Ronald M 97 Summer Avenue 2011 Y 6 Kaine Diana M 10 Laneton Way 2013 N 6 Mandell Jacquelyn A 441 Lowell Street 2011 - -- 6 Mandell Robert L 441 Lowell Street 2011 N 6 Miles John M 532 West Street 2011 N 12 Precinct Last Name First Name MI Address Term Vote 6 Mulvey James _ P 8 Palmer Hill Avenue 2012 N 6 O'Neill Mary Ellen 125 Summer Avenue 2012 Y 6 Parr Mary M 22 Garrett Road 2012 Y 6 Parr Thomas J 22 Garrett Road 2012 Y 6 Phillips Gary D 42 Willow Street 2011 N Linda M 42 Willow Street 6 Piper Allison M 42 Willow Street 2013 - -- 6 Robinson Chuck J 81 Prospect Street 2012 Y 6 Russell John W 23 Plymouth Road 2013 Y 6 Selvitelli Greg F 25 Arnold Avenue 2013 Y 6 Shields Peter A 31 Randall Road 2011 Y 6 Smith Beverly Lynn B 43 Enos Circle 2012 Y 6 Smith Chad R 517 West Street 2013 N 6 Wood- Beckwith Drucilla J 17 Palmer Hill Road 2013 Y 7 Anderson Carl F III 74 Whittier Road 2011 Y 7 Caruso Christopher C 77 Hartshorn Street 2011 - -- 7 Chiappini Michele Weber W 50 Locust Street 2011 Y 7 Commito Ellen C 78 Hanscom Avenue 2011 Y 7 Dahl Harvey J Pete 16 Tennyson Road 2011 Y 7 Donnelly -Moran Charles V 32 Vale Road 2013 Y 7 Doucette Jeffrey M 30 Vale Road 2012 Y Jesse M 91 Whittier Road 2012 - -- 7 Downing John K Jack 91 Whittier Road 2011 Y 7 Foodman Martin J 21 Hanscom Avenue 2012 Y 7 Hines George V 35 Grand Street 2011 - -- 7 Jarrin Hurtado Mario A 36 Parkview Road 2012 - -- 7 Kozlowski Norman F 16 Weston Road 2013 N 7. Matheson Nancy B 27 Auburn Street 2013 - -- 7 McGoldrick Moira 18 Winthrop Avenue 2012 Y 7 Michaud Sandra J 37 Estate Lane 2013 - -- 7 Porter Darlene C 193 Lowell Street 2013 Y 7 Sansalone Frances C 72 Winthrop Avenue 2013 Y 7 Schubert Richard W 119 Winthrop Avenue 2013 Y 7 Segalla John C 115 Hanscom Avenue 2013 N 13 Precinct Last Name First Name MI Address Term Vote 7 Struble Jeffrey W 4 Tower Road 2012 Y 7 Walsh Bryan E 58 Grand Street 2011 Y 7 Weld Karl E 60 Highland Street 2012 N Denise D 228 Forest Street 8 Beckman Robert J 26 Sunset Rock Lane 2011 Y 8 Brown William C 28 Martin Road 2011 N 8 Brzezenski John E 60 Terrace Park 2012 - -- 8 Cooper Kendra JG 20 Covey Hill Road 2013 N 8 Davarich Scott L 8 Twin Oaks Road 2012 Y 8 Ehl Charles S 249 Franklin Street 2012 Y 8 Finch William O 51 Mill Street 2012 - -- 8 Golini Donald J 62 Martin Road 2011 - -- 8 Golini Kathleen E 62 Martin Road 2011 Y 8 Hecht Olive B 73 Martin Road 2013 Y 8 Hecht William J Sr 73 Martin Road 2013 Y 8 Herrick Karen Gately 9 Dividence Road 2012 N 8 Koppel Paula D 60 Lilah Lane 2011 Y 8 Lloyd Patricia J 388 Franklin Street 2013 Y 8 Lordan James F Jr 26 Fairchild Drive 2013 N 8 MacKenzie Bruce A 102 Sanborn Lane 2012 Y 8 Nordstrand Robert 1 384 Franklin Street 2011 Y 8 Perry George B II 230 Franklin Street 2013 N 8 Rogers Elizabeth H 88 Colburn Road 2012 Y 8 Russell John H 91 Spruce Road 2013 - -- 8 Russell Margaret W 91 Spruce Road 2013 - -- 8 Stosez Richard J 25 Emerson Street 2012 - -- 8 Tucci Kenneth R 8 Buckskin Drive 2011 Y Vital Statistics and Licensing During the calendar year 2010, the following Vital Statistics were recorded in the Town Clerk's Office: Births — 213 Marriages — 69 Deaths — 313 14 The Town Clerk's office issued 2,187 dog licenses, 2 commercial dog kennel licenses, and 5 residential kennel licenses, 142 business certificates, 22 renewals for 69 underground storage tanks, and 41 cemetery deeds. Reading is one of a few towns north of Boston still selling fishing and hunting licenses. A total of 278 Fish and Wildlife licenses and 70 stamps were issued during the year for a total of $6,007.25. Of these, the Town of Reading issued 77 licenses free of charge to those, citizens over 70 years of age. The Town retained $111.25 in fees from the sale of licenses. Total receipts collected in the Clerk's Office for the calendar year 2010 amounted to $78,527.99. 15 Town of Reading, Massachusetts Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Trust Funds Year Ended June 30, 2010 Hospital funds: Stephen Foster Balance July 1, 2009 Receipts - Disbursements Balance June 30, 2010 . Non- 1,987,365 Bequests and Investment 75,000 Non - Gilman L. Parker 35,010 expendable Expendable Contributions Income Expenditures expendable Expendable 4,042,349 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Cemetery funds: Endowment 4,000 454 Charles Lawn 463,259 226,217 11,550 19,279 23,040 474,809 222,455 Forest Glen 648,083 703,765 4,200 37,408 44,699 652,283 696,474 Laurel Hill 293,310 498,686 - 21,889 26,157 293,310 494,418 Wood End 712,836 83,312 85,400 23,455 28,104 798,236 78,662 Total cemetery funds 2,117,488 1,511,980 101,150 102,030 122,000 2,218,638 1,492,010 Hospital funds: Stephen Foster 3,872 92,981 2,714 - 3,872 95,695 Anne S. Grouard 75,000 1,987,365 - 56,471 84,117 75,000 1,959,720 Gilman L. Parker 35,010 1,962,003 540 55,830 9,150 35,010 2,009,223 Total hospital funds 113,882 4,042,349 540 115,015 93,267 113,882 4,064,638 Library funds: Endowment 4,000 454 - 125 - 4,000 579 Appleton /Mansfield 11,000 999 - 334 1,243 11,000 90 Edward Appleton 5,000 6,137 - 307 2,885 5,000 3,559 R/M Babcock 3,598 647 - 118 657 3,598 109 Stephen Foster 12,000 1,137 - 366 1,477 12,000 25 Charles Torrey 1,000 178 - 33 19 1,000 192 Donald Tuttle 500 1,616 - 59 - 500 1,675 James/Freda Rawstron 1,613 293 - 53 344 1,613 2 Elaine & George Long 5,000 906 - 165 - 5,000 1,071 Barbara Hewitt 8,952 1,592 - 294 921 8,952 965 Total library funds 52,663 13,959 1,854 7,545 52,663 8,268 !Si Town of Reading, Massachusetts Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance Trust Funds Year Ended June 30, 2010 Non- Bequests and Investment Non - expendable Expendable Contributions Income Expenditures expendable Expendable Scholarship funds: Kenneth Brown 1,000 6,597 - 213 25 1,000 6,785 Nathaniel Hill 1,500 19 - 42 50 1,500 12 No. Residents Association 11,370 1,465 - 343 700 11,370 1,108 Gilman L. Parker 5,000 1,444 - 161 700 5,000 905 Torre - 5,743 - 152 400 - 5,494 Carl B. Sawyer 5,000 1,743 - 172 600 5,000 1,316 Hal Croft 5,687 39 - 160 150 5,687 49 Florence Nichols 16,680 1,119 - 495 1,000 16,680 615 Dennis Lehane 30,257 760 200 868 1,200 30,457 429 James Klepeis 15,000 159 - 423 400 15,000 182 Patron for Older Adults - - 25,000 42 - 25,000 42 Patrick Schettini - - 28,527 91 2,500 - 26,118 Joan Clifford Award 1,000 56 - 30 - 1,000 86 Exemplary teacher award: Arnold Berger 6,856 5,103 335 6,856 5,438 Education loan fund: Winthrop Parker 22,672 - 635 23,307 - Total education funds 122,024 24,248 53,727 4,163 7,725 147,859 48,579 Veterans Memorial Veterans Memorial 81,987 21,149 175 2,882 5,028 82,118 19,047 Elder Services Avis E. Schroeder 10,000 13,684 - 646 902 10,000 13,428 Dorothy Burbank - 262,543 22 7,259 8,018 - 261,806 Patron for Older Adults - - 126,482 213 - 126,482 213 Celebration General - 34,585 5,250 972 6,050 - 34,757 400th - 12,501 - 350 - - 12,851 Historical Preservation I General - 27,312 5,062 813 - 33,128 400th celebration - 12,475 - 350 - - 12,825 Historical Commission 27,028 678 5,600 22,106 Total trust funds 2,498,043 6,003,814 292,348 237,227 256,135 2,751,642 6,023,655 17 Committed 2009 -2010 Interest and Costs Collected Abatements & Adjustments Paid to Treasurer Subsequent Tax Title Deferred Taxes Uncollected June 30, 2010 Balance June 30, 2009 Interest and Costs Collected Abatements & Adjustments Paid to Treasurer Taxtitle Taking Uncollected June 30, 2010 Committed 2009 -2010 Interest and Costs Collected Abatements & Adjustments Paid to Treasurer Uncollected June 30, 2010 TOWN OF READING REPORT OF THE COLLECTOR 12 MONTHS ENDING JUNE 30, 2010 2010 REAL ESTATE 49,705,904.96 34,483.02 49,740,387.98 2009 REAL ESTATE 197,729.11 19,523.45 217,252.56 2010 PERSONAL PROPERTY E. 625,564.67 148.62 625,713.29 238,796.68 49,076,858.09 169,639.00 14,171.41 240,922.80 49,740,387.98 735.80 112,728.77 103,787.99 0 217,252.56 9,100.98 609,940.15 6,672.16 625,713.29 Balance June 30, 2009 Interest and Costs Collected Abatements & Adjustments Paid to Treasurer Uncollected June 30, 2010 2009 PERSONAL PROPERTY 5,579.65 362.05 0 3,139.54 2,802.16 5,941.70 5,941.70 2010 MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE Committed 2010 2,440,568.33 Interest and Costs Collected 733.34 Abatements & Adjustments 51,255.09 Paid to Treasurer 2,233,920.18 Uncollected June 30, 2010 156,126.40 2,441,301.67 2,441,301.67 2009 MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE Balance June 30, 2009 54,984.88 Committed 2009 -2010 356,460.97 Interest and Costs Collected 2,486.44 Abatements & Adjustments 47,088.12 Paid to Treasurer 338,048.01 Uncollected June 30, 2010 28,796.16 413,932.29 413,932.29 19 Balance 6/30/09 Committed 2009 -2010 Interest and Costs Collected Abatements & Adjustments Paid to Treasurer Uncollected June 30, 2010 2008 MOTOR VEHICLE .EXCISE 30,113.45 495.20 2,744.25 5,663.02 13,189.83 14,500.05 33,352.90 33,352.90 2007 MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE Balance June 30, 2009 18,869.74 Committed 2009 -2010 75.00 Interest and Costs Collected 1,077.44 Abatements & Adjustments 1,243.74 Paid to Treasurer 3,609.45 Uncollected June 30, 2010 15,168.99 20,022.18 20,022.18 2006 MOTOR VEHICLE EXCISE Balance June 30, 2009 10,408.37 Interest and Costs Collected 201.29 Abatements & Adjustments 720.00 Paid to Treasurer 393.48 Uncollected June 30, 2010 9,496.18 10,609.66 10,609.66 OLD EXCISE -2005 & PRIOR Balance June 30, 2009 172,126.87 Interest and Costs Collected 550.34 Paid to Treasurer 1,894.64 Uncollected June 30, 2010 170,782.57 172,677.21 172,677.21 0 Committed 2009 -2010 Service Charge Interest & Costs Collected Abatements & Adjustments Paid to Treasurer Discount for Timely Payments Added to 2010 Taxes Uncollected June 30, 2010 Committed 2009 -2010 Interests & Costs Collected Abatements & Adjustments Paid to Treasurer Discount for Timely Payments Added to 2010 Taxes Uncollected June 30, 2010 Committed 2009 -2010 Interest & Costs Collected Abatements & Adjustments Paid to Treasurer Discount for Timely Payments Added to 2010 Taxes Uncollected June 30, 2010 WATER CHARGES 5,267,604.68 3,072.69 5,890.63 5,276,568.00 SEWER CHARGES 5,385,781.53 5,892.75 5,391,674.28 STORM WATER FEES 21 411,362.15 332.31 411,694.46 35,846.57 3,694,569.45 384,899.88 177,926.73 983,325.37 5,276.568.00 38,516.90 3,783,127.83 394,802.29 170,200.04 1,005,027.22 5,391.674.28 496.88 297,960.24 31,492.63 10,619.40 71,125.31 411,694.46 ADDITIONAL WATER CHARGES (SPM, SPC, SPR) Balance June 30, 2009 2,524.13 Committed 2009 -2010 36,944.39 Paid to Treasurer 36,122.60 Added to 2010Taxes 0 Uncollected June 30, 2010 3,345.92 39,468.52 39,468.52 AMBULANCE FEES Committed 2009 -2010 1,452,886.09 Abatements & Adjustments 571,030.22 Paid to Treasurer 627,063.59 Uncollected June 30, 2010 254,792.28 1,452,886.09 1,452,886.09 CERTIFICATES OF MUNICIPAL LIENS Certificates Issued 24,875.00 Paid to Treasurer 24,875.00 24,875.00 24,875.00 22 23 TOWN OF READING REAL ESTATE ABATEMENTS FOR PERIOD JAN 1 - DEC 31 2010 Owner Name Parcel Address Amount Decision Abrams 23 Thomas Rd $14,500 3/16/2010 Amara 93 Eastway $25,100 2123/2010 Aristonic 95 Walkers Brook 1 $259,870 115/2010 Atlantic Tambone 370 South Street $26,800 4/28/2010 Autiiero 36 Rustic Lane $2,500 4/28/2010 Berube 361ntervale $39,000 2/2312010 Boyd 252 Franklin St $4,400 313012010 Brady lsb Twn of Reading Norman Rd $3,700 2/312010 Buckley 10 Beaver Road $12,400 1/20/2010 Colorusso 31 Enos Circle $26,700 5/12/2010 Counihan 8 Verde Circle $164,500 3/16/2010 Devir 38 Tamarack Rd $3,900 3/2/2010 DiBella 295 Main St U9 $3,900 1/26/2010 Digby 16 Winter Street $37,500 4/7/2010 Downs /c/o Blankship 24 Grove St $26,500 4/28/2010 Engberg /sb Twn of Read W of Main St $37,000 2/312010 Faucette 35 Kingston Rd $8,100 5/12/2010 Faulkner 1 Gateway Circle $25,400 5/512010 Frist America Leasing 248 Main ST $2,940 1/20/2010 Gentile 12 Robin Rd $14,600 2/23/2010 Haggerty 90 Prospect St $85,300 5/24/2010 Karen German 12 Linden St $31,800 4/28/2010 Kendall 20 Lucy Drive $300 1/13/2010 Kumar 20 Melendy Dr $23,100 2/23/2010 LaMontagne 24 Gavin Circle $37,200 2/23/2010 Lederer 267 Summer A U -1 $16,300 2/17/2010 Lentell 67 Howard St $37,600 3/2/2010 LJH Realty 159 Haven 159 Haven St $109,000 3/30/2010 LJH Realty 169 Haven 169 Haven St (bldg $20,900 3130/2010 LJH Realty 169 Haven 169 Haven St (pkg 1$123,000 3/30/2010 Lyons & Bucko 86 Van Norden Rd $14,300 5/5/2010 Mahoney JR 27 Pitman Drive $23,100 5/2612010 Margossian 21 Pasture Rd $9,600 5/19/2010 Mazzarella 19 Pitman Dr $16,600 2/17/2010 Melnick 355 Pearl St $8,300 4/19/2010 Paula Gentile 393 South Street $13,100 5/12/2010 Pelosi 41 Hancock Street $17,700 1/5/2010 Perry 10 Spring St $5,500 2/3/2010 Quimby 23 Hampshire Rd $61,300 1/26/2010 Richards 198 Haverhill $3,200 2/23/2010 Saviano 112 Colonial Dr $16,700 5/12/2010 Sheehan 22 Kensington Ave $7,200 5/19/2010 Stackpole 190 Summer Ave $269,700 5/12/2010 Stitt 54 Deering St $5,700 4/28/2010 Sunbury 115 Forest Street $34,000 1/26/2010 Tarasuk 53 Batchelder Dr $41,400 4/28/2010 Tarello 25 Rustic Lane $8,400 3/16/2010 TM- Glover Properties off West $172,700 6/8/2010 TM- Glover Properties 122 JWD u 102 $22,200 6/8/2010 TM- Glover Properties 122 JWD u 103 $30,000 6/8/2010 TM- Glover Properties 57 Longwood Dr $93,000 6/8/2010 TM- Glover Properties 27 Green Meadow 1$55,200 6/8/2010 TM- Glover Properties 162 JWD $47,400 6/8/2010 TM- Glover Properties 122 JWD U304 $33,500 6/8/2010 TM- Glover Properties 112 JWD U 302 $530,000 6/812010 TM- Redstone Realty 112 JWD U 102 $22,200 6/812010 TM- Redstone Realty 112 JWD U 103 $15,000 6/8/2010 - TM- Redstone Realty 112 JWD U 203 $95,000 6/8/2010 TM- Redstone Realty 3 Deer Path Lane $19,700 6/8/2010 Trites 9 Pierce $59,200 5/512010 Trubiano - 23 Enos Circle $53,100 5/12/2010 23 Turchi 22 Riverside Dr $14,000 4!7/2010 Unknown/ sb Twn of Rea- Emerson St $200 2/3/2010 Vail 4 Bolton $20,800 2117/2010 Wang 40 Harvest Rd $19,100 2/17/2010 Wash- Reading PI LLC, 139 Washington St $371,700 412012010 Widzinski 59 Hillcrest Rd $22,400 5/19/2010 Wilcox 84 Hanscom Ave $12,100 4/20/2010 2010 Abatements: 68 Amount $3,488,110 24 TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS Annual Financial Statements For the Year Ended June 30, 2010 25 TABLE OF CONTENTS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Government -Wide Financial Statements: Statement of Net Assets Statement of Activities Fund Financial Statements: Governmental Funds: Balance Sheet Reconciliation of Total Governmental Fund Balances to Net Assets of Governmental Activities in the Statement of Net Assets Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities Statement of Revenues and Other Sources, and Expenditures and Other Uses - Budget and Actual - General Fund Proprietary Funds: Statement of Net Assets Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Assets Statement of Cash Flows Fiduciary Funds: Statement of Fiduciary Net Assets Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Assets Notes to Financial Statements Electric Light Plant Notes to the Financial Statements 26 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Schedule of Funding Progress SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Combining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor Governmental Funds Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Nonmajor Governmental Funds Combining Schedule of Net Assets - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds Combining Schedule of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Assets - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds Combining Schedule of Cash Flows - Nonmajor Proprietary Funds 27 MELANsoN HEATH & CONVANY, PC: C:.mtHla> Puri.t,:: Accou N-•.n.NT., ,MANAGEMENT AllV?SORS 10 New Fnoland Business CenteT Dive • Suite 107 Andmm tIMA0181Q1096 (978) 749.0005 - Fax (973) 7490006 u?uu .nu�1�i nsonh�ach. com INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Board of Selectmen Town of Reading, Massachusetts We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the governmental activi- ties, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the Town of Reading, Massachusetts, as of and for the year ended June 30, 2010, which collectively comprises the Town's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Town of Reading's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards; issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used.and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinions. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all mate- rial respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund infor- mation of the Town of Reading as of June 30, 2010, and the respective changes in financial position and cash flows, where applicable, thereof for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. 28 Ml&ti<med Ofhcn' liromi /io4t MA • Ef mr pn 14 M1: • Nadmq NH • ?,4,=2+twtm, NH In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued a report dated January 19, 2011 on our consideration of the Town's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial report- ing and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an inte- gral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit. The management's discussion and analysis, appearing on the following pages, . and the supplementary information, appearing on page 67, are not a required part of the basic financial statements but are supplementary information required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally of inquiries of management regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of the required supplementary information. However, we did not audit the information and express no opinion on it. Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial state- ments that collectively comprise the Town of Reading's basic financial statements. The accompanying supplementary information, appearing on pages 68 - 77 are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statement. This information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements, and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole. Andover, Massachusetts January 19, 2011 PA MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS As management of the Town of Reading, we offer readers this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the Town of Reading for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010. Unless otherwise noted, all amounts reported in this analysis are expressed in thousands. A. OVERVIEW OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS This discussion and analysis is intended to serve as an introduction to the basic financial statements. The basic financial statements are comprised of three components: (1) government -wide financial statements, (2) fund financial state- ments, and (3) notes to the financial statements. This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements themselves. Government -wide financial statements. The government -wide financial state- ments are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of our finances in a manner similar to a private- sector business. The statement of net assets presents information on all assets and liabilities, with the difference between the two reported as net assets. Over time, increases or decreases in net assets may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position is` improving or deteriorating. The statement of activities presents information showing how the government's net assets changed during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net assets are reported as soon as the underlying event giving rise to the change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods (e.g., uncollected taxes and earned but unused vacation leave). Both of the government -wide financial statements distinguish functions that are principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities) from other functions that are'intended to recover all or a significant portion of their costs through user fees and charges (business -type activities). The governmental activities include general government, public safety, educa- tion, public works, health and human services, and culture and recreation. The business -type activities include water supply and distribution, sewer disposal, landfill, electricity, and storm water activities. Fund financial statements. A fund is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. Fund accounting is used to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance- related legal requirements. All.of the funds can be 30 divided into three categories: governmental funds, proprietary funds and fiduci- ary funds. Governmental funds. Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. However, unlike the government -wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near -term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government's near -term financing requirements. Because the focus of governmental funds is narrower than that of the government - wide financial statements, it is useful to compare the information presented for governmental funds with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. By doing so, readers may better understand the long -term impact of the government's near -term financing deci- sions. Both the governmental fund balance sheet and the governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities. An annual appropriated budget is adopted for the general fund. A budgetary comparison statement has been provided for the general fund to demonstrate compliance with this budget. Proprietary funds. Proprietary funds are maintained as follows: Enterprise funds are used to report.the same functions presented as business - type activities in the government -wide financial statements. Specifically, enter- prise funds are used to account for water, sewer, landfill, and electricity opera- tions. Proprietary funds provide the same type of information as the business -type activities reported in the government -wide financial statements, only in more detail. The proprietary fund financial statements provide separate information for the water, sewer, landfill, electricity, and storm water operations. Water and electricity are considered to be major funds. Fiduciary funds. Fiduciary funds are used to account for resources held for the benefit of parties outside the government. Fiduciary funds are not reflected in the government -wide financial statements because the resources of those funds are not available to support the Town's own programs. The accounting used for fiduciary funds is much like that used for proprietary funds. Notes to financial statements. The notes provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in the government -wide and fund financial statements. 31 Other information. In addition to the basic financial statements and accom- panying notes, this report also presents certain required supplementary infor- mation which is required to be disclosed by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. B. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS As of the close of the current fiscal year, the total of assets exceeded liabili- ties by $ 225,665 (i.e., net assets), a change of $ 14,815 in comparison to the prior year. The majority of this change was driven by the receipt of a one- time MSBA grant, which will be used to offset future debt service. As of the close of the current fiscal year, governmental funds reported com- bined ending fund balances of $ 40,855, a change of $ 15,387 in comparison with the prior year. The majority of this change was driven by the receipt of a one -time MSBA grant, which will be used to offset future debt service. At the end of the current fiscal year, unreserved fund balance for the general fund was $ 6,297, a change of $ (189) in comparison with the prior year. Total bonds payable at the close of the current fiscal year was $ 60,729 change of $ (124) in comparison to the prior year. C. GOVERNMENT -WIDE FINANCIAL ANALYSIS The following is a summary of condensed government -wide financial data for the current and prior fiscal years. 32 Governmental Business -Type Activities Activities Total . 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 Current and other assets $ 48,926 $ 32,469 $ 42,577 $ 41,525 $ 91,503 . $ 73,994 Capital assets 132,665 132,728 88,218 86,482 220,883 219,210 Total assets 181,591 165,197 130,795 128,007 - 312,386 293,204 Long -term liabilities outstanding 55,119 50,755 16,560 17,890 71,679 68,645 Other liabilities 7,413 6,506 7,629 - 7,203 15,042 13,709 Total liabilities 62,532 57,261 24,189 25,093 86,721 82,354 Net assets: Invested in capital assets, net 87,843 88,095 76,251 72,977 164,094 161,072 Restricted 26,368 13,376 4,801 4,404 31,169 17,780 Unrestricted 4,848 6,465 25,554 25,533 30,402 31,998 Total net assets $ 119,059 $ 107936 $ 106,606 $ 102,914 $ 225,665 $ 210,850 32 As noted earlier, net assets may serve over time as a useful indicator of a government's financial position. At the close of the most recent fiscal year, total net assets were $ 225,665, a change of $ 14,815 from the prior year. 33 CHANGES IN NET ASSETS Governmental Business -Type - Activities Activities Total 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 Revenues: ' Program revenues: Charges for services $ 5,527 $ 5,762 $ 91,192 $ . 100,990 $ 96,719 $ 106,752 Operating grants and ' contributions 20,564 20,321 5,650 3,057 26,214 23,378 Capital grants and contributions 388 788 910 178 1,298 966 General revenues: Property taxes 49,877 48,917 - - 49,877 48,917 Excises 2,672 2,659 - - 2,672 2,659 Penalties and interest and other taxes 461 493 - - 461 493 Grants and contributions not restricted to specific programs 16,844 (a) 4,675 - - 16,844 4,675 Investment income 1,460 1,143 194 442 1,654 1,585 Other 1,196 792 805 410 2,001 1,202 Total revenues 98,989 65,550 98,751 105,077 197,740 190,627 Expenses: , General government 4,027 4,737 - - 4,027 4,737 . Public safety 10,440 10,146 - - 10,440 10,146 Education 59,493 59,911 - - 59,493 59,911 Public works 8,779 9,261 - - 8,779 9,261 Human services 1,144 1,080 - - 1,144 1,080 Culture and recreation 3,030 1,926 - - 3,030 1,926 Interest on long -term debt 2,149 2,054 - - 2,149 2,054 Intergovernmental 907 1,012 - - 907 1,012 Electric - - 83,244• 92,624 83,244 92,624 Water - - 4,812 5,451 4,812 5,451. Other - - 4,900 4,476 - 4,900 4,476 Total expenses 89,969 90,127 92,956 102,551 182,925 192,678 Excess of revenues over expenses 9,020 (4,577) 5,795 2,526 14,815 (2,051) Transfers in (out) 2,103 2,870 2,103 (2,870) - Change in net assets 11,123 (1,707) 3,692 (344) 14,815 (2,051) Net assets - beginning of year 107,936 109,643 102,914 103,258 210,850 212,901 Net assets - end of year $ 119,059 $ 107,936 $ 106,606 $ 102,914 $ 225,665 $ 210,850 (a) 2010 Includes a one -time MSBA grant of $13,206 As noted earlier, net assets may serve over time as a useful indicator of a government's financial position. At the close of the most recent fiscal year, total net assets were $ 225,665, a change of $ 14,815 from the prior year. 33 The largest portion of net assets $ 164,094 reflects our investment in capital assets (e.g., land, buildings, machinery, and equipment); less any related debt used to acquire those assets that is still outstanding. These capital assets are used to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. Although the investment in capital assets is reported net of related debt, it should be noted that the resources needed to repay this debt must be provided from other sources, since the capital assets themselves cannot be used to liquidate these liabilities. An additional portion of net assets $31,169 represents resources that are subject to external restrictions on how they may be used. The remaining balance of unrestricted net assets $ 30,402 may be used to meet the government's ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. Governmental activities. Governmental activities for the year resulted in a change in net assets of $ 11,123. Key elements of this change are as follows: MSBA grant for debt service, net $ 12,530 Other general fund expenditures exceeding revenues and transfers in (2,602) Special revenue and permanent fund revenues exceeding expenditures and transfers out 1,740 Current year revenue used for the acquisition of capital assets 1,661 PILOT from RMLD 2,187 Depreciation expense exceeding debt service principal (1,914) Increase in OPEB liability (2,357) Other (122) Total $ 11,123 Business -type activities. Business -type activities for the year resulted in a change in net assets of $ 3,692. Key elements of this change are as follows: • The electric operations had revenues of $ 88,212 and expenses and transfers of $ 85,432, resulting in a change in net assets of $ 2,780. The water operations had revenues and transfers of $ 5,727 and expenses and transfers of $ 5,188, resulting in a change in net assets of $ 539. • The sewer operations had revenues of $ 5,129 and expenses and transfers of $ 5,040, resulting in a change in net assets of $ 89. 34 The landfill operations did not report any revenues or expenditures. The storm water management operations had revenues of $ 403 and expenses of $ 119, resulting in a change in net assets of $ 284. D. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE GOVERNMENT'S FUNDS As noted earlier, fund accounting is used to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance- related legal requirements. Governmental funds. The focus of governmental funds is to provide infor- mation on near -term inflows, outflows and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in assessing financing requirements. In particular, unreserved fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government's net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year. As of the end of the current fiscal year, governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $ 40,854, a change of $ 15,387 in comparison with the prior year. Key elements of this change are as follows: MSBA grant for debt service, net $ 12,530 Other general fund expenditures exceeding revenues (2,602) Special revenue and permanent fund revenues exceeding expenditures 1,740 Capital project fund revenues and bond proceeds exceeding expenditures 1,615 Pilot from RMLD 2,187 Enterprise fund indirect costs 636 MBTE settlement transfered to the sewer fund (719) Total $ 15,387 The general fund is the chief operating fund. At the end of the current fiscal year, unreserved fund balance of the general fund was $ 6,494, while total fund balance was $ 23,706. As a measure of the general fund's liquidity, it may be useful to compare both unreserved fund balance and total fund balance to total fund expenditures. Unreserved fund balance represents 8.3 percent of total general fund expenditures, while total fund balance represents 30.5 percent of that same amount. The fund balance of the general fund changed by $ 13,407 during the current fiscal year. The majority of this change is due to the MSBA grant received of $13,206, which the Town plans to use to offset debt service costs over the next 14 years. Key factors in this change are as follows: 35 MSBA grant not budgeted $ 13,206 Use of MSBA grant for debt service (676) Use of free cash and overlay surplus as a funding source (821) Revenues in excess of budget 185 Expenditures less than budget 1,153 Other 360 Total $ 13,407 The following table reflects the trend in all the components of the general fund's fund balance: Last Six Fiscal Years Proprietary funds. Proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the business -type activities reported in the government -wide financial statements, but in more detail. Net assets of the enterprise funds at the end of the year amounted to $ 106,606, a change of $ 3,692 in comparison with the prior year. Factors concerning the finances of proprietary funds have already been addressed in the entity -wide discussion of business -type activities. E. GENERAL FUND BUDGETARY HIGHLIGHTS Differences between the original budget and the final amended budget resulted in an overall change in appropriations of $ 285. The majority of this increase was related to the snow'and ice supplemental appropriation, which was primarily funded through the use of free cash. F. CAPITAL ASSET AND DEBT ADMINISTRATION Capital assets. Total investment in capital assets for governmental and business - type activities at year end amounted to $ 220,883 (net of accumulated deprecia- tion), a change of $ 1,673 from the prior year. This investment in capital assets Subsequent As of Reserved for Year's Stabilization Debt Total Fund 30-Jun Encumbrances Expenditures Fund Unreserved Service Balance 2005 $ 679 $ 706 $ 820 $ 3,513. $ $ 5,718 2006 881 662 851 4,221 6,615 2007 1,435 264 896 5,788 - 8,383 2008 1,597 227 1,454 6,451 4,362 14,091 2009 1,210 763 1,840 6,486 - 10,299 2010 1,488 1,491 1,900 6,297 12,530 23,706 Proprietary funds. Proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the business -type activities reported in the government -wide financial statements, but in more detail. Net assets of the enterprise funds at the end of the year amounted to $ 106,606, a change of $ 3,692 in comparison with the prior year. Factors concerning the finances of proprietary funds have already been addressed in the entity -wide discussion of business -type activities. E. GENERAL FUND BUDGETARY HIGHLIGHTS Differences between the original budget and the final amended budget resulted in an overall change in appropriations of $ 285. The majority of this increase was related to the snow'and ice supplemental appropriation, which was primarily funded through the use of free cash. F. CAPITAL ASSET AND DEBT ADMINISTRATION Capital assets. Total investment in capital assets for governmental and business - type activities at year end amounted to $ 220,883 (net of accumulated deprecia- tion), a change of $ 1,673 from the prior year. This investment in capital assets includes land, buildings and system, improvements, and machinery and equip- ment. Major capital asset events during the current fiscal year included the following: Governmental additions: • $ 3,297 in education improvements • $ 906 in public safety additions • $ 494 in roadway improvements • $ 374 in general government additions • $ 361 in culture and recreation additions • $ 139 in other public works additions Business -type additions: • $ 4,469 in electric improvements • $ 473 in water improvements, • $ 709 in sewer improvements Additional information on capital assets can be found in the footnotes to the financial statements. Long -term debt. At the end of the current fiscal year, total bonded debt out- standing was $ 60,729, all of which was backed by the full faith and credit of the government. Additional information on capital assets and long -term debt can be found in the footnotes to the financial statements. G. ECONOMIC FACTORS AND NEXT YEAR'S BUDGETS AND RATES The adopted FY11 General Fund budget of $ 75,005 is a 2.3% increase over the prior year. The FY11 budget is balanced. State Aid exclusive of ARRA funds has been level at approximately $ 12,400 since 2008. FY2011 State aid will be $ 12,496. In FY2009 and FY2010, the state used funds from the ARRA Federal Stimulus program to replace some of their traditional aid to cities and towns. Federal ARRA stimulus funding is not available to supplement FY2011 state aid to cities and town. To make up for this revenue reduction, the town made an allocation from the unreserved fund bal- ance of $ 936. 37 The tax levy for FYI of $ 51,716 represents a 3.0% increase over the prior year, and the FYI tax rate is $ 13.80 per thousand compared to $ 13.75 in the prior year. Overall, property values increased 2.8% to $ 3,747,546. In early FY2010, The Board of Selectmen, acting as the Water and Sewer Commissioners, voted to increase water Rates by 3.9% and Sewer Rates by 5.2% for all customers effective September 2010. These increases are expected to cover all operations, planned infrastructure improvements, and debt. The state passed legislation allowing Massachusetts municipalities to pass a Local Option Meals Tax of 0.75% with 100% of the revenue going to the Town. Reading Voted to accept this local option at their November 2010 Town Meeting. The FYI revenue estimate associated with the tax is approximately $ 140. The Town issued $ 5,525 General Obligation Bonds in July 2009. The True Interest Cost is 2.92 %. $ 5,000 is 20 year debt. It is being used to implement comprehensive energy conservation measures through the Energy Savings Performance Contracting (ESPC) process under MGL Chapter 25A Section 111. The program includes improvements to 15 town and school buildings. $ 525 is a 5 year debt and was used to purchase a Fire Engine. The Town issued a $ 165 no- interest bond in the Sewer Fund in August of 2009 through the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority program for Sewer Rehabilitation and Infiltration /inflow reduction. The High School Building Construction project was completed in,FY2009; and in FY2010, the Town filed the preliminary closing documents with the Massachu- setts School Building Authority (MSBA). The $ 55,900 project was funded with a $ 35,000 bond and $ 20,900 of progress payments from the MSBA. The MSBA has calculated their share of the project to be $ 35,600. The Town already received $ 20,900 of that in progress payments and MSBA is retaining $ 1,500 pending settlement of contract law suits. The'Town received the balance as a lump sum payment of $ 13,200 from MSBA in FY2010. The MSBA grant must be reserved and applied over the remaining term of the bond issue to pay the same percentage of each annual principal payment on the recipient's debt for the project. Interest earned on the balance is general fund revenue. Each year, the unused portion of the MSBA grant will be reflected in the General Fund -Fund Balance Reserved for Debt Service. The Total General Fund Bal- ance as a percent of Expenditures could be distorted by this reserve. A better measure of reserve strength uses only the unreserved fund balance. Users of these financial statements should take this into consideration when calculating reserve ratios. NH REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the Town of Reading's finances for all those with an interest in the government's finances. Questions concerning any of the information provided in this report or requests for additional financial information should be addressed to: Town Accountant Town Hall 16 Lowell Street Reading, MA 01867 39 TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS JUNE 30, 2010 Governmental Business -Type Activities Activities Total ASSETS Current: Cash and short-term investments $ 24,091,210 $ 12,672,477 $ 36,763,687 Restricted cash - 15,255,385 15,255,385 Investments 23,410,649 - 23,410,649 Receivables, net of allowance for uncollectibles: Property taxes 315,560 - 315,560 Excises 168,820 - 168,820 Userfees - 10,524,188 10,524,188 Departmental and other 254,433 - 254,433 Intergovernmental 276,662 - 276,662 Prepaid assets - 756,954 756,954 Unamortized discounts on bonds 9,908 296 _ 10,204 Inventory - 1,869,976 1,869,976 Noncurrent: Restricted investments - 1,400,000 1,400,000 Investment in associated companies - 97,690 97,690 Receivables, net of allowance for uncollectibles: Property taxes 308,775 - 308,775 Deferred charges 90,085 1,184 91,269 Capital assets being depreciated, net 127,357,927 86,768,289 214,126,216 Capital assets not being depreciated 5,306,998 1,449,426 6,756,424 TOTAL ASSETS 181,591,027 130,795,865 312,386,892 LIABILITIES Current: Warrants payable 1,463,251 6,265,627 7,728,878 Accrued liabilities 3,820,307 438,955 4,259,262 Customer advances for construction - 333,919 333,919 Customer deposits - 499,197 498,197 Retainage payable 1,369,598 - 1,369,598 Other current liabilities 760,649 91,651 852,300 Current portion of long -term liabilities: Bonds and loans payable 4,165,000 • 1,492,965 5,657,965 Accrued employee benefits 63,931 73,802 137,733 Unamortized premiums on bonds 24,762 777 25,539 Noncurrent: Bonds and loans payable, net of current portion 44,065,000 11,006,096 55,071,096 Accrued employee benefits 1,762,678 3,037,630 4,800,308 Unamorlized premiums on bonds 225,181 3,104 228,285 Net OPEB obligation 4,811,888 945,571 5,757,459 TOTAL LIABILITIES 62,532,245 24,189,294 86,721,539 NET ASSETS Invested in capital assets, net of related debt 87,842,672 76,250,692 164,093,364 Restricted for. Grants and other statutory restrictions 18,091,320 4,801,694 22,893,014 Permanent funds: Nonexpendable 2,748,172 - 2,748,172 Expendable 5,528,977 - 5,528,977 Unrestricted 4,847,641 25,554,185 30,401,826 TOTAL NET ASSETS $ 119,058,782 $ 106,606,571 $ 225,665,353 40 See notes to financial statements. TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 Program Revenues Net (Expenses). Revenues and Changes in Net Assets . Operating - Capital Business- Charges for Grants and Grants and Governmental Type Expenses Services Contributions Contributions Activities Activities Total Governmental Activities: General government $ 4,027,484 $ 311,385 $ 148,852 $ - _ $ (3,567,247) $ - $ (3,567,247) Public safety 10,440,135 1,782,189 219,701 - (8,438,245) - (8,438,245) Education 59,493,119 2,539,657 19,967,359 - (36,986,103) - - (36,986,103) Public works 8,778,541 222,519 - 387,760 (8,168,262) - (8,168,262) Health and human services 1,143,786 84,858 195,854 - (863,074) - (863,074) Culture and recreation 3,030,448 586,015 32,706 - (2,411,727) - (2,411,727) Debt service interest 2,148,497 - - - (2,148,497) - (2,148,497) Intergovernmental 907,253 - - - (907,253) (907,253) Total Governmental Activities 89,969,263 5,526,623 - 20,564,472 387,760 (63,490,408) - (63,490,408) Business -Type Activities: Electric operations 83,244,248. 80,892,291 5,650,547 772,279 - 4,070,869 4,070,869 Water operations 4,811,613 4,910,491 - - - 98,878 98,878 Other 4,900,192 5,389,435 137,730 626,973 626,973 Total Business- type Activities 92,956,053 91,192,217 5,650,547 910,009 - 4,796,720 4,796,720 Total $ 182,925,316 $ 96,718,840 $ 26,215,019 $ 1,297,769 (63,490,408) 4,796,720 (58,693,688) General Revenues and Transfers: Property taxes 49,877,139 - 49,877,139 Excises 2,671,810 - 2,671,810 Penalties, interest and other taxes 460,742 - 460,742 Grants and contributions not restricted to specific programs 16,844,252 - 16,844,252 Investment income 1,460,122 194,394 1,654,516 Other 1,195,634 805,081 2,000,715 Transfers, net 2,103,140 (2,103,140) Total general revenues and transfers 74,612,839 (1,103,665) 73,509,174 Change in Net Assets 11,122,431 3,693,055 14,815,486 Net Assets: Beginning of year 107,936,351 102,913,516 210,849,867 End of year $ 119,058,782 $ 106,606,571 $ 225,665,353 41 See notes to financial statements. - TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BALANCE SHEET JUNE 30, 2010 42 r Nonmajor Total Governmental Governmental General Funds Funds ASSETS Cash and short-term investments $ 13,274,544 $ 10,816,666 $ 24,091,210 Investments 15,132,033 8,278,616 23,410,649 Receivables: Property taxes 752,569 - 752,569 Excises 224,638 - - 224,638 Departmental and other 254,433 - 254,433 Intergovernmental 276,662 276,662 TOTAL ASSETS $ 29,638,217 $ 19,371,944 $ 49,010,161 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES Liabilities: Warrants payable $ 1,158,047 $ 305,204 $ 1,463,251 Accrued liabilities 2,781,804 548,331 3,330,135 Deferred revenues 1,231,639 222 1,231,861 Retainage payable - 1,369,598 1,369,598 Other liabilities 760,649 760,649 TOTAL LIABILITIES - 5,932,139 2,223,355 8,155,494 Fund Balances: Reserved for: - Encumbrances and carryfomards 1,488,245 - 1,488,245 Expenditures 1,490,827 - 1,490,827 Debt service 12,529,683 - 12,529,683 Stabilization 1,899,866 - 1,899,866 Perpetual'nonexpendable) permanent funds - 2,748,172 2,748,172 Unreserved: Undesignaled, reported in: General fund 6,297,457 - 6,297,457 Special revenue funds - 5,463,693 5,463,693 Capital project funds - 3,407,747 3,407,747 Permanent funds 5,528,977 5,528,977 TOTAL FUND BALANCES 23,706,078 17,148,589 40,854,667 TOTAL LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES $ 29,638,217 $ 19,371,944 $ 49,010,161 See notes to financial statements. - 42 r TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS RECONCILIATION OF TOTAL GOVERNMENTAL FUND BALANCES TO NET ASSETS OF GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES IN THE STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS JUNE 30, 2010 Total governmental fund balances • Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and, therefore, are not reported in the funds. • Revenues are reported on the accrual basis of accounting and are not deferred until collection. • Governmental funds report the effect of long -term debt issuance costs, premiums, and discounts when debt is first issued, whereas these amounts are deferred and amortized in the statement of activities. • In the statement of-activities, interest is accrued on outstanding long -term debt, whereas in governmental funds interest is not reported until due. • Long -term liabilities, (bonds payable, accrued employee benefits and net OPEB obligation) are not due and payable in the current period, and, therefore, are not reported in the governmental funds. Net assets of governmental activities See notes to financial statements. 43 $ 40,854,667 132,664,925 1,047,809 (149,950) (490,172) (54,868,497) $ 119,058,782 TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS GOVERNMENTALFUNDS STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Issuance of bonds - Nonmajor Total Transfers in 3,479,105 Governmental Governmental Transfers out General Funds Funds Revenues: 3,479,105 4,149,035 7,628,140 Property taxes $ 49,772,342 $ - $ 49,772,342 Excises 2,582,328 - 2,582,328 Penalties, interest and other taxes 460,742 - 460,742 Departmental 1,444,431 3,742,235 5,186,666 Licenses and permits 156,881 - - 156,881 Fines and forfeitures 111,653 - 111,653 Intergovernmental 32,525,629 - 5,270,855 37,796,484 Investment income 600,776 834,584 1,435,360 Other 107,379 1,122,314 1,229,693 Total Revenues 87,762,161 .10,969,988 98,732,149 Expenditures: Current: General government 3,231,604 341,680 3,573,284 Public safety 8,135,773 1,241,781 9,377,554 Education 41,344,781 9,628,140 50,972,921 Public works 5,364,023 803,545 6,167,568 Health and human services 619,207 291,562 910,769 Culture and recreation 1,905,298 832,497 2,737,795 Employee benefits 10,521,099 - 10,521,099 Debt service 5,805,523 - 5,805,523 Intergovernmental 907,253 - - 907,253 Total Expenditures 77,834,561 13,139,205 90,973,766 Excess (deficiency) of revenues over expenditures. 9,927,600 (2,169,217) 7,758,383 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Issuance of bonds - 5,525,000 5,525,000 Transfers in 3,479,105 - 31479,105 Transfers out (1,375,965) (1,375,965) Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) 3,479,105 4,149,035 7,628,140 Change in fund balances 13,406,705 1,979,818 15,386,523 Fund Balances, at Beginning of Year 10,299,373 15,168,771 25,468,144 Fund Balances, at End of Year $ 23,706,078_ $ 17,148,589 $ 40,854,667 See notes to financial statements. 44 TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS RECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS TO THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 NET CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES -TOTAL GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities the cost of those assets is allocated over their estimated useful lives and reported as depreciation expense: Capital outlay purchases Depreciation Revenues in the statement of activities that do not provide current financial resources are fully deferred in the statement of revenues, expenditures and changes in fund balances. Therefore, the recognition of revenue for various types of accounts receivable (i.e., real estate and personal property, motor vehicle excise, etc.) differ between the two statements. This amount represents the net change in deferred revenue. The issuance of long -term debt (e.g., bonds) provides current financial resources to governmental funds, while the repayment of the principal of long -term debt consumes the financial resources of governmental funds. Neither transaction, however, has any effect on net assets: Issuance of debt Repayments of debt Current year amortization of bond premiums and costs Increase in other long -term liabilities (OPEB) In the statement of activities, interest is accrued on outstanding long -term debt, whereas in governmental funds interest is not reported until due. Some expenses reported in the statement of activities, such as compensated absences, do not require the use of current financial resources and therefore, are not reported as expenditures in the governmental funds. CHANGE IN NET ASSETS OF GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES See notes to financial statements. ER $ 15,386,523 5,570,904 (5,633,864) 225,128 (5,525,000) 3,720,000 14,853 (2,357,439) (53,065) (225,609) $ 11,122,431 TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS GENERALFUND STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND OTHER SOURCES, AND EXPENDITURES AND OTHER USES - BUDGET AND ACTUAL FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 Budgeted Amounts Variance with Final Budget Original Final Actual Positive Budget Budget Amounts (Negative) Revenues and Transfers: Taxes $ 49,490,610 $ 49,508,474 $ 49,771,107 $ 262,633 Excise taxes 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,582,330 82,330 Penalties, interest and other taxes 484,100 484,100 457,842 (26,258) Departmental 1,469,000 1,554,000 1,445,213 (108,787) Licenses and permits 131,200 131,200 156,794 25,594 Fines and forfeitures 137,500 137,500 111,653 (25,847) Intergovernmental 13,039,666 13,039,666 12,724,166 (315,500) Investment income 600,000 600,000 541,162 (58,838) Other 3,150 3,150 110,775 107,625 Transfers in - 3,377,788 3,377,788 3,620,022 242,234 Total Revenues and Transfers 71,233,014 71,335,878 71,521,064 185,186 Expenditures: General government 3,639,204 3,654,204 3,432,401 221,803 Public safety 8,150,768 8,273,768 8,155,775 117,993 Education 35,165,940 35,183,804 34,896,955 286,849 Public works 5,217,533 5,437,533 5,247,925 189,608 Health and human services 622,444. 646,444 619,092 27,352 Culture and leisure 1,842,046 1,927,046 1,903,392 23,654 Intergovernmental 957,970 957,970 � 907,253 50,717 Employee benefits 10,951,082 . 10,751,082 10,536,100 214,982 Debt service 5,765,113 5,765,113 5,745,269 19,844 Stabilization and capital items 236,386 236,386 236,386 - Total Expenditures 72,548,486 72,833,350 71,680,548 - 1,152,602 Excess (deficiency) of revenues and other sources over expenditures (1,315,472) (1,497,472) (159,484) 1,337,988 Other Financing Sources: Use of free cash and overlay surplus 639,252 821,252 821,252 - Use of debt service reserve 676,220 676,220 676,220 Total Other Financing Sources 1,315,472 1,497,472 1,497,472 - Excess of revenues and other - sources over expenditures and other uses $ - 46 $ $ 1,337,988 $ 1,337,988 See notes to financial statements. TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS PROPRIETARY FUNDS STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS JUNE 30, 2010 LIABILITIES Current: Division Water Non Major Warrants payable Fund Fund Funds Total ASSETS 343,076 95,879 - 438,955 Current: 333,919 - - 333,919 Cash and short-term investments $ 8,167,774 $ 2,144,466 $ 2,360,237 $ 12,672,477 User fees, net of allowance for uncollectibles 7,823,935 1,275,300 1,424,953 10,524,188 Prepaid expenses 756,954 - - 756,954 Deferred charges - 296 - 296 Inventory 1,634,571 232,183 3,222 1,869,976 Total current assets 18,383,234 3,652,245 3,788,412 25,823,891 Noncurrent: 7,438,252 1,499,780 - 9,196,893 Restricted cash and cash equivalents 15,255,385 - - 15,255,385 Restricted investments 1,400,000 - - 1,400,000 Investment in associated companies 97,690 - - 97,690 Deferred charges, net of current portion - 1,184 - 1,184 Capital assets being depreciated, net 65,615,657 14,939,218 6,213,414 86,768,289 Capital assets not being depredated 1,265,842 121,823 61,761 1,449,426 Total noncurrent assets 83,634,574 15,062,225 6,275,175 104,971,974 TOTAL ASSETS 102,017,808 18,714,470 10,063,587 130,795,865 LIABILITIES Current: Warrants payable 6,188,258 28,124 49,245 6,265,627 Accrued liabilities 343,076 95,879 - 438,955 Customer advances for construction 333,919 - - 333,919 Customer deposits 499,197 - - 499,197 Other current liabilities - - 91,651 91,651 Current portion of long -term liabilities: Bonds and loans payable - 1,375,000 117,965 1,492,965 Accrued employee benefits 73,802 - - 73,802 Unamortized premiums on bonds 777 - 777 Total current liabilities 7,438,252 1,499,780 258,861 9,196,893 Noncurrent: - Bonds and loans payable - 10,770,000 236,096 11,006,096 Accrued employee benefits 2,946,231 69,686 21,713 3,037,630 Unamortized premiums on bonds - 3,104 - 3,104 Net OPEB obligation 813,461 94,355 37,755 945,571 TOTAL LIABILITIES 11,197,944 12,436,925 554,425 24,189,294 NETASSETS . Invested in capital assets, net of related debt 66,881,500 3,207,836 6,161,356 76,250,692 Restricted for depredation fund 4,801,694 - - 4,801,694 Unrestricted 19,136,670 3,069,709 3,347,806 25,554,185 TOTAL NET ASSETS $ 90,819,864 $ 6,277,545 $ 9,509,162 $ 106,606,571 See notes to financial statements. 47 TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS PROPRIETARY FUNDS STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN FUND NET ASSETS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 See notes to financial statements. 48 Electric Division Water Non Major Fund Fund Funds Total Operating Revenues: Charges for services $ 80,892,291 $ 4,910,491 $ 5,389,435 $ 91,192,217 Other 5,650,547 - 5,650,547 Total Operating Revenues 86,542,838 4,910,491 5,389,435 96,842,764 Operating Expenses: Personnel expenses - 811,202 461,208 1,272,410 Non - personnel expenses - 277,016 212,059 489,075 Intergovernmental 1,282,631 1,737,501 3,844,457 6,864,589 Depreciation 2,240,846 1,447,821 344,680 4,033,347 Energy purchases 68,012,702 34,755 28,537 68,075,994 Other - 11,692,878 11,692,878 Total Operating Expenses 83,229,057 4,308,295 4,890,941 92,428,293 Operating Income 3,313,781 602,196 498,494 4,414,471 Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses): Intergovernmental revenue - - 137,730 137,730 Investment income 184,618 4,218 5,558 194,394 Interest expense (11,620) (503,318) (9,251) (524,189) Loss on disposal of capital assets (3,571) - - (3,571) Other 711,331 93,750 805,081 Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) 880,758 (405,350) 134,037 609,445 Income Before Transfers and Contributions 4,194,539 196,846 632,531 5,023,916 Capital contributions 772,279 - - 772,279 Transfers in - 719,891- - 719,891. Transfers out (2,186,670) (377,367) (258,994) (2,823,031) Change in Net Assets 2,780,148 539,370 373,537 3,693,055 Net Assets at Beginning of Year 88,039,716 5,738,175 9,135,625 102,913,516 Net Assets at End of Year $ 90,819,864 $ 6,277,545 $ 9,509,162 $ 106,606,571 See notes to financial statements. 48 TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS PROPRIETARY FUNDS STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 See notes to financial statements. M Division Water Non Major Fund Fund Funds Total Cash Flows From Operating Activities Receipts from customers and users $ 60,158,464 $ 4,957,622 $ 5,346,071 $ 90,462,157 Payments to vendors and employees (80,060,874) (1,257,656) (711,348) (82,029,878) Customer refund, purchase power, and fuel charge adjustments 5,650,547 - - 5,650,547 Payments to other governments - (1,737,501) (3,644,457) (5,581,958) Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities 5,748,137 1,962,465 790,266 8,500,868 Cash Flows From Noncapital Financing Activities MMWEC refund 371,273 - - 371,273 Other 340,058 93,750 - 433,808 Transfers in - 719,891 - 719,891 Transfer out (2,186,670) (377,367) (258,994) (2,823,031) Net Cash Provided By (Used For) Noncapital Financing Activities (1,475,339) 436,274 (258,994) (1,298,059) Cash Flows From Capital and Related Financing Activities Proceeds from issuance of bonds and notes - - 164.670 164,670 Acquisition of capital assets (4,468,826) (473,270) (830,880) (5,772,976) Capital grants and contributions 772,279 - 137,730 910,009 Principal payments on bonds and notes (550,000) (1,375,000) (168,708) (2,093,708) Interest expense (11,620) (503,318) (9,251) (524,189) Net Cash (Used For) Capital and Related Financing Activities (4,258,167) (2,351,588) (706,439) (7,316,194) Cash Flows From Investina Activities Decrease in restricted cash and investments (657,247) - (657,247) Investment income 184,618 4,218 5,558 194,394 Net Cash Provided By Investing Activities (472,629) 4,218 5,558 (462,853) Net Change in Cash and Short-Term Investments (457,998) 51,369 (169,609) (576,238) Unrestricted Cash and Short Term Investments, Beginning of Year 8,625,772 2,093,097 2,529,846 13,248,715 Unrestricted Cash and Short Tenn Investments, End of Year $ 8,167,774 $ 2,144,466 $ 2,360,237 $ 12,672,477 Reconciliation of Operating Income to Net Cash ' Provided By (Used For) Operating Activities Operating income $ 3,313,781 $ 602,196 $ 498,494 $ 4,414,471 Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net .. cash provided by (used for) operating activities: - Depreciation 2.240.846 1,447,821 344,680 4,033,347 Changes in assets and liabilities: User fees receivables (736,689) (10,380) (74,088) (821,157) Inventory and prepayments - (59,122) (90,546) (1,766) (151,434) Other assets - 297 189 486 Warrants payable 740,003 (25,024) (4,780) 710,199 Accrued liabilities 231,995 (19,113) (2,998) 209,884 Other liabilities (359,736) 9,909 .13,195 (336,632) OPEB liability - 377,059 47,305 17,340 441,704 Net Cash Provided By (Used For) Operating Activities $ 5,748,137 $ 1,962,465 $ 790,266 $ 8,500,868 See notes to financial statements. M TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS FIDUCIARY FUNDS STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET ASSETS JUNE 30, 2010 LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS Warrants payable - 19,373 Other liabilities 158,683 404,569 Total Liabilities 158,683 423,942 NET ASSETS Total net assets held in trust for pension benefits and other purposes $ 76,650,022 $ 6,017,679 $ See notes to financial statements. GI1 Municipal Light Pension Pension Trust Agency Trust Fund Funds Funds ASSETS Cash and short term investments $ 228,011 $ 4,017,679 $ 420,065 Investments 76,580,082 1,800,000 Accounts receivable 612 - Other 200,000 3,877 Total Assets 76,808,705 6,017,679 423,942 LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS Warrants payable - 19,373 Other liabilities 158,683 404,569 Total Liabilities 158,683 423,942 NET ASSETS Total net assets held in trust for pension benefits and other purposes $ 76,650,022 $ 6,017,679 $ See notes to financial statements. GI1 TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS FIDUCIARY FUNDS STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FIDUCIARY NET ASSETS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 Additions: Contributions: Employers Intergovernmental Plan members Total contributions Investment Income: Increase in fair value of investments Less: management fees Net investment income Total additions Deductions: Benefit payments to plan members, beneficiaries, and other systems Refunds and transfers to other systems Administrative expenses Other Total deductions Net increase (decrease) Net assets: Beginning of year End of year See notes to financial statements. 51 Municipal Pension Light Trust Fund Pension (For the Year Ended Trust Funds December 31. 2009) $ 3,686,795 $ 200,000 276,310 - 2,111,844 - 6,074,949 200,000 9,071,128 120,760 (390,879) - 8,680,249 120,760 14,755,198 320,760 7,119,752 229,646 85,350 - - 919,336 7,434,748 919,336 7,320,450 (598,576) 69,329,572 6,616,255 $ 76,650,022 $ 6,017,679 r TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS Notes to Financial Statements Summary of Significant Accountinq Policies The accounting policies of the Town of Reading (the Town) conform to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) as applicable to govern= mental units: The following is a summary of the more significant policies: A. Reporting Entity The government is a municipal corporation governed by an elected Board of Selectmen. As required by generally accepted accounting principles, these financial statements present the government and applicable com- ponent units for which the government is considered to be financially accountable. The Reading Contributory Retirement System was estab- lished to provide retirement benefits primarily to employees and their beneficiaries. The System is presented using the accrual basis of accounting and is reported as a pension trust fund in the fiduciary fund financial statements. B. Government -Wide and Fund Financial Statements Government -Wide Financial Statements The government -wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net assets and the statement of changes in net assets) report information on all of the nonfiduciary activities of the primary government. For the most part, the effect of interfund activity has been removed from these statements. Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from business -type activities, which rely to a significant extent on fees and charges for support. The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or segment is offset by program revenues. Direct, expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific func- tion or segment. Program revenues include (1) charges to customers or applicants who purchase, use, or directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function or segment and (2) grants and contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular function or segment. Taxes and other items not properly included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues. 52 Fund Financial Statements Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds, proprietary funds and fiduciary funds, even though the latter are excluded from the government -wide financial statements. Major individual govern- mental funds and major individual enterprise funds are reported as sepa- rate columns in the fund financial statements. C. Measurement Focus Basis of Accounting, and Financial Statement Presentation Government -Wide Financial Statements The government -wide financial statements are reported using the econ- omic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting, as is the proprietary fund and fiduciary fund financial statements. Reve- nues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized as revenues in the year for which they are levied. Grants and similar items are recognized as revenue as soon as all elig- ibility requirements imposed by the provider have been met. As a general rule, the effect of interfund activity has been eliminated from the govern- ment- wide financial statements. Amounts reported as program revenues include (1) charges to customers or applicants for goods, services, or privileges provided, (2) operating grants and contributions, and (3) capital grants and contributions, includ- ing special assessments. Internally dedicated resources are reported as general revenues rather than as program revenues. Likewise, general revenues include all taxes and excises. Fund Financial Statements Governmental fund financial statements are reported using the current financial resources measurement focus and the modified accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized as soon as they are both measur- able and available. Revenues are considered to be available when they are collectible within the current period or soon enough thereafter to pay liabilities of the current period. For this purpose, the government con- siders property tax revenues to be available if they are collected within 60 days of the end of the current fiscal period. All other revenue items are considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received by the government. Expenditures generally are recorded when a liability is incurred, as under accrual accounting. However, debt service expendi- tures, as well as expenditures related to compensated absences and claims and judgments, are recorded only when payment is due. The government reports the following major governmental funds: 53 The general fund is the government's primary operating fund. It accounts for all financial resources of the general government, except those required to be accounted for in another fund. Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from non - operating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund's principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the enterprise fund are charges to customers for sales and services. Operating expenses for enterprise funds include the cost of sales and services, administrative expenses and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses. Private - sector standards of accounting and financial reporting issued prior to December 1, 1989 generally are followed in both the government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements to the extent that those stan- dards do not conflict with or contradict guidance of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. Governments also have the option of fol- lowing subsequenfprivate- sector guidance for their business -type activi- ties and enterprise funds, subject to this same limitation. The government has elected not to follow subsequent private- sector guidance. The government reports the following major proprietary funds: Electric Enterprise Fund Water Enterprise Fund The government reports the following fiduciary funds The pension trust fund accounts for the activities of the Employees Contributory Retirement System, which accumulates resources for pension benefit payments to qualified employees. The municipal light pension trust fund accounts for the activities of the Municipal Light Employees Contributory Retirement System, which accumulates resources for pension benefit payments to qualified employees. . The agency fund is used to account for student activity funds D. Cash and Short -Term Investments Cash balances from all funds, except those required to be segregated by law, are combined to form a consolidation of cash. Cash balances are invested to the extent available, and interest earnings are recognized in the General Fund. Certain special revenue, proprietary, and fiduciary 54 funds segregate cash, and investment earnings become a part of those funds. Deposits with financial institutions consist primarily of demand deposits, certificates of deposits, and savings accounts. A cash and investment pool is maintained that is available for use by all funds. Each fund's portion of this pool is reflected on the combined financial statements under the caption "cash and short -term investments ". The interest earnings attributable to each fund type are included under investment income. For purpose of the statement of cash flows, the proprietary funds consider investments with original maturities of three months or less to be short- term investments. E. Investments State and local statutes place certain limitations on the nature of deposits and investments available. Deposits in any financial institution may not exceed certain levels within the financial institution. Non - fiduciary fund investments can be made in securities issued by or unconditionally guaranteed by the U.S. Government or agencies that have a maturity of one year or less from the date of purchase and repurchase agreements guaranteed by such securities with maturity dates of no more than 90 days from the date of purchase. Investments for the Contributory Retirement System and Trust Funds consist of marketable securities, bonds and short -term money market investments. Investments are carried at market value. F. Property Tax Limitations Legislation known as "Proposition 2 %' limits the amount of revenue that can be derived from property taxes. The prior fiscal year's tax levy limit is used as a base and cannot increase by more than 2.5 percent (excluding new growth), unless an override or debt exemption is voted. The actual fiscal year 2010 tax levy reflected an excess capacity of $ 51,933. G. Inventories Inventories are valued at cost using the first -in /first -out (FIFO) method. The costs of governmental fund -type inventories are recorded as expendi- tures when purchased rather than when consumed. No significant inven- tory balances were on hand in governmental funds. H. Capital Assets Capital assets, which include property, plant, equipment, and infra- structure assets are reported in the applicable governmental or business- 55 type activities columns in the government -wide financial statements. Capital assets are defined by the government as assets with an initial individual cost of more than $ 5,000 and an estimated useful life in excess .of. two years. Such assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost if purchased or constructed. Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated fair market value at the date of donation. The costs of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend assets lives are not capitalized. Major outlays for capital assets and improvements are capitalized as projects are constructed. Interest incurred during the construction phase of capital assets of business -type activities is included as part of the capitalized value of the assets constructed. Property, plant and equipment is depreciated using the straight -line method over the following estimated useful lives: Assets Years Land improvements 20 Buildings and improvements 20-40 Machinery, equipment, and furnishings 3-20 Infrastructure 50 1. Compensated Absences It is the government's policy to permit employees to accumulate earned but unused vacation and sick pay benefits. All vested sick and vacation pay is accrued when incurred in the government -wide, proprietary, and fiduciary fund financial statements. A liability for these amounts is. reported in governmental funds only if they have matured, for example, as a result of employee resignations and retirements. J. Long -Term Obligations In the government -wide financial statements, and proprietary fund types in the fund financial statements, long -term debt, and other long -term obliga- tions are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business -type activities, or proprietary fund type statement of net assets. K. Fund Equity In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report reservations of fund balance for amounts that are not available for appropriation or are legally restricted by outside parties for use for a specific purpose. Desig- 56 nations of fund balance represent tentative management plans that are subject to change. L. Use of Estimates The preparation of basic financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures for contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the basic financial statements, and the reported amounts of the revenues and expenditures /expenses during the fiscal year. Actual results could vary from estimates that were used. 2. Stewardship, Compliance, and Accountability A. Budgetary Information At the annual town meeting, the Finance Committee presents an operating and capital budget for the proposed expenditures of the fiscal year com- mencing the following July 1. The budget, as enacted by town meeting, establishes the legal level of control and specifies that certain appropria- tions are to be funded by particular revenues. The original budget is amended during the fiscal year at special town meetings as required by changing conditions. In cases of extraordinary or unforeseen expenses, the Finance Committee is empowered to transfer funds from the Reserve Fund (a contingency appropriation) to a departmental appropriation. "Extraordinary" includes expenses which are not in the usual line, or are great or exceptional. "Unforeseen" includes expenses which are not foreseen as of the time of the annual meeting when appropriations are voted. Departments are limited to the line items as voted. Certain items may exceed the line item budget as approved if it is for an emergency and for the safety of the general public. These items are limited by the Massa- chusetts General Laws and must be raised in the next year's tax rate. Formal budgetary integration is employed as a management control device during the year for the General Fund and Proprietary Funds. Effective budgetary control is achieved for all other funds through provi- sions of the Massachusetts General Laws. At year end, appropriation balances lapse, except for certain unexpended capital items and encumbrances which will be honored during the subse- quent year. 57 B. Budgetary Basis The General Fund final appropriation appearing on the "Budget and Actual' page of the fund financial statements represents the final amended budget after all reserve fund transfers and supplemental appropriations. C. Budget/GAAP Reconciliation The budgetary data for the general and proprietary funds is based upon accounting principles that differ from generally accepted accounting prin- ciples (GAAP). Therefore, in addition to the GAAP basis financial state- ments, the results of operations of the general fund are presented in accordance with budgetary accounting principles to provide a meaningful comparison with budgetary data. The following is a summary of adjustments made to the actual revenues and other sources, and expenditures and other uses, to conform to the budgetary basis of accounting. General Fund Revenues /Expenditures (GAAP basis) Other financing sources /uses (GAAP basis) Subtotal (GAAP basis) To record use of free cash and overlay surplus Reverse beginning of year appropriation carryforwards from expenditures Add end of year appropriation carryforwards to expenditures To reverse the effects of the non - budgeted MSBA grant (net) To reverse the effects of non - budgeted State contributions for teacher retirements Other Budgetary basis E-3 Revenues Expenditures. and Other and Other Financing Sources Financing Uses 87,762,161 $ 77,834,561 3,479,105 - 91,241,266 77,834,561 821,252 (1,210,954) 1,291,729 (12,529,683) (6,595,561) (6,595,561) 81,262 360,773 $ 73,018,536 $ 71,680,548 D. Deficit Fund Equity The Town reflects several special revenue fund deficits, primarily caused by grant expenses occurring in advance of grant reimbursements. The deficits in these funds will be eliminated through future intergovernmental revenues and transfers from other funds. 3. Cash and Short -Term Investments Custodial Credit Risk - Deposits. Custodial credit risk is the risk that in the event of a bank failure, the Town's and Contributory Retirement System's (the System) deposits may not be returned. Massachusetts General Law Chapter 44, Section 55, limits the Town's deposits "in a bank or trust company or banking company to an amount not exceeding sixty percent of the capital and surplus of such bank or trust company or banking company, unless satisfac- tory security is given to it by such bank or trust company or banking company for such excess. Massachusetts General Law Chapter 32, Section 23, limits the System's deposits "in a bank or trust company to an amount,not exceed- ing ten percent of the capital and surplus of such bank or trust company. The Town and System do not have a deposit policy for custodial credit risk. As of June 30, 2010, none of the Town's and the System's bank balances of $ 55,585,978 and $ 683,617, respectively, were exposed to custodial credit risk. 4. Investments A. Credit Risk Generally, credit risk is the risk that an issuer of an investment will not fulfill its obligation to the holder of the investment. For short -term invest- ments that were purchased using surplus revenues, Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 44, Section 55, limits the Town's investments to the top rating issued by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSROs). The Town and System do not have a. policy for credit risk. Presented below (in thousands) is the actual rating as of year end for each investment of the Town: 59 Investment Type Corporate bonds Corporate equities Mutual funds Certificates of deposit Federal agency securities Total investments Exempt Rating as of Year End Fair From Value Disclosure Aaa A2 $ 113 $ - $ $ 113 1,635 1,635 11 11 17,126 17,126 - - 7,726 - _ 7,726 - $ 26,611 $ 18,772 $ 7,726 $ 113 Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 32, Section 23, limits the investment of System funds, to the extent not required for current disbursements, in the PRIT Fund or in securities, other than mortgages or collateral loans, which are legal for the investment of funds in savings banks under the laws of the Commonwealth, provided that no more than the established percentage of assets, is invested in any one security. At June 30, 2010, the Contributory Retirement System maintained its invest- ments in the State Investment Pool* with a fair value of $ 76,582,082. This investment type is not rated. *Fair value is the same as the value of the pool share. The Pension Reserves Investment Trust was created under Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 32, Section 22, in December 1983. The Pension Reserves Investment Trust is operated under contract with a private investment advisor, approved by the Pension Reserves Investment Management Board. The Pension Reserves Investment Management Board shall choose an investment advisor by requesting proposals from advisors and reviewing such proposals based on criteria adopted under Massachusetts General Law, Chapter 30B. B. Custodial Credit Risk The custodial credit risk for investments is the risk that, in the event of the failure of the counterparty (e.g. broker - dealer) to a transaction, a govern- ment will not be able to recover the value of its investment or collateral securities that are in the possession of another party. The Town and System do not have policies for custodial credit risk. The System's investments of $ 76,580,082 were exposed to custodial credit risk as uninsured and uncol lateral ized. However, the investments were held in the State Investment Pool. Of the Town's investment of $ 112,675, the government has a custodial credit risk exposure of $ 112,675 because the related securities are uninsured, unregistered and held by the Town's brokerage firm, which is also the Counterparty to these securities. The Town manages this custodial credit risk with SIPC and excess SIPC. GT C. Concentration of Credit Risk The Town places no limit on the amount the Town may invest in any one issuer. Investments in any one issuer (other than U.S. Treasury securities and mutual funds) that represent 5% or more of total investments are as follows (in thousands): Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. Certificates of Deposit $ 4,729,332 $ 16,126,262 Massachusetts General Law Chapter 32, Section 23 limits the amount the System may invest in any one issuer or security type, with the exception of the PRIT Fund. The System does not have an investment in one issuer greater than 5% of total investments, with the exception of the PRIT Fund. D. Interest Rate Risk Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates will ad- versely affect the fair value of an investment. Generally„ the longer the maturity of an investment, the greater the sensitivity of its fair value to changes in market interest rates. The Town and System do not have a formal investment policy that limits investment maturities as a means of managing its exposure to fair value losses arising from increasing interest rates. Information about the sensitivity of the fair values of the Town's investments to market interest rate fluctuations is as follows: E. Foreign Currency Risk Foreign currency risk is the risk that changes in foreign exchange rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment. The Town and System do not have policies for foreign currency risk. 61 Investment Maturities (in Years) Fair Less Investment Type Value Than 1 11 -55 6 -10 Debt Related Securities: Corporate bonds $ 113 $ 51 $ 62 $ - Federal agency securities 7,726 4,207 3,519 Total $ 7,839 $ 51 $ 4,269 $ 3,519 E. Foreign Currency Risk Foreign currency risk is the risk that changes in foreign exchange rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment. The Town and System do not have policies for foreign currency risk. 61 5. 91 Taxes Receivable Real estate and personal property taxes are levied and based on values assessed on January 1 st of every year. Assessed values are established by the Board of Assessor's for 100% of the estimated fair market value. Taxes are due on a quarterly basis and are subject to penalties and interest if they are not paid by the respective due date. Real estate and personal property taxes levied are recorded as receivables in the fiscal year they relate to. Fourteen days after the due date for the final tax bill for real estate taxes, a demand notice may be sent to the delinquent taxpayer. Fourteen days after the demand notice has been sent, the tax collector may proceed to file a lien against the delinquent taxpayers' property. The Town has an ultimate right to foreclose on property for unpaid taxes. Personal property taxes cannot be secured through the lien process. Taxes receivable at June 30, 2010 consist of the following (in thousands): Real Estate 2010 $ 216 Personal Property 2010 6 2009 3 2008 2 2007 2 2006 1 Prior 5 19 Tax Liens 406 Deferred Taxes Taxes in Litigation 1 Total $ 753 Allowance for Doubtful Accounts The receivables reported in the accompanying entity -wide financial state- ments reflect the following estimated allowances for doubtful accounts (in thousands): Property taxes Excises 62 Governmental $ 129 56 7. Capital Assets Capital asset activity for the year ended June 30, 2010 was as follows (in thousands): Governmental Activities: Capital assets, being depreciated: Land improvements Buildings and improvements Machinery, equipment, and furnishings Infrastructure Total capital assets, being depreciated Less accumulated depreciation for: Land improvements Buildings and improvements Machinery, equipment, and furnishings Infrastructure Total accumulated depreciation Total capital assets, being depreciated, net Capital assets, not being depreciated: Land Construction in progress Total capital assets, not being depreciated Governmental activities capital assets, net 63 Beginning Ending Balance Increases Decreases Balance $ 2,526 $ 86 $ - $ 2,612 126,785 2,316 (212) 128,889 7,213 1,347 (242) 8,318 38,486 779 jjl341 j 37,924 175,010 4,528 (1,795) 177,743 (527) (102) - (629) (22,102) (3,392) 212 (25,282) (2,626) (661) 242 (3,045) (21,291) 1,479 1,341 21,429 (46,546) 5,634 1,795 5( 0,385) 128,464 (1,106) 127,358 3,939 - 3,939 325 1,043 1,368 4,264 1,043 5,307 1 132,728 $ (63) $ $ 132,665 Business -Type Activities: Capital assets, being depreciated: Land improvements Buildings and improvements Machinery, equipment, and furnishings Infrastructure Total capital assets, being depreciated Less accumulated depreciation for: Land improvements Buildings and improvements Machinery, equipment, and furnishings Infrastructure Total accumulated depreciation Total capital assets, being depreciated, net Capital assets, not being depreciated Beginning Balance $ 84 16,739 29,884 99,232 145,939 (41) (8,783) (17,012) 36,244 62,080 83,859 Increases Decreases $ 1,353 $ 9 (207) 2,495 (735) 3,089 743 6,946 (1,685) (7) (397) (986) 2,643 4,033 2,913 207 735 739 1,681 (4) Ending Balance $ 1,437 16,541 31,644 101,578 151,200 (48) (8,973) (17,263) 38,148 (64,432) 86,768 Land 1,450 1,450 Construction in progress 1,173 Total capital assets, not being depreciated 2,623 1,173 1,450 Business -type activities capital assets, net $ 86,482 $ 2,913 $ 1,177 $ 88,218 Depreciation expense was charged to functions of the Town as follows (in thousands): Governmental Activities General government $ 171 Public safety 490 Education 3,034 Public works 1,753 Health and human services 30 Culture and recreation 156 Total depreciation expense - governmental activities $ 5,634 Business -Type Activities Electric $ 2,241 Water 1,448 Other - Sewer 338 Other - Stormwater 6 Total depreciation expense - business -type activities $ 4,033 611 91 a 10 Warrants Payable Warrants payable represent 2010 expenditures paid by July 15, 2010. Deferred Revenue Governmental funds report deferred revenue in connection with receivables for revenues that are not considered to be available to liquidate liabilities of the current period. The balance of the General Fund deferred revenues. account is equal to the total of all June 30, 2010 receivable balances, except real and personal property taxes that are accrued for subsequent 60 day collections. Long -Term Debt A. Bond Authorizations Long -term debt authorizations which have not been issued or rescinded as of June 30, 2010 are as follows: Purpose Amount MWRA loan program $ 404,000 Birch meadow tennis courts 140,000 Turf field improvements 275,000 Sunnyside /Fairview sewer mains 65,000 Fire ladder truck 50,000 Total $ 934,000 B. General Obligation Bonds The Town issues general obligation bonds to provide funds for the acquisi- tion and construction of major capital facilities. General obligation bonds have been issued for both governmental and business -type activities. General obligation bonds currently outstanding are as follows: 65 66 Amount Serial Outstanding Maturities Interest as of Governmental Activities: Through Rates % 6/30/10 Police station 02/01/12 4.12% $ 800,000 Coolidge Middle School 02/01/21 4.75% 5,200,000 Memorial High School 03/15/24 4.22% 27,145,000 Barrow Elementary School 06/30/24 3.96% 1,765,000 Wood End Elementary School 06/30/24 3.96% 2,100,000 Wood End Elementary School 06/30/24 3.92% 140,000 Wood End Elementary School 04/15/24 3.94% 420,000 Wood End Elementary School 04/15/24 3.94% 635,000 Downtown Improvement projects 11/01/17 3.45% 520,000 Fire Engine 11/01/12 3.45% 240,000 Turf Field improvements 11/01/12 3.45% 225,000 Joshua Eaton refunding 07/01/13 3.05% 130,000 Birch Meadow refunding 07/01/12 3.05% 45,000 Parker School refunding 07/01/17 3.05% 1,590,000 Ladder truck 07/01/17 3.05% 640,000 Tennis courts 07/01/12 3.05% 285,000 Financial hardware and software 01/27/13 2.00% 825,000 Fire truck 08/01/14 4.61% 525,000 Energy Improvements 08/01/24 4.61% 5,000,000 Total Governmental' Activities: $ 48,230,000 Amount Serial Outstanding Maturities Interest as of Business -Type Activities: Through Rates % 06/30/10 Water treatment plant 06/30/15 3.38% $ 500,000 MWRA buy -in 04/15/27 4.00% 2,700,000 Water mains 04/15112 3.66% 985,000 MWRA buy -in 11/01/17 3.05% 7,020,000 Water demo 07/01/17 3.05% 640,000 MWRA water supply 01/27/13 2.00% 300,000 MWPAT septic 02/01/12 0.00% 12,793 MWRA sewer 08/15/12 0.00% 26,598 Fairview and Sunnyside sewer 11/01/11 3.05% 150,000 MWRA sewer 08/20/14 0.00% 164,670 Total Business -Type Activities: $ 12,499,061 66 C. Future Debt Service The annual payments to retire all general obligation long -term debt outstanding as of June 30, 2010 are as follows: Governmental Principal Interest Total 2011 $ 4,165,000 $ 1,970,164 $ 6,135,164 2012 4,185,000 1,830,943 6,015,943 2013 3,810,000 1,686,344 5,496,344 2014 3,310,000 1,619,425 4,929,425 2015 3,350,000 1,433,155 4,783,155 2016 -2020 16,495,000 5,039,060 21,534,060 2021 -2024 12, 915, 000 1,444,606 14, 359, 606 Total $ 48,230,000 $ 15,023,697 $ 63,253,697 The general fund has been designated as the sole source to repay the governmental -type general obligation debt outstanding as of June 30, 2010: Business -Type Principal Interest Total 2011 $ 1,492,965 $ 467,638 $ 1,960,603 2012 1,487,965 416,116 1,904,081 2013 772,965 366,670 1,139,635 2014 764,099 339,905 1,104,004 2015 764,099 312,340 1,076,439 2016 -2020 2,995,826 1,159,261 4,155,087 2021 -2025 2,751,142 587,875 3,339,017 2026 -2027 1,470,000 88,763 1,558,763 Total $ 12,499,061 $ 3,738,568 $ 16,237,629 D. Changes in General Long -Term Liabilities During the year ended June 30, 2010, the following changes occurred in long -term liabilities (in thousands): 67 Governmental Activities' Bonds payable Other: Accrued employee benefits Unamortized premium on bonds Net OPEB obligation Totals Business -Type Activities Bonds and loans payable Other: Accrued employee benefits Unamortized premium on bonds Net OPEB obligation Totals Equals Total Total Less Long -Term Balance Balance Current Portion 7/1/09 Additions Reductions . 6130/10 Portion 6/30/10 J $ 46,425 $ 5,525 $ (3,720) $ 48,230 $ (4,165) $ 44,065 1,601 306 (80) 1,827 (64) 1,763 275 - (25) 250 (25) 225 2,454 5,494 (3,136) 4,812 - 4,812 $ 50,755 $ 11,325 $ (6,961) $ 55,119 $ (4,254) $ 50,865 Total Total Less Long -Term Balance Balance Current Portion 711/09 Additions Reductions 6/30/10 Portion 6130/10 $ 14,428 $ 165 $ (2,094) $ 12,499 $ (1,493) $ 11,006 2,953 240 (82) 3,111 (74) 3,037 5 (1) 4 (1) 3 504 1,029 (587) 946 - 946 $ 17,890 $ 1,434 $ 2,764 $ 16,560 $ (1,568) $ 14,992 11. Restricted Net Assets The accompanying entity -wide financial statements report restricted net assets when external constraints from grantors or contributors are placed on net assets. Permanent fund restricted net assets are segregated between nonexpend- able and expendable. The nonexpendable portion represents the original restricted principal contribution, and the expendable represents accumulated earnings which are available to be spent based on donor restrictions. 12. Reserves of Fund Equity "Reserves" of fund equity are established to segregate fund balances which are either not available for expenditure in the future or are legally set aside for a specific future use. M 13. The following types of reserves are reported at June 30, 2010: Reserved for Encumbrances and Carryforwards - An account used to segregate that portion of fund balance committed for expenditure of financial resources upon vendor performance and non - lapsing appropriations. Reserved for Expenditures - Represents the amount of fund balance appropriated to be used for expenditures in the subsequent year budget. Reserved for Debt Service - An account used to segregate MSBA grant revenues restricted for debt service. The Town received a one -time MSBA grant in fiscal year 2010. The Town intends on using these reserves to fund debt service as follows: 2011 $ 696,991 2012 720,070 2013 743,149 2014 770,844 2015 798,539 2016 -2020 4,481,976 2021 -2024 4,318,114 Total $ 12,529,683 Reserved for Stabilization - An account used to segregate reserves set aside by the Town to fund unforeseen emergencies and to fund long -term capital projects and equipment purchases. Reserved for Perpetual Funds - Represents the principal of the nonexpend- able trust fund investments. The balance cannot be spent for any purpose; however, it may be invested and the earnings may be spent. Commitments and Contingencies Outstanding Lawsuits - There are several pending lawsuits in which the Town is involved. The Town's management is of the opinion that the potential future settlement of such claims would not materially affect its financial statements taken as a whole. Grants - Amounts received or receivable from grantor agencies are subject to audit and adjustment by grantor agencies, principally the federal government. Any disallowed claims, including amounts already collected, may constitute a liability of the applicable funds. The amount of expenditures which may be disallowed by the grantor cannot be determined at this time, although the Town expects such amounts, if any, to be immaterial. .• 14. Post - Employment Health Care and Life Insurance Benefits Other Post - Employment Benefits During the year, the Town implemented GASB Statement 45, Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions. Statement 45 requires governments to account for other post - employment benefits (OPEB), primarily healthcare, on an accrual basis rather than on a pay -as- you -go basis. The effect is the recognition of an actuarially required contribution as an expense on the Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Assets when a future retiree earns their post - employment benefits, rather than when they use their post - employment ben- efit. To the extent that an entity does not fund their actuarially required contri- bution, a post - employment benefit liability is recognized on the Statement of Net Assets over time. A. Plan Description In addition to providing the pension benefits described in Note 17, the Town provides post - employment health and life insurance benefits for retired employees through the Town of Reading's Massachusetts Interlocal Insurance Association (MIIA) Health Benefits Trust. Benefits, benefit levels, employee contributions and employer contributions are governed by Chapter 32 of the Massachusetts General Laws. As of June 30, 2008, the actuarial valuation date, approximately 645 retirees and 524 active employees meet the eligibility requirements. The plan does not issue a separate financial report. B. Benefits Provided The Town provides post - employment medical, prescription drug, and life insurance benefits to all eligible retirees and their surviving spouses. All active employees who retire from the Department and meet the eligibility criteria will be eligible to receive these benefits. C. Funding Policy Retirees contribute 29% of the cost of the medical and prescription druc plan, as determined by the MIIA Health Benefits Trust. Retirees also contribute 50% of the premium for a $ 5,000 life insurance benefit. The Department contributes the remainder of the medical, prescription drug, and life insurance plan costs on a pay -as- you -go basis. D. Annual OPEB Costs and Net OPEB Obligation The Town's fiscal 2010 annual OPEB expense is calculated based on the annual required contribution of the employer (ARC), an amount actu- arially determined in accordance with the parameters of GASB Statement No. 45. The ARC represents a level of funding that, if paid on an ongoing 70 basis, is projected to cover the normal cost per year and amortize the unfunded actuarial liability over a period of twenty years. The following table shows the components of the Town's annual OPEB cost for the year ending June 30, 2010, the amount actually contributed to the plan, and the change in the Town's net OPEB obligation based on an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2008: Annual Required Contribution (ARC) $ 6,346,870 Interest on net OPEB obligation - Adjustment to ARC 176,035 Annual OPEB cost 6,522,905 Contributions made (3,723,762) Increase in net OPEB obligation 2,799,143 Net OPEB obligation - beginning of year 2,958,316 Net OPEB obligation - end of year $ 5,757,459 The Town's annual OPEB cost, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed to the plan, and the net OPEB obligation were as follows: Percentage of OPEB Annual OPEB Cost Net OPEB Fiscal year ended Cost Contributed Obligation 2010 $ 6,522,905 57.09% $ 5,757,459 2009 $ 6,326,701 53.24% $ 2,958,316 The Town's net OPEB obligation as of June 30, 2010 is recorded as a component of the "noncurrent liabilities" line item. E. Funded Status and Funding Progress The funded status of the plan as of June 30, 2008, the date of the most recent actuarial valuation was as follows: Actuarial accrued liability (AAL) $ 60,022,927 Actuarial value of plan assets - Unfunded actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) $ 60,022,927 Funded ratio (actuarial value of plan assets /AAL) 0% Covered payroll (active plan members) N/A UAAL as a percentage of covered payroll N/A 71 Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the probability of events far into the future. Examples include assumptions about future employment, mortality, and the healthcare cost trend. Amounts determined regarding the funded status of the plan and the annual_ required contributions of the employer are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared to past expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The schedule of funding progress, presented as required supplementary information following the notes to the financial statements, presents multi- year trend information about whether the actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liability for benefits. F. Actuarial Methods and Assumptions Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the plan as understood by the Town and the plan members and include the types of benefits provided at the time of each valuation and the historical pattern of sharing of benefit costs between the Town and plan members to that point. The actuarial methods and assumptions used include techniques that are designed to reduce short-term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets, consistent with the long -term perspective of the calculations. In the June 30, 2008 actuarial valuation, the Projected Unit Credit actuarial cost method was used. The actuarial value of assets was not determined, as the Town has not advance funded its obligation. The actuarial assump- tions included a 7.75% investment rate of return and an initial annual health care cost trend rate of 10.0% which decreases to a 5.0% long -term rate for all health care benefits after seven years. The amortization costs for the initial UAAL is a level percentage of payroll amortization, with amortization payments increasing at 2.5% per year for a period of 20 years. 15. Contributory Retirement System The Town follows the provisions of GASB Statement No. 27, Accounting for Pensions for State and Local Government Employees, (as amended by GASB 50) with respect to the employees' retirement funds. A. Plan Description and Contribution Information Substantially all employees of the Town (except teachers and administra- tors under contract employed by the School Department) are members of the Reading Contributory Retirement System (Reading CRS), a cost sharing, multiple employer defined benefit PERS. Eligible employees must participate in the Reading CRS. The pension plan provides pension 72 benefits, deferred allowances, and death and disability benefits. Chapter 32 of the Massachusetts General Laws establishes the authority of the Reading CRS Retirement Board. Chapter 32 also establishes contribution percentages and benefits paid. The Reading CRS Retirement Board does not have the authority to amend benefit provisions. As required by Massachusetts General Laws, the System issues a separate report to the Commonwealth's Public Employee Retirement Administration Commis- sion. Membership of each plan consisted of the following at December 31, 2009: Retirees and beneficiaries receiving benefits 316 Terminated plan members entitled to but not yet receiving benefits 27 Active plan members 353 Total 696 Number of participating employers 2 Employee'contribution percentages are specified in Chapter 32 of the Massachusetts General Laws. The percentage is determined by the participant's date of entry into the system. All employees hired after January 1, 1979 contribute an additional 2% on all gross regular earnings over the rate of $ 30,000 per year. The percentages are as follows: Before January 1, 1975 5% January 1, 1975 - December 31, 1983 7% January 1, 1984 - June 30, 1996 8% Beginning July 1, 1996 9% Employers are required to contribute at actuarially determined rates as accepted by the Public Employee Retirement Administration Commission (PERAC). 73 Schedule of ErnDlover Contributions Year Ended Annual Required Percentage June 30 Contribution Contributed 2001 $ 2,910,900 100% 2002 2,980,400 100% 2003 3,051,200 100% 2004 3,124,800 100% 2005 3,405,725 100% 2006 3,488,686 100% 2007 3,696,695 100% 2008 3,785,501 100% 2009 3,600,826 100% 2010 3,686,795 100% B. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Accounting - Contributory retirement system financial statements are prepared using the accrual basis of accounting. Plan member contri- butions are recognized in the period in which the contributions are due. Employer contributions are recognized when due and the employer has made a formal commitment to provide the contributions. Benefits and refunds are recognized when due and payable in accordance with the terms of the plan. Method Used. to Value Investments - .Investments are reported at fair value in accordance with PERAC requirements. C. Funded Status and Funding Progress The information presented below is from the Reading Contributory Retirement System's most recent valuation. The Schedule of Funding Progress following the notes to the financial statements presents multi -year trend information about the actuarial value of plan assets relative to the actuarial accrued liability for benefits. 74 J Actuarial UAAL as Accrued a Percent - Actuarial Liability Unfunded age of Actuarial Value of (AAL) - AAL Funded Covered Covered Valuation Assets Entry Age (UAAL) Ratio Payroll Payroll Date faal 11 (b-a) (alb) u b -a /c 06/30/09 $ 83,167 $ 121,918 $ 38,751 68.2% $ 21,005 184.5% The Schedule of Funding Progress following the notes to the financial statements presents multi -year trend information about the actuarial value of plan assets relative to the actuarial accrued liability for benefits. 74 J D. Actuarial Methods and Assumptions The annual required contribution for the current year was determined as part of the actuarial valuation using the entry age normal actuarial cost method. Under this method an unfunded actuarial accrued liability of $ 38.8.million was calculated. The actuarial assumptions included (a) 7.75% investment rate of return and (b) a projected salary increase of 4.75% - 8.00% per year. Liabilities for cost of living increases have been assumed at an annual increase of 3 %, on the first $ 12,000 of benefit payments. The actuarial value of assets is determined by projecting the market value of assets as of the beginning of the prior plan year with the assumed rate of return during that year (7.75 %) and accounting for deposits and disbursements with interest at the assumed rate of return. An adjustment is then applied to recognize the difference between the actual investment return and expected return over a five -year period. As of June 30, 2010, the unfunded actuarially accrued liability is being amortized over 19 years using 4.5% increase in payments method. E. Teachers As required by State statutes, teachers of the Town are covered by the Massachusetts Teachers Retirement System (MTRS). The MTRS is funded by contributions from covered employees and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Town is not required to contribute. All persons employed on at least a half -time basis, who are covered under a contractual agreement requiring certification by the Board of Education are eligible, and must participate in the MTRS. Based on the Commonwealth of Massachusetts' retirement laws, employ- ees covered by the pension plan must contribute a percentage of gross earnings into the pension fund. The percentage is determined by the participant's date of entry into the "system and gross earnings, up to $ 30,0.00, as follows: Before January 1, 1975 5% January 1, 1975 - December 31, 1983 7% January 1, 1984 - June 30, 1996 8% July 1, 1996 - June 30, 2001 9% Beginning July 1, 2001 11% 'Effective January 1, 1990, all participants hired after January 1, 1979, who have not elected to increase to 11 %, contribute an additional 2% of salary in excess of $ 30,000. The Town's current year covered payroll for teachers and administrators was not available. 75 In fiscal year 2010, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts contributed $ 6,595,561 to the MTRS on behalf of the Town. This is included in the education expenditures and intergovernmental revenues in the general fund. 16. Risk Management The Town is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts; theft of, damage to and destruction of assets; errors and omissions; and natural disasters for which the government carries commercial insurance. There were no signifi- cant reductions in insurance coverage from the previous year and have been no material settlements in excess of coverage in any of the past three fiscal years. 76 Town of Reading, Massachusetts Municipal Light Department Notes to Financial Statements Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The significant accounting policies of the Town of Reading Municipal Light Department ( "the Department ") (an enterprise fund of the Town of Reading) are as follows: A. Business Activity - The Department purchases electricity which it distrib- utes to consumers within the towns of Reading, North Reading, Wilmington, and Lynnfield. B. Regulation and Basis of Accounting - Under Massachusetts General Laws, the Department's electric rates are set by the Municipal Light Board. Electric rates, excluding the fuel charge, cannot be changed more often than once every three months. Rate schedules are filed with the Mass- achusetts Department of Public Utilities (DPU). While the DPU exercises general supervisory authority over the Department, the Department's rates are not subject to DPU approval. The Department's policy is to prepare its financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from non - operating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund's principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the enterprise fund are charges to customers for sales and services. Operating expenses for enterprise funds include the cost of sales and services, administrative expenses and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses. Private - sector standards of accounting and financial reporting issued prior to December 1, 1989 generally are followed in the proprietary fund finan- cial statements to the extent that those standards do not conflict with or contradict guidance of the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. Governments also have the option of following subsequent private- sector guidance for their enterprise funds, subject to this same limitation. The Department has elected not to follow subsequent private- sector guidance. C. Concentrations - The Department operates within the electric utility indus- try which has undergone significant restructuring and deregulation. Legis- lation was enacted by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts in 1998 which changed the electric industry. The law introduced competition and pro- 77 vided consumers with choices while assuring continued reliable service. _ Municipal utilities are not currently subject to this legislation. D. Retirement Trust - The Reading Municipal Light Department Employees' Pension Trust (the "Trust ") was established on December 30, 1966, by the Town of Reading's Municipal Light Board pursuant to Chapter 164 of the General Laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Trust constitutes the principal instrument of a,plan established by the Municipal Light Board for the purpose of funding the Department's annual required contribution to the Town of Reading Contributory Retirement System (the System), a cost sharing, multi - employer public employee retirement system. E. Revenues - Revenues are based on rates established by the Department and filed with the DPU. Revenues from sales of electricity are recorded on the basis of bills rendered from monthly meter readings taken on a cycle basis and are stated net of discounts. Recognition is given to the amount of sales to customers which are unbilled at the end of the fiscal period. F. Cash and Short-term Investments - For the purposes of the Statement of Cash Flows, the Department considers both restricted and unrestricted cash on deposit with the Town Treasurer to be cash or short-term invest- ments. For purpose of the Statement of Net Assets, the proprietary funds consider investments with original maturities of three months or less to be short-term investments. G. Investments - State and local statutes place certain limitations on the nature of deposits and investments available. Deposits in any financial institution may not exceed certain levels within the financial institution. Non - fiduciary fund investments can be made in securities issued or unconditionally guaranteed by the U.S. Government or agencies that have a maturity of one year or less from the date of purchase and repurchase agreements guaranteed by such securities with maturity dates of no more than 90 days from date of purchase. Investments for the Department and the Trust consist of U.S. government bonds that are being held to maturity. Investments are carried at cost. H. Inventory - Inventory consists of parts and accessories purchased for use in the utility business for construction, operation and maintenance purposes and is stated at average cost. Meters and transformers are capitalized when purchased. I. Capital Assets'and Depreciation - Capital assets, which include property, plant, equipment, and utility plant infrastructure, are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost when purchased or constructed. Donated W. capital assets are recorded at estimated fair market value at the date of the donation. The cost of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially extend asset lives are not capitalized. Major outlays for capital assets and improvements are capitalized as they are acquired or constructed. Interest incurred during the construction phase of proprietary fund capital assets is included as part of the capitalized value of the constructed asset. When capital assets are retired, the cost of the retired asset, less accumulated depreciation, salvage value and any cash proceeds, is charged to the Department's unrestricted net assets account. Massachusetts General Laws require utility plant in service to be depre- ciated at an annual rate of 3 %. To change this rate, the Department must obtain approval from the DPU. Changes in annual depreciation rates may be made for financial factors relating to cash flow for plant expansion, rather than engineering factors relating to estimates of useful lives. In 2010, the Department requested and was granted permission by the DPU to temporarily reduce its depreciation rate to 2% for the fiscal year. Accrued Compensated Absences - Employee vacation leave is vested annually but may only be carried forward to the succeeding year with supervisor approval and, if appropriate, within the terms of the applicable Department policy or union contract. Generally, sick leave may accumu- late according to union and Department contracts and policy, and is paid upon normal termination at the current rate of pay. The Department's policy is to recognize vacation costs at the time payments are made. The Department records accumulated, unused, vested sick pay as a lia- bility. The amount recorded is the amount to be paid at termination at the .current rate of pay. K. Long -Term Obligations - The proprietary fund financial statements report long -term debt and other long -term obligations as liabilities in the pro- prietary fund statement of net assets. L. Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures for contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of the revenues and expenses during the fiscal year. Actual results could vary from estimates that were used. M. Rate of Return - The Department's rates must be set such that earnings attributable to electric operations do not exceed eight percent of the net cost of plant. The audited financial statements are prepared in accor- dance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. To determine the net income subject to the rate of return, the 79 2. Department performs the following calculation. Using the net income per the audited financials, the return on investment to the Town of Reading is added back, the fuel charge adjustment is added or deducted, and miscellaneous debits /credits (i.e. gain /loss on disposal of fixed assets, etc.) are added or deducted, leaving an adjusted net income figure for rate of return purposes. Investment interest income and bond principal payments are then deducted from this figure to determine the net income subject to the rate of return. The net income subject to the rate of return is then subtracted from the allowable eight percent rate of return, which is calculated by adding the book value of net plant and the investment in associated companies less the contributions in aid of construction multi- plied by eight percent. From this calculation, the Municipal Light Board will determine what cash transfers need to be made at year end. Cash and Investments Cash and investments as of June 30, 2010 are classified in the accompa- nying financial statements as follows: Statement of net assets Unrestricted cash and short-term investments $ 8,167,774 Restricted cash and short-term investments 15,255,385 Restricted investments 1,400,000 Fiduciary funds: Cash and short-term investments 4,017,679 Investments 1,800,000 Total cash and investments $ 30,640,838 Cash and investments at June 30, 2010 consist of the following: Cash on hand $ 3,000 Deposits with financial institutions 27,437,838 Investments 3,200,000 Total cash investments $ 30,640,838 Disclosures Relating to Interest Rate Risk Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value of an investment will be adversely affected by changes in market interest rates. Generally, the longer the maturity of an investment, the greater the sensitivity of its fair value to changes in market interest rates. One of the ways that the Department manages its exposure to interest rate risk is by purchasing a combination of shorter term and longer term investments and by timing cash flows from maturities so that a portion of the portfolio is maturing or :1 coming close to maturity evenly over time as necessary to provide the cash flow and liquidity needed for operations. As of June 30, 2010, the Department (including the Pension Trust) had the following investments: Disclosures Relating to Credit Risk Generally, credit risk is the risk that the issuer of an investment will not fulfill its obligation to the holder of the investment. This is measured by the assign- ing of a rating by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Pre- sented below is the actual rating as of year end for each of the Department's (including the Pension Trust) investment types: Minimum Rating as of Year End Legal Not Investment Type Amount Rating AAA Rated Government agency bonds $ 3,200,000 N/A $ 3,200,000 $ - Total $ 3,200,000 $ 3,200,000 $ - Concentration of Credit Risk. The Department follows the Town of Reading's investment policy, which does not limit the amount that can be invested in any one issuer beyond that stipu- lated by Massachusetts General Laws. Investments in any one issuer (other than U.S. Treasury securities, mutual funds, and external investment pools) that represent more than 5% of the Department's total investments (including the Pension Trust investments) are as follows: Reported Issuer Investment Type Amount Freddie Mac Government agency bonds $ 3,200,000 Custodial Credit Risk Custodial Credit Risk for deposits is the. risk that, in the event of the failure of a depository financial institution, the Department will not be able to recover its deposits or will not be able to recover collateral securities that are in the pos- Al Restricted Pension Maturity Moody's Investments Trust Date Ratina Government agency bonds . Freddie Mac $ 1,400,000 $ - 7/15/2014 AAA Freddie Mac - 1,800,000 2/15/2015 AAA Total $ 1,400,000 $ 1,800,000 Disclosures Relating to Credit Risk Generally, credit risk is the risk that the issuer of an investment will not fulfill its obligation to the holder of the investment. This is measured by the assign- ing of a rating by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. Pre- sented below is the actual rating as of year end for each of the Department's (including the Pension Trust) investment types: Minimum Rating as of Year End Legal Not Investment Type Amount Rating AAA Rated Government agency bonds $ 3,200,000 N/A $ 3,200,000 $ - Total $ 3,200,000 $ 3,200,000 $ - Concentration of Credit Risk. The Department follows the Town of Reading's investment policy, which does not limit the amount that can be invested in any one issuer beyond that stipu- lated by Massachusetts General Laws. Investments in any one issuer (other than U.S. Treasury securities, mutual funds, and external investment pools) that represent more than 5% of the Department's total investments (including the Pension Trust investments) are as follows: Reported Issuer Investment Type Amount Freddie Mac Government agency bonds $ 3,200,000 Custodial Credit Risk Custodial Credit Risk for deposits is the. risk that, in the event of the failure of a depository financial institution, the Department will not be able to recover its deposits or will not be able to recover collateral securities that are in the pos- Al session of an outside party. The custodial credit risk for investments is the risk that, in the event of the failure of the counterparty (e.g., broker - dealer) to a transaction, the Department will not be able to recover the value of its investments or collateral securities that are in the possession of another party. Massachusetts General Laws; Chapter 44, section 55, limits deposits "in a bank or trust company or banking company to an amount not exceeding sixty per cent of the capital and surplus of such bank or trust company or banking company, unless satisfactory security is given to it by such bank or trust company or banking company for such excess." The Department follows the Massachusetts statute as written, as well as the Town of Reading's deposit policy for custodial credit risk. Because the Department pools its cash with the Town of Reading, the spe- cific custodial credit risk of the Department's deposits could not be deter- mined at June 30, 2010. As of June 30, 2010, Department investments (including the Pension Trust) in the following investment types were held by the same broker - dealer (counterparty) that was used by the Department to buy the securities: Investment Type Reported Amount Government agency, bonds $ 3,200,000 Total $ 3,200,000 3. Restricted Cash and Investments Restricted cash and investments consist of the following at June 30, 2010: Depreciation fund Deferred fuel reserve Rate stabilization Deferred energy conservation reserve Reserve for uncollectible accounts Sick leave benefits Hazardous waste fund Customer deposits Total Cash Investments $ 4,801,694 $ 2,326,112 3,949,468 1,400,000 308,882 200,000 3,020,033 150,000 499,196 $ 15,255,385 $ 1,400,000 Restricted investments are invested in government agency bonds, which will be held to maturity, and are reported at book value of $ 1,400,000. The fair market value of the investments at June 30, 2010 was $ 1,401,316. The Department maintains the following restricted cash accounts: M Depreciation fund - The Department is normally required to reserve 3.0% of capital assets each year to fund capital improvements. The Department received special permission from the DPU to reduce this rate to 2% for fiscal year 2010. Deferred fuel reserve - The Department transfers the difference between the customers' monthly fuel charge adjustment and actual fuel costs into this account to be used in the event of a sudden increase in fuel costs. Rate stabilization - The Department transfers funds in excess of 8 %. of capital assets to this account to be used to stabilize customer rates. Deferred energy conservation reserve - This account is used to reserve monies collected from a special energy charge added to cus- tomer bills. Customers who undertake measures to conserve and improve energy efficiency can apply for rebates that are paid from this account. Reserve for uncollectible accounts - This account was set up to offset a portion of the Department's bad debt reserve. Sick leave benefits - This account is used to offset the Department's actuarially determined compensated absence liability. Hazardous waste fund -This reserve was set up by the Board of Commissioners to cover the Department's insurance deductible. in the event of a major hazardous materials incident. Customer deposits - Customer deposits that are held in escrow 4. Accounts Receivable Accounts receivable consists of the following at June 30, 2010: a 5. A 7 Customer Accounts: Billed $ 3,775,128 Less allowances: Uncollectible accounts (200,000) Sales discounts (353,510) Total billed Unbilled „net Total customer accounts Other Accounts: Merchandise sales 69,192 MMWEC flush 387,497 Liens and other 90,469 Total other accounts Total net receivables Prepaid Expenses Prepaid expenses consist of the following: Insurances Purchase power PASNY prepayment fund WC Fuel - Watson Total Inventory 3,221,618 4,055,159 7,276,777 547,158 $ 7,823,935 $ 272,954 61,843 247,207 174,950 $ 756,954 Inventory is comprised of supplies and materials at June 30, 2010, and is valued using the average cost method. Investment in Associated Companies Under agreements with the New England Hydro- Transmission Electric Com- pany, Inc. (NEH) and the New England Hydro- Transmission Corporation (NHH), the Department has made the following advances to fund its equity requirements for the Hydro - Quebec Phase II interconnection. The Depart- ment is carrying its investment at cost, reduced by shares repurchased. The Department's equity position in the Project is less than one -half of one percent. 84 A Q Irc Investment in associated companies consists of the following, at June 30, 2010: New England Hydro-Transmission Electric Company, Inc. New England Hydro- Transmission Corporation Total Capital Assets $ 31,252 66,438 $ 97,690 The following is a summary of fiscal year 2010 activity in capital assets (in thousands): Business -Type Activities: Capital assets, being depreciated: Structures and improvements $ Equipment and furnishings Infrastructure Total capital assets, being depreciated Less accumulated depreciation for: Structures and improvements Equipment and furnishings Infrastructure Total accumulated depreciation Total capital assets, being depreciated, net Capital assets, not being depreciated: Land Total capital assets, not being depreciated Capital assets, net Accounts Payable Beginning Ending Balance. Increases Decreases Balance 13,512 $ 9 $ - $ 13,521 27,856 1,847 (452) 29,251 70,673 2,613 684 72,602 112,041 4,469 (1,136) 115,374 (6,515) (257) - (6,772) (16,374) (810) 452 (16,732) 25,762 1,173 680 26,255 48,651 2,240 1,132 49,759 63,390 2,229 (4) 65,615 1,266 1,266 1,266 - 1,266 $ 64,656 $ 2,229 $ (4) $ 66,881 Accounts payable represent fiscal 2010 expenses that were paid after June 30, 2010. Customer Deposits This balance represents deposits received from customers that are held in escrow. im III.. 12. 13 14. 15. Customer Advances for Construction This balance represents deposits received from vendors in advance for work to be performed by the Department. The Department recognizes these deposits as revenue after the work has been completed. Accrued Liabilities Accrued liabilities consist of the following at June 30, 2010: Accrued payroll Accrued interest Other Total Bonds Payable $ 199,601 1,112 142,363 $ 343,076 The following summarizes activity in bonds payable for the year ended June 30, 2010. Balance Balance Less Long -Term 7/1/09 Maturities 6/30/10 Current Portion $ 550,000 $ 550,000 $ - $ $ Accrued Employee Compensated Absences Department employees are granted sick leave in varying amounts. Upon retirement, termination, or death, employees are compensated for unused sick leave (subject to certain limitations) at their then current rates of pay. Restricted Net Assets The proprietary fund financial statements report restricted net assets when external constraints are placed on net assets. Specifically, restricted net assets represent depreciation fund reserves, which are restricted for future capital costs. ::. 16. Post - Employment Health Care and Life Insurance Benefits Other Post - Employment Benefits The Department follows GASB Statement 45, Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Postemployment Benefits Other Than Pensions. Statement 45 requires governments to account for other post - employment benefits (OPEB), primarily healthcare, on an accrual basis rather than on a pay -as- you -go basis. The effect is the recognition of an actuarially required contribution as an expense on the Statement.of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Assets when a future retiree earns their post - employment _ benefits, rather than when they use their post - employment benefit. To the extent that an entity does not fund their actuarially required contribution, a post - employment benefit liability is recognized on the Statement of Net Assets over time. A. Plan Description In addition to.providing the pension benefits described in Note 17, the Department provides post - employment health and life insurance benefits for retired employees through the Town of Reading's Massachusetts Inter - local Insurance Association (MIIA) Health Benefits Trust. Benefits, benefit levels, employee contributions and employer contributions are governed by Chapter 32 of the Massachusetts General Laws. As of June 30, 2008, the actuarial valuation date, approximately 72 retirees and 64 active employees meet the eligibility requirements. The plan does not issue a separate financial report. B. Benefits Provided The Department provides post - employment medical, prescription drug, and life insurance benefits to all eligible retirees and their surviving spouses. All active employees who retire from the Department and meet the eligibility criteria will be eligible to receive these benefits. C. Funding Policy Retirees contribute 30% of the cost of the medical and prescription drug plan, as determined by the MIIA Health Benefits Trust. Retirees also contribute 50% of.the premium for a $ 5,000 life insurance benefit. The Department contributes the remainder of the medical, prescription drug, and life insurance plan costs on a pay -as- you -go basis. D. Annual OPEB Costs and Net OPEB Obligation The Department's fiscal 2010 annual OPEB expense is calculated based on the annual required contribution of the employer (ARC), an amount MN actuarially determined in accordance with the parameters of GASB State- ment No. 45. The ARC represents a level of funding that, if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover the normal cost per year and amortize the unfunded actuarial liability over a period of twenty years. The follow- ing table shows the components of the Department's annual OPEB cost for the year ending June 30, 2010, the amount actually contributed to the plan, and the change in the Department's net OPEB obligation based on an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2008. Annual Required Contribution (ARC) $ 878,668 Interest on net OPEB obligation - Adjustment to ARC - Annual OPEB cost 878,668 Contributions made (501,609) Increase in net OPEB obligation 377,059 Net OPEB obligation - beginning of year 436,402 Net OPEB obligation - end of year $ 813,461 The Department's annual OPEB cost, the percentage of annual OPEB cost contributed to the plan, and the net OPEB obligation for fiscal year 2010 and the two preceding fiscal years were as follows: The Department's net OPEB obligation as of June 30, 2010 is recorded as a component of the "noncurrent liabilities" line item in the Statements of Net Assets. E. Funded Status and Funding Progress The funded status of the plan as of June 30, 2008, the date of the most recent actuarial valuation was as follows: :: Annual Percentage of OPEB OPEB Net OPEB Fiscal year ended Cost Cost Contributed Obligation 06/30/08 N/A N/A N/A 06/30/09 $ 890,140 50.97% $ 436,402 06/30/10 $ 878,668 57.09% $ 813,461 The Department's net OPEB obligation as of June 30, 2010 is recorded as a component of the "noncurrent liabilities" line item in the Statements of Net Assets. E. Funded Status and Funding Progress The funded status of the plan as of June 30, 2008, the date of the most recent actuarial valuation was as follows: :: Actuarial accrued liability (AAL) $ 8,085,388 Actuarial value of plan assets - Unfunded-actuarial accrued liability (UAAL) $ 8,085,388 Funded ratio (actuarial value of plan assets /AAL) 0% Covered payroll (active plan members) Not available UAAL as a percentage of covered payroll Not available Actuarial valuations of an ongoing plan involve estimates of the value of reported amounts and assumptions about the probability of events far into the future. Examples include assumptions about future employment, mortality, and the healthcare cost trend. Amounts determined regarding the funded status of the plan and the annual required contributions of the employer are subject to continual revision as actual results are compared to past expectations and new estimates are made about the future. The schedule of funding progress, presented as required supplementary information following the notes to the financial statements, presents multi- year trend information about whether the actuarial value of plan assets is increasing or decreasing over time relative to the actuarial accrued liability for benefits. F. Actuarial Methods and Assumptions Projections of benefits for financial reporting purposes are based on the plan as understood by the Department and the plan members and include the types of benefits provided at the time of each valuation and the his- torical pattern of sharing of benefit costs between the Department and plan members to that point. The actuarial methods and assumptions used include techniques that are designed to reduce short-term volatility in actuarial accrued liabilities and the actuarial value of assets, consistent with the long -term perspective of the calculations. In the June 30, 2008 actuarial valuation, the Projected Unit Credit actuarial cost method was used. The actuarial value of assets was not determined, as the Department has not advance funded its obligation. The actuarial assumptions included a 7.75% investment rate of return and an initial annual health care cost trend rate of 10.0% which decreases to a 5.0% long -term rate for all health care benefits after seven years. The amortiza- tion costs for the initial UAAL is a level percentage of payroll amortization, with amortization payments increasing at 2.5% per year for a period of 20 years. 17. Pension Plan The Department follows the provisions of GASB Statement No. 27, (as . amended by GASB 50) Accounting for Pensions for State and Local rX, 18 Government Employees, with respect to the employees' retirement funds. Chapter 32 of the Massachusetts General Laws assigns the System the authority to establish and amend benefit provisions of the plan, and the State legislature has the authority to grant cost -of- living increases. The System issues a publicly available financial report which can be obtained through the Town of Reading Contributory Retirement system at Town Hall, Reading, MA. A. Plan Description The Department contributes to the Town of Reading Contributory Retire- ment System (the System), a cost - sharing, multiple - employer, defined benefit pension plan administered by a Town Retirement Board. The System provides retirement, disability and death benefits to plan mem- bers and beneficiaries. Chapter 32 of the Massachusetts General Laws assigns the System the authority to establish and amend benefit provi- sions of the plan, and grant cost -of- living increases. B. Funding Policy Plan members are required to contribute to the System at rates ranging from 5% to 11 % of annual covered compensation. The Department is required to pay into the System its share of the remaining system wide actuarially determined contribution plus administration costs which are apportioned among the employers based on active covered payroll. The contributions of plan members and the Department are governed by Chapter 32 of the Massachusetts General Laws. The Department's contributions to the System for the years ended June 30, 2010, 2009, and 2008 were $ 919,336, $ 896,185, and $ 1,055,758, respectively, which were equal to its annual required contributions for each of these years. Participation in Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company The Town of Reading, acting through its Light Department, is a participant in certain Projects of the Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Company ( MMWEC). MMWEC is a public corporation and a political subdivision of the Common- wealth of Massachusetts, created as a means to develop a bulk power supply for its Members and other utilities. MMWEC is authorized to construct, own, or purchase ownership interests in, and to issue revenue bonds to finance, electric facilities (Projects). MMWEC has acquired ownership interests in electric facilities operated by other entities and also owns and operates its own electric facilities. MMWEC sells all of the capability (Project Capability) of each of its Projects to its Members and other utilities (Project Participants) under Power Sales Agreements (PSAs). Among other things, the PSAs .I require each Project Participant to pay its pro rata share of MMWEC's costs related to the Project, which costs include debt service on the revenue bonds issued by MMWEC to finance the Project, plus 10% of MMWEC's debt ser- vice to be paid into a Reserve and Contingency Fund. In addition, should a Project Participant fail to make any payment when due, other Project Partici- pants of that Project may be required to increase (step -up) their payments and correspondingly their Participant's share of that Project's Project Capa- bility to an additional amount not to exceed 25% of their original Participant's share of that Project's Project Capability. Project Participants have cove- nanted to fix, revise, and collect rates at least sufficient to meet their obliga- tions under the PSAs. MMWEC has issued separate issues of revenue bonds for each of its eight Projects, which are payable solely from, and secured solely by, the reve- nues derived from the Project to which the bonds relate, plus available funds pledged under MMWEC's Amended and Restated General Bond Resolution (GBR) with respect to the bonds of that Project. The MMWEC revenues derived from each Project are used solely to provide for the payment of the bonds of any bond issue relating to such Project and to pay MMWEC's cost of owning and operating such Project and are not used to provide for the payment of the bonds of any bond issue relating to any other Project. MMWEC operates the Stony -Brook Intermediate Project and the Stony Brook Peaking Project, both fossil - fueled power plants. MMWEC has a 3.7% interest in the W.F. Wyman Unit No. 4 plant, which is operated and owned by its majority owner, FPL Energy Wyman IV, LLC, a subsidiary of NextEra Energy Resources LLC (formerly FPL Energy LLC), and a 4.8% ownership interest in the Millstone Unit 3. nuclear unit, operated by Dominion Nuclear Connecticut, Inc. (DNCI), the majority owner and an indirect subsidiary of Dominion Resources, Inc. DNCI also owns and operates the Millstone Unit 2 nuclear unit. The operating license for the Millstone Unit 3 nuclear unit extends to November 25, 2045: A substantial portion of MMWEC's plant investment and financing program is an 11.6% ownership interest in the Seabrook Station nuclear generating unit operated by NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC (NextEra Seabrook) (formerly FPL Energy Seabrook LLC), the majority owner and an indirect subsidiary of NextEra Energy Resources LLC (formerly FPL Energy LLC). The operating license for Seabrook Station extends to March, 2030. NextEra Seabrook has submitted an application to extend the Seabrook Station operating license for an additional 20 years. Pursuant to the PSAs, the MMWEC Seabrook and Millstone Project Partici- pants are liable for their proportionate share of the costs associated with decommissioning the plants, which costs are being funded through monthly Project billings. Also the Project Participants are liable for their proportionate share of the uninsured costs of a nuclear incident that might be imposed under the Price- Anderson Act (Act). Originally enacted in 1957, the Act has 91 been renewed several times. In July 2005, as part of the Energy Policy Act of 2005, Congress extended the Act until the end of 2025. Reading Municipal Light Department has entered into PSAs and Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs) with MMWEC. Under both the PSAs and PPAs, the Department is required to make certain payments to MMWEC payable solely from Department revenues. Under the PSAs, each Participant is unconditionally obligated to make all payments due to MMWEC, whether or not the Project(s) is completed or operating, and notwithstanding the suspension or interruption of the output of the Project(s). MMWEC is involved in various legal actions. In the opinion of MMWEC management, the outcome of such actions will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the company. Seven municipal light departments that are Participants under PSAs with MMWEC have submitted a demand for arbitration of a dispute relating to charges under the PSAs. MMWEC cannot predict the outcome of the arbitration demand, but in the opinion of MMWEC management, it will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position of MMWEC. After the July 1, 2010 principal payment, total capital expenditures for MMWEC's Projects amounted to $ 1,574,094,000, of which $ 113,385,000 represents the amount associated with the Department's share of Project Capability of the Projects in which it participates, although such amount is not allocated to the Department. MMWEC's debt outstanding for the Projects includes Power Supply System Revenue Bonds totaling $ 502,245,000, of which $ 26,370,000 is associated with the Department's share of Project Capability of the Projects in which it participates, although such amount is not allocated to the Department. After the July 1, 2010 principal payment, MMWEC's total future debt service requirement on outstanding bonds issued for the Projects is $ 532,190,000, of which $ 26,829,000 is anticipated to be billed to the Department in the future. The estimated aggregate amount of Reading Municipal Light Department's required payments under the PSAs and PPAs, exclusive of the Reserve and Contingency Fund billings, to MMWEC at June 30, 2010 and estimated for future years is shown below. Annual Costs For years ended June 30, 2011 $ 4,674,000 2012 4,657,000 2013 4,702,000 2014 4,154, 000 2015 3,189,000 2016-2019 5,453,000 Total $ 26,829,000 92 In addition, under the PSAs, the Department is required to pay to MMWEC its share of the Operation and Maintenance (O &M) costs of the Projects in which it participates. The Department's total O &M costs including debt service under the PSAs were $ 14,350,000 and $ 16,070,000 for the years ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. 19. Environmental Remediation In August of 2009, during the Transformer Upgrade Project at Gaw Sub- station, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) contaminated soil was discovered. This contamination was traced to a capacitor bank lineup located on the south side of the Gaw Substation control house. Once utilized to stabilize voltage, these capacitor banks were removed from the substation decades prior to the project. As of June 30, 2010, the cost for this cleanup has eclipsed $ 1.1 M. Addi- tional soil remediation costs for FY11 are expected to be $ 650,000. The soil sampling, analysis and remediation of the area should be complete by October 3.0, 2010. Cleanup of the soil has been conducted by a Commonwealth of Massachu- setts Licensed Site Professional (LSP) in concert with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MA DEP) requirements. The Department has included in its rate structure a Hazardous Material Charge of $ 0.001 /kWh, which is designed to recover the Gaw Substation soil remediation costs over three years. 20. Leases Related Party Transaction - Property Sub -Lease The Department is sub - leasing facilities to the Reading Massachusetts Town Employees Federal Credit Union. The original sub -lease agreement commenced in December 2000 and ended in November 2005. A new agree- ment, which extended the lease through November 30, 2008, was signed on December 1, 2005. An additional amendment, effective December 1, 2008, extends the lease through November 30, 2011. The following is the future minimum rental income for the years ending June 30: 2011 $ 8,712 2012 3,630 Tdtal $ 12,342 93 TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS SCHEDULE OF FUNDING PROGRESS REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION June 30, 2010 (Unaudited) (Amounts Expressed in thousands) Employees' Retirement System Other Post - Employment Benefits Actuarial UAAL as UAAL as Actuarial Accrued a Percent- Actuarial Accrued a Percent - Actuarial Liability Unfunded Value of Liability AAL age of Actuarial Value of (AAL) - AAL Funded Covered Covered Valuation Assets Entry Age (UAAL) Ratio (a/b) Payroll Payroll Date $ - u u (b-a) (a/b) N/A (C) b -a /c 06/30/00 $ 54,076 $ 78,486 $ 24,410 68.9% $ 15,798 154.5% 06/30/01 $ 58,286 $ 82,550 $ 24,264 70.6% $ 16,129 150.4% 06/30/02 $ 60,933 $ 86,888 $ 25,955 70.1% $ 16,855 154.0% 06/30/03 $ 62,897 $ 91,302 $ 28,405 68.9% $ 16,734 169.7% 06/30/04 $ 66,850 $ 95,961 $ 29,111 69.7% $ 17,487 166.5% 06/30/05 $ 71,468 $ 102,153 $ 30,685 70.0% $ 18,048 170.0% 06/30/06 $ 77,151 $ 106,238 $ 29,087 72.6% $ 18,860 154.2% 06/30/07 $ 84,784 $ 112,012 $ 27,228 75.7% $ 19,313 141.0% 06/30/09 $ 83,167 $ 121,918 $ 38,751 68.2% $ 21,005 184.5% Other Post - Employment Benefits See Independent Auditor's Report .. UAAL as Actuarial a Percent- Actuarial Accrued Unfunded age of Actuarial Value of Liability AAL Funded Covered Covered Valuation Assets (AAL) (UAAL) Ratio Payroll Payroll Date La (?b . (b -a) (a/b) fc-1 b -a /c 06/30/08 $ - $ 60,023 $ 60,023 0.0% N/A N/A See Independent Auditor's Report .. ASSETS Cash and short -term investments Investments Receivables: Intergovernmental Total Assets LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Liabilities: Warrants payable Accrued liabilities _ Deferred revenue Retainage payable Total Liabilities Fund Balances: Reserved for: Perpetual (nonexpendable) Permanent funds Unreserved: Undesignaled, reported in: Special revenue funds ' Capital project funds Permanent funds Total Fund Balance Total Liabilities and Fund Balance TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS JUNE 30, 2010 Special Revenue Funds Federal Slate Revolving Receipts Grants Grans Funds Reserved $ (1,789) $ 151,091 164,955 72,365 $ 163,166 $ 223,456 $ 2,342,443 $ 1,905,286 39,342 $ 2,381,785 $ 1,905,286 $ 66,934 $ 23,773 $ 115,082 $ 222 66,934 23,995 115,082 - 96,232 199,461 2,266,703 1,905,286 96,232 199,461 2,266,703 1,905,286 $ 163,166 $ 223,456 $ 2,381,785 $ 1,905,286 95 Special Revenue Funds Gifts and Trust Reserve Donations Funds Funds Subtotals $ 897,526 $ - $ 196,433 $ 5,490,990 - 8,278,616 - 8,278,616 276,662 $ 897,526 $ 8,278,616 $ 196,433 $ 14,046,268 $ 97,948 $ 1,467 $ - $ 305,204 222 97,948 1,467 - 305,426 - 2,748,172 - 2,748,172 799,578 - 196,433 5,463,693 5,528,977 5,528,977 799,578 8,277,149 196,433 13,740,842 $ 897,526 $ 8,278616 $ 196,433 $ 14,046,268 (continued) a (continued) ASSETS Cash and short -term investments Investments Receivables: Intergovernmental Total Assets LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE Liabilities: Warrants payable Accrued liabilities Deferred revenue Retainage payable Total Liabilities Fund Balances: Reserved for: Perpetual (nonexpendable) permanent funds Unreserved: Undesignated, reported in: Special revenue funds Capital project funds Permanent funds Total Fund Balance Total Liabilities and Fund Balance TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS COMBINING BALANCE SHEET NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS JUNE 30, 2010 604,207 2,803,540 3,407,747 604,207 2,803,540 3,407,747 $ 604,207 $ 4,721,469 $ 5,325,676 97 2,748,172 5,463,693 3,407,747 5,528,977 17,148,589 $ 19,371,944 Capital Project Funds Total Town School Nonmajor Capital Capital Governmental Proiect Funds Proied Funds Subtotals Funds $ 604,207 $ 4,721,469 $ 5,325,676 $ 10,816,666 _ _ - 8,278,616 276,662 $ 604,207 $ 4,721,469 $ 5,325,676 $ 19,371,944 $ _ $ 7 $ - $ 305,204 - 548,331 548,331 548,331 _ - 222 1,369,598 1,369,598 1,369,598 - 1,917,929 1,917,929 2,223,355 604,207 2,803,540 3,407,747 604,207 2,803,540 3,407,747 $ 604,207 $ 4,721,469 $ 5,325,676 97 2,748,172 5,463,693 3,407,747 5,528,977 17,148,589 $ 19,371,944 (This page intentionally left blank.) M TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 Revenues: Departmental Intergovernmental Investment income Other Total Revenues Expenditures: Current: General government Public safety Education Public works Health and human services Culture and recreation Total Expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses): Issuance of bonds Transfers out Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) Change in fund balances Fund Balances, beginning of year Fund Balances, end of year ' Special Revenue Funds Federal State Revolving Receipts Grant s Grants Funds Reserved $ - $ - $ 3,698,885 $ 43,350 2,993,454 1,939,963 150,438 - _ - 315 8,600 93,136 166,139 2,993,454 1,939,963 3,942,774 218,089 16,536 39,538 192,746 - 43,805 82,387 589,592 - 2,770,782 1,294,097 2,393,195 - - 394,882 529 - 111,295 44,775 19,560 - 16,669 8,792 438,726 - 2,959,087 1,864,471 3,634,348 34,367 75,492 308,426 218,089 (147,066) (1,228,899) (147,066) (1,226,899) 34,367 75,492 161,360 (1,010,810) 61,865 123,969 2,105,343 2,916.096 $ 96,232 $ 199,461 $ 2,266,703 $ 1,905,286 M 0 Soecial Revenue Funds Gifts and Trust Reserve 1,119 Donations Funds Funds Subtotals $ _ $ _ - $ _ $ 3,742,235 _ - - 5,083,855 - 767,784 57,885 834,584 862,499 540 - 524,362 1,122 314 862,499 768,324 57,885 10,782,988 1,526 2,031 - 252,377 1,119 - - 716,903 57,377 - 7,725 6,523,176 1,518 122,000 - 518,929 9,070 106,862 - 291,562 267,527 7,845 739,559 338,137 238,738 7,725 9,042,506 - 524,362 529,586 50,160 1,740,482 (1,375,965) (1,375,965) 524,362 529,586 50,160 364,517 275,216 7,747,563 146,273 13,376,325 $ 799,578 $ 8,277,149 $ 196,433 $ 13,740,842 (continued) 100 TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES NONMAJOR GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 (oonfinued) Revenues: Departmental Intergovernmental Investment income Other Total Revenues Expenditures: Current: General government Public safety Education Publicworks Health and human services Culture and recreation Total Expenditures Excess (deficiency) of revenues over (under) expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses): Issuance of bonds Transfers out Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) Change in fund balances Fund Balances, beginning of year Fund Balances, end of year 187,000 187,000, 187,000 187,000 89,303 - 89,303 524,878 - 524,878 - 3,104,964 3,104,964 284,616 - 284,616 92,938 92,938 Total Nonmajor Governmental Funds $ 3,742,235 5,270,855 834,584 1,122,314 10,969,988 341.680 1,241,781 9,628,140 803,545 291,562 832,497 991,735 3,104,964- 4,096,699 13,139,205 (991,735) (2,917,964) (3,909,699) (2,169,217) 525,000 5,000,000 5,525,000 525,000 5,000,000 (466,735) 2,082,036 1,070,942 721,504 $ 604,207 $ 2,803,540 101 5,525,000 1,615,301 1,792,446 $ 3,407,747 5,525,000 (1,375,965) 4,149,035 1,979,818 15,168,771 $ 17,148,589 Capital Project Funds Town School Capital Capital Project Funds Project Funds Subtotals 187,000 187,000, 187,000 187,000 89,303 - 89,303 524,878 - 524,878 - 3,104,964 3,104,964 284,616 - 284,616 92,938 92,938 Total Nonmajor Governmental Funds $ 3,742,235 5,270,855 834,584 1,122,314 10,969,988 341.680 1,241,781 9,628,140 803,545 291,562 832,497 991,735 3,104,964- 4,096,699 13,139,205 (991,735) (2,917,964) (3,909,699) (2,169,217) 525,000 5,000,000 5,525,000 525,000 5,000,000 (466,735) 2,082,036 1,070,942 721,504 $ 604,207 $ 2,803,540 101 5,525,000 1,615,301 1,792,446 $ 3,407,747 5,525,000 (1,375,965) 4,149,035 1,979,818 15,168,771 $ 17,148,589 TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS COMBINING SCHEDULE OF NET ASSETS JUNE. 30, 2010 ASSETS Current: Cash and short-term investments User fees, net of allowance for uncollectibles Inventory Total current assets Noncurrent: Capital assets being depreciated, net _ Capital assets not being depreciated Total noncurrent assets TOTALASSETS LIABILITIES Current: Warrants payable Other current liabilities Current portion of long -term liabilities: Bonds payable Total current liabilities Noncurrent: Bonds payable, net of current portion Accrued employee benefits Net OPEB obligation Total noncurrent liabilities TOTAL LIABILITIES NETASSETS Invested in capital assets, net of related debt Unrestricted TOTAL NET ASSETS See notes to financial statements. Business -Type Activities Enterorise Funds 6,097,366 Landfill 61,761 - - 61,761 Sewer Closure and Stormwater 91,651 1,175,222 10,063,587 Fund - Postclosure Management Total $ 1,313,552 $ 91,651 $ 955,034 $ 2,360,237 1,320,813 - 104,140 1,424,953 3,222 - - 3,222 2,637,587 91,651 1,059,174 3,788,412 6,097,366 - 116,048 6,213,414 61,761 - - 61,761 6,159,127 - 116,048 6,275,175 8,796,714 91,651 1,175,222 10,063,587 33,921 15,324 49,245 - 91,651 - 91,651 117,965 - 117,965 151,886 91,651 15,324 258,861 236,096 - - 236,096 4,983- - 16,730 21,713 37,755 37,755 278,834 - 16,730 295,564 430,720 91,651 32,054 554,425 6,045,308 - 116,048 6,161,356. 2,320,686 1,027,120 3,347,806 $ 8,365,994 $ $ 1,143,168 $ 9,509,162 102 TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS - NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS COMBINING SCHEDULE OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN FUND NET ASSETS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 Business -Type Activities Enteronse Funds Landfill Sewer Closure and Stonnwater Fund Postclosure I Management Total Operating Revenues Charges for services $ 4,985,806 $ $ 403,629 $ 5,389,435 Total Operating Revenues 4,985,806 - 403,629 5,389,435 Operating Expenses: Personnel expenses 384,701 - 76,507 461,208 Non personnel expenses 175,509 - 36,550 212,059. Intergovernmental 3,844,457 - - 3,844,457 Depreciation 338,572 - 6,108 344,680 Energy purchases 28,537 28,537 Total Operating Expenses 4,771,776 - 119,165 4,890,941 Operating Income 214,030 - 284,464 .498,494 Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses): Intergovernmental revenue 137,730 - - 137,730 Investment income 5,161 - 397 5,558 Interest expense (9,251) - (9,251) Total Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) 133,640 397 134,037 Income Before Transfers 347,670 - 284,861 632,531 Transfers (out) (258,994) - (258,994) Change in Net Assets 88,676 - 284,861 373,537 Net Assets at Beginning of Year, 8,277,318 858,307 9,135,625 Net Assets at End of Year $ 8,365,994 $ - $ 1,143,168 $ 9,509,162 See notes to financial statements. 103 J TOWN OF READING, MASSACHUSETTS NONMAJOR PROPRIETARY FUNDS COMBINING SCHEDULE OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2010 Cash Flows From Operating Activities: Receipts from customers and users Payments to vendors and employees Payments to other governments Net Cash Provided By (Used For) Operating Activities Cash Flows From Noncapital Financina Activilies: Transfer out Net Cash Provided By (Used For) Noncapital Financing Activities Cash Flows From Capital and Related Financing Activitles: Proceeds from issuance of bonds and notes Acquisition of capital assets Capital grants and contributions Principal payments on bonds and notes Interest expense Net Cash (Used For) Capital and Related Financing Activities Cash Flows From Investina Activities: Investment income Net Cash Provided By Investing Activities Net Change in Cash and Short -Term Investments Cash and Short Term Investments, Beginning of Year Cash and Short Term Investments, End of Year Reconciliation of Operatma Income (Loss) to Net Cash Provided By (Used For) Operating Activities: Operating income Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities: Depreciation Changes in assets and liabilities: User fees receivables Inventory and prepayments Other assets Warrants payable Accrued liabilities Other liabilities OPEB liability Net Cash Provided By (Used For) Operating Activities See notes to financial statements. Business -Type Activities Enteronse Funds Landfill Sewer Closure and Stormwater Fund Postdosure Manaoement Total $ 4,951,699 $ 13,014 $ 381,358 $ 5,346,071 (600,214) (7,007) (104,127) (711,348) (3,844,457) (3,844,457) 507,028 6,007 277,231 790,266 (258,994) (258,994) (258,994) - - (258,994) 164,670 - - 164,670 (708,724) - (122,156) (830,880) 137,730 - - 137,730 (168,708) - - (168,708) (9,251) (9,251) (584,283) - (122,156) (706,439) 5,161 397 5,558 '5,161 397 5,558 (331,088) 6,007 155,472 (169,609) 1644,640 85,644 799,562 2,529,846 $ 1,313,552 $ 91,651 $ 955,034 $ 2,360,237 $ 214,030 $ - $ 284,464 $ 498,494 338,572 (49,930) (1,766) (6,703) (2,998) (1,517) 17.340 $ 507,028 104 6,108 344,680 (24,158) (74,088) - (1,766) 169 189 (7,007) 8,930 (4,780) (2,998) 13,014 1,698 13,195 17,340 $ 6,007 $ 277,231 $ 790,266 ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT Board of Selectmen Selectmen Stephen Goldy and Richard Schubert were re- elected to three year terms. For Fiscal Year 2011, James Bonazoli served as Chairman, Camille Anthony served as Vice Chairman and Richard Schubert served as Secretary. Jimmy Houston was appointed as the Youth Liaison to the Board of Selectmen. Personnel and Volunteers • The Board of Selectmen • Reappointed Gail LaPointe as Town Accountant • Reappointed Brackett and Lucas as Town Counsel • Approved the FY 2011 Classification and Compensation Plan that was the same as FY2010 • Approved a Section 20 Exemption (Ethics laws) for Hal Croft as a member of the School Committee In the area of Boards, Committees and Commissions, the Board of Selectmen • Approved the policy establishing the Volunteer Appointment Subcommittee • Approved the policy establishing the Town Forest Committee • Designated the ad hoc Municipal Building Committee members as special employees The following individuals were either newly appointed or re- appointed by the Board of Selectmen to the following Boards, Committees or Commissions • Animal Control Appeals Committee - John Miles; • Board of Appeals - John A. Jarema and Kristin Marie Cataldo (Associate); • Board of Cemetery Trustees - Ronald Stortz and Elise M. Ciregna; • Board of Health - David Singer; • Board of Registrars - Krissandra Holmes; • Advisory Committee on the Cities for Climate Protection Program - Tony Capobianco, Joan Boegel, Ronald D'Addario, and Associates Gina Snyder, David L. Williams, Ronald K. Taupier, Tracy Sopchak and Michele Benson; i Commissioners of Trust Funds - John J. Daly; • Community Planning and Development Commission _ Paul Bolger, Nicholas Salina, John Weston and George Katsoufis (Associate; • Conservation Commission - Brian F. Sullivan, Jamie Maughan and Annika Scanlon; • Constable - Alan Ulrich; • Council on Aging - Steve Oston, Sally M. Hoyt, Carole N. Scrima and Dorothy Deros; • Cultural Council - Lorraine Horn and Joan Marshman; • Custodian of Soldier's and Sailor's Graves - Francis P. Driscoll; • Economic Development Committee - Michelle R. Williams, Meghan Young - Tafoya and Associates Ben Yoder, Michell Ferullo, Maria Higgins and John Russell; • Historical Commission - Mark Cardono, Angela Binda and Associate Sharlene Reynolds Santo; 105 • Housing Authority - Kevin F. Mulvey; • Human Relations Advisory Committee - Lori Hodin, James Cormier, Margaret LeLacheur and Associate Randall Jones; • North Suburban Planning Council - Ben Tafoya and George Katsoufis; • RCTV Board of Directors - Joe Lachiana; • Reading Ice Arena Authority - Carl McFadden; • Recreation Committee - Michael DiPetro, Francis Driscoll, Catherine Kammer and Associates John Winne, Adam Chase and Joseph Rossetti; • Town Forest Committee - Patrice A. Todisco, Mark Wetzel and Associate Thomas Gardiner; • Trails Committee - Joan A. Hoyt, David Williams and Associates Matthew DesMeules and John E. Parson; • Volunteer Appointment Subcommittee - Camille Anthony and Stephen Goldy; • West Street Historic District Commission - Everett Blodgett and Stephen O'Shea Licensing and Permits In the area of licenses the Board of Selectmen approved • an all alcohol restaurant liquor license for Bistro Concepts, Inc. d/b /a Sam's Bistro at 107 Main Street, • an all alcohol restaurant liquor license for Ristorante Pavarotti, Inc. d/b /a Ristorante Pavarotti at 601 Main Street. • a liquor license transfer from Emperor's Choice to Phider Corp. d/b /a Grumpy Doyle's at 530 Main Street. The Board issued the last existing Package Store Liquor License to Peter J. Donovan d/b /a The Wine Bunker at One General Way, and approved the transfer of a Package Store Liquor License from Johnavi Riya Wine Shop, Inc. to Reading Fine Wines, LLC d/b /a The Wine Shop of Reading located at 676 Main. At year's end, the legislature approved the Home Rule Petition to grant one additional license for the Sale of All Alcohol Beverages not to be Drunk on the Premises to Oaktree Development, LLC located at 30 Haven Street. Community Development The Board of Selectmen approved amendments to Section 3.10 of the Board of Selectmen Policies — Licenses for Utilizing Public Sidewalks for Outdoor Dining, to allow the service of alcohol with outdoor dining. At the 2010 Annual Town Meeting, Section 6.2. "Signs" of the Zoning By -Law was amended to permit the use of Portable A -Frame or Sandwich Board signs in' the Business B Zone. The amended sign by -law stipulates that Portable A -Frame signs fall under the regulatory control of the Board of Selectmen so a policy was approved by the Board of Selectmen to promote a pedestrian friendly community that supports businesses. The regulation of Portable A- 106 Frame /Sandwich Board Signs was intended to balance the aesthetic, safety, and economic development needs of the community. Regarding the Route 128 /93 Interchange process, Mass. Highway is now the Mass. Department of Transportation and staffing has been reduced and money is not there for projects. Last Spring, the RFP process to select a consultant to take the project to the environmental review process began. Fay, Spofford and Thomdike was selected. The State is trying to combine the environmental process with the design process. Aerial photographs were taken in the Spring. They are currently looking at the wetlands delineation and looking at adding a lane on 128. They will start with the Task Force recommendations and will hold public hearings. The timeframe is uncertain and funding is another process — this project will go up against all other projects. The Oak Tree 40R Development on Haven Street is the first application for a 40R district in Reading. The original proposal for condominiums has been changed to rental units. Affordable Housing Trust Funds have been requested for the project and the Town applied for and received from the state an additional All Alcohol Package Store License at this location. The Board of Selectmen approved the revised Local Initiative Program (LIP) Regulations. The new regulations have been streamlined and reference to State laws have been removed. They are still in existence by implication behind the scenes but now this policy need not be amended when the State laws change. The Board of Selectmen received an introduction from Pulte Homes, who plan on purchasing and redeveloping the Addison Wesley Pearson property on Jacob Way. Pulte is a national home builder with 69 divisions in 29 states. Pulte Homes will purchase and redevelop the entire property which will result in one consistent compatible environment of 424 homes including 16 townhomes, over 55 condos, and 200 condos in the 40R Gateway Smart Growth section. It was estimated thai this development will lead to a significant amount of revenue to the Town — approximately $1.9 million to the Town in annual tax revenues. Infrastructure The Town received a grant in the amount of $4,000 to have a Forester come out and make recommendations on land use management in the Town Forest (and adjoining Town owned properties). The Town has completed a Forest stewardship plan for the area. The Board of Selectmen approved the Joshua Eaton Master Plan for the park/open space at the school. The plan includes 18 extra spaces parking spaces. There will be a handicap accessible ramp, the raised island will be removed to ease plowing, there will be a 90 x 65 playground area, the ball fields remain the same, the batting cage is semi permanent, and the driveway in the back will be for police and fire only. The complete renovation of Memorial Park was begun and completed, thanks to the generous donation by Nelson and Rita Burbank, donations by a number of individuals and businesses including the Reading Cooperative Bank, and thanks to the dedication and hard work by the Engineering Division of the Department of Public Works. 107 The Town continued its Pavement Improvement program for the year, including a complete improvement to Temple Street including new street, granite curb, and sidewalk on one side of the street. The Town has applied for a grant on the Safe Routes to School program, and has been approved for a project that will include new sidewalks on: • one side of Washington Street between Woburn and Prescott Streets • one side of Sunnyside from Prescott to Riverside • Improvement to various handicapped ramps on a variety of intersections in the project area including Temple Street, Woburn Street, Prescott Street, Sunnyside Ave., and Riverside Dr. Financial The Board of Selectmen approved the extension of the 20 Year Agreement with the Reading Municipal Light Department and the communities of Lynnfield, North Reading and Wilmington for 10 more years that will continue the agreement through July 9, 2030. In an effort to increase recycling and reduce rubbish disposal costs the Board of Selectmen voted to approve the amendments to Section 4.6 of the Board of Selectmen Policies — Solid Waste Recycling, Collection and Disposal Rules and Regulations, to allow for JRM's proposal of • weekly recycling (instead of biweekly); • curbside leaf collection (five weeks), • elimination of bulk waste stickers — residents will be allowed one bulk item per week, • residents call vendor directly for CRT /TV pick up at $10.00 each, • resident calls vendor directly for weekly appliance curbside pickup $20.00 /each. • eliminates monthly charges to the Town for additional dumpsters, • one metal pick up annually, • one paper shredding event annually, • one bulky rigid plastics event annually, and • enforcement of recycling and four barrel limit. This contract will be $36,000 less than the current contract. The Town Manager executed transitional agreements for the first time with churches for snow plowing where the Town will continue to plow their parking lots and the church will reimburse the Town for this service. After 3 years the churches will be fully responsible for plowing their own parking lots. The Board of Selectmen held a hearing in November and approved a number of fee increases items including mostly inspectional fees and copy fees. They also approved the liquor license fees for the next two years. on CONSERVATION DIVISION The Conservation Commission was established in 1960 under the Conservation Act, Section 8C of Chapter 40 of the Massachusetts General Laws, for the promotion and development of the natural resources and for the protection of watershed resources in Reading. The Commission has worked since that time to acquire and maintain hundreds of acres of conservation land within the town for public enjoyment and resource protection. In 1972, the Conservation Commission was given regulatory authority to administer the new Wetlands Protection Act, Section 40 of Chapter 131 of the Massachusetts General Laws. Over the years, the Commission's role in the administration of the Wetlands Protection Act has been further defined through regulations and policies issued by the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection. In 1980, the Town adopted the Wetlands Protection Bylaw, Section 5.7 of the Reading General Bylaws. The Commission subsequently promulgated the Reading Wetlands Protection Regulations under the Bylaw. From time to time, Town Meeting has amended the Bylaw and the Commission has amended the Regulations, most recently in July of 2006. The amendments serve to clarify the language, to make it consistent with recent changes in the state law and regulations, and to assure revenues from filing fees. Wetlands Protection Activities During 2010, the Conservation Commission reviewed 29 permit applications for proposed work and wetlands delineation. The Commission held 52 public hearings and public meetings and performed more than 100 site inspections regarding the permit applications and construction. The Commission also issued 66 decisions including permits, resource area delineations, extensions, and amendments. The Commission made final site inspections and closed 78 project files. The Commission identified and resolved 22 violations. The Administrator reviewed and signed off on 630 building permits and 30 minor projects, and performed 476 site inspections. The Commission collected $687.50 in filing fees under the Wetlands Protection Act and $4,842.29 under the Wetlands Protection Bylaw. Major projects under permitting review and/or construction oversight by the Commission in 2010 included: • Additional units and trail layout at Johnson Woods condominium; • Completion of Kylie Drive and Benjamin Lane subdivisions - nine new houses and two remaining vacant lots; • Five new houses on existing lots, and numerous improvements to existing houses; • Completion of wetlands restoration at Reading Memorial High School; • Recreational, drainage, and other improvements in Memorial Park and Harrison Street; • Commercial redevelopment projects, including hazardous waste removal and drainage improvements, at 107, 212, 281, 285, and 306 Main Street, and at the Honda Gallery on Walkers Brook Drive; • Completion of a new day -care center on Torre Street, with stream bank restoration along Walkers Brook; • Hazardous waste mitigation at the RMLD substation on Causeway Road; • Drainage improvements at St. Athanasius Church, Wingate health care facility, and a Housing Authority site, 109 • Signage, lighting, and pavement improvements by MassHighway on Routes I -95 and I- 93; • Planting of street trees in Sunset Rock Lane Subdivision; • Preliminary review of plans for redevelopment at 80 -100 Main Street, Jacob's Way, and for installation of a regional water main system by the MWRA. The Commission provided emergency permits for work to replace damaged utility poles and to address flooding caused by beavers. The Commission amended the Reading Wetlands Protection Regulations to provide better protection for streams and rivers. The Commission participated in the Earth Day Fair and the Economic Development Summit Meeting. The Administrator worked with other Town staff to draft an earth removal bylaw, review permit tracking systems, improve customer service, and incorporate changes in the State Open Meeting Law and the new Permit Extension Act. The Administrator also continued to update the Conservation website with agendas, minutes, a section on "frequently asked questions" with links to supporting forms and documents, and other relevant information. Natural Resources Conservation Activities The Commission received a $16,536 Recreational Trails Grant from the MA Division of Conservation and Recreation in 2009 for trail improvements in Bare Meadow. The Commission and Administrator worked with the Trail Committee and numerous volunteers to design and construct 200 feet of boardwalks, harden trail surfaces, install a comprehensive blazing and directional sign system, and add bulletin boards at trail entrances. The project was completed on time, with more than 600 hours of volunteer labor contributed. We have applied for another Recreational Trails Grant for similar improvements in Kurchian Woods, and hope to receive an award next spring. We worked with the MA Fishing and Boating Access Board to complete installation of the fishing platform and handicapped accessible trail at Lobs Mill Conservation Area on the Ipswich River. Through a partnership with Friends of Reading Recreation, we received an $8,500 grant from the Harpley Foundation for renovation of the Mattera Cabin. We have also received $2,500 in donations from citizens, and last year received $2,000 from the Fleetwing Charitable Foundation Trust. The Administrator worked with the Town Manager, Selectmen, and staff and students from the Northeast Metropolitan Regional Vocational School to design the renovations, obtain permits, purchase materials, and coordinate work. Students began construction last March and have continued through the 2010 -2011 school year. They are installing new plumbing, wiring, lighting, heating, flooring, kitchen cabinets, and a handicapped accessible bathroom. Health and Engineering staff inspected the septic system, which fortunately only needed minor repairs, and DPW completed the repairs. A security system and phone line was installed by outside vendors. We are looking forward to opening the cabin for public use this spring, and would welcome additional donations for furniture and appliances. We worked with Planning and GIS staff and the Town Forest Committee to apply for a grant, hire a consultant, and produce a Forestry Management Plan. We also worked with the Selectmen and Town Forest Committee on updating the Selectmen's policy regarding the scope of TFC authority, responsibilities, and membership. 110 We worked with Boy Scouts who replaced rotting boardwalks in the Town Forest and built a bridge over Walkers Brook in Pinevale Conservation Area. We worked with a Girl Scout Troop to clear the overgrown entrance to Pinevale from Park Avenue. We have welcomed nature walks led by Library staff, including an `owl prowl" in January, a spring walk in April, and a summer walk in July. Information about trail events is posted on the website, www.readingma.gov. We received a donation of 4.29 acres of land and two trail easements from the developer of the Kylie Drive subdivision, Deer Run Developers. These will allow the creation of a trail system that will connect Wakefield Street, Baker Road, and Kylie Drive to Charles Street through land belonging to the Conservation Commission, Cemetery Commission, and Reading Open Land Trust. We have continued to work closely with the Police Department to stop occasional misuse of Conservation lands, including fires and ORV use. With better signage and patrolling, incidents have decreased this year. In September, the Trail Committee and Administrator met with trail adopters and added 13 new members to the Adopt -a -Trail program. Adopters are provided with a handbook and field training, and are assigned a particular trail to oversee. Adopters inspect their trails several times a year and carry out routine brush clearing, marking, and clean -up. They report larger problems to the Trail Committee for resolution by volunteer work parties and/or Public Works crews. If you would like to volunteer to help with trails, please contact the Conservation office (781 -942- 6616). The Commission truly appreciates all of the people who have contributed time and money to the cabin and trail projects this year! Membership and Office Management The Commission began.2010 with Bill Hecht as Chairman, and Doug Greene, Tina Ohlson, Barbara Stewart, Annika Scanlon, and Brian Tucker, as members. Associate member Brian Sullivan was appointed as a full member in January. He served until June, when he moved out of Reading, and was reappointed in September when he moved back. Sadly, long -time member Doug Greene passed away unexpectedly in June, and we continue to miss his many contributions. Jamie Maughan, a former Commissioner, was appointed to fill the vacancy and was elected Vice Chairman. Fran Fink continued as Conservation Administrator, and Maureen Knight as Recording Secretary. Commissioners and the Administrator attended various workshops and courses during the year to stay current with open space protection and wetland regulation practices, and to obtain certification on new State ethics regulations. The Commission's office is located in the Community Services Department on the first floor of Town Hall. The phone number is 781 - 942 -6616. 111 ELDER/HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION The Division of Elder/Human Services provides social services, advocacy, activities, transportation, educational programs, and a meal site for Reading residents age 60 and over. Home - delivered meals are available for homebound elders through Mystic Valley Elder Services' Meals on Wheels program. In addition, the division offers information, support, and referrals to seniors and their adult children, friends, and caregivers about a variety of aging concerns. For those under age 60, the division provides social services and holiday programs. The staff consists of an Administrator (37.5 hr /wk), a Social Worker (37.5 hr /wk), a Senior Center Coordinator (35 hr /wk), a Van Driver (35 hr /wk), a Nurse Advocate (21 hr /wk) and a Clerk (19 hr /wk). Highlights and lowlights for the division this year included the following: • At Town Meeting (Article 17) the members voted to accept a gift from the Patrons for Older Adults. The funds will establish a permanent trust fund to be known as "Patrons for Older Adults Support Fund." The Council on Aging and the division will determine how the funds are expended. • The division has implemented the transportation module of MySeniorCenter tracking software • In collaboration with the School Department, the division has established the METCO shuttle. The shuttle uses the Elder Services' van and driver's but is funded by the METCO grant. • The Property Tax Work Program was expanded to allow for 30 participants, an abatement maximum of $1000, and an hourly rate of $8.00. • The Pleasantries newsletter became available online and more than 100 people have subscribed. • The division now has liability waivers for Medical and Shopping Escort volunteers. • The Coordinator of Volunteers retired in 2009 and this year the position was removed from the budget. Social Services The Social Worker addresses the needs and concerns of Reading residents of all ages. Assistance for those under the age of 60 often involves crisis intervention, goal- setting, information and referrals about financial, housing, mental health, and disability - related concerns. For those age 60 and over, assistance includes crisis intervention; EAP -model of case management; addressing housing concerns; mediating intergenerational disputes; intervening in cases of neglect, loneliness, or depression; coordinating appointments with area medical and social service agencies; as well as providing information and referrals with regard to nursing home placement and eligibility for State and Federal programs. Assisting relatives and friends of seniors with all the above concerns is another important service our Social Worker provides. During .2010, our Social Worker had 3,243 contacts with 112 approximately 1,361 people (43% more than last yea who required assistance of some kind. In addition, our Social Worker co- facilitates an Alzheimer's/Memory Loss Caregivers' support group at the Senior Center. The Social Worker provides eligibility screening for, and assistance with, applications for Fuel Assistance, the Reading Food Pantry and various transportation programs. In 2010, the Social Worker completed these tasks for 112 (2.5% decrease from 2009) individuals /families to the Reading Food Pantry, 126 (15% decrease from 2009) certifications for medical transportation and assisted 180 (13% increase from 2009) households with their Fuel Assistance applications. Our Home Heating Financial Assistance program provided $525 in assistance during 2010. Nurse Advocate The Nurse Advocate is dedicated to helping Reading seniors manage their health care needs. The main responsibilities of the Nurse Advocate include educating, counseling and advocating for seniors. This position is interested in identifying the frailest seniors in Reading, especially those who live alone and do not have someone nearby for support. By being available to support seniors more proactively, the program will help seniors to remain healthier and more independent. Similar programs have demonstrated that such interventions can even reduce disabilities and prevent or delay institutionalization. In the past year, the Nurse Advocate has assisted 113 seniors with 851 contacts. Some of the outcomes of her work include: o helping to reduce anxiety o facilitating transition to more appropriate living situation o encouraging proactive planning o developing trusting relationships o providing referrals o advocating for seniors by problem solving with providers and/or family members o assisting with accurate diagnosis o facilitating prompt treatment and/or follow up o improved quality of life for seniors and caregivers o educating seniors regarding health/medical issues o educating caregivers o promoting self care o prevent 911 calls o prevent hospitalizations o prevent fall, injury or disability o prevent caregiver burnout o prevent premature nursing home placement Helping seniors understand their health care needs and plan strategies for managing these needs both in the short term and future is the goal of this program. 113 The Nurse Advocate is very knowledgeable about Alzheimer's disease. This year she co- facilitated the Alzheimer's/Memory Loss support group at the Senior Center. During the past year, there has been a consistent flow of referrals from a wide variety of sources. Both seniors and elder care professionals have shown a great deal of interest in learning about the position. There have been many notes of appreciation from seniors and their caregivers. Senior Center The Senior Center Coordinator's primary responsibility is to manage the daily operations of the Senior Center including the care of the facility and the coordination of activities. As can be seen from the following chart, the Senior Center is a hub of activity Monday through Friday. Monday Tuesday Wednesdav Thursday Friday Cribbage Bingo Billiards Bingo Chess Movies Motion to Knitters Motion to Music- Strength Music - aerobics aerobics Training Open Computer Computer Book Discussion Party Bridge Computer Lab Lessons Lessons Tai Chi Open Quilting Congressman* Open Computer Computer Lab Tierney's Office Lab Hairdresser* Practice Bridge Yoga Open Computer AA Lab Birthday Lunch* Food Renewed Ask a Nurse Scuttlebutt* SHINE - health insurance info* Art Classes Keep Moving Low Vision* Podiatry Clinic* Walgreen's Club Blood Sugar Screening SHINE* Health Visit with the* Open Blood Pressure Art Classes Insurance School Supt. Computer Lab Clinic ** Information Laughter Yoga Facials Party Bridge Visit with the* Town Manager Chronic Disease Bereavement Visit with Self- Management Support Grou Selectman Goldy* Zumba fitness Walgreen's Blood Pressure Clinic* Keep Moving Club Manicures Ask a Social Worker Memoir Writing *Meet monthly * *Provided by the Reading Health Department 114 New programs added during 2010 include: Art Classes; Laughter Yoga; Keep Moving Club; Bereavement Support Group; Ask a Social Worker; Manicures; Keep Moving Club; Facials; Visit with the* School Supt.; Ask a Nurse; Food Renewed Support groups, like Low Vision, Scuttlebutt, the Bereavement Support Group and the Alzheimer's/ Memory Loss Caregivers' group provide participants with an opportunity to express their feelings and gain insights from other participants' experiences. Guest speakers are often invited to present education and alternate viewpoints. Elder Services is always looking to broaden the programs, classes, and services currently offered at the Senior Center. For this reason, Reading seniors are frequently surveyed about their interests. The 2011 survey was administered during the 3`d Annual Thanksgiving Dinner. There were approximately 370 seniors present, many of whom are not familiar with the Senior Center's offerings. The results 'demonstrated a strong interest in the following: day trips; evening activities, and line dancing, Volunteers The division recognizes the importance of volunteers. Few of our programs would run smoothly without volunteers from the community. The volunteers themselves learn new skills, meet new people, and enjoy an increased sense of self -worth. For these reasons, the division places great emphasis on offering a variety of volunteer opportunities for a diverse set of skills, abilities, and interests. The Administrator matches volunteers to various community service positions -- many of which specifically aid Reading's older population. Some of the positions filled by volunteers include: Senior Center receptionists, gardeners, book discussion leaders, game leaders, income tax preparers, computer instructors, COA board members, repairmen, friendly visitors, medical escorts, office workers, newsletter editor, bread suppliers, kitchen helpers, shoppers for homebound seniors, and shopping escorts. Intergenerational projects continue to be an important teaching tool for cooperation among the generations. Students served the seniors lunch and helped with yard work. They provided entertainment at the Senior Center and prepared dinner and entertainment for the seniors at their schools. They made cards, cookies, and tray favors at holiday times. When reporting statistics, the Executive Office of Elder Affairs has requested a differentiation between "registered" volunteers and "unregistered" volunteers. Registered volunteers include those who have completed the volunteer application process including; the application; Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) check, interview, training, placement and ongoing support. Unregistered volunteers include, but are not limited to, students, civic groups, town departments, and free performers. In the past year 240 registered volunteers gave 9,853 hours of service. The financial equivalent for these services is approximately $259,330 *. And unregistered volunteers gave 859 hours of service. 115 *The 2008 rate of $26.32 is used by the United Way, the Massachusetts Executive Office of Elder Affairs, Minnesota School of Business, several medical centers, Points of Light, and Synergy Resource Center. (Jalandoni, N, (2008) Value of Volunteer Time http:/ /independentsector.org/programs /research/volunteer time.html). The Coordinator of Volunteers (COV) retired in March of 2009. At the Spring Town Meeting in April 2009, Town Meeting members voted to amend the FY10 budget to include the COV position at a reduced level of 19 hours per week without benefits. Unfortunately, due to the continuing fiscal crisis the position was not filled. The division has been incorporating the COV tasks into the responsibilities of the remaining staff members. Portions of the Medical Escort and Property Tax Work programs have been assumed by the Finance Department. This has helped reduce the workload for the division. Be assured that the staff will continue to work diligently to maintain the quality and quantity of volunteers, services, and programs until the economy is robust enough to fill the COV position. Lunch time Meals The Senior Center's daily nutrition program is provided by Mystic Valley Elder Services, Inc. (MVES). In an effort to increase attendance at lunch we often offer concurrent games, programs, and/or entertainment. There are 30 meal site volunteers who help serve and clean up after the noontime meal at the Senior Center. Socialization is an important component of this program. In 2010, a total of 4,926 lunches were served at the Senior Center. In 2010, MVES' Meals -On- Wheels program delivered a total of 20,546 meals to 163 participants. The roster of participants changes as people become well enough to prepare their own meals or move to other levels of care. .A variety of meals is delivered: lunch meals, evening meals, clinical diets, and frozen meals for the weekend. A variety of "clinical diet" meals is also available including: no concentrated sweets, diabetic, low fiber, high fiber, low lactose, renal, or pureed. Van Transportation The van transportation program provides a vital service for those seniors that don't drive. Transportation is provided in -town for the following purposes: errands, grocery shopping, voting, medical and personal appointments, pharmacy needs, going to breakfast, and visiting the Senior Center. For younger residents, the van services offers transportation to and from the food pantry and other vital destinations. In 2010, the van provided 8041 one -way trips. Newsletter The Pleasantries newsletter is a monthly publication created by the division and published by Senior Citizen's Publishing, Inc. (SCP). There is no cost to the Town for this arrangement. SCP's revenue is derived from selling advertising space in the newsletter. The newsletters are delivered to approximately 2610 senior households in Reading three times a year. This figure is significantly lower than in previous years. In an effort to lower costs, we have 116 combined married couple households, and we now hand - deliver stacks of newsletters to senior housing developments instead of mailing them. The Burbank Trust Fund provides the funding for postage. During the other nine months, 900 copies of the newsletter are available at several locations around town. The goal of the newsletter is to increase awareness of the programs and services available to Reading's seniors and their caregivers. The newsletter also provides important information about benefit changes and helpful agencies. An annual subscription is available by mail for $5. Residents can now subscribe to the newsletter online at no cost and receive it via email. Property Tax Worker Program The division coordinates the Property Tax Worker program which allows Reading seniors to perform various tasks for Town departments in exchange for an abatement on their property taxes. The program is open to Reading residents age 65 and over or disabled, who own property and have a household income that does not exceed limits set by the program. In 2010 there were 30 positions available, and each participant was permitted to earn a maximum abatement of $1,000 annually. In 2010, participants were compensated at a rate of $8.00 per hour. The program has been funded through the Assessors' Overlay account. Burbank Trust Fund In 2010 the Council on Aging approved expenditures from the Dorothy L. Burbank Trust to pay for the following: pictures frames; a cork board; the Volunteer Recognition Reception; a wall divider and door for the lower level; bingo cards for low vision seniors; advertisements in the Reading Recreation Community Guide; three months of postage cost for bulk mailings of the newsletter; monthly entertainment for the Senior Center's special lunch program; birthday cake, gift certificates, and lunch for the monthly birthday celebrants. 2010 beginning balance = $265,760.82 2010 ending balance = $264,492.69 Patrons for Older Adults Support Fund At Town Meeting (Article 17) the members voted to accept a gift from the Patrons for Older Adults. The funds have established a permanent trust fund to be known as "Patrons for Older Adults Support Fund." The Council on Aging and the division will determine how the funds are expended. 2010 beginning balance = $125,000.00 2010 ending balance = $126,695.65 Schroeder Trust Fund In 2010, funds from the Schroeder Trust were used to purchase hot Thanksgiving and Christmas meals for seniors who were going to be alone for the holidays. Thirty meals were provided for each Thanksgiving and Christmas. All meals were delivered by COA board members. 2010 beginning balance = $23,003.88 2010 ending balance = $22,978.48 117 Donations Many individuals and organizations have generously supported Elder/Human Services' efforts by providing money, gifts, and in -kind services. Some of the donations have included: sponsorship of an event, program or meal; senior center decorations; baked goods; paper cups and plates; flowers; plants; art work; refreshments; and more. Human Services 2010 beginning balance = $8,423 -87 Human Services 2010 ending balance = $6,598.16 Elder Services 2010 beginning balance = $16,209.58 Elder Services 2010 ending balance = $18,116.92 Holiday Programs Adopt -a- Family This was the first year the Reading Rotary Club and ReadingCARES coordinated the Adopt -A- Family holiday program and they did a terrific job. Elder/Human Services will continue to guide their efforts until they are more familiar with the tasks involved. The Adopt -a- Family program matches low income Reading families with confidential donors of food and gifts for children. Reading residents, businesses, out -of -town businesses that employ Reading residents, youth organizations, school groups, nursery schools, churches, and municipal departments join together to make this program a success. This past year, 101 donor groups, families, and individuals made donations of food and gifts to the Adopt -A- Family program. Recipients Households Thanksgiving Food 54 Christmas Food/Gifts 64 (129 children) COA Hot Meals The Social Worker supplies the Council on Aging with a list of 30 seniors who would welcome a Thanksgiving meal and a visitor, and another 30 for around Christmas time. (This task is more difficult than it sounds as many seniors are uncomfortable accepting assistance.) The meals are purchased from Boston Market using Schroeder Trust funds and are delivered by COA board members. Christmas Gifts The Social Worker gathers gift wishes from 25 seniors. The Young Women's League purchases, wraps and delivers the gifts. Thanksgiving and Christmas Baskets The Social Worker supplies the Wakefield Elks with a list of 20 seniors who would welcome receiving a basket of uncooked holiday food. Emergency Funds The division has two revolving funds. The Elder Services Revolving Fund covers emergency situations for persons age 60 and older who lack financial resources to cover basic needs or emergencies. The Human Service Revolving Fund is for persons under age 60 who lack financial resources for emergency situations. Council on Aging Board The Council on Aging Board members took on many volunteer tasks this year. Their assistance and support is very much appreciated. 118 PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION Introduction The Reading Board of Health is responsible for administering the local public health function in the Town of Reading and the Reading Health Division is the administrative unit that carries out the essential responsibilities of Board of Health. This involves preparing for and responding to Public Health emergencies, promoting and protecting public health in Reading. This process involves the utilization of numerous scientific principles, specific knowledge and skill sets including (but not limited to): epidemiology, microbiology, chemistry, physics, building science, testing of electrical services and outlets, knowledge of plumbing principles and equipment operation, HVAC operation, psychology, medical entomology, health education, water quality, pest control, communicable disease processes, wastewater treatment and disposal, solid waste disposal, air quality control, noise control and public health law. The Health Division is required to enforce a minimum of fourteen State regulations, in addition to Board of Health regulations and Town By -Laws. The Division provides advice to residents and businesses on these laws. The Health Division is expected to enforce a new State law on allergen information and awareness. Responsibilities for licensing waste transfer stations handling less than 40 tons of waste per week were transferred to the Board of Health from the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). The new law denoting these . changes removes all advisory requirements from the DER The Health Division has an open door policy and always advises ways for businesses and residents to gain compliance with the legal and safe practice requirements. Board of Health The Reading Board of Health is authorized by Town Charter and Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 111 to administer Public Health in the community and is comprised of 3 members, Barbara Meade RN/NP, Chair; Colleen Seferian RN MPH and Dr. David Mitchell Singer DMD. Board members are appointed annually on a rotating basis by the Board of Selectmen. The Board usually meets on the second Thursday of each month. The Board provides advice to the Health Services Administrator and sets policy on Public Health issues in the Town of Reading. Barbara Meade was re- elected as Chair of the Board in September 2010. Staffing Clerical/ Licensing The Health Division is fortunate to have the services of Darlene Foley, Clerk. Mrs. Foley is the face and voice of the Health Division. She is the first person the public interacts with when they seek to avail themselves of the services of the Health Division. Her attention to detail, her demeanor and customer service skills play an important part in the provision of services to those who do business with the Health Division. She processes all incoming calls, complaints, applications, licenses, and issues burial permits. Additionally, she serves as the Logistics section chief in the Emergency Dispensing Site Incident Command Structure (ICS). This year Mrs. Foley was certified in the ICS 808 - Public Health Emergency Support function. 1[L`: Environmental Health The Environmental Health Division also provides advice on good safety practices to all temporary event hosts, conducts risk assessments on the food and initiates food safety requirements as mandated by 105 590, the Massachusetts Food Safety regulations. We have meet with numerous community organizations to advise them on facility upgrades, temporary food permits and other public health matters. The Environmental Health Division responds to complaints, and conducts inspections mandated by the Public Health laws e.g.: food inspections, housing inspections, complaints, air quality and noise control, swimming pools (indoor and outdoor), camps, tanning salons and animal licensing. Joan Vitale, CPSI, CPO, Health Inspector, continues to do an outstanding job and is invaluable to the Health Division. During the year our focus has shifted to risk -based food safety inspections. Casey Mellin, part time Health Inspector, has given the Health Division the ability to provide limited public health services to Reading on nights and weekends. This has proven to be invaluable to the community, especially when he visits temporary events to advise the event coordinators on food safety. This year, five new food establishments opened in Reading. The Health Division provided advice to the owners and guided them through the regulatory process. Additionally, there were changes to the Food Code that resulted in the requirement for posting of notices on allergen notification that came into effect on October 1. The second phase will take effect on February 1, 2011 when every food establishment that prepares and serves food would be required to have a manager certified as having viewed an allergen training video. The Health Division secured a Sharps disposal kiosk from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and it is located in the lower level of Town Hall. This kiosk will serve an important function in removing medical sharps from the waste- stream as we move to the implementation of new medical waste regulations in 2012. Community Health Services The Community Health Services unit provides immunization to residents, hosts preventative blood pressure and cholesterol clinics and health education activities. This year we participated in /coordinated the following: - Reading Fall Street Faire - Reading Friends and Family Day - Senior Health Fair at the Senior Center - Healthy Habits Seminar at the library - Reading Memorial High School Health Fair Dina McCarron R.N., Public Health Nurse, is responsible for investigating communicable diseases and Reading now receives all communicable diseases notifications electronically from the Department of Public Health. The disease investigation aspects of the PHN duties require detailed interviews which adhere to patient privacy principles that are mandated by State and federal laws. We continue to engage the community in promoting healthy lifestyle choices that will eventually lead to a healthier Reading. The Public Health Nurse also inspects camps to 120 ensure that the clinical requirements of the Camp regulations are met. Additionally, the Nurse does visits to home -bound seniors on request of the Nurse Advocate and is also the designated Operations Chief in our Emergency Dispensing Site Preparedness Plan. This year we continued the H1N1 response by providing vaccines to our Middle and High School students as well as the greater community when vaccines became available. The vaccination rates for the Reading School population were higher than most communities due to our active engagement of the school community and support of the School Superintendent, School Staff and the Headmaster of Austin Prep. Emergency Preparedness The Reading Health Division is responsible for the public health emergency function in the Town of Reading and the Health Administrator is part of the town Unified Command in the ICS structure. This function requires that all Health Division staff be available on a 24/7 basis to respond to emergencies. The Health Division participated in a town wide response to a boil water order that resulted from a water main break in the MWRA water supply. All food establishments were contacted and given guidance on steps to take so that they provided a safe water supply and food to patrons. Health Division staff were presented- with Certificates of Appreciation by the Board of Selectmen for their participation in the response. The Public Health Administrator responded to emergency calls from the Fire Department. The Health Division continues to participate in the Emergency Preparedness Region 313- Greater Lawrence Coalition and Greater River Valley Medical Reserve Corps (GRVMRC). The Health Administrator is a member of the Local State Advisory Committee on Emergency Preparedness and the Coalition for Local Public Health. This year the Health' Services Administrator and Health Division staff participated in a number of regional exercises and trainings emergencies. The Greater River Valley MRC has provided support by manning a first aid/lost child station at our Fall Street Faire and Friends & Family Day. Volunteers from.the MRC provided invaluable assistance at our town wide Influenza (Seasonal and H1N1) vaccination clinics. Weights and Measures The Weights and Measures function is contracted to the State Division of Standards. The contract with the Division of Standards was renewed for 2011. Mosquito Control Reading continues to be part of the Eastern Middlesex Mosquito Control Project. The project conducts larviciding of large areas in town, spraying for adult mosquitoes and the Department of Public Works assists with the larviciding of catch basins in town. Report of the East Middlesex Mosquito Control Project The East Middlesex Mosquito Control Project conducts a program in Reading consisting of mosquito surveillance, larval and adult mosquito control and public education. 121 Extreme flooding in March produced mixed results with higher spring mosquito populations emerging from forested wetlands and lower mosquito populations emerging from floodplain areas. Dry weather during the late spring and summer produced lower than normal summer mosquito populations. Hot dry weather provided suitable conditions for a developing risk of West Nile Virus that resulted in 6 human cases occurring in eastern Massachusetts. There was an elevated risk of EEE in southeastern Massachusetts that resulted in a decision by the State to intervene using wide -area aerial spraying. The adult mosquito surveillance program used traps to collect mosquitoes from 4 Reading locations. Data was compiled from 25 mosquito trap collections over 9 different nights. Selected trap collections in the district including two collections from Reading were tested for West Nile Virus and FEE by the Massachusetts Department of Public Health. The larval mosquito control program relied on the larvicides, Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis (Bti) and methoprene, which are classified by the EPA as relatively non - toxic. An April helicopter application of Bti controlled mosquito larvae at 244 wetland acres. Field crews using portable sprayers applied Bti in the summer to one wetland acre when high densities of mosquito larvae were found in stagnant water. For adult mosquito control, there were 6 crews assigned to apply Sumithrin to 3,261 acres at night using truck- mounted aerosol sprayers when survey traps indicated high populations of mosquitoes. Advance notification of the spray program was done through notices in the Reading Chronicle and Daily Times, on the Town website and via a recorded telephone message at 781- 893 -5759. The Project's public education program is designed to develop awareness within the public and the private sectors as to their roles in mosquito control. The Project serves as a resource to residents, municipal officials and the local media on mosquitoes and mosquito home diseases. A web page, www.town.sudbury .ma.us /services/health/emmcp, provides residents with information on mosquitoes, control programs and related topics. Respectfully submitted, David M. Henley, Superintendent Statistics Action Inspections/ individuals served Revenue Calendar YTD Inspections 37 546 Immunizations /tests 39 2442 Infectious Disease Investigations 4 42 Wellness Clinic 3 46 Clinics visits 20 275 Licenses, fees and Permits 322 746 Receipts $15835 $21 108 Fines /tickets 6 $250.00 $750.00 122 General Darlene Foley, Health Division Clerk, received a President's Award from Massachusetts Environmental Health Association. Larry Ramdin, Public Health Administrator, was awarded the 2010 Dr. Joseph Goldfarb Award for Outstanding Contributions to Environmental Health by the Massachusetts Environmental Health Association. Larry Ramdin presented at the 48`h Yankee Conference on Environmental Health on "Hazardous Materials Disposal and Utilizing off the shelf software to track food inspections." He also presented at the 2010 Massachusetts Association of Health Boards Certification program on "Farms, Food and Public Health — How to Protect Public Health while Encouraging Locally Grown." Conclusion We would like to thank the Board of Health for their continued support in promoting, protecting and preserving the Public Health in Reading. 123 INSPECTIONS DIVISION The Inspections Division is responsible for carrying out inspectional services on commercial and residential construction in the areas of building, gas, plumbing and wiring. In addition, the division is responsible for enforcing the Town's Zoning By -laws and providing staff to the Zoning Board of Appeals. STATISTICS YEAR -END 2010 PREVIOUS YEAR -END 2009 Building Building Permits issued 759 680 Inspections 1212 1,259 Fees received $218,086.28* $253,031.26* Occupancy Permits 117 146 Fees received $4,760.* $5,825* Wiring Wiring Permits issued 503 486 Inspections 875 930 Fees received $34,940.* $36,932* Plumbing /Gas Gas Permits issued 213 222 Gas Fees received $7,439.* $7,924.* Plumbing Permits issued 358 354 Plumbing Fees received $15,703.* $17,826.* Combined Inspections Gas/Plumbing 848 783 TOTAL FEES $280,928.28* $321,538.26* * Totals do not include permit fees for Walkers Brook Crossing, Johnson Woods and Archstone- Reading deposited in revolving building account. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS The Zoning Board of Appeals met 15 times in 2010. The ZBA voted on petitions for 16 Variances, Special Permits and appeals. ZBA Members are Chairman Clark Petschek, Vice Chairman Jeffrey Perkins, Robert Redfern, John Jarema, Damase Caouette, John Miles, and Kristin Cataldo. The Town Planner, Jean Delios, and the Commissioner of Buildings, Glen Redmond, provide primary support to the Zoning Board of Appeals. 124 PLANNING DIVISION The following is a report of the activity in 2010 in the Planning Division of the' Community Services Department. In general, 2010 was" a very productive year in which there were many updates to the zoning by -law. Also, 2010 was an active year in economic development. Development review of key redevelopment sites that were stalled for some time was a major cornerstone of 2010. Redevelopment plans were reviewed for large vacant sites including: the former Atlantic Supermarket Site on Haven Street; the former Tambone property at 80 -100 Main Street; and the former Addison Wesley Site at the gateway into Reading. The Community Planning and Development Commission (CPDC) continued to receive experienced and dedicated service from its Chair, John Weston and Vice Chair, Joseph Patterson and board members David Tuttle, Nick Safina, Paul Bolger, and associate member George Katsoufis. The Planning Division worked closely with the CPDC and Economic Development Committee to achieve important milestones in 2010. Planning Division Activities Responsibilities of the Planning Division include advising the public, property owners, Reading's Boards and Commissions, business owners and architects, and coordinating Town Staff on planning issues regarding land use, zoning, and economic development. The Planning Division provides support to the Community Planning and Development Commission, the Zoning Board of Appeals, and the Economic Development Committee. In 2010, the Planning Division reviewed 38 applications for a variety of approvals including site plan review; subdivision; signage design and extensions /modifications to existing decisions. The CPDC held 22 public meetings and 11 zoning work sessions centered on zoning by -law amendments noted below and proposed zoning changes and design standards for South Main Street. Thirteen Development Review Team (DRT) meetings were also held with Town Staff and Applicants to provide guidance on application procedures, permitting and zoning compliance. Major Accomplishments - 2010: • ZBL Updates - Annual Town Meeting Adopted changes to • Section 6.3 Non - Conforming Uses and Structures; • Section 6.2 Signs; and • Section 4.4 Floodplain Overlay District. • Planning Staff and CPDC held numerous workshops, meetings, presentations, and public hearings as part of these changes. South Main Street - Additional work on draft design standards and zoning changes. • ZBL Updates — Subsequent Town Meeting — With CPDC and Economic Development Committee prepared updates and recommended by -law revisions to Section 6.2 Signs Economic Development Committee The Economic Development Committee (EDC) Chair, Meghan Young - Tafoya; Vice Chair, Sheila Clarke; Russ Graham; George Rio; Michelle Williams; and Associate Members Jack Russell; Michelle Ferullo and Kara Fratto working with Planning Staff, executed an aggressive 125 work plan for the year. The Committee welcomed two new associate members; Maria Higgins and Ben Yoder. A very successful Fall Street Faire was held in September for the second year. A Wayfinding project was undertaken with funding from a State grant. Website updates including a more prominent link from the home page to an updated list of active projects. Projects reviewed by Planning Division and CPDC in 2010: Subdivisions • Sunset Rock Lane Subdivision — bond release • Kylie Drive Subdivision completion deadline extension & bond reduction • Sailor Tom's Way — 175 Franklin Street — Subdivision completion date extended • Benjamin Lane —Bond release and street accepted by Town Meeting Site Plan Review - Street Address /Business Name /notation if a waiver • 530 Main Street — Grumpy Doyle's (formerly Emperor's Choice) • 30 Haven Street — Oaktree Development (formerly Atlantic Super Market) • 22 Frank Tanner Drive — Reading Housing Authority addition for office space & storage • 55 Haven Street — Salon on Haven (formerly Carlson Real Estate) • 80 -100 Main Street — Calareso's Farm Stand (relocating from existing location) • 1321 Main Street — Reading Housing of Pizza (WAIVER) • 26 Walkers Brook Drive — Oye's Restaurant (WAIVER) • 545 Main Street — Premier Realty (WAIVER) • 2 Haven Street — Sammy Jo's Italian Bakery (WAIVER) • 40 Walkers Brook Drive — Golf Town (WAIVER) • 1 General Way — Wine Bunker(WAIVER) • 580 Main Street — Kumon & Embellish (WAIVER) Sign Review (Certificate of Appropriateness) — Address /Business Name • 545 -557 Main Street / RCTV building • 26 Walkers Brook Drive / Oye's Restaurant. • 159 Ash Street / Encore Consignments & More • 580 Main Street / Kumon Learning Center & Embellish Hair Salon • 530 Main Street / Grumpy Doyle's • 25 Walkers Brook Drive / Stop & Shop • 643 Main Street / Latham Law Offices • 279 Salem Street / REI • 40 Walkers Brook Drive / Spirit Halloween Store CPDC Special Permits - Street Address /Business Name /notation if a modification • 80 -100 Main Street — Calareso's Farm Stand ZBA Comprehensive Permits — e.g., LIP DRT None. 126 Zoning Work Sessions/Public Hearing for Zoning Amendment — Date /Subject Public Hearings: • January 11th — Zoning By -Law Section 6.2 "Signs ", 6.3 "Nonconforming Lots & Structures ", Earth Removal by -law • February 81h — Signs, non - conforming, earth removal • February 22nd — Signs, non - conforming, flood plains overlay district/FEMA maps • March 1st — Two public hearings for Annual Town Meeting (Signs & Non - conforming) • March 15th — Public hearing for Annual Town Meeting (Flood Plans Overlay District) • May 10`h & Mary 24th — South Main Street design guidelines • August 9th — Preparations for Subsequent Town Meeting • September 13th — Vote to add zoning articles to Town Meeting Warrant • October 13th — Public hearing for zoning article (signs) • November 29th & December 13th — South Main Street design guidelines Scenic Road Applications • 51 Walnut Street (tree removal and driveway curb cut request) • 46 Walnut Street (driveway alteration) Endorsement of Subdivision Approval Not Required Plans • 1 Springvale Road • 75 -79 Pleasant Street ZBA & CPDC Agenda Sharing and Case Review Comments • Jiffy Lube In 2010, revenue generated from Planning Division activities totaled $38,908. The Planning Division is located at Town Hall, 16 Lowell Street, telephone 781 - 942 -9056. 127 VETERANS SERVICES The Department of Veterans' Services Office is responsible for the needs of all the veterans in Reading. It is the Veterans Services Officer to whom the unemployed, the indigent, the disabled, the ill, or veterans otherwise in need, first apply for assistance. The Veterans Services Officer administers benefits and assists veterans with other resources, referrals, and assistance. The Veterans Services Officer interviews applicants, determines eligibility, and helps veterans file for all veterans' benefits, including the Massachusetts Chapter 115 program for income eligible veterans and their dependents. The Town of Reading receives 75% reimbursement from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts under the Chapter 115 program. The Veterans' Service Officer also assists Reading veterans with applying for all other state benefits such as tuition waivers, grants, student loans, annuities, bonuses, outreach centers, counseling, veterans' license plates and many more. Under the category of federal aid, veterans' are assisted in processing applications for benefits including service - related compensation, disability pensions, personal aid, pensions, social security benefits, medical, education, employment, medals, death benefits and retrieving military records for veterans who without, would not be eligible for any benefits. . Federal Benefits include filing for compensation and pension, life insurance, burial and survivor's benefits. The Veterans' Affairs Administration provided benefits directly to the veteran population in Reading of over. $2.4 million dollars for the fiscal year that ended June 2010 Readings Department of Veterans' Services also works with other committees to coordinate public events such as Veterans Day ceremony held at the Reading Memorial High School and Memorial Day service's held at the 4 cemetery's in town The Reading Department of Veterans' Services office hours are Tuesday 8:30 AM to 3:30 PM Wednesday 8:30 AM to 5:30 PM and Thursday 11:00 AM to 3:00 PM. The office phone number is 781 - 942 -6652. 128 Ellen Callahan Doucette, Esq. BRACKF,Tr & Lucas COUNSELORS AT LAW 19 CEDAR STREET WORCESTER, MASSACHUSETTS 01609 508 -799 -9739 Fax 508 -799 -9799 March 7, 2011 Peter I. Hechenbleikner, Town Manager Town of Reading 16 Lowell Street Reading, MA 01867 Re: 2011 Annual Report Dear Mr. Hechenbleikner: ecdoucette@brackettlucas.com I am hereby submitting the report of Brackett & Lucas, as Town Counsel on legal matters for the Town of Reading ( "Town ") for the calendar year 2010. During 2010, Brackett & Lucas addressed various and diverse issues on the Town's behalf. At present, this office is engaged in mediation proceedings involving two litigation matters arising out of the construction/renovation of the Reading Memorial High School ( "RMHS "). The goal of mediation is to narrow the disputed issues and minimize the legal costs associated with these complex litigation matters. One other litigation matter arising out of the RMHS project involving the demolition sub - contractor was resolved in 2010. During 2010, two zoning decisions issued by the Board of Appeals involving the demolition and reconstruction, and partial reconstruction of a property located on Franklin Street were overturned by the Land Court. One of those matters is being appealed to the Massachusetts Appeals Court. Two other zoning appeals were instituted regarding decisions of the Board of Appeals. One decision granted the relief requested and was appealed by an abutter. The other appeal was a denial of the relief requested. Both appeals involve alleged claims that property is "grandfathered" for residential use. The proponent of a 40B project appealed the Building Inspector's denial of a building permit to the Board of Appeals which upheld the denial, and determined that the comprehensive permit had expired. The proponent filed an appeal with the Housing Appeals Committee and in response; this office has filed a motion to,dismiss that appeal. 129 In the past year, legal assistance was provided to department heads, town boards, committees and commissions, including, the Board of Selectmen. Legal services which were provided included advice and legal opinions in the areas of land use to the Zoning Board of Appeals and Community Planning and Development Commission. Of note was assistance provided in applying recent legislation which provides for an extension of expired land use permits. Section 173 of Chapter 240 of the Acts of 2010 established an automatic two -year extension for permits or approvals in effect between August 15, 2008 and August 15, 2010. Section 173 does not apply to comprehensive permits. Conservation Commission matters are handled by Attorney Judith Pickett. We have also provided advice and representation to the Town regarding employee issues, and some assistance was provided for contract review. This office is also actively engaged in assisting the Bylaw Committee with the recodification of Reading's General Bylaw, a project that is currently scheduled to be presented at the 2010 Subsequent Town Meeting. Aside from issues related to the RMHS litigation, we continue to provide advice to the School Department on various non - litigation issues and we assist in the development of contract and bid documents. Brackett & Lucas also assisted in the preparation and review of by -laws, as well as the review and drafting of warrant articles for Town Meeting. We attended all Town Meetings in order to address any legal issues or concerns that may be raised by members. It has been a pleasure and a privilege to serve the legal needs of the .Town of Reading this past year and we look forward to continuing to do so in the future. cc: Gary S. Brackett, Esq. Very truly yours, g Ellen Callahan Doucette 130 . EMARC Listed below is a detailed analysis of the number of individuals serviced during FY 2010 by EMARC in Reading as well as surrounding cities and towns: Program Statistics for FY 2010: Program Reading Other Total Day Services 25 230 255 Family Support 24 183 207 Adult Foster Care 0 21 21 Recreation 67 310 377 Residential Range Heights Road, Lynn 5 5 Cliffside Commons, Malden 4 4 Main Street, Melrose 8 8 Haven Street, Reading 8 8 Hopkins Street, Reading 5 5 Pitman Drive, Reading 4 4 Newcomb Avenue, Saugus 4 4 Albion Street, Wakefield 4 4 Nahant Street, Wakefield 7 7 Spruce Street, Wakefield 4 4 Water Street, Wakefield 4 4 Independent /Supported Living 6 17 25 Woodcrest Drive, Wakefield 5 5 TOTAL RESIDENTS 23 62 85 EMARC is a non - profit charitable corporation founded in 1954 and incorporated in 1957. We help children and adults with developmental disabilities live, work and play in our communities. EMARC annually serves over 700 families from Burlington, Beverly, Everett, Lynn, Lynnfield, Malden, Medford, Melrose, North Reading, Reading, Saugus, Stoneham, Wakefield and surrounding communities. 131 The following is an overview of the services EMARC provides: • Life Choices, a new program supporting adults in developing their life skills to increase independence. This innovative new program has distinct focuses for various age groups. Locations in Reading, Beverly and Burlington. • Adult Foster Care offers the opportunity of receiving financial assistance while providing live -in care to your adult family member. • Residential Supports in 10 24 -hour staffed homes and 17 semi - independent apartments staffed by EMARC and for individuals living independently. • Job Training (including literacy and computer classes) and Paid Work in a sheltered workshop setting at EMARC. • Employment Opportunities at supervised sites in the community including REI. • Food Pantry services for individuals seeking competitive employment and the Reading community. • Job Placement for low income adults with developmental disabilities and low income families of people with developmental disabilities. • The Center for Emerging Artists which explores and fosters the artistic talents of individuals with disabilities. Artwork created by participants is sold through the Center, through local exhibits and at local gift shops. • School to Work Transition Services and Journey to Independence to prepare High School students to live and work independently in our communities. • Respite Care to support families caring for their sons and daughters with developmental disabilities at home. • Family Support Groups for parents and siblings of people with disabilities. • A Successful Parenting Program for parents with cognitive limitations. • Support for Seniors, a monthly education and support group for elder caregivers of people with developmental disabilities. Guest speakers cover topics including health care coverage, depression and Social Security benefits. • Recreation Programs held independently and in cooperation with local schools and YMCAs. Activities include integrated sports, Special Olympics training and teams, crafts, music therapy, cooking, outings and special events. EMARC has received has received some of the highest marks in the state for the past ten years in audits completed by the Massachusetts Department of Developmental Disabilities. For additional information, please visit our web site at www.TheEmarc.org. EMARC, 20 Gould Street, Reading, MA 01867 Phone: 781 - 942 -4888, Fax 781 - 942 -0820. 132 HISTORICAL COMMISSION The Reading Historical Commission's (RHC) work in 2010 included regular monthly meetings and work in the Historical Commission Archives. RHC also added approximately 100 properties to the Historical and Architectural Inventory. Other activity included collaboration with the Library, Community Services, and several project reviews /demolition delays. RHC continued its effort to convert historically important town records to formats that may be accessed electronically. RHC has been working with the new owner and developer of the Pierce Organ Factory. A number of citizens and various entities requested the assistance of RHC in 2010, including requests for input on renovation, restoration and genealogical research. A few abandoned properties of historical significance were also worked on. In June, RHC re- elected its current officers to a new term for the following twelve -month period. Members at year -end 2010 Kathryn M. Greenfield, Chairman Sharlene Santo Reynolds, Secretary Roberta Sullivan, Treasurer Virginia Adams Mark Cardono Associates at year -end 2010 Angela Binda 133 LAND BANK COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT 2010 During most of 2010, the Land Bank Committee provided assistance with identifying and documenting Town -owned property. The Committee provided any requested historical documentation to the Town manager, Board of Selectmen, Town Planner and GIS coordinator. By unanimous vote of Subsequent Town Meeting on November 15, 2010, the Land Bank Committee was officially disbanded. 134 METROPOLITAN AREA PLANNING COUNCIL The Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) is a regional planning agency serving the people who live and work in the 101 cities and towns of Greater Boston. With a mission to promote smart growth and regional collaboration, MAPC's work is guided by our regional plan, "MetroFuture: Making a Greater Boston Region." This year, we have increasingly focused our work on helping municipalities to collaborate across city and town borders, to achieve savings through new efficiencies, to capitalize on the existing and multifaceted resources of Greater Boston, and to explore innovation in unexpected ways. As fiscal challenges have intensified at the local level, MAPC has amplified its commitment to partnering with cities and towns in offering progressive solutions. We're expanding our reach into new areas — from the federal policy arena, to green energy development, and interactive gaming as a tool for community engagement — while keeping an eye toward preservation, sustainability, and responsible stewardship of our shared resources. In every effort we undertake, MAPC works toward a more equitable, livable Greater Boston region. This year, we are heartened to have the Obama Administration's support for the smart growth ideals put. forth in our regional plan, MetroFuture. We are honored to be among a select group of grant recipients from the Sustainable Communities Partnership, a new federal collaboration among HUD, the EPA, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. With this grant, MAPC can go further in promoting sustainable development in Greater Boston. The coming year will bring the first activities under the grant, which could total more than $4.5 million over three years when matching commitments from regional foundations. are included. The Metro Boston Sustainable Communities Consortium — which includes municipalities, non- profits, and institutional allies — will oversee our work under the grant. The heart of the work plan features several illustrative projects poised to benefit from Sustainable Communities funding. They include: • Enhancing the Fairmount transit corridor through Dorchester, Mattapan and Hyde Park in Boston; • Engaging the Asian communities in Chinatown, Quincy, and Malden in planning efforts; • Creating an anti - displacement strategy for residential areas along the planned Green Line extension in Somerville; • Identifying priority preservation and development areas along the Route 495/MetroWest corridor; and • Studying office park retrofit potential for the Framingham Tech Park, and exploring opportunities for linkage to the downtown commuter rail station. All of these initiatives — and others that will be added as the program develops — will help the region to plan and grow responsibly, with a focus on future stewardship of our shared resources. 135 In addition to this local work, MAPC will develop tools and models, build skills and capacity throughout the region, design and advocate for smart growth policies in state and local government, and track the region's progress through a Regional Indicators Program. At the core of our mission is serving as a resource to our member municipalities. One of the most important ways MAPC serves cities and towns is to foster forward - thinking economic development opportunities. In 2011, we'are focusing much of our economic development work in clean energy and local business development. MAPC links federal resources to emerging green technology start-ups like the Fraunhofer Center for Sustainable Energy Systems. Fraunhofer is a non - profit applied research and development laboratory located in the heart of Boston's Innovation District on the South Boston waterfront, dedicated to the commercialization of clean energy technologies. We also provide support and advocacy for emerging business incubators such as the Cleantech InnoVenture Center in Lynn. This business incubator is designed to reduce the start-up expenses of small clean technology companies, while accelerating the time it takes to transform a research idea into a marketable product. In Gloucester, MAPC is helping to build a cluster of marine research institutes on and around the harbor — adding strength to a historic fishing -based economy. We are also working with the Dorchester Bay Economic Development Corporation to place job training facilities within walking distance of neighborhoods in need, and to provide skill -based training in partnership with larger businesses that are seeking trained employees. MAPC also plans to unveil a web -based business development tool that will allow cities in Greater Boston's urban core to market hard -to -sell commercial and industrial real estate to appropriate buyers. The website, Choose Metro Boston, can be found at www.choosemetroboston.com. Our energy planning will continue to grow as we start developing energy strategies for Chelsea and Revere, and as we explore similar opportunities across the region. All our green energy work is 'guided by our Green Energy Campaign, which is an effort to achieve the energy goals of MetroFuture by building local capacity, increasing energy efficiency, and developing alternate energy resources. In the coming year, proposed energy - related projects include developing a regional ESCO, or Energy Services Company, which would provide comprehensive energy efficiency services for multiple municipalities and school districts; developing a site suitability assessment for wind or solar energy on closed landfill and brownfield sites; and creating a regional energy manager service, which would provide MAPC staff support for a wide range of local energy work. In many municipalities, MAPC can best help to achieve smart growth goals through targeted zoning bylaw work. This year, MAPC worked with the town of Littleton Planning Board, Board of Selectmen and a faithful cadre of concerned citizens over several months to draft, review and finalize two zoning bylaws: a new Village Common zone, and an Overlay zone. 136 The Village Common zone created a new business district along Routes 119 and 110, where mixed use development will be allowed so long as new design guidelines are met. In the Overlay zone, created along Route 119, a vacant 90 -acre site once owned by Cisco Systems may now be more easily redeveloped. MAPC presented the zoning changes at Town Meeting, helping to usher the bylaws toward adoption. Both zoning changes will help the town control and attract development consistent with both MetroFuture and the community's vision. The District Local Technical Assistance (DLTA) program is another essential vehicle for helping communities to achieve such goals. DLTA is a state funding program that helps cities and towns to collaborate regionally on housing, economic development, and environmental protection projects. The funding can also be used to help municipalities to coordinate and more efficiently deliver local services. 2010 was by any measure a prolific year for DLTA- funded projects in municipalities throughout the region. There were a total of 19 projects approved for funding this year — 10 in land use planning, and nine in municipal services. More than two dozen communities received help from MAPC on land use planning projects thanks to DLTA funding, the majority involving research or drafting local zoning bylaws. There are 39 cities and towns currently participating in municipal services projects, such as examining how to save funds or provide expanded services by sharing engineering staff, public health offices, and even ambulances. Since many of these projects affect multiple municipalities, the total number of cities and towns served is 57 - a record high for the program. With DLTA funding, MAPC and the MetroWest_ Regional Collaborative are conducting a MetroWest Regional Open Space Connectivity study. This study will coordinate all the individual open space plans among MetroWest cities and towns, allowing open spaces to become linked into an interconnected network that will cross municipal boundaries and serve a variety of regional needs. The study will also identify and prioritize lands that are ripe for protection or acquisition for open space. Using DLTA funds, MAPC assisted Bellingham in writing a Housing Production Plan in 2010, the first of what we hope will be many such plans crafted by MAPC. Housing Production Plans help cities and towns guide local affordable housing developments. Another tool, the Smart Growth Zoning and Housing Act (Chapter 40R), offers financial incentives to encourage cities and towns to zone for compact residential and mixed -use development in smart growth locations. These districts are catching on slowly across Eastern Massachusetts, and MAPC is currently working to prepare a 40R District for Sharon. On the North Shore, MAPC is working with Beverly, Danvers, Hamilton, Ipswich, Salem and Wenham to solicit local input on Priority Development Areas and Priority Preservation Areas, as part of a $68,000 grant from the Massachusetts Executive Office of Housing and Economic Development. 137 Transportation planning is central to all facets of MAPC's work. The economic vitality of the region is dependent on a strong transportation network, and continued investment in all modes of transportation — roads, bridges, sidewalks, bicycle infrastructure, and public transit — is crucial to Greater Boston's ongoing competitiveness. MAPC works toward sustainable transportation projects throughout the year, including the regional bike share system that is projected to launch in Boston in spring 2011. MAPC is collaborating with Boston, Cambridge, Somerville, and Brookline to link into Boston's system once it is established. The program will provide hundreds of stations, outfitted with several thousand bicycles, throughout the participating municipalities. Designed for short trips, the bike share system will provide a sustainable mode of transportation while extending access to public transit locations across the region. MAPC worked with Boston and the MBTA to secure a $3 million Federal Transit Administration grant to implement the program in 2011. In 2010, MAPC unveiled a comprehensive Pedestrian Transportation Plan with action steps that cities and towns can take to make their streets more walkable. Both a resource and a guide, the Pedestrian Transportation Plan identifies actions that local governments, advocacy groups, the private sector and individuals can take to increase pedestrian safety and convenience and to encourage more walking. The plan is available on our website, at www,mape.org/resources/ped- plan. MAPC is working collaboratively with three towns on the Upper Charles River to help them adapt to a series of new federal storm water regulations. Bellingham, Franklin and Milford were selected this year by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to pilot stricter storm water regulations. These regulations are required to reduce unhealthy rates of pollution in the Charles River. The new regulations will attempt to reduce storm water flow and contaminated runoff into the watershed from private and public properties, which could cost the towns and property owners several million dollars to retrofit existing infrastructure. The regulations may eventually be extended to the rest of the Charles River and other watersheds in the region. To assist with these challenges, MAPC is working with three towns to explore creation of a storm water utility, a public entity that maintains storm water infrastructure and performs needed upgrades and capital improvements. As with water or sewer utilities, costs are covered by user fees, which are assessed on each property owner that contributes storm water runoff. Another area in which MAPC aids cities and towns in planning for the future is public safety. As municipal budgets grow tighter, cities and towns are increasingly seeking ways to maintain public safety services in the face of cuts, to build emergency preparedness, and to enhance their expertise by working with neighbors and allies. In keeping with our mission to promote regional collaboration, MAPC has helped to establish three regional emergency equipment cache sites, containing reserves of emergency equipment for large -scale use. The three sites — in Beverly, Framingham, and Lexington — help the region to be prepared for a major incident, by providing resources that municipalities most likely could not afford on their own. 138 The cache sites offer first responders and public safety officials such equipment as shelters -in -a- box, cyanide detectors, cots, illuminated signs, and other tools for disaster preparedness. MAPC works in tandem with NERAC, the Northeast Homeland Security Regional Advisory Council, to offer these vital resources through a federal homeland security grant program. Throughout this year, despite of several budget cuts, the Metro Mayors Community Safety Initiative worked to maintain a strong police presence in troubled areas of the region through the Metro Gang Task Force and through additional patrols funded by the anti -crime Shannon Grant. High -risk and gang - involved youth experience intervention and.prevention through Shannon Grant - funded programs, including more than 600 out -of- school activities and employment opportunities. MAPC also helps municipalities to save money through our collective purchasing efforts, which allow cities and towns to make discounted bulk purchases of supplies, equipment, vehicles and more. Since its inception in 1998, the program has assisted dozens of municipal clients in saving millions of dollars. This year, we announced an exciting new partnership with the Fire Chiefs Association of Massachusetts, allowing MAPC to act as a collective purchasing agent for fire apparatus. This program has lots of potential to help communities save local dollars on major purchases, while improving the caliber of emergency vehicles and response capabilities. Another way MAPC is working with NERAC to support emergency planning is through a new evacuation route planning tool, which kicked off in 2010. The goal of the program is to create an intuitive mapping application that will provide local emergency responders with critical information during emergencies and evacuations. The project will feature online maps and a mapping application that will let users coordinate evacuations by referencing electronic route maps and resources from inside emergency response vehicles or emergency command centers. MAPC staff is also working on a first -in- the - nation dataset analyzing driving patterns, fuel consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions. Working in collaboration with MassGIS and the MIT Department of Urban Studies and Planning, we will collect and analyze data on vehicle miles travelled and fuel consumption based on odometer readings from vehicle inspection records. The data will help local, state, and regional entities develop effective strategies to reduce transportation - related greenhouse gas emissions and their associated climate impacts. The data also answer MetroFuture's call to focus new development in transportation - efficient locations. MAPC and WalkBoston are also conducting research on which school districts in the MAPC region have the best potential for encouraging more students to walk to school. This "Safe Routes to School" Analysis aims to shift school trips from cars to feet, which can reduce greenhouse gas production, air pollution, and traffic congestion around schools. Several studies estimate that up to 30 percent of morning commuter traffic is actually generated by parents driving children to school. Shifting even a small percentage back to walking could result in measurable reductions in emissions, as well as health benefits for children and community benefits for their neighborhoods. Once the most promising walkable school districts are identified, MAPC and WalkBoston will work with participating municipalities to devise a plan for increasing the number of students who walk to school in those areas. 139 MAPC, an official Census Affiliate, helped promote Census participation throughout 2010, and will continue to monitor the results of the Census as data are released in 2011. As the data come out, MAPC will assist municipalities and non - profit partners with training and technical assistance. Data release schedules, new data and municipal profiles about your city or town, as well as training opportunities, can be found on the MetroBoston DataCommon, MAPC's online mapping tool, at www.metrobostondatacommon.org. As we work collaboratively and in innovative new ways throughout the year, we are mindful that all we do is guided by our bold regional plan, "MetroFuture." The development of the MetroFuture plan involved thousands of "plan builders" around the region, a group MAPC is now working to turn into "plan implementers," who will work to advance MetroFuture at the local, regional, and state levels. To engage old and new allies alike, MAPC launched the Friends of MetroFuture program with a well- attended open house in January 2010. This program will educate the public about key issues relating to MetroFuture implementation, and will build public energy for the change necessary to achieve MetroFuture's goals. In the past year, the program has sponsored a photo contest, eight speakers on a wide range of topics, and three walking tours in the summer months, with similar activities planned for 2011. Check www.metrofuture.org for the full agenda. As always, building a constituency for change involves many partnerships with other like - minded organizations. MAPC was a founding member in the Massachusetts Smart Growth Alliance (MSGA), and remains active in its work. This year, MAPC and the MSGA kicked off the Great Neighborhoods Initiative, a campaign to link smart growth policy with place -based results. Throughout 2011, MAPC and MSGA will work with several local organizations around the region as they make their neighborhoods into smart growth models. Finally, building regional support for smart growth principles requires research, expertise, a demonstrated record of local success, and — importantly — a commitment to legislative advocacy. We are proud to be pointing to a demonstrated track record of success both on Beacon Hill and in Washington. MAPC furthered its agenda of fostering regional collaboration by participating in the legislatively mandated Regionalization Advisory Commission. Chaired by Lieutenant Governor Timothy Murray, the commission studied impediments and benefits of regionalization over a broad spectrum of topics, ranging from public safety to energy and backroom office support. MAPC will use the findings of the commission's report to file a comprehensive piece of legislation in the 2011 -2012 session, which will incentivize and remove barriers to sharing services across municipal boundaries. Additionally, MAPC and the MSGA were successful for the first time in advancing a piece of land use reform legislation favorably out of committee. Passage of comprehensive land use reform will continue to be a major priority for MAPC in the upcoming year. Check www.mapc.orq for news and updates about MAPC's work throughout the year 140 NORTH SUBURBAN PLANNING COUNCIL The North Suburban Planning Council, serving Reading, Burlington, Lynnfield, North Reading, Stoneham, Wakefield, Wilmington, Winchester and Woburn, met nine times in 2010. The meetings covered a wide range of topics and the schedule included two site visits to provide members with an opportunity to view first hand some exciting projects in member communities. The year began with a meeting focused on the Clean Air and Mobility transportation program. At this meeting there was also a discussion of opportunities for funding projects under the District Local Technical Assistance program. In February the focus was on the logistics and importance of the upcoming US Census. There was also a demonstration of upgrades to the NSPC web page. In March the entire meeting was a presentation on the MS4 Stormwater Management Permit which many communities will need to be in compliance with. The April meeting was devoted to two very important transportation issues; the development of the Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and the Regional Transportation Plan. In May was the first of two site visits. The meeting began in Reading Town Hall with a discussion of the communities' 40R zoning district and economic development initiatives. It was followed by a walk through downtown Reading to view streetscape improvements and some of the potential projects being contemplated in the 40R district. In June NSPC turned its attention to land use reform and discussed the merits of the proposed Comprehensive Land Use and Reform Partnership Act. In July transportation was once again on the agenda as the group discussed the TIP and the UPWP. Also on the agenda was another transportation topic: a presentation on the first ever regional Pedestrian Transportation Plan. In September the group met in Winchester for a presentation on the Winchester Town Center Parking Study. This was followed by a walking tour of Winchester Town Center to view many of the areas that were included in the study. The October meeting was a discussion of legislative priorities in order to provide input to the MAPC Legislative Committee. The final meeting of the year was a discussion of the financing element of the Regional Transportation Plan and a briefing on the $4million Sustainable Communities grant which HUD awarded MAPC. In an on -going effort to provide member communities with better access to information, regular upgrades to the NSPC web page were made. The page can be accessed at http: / /www.mapc.or subregions /nspe. The page includes links to municipal web pages, agendas and meeting notes, photos from the site visits, links to major development projects, land use legislation and links to transportation web sites and databases. 141 MYSTIC VALLEY ELDER SERVICES We are sending a detailed inventory and value of services delivered to Reading's older residents by Mystic Valley Elder Services during the past year. I believe this accounting demonstrates in a concrete way how your local contribution assists us in returning a substantial amount of direct support to Reading. Without Reading's assistance and that of the other seven participating cities and towns, Mystic Valley Elder Services would be unable to continue to provide the level of crucial supportive services currently available. As you may know, Mystic Valley Elder Services is both the federally designated Area Agency on Aging as well as the State's designated Aging Service Access Point for the Town of Reading. We received these designations through an application process approved by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts' Executive Office of Elder Affairs. Our goal is to raise the additional money that we need to meet the increasing demand for services directly from private sources. However, your support is crucial to our ability to provide needed in home and community based services to area residents. Thank you for your continued support of Mystic Valley Elder Services programs and services through good and bad economic times. We will always be here for the residents of Reading who need help at home. 142 Mystic Valley Elder Services, Inc. 19 Riverview Business Park 300 Commercial Street Malden, Massachusetts 02148 Title III -B Social Services and Title III -C Nutrition Services I provided to Reading elders in Fiscal Year 2010. Title III-C Nutrition Program Meals Served Value of Service Home Delivered Meals 20,011 $95,473 Congregate Meals 4,890 $31,857 Site Managers (Wages/Benefits $10,676 Home Delivered Meals Drivers $26,653 (Wages/Benefits) TOTAL TITLE III-C VALUE $164,660 Title III-Supportive Services Clients Total Value of Legal Services Served Value Services Greater Boston Le al Services, Inc. Total Cases /Consults 253 Total Reading Residents Served 21 9 -00 $51,000 = a9 8 3 Reading's Costl $4,233 Medical Transportation Total Residents Served 57 Total Reading Residents Served 1 Amount Spent On Reading Elders $512 Services to Blind Elders Massachusetts Association for the Blind Total Residents Served 1 56 Total Reading Residents Served 16 Budget 10/09 - 9/10 $5,000 % in Reading = 28.57% Reading' Cost $1,429 Minority Outreach Assistance to Minori Elders Total Residents Served 192 Total Reading Residents Served 0 Bud et 10/09 - 9/10 $25,000 %in Reading =1 0% Readin 's Cost $0 Title III E Family Care fiver Program MVES Care fiver Support and Eldercare Advice Cost 10/09 -09/10 $130,037 % in Readin = 10.19% Reading's Cost $13,251 Clients Total Value of Title III Health Promotions Served Value Services Title III Health Promflons Funding Project Safe Cost 10/09 -09/10 $27307 OX in Reading =1 16.90% Readin 's Costl I 1 $4,615 142 Friendly Visitor Grants Awarded to Council on Agin during FFY' 10 $1,948 Money Management Pro ram Total Residents Served 103 Total Reading Residents Served 7 Bud et 10/09 -9'1 12 09 $74,481 in = 6.80% Reading's Cost $5,062 SHINE Program Total Residents Served 2,397 Total Reading Residents Served 143 Bud et-lo' 09 - 9/10 $76,186 in Readin = 5.97% Readin 's Cost $4,545 TOTAL OF TITLE III AND COMMUNITY PROGRAM $200,254 SERVICES PR READING ELDERS STATE HOME CARE PROGRAM $1,433,051 222 Reading residents received home care services for the year ending June 30, 2010. These services included intake & referral case management, chore transportation, social day care adult day health personal care home health aides laundry, personal emergency res onse, com anionshi , homemaker and respite care TOTAL SERVICES PROVIDED TO READING ELDERS $1,633,306 143 READING TRAILS COMMITTEE The Reading Trails Committee is made up of a very interesting and active group of Reading residents who enjoy outdoor activities and have a desire to thoughtfully maintain and develop Reading's trail systems for others to explore, respect and enjoy. With the support, knowledge and skills of Fran.Fink, the Conservation Administrator, and Kim Honetschlager, the GIS Coordinator, the RTC has been able to move forward with its mission. Their support has been instrumental in the organization, planning, communication and progress of what the RTC has accomplished. Fran and Kim have been major participants in applying for various grants to support the financial needs of trail maintenance and improvement. Mike DeBrigard and the DPW crew have also been very supportive of our committee by providing time, equipment, digging holes where we couldn't, plowing snow, picking up and disposing of piles of invasive plants, pouring cement pads for setting the Judy LeBlanc benches along the handicapped accessible trail, all of which have been very helpful. The volunteers that have attended and worked on the various projects have been a great help and the RTC is very thankful to them. Many are from the Adopt -a -Trail program and are happy to help out with whatever is going on. Most are from Reading but some of our volunteers are from surrounding towns. Some show up and work for a few hours and some stay a full day, and again, we are very thankful for whatever they can do. There have been monthly RTC meetings at the Town Hall and some members have attended additional Town meetings for various reasons that were pertinent to RTC or conservation business. Like most town groups, the RTC is included on the Town of Reading website where residents can be kept up to date with trail maps, new information, upcoming events and invitations, photos of volunteers and projects. Your Community Connection, the Town newsletter, and local papers are also used to share opportunities and updates. Many of the RTC meetings have included Scouts who are looking for projects they can use to obtain their Eagle Scout award. The amount of time a Scout puts into planning a project, getting the advice and /or okay from Town Committees to go ahead with a project, many times having to come up with funds or donations for a project, and the many hours of hard work actually going into the project is quite a feat. In the last few years, those who venture into Bare Meadow or the Town Forest have been able to walk, cross - country ski or snowshoe through some very wet areas thanks to the completion of these well built wooden structures. Prior to these Eagle Scout projects being built and completed, these areas were not safely passable. On a cold day in January, a few RTC members traveled to Ward Reservation in North Andover and Goldsmith Reservation in Andover to see how those trails had been blazed (marked) and also to see the style of kiosks at each site. This was helpful in deciding how to proceed with marking Reading's trails. 144 In April, the continuation of the Bare Meadow Enhancement project geared up again. This ambitious project began and continued due to the application and receipt of a MA Recreation Trails grant in the amount of $15,600 in 2010. The first April day was considered a "trial" workday in the placement of 50 pound cement "piers" set into the muddy ground. This was followed by pounding metal "pins" through the piers into the ground, setting a foundation for the frame of boardwalk. This was a successful day of work so the project continued through April and into May, setting the remaining piers, attaching framing and decking until the group had finished creating a very nice looking boardwalk and dry access from the path entrance at Haverhill Street into trails that lead into Bare Meadow. April 10`h found members that were not working on the boardwalk spending time at the Earth Day Fair held at the RMLD. Trail maps and displays were set up and discussed, as well as the Adopt -a -Trail program and opportunities to volunteer, and to bring attention to Reading's trails and the outdoor recreational opportunities we have. June 5`h, being National Trails Day was a day to get out and clean up the Mattera Cabin yard and other members participated in the Ipswich River Cleanup collecting trash, bottles, cans and disposing of them. John Parsons attended an event in Medford, MA with the Department of Conservation and Recreation where a trails event took place. John then reported back to the RTC with information that he had gathered. Participating in the Friends and Family Day in June is a time to share what the RTC has been up to when people stop by the display table. There are always reports from excited Reading residents who want to talk about the wildlife they've seen in their neighborhoods or in town. Many are interested in the display maps of the Town Forest and conservation areas and many, many people pick up complimentary trail maps provided by Kim H. It is interesting to hear how many people don't know that Reading actually has a Town Forest! There was another work day in July finishing screwing down the decking on the new boardwalk; a few teams worked on trail blazing (marking trees along color coded trails with paint) the red and yellow trails in Bare Meadow woods in August; holes were dug and prepared at three locations and kiosks were set up and secured, one at the entrance to the handicapped_ trail at Mattera, one at the Haverhill Street entrance and one at the entrance to the blue trail located at the back of Wood End Cemetery. The kiosks will continue to be posted with trail maps, upcoming events, conservation rules and regulations. The patch of Japanese knotweed, an invasive plant species, growing along the driveway and entrance to Bare Meadow on Pearl Street, was cut down by RTC members and disposed of properly. It is the hope and desire of the committee to keep this patch from growing up again and spreading. In September the RTC hosted an evening at the Senior Center for people who want to continue "adopting" their designated trail and for new volunteers who would like to become "adopters ". 145 Adopt -a -Trail Handbooks were handed out, names and contact information exchanged and the list of volunteers grew. The RTC is happy to report another productive and successful year of activities. It is a group of people who enjoy working together, have similar outdoor interests and believe the work they're doing is having a positive effect in Reading's woods and for its residents. We will continue to make future plans and decisions, state our opinions and ideas regarding any issues; celebrate our progress.and oversee the trails and how the woods can be used in a respectful manner and that they never come to a "Wood End ". 146 WEST STREET HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION The purpose of the West Street Historic Commission is to administer Section 5.18: Historic District Bylaw of the General Bylaws as it pertains to the West Street Historic District. The District was created to preserve the distinctive characteristics and architecture of the West Street area. Through its required review of all construction projects in the District, the Commission seeks to maintain and improve the settings of the buildings within the District and to encourage building designs compatible with the historic character of the area. The Commission is currently composed of five voting members and two alternates. The voting members are: Chairman Richard Schubert, Vice Chairman Steve O'Shea, Virginia Adams, Everett Blodgett, and Priscilla Poehler. The alternates are: Ilene Bornstein and Sharlene Reynolds Santo. In 2010 the Commission received eight homeowner applications and issued five Certificates of Non - Applicability and three Certificates of Appropriateness. For more complete information about the West Street Historic District and the Commission, including the text of the Historic District Bylaw and design guidelines for the District, please refer to the Commission's webpage which is linked to the Town Of Reading webpage (www.readingma.gov) under Boards and Committees. 147 READING HOUSING AUTHORITY It is with great pleasure that we share with you the activities and accomplishments of the Reading Housing Authority over the past year. The start of the New Year has seen a continued decline in our economy and we remain cautious during this somewhat unstable time. The pressure on the real estate market has continued to create a critical challenge for poor and lower income families to find, keep and maintain their housing. As the real estate values escalated over the past few years, it was certainly felt most dramatically at the low- income levels. Rental units had been at a greater premium in this area; however, we continue to see an increase in availability. Previously, landlords had been able to ask for and receive a high rent, which historically prices the poor and lower income families out of the rental market. Again, we ate beginning to see a change in the rental market area with increase inquiries from landlords who are experiencing more difficulty renting units. The Reading Housing Authority (Authority) strives to assist these families to seek and obtain housing that is decent, safe and sanitary. In an effort to ameliorate this impact, the Authority will continue its efforts to develop new units and 'purchase affordable units when the opportunity arises. The Authority recently attained an additional site to ready for use in their family program in the upcoming year. Plans are presently underway to best develop that location. We continue to support private developers and the Town in their efforts to set aside units for low /moderate income families in their proposed developments. We reach out to owners of multi - family units who would like to work with us to serve our clients. As always, the Authority goes beyond the bricks and mortar and provides assistance to families, elderly and handicapped persons to obtain the services they need. We work closely with Mystic Valley Elder Services and other home care agencies to meet the needs of the elderly residents as they strive to remain independent and age in place. With budget cuts affecting all of us, we strive to maintain our programs, work with other supportive agencies and still offer a safe and decent place for our seniors, disabled and families in need. On behalf of the Board, we want to thank Executive Director, Lyn Whyte and her staff for their continued dedication, commitment and service to the Reading Housing Authority. We look forward to working with them as we meet the new challenges that lie ahead. Organization Organized in 1963 to address the housing needs of the Town's low and moderate income residents, the Reading Housing Authority (Authority) is "a public body politic and corporate" duly organized and authorized by Massachusetts General Laws (MGL), Chapter 121B, s.3. The Authority receives it funds from the State and Federal government to assist our clients with their housing needs. Although the Authority does not receive any local funding, five unpaid Reading residents compose the Board of Commissioners. The Board of Selectmen appoints four of these board members and one is the Governor's appointee. Each member serves for a 5 -year term. The Board is responsible for the overall operation of the Authority. The day to day responsibility is delegated to the Executive Director. 148 The Board meets regularly and has scheduled their monthly meetings for the first Monday of each month. The Annual Meeting of the Board is currently scheduled for the month after the Selectmen makes their annual appointment of a Board member. Currently, the Board Members and their term of office are as follows: Diane Cohen 51 Redgate Lane Timothy J. Kelley 84 Woburn Street Kevin Mulvey 67 Whittier Road Mary Connors 52 Sanborn Street, #103 Karen L. Flammia 19 Vista Avenue Lyn E. Whyte 41 Shore Road, Saugus Chair and State Appointment Term expires 5/03/2011 Vice -Chair Term expires 6/30/2014 Treasurer Term expires 6/30/2013 Asst. Treasurer and Tenant Representative Term expires 6/30/2012 Member Term expires 6/27/2010 Secretary and Executive Director Administrative Staff The Board contracts an Executive Director who manages the day -to -day operations of the Authority. Within State and Federal guidelines and other budgetary limits, the Executive Director hires the supporting staff necessary to achieve the goals and responsibilities of the Authority's programs. The Executive Director, Lyn Whyte, is in a five -year contract that expires August 29, 2015. Administration Lyn E. Whyte Secretary and Executive Director Catherine Sutherland Office Manager Kathleen Rolli Federal Program Coordinator & Assistant Executive Director Michelle Hudzik State Program Coordinator Katelyn Veglia Part-time Program Assistant Maintenance Frank Veglia Maintenance Supervisor Joseph Costello Maintenance Staff Kevin Boyle Maintenance Staff Supportive Services Affiliations / Home Care Jacqueline Carson Sanborn Home Care Director 149 Daniel J. O'Leary Director, Mystic Valley Elder Services Dawn Folopoulos Town of Reading, Elder Services Administrator Financial Institutions Reading Cooperative Bank Eastern Bank BankNorth Mass. Municipal Depository Trust — Boston, MA Affiliations National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials (NAHRO) Massachusetts Chapter of National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials (MassNAHRO) New England Regional Council of National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials (NERCINAHRO) Section 8 Administrators Association North Shore Housing Executive Directors' Association (NSHEDA) Adult Literacy Committee of Reading/Wakefield YMCA Consultants Accountants: Fenton, Ewald & Associates Legal: Charles Houghton, Esq. & DHCD Legal Counsel, Lori McBride Contractors Hiltz Waste Disposal Avon Plumbing Supply . Hodson S M Co hic Roberto Bros. Landscaping Automatic Laundry Bennett Construction John's Sewer & Pipe Cleaning Powers Plowing Service Atlas Alarm Home Depot Maintenance We do it all — from the beautiful paint job to the new appointments before you move into your new apartment. The maintenance staff meets the challenges on every occasion and has done an excellent job. With the four seasons here in New England, maintenance has to be ready to take it all in stride. They do the spring clean -up and plantings; the summer mowing, watering, weeding and trimming; the fall leaf pick -up; and winter's snow and ice removal. The maintenance staff works tirelessly to keep our developments looking beautiful. We have been lucky enough to have the assistance of the Work Release Program from the Middlesex Sheriff's Department. They have been exceptional in the work that they have done with our landscaping and painting projects. These programs are cost effective and have become a critical component to maintaining our properties. During the course of this past year, this program enabled us to maintain the grounds of our properties with a fall and spring clean up. This project changed the look of these properties and it greatly enhanced their appearances. Additionally, with the assistance of this 150 program, we painted a family residence this year. The properties needed a facelift and the Work Release Program afforded us the opportunity to enhance the appearance of those homes. The Authority is responsible for 108 individual units located on 10 different sites. It is no easy task to keep each one looking in its top form. The maintenance staff is also responsible for the daily work orders and any emergency work that has to be done. The Authority has an extensive preventative maintenance program for all major components and has a cyclical paint schedule for all units. 2010 Grants Received Each year the Authority applies for several grants to improve our properties and better serve our residents and the community. Included in this year's awards were: Modernization of State Housing American Recovery & Reinvestment Act - Weatherization Assistance Program (ARRAWAP) grant of $55,120 to fund costs related to the heating system replacement at our state family developments was awarded to the RHA. The project would carryover into 2011. Supportive Services Grant — HUD No funding available since we no longer administer an FSS program. Supportive Services Grant — State Funding of Resident Service Coordinator to address elderly /non - elderly needs for Frank D. Tanner Drive residents was approved; however, it is now 'categorized as an administrative expense. I Audits The Authority has a Single Audit of all programs by an independent auditor each year. Ross and Company of Nashua, NH was engaged to perform the latest review of the Authority's programs for fiscal year end June 2010. The audit was completed in December 10 and final submissions expected to be completed in January 2011. The Authority had no findings or additional recommendations as a result of this latest audit. The Authority's financial position is adequate to meet the needs of the operation and development of the programs and we are fortunate to maintain a retained revenue agency status. A compliance audit for FYE June 2008 and June 2009 was conducted by the Commonwealth of Mass State Auditors office in February 2010 and completed with no findings. The Commonwealth of MA conducts this audit every two years. Our next compliance audit for FYE June 2010 and June 2011 will not be scheduled until 2012. Management Review The Authority has had a current Management Review done of all State programs. The Asset Managers from the State's Department of Housing and Community Development reviewed all the operations of the State programs to insure compliance in the daily operation of the 151 Authority's budget, occupancy, administration, maintenance, ,services and tenant participation. The Authority received an excellent review with minor comments. In regard to our federal program, the Authority submitted its annual Section 8 Management Assessment Program ( SEMAP) reports for fiscal year end June 2009 to HUD for review and subsequent scoring. The purpose of SEMAP is to measure public housing authority performance in key areas of the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program management. It is a tool used by HUD to effectively monitor and assist PHA's. It is our pleasure to report that the Reading Housing Authority received an overall score of 100 percent for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009. As a result of this score, HUD designates the Authority as a "high performer" with credit going to Section 8 Program Coordinator Kathy Rolli for her continued efforts in administering an ever - changing federal program. We will not submit additional SEMAP reports until fiscal year June 2011. These assessments are now performed every two years for an agency of our size per latest HUD changes. State Programs The Authority currently manages the three programs under the State's Department of Housing and Community Development: 667 Housing (elderly/handicapped housing); 705 Housing (Family housing); 689 Housing (Special Needs Housing). Our 667 wait lists are open at the present time; however, we are not accepting applications for our state family program at this time due to an estimated wait of fifteen years. We encourage applicants to apply for our elderly/handicapped (667) housing by contacting the Housing Authority at 781 - 944 -6755 or by accessing the application on the Town of Reading website. Housine for Elderlv/Handicanued Persons (667 80 units Frank D. Tanner Drive Complex Eligibility : 60 years of age or disabled Income: 1 person - $45,100 2 persons - $50,550 Housing for Families (705) 6 units Waverly and Oakland Road (six 3BR units) 4 units Pleasant and Parker Street (Two 2BR units; two 3BR units) Eligibility: Family of 2 or more depending on Bedroom size Income: 2 persons - $5,550 3 persons - $58,000 4 persons - $64;400 5 persons - $69,600 6 persons - $74,750 7 persons - $79,900 8 persons - $85,050 152 Federal Programs The Authority manages 125 subsidies for persons of very low income under the Federal Section 8 program. Currently, the RHA participates in a centralized waiting list administered by the MASSNAHRO organization. Applications for this wait list are available at the administration office building at 22 Frank D. Tanner Drive, Reading. The income limits are: Section 8 Rental Assistance Income limits: 1 person - $32,150 2 persons - $36,750 3 persons - $41,350 4 persons - $45,900 5 persons - $49,600 6 persons - $53,250 7 persons - $56,950 8 persons - $60,600 RHA -owned Properties The Authority presently owns and manages sixteen family units located in various locations throughout the Town of Reading. We acquired one additional property for potential use as an affordable home; however, the building was sold by RHA in October 2010. Funds from that sale have been set aside to improve present affordable units and to purchase additional affordable property upon future availability. We continue to pursue opportunities to expand low income housing units within the Town whenever possible. Applications Elderly/Handicapped Housing g 667) The Authority manages 80 one - bedroom units of housing for elderly/handicapped persons at our Frank D. Tanner Drive complex in Reading. To qualify for this housing, a single person or couple must meet the eligibility guidelines and be 60 years of age or older or handicapped. The Authority sets aside 13.5% of these units for non - elderly handicapped persons. The wait list is currently open for all seniors' 60 years of age and older. We encourage Reading residents to apply and are making special outreach efforts to elderly of minority representation. The 13.5% non - elderly handicapped requirement has been fulfilled but applications are still being accepted for our wait list. Non - elderly applicants will be served after the Authority has placed all qualified applicants if the 13.5% requirement has been met. You may obtain an application at the office of the Authority, 22 Frank D. Tanner Drive, Reading, MA 01867 or by accessing one online from the Town of Reading website. Family Housing — State (705) The Authority operates the State's Family Housing Program with 2 different developments. The first family housing development that was built by the Authority is located at Oakland and Waverly Roads and is called Waverly Oaks. There are six 3- bedroom units. Our second state family development is near the center of Town and is referred to as our Pleasant/Parker location. There are only four units available at this site. Our wait list is currently closed. Wait times for those presently on the list remains quite long. 153 Section 8 Federal Housing Assistance Program Currently the wait list for our Section 8 Program is open. We now participate in the centralized wait list program initiated in December 2002 and administered by Mass NAHRO. Applications are available at our administrative office or online at www.mnahro.or¢. An application can be downloaded from that site and submitted to any agency participating in the centralized wait list program. There are currently over 85 member agencies taking part in that joint process. At present there are almost 100,000 families on this waitlist with waiting times for assistance quite long. The State maintains a wait list for its programs through the Metropolitan Boston Housing Program (MBHP). Anyone seeking an emergency application should contact MBHP at 800 -272- 0990 to obtain an application. The local area service agency for emergency applicants is Community Service Network. You may contact them at 781 - 438 -1977. Summit Village First Time Homebuyers Program The Authority continues to oversee the maintenance of the wait list for qualified and eligible applicants for the affordable units at Summit Village through the First Time Homebuyers Program. We presently have nine potential buyers on our waitlist. During the past year, no affordable unit was made available and subsequently sold at an affordable price to a family on our wait list. The "affordable" owners must have a fair market appraisal done; the Authority reviews the appraisal and if accepted, provides the owner with the maximum resale price for the affordable unit. If the owner has a friend who would be eligible and income - qualified, then the Authority reviews their qualifications and provides them with an "Eligible Purchaser Certificate ". If the owner wishes to select an applicant from the wait list, the Authority would send the next available and eligible buyer's name to the owner to negotiate the sale. Interested applicants may pick up applications packets at the Town Clerk's office in Town Hall; at the Reference Desk at the Reading Public Library; or at the office of the Reading Housing Authority, 22 Frank D. Tanner Drive. When making an application, a $10 fee made payable to the "Reading Housing Authority" must be included along with all pertinent documentation. If the family applying for the affordable unit is headed by 2- persons, both parties must execute the application as applicant and co- applicant. Income from all family members age 18+ is included in family income for eligibility. However, if the income of one of these persons is from a dependent (not spouse) who is a full -time student, then a deduction for out of pocket expenses for books, tuition, fees and/or travel is allowed. Documentation from the school must be provided and verification for employment and expenses must be provided with the application. All persons must sign a "Release of Information" to have their documentation verified by the Authority. Highlights of the program are: First Time Homebuyer Cannot have owned a home within the last 3 years; divorced persons cannot currently own home but 3 year restriction is excused. Maximum Family Income Currently, the maximum family income cannot exceed 80% of FY 2010 Medium Family Income presently set at $91,800 154 (effective 5/14/10) for all persons in the family from all sources (wages, interest, dividends, etc). Family Housing The 2 bedroom units must have a minimum family size of 2 persons. The maximum number of persons that can qualify for a 2- bedroom unit would be 4 persons. The 3 bedroom units must have a minimum of 3 persons with 2 being minor children living in the household. The maximum number of persons that would qualify for a 3- bedroom unit would be 6 persons. Affordable Price The affordable price is based on a 20% discount from the current fair market appraisal of the unit, which must be verified by the Authority. Deed Restriction Anyone wishing to purchase an "affordable" unit should be aware that a permanent deed restriction would be recorded with their deed. This restriction states that the unit must be sold to a qualified and eligible purchaser at a 20% discount from the fair market value as approved by the Reading Housing Authority. Single Persons Applications are accepted from single family households but persons on the single person wait list will be chosen only after all the eligible family applicants have been served. Local Preference Applicants from the Town of Reading are given preference over other applicants if their application is made on the same day. This local preference is given if a person is employed in the Town of Reading; has a business or enterprise in Reading which has been established for one or more years; if they are parents of a school child in Reading; persons who were residents of Reading for 5 or more years. Conclusion The Reading Housing Authority is proud to provide this information to you. Anyone interested in obtaining an application for any of our housing programs: elderly/handicapped housing, state family or the Federal Section 8 Rental Assistance Program, should contact the authority at 22 Frank D. Tanner Drive or by calling the office at 781 - 944 -6755. 155 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Middlesex, ss. Officer's Return, Reading: By virtue of this Warrant, I, on January.6, 2010 2010 notified and warned the inhabitants of the Town of Reading, qualified to vote on Town affairs, to meet at the place and at the _..` time specified by posting attested copies of this Town Meeting Warrant in the following public places within the Town of Reading: Precinct 1 Precinct 2 Precinct 3 Precinct 4 Precinct 5 Precinct 6 Precinct 7 Precinct 8 J. Warren Killam School, 333 Charles Street Peter Sanborn Place, 50 Bay State Road Reading Police Station, 15 Union Street Joshua Eaton School, 365 Summer Avenue Town Hall, 16 Lowell Street Austin Preparatory School, 1,01 Willow Street Reading Library, Local History Room, 64 Middlesex Avenue Wood End School, 85 Sunset Rock Lane The date of posting being not less than seven (7) days prior to January 19, 2010, the date set for the State Special Election in this Warrant. I also caused an attested copy of this Warrant to be posted on the Town of Reading web site. A true copy Attest: Laura Gemme, Town Clerk 156 Tho ceeman Constable COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS WILLIAM FRANCIS GALVIN SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH STATE SPECIAL ELECTION WARRANT Middlesex, SS. To any of the Constables of the Town of Reading, Greetings: In the name of the Commonwealth, you are hereby required to notify and warn the inhabitants of the Town of Reading who are qualified to vote in the Special State Election to vote at Precincts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 Reading Memorial High School - Hawkes Field House - Oakland Road on TUESDAY, THE NINETEENTH OF JANUARY, 2010, from 7:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. for the following purpose: To cast their votes in the Special State Election for the candidates of political parties for the following office: SENATOR IN CONGRESS. . .. . FOR THE COMMONWEALTH Hereof fail not and make return of this warrant with your doings thereon at the time and place of said voting. Given under our hands this 5th day of January, 2010. A true copy Attest: Laura A Gemme, Town Clerk � z Ons able Thomas Freeman Tafoya, Chairman Jarpes oppzoli, Vice Chairman CamVV-A—nthoW,, Secretary 157 January 6, 2010 Date MILAIGIU vv Jl.•IIUV VII BOARD OF SELECTMEN STATE ELECTION January 19, 2010 Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 00. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: Democratic - Martha Coakley Republican - Scott P Brown Unenrolled - Joseph L Kennedy - 10992 ballots of registered voters cast as follows: 67% of registered voters recorded: BALLOTS CAST: SENATOR IN CONGRESS - Candidate Precinct 1 Precinct 2 Precinct 3 Precinct 4 Precinct 5 Precinct 6 Precinct 7 Precinct 8 Total Martha Coakley - Democratic 587 525 515 657 571 644 677 489 4665 Scott P Brown - Republican 893 676 672 825 652 894 748 880 6240 Joseph L Kennedy - Unenrolled 9 10 12 6 15 7 15 7 81 Write -Ins 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 5 Blanks 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 1490 1211 1200 1488 1238 1546 1442 1377 10992 I- —'A true copy. Attest: Laura A Gemme Town Clerk 158 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Middlesex, ss. Officer's Return, Reading By virtue of this Warrant, I, on March 8, 2010 notified and warned the inhabitants of the Town of Reading, qualified to vote on Town affairs, to meet at the place and at the time specified by posting attested copies of this Town Meeting Warrant in the following public places within the Town of Reading: Precinct 1 J. Warren Killam School, 333 Charles Street Precinct 2 Peter Sanborn Place, 50 Bay State Road Precinct 3 Reading Police Station, 15 Union Street Precinct 4 Joshua Eaton School, 365 Summer Avenue Precinct 5 Town Hall, 16 Lowell Street Precinct 6 Austin Preparatory School, 101 Willow Street Precinct 7 Reading Library, Local History Room, 64 Middlesex Avenue Precinct 8 Wood End School, 85 Sunset Rock Lane The date of posting being not less than fourteen (14) days prior to April 6, 2010, the date set for the Local Election in the Warrant. I also caused a notice of this Warrant posting to be published in the Reading Chronicle in the issue of March 10, 2010 with an attested copy of this Warrant to be published on the Town of Reading website on March 8, 2010 A true copy. Attest: I 2� Laura Gemme, Town Clerk 159 Alan Ulrich, Constable TOWN WARRANT (Seal) 'COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Middlesex, ss. To any of the Constables of the Town of Reading, Greetings: In the name of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, you are hereby required to notify and warn the inhabitants of the Town of Reading, qualified to vote in the. Local Elections and Town affairs, to meet in the following place designated for the eight precincts in said Town, namely: Precincts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Readinq Memorial High School Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road TUESDAY, the SIXTH DAY OF APRIL, A.D., 2010 from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. to act on the following Articles, viz: ARTICLE 1 To elect by ballot the following Town Officers: A Moderator for one year; Two members of the Board of Selectmen . for three years; One member of the Board of Assessors for three years; One member of the Board of Assessors for one year; Two members of the Board of Library Trustees for three years; Two members of the Municipal Light Board for three years; Two members of the School Committee for three years; and Seventy Town Meeting Members shall be elected to represent each of the following precincts: Precinct 1 Eight members for three years; Precinct 2 Eight members for three years; and to meet at the .Reading Memorial High School, 62 Oakland.-Road., in said Reading on MONDAY, the TWENTY -SIXTH DAY OF APRIL A.D., 2010 at seven - thirty- o'clock in the evening, at which time and place the following Articles are to be acted upon and determined exclusively by Town Meeting Members in accordance with the provisions of the Reading Home Rule ..Charter. 160 Two members for two years; One member for one year; Precinct 3 Eight members for three years; Precinct 4 Eight members for three years; One member for two years; One member for one year; Precinct 5 Eight members for three years; One member for two years; Precinct 6 Eight members for three years; Precinct 7 Eight members for three years; and Precinct 8 Eight members for three years. and to meet at the .Reading Memorial High School, 62 Oakland.-Road., in said Reading on MONDAY, the TWENTY -SIXTH DAY OF APRIL A.D., 2010 at seven - thirty- o'clock in the evening, at which time and place the following Articles are to be acted upon and determined exclusively by Town Meeting Members in accordance with the provisions of the Reading Home Rule ..Charter. 160 ARTICLE 2 To hear and act on the reports of the Board of Selectmen, Town Accountant, Treasurer - Collector, Board of Assessors, Director of Public Works, Town Clerk, Tree Warden, Board of Health, School Committee, Contributory Retirement Board, Library Trustees, Municipal Light Board, Finance Committee, Cemetery Trustees, Community Planning & Development Commission, Town Manager and any other Official, Board or Special- Committee. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 3 To choose all other necessary Town Officers and Special Committees and determine what instructions shall be given Town Officers and Special Committees, and to see what sum the Town will vote to appropriate by borrowing or transfer from available funds, or otherwise, for the purpose of funding Town Officers and Special Committees to carry out the instructions given to them, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 4 To see if the Town will vote to amend the FY 2010 - FY 2019 Capital Improvements Program as provided for in Section 7 -7 of the Reading Home Rule Charter and as previously amended, or take any other action with respect thereto. , . Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 5 To see if the Town will vote to amend one or more of the votes taken under Article 14 of the Warrant of the Annual Town Meeting of April 27, 2009, as amended under Article 4 of the November 9, 2009 Subsequent Town Meeting; and to see what sum the Town will vote to appropriate by borrowing or transfer from available funds, or otherwise, as the result of any such amended votes for the operation of the Town and its government, or take any other action with respect thereto. Finance Committee ARTICLE 6 To see if the Town will vote to authorize the payment during Fiscal Year 2010 of bills remaining unpaid for previous fiscal years for goods and services actually rendered to the Town, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 7 To see if the Town will vote to authorize the Board of Selectmen to sell, or exchange, or dispose of, upon such terms and conditions as they may determine, various items of Town tangible property, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 8 To see if the Town will vote to authorize revolving funds for certain Town Departments under Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 44, Section 53E '/2 for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010 with the receipts, as specified, credited to each fund; the purposes, as listed, for which each fund may be spent, the maximum amount that may be spent from each fund for the fiscal year, and the disposition of the balance of each fund at fiscal year end. 161 Revolving Spending Revenue Allowed Expenditure Year End Account Authorit Source Expenses Limits Balance Consulting and engineering Fees as provided services for the or in Reading review of designs Conservation General Bylaws and engineering $25,000 Commission Section 5.7, ork for the vailable for Consulting Conservation Wetlands protection of expenditure Fees Commission Protection etlands. next year Legal, oversight and inspection, plan review, initial property appraisals and appeals, Community Services general Building Plumbing, management, $200,000 Wiring, Gas and landfill monitoring other permits for costs, curb the Walkers Brook sidewalks and Crossing, Oaktree, pedestrian safety Addison-Wesley/ improvements, Inspection Pearson and records archiving Available for Revolving Town Johnson Woods and other project expenditure Fund Mana er develo men's related costs, next ear . accines, materials or screening clinics and clinical supply costs, medical equipment and $25,000 supplies, Public Health Clinic Fees and immunizations, vailable for Clinics and Board of third party educational expenditure Services Health reimbursements materials next ear Acquire Library Library Library Charges for lost or materials to replace vailable for Materials Director and damaged Library lost or damaged $15,000 expenditure- Re lacement Trustees materials items next year Utilities and all Matt era other Cabin Recreation maintenance $10,000 vailable for and operating expenditure O eratin Administrator Rental Fees ex enses next year or take any other action with respect thereto. 162 Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 9 To see if the Town will vote to approve the FY 2011 — FY 2020 Capital Improvements Program as provided for in Section 7 -7 of the Reading Home Rule Charter, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 10 To see what sum the Town will vote to appropriate by borrowing, whether in anticipation of reimbursement from the State under Chapter 44, Section 6, Massachusetts General Laws, or pursuant to any other enabling authority or from the tax levy, or transfer from available funds, or otherwise, for highway projects in accordance with Chapter 90, Massachusetts General Laws, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 11 To see if the Town will raise and appropriate the sum of $25,000 (Twenty Five Thousand Dollars) for snow plowing and /or removal in ail church parking lots. By Petition ARTICLE 12 To see. if the Town will vote to determine how much money the Town will appropriate by borrowing, or from the tax levy, or transfer from available funds, or otherwise, for the operation of the Town and its government for Fiscal Year 2011 beginning July 1, 2010, or take any other action with respect thereto. Finance Committee ARTICLE 13 To see if the Town will vote to accept the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 64L, § 2(a) to impose a local sales tax upon the sale of restaurant meals originating within the Town by a vendor at the rate of .75 percent of the gross receipts of the vendor from the sale of restaurant meals to take effect January 1, 2010, or take any other action with respect thereto. Finance Committee ARTICLE 14 To see if the town will vote to change the name of the Gateway Smart Growth Zoning Incentive Payment Stabilization Fund to the Smart Growth Zoning Incentive Payment Stabilization Fund, and to include in the purpose any 40R project for which the Town of Reading receives a Zoning Incentive Payment and further, to transfer additional funds into the Stabilization Fund, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 15 To see if the Town will vote pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 59, Section 5, Clause 41C to adopt a change in the income, asset and age limits of certain elderly tax exemptions as follows: To increase the income limits for unmarried persons to $20,000.00 and for married persons to $30,000.00; to increase the asset limits for unmarried persons to $40,000.00 and for married persons to $55,000.00; to reduce the age of eligibility to 65 years or older; and to increase the exemption amount from $500.00 to $750.00, or take any other action with respect thereto. 163 Board of Assessors ARTICLE 16 To see if the Town will vote pursuant to Massachusetts Generai Laws Chapter 30B, Section 12 to authorize the Town Manager to enter into a contract or contracts including all extensions renewals and options for the collection of rubbish and recyclables, and for the disposal of rubbish fora period greater than three years but not exceeding 20 - years upon such terms and conditions determined by the Town Manager, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 17 To see if the Town will vote to accept the following gifts: 1. Scholarship Fund: To be established as a permanent trust fund to be known as "Patrons for Older Adults Scholarship" with the income there from to be used as an annual scholarship award for a student who is a resident of Reading, Massachusetts, who is planning to enter a profession that helps senior citizens (such as, but not limited to, medicine, social work, etc.). 2. Support Fund: To establish a permanent trust fund to be known as "Patrons for Older Adults Support Fund" with the income there from to be used no less frequently than annually to sponsor programs which support the social needs of Reading's senior citizens (such as, but not limited to, parties, group events, transportation to such events, etc.); to be expended as determined by the Council on Aging in concert with the Elder /Human Services Division. the foregoing to be administered by the Town of Reading Commissioners of Trust Funds in accordance with the wishes of the donors, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 18 To see if the Town will vote to accept a gift to establish the Patrick A. Schettini, Jr. Memorial Scholarship Fund to be administered by the Town of Reading Commissioners of Trust Funds in accordance with the wishes of the donors, or take any other action with respect thereto. School Committee ARTICLE 19 To see if the Town will vote to accept a gift from the Downtown Steering Committee to fund a trust fund to be known as the "Downtown Improvement and Events Trust." The trust fund may accept donations which may be added to the funds to be invested and reinvested and shall be expended by the Town Manager or his designee under the general direction of the Economic Development Committee, for the sole purposes of supporting and funding improvements, promotions and community events in the Downtown area of Reading. The trust shall begin upon the acceptance hereof by Town Meeting, and shall terminate immediately and automatically in 20 years unless the Board of Selectmen shall determine at that time that the need and purposes of the trust continue. If the trust continues past 20 years, the Board of Selectmen shall evaluate and determine the ongoing .need for the trust every 10 years thereafter. Upon the termination of the Trust, the trust assets shall be transferred to the Town of Reading to be used for any other purpose. The Trust is to be administered by the Town of Reading Commissioners of Trust Funds in accordance with the wishes of the donors, or take any other action with respect thereto. 164 Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 20 To see if the Town will vote to transfer the sum of $61,001 which was previously appropriated and raised by borrowing under Article 23 (Sunnyside Avenue sewer) of the Warrant at the April 30, 2007 Town Meeting, and which sum is no longer needed to complete the project for which it was initially borrowed, to pay all or a portion of the cost of the California Road sewer, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 21 To see if the Town will vote to accept the provisions of Massachusetts General Law Chapter 148, Section 261 which provides that any building constructed or substantially rehabilitated so as to constitute the equivalent of new construction and occupied in whole or in part for residential purposes and containing not less than four dwelling units including but not limited to lodging houses, boarding houses, apartments, hotels, condominiums and group residences shall be equipped with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with the Massachusetts State Building Code, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 22 To see if the Town will vote to amend Section 4.5.2, Junk, of the Town of Reading General Bylaws by deleting Section 4.5.2 in its entirety and replacing it with the following: 4.5.2 Purchase Sale or Barter of Junk. Old Metals and Second -Hand Articles 4.5.2.1 No person shall use any building, enclosure or other structure for the storage, sale or keeping of rags, waste paper stock or other inflammable material without a license therefore from the Board of Selectmen. 4.5.2.2 The Board of Selectmen may license suitable persons, upon such terms and conditions as the Board shall determine, to be dealers in and keepers of shops for the purchase, sale or barter of junk, old metals and second -hand articles, and no person shall be such a dealer or keeper without such a license. 4.5.2.3 The Board of Selectmen may also license suitable persons as junk collectors to collect by purchase or otherwise, junk, old metals and second -hand articles from place to place within the Town, and no person shall engage in such business without such a license. 4.5.2.4 In addition to any other means of enforcement, the provisions of this bylaw may be enforced by non - criminal disposition in. accordance with Section 5.11 of this bylaw, or to take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen 165 ARTICLE 23 To see if the Town will vote to amend Article 2, Town Meeting, of the Town of Reading General Bylaws as follows (new language in italics): 2.1 General 2.1.9 Any tax and /or fee increase rejected by a vote of Town Meeting cannot be brought back before Town Meeting for approval for a period of eighteen (18) months. Nothing in this section limits the Town's ability to put such tax and /or fee increase on the ballot at the next local election for voter approval, or take any other action with respect thereto. By Petition ARTICLE 24 To see if the Town will vote to authorize the Board of Selectmen to convey a sewer easement to the owner of the land located at 757 Main Street which easement is shown on a plan entitled: "Easement Plan 767 Main Street Reading, Massachusetts, dated February 25, 2010," upon such terms and conditions and for such consideration as the Board of Selectmen deems to be in the best interest of the Town, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 25 To see if the Town will vote to authorize the Board of Selectmen to accept the conveyance of drainage easements located on Howard Street which easements are shown on a plan entitled: "Plan of Drainage Easement Howard Street, Reading, Massachusetts, dated February 2, 2010," upon such terms and conditions and for such consideration as the Board of Selectmen deems to be in the best interest of the Town, or take any other action with respect thereto Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 26 To see if the Town will vote to amend Section 2.0, Definitions, Section 2.2.22 and Section 6.3, Nonconforming Uses and Structures, of the Town of Reading Zoning By -Laws by deleting in their entirety Section 2.2.22 and Section 6.3, and inserting in their place the following new definition and section: Definitions (New) 2.2.22 Nonconforming - A lawful pre- existing building, structure, vacant lot, or use of buildings or land that does not conform to the zoning regulations for the district in which it is located, but did conform at the time it was built or established. 6.3 Nonconforming Uses and Structures: 6.3.1 Applicability: This bylaw shall not apply to uses or structures lawfully in existence or lawfully begun, or to a building or Special Permit issued before the first publication of notice of the public hearing required by G.L. c. 40A, s. 5 at which this bylaw, or any relevant part thereof, was adopted. No modification of a lawfully existing nonconforming use or structure is allowed except as authorized hereunder. TSI 6.3.2 Nonconforming Uses: The Board of Appeals may grant a Special Permit to change or extend a nonconforming use only if it determines that such change or extension shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. The following types of changes to nonconforming uses may be considered by the Board of Appeals: a. Modification or extension of the existing nonconforming use; b. Change from one nonconforming use to another, less detrimental, nonconforming use. Once a nonconforming use is changed to a conforming use, there is no authority to allow the property to revert to a nonconforming use. 6.3.3 Nonconforming Structures: 6.3.3.1 The Building Inspector may. issue a Building Permit for an interior renovation, interior alteration or interior reconstruction of a pre- existing, nonconforming structure that does or will not extend the nonconformity or create a new nonconformity. 6.3.3.2 The Board of Appeals may grant a Special Permit to reconstruct, extend, alter, or change a nonconforming structure in accordance with this section only if it determines that such reconstruction, extension, alteration or change does not increase the nonconforming nature of said structure or create a new nonconformity and shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming structure to the neighborhood. The following types of changes to nonconforming structures may be considered by the Board of Appeals: a. A reconstruction, extension or structural change; b. An alteration to provide for a substantially different purpose or for the same purpose in a substantially different manner or to a substantially greater extent. 6.3.3.3 For purposes of this bylaw, an increase in the nonconforming nature of a structure will result when the portion added to the structure violates any provision of this Zoning By -Law applicable at the time of application for the building permit required for such addition. An increase in the nature of a nonconforming structure will not result from a mere replacement, without undue delay, of a nonconforming portion thereof. 6.3.3.4 Nothing in this bylaw shall prevent the strengthening or restoring to a safe condition of any building or structure, or part thereof, declared unsafe by the Building Inspector. 6.3.4 Variance Required: Except as provided in Section 6.3.5 herein, the reconstruction, extension or structural change of a nonconforming structure in such a manner as to increase an existing nonconformity, or create a new nonconformity, including the extension of an exterior wall at or along the same nonconforming distance within a required yard, shall require the issuance of a variance from the Board of Appeals. 167 6.3.5 Alteration of Nonconforming Single and Two - Family Residential Structures — As of Right: Nonconforming single and two - family residential structures may be extended, altered or structurally changed (collectively "alteration ") upon a determination by the Building Inspector that such proposed alteration does not increase the nonconforming nature of said structure. The Building Inspector may issue a Building Permit under any of the following circumstances: a. For the alteration of a single or two- family structure which will not increase the footprint of the existing structure, create a new dimensional nonconformity or extend an existing dimensional nonconformity, provided that the existing height restrictions shall not be exceeded. This clause shall apply regardless of whether the lot complies with the current area and /or frontage requirements; b. For the alteration of a single or two- family structure that is located on a lot which is nonconforming only with respect to area, where such alteration will comply with all current setback, yard, lot coverage and building height requirements; c. For the alteration of a single or two family structure that is located on a lot which is nonconforming only with respect to frontage where such alteration complies with all current setback, yard, lot coverage and building height requirements, and For the alteration of a single or two- family structure which encroaches upon one or more required yard or setback areas, where the alteration will comply with all current setback, yard, lot coverage and building height requirements. 6.3.6 In the event that the Building Inspector determines, after consideration of Section 6.3.5 above, that the nonconforming nature of such structure would be increased by the proposed extension, alteration or change, the Board of Appeals may, by special permit, allow such extension, alteration or change where it determines that the proposed extension, alteration or change will not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming structure to the neighborhood. 6.3.7 Reconstruction after Catastrophe: A lawful, pre- existing, nonconforming single or two- family building, structure or use, which has been destroyed or damaged by fire or other casualty may be re- established, restored or reconstructed within two years of occurrence of the damage or destruction. Re- establishment, restoration or reconstruction shall be permitted provided that there is no increase in the degree of the nonconformity. Any proposed change of use is subject to the provisions of this bylaw. 6.3.8 Voluntary Demolition and Reconstruction: 6.3.8.1 Any new construction, following voluntary demolition of a nonconforming structure, shall be in conformance with this Zoning By -Law, except in the following circumstances: i.:: a. A single - family or two- family dwelling which is nonconforming only with respect to lot size and /or frontage may be voluntarily removed or demolished and replaced by a new single - family or two - family dwelling. Such reconstruction must comply with the current dimensional controls for the district in which the dwelling is located. b. In the event that the proposed reconstruction would (a) cause the structure to exceed the volume or area of the original nonconforming structure or (b) cause the structure to be located other than on the original footprint, a special permit shall be required from the Board of Appeals prior to such demolition. The Board of Appeals may, by Special Permit, allow such reconstruction where it determines that the proposed reconstruction will not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming structure to the neighborhood. C. A detached accessory structure which is accessory to a single - family or two- family dwelling that has nonconforming setbacks may be demolished and a new accessory structure may be built in the same footprint; provided, that the new accessory structure does not exceed the existing height and size limitations for accessory structures. 6.3.9 Abandonment or Non -Use: A nonconforming use of a structure or land that has been abandoned or not used for a period of two (2) years, shall lose its protected status and be subject to all of the provisions of this Zoning By -Law, or take any other action with respect thereto. Community Planning and Development Commission ARTICLE 27 To see if the Town will vote to amend Section 2.0 Definitions, 2.2.29 Sign, Section 4.3.3 Site Plan Review and Section 6.2, Signs, of the Town of Reading Zoning By -Laws by deleting in its entirety 2.2.29., 4.3.3.5.1.a:, 4.3.3.6.f. and Section 6.2, and inserting in its place the following new sections: New Definition in Section 2.2.29 to read, 2.2.29. Sign: Any word or combination of number, emblem, picture, design, trademark or other device including the support structure of freestanding signs. Signage is the collection of signs. Signage does not include temporary holiday decorations, historical date markers or plaques, or artwork that contains no commercial messages. The words in italics in the following two paragraphs show language to be added in the existing bylaw. 4.3.3.5.1.a. Site Layout, which shall contain the boundaries of the lot(s) in the proposed development, proposed structures, drives, parking, fences,, walls, walks, outdoor lighting, signage, loading facilities, and areas for snow storage after plowing. The first sheet in this plan shall be a locus plan, at a scale acceptable to CPDC, showing the entire project and its relation to the existing 169 areas, buildings and roads for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the project boundaries or such other distance as may be approved or required- by the staff. 4.3.3.6.f. Minimize unreasonable departure from the character, materials, signage and scale of buildings in the vicinity, as viewed from public ways and places; To replace Section 6.2 entirely with the following: 6.2. SIGNS. 6.2.1 Signs perform important functions in the community such as communicating messages and providing information about goods and services available. Because signs potentially have detrimental impact on the visual and perceptual environment, signs must be regulated. It is the intent of Section 6.2 of the zoning by -law to protect property values, create an attractive business climate, enhance and protect the physical appearance of the community and to encourage the most appropriate use of the land. This section will also assist those installing signs within the Town of Reading by setting forth the process governing the application, installation, and maintenance of such signs. 6.2.1.2. Applicability: A sign may be erected, placed, established, painted, created or maintained only in conformity with the provisions of,this Section. 6.2.1.3 Zoning Districts: The zoning districts are as shown on the official zoning map which is on file with the Engineering Department and the Town Clerk's Office and can also be found on the Town website. Reading has also adopted a Downtown Smart Growth District (DSGD) and a Gateway Smart Growth District (GSGD). Please refer to Section 4.12 for DSGD regulations and Section 4.11 for GSGD regulations. 6.2.2. Definitions: For the purposes of Section 6.2., the following terms shall have the meanings hereby assigned to them: a. Awninq Sign: A sign painted on or attached to the cloth, canvas or metal cover of a movable or stationary frame of the fixed, hinged, rolled or folding type of awning. b. Banner or Pennant: Any sign of lightweight fabric or similar material that is mounted or affixed at one or more edges. c. Beacon: A stationary or revolving light, not primarily illuminating a sign, which flashes or projects illumination, single color or multi- colored, in any manner which is intended to attract or divert attention, except any such fixture which is required by the Federal Aviation Administration or a similar agency, and is installed and operated under the safety regulations of such agency. d. Bulletin Board: Any sign erected by a charitable, educational, or religious institution or a public body on its property for purposes of announcing events which are held on the premises, and contains no commercial information. 170 e. Commercial Message: Any sign wording, logo or other representation that directly or indirectly names, advertises, or calls attention to a business, product, service, sale or sales 'event or other commercial activity. f. Facade: The area of the face of a building, typically the principal or front wall of a building. g. Free - Standing Sign: Any and every sign erected on or permanently affixed to the land, including any and every sign that is not attached to a building. h. Halo Lighting: Light showing from the back of or from within a letter or graphic shape out towards the surface that the letter or graphic is mounted on without having any light visible through the face of the letter or graphic. i. Informational and Directional Signage: A sign that has a purpose secondary to the use of the lot on which it is located, such as "no parking, private parking, enter, exit, one -way, street address or drive -thru teller." j. Identification Sign: I . Joint Identification Sign: A sign which serves as common or collective identification for a group of persons or businesses operating on the same lot and which contains the names and logos of establishments but no advertising or promotional information. Area Identification Sign: A sign, located at the site entrance(s), identifying a common area containing a group of structures, or a single structure containing several uses. k. Marquee Sign: Any sign attached to or made part of a marquee, that is, any permanent canopy or structure projecting beyond and extending along a building wall. I. Monument Sign: A free - standing sign with a low height configuration permanently affixed to the ground at its base and not mounted on a pole. m. Off - Premises Sign: Any sign which directs attention to a business, commodity, service, entertainment, attraction or other commercial activity which is sold, offered or existing elsewhere than upon the same lot on which such sign is located, including any outdoor advertising sign ( "billboard ") on which space is leased or rented for the purpose of conveying a commercial or non - commercial message. n. Portable Sign: Any sign not permanently attached to the ground or any permanent structure or a sign designed to be transported in any way including: - signs converted to "A" or "T frames; - menu and sandwich -board signs. , o. Projecting /Blade Sign: A sign which is affixed to a building or other structure where the sign face is approximately perpendicular to the building facade. p. Reader Board: A sign or portion thereof with characters, letters or illustrations that can be changed or rearranged without altering the face or surface of the sign or signboard. A sign on which the message changes more than eight times per day shall be considered an animated sign and not a reader board sign. A sign on which 171 the only copy that changes is an electronic or mechanical indication of time or temperature shall be considered a "time and temperature" portion of a sign and not a reader board sign. q. Sign Area: The area contained entirely within the signboard (the flat surface of durable material upon which letters or other graphic content of a sign is displayed) or if no sign board is present, the area contained entirely within the smallest rectangle which completely encloses the outer extremities of all graphic material of a sign. r. Sign Height: The distance from the base of the sign at normal grade to the top of the highest attached component of the sign or sign structure. Normal grade shall be construed to be the lower of: (1) Existing grade prior to construction, or (2) The newly established grade after construction, exclusive of any filling, berming, mounding, or excavating solely for the purpose of locating the sign. In cases in which the normal grade cannot be reasonably determined, sign height shall be computed on the assumption that the normal grade is the elevation of the nearest point of the crown of the public street along which the lot has frontage or the grade of the land at the principal entrance to the principal structure on the lot, whichever is lower. s. Temporary Sign: Any sign which is used temporarily, relates to events of a temporary nature, or is not permanently mounted. Table 6.2.3. Signs Permitted According to Zoning District Max. Max. Sign Sign Setbacks: Permit Area Height Front Side Maximum Type Required (sq. ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Number All Zoning Districts: 1. Personal Message N 4 6 N/A 20 1 /lot 2. Identification (Joint and Area N 4 8 (A) N/A N/A 1 /lot 3. Construction N 16(B) N/A N/A 20 N/A 4. Subdivision Sales (C) 48 N/A N/A N/A 1 /subdiv. 5. Subdivision (C) 24 NIA N/A N/A 1 /subdiv. 6. Real Estate Sales N 8 (G) 6 N/A 20 1 /lot 7. Temp. Open House N 4 N/A N/A 20 1 /agency per lot 8. Garage /Yard Sale N 4 N/A N/A 20 1 /lot 172 .9. Informational / N 4 6 N/A N/A - N/A Directional 10. Portable/ A -Frame Regulated by the Board of Selectmen —Annual Permit Required 11. Temporary Y 16 or 30 N/A (See Section 6.2.6.2.h.) Business Signs Business -A, Business -C and Industrial Zoning Districts: 12. Free - Standing Y 50(D) 20. 0 20 1 /lot 13. Wall Y 2/4E (A) N/A 10 1 /business 14. Projecting /Blade Y 8 (A)(H) N/A 10 1 /business Business -B Zoning Districts: 15. Free- Standing Y 50(d) 20 0 20 1 /104 (Service Stations only) 16: Wall Y 2(F) (A) 0 0 2 /businesses 17. Projecting /Blade Y 8 (A)(H) -4 0 1 /business NOTES: (A) No portion of such sign shall extend higher than the bottom of the sills of the windows of the second floor of a building or higher than the lowest portion of the eaves or, in the case of a gabled wall, no higher than a line equal in height to the lowest portion of the lower eave of any adjoining building wall, whichever of the above is lowest. (B) Aggregate sign area of all applicable signs. (C) Only as shown in Definitive Subdivision Plans as approved by the Community Planning and Development Commission. consistent with Paragraph 6.2.1.1. (D) May not be larger than 75 square feet, if more than one business occupies the lot. . *See Section 6.2.6.4. 173 (Continued) If the minimum distance from the building wall on which the sign is mounted is less than 100 feet from the centerline of the street which the sign faces, the maximum sign area shall be equal to 2 square feet per linear foot of said wall occupied by the establishment to which the sign relates; if such distance is more than 100 feet, maximum sign area shall be equal to 4 square feet per linear foot of said wall so occupied. (F) No wall sign for any non - residential establishment shall exceed a sign area equal tol 2 square feet per linear footage of length of the front wall of the building occupied by the establishment to which the sign relates. (G) Real Estate Signs in the Industrial Zoning Districts are allowed one sign per business with a maximum sign area equal to 2 square feet per linear foot of said wall occupied by the establishment to which the sign relates without a sign permit. (H) Projecting /Blade Signs shall be at least eight (8) feet from the ground and project no more than four (4) feet from the structure. 6.2.4. Exempt Signs: Signs for which no permit is required are identified in Table 6.2.3 and Section 6.2.4. The following signs are exempt from this Section 6.2 and may be installed without permit, provided that the following is complied with: a. Authorized signs installed by the Town of Reading or the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any agency thereof, or with the express written permission thereof, for the purposes of traffic control or traffic or pedestrian safety or convenience, identification of public facilities or streets, or for direction to same; public notices and warnings required by and erected by Town, State, or Federal Government agencies. b. Directional signs; building markers. C. Political signs on private properties or vehicles only, provided that such sign shall not exceed six square feet in sign area, shall not be placed in such location as to constitute a traffic or pedestrian safety hazard, and shall not be . displayed for more than forty -two days prior to the applicable election or more than two days following such election. d. Signs for churches and other federally tax - exempt institutions. e. Holiday lights and decorations which contain no commercial messages and which are displayed during the appropriate season. f. Works of art which contain no commercial messages with prior Town Planner or CPDC written approval. 174 g. Fuel pump information signs, only as required by State law, are allowed and shall not affect . the computation of allowable number of signs or aggregate sign size on a property. j .h. Any sign within a structure, not attached to any window or door, which is not visible from other properties or from any street right -of -way. i. Signs showing resident's name, historical plaque or marker, street address and /or name of a lawful home occupation taking place on the premises. j. Construction Signs, identifying contractors while doing construction work on a property. k. Temporary Subdivision Sales Signs and permanent Subdivision Identification Signs as approved in connection with the Definitive Plans for such subdivision, and located at the principal entrance to the subdivision in an acceptable easement, not within any street right -of -way or access easement. 1. Real Estate Sales Signs, including placards showing the words "Sold" or "Sale Pending or similar not exceeding one -third the size of the sales sign. M. Temporary Open House signs, not exceeding four square feet each, may be placed at a rate of one per agency per intersection per property and one on the open house property. n. GarageNard Sale Signs, limited to one sign located on the property on which the garage /yard sale is taking place and one at each of no more than two intersections of public streets. . o. Any establishment located in a Business or Industrial Zoning District may display: • An "Open" Flag - with dimensional requirements not to exceed four (4) feet by six (6) feet and may contain decorative graphics. • A National or State Flag - with emblems of religious, educational, governmental organization or any other federally tax - exempt organization, except when displayed in connection with commercial promotions or advertising. Dimensions shall not exceed four (4) feet by six (6) feet. 6.2.5. Prohibited Signs: No private sign shall be installed or placed on public property, except by express permission of the Town or as otherwise allowed herein. The following signs are prohibited in any zoning district a. Signs which interfere with traffic or pedestrian safety, including any which may , obstruct or interfere with traffic or pedestrian visibility or movement at any intersection or into or out of any property, or which by reason of position, shape, or color may interfere with, may obstruct the view of, or be confused with any authorized traffic sign, signal, or device; or.which makes use of the words "STOP," "LOOK," "DANGER,' or any other word, phrase, symbol or character in such a manner as to interfere with, mislead or confuse motorists or pedestrians. 175 b. Signs placed or painted on any tree (other than street address), rock (other than street address), utility pole (other than yard sale sign), traffic safety sign, or similar fixture; painted on any building wall, bench, pavement, parking bumper or curb (other than a "Reserved" marking), or other similar outdoor surface. C. Internally illuminated signs, unless the background or signboard completely blocks illumination or glow except through the letters and graphics. d. Signs which contain a beacon of any type; which contain a spot light providing direct illumination to the public; which flash, revolve, rotate, move, or blink, or which fluctuate in light intensity; animated signs, that is, which use lighting to depict action or to create an illusion of movement or a special effect or scene. e. Any self illuminated or backlit signs which use LCD, LED, electronic messaging or digital technology, neon or similar signs except as displayed on the inside of windows.subject to the provisions of Paragraph 6.2.6.2.c. f. Free- standing signs in a Business -B Zoning District (except as permitted at service stations). g. Internally illuminated signs in a Business -B Zoning District (except as permitted at service stations). h. Banners as permanent signs. Banners are allowed only as temporary signs four times a year for an annual total of 56 days with a sign permit, refer.to Section 6.2.6.2.h. for full details. i. Signs located on any portion of a.lot except a front yard or a side yard directly abutting a public street. J. Signs which do not meet and are not maintained to meet the provisions of this Section and all applicable building, wiring, health, and safety codes; or which are not neatly and legibly lettered. k. Reader Board Signs are not allowed except as price displays at gas stations. I. Balloons or blimps used as signs, a movable poster or panel sign, umbrellas containing any commercial message; or signs attached to or painted on vehicles traveling or parked on, or visible from any public right -of -way, unless such vehicle is used in the normal day -to -day operation of a business. 6.2.6. Signs by Zoning District: Signs are allowed or permitted in each Zoning District and are specified in Table 6.2.3. and as follows: 6.2.6.1. Business or Commercial Signs in Residential Zoning Districts: Legal nonconforming business or commercial operations in any residential zoning district shall follow the Business B- Zoning District regulations as specified in Subsection 6.2.6.4. except that such signs shall be set back a minimum of twenty feet from any other.lot and shall not be illuminated except during hours of operation. 176 6.2.6.2. Signs in Business and Industrial Zoning Districts: The following signs are allowed in all Business and Industrial Zoning Districts. In addition, please refer to Table 6.2.3: a. All awnings and canopies shall be impervious to light so that no illumination or glow can be seen through it. Awnings may contain letters up to four inches in height stating only the name of the business and the street number without requiring a sign permit. Such lettering shall not count toward allowed sign area. All other awnings or canopies with lettering or graphics shall require a sign permit and count as part of the allowed sign area. All awnings and canopies shall have a minimum ground clearance of eight feet. Ground clearance shall be measured between the lowest point of the awning or canopy and the ground or sidewalk. b. Bulletin boards are allowed, provided that no free - standing or wall- mounted bulletin board may exceed twelve square feet in size. C. Window Signs: Window signs are encouraged on the inside surface of the glass. Permanently affixed, weather resistant, individual letters that are not subject to wear and tear are permitted on the exterior of the window. Temporary or permanent signs may without permit be attached to the inside of the glass surface of a window (a single structurally supported sheet of glass or a sash) or door, or placed within the premises closer than five feet from any window or door and situated or designed so that the sign's graphic content is visible from the outside through an window or door, provided that any such sign shall: (1) Be uniformly located only in thirty percent (30 %) of the glass sheet or sash; (2) Contain no letters larger than eight (8) inches in height; (3) Be professional in appearance and good order shall be maintained at all times. Not be restricted with 'respect to graphic or message content, whether of a permanent or temporary nature, nor be restricted with respect to materials; (4) Have a sign area not to exceed six (6) square feet if the sign is not illuminated; (5) In addition to the above, any illuminated sign shall be placed only in a window, and not in a door, and shall also: (a) Have a sign area not to exceed four (4) square feet; (b) Be placed no closer than ten feet from any other internally illuminated window sign on the premises. In cases where there is a door or other architectural break in the facade this buffer shall be reduced to seven (7) feet; 177 (c) Be placed only in a window which contains no other signs of any type; and (d) Be illuminated only during hours of operation of the business establishment. Notwithstanding the above, window signs shall also be allowed in conformity with the provisions of Paragraph 6.2.6.2.h. below. d. Directional and informational signs displaying text only, no corporate logos, or slogans are allowed provided that such signs shall be limited to wall and free- standing signs with a maximum of four square feet of sign area. One such sign, not exceeding six (6) feet in height, may be placed at each vehicular entrance or exit on a lot to identify such entrance or exit provided such sign does not constitute a traffic hazard; such signs shall not affect the computation of allowable number of signs or aggregate sign size on a property. One such sign, not exceeding six feet in height and four square feet of sign area, may be placed in conjunction with each drive -up bank teller window or machine provided that such sign shall not constitute a traffic hazard. e. Marquee signs are prohibited except when used in conjunction with an indoor movie theater and attached to the outside wall of the building, provided that the size of the marquee sign shall not exceed twenty -four (24) square feet, and the bottom of the marquee sign shall not be of a height of less than 8 feet above the grade directly below. f. Outdoor menu boards are prohibited except: • As a portable sign with a sign permit issued by the Board of Selectmen. • When used in conjunction with a restaurant having a drive up window. No more than three menu boards are allowed. The maximum aggregate sign area is 100 square feet. No one menu board may exceed, 50 square feet. Any lettering shall not be legible from any other property or any street right -of -way. g. Informational and directional signs are allowed in all business and industrial zoning districts with a maximum sign area. of four square feet per sign in accordance with Table 6.2.3. h. Temporary signs intended for business openings and re- openings, open houses, and special sales and promotional events.for an individual business, are allowed, provided that: • The individual business shall place no more than four (4) such signs per calendar year for an annual total of 56 days (except in conjunction with an organized Town -wide common special event as specified below); • All temporary signs shall have received a sign permit from the Building Inspector; • No such sign shall exceed sixteen (16) square feet in sign area or thirty (30) square feet in sign area for businesses that have a setback more than fifty (50) feet from the primary street upon which the business is located; 178 Any such sign shall be printed or legibly lettered on a rigid signboard or fabric banner; In cases where renovation or construction includes removal of permanent signs, a temporary sign is allowed as follows: • Dimensions shall be the same as temporary signs • May be used as a permanent sign • May remain during construction provided the construction or renovation is expeditiously pursued Must be removed upon the installation of the permanent sign No such sign shall be placed so as to constitute a hazard to motorists or pedestrians; • If placed upon a window, any such sign shall be included in the aggregate window area specified in Paragraph 6.2.6.2.c above. In the case only of common special events organized by a recognized association of businesses for which events a license has been granted by the Board of Selectmen, an individual participating business may display a temporary sign in conjunction with such an event, provided that such signs related to said events shall not exceed four per year. Grand opening events for a new business may display for fourteen (14) days, upon issuance of a sign permit. Non - illuminated temporary banners, flags, balloons and streamers provided they are mounted in a way that does not pose a hazard to pedestrian or vehicular traffic and sight lines as determined by the Zoning Enforcement Officer. Only one grand opening sign permit per business may be issued until the property undergoes a change of use or change of ownership. Farm Stands and Garden Stands which do not have permanent windows shall be allowed, without permit or limitation as to number or material, to display temporary signs identifying goods offered for sale on the premises, provided that such signs are kept in good order and that the aggregate total sign area of all such signs on a lot shall not exceed one square -foot per lineal feet of frontage of such lot. Decorative noncommercial flags may be displayed for sale. j. Clocks, not to exceed eight square feet in surface area per side or twelve feet in height, are allowed, provided that they display no advertising or commercial material. k. Time and temperature displays may be included in any free - standing or wall sign, and no more than twelve additional square feet of sign area may be added to the otherwise allowable sign area of such sign. For commercial buildings containing more than one business requiring wall signage, any wall sign provided for any such business must be in conformity with the requirements of this Section 6.2 and in accordance with the following stipulations concerning an overall master signage plan for such building. The master signage plan shall show not more than one wall sign per business within the building. However, at the owner's election not every business within the building need be provided with a wall sign within the proposed assemblage. No wall sign shall be issued a sign permit for any building for 179 which a signage plan has been submitted or approved that is not included in or is not in conformity with the applicable, signage plan. The master signage plan need not show the specific message content for any individual sign contained therein, so as to provide for change in business occupancy which may from time to time occur within the building: (1) In all Business and Industrial Zoning Districts, the building owner may submit for approval to the Community Planning and Development Commission (CPDC), a master signage plan in accordance with the provisions of Section 6.2.6.4.1. The CPDC may issue a Certificate of Appropriateness for the building showing the allocation within the maximum sign area as allowed according to Table 6.2.3. hereof among wall signs for businesses within the building. This master signage plan shall show the size, placement, materials, framing, graphic and design standards for each such sign and the assemblage thereof proposed within said allowable maximum sign area, together with proposed lighting and methods,of attachment of all such signs. Once the Certificate of Appropriateness has been approved by the CPDC, the Building Inspector shall issue a sign permit for any individual business sign if it conforms to the master signage plan. 6.2.6.3. Signs in Business -A Zoning Districts: Allowed Signs (also specified in Table 6.2.3): Free- Standing • Wall Projecting • Internally illuminated Prohibited Signs: Banners as permanent signs A free - standing and wall sign for buildings that are not multi- tenant All internally illuminated signs shall have a background or signboard that completely blocks illumination or glow such that light is only visible through the letters and graphics. All illuminated signs shall be turned off at the close of business. A lot which contains not more than one establishment shall be allowed one free - standing sign or one wall sign or one projecting sign only. The street address number of the property shall be prominently displayed on such sign, and the sign shall in all respects conform to the above requirements. A lot which contains more than one establishment shall be allowed a maximum of the following signs, all of which shall in every respect conform to the requirements of this Section: One free - standing sign identifying the property, and MR b. One wall or projecting sign per business occupying the ground floor and front wall of the building, except in cases where the provisions of Paragraph 6.2.6.21. are utilized, and c. One joint identification sign listing the names and logos of the establishments on the premises but containing no other advertising matter, mounted either on an appropriate building wall or on two posts, provided that such joint identification sign shall not exceed four (4) square feet in sign area, shall not exceed eight (8) feet in height, and shall not be located within a front, side, or rear yard as required in Subsection 5.1.2. hereof, d. Either the allowed free- standing sign or, if no free- standing sign is used, then at least one wall or projecting sign, shall prominently display the street address number of the property. 6.2.6.3.1 Off- Premises Signs: The Board of Appeals may grant a Special Permit for an Off Premises Sign including an outdoor advertising sign ( "billboard ") in a Business A zoning district under the following conditions: a. The proposed sign shall be in a Business A district immediately abutting an Interstate Highway, and within 25 feet of the main right of way of such highway excluding on and off ramps; b. The placement of the proposed sign shall be conditioned upon the j elimination of no less than three non - conforming Off Premises signs elsewhere in the Town of Reading; C. There shall be no more than one Off Premises sign on any one lot that existed as a separate lot at the time of adoption of this section; d. The sign may be double sided with no greater than a 30 degree angle of separation between the two faces; e. Illumination of the sign shall be by external illumination only and illumination shall be limited to the hours of 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p -m.; f. The sign shall not exceed .675 square feet on each of the two permitted faces; g. The maximum height of any Off Premises sign shall be 95 feet from the ground level upon which the sign is installed to the highest point of the structure; h. The nearest part of any Off Premises sign shall be no closer than 20 feet from an abutting property, and no less than 10 feet from the highway right of way; and i. The proposed use shall not be detrimental to the public good. 191 6.2.6.4. Signs in Business -B Zoning Districts: Allowed Signs: • Wall - Projecting • Awning Sign • Externally illuminated signs Prohibited: • Free - Standing (except as permitted at service stations) • Internally illuminated signs • Banners as permanent signs No sign permit shall be issued for any permanent sign in the Business -B Zoning District without the sign having been granted a Certificate of Appropriateness (Subsection 6.2.6.4.1.). .Free- standing, wall and projecting signs permitted in any Business -B Zoning District are specified in Table 6.2.3. No, free - standing, internally illuminated, or Reader Board signs shall be permitted anywhere in a Business -B Zoning District. Free - standing signs will be allowed only for service stations. All internally illuminated signs shall have a background or signboard that completely blocks illumination or glow such that light is only visible through the letters and graphics. All illuminated signs shall be turned off at the close of business. Signs for properties containing more than one establishment: For a lot which contains more than one business, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be granted for more than one sign, and a maximum of the following signs are allowed, all of which shall in every, respect conform to the requirements of this Section: a. A business occupying the ground floor is allowed two (2) signs if one sign is a, wall sign and the second one is a projecting / blade sign, an awning sign, or a wall sign that is located on a different building fagade than the first wall sign. The allowable sign area for the primary sign is equal to 2 square feet per linear footage of length of the front wall of the building occupied by the establishment to which the sign relates in accordance with Table 6.2.3. The secondary sign area shall not exceed half of the sign area allowed for the primary sign located on the principal frontage. b. One . joint identification is allowed listing the names and logos of establishments on the premises provided the following conditions are met: • No additional advertising • Shall be mounted on the building wall closest to the entrance • Shall not exceed four (4) square feet in sign area • Shall not exceed eight (8) feet in height • Shall not project beyond the property line C. Allowance for an Additional Wall Sign: In addition to signs allowed above, a street address sign shall be permitted as follows: 182 6.2.6.4.1 6.2.6.5. • Not to exceed four (4) square feet in sign area • Not to exceed six (6) feet in sign height • Shall only display the street address and number of the property I i Certificate of Appropriateness /Community Planning and Development Commission (CPDC): The CPDC shall establish procedures for receiving and reviewing applications for signs in the Business B Zoning District, and for providing. written decisions to the Building Inspector. The CPDC shall, in reviewing such applications, consider the design, arrangement, location, texture, materials, colors, lighting, and other visual characteristics of each proposed sign and its compatibility with its general surroundings with regard to the purposes outlined in Paragraph 6.2.1. If the CPDC shall refuse to issue a Certificate of Appropriateness for any proposed sign, it shall state in writing the reasons therefore, with suggestions as to how the proposal may be modified so as to be approved. If the CPDC shall fail to issue or refuse Appropriateness within forty -five (45) days o' application being submitted, the Certificate sha issued. An appeal from any decision of the twenty days of such decision being filed with the Selectmen, who may uphold, modify or overrule grant a Certificate of Appropriateness. In those to issue a Certificate of the date of a completed II be deemed to have been CPDC may be made within Town Clerk, to the Board of the action of the CPDC and cases where proposed signs are included as part of plans for approval under Site Plan Review (Section 4.3.3) or PRD Special Permit review (Section 4.10), a Certificate of Appropriateness separate from such approval shall not be required and shall be combined with the review of said permit. Signs in Business -C Zoning Districts: Allowed Signs: • Free - Standing • Wall • Projecting • Internally illuminated signs Prohibited Signs: Banners as permanent signs A free - standing and wall sign for buildings that are not multi- tenant The allowed signs in the Business -C Zoning District are subject to the corresponding provisions of Paragraph 6.2.6.3. (Business -A). In addition, a wall sign consisting only of the name and corporate logo of the principal occupant of a building located within eighteen hundred feet of the centerline of an Interstate Highway may be displayed between the top course of windows and the parapet of such building provided that sign area not exceed fifty percent of the surface area described by the tops of such windows, the parapet, and the wall corners, that letters and logo contained in or constituting such sign shall not exceed eight feet in height, that the lowest point of such 193 sign shall not be closer than 48 feet above the ground immediately below, that such sign shall not be illuminated between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and sunrise, and that such sign shall be located on the building wall most directly facing said highway. 6.2.6.6. Signs in Industrial Zoning Districts: Allowed Signs: • Free - Standing • Wall • Projecting • Internally illuminated Prohibited Signs: • Banners as permanent signs • A free - standing and wall sign for buildings that are not multi- tenant The allowed signs in the Industrial zoning district should conform to the provisions of Section 6.2.6.5. (Business -C). In conjunction with a Special Permit to Construct a Planned Unit Development (PUD) granted in accordance with Section 4.9. hereof, the Community Planning and Development Commission (CPDC) may, consistent with Subsection 6.2.1., allow modifications to any provision of this Section. The CPDC may allow one additional free - standing sign, not to exceed thirty -five feet in height or 144 square feet in sign area, in that portion of the PUD parcel's landscaped perimeter buffer area most closely adjacent to Route 128 but not closer than 500 feet from any other public street existing at the time of submission of a relevant Preliminary PUD Plan. 6.2.6.7. Signs in a PUD: Notwithstanding anything in this Section 6.2 to the contrary, signs are allowed or permitted in a PUD only in accordance with Section 4.9.5.6. of these bylaws. 6.2.6.8 Signs in Residential Districts: Allowed Signs: • Wall • Projecting • Externally illuminated signs Prohibited: • Internally illuminated signs • Free - standing signs • Banners as permanent signs Except for identification signs (6.2.4.i.) or signs allowed in Subsection 6.2.6.1., no sign in any Residential Zoning District shall be illuminated in any manner. Decorative non- commercial banners or flags displayed on residential lots shall not be construed as signs for purposes of this bylaw. In connection with any RM Special Permit to Construct a Planned Residential Development (PRD) granted in accordance with Section 4.10. hereof, the Community Planning and Development Commission may allow modifications to any provision of this Section which is not inconsistent with the Purposes of this Section as specified in Subsection 6.2.1. 6.2.7. Removal of Defunct Signs: In the event a business, other than a seasonal business, ceases operations for a period of time in excess of thirty days, the sign owner or lessee, or the property owner, shall immediately remove any identification or advertising of said business OF any product or service sold thereby. If the sign conforms to the provisions of this Section, and if a permit has been requested within said thirty -day period for altering the same sign in conformity with this Section to identify a new business in the same location, such alteration shall be allowed. Changes in legend on any directory sign shall be exempt from the provisions of this paragraph. 6.2.8. Nonconforming Signs: A nonconforming sign may not be enlarged or altered in any way which would increase its nonconformity. Should any nonconforming sign be damaged by any means to an extent of more than fifty percent of its replacement cost at the time of damage, it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of this Section 62., or take any other action with respect thereto. Community Planning and Development Commission ARTICLE 28 To see if the Town will vote to amend Section 4.4, Floodplain Districts, of the Town of Reading Zoning By -Laws by deleting in its entirety Section 4.4, and inserting in its place the following new section: 4.4. FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT 4.4.1. Statement of Purpose: The purposes of the Floodplain Overlay District are to: 1) Ensure public safety through reducing the threats to life and personal injury; 2) Eliminate new hazards to emergency response officials; 3) Prevent the occurrence of public emergencies resulting from water quality, contamination and pollution due to flooding; 4) Avoid the loss of utility services which if damaged by flooding would disrupt or shut down the utility network and impact regions of the community beyond the site of flooding; 5) Eliminate costs associated with the response and cleanup of flooding conditions; 6) Reduce damage to public and private property resulting from flooding waters. 185 4.4.2. Boundaries of Floodulain District: The Floodplain District is established as an overlay district. The Floodplain District includes all special flood hazard areas within the Town of Reading designated as Zone A and AE on the Middlesex County Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for the administration of the National Flood Insurance Program. The map panels of the Middlesex County FIRM that are-wholly or partially within the Town of Reading are panel numbers 25017CO292E, 25017CO294E, 25017C0303E, 25017CO311 E, 25017C0312E, 25017CO313E and 25017CO314E that go into effect on June 4, 2010. The exact boundaries of the District may be defined by the 100 -year base flood elevations shown on the FIRM and further defined by the Middlesex County Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report dated June 4, 2010. The FIRM and FIS report are incorporated herein by reference and are on file with the Town Engineer 4.4.3 Definitions: AREA OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD is the land in the floodplain within a community subject to a one percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year. The area may be designated as Zone A, AO, AH, Al -30, AE, A99, V1 -30, VE or V. BASE FLOOD means the flood having a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any given year. , DEVELOPMENT means any manmade change to improved or unimproved real estate, including but not limited to building or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations. DISTRICT means floodplain district. FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) administers the National Flood Insurance Program. FEMA provides a nationwide flood hazard area mapping study program for communities as well as regulatory standards for development in the flood hazard areas. FLOOD BOUNDARY AND FLOODWAY MAP means an official map of a community issued by FEMA that depicts, based on detailed analyses, the boundaries of the 100 -year and 500 year floods and the 100 -year floodway. (For maps done in 1987 and later, the floodway designation is included on the FIRM.) FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP (FHBM) means an official map of a community issued by FEMA where the boundaries of the flood and related erosion areas having special hazards have been designated as Zone A or E. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) means an official map of a community on which FEMA has delineated both the areas of special flood hazard and the risk premium zones applicable to the community. FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY means an examination, evaluation, and determination of flood hazards, and, if appropriate, corresponding water surface elevations, or an examination, evaluation and determination of flood - related erosion hazards. :. FLOODWAY means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing E the water surface elevation. i t L_1. LOWEST FLOOR means the lowest floor of the lowest enclosed area (including basement or cellar). An unfinished or flood resistant enclosure, usable solely for parking of vehicles, building access or storage in an area other than a basement area is not considered a building's lowest floor, PROVIDED that such enclosure is not built so as to render the structure in violation of the applicable non - elevation design requirements of NFIP Regulations 60.3. . MANUFACTURED HOME means a structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is built on a permanent chassis and is designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities. For floodplain management purposes the term "manufactured home" also includes park trailers, travel trailers and other similar vehicles placed on a site for greater than 180 consecutive days. For insurance purposes, -.the term "manufactured home" does not include park trailers, travel trailers and other similar vehicles. MANUFACTURED HOME PARK OR SUBDIVISION means a parcel (or contiguous parcels) of land divided into two or more manufactured home lots for rent or sale. NEW CONSTRUCTION means, for floodplain management purposes, structures for which the "start of construction" commenced on 'or after the effective date of a floodplain management regulation adopted by a community. For the purpose of determining insurance rates, NEW CONSTRUCTION means structures for which the "start of construction' (as evidenced by issuance of a building permit) commenced on or after the effective date of an I. initial FIRM or after December 31, 1974, whichever is later. ONE - HUNDRED -YEAR FLOOD - see BASE FLOOD REGULATORY FLOODWAY - see FLOODWAY SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA means an area having special flood and /or flood- related erosion hazards, and shown on an FHBM or FIRM as Zone A, AO, Al -30, AE, A99, AH, V, V1 -30, VE. STRUCTURE means, for floodplain management purposes, a walled and roofed building, including a gas or liquid storage tank, that is principally above ground, as well as a manufactured home. STRUCTURE, for insurance coverage purposes, means a walled and roofed building, other than a gas or liquid storage tank that is principally above ground and affixed to a permanent site, as well as a manufactured home on foundation. For the latter purpose, the term includes a building while in the course of construction, alteration, or repair, but does not include building materials or supplies intended for use in such construction, alteration, or repair, unless such materials or supplies are within an enclosed building on the premises. SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE means damage of any origin sustained by a structure whereby the cost of restoring the structure to its before - damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred. 187 SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT means any repair, reconstruction or improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure either (a) before the improvement or repair is started, or (b) if the structure has been damaged and is being restored, before the damage occurred. For the purposes of this definition, "substantial improvement' is considered to occur when the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of the building commences, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the structure. ZONE A means the 100 -year floodplain area where the base flood elevation (BFE) has not been determined. To determine the BFE, use the best available Federal, State, local or other data. ZONE Al -30 and ZONE AE (for new and revised maps) mean the 100 -year floodplain where the base flood elevation has been determined. ZONE AH and ZONE AO means the 100 -year floodplain with flood depths of 1 to 3 feet where a clearly defined channel does not exist, where the path of flooding is unpredictable, and where velocity flow may be evident. Such flooding is characterized by ponding or sheet flow. ZONES B, C, AND X are areas identified in the community Flood Insurance Study as areas of moderate or minimal flood hazard. Zone X replaces Zones B and C on new and revised maps. 4.4.4. Reference to Existinq Regulations: The Floodplain District is established as an overlay district to all other districts. All development in the district, including structural and non - structural activities, whether permitted by right or by special permit must be in compliance with Chapter 131, Section 40 of the Massachusetts General Laws and with the following: - Section of the Massachusetts State Building .Code which .addresses floodplain and coastal high hazard areas (currently 780 CMR 120.G, "Flood Resistant Construction and Construction in Coastal Dunes "); - Wetlands Protection Regulations, Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) (currently 310 CMR 10.00); - Inland Wetlands Restriction, DEP (currently 310 CMR 13.00); - Minimum Requirements for the Subsurface Disposal of Sanitary Sewage, DEP (currently 310 CMR 15, Title 5); - Town of Reading Zoning By -Law; and - Town of Reading Wetlands Protection By -Law. Any variances from the provisions and requirements of the above referenced State and local regulations may only be. granted in accordance with the required variance procedures of such regulations. 4.4.5. Uses Permitted as of Right in the Floodplain Overlay District: In the Floodplain Overlay District, no new building shall be erected and no premises shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: 188 4.4.5.1. Municipal recreation, public water supply, drainage or flood control use, orchard, truck garden, nursery, or similar open use of the land for the raising of agricultural or horticultural crops, for rifle, pistol and shotgun shooting on land of any established range. 4.4.6. Uses Permitted in the Floodplain Overlay District By Special Permit: 4.4.6.1. If authorized by the Board of Appeals, commercial golf course, or non - profit social, civic or recreational use (but not including any use the chief activity of which is one customarily conducted as a business); and buildings and sheds accessory to any use permitted in the district. 4.4.6:2. If any land defined in the bylaws as being in a Floodplain Overlay District is proven to be in fact neither subject to flooding nor unsuitable for human occupancy because of drainage and topographic conditions, and if the use of such land will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, the Board of Appeals may permit buildings for human occupancy on such land in accordance with the requirements of the underlying district after the necessary proof has been presented to and reported on by the Community Planning and Development Commission and the Board of Health. 4.4.7. Uses Prohibited in the Floodplain Overlay District: Dumping, filling or earth transfer or relocation operations are prohibited except for utility trenches, driveways, landscaping and accessory building foundations, or municipal or public facilities. 4.4.8. Conditions for Approval for uses Permitted in the Floodplain Overlay District: 4.4.8.1 Within the floodplain overlay district, no new construction, substantial improvement or other land development shall be permitted unless it is demonstrated by the applicant that the cumulative effect of the proposed development, when combined with all other existing and anticipated development, will not increase the water surface elevation of the base flood. For the purposes of this section, substantial improvement shall be taken to mean: any repair, reconstruction, or improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds fifty percent of the market value of the structure either (a) before the improvement is started, or (b) if the structure has been damaged and is being restored after the damage occurred. 4.4.8.2 For new construction, substantial improvements of existing structures or other land development, the following conditions shall apply: 1) All new construction or improvement of non - residential structures shall either have the lowest floor, including basement, at or above the base flood elevation, or along with attendant utility and sanitary facilities, shall be flood proofed; i.e., designed so that below the established base flood elevation, the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy. . :E 2) Within Zones A and AE where base flood elevations are provided on the FIRM: elevations shall be determined by using the flood profile contained in the Flood Insurance Study. 3) Within Zones A and AE, where the base flood elevation is not shown on the FIRM, the applicant shall obtain any existing base flood elevation data as a basis for the elevation and flood - proofing requirements of this section and shall submit such base flood elevation data to the Board of Appeals at the time of making application for a special permit under this section. When base flood data is not available, the base flood elevation shall be determined through hydrologic and hydraulic analyses performed by a .registered professional engineer in accordance with standard engineering practices. 4) The structure will withstand the effects of flooding. The ground level around and extending 25 ft. outward from any building or structure in a Floodplain District shall be raised as necessary so that no part of the ground level area so defined, shall be below the elevation shown on the FIRM. Embankments subject to possible scouring by flood waters shall be properly stabilized and protected to prevent erosion by flood waters. 5) The containment of sewerage, safety of gas, electric, fuel, and other utilities from breaking, leaking, short circuiting, grounding, igniting, electrocuting or any other dangers due to flooding, will be adequately protected. 6) Safe vehicular and pedestrian movement to or over, and from the premises shall be provided on ways having a minimum profile elevation of no less than the base flood elevation. 7) Methods of drainage shall be adequate. 8) Other land in the Floodplain Overlay District shall be protected from impacts resulting from all work of development both approved and not approved on the premises. 9) Where watertight flood proofing of a structure is permitted, a registered professional engineer shall verify that the methods used will be adequate to withstand the flood depths, pressures and velocities, impact and uplift, and other factors associated with the base flood. 10) A registered professional engineer shall certify that the above minimum conditions listed in Sections 4.4.4 and 4.4.8 are satisfied in the design proposal. 4.4.9. Base Flood Elevation and Floodway Date: 4.4.9.1. Floodway Data. In Zones A, and AE, along watercourses that have not had a regulatory floodway designated, the best available Federal; State, local or other Floodway data shall be used to prohibit encroachments in floodways which would result in any increase in flood levels within the community during the occurrence of the base flood discharge. 4.4.9.2. Base Flood Elevation Data. Base flood elevation data is required for subdivision proposals or other developments greater than 50 lots or 5 acres, whichever is the lesser. within unnumbered A zones. 190 4.4.10 Notification of Watercourse Alteration: In a riverine situation, the Conservation Commission shall notify the following of any alteration or relocation of a watercourse: Adjacent Communities • NFIP State Coordinator Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation 251 Causeway Street, Suite 600 -700 Boston, MA 02114 -2104 • NFIP Program Specialist Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region I 99 High Street, 6th Floor Boston, MA 02110 and further, that the Zoning Map of the Town of Reading be amended to adopt the boundaries of the new overlay district as defined on the Middlesex County Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). that goes into effect on June 4, 2010 and as further defined by the Middlesex County Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report dated June 4, 2010, or take any other action with respect thereto. Community Planning and Development Commission ARTICLE 29 To see if the Town will vote, pursuant to Section 2 -6 of the Reading Home Rule Charter, to declare the seats of certain Town Meeting Members to be vacant and remove certain described persons from their position as Town Meeting Members for failure to take the oath of office within 30 days following the notice of election or for failure to attend one half or more of the Town Meeting sessions during the previous year, or take any other action with respect thereto: Precinct 1 Crawford Lynne A 2011 D'Entremont Keith J 2011 Precinct 2 Connearney Joseph T Sr. 2011 Lam Wei E 2011 Snow George A 2011 Sullivan John B 2011 Precinct 3 Jones Randall W 2011 Precinct 5 Kelley Timothy J 2011 Precinct 8 Griset William J Jr 2011 Herrick Karen Gately 2012 Board of Selectmen 191 Local Election April 6, 2010 . Official - Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the'Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts, at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 00. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 2218 ballots (13.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Moderator for one year - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Alan E. Foulds* 316 133 7 123 221 186 212 264 203 1658 Other 0 2 1 0 1 2 0 3 9 Blanks 84 49 27 89 70 66 891 77 551 Total 400 184 151 310 257 280 353 283 2218 *Elected Board of Selectmen for three years - Vote for Two Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Stephen A Goldy* Richard W Schubert* 293 282 118 116 113 109 210 208 170 157 191 183 228 242 170 183 1493 1480 Other 1 4 1 0 1 2 21 31 14 Blanks 224 130 79 202 186 184 2341 2101 1449 Total 8001 368 302 620 514 560 7061 5661 4436 *Elected Board of Assessors for three years - Vote for One +' ' Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Colorusso* 277 1 121 2 109 0 194 0 168 1 192 2 221 0 180 1 1462 7 [W*ElCandidate 122 61 42 116 88 86 132 102 749 400 184 151 310 257 280 353 283 2218 ected Board of Assessors for one year - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Fred A McGrane* 270 122 111 190 163 193 222 171 1442 Other 1 1 1 0 1 0 01 11 5 Blanks 129 61 39 120 93 87 1311 1111 771 Total 400 184 151 3101 257 280 1511 2831 2218 *Elected 192 Local Election April 6, 2010 Official- Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 00. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 2218 ballots (13.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Precinct One - Town Meeting Members for three years -Vote for not more than Eight Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Gary C Derusha 193 193' Sheila M Mulroy* 271 271 Ronald Thomas O'Keefe, Jr* 217 217 Seven L Perry* 272 272 James Foster Rigney* 225 225 John J Arena* 218 218 Sheila M Clarke* 220 220 Joseph E Patterson* 200 200 Douglass E Webb* 234 234 Other 1 1 Blanks 1149 1149 Total 3200 3200 *Elected 193 Local Election April 6, 2010 Official- Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 00. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 2218 ballots (13.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Board of Library Trustees for three years - Vote for Two Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Richard H Curtis* 274 117 110 207 172 186 226 176 1468 Cherrie M Dubois* 274 119 115 190 166 186 226 180 1456 Other 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 7 Blanks 252 131 77 222 174 188 253 208 1505 Total 800 368 302 620 514 560 706 566 4436 *Elected Municipal Light Board for three years - Vote for Two Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Philip B Pacino* Gina M Synder* Other 257 249 0 117 .105 1 106 104 0 182 178 0 158 145 1 184 168 1 198 216 0 161 154 1 1363 1319 4 Blanks 294 145 92 260 210 207 292 250 1750 Total 800 368 302 .620 514 560 706 566 4436 *Elected School Committee for three years - Vote for Two Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Chuck Robinson* 250 110 92 211 169 193 235 198 1458 Elaine L Webb 235 101 81 154 125 122 163 141 1122 Harold A Croft* 205 93 84 160 140 158 200 144. 1184 Other 0 1 0 1 1 4 1 4 12 Blanks 110 63 45 94 79 83 107 79 660 Total 800 368 302 620 514 560 706 566 4436 *Elected 194 Local Election April 6, 2010 Official- Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by -the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 00. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 2218 ballots (13.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Precinct Two - Town Meeting Members for three years - Vote for not more than Eight Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 I Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Peter G Coumounduros* Denise M Iozzo* 122 116 122 1161 Anthony L Rickley* 108 108' Paul F Robertson* 106 106 Priscilla Ryan* 109 109 Ian A Nelson* 107 107 Lizabeth Ann Malinski ** 1 1 1 Brooks E Rice ** * * Tie Breaker to be determined by Precinct at Annual Town Meeting 1 1 Alice M O'Sullivan ** I I Other 4 4 Blanks 797 797 Total 1 1 1472 ] 472 *Elected * * Tie Breaker to be determined by Precinct at Annual Town Meeting Precinct Two - Town Meeting Member for two year - Vote for not more than Two Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Lizabeth Ann Malinski* 2 2 Gerard M McDonald ** . 1 1 Kim Marie Sullivan** 1 I Other 7 7 Blanks 3571 357 Total .3681 1 368 *Elected * * Tie Breaker to be determined by Precinct at Annual Town Meeting 195 Local Election April 6, 2010 Official- Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 00. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 2218 ballots (13.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Precinct Two - Town Meeting Member for one year -Vote for not more than One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 1 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Gerard M McDonald* 3 107 3 Other 6 112 6 Blanks 175 111 175 Total 184 1 I 1 184 *Elected Precinct Three - Town Meeting Members for three years–:Tote for not more than Eight Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 — Pr 7 — Pr 8 Total William H Downing* 107 107 Kara Marie Fratto* 112 112 William M Hank* 111 111 Steven G Oston* 1 I 1 111 Jason D Tuttle* 2 2 Linda A Hank* 4 4 Kristen Ann Eagleston* * 1 1 Thomas D Quinn ** 1 1 Roxanne V McConnell ** 1 I John A Burke Jr** 1 1 Other 6 6 Blanks 751 751 Total 1208 1 1 1208 *Elected * * Tie Breaker to be determined by Precinct at Annual Town Meeting 196 Local Election April 6, 2010 Official- Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 00. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 2218 ballots (13.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Precinct Four - Town Meeting Members for three years - Vote for not more than Eight Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Richard H Curtis* 162 162 Stephen A Goldy* Andrew W Grimes* 169 170 169 170'I Richard E McDonald* 169 169 Thomas J Meharg 148 148 Ralph L Vinciguerra* 1801 180 Matthew L Wilson* 1751 175 Richard P Abate* 155 155 Meghan A Young* 178 178 Other 2 2 Blanks 972 972 Total 2480 2480 *Elected Precinct Four - Town Meeting Member for two years - Vote for not more than One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Richard H Coco* 188 188 Other 1 I Blanks 121 121 Total 310 310 *Elected Precinct Four - Town Meeting Member for one years - Vote for not more than One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Marie J Fratto* 188 188 Other 0 0 Blanks 122 122 'Total 310 310 11*Elected 197 Local Election April 6, 2010 Official- Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and.each found to be empty and registered 00. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 2218 ballots (13.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Precinct Five - Town Meeting Members for three years - Vote for not more than Eight Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Christina L Dinardo* 146 146 Robert L Fuller* 129 129 Susan A Giacalone* 125 125 Janice M Jones* 134 134 Philip B Pacino* 127 127 David A Talbot* 117 117 Charles L Adams* 131 131 Michael G Miele 111 111 Patrick P O'Sullivan* 152 152 Other 8 8 Blanks 876 876 Total 20561 2056 *Elected Precinct Five - Town Meeting Member for two years - Vote for not more than One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 I Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Dorman SBarnes* 112 112 Christina A Holsclaw 62 62 Other 1 1 Blanks 82 82 Total 257 257 *Elected IM Local Election April 6, 2010 Official - Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 00. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at.7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 2218 ballots (13.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Precinct Six - Town Meeting Members for three years - Vote for not more than Eight Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Linda M Phillips* 143 168 143 Greg F Selvitelli* 175 193 175 Drucilla Wood- Beckwith* 178 191 178 Allison M Piper* 166 181 166 John W Russell* 1 173 173 173 Chad R Smith* 170 206 170 Diane M Kaine* 24 164 24 Laura B Gold* 3 130 3 Other 7 177 7 Blanks 1201 11 1201 Total 2240 1230 2240 *Elected Precinct Seven - Town Meeting Members for three years - Vote for not more than Eight Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Charles VDonnelly -Moran* 168 168 Norman F Kozlowski* 193 193 Nancy B Matheson* 191 191 Sandra J Michaud* 181 181 Frances C Sansalone* 1 173 173 Richard W Schubert* 206 206 Darlene C Porter* 164 164 Jason Patrick Scales, Sr 130 130 John C Segalla* 177 177 Other 11 11 Blanks 1230 1230 Total 2824 2824 *Elected 199 Local Election April 6, 2010 Official - Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 00. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 2218 ballots (13.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Precinct Eight- Town Meeting Members for three years -Vote for not more than Eight Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total William J Hecht, Sr* 163 163 Patricia Jean Lloyd* 162 162 James F Lordan, Jr* 165 165 George B Perry II* 165 165 John H Russell* 163 163 Margaret W Russell* 161 161 Olive B Hecht* 157 157 Kendra JG Cooper* 4 4 Other 15 15 Blanks 1109 1109 Total 2264 2264 *Elected A true copy.. Attest: Laura A Gemme Town Clerk 200 ANNUAL TOWN MEETING Reading Memorial High School April 26, 2010 Town Clerk, Laura Gemme and Moderator, Alan Foulds swore in elected Town Meeting members before their precinct meetings. Precinct 2 Brooks E Rice was voted in with a 3 year term 14 -0 - Alice M O'Sullivan requested to be voted out and was voted out 14 -0 - Paul McNeice was appointed to fill the vacancy of Alice M O'Sullivan - Lizabeth Ann Malinski was voted in with a 2 year term 14 -0 - Gerard M McDonald was voted in with a 1 year term 14 -0 Precinct 3 Did not vote as Kristen Ann Eagleston, Thomas D Quinn and John A Burke, Jr was not present Precinct 6 Did not fill the 3 year vacancy or the 1 year vacancy The meeting was called to order, by the Moderator, Alan E. Foulds, at 7:40 p.m., there being a quorum present. The Invocation was given by Philip B. Pacino, Precinct 5 followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. All newly elected and appointed Town Meeting Members were sworn in by the Moderator. The Warrant was partially read by the Town Clerk, Laura Gemme, when on motion by Ben Tafoya of the Board of Selectmen, it was voted to dispense with further reading of the Warrant except for the Officer's Return, which was read by the Town Clerk. Making Reading Better presented information on the upcoming Public Seminar "Staying Safe in Your Backyard This Summer" Tick and Tick Bite Prevention In Your Neighborhood - May 6, 2010 - Parker Middle School, Reading ARTICLE 2 — Chairman of the Board of Selectmen, Ben Tafoya, gave the following State of the Town Report: Mr. Moderator, Town Meeting Members, guests and residents, staff and elected officials, welcome to Town Meeting 2010- 1 would like to thank my colleagues on the Board of Selectmen for the opportunity to serve as chair this year and the chance to address you tonight for a few minutes on the state of the town, 2009. As always I must thank our Town Manager, Peter Hechenbleikner and our Office Manager, Paula Schena and the rest of town staff for their help in compiling this information. The opinions of course are my own. The salient fact of life in our country during 2009 is summarized by this statistics from the Bureau of Economic Research; the nation's Gross Domestic Product declined 2.4 %. While we might hope our town could be sheltered from the economic storm that buffeted our country and quite frankly the world; that is not possible. Since the beginning of the recession in late 2007, too many of our conversations with neighbors covered job losses and income cuts. We have all been touched by this reality in one way or another. Despite this, our town continues to function, serve the population and in many respects thrive. Change is a constant element in our town. New faces joined our senior staff; Jean Delios joined the town as Director of Community Services and has had an immediate and positive impact on our community. Jeff Zager was hired as Director of Public Works replacing Ted McIntyre who Annual Town Meeting 201 April 26, 2010 retired after a long and valued career with the town. Laura Gemme was hired as Town Clerk and dived right in and coordinated a special primary election in December that attracted higher than expected turnout. Some change was not planned. Each year we feel the loss of many of our citizens, and tonight I cannot mention everyone that is deserving of note but I want to draw your attention to three people who had a major impact on the work we do as a community. Ben Nichols, who set a very high standard for community involvement passed away after a full century. Neil Sullivan, who was a former member of our Community Planning and Development Commission and made a valuable contribution to our current master plan, passed away. Neil was, a gentle person who showed exceptional compassion to his neighbors in making decisions involving public policy. We also mourned the passing of our School Superintendent and fellow town meeting member Pat Schettini, whose connection to all of us was seen in the huge outpouring of support for his family, friends and colleagues at his visiting hours and funeral. He is dearly missed but the successes of our schools, and the respect they are shown by folks throughout the Commonwealth stand as a major testament to his life and work. These passing's remind us of our responsibility to be involved but to also encourage others in the community to step forward and be involved to help each other achieve our goals for the community. For example, the School Department turned to Dr. John Doherty for able leadership and we thank him for making Reading his priority when he had other opportunities. The Board of Selectmen made dozens of appointments and re- appointments to our boards, committees and commissions. I am continually amazed by the popularity of some of our newest bodies such as the Trails Committee, Economic Development Committee and the Advisory Committee on Climate Protection. At the conclusion of a long discussion and evaluation the Board of Selectmen formed another new body to help with future planning, the ad hoc Municipal Building Committee. It has started meeting and will help the town make decisions about our public buildings including the Cemetery Garage, per the instruction of town meeting, and based on the extensive data collection forthcoming from the DPW. We have also appointed a new sub - committee. of the Board of Selectmen to help the Board handle volunteer appointments. My colleague Rick Schubert and I have interviewed a number of candidates for board appointments through this process and have received positive feedback. We are now gearing up for our busy season of BCC appointments and will give a fuller report to our colleagues on the Board of Selectmen at the conclusion. So what else did we accomplish in. 2009 outside of two new committees? As a community here are a few of the highlights... We authorized the first lodging house license in the town's history. Town Meeting created our second smart growth zoning district, this one for our downtown. Through most of two construction seasons and after many years of planning and anticipation our downtown streetscape project was completed- We discussed and rejected the MWRA's proposal for two large water storage tanks within the town limits. We developed and adopted master plans for three parks; Washington, Memorial and Birch Meadow. Annual Town Meeting April 26, 2010 202 The Board of Selectmen adopted policies on outdoor dining, all alcohol licenses for establishments with less than 100 seats, alcohol service on public property and various individual liquor licenses. — 6 new businesses opened including a butcher, a baker but we are still looking for the candle stick maker. 298 students graduated from Reading Memorial High School at commencement last June. 486 members participated in the Reading Coalition again_ st Substance Abuse. 655 voters participated in the local elections in April. 680 building permits were issued. 1200 families receive health insurance through the town. 1808 Emergency Medical Service calls were received. 2369 immunizations and tests were administered by our health department. 2551 people participated in recreation programs offered by the town. 4068 voters participated in a special primary in December. 5230 children and adults participated in organized sporting events on our playing fields. Countless thousands of people were brought to our community as a result of the incredibly successful Reading Fall Street Faire in September of last year. Reading is more than a collection of numbers or even interesting events, but each of these examples shows the broad array of involvements of our neighbors. The street fair was a great example of what can be done with citizen initiative and town cooperation; our town shined as brightly as in any day in memory thanks to the volunteers and vendors and business people and police and fire and public works and inspectional services and management; and now it will be as anticipated an annual event as any on the calendar. And the surplus funds raised will go toward projects to further improve our downtown. Reading has prepared itself to weather the current financial storm due to strong policies of fiscal prudence in budgeting and spending. We have been saving money for a rainy day. And it is raining. We should acknowledge the fact that much of this is possible because of the cooperation and sacrifice made by our town employees who are partners in this effort. The budget proposed for fiscal year 2011 does not include salary increases that had not been previously negotiated. Last year's budget was successful in large measure because the Town in cooperation with our employees and retirees implemented significant changes to our health insurance plan to lower costs to the town and employees, and put us far ahead of the curve with respect to this issue in the Commonwealth. This is not to say we do not have continuing challenges, we do. During the past few years we continued to work to make town government more responsive and transparent. Our list of goals for town government this year is long and complex, but even with limited resources we can make great strides. It should be no surprise that we can persevere through these challenges. Our town has been here for most of four centuries now. Think about the history we have traversed.... Revolution, Slavery and Civil War, Depressions in the 19th and 20th Centuries, World Wars, social and economic changes and challenges... and our town is still strong and a great place to live. It is a testament to everyone active in Reading and your efforts to have the town reflect our values of progress and community. We have some difficult choices ahead of us at this town meeting and a full agenda. I wish us well as we take on these challenges and I thank you for your kind attention tonight. ARTICLE 2 — On motion by Ben Tafoya, Chairman of the Board of Selectmen, it was voted to table the subject matter of Article 2. Annual Town Meeting 203 April 26, 2010 Motion Carried ARTICLE 3 — On motion by James Bonazoli, Vice Chairman of the Board of Selectmen, it was Voted to table the subject matter of Article 3. Motion Carried ARTICLE 4 — On motion by Camille Anthony, Secretary of the Board of Selectmen, it was voted to approve the following amendments to the FY 2010 - FY 2019 Capital Improvements Program as provided for in Section 7 -7 of the Reading Home Rule Charter and as previously amended, by adding the following described projects: • Library Building Feasibility Study ($85;000 in FY10) ♦ Fire, Police and DPW Defibrillators ($27,000 in FY10) • Killam Parking Lot Paving and Repairs ($83,000 in FY11) Background given by Bob LeLacheur Library Board of Trustees report given by David Hutchinson, Chair of the Library Board of Trustees FinCom Report given by David Greenfield, Vice Chairman of Finance Committee Motion Carried ARTICLE 5 — On motion by George Hines, Chairman of Finance Committee, it was voted to amend one or more of the votes taken under Article 14 of the Warrant of the Annual Town Meeting of April 27, 2009, as amended undeu Article 4 of the November 9, 2009 Subsequent Town Meeting and appropriate by borrowing or transfer from available funds, or otherwise, as noted for the operation of the Town and its government, as follows: Motion made Ben Tafoya, Chairman of the Board of Selectmen to dispense of further reading Motion to Dispense Carried General Fund — Wages and Expenses Account Line Description Decrease Increase B9 Benefits: Health Insurance $200,000 E97 Northeast Regional Vocational $17,864 191 Finance: Wages (Assessors) $10,000 192 Finance: Expenses (Assessors) $25,000 Annual Town Meeting April 26, 2010 204 K92 Community Services — Expenses (animal disposal — beavers $4k; Veteran's benefits $20k Decrease $24,000 M92 Public Works: Expenses (hwy equip) Capital: Library — Building Study = $85k Police, Fire, Public Works: Local share of $95k in ALS Equipment = $27k $30,000 M93 Public Works: Snow & Ice From Sale of Real Estate Fund $255,000 M94 Public Works: Street Lighting From Free Cash $10,000 M95 Public Works: Rubbish $75,000 N91 Public Safety (Fire) Wages $93,000 N92 Public Safety (Police) Expenses (Police Academy reimbursed by new Officers into the general fund $3,000 Subtotals of operating transfers $285,000 $457,864 From Free Cash $172,864 General Fund — Capital Account Line Description Decrease Increase C99 Capital: Library — Building Study = $85k Police, Fire, Public Works: Local share of $95k in ALS Equipment = $27k $112,000 From Sale of Real Estate Fund $85,000 From Free Cash $27,000 Presentation given by Bob LeLacheur - Presentation Attached FinCom report given by Harold Torman - FinCom voted to support 7 -0 -0 Motion Carried Annual Town Meeting 205 April 26, 2010 Ir . rJ SfIL lr if �(f 1t�.ScSk` � l�Cfr<Sd r (Gli � E t /1�'[Ay dN i 6 <i sysrrvd ; " :, l;�yl ;Yu z..•f:m '; tic -lN 5 Projected Reserves Status 5% of MO r:et a"leble reraere TARE : 3 3'sos.000 T—s Meetly 3 5.312,000 m3 bvddet (9rtvnel -Ar. 57 f (199.11") ms 6rdpf gre9.ns - Art.11) s (".000) me audy[r (papw.e- M.Ilf 3 0)6.osoi • "I, straits 11 s ON M - AcQ,.if Free Cmb• $ 3.1101.136 - Steb11rsefsen Fu:r� $ 1,115,000 - Lewel fl ]90,eei - rw.6eye.a 3 z? 0011 ^FstswmA 3 lW.r%V Camitte pe s 305 e]o Is reeema 9 ^jaznd si 1.6% $ 5,322,006 srr3se wnw 5 %rm. nryst $ 1 alb' 6 rw rw. M r.erwrw.e rye faMN A� ebAn� 206 ra, FINCOM Reserves Policy The t=t it re ComnNtee (FINCOM) of the Town of ReadiN hereby establshes and a0op3s a Pddccy/ ealablish+q • mn6num target for cash reserves of 5% of Net Av. Ile, Revenue las defewd bebw). Funtor, Me FINCOM r scogna.. thatuwmsinnces may ocaa wh would require the FINCOM to race or lower Ns minmum Imm time to time. The FINCOM rempn¢es Mat Me financial health of this Town of Reading is a Paramount importenca to its residers who receive ssSentlLl serNW? to 115 bJndroMerb whd pNVlde tam,, for IOIp -18m1 Torn projects: to its vendors wbo proNde services aM ay 'pment to, tM Town; and m its aerent aM mt d empbye , TNi Pobcy on Cash Reserves u designed m ,rt,t.d Me ..dy hero sudden and unexpected dtonpes M rovemres or e.yenses ... Orin full teA 0O Projected Reserves Status Sale ofReal Estate Selo of Gul Exton 3 1.3".287 "to "w grpeu9 -M. v) s t ss.oOU) bWxl rsmeer-0 -Art to s a 011N Nlna. r z %o A-1 Town Ateet4y 3 1.e17 9njesnd us n offs? Cepltel expvu: %13 31T3a FT13 $:'5011 "Is $20011 fr15 $15011 %16 $30011 "17 $ 501 (edditiorol Fnrxet wa " o.d) 1 ARTICLE 6 - On motion by Richard Schubert, member of Board of Selectmen, it was voted to indefinitely postpone the subject matter of Article 6. 1 Motion Carried ARTICLE 7 - On Motion by Stephen Goldy, member of Board of Selectmen, it was voted that the Town vote to authorize the Board of Selectmen to sell, or exchange, or dispose of, upon such terms and conditions as they may determine, the following items of tangible property: Motion made Stephen Goldy, Board of Selectmen to dispense of further reading Motion to Dispense Carried Department Equipment Fire 2000 Model Year Type III Ford/ Horton Ambulance Police Two Ford Crown Victoria Police Cruisers DPW 2000 Ford E250 Cargo Van Extender DPW 1987 Melrose Bobcat Front End Loader DPW 1952 Warco Diesel Powered Motor Grader DPW 1990 International Dump Truck # (16) Model # 4900 4x2 DPW 1998 International Dump Truck with Mounted Catch Basin Cleaner (Stetco Model 950t/13) Information given by Peter Hechenbleikner FinCom Report given by Harold Torman - FinCom voted to support Motion Carried ARTICLE 8 - On motion by Ben Tafoya, Chairman of the Board of Selectmen, it was voted to authorize revolving funds for certain Town Departments under Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 44, Section 53E Y: for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2010 with the receipts, as specified, credited to each fund, the purposes, as listed, for which each fund may be spent, the maximum amount that may be spent from each fund for the fiscal year, and the disposition of the balance of each fund at fiscal year end: Motion made James Bonazoli, Board of Selectmen to dispense of further reading Motion to Dispense Carried Annual Town Meeting 207 April 26, 2010 Revolving Spending Revenue Allowed Expenditure Year End Account Authority Source Expenses Limits Balance Consulting and engineering services or the review of Conservation Fees as provided for designs and $25,000 Commission in Reading General engineering work for vailable for Consulting Conservation Bylaws Section 5.7, the protection of expenditure Fees Commission Wetlands Protection wetlands next year Legal, oversight and inspection, plan review, initial property appraisals and Building Plumbing, appeals, Community Wiring, Gas and Services general other permits for the management, landfill. $200,000 Walkers Brook monitoring costs, curb Crossing, Oaktree, sidewalks and Addison-Wesley/ pedestrian safety Inspection Pearson and improvements, records vailable for Revolving Town Johnson Woods archiving and other expenditure Fund Manager developments project related costs next year Vaccines, materials for screening clinics and clinical supply costs, medical equipment and $25,000 Public Health Clinic Fees and third supplies, Available for Clinics and Board of party immunizations, expenditure Services Health reimbursements educational materials next year Library Library Charges for lost or Acquire Library Ava ilable for Materials Director and damaged Library materials to replace $15,000 expenditure Replacement Trustees materials lost or damaged items next ear Utilities and all other Available for Mattera Cabin Recreation maintenance and $10,000 expenditure Operating dministrator Rental Fees operating expenses next year Information given by Peter Hechenbleikner FinCom report given by Marsie West - FinCom voted to support Motion by William Brown, Precinct 8 to change Expenditure Limits of Inspection Revolving fund from $200,000 to $100,000 Motion to Amend Does Not Carry After Discussion among Town Meeting Members Motion Carried 1: Annual Town Meeting April 26, 2010 ARTICLE 9 — On motion by James Bonazoli, Vice Chairman of Board of Selectmen, it was voted that the Town approve the FY 2011 — FY 2020 Capital Improvements Program as provided for in Section 7 -7 of the Reading Home Rule Charter and as detailed on page 69 of the "Report of the Warrant, 2010 Annual Town Meeting ". Presentation given by Bob LeLacheur - Presentation Attached FinCom Report given by George Hines - FinCom voted to support Motion Carried Annual Town Meeting 209 April 26, 2010 ?S:gl ,aa� s� FINCOM DeW C Capital. FY2011 Budget - Capital f290 $ $0.96 paycs 65 -69 $3.92 f fi]6 $ - FINCOM dasgrotcs FY1] $ $3.96 f f25] $ a rrrto. anmua of fund., towards FY14 H H.96 f f1.69 S debt 6 cogtal •an ya, m order 10 preserve the Towns FY20 2 24.96 f fO.H H infrmtrvctire. This annual is to wr svfficiun ily address the .4. tha Town. eaf AS As debt is paid dwn, ore is ble far wikbk lw'cosh •:.•cue.. a.4..r••e - rw kbaeu• (f m0) P FINCOM DeW C Capital. fY11 f f].66 f f290 $ $0.96 FY12 $ $3.92 f fi]6 $ $1.14 FY1] $ $3.96 f f25] $ $1144 FY14 H H.96 f f1.69 S Sz20 FY20 2 24.96 f fO.H H H.14 —a® FY2011 Budget - Capital pages 65 -69 FYI bit higher than FIWOM Pali" §4251, roads (in addition to f460k from Chapter 90 funding) f 230k Ambulance • f115k DPW sander $B3k Killam parking lot repairs $40k 6encral curb /sidewalk $301, Kill. playground (anaol program) $251, Patient care syftcm $20k School security system f15k General playground surfaces $10k Street sign neplacemcnis 210 Criivio for Evaluating Projects: - Life /hrshn /rofery - Pubkc safety - Irdwtrvnae -bws - eae,:wing. - Iidinn•vrive- ecorwmics - Departmental high priority - Ort -time ePPariwlY - Lewage Tana ruovices - Key goal of cammmiry o FY2011 Budget - Capital pages 65 -69 Adopt rcw 10 -year Capitol Improvement Programs (LIP) (and on page 69 of the Warrant for FYII- FY20. The ILq of CIP propels shown on pogo 65 are the highest priorities for F/17. Funding for this list is rtquesird in the FYI] Budget under Artick 12. The CIP is �N balanced with respect to the projected funding that will be owilabk through FY20. We do not anticipate airy significant mid -year capitol requests due to attend Town fironccs. Background details ate on the blue pages 216 -222 for capital and 223-230 far debt. Capital Plan FY10 to FY20 Balanced versus expected funding own ol Keat"n g, 41512010 14:43 FY -2010 FY -2011 FY -2012 FY -2013 FY•2014 FY -2015 FY-2016 FY•2017 FY-20`18 FY-2019 FY-2020 10yrCIP i rary 20,000 120,000 20,000 20,000 - - 180,000 Furnishings & Shelving 100,000 100,000 Circulation System jPublic Safety - Fire - 31,000 255,000 24,000 36,000 155,000 69,000 654,000 316,500 90,600 150,000 849,000 2,599,100 Pumper Eng #1(2010- 525k; next FY30) Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt - PumperEng #2(2001- $410k; next FY25) Debt Debt Debt Debt " Pumper Eng #3(1995: est $630k FY 16) 630,000 630,000 Pumps' En' It 2001: as' $804k FY20) 804,000 804,000 Ladder Trk#1(2008:$800k,next FY27) Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt .Debt Debt Debt - Ambulance #1 (2000 -10 yrs) 230,000 230,000 Ambulance #2 (2005 - 10yrs) 275,000 275,000 Patient Care Reporting System 25,000 25,000 Passenger Car#1 (2005. 10yrs) 41,500 41,500 Passenger Car#2 (1997 - 10yrs) 31,000 - Pickup Truck #3 (2006 -12yrs) 45,600 45,600 Pickup Truck #4 (1996 -12yrs) 36,000 - 36,000 Alarm Truck (1994 -16yrs) 69,000 69,000 ALS Defibrillator (2006 - 5yrs) GRANT in FY10 (requesting local share Apol'l0) 24,000 24,000 BLS -AED (2004 - Byrs) 10,000 10,000 Rescue Tool(2006 -12yrs) _ 45,000 45,000 Breathing Air Bottles 14,000 14,000 Thermal Imaging (2010 - 10yrs) 45,000 45,000 Fire Hose 25,000 25,000 Turnout Gear (2008 - 5yrs) 130,000 150,000 280,000 Public Safety - Police/Dispatch 311,000 35,000 211,000 10,000 - - 35,000. - 291,000 Handguns d Associated Leather (Police) 10,000 10,000' Digllal Fingerprint Scanner 16,000 - 16,000 Vehicle Video Integration 35,000 35,000 70,000 Radlos (Police 8 Fire 1997 -10yrs) 311,000 - AEDs 20,000 20,000 Public Safelysoftware ($175k) 175,000 175,000 211 Capital Plar °A-to FY20 Balanced versu- -,,, Aed funding own of ea ing, MA 41512010 14:43 FY -2010 FY-2011 FY-2012 FY -2013 FY -2014 FY -2015 FY -2016 FY-2017 FY -2018 FY -2019 FY -2020 FY11-20 10yrCIP Public Works - qulpment 138,600 115,000 35,000 224,300 249,800 293,100 275,100 693,200 763,400 604,800 914,700 4,168,400 Large Trucks Life 97,000 115,000 - 60,000 115,000 64,000 280,000 198,000 72,000 - 276,000 1,180,000 Truck #4- .Sander (2001) 15 123,000 123,000 Truck #8 -10 wheeler (2000) • 15 220,000 220,000 Truck #9 • Sander (2004) 15 - 136,000 136,000 Truck #16• Sander (1990) 15 115,000 _ - 115,000 Truck #18- Sander (2006) 15 ' Truck #19 - Sander (1987) 15 - 140,000 140,000 Truck #3 - Sander (1995) 15 97,000 ' Dump Truck C2 (1996) 10 - 60,000 75,000 135,000 Dump Truck C3(1999) 10 60,000 - 60,000 Truck #10(1996) 15 115,000 115,000 Dump Wck #12 Parks (1997) 15 64,000 64,000 Dump truck #24 Parks (2000) 15 72,000 72,000 Pick- upslCamftns 41,600 35,000 35,000 81,000 113,700 78,800 48,700 130,000 185,000 707,200 Pickup Ford Utility #11 (1989) 10 35,000 - 45,000 80,000 Pickup Chevy #9 Parks (1986) 10 35,000 � 45,000 . 80,000 Pickup Ford Utility #C1 (1997) 10 46,000 - 46,000 Pickup Ford #2 Parks (1997) 10 46,000 46,000 Pickup Chevy Utility #1 (2008) 10 85,000 65,000 Pickup Ford UBlity 94 (1997) 10 41,600 50,000 50,000 Pickup Ford Utility #7 (1997) 10 35,000 35,000 HV3 Ford Van (1995) 10 36,500 36,500 HV4 Ford Van (1995) 10 39,500 39,500 HV5 Ford Van COA (2003) 10 48,700 48,700 Survey #1 Ford Explorer (2000) 10 39,300 39,300 Car#2 Ford Sedan (2007) 10 45,000 45,000 Car#3 Ford Escape HYBRID (2008) 10 45,000 45,000 Cem. #4 Ford Sedan (1993) - 10 31,200 31,200 BaekhosslLoaderslHeavy Equipment - 105,000 32,400 200,000 96,000 180,000 613,400 BacJkhoe Loader (Gem.) (2008) 10 - 96,000 96,000 Loader JD #624G (2007) 10 200,000 200,000 Loader Cat #928F (1994) 10 180,000 180,000 Bobcat Loader 743 (1987) 10 32,400 32,400 CAT Bulldozer 951 (1971) . 105,000 105,000 Speclalty Equipment - Heavy Duty 168,700 - 255,000 217,000 135,000 111,000 886,700 Tractor Ford 445 (Parks) 15 48,700 48,700 Roller • Ferguson 46A (1988) 15 - 82,000 82,000 Screener(1994) 15 - 135,000 - 135,000 212 Capital Plan FY10 to FY20 Balanced versus expected funding own ot Reacling, 41512010 14:43 FY -2010 FY-2011 FY -2012 FY -2013 FY -2014 FY -2015 FY -2016 FY -2017 FY -2018 FY -2019 FY -2020 10yr CIP Pavement Leeboy Sprd(1998) 10 130,000 130,000 Sidewalk Snow Plow #3(2008) 10 111,000 111,000 Snow - Holder #1 C6000 (1995) 10 - 120,000 120,000 Snow - Holder #2 C9700(1997) 10 135',000 135,000 Snow - Bombardier #1 (1993) 10 125,000 125,000 Specialty Equipment• Light Duty - 20,000 37,81)0 26,800 30,000 43,000 81,500 89,600 66,500 395,200 HW Comp21NT Compr (1996) 10 26,800 26,800 300L Lebot (Roller) (1998) 10 21,000 21,000 Eager Beaver Trailer (1985) 15. 37,800 37,800 1CH Woodsman Chipper (2004) 10 _ 66,500 66,500 1GV Leaf Vac (1999) to 39,500 39,500 2CH Mobark (1989) 10 46,000 46,000 2GV Leaf Vac (2000) 10 . - 43,600 43,600 SmithCo 60 Leal Vac (1999) 10 - 42,000 42,000 Toro 48" LeafVac (1993) 10 20,000 _ 20,000 FMC Truck Mount Sprayer 500gal 30,000 30,000 SmilhCo 13 -550 Infield (1994) 7 22,000 22,000 750 John Deere Farm Tractor 10 - Lawnmowers - 15,600 - 70,300 35,000 36,400 18,200 82,200 96,200 353,900 Mower (Cem.) SKAG 72' If 998) 4 17,500 17,500 Mower (Cem.) SKAG 61' (1999) 4 18,200 18,200 Mower (Parks) TORO Gang (1996) 8 70,300 - 96,200 166,500 Mower (Cem.) SKAG 52" (1995) 4 15,600 18,200 33,800 Mower (Parks) SKAG 52' (1998) 4 17,500 17,500 Mower -TORO Gang (2008) 6 82,200 82,200 912F #2 John Deere Mower (1989) 7 .18,200 18,200 Engineering EqulpmentlServices 20,000 12,000 - - 32,000 Survey EquipmenVPlan Plotter 20,000 12,000 32,000 Fuel Management System - - - Fuel system replacement - - Public Works - Parks & Cemete 45,000 45,000 75,000 95,000 748,000 335,000 170,600 575,000 685,600 1,463,700 720,000 4,912,900 Public Works - Cemetery Design - Maintenance Building $60k sale of real estate - Construction Maintenance Building $1 miV5ym Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt - Public Works - Urounds - 30,000 50,000 20,000 50,000 20,000 50,000 20,000 50,000 20,000 310,000 Fence Replacement 30,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 110,000 Parking Lot Pavement 50,000 50,000 . 50,000 50,000 200,000 213 Capital Plar o FY20 Balanced versus expected funding own ot Kcaoing, MA 41512010 14:43 FY -2010 I FY-2011 FY -2012 FY -2013 FY -2014 FY-2015 FY -2016 FY -2017 FY -2018 FY -2019 FY -2020 FY11-ZU 10yrCIP Public Wortis---P-arks 45,000 45,000 45,000 45,000 728,000 285,000 150,600 525,000 665,600 1,413,700 700,00D 4,602,900 Tennis Courts - Bancroft Ave. 465k Debt Debt Debt Debt . Artificial Turf @Parker MS $736k Debt Debt Debt Debt 150,000 150,000 Coolidge MS field upgrade (grass) 250,000 250,000 Reconstruct Playgrounds Program 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 200,000 Wash Park Killam Josh Eaton Sturges Wood End up Hunt Pk BM Tot lot Wood End do Mem Park B Meadow Barrows Playground safety surface 15,000 L 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 25,000 15,000 15,000 115,000 Memorial Park $650k grant in FY10 Washington Park $625k 129,000 233,000' 100,000 462,000 (also playground in FY10) tennis ct backstop paths 124,000 & shift field 124,000 basketball ct Birch Meadow Complex - $2.116 mill 230,000 110,000 150,000. 1,100,000 38,000 1,628,000 (also playgrounds in FY16 &FY19) BB courts Mnn bkstop softball light fields & paths st. backstop Multi -Purp cts dugouts 20,000 38,000 58,000 Playground $430k (Imagination Station) 430,000 bleachers batting cage lot backstop 430,000 Barrows $2981k 95,000 124,500 219,500 (also playground in FY09) backstop tennis ct & infield 78,100 78,100 basketball ct - Killam $30.6k 30,600 30,600 (also playground in FY11) backstop - Joshua Eaton $179k 140,000 39,000 179,000 backstop backstop (also playground In FY12) - & Infield Symonds Way $50k 50,000 50,000 backstop Hunt Park $125k 125,000 125,000 (also playground in FY 15) - backstop Sturges Park $178.7k 63,800 63,800 (also playground In FY13) tennis ct ' - 80,000 80,000 - basketball ct 34,900 34,900 backstop Wood End $325k 325,000 325,000 field 214 Capital Plan FY10 to FY20 Balanced versus expected funding own ol Reading, 4151201014:43 FY -2010 FY -2011 FY -2012 FY -2013 FY -2014 FY -2015 FY -2016 FY -2017 FY -2018 FY -2019 FY -2020 10yr CIP Over -ride local share (previous schedule) 347,270 355,952 364,851 373,972 383,321 392,904 402,727 412,795 423,115 433,693 444,535 3,987,863 - 25ktyr = => 450,000 475,000 500,000 525,000 550,000 +50k/yr = => 600,000 65D,000 700,000 750,000 - Over•ride local share (new schedule) 400,000 425,000 5,625,000 Public Works - Roads 435,000 558,000 475,000 500,000 525,000 550,000 575,000 650,000 700,000 750,000 800,000 6,083,000 Sldewalk/Curb /Ped. SA Street Signs 25,000 10,000 40,000 10,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 365,000 � 10,000 Downtown Improve ($650k 10yr bond) Reconstruction: West Street . Debt Debt. Debt 7,500,000 Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt Debt - 7,500,000 Skim Coating & Crack Seal Patch Various Streetstlocal fund Repair Killam parking lot West Street design ($155k) West Street- Local share ($480k) Various Streets /C h. 90 fund or grants 50,000 350,000 450,000 50,000 375,000 83,000 450,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 475,000 450,000 50,000 500,000 450,000 50,000 550.000 450,000 50,000 600,000 450,000 50,000 650,000 450,000 50,000 700,000 450,000 500,000 , 4,490,000 83,000 155,000 480,000 4,500,000 245,000 185,000 210 000 155,000 240,000 240,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 Total Cost 885,000 1,008,000 8,425,000 950,000 975,000 1,000,000 1,025,000 1,100,000 1,150,000 1,200,000 1,250,000 18,083,000 1 Chapter 90 or Grants 450,000 450,000 7,950,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 450,000 .12,000,000 General Fund Cost 435,000 558,000 475,000 500,000 525,000 550,000 575,000 650,000 700,000 750,000 800,000 6,083,000 215 ARTICLE 10 — On motion by Camille Anthony, Secretary of the Board of Selectmen, it was voted that the Town appropriate the sum of Four Hundred Sixty Thousand Three Hundred Six Dollars ($460,306) for the purposes of repair, construction, maintenance and preservation of the Town's roads and bridges together with other related costs, said sum to be offset by reimbursement from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 90. Presentation given by George Zambouras - Presentation Attached After Discussion among Town Meeting Members Motion Carried Annual Town Meeting 216 April 26, 2010 ARTICLE 11 — On Motion by Mike Monahan, First Baptist Church it was voted that the town appropriate the sum of $25,000 (Twenty Five Thousand Dollars) for snowplowing and /or removal in all church.parking lots. It is the opinion of Town Counsel that the adoption of this article by Town Meeting may violate the provisions of Section 2 of Article 18 of the Articles of Amendment to the Mass. Constitution, further amended by Articles 46 and 103 commonly (and more simply) known as the "Anti -Aid Amendment'. Specifically, Section of Amended Article 18 states that "no grant, appropriation or use of public money or property or loan of credit shall be made or authorized by the commonwealth or any political subdivision thereof for the purpose of funding, maintaining or aiding any infirmary, institution, primary or secondary school, or charitable or religious undertaking which is not publicly owned and under the exclusive control, order or supervision of public officers or public agents authorized by the commonwealth or federal authority or both ... and no such grant, appropriation or use of public money or property or loan of credit shall be made or authorized for the purpose of funding, maintaining or aiding any church, religious denomination or society." Presentation given by Tony Rickley FinCom Report given by Bryan Walsh Presentation given by Non Town Meeting Member Thomas Ryan Motion made by David Talbot, Precinct 5 to Dispense of Discussion 2/3 Vote required 116 Voted in the affirmative 47 Voted in the negative Motion to Dispense of Discussion Does Not Carry Motion to indefinitely postpone made by John Arena, Precinct 1 Motion to Indefinitely Postpone Does Not Carry After Discussion among Town Meeting Members Motion Does Not Carry ARTICLE 12 Budget Motions Motion to Table until Thursday, April 29, 2010 Motion to Table Carried 217 Annual Town Meeting April 26, 2010 T? ff.. 1 1 Aradis 10 ® Article 10: FY 2011 Chapter 90 Allocation Enables Chapter 90 funds to be used for road Improvements Chapter 90 funding is a reimbursement program Need to appropriate funds in anticipation of receipt of Chapter 90 funds No debt has ever been sold In anticipation of Chapter 90 ® ®� Article 10: FY 2011 Roadway Improvements Re- Inspection of roadways underway • Annual pavement plan —end May Maximize pavement life — Roadway paving — Minor maintenance — Crack Scaling 218 ®® Article 10: FY 2011 Chapter 90 Allocation FY 2011 $460,306 $ 14,209 Increase over FY 2010 ®® Article 10: FY 2011 Roadway Improvement Funding CH 90 FY2011 $460,306 Capital Funds FY2011 $376.00 0 Total Roadway FY2011 $835,306' ARTICLE 13 — On motion by George Hines, Chairman of the Finance Committee, it was voted to accept the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 64L, § 2(a) to impose a local sales tax upon the sale of restaurant meals originating within the Town by a vendor at the rate of .75 percent of the gross receipts of the vendor from the sale of restaurant meals to take effect - July 1, 2010. Motion to Table until Thursday, April 29, 2010 Motion to Table Carried ARTICLE 14 - On motion by Richard Schubert, member of the Board of Selectmen, it was voted to change the name of the Gateway Smart Growth Zoning Incentive Payment Stabilization Fund to the Smart Growth Zoning Incentive Payment Stabilization Fund, and that the purposes of the Stabilization Fund be revised to include the deposit of all Zoning Incentive Payments received by the Town of Reading for any 40R project and further, that the sum of $350,000 be transferred from free cash into the Stabilization Fund. Information presented by Gail LaPointe FinCom Report given by David Greenfield - Voted to Support by 7 -0 -0 Motion Carried 2/3 Vote required Declared unanimous by Moderator phU Annual Town Meeting April 26, 2010 ARTICLE 15 — On motion by Robert Nordstrand, Chairman of Board of Assessors, it was voted pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 59, Section 5, Clause 41C to adopt the following changes effective for FY 2011 in the income, asset and age limits of certain elderly tax exemptions as follows: To increase the income limits for unmarried persons to $20,000.00 and for married persons to $30,000.00; to increase the asset limits for unmarried persons to $40,000.00 and for married persons to $55,000.00; to reduce the age of eligibility to 65 years or older; and to increase the exemption amount from $500.00 to $750.00. Presentation given by Bob LeLacheur- Presentation Attached FinCom Report given by Berry Berman - FinCom supported Article 15 7 -0 -0 Board of Assessor Report given by Robert Nordstrand - Board of Assessor supported Article 15 3 -0 Motion made by Ronald D'Addario, Precinct 6 for amendment to change $20,000 to $26,000 - $30,000 to $40,000 - $40,000 to $50,000 - $55,000 to $68,000 Motion to Amend Determined to be Out of Order Motion made by Ronald D'Addario, Precinct 6 for amendment to change $750 to $1000 Motion to Amend Does Not Carry Motion made by Pete Dahl, Precinct 7 for amendment to change age limit from 65 to 70 Motion Amend Does Not Carry After Discussion among Town Meeting Members Motion Carried as Originally Presented Annual Town Meeting April 26, 2010 220 -., S r Amt - of Tv -uMrs M � iva9 Elderly Tax Exemptions These changes will bring Reading in line with many surrounding communnles; The cost fthe current elderly exemptions program is fully reimbursed as State Aid in the following year. Increased costs will be absorbed entirely by the Town of Reading through the Assessors overlay account 221 WC Elderly Tax Exemptions The Board of Assessors recommend to make three changes to allow for increased participation and one change to increase benefits for Reading elderly tex payers in these difficult economic times: • increase income limits; • increase asset limits; • reduce the age of eligibility; • increase the exemption amount. WPM Elderly Tax Exemptions Income limits (000s) Age . limits Asset limits (0005) R/E tax reduction Current $1781 70+ $28130 $500 Proposed $20130 65« $40155 $750 Average of Surrounding Communities 521131 66• $40152 S710+ ARTICLE 16 — On motion by Stephen Goldy, member of Board of Selectmen, it was voted pursuant to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 30B, Section 12 to authorize the Town Manager to enter into a contractor contracts including all extensions renewals and options for a period greater than three years for • the collection of rubbish and recyclables, not to exceed 10 years ♦ for the disposal of rubbish not exceeding 20 years upon such terms and conditions determined by the Town Manager 2/3 Vote required 135 Voted in the affirmative 8 Voted in the negative Information presented by Peter Hechenbleikner FinCom Report given by Bryan Walsh Motion Carried On motion by Ben Tafoya, member of the Board of Selectmen, it was voted that this Annual Town Meeting stand adjourned to meet at 7:30 p.m. at the Reading Memorial High School Auditorium, on Thursday, April 29, 2010. Meeting adjourned at 10:33 p.m. 163 Town Meeting Members were present. Rui A true copy. Attest: Laura A. Gemme Town Clerk Annual Town Meeting April 26, 2010 222 ANNUAL TOWN MEETING Reading Memorial High School April 29, 2010 The meeting was called to order by the Moderator, Alan E. Foulds, at 7:38 p.m., there being a quorum present. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag stated. All newly elected and appointed Town Meeting Members were sworn in by the Town Clerk. Announcements by Moderator: Before we begin deliberations on the budget, let me explain how we will proceed: We will start with an overall motion, to begin discussion on the budget. This will be followed by a general presentation. Following that, each group of line items will be taken up separately — each with its own motion and presentation. After the motion is made, discussion on that particular grouping is permitted, and motions to amend, if any, are appropriate at that time. Once discussion ends, we will vote on any proposed amendments. When completed — or if there are none — we move on to the next section, without voting on each section. When we have finished all of the sections, we will recess for a few minutes as the various boards reconcile any differences from the original budget, if any. When they are ready a motion for the entire amount will be made and voted upon. Motion made by David Greenfield, Finance Committee to take Article 12 off the table Presentation given by Peter Hechenbleikner, Town Manager - Municipal Services provided to the Town of Reading Residents - Presentation Attached Presentation given by Bob LeLacheur on budgeting process - Presentation Attached Presentation given by David Greenfield, Finance Committee Bob LeLacheur explained the process ARTICLE 12 Budget Motions Motion under Article 12 2010 Annual Town Meeting Move that the Town raise by borrowing, or from the tax levy, or transfer from available funds, and appropriate the sum of: $85,660,297 for the operation of the Town and its Government for Fiscal Year 2011, beginning July 1, 2010. Motion Carried Motion under Article 12 2010 Annual Town Meeting Annual Town Meeting 223 April 29, 2010 Move that the Town approve and appropriate the proposed FY 2011 Budget as presented for Line Item B99 (Benefits): $11,712,081 to be provided as follows: i Line B99 — $936,000 from Free Cash, $204,827 from the Overlay surplus and the balance from property taxes. State aid and non - property tax local receipts Motion under Article 12 2010 Annual Town Meeting Move that the Town approve and appropriate the proposed FY 2011 Budget as presented for Line Item C99 (Capital): $993,000 to be provided as follows Line C99 — from property taxes, State aid and non- property tax local receipts Motion under Article 12 2010 Annual Town Meeting Move that the Town approve and appropriate the proposed FY 2011 Budget as presented for Line Item D99 (Debt): $6,158,003 to be provided as follows: Line D99 - $300,000 from Sale of Real Estate Fund and the balance from property taxes, State aid and non - property tax local receipts Motion under Article 12 2010 Annual Town Meeting Move that the Town approve and appropriate the proposed FY 2011 Budget as presented for Line Item E99 Vocational Education: $327,946 to be provided as follows: Line E99 — from property taxes, State aid and non - property tax local receipts Motion under Article 12 2010 Annual Town Meeting Move that the Town approve and appropriate the proposed FY 2011 Budget as presented for Line Item G91 (Town Administration Wages): $211,646 and Line Item G92 (Town Administration Expenses): $472,000 to be provided as follows: Lines G91 and G92 — from property taxes, State aid and non - property tax local receipts Motion under Article 12 2010 Annual Town Meeting Move that the Town approve and appropriate the proposed FY 2011 Budget as presented for Line Item H91 (Accounting Wages): $155,770 and Line Item H92 (Accounting Expenses): $1,550 to be provided as follows: Lines H91 and H92 — from property taxes, State aid and non - property tax local receipts Annual Town Meeting 224 April 29, 2010 Motion under Article 12 2010 Annual Town Meeting Move that the Town approve and appropriate the proposed FY 2011 Budget as presented for Line Item 191 (Finance Wages) $1 137 410 and Line Item 192 (Finance Expenses): $504,800 to be provided as follows: Lines 191 and_ 192 —from property taxes, State aid and non- property tax local receipts Motion by William Brown, Precinct 8 for Amendment reducing Line Item 191 $1,137,410 by $30,567 to $1,106,843 allowing the GIS Coordinator position to Half Time Motion for Amendment Does Not Carry Motion under Article 12 2010 Annual Town Meeting Move that the Town approve and appropriate the proposed FY 2011 Budget as presented for Line Item J92 (FINCOM Reserve Fund): $150,000 to be provided as follows: Line J92 — from property taxes, State aid and non - property tax local receipts Motion under Article 12 2010 Annual Town Meeting Move that the Town approve and appropriate the proposed FY 2011 Budget as presented for Line Item K91 (Community Services Wages): $871,087 and Line Item K92 (Community Services Expenses): $215,485 to be provided as follows: Lines K91 and K92 — from property taxes, State aid and non - property tax local receipts Motion by William Brown, Precinct 8 for Amendment reducing Line Item K91 $871,087 by $49,250.50 to $821,836.50 allowing the Permits Coordinator position and the Planner position to Half Time Motion for Amendment Does Not Carry Motion under Article 12 2010 Annual Town Meeting Move that the Town approve and appropriate the proposed FY 2011 Budget as presented for Line Item L91 (Library Wages): $960,861 and Line Item L92 (Library Expenses): $268,817 to be provided as follows: Lines L91 and L92 — from property taxes, State aid and non - property tax local receipts Motion under Article 12 Annual Town Meeting 225 April 29, 2010 2010 Annual Town Meeting Move that the Town approve and appropriate the proposed FY 2011 Budget as presented for Line Item M91 (Public Works Wages): $2,351,314 and Line Item M92 (Public Works Expenses): $738,835 to be provided as follows: Line M91 — $60,000 from the Reading Ice Arena to support Recreation wages; Line M92 — $25,000 from the Sale of Cemetery lots to support Cemetery expenses; and the balance of Lines M91 and M92 from property taxes, State aid and non - property tax local receipts Motion under Article 12 2010 Annual Town Meeting Move that the Town approve and appropriate the proposed FY 2011 Budget as presented for Line Item M93 (Public Works - Snow &. Ice Expenses): $525,000; Line Item M94 (Public Works — Street Lighting Expenses): $241,500 and Line Item M95 (Public Works — Rubbish Collection & Disposal Expenses): $1,560,770 to be provided as follows: Lines M93, M94 and M95 — frorn property taxes, State aid and non - property tax local receipts Motion by David Talbot, Precinct 5 for Amendment reducing Line Item M95 by $50,000 Motion for Amendment Does Not Cara Motion under Article 12 2010 Annual Town Meeting Move that the Town approve and appropriate the proposed FY 2011 Budget as presented for Line Item N91 (Public Safety Wages): $7,393,727 and Line Item N92 (Public Safety Expenses): $353,854 to be provided as follows: Lines N91 and N92 — from property taxes, State aid and non - property tax local receipts Motion under Article 12 2010 Annual Town Meeting Move that the Town approve and appropriate the proposed FY 2011 Budget as presented for Line Item U99 (School Department): $36,390,308 to be provided as follows: Line U99 — from property taxes, State aid and non - property tax local receipts Presentation given by Charles Robinson, School Committee Chairman Presentation given by John Doherty, Superintendent of Reading Schools - Presentation Attached Presentation given by Mary DeLai, Finance Manager Reading Schools - Presentation Attached Annual Town Meeting 226 April 29, 2010 Motion under Article 12 2010 Annual Town Meeting Move that the Town approve and appropriate the proposed FY 2011 Budget as presented for Line Item V99 (Town Facilities): $740,693 to be provided as follows: Line V99 — from property taxes, State aid and non - property tax local receipts f Motion under Article 12 2010 Annual Town Meeting Move that the Town approve and appropriate the proposed FY 2011 Budget as presented for Line Item W99 (Water Enterprise Fund): $5,433,291 to be provided as follows: Lines W99 =$225,000 from Water Reserves and $5,208,291 from property taxes, State aid and non - property tax local receipts Motion under Article 12 2010 Annual Town Meeting Move that the Town approve and appropriate the proposed FY 2011 Budget as presented for Line Item X99 (Sewer Enterprise Fund): $5,412,723 to be provided as follows: Line X99 — $100,000 from Sewer Reserves and $5,312,723 from property taxes, State aid and non - property tax local receipts Motion under Article 12 2010 Annual Town Meeting Move that the Town approve and appropriate the proposed FY 2011 Budget as presented for Line Item Y99 (Storm Water Enterprise Fund): $377,826 to be provided as follows: Line Y99 — $30,000 from Storm Water Reserves and $347,826 from property taxes, State aid and non - property tax local receipts Motion under Article 12 2010 Annual Town Meeting Move that the Town approve and appropriate the proposed FY 2011 Budget, exclusive of State and county assessments: $85,660,297 representing the total of all motions made under Article 12 as amended Funds are to be provided as set forth in said motions as amended Presentation given by Peter Hechenbleikner and Bob LeLacheur Motion made by Bill Brown, Town Meeting Member Precinct 8 to Adjourn Motion to Adjourn Does Not Carry Annual Town Meeting 227 April 29, 2010 After Discussion by Town Meeting Members Motion for Entire Budget Carried 228 Annual Town Meeting April 29; 2010 —0— ® Fiscal 2011 Budget Guiding Principles All zeeo ' fra[o I vpabvanitz' nw'p ea .nall f, rn, nt& and l b W fu m officials 6 rtnf Many pok budget metw ga FaeaN 1-1. yr firer l0a,-J Fenn- cen,on vdP.1— s rwap werl Maiwad caiman budget fleokal,n . unahanad econanac I— u,.,a +ad mid -rear _n't Plm for multi -Yes fi,towial difficuhiea Racrwy fe, kcal gw onet. take mwral run OK to um Reaetwt b Wdgrta - mnicadY ($IWI in "11) Maintain rcutw kt,le rf. sfmy fRwwlol base PWlic Ed,aatlon, 1leohh 6 safety Meet-1a l wu in wed ®py5a�t9® FY2010 Budget - Municipal Government P/v'ar Objecf. Maintain x strong fimwnl awability fusing $1 m itm In rmw) - 1„r,a,,,aewae(Kagita11 obilily to Coke rd)mfejee gpar[wtiu (E[an Ma)Kf Protect - Cemnniry lkahhbd <omxeay safety - Lxal "satery car' athw oflecrW Wu.nua dalalvn� Miai,wte addniaad fiwwA'hvtlen on realdente all bu,Me,au It 229 MOTION UNDER ARTICLE 12 'Move that the Town raise by borrowiN. w from the tiv levy, air trcnsfer from available funds, told appropriate the . of: $85 660.297 far the oprrotien of the Town and its 6oternment for Fiscol Year 2011, be9ltnin9 7ldy 1, 2010" Fimnce conmittee /WSe: 7M1is 585. 660, 291 /osalreP^esrnrs rM1C [onibimfian e/ a 519, 936,4576errra /F[M and /Mee Fntvp -ire Funds which rolal 511,12J,d10 (pagc 61J —a— Fiscal 2011 Budget Guiding Principles Use rcaertle moue fora.' FYIO local remme, hill fall 1M N gojeetiw Adam We FYI1 state And than Lawmr wgeata P,uar a iat.- ctve'le.* [on'in,rd m.enmwts fill bAstirgs mMnwnet 4 [aptd budget, e-o"'ta fi—bal d4ficultie' of rvident+A businetwt MFiniite eMMirnel flmndnl Wden MSeA repafinent fa, RMM baoa FY10 tax bill, Shred aammitnwt 1 an aewl' e.rana All o%a, aaabywl Mdgeted fx w nlaa M FYI I FY2010 Budget Recap Shortfall in local Revenues despite forecast of -10.9% n. FY09 go Budget FY10 Projected FY10 Variance fY10 Excise Taxes $2,500,000 $2,600,000 +5100,000 PenalryRnL 174,300 150,000 - 29,300 PILOT 289,600 291,000 +1,200 Fee/IIclPrmt 1,685.200 1,637600 47,600 MMlcaid 400,000 125,000 - 275,000 Spec. Assess 3.150 2,500 S50 Flnes/Forfelts 157,500 10'000 . 57,500 Miss. 1 -tlme 1118,000 +168,000 Investments 600,000 600,000 0 $5,809,950 S5,674,100 . $135,850 t ®o $19 191 030. FY2011 Budget - Revenues - B..fits _ /over 60 -63 69% • TOTAL REVENUES $75,007,769 •2.2% - Property Taxes $51096,967 • 3.1% - Other Local Revs.` $ 5,548,000 - 4.5% - Intergavt Revs." $13,212,036 - 2.0% - Transfers d Avail. $ 4,214,766 - 2.2% . - Free Cwh`en $ 936,000 ast w� -33%: Mes-cl mw W,mn em Will, -Excise tuo -4%: Imv � •• Asmme Slate/Fed Ald $2006 bsk Go vmr (Jo.. 10): obaA emal so Mons Wars d Mew (Apnl'10) ••-Abend W% of M ye in Ml re. (ormemraLk) ®ts FY2011 Budget Overview per." 64 Prej <cted R <v<l -ws $ 75.007,769 •1.0% Used for STate ASSessmmds $ 568,602 Avildbkfor Rradiry $ 74,439.167 sh.d Costs (25.8 %) $19,191,030 .5.6% Muricipol 6ovcrnnent (24.3X) $18.114,426 d.1% school Departmset (48.9 %) $36,390,308 •1.1% Tessa Fecifities (1.0 %) $ 740,693 •0.0% 11M, FY2011 Budget Overview FYII Budget spending Scoracord (page 64) Each of tbese Ilia items rout de voted by Timn MeeMg. Metlarm will be made M bgkal roopings when "etleal (for eeemple. I'wx W1 old 692 Two Admimtst cll m woven and expema). Afty each mmlm b read, a short prsssrdntim will follow. T. m ,e,L, m xbew should ask arts gimxtlom s make my sanmlems of this shw. If then are mrcMmoas, the am mim errs, wi3 be voted. We " Men lore to the next motion °n a aaetldn of the budget, and arcs all mesons hove bean moved and emended m pvpmed, is revised mein osildn Newpomsi, -1 ameMmeirs will be mode old vied. 230 ,sissississil FY2011 Budget - State Aid paver 60 -63S 7" e!lfitttffi ill! /!/I!!! / /! FY2011 Budget Overview FINCOM FYI1 Budget Message (peg- 59) tvs FY2011 Budget - Shared Costs paves 65 -72 • Total Shared $19 191 030. • 5.6X - B..fits 11,712 081 69% - Capital` 993.000 - 8.1% - Debt Service* 6,158,003 • 6.8% - Vocatl schools 327,946 - 13.2% •Tool $7.15 million is ap from $6.B5 million h. FYIa Tha FY11 fgire is pee fo wfo Pa6ry , (5% or of M rew4es ovikbk) plus an allwaree for pvfor'lmnce coanenirg rawxgy sovicgs. FY2011 Budget - Shared Costs pager 65 -7Z 8enefits(899) $11,712081 . 6.9% - Retirement 12,991,956 .1 186,924 . 6.7% - 'Wacker Canso 1 305,000 .1 58,950 . 24% - Unemployment $ 125,000 .1 70,000 .127% - "Heolth/Life $7,625,000 •1400,000 + 5.5% - Medicare $ 607,375 •1 42,375 . 7.5% - Indumification 1 57,500 •1 2,500 . 5.0% ' 101"ds r u.drAe.ied - "11 Mcmre It •7..5% "7X10 paler, �d - FYI] pveare a •9. Fs ® ®® 1% -FY2011 Budget - Shared Costs pager 65 -72, (blue) 223 -230 • bebt(M) $6,158003 .6.8% • Excluded debt $2,798,191 - RM 52707million:Barrows6Wood EM$91k WsftA pays $69B,BTI of Mit --V 16.9 ( -0.6) Included debt $3,359,812 - Ewgy Improwrcmz $ 473.988 - 5ch.1 buddkgs $1,584,923 (Mm. PiO $41,036 of MU -.0 49% - Tennis course: - artificial turf $ 184,169 - Dowmown impro+enwms 1 84.419 - PAC. srmign E 440,(M Fire equipmem $ 300613 - Fiprxial orstemz $ 291 500 �IRY-2011 Budget - Municipal Government pager 73 -106 Full Time Equivalents: 205.8 (-0 6 Town Admin. 1% 2.4 uncharged Accounting 1% 2.5 unchanged Finance 10% 19.5 uncharged Comm. Sara. 8% 16.9 ( -0.6) Library 10% 19.7 uncharged Public Works 21% 43.0 unchanged Public Safety 49% 101.8 uncharged Na £X11 buegetedraser except lerproWtiovl•empbyees 231 FY2011- Budget - Shared Costs pager 65 -72, (bole) 276 -222 capitol(c99) $993,000 - 8.1% $425k roads (in addition to Chapter 90 funding) $230k Ambul.. (10yr life, 50% as backup) 11151, DPW smiler (20 yrs old - 15yr life) 1831, Kill. parking lot repairs 1401, General nub /sidewalk 1301, Kill. Playground (-I progrom) 1251, Patient care system (rew mandate) 1201, School security system 1151, General Playground surfaces 1101, Street sign spkcemenU (old mandate) ® Y2011 Budget - Shared Costs pager 65 -7Z Viacirtiarxil Edoc ' rdE991 $327 946 -23,2% tMl eenepok," Regioid Ve Iooel Yid (xi a 70) 12 mmrveri x awbm; Mwkko; Meh .: M Rmdi,: Real"; Reese: : stercbm: WekefiW; Wx wr; WntNp. Wa 1�, N J1h� sees 72011 Budget - Municipal Government pager 73 -106 Total Costs: 118 114,426 + 1.1% Town Ad.(.("I -92) 4% 683 646 - 0.0% AccuedinsH91 -92) I% 157,320 +0.0% Fl..(191 -92) 9% 1642 210 - 0.0% HWOM Raervrr(J92) 3% 15(1,000 + 0.0% Cmom, Sw.(K91 -92) 6% 1 086,572' + 4.9% ub,on,"1 -92) 7% 1.229.678 + 0.8% Publk'Works(M91 -92) 1]% 3,098149 . 1.5% Srww/dghia/7re,h(A193- 95)13% 2,327,270 + 3.2% Public Safel,"I.92) 43% 7.747,581 . 0.6% ,4w" rw..ta,.n.r tw.11..1 ®FY2011 Budget - School Department 4 Building Maintenance pegs, 109 -197 Preseldotion by the School Come . orld Scheel Dcpornnerd doing the Motions for: - Line V99 (5chode). - U. V99 (Town Facilities) 232 v072011 Budget - Enterprise Funds pops, 199 -M Rates set for September 2010 billing: Wei -•3.9% Se —•52% Storm Wot- •85% Budgets for FY11: Wa.r") f5.I33291 Wet- 55,208291 Sem -p(99) $5.412,M Sew- $5208291 St-m Wh (W99) 53n 626 St-m Wk $39] }36 • on R10 0 / $2 S32X ry -w 1.0%o 1"fn -.O t. WI) • 3.1% -, of $10a res -•e6 19 4% o9-et 3 5300Germ.�. topral) 19.9; nr of 6.0 -w ARTICLE 13 — On motion by George Hines, Chairman of the Finance Committee, it was voted to accept the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 64L, § 2(a) to impose a local ,lam sales tax upon the sale of restaurant meals originating within the Town by a vendor at the rate of .75 percent of the gross receipts of the vendor from the sale of restaurant meals to take effect July 1, 2010. Motion to Table until May 3, 2010 Motion to Table Carries ARTICLE 17 — On motion by Ben Tafoya, Chairman of the Board of Selectmen, it was voted to accept the gift of a sum of money to establish the following funds: 1. a permanent trust fund to be known as 'Patrons for Older Adults Scholarship" with the income there from to be used to fund an annual scholarship award for a student who is a resident of Reading, Massachusetts, who is planning to enter a profession that helps senior citizens (such as, but not limited to, medicine, social work, etc.), and Estimated Amount $25,000 2. a permanent trust fund to be known as 'Patrons for Older Adults Support Fund" with the income there from to be used no less frequently than annually to sponsor programs which support the social needs of Reading's senior citizens (such as, but not limited to; parties, group events, transportation to such events, etc.); to be expended as determined by the Council on Aging in concert with the Elder /Human Services Division; and that the foregoing trusts be administered by the Town of Reading Commissioners of Trust Funds in accordance with the wishes of the donors. Estimated Amount $125,000 Presentation given by Peter Hechenbleikner - Presentation Attached FinCom Report given by Kevin Leyne to support by a vote of 7 -0 -0 Motion Carried ARTICLE 18 — On motion by Chuck Robinson, Chairman of School Committee, it was voted to accept a gift of a sum of money to establish the Patrick A. Schettini, Jr. Memorial Scholarship Fund, and that said fund be administered by the Town of Reading Commissioners of Trust Funds in accordance with the wishes of the donors. Estimated Amount $26,744.00 Information presented by Mary DeLai FinCom Report given by Harold Torman voted to support 7 -0 -0 Motion Carried ARTICLE 19 - On motion by James Bonazoli, Vice Chairman of Board of Selectmen, it was voted to accept a gift of a sum of money from the Downtown Steering Committee to establish a trust fund to be known as the "Downtown Improvement and Events Trust upon the following terms and Annual Town Meeting 233 April 29, 2010 conditions; "that the trust fund may accept donations which may be added to the funds to be invested and reinvested and shall be expended by the Town Manager or his designee under the general direction of the Economic Development Committee, for the sole purposes of supporting and funding improvements, promotions and community events in the Downtown area of Reading; j that the trust. shall begin upon the acceptance hereof by Town Meeting, and shall terminate immediately and automatically in 20 years unless the Board of Selectmen shall determine at that time that the need and purposes of the trust continue; that if the trust continues past 20 years, the Board of Selectmen shall evaluate and determine the ongoing need for the trust every 10 years thereafter; that upon the termination of the Trust, the trust assets shall be transferred to the Town of Reading to be expended on Downtown Improvements; and that the Trust be administered by the Town of Reading Commissioners of Trust Funds in accordance with the wishes of the donors. Motion by Richard Schubert to dispense of further reading of Article 19 Motion to Dispense Carried Information presented given by Peter Hechenbleikner Information presented given by Jack Russell - Presentation Attached FinCom Report given by Marsie West voted to support 7 -0 -0 Motion Carried Annual Town Meeting 234 April 29, 2010 Thank you, Mr. Moderator. I'm Jack Russell. Precinct 8 and President of the Downtown Steering Committee Corporation. I'd like to give you a little history leading up to this motion. As you may know, and have probably forgotten by now, the Downtown Steering Committee was formed as a non - profit corporation in 1996, 14 years ago, by a group of residents and business owners. Its purpose was to help define, and contribute to the revitalized streetscape of the downtown area. As this major task approached completion, the DSC turned its attention to organizing and raising money for other downtown improvements and events. The Alleyway Initiative, which resulted in the beautiful wall mural, improved lighting, brick paving and decorative arches was a great improvement of the alleyway between Main St. and the central parking lot. The I" Annual Fall Street Faire held last September to celebrate the completion of the streetscape Project was so successful that planning for the 2 "d Annual Fall Street Faire has started. It will be held on Sunday September 12`h. Save the date! In the 3 years since the Economic Development Committee was formed in 2007, several of the EDC members became members of the Downtown Steering Committee. Currently 4 of the 7 DSC directors are associated with the EDC and 1 is a member of the Historical commission. This by itself is not a problem unless it is necessary to do business with the Town, in which case we run afoul of the State Conflict of interest law. We do have.to do business with the town for events like the Faire and when coordinating other downtown improvements, Thus; either the Downtown Steering Committee members who are associated with Town Boards would have to resign from one or the other, which none of us wanted to do, or we could dissolve the DSC and carry out the DSC function through the EDC. This second option becomes more attractive in view of the fact that the Downtown Steering Committee is a 501(c)(4) non - profit which does not allow donors to deduct donations from their income tax. We were about to embark on a long, torturous, and potentially expensive path to become a 501(c)(3) non - profit which would allow donors to deduct their gifts. By becoming a town trust, donations to which are tax deductable, fund raising will be much easier and more effective. In view of the above, on April 12, 2010, The Downtown Steering Committee Directors voted 6:0:0 to dissolve the Corporation and transfer all remaining assets, currently about $15,000 un- encumbered, to the Downtown Improvement and Events Trust if such trust is approved by this Town Meeting under the motion before you. We recommend that you establish this Trust. Thank You 235 On motion by William Brown, member of the Board of Selectmen, it was voted that this Annual Town Meeting stand adjourned to meet at 7:30 p.m. at the Reading Memorial High School Auditorium, on Monday, May 3, 2010. Meeting adjourned at 10:58 p.m. 158 Town Meeting Members were present. �, W�Voaj � A true copy. Attest: Laura A. Gemme Town Clerk Annual Town Meeting 236 April 29, 2010 FY 2011 Town Manager's Budget Presentation 4 -29 -10 This level of government — local government - touches the lives of all of our citizens in many ways every single day. That is why our employees, our volunteers, and you as Town Meeting members are involved. This is our collective passion. Ben Tafoya told Town Meeting on Monday night that in spite of the worldwide financial meltdown, Reading is thriving. My presentation this evening is intended to show you, in very real terms, evidence that as a community we are thriving, and why that is so. The Town's Mission Statement and values guide us in what we do and how we do it: "The Town of Reading strives for excellence in all its services — from education to government — and seeks to enhance and enrich the social, intellectual, and leisure life of the community" Our Values and guiding principals are detailed on pages 56 and 57 of your warrant report, and are summarized on the slides in front of you. Integrity and Transparency • highest standards of ethics and integrity. • open government. • keep the community informed. • civil, professional, and mutually respectful . Excellence • excellence will be the standard continuous improvement • careful planning Diversity • . diversity and respect for differences Community Sustainability • Tolerance, Civility and Cultural Diversity • Volunteerism and Civic Engagement • Historic Preservation and Open Space • Recreational, Cultural, and Educational Opportunities It is the people — volunteers, employees, and residents that make this community what it is. Our employees and volunteers, plus equipment and materials, are the raw materials from which we produce services to our community. Ben Tafoya talked about our wonderful residents and volunteers Monday night, and I agree with his comments. They are all "off budget" though, so I will talk about our employees, and how they are working in partnership with our volunteers and residents to make this community thrive. I first want to recognize the leadership of our Department Heads. They are all expert in their fields, and in addition are outstanding leaders in this community. Two new Department heads — DPW director Jeff Zager and Community Services Director Jean Delios, have added wonderful experience Ind expertise to an already great team. 237 And while they are not part of the municipal budget,. I also want to recognize Facilities Director Joe Huggins, Director of School Finance and Operations Mary Delai, Superintendent of Schools John Doherty, and RMLD General Manager Vinnie Cameron. They are an integral part of the senior management team that this community can be very proud of. I want to talk for a couple of minutes about 5 areas related to our employees: • Staffing levels • Health Insurance • Salaries 2011 • Customer Service success • Achieving results together with limited resources The staffing levels for municipal government in 2011 are the same as in 2008, and slightly below 2009 levels, even though self imposed increases in service, and state and federally mandated workloads have increased appreciably. , Health Insurance is a major cost driver for municipal budgets. The Town in partnership with our employees as represented by the Public Employee Committee has negotiated 5 major changes in the health insurance program over the past 7 years. Beginning in July 1 2009 all active employees moved into a 3 tiered insurance program that reduced premiums from 2% to 27 %. The Town evaluated the option of going into the Group Insurance Commission (GIC) program, and our analysi is that this program provides neither the cost savings nor the quality of program that our new prograr offers. While our rates are going up over 9% for FY 2011, following a significant reduction in rates in FY 2010, the GIC rates are going up 13% to 15 %. Salaries • 251 regular municipal employees (not including seasonal) • 113 non -union employees • 6 Municipal Unions • 3 contracts settled for FY2011 - 55 employees • 3 contracts under negotiation - 83 employees • For FY2011, no COLA beyond what is in place on 6- 30 -10. For example, as part of the previous 3 year contract, the Firefighters union accepted the deferral of a portion of their salary increase until the last day of their contract. And as part of the Town Manager's salary increase for FY 2010, approved by the Board of Selectmen in December 2008, a portion of the salary increase was deferred 'til mid year. • For FY2011 — no step movement except for employees who complete their probationary period. Customer service We are working hard to emphasize excellent customer service. This is very hard to measure, but beginning in January 2009 we have provided customer survey cards, a copy of whic` was distributed to Town Meeting members. Last year we had about 100 surveys returned. This yet, ; 238 we had 100 surveys returned during the first quarter. The slide shows that those who respond rate our customer service very highly. We will continue to strive for excellence in this area. Achieving results together with limited resources could be a 2 hour slide show: The examples are intended to illustrate — not be a complete listing: ♦ comprehensive records management system, savings in storage and search costs, and , more documents to be available to the community , ♦ Significantly increased service to veterans. ♦ 2 of our employees were deployed yesterday first to Fort Dix, and then on to Afghanistan — Police Patrol Officers Mike Lee and Christine Amendola. We wish them a safe journey and good health. ♦ Staff secured grants and are coordinating trail building • new Town Clerk was faced with 2 unexpected elections ♦ MSBA Funding — reduced property tax ♦ MUNIs implementation ♦ Refinancing debt ♦ Improvements in technology ♦ Flood prevention - through efforts of Conservation Commission ♦ Flood mitigation — DPW — with new equipment ♦ Pumping of basements — Fire ♦ Pumping of back yards — DPW Large (not large enough) road construction program - $900,000 per. year ♦ Some done by contractor, some by DPW crews ♦ RHA grant for curb, sidewalk, and roadway — DPW did work ♦ Library — more hours — Sundays ♦ All statistics are on the rise ♦ Increasing programs ♦ Increasing interlibrary loans ♦ Induction of Children's Librarian Corinne Fisher into the MA Library Hall of Fame this Friday ♦ Performance Contracting — $5.5 million, undertaken by Mary Delai of the School Department, and implementation under the direction of Joe Huggins of Facilities Department. ♦ Additional grant of $150,000; work with RMLD ♦ Largest flu clinic in our history ♦ On again /off again H1 N1 vaccination —work with schools ♦ New mandates on sharps collection ♦ Fire Department has expanded availability of AILS by placing equipment on fire apparatus ♦ Police Department has highest volume of activity of any Police Department.around, and Reading is one of safest communities in suburban Boston 239 ♦ Expanded drainage work ♦ Water line installation ♦ Sewer inflow /infiltration — lowering incidents of sewer back -ups — still more to be done ♦ Significantly expanded recreational facilities and programs It takes funding to make sure that we have the people we need, and the equipment and materials required, to provide the services we want to maintain the community that we cherish. That is the essence of our budget 240 zz READING A Community of Excellence ®QD® Values Integrity and Transparency highest standards of ethics and integrity. open government. • keep the community informed. civil, professional, and mutually respectful . Excellence Excellence will be the standard — continuous improvement careful planning Diversity diversity and respect for differences Many of our employees, and all of our volunteers, are residents of Reading. 241 .71.- Town of Reading Mission The Town of Reading strives for_ excellence in all its services — from education to government — and seeks to enhance and enrich the social, intellectual, and leisure life of the community. Values Community Sustainability Tolerance, Civility and Cultural Diversity Volunteensm and Civic Engagement Historic preservation and Open Space Reveational, Cultural, and Educational Opportunities ®®® Partnership with Employees • Staffing levels • Health Insurance • Salaries 2011 • Customer Service success. • Achieving results together with limited resources ® ® STAFFING LEVELS FY2DO7 TO FY 2011 2001 2000 2009 -201D " 2011 TOWN ADMeMIMATION 2.50 -250 250 240 240 COMMUNITY SERVICES 1740 1920 1920 . 1750 less ACCOUN 2,50 3 50 250 2 50 - 2 50 FINMCE " - too W40 1a 30 1950 19 50 PUBLIC. SAFETY _ 98,80 W Be 1D1 B0 101 80 10110 PUBLIC WORKS 43.50 4350 4350 43.00 43W LIBRARY, - 193D 1970 19.70 1970 . 19.10 1 TOTAL 203.00 205.60 207.56 206.40 205AD ®- SALARY LEVELS 2011 251 regular municipal employees (not including seasonal) • 113 non -union employees • 6 Municipal Unions 3 contracts settled for FY2011 - 55 employees • 3 contracts under negotiation - 83 employees For FY2011, no COLA beyond what is In place on 6 -3040 For FY2011 - no step movement except for employees who complete their probationary period. •l •�4k ps 1z 77;t 242 @m HEALTH INSURANCE 5 ma3or chants. In W.. Effective Dale Major Change 1Rate 6.45X Plies to J -1-0/ Increase co -pays: Inc. prescription drugs —_ 3.1-M— _ 72 %. J -t -0S Increase co -pays 19°420% 31.06 O �A 49% t0%2 9% fst-06 Increase Co - pays; Increase mail prescription Good drugs Fscellent 6 1 -07 6 4% 6 -1-09 Increase co -pays; change I. Medex 27Pad D 3.8%/61% 1 -1-09 Medex 2 an [ Pad D 1 9% 6 -1 -09 Switch to tiered preduct (like GIC) -M -27% 1 -1 -10 Medex 2 and Peg _ 49Y. 11-10 _ 97% ®m CUSTOMER SERVICE SUCCESS Were you assisted in a timely manner? (sOOd 6.45X Excellent Was the person who assisted you knowledgeabte? _ 90.32% Good 9.69% Fscellem 9002% _ Did you accomplish what you came for? Good O �A Ezcetlenl 96.77% Was me person you spoke wnn protesslonaUCOuneuus? Good 0.00% Fscellent 100.00% la Refinanced several debt issues, saving 9190,000 per year Cam`. - -� -. -.. ,. . so It takes funding to make sure that we have the people we need, and the equipment and materials required, to provide the services we want to maintain the community that we cherish. That is the essence of our budget + _ 244 ANNUAL TOWN MEETING Reading Memorial High School May 3, 2010 The meeting was called to order by the Moderator, Alan E. Fouids, at 7:36 p.m., there being a quorum present. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag given. Motion made by Ben Tafoya to bring Article 13 off the table Presentation given by Peter Hechenbleikner, Town Manager - giving an update on the Emergency Meeting of the Board of Selectman prior to Town Meeting - Peter gave an update on . the Boil Water issued by the MWRA Moderator, Alan Foulds excused himself to due to possible conflict of interest, ownership of a restaurant in Reading. Town Clerk, Laura Gemme requested nominations for an Acting Moderator; Ben Tafoya nominated Paul Dustin. Motion for Paul Dustin to act as Moderator Carried ARTICLE 13 — On motion by George Hines, Chairman of the Finance Committee, it was voted to accept the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 64L, § 2(a) to impose a local sales tax upon the sale of restaurant meals originating within the Town by a vendor at the rate of .75 percent of the gross receipts of the vendor from the sale of restaurant meals to take effect July 1, 2010. Presentations given by Marsie West and Barry Berman FinCom Report given by Barry Berman in support 6 -1 -0. Bylaw Committee Report given by Philip Pacino - Bylaw Committee does not support Article 13 School Committee Report given by Charles Robinson - School Committee unanimous supports Article 13 After some discussion a Motion was made by Frank Driscoll, Precinct 3 to move the question 213 Vote required 32 Voted in the affirmative 117 Voted in the negative Motion to move the Question Does Not Carry After some discussion a Motion was made by Nancy Graham, Precinct 4 to move the question 2/3 Vote required 125 Voted in the affirmative 19 Voted in the negative Motion to move the Question Carries Motion made by Bill Brown, Precinct 8 for a Roll Call Count -2.0 votes for Roll Call Count must be present - 21 voted for Roll Call Motion for Roll Call Vote Carried 245 Annual Town Meeting April 29, 2010 Roll Call Vote taken - Members voted as follows Members vote attached Motion Carried 116 Voted in the affirmative 35 Voted in the negative 36 Did not cast a vote 246 Annual Town Meeting April 29, 2010 Annual Town Meeting '2V1O Roll Call Vote ' Article 13 Town cfReading 247 Precinct 1 !Andrews Francis J 17 5 Dana Road 2012 Y 2 !Arena !John J 126 Francis Street 2013 N !Jr 2011 Benjamin Roy 1105 Colonial Drive 4 iClarke isheila M i 1536 Haverhill Street 12013 �Thomas N 5 IConnery William 101 Beaver Road 2012 —6—tCrawford 1A 2011 y Lynne 10 Eastway 8 D'Entremont Keith J :392 Haverhill Street 2011 N 9 D'Entremont 'Roger 1 398 Haverhill Street !2011 N 10 Dockser lmark L 110 Beaver Road 2011 11 Docktor Nancy A 1371 Pearl Street 2012 N 12 Herlihy Andrew 'K 1 10 Field Pond Drive 2012 13 Huntington-Stager Nancy 42 Autumn Lane - 2012 N iLee David Francis -Jr 55 Beaver Road 12012 15 ;Mounteer :Ellen i99 Colonial Drive 12011 y 16 Mulroy Sheila M '107 Eastway 12013 :Clerk Y 17 :O'Keefe !Ronald Thomas Jr 144 Batchelder Road 12013 Chairperson N Granger 18 Patterson iloseph iE Avenue 12013 Y 19 Perry 11 140 Beaver Road 2011 Taula Y 20 Perry ISteven IL :40 Beaver Road 2013 22 IStager es It 42 Autumn Lane !2012 Jam Y 23 lWebb Douglass IE Pearl Street 2013 Y �309 24 lWebb Hai arl Street 2011 Y Town cfReading 247 Precinct Annual Town Meeting - 2010 Roll Call Vote - Article 13 Count Last Name First Name MI Address Term Position Vote - 1 ;Bastian! Anthony 127 Chequessett Road 2011 - Y! 2 �Connearney Joseph T ISr 26B Carnation Circle 2011 3 Coumounduros !Peter G ! 24 Smith Aveune 2013 'Chairperson - - 4 Ford !Christine 195 Salem Street 2012 ! Y Clerk j Y S Iozzo Denise IM '30 Johanna Drive 2013 - - — - 6 - -- !Karen �T yam- r - - - 130 Azalea Circle - 2012 i Y !Janowski - - - - 7 Lam Wei E 1 150 Pleasant Street 126 Harrison Street '2011 2012 Y- 8 M ski ;Lizabeth 'Ann 9 2011 Y !McDonald 'Gerard i 14 John Street — - !McNeice !Paul !F 1 !20 Johanna Drive I2O11 Y -- 10 it Moore .Richard I] I S Elm Street 12012 I 12 jMorelli Robert !R ,236 Salem Street 12012 !Ian A 1266 Haverhill Street 2013 Y 13 14 jNelson O'Rourke _ - - Thomas. -- B 150 Chequessett Road 2012 i - - - -. - j Y 1-5 ]O'Sullivan Da v id iH i 18 Thorndike Street 2011 j 16 !Peters !Reginald 2011 1 Y T ! 13 Bay State Road 1 2013 17 Rice Brooks E 16 Eaton Street Y 18 Rickley ,Anthony IL !95 Timberneck Drive 2013 19 ;Robertson !Paul IF ! 19 Elm Street. 2013. N 20 ;Robertson !Rita C ,9 Elm Street 12012 21 !Ryan !Priscilla 142 John Street 12013 Y 22 Snow 'George 1A 237 Salem Street #2 !2011 j !B :134 Belmont Street 23 !Sullivan John 12011 24 !Sullivan Kim Marie! 1 Charles Street #C 12012 -! — Notes: Town of Reading Precinct 2 248 Annual Town Meeting '2O1U Roll Call Vote Article 13 ,ount Last irst Name Address IlTerm Position Vote 2 Brungardt —IChr, t.,her L 1324 South Street 2012 1 3 Craven !David A 122 Beech Street 12011 4 Crook !Stephen IL i 137 Plea ant Street !2012 Y 5 D'Alesslo Joseph M �58 Curtis Street 12012 Y 6 Downing William H 14 Avon Street 12013 Clerk Terrace 2012 Chairperson Y 8 -9- —t'Ea Duran Jeanne Macdonald W Ir 151 13 Cross Street :2011 Cross Street 12011 Y g 11 es to n Richard 10 FratLo Kara Marie 129 Pleasant St 12013 i N 11 Hank liam M 170 Walnut Street 2013 12 I Linda Hank "uc' IA 70 Walnut Street 2013 Y N 14 Jones Randall W i I I Cross Street 15 !Oston Steven G 166 Sturges Road 2013 16 Rojas 'Eileen S.Kj 8 Bolton Street 2012 Y 17 iSafina !Nicholas J 221 South Street 2012 Y 18 Spinney IKathleen iSheila C 323 South Street Avenue M11 2011 y 19 Tibbetts M 1 512 Summer 20 ;Tuttle 2012 i Y IDavld ;B '27 Heather Drive 21 iTuttle Jason ;D 127 Heather Drive 22 'Westerman----- 13oseph 17 Avon Street 12012 Y Town of Reading 249 Precinct 3 Annual Town Meeting '2010 Roll Call Vote ' Article 1J countil Last Name 11 First / l Rjchand -� ! 2 !Barnes '!Jonathan 3 �[Cameron !Lynne |H Position i Woburn Street 12013 Pratt Street 2012 Y 39 Ellis Avenue 12012 | \ Y / � |H |4»enn» F Fremont 12OlZ| | | | 4 Coco Rjchard | | | | 5 JH - _ 9 !:Graham iRussell IT. !Andrew W 10 i,Grimes 11 IHartzler Glen M 12 'Hopkinson :Michelle M iG 14 [Lenox !James 15 !Loughlin Thomas 16 Ficuonald Richard 17 :Simmons lHarry M 18 Tafoya !Ben 19 ;,Twomey Nancy 20 . Ralph L 21 �Vinciguerra Lori 12011 Chairperson Y L 132 Oak Street 12011 68 Maple Ridge KoaC1 10 Sylvan Road 23 Wilson !Matthew L i 2013 Y :119 West Street 24 Oak Street 24 tYoung ;Meghan JA 2013 Y 17 Pine Ridge Road 1:2011 Y 40 Oak Street 15 Holly Road N 58 Oak Street - ----- -----��� |2011 Berkeley Street 12013 / \ -- 126 Holly Road !2012 12011 Chairperson Y Y 132 Oak Street 12011 68 Maple Ridge KoaC1 10 Sylvan Road 1/011 Y 1103 Oak Street i 2013 Y :119 West Street 24 Oak Street 2012 Clerk Y 21 Sherwood Road !2012 Y 132 Oak Street 12011 10 Sylvan Road 12012 24 Oak Street 2012 Y 80 Red Gate Lane 2013 Y 17 Pine Ridge Road 1:2011 Y 40 Oak Street '2011 Y 23 California Road 12011 Y 98 Pine Ridge Road 12013 i y 98 Pine Ridge Road 12012 Y 3 Whitehall Lane !2011 Y Y | 385SurnnoerAvenue , �ZV1J � / �40 Oak Street ------ hO1] | | Y �--| __--- Precinct Town of Reading 250 Annual Town Meeting - 2010 Roll Call Vote - Article 13 -ount Last Name First Name MI Address Term Position Vote 1 !Adams Charles L ' 13 Riverside Drive _ 2013 Y - 2 Anderson Linda L 9 School Street 12012 . -_— Y - 3 Anthony Camille W Fr26 Orchard Park Drive. 2011 Y - 44 iBBarnes Donnan S 11 Bancroft Avenue 2012 Y - 5 Binda- Angela F+ 10 Orchard Park Drive 2011 Clerk Y - 6 Cotter !Bernard Daniel - Sr L 49 Riverside Drive 12012 129 High Street 12013 Y 7 Dinardo !Christina - - - - -- 8 Dirocco !Gina 'M 33 Knollwood Road l201Y 9 Dustin !Paul I C 3 Orchard Park Drive 12011 10 .Foley {Kenneth 11 !43 Chute Street 12011 ` Y 11 Fuller Robert Y L (450 Summer Avenue 12013 Y 12 !Garrison IBo IS I 11JademTerrace 12012 13 IGiacalone ISusan �A ! 9 Orchard Park Drive - 12013 - - 14 Higgott (Eleanor K 18 Buckingham Drive 12012 1 N + - -- 15 Jones Janice M 1122 Mt. Vernon Street 120 13 Chairperson I Y 16 ,Kelley Timothy 84 Woburn Street 12011 1 Y 17 Mabius Lawrence E i 159 Riverside Drive ;2012 18 ;Nihau !Gary � iM '33 Dudley Street r- 12011 Y 19 O'Sullivan ;Patrick P 178 Sunnyside Avenue 12013 2013 I N N 1 -- - - - +- -N - 20 IPacino Philip - -T IB -� i 5 Washington Street - -- + -- - -- 21 Rushworth !Philip ! 136 Knollwood Road ;2012 Y 22 'Shaffer I 67 Woburn Street .2011 ! N !Frederick S 1 Y !M 11 Jadem Terrace .2012 23 !Snyder Gina 24 'Talbot !David A 75 Linden Street 12013 -- - Y i - i Precinct 5 Town of Reading 251 Annual Town Meeting '2V10 Roll Call Vote ' Article 13 =C..nt IL st Name � First Name ddress Term I Positionib—ot- 1C �S4 Longview Road Y 2 'Bonazoli N James :E 100 Grove Street 12012 20 11 2011 y 1 Mandel 2011 2011+ N treet 9 IMulvey james P 8 Palmer Hill Avenue 2012 !Chairperson N 10 O'Neill !,Mary Ellen i i 125 Summer Avenue 2012 y 11 iParr Thomas 122 Garrett Road 2012 Y 12 Parr IM I �22 Garrett Road 2012 y _jMary, 2011 13 Phillips Gary :D :42 Willow Street 14 Phillips Lincla im 42 Willow Street 2013 15 Piper !Allison m 42 Willow Street 2013 16 Robinson 181 Prospect Street 2012 y 17 Russell John :W i23 Plymouth Road 2013 2013 Clerk 18 Selvitelli Greg IF 25 Arno venue A i 31 Randall Road 19 Shield Peter 2011 143 Enos Circle 20 Smith ---fZverly Lvnn 2012 Y 21 Smith IChad R 1517 West Street 2013 1 N 22 h Wood-Beckwit. .17 Palmer Hill Road 12013 _JD�ru:c:illa i* ` Pn�c� m�G Town nfReading 252 ' Annual Town Meeting - 2010 Roll Call Vote - Article 13 `;ount Last Name First Name MI Address Term Position Vote 1 iAnderson !Carl F III 74 Whittier Road 2011 i Y- 2 Caruso !Christopher 77 Hartshorn Street 2011 3 Chiappini Michele Weber j 50 Locust Street 2011 Y Commito Ellen 1C j 78 Hanscom Avenue 2011 Y -4 -- 5 Dahl Harvey J Petei16 Tennyson Road 2011 Y 'Charles - i Y -- 6 !Donnelly -Moran V 32 Vale Road 2013 I M ;91 30 Vale Road Whittier Road 12012 12012 ! 7 Doucette !Jeffrey jM 8 (Downing Jesse Y ! Y 9 !Downing John K Jack 91 Whittier Road 2011 10 IFoodman Martin J 21 Hanscom Avenue 2012 Y 11 L - (Hines 'Jarrin George V 35 Grand Street 2011 12 Hurtado Mario A 136 Parkview Road 2012 - 13 Kozlowski !Norman F 116 Weston Road 2013 ! 1 N 14 ;Matheson Nancy B 27 Auburn Street 2013 Y — - -- 18 Winthrop Avenue ;2012 jClerk 137 Estate Lane ;2013 �- Y I 15 (McGoldrick 16 !Michaud Moira !Sandra �] ! 17 !Porter (Darlene jC 193 Lowell 2013 Y 18 jSansalone C 1 72 Winthrop Avenue 2013 �rt- Y -- ;Frances - - - -I 19 'Schubert -- - - - 1 Richard - - -- - - - -- -- 119 Winthrop Avenue ;2013 - - -- -' Y — — 20 iSegalla 21 !Struble John IW C ! 115 Hanscom Avenue 12013 -- -- 4 Tower Road 12012 N - 1 Y ;Jeffrey W 22 ',Walsh 23 !Weld !Bryan Karl E E i 2011 58 Grand Street 1 !60 Highland Street 201 Y T - N 24 !W er 1 Denise �D 1 1228 Forest Street 2012 Chairpersons Y Notes Town of Reading 253 Precinct 7 Annual Town Meeting - 2010 Roll Call Vote - Article 13 Count Last Name First Name MI Address Term Position Votes 1 Beckman Robert J !26 Sunset Rock Ln 2011 1 1 Y 2 Brown William C 28 Martin Rd 1 1 -- ! - N 3 Brzezenski John E 160 Terrace Park 2012 — - 4 Coop Kendra iJG 120 Covey Hill Road 12013 + N 8 Twin Oaks Rd 12012 ; Y 5 Davarich Scott iL 6 _T .. lEhl :Charles S '249 Franklin St 12012 1 Y 7 !Finch lWilliam O 151 Mill St 12012 TJ 62 Martin Rd 2011 8 iGolini Donald - — 9 ; Golini }-- Kathleen E l 62 Martin Rd 12011 Y 10 Hecht (Olive B 173 Martin Road L2013 Y 11 I Hecht I !William -1 J Sr i '73 Martin Rd 12013 4 Y 12 Herrick Karen Gately - - -1- - i9 Dividence Rd ;2012 !Chairperson . N a- 13 'Koppel (PaulaD 160 Lilatr Ln X2011 Y. 14 :Lloyd Patricia I] Franklin St - 12013 Y ,3I88 15 jLordan !James IF Jr 126 Fairchild Dr 12013 1 - - '� N 16 -T - =— - - - - --�� MacKenzie - -- Bruce — IA i102 Sanborn Ln 12012 ' Y 17 ;N dstrand Robert ± 83 Franklin St !2011 1 Y- _ I (Perry !George B iII 1230 Franklin St 2013 N -18_ 19 :Rogers Elizabeth iH 88 Colburn Rd 2012 1' Y 20 'Russell !John H 91 Spruce Rd 12013 - 21 { 'Russell !Margaret iW !91 Spruce Rd 2013 - 22 iStosez Richard ] 25 Emerson St 12012 23 ITucc Kenneth !R 1 i8 Buckskin Or i2011j— Y. - 24 I - - j Notes: - - -- i Town of Reading 254 Precinct 8 ARTICLE 20 - On motion by James Bonazoli, Board of Selectmen, it was voted to appropriate the sum of $61,001 for the purpose of constructing the California Road sewer, including any associated costs; and that to meet such appropriation, that said sum shall be transferred from unexpended proceeds of the Town's Sewer Bonds dated November 1, 2007 which were issued for the construction of the Sunnyside Avenue sewer pursuant to the vote of the Town Meeting passed on April 30, 2007 (Article 23); and that the Board of Selectmen be authorized to take any other action necessary to carry out this project; provided, however that no expenditure shall be made hereunder until the Board of Selectmen determine (which determination shall be conclusive) that after the transfer of such unexpended bond proceeds, the remaining amount of unexpended bond proceeds from the Town's Sewer Bonds dated November 1, 2007 is sufficient to complete the Sunnyside Avenue sewer project referred to above. Presentation given by George Zambouras - Presentation Attached FinCom Report given by Matthew Wilson - FinCom voted to support 7 -0 -0 Motion Carried 2/3 Vote required 125 Voted in the affirmative 1 Voted in the negative Annual Town Meeting 255 April 29, 2010 ;IT,j1: F777711 �T�� �F �� ' � .Y'i. T �✓.i 4 u : uuroRSU Roza �� stweR RSVUCewsxT a r y, v° e � , L 256 Article 20: FY 2011 California Road Sewer Deficiencies Determined During VI Work — 2009 Replacement of 570 LF Sewer and Appurtenances Estimated Cost $185;000 ® Article 20: FY 2011 California Road Sewer Sunnyside Avenue — Completed Spring 2008 Total Expenditures $303,999 Unexpended Funds $61,001 ARTICLE 21 — On motion by Richard Schubert member of Board of Selectmen, it was voted to accept the provisions of Massachusetts General Law Chapter 148, Section 261 which provides that any building constructed or substantially rehabilitated so as to constitute the equivalent of new construction and occupied in whole or in part for residential purposes and containing not less than four dwelling units including but not limited to lodging houses, boarding houses, apartments, hotels, condominiums and group residences shall be equipped with an automatic sprinkler system in accordance with the Massachusetts State Building Code. Presentation given by Chief Burns, Fire Department - Presentation Attached Bylaw Committee voted in support 3 -0 -0 Motion Carried Annual Town Meeting 257 April 29, 2010 Article 21 Requests Town Meeting accept Massachusetts General Law Chapter 146 Section 26i as a local option. This law requires residential buildings with four or more units to be equipped with fire sprinklers when: • They are constructed new. - • Or substantially rehabilitated to constitute the equivalent of new construction. ®- Article 21 Currently, residential buildings are not required to be equipped with automatic sprinklers unless: — It Is a high rise building (over 70 feet in height). — The building exceeds 12,000 square feet. — A mixed use building would be required to be sprinklered if it exceeded 7,500 square feet z'} Article 21 Communities that are geographically close to Reading that have adopted Massachusetts General Law Chapter 148 Section 26i: Wakefield • North Reading Stoneham • Winchester Wobum • Burlington • Wilmington • North Andover rwala: t= Article 21 National statistics show that properly installed and maintained automatic fire sprinkler systems help save lives. — This law Improves the life safety of residents in larger residential buildings. • Because fire sprinkler systems react so quickly, they can dramatically reduce the heat, Flames, and smoke produced in a fire. T; 1_ .... ARTICLE 22 — On motion by Stephen Goldy, member of Board of Selectmen, it was voted to indefinitely postpone the subject matter of Article 22. Motion Carried ARTICLE 23 — On motion by Kara Fratto, it was voted to amend Article 2, Town Meeting, of the Town of Reading General Bylaws as follows (new language in italics): 1.1 General 2.1.9 Any tax andlor fee increase rejected by a vote of Town Meeting cannot be brought back before Town Meeting for approval for a period of eighteen (18) months. Nothing in this section limits the Town's ability to put such tax andlor fee increase on the ballot at the next local election for voter approval, Motion made by Kara Fratto, Precinct 3 to Indefinitely Postpone Motion to Postpone Carried ARTICLE 24 — On motion by Ben Tafoya, Chairman of the Board of Selectmen, it was voted to authorize the Board of Selectmen to convey a sewer easement to the owner of the land located at 757 Main Street which easement is shown on a plan entitled: "Easement Plan 767 Main Street Reading, Massachusetts, dated February 25, 2010," upon such terms and conditions and for such consideration as the Board of Selectmen deems to be in the best interest of the Town. Information given by George Zambouras - See Attachment Motion Carried 213 Vote required Declared unanimous by Moderator Annual Town Meeting 259 April 29, 2010 a Z A 0 c m N m c Y t' M. 22 W 261 cOx00 Comm 51 2CMML d40IRIC3 - . W o- Moo 1 ceVll Ma\ Me pcgvlY IM• mom Mspn oe N• li... aw0iq cticlRO e.MSmb. me M• Mu M .boat• me .•y MM W. Ne» or tamr ma Mol w .•. R, n o 1. m .1 eot p ..w m oo, .• .en m..Iw... • I eNly Pal MY or m• p01— In mmemo •IN M• Mm sa .puleem• M M• R•gM1l•n or Umb. PRfLF59MI1 UNO SI1RKltl1 a�lE 260 242 aM 1. M— Ben.v Pq 3 cY , Psp• lu 2 nm F2 I.1 Plm 1 • P n366 1 w2. 5 RMC lo • uM R,. q. For Slelbn, $N• . 1 .30' OK 1Y66 EASEMENT PI414 767 MAIN STREET READING, MASSACHUSETTS Prepared By LeBlanc Survey Aa aclatea, Inc. 161 Halle. Street Danvers, MA 01925 (978) 774 -6012 February 25, 2010 Scale: 1' -20' HOR, SCALE IN FEET D 20 SD 100 ARTICLE 25 — On motion by James Bonazoli, Vice Chairman of Board of Selectmen, it was voted to authorize the Board of Selectmen to accept the conveyance of drainage easements located on Howard Street which easements are shown on a plan entitled: "Plan of Drainage -- Easement Howard Street, Reading, Massachusetts, dated February 2, 2010, "upon such terms and conditions and for such consideration as the Board of Selectmen deems to be in the best interest of the Town. Information presented by George Zambouras _ See Attachment Motion Carried 2/3 Vote required Declared unanimous by Moderator Annual Town Meeting 261 April 29, 2010 HOWARD STREET 262 M�.i nn�s w �ion.�u.s 1 a'in MO. HOWARD STREET DRAINAGE EASEMENT EASEMENT PROPERTY OWNER ADDRESS EASEMENT NUMBER AREA (S.F.) E -1 MCLAUGHLIN RONALD P. & KATHLEEN M MCLAUGHLIN 115 HOWARD STREET 1,879.4 E -2 ! PETRIN RONALD L. & GLORIA A PETRIN 119 HOWARD STREET 2,156.5 E -3 tONNORS ROBERT M. & KAREN A RICHARD 107 HOWARD STREET 1,355.4 E -4 LESSARD LEO E. & MARGARET M LESSARD 1 127 HOWARD STREET 168.6 E -5 IBOWE BRIAN & SUSAN BOWE 178 WEST STREET 5,121.7 263 ARTICLE 26 — On motion by Nicholas Safina, Chairman of Community Planning & Development Commission it was voted to amend Section 2.0, Definitions, Section 2.2.22 and Section 6.3, Nonconforming Uses and Structures, of the Town of Reading Zoning By -Laws by deleting in their entirety Section 2.2.22 and Section 6.3, and inserting in their place the following new definition and section: Motion made by Ben Tafoya to Dispense of Reading of Article Motion to Dispense Carried Definitions (New) 2.2.22 Nonconforming - A lawful pre- existing building, structure, vacant lot, or use of buildings or land that does not conform to the zoning regulations for the district in which it is located, but did conform at the time it was built or established. 6.3 Nonconforming Uses and Structures 6.3.1 Applicability: This bylaw shall not apply to uses or structures lawfully in existence or lawfully begun, or to a building or Special Permit issued before the first publication of notice of the public hearing required by G.L. c. 40A, s. 5 at which this bylaw, or any relevant part thereof, was adopted. No modification of a lawfully existing nonconforming use or structure is allowed except as authorized hereunder. 6.3.2 Nonconforming Uses: The Board of Appeals may grant a Special Permit to change or extend a nonconforming use only if it determines that such change or extension shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming use to the neighborhood. The following types of changes to nonconforming uses may be considered by the Board of Appeals: a. Modification or extension of the existing nonconforming use; b. Change from one nonconforming use to another, less detrimental, nonconforming use. Once a nonconforming use is changed to a conforming use, there is no authority to allow the property to -revert to a nonconforming use. 6.3.3 Nonconforming Structures: 6.3.3.1 The Building Inspector may issue a Building Permit for an interior renovation, interior alteration or interior reconstruction of a pre- existing, nonconforming structure that does or will not extend the nonconformity or create a new nonconformity. change a nonconforming structure in accordance with this section only if it determines that such reconstruction, extension, alteration or change does not increase the nonconforming nature of said structure or create a new nonconformity and shall not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming structure to the neighborhood. The following types of changes to nonconforming structures may be considered by the Board of Appeals: a. A reconstruction, extension or structural change; Annual Town Meeting 264 April 29, 2010 b. An alteration to provide for a substantially different purpose or for the same purpose in a substantially different manner or to a substantially greater extent. 6.3.3.3 For purposes of this bylaw, an increase in the .nonconforming nature of a structure will result when the portion added. to the structure violates any provision of this Zoning By -Law applicable at the time of application for the building permit required for such addition. An increase in the nature of a nonconforming structure will not result from a mere replacement, without undue delay, of a nonconforming portion thereof. 6.3.3.4 Nothing in this bylaw shall .prevent the strengthening or restoring to a safe condition of any building or structure, or part thereof, declared unsafe by the Building Inspector. 6.3.4 Variance Required: Except as provided in Section 6.3.5 herein, the reconstruction, extension or structural change of,a nonconforming structure in such a manner as to increase an existing nonconformity, or create a new nonconformity, including the extension of an exterior wall at or along the same nonconforming distance within a required yard, shall require the issuance of a variance from the Board of Appeals. 6.3.5 Alteration of Nonconforming Single and Two - Family Residential Structures — As of Right: Nonconforming single and two- family residential structures may be extended, altered or structurally changed (collectively "alteration ") upon a determination by the Building Inspector that such proposed alteration does not increase the nonconforming nature of said structure. The' Building Inspector may issue a Building Permit under any of the following circumstances: a. For the alteration of a single or two- family structure which will not increase the footprint of the existing structure, create a new dimensional nonconformity or extend an existing dimensional nonconformity, provided that the existing height restrictions shall not be exceeded. This clause shall apply regardless of whether the lot complies with the current area and /or frontage requirements; b. For the alteration of a single or two-family structure that is located on a lot which is nonconforming only with respect to area, where such alteration will comply with all current setback, yard, lot coverage and building, height requirements; c. For the alteration of a single or two-family structure that is located on a lot which is nonconforming only with respect to frontage where such alteration complies with all current setback, yard, lot coverage and building height requirements; and d. For the alteration of a single or two- family structure which encroaches upon one or more required yard or setback areas, where the alteration, will comply with all current setback, yard, lot coverage and building height requirements. 6.3.6 Alteration of Nonconforming Single and Two - Family Residential Structures — by Special Permit: In the event that the Building Inspector determines, after consideration of Section 6.3.5 above, that the nonconforming nature of such structure would be increased by the proposed extension, alteration or change, the Board of Appeals .may, by special permit, allow such extension, Annual Town Meeting 265 April 29, 2010 alteration or change where it determines that the proposed extension, alteration or change will not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming structure to the neighborhood. 6.3:7 Reconstruction after Catastrophe: A lawful, pre- existing, nonconforming single or two-family building, structure or use, which has been destroyed or damaged by fire or other casualty may be re- established, restored or reconstructed within two years of occurrence of the damage or destruction. Re- establishment, restoration or reconstruction shall be permitted provided that there is no increase in the degree of the nonconformity. Any proposed change of use is subject to the provisions of this bylaw. 6.3.8 VotuntarV Demolition and Reconstruction: 6.3.8.1 Any new construction, following voluntary demolition of a nonconforming structure, shall be in conformance with this Zoning By -Law, except in the following circumstances: a. A single - family or two- family dwelling which is nonconforming only with respect to tot size and /or frontage may be voluntarily removed or demolished and replaced by a new single - family or two- family dwelling. Such reconstruction must comply with the current dimensional controls for the district in which the dwelling is located. b. In the event that the proposed. reconstruction would (a) cause the structure to exceed the volume or area of the original nonconforming structure or (b) cause the structure to be located other than on the original footprint, a special permit shall be required from the Board of Appeals prior to such demolition. The Board of Appeals may, by Special Permit, allow such reconstruction where it determines that the proposed reconstruction will not be substantially more detrimental than the existing nonconforming structure to the neighborhood. C. A detached accessory structure which is accessory to a single - family or two- family dwelling that has nonconforming setbacks may be demolished and a new accessory structure may be built in the same footprint; provided, that the new accessory structure does not exceed the existing height and size limitations for accessory structures. 6.3.9 Abandonment or Non -Use: A nonconforming use of a structure or land that has. been abandoned or not used for a period of two (2) years, shall lose its protected status and be subject to all of the provisions of this Zoning By -Law. Presentation given by Jean Delios - Presentation Attached CPDC Report given by Nicholas Safina - Voted to support 4 -0 Bylaw Committee Report given by Phillip Pacino - Voted to support 3 -0 213 Vote required Declared unanimous by Moderator After Some Discussion by Town Meeting Members Motion Carried Annual Town Meeting 266 April 29, 2010 TOWN OF READING Community Planning t. Developmett Commission Proposed Amendments to Non - Conforming Section 6.3 warrant Article 26 . Annual Town Meeting, Spring 2010 Section 6.3 Non- Cnoorming Uses and Structures Developing Proposed Changes - , Town Counsel recommended deletion of existing Section 6.3 in its entirety • A new Section 6.3 is proposed. designed to clarify and simplify the regulations by which a nonconforming use or structure can be altered, extended, or rebuilt • Town Counsel drafted new language based on review of similar zoning by -laws in other communities • The CPDC consulted with the ZBA to solicit comments and input into the draft language Section 6.3 Non- Cnnfonning. Uscs and Strictures Current Definition 2.2.22 Non - Conforming A condition, structure or use inconsistent with this By- Law, and lawfully in existence at the time the provision with which it does not conform became effective 267 Section 6.3 Non - Conforming Uses and Structures Background – . Portions of the existing By -Law section have been confusing; many have expressed the need for revision Liligabon is pending, appealing ZBA interpretation of certain provisions of the existing By -Law o Areas of the existing By -Law unnecessanly restate the statutory, provisions of G.L. c.40A, Section 6. This requires changing the Town by -law whenever there is a meaningful change to the State statute Section 6.3 Nun - Conforming Uses and Structures What is Non - Conforming? A use or structure that complied with zoning when it was built. but subsequent changes to the zoning now make it Non-Conforming in one or more ways A W smess has operated at this property since1g30s. _ before ReWing adopted _ Zoning By -laws in 1942 (now zoned residentla0. Section 6.3 Non - Conforming Uses and Structures New Definition . 2.2.22 Non - Conforming A lawful pre - existing building, structure, vacant [at, or use of buildings or land that does not conform to the zoning regulations for the district in which it is located, — Gut- didconfoFrn st the hme it was w t or esta Is ^Fed- i Section 6.3 Non - Conforming Uses and Stouctums What is the purpose of 6.3? State law (G.L. 40A sec 6) restricts the alteration, change or extension of nonconforming uses and structures. The zoning By -Law defines the conditions under which changes or extensions of such structures and uses are allowed. i e .f 4 285 Main St. - NorcoMOrming due to setback requirements Scurion 63 Non - Conforming Uses and Snucmres 6.3.3 - Non - Conforming Structures The ZBA may issue a Special Permit for alteration of a non - conforming structure, provided the result: ., Does not increase an existing nonconformity Does not create a new nonconformity ., Is not substantially more detrimental to the neighborhood i Section 6.3 Non - Conforming Uses and Structures The proposed By -Law changes clarify and simplify the criteria, allowing many owners who want to fix up their homes to deal directly with the Building Inspector. . The proposed changes also clarify when a Special Permit from the ZBA is required. - . The new By -Law clarifies what is intended by .Reconstruction After Catastrophe" and "Voluntary Demolition and Reconstruction' E41L 1 Section 6.3 Non - Conforming Uses and structures 6.3.2 - Non - Conforming Uses The ZBA may issue a special Pernm to change or extend a non - Conrorlreng sae, 20h� If 11 determines that soon d%x98 of extension is not substantially more detrimental to the neighborhoi • Changes to nanmdomnN uses that may be considered by the ZBA include: Modification or extension of the existing 1bnaroMOnning use charge from one noncolfotmgg use to another, 9.*s detnmental, rwmmnformmg use. . Once a conromung use is eslablisMd, Mere o no authority to allow the progeny to reven to a nonconforming use. Section 6.3 Non - Conforming Uses and Stnicrures 6.3.5 Non-conforming single - Family or Two- Family Homes In fruited situations, the Sut" Insaecfor may issue a busts, yanmil for 10h, A .son of a a.pb orM foniY home a the rt$A I J Does not n..,. Me ealb, nrvdur loctynn%Is Is ns.i forming on"Its or % rtspedbbtarea. . 1. non- confamiip only wth •Pad Mletfrvnfapa, H _ -. -_ _.'.L1 __�._..t . Is mneonlonnng s* due to existing invasion on requires b or a.tb.ex arts. And, it does not increase any F -- Y exislmg nonionlortndY. R�Y;sSi Section 6.3 Non - Conforming Uses and Structures 6.3.7 Reconstruction After Catastrophe . A pre - existing, nonconforming single -family or two - family building, structure, or use, which has been destroyed or heavily damaged by fire or other casualty, may be re- established, restored, or reconstructed within two years of occurrence of the _ ... ddruagp or cleglainfinin provided Re- establishment, restoration, and /or reconstruction does not increase the degree of the nonconformity Section 6.3 Non - Conforming Uses and Structures 6.3.8 Voluntary Demolition & Reconstruction • Not specifically authorized by the State statute (G.L. c40A, Sec 6), but is permitted by current 6.3.17. The proposed language clarifies this act. • Any new construction, following voluntary demolition of a nonconforming structure, is subject to the provisions of the By -Law. SccInm 6.3 Non - Conforming Uses and Structures • The revised by -law clarifies the rules for modifying a non - conforming use or structure. • The new language will simplify permitting and make it easier for both the property owners and the town to follow the rules. M, Section 6.3 Non - Conforming Uses and Structures • A single - family or two-family dwelling that is noon- conforming ony with respect to lot size and /or lot frontage, may be voluntarily demolished and replaced by a new single - family or two-family dwelling. roQ vlded such conswdion complies with the current dimensional controls for the district in which the dwelling is located. • A special Permit from the ZBA is reeutred Pnor to demolition d the proposed reconstructor: Exceeds the volume and/or area of the existing structure Relocates the structure from the preexisting footprint • An accessory structure that is demolished must be rebut on the same footprint and may not exceed the existing height and sae limitations for accessory stmclures. r F:ONI:'.GE . -PF AE IAT I.aJE I i.FAC YA2C i - BJILI?IIJC Le.E ; Ee I 'i17G Gar Y.'>kJ IAJF y Irrl(1 t yizfip in.Z.�l ._. �t 4 iV = _TJ_ I r F:ONI:'.GE ARTICLE 27 — On motion by Nicholas Safina, Chairman of CPDC, it was voted to amend Section 2.0 Definitions, 2.2.29 Sign, Section 4.3.3 Site Plan Review and Section 6.2, Signs; of the Town of Reading Zoning By -Laws by deleting in its entirety 2.2.29., 4.3.3.5.1.a., 4.3.3.6.f. and Section 6.2, and inserting in its place the following new sections: Motion made by Ben Tafoya to dispense of the reading of article Motion to Dispense Carried New Definition in Section 2.2.29 to read, 2.2.29 Sign: Any word or combination of number, emblem, picture, design, trademark or other device including the support structure of freestanding signs. Signage is the collection of signs. Signage does not include temporary holiday decorations, historical date markers or plaques, or artwork that contains no commercial messages. The words in italics in the following two paragraphs show language to be added in the existing bylaw. 4.3.3.5.1.a. Site Layout, which shall contain the boundaries of the lot(s) in the proposed development, proposed structures, drives, parking, fences, walls, walks, outdoor lighting, signage, loading facilities, and areas for snow storage after plowing. The first sheet in this plan shall be a locus plan, at a scale acceptable to CPDC, showing the entire project and its relation to the existing areas, buildings and roads for a distance of one thousand (1,000) feet from the project boundaries or such other distance as may be approved or required by the staff. 4.3.3.6.f Minimize unreasonable departure from the character, materials, signage and scale of buildings in the vicinity, as viewed from public ways and places; To replace Section 6.2 entirely with the following: 6.2 SIGNS 6.2.1 Signs perform important functions in the community such as communicating messages and providing information about goods and services available. Because signs potentially have detrimental impact on the visual and perceptual environment, signs must be regulated. It is the intent of Section 6.2 of the zoning by -law to protect property values, create an attractive business climate, enhance and protect the physical appearance of the community and to encourage the most appropriate use of the land. This section will also assist those installing signs within the Town of _ din -4- setting..forthihe. = asa-- govamiag- .the_appLcation,..installation, and.-- - maintenance of such signs. 6.2.1.2 Applicability: A sign may be erected, placed, established, painted, created or maintained only in conformity with the provisions of this Section. 6.2.1.3. Zoning Districts: The zoning districts are as shown on the official zoning map which is on file with the Engineering Department and the Town Clerk's Office and can also be found on the Town website. Reading has also adopted a Downtown Smart Annual Town Meeting 270 April 29, 2010 Growth District (DSGD) and a Gateway Smart Growth District (GSGD). Please refer to Section 4.12 for DSGD regulations and Section 4.11 for GSGD regulations. 6.2.2. Definitions: For the purposes of Section 6.2., the following terms shall have the meanings hereby assigned to them: a. Awning Sign: A sign painted on or attached to the cloth, canvas or metal cover of a movable or stationary frame of the fixed, hinged, rolled or folding type of awning. b. Banner or Pennant: Any sign of lightweight fabric or similar material that is mounted or affixed at one or more edges. c. Beacon: A stationary or revolving light, not primarily illuminating a sign, which Flashes or projects illumination, single color or multi - colored, in any manner which is intended to attract or divert attention, except any such fixture which is required by the Federal Aviation Administration or a similar agency, and is .installed and operated under the safety regulations of such agency. d. Bulletin Board: Any sign erected by a charitable, educational, or religious institution or a public body on its property for purposes of announcing events which are held on the premises, and contains no commercial information. e. Commercial Message: Any sign wording, logo or other representation that directly or indirectly names, advertises, or calls attention to a business, product, service, sale or sales event or other commercial activity. f. Facade: The area of the face of a building, typically the principal or front wall of a building. g. Free - Standing Sign: Any and every sign erected on or permanently affixed to the land, including any and every sign that is not attached to a building. h. Halo Lighting: Light showing from the back of or from within a letter or graphic shape out towards the surface that the letter or graphic is mounted on without having any light visible through the face of the letter or graphic. i. Informational and Directional Signage: A sign that has a purpose secondary to the use of the lot on which it is located, such as "no parking, private parking, enter, exit, one -way, street address or drive -thru teller." j. Identification Sign: Joint Identification Sign: A sign which serves as common or collective identification for a group of persons or businesses operating on the same lot and which contains the names and logos of establishments but no advertising or promotional information. Area Identification Sign: A sign, located at the site entrance(s), identifying a common area containing a group of structures, or a single structure containing several uses. k. Marquee Siqn: Any sign attached to or made part of a marquee, that is, any permanent canopy or structure projecting beyond and extending along a building wall. I. Monument Sign: A free - standing sign with a low height configuration permanently affixed to the ground at its base and not mounted on a pole. m. Off - Premises Sign: Any sign which directs attention to a business, commodity, service, entertainment, attraction or other commercial activity which is sold, offered or existing 271 Annual Town Meeting April 29, 2010 elsewhere than upon the same Iof on which such sign is located, including any outdoor advertising sign ( "billboard ") on which space is leased or rented for the purpose of conveying a commercial or non -commercial message. n. Portable Sign: Any sign not permanently attached to the ground or any permanent structure or a sign designed to be transported in any way including: - signs converted to "A" or "T' frames; - menu and sandwich -board signs. o. Proiecting /Blade Sign: A sign which is affixed to a building or other structure where the sign face is approximately perpendicular to the building facade. p. Reader Board: A sign.or portion thereof with characters, letters or illustrations that can be changed or rearranged without altering the face or surface of the sign or signboard. A sign on which the message changes more than eight times per day shall be considered an animated sign and not a reader board sign. A sign on which the only copy that changes is an electronic or mechanical indication of time or temperature shall be considered a "time and temperature" portion of a sign and not a reader board sign. q. Sign Area: The area contained entirely within the signboard (the flat surface of durable material upon which letters or other graphic content of a sign is displayed) or if no sign board is present, the area contained entirely within the smallest rectangle which completely encloses the outer extremities of all graphic material of a sign. r. Sign Height: The distance from the base of the sign at normal grade to the top of the highest attached component of the sign or sign structure. Normal grade shall be construed to be the lower of: (1) Existing grade prior to construction, or (2) The newly established grade after construction, exclusive of any filling, berming, mounding, or excavating solely for the purpose of locating the sign. In cases in which the normal grade cannot be reasonably determined, sign height shall be computed on the assumption that the normal grade is the elevation of the nearest point of the crown of the public street along which the lot has frontage or the grade of the land at the principal entrance to the principal structure on the lot, whichever is lower. s. Temporary Sign: Any sign which is used temporarily, relates to events of a temporary nature, or is not permanently mounted. Table 6.2.3 Signs Permitted According to Zoning District Max Max Sign Sign Setbacks: Permit Area Height Front Side Maximum Type Required (sq. ft.) (ft.) (ft.) (ft.) Number All Zoning Districts: 1.Personal Message N 4 6 N/A 20 1 /lot 272 Annual Town Meeting April 29, 2010 I 2. Identification (Joint and Area) N 4 8 (A) N/A N/A 1 /lot 3. Construction N 16(B) N/A N/A 20 N/A 4.Subdivision Sates (C) 48 N/A N/A N/A 1 /subdiv. 5. Subdivision (C) 24 N/A N/A N/A 1 1subdiv. 6. Real Estate Sales N 8 (G) 6 N/A 20 1 /lot 7. Temp Open House N 4 N/A N/A 20 1 1agency per lot 8. Garage/Yard Sale N 4 N/A N/A 20 1 /lot 9. Informational- N 4 6 NIA N/A N/A Directional Portable A -Frame Regulated by the Board of Selectmen — Annual Permit Required 10. Temporary Y 16 N/A (See Section 6.2.6.2. h.) Business Signs or 30 Business -A, Business -C and Industrial Zoning Districts: 11. Free - Standing Y 50(D) 20 0 20 1 /lot 12. Wall Y 2/4E (A) N/A 10 1 /business 13. Projecting / Blade Y 8 (A)(H) N/A 10 1 /business Business -B Zoning Districts: 14. Free - Standing Y 50(d) 20 0 20 1 /lot (Service Stations only) 15. Wall Y 2(F) (A) 0 0 2 /businesses 16. Projecting / Blade Y 8 (A)(H) -4 0 1 /business 273 Annual Town Meeting April 29, 2010 (A) No portion of such sign shall extend higher than the bottom of the sills of windows of the second floor of a building or higher than the lowest portion of eaves or, in the case of a gabled wall, no higher than a line equal in height to lowest portion of the lower eave of any adjoining building wall, whichever of above is lowest. Aggregate sign area of all applicable signs. Only as shown in Definitive Subdivision Plans as approved by the Community Planning and Development Commission consistent with Paragraph 6.2.1.1. (D) May not be larger than 75 square feet, if more than one business occupies the lot. 'See Section 6.2.6.4. If the minimum distance from the building wall on which the sign is mounted is less than 100 feet from the centerline of the street which the sign faces, the maximum sign area shall be equal to 2 square feet per linear foot of said wall occupied by the establishment to which the sign relates; if such distance is more than 100 feet, maximum sign area shall be equal to 4 square feet per linear foot of said wall so occupied. (F) No wall sign for any non - residential establishment shall exceed a sign area equal to 2 square feet per linear footage of length of the front wall of the building occupied by the establishment to which the sign relates. (G) Real Estate Signs in the Industrial Zoning Districts are allowed one sign per business with a maximum sign area equal to 2 square feet per linear foot of said wall occupied by the establishment to which the sign relates without a sign permit. (H) Projecting /Blade Signs shall be at least eight (8) feet from the ground and project no more than four (4) feet from the structure. 6.2.4. Exempt Signs: Signs for which no permit is required are identified in Table 6.2.3 and Section 6.2.4. The following signs are exempt from this Section 6.2 and may be installed without permit, provided that the following is complied with: a. Authorized signs installed by the Town of Reading or the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, or any agency thereof, or with the express written permission thereof, for the purposes of traffic control or traffic or pedestrian safety or - cursverttsnc�; id€n i i`ca—ion oapublic faciii ies oeeis, or for difection To same; public notices and warnings required by and erected by Town, State, or Federal Government agencies. b. Directional signs; building markers. C. Political signs on private properties or vehicles only, provided that such sign shall not exceed six square feet in sign area, shall not be placed in such location as to Annual Town Meeting 274 April 29, 2010 constitute a traffic or pedestrian safety hazard, and shall not be displayed for more than forty -two days prior to the applicable election or more than two days following such election. d. . , Signs for churches and other federally tax - exempt institutions. e. Holiday lights and decorations which contain no commercial messages and which are displayed during the appropriate season. f. Works of art which contain no commercial messages with prior Town Planner or CPDC written approval. g. Fuel pump information signs, only as required by State law, are allowed and shall not affect the computation of allowable number of signs or aggregate sign size on a property. h. Any sign within a structure, not attached to any. window or door, which is not visible from other properties or from any street right -of -way. i. Signs showing resident's name, historical plaque or marker, street address and /or name of a lawful home occupation taking place on the premises. j. Construction Signs, identifying contractors while doing construction work on a property. k. Temporary Subdivision Sales Signs and permanent Subdivision Identification Signs as approved in connection with the Definitive Plans for such subdivision and located at the principal entrance to the subdivision in an acceptable easement, not within any street right -of -way or access easement. I. Real Estate Sales Signs, including placards showing the words "Sold" or "Sale Pending or similar not exceeding one -third the size of the sales sign. M. Temporary Open House signs, not exceeding four square feet each, may be placed at a rate of one per agency per intersection per property and one on the open house property. n. GarageNard Sale Signs, limited to one sign located on the property on which the garage /yard sale is taking place and one at each of no more than two intersections of public streets. o. Any establishment located in a Business or Industrial Zoning District may display: • An "Open" Flag - with dimensional requirements not to exceed four (4) feet by six (6) feet and may contain decorative graphics. A National or State Flag - with emblems of religious, educational, governmental organization or any other federally tax - exempt organization, except when displayed -in - connection - -with Commercial-- promotiens or advertising. Dimensions shall not exceed four (4) feet by six (6) feet. 6.2.5. Prohibited Signs: No private sign shall be installed or placed on public property, except by express permission of the Town or as otherwise allowed herein. The following signs are prohibited in any zoning district: Annual Town Meeting 275 April 29, 2010 a. Signs which interfere with traffic or pedestrian safety, including any which may obstruct or interfere with traffic or pedestrian visibility or movement at any intersection or into or out of any property, or which by reason of position, shape, or color may interfere with, may obstruct the view of, or be confused with any authorized traffic sign, signal, or device; or which makes use of the words "STOP," "LOOK," "DANGER," or any other word, phrase, symbol or character in such a manner as to interfere with, mislead or confuse motorists or pedestrians. b. Signs placed or painted on any tree (other than street address), rock (other than street address), utility pole (other than yard sale sign), traffic safety sign, or similar fixture; painted on any building wall, bench, pavement, parking bumper or curb (other than a 'Reserved" marking), or other similar outdoor surface. C. Internally illuminated signs, unless the background or signboard completely blocks illumination or glow except through the letters and graphics. d. Signs which contain a beacon of any type; which contain a spot light providing direct illumination to the public, which flash, revolve, rotate, move, or blink, or which fluctuate in light intensity; animated signs, that is, which use lighting to depict action or to create an illusion of movement or a special effect or scene. e. Any self illuminated or backlit signs which use LCD, LED, electronic messaging or digital technology, neon or similar signs except as displayed on the inside of windows subject to the provisions of Paragraph 6.2.6.2.c. f. Free- standing signs in a Business -B Zoning District (except as permitted at service stations). g. Internally illuminated signs in a Business -B Zoning District (except as permitted at service stations). h. Banners as permanent signs. Banners are allowed only as temporary signs four times a year for an annual total of 56 days with a sign permit, refer to Section 6.2.6.2.h. for full details. . i. Signs located on any portion of a lot except a front yard or a side yard directly abutting a public street. j. Signs which do not meet and are not maintained to meet the provisions of this Section and all applicable building, wiring, health, and safety codes; or which are not neatly and legibly lettered. k. Reader Board Signs are not allowed except as price displays at gas stations. I. Balloons or blimps used as signs, a movable poster or panel sign, umbrellas containing any commercial message, or signs attached to or painted on vehicles AavelingDLRar kednn,- nr_visible_fromany.publi iri .af- way,j-Lnless.such_vehicle._.. is used in the normal day -to -day operation of a business. 6.2.6. Sians by Zoning District: Signs are allowed or permitted in each Zoning District and are specified in Table 6.2.3. and as follows: 6.2.6.1. Business or Commercial Signs in Residential Zoning Districts: Annual Town Meeting 276 April 29, 2010 Legal nonconforming business or commercial operations in any residential zoning district shall follow the Business B- Zoning District regulations as specified in Subsection 6.2.6.4. except that such signs shall be set back a minimum of twenty feet from any other lot and shall not be illuminated except during hours of operation. 6.2.6.2. Signs in Business and Industrial Zoning Districts: The following signs are allowed in all Business and Industrial Zoning Districts. In addition, please refer to Table 6.2.3: a. All awnings and canopies shall be impervious to light so that no illumination or glow can be seen through it. Awnings may contain letters up to four inches in height stating only the name of the business and the street number without requiring a sign permit. Such lettering shall not count toward allowed sign area. All other awnings or canopies with lettering or graphics shall require a sign permit and count as part of the allowed sign area. All awnings and canopies shall have a minimum ground clearance of eight feet. Ground clearance shall be measured between the lowest point of the awning or canopy and the ground or sidewalk. b. Bulletin boards are allowed, provided that no free - standing or wall- mounted bulletin board may exceed twelve square feet in size. C. Window Signs: Window signs are encouraged on the inside surface of the glass. Permanently affixed, weather resistant, individual letters that are not subject to wear and tear are permitted on the exterior of the.window. Temporary or permanent signs may without permit be attached to the inside of the glass surface of a window (a single structurally supported sheet of glass or a sash) or door, or placed within the premises closer than five feet from any window or door and situated or designed so that the sign's graphic content is visible from the outside through an window or door, provided that any such sign shall: (1) Be uniformly located only in thirty percent (30 %) of the glass sheet or sash; (2) Contain no letters larger than eight (8) inches in height; (3) Be professional in appearance and good order shall be maintained at all times. Not be restricted with respect to graphic or message content, whether of a permanent or temporary nature, nor be restricted with respect to materials; (4) Have a sign area not to exceed six (6) square feet if the sign is not illuminated; (5) In addition to the above, any illuminated sign shall be placed only in a window, and not in a door, and shall also: (a) Have a sign area not to exceed four (4) square feet: (b) Be placed no closer than ten feet from any other internally illuminated window sign on the premises. In cases where there is a door or other Annual Town Meeting 277 April 29, 2010 architectural break in the fagade this buffer shall be reduced to seven (7) feet; (c) Be placed only in a window which contains no other signs of any type; and (d) Be illuminated only during hours of operation of the business establishment. Notwithstanding the above, window signs shall also be allowed in conformity with the provisions of Paragraph 6.2.6.2.h. below. . Directional and informational signs displaying text only, no corporate logos, or slogans are allowed provided that such signs shall be limited to wall and free- standing signs with a maximum of four square feet of sign area. One such sign, not exceeding six (6) feet in height, may be placed at each vehicular entrance or exit on a lot to identify such entrance or exit provided such sign does not constitute a traffic hazard; such signs shall not affect the computation of allowable number of signs or aggregate sign size on a property. One such sign, not exceeding six feet in height and four square feet of sign area, may be placed in conjunction with each drive -up bank teller window or machine provided that such sign shall not constitute a traffic hazard. e. Marquee signs are prohibited except when used in conjunction with an indoor movie theater and attached to the outside wall of the building, provided that the size of the marquee sign shall not exceed twenty -four (24) square feet, and the bottom of the marquee sign shall not be of a height of less than 8 feet above the grade directly below. f.. Outdoor menu boards are prohibited except: • As a portable sign with a sign permit issued by the Board of Selectmen. • When used in conjunction with a restaurant having a drive up window. No more than three menu boards are allowed. The maximum aggregate sign area is 100 square feet. No one menu board may exceed 50 square feet. Any lettering shall not be legible from any other property or any street right -of -way. g. Informational and directional signs are allowed in all business and industrial zoning districts with a maximum sign area of four square feet per sign in accordance with Table 6.2.3. h. Temporary signs intended for business openings and re- openings, open houses, and special sales and promotional events for an individual business, are allowed, provided that: • The individual business shall place no more than four (4) such signs per calendar. year far an annual- total of 56 days (except in conjunction with - an organized Town -wide common special event as specified below), • All temporary signs shall have received a sign permit from the Building Inspector; • No such sign shall exceed sixteen (16) square feet in sign area or thirty (30) square feet in sign area for businesses that have a setback more than fifty (50) feet from the primary street upon which the business is located; Annual Town Meeting 278 April 29, 2010 • Any such sign shall be printed or legibly lettered on a rigid signboard or fabric banner, • In cases where renovation or construction includes removal of permanent signs, a temporary sign is allowed as follows: • Dimensions shall be the same as temporary signs May be used as a permanent sign May remain. during construction provided the construction or renovation is expeditiously pursued • Must be removed upon the installation of the permanent sign • No such sign shall be placed so as to constitute a hazard to motorists or pedestrians; • If placed upon a window, any such sign shall be included in the aggregate window area specified in Paragraph 6.2.6.2.c above. In the case only of common special events organized by a recognized association of businesses for which events a license has been granted by the Board of Selectmen, an individual participating business may display a temporary sign in conjunction with such an event, provided that such signs related to said events shall not exceed four per year. Grand opening events for a new business may display for fourteen (14) days, upon issuance of a sign permit. Non - illuminated temporary banners, flags, balloons and streamers provided they are mounted in a way that does not pose a hazard to pedestrian or vehicular traffic and sight lines as determined by the Zoning Enforcement Officer. Only one grand opening sign permit per business may be issued until the property undergoes a change of use or change of ownership. Farm Stands and Garden Stands which do not have permanent windows shall be allowed, without permit or limitation as to number or material, to display temporary signs identifying goods offered for sale on the premises, provided that such signs are kept in good order and that the aggregate total sign area of all such signs on a lot shall not exceed one square -foot per lineal feet of frontage of such lot. Decorative noncommercial flags may be displayed for sale. j. Clocks, not to exceed eight square feet in surface area per side or twelve feet in height, are allowed, provided that they display no advertising or commercial material. i k. Time and, temperature displays may be included in any free - standing or wall sign, and no more than twelve additional square feet of sign area may be added to the otherwise allowable sign area of such sign. I. For commercial buildings containing more than one business requiring wall _ signage; any wall sign provided for any such business must be in conformity with the requirements of this Section 6.2 and in accordance with the following stipulations concerning an overall master signage plan for such building. The master signage plan shall show not more than one wall sign per business within the building. However, at the owner's election not every business within the building need be provided with a wall sign within the proposed assemblage.. No wall sign shall be issued a sign permit for any building for which a signage plan has been submitted or approved that is not included in or is not in conformity with the applicable signage plan. The master signage plan need not show the specific Annual Town Meeting 279 April 29, 2010 message content for any individual sign contained therein, so as to provide for change in business occupancy which may from time to time occur within the building: (1) In -all Business and Industrial Zoning Districts, the building owner may submit for approval to the Community Planning and Development Commission (CPDC), a master signage plan in accordance with the provisions of Section 6.2.6.4.1. The CPDC may issue a Certificate of Appropriateness for the building showing the allocation within the maximum sign area as allowed according to Table 6.2.3. hereof among wall signs for businesses within the building. This master signage plan shall show the size, placement, materials, framing, graphic and design standards for each such sign and the assemblage thereof proposed within said allowable maximum sign area, together with proposed lighting and methods of attachment of all such signs. Once the Certificate of Appropriateness has been approved by the CPDC, the Building Inspector shall issue a sign permit for any individual business sign if it conforms to the master signage plan. 6.2.6.3. Signs in Business-- Districts: Allowed Signs (also specified in Table 6.2.3): Free- Standing Wall • Projecting , Internally illuminated Prohibited Signs: • Banners as permanent signs • A free- standing and wall sign for buildings that are not multi- tenant All internally illuminated signs shall have a background or signboard that completely blocks illumination or glow such that light is only visible through the letters and graphics. All illuminated signs shall be turned off at the close of business. A lot which contains not more than one establishment shall be allowed one free- standing sign or one wall sign or one projecting sign only. The street address number of the property shall be prominently displayed on such sign, and the sign shall in all respects conform to the above requirements. A lot which contains more than one establishment shall be allowed a maximum of the following signs, all of which shall in every respect conform to the requirements of this Section: a. One free - standing sign identifying the property, and One -waft or projecting sign per business-uccupymg-the ground floor and - front wall of the building, except in cases where the provisions of Paragraph 6.2.6.21, are utilized, and C. One joint identification sign listing the names and logos of the establishments on the premises but containing no other advertising matter, mounted either on an appropriate building wall or on two posts, provided that such joint identification sign shall not exceed four (4) square feet in sign area, shall not exceed eight (8) feet in height, and Annual Town Meeting 280 April 29, 2010 shall not be located within a front, side, or rear yard as required in Subsection 5.1.2. hereof, d. Either the allowed free - standing sign or, if no free - standing sign is used, then at least one wall or projecting sign, shall prominently display the street address number of the property. 6.2.6.3.1 Off - Premises Signs: The Board of Appeals may grant a Special Permit for an Off Premises Sign including an outdoor advertising sign ( "billboard ") in a Business A zoning district under the following conditions: a. The proposed sign shall be in a Business A district immediately abutting an Interstate Highway, and within 25 feet of the main right of way of such highway excluding on and off ramps; L The placement of the proposed sign shall be conditioned upon the elimination of no less than three non - conforming Off Premises signs elsewhere in the Town of Reading; C. There shall be no more than one Off Premises sign on any one lot that existed as a separate lot at the time of adoption of this section, d. The sign may be double sided with no greater than a 30 degree angle of separation between the two faces; e. Illumination of the sign shall be by external illumination only and illumination shall be limited to the hours of 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., I. The sign shall not exceed 675 square feet on each of the two permitted faces; g. The maximum height of any Off Premises sign shall be 95 feet from the ground level upon which the sign is installed to the highest point of the structure; h. The nearest part of any Off Premises sign shall be no closer than 20 feet from an abutting property, and no less than 10 feet from the highway right of way; and i. The proposed use shall not be detrimental to the public good. 6.2.6.4. Signs in Business -B Zoninq Districts: Allowed Signs: • Wall Projecting_ • Awning Sign • Externally illuminated signs Prohibited: • Free - Standing (except as permitted at service stations) • Internally illuminated signs • Banners as permanent signs Annual Town Meeting 281 April 29, 2010 No sign permit shall be issued for any permanent sign in the Business -B Zoning District without the sign having been granted a Certificate of Appropriateness (Subsection 6.2.6.4.1.). Free - standing, wall and projecting signs permitted in any Business -B Zoning District are specified in Table 6.2.3. No free - standing, internally illuminated, or Reader Board signs shall be permitted anywhere in a Business -B Zoning District. Free - standing signs will be allowed only for service stations. All internally illuminated signs shall have a background or signboard that completely blocks illumination or glow such that light is only visible through the letters and graphics. All illuminated signs shall be turned off at the close of business. Signs for properties containing more than one establishment: For a lot which contains more than one business, a Certificate of Appropriateness may be granted for more than one sign, and a maximum of the following signs are allowed, all of which shall in every respect conform to the requirements of this Section: a. A business occupying the ground floor is allowed two (2) signs if one sign is a wall sign and the second one is a projecting / blade sign, an awning sign, or a wall sign that is located on a different building fagade than the first wall sign. The allowable sign area for the primary sign is equal to 2 square feet per linear footage of length of the front wall of the building occupied by the establishment to which the sigh relates in accordance with Table 6.2.3. The secondary sign area shall not exceed half of the sign area allowed for the primary sign located on the principal frontage. b. One joint identification is allowed listing the names and logos of establishments on the premises provided the following conditions are met: • No additional advertising • Shall be mounted on the building wall closest to the entrance • Shall not exceed four (4) square feet in sign area • Shall not exceed eight (8) feet in height • Shall not project beyond the property line C. Allowance for an Additional Wall Sign: In addition to. signs allowed above, a street address sign shall be permitted as follows: • Not to exceed four (4) square feet in sign area • Not to exceed six (6) feet in sign height • Shall only display the street address and number of the property 6.2.6.4.1. The CPDC shaft estabtish procedures for receiving a1Td reviewing applications for signs in the Business B Zoning District, and for providing written decisions to the Building Inspector. The CPDC shall, in reviewing such applications, consider the design, arrangement, location, texture, materials, colors, lighting, and other visual characteristics of each proposed sign and its compatibility with its general surroundings with regard to the purposes outlined in Paragraph 6.2.1. Annual Town Meeting 282 April 29, 2010 If the CPDC shall refuse to issue a Certificate of Appropriateness for any proposed sign, it shall state in writing the reasons therefore, with suggestions as to how the proposal may be modified so as to be approved. If the CPDC shall fail to issue or refuse to issue a Certificate of Appropriateness within forty -five (45) days of the date of a completed application being submitted, the Certificate shall be deemed to have been issued. An appeal from any decision of the CPDC may be made within twenty days of such decision being filed with the Town Clerk, to the Board of Selectmen, who may uphold, modify or overrule the action of the CPDC and grant a Certificate of Appropriateness. In those cases where proposed signs are included as part of plans for approval under Site Plan Review (Section 4.3.3) or PRD Special Permit review (Section 4.10), a Certificate of Appropriateness separate from such approval shall not be required and shall be combined with the review of said permit. 6.2.6.5. Signs in Business -C Zoning Districts: Allowed Signs: • Free - Standing • Wall • ,Projecting • Internally illuminated signs Prohibited Signs: • Banners as permanent signs • A free - standing and wall sign for buildings that are not multi- tenant The allowed signs in the Business -C Zoning District are subject to the corresponding provisions of Paragraph 6.2.6.3. (Business -A). In addition, a wall sign consisting only of the name and corporate logo of the principal occupant of a building located within eighteen hundred feet of the centerline of an Interstate Highway may be displayed between the top course of windows and the parapet of such building provided that sign area not exceed fifty percent of the surface area described by the tops of such windows, the parapet, and the wall corners, that letters and logo contained in or constituting such sign shall not exceed eight feet in height, that the lowest point of such sign shall not be closer than 48 feet above the ground immediately below, that such sign shall not be illuminated between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and sunrise, and that such sign shall be located on the building wall most directly facing said highway. 6.2.6.6. Signs in Industrial Zoning Districts: Allowed Signs: • Free - Standing Wall • Projecting • Internally illuminated Prohibited Signs: • Banners as permanent signs • A free - standing and wall sign for buildings that are not multi- tenant The allowed signs in the Industrial zoning district should. conform to the provisions of Section 6.2.6.5. (Business -C). In conjunction with a Special Permit to Construct a Planned Unit Development (PUD) granted in accordance with Annual Town Meeting 283 April 29, 2010 Section 4.9. hereof, the Community Planning and Development Commission (CPDC) may, consistent with Subsection 6.2:1., allow modifications to any provision of this Section. The CPDC may allow one additional free - standing sign, not to exceed thirty -five feet in height or 144 square feet in sign area, in that portion of the PUD. parcel's landscaped perimeter buffer area most closely adjacent to Route 128 but not closer than 500 feet from any other public street existing at the time of submission of a relevant Preliminary PUD Plan. 6.2.6.7. Signs in a PUD: Notwithstanding anything in this Section 6.2 to the contrary, signs are allowed or permitted in a PUD only in accordance with Section 4.9.5.6. of these bylaws. 6.2.6.8 Signs in Residential Districts: Allowed Signs: • Wall • Projecting • Externally illuminated signs Prohibited: • Internally illuminated signs • Free - standing signs • Banners as permanent signs Except for identification signs (6.2.4.1.) or signs allowed in Subsection 6.2.6.1., no sign in any Residential Zoning District shall be illuminated in any manner. Decorative non - commercial banners or flags displayed on residential lots shall not be construed as signs for purposes of this bylaw. In connection with any Special Permit to Construct a Planned Residential Development (PRD) granted in accordance with Section 4.10. hereof, the Community Planning and Development Commission may allow modifications to any provision of this Section which is not inconsistent with the Purposes of this Section as specified in Subsection 6.2.1. 6.2.7. Removal of Defunct Signs: In the event a business, other than a seasonal business, ceases operations for a period of time in excess of thirty days, the sign owner or lessee, or the property owner, shall immediately remove any identification or advertising of said business or any product or service sold thereby. If the sign conforms to the provisions of this Section, and if a permit has been requested within said thirty -day period for altering the same sign in conformity with this Section to identify a new business in the same location, such alteration shall be allowed. Changes in legend on any directory sign shall be exempt from the provisions of this paragraph. 6.2.8. Nonconforming_ Signs: A nonconforming sign may not be enlarged or altered in any way which would increase its nonconformity. Should any nonconforming sign be damaged by any means to an extent of more than fifty percent of its replacement cost at the time of damage, it shall not be reconstructed except in conformity with the provisions of this Section 6.2. Annual Town Meeting 284 April 29, 2010 Presentation given by Jean Delios - Presentation Attached CPDC Report given by Nick Salina - CPDC voted to support 4 -0 EDC Report given by Megan Young - Tafoya - EDC voted to support Bylaw Report voted to support 3 -0 Motion for the following 4 Amendments made by Bill Brown, Precinct 8 First Amendment: 6.2.5 Prohibited Signs: to read as follows Balloons or tethered blimps used as signs, a movable poster or panel sign, umbrellas containing any commercial message; or signs attached to or painted on vehicles traveling or parked on, or visible from any public right -of -way, unless such vehicle is used in the normal day -to -day operation of a business. Motion Carried Second Amendment: 6.2.4 Exempt Signs: to read as follows . o. Any establishment located in a Business or Industrial Zoning District may display: • An "Open" Flag - with dimensional requirements not to exceed four (4) feet by six (6) feet and may contain decorative graphics. • A National, State or Town Flag or Flags - with emblems of religious, educational, governmental organization or any other tax - exempt organization Dimensions shall not exceed four (4) feet by six (6) feet. Motion Carried Third Amendment 6.2.4 Exempt Signs: to read as follows a. Authorized signs installed by the Town of Reading or the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, _Federal, Agencies, or with the express written. permission thereof, for the purposes of traffic control or traffic or pedestrian safety or convenience, identification of public facilities or streets, or for direction to same; public notices and warnings required by and erected by Town, State, or Federal Agencies. Motion Carried Annual Town Meeting 285 April 29, 2010 Forth Amendment 6.2.4 Exempt Signs: to read as follows C. Political signs on private properties or vehicles Motion Ruled Out of Order Motion Carried as Amended 2/3 Vote required Declared unanimous by Moderator Annual Town Meeting 286 April 29, 2010 TOWN OF READING Community Punning & Development Cmmissi Proposed Armindments to Sign By-Law Section 6.2 Warrant Article 27 Annual Town Meeting, Spring 2010 Goals of Proposed Sign By-Law Amendments Review and incorporate inputiconcems received from businesses, CPDC and Zoning Board of Appeals • Strive to make by-laws more business Inendly Clarify the miss Offer aesthetic advice and considerations (Design Guidelines in the form of a Business Development Guidebook) Preserve community character I--, Proposed Amendments: Business B (downtown) Two Sign Allowance Current Only 1 sign is allowed (one projecting or one wall) Proms- Businesses in the Business-B zoning district would! be allowed 2 signs. The amendment allows 2 signs it the second sign is a projecting sign, awning sign or 2 wall signs it located on 2 different budding facades. 287 Background: Businesses surveyed by the EDC in 2008. The survey found Ii: signage to be a majour concern for business .a.. • In 2009 the EDC began reviewing the sign by -law. A public forum was held in January 2010. The CPDC has been working on the sign by-law, amendments since January. EDC= Emnwni NW rr Cam Wn cpa, . c.rxv, miirvdrq . V Zoning District Map Ii: ,AX L� Signs regulated by zoning distinct Grand Openings Current: Allowed under temporary signs for 14 days with sign permit Proposed: New Grand Opening provisions to allow signage, gags, streamers, balloons for 14 days wRh sign permit Guide book to Doing Business In Reading The EDC is working old a business develoomenl Quids book that will: Be a'Passpmr outlining Town parnifting processes end procedures • Create a'" stop guide to doing business an Town Educate business owners on Town depannents and functions Provide Design Guidelines for Signage Proposed Amendment by B Bmwn 6.2.4 Eaampt Signs a Govemmemal Sion e- Amend by deleting exising timid -or arty agenry thereof and vi 'or Federal agencies or wiN express wnten Iximission Ihemef Fields -Amend by adding'rown Flag' and insenirg'Flags' belere Na naal PMase. .. .6.3.SPrahibded signs I. Beloons or glands as Siam -Amend by adding leMend' belore She word bl rn, so�u�a�r Im Proposed Amentlmenl by B. Brown 624 Exempt Signs Political Siam -Amend by deleting eveMNng after the word vehicles so ant n now reads: c. Political Signs on private properties or vehicles A ARTICLE 28 — On motion by Nicholas Safina, Chairman of CPDC, it was voted to amend Section 4.4, Floodplain Districts, of the Town of Reading Zoning By -Laws by deleting in its entirety Section 4.4, and inserting in its place the following new section: Motion made by Ben Tafoya to Dispense of further reading Motion to Dispense Carried 4.4. FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT 4.4.1. Statement of Purpose: The purposes of the Floodplain Overlay District are to: 1) Ensure public safety through reducing the threats to life and personal injury, 2) Eliminate new hazards to emergency response officials, 3) Prevent the occurrence of public emergencies resulting from water quality, contamination and pollution due to flooding; 4) Avoid the loss of utility services which if damaged by flooding would disrupt or shut down the utility network and impact regions of the community beyond the site of flooding, 5) Eliminate costs associated with the response and cleanup of flooding conditions; 6) Reduce damage to public and private property resulting from flooding waters. 4.4.2. ' Boundaries of Floodplain District: The Floodplain District is established as an overlay district. The Floodplain District includes all special flood hazard areas within the Town of Reading designated as Zone A and AE on the Middlesex County Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for the administration of the National Flood Insurance Program. The map panels of the Middlesex County FIRM that are wholly or partially within the Town of Reading are panel numbers 25017CO292E, 25017CO294E, 25017C0303E, 25017C0311E, 25017C0312E, 25017CO313E and 25017CO314E that go into effect on June 4, 2010. The exact boundaries of the District may be defined by the 100 -year base flood elevations shown on the FIRM and further defined by the Middlesex County Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report dated June 4, 2010. The FIRM and FIS report are incorporated herein by reference and are on file with the Town Engineer 4.4.3 Definitions: AREA OF SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD is the land in the floodplain within a community subject to a one percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year. The area may be designated as Zone A, AO, AH, Al -30, AE, A99, V1 -30, VE or V. BASE FLOOD means the flood having a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in any-given - - - - -- DEVELOPMENT means any manmade change to improved or unimproved real estate, including but not limited to building or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving, excavation or drilling operations. DISTRICT means floodplain district. Annual Town Meeting 289 April 29, 2010 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) administers the National Flood Insurance Program. FEMA provides a nationwide flood hazard area mapping study program for communities as well as regulatory standards for development in the flood hazard areas. -- FLOOD BOUNDARY AND FLOODWAY MAP means an official map of a community issued by FEMA that depicts, based on detailed analyses, the boundaries of the 100 -year and 500 year floods and the 100 -year floodway. (For maps done in 1987 and later, the floodway designation is included on the FIRM.) FLOOD HAZARD BOUNDARY MAP (FHBM) means an official map of a community issued by FEMA where the boundaries of the flood.and related erosion areas having special hazards have been designated as Zone A or E. FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) means an official map of a community on which FEMA has delineated both the areas of special flood hazard and the risk premium zones applicable to the community. FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY means an examination, evaluation, and determination of flood hazards, and, if appropriate, corresponding water surface elevations, or an examination, evaluation and determination of flood - related erosion hazards. FLOODWAY means the channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation. LOWEST FLOOR means the lowest floor of the lowest enclosed area (including basement or cellar). An unfinished or flood resistant enclosure, usable solely for parking of vehicles, building access or storage in an area other than a basement area is not considered a building's lowest floor, PROVIDED that such enclosure is not built so as to render the structure in violation of the applicable non - elevation design requirements of NFIP Regulations 60.3. MANUFACTURED HOME means a structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is built on a permanent chassis and is designed for use with or without a permanent foundation when connected to the required utilities. For floodplain management purposes the term "manufactured home" also includes park trailers, travel trailers and other similar vehicles placed on a site for greater than 180 consecutive days. For insurance purposes, the term "manufactured home" does not include park trailers, travel trailers and other similar vehicles. MANUFACTURED HOME PARK OR SUBDIVISION means a parcel (or contiguous parcels) of land divided into two or more manufactured home lots for rent or sale. NEW CONSTRUCTION means, for floodplain management purposes, structures for which the "start of construction" commenced on or after the effective date of a floodplain management regulation adopted by a community. For the purpose of determining insurance rates, NEW CONSTRUCTION means structures for which the "start of construction" (as evidenced by issuance of a building permit) commenced on or after the effective date of an initial FIRM or after December 31, 1974, whichever is later. ONE- HUNDRED -YEAR, FLOOD - see BASE FLOOD..__. REGULATORY FLOODWAY - see FLOODWAY. SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA means an area having special flood and/or flood - related erosion hazards, and shown on an FHBM or FIRM as Zone A. AO, Al -30, AE, A99, AH, V, V1-30, VE. . Annual Town Meeting 290 April 29, 2010 STRUCTURE means, for floodplain management purposes, a walled and roofed building, including a gas or liquid storage tank, that is principally above ground, as well as a manufactured home. STRUCTURE, for insurance coverage purposes, means a walled and roofed building, other than a gas or liquid storage tank that is principally above ground and affixed to a permanent site, as well as a manufactured home on foundation. For the latter purpose, the term includes a building while in the course of construction, alteration, or repair, but does not include building materials or supplies intended for use in such construction, alteration, or repair, unless such materials or supplies are within an enclosed building on the premises. SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE means damage of any origin sustained by a structure whereby the cost of restoring the structure to its before - damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred. SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT means any repair, reconstruction or improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the market value of the structure either (a) before the improvement or repair is started, or (b) if the structure has been damaged and is being restored, before the damage occurred. For the purposes of this definition, .,substantial improvement' is considered to occur when the first alteration of any wall, ceiling, floor, or other structural part of the building commences, whether or not that alteration affects the external dimensions of the structure. ZONE A means the 100 -year floodplain area where the base flood elevation (BFE) has not been determined. To determine the BFE, use the best available Federal, State, local or other data. ZONE Al -30 and ZONE AE (for new and revised maps) mean the 100 -year floodplain where the base flood elevation has been determined. ZONE AH and ZONE AO means the 100 -year floodplain with flood depths of 1 to 3 feet where a clearly defined channel does not exist, where the path of flooding is unpredictable, and where velocity flow may be evident. Such flooding is characterized by ponding or sheet flow. ZONES B, C, AND X are areas identified in the community Flood Insurance Study as areas of moderate or minimal flood hazard. Zone X replaces Zones B and C on new and revised maps. 4.4.4. Reference to Existing Regulations: The Floodplain District is established as an overlay district to all other districts. All development in the district, including structural and non - structural activities, whether permitted by right or by special permit must be in compliance with Chapter 131, Section 40 of the Massachusetts General Laws and with the following: — Section of the Massachusetts State Building Code which addresses floodplain and coastal high hazard areas (currently 780 CMR 120.13, "Flood Resistant Construction and Construction in Coastal Dunes "); Wetlands Protection Regulations, Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) (currently 310 CMR 10.00); Inland Wetlands Restriction, DEP (currently 310 CMR 13.00); Minimum Requirements for the Subsurface Disposal of Sanitary Sewage, DEP (currently 310 CMR 15, Title 5); — Town of Reading Zoning By -Law; and Annual Town Meeting 291 April 29, 2010 — Town of Reading Wetlands Protection By -Law. Any variances from the provisions and requirements of the above referenced State and local regulations may only be granted in accordance with the required variance procedures of such regulations. 4.4.5. Uses Permitted as of Right in the Floodplain Overlay District: In the Floodpla in. Overlay District, no new building shall be erected and no premises shall be used except for one or more of the following uses: 4.4.5.1. Municipal recreation, public water supply, drainage or flood control use, orchard, truck garden, nursery, or similar open use of the land for the raising of agricultural or horticultural crops, for rifle, pistol and shotgun shooting on land of any established range. 4.4.6. Uses Permitted in the Floodplain Overlay District By Special Permit: 4.4.6.1. If authorized by the Board of Appeals, commercial golf course, or non - profit social, civic or recreational use (but not including any use the chief activity of which is one customarily conducted as a business); and buildings and sheds accessory to any use permitted in the district. 4.4.6.2. If any land defined in the bylaws as being in a Floodplain Overlay District is proven to be in fact neither subject to flooding nor unsuitable for human occupancy because of drainage and topographic conditions, and if the use of such land will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, the Board of Appeals may permit buildings for human occupancy on such land in accordance with the requirements of the underlying district after the necessary proof has been presented to and reported on by the Community Planning and Development Commission and the Board of Health. 4.4.7. Uses Prohibited in the Floodplain Overlay District: Dumping, filling or earth transfer or relocation operations are prohibited except for utility trenches, driveways, landscaping and accessory building foundations, or municipal or public facilities- 4.4.8. Conditions for Approval for uses Permitted in the Floodplain Overlay District: 4.4.8.1 Within the floodplain overlay district, no new construction, substantial improvement or other land development shall be permitted unless it is demonstrated by the applicant that the cumulative effect of the proposed development, when combined with all other existing and anticipated development, will not increase the water surface elevation of the base flood. For the purposes of this section, substantial improvement shall be taken to mean: any repair, reconstruction, or improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds fifty percent of the market value of the structure either Sa) before the improvement is started, or _... (b) if the structure has been damaged and is being restored after the damage occurred. 4.4.8.2 For new construction, substantial improvements of existing structures or other land development, the following conditions shall apply: 1) All new construction or improvement of non - residential structures shall either have the lowest floor, including basement, at or above the base flood elevation, Annual Town Meeting 292 April 29, 2010 or along with attendant utility and sanitary facilities, shall be flood proofed, i.e., designed so that below the established base flood elevation, the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy. 2) Within Zones A and AE where base flood elevations are provided on the FIRM: elevations shall be determined by using the flood profile contained in the Flood Insurance Study. 3) Within Zones A and AE, where the base flood elevation is not shown on the FIRM, the applicant shall obtain any existing base flood elevation data as a basis for the elevation and flood - proofing requirements of this section and shall submit such base flood elevation data to the Board of Appeals at the time of making application for a special permit under this section. When base flood data is not available, the base flood elevation shall be determined through hydrologic and hydraulic analyses performed by a registered professional engineer in accordance with standard engineering practices. 4) The structure will withstand the effects of flooding. The ground level around and extending 25 ft. outward from any building or structure in a Floodplain District shall be raised as necessary so that no part of the ground level area so defined, shall be below the elevation shown on the FIRM. Embankments subject to possible scouring by flood waters shall be properly stabilized and protected to prevent erosion by flood waters. 5) The containment of sewerage, safety of gas, electric, fuel, and other utilities from breaking, leaking, short circuiting, grounding, igniting, electrocuting or any other dangers due to flooding, will be adequately protected. 6) Safe vehicular and pedestrian movement to or over, and from the premises shall be provided on ways having a minimum profile elevation of no less than the base flood elevation. 7) Methods of drainage shall be adequate. 8) Other land in the Floodplain Overlay District shall be protected from impacts resulting from all work of development both approved and not approved on the premises. 9) Where watertight flood proofing of a structure is permitted, a registered professional engineer shall verify that the methods used will be adequate to withstand the flood depths, pressures and velocities, impact and uplift, and other factors associated with the base flood. 10) A registered professional engineer shall certify that the above minimum conditions listed in Sections 4.4.4 and 4.4.8 are satisfied in the design proposal_.. 4.4.9. Base Flood Elevation and Floodway Date: 4.4.9.1. Floodway Data. In Zones A, and AE, along watercourses that have not had a regulatory floodway designated, the best available Federal, State, local or other floodway data shall be used to prohibit encroachments in floodways which would result in any increase in flood levels within the community during the occurrence of the base flood discharge. Annual Town Meeting 293 April 29, 2010 4.4.9.2. Base Flood Elevation Data. Base flood elevation data is required for subdivision proposals or other developments greater than 50 lots or 5 acres, whichever is the lesser, within unnumbered A zones. 4.4.10 Notification of Watercourse Alteration: In a riverine situation, the Conservation Commission shall notify the following of any alteration or relocation of a watercourse: Adjacent Communities • NFIP State Coordinator Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation 251 Causeway Street, Suite 600 -700 Boston, MA 02114 -2104 • NFIP Program Specialist Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 1 99 High Street, 6th Floor Boston, MA 02110 and further, that the Zoning Map of the Town of Reading be amended to adopt the boundaries of the new overlay district as defined on the Middlesex County Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) that goes into effect on June 4, 2010 and as further defined by the Middlesex County Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report dated June 4, 2010. Presentation given by Jean Delios - Presentation Attached Motion Carried 2/3 Vote required Declared unanimous, by Moderator Annual Town Meeting 294 April 29, 2010 TOWN OF READING community planning s Development commission Proposed Amendments to Floodplain Districts Section 4.4 Warrant Article 29 Annual Town Meeting, Spring 2010 Section 4.4 Floodplain Overlay District • FEMA identifies flood hazards nationwide and publishes and updates flood hazard data in support of the national program. • FEMA has developed new flood hazard data and revised some of the existing data for Reading as part of recent updates. Section 4.4 Floodplain Overlay District PROPOSED CHANGES Old 4.4 - Deleted + New 4.4— Based on Standard Boilerplate Language from the State plus included language from our existing _ zoning _ by- lawpertaiNng.lo:._ .... -_.. ___ ..._ Uses permitted by Right (4.4.5) Uses permitted by Special Permit (4 4e) - Uses prohibited (4 4 7) 295 Section 4.4 Floodplain Overlay District • The National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) is a federal program available in participating communities. • The NFIP allows property owners the ability to purchase insurance as a protection against floodlosses • The program requires adopting state and local floodplain management regulations that reduce future flood damages. Section 4.4 Floodplain Overlay District - Purpose • Cities and Towns across the country are required to adopt the new FEMA data is In Reading's case this requires amending the zoning by -law Section 4.4 . Impact on Reading - the new floodplain overlay district extends only to the 100 year flood plain and not the 500 year flood plain that previously applied ISection 4.4 Floodplain Overlay District New Maps ®L`" i Ie r rt l K Section 4.4 Floodplain Overlay District Adopting the new Section 4.4 will: • Meet FEMA's June 4, 2010 deadline • Comply with the need to adopt the new FEMA data allowing property owners to continue to be eligible for federal flood insurance program. Note: No changes are anticipated between now and June 4, 2010. U P Section 4.4 Floodplain Overlay District . What Does the Change mean? • No impact on the way we regulate wetland areas under the State Wetlands Protection Act or the Local By -Law. • FEMA's new boundaries reduce the requirements under the federal program since it now only applies to properties in the 100 year Floodplain. • Anyone that wants to get flood insurance can Section 4.4 Floodplain Overlay District • No new properties are placed in the Floodplain. • Property owners will continue to be able to purchase flood insurance. • Time sensitive matter requiring action in advance of June 4, 2010. ARTICLE 29 — On motion by Camille Anthony, Secretary of Board of Selectmen, it was voted, pursuant to Section 2 -6 of the Reading Home Rule Charter, to declare the seats of the-following Town Meeting Members to be vacant and remove those persons from their position as Town Meeting Members for failure to take the oath of office within 30 days following the notice of election or for failure to attend one half or more of the Town Meeting sessions during the previous year: Precinct 1 - Ronald Thomas O'Keefe Precinct Chair Crawford Lynne A 2011 D'Entremont Keith - J 2011 Precinct 2 - Peter Coumounduros, Precinct Chair Connearney Joseph T Sr. 2011 Lam Wei E 2011 Snow George A 2011 Sullivan John B 2011 Voted to keep as a TMM Voted to keep as a TMM Voted to keep as a TMM Voted to keep as a TMM Voted to keep as a TMM Voted to keep as a TMM Precinct 3 - Francis Driscoll, Precinct Chair Jones Randall W 2011 Voted to keep as a TMM Precinct 5 - Janice M Jones, Precinct Chair Kelley Timothy J 2011 Voted to keep as a TMM Precinct 8 - Karen Gately Herrick Precinct Chair_ Griset William J Jr. 2011 Voted to not to keep as a TMM Motion Carried as Presented by Precinct Chairs ARTICLE 3 - On motion by Tony Rickley of Precinct 2 to bring Article 3 back to the table for an instructional motion Instructional Motion as follows: Move that the Board of Selectmen be instructed to meet with Church leaders of the town who may be interested in pursuing the possibility of a program for plowing and / or removal of snow from church parking lots and driveways by the town at some mutually agreed to terms and conditions, and costs payable to the town for such services. A report on progress, and hopefully conclusions on such negotiations shall be made at the 2010 Subsequent Town Meeting desirable. Motion Carried 297 Annual Town Meeting April 29, 2010 On motion by Ben Tafoya, Chairman of Board of Selectmen it was voted that this Annual Town Meeting stand adjourned (sine die). Meeting adjourned at 11:28 p.m. 151 Town Meeting Members were present. A true copy. Attest: Laura A. Gemme Town Clerk Annual Town Meeting 298 April 29, 2010 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Middlesex, ss. Officer's Return, Reading: By virtue of this Warrant, 1, on June 9, 2010 notified and warned the inhabitants of the Town of _Reading, qualified to vote on Town affairs, to meet at the place and at the time specified by posting attested copies of this Town Meeting Warrant in the following public places within the Town of Reading: Precinct 1 J. Warren Killam School, 333 Charles Street Precinct 2 Peter Sanborn Place, 50 Bay State Road Precinct 3 Reading Police Station, 15 Union. Street Precinct 4 Joshua Eaton School, 365 Summer Avenue Precinct 5 Town Hall, 16 Lowell Street Precinct 6 Austin Preparatory School, 101 Willow Street Precinct 7 Reading Library, Local History Room, 64 Middlesex Avenue Precinct 8 Wood End School, 85 Sunset Rock Lane The date of posting being not less than seven (7) days prior to June 23, 2010, the date set for the Special Local Election in this Warrant. I also caused an attested copy of this Warrant to be posted on the Town of Reading web §ite. A true copy Attest: Mgd� Laura. Gemme, Town Clerk 299 Tom Freeman, Constable COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS WILLIAM FRANCIS GALVIN SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH SPECIAL LOCAL ELECTION WARRANT Middlesex, SS. To any of the Constables of the Town of Reading, Greetings: In the name of the Commonwealth, you are hereby required to notify and warn the inhabitants of the Town of Reading who are qualified to vote in the Special Local Election to vote at Precincts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 Reading Memorial High School - Hawkes Field House - Oakland Road on WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY -THIRD OF JUNE, 2010, from 7:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. for the following purpose: To cast their votes in the Special Local Election for the follow ballot question: "Shall the Town vote to approve the action of the representative Town Meeting whereby it was voted to accept the provisions of Massachusetts General Law Chapter 64L, Section 2(a) to impose a local sales tax upon the sale of restaurant meals originating within the Town by a vendor at the rate of .75 percent of the gross receipts of the vendor from the sale of restaurant meals ?" r Hereof fail not and make return of this warrant with your doings thereon at the time and place . of said voting. Given under our hands this 8th day of June, 2010. Ben Ta ya, Chairman J a li, Vice Chairman Carrfille ny, S retary Stephen A Goldy 1� se Richard W Schubert BOARD OF SELECTMEN A true copy Attest: Laura A Gemme, Tow June 9, 2010 m ree an, Constable 300 Local Election June 23, 2010 Official - Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a Local Special Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 00. . The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 2052 ballots (12.3 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Question "Shall the Town vote to approve the action of the representative Town Meeting whereby it was voted to accept the provisions of Massachusetts General Law Chapter 64L, Section 2(a) to impose a local sales tax upon the sale of restaurant meals originating within the Town by a vendor at the rate of .75 percent of the gross receipts of the vendor from the sale of restaurant meals ?" Question Pr 1 Pr2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Yes 126 69 79 141 91 101 114 88 809 No 161 119 117 165 1371 167 177 199 1242 Blanks 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Total 287 189 196 306 228 268 291 287 2052 A true copy. Attest: Laura Gemme Town Clerk 301 September 14, 2010, State Primary Warrant COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Middlesex, ss. Officer's Return, Reading: By virtue of this Warrant, I, on September i, , 2010 notified and warned the inhabitants of the Town of Reading, qualified to vote on Town affairs, to meet at the place and at the time specified by posting attested copies of this Town Meeting Warrant in the following public places within the Town of Reading: Precinct 1 Precinct 2 Precinct 3 Precinct 4 Precinct 5 Precinct 6 Precinct 7 J. Warren Killam School, 333 Charles Street Peter Sanborn Place, 50 Bay State Road Reading Police Station, 15 Union Street Joshua Eaton School, 365 Summer Avenue Town Hall, 16 Lowell Street Austin Preparatory School, 101 Willow Street Reading Library, Local History Room, 64 Middlesex Avenue Precinct 8 Wood End School, 85 Sunset Rock Lane The date of posting being not less than seven (7) days prior to September 14, 2010, the date set for the State Primary Election in this Warrant. I also caused an attested copy of this Warrant to be posted on the Town of Reading web site. Tom Fr eman Constable A true copy Attest: Aura'Gernme, Town Clerk n�— 302. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS WILLIAM FRANCIS GALVIN SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH STATE PRIMARY ELECTION WARRANT MIDDLESEX, SS. To any of the Constables of the Town of Reading, Greetings: In the name of the Commonwealth, you are hereby required to notify and warn the inhabitants of the Town of Reading who are qualified to vote in the State Primary Election to vote at Precincts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 ' Reading Memorial High School - Hawkes Field House - Oakland Road on TUESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2010, from 7:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. for the following purpose: To cast their votes in the State Primaries for the candidates of political parties for the following offices: GOVERNOR............................... ............................... LT. GOVERNOR ......................... ............................... ATTORNEY GENERAL .............. : ...................... ......... SECRETARY OF STATE ............ ............................... TREASURER............ ........ ........ .. ......... ....... ......... ..:... AUDITOR.......................................... ............................... REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS ............................... COUNCILLOR................................... ............................... COURT FOR THIS COMMONWEALTH FOR THIS COMMONWEALTH ............. ..... :...... FOR THIS COMMONWEALTH .......................... FOR THIS COMMONWEALTH ........................ FOR THIS COMMONWEALTH .......................... FOR THIS COMMONWEALTH ............SIXTH DISTRICT ...................... ..........:...............SIXTH DISTRICT SENATOR IN GENERAL ...... ............................... ......................MIDDLESEX &ESSEX DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE IN GENERAL COURT............ TWENTIETH & THIRTIETH MIDDLESEX DISTRICTS DISTRICT ATTORNEY ....................................... ............................... .......................NORTHERN DISTRICT SHERIFF............................................................... ............................... .................:....MIDDLESEX COUNTY Hereof fail not and make return of this warrant with your doings thereon at the time and place of said voting. Given under our hands this 2616 day of August, 2010. A true copy Attest, Laura A Gemme, Town Clerk 303 BOARD OF SELECTMEN T Freeman Constable State Primary Election September 14, 2010 Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 1905 Voted Democratic Ballots 1169 Voted Republican Ballots 4 Voted Libertarian Ballots 3078 Total ballots (18.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Democrat Ballot Governor - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 58 64 49 66 66 46 50 53 452 Deval L Patrick 172 166 151 181 183 188 208 148 1397 Charles Baker 1 4 0 2 0 1 1 4 13 Tim Cahill 1 1 1 2 1 0 2 0 8 Write -Ins 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 11 35 Total 2361 2391 2041 2541 2531 238 2651 216 1905 Lieutenant Governor - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 I Pr 4 I Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 60 63 48 72 67 46 61 62 479 Timothy P Murray 171 173 155 180 186 188 201 149 1403 Write -Ins 5 3 1 2 0 4 3 5 23 Total 236 239 204 254 253 238 265 216 1905 Page 1 of 13 304 State Primary Election September 14, 2010 Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 1905 Voted Democratic Ballots 1169 Voted Republican Ballots 4 Voted Libertarian Ballots 3078 Total ballots (18.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Attorney General - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2- Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 45 56 47 62 54 41 57 .51 413 Martha Coakley 187 178 155 .191 196 191 206 158 1462 James McKenna 1 2 0 1 0 1 0 1 6 Write-ins 3. 3 2 0 3. 5 2 6 24 otal 236 2391 204 1 254 253 238 265 216 1905 Secretary of State - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 57 58 42 60 61 44 61 51 434 William F Galvin 178 180 162 194 192 190 204 161 1461 Write-ins 1 1 01 01 0 4 0 4 10 Total 236 239 204 254 253 238 265 216 1905 Page 2 of 13 305 State Primary Election September 14, 2010 Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 1905 Voted Democratic Ballots 1169 Voted Republican Ballots 4 Voted Libertarian Ballots 3078 Total ballots (18.4°/x) of registered voters cast as follows: Treasurer - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 I Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 I Pr 8 Total Blanks 38 38 29 431 5 32 48 45 318 Steven Grossman 121 114 125 1351 128 131 159 109 1022 Stephen J Murphy 76 87 50 761 80 74 571 60 560 Write -Ins 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 5 Total 236 239 204 254 253 238 265 216 1905 Tl ota Auditor - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 39 38 20 33 34 28 44 35 271 Suzanne M Bump 101 102 91 135 94 113 125 91 852 Guy Wiliam Glodis 43 40 44 39 46 30 43 37 322 Mike Lake 52 59 49 47 79 65 53 51 455 Write -Ins 1 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 5 Tl ota 236 239 204 254 253 2381 2651 216 1905 Page 3 of 13 306 State Primary Election September 14, 2010 Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open it 7.00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 1905 Voted Democratic Ballots 1169 Voted Republican Ballots 4 Voted Libertarian Ballots 3078 Total ballots (18.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Repersentive in Congress - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 46 63 42 69 57 41 62 53 433 John F Tierney 187 173 161 185 195 193 202 158 1454 Write -Ins 3 3 1 0 1 4 1 5 18 Total 236 239 204 254 253 238 265 216 1905 Total Councilor - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 . Total Blanks 54 54 40 74 69 58 75 70 494 S.R. En fish - Merullo 91 76 102 121 92 99 107 68 756 Terrence W Kennedy 90 109 62 59 90 80 83 77 650 Write -Ins 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 1 5 Total 236 239 —2641 2541 253 238 265 216 1905 Senator in General Court - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 . Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr ii Blanks 13 15 11 14 10 13 11 13 Katherine M Clark 154 130 103 170 139 144 169 134 Michael Seamus Da 69 94 90 70 104 81 85 67 qTotal rite -Ins 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 236 239 204 254 253 238 265 216 Page 4 of 13 307 State Primary Election September 14, 2010 Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7.00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 1905 Voted Democratic Ballots 1169 Voted Republican Ballots 4 Voted Libertarian Ballots 3078 Total ballots (18.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Repersentive in General Court 20th Middlesex District _ Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 I Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 227 54 43 239 47 222 249 203 1140 Write -Ins 9 185 161 15 205 16 16 13 69 Total 236 0 0 254 0 2381 265 216 1209 Total Repersentive in General Court 30th Middlesex District - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 I Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 I Pr 7 I Pr 8 Total Blanks 73 54 43 77 47 62 88 61 144 James J. Dwyer 163 185 161 176 205 174 176 153 551 Write-Ins 0 0 0 1 1 2 1 2 1 Total 0 239 204 0 253 0 0 0 696 District Attorney - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 73 64 48 77 80 62 88 61 553 Gerard T Leone, Jr 163 175 156 176 173 174 176 153 1346 Write -Ins 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 2 6 Total 236 239 204 2541 253 238 265 216 1905 Page 5 of 13 1: State Primary Election September 14, 2010 Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being accoording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 1905 Voted Democratic Ballots 1169 Voted Republican Ballots 4 Voted Libertarian Ballots 3078 Total ballots (18.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Sheriff -Vote for One Candidate Pr" Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 I Total Blanks 73 71 55 90 85 69 99 65 607 James V DiPaola 163 167 148 163 168 167 166 148 1290 Write-Ins 0 1 1 1 0 2 0 3 8 otal 236. 239 204 254 253 238 265 2161 1905 Total Republican Ballot Governor - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr-3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 I Pr 7 Pr 8 . Total Blanks 5 5 17 9 5 71 91 10 67 Charles D Baker 171 122 103 135 130 143 131 156 1091 Scott Lively 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 1 5 Write-ins 0 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 6 Total 177 130 121 145 136 150 142 168 1169 Lieutenant Governor - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 1011 16 14 6 14 12 16 99 Richard R Tisei 166 117 104 128 129 135 128 151 1058 Keith Davis 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 7 Write -Ins 0 1 0 2 0 1 1 0 5 otal 177 130 121 145 1351 1511 1421 168 1169 Page 6 of 13 309 State Primary Election September 14, 2010 Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 1905 Voted Democratic Ballots 1169 Voted Republican Ballots 4 Voted Libertarian Ballots 3078 Total ballots (18.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Attorney General - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr -5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 . Total Blanks 135 94 92 95 99 109 .104 128 856 Guy A Carbone 11 7 4 13 12 5 5 10 67 James P McKenna 21 18 19 30 18 30 25 20 181 Write -Ins 10 11 6 7 6 7 81 10 65 Total 177 130 121 145 135 151 1421 168 1169 Se retary of State - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 I Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 42 24 31 44 21 26 27 38 253 William C Campbell 135 106 90 101 114 125 114 130 915 Write -Ins 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Total 177 130 121 145 135 151 142 168 1169 Treasurer - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 I Pr 3 Pr 4 I Pr 5 I Pr 6 I Pr 7 I Pr 8 Total Blanks 35 24 34 34 25 30 26 33 241 Karyn E Polito 142 106 87 110 110 121 114 134 924 rite -Ins 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 4 Total 177 130 121 145 135 151 142 168 1169 Page 7 of 13 310 State Primary Election September 14, 2010 Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 1905 Voted Democratic Ballots 1169 Voted Republican Ballots 4 Voted Libertarian Ballots 3078 Total ballots (18.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Auditor -Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 18 11 21 19 12 11 12 22 126 Mary Z Connau hton 136 104 90 108 105 124 120 126 913 Kama] Jain 23 15 10 18 18 16 10 '20 130 Write -Ins 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 177 130 121 145 135 151 142 168 1169 Repersentive in Congress - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 I Pr 2 Pr 3 I Pr 4 I Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr B Total Blanks 12 15 15 14 9 11 10 24 11 Bill Hudak 127 80 73 104 88 100 103 99 774 Robert J McCarthy, Jr 38 34 33 27 38 40 28 45 283 Write-Ins 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 Total 177 130 121 145 135 151 142 168 1169 Councilor - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 1 Pr 6 1 Pr 7 1 Pr 8 Total Blanks 53 34 40 50 311 361 311 52 Paul A Caruccio 123 96 81 95 103 115 109 115 Write -Ins 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 d32 Total 177 130 121 145 135 151 142 168 Page 8 of 13 311 State Primary Election September 14, 2010 Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 1905 Voted Democratic Ballots 1169 Voted Republican Ballots 4 Voted Libertarian Ballots 3078 Total ballots (18.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Senator in General Court -Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 28 19 28 29 18 25 21 30 198 Craig S adafora 149 111 93 116 117 126 121 138 971 Write -Ins 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 177 130 121 145 135 151 1421 168 1169 386 Repersentive in General Court 20th Middlesex District - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 31 Pr 4 1 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr, 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 15 21 14 19 17 21 86 Bradley H Jones Jr 162 109 131 132 125 147 697 Write -Ins 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 177 0 0 1451 0 151 142 168 783 386 Repersentive in General Court 30th Middlesex District - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 21 30 26 77 Kara Marie Fratto 109 91 108 308 Write-Ins 0 0 1 1 Total 0 130 121 0 135 0 0 0 386 Page 9 of 13 312 State Primary Election September 14, 2010 Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 1905 Voted Democratic Ballots 1169 Voted Republican Ballots 4 Voted Libertarian Ballots 3078 Total ballots (18.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: District Attorney - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 1 Pr 2 1 Pr 3 1 Pr 4 1 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 164 1231 1141 1411 129 143 132 156 1102 James McKenna 1 0 11 01 0 0 21 4 8 Write-ins 12 71 61 41 6 8 8 8 59 Total 177 1301 1211 1451 135. 151 142 168 1169 Sheriff -Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 I Pr 2 I Pr 3 1 Pr 4 1 Pr 5 1 Pr 6 1 Pr 7 1 Pr 8 Total Blanks 170 124 117 142 129 144 137 160 M11 Write-Ins 7 6 4 3 6 7 5 8 3 Total 177 130 121 145 135 151 142 168 4 Libertarian Ballot Governor - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 I Pr 2 I Pr 3 I Pr 4 I Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1 Write -Ins 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 Total 0 01 01 11 1 2 0 0 4 Lieutenant Governor - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 I Pr 2 1 Pr 3 1 Pr 4 1 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 0 0 0 11 0 2 0 0 3 Write-Ins 0 01 01 01 1 0 0 0 1 Total 0 01 01 11 1 2 0 0 4 Page 10 of 13 313 State Primary Election September 14, 2010 Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 1905 Voted Democratic Ballots 1169 Voted Republican Ballots 4 Voted Libertarian Ballots 3078 Total ballots (18.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Attorney General - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 I Pr 2 1 Pr 3 1 Pr 4 1 Pr 5 Pr 6 1 Pr 7 I Pr 8 1 Total Blanks 0 0 0 01 0 2 0 0 2 Write-Ins 20 i 0 01 11 1 0 0 0 2 Total. 0 01 01 11 11 21 01 al 4 Secretary of State - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 4 Write -Ins 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 1 1 2 01 0 4 Treasurer - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 ' Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 2 Write-ins 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 Total 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 4 Auditor - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 I Pr 2 I Pr 3 I Er 4l I Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 0 01 01 11 1 0 0 0 2 Write -Ins 01 01 01 01 0 2 0 0 2 Total ol 01 01 11 1 2 0 0 4 Page 11 of 13 314 State Primary Election September 14, 2010 Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 1905 Voted Democratic Ballots 1169 Voted Republican Ballots 4 Voted Libertarian Ballots 3078 Total ballots (18.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Repersentive in Congress - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 I Pr 2 I Pr 3 1 Pc4 t Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 4 Write-Ins 0 0 0 0 01 0 0 01 0 Total 0 0 0 1 11 2 01 01 4 3 Councilor - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 I Pr 2 Pr 3 1 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr B Total Blanks 1 01 0 01 1 1 2 0 0 4 Write -Ins 01 0 01 01 0 01 2 0 0 Total 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 4 3 Senator in General Court -Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 Write-Ins 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Total 0 .0 0 1 1 2 01 0 4 3 Repersentive in General Court 20th Middlesex District -Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 3 Write-Ins 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 01 0 . 0 1 0 2 0 0 3 Page U of 13 315 State Primary Election September 14, 2010 Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Primary Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being acccording to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m„ with the following results: 1905 Voted Democratic Ballots 1169 Voted Republican Ballots — 4 Voted Libertarian Ballots 3078 Total ballots (18.4 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Repersentive in General Court 30th Middlesex District -Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 I Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7_ Pr 8 Total Blanks 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 Write -Ins 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 01 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 4 District Attorney - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 I Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 01 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 4 Write -Ins 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 01 0 0 1 1 2 0 01 4 4 Sheriff -Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 4 Write-ins 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 4 A true copy. Attest: A6 i Laura A Gemme Town Clerk 316 Page 13 of 13 COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Middlesex, ss. Officer's Return, Reading: By virtue of this Warrant, I, on October 12, 2010 notified and warned the inhabitants of the Town of Reading, qualified to vote on Town affairs, to meet at the place and at the time specified by posting attested copies of this Town Meeting Warrant in the following public places within the Town of Reading: Precinct 1 J. Warren Killam School, 333 Charles Street Precinct 2 Peter Sanborn Place, 50 Bay State Road Precinct 3 Reading Police Station, 15 Union Street Precinct 4 Joshua Eaton School, 365 Summer Avenue Precinct 5 Town Hall, 16 Lowell Street Precinct 6 Austin Preparatory School, 101 Willow Street Precinct 7 Reading Library, Local History Room, 64. Middlesex Avenue Precinct 8 Wood End School, 85 Sunset Rock Lane The date of posting being not less than fourteen (14) days prior to November 8, 2010, the date set for the Subsequent Town Meeting in this Warrant. I also caused an attested copy of this Warrant to be posted on the—Town. of. Reading web site. A true copy. Attest: Laura Gemme, Town Clerk 317 SUBSEQUENT TOWN MEETING (Seal) COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Middlesex, ss. To any of the Constables of the Town of Reading, Greetings: In the name of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, you are hereby required to notify and warn the inhabitants of the Town of Reading, qualified to vote in elections and Town affairs, to meet at the Reading Memorial High School Auditorium, 62 Oakland Road, in said Reading, on Monday, November 8, 2010, at seven -thirty o'clock in the evening, at which time and place the following articles are to be acted upon and determined exclusively by Town Meeting Members in accordance with the provisions of the Reading Home Rule Charter. ARTICLE 1 To hear and act on the reports of the Board of Selectmen, Town . Accountant, Treasurer - Collector, Board of Assessors, Director of Public Works, Town Clerk, Tree Warden, Board of Health, School Committee, Contributory Retirement Board, Library Trustees, Municipal Light Board, Finance Committee, Cemetery Trustees, Community Planning & Development Commission, Conservation Commission, Town Manager and, any other Board or Special Committee. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 2 To choose all other necessary Town Officers and Special Committees and determine what instructions shall be given Town Officers and Special Committees, and to see what sum the Town will raise by borrowing or transfer from available funds, or otherwise, and appropriate for the purpose of funding Town Officers and Special Committees to carry out the instructions given to them, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 3 To see if the Town will vote to amend the FY 2011 —. FY 2020, Capital Improvements Program as provided for in Section 7 -7 of the Reading Home Rule Charter, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 4 To see if the Town will vote to amend one or more of the votes taken under Article 12 -of the April 26, 2010 Annual Town Meeting relating to the Fiscal Year 2011 Municipal Budget, and see what sum the Town will raise by borrowing or transfer from available funds, or otherwise, and appropriate as the result of any such amended votes for the operation of the Town and its government, or take any other action with respect thereto. Finance Committee ARTICLE 5 To see if the Town will vote to authorize the payment during Fiscal Year 2011 of bills remaining unpaid for previous fiscal years for goods and services actually rendered to the Town, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen 318 ARTICLE 6 To see if the Town will vote to authorize the Board of Selectmen to sell, or exchange, or dispose of, upon such terms and conditions as they may determine, various items of Town tangible property, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 7 To see what sum the Town will raise by borrowing pursuant to G.L. Chapter 44, §7 and 8 or transfer from available funds, or otherwise, and appropriate for the purpose of reconstructing water systems, including the costs of engineering services, plans, documents; cost estimates, bidding services and all related expenses incidental thereto and necessary in connection therewith, said sum to be spent under the direction of the Town Manager; and to see if the Town will authorize the Town Manager, the Board of Selectmen, or any other agency of the Town to apply for a grant or loans to be used to defray all or any part of said water construction and /or reconstruction and related matters; and to see if the Town will vote to authorize the Town Manager to enter into any or all agreements as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this Article; and to see if the Town will authorize the Town Manager, the Board of Selectmen, or any other agency of the Town to apply for a non - interest bearing loan from the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority; and to authorize the Treasurer - Collector, with the approval of the Board of Selectmen, to borrow pursuant to said loan, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 8 To see if the Town will vote to authorize the Library Trustees of the Reading Public Library and /or the Board of Selectmen to apply for, accept and expend any State grants which may be available for the project; and to authorize the Library Building Committee and /or the Board of Selectmen and /or Library Trustees to apply for any State funds which might be available to defray all or part of the cost of the design, construction and equipping of the Library project; and to authorize the Library Building Committee and /or the Board of Selectmen and /or Library Trustees to accept and expend any such funds when received without further appropriation. r Board of Library Trustees ARTICLE 9 To see what sum the Town will raise by borrowing or transfer from available funds, or otherwise, and appropriate for the purpose of making improvements including but not limited to repairing and /or replacing roofs and /or windows at the Killam School and /or Birch Meadow School, including the costs of consulting services, audits, plans, documents, cost estimates, bidding services and all related expenses incidental thereto and necessary in connection therewith, said sum to be expended by and under the direction of the School Committee and /or the Superintendent of Schools; and to see if the Town will authorize the School Committee, Board of Selectmen, Superintendent of Schools, Town Manager, or any other agency of the Town, to apply for a grant from the Massachusetts School Building Authority or any other source of funding, to be used to defray the cost of all, or any part of such improvements; and to authorize the School Committee and /or the Superintendent of Schools and /or the Town Manager to enter into any and all contracts and agreements as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this Article, or take any other action with respect thereto. School Committee 319 ARTICLE'10 To see if the Town will vote to transfer the care, custody, management and control of certain parcels of land, more or less located on Birch Meadow Drive and Oakland Road, and shown on a plan entitled "Plan of Land Birch Meadow Drive, owned by, the Town of Reading, Scale 1 " =40', Date: September 30, 2010, prepared by Town of Reading Engineering Division" said plan being on file in the Town of Reading Engineering Division, from the Reading School Committee for school purposes, to the Board of Selectmen for roadway layout purposes; and to vote to transfer the care, custody, management and control of certain parcels of land as shown on the above plan from the Board of Selectmen for municipal purposes, to the Reading School Committee for school purposes, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 11 To see if the Town will vote to accept the following roads as public ways pursuant to M.G.L. c.82, in accordance with the layouts adopted by the Board of Selectmen and on file with the Office of the Town Clerk: Benjamin Lane, the entire length from Avon Street northerly for approximately 343 feet; Kylie Drive, the entire length from Wakefield Street southerly for approximately 432 feet; Causeway Road from the end of the existing public way southeasterly approximately 950 feet; and to authorize the Board of Selectmen to accept deeds of easement and for the fee in said roads; and to authorize the Board of Selectmen to purchase, or take such.ways in fee or rights of easement by eminent domain under the provisions of M.G.L. c.79;, or to acquire said lands in fee or rights of easement therein by purchase, gift or otherwise, and to assess betterments therefore pursuant to M.G.L. c.80 or Chapter 80A; and to see what sum the Town will raise by borrowing, or from the tax levy, or transfer from available funds, or otherwise, and appropriate for the acquisition of said lands or easements therein or for payment of any eminent domain damages and for the construction of said ways, or take any other action with respect thereto. ♦ Causeway Road ♦ Benjamin Lane Kylie Drive Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 12 To see if the Town will vote to authorize the Board of Selectmen to accept the conveyance of permanent drainage easements in Reading, Middlesex County, MA located on Lot 2 and Lot 3 of Benjamin Lane which easements are shown on a plan entitled: Benjamin Lane Definitive Subdivision - Property Rights Plan of Land, Reading Massachusetts Street, prepared by Sullivan Engineering Group, Inc., dated September 28, 2005, with revisions through March 1, 2006, and recorded with Middlesex South Registry of Deeds, as Plan 1106 of 2007, sheet 3 of 8; upon such terms and conditions as the Board of Selectmen shall consider proper; or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 13 To see if the Town will vote to authorize the Board of Selectmen to file a Home Rule Petition with the General Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and that the legislation be adopted precisely as follows, except for clerical or editorial changes of form only unless the Selectmen (or other municipal 320 executive) approve amendments to the bill before enactment by the General Court. The Selectmen (or other municipal executive) are hereby authorized to approve amendments which shall be within the scope of the general public objectives of this petition: "An Act Authorizing the Town of Reading to Grant One Additional License for the Sale of All Alcoholic Beverages Not to be Drunk on the Premises in the Downtown Smart Growth District" Section 1. Notwithstanding Section 17 of Chapter 138 of the General Laws, or any other general or special act to the contrary, the licensing authority of the Town of Reading may grant an additional license for the sale of all alcoholic beverages not to be drunk on the premises to a business located within the Town of Reading Smart Growth 40R District roughly bounded by Woburn Street, Union Street, Pleasant Street, Parker Street, Haven Street, Ash Street, Gould Street, Green Street, High Street, Brande Court, Linden Street and Sanborn Street in the Town of Reading under Section 15 of said Chapter 138. The licensing authority shall not approve the transfer of the license to any other location but it may grant the license to a new applicant at the same location if the applicant files with the licensing authority a letter from the Department of Revenue indicating that the license is in good standing with the Department and that all applicable taxes have been paid. Section 2. If the license granted under this act is cancelled, revoked or no longer in use, it shall be returned physically, with all of the legal rights, privileges and restrictions pertaining thereto to the licensing authority, which may then grant the license to a new applicant at the same location and under the same conditions as specified in this act. Section 3. The license shall be subject to all of said chapter 138 except said Section 17. Section 4. This act shall take effect upon its passage. Or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 14 To see if the Town will vote to amend Section 2.2.6 of the General Bylaws of the Town of Reading by striking the sentence "Chairmen shall serve no more than six consecutive years in that position" so that Section 2.2.6 reads in its entirety: "2.2.6 The Town Meeting Members and Town Meeting Members -Elect from each precinct shall hold an Annual Precinct Meeting after the Annual Town Election but before the convening of the business sessions of the Annual Town Meeting. The purpose of the meeting shall be the election of a Chairman and a Clerk and to conduct whatever business may be appropriate. Additional precinct meetings may be called by the Chairman or by a petition of six (6) Town Meeting Members of the precinct." Or take any other action with respect thereto. Rules Committee 321 ARTICLE 15 To see if the Town will vote, pursuant to Section 8 -1 of the Reading Home Rule Charter, to amend Section 4 -10: Other Committees, to delete Section 4 -10 (a) Land Bank Committee, and to re- letter Sections (b) and (c) thereof so that Section 4 -10 will read in its entirety as follows: Section 410: Other Committees The Selectmen shall appoint the following committees and determine the number of members and their term of appointment, not to exceed three (3) years: (a) Town Forest Committee (b) Historical Commission The Board of Selectmen may establish and appoint standing advisory committees from time to time for a specific purpose. Such committees shall be considered a "multiple- member body" as defined in the Charter, shall be appointed in accordance with the process detailed in Section 8 -12, and members shall physically reside in the Town of Reading at the time of their appointment and during their term of office. Any of the elected boards or committees as listed in Article 3 of the Charter may, from time to time, establish and appoint ad hoc committees which shall serve no longer than 12 months. The term may be extended one time only for up to an additional 12 months s. Each ad hoc committee shall be considered a "multiple- member body" as defined in the Charter, and shall be bound by all laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts but shall not be required to meet the requirements of Section 8 -12 of the Reading Home Rule Charter as to the appointment process. Or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen ARTICLE 16 To see if the Town will vote, pursuant to Section 8 -1 of the Reading Home Rule Charter, to amend Section 2 -15: Referendum Procedures, so that it reads as follows: (language with strikethrough shows deletions /words in italics denotes new language.) No final affirmative vote of a Town Meeting on any Warrant Article shall be operative until after the expiration of seven (7) days following the dissolution of the Town Meeting except the following: (a) a vote to adjourn or dissolve, (b) votes appropriating money for the payment of notes or bonds of the Town and interest becoming due within the then current fiscal year, (c) voles for the temporary borrowing of money in anticipation of revenue, or (d) a vote declared by preamble by a two- thirds vote of Town Meeting to be an emergency measure necessary for the immediate preservation of the peace, health, safety or convenience of the Town. If a referendum petition is not filed within the said seven (7) days, the votes of the Town Meeting shall then become operative. (a) Referendum Petition — If, within said seven (7) days, a referendum petition signed by not less than three (3) percent of the voters. certified by the Registrars of Voters containing their names and addresses is filed with the Board of Selectmen requesting that any question affirmative vote of Town Meeting be submitted to the voters in the form of a ballot question, such ballot question to be in the form required in (b) herein, to the voters, then the operation of the Town Meeting vote shall be further suspended pending its determination as provided below. The Board of Selectmen shall, 322 within ten (10) days after the filing of such referendum petition, call a Special Election that shall be held within thirty (30) days or such longer period as may be required by law after issuing the call, for the purpose of presenting to the voters any such ballot question. If, however, a regular or Special Election is to be held not more than sixty (60) days following the date the referendum petition is filed, the Board of Selectmen may provide that any such ballot question be presented to the voters at that Election. (b) Form of Referendum Petition /Ballot Question - Each ballot question se submitted shall appear at the top of each referendum petition and shall be presented in the following form Gf the f0lleWiRg qUeGPeR which shall be placed on the official ballot: - "Shall the Town vote to approve the action of the representative Town Meeting whereby it was voted on (insert date of town meeting) to ( subsfaflse (insert complete language of the vote in the same laagaage-aad form in which it was stated when presented by the Moderator to the Town Meeting, and as it appears in the records of the Clerk of the meeting) "? The form of the referendum petition shall be prepared by Town Counsel in conformance with this section. The circulator(s) of the referendum petition may make additional copies of the petition form, but such copies must be an exact duplicate thereof. The petition form may not be altered in any way. No extraneous markings, such as underlines, highlighting, erasures, marking out or insertion of words or other information, are allowed on any area of the petition form. Any such extraneous markings on, or alterations of the petition form, or copies of the petition form that are not exact duplicates,. will result in the invalidation of all signatures contained.on that petition form. Extraneous markings do not include signatures or addresses. Each petition form shall include language informing voters that additional markings will disqualify the signatures on the petition form; that for their signature to be valid, they must be a registered voter of the Town of Reading; that their signature shall be written as they are registered; that they should not sign the petition more than once; and that if they are prevented by physical disability from writing, that they may authorize some person to write their name and residence in their presence. The back of each petition form where signature lines appear, shall include the following instruction: 'ATTENTION VOTERS: Before signing, read signer information on the other side" In addition to the certification of signatures on the petition form, the Board of Registrars of Voters shall examine the petition forms for extraneous markings, and determine whether they are exact copies. (c) Election - Any ballot question se- submitted in accordance with this procedure shall be determined by a majority vote of the voters voting in said election, but no action of the Town Meeting shall be reversed unless at least twenty percent (20 %) of the eligible voters vote in such election, or take any other action with respect thereto. Board of Selectmen 323 ARTICLE 17 1 To see if the Town will vote to authorize the General Manager of the Reading Municipal Light Department, on the recommendation of the RMLD Board of Commissioners, to enter into a five -year contract, including all extensions, renewals, and options, for maintenance of the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) program at the RMLD, or take any other action with respect thereto. Reading Municipal Light Board ARTICLE 18 To see if the Town will vote to amend Section 6.2 of the Reading Zoning By -Laws by adding an (1) after 20 in row # 11 Free - Standing Signs under Side Setback in Table 6.2.3 for Business -A, Business -C and Industrial Zoning Districts. And add (I) to the Notes in Table 6.2.3. and add a new Section 6.2.9. "Signs by Special Permit' as follows: (words in bold italics denotes new language). Business -A, Business -C and Industrial Zoning Type Permit Max. Sign Max. Sign Front Side Maximum Required Area Height Setback Setback Number (sq. ft ) (ft. (ft.) (ft.) 11. Free- Standing Y 50(D) 20 0 20 (1) 1/lot Note (I): A Special Permit may be granted by the CPDC. See Section 6.2.9. for Special Permit Criteria. Add new Section 6.2.9. so that it reads as follows: Section 6.2.9. Signs by Special Permit: The CPDC may grant a Special Permit for a free - standing sign within the side setbacks identified in Table 6.2.3 or Section 6.2.6.3. if it finds that the sign complies with the purposes of this by -law, abutting properties are not unreasonably impacted by sign placement, and the sign conforms in all other respects with Section 6.2, with specific attention to Section 6.2.5.a, regarding impact on traffic and pedestrian safety. . Or take any other action with respect thereto. Community Planning and Development Commission ARTICLE 19 To see if the Town will vote to amend Section 6.2. of the Town of Reading Zoning By -Laws by amending Table 6.2.3 and the corresponding Sections in 6.2. as follows: ( (words in bold italics denotes new language.) Signs Per ing Districts: Amend Line #14 under Business -B Zoning Districts as shown in the chart and add a new Line #17 under to read as follows: 324 Add (J) under the Notes in Table 6.2.3 so that it reads as follows: Note (J): Free - standing signs shall be permitted only where the principal business entrance is located more than 40 feet from the centerline of the street in front of the lot. See Section 6.2.9.a. for Special Permit Criteria. Add "or by special permit" at the end of Section 6.2.5.f. under "Prohibited Signs" so that it reads: Free - standing signs in a Business -B Zoning District (except as permitted at service stations or by special permit). In Section 6.2.6.4. "Signs in Business -B Zoning Districts" under "Prohibited Signs," add the words "or by Special Permit" at the end of the first bullet so that it reads: Free- standing (except as permitted at service stations or by special permit). In the second to last sentence of the first paragraph of Section 6.2.6.4. "Signs in Business -B Zoning District," delete "free- standing" and add "or by special permit from the CPDC' to the end of the last sentence so that it reads: No free standing, internally illuminated, or Reader Board signs shall be permitted anywhere in a Business -B Zoning District. Free - standing signs will be allowed only for service stations or by special permit from the CPDC. In Section 6.2.6.8. "Signs in Residential Districts," add "except as allowed by a special permit "to the end of:the second bullet under "Prohibited Signs" so that it reads: • Free - standing signs (except as allowed by a special permit). . Add new Section 6.2.9.a. so that it reads as follows: Section 6.2.9.a. The CPDC may grant a Special. Permit for a free - standing sign in the Business -B or Residential Zoning Districts if it finds that the sign complies with the purposes of this bylaw, abutting properties are not unreasonably impacted by sign placement and there is no negative impact on traffic and pedestrian safety. 325 Permit Max. Sign Max. Sign Front Side Maximum Type Required Area (sq. ft.) Height Setback (ft.) Setback (ft.) Number 14. Free- Y. 35 60(D) 24-14 0 20 1 /lot Standing (Service Stations only) 17. Free- SPP (J) 35 10.5 0 20 171ot Standing Add (J) under the Notes in Table 6.2.3 so that it reads as follows: Note (J): Free - standing signs shall be permitted only where the principal business entrance is located more than 40 feet from the centerline of the street in front of the lot. See Section 6.2.9.a. for Special Permit Criteria. Add "or by special permit" at the end of Section 6.2.5.f. under "Prohibited Signs" so that it reads: Free - standing signs in a Business -B Zoning District (except as permitted at service stations or by special permit). In Section 6.2.6.4. "Signs in Business -B Zoning Districts" under "Prohibited Signs," add the words "or by Special Permit" at the end of the first bullet so that it reads: Free- standing (except as permitted at service stations or by special permit). In the second to last sentence of the first paragraph of Section 6.2.6.4. "Signs in Business -B Zoning District," delete "free- standing" and add "or by special permit from the CPDC' to the end of the last sentence so that it reads: No free standing, internally illuminated, or Reader Board signs shall be permitted anywhere in a Business -B Zoning District. Free - standing signs will be allowed only for service stations or by special permit from the CPDC. In Section 6.2.6.8. "Signs in Residential Districts," add "except as allowed by a special permit "to the end of:the second bullet under "Prohibited Signs" so that it reads: • Free - standing signs (except as allowed by a special permit). . Add new Section 6.2.9.a. so that it reads as follows: Section 6.2.9.a. The CPDC may grant a Special. Permit for a free - standing sign in the Business -B or Residential Zoning Districts if it finds that the sign complies with the purposes of this bylaw, abutting properties are not unreasonably impacted by sign placement and there is no negative impact on traffic and pedestrian safety. 325 The CPDC may consider the following items when reviewing the Special Permit request, considerations for the character of the surrounding neighborhood, the principal use.of the property or business, the location of the parking, landscaping in the front yard setback and other signs on the property. Or take any other action with respect thereto. Community Planning and Development Commission ARTICLE 20 To see if the Town will vote to amend the Town of Reading Zoning By -Laws Section 6.2.4.0. "Exempt Signs" and Section 6.2.6.3 "Signs in Business -A Zoning Districts ".and Section 6.2.6.4. "Signs in Business -B Zoning Districts' as follows: ( l (words in bold italics denotes new language.) Add the following language to Section 6.2.4.0. "Exempt Signs:" Any establishment located in a Business or Industrial Zoning District may display: • An "Open" Flag - with dimensional requirements not to exceed four (4) feet by six (6) feet and may contain decorative graphics. • A National or State Flag - with emblems of religious, educational, governmental organization or any other federally tax - exempt organization, except when displayed in connection with commercial promotions or advertising. Dimensions, shall not exceed four (4) feet by six (6) feet. • A minimum ground clearance of eight (8) feet shall be provided for flags that hang over walkways, sidewalks and entrances of businesses. Ground clearance shall be defined as the distance between the lowest hanging portion or bottom of the flag and the grade directly below. Delete the last sentence in the second paragraph of Section 6.2.6.3. "Signs in Business - A Zoning Districts" so that it reads: A lot which contains not more than one establishment shall be allowed one free - standing . sign or one wall sign or one projecting sign only. GARfAFFn to the above �equkemeni[6. Delete Section d. Either the allowed fFee 6t, a #88 StandiRg SigPj&4F�Xe-A RUFRbGF of the pmpefty-- 326 Delete the second paragraph of Section 6.2.6.4. "Signs in Business -B Zoning Districts: Or take any other action with respect thereto. Community Planning and Development Commission ARTICLE 21 To see if the Town will vote to amend the Town of Reading Zoning By -Laws Section 6.2.6.3 "Signs in Business -A Zoning Districts" as follows: (LaRg ag l (words in bold italics denotes new language.) To remove the second bullet under Prohibited Signs in Section 6.2.6.3. so that it reads: Prohibited Signs: Banners as permanent signs Amend the first sentence in the second paragraph in Section 6.2.6.3. "Signs in Business - A Zoning Districts" so that it reads as follows: ' A lot which contains not more than one establishment shall be allowed one free - standing sign or one wall sign or one projecting sign erity. A second sign of a different sign type shall be allowed not to exceed a maximum of eight (8) square feet. The total square footage of the two signs shall not exceed the maximum allowed as specified in Table 6.2.3. Or take any other action with respect thereto. Community Planning and Development Commission ARTICLE 22 To see if the Town will vote to amend Section 6.3.3.1 of the Zoning By -Laws by adding the word "not' in the second line between the words "does" and "or" so that Section 6.3.3.1 reads in its entirety as follows (words in bold italics denotes new language.): 6.3.3.1 The Building Inspector may issue a Building Permit for an interior renovation, interior alternation or interior reconstruction of a pre- existing, nonconforming structure that does not or will not extend the non - conformity or create a new non - conformity. Or take any other action with respect thereto. Community Planning and Development Commission 327 and you are. directed to serve this Warrant by posting an attested copy thereof in at least. one (1) public place in each precinct of the Town not less than fourteen (14) days prior to November 8, 2010, the date set for the meeting in said Warrant, and to publish this Warrant in a newspaper published in the Town, or providing in a manner such as electronic submission, holding for pickup or mailing, an attested copy of said Warrant to each Town Meeting Member. Hereof fail not and make due return of this Warrant with your doings thereon to the Town Clerk at or before the time appointed for said meeting. Given under our hands this 21 st day of September, 2010. AjZ. Bonazoli, C, it an Camille W. Anthony, Vice Chairman Richard W. Schubert, Secretary j . John Della Paolera, Constable 328 Stephen A. Goldy Be ya SELECTMEN OF READING November 2, 2010 State Election Warrant COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Middlesex, ss. Officer's Return, Reading: By virtue of this Warrant, I, on October 12, 2010 notified and warned the inhabitants of the Town of Reading, qualified to vote on Town affairs, to meet at the place and at the time specified by posting attested copies of this State Election Warrant in the following public places within the Town of Reading: Precinct 1 J. Warren Killam School, 333 Charles Street Precinct 2 Peter Sanborn Place, 50 Bay State Road Precinct 3 Reading Police Station, 15 Union Street Precinct 4 Joshua Eaton School, 365 Summer Avenue Precinct 5 Town Hall, 16 Lowell Street Precinct 6 Austin Preparatory School, 101 Willow Street Precinct 7 Reading Library, Local History Room, 64 Middlesex Avenue Precinct 8 Wood End School, 85 Sunset Rock Lane The date of posting being not less than seven (7) days prior to November 2, 2010, the date set for the State Election in this Warrant. I also caused an attested copy of this Warrant to be posted on the Town of Reading web site. A true copy Attest. - Laura Gemme, Town Clerk 329 Wohn 4Paolera, Constable COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS WILLIAM FRANCIS GALVIN SECRETARY OF THE COMMONWEALTH STATE ELECTION WARRANT MIDDLESEX, SS: To any of the Constables of the Town of Reading, Greetings: In the name of the Commonwealth, you are hereby required to notify and warn the inhabitants of the Town of Reading who are qualified to vote in the State Election to vote at Precincts 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 Reading Memorial High School - Hawkes Field House - Oakland Road on TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2010, from 7:00 A.M. to 8:00 P.M. for the following purpose: To cast their votes in the State Primaries for the candidates of political parties for the following offices: GOVERNOR.............................. ............................... LT. GOVERNOR ........................ ............................... ATTORNEY GENERAL .............. ............................... SECRETARY OF STATE ........... ............................... TREASURER............................. ............................... AUDITOR................................. ............... ....: ..... ........ REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS ........................ COUNCILLOR ............................ ............................... SENATOR IN GENERAL COURT ............................ REPRESENTATIVE IN GENERAL COURT............ DISTRICT ATTORNEY ............. '. ........ ....... ..... ........... SHERIFF.................................... ............................... REGIONAL VOCATIONAL. SCHOOL DISTRICT..... FOR THIS COMMONWEALTH FOR THIS COMMONWEALTH FOR THIS COMMONWEALTH FOR THIS COMMONWEALTH FOR THIS COMMONWEALTH FOR THIS COMMONWEALTH SIXTH DISTRICT SIXTH DISTRICT ..............MIDDLESEX & ESSEX DISTRICT TWENTIETH & THIRTIETH MIDDLESEX DISTRICTS NORTHERN DISTRICT MIDDLESEX COUNTY .............NORTHEAST METROPOLITAN DISTRICT QUESTION 1: LAW PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives before May 4, 2010? SUMMARY This proposed law would remove the Massachusetts sales tax on alcoholic beverages and alcohol, where the sale of such beverages and alcohol or their importation into the state is already subject to a separate excise tax under state law. The proposed law would take effect on January 1, 2011. A YES VOTE would remove the state sales tax on alcoholic beverages and alcohol where their sale or importation into the state is subject to an excise tax under state law. A NO VOTE would make no change in the state sales tax on alcoholic beverages and alcohol. QUESTION 2: LAW PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote. was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives before May 4, 2010? SUMMARY This proposed law would repeal an existing -state law that allows a qualified organization wishing to build government- subsidized housing that includes low- or moderate - income units to apply for a single comprehensive permit from a city or town's zoning board of appeals (ZBA), instead of separate permits from each local agency or official having jurisdiction over any aspect of the proposed housing. The repeal would take effect on January 1 330 2011, but would not stop or otherwise affect any proposed housing that had already received both a comprehensive permit and a building permit for at least one unit. Under the existing law, the ZBA holds a public hearing on the application and considers the recommendations of local agencies and officials. The ZBA may grant a comprehensive permit that may include conditions or requirements concerning the height, site plan, size, shape, or building materials of the housing. Persons aggrieved by the ZBA's decision to grant a permit may appeal it to a court. If the ZBA, denies the permit or grants it with conditions or requirements that make the housing uneconomic to build or to operate, the applicant may appeal to the state Housing Appeals Committee (HAC). After a hearing, if the HAC rules that the ZBA's denial of a comprehensive permit was unreasonable and not consistent with local needs, the HAC orders the ZBA to issue the permit. If the HAC rules that the ZBA's decision issuing a comprehensive permit with conditions or requirements made the housing uneconomic to build or operate and was not consistent with local needs, the HAC orders the ZBA to modify or remove any such condition or requirement so as to make the proposal no longer uneconomic. The HAC cannot order the ZBA to issue any permit that would allow the housing to fall below minimum safety standards or site plan requirements. If the HAC rules that the ZBA's action was consistent with local needs, the HAC must uphold it even if it made the housing uneconomic. The HAC's decision is subject to review in the courts. A condition or requirement makes housing "uneconomic" if it would prevent a public agency or non - profit organization from building or operating the housing except at a financial loss, or it would prevent a limited dividend organization from building or operating the housing without a reasonable return on its investment. A ZBA's decision is "consistent with local needs" if it applies requirements that are reasonable in view of the regional need for low- and moderate- income housing and the number of low- income persons in the city or town, as well as the need to protect health and safety, promote better site and building design, and preserve open space, if those requirements are applied as equally as possible to both subsidized and unsubsidized housing. Requirements are considered "consistent with local needs" if more than 10% of the city or town's housing units are low- or moderate - income units or if such units are on sites making up at least 1.5% of the total private land zoned for residential, commercial, or industrial use in the city or town. Requirements are also considered "consistent with local needs" if the application would result, in any one calendar year, in beginning construction of low- or moderate - income housing on, sites making up more than 0.3% of the total private land zoned for residential, commercial, or industrial use in the city or town, or on ten acres, whichever is larger. The proposed law states that if any of its parts were declared invalid, the other parts would stay in effect. A YES VOTE would repeal the state law allowing the issuance of a single comprehensive permit to build housing that includes low- or moderate - income units. A NO VOTE would make no change in the state law allowing issuance o. f such a comprehensive permit. . QUESTION 3: LAW PROPOSED BY INITIATIVE PETITION Do you approve of a law summarized below, on which no vote was taken by the Senate or the House of Representatives before May 4, 2010? SUMMARY This proposed law would reduce the state sales and use tax rates (which were 6.25% as of September 2009) to B% as of January 1, 2011. It would make the same reduction in the rate used to determine the amount to be deposited with the state Commissioner of Revenue by non - resident building contractors as security for the payment of sales.and use tax on tangible personal property used in carrying out their contracts. The proposed law provides that if the 3% rates would not produce enough revenues to satisfy any lawful pledge of sales and use tax revenues in connection with any bond, note, or other contractual obligation, then the rates would instead be reduced to the lowest level allowed by law. The proposed law would not affect the collection of moneys due the Commonwealth for sales, storage, use or other consumption of tangible personal property or services occurring before January 1, 2011. The proposed law states that if any of its parts were declared invalid, the other parts would stay in effect. A YES VOTE would reduce the state sales and use tax rates to 3 %. A NO VOTE would make no change in the state sales and use tax rates. Hereof fail not and make return of this warrant with your doings thereon at the time and place of said voting. 331 Given under our hands this 5th'" day of October, 2010. A true copy Attest: 0, 332 "W E Bonazoli, Chairman d W �`hubert, Secretary r, / A Goldy Tafoya BOARD OF SELECTMEN John Della Paolera, Constable State Election November 2, 2010 Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being according to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 11046 Total ballots (65.5°/x) of registered voters cast as follows: Governor & Lieutenant Governor - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 5 4 13 7 9 5 12 7 62 Patrick & Murray 576 542 513 650 515 613 631 508 4548 Baker & Tisei 830 628 622 758 591 758 690 780 5657 Cahill & Loscocco 84 93 81 69 74 89 9081 . 0 661 Stein & Purcell 11 19 121 61 18 14 21 10 111 Write -Ins 1 21 21 11 01 2 0 0 01 7 Total 1 15081 12881 12421 14901 1209 14791 14441 13861 11046 Attorney General - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 32 26 22 17 23 24 31 29 204 Martha Coakley 859 772 744 935 743 885 913 770 6621 James McKenna 6161 490 474 538 443 566 499 587 4213 Write -ins 1 1 0 2 0 0 4 1 . 0 8 Total 1508 1288 1242 1490 1209 14791 14441 13861 11046 333 State Election November 2, 2010 Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being according to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following - results: 11046 Total ballots (65.5 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Secretary of State - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 73 50 46 71 39 68 77 81 505 William F Galvin 835 775 730 .888 732 876 851 724 6411 William C Campbell 579 430 443 510 412 517 493 566 3950 James D Henderson 20 33 23 21 26 18 23 14 178 Write -Ins 1 0 0 0 01 0 0 1 2 Total 1 15081 12881 12421 1490 1209 1479 1444 1386 11046 Treasurer - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr Z Pr 8 Total Blanks 93 58 55 76 50 73 76 82 563 Steven Grossman 642 637 572 722 591 706 725 574 5169 Ka n E Polito 772 591 614 692 565 699 640 728 5301 Write -Ins 1 2 1 0 3 1 3 2 13 Total. 1508 1288 1242 1490 1209 1479 1444 1386. 11046 334 State Election November 2, 2010 ' Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being according to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 11046 Total ballots (65.5 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Auditor - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 159 119 117 1371 86 159 159 122 1058 Suzanne M Bump 502 513 459 5371 466 533 547 462 4019 Mary Z Connau hton 796 595 614 756 594 735 686 757 5533 Nathanael A Fortune 50 59 51 59 59 51 51 43 423 Write -Ins 1 2 1 1 4 1 11 21 13 Total 1508 1288 1242 1490 12091 14791 14441 13861 11046 Repersentive in Congress - Vote for One Candidate Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 61 57 56 .36 67 78 63 469 John F Tierney 739 677 819 708 789 806 699 6022 Bill Hudak r785 487 506 613 463 622 557 624 4541 Write -Ins 1 2 2 2 1 3 0 14 Total 1288 1242 1490 1209 1479 1444 1386 11046 335 State Election November 2, 2010 Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being according to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 11046 Total ballots (65.5 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Councillor - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 . Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 . Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 249 156 146 254 155 217 246 " 212 1635 Paul A Caruccio 645 481 497 578 482 601 553 627 4464 Terrence W Kennedy 498 532 489 549 469 536 526 426 4025 Scott C Crabtree 76 79 77 53 76 83 96 77 617 Andrew W Mostone 39.. 37 32 55 27 41 23 43 297 Write -Ins 11 31 1 11 0 11 0 1 8 Total 1 15081 12881 12421 14901,12091 14791 1444 1386 11046 Senator in General Court - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 I Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 81 62 68 76 59 82 88 70 586 Katherine M Clark 652 621 576 707 594 642. 714 566 5072 Craig S adafora 775 603 596 707 550 754 640 749 5374 Write -Ins 0 2 2 0 6 1 2 1 14 Total 1508 1288 1242 1490 1209 1479 1444 13861 11046 Representative in General Court 20th Middlesex District - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr Pr 8 Total Blanks 298. 341 367 357 267 1630 Bradley H Jones Jr 1189 1134 1103 1069 1105 5600 Write -Ins 21 15 9 18 14 77 Total 1508 0 0 1490 0 1479 1444 1386 7307 336 State Election November 2, 2010 Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being according to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 11046 Total ballots (65.5 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Representative in General Court 30th Middlesex District - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 524 84 76 511 61 523 495 491 221 James J. Dwyer 968 657 620 968 615 943 933 882 1892 Kara Marie Fratto 16 547 543 11 530 13 16 13 1620 Write -Ins 1508 0 3 1490 3 1479 1444 1386 6 Total 0 1288 1242 0 1209 0 0 0 3739 District Attorney - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 524 401 401 511 387 523 495 491 3733 Gerard T Leone, Jr 968 869 824 968 803. 943 933 882 7190 Write -Ins 16 18 17 11 19 13 16 13 123 Total 1508 1288 1242 1490 1209 1479 1444 1386 11046 Total Sheriff - Vote for One Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 I Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 321 219 206 . 336 227 318 310 292 2229 James V DiPaola 842 770 715 808 699 823 791 740 6188 Michael Tranchita, Sr 340 297 319 344 278 336 339 352 2605 Write -Ins 5 2 2 2 5 2 4 2 24 Total 1508 1288 1242 1490 1209 1479 1444 1386 11046 337 State Election November 2, 2010 Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being according to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: 11046 Total ballots (65.5 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Regional School -Re ding Candidate Pr 1 I Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 PrS Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 532 350 373 494 367 523 525 476 3640 Jeanne M Feeley 547 531 522 699 495 589 574 501 4458 Marie B Ferrari 426 -402 - 345 294 344 363 341 404 2919 Write -Ins 3 5 2 3 3 4 4 5 29 Total 1508 1288 1242 1490 1209 1479 1444 1386 11046 Regional School - Stoneham Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 688 514 5321 698 • 511 688 683 637 4951 Lawrence M Means 814 764 705 791 689 786 756 743 6048 Write -Ins 6 10 51 1 9 5 5 6 47 Total 1508 1288 12421 1490 1209 1479 1444 1386 11046 Question 1 Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 32 50 49 37 31 30 47 25 301 Yes 883 719 712 788 632 821 762 819 6136 No 593 519 481 665 546 628 . 635 542 4609 Total 1508 1288 1242 1490 1209 1479 1444 1386 11046 338 State Election November 2, 2010 Official Certified Results Pursuant to the Warrant and the Constable's Return thereon, a State Election was held for all eight precincts at the Hawkes Field House, Oakland Road. The Declaration of Polls being according.to the Warrant by the Town Clerk, Laura A Gemme. The ballot boxes were examined by the respective Wardens and Police Officer on duty and each found to be empty and registered 000. The Town Clerk declared the polls open at 7:00 a.m. and closed at 8:00 p.m., with the following results: ' 11046 Total ballots (65.5 %) of registered voters cast as follows: Question 2 Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 89 73 64 77 60 74 96 70 603 Yes 706 569 587 726 515 708 664 684 5159 No 713 646 591 687 634 697 684 632 5284 Total 1508 1288 1242 1490 1209 1479 1444 1386 11046 Question 3 Candidate Pr 1 Pr 2 Pr 3 Pr 4 Pr 5 Pr 6 Pr 7 Pr 8 Total Blanks 19 16 15 23 17 10 19 20 139 Yes 702 557 581 602 482 650 600 667 4841 No 787 715 646 865 710 819 825 699 6066 Total 1508 1288 1242 1490 1209 1479 1444 1386 11046 copy. A true Laura A Gemme Town Clerk 339 SUBSEQUENT TOWN MEETING Reading Memorial High School . November 8, 2010 Precinct 3 appointed Anthony D'Arezzo to fill a three -year vacancy; with a three year vacancy remaining open. Precinct 6 appointed Steven Cool to fill a three -year vacancy and Rick D'Angelo to fill a one -year vacancy. Precinct 8 appointed Patricia Beckman to fill a two -year vacancy; with a two year vacancy remaining open. Alan Foulds swore in newly appointed Town Meeting members after the precinct meetings The meeting was called to order by the Moderator, Alan E. Foulds, at 7:45 p.m., there being a quorum present. The Invocation was given by Philip B. Pacino, Precinct 5, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. ARTICLE 7 Reports Given: Philip Pacino, Bylaw Committee Chair, gave recognition to George Theophanis for his service on the Bylaw Committee Christopher Caruso, School Committee Chair introduced John Doherty, Superintendent of Schools John Doherty gave State of School Address: Welcome Thank you, Chairman Caruso. Good Evening. I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge and thank the Reading Board of Selectmen, the Finance Committee, my fellow Town Department Heads, our Town Manager, the Reading School Committee, the Reading Public Schools Administration, Faculty and Staff and all of you, our Town Meeting Members for all the your hard work and efforts in making Reading such a great place to live, work, and learn. On behalf of the Reading School Committee and the Reading Public Schools, 1 am pleased to present to you the 2010 State of the School Address. As I enter my first full year as Superintendent of Schools and my 23'" year as an educator in Reading, I would first like to thank the Reading Community for their support last year. With the passing of Pat Schettini, it was a difficult year for all us, but in dealing with his loss, we have grown stronger, more resilient as a school community, and better prepared to face the challenges that lie ahead. - Our district continues to focus on the vision of preparing all students for a 21° Century Global Society. To that end, we continue to find innovative and creative ways to improve our schools, even in these difficult financial times. Tonight, I am proud to highlight three areas that capture that spirit of innovation, creativity, and collaboration. These are: the accomplishments of our school district, an update on the performance contracting project, and the continued positive and collaborative relationship we enjoy with our town officials. As part of measuring where we are as a school district, I have been meeting with many community members to ask them about their perceptions of the Reading Public Schools. Many have shared their thoughts on what is working in our schools, what we need to do to improve in our schools, and what suggestions they may offer to improve our district. So far I have met with over 300 people, which include parents, teachers, administrators, town officials, senior citizens, booster groups, clergy, community members, and most importantly, our students. My goal is to meet with at least 600 people by January, survey several more and then report the results of my transition plan to the greater Reading community. During these conversations, one of my favorite questions has been; 'What are you most proud of in the Reading Public Schools?" • Here are some of the responses: • . The quality and dedication of the staff - k • That everyone has the best interest of the students 340 Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010 • The facilities are in great condition • The technology infrastructure and its hardware • The investment that the parents and the community have made to our schools _ • The learning opportunities that our students have • The reputation of the school district The commitment to seek continuous improvement AND • The collaboration between our town and our schools These comments help support the.fact that Reading is a very special place to educate children. I am very proud and honored to be a part of this school district and to have the opportunity to lead us closer to our vision. Superintendent's Award To that end, one of my favorite moments during the school year is to recognize two RMHS students for The Massachusetts Association of School Superintendents Superintendent's Award for Academic Excellence. This recognition goes to two-deserving members of the Senior Gass who have a strong three year cumulative average, participate in extracurricular and community service activities, and are currently in the top 5% of their graduating class. I am proud to say that each year we have many deserving students and the decision is always a difficult one. It is with great pride that I present this award to the following students: Our first recipient is Micayla Oniskey. Micayla is a National Honor Society student who is currently taking five Advanced Placement Courses. She is a four -year letter award winner for Varsity Cross Country, Winter Track, and Spring Track. Currently, Micayla is the captain of the Cross Country team and this season she broke the RMHS course record by 30 seconds. She started the French Club a few years ago and is now its president. Her community service activities include serving breakfast to our senior citizens at Tannerville on Sunday mornings to walking dogs at the MSPCA shelter. Micayla is applying to 13 colleges including Dartmouth, Princeton, William and.Mary, Amherst, Bowdoin, and Tufts. She plans to pursue a double major in Pre -Med and French. Micayla, please come forward to receive the 2010 MASS Superintendent's Award. Mark Mauriello is tonight's second recipient. Mark is also a National Honor Society member who is currently taking four AP courses. He is a recipient of the Middlesex league Principars Award, the President of the Drama Club, a class officer, and the Vice President of the Student Council. Like Micayla, he began his own foreign language club, the Spanish Club, a few years ago and is now the President. He is on the Executive Board of the Reading Coalition against Substance Abuse, where he has served as a student representative for the last two years. This weekend, Mark will perform the lead role in the RMHS Drama Club production of the Scarlet Pimpernel. Last April, Mark was a co- emcee at the National Blue Ribbon Conference which was held here in Reading. Mark has also applied to 13 schools including Emerson, Carnegie Melon, Ithaca, Cincinnati Conservatory, and the University of Michigan where he hopes to major in Musical Theater. Mark, please come forward and accept the 2010 Superintendent's Award for Academic Excellence. Accomplishments of District Our accomplishments do not stop with these students. During the 2009 -2010 school year, the Reading Public Schools continued to reach new heights. The flier that you received this evening lists several of the 2009 -10 accomplishments, as well as, many of our current initiatives. Over the last several years, I have had the opportunity to network with colleagues from all over our country and visit their schools, I have come to the conclusion that Reading is a very special place. The learning experiences, activities and - programs that we offer in our district are not commonly found in other school districts. These experiences would not be possible without the dedication of our staff, the strong leadership provided by our principals, assistant principals, and directors, and the finandal and volunteer support that we receive from our parents and our community. We operate as a team, and we know that the power of many is much greater than the power of one. I am happy to highlight a few of those accomplishments. District As a district, the Reading Public Schools continues to graduate a very high percentage of college -bound students. 91.6% of our students go on to post - secondary education with 83.8% of our students attending four -year colleges and universities. Our students are accepted to some of the top schools in our country. They continue to excel in standardized tests like the MCAS, AP and SAT tests and, once again, 100% of our graduating Gass passed the MCAS test requirement for graduation. Another data point that we closely watch is the % of Grade 8 students that attend Reading Memorial High School. This year, 94% of our Grade 8 students attended Reading Memorial High School. This is a very high number compared to other communities. Our middle and high school students have had numerous opportunities in the past year to travel and expand their boundaries of learning beyond the classroom walls. They have traveled to Spain, France, Greece, Italy, Quebec, Montreal, New York, Virginia, Washington D.C. the Berkshires, Costa Rica, and Iceland, all of which are at no cost to our district and are possible through the financial support of our parents, the dedication of our teachers, and the willingness of our students to participate in these exciting experiences. We provided numerous professional development experiences for our teachers and paraeducators in a variety of areas including technology integration and 21m Century Skills, project-based learning, literacy, inclusion, and curriculum development. Most of these workshops and courses are led by our own staff which in itself accomplishes two things. First, it requires less funding to provide district-based professional development and second, it builds the capacity of our staff to become leaders in these areas. 341 Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010 One such experience occurred this past April when Reading was the host to the Blueprint for Educational Excellence National Institute. This high energy two-day institute focused on sharing best teaching practices in a variety of areas. This institute was attended by over 800 educators from all over the country and included our entire Reading Public School staff. I am pleased to share that last year's conference was at no cost to our district. In fact, it actually generated revenue, which will be used to fund additional professional development activities this year. It was a successful and inspiring experience for those in attendance. We are proud and excited to share that we have been invited to host this conference again this year in Reading. Under the leadership of Reading Memorial High School Fine Arts Department Chair Bill Endslow and Elementary Fine Arts Curriculum Coordinator At Mosier, our 5'° annual ArtsFest, which showcased student art work, drama, and music performances, was the best it has ever been. And that is a high bar to achieve. In collaboration with the community and town organizations, our health and wellness educators, under the leadership of Tom Zaya and RCASA Executive Director Erica McNamara, hosted the first annual Health and Wellness Education Fair in March for all students in grades 8 -12. The fair provides us with an additional opportunity to educate our students about making healthy choices and wise decisions. Due to the collaborative efforts of our special education department, Understanding Disabilities, the RMHS Drama Club, the PTO organizations, and Samantha's Harvest, the Reading Public Schools held its first ever inclusive schools celebration which focused on providing opportunities for students and the community to understand how important it is to respect and accept all people in our society. One of the highlights of Inclusive School month was Dr. Michael Fowlin, who provided a powerful message of accepting all differences regardless of race, color, gender, sexual orientation, disabilities, or talents. _ Our special education staff continues to strengthen and develop our programs within our schools to meet the needs of all students at all levels. Over the last three years, seventeen students have returned to our district from out of district placements because of the strength of our special education programs and services. Students that were once previously separated from their peers are now in inclusive settings in their community schools and are provided more appropriate opportunities for academic and social growth. Additionally, the return of our Reading students provides a significant.cost savings for our district. The earned reputation of our programs has enabled us to tuition in students from other districts who would otherwise be placed in non - inclusive settings. This is the right thing to do for ALL children. We have strong partnerships with the Reading Police and Fire Departments. Our schools are much safer and are well prepared for crisis and emergencies than they were two years ago with enhanced safety plans and procedures. Last year, we initiated a calendar of scheduled safety drills which included fire, lockdowns, evacuations, and shelter in place drills. Implementing these drills would not have been possible without the continued support that we receive from Chief James Cornier, Chief Greg Bums, School Resource Officer Corey Santasky, Sergeant Richard Abate and the Reading Police and Fire Departments. As an integral part of our mission all of our schools continue to participate in meaningful community service projects. Some of these projects are local, while others are in other parts of the word. Examples include Habitats for Humanity, Pennies for Peace, Coats for Kids, Hoops for Heart, Walk for Hunger, Animal Rescue Club, Earthquake Relief in Haiti, Reading Food Pantry, Toys for Tots, and . the ALS walk. This year Reading Memorial High School will partner with Reading Rotary to begin an Interact Club, named after Rotarian Patrick Schettini. The Schettini Interact Club will focus on community service after the Rotary Motto, "Service Above Self." High School Reading Memorial High School continues to focus on preparing our students for a 21" Century Global Society with increased use of technology integration, project-based learning, a strong freshmen advisory program and authentic assessments. 84 of our students qualified for the Abigail Adams scholarship, which is determined based on MCAS scores. This provides them with free tuition to any of our state colleges and Universities. 10 RMHS students were recognized. as National Merit Scholars Commended Students. 38 of our students earned AP scholar awards, which exemplifies exceptional achievement in attaining a high level on AP exams. In staying consistent with our mission, the Young Engineers club finished a two year project during which they built a working biodiesel reactor which converts waste vegetable oil into diesel fuel. They successfully tested their new product in fans tractors at Russell Orchards in Ipswich. This may become the model that we need to generate more revenue for our community. Our Fine Arts program is one of the best in our region. The Marching Band and Jazz Bands received medals jn competitions throughout the year. Several musicians were recognized for outstanding musicianship at competitions. The RMHS Jazz Band performed at the Hatch Shell on the Chades River Esplanade as one of the top jazz bands in the state. Several students received Boston Globe Scholastic Art Awards. Last year, the RMHS Drama Club had very successful productions, including Into the Woods, The Elephant Man, The Boys Next Door and Me and My Gir. Not only were the shows well done, but two of the shows continued the theme of Social Justice. Beginning this weekend, the Drama Club will perform The Scarlet Pimpernel. 167 high school students or 117" of our entire high school student body will be involved in this show. The quality of these performances and productions are incredible. Regardless of our difficult economic times, our Fine Arts programs in our schools can not be compromised. I encourage all of you to attend this weekend's shows and all of our student fine arts performances. 342 Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010 Our high school athletic program continues to excel both on the playing surfaces and on the sidelines. Our football team was the Division 2A Super Bowl Champions highlighting an exciting undefeated season. Six varsity sports won their respective league championships. We had several Globe and Herald All- Scholastic athletes and Football Coach John Fiore earned himself the recognition of Boston Globe Coach of the Year. Our quality of education continues at the middle school level where we continue to provide the strong foundation of knowledge and skills necessary for our students to be well prepared for high school. . We continue to have the only middle schools in New England that have achieved the rigorous standards of both New England League of Middle Schools Spotlight Schools and National Blue Ribbon Schools. The Parker Math Team finished first in the Intermediate Math League while the Coolidge Science Team continued to excel in state and national competitions. In addition, Parker and Coolidge students received top honors in literacy, history, geography, and foreign language events. Both middle schools continue to provide high quality opportunities for our students in the fine arts with strong music and art programs. Last year, many of you attended the wonderful productions of Willie Wonka and Pied Piper, and the Junior District Music Festival. Several students received Boston Globe scholastic art awards and our middle school jazz band received a gold medal at the Massachusetts Association for Jazz Education Festival. Our elementary schools, where the journey all begins, continue to prepare our students with the sk81s and knowledge necessary to transition successfully to middle school. Each school has a unique culture that focuses on content skill building, character education, health and wellness, the arts, technology integration, community service, literacy and STEM curriculum. Last year, the Wood End Elementary School was awarded the designation of a Blue Ribbon Lighthouse School. Wood End, Birch Meadow and Killam Elementary Schools were featured as site visit schools for the April Sharing Institute. Due to the joint efforts of our PTO's and district funding, each elementary school now has SMART Boards in every classroom. These interactive white boards have positively changed the daily instruction in our classrooms. Under the leadership and dedicated efforts of David Ventola and several parent volunteers, over 104 elementary and middle school students participated in the Second Annual Lego Robotics Invitational in January. RISE Preschool continues to grow offering superior programming for 3 — 5 year olds. This year, with the expansion of programming, the RISE program extended to an additional classroom at the Joshua Eaton Elementary School. Our teachers and paraeducators are continually engaged in professional development activities. These include specific training in a variety of disabilities, video modeling, and related therapy services within the general education classroom. Support form the RISE parent teacher network has provided excellent enrichment opportunities for RISE students. This is a snapshot of our schools and our district. In addition, one of the major areas that I would like to highlight and take the next few minutes to report out is the progress of Performance Contracting. This project, which you overwhelmingly supported in April, 2009, is providing long term sustainable solutions to conserve energy and cut costs in our school and town facilities. Other - communities are nowjust realizing the value of such a project and are beginning to have discussion in their own towns on how to implement this type of initiative. This project is on budget, on time, with no cost overruns or change orders. It is scheduled to be completed in January. The smooth implementation of the project would not have been possible if it were not for the leadership of Director of Finance and Operations Mary DeLai, Director of Facilities Joe Huggins and Assistant Director of Facilities DJ Cacciapuotti, Jr. I would like to thank them publicly for their efforts. Here are some other facts about this project. Energy Conservation efforts You can see by the list behind me the numerous energy conservation highlights of this project. During the life of this project • Over 5,000 incandescent fixtures were upgraded to high efficiency systems Occupancy -based lighting controls were installed in all school and town buildings Energy management systems were installed in five school and five town buildings • 257 LED traffic and pedestrian signals were retrofitted with LED lights (all town -owned signals now equipped with LED technology) • Solar domestic hot water systems were installed at all three public safety buildings • New unit ventilators and heating & ventilation units were replaced at Killam and Birch Meadow • New Boilers were installed at Birch Meadow, Town Hall, and the West Side Fire Station • The chiller was replaced at Town Hall The Total Energy once it is fully implemented will be 365,000 MBtutyear • Electricity —1.3 million kWhfyear Gas — 88,000therms/year • Water— 869,000 gallonstyear The Annual Emissions Reductions will be the equivalent of what 422 cars or 769 homes gives off each year. • The annual average total savings will be over $350,000 per year • Finally, the financial information of the project. • Total Project Cost: $5.4 million • Less: $164,000 guaranteed utility rebates & incentives • Less: $308,000 school and town facilities operating budgets • $5.0 million financed through town - issued debt • Reading also received $150,000 in Federal Stimulus.(EECBG) funding for the project 343 Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010 • The energy savings during the Construction Period was used to reinvest into capital projects and to help offset the initial interest payment As a result of these savings, the corridor windows and the fire alarm system were replaced at Killam and new windows were fabricated at Town Hall. As you can see this is a truly impressive project and investment for our town and schools which will continue to reap benefits for many years to come. Teamwork The performance based project and the highlights that I mentioned earlier are just some of the terrific things that are happening in our district. Our philosophy has been to continue to improve, move forward, and not be satisfied with the status quo. Other surrounding communities have not always been able to do this. I believe the reason for this is that we have a culture in this community that is focused on leadership, communication and teamwork, not only within our schools, but with town government and the community as well. We have a tendency to leave our egos at the door and get the job done for the right reasons, which is in the best interest of our students and our community. Over the last year, town and school officials, staff, and community have collaborated on a number of projects including the H1 N1 Pandemic, the MWRA Water Main Break, new RCASA initiatives, implementation of emergency preparedness plans and the Killam Playground Project. We have just begun some new town/school projects including offering an afterschool elementary RAD kids course with the police department, implementing the new recycling program in the schools, and the one that we have been most excited about is accessing the Senior Citizen van to provide shuttle transportation to the Oak Grove subway station for our METCO students in the evening, so that they can participate in extracurricular activities and sports. These projects would not be possible if It were not for a trust level and communication avenues that have been built over time between town and school officials. I personally want to thank Peter Hechenbleikner for the ongoing opportunities to discuss issues proactively and coming up with solutions collaboratively. However, as we all know, this collaboration will continue to be challenged this year as we face limited resources caused by a weakening economy and a decrease in state and federal resources. For the last several years, we have had the opportunity to grow and improve as a community. Now, we are faced with a very difficult test. We must continue to provide the high quality education for our children and the services for our citizens without dismantling the core structures that we have in place. History has shown that if we dismantle these core structures, @ takes even longer to put them back together, even in the best of economic conditions. This challenge will take leadership, innovation, but most of all, teamwork. Neither town government, nor the school department will be able to accomplish this task alone. You have my word that I will continue to lead and support the.collaborative culture that we have built to navigate through these turbulent waters during difficult economic times. Andrew Carnegie once wrote that "teamwork is the fuel that allows common people to attain uncommon results." This quote exemplifies the challenges that each elected and appointed board, each department head, each administrator, and each town meeting member will face over the next several months as we develop an FY12 budget. The Reading Public Schools is committed to that spirit of teamwork as we continue to find solutions collaboratively to achieve uncommon results and do what is in the best interest of our students and our community. Thank you for your time this evening. I look forward to working with you as together we shape our community so that Reading will continue to be a place where all students can learn and succeed. Mary Ellen O'Neill gave RMLD report... _ For a quick background to my remarks this evening, let me provide you with a few basic fads about the RMLD: • The RMLD serves four communities - Reading, North Reading, Wilmington, and the residential portion of Lynnfield; • Approximately 60% of its electric sales comes from the town of Wilmington, and about 60% of its overall sales comes from the commercial sector; • The RMLD serves 25,000 residential customers and 3,000 commercial customers, a group that indudes small businesses, municipalities, and larger industries. In fiscal year 2010 the RMLD sold 684 million kilowatts of electricity, a 1.7% decrease from the previous year. The one -day peak demand of 156 megawatts occurred last August and was only marginally higher than the peak demand in FY2009. . As many of you know, a 20 -year agreement binds the four towns in a contractual arrangement with the RMLD. Based on this agreement, the RMLD makes semi - annual cash payments to all four communities, the amount of which is based on each town's percentage of kilowatt hour sales. In addition to this payment, the town of Reading only receives a return -on- investment payment. In FY2010 the RMLD returned a combined total of $2.45 million to the town of Reading. Major initiatives of the RMLD this year included: • The extension of the 20 -year agreement, agreed to by all four communities;, . • Capital infrastructure improvement projects throughout its service area; • Completion of the RMLD's GIS system which is now being used for construction drawings, systems studies, and dig safes; • The signing of new power supply agreement which will help stabilize fuel charges for the 2011 -2014 period; and 344 Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010 z The ongoing upgrade project at the Gaw substation in Reading which included the installation of two out of the three new transformers there: This project will increase the capacity of the substation by 50% and will allow the RMLD to meet future load requirements. Soil contamination, unfortunately, was discovered during the Gaw project. The RMLD worked diligently to address this situation and the soil remediation effort is now complete. In the coming year the RMLD will begin the phase -in of more advanced electric meters for all residential customers. Capital improvement work will continue throughout the area. The energy efficiency and conservation program will continue to be refined and expanded. Updates on this program are given to the RMLD's Board of Commissioners on a quarterly basis and can be seen on RCN's airing of the Board's meetings. The RMLD is also participating, as required, in the reporting of greenhouse gas emissions as Massachusetts continues to implement various portions of its Global Warming Solutions legislation. Thank you for your continued support. Copies of the RMLD's annual report are available this evening. Your questions and comments are always welcome. Peter Hechenbleikner gave update on Instructional Motion on snow plowing of churches from last town meeting Pursuant to an instructional motion at the 2010 Annual Town Meeting, the Board of Selectmen and Town staff engaged in discussion with the Reading Clergy Association about the issue of Town plowing of church parking lots. As you may remember Town Meeting was asked to fund continued snow plowing of church parking lots, and that motion was defeated largely upon the advice of Town Counsel that plowing church parking lots violated the state constitution. Father Steve Rock of St. Agnes Church was designated as the Clergy Association representative on this issue, and a meeting and numerous emails resulted in an agreement that the Town would phase out plowing church parking lots over a 3 winter period, beginning with the winter of 2010/2011. Beginning this winter, any church that opted to enter into an agreement with the Town, would reimburse the Town for actual costs of plowing. This agreement ends with the winter of 2012/13, after which the Town will no longer do the plowing. The Town wanted to work with the churches to give them a reasonable time to make other arrangements and still abide by the decision of Town Meeting to discontinue this practice. As of this date, 3 churches have entered into the agreement St. Agnes, First Baptist Church of Reading, and the Korean Church of the Nazarene. Report given by David Michaud, ad hoc Municipal Building Committee Chair A policy establishing this Committee was approved by the Board of Selectmen on November 24, 2009. Members were appointed and our first meeting was held on March 9, 2010. The Committee met 10 times between March 9 and August 12 operating with 6 of 7 positions filled. We have visited all Town buildings and 3 schools (selected -by the Superintendent) to understand the conditions, major maintenance requirements, and operation of each-building: We also invited department heads to. Share their thoughts regarding expansion and / or renovation to meet future operational needs. The Committee met with Mary Delai.and Joe Huggins from the School Department regarding management and conditions of all Town and School buildings. The Committee also met with a group of private citizens who have expressed interest in developing town owned property on Oakland Road. Several members of the Committee subsequently conducted a site walk of the Oakland Road property. The Committee received and reviewed copies of the following reports: RMLD and Town of Reading "Optimization Study of Fleet Maintenance Activities" 12/00 DPW Management study - April 2008 - Executive Summary and sections relevant to facilities FY 2011 - 2020 Capital Improvements Program Draft Cemetery facility report by the Reading DPW Reading Public library- Library Building Assessmentby Adams and Smith dated 9 -15-08 On October 5th the ad.hoc Municipal Building Committee made a progress report to the Board of Selectmen, sharing an extensive list of findings and seeking input as to how to proceed. We are currently involved in prioritizing our list of findings based on the Board of Selectman's guidance and intend to make a full report by year -end that includes recommendations that take into consideration public and worker safety, frequency of needed repairs, operational efficiency, work that has to be done anyway, benefits to the community, opportunities (such as grants), available funding, advancing community goals, and the current CIP. Buildings and Sites visited include: Birch Meadow School Cemetery Garage Community Center DPW - Fire Stations Joshua Eaton School Killam School Library - Oakland Road property Police Station Senior Center Town Hall 345 Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010 ad hoc Municipal Building Committee members include: Kathleen. Duggan - Resident Representative Andrew Grimes - Resident Representative George Hines - Finance Committee Representative David Michaud - School Committee Representative Richard Schubert - Board of Selectmen Representative Vicky Yablonsky - Library Board Representative James Bonazoli moves that the Town vote to table the subject matter of Article 1 Motion Carried ARTICLE 2 James Bonazoli, Board of Selectmen moves that the Town vote to table the subject matter of Article 2 Motion Carried ARTICLE 3 Camille Anthony, Board of Selectmen moves that the Town vote to amend the FY 2011 — FY 2020, Capital Improvements Program as submitted on pages 32 -39 in the "Town of Reading Massachusetts Report on the Warrant Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010" as provided for in Section 7 -7 of the Reading Home Rule Charter by virtue of the Board of Selectmen Background - given by Peter Hechenbleikner: The following amendments are proposed to the FY 2011 - FY 2020 Capital Improvements Program (CIP). These amendments need to be included in the CIP in order for Town Meeting to consider funding them under the various Articles at Town Meeting. The full revised CIP is included in the blue pages in the back of this report. The following are proposed modifications to the CIP previously approved at the Annual Town Meeting in April 2010: • Killam Roof $1,000,000 in FY11 (Article 9) previously shown in FY18 for $700,000; • Killam Windows $500,000 in FY11 (Article 9) previously shown as $36,000 per year in FY12- FY13; • Birch Meadow Windows $500,000 in FY11 (Article 9) previously shown as$18,000 per year in FY12 -13. Finance Committee Report - given by Barry Berman: The Finance Committee voted to recommend the subject matter of this Article at their meeting on October 13, 2010 by a vote of 6 -0 -0. These changes to the Capital Plan will be discussed further in Article 9. Bylaw Committee Report: No report After discussion from Town Meeting Members the Motion Carried 346 - Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010 ARTICLE 4 Marcie West, Finance Committee Chair moves that the Town vote to amend the following votes taken under Article 12 of the April 26, 2010 Annual Town Meeting relating to the Fiscal Year 2011 Municipal Budget James Bonizoli, Board of Selectmen moved to dispense of the reading of article. Motion to Dispense Carried Account Line Description Decrease Increase B99 Benefits funding source change only = increase free cash use by $50,000, reduce the balance from property taxes, State aid and non - property tax local receipts by $50,000 G92 Town Administration — Expenses Postage Printing and Paper 192 Finance — Expenses F2,OOO Postage Printing and Paper Mass Communications System (Public $ 8,000 Safety) $ 2,000 from Free Cash K91 Community Services —Wages _ $ 4,470 Sick Leave Buyback from Town SickNacation Stabilization Fund K92 Community Services — Expenses Veteran's Benefits $25,000 from Free Cash L91 Library -Wages Sick Leave Buyback $ 5,145 from Town Sick/Vacation_ Stabilization Fund M91 Recreation wages funding source change only — increase Reading Ice Arena use by $35,000, reduce the balance from property taxes, State aid and non - property tax local receipts by $35,000 Subtotals $10,000 $56,615 347 Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010 Enterprise Funds Account Line Net Operating Expense Decrease $46,615 W99 From Town Sick/Vacation Stabilization Fund $ 9,615 From Free Cash $377,367 $37,000 Enterprise Funds Account Line Description Decrease Increase W99 Water Reduce by overhead already voted in $377,367 General Fund budgets; new total for line W99 is $5,055,924 of which $225,000 is from Water Reserves and the balance from property taxes, State aid and non - property tax local receipts X99 Sewer Reduce by overhead already voted in $259,004 General Fund budgets, new total for line W99 is $5,153,719 of which $100,000 is from Sewer Reserves and the balance from property taxes, State aid and non - property tax local receipts Subtotals $636,371 $0 Finance Committee Report - given by David Greenfield: The Finance Committee voted to recommend the subject matter of this Article at their meeting on October 13, 2010 by a vote of 7 -0 -0. The general fund changes adjust balances versus the original FY 2011 Budget for unanticipated changes, and the Enterprise Fund changes eliminate accounting redundancies without changing any actual budget intentions. - Bylaw Committee Report: No report Report and background information given by Gail LaPointe - Page 4 warrant booklet Bill Brown Precinct 8 made a comment to consider that in the future we will be required to keep a 10% reserve Motion Carried ARTICLE 5 2/3 Vote required Declared unanimous by Moderator - 152 Town Meeting Members in Attendance 348 Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010 Stephen Goldy, Board of Selectmen moves that the Town vote to authorize the payment during Fiscal Year 2011 of the following bill remaining unpaid for previous fiscal years for goods and services actually rendered to the Town: Ricoh Americas Corporation $191 With funding from property taxes, state aid and non - property tax local receipts. Background - given by Gail LaPointe: There is one known bill from a prior year. Approval of payment of that bill will take a 9/10 vote of Town Meeting. An engineering bill for $190 was thought to be a duplicate bill, but two service calls had been performed. Finance Committee Report - given by Kevin Leyne: The Finance Committee voted to recommend the subject matter of this Article at their meeting on October 13, 2010 by a vote of 6 -0 -0. There is only one bill outstanding for $190 which originally.was thought to be a duplicate bill. Bylaw Committee Report: No report 9/10 Vote required Declared unanimous by Moderator 152 Town Meeting Members in Attendance Motion Carried ARTICLE 6 Ben Tafoya, Board of Selectmen moves that the Town vote to authorize the Board of Selectmen to sell, or exchange, or dispose of, upon such terms and conditions as they may determine, the following items of Town tangible property: Police - 1996 Ford Econoline 250 Van Police - 1998 Ford Expedition Police - 1999 Ford Taurus Background - given by Peter Hechenbleikner: The following list of tangible property with a value in excess of $5,000 is proposed for disposition under this Article. Between now and Town Meeting, there may be additional items added to the list. • Police -1996 Ford Econoline 250 Van • Police - 1998 Ford. Expedition • Police - 1999 Ford Taurus Finance Committee Report - given by Harold Torman: The Finance Committeevoted to recommend the subject matter of this Article at their meeting on October 13, 2010 by a vote of 7 -0 -0. The Town either uses this property as trade -in or sells it outright depending on the best value in individual circumstances. Bylaw Committee Report: No report Motion Carried 349 Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010 ARTICLE 7 James Bonziolo, Board of Selectmen moves that the Town raise by borrowing pursuant to G.L. Chapter 44, §7 and 8 and appropriate the sum of two million two hundred and eighty five thousand dollars ($2,285,000) for the purpose of reconstructing water systems on Haverhill Street, including the costs of engineering services, plans, documents, cost estimates, bidding services and all related expenses incidental thereto and necessary in connection therewith, said sum to be spent under the direction of the Town Manager; and that the Camille Anthony, Board of Selectmen moved to dispense of the reading of article. Motion to Dispense Carried Town authorizes the Town Manager, the Board of Selectmen, or any other agency of the Town to apply for a grant or loans to be used to defray all or any part of said water construction and /or reconstruction and related matters; and that the Town vote to authorize the Town Manager to enter into any or all agreements as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this Article; and that the Town authorizes the Town Manager, the Board of Selectmen, or any other agency of the Town to apply for non - interest bearing loan from the Massachusetts Water Resources Authority; and that the Town authorizes the Treasurer - Collector, with the approval of the Board of Selectmen, to borrow pursuant to said loan. Background - given by George Zambouras: The Massachusetts Water Resources Authority offers, two assistance programs that, provide financial assistance to member MWRA communities to perform water rehabilitation projects. The first is the Local Pipeline Assistance Program (LPAP) which provides interest free loans to member communities to' rehabilitate water pipelines and improve local water quality conditions. This loan program is scheduled to terminate in FYI 3, and the Town's allocation under the LPAP Program is $1,916,000. The second program is the Local Water System Assistance Program (LWSAP) which provides interest free loans to member communities to .rehabilitate water pipelines, improve local water quality conditions, and upgrade local water systems. This is a new program which will provide assistance from FYI to FY20. The, Town's allocation under the LPAP Program is limited'to $500,000 annually with a total allocation of $4,146,000 over the 10 year period. Under each program, the interest free loan is required to be paid back to the MWRA in equal installments over a 10 year period beginning one year after the distribution of the funds for approved projects. Acceptance of the interest free loan offers will enable the Town to continue with its water distribution system improvement projects with reduced capitol expenditures. The use of the loan programs also enables the Town to combine projects, and achieve reduced' construction costs resulting from the economy of scale of projects. The Town has been making strides to upgrade and rehabilitate the Town's water distribution system. These upgrades help to address poor fire flows, water quality, and pressure loss due to undersized or deteriorated mains. In a 2001 study performed for the Town by Weston and Sampson Engineering, the Haverhill Street at Batchelder Road area was found to have deficient fire flows, providing only 27% of the recommend fire flows. The construction of a new transmission main in Haverhill Street is part of the Town's Water Distribution Master Plan, and will greatly improve the flows in this area increasing them to the recommend levels. The upgrades to the water distribution system that have been performed by the Town in recent years were not considered as eligible projects under the MWRA Program. The new Haverhill Street transmission main is eligible for the MWRA Loan Program. and consists of the replacing the existing water main from Wakefield Street to Batchelder Road with a new cement lined ductile iron pipe approximately 7,500 feet long with an estimated cost of $2.285M. 350 Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010 The effect of the no-interest loan versus previous estimates carried on the debt schedule show a projected savings of $445,575 over a five -year period. Finance Committee Report - given by Marcie West: The Finance Committee voted to recommend the subject matter of this Article at their meeting on October 13, 2010 by a vote of 7 -0 -0. This will allow significant savings of interest on expected future debt service. Bylaw Committee Report: No report 213 Vote required Declared unanimous by Moderator 152 Town Meeting Members in Attendance Motion Carried ARTICLE 8 Richard Curtis, Library Board of Trustees moves that the Town vote to authorize the Board of Library Trustees and /or the Board of Selectmen and /or the Town Manager to apply for and accept any federal and /or state grants and /or other funds which may be or may become available to defray all or a part of the cost of the design, construction and equipping and furnishing of the Library Renovation and Expansion Project for the Reading Public Library at 64 Middlesex Avenue; and to authorize the Board of Library Trustees and /or the Board of Selectmen and /or the Town Manager to expend the funds from such grant or grants, to contract for and expend any State.or Federal aid available for said Project without further appropriation, and to enter into any other contracts and to take any and all actions they deem necessary or desirable to effectuate the purposes of the foregoing vote or to carry out the Project. Background - given by David Hutchinson, Library Board of Trustees: In January, 2010; the Massachusetts Board of Library Commissioners issued an announcement of major changes to the Public. Library Construction Regulations, which increase the average grant award for eligible projects -to an average of 50 %. Further changes encourage sustainable construction and energy - efficient systems and construction. "Funding for the Massachusetts Public Library Construction .Program was authorized by Governor Deval Patrick and the Legislature in the General Governmental Bonds Bill in 2008. The program was first funded by a State bond authorization in 1987. As of January 2010, 290 grants totaling over $304 million have been awarded. Of these, 209 have been for construction, addition /renovation or special projects." Town Meeting (April 2010) approved $85,000 in funding to engage professional services to develop a building program to update and expand the Reading Public Library for the future, and to meet an accelerated timeline to apply for a State construction grant. The' Reading Public Library Building Program Study is currently underway. A Building Programmer, Owners Project Manager, and architects have been hired as required by the Massachusetts Board of Library Commissioners in order for the project to be granted eligible. This Article is requesting Town Meeting approval to apply for a State construction grant in January 2011 based on the results of the current Building Program Study. This Article is NOT requesting funding. Finance Committee Report - Francis Fardy: The Finance Committee voted to recommend the subject matter of this Article at their meeting on October13, 2010 by a vote of 7 -0 -0. Bylaw Committee Report: No report After discussion among town meeting members with responses by David Hutchinson 351 Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010 Motion carried ARTICLE 9 Chris Caruso, School Committee Chair moves that the Town of Reading appropriate the sum of one million five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000) for replacement of the roof and windows at the J. Warren Killam School, 333 Charles Street, which proposed repair project would materially extend the useful life of the school and preserve an asset that otherwise is capable of supporting the required educational program. James Bonizoli, Board of Selectmen moved to dispense of the reading of article. Motion to Dispense Carried Said sum to be expended under the direction of the School Committee, and to meet said appropriation the Treasurer is authorized to borrow said sum under M.G.L. Chapter 44, or any other enabling authority; that the Town of Reading acknowledges that the Massachusetts School Building Authority's ( "MSBA") grant program is a non - entitlement, discretionary program based on need, as determined by the MSBA, and any project costs the Town of Reading incurs in excess of any grant approved by and received from the MSBA shall be the sole responsibility of the Town of Reading]; provided further that any grant that the Town of Reading may receive from the MSBA for the Project shall not exceed the lesser of (1) forty seven and 2 tenths percent (47.21 %) of eligible, approved project costs, as determined -by the MSBA, or (2) the total maximum grant amount determined by the MSBA; and that the amount of borrowing authorized pursuant to this vote shall be reduced by any, grant amount set forth in the Project Funding Agreement that may be executed between the Town of Reading and the MSBA. Background: Submitted Below Finance Committee Report: Submitted Below Bvlaw Committee Rte: No report School Committee Report: Submitted Below After discussion among town meeting members with responses by Mary DeLai and Peter Hechenbleikner 2/3 Vote required Declared unanimous by Moderator 152 Town Meeting Members in Attendance Motion carried Chris Caruso, School Committee Chair moved to dispense of the reading of article. Motion to Dispense Carried Chris Caruso, School Committee Chair moves that the Town of Reading appropriate the sum of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) for replacement of the windows at the Birch Meadow School, 27 Arthur B. Lord Drive, which proposed repair project would materially extend the useful life of the school and preserve an asset that otherwise is capable of supporting the required educational program. said sum to be expended under the direction of the School Committee, and to meet said appropriation the Treasurer is authorized to borrow said sum under M.G.L. Chapter 44, or any other enabling authority; that 352 Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010 the Town of Reading acknowledges that the Massachusetts School Building Authority's ( "MSBA ") grant program is a non - entitlement, discretionary program based on need, as determined by the MSBA, and any project costs the Town of Reading incurs in.excess of any grant approved by and received from the MSBA shall be the sole responsibility of the Town of Reading]; provided further that any grant that the Town of Reading may receive from the MSBA for the Project shall not exceed the lesser of (1) forty seven and 2 tenths percent (47.21 %) of eligible, approved project costs, as determined by the MSBA, or (2) the total maximum grant amount determined by the MSBA; and that the amount of borrowing authorized pursuant to this vote shall be reduced by any grant amount set forth in the Project Funding Agreement that may be executed between the Town of Reading and the MSBA. Presentation - given by Mary DeLai: Thank you Mr. Moderator and Thank You Town Meeting Members for allowing us to present this funding opportunity forward for your consideration. I would first like to tell you about the new Green Repair Program offered through the Massachusetts School Building Authority, then talk about the specifics of the projects for which we are seeking your support. Unlike the standard MSBA Comprehensive Grant Program, with the Green Repair Program, grants are only available for repair projects limited in scope to roof, window and /or boiler repair or replacement. Only schools that are otherwise in good condition can apply for these funds The program established by the MSBA Board of Directors in May of 2010. In the initial program announcement, the MSBA stated that It is looking to leverage the favorable borrowing climate to fund smaller -scale repairs that will improve the efficiency of schools in districts that already have Statements of Interest filed with the MSBA. With the successful implementation of those projects and a reported infusion of federal stimulus funds, the funding opportunity was opened up to additional districts in August. Here you see the MSBA's stated goals for the program. As mentioned earlier, with the success of earlier projects, this funding opportunity was opened to other districts in early August. Through the existing network of Superintendents and other school officials, MSBA invited districts to submit Statements of Interest between August 11th and September 22nd. Per the requirements of the program, the School Committee and Board of Selectmen each voted to authorize the submission of the Statements for two or our schools — Killam and Birch Meadow Elementary. Between mid- August and early September, we gathered all of the data and information required as part of the very comprehensive SOI application and the two SOls were submitted to MSBA on September 16th. Based on a reimbursement formula used by MSBA, each district in the Commonwealth has already been assigned a standard reimbursement rate. For Reading, that rate is 47.21 % Therefore, if we are awarded this reimbursement grant, Reading will reimbursed $0.47 cents of each dollar spent. The appropriation being requested this evening will only be expended if a Project Funding Agreement is executed with MSBA. Per the program requirements, the amount that you are being asked to vote tonight to authorize the town to raise through borrowing is to be reduced by the amount of the grant award. Why is it necessary to take action tonight? 1. On October 8th, representatives from MSBA came to Reading to conduct a site visit to verify conditions as reported in the Statement of Interest. 2. At that time, we were told that 90 districts had submitted SOI's for a total of about 180 projects with $300 million available for this round of applications. We were informed that if the total for all submitted projects was equal to or less than $300 million, all projects would likely be funded. 3. On October 25th, Superintendent Doherty received an email from MSBA which read, Dear Superintendent Doherty: Your District's Green Repair Statements of Interest were reviewed at the MSBA Facility Subcommittee Meeting Wednesday of last week. These have been recommended for a full review by the Board of Directors at their next meeting scheduled for Wednesday, November 17, 2010. The pre- requisites necessary to advance a potential Green Repair Project are attached to this email. In anticipation of MSBA Board action on your Green Repair Statements of Interest we encourage you to begin acting on these requirements. 4. If the Board takes action on November 17th, we would need to demonstrate that the entire amount has been authorized by Town Meeting in order to sign the PFA 5. As a condition of the program, construction must be completed by Dec. 2011 6. If we waited, we would have to either hold a Special Town Meeting or wait for April Town Meeting. If we waited unlit late April to vote and sign a PFA, these projects would not be completed by the December 2011 deadline. Why did we select these projects? 1. Each of these projects were already part of the Capital Improvement Program. - The original plan was to complete the window projects over a 10 -year horizon by completing 15 -30 per year at each school. - The replacement of the Killam roof has been included in the capital plan each year for a number of years and has been deferred several times; tens of thousands of dollars have been spent in the last few years for patching and sealing. 2. Each meets the stated goals and criteria of the program 353 Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010 Will improve the leaming environment Will reduce energy consumption - Will improve existing buildings that are otherwise structurally and educationally sound - Will generate cost savings for the district _ The cost of the project based on contractor estimates is approximately $1.6 - $1.8 million dollars including project management, design, and construction. The additional funding requested is to cover any contingencies such as additional asbestos beyond what is already anticipated or other unforeseen conditions in or around the windows or the roof decking and insulation. The current plan is to finance these projects by selling 10 year debt to finance our 52.79% share. Current rates are at about 3.5 %. As shown here in the debt service schedule provided by our Town Finance Director, the Debt Service payments will begin at $142,000 and diminish about $4,000 per year unfit the debt is paid off in FY2021. On behalf of the School Committee, Superintendent, myself, our Director _ of Facilities, the Principals of Birch Meadow and Killam Elementary Schools and their school community, we thank the Finance Committee and the Board of Selectman for their support of these projects and we thank you for your consideration tonight. Background -given by Mary De Lai: In August of 2010, the Massachusetts School Building Authority announced a new funding program entitled the Green Repair Program. This program is intended to assist in funding the repair or replacement of roofs, windows and /or boilers in public school facilities that are otherwise structurally, functionally and educationally sound except for the condition of their roof, windows and /or boilers. School districts interested in accessing the funding were required to submit Statements of Interest between August 11 and September 22, 2010. Over the past several years, the School Department has included in their school building facilities ten - year capital plan, capital projects for the replacement of windows at both the Killam and Birch Meadow Elementary Schools as well as for a total roof replacement at the Killam Elementary School. Given the funding targets for the MSBA's Green Repair Program, the Reading School Committee and the Reading Board of Selectmen both authorized the submission of Statements of Interest for these projects at each of these schools per program requirements. These Statements of Interest were filed with MSBA on September 16, 2010. The MSBA has already defined the reimbursement rates for each school district in the Commonwealth. For Reading, the defined rate is47.21 %. Thus, if the Town were to be invited into the program, we could potentially be reimbursed in the amount of $0.4721 for each dollar spent. The MSBA Board is expected to vote in November or December on the recommendation of MSBA staff on who to invite into the program. If a district is invited to participate in the program, they must be able to demonstrate that they have raised the entire' funding amount for the submitted projects in order to execute a Project Funding Agreement. Once the Project Funding Agreement is executed, the district can begin submitting for reimbursement immediately. The anticipated combined cost of the two projects,.including feasibility studies, project management, design and construction, is on the order of $1.9 million. We are requesting authorization to appropriate up to $2.0 million to allow for unforeseen contingencies. Our intent is to not sell bonds or proceed with any work on these two projects during this fiscal year unless a Project Funding Agreement with the MSBA is executed. The MSBA has reported that the total funding available for this statewide program is about $300 million and that the source is federal funding. The Green Repair Program requires that districts receiving the funding commit to expend funds by December 30, 2011 per flow -down requirements from the federal government. This is the reason for the accelerated timeline, and the need for this vote prior to receiving final approval and invitation into the program. If the project does move forward, it is expected that the Town will sell 10 year debt to pay for its 52.79% share (at a rate of 3.5% at present). This will curtail some annual capital spending for the next two years but have a lesser impact after that. The bulk of capital needs for the next two years are in Facilities and Public Works equipment. Public Safety, Roads and Recreation projects will be unaffected. Here is the expected debt service from Article 9, along with the amount of cash available for annual capital requests both before and after such debt is sold: $000s FY12 FYI FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 354 Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010 Cash for ra ital 691 967 1698 1884 2187 2371 2775 3231 3392 3500 Article 9 debt 142 138 134 130 126 123 120 116 112 109 New cash for capital 549 829 1564 1754 2061 2248. 2655 3115 3280 3391 Finance Committee Report - given by Chris Caruso: The Finance Committee voted to recommend the subject matter of this Article at their meeting on October 13, 2010 by a vote of 7 -0 -0. These improvements are already in the Capital plan and accelerating them at this time with a 47% reimbursement rate would represent significant savings on the. project. Bylaw Committee Report: No report School Committee Report: Although the Reading School Committee has not taken a vote yet. To support Article 9, they will take the vote on November 1st The School Committee did vote in September to support the Green Schools grant, which included the Killam roof and windows and the Birch Meadow windows. 213 Vote required Declared unanimous by Moderator 152 Town Meeting Members in Attendance Motion carried ARTICLE 10 Camille Anthony, Board of Selectmen moves that the Town vote to table the subject matter of Article 10 Motion Carried ARTICLE 11 A Richard Schubert moves that the Town vote to accept that portion of Causeway Road from the end of the existing public way portion of Causeway Road southeasterly approximately 927 feet, as a public way in the Town of Reading pursuant to M.G.L. c.82, as shown on the "Town of Reading Department of Public Works Street Acceptance Plan of Causeway Road dated September 22, 2010" adopted by the Board of Selectmen and on file with the Office of the Town Clerk; and that the Board of Selectmen be authorized, pursuant to M.G.L. c.40, § §3 and 14, to accept easements and the deed of a fee interest in said Causeway Street; and to authorize the Board of Selectmen to take such ways in fee or rights of easement by eminent domain under the provisions of M.G.L. c.79, or to acquire said lands in fee or rights of easement therein by gift or otherwise, and to transfer the sum of two hundred thirty thousand dollars ($230,000) from free cash for the payment of any eminent domain damages and for the purpose of repair and /or improvement of Causeway Road and further, that a betterment assessment, pursuant to M.G.L. c.80 or c.80A, shall be assessed to the properties improved in the amount of one hundred (100 %) percent of the total cost to the Town of the project. James Bonazoli, Board of Selectmen moved to dispense of the reading of article. Motion to Dispense Carried Presentation - given by George Zambouras - See Attached 355 Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010 Letter submitted by Joseph Curto - Attached Finance Committee Report - given by Mark Dockser, At October meeting it was voted 7 -0 -0 in support After Discussion by town meeting members 2/3 Vote required Declared unanimous by Moderator 152 Town Meeting Members in Attendance Motion Carried ARTICLE 11 B Richard Schubert moves that the Town vote pursuant to M.G.L. c.82 to accept Benjamin Lane as a public way in the Town of Reading, from Avon Street northerly for 343 feet, as shown on the 'Town of Reading Department of Public Works Street Acceptance Plan of Benjamin Lane dated July 1, 2009 ", adopted by the Board of Selectmen and on file with the Office of the Town Clerk: and that the Board of Selectmen be authorized pursuant to M.G.L. c.40, §3 and 14 to accept easements and the deed of a fee interest in said Benjamin Lane; Camille Anthony, Board of Selectmen moved to dispense of the reading of article. Motion to Dispense Carried Presentation - given by George Zambouras - See Attached Finance Committee Report - given by Mark Dockser, At October meeting it was voted 7 -0 -0 in support After discussion by town meeting members Motion Carried ARTICLE 11 C Richard Schubert moves that the Town vote pursuant to M.G.L. c.82 to accept Kylie Drive as a public way in the Town of Reading, from Wakefield Street southerly for 432 feet as shown on the 'Town of Reading Street Acceptance Plan of Kylie Drive dated August 4, 2010 ", accepted by the Board of Selectmen and on file with the Office of the Town Clerk; and that the Board of Selectmen be authorized pursuant to M.G.L. c.40, §3 and 14 to accept easements and the deed of a fee interest in said Kylie Drive. Camille Anthony, Board of Selectmen moved to dispense of the reading of article. Motion to Dispense Carried Presentation - given by George Zambouras - See Attached Finance Committee Report- given by Mark Dockser, At October meeting it was voted 7 -0 -0 in support After discussion by town meeting members Motion Carried 356 Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010 ARTICLE 12 Motion made by Stephen Goldy to move that the Town vote to authorize the Board of Selectmen to accept the conveyance of permanent drainage easements in Reading, Middlesex County, MA located on Lot 2 and Lot 3 of Benjamin Lane which easements are shown on a plan entitled: Benjamin Lane Definitive Subdivision - Property Rights Plan of Land, Reading Massachusetts Street, prepared by Sullivan Engineering Group, Inc., dated September 28, 2005, with revisions through March 1, 2006, and recorded with Middlesex South Registry of Deeds, as Plan 1106 of 2007, sheet 3 of 8, upon such terms and conditions as the Board of Selectmen shall consider proper Motion made by Richard Schubert to dispense of further reading of the article Motion to Dispense Carried Presentation given by George Zambouras -.See Attached 2/3 Vote required 140 Voted in the affirmative 1 Voted in the negative 152 Town Meeting Members in Attendance Motion Carried ARTICLE 13 - On motion made by Ben Tafoya, member of Board of Selectmen, it was voted to authorize the Board of Selectmen to file a Home Rule Petition with the General Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and that the legislation be adopted precisely as follows; except for clerical or editorial changes of form only unless the Selectmen (or other municipal executive) approve amendments to the bill before enactment by the General Court. The Selectmen (or other municipal executive) are hereby authorized to approve amendments which shall be within the scope of the general public objectives of this petition: "An Act Authorizing the Town of Reading to Grant One Additional License for the Sale of All Alcoholic Beverages Not to be drunk on the Premises in the Downtown Smart Growth District" Motion made Stephen Goldy, Member of the Board of Selectmen to dispense of further reading Motion to Dispense Carried Section 1: Notwithstanding Section 17 of Chapter 138 of the General Laws, or any other general or special act to the contrary, the licensing authority of the Town of Reading may grant an additional license for the sale of all alcoholic beverages not to be drunk on the premises to a business located within the Town of Reading Smart Growth 40R District roughly bounded by Woburn Street, Union Street, Pleasant Street, Parker Street, Haven Street, Ash Street, Gould Street, Green Street, High Street, Brande Court, Linden Street and Sanborn Street in the Town of Reading under Section 15 of said Chapter 138. The licensing authority shall not approve the transfer of the license to any other location but it may grant the license to a new applicant at the same location if the applicant files with the licensing authority a letter from the Department of Revenue indicating that the license is in good standing with the Department and that all applicable taxes have been paid. Section 2: If the license granted under this act is cancelled, revoked or no longer in use, it shall be returned physically, with all of the legal rights, privileges and restrictions pertaining thereto to the licensing 357 Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010 authority, which may then grant the license to a new applicant at the same location and under the same conditions as specified in this act. Section 3: The license shall be subject to all of said chapter 138 except said Section 17. Section 4: This act shall take effect upon its passage. Presentation was given by Peter Hechenbleikner Report of the Bylaw Committee given by Philip Pacino - Bylaw Committee in support 5 -0 After discussion by Town Meeting Members a motion made by ? ?, Precinct ?.to Dispense of Discussion 2/3 Vote required 114 Voted in the affirmative 22 Voted in the negative 152 Members in Attendance Motion to Dispense of Discussion Carries Counted Vote required 93 Voted in the affirmative 44 Voted in the negative 152 Members in Attendance Motion Carried Motion to adjourn 10:18 PM by a Town Meeting Member A true copy Attest: Laura A Gemme Town Clerk 358 Subsequent Town Meeting November 8, 2010 SUBSEQUENT TOWN MEETING Reading Memorial High School November 15, 2010 Alan Foulds called the meeting to order at 7:42 PM with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was said by Town Meeting Members ARTICLE 14 Motion made by James Bonazoli Move that the Town vote to amend Section 2.2.6 of the General Bylaws of the Town of Reading by striking the sentence "Chairmen shall serve no more than six consecutive years in that position" so that Section 2.2.6 reads in its entirety: "2.2.6 The Town Meeting Members and Town Meeting Members -Elect from each precinct shall hold an Annual Precinct Meeting after the Annual Town Election but before the convening of the business sessions of the Annual Town Meeting. The purpose of the meeting shall be the election of a Chairman and a Clerk and to conduct whatever business may be appropriate. Additional precinct meetings may be called by the Chairman or by a petition of six (6) Town Meeting Members of the precinct. Rules Committee Report: given by Alan Foulds, Moderator and member of the Rules Committee as follows: Pursuant to the Reading Home Rule Charter, Section 2 -12, the Town. Meeting Rules Committee met on May 28, 2010 to review and make recommendations on possible changes in the conduct of Town Meeting. It was decided by majority vote to recommend to Town Meeting that article 2.2.6 of the Reading Bylaws be changed to eliminate term limits for precinct chairmen. The change was recommended because it was felt by a majority of the committee that there I no known problem caused by retaining people in.that position indefinitely, and it unnecessarily rule out people that would like to serve. By a vote of 5 -1 the committee recommended the removal of the line "Chairmen shall serve no more than six consecutive years in that position." BVIaw Committee Report: Recommends 4 -0 for same reasons as the Rules Committee After discussion by Town Meeting members Motion does not Carry ARTICLE 15 Motion made by Camille Anthony to move that the Town vote, pursuant to Section 8 -1 of the Reading Home Rule Charter, to amend Section 4 -10: Other Committees, to delete Section 4 -10 (a) Land Bank Committee, and to re -letter Sections (b) and (c) thereof so that Section 4 -10 will read in its entirety as follows: Motion made by Stephen Goldy to dispense of the reading of the Article Subsequent Town Meeting 359 November 15, 2010 Motion to Dispense Carries Section 4 -10: Other Committees The Selectmen shall appoint the following committees and determine the number of members and their term of appointment, not to exceed three (3) years: (a) Town Forest Committee (b) Historical Commission The Board of Selectmen may establish and appoint standing advisory committees from time to time for a specific purpose. Such committees shall be considered a "multiple- member body" as defined in the Charter, shall be appointed in accordance with the process detailed in Section 8 -12, and members shall physically reside in the Town of Reading at the time of their appointment and during their term of office. Any of the elected boards or committees as listed in Article 3 of the Charter may, from time to time, establish and appoint ad hoc committees which shall serve no longer than 12 months. The term may be extended one time only for up to an additional 12 months. Each ad hoc committee shall be considered a "multiple- member body" as defined in the Charter, and shall be bound by all laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts but shall not be required to meet the requirements of Section 8 -12 of the Reading Home Rule Charter as to the appointment process. Board of Selectmen Information given by Peter Hechenbleikner and discussion with Town Meeting Members it agreed that all the documents would be scanned into the Electronic Document Management system by the Town Clerk within 6 months if possible. BVlaw Committee Report: given by Philip Pacino - The Bylaw committee would like to thank the Land Bank committee for their work and voted 4 -0 in support of this Article After discussion by town meeting members the vote was 2/3 Vote required Declared unanimous by Moderator 136 Town Meeting Members in Attendance Motion Carried ARTICLE 16 Motion made by Richard Schubert to move that the Town vote, pursuant to Section 8 -1 of the Reading Home Rule Charter, to amend Section 2 -15: Referendum Procedures, so that it reads as follows: (language with strikethrough shows deletions /words in italics denotes new language.) Motion made by Stephen Goldy to dispense of the reading of the Article Motion to Dispense Carries No final affirmative vote of a Town Meeting on any Warrant Article shall be operative until after the expiration of seven (7) days following the dissolution of the Town Meeting except the following: (a) a vote to adjourn or dissolve, (b) votes appropriating money for the payment of notes or bonds of the Town and interest becoming due within the then current fiscal year, (c) votes for the temporary borrowing of money in anticipation of revenue, or (d) a vote declared by preamble by a two- thirds vote of Town Meeting to be an emergency measure necessary for the immediate preservation of the peace, health, Subsequent Town Meeting 360 November 15, 2010 safety or convenience of the Town. If a referendum petition is not filed within the said seven (7) days, the votes of the Town Meeting shall then become operative. (a). Referendum Petition — If, within said seven (7) days, a referendum petition signed by not less than three (3) percent of the voters certified by the Registrars of Voters containing their names and addresses is filed with the Board of Selectmen requesting that any question affirmative vote of Town Meeting be submitted to the voters in the form of a ballot question, such ballot question to be in the form required in (b) herein, to the voters, then the operation of the Town Meeting vote shall be further suspended pending its determination as provided below. The Board of Selectmen shall, within ten (10) days after the filing of such referendum petition; call a Special Election that shall be held within thirty (30) days or such longer period as may be required by law after issuing the call, for the purpose of presenting to the voters any such ballot question. If, however, a regular or Special Election is to be held not more than sixty (60) days following the date the referendum petition is filed, the Board of Selectmen may provide that any such ballot question be presented to the voters at that Election. (b) Form of Referendum Petition /Ballot Question - Each ballot question so submitted shall appear at the top of each referendum petition and shall be presented in the following form of the following question which shall be placed on the official ballot: - "Shall the Town vote to approve the action of the representative Town Meeting whereby it was voted on (insert date of town meeting) to (brief description of the substance (insert complete language of the vote in the same language and form in which it was stated when presented by the Moderator to the Town Meeting, and as it appears in the records of the Clerk of the meeting) "? The form of the referendum petition shall in conformance with this section. The circulator(s) of the referendum petition may make additional copies of the petition form, but such copies must be.an exact duplicate thereof. The petition form may not be altered in any way. No extraneous markings, such as underlines, highlighting, erasures, marking out or insertion of words or other information, are allowed on any area of the petition form. Any such extraneous markings on, or alterations of the petition form, or copies of the petition form that are not exact duplicates, will result in the invalidation of all signatures contained on that petition form. Extraneous markings do not include signatures or addresses: Each petition form shall include language informing voters that additional markings will disqualify the signatures on the petition form; that for their signature to be valid, they must be a registered voter of the Town of Reading; that their signature shall be written as they are registered; that they should not sign the petition more than once; and that if they are prevented by physical disability from writing, that they may authorize some person to write their name and residence in their presence. The back of each petition form where signature lines appear, shall include the following instruction: "ATTENTION VOTERS: Before signing, read signer information on the other side ". In addition to the certification of signatures on the petition form, the Board of Registrars of Voters shall examine the petition forms for extraneous markings, and determine whether they are exact copies. (c) Election - Any ballot question so submitted in accordance with this procedure shall be determined by a majority vote of the voters voting in said election, but no action of the Town Meeting shall be reversed unless at least twenty percent (20 %) of the eligible voters vote in such election. Board of Selectmen Presentation was given by Ben Tafoya - See Attached Example Board of Selectmen: Vote is 4 -1 in support of Article Bylaw Committee Report: 4 -0 in support Subsequent Town Meeting 361 November 15, 2010 Motion was by Bill Brown, Precinct 8 to Indefinitely Postpone Motion Does Not Carry Motion to move the question was by Ron O'Keefe, Precinct 1 2/3 Vote required 90 Voted in the affirmative 39 Voted in the negative 136 Town Meeting Members in Attendance Motion to move the Question Carries After discussion by Town meeting members Motion Carries ARTICLE 17 Mary Ellen O'Neil, Reading Municipal Light Board moves that the Town vote to authorize the General Manager of the Reading Municipal Light Department, on the recommendation of the RMLD Board of Commissioners, to enter into a five -year contract, including all extensions, renewals, and options, for maintenance of the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) program at the RMLD. Background - given Peter Hechenbleikner: The Reading Municipal Light Department (RMLD) has a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Program that provides real -time data on the RMLD's electric distribution system. This program was purchased from Survalent Technologies in 2008, and includes an annual maintenance contract for the Survalent software. Survalent recently offered the RMLD a five -year maintenance contract, which would result in a cost saVings compared to signing a contract with a shorter time period. The cost of the contract is shown below with the relative discount amounts. If the RMLD signs a five -year maintenance contract with Survalent, the RMLD could save $12,187.50 or 25% of the five -year maintenance cost. The RMLD intends to use this software for the long term, well more than five years. The RMLD's prior SCADA system was installed in the 1980's. Table 1 shows the contract years, the amount of the contract, and the relative discount. 1010 Subsequent Town Meeting Report on the Warrant. TABLE 1 Survalent Technologies Gold Service / Annual Software Su pport / Maintenance Year s Cost Multi -Year Discount. Discount Savings Total Cost 1 2 9,750.00 19,500.00 10% 0.00 - 1,950.00 9,750.00 17,550.00 3 29,250.00 15% - 4,387.50 24,862.50 4 39,000.00 20% - 7,800.00 31,200.00 5 48,750.00 25% - 12,187.50 36,562.50 According to Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 30B, Section 12 (b), municipalities cannot .sign contract longer than three years, unless the legislative body (Town Meeting) approves a contract for a longer period of time. Subsequent Town Meeting 362 November 15, 2010 Finance Committee Report: No report Reading Municipal Light Board Report - given by Peter Hechenbleikner: At the RMLD Board of Commissioners' Meeting held on Wednesday, July 28, 2010, the following vote was taken on the Survalent contract: Chairman O'Neill made a motion seconded by Ms. Snyder that the RMLD Board of Commissioners place the following Article on the Warrant of the Fall 2016 Town of Reading Subsequent Town Meeting; To see if the Town will vote to authorize the General Manager of the Reading Municipal Light Department, on the recommendation of the RMLD Board of Commissioners, to enter into a five -year contract, including all extensions, renewals and options, for maintenance of the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Program at the RMLD, or to take any other action with respect thereto. Motion carried 5:0:0. Bylaw Committee Report: No report 2/3 Vote required Declared unanimous by Moderator 136 Town Meeting Members in Attendance Motion Carried ARTICLE 18 Nicholas Safina, Community Planning & Development Commission moves that the Town vote to amend Section 6.2 of the Reading Zoning By -Laws by adding an (1) after 20 in row # 11 Free - Standing Signs under Side Setback in Table 6.2.3 for Business -A, Business -C and Industrial Zoning Districts. And add (1) to the Notes in Table 6.2.3 and add a new Section 6.2.9. "Signs by Special Permit" as follows: (words in bold italics denotes new language). Stephen Goldy, Board of Selectmen moved to dispense of the reading of article. Motion to Dispense Carried Table 6.2.3 Signs Permitted According to Zoning District Business -A, Business -C and Industrial Zoning Districts: Type Permit Max. Sign Max. Sign Front Side Maximum Required Area (sq Height (ft) Setback (ft) Setback (ft) Number ft 11. Free- Y 50(D) 20 0 20'(I) lllot Standing Note (1): A Special Permit may be granted by the CPDC. See Section 6.2.9 for Special Permit Criteria. Add new Section 6.2.9 so that it reads as follows: Section 6.2.9 Signs by Special Permit: The CPDC may grant a Special Permit for a free - standing sign within the'side setbacks identified in Table 6.2.3 or Section 6.2.6.3 if it finds that the sign complies with the purposes of this by -law, abutting properties are not unreasonably impacted by sign placement, and the sign conforms in all other respects with Section 6.2 with specific, attention to Section 6.2.5.a regarding impact on traffic and pedestrian safety. Subsequent Town Meeting 363 November 15, 2010 Background - given by Jean Delios: In 1993, Signs under the Zoning By -Law was amended. The changes that resulted created non - conformity with regard to signs. A sunset provision was also adopted as part of the zoning changes which allowed businesses to come into compliance over time. The deadline for compliance was July 1, 2010. An in was conducted last Spring which identified numerous non - conforming signs, many of which did not meet the side setback requirements in Table 6.2.3 of the Zoning By -Laws for Business A, Business -C and Industrial Zoning Districts. The sunset provision is no longer in effect so the nonconformity must be addressed. As a way to deal with side setback non - conformity, the proposed changes in Article 17 add a Special Permit provision to the side setback requirements. Under the existing zoning ordinance, a 20 foot side setback (an allowance or setback of area from the side of the property line to the sign) is required for free- standing signs: This creates a hardship for many businesses by requiring that the sign be placed in the middle of the parking lot thus interfering with access. Article 18 provides a way for the CPDC, through a Special Permit process, to allow a free - standing sign within the side setbacks. The criteria for CPDC to use in issuing a Special Permit are: • Complies with the purposes of this by -law; • Abutting properties are not unreasonably impacted by sign placement; • The sign conforms in all other respects with Section 6.2, with specific attention to Section 6.2.5.a regarding impact on traffic and pedestrian safety. Finance Committee Report: No report Bylaw Committee Report - given by Philip Pacino: The Bylaw Committee recommends the subject matter of this Article by a vote of 3 -1 -0. CPDC Report -given by Nicholas Safina: On October 18, 2010, CPDC convened to hold a public hearing on the proposed Section 6.2. All documents were made available on the Town website and at Town Hall. The pubic hearing was held to provide an opportunity for comment and to determine whether the provisions of the proposed zoning amendments shall be adopted by the Town. The October 18, 2010 Article 18 was taken up at the public hearing at approximately 7:50 p.m. Any comments received at the hearing were included as part of the record of the hearing. CPDC voted 3 -0 -0 to recommend Article 18 to Town Meeting. 2/3 Vote required 129 Voted in the affirmative 0 Voted in the negative 136 Town Meeting Members in Attendance Motion Carried ARTICLE 19 Nicholas Safina, Community Planning & Development Commission moves that the Town vote to amend Section 6.2 of the Town of Reading Zoning By -Laws by amending Table 6.2.3 and the corresponding Sections in 6.2 as follows: ( (words in bold italics denotes new language.) Stephen Goldy, Board of Selectmen moved to dispense of the reading of article. Motion to Dispense Carried Subsequent Town Meeting 364 November 15, 2010 In Table 6.2.3 Signs Permitted According to Zoning District r Business -B Zoning Districts: Amend Line #14 under Business -B Zoning Districts as shown in the chart and add a new Line #17 under to read as follows: Type Permit Required Max. Sign Area (sq ft Max. Sign Height ft Front Setback ft Side Setback ft Maximum Number 14. Free- Y 35 50(D) 2-914 0 20 1 /lot Standing (Service Stations only) 17. Free- SPP (J) 35 10.5 0 20 1 /lot Standing Add (J) under the Notes in Table 6.2.3 so that it reads as follows: Note (J): Free - standing signs shall be permitted only where the principal business entrance is located more than 40 feet from the centerline of the street in front of the lot. CPDC may waive the 40' business entrance setback requirement for signs in existence as of the effective date of this amendment. See Section 6.2.9.a. for Special Permit Criteria. Add "or by special permit" at the end of Section 6.2.5.f. under "Prohibited Signs" so that it reads: f. Free - standing signs in a Business -B Zoning District (except as permitted at service stations or by special permit). In Section 6.2.6.4 "Signs in Business -B Zoning Districts" under "Prohibited Sighs," add the words "or by special permit" at the end of the first bullet so that it reads: Free- standing (except as permitted at service stations or by special permit). In the second to last sentence of the first paragraph of Section 6.2.6.4 "Signs in Business -B Zoning District," delete "free- standing" and add "or by special permit from the CPDC" to the end of the last sentence so that it reads: No free standing, internally illuminated, or Reader Board signs shall be permitted anywhere in a Business-13 Zoning District. Free - standing signs will be allowed only for service stations or by special permit from the CPDC. In Section 6.2.6.8 "Signs in Residential Districts," add "except as allowed by a special permit" to the end of the second bullet under "Prohibited Signs" so that it reads: Free - standing signs (except as allowed by a special permit). Add new Section 6.2.9.a so that it reads as follows: Section 6.2.9.a The CPDC may grant a Special Permit for a free - standing sign in the Business -B or Residential Zoning Districts if it rinds that the sign complies with the purposes of this bylaw, abutting properties are not unreasonably impacted by sign placement and there is no negative impact on traffic and pedestrian safety. The CPDC may consider the following items when reviewing the Special Permit request, considerations for the character of the surrounding subsequent 365 November 15,2010 neighborhood, the principal use of the property or business, the location of the parking, landscaping in the front yard setback and other signs on the property. Or take any other action with respect thereto. Background - given by Jean Delios: In 1993, Signs under the Zoning By -Law was amended. The changes that resulted created non - conformity with regard to signs. A sunset provision was also adopted as part of the zoning changes which allowed businesses to come into compliance over time. The deadline for compliance was July 1, 2010. An inventory was conducted last spring which identified numerous non- conforming signs, including free- standing signs in the Business -B or Residential Zoning District. The sunset provision is no longer in effect so the non - conformity must be addressed. The 2010 Annual Town Meeting adopted zoning changes related to Signs including allowing free- standing signs at service stations in Business -B.. Article 19 revises the dimensional requirements for free- standing signs at service stations by reducing the maximum sign area and height to bring those more in line With the provision under Article 19 to allow free - standing signs (beyond just service stations) in Business -B or Residential Zoning District. The maximum sign area for service stations under Article 19 is reduced from fifty (50) feet to thirty five (35) feet, and sign height is reduced from twenty (20) feet to fourteen (14) feet. Article 19 allows free - standing signs in a Business -B or Residential Zoning District only if it meets the street setback requirements, and is allowed only by Special Permit from the CPDC. The dimensional requirements for free - standing signs in Business -B or Residential Zoning Districts include a maximum sign area of thirty five (35) feet and a maximum sign height of ten and a half (10.5), and shall be permitted only where the principal business entrance is located more than forty (40) feet from the centerline of the street in front of the lot. The addition of Section 6.2.9.a states that the CPDC may grant a Special Permit for a free - standing sign in the Business -B or Residential Zoning Districts if it finds that the sign meets the following criteria: • Complies with the purposes of this by -law; • Abutting properties are not unreasonably impacted by sign placement; • No negative impact on traffic and pedestrian safety. In addition, the CPDC may also consider the following when processing requests for Special Permits: • Character of the surrounding neighborhood; • Principal use of the property or business; Location of the parking, Landscaping in the front yard setback and other signs on the property. Finance Committee Report: No report Bylaw Committee Report - given by Philip Pacino: The Bylaw Committee recommends the subject matter of this Article.by a vote of 4 -0 ":0. CPDC Report - given by Nicholas Safina: On October 18, 2010, CPDC convened to hold a public hearing on the proposed changes to Section 6.2.. All documents were made available on the Town website and at Town Hall. The pubic hearing was held to provide an opportunity for comment, and to determine whether the provisions of the proposed zoning amendments shall be adopted by the Town. On October 18, 2010, Article 19 was taken up at the public hearing at approximately 8:00 p.m. Subsequent Town Meeting 366 November 15, 2010 Any comments received at the hearing were included as part of the record of the hearing. CPDC amended the language for Article 19 to be inserted in Note J after the word "lot" as follows: CPDC may waive the 40' business entrance setback requirement for signs in existence as of the effective date of this amendment. CPDC voted 3 -0 -0 to recommend Article 19 as amended above to Town Meeting. 2/3 Vote required, 122 Voted in the affirmative 3 Voted in the negative 136 Town Meeting Members in Attendance Motion Carried ARTICLE 20 David Tuttle, Community Planning & Development Commission moves that the Town vote to amend the Town of Reading Zoning By -Laws Section 6.2.4.0. "Exempt Signs" and Section 6.2.6.3 "Signs in Business -A Zoning Districts" and Section 6.2.6.4. "Signs in Business -B Zoning Districts' as follows: (Language l (words in bold italics denotes new language.) Stephen Goldy, Board of Selectmen moved to dispense of the reading of article. Motion to Dispense Carried Add the following language to Section 6.2.4.0. "Exempt Signs:" o. Any establishment located in a Business or Industrial Zoning District may display: • An "Open" Flag - with dimensional requirements not to exceed four (4) feet by six (6) feet and may contain decorative graphics. • A National or State Flag - with emblems of religious, educational, governmental organization or any other federally tax - exempt organization, except when displayed in connection with commercial promotions or advertising. Dimensions shall not exceed four (4) feet by six (6) feet. • A minimum ground clearance of eight (8) feet shall be provided for flags that hang over walkways, sidewalks and entrances of businesses. Ground clearance shall be defined as the distance between the lowest hanging portion or bottom of the flag and the grade directly below. Delete the last sentence in the second paragraph of Section 6.2.6.3. "Signs in Business -A Zoning Districts" so that it reads: A lot which contains not more than one establishment shall be allowed one free - standing sign or one wall sign or one projecting sign only. The street addFes6 numbei: 9f the PFAPP4y-��Girpinently displayed Delete Section 6.2.6.3.d Delete the second paragraph of Section 6.2.6.4. "Signs in Business -B Zoning_Districts:" Subsequent Town Meeting 367 November 15, 2010 All :u......:....an . l .-inns Xh-ll ho a,,.nnCI Background - given by Jean Delios: The changes being proposed under Article 20 are, mostly to clarify not change anything under the Sign portion of the Zoning By -Laws. The clarifications are as follows: • Exempt Signs - Flags (Section 6.2.4.0 of the Zoning By -Laws) Adds a provision 'for a minimum ground clearance of 8 feet for all flags. Ground clearance is defined as the distance between the lowest hanging portion or bottom of the flag and the grade directly below. • Signs in Business -A Zoning District (Section 6.2.6.3 of the Zoning By -Laws) Deletes the requirement for placing a street address number of the property on a freestanding sign. Note that signs depicting street address number are allowed under exempt signs in Section 6.2.4. i • Signs in Business -B Zoning District (Section 6.2.6.4 of the Zoning By -Laws) Deletes the reference to internally illuminated signs since they are not allowed in the Business -B Zoning District and, therefore, should not be included in this section of the Zoning By -Laws. Finance Committee.Report: No report Bylaw Committee Report - given by Philip Pacino: The Bylaw Committee recommends the subject matter of this Article by a 'vote of 4 -0 -0. CPDC Report -given by David Tuttle: On October 18, 2010, CPDC convened to hold a public hearing on the proposed Section 6.2. All documents, including maps of the proposed changes, were made available on the Town website and at Town Hall. The public hearing was held to provide an opportunity for comment, and to determine whether the provisions of the proposed zoning amendments shall be adopted by the-Town. On October 18, 2010, Article 20 was taken up at the public hearing at approximately 8:40 p.m. Any comments received at the hearing were included as part of the record of the hearing. CPDC voted 3 -0 -0 to recommend Article 20 to Town Meeting. 2/3 Vote required 121 Voted in the affirmative 3 Voted in the negative 136 Town Meeting Members in Attendance Motion Carries ARTICLE 21 David Tuttle, Community Planning & Development Commission moves that the Town vote to amend the Town of Reading Zoning By -Laws Section 6.2.6.3 "Signs in Business -A Zoning Districts" as follows: ( l (words in bold italics denotes new language.) Camille Anthony, Board of Selectmen moved to dispense of the reading of article. Motion to Dispense Carried Subsequent Town Meeting 368 November 15, 2010 To remove the second bullet under Prohibited Signs in Section 6.2.6.3. so that it reads Prohibited Signs: • Banners as permanent signs A fFee standing-and a wall sign feF buildings that RFP net MI'lli tenAPA Amend the first sentence in the second paragraph in Section 6.2.6.3. "Signs in Business -A Zoning Districts" so that it reads as follows: A lot which contains not more than one establishment shall be allowed one free - standing sign or one wall sign or one projecting sign enty. A second sign of a different sign type shall be allowed not to exceed a maximum of eight (8) square feet. The total square footage of the two signs shall not exceed the maximum allowed as specified in Table 6.2.3. Background - given by David Tuttle: The changes being proposed under Article 21 allow single tenant buildings in Business -A to have more than one sign. The Economic Development Committee through their work with the business community identified this need for added signage in the Business -A Zoning Districts. In response, Article 21 was developed to allow additional signage but with limits. A second sign is allowed provided it does not exceed a maximum of eight (8) square feet, and the total square footage of the two signs shall not exceed the maximum allowed in Table 6.2.3 of the Zoning By -Laws. Finance Committee Report: No report Bylaw Committee Report - given by Philip Pacino: The Bylaw Committee recommends the subject matter of this Article by a vote of 4 -0-0. CPDC Report -given by David Tuttle: On October 18, 2010, CPDC convened to hold a public hearing on the proposed Section 6.2.6.3. All documents, including maps of the proposed changes, were made available on the Town website and at Town Hall. The public hearing was held to provide an opportunity for comment, and to determine whether the provisions of the proposed zoning amendments shall be adopted by the Town. The October 18, 2010, Article 21 was taken up at the public hearing at approximately 8:50 p.m. The CPDC Chair read a statement from fellow CPDC Member Nick Safina who could not attend the meeting. Any comments received at the hearing were included as part of the record of the hearing. The public hearing was closed the same evening. CPDC voted 3 -0 -0 to recommend Article 21 to Town Meeting. Megan Young spoke on behalf of EDC stating the EDC supports this Article 2l3 Vote required 62 Voted in the affirmative 60 Voted in the negative 136 Town Meeting Members in Attendance Motion Does Not Carry ARTICLE 22 David Tuttle, Community Planning & Development Commission moves that the Town vote to amend Section 6.3.3.1 of the Zoning By -Laws by adding the word "not" in the second line between the words "does" and "or" so that Section 6.3.3.1 reads in its entirety as follows (words in bold italics denotes new language.): Subsequent Town Meeting 369 November 15, 2010 Camille Anthony, Board of Selectmen moved to dispense of the reading of article. Motion to Dispense Carried The Building Inspector may issue a Building Permit for an interior renovation, interior alteration or interior reconstruction of a pre- existing, nonconforming structure that does not or will not extend the non- conformity or create a new nonconformity. Presentation - given by Jean Delios - See Attached Slides Background - given by Jean Delios: Article 22 is simply to correct a typographical error to amendments to the Zoning Bylaw that was approved in. April 2010. Finance Committee Report: No report Bylaw Committee Report - given by Philip Pacino: The Bylaw Committee recommends the subject matter of this Article by a vote of 4 -0 -0. CPDC Report - given by David Tuttle: On October 18, 2010, CPDC convened to hold a public hearing on the proposed Section 6.3.3.1. All documents, including maps of the proposed changes, were made available on the Town website and at Town Hall. The public hearing was held to provide an opportunity for comment, and to determine whether the provisions of the proposed zoning amendments shall be adopted by the Town. The October 18, 2010 public hearing was opened at approximately 7:30 p.m. Any comments received at the hearing were included as part of the record of the hearing. CPDC' voted 3 -0 -0 to recommend Article 22 to Town Meeting. 2/3 Vote required Declared unanimous by Moderator 136 Town Meeting Members in Attendance Motion Carried On motion by Ben Tafoya, Board of Selectmen it was voted that this Subsequent Town Meeting stand adjourned (sine die). Meeting adjourned at 9:35 PM with 136 Town Meeting Members were present. A true copy Attest: Laura A Gemme Town Clerk Subsequent Town Meeting 370 November 15, 2010 • Ah t f. v Y t.� • Ah ��. � � �} � � � \� cq a S J � 6 trcl *'a 'w,+'.� ki �jy P i� G i ? %�: i r' r 374 I NJ -o � A I §i D t x j IZ c i .r s .,., %:;J '�.., x. 9 ��.. x�?i �u� ;'� � 4f iI ��+4�' ..Ya M,a �.. i�a�.;n��.,�5 �a •.'^ J� t�if 1Y! t.jt�M1 t3f.� �.° !3 a�� k� � k��� ��;� �{ Im Si taut I 0� VA ptd �4t 'W Li tk Cj k, 'J IN LINuY$ I it 7777A IT-,& 077. K -'V! 4'k "I It 390 Report to Town of Reading 201O Subsequent Town Meeting Article 9: Improvements to Birch Meadow and J. W. Killam Elementary Schools 392 "The Green Repair Program is for the repair or replacement of roofs, windows and /or boilers in public school facilities that are structurally, functionally and educationally sound except for the condition of their roof, windows, and /or boiler. ". — Massachusetts School Building Authority MSBA Green Repair Program 393 Massachusetts School_ Building Authority Timothy P. Cahill Chairman, State Treasurer FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE May 26, 2010 Katherine P. Craven . Executive Director CONTACT: Emily Mahlman (617) 720 -4466 TREASURER CAHILL AND THE MSBA INVITE A DOZEN DISTRICTS IN TO THE GREEN REPAIR PROGRAM BOSTON, MA — State Treasurer Tim Cahill. Chairman of the Massachusetts School Building Authority ( "MSBA ") and. Katherine Craven, MSBA Executive Director. announced today that the MSBA has invited twelve districts into the Green Repair Program. The projects include the replacement or repair of windows. boilers and roofs The Green Repair Program was established at the MSBA Board of Directors' last meeting. The MSBA will leverage this favorable borrowing climate to fund smaller- scale repturs that will improve the efficiency of schools in districts that already have Statements of Interest filed with the MSBA. "This program will allow us to make much needed repairs to more than one school in a district, making more schools more efficient in less time," stated Treasurer Tim Cahill. 394 • Stated Goals ➢Improve the learning environment for children and teachers ➢Reduce energy consumption ➢Improve existing buildings ➢. Generate cost savings for districts MSBA Green Repair Program 395 • August 1: Districts invited to submit Statements of Interest • August 11= September 22: Submission window open • August 30: School Committee votes to authorize submission of SOI • September 7: Board of Selectmen votes to authorize submission of SOI • September 16: SOI submitted MSBA Green Repair Program M. • If awarded grant, Reading to be reimbursed for 47% of project costs • Funds expended only if grant is awarded • Amount borrowed to be reduced by grant award MSBA Green Repair Program 397 Why vote now? 0 1 MSBA Board vote on November 17 2. To execute PFA, must demonstrate that entire amount has been authorized 3. Program requires all projects to be completed prior to December 2011 MSBA Green Repair Program .: Killam Roof Killam.Windows Birch Meadow Windows Project Selection Anticibated Debt Service Notes •Current financing rate is 3.5% *Will curtail annual capital spending for next two years but lesser impact thereafter Project Financing ..., • Subnut required documents • Execute PFA • Select OPM and designer • Develop drawings and specifications • Select contractor MI • Commence and complete construction Anticipated Tmefine i 401 f 402 403 rtur .m rn mr �vrr cPIP10< 9C= m„r.o. u. rar rwm. mrr ...urns �r..rmrt.,Mrr..r wrrrrmrrr mvmaros urc /ryN /L Y1rC 4qf ^�IG�, — � � I � I � YYl]Vm Alplll rVIAIRAM m..vwuurs _ .W.... �°.w°..9L^." i'°C.. I °� v.I.�.�.. .\.S .e..�..�. //_.•\ � mdnAn R+x.uD uR Dnnemdr m.oarrAr .._1°xivsnur�"`rein'�f.:w ._ _.. -'�✓D � �� I I �•�•� \ _ .J ° ":.r Ufa- ...p.m DRS i' ........._ 5. V IOlD DRd 1'Y! mIN ['LL.I M2 GBVFR XYd v vm x�a''DV 404 RI\% 405 ri %� I •1 . \•\ i �.m DNDDII .D.r.Rmx D D.I'DO. NDpMw.n ii / mxn.in °iw I �•tu�� 'pwi.w..� I M.w j.ri.n �• wwrrsr ��� _ T mM(NIRI �MNO /IS vvmNMx mg MIR •� ' ''i."i�S y � . _ nor D..L 4. �' yW AAAAM. Z. V� RUD .RG )M MN CWf 1CIN °! F(ADW4 YA®'ILSI/IISSS - u2 O:P,IRNdMI' W PUBfJC JOFLP _ SIR£i IGCBPfI PG CA IISMAY ROAD mun,r.sn rm mm¢rN r V(�,pwv M�Y�eoV�N Oro °D� caDnoc BC= 40QJ /G /OM COW AAATA mm w'�� vm�'w°° "oo THE..w YWMt .. �.T - rr nr naw°evc uarna mm war, r NRs 405 . O \ �• I �b��R�(y�cl�` \ • � I � •\ .\ % vw m wren art \ � it ar Havoc %:�,.:..�. -;�- ;��:_ i �_, i.�.. .\• . _.�._ ��- i ��x �� yp .Z. nuo rma rn Trx cuvr row, v ��. ��� v2 ON.IR}LdM1' N Pr/Bl1C apxcv' S/RddT �LCdPTINGB PlJN CAUSATAY ROAD i401 p. 11r YTO /O ®CM �mm dw wmr v arm xe n/.sn Ommw vrG. ,mayy�C- csuro< ecua • O4 MMO or.n c cv., wee�.n�F p. N2� .�urm R.f.41. M IM O ti ----------- -- CAVSZWAr MAD tMPAOVfMZMS 1.1.1HAftr P". - .11 1 407 m I. CAUSEWAY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PRELIMINARY PLAN SEPTEMBER 30. 2010 SCALE., I•=ZO• m I c _,W- CAVSSWAr MAD IMPAVVEMIATS PAzumjNAfir PUN - ALTLRNArl A It - -- --- - --- 410 % 1 r i - isx�.srt gem F� ; .- - -eid �• -• - \ �- _.-- ,�p i 1 A CAUSEWAY ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PRELIMINARY PLAN - ALTERNATE 2 OCTOBER 5, 2010 SCALE: 1': =20'- - --- 410 % 1 r - --- 410 RYO rT CAUSEWAY ROAD ES- nUATED BETTERMENT ASSESSMENTS October 26.2010 MAP PARCEL ADDRESS FRONTAGE I ASSESSMENT NOTES 31 1 (RMLD ) 31 $ 3.004.11 fron shown on Assessors an is +I- 31 2 31 G Rd, Reaciin , MA 9058 $ 7,219.00 Cetculaled Frontage 31 3 33 Causeway Rd, Rea , MA 90-58 $ 7,216.82 e Cefeulated Frontage 25 57 MLD 22128 $ 20,368.79 Calctdeted Front3ge 31 4 (RMILD) 178.96 $ 21,325.73 Caioulaaed Frontage 31 5 OWN 16924 $ 20,167.45 Calculated Frontage 25 46 80 Causeway Rd. Reading. MA 12920 $ 1.5.366.09 25 47 74 Causeway Rd. Reading, MA 120.00 $ 14299.78 25 48 60 Causeway Rd, Reading. MA 120 -00 $ 1,4299.78 25 40 60 Causeway Rd, Reackng. MA 120.00 $ 1.4291178 25 50 52 Catiseway Rd, Rea , MA 126.47 $ 15,070.77 25 51 1 53 Causeway Rd, Reacting. MA - 120:00 $ 74291178 25 52 crm 01 Causew y Rd, Rea , MA 120.00 $ 14,299.78 25 53 05 Causeway Rd. Rea . MA 120 -00 $ 14,299.78 25 54 73 Causeway Rd. Realm . MA 120.00 $ 114299.78 251 55 181 Causeway Rd. ding, MA 112.81 $ 1'.3.44268 1 $ 230,000.00 I ToW pmadDe read frontage 1930.1'0 71,550.06 Estimate for the construcdon of the private section of roadwa $ 230,000.00 cost per linear foot = 119.1$ Voted - Approved by Board of Selectman OcL 26, 2010 411 CA11861rAY.:� IWAD Irn JJ Ye.w III r �.. I °�'-A.uu� �• "T� � �. .gym ti man m: rwi s'im�G a r'ir°.'rm.. UP .� �.. UK APNMrR oNUe Nmannmv WMM4 4. Mr N4VlNC )GIN 0/ NLYI(AO LGYYIMrf nJd "MAO II9 drrrae.aNr n.omw �.o.. . uimry sArc V� nuo me re+ mrN ruu � — i i { \ ,•\ , i uwmrm mmpemmrmmx �'GT� :.. i T.wCSY.'• i?.- .�..._ I °...:2.:. i.r.. .\• v.^. ^^ �-�- � mn.rmn w•xm.. um I � urmrm um �4• mw v.m .fir^ 5 �0 iw^mm•.. we... w xo �m•r a n<imiw � mw 413 nvo .me rm mrx mse� carom; scu �AI u �( . %)! ®`— •STREET . ®`— •STREET . . , gg - - - - -- q� L) �- _ \ = Q / 68 p go / . . ].. � } . - . \ � § - , $ E;re . . ; :- ) � AIIDIN6 W'WNRT PL NfxC OITILOPYlNT COYYISSION REJ EM= l—+ I- �ce - HABWY.SW °,IH ¢ mv• 5J0 C/ IN6 - meow an¢x. Iw 0. N w. a. �,Ka• viw 1e6• .suawJS xM a for s. - �°J:�' 1 A 6* 11 A.x Hww Sl IN n[v [eRVSSwlx row.n wRU . ISla'A¢ IJa ,a dPPLGdN! TFYlPT "f m"%m�x ixm�v SaJ1H2 -m rzm • ,get su•S Y'v �y IIlyT /.��..4wlKnrwn is ✓�/ i— r rr.mmrwr¢ ,}y, I I mx / .SSlSX�)yfYiW sm[[I - a2(P AMP 5 oMw umay. N " c'4 awl R e4v1� SJ1 w �nI' 4 I. Han. yf vain s, v,I Ij rM �jh IA�K dJ.f T .SJJ�W A�, SJe[! (SIAIr Y! OLNJ,�. xfelON�x�� _ 4bf� ` /��3 $Hove fall sn.g y}11 � rs.p`e �� • n � 5 TFR r x 9� T L rrcrs ° 415 'QM A/ NOIES I M IM MA�r. eu 4rM f 9MAR uIR°r[Kx15 KFCR° rKn FW¢ K `JIFYxO SNf/vavxrmv }VIKrcMP.[rt°w.WVil6 W8 t M lWR plry[xs. KF[Ra a 1¢.rt° x IWC MIMI S -IS y M .KVS /W[ /n a CIMxO.s IaR n u.0 }° w M ILw ¢ M.w.c .SIIfSMT u✓ 4 n. Ax .uMrexrs +.w x.. S 1 . M.m.. v Al a ¢ q M IM: MOI Hw. US'I.I m1 Mn1n¢ N R A . WM R[ MAI M SuM IARUfOT [n5. (.M. (/ ¢w[nll[ fxMO. JS a (KRMRR ¢ ¢wllM' SvYC)n °./ ea..M Me.I[ r.K.,JJ JMImrmNJ. FACM afd � rvnrce `orm m rya rn - A9Nlfwc mr (n . Jas rot. n4rx for ;e�I� v trot IRS 9rM( ncru. Nr srrs for Vx K NMw O.[IR 11[KM1PL fur J .J flIOM/ a ¢[ud M wRxr - M SN/Mf rI[IG R[[f41RN r. v 6_ PARf.FI NOBS { ,) IM(N,w tA ¢ xJr N K [avSIXRN . K(u.6YL fur wIX,l 94% M 4w•c LwiVC Itt. wS. ,. N K CwKrtu ru M AWr1AV . rE[ K Mwnf N[Tew0.G1 ° � � ,) rAMn e a xvr m K fwsclMV ewwK! 101 foe rAR¢I e C� cussrs ¢ M Algr -¢ -rr nMA mr Kx.svw.I.ur .ro n �q KuAM ImYx Me u,wAAY ¢ V4[� 4 M1 IAUf[ w Al A . M NNnr a Kw- Im IK Iav/ K MApty e, Al IA a rnr [wsue[n A euaoAU tvr,Mrtx M r,e ew lo..c svrs N ,) r..m :. NK fpKld so M .eurrerc rRwury ¢ ronl.AO .lM.l r. xR —1 n.sr r�ro Iv A 4I¢x .m K/ R.pvS MI[xcM cK r� x f RFL1M0 ONNM ASCSSw@ I{ Wl Ja REJ EM= - HABWY.SW °,IH ¢ mv• 5J0 C/ IN6 - meow an¢x. Iw 0. N w. a. �,Ka• viw 1e6• .suawJS xM a for s. - �°J:�' x xMw ° f.9NDR/exe 11 A.x Hww Sl IN n[v [eRVSSwlx row.n wRU . ISla'A¢ IJa ,a dPPLGdN! TFYlPT "f m"%m�x ixm�v SaJ1H2 -m rzm tl .ruly� /.��..4wlKnrwn is ✓�/ i— r rr.mmrwr¢ ,}y, I a II� w +.+IleAa r. I mx / .SSlSX�)yfYiW sm[[I - a2(P AMP 5 oMw umay. N " c'4 awl R e4v1� SJ1 w �nI' 4 I. Han. yf vain s, v,I Ij rM �jh IA�K dJ.f T .SJJ�W A�, SJe[! (SIAIr Y! OLNJ,�. xfelON�x�� _ 4bf� ` /��3 $Hove fall sn.g y}11 � rs.p`e �� • n � 5 TFR r x 9� T L rrcrs ° 415 'QM A/ NOIES I M IM MA�r. eu 4rM f 9MAR uIR°r[Kx15 KFCR° rKn FW¢ K `JIFYxO SNf/vavxrmv }VIKrcMP.[rt°w.WVil6 W8 t M lWR plry[xs. KF[Ra a 1¢.rt° x IWC MIMI S -IS y M .KVS /W[ /n a CIMxO.s IaR n u.0 }° w M ILw ¢ M.w.c .SIIfSMT u✓ 4 n. Ax .uMrexrs +.w x.. S 1 . M.m.. v Al a ¢ q M IM: MOI Hw. US'I.I m1 Mn1n¢ N R A . WM R[ MAI M SuM IARUfOT [n5. (.M. (/ ¢w[nll[ fxMO. JS a (KRMRR ¢ ¢wllM' SvYC)n °./ ea..M Me.I[ r.K.,JJ JMImrmNJ. FACM afd � rvnrce `orm m rya rn - A9Nlfwc mr (n . Jas rot. n4rx for ;e�I� v trot IRS 9rM( ncru. Nr srrs for Vx K NMw O.[IR 11[KM1PL fur J .J flIOM/ a ¢[ud M wRxr - M SN/Mf rI[IG R[[f41RN r. v 6_ PARf.FI NOBS { ,) IM(N,w tA ¢ xJr N K [avSIXRN . K(u.6YL fur wIX,l 94% M 4w•c LwiVC Itt. wS. ,. N K CwKrtu ru M AWr1AV . rE[ K Mwnf N[Tew0.G1 ° � � ,) rAMn e a xvr m K fwsclMV ewwK! 101 foe rAR¢I e C� cussrs ¢ M Algr -¢ -rr nMA mr Kx.svw.I.ur .ro n �q KuAM ImYx Me u,wAAY ¢ V4[� 4 M1 IAUf[ w Al A . M NNnr a Kw- Im IK Iav/ K MApty e, Al IA a rnr [wsue[n A euaoAU tvr,Mrtx M r,e ew lo..c svrs N ,) r..m :. NK fpKld so M .eurrerc rRwury ¢ ronl.AO .lM.l r. xR —1 n.sr r�ro Iv A 4I¢x .m K/ R.pvS MI[xcM cK r� x f RFL1M0 ONNM ASCSSw@ I{ Wl Ja REJ EM= - HABWY.SW °,IH ¢ mv• 5J0 C/ IN6 - meow an¢x. Iw 0. N w. a. �,Ka• viw 1e6• .suawJS xM a for s. - �°J:�' x xMw vfxvm oalMaxrs Hcwxn 11 A.x Hww Sl IN n[v [eRVSSwlx row.n wRU . ISla'A¢ IJa ,a dPPLGdN! P SULLIVAN ENGINEERING GROUP. LLC vrtn xv. J or e 300 -L -841 416 ET' I� Yl EPARMENf OF PUBLIC WORKS s a STREET ACCEPTANCE PLAN pt!%- xzo ;j KYUE DRIVE lYrar 1. mu o.mu e... 417 / •r Jr rw v� wvurn wJr rvw w ,c� ORhE 1pt /Cfi.lE wrlw rr �. wvtw rr �f R.< "��e. IN Lemon 0.M1 �yB � Bd ns crn Iw u. I� Yl EPARMENf OF PUBLIC WORKS s a STREET ACCEPTANCE PLAN pt!%- xzo ;j KYUE DRIVE lYrar 1. mu o.mu e... 417 i RECEIVED Dear Board of Selectmen: TOWN CLERK We, the undersigned registered voters of Reading, Massachusetts, hereby submit thisHBWWi nP n of Article 13 of the 2010 Annual Town Meeting Warrant to repeal the vote of Town Meeting accepting the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 64L, § 2(a) to impose a local sales tax upon the sale of restaurant meals originatindffitXWd1(0TQ4M bylaslvendor at the rate of .75 percent of the gross receipts of the vendor from the sale of restaurant meals. H1 Z, Address M I PENN, i! M130 W41-411A ......r Ad 21 1111111' woxyll —w 11 � Al o VA 01 "wo it A4 V� LIN, � H1 Z, RECEIVED Dear Board of Selectmen: R TOWN (1 �CLERK We, the undersigned registered voters o Reading,,,�M....��ass_ Massachusetts hereby � 4Qsubmit this td lSUUiii jW9 -of Article 13 of the 2010 Annual Town Meeting Warrant to e pe the vote ofeT'own Meeting accepting the provNQ *gqr *sW4Vsgtq General Laws Chapter 64L, § 2(a) to impose a local sales tax upon the sale of restaurant meals originating within the Town by a vendor at the rate of .75 percent of the gross receipts of the vendor from the sale of restaurant meals. Number Check S ature Address 1. 2. 3. 4. s 419 0 Dear Board of Selectmen: I R E C E I V E D We, the undersigned registered vot of eading, iereby submit this refere oErticle 13 of the Lr, 2010 Annual Town Meeting Warrant to RSn he vote oo�n�eehng accepting the provisions of �acusetts General Laws Chapter 64L, § 2(a) to impose a local sales tax upon the sale of restaurant meals originating withinAt Im �v ws@gv the rate of .75 percent of the gross receipts of the vendor from the sale of restaurant meals. Number Signature Address 1. 2. ( - � 2 %JG �j�- / C 3. ✓ y/� B 4 �/ ��rUCe.�(�C'D e5 obi 3 �VArreat 6. �.1;ch�1 LO he- 7. 8. IWO ' J 9. LKAe 10'' O 1a � 4 420 Dear Board of Selectmen: RECEIVED OWN CLERK We, the undersigned registered voters of Reading, Massachusetts, hereby submit this imQ*pM 00" of Article 13 of the 2010 Annual Town Meeting Warrant to ask: shall the Town vote to approve the action of the representative Town Meeting whereby it was voted to accept the provisions of Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 64L, § 2(a) to imp %JoM sr4 tj dp'on the sale of restaurant meals originating within the Town by a vendor at the rate of .75 percent of the g�rd�-s °s��� "receipts of the vendor from the sale of restaurant meals? Number Signature Address 2 3, � T 1��74 Z ("c fi nca. 4. 6. 7. 8. LV/ Qa� ruc2 �d . /6"'1-11 `1Gre�� 10. a s\1� 421 SITA i go] a:4 a: Background In 1993 Town Meeting adopted a zoning amendment that allowed a sunset provision allowing signs to be phased into compliance overtime, with a final deadline of July. 1, 2010 ® An inventory in the spring of 2010 found numerous sign violations ® April 2010 Town Meeting adopted sign zoning by -law amendments that went into effect in August 2010 Subsequent Town Meeting - November 2010 423 Process for Developing RecornMendations ® In June, 2010 a complete inventory of sign violations was created. ® Worked with the EDC and Board of Selectmen on how best to deal with sign non - conformities ® Reviewed Sign By -Laws in other Communities ® CPDC held public hearings to solicit. input Subsequent Town Meeting - November 2010 424 Sign Amendments — By Article ® Article 18 — Allowance for Side Yard Setback by Special Permit (CPDC) based on criteria Article 19 — Business B (mostly downtown) Allowing Free Standing Signs and modifying size of Service Station Signs by Special Permit (CPDC) based on criteria Subsequent Town Meeting - November 2010 425 Sign Amendments — By Article Article. 20 — Ground clearance for all flags; omits the requirement for a street address on ,a free standing sign; omits typo on internally illuminated signs Article 21 — Allows a single tenant building in Business A to have a free standing sign and a' second sign (wall, projecting, etc) but with limits Subsequent Town Meeting - November 2010 W1 A Non- Conforming Amendment Article 22 Article 22 — Corrects .a typo Subsequent Town Meeting - November 2010 EWA Article 18 — Side Yard Setback Relief ® 'Developed as a way to allow businesses to apply for a Special Permit from CPDC for relief from the requirement for a 20 foot side yard setback. 0 Subsequent Town Meeting - November 2010 EM Free Standing Signs - Business a, Business C, and MAIN STREET Subsequent Town Meeting - November 2010 429 n Article 18 Side Yard Setback — Issues ® Some lots are configured in a way that can't reasonably meet the 20 foot setback requirement. ® For example, a sign that meets setback could end up in the middle of a parking lot - ® 13 existing signs are non- conforming due to 20 ft side setback Subsequent Town Meeting - November 2010 430 9 Article 18 Side Yard Setback - Proposed m Allows the CPDC to grant a Special Permit to allow free- standing signs to be located within the 20 ft side yard setback. . ® Through an established Special Permit case by case process, applicants could seek relief from the 20 foot requirement. Subsequent Town Meeting - November 2010 431 Article 18 Why Special Permit im Facilitates flexible and sensitive administration of zoning controls; Provides CPDC. with a zoning tool that can be applied on the basis of the.facts and circumstances pertaining to specific sites; ® Avoids the need to go to ZBA for a Variance which has been problematic; Subsequent Town Meeting - November 2010 432 ifKrv� DON eM" A wi'1iY ti ,etx •j ` y) NMN '4df."VNhry,_4 •' '..,aYILL f 1 �' u` i i �' 't�,g� ! — I G '"� VAR 3 aI I i i - It JL� ftup .l � c3 . • A s5 li °F it w ' a�i ?WEBS"° OUT -- i. 1 x n� 1 y�, law i � .��.._.; �"'"� �P ,r t • .r < i s ? 1- a'^ S '°`• —�l e� ran �' yH'siV y.q x �, ..,.,x ,. .�,.,. 11"'R9�• � ., r' 1 .iii f � � s � s 'p � rt �t r r �' e, i �6�` -"y ' �� °��,uk� r -n 1° ��r ' S s f PAW \ \�� /��d \ \� \ � u un \ ir - \�� \ \/ \° PAW \ \�� /��d \ \� \ � u un \ - 'Jar wm INN F330- Wil vo bA To 1% Cl t ;4 '6 ' . I •. \ f }Yi,� h y . �• � r4 ®t/ v�'Q�aW CJD' Qlrcy ©�' - ._i>''--- ' "il +°i _ i tm s -- n,., s�tr axr ';y Year*... ra, ry �y n '� a y 3 1 �-: -QTii` 7 S s-s�Si Article 18. Special Permit Criteria: Impact on abutting properties Traffic and pedestrian safety Reasons why the 20 ft setback can not be met. Complies sign by -law purposes: ❑ protects property values ❑ creates an attractive business climate ❑ enhances and protects the physical appearance of the community ❑ encourages the most appropriate use of the land. ® Complies with all other aspects of ZBL Subsequent Town Meeting - November 2010 Article 19 Allows free- standing signs in the Business-13 zoning district (downtown) & Residential zone by Special Permit from CPDC. ® Reduces.the max. height for free - standing signs at services stations to 14 ft & max. sq. area to 35 sq. ft. (CPDC Review and sign permit required) *. 'Certificate of Appropriateness required in Business B Subsequent Town Meeting - November 2010 439 •� za ��l � n � � ticadinS i'ubhc Schools ,� t i'QEHG�t�E9� tis€ .�i it ";yS;i''��d� _j�ICgRflE`Ji° ➢(}:ItIllt tk3: v 1 "1, " RNxS Begs ice Hockey r, RPJI.�HS Ames 'Award LL 4S ' -'Cool d�c Sdmco OlV np ad ipam ' RMH55partsmaoship Award Ty 1 N RMHS Marching Hmntl ' M' :.i {5�+yrhr N F LIH 1 c t7F, RMHS Jazz Hand 1 0 I10 i s RMHS Football x u ^.D7 r -�j �MSi:z'a'.f:' Y pkw low, py µp gf4 Y � e '��Ell k'{//JJ:: r�4*it � � ^! eh 5 hj�M 8 MOM l;5 u t r � itir, Ile! I-F ® The principal business entrance is 40 ft from center line of the street.* Special Permit CPDC considerations: o Impact to abutting properties ® Impact on traffic & pedestrians ® Character of neighborhood ® Business use ® Location of parking ® Landscaping in the front setback • Other signage on site. • Complies with the purposes of the by -law *CPDC amended the language to include: CPDC may Waive the 40' business entrance setback requirement for signs in existence as of the effective date of this amendment. Subsequent Town Meeting - November 2010 Internally illuminated signs are still prohibited in the Business — B & Residential Zones Subsequent Town Meeting - November 2010 445 ,. _ �� .�«�a � ��� �p� a di ` .ii� �`��_ � ., 33 or ;,�, � ��. G ! :. �x Article 21 ® Allows single tenant buildings in Business - A* a second sign of a different sign type.. The max. square area of 2nd sign is 8 sq. ft. ® The total sq. footage of the two signs must not exceed max. allowed in Table 6.2.3. Business A - South Main Street (from RR Tracks to South Street) & North Main Street at the Franklin St. intersections (by Homegoods) Subsequent Town Meeting - November 2010 447 n1.* -r �.r✓.r r for t ,e r ,per T. � i q'RX^.'*T.. T f�_ rte, �'�;� k a�. s s vnd4"��� i •r —"' _ . I . G �JI J f/ r �M � '�' :. / ""' ,✓ r�r � � A. :I' �tY.r �'. �%n iC �� t Sic } r 5 � MEN T Ik A IV!, jell FAN , T � J Y l n Mli " t :,5v'_f p"t Italics — designates positions appointed by the Board of Selectmen * - designates an elected or appointed Board, Committee, or Commission that works with that Division Dashed Line indicates a relationship between an elected Board and the Department or Division Note — The Town Manager is the acting Department Head of Community Services until a Department Head is assigned 04/10/02 451 Services & Programs Record numbers of adults and teens came out for established favorites and many new classes, activities, guest speakers, and program series in 2010. Programs like inter - generational nature walks in the town forest, band concerts and picnics on the library lawn, book - clubs, and Sit `n Knit series that continued to attract participants of all ages and interests. A new monthly Drop -In Chess program, using teen volunteers to provide guidance and help, enhanced weekends for many Reading families. , We launched a new REWIND Film Discussion series of screenings and monthly film discussions led by an expert facilitator. Cool Cats Craft Night attracted many to the library on a hot summer night, and the staff -led Summer Sizzlers - Speed Book Reviews was a smash hit as we made it easy for everyone to reserve books reviewed that night on the spot. Forty -five people enjoyed a new Holiday Arts & Crafts night featuring staff and volunteers sharing their special talents and interests. Several new marketing efforts resulted in boosts to circulation of selected collections as displays featured new media and a new emphasis on different formats. The library took to the streets to serve everyone: from summer into early fall, librarians once again provided books, recipes, and more, to shoppers and busy commuters at the Farmers' Market /Train Depdt. Several librarians made the most of the successful Reading Fall Street Faire to spread the word about library services and partnered with Reading Public Library Foundation and Friends to promote library resources and services. The Library hosted an informational table at Friends and Family Day and signed up participants for summer programs. Librarians took a new Library Myths presentation to PTO meetings and reached out to parents and faculty at several schools. There's also a colorful new library services brochure entitled "Did You Know ?" and Information Emergency business cards available at the Information Desk as a fun and easy way to keep library contact information. New in 2010 are eight Grab and Go kits - book bags that have five books in them on a similar topic. The highest circulating kit is the cozy mysteries followed by historical fiction. The other bag titles are:.Baseball,,Beach Reads, Local Color, Laugh Out Loud, Non - Fiction Page Turners and Thrillers. We've also added a new quick pick up for Book Clubs! So far we offer six Club Kits and a few more on the way. These are the book club kits in a bag with a variety of formats of the same title for book club members to enjoy. If you have thought about starting a book club in your neighborhood or workplace, grab a "Club Kit" next time you're in the library and find out how simple it is! 452 The Library subscribes to a new online service called `Bookletters" which provides reading lists directly to patrons and allows librarians to create a variety of custom lists of new materials to which patrons can subscribe. We now offer Ebooks, connecting to a whole new group of users. Ebooks are downloadable titles users can read on devices such as Sony Readers and the Nook. We created a new Too Hot to Trot collection of bestselling paperbacks to ensure a greater selection for walk -in users. The library looked for new ways to connect people to enriching activities for all ages and engage families in learning and worthwhile experiences at home and on vacation. Every week from spring through summer, a different Museum Pass was featured on a "Monopoly" board display. We used bookmarks, displays, and weblogs to enrich and extend community interest in Afghanistan and global issues, reminding us all that all kinds of learning activities are available and no matter what age we are, we are still leaming! Adult Services The Massachusetts Board of Library Commissioners approved an environmental literacy grant entitled "Change makes a Difference" to offer programs and resources to engage the public to make informed decisions on environmental issues. In 2010 we created a new grant website and revitalized our green collection. Attendance was solid and interest was high in the first of several planned classes, local information on home energy. As soon as we learned about a new digitization project through Internet Archive at Boston Public Library, we hastened to add some of our local history books to it. We hand - carried eleven volumes of rare and out of print books of local historical significance to Boston to have them digitized. You can now find them online for the very first time! Also newly available online are several podcasts developed in partnership with local historians and Walkable Reading that provide a walking/bicycling tour of some historic houses in Reading. Plans are afoot to do more podcasts of Bare Meadow and other local places to explore while listening to experts describe some special features. One of the most successful program series the library has ever offered is the twice - monthly LiveWires program, lifelong - learning programs that attract people who bring their curiosity and interest in everything from Pleasure Island to charitable giving to Cape Ann artists and more. This program series was originally established through a special grant and has been continued through generous private donations. A Job Search Skill Series provided resources for people looking to change careers, find employment, or learn how to update their job seeking skills. Attendees from previous years who succeeded in their job search returned to tell their stories and share their successes and special tips to the newest group. Librarians shared their enthusiasm for lots of new books at the annual Reading Women's Club Booktalks program. 60 people attended their very entertaining presentation. For the first time, the Reading Public Library is offering a Foreign Affairs discussion series. This monthly group is led by a former state department employee who provides readings and insights for the participants during their in -depth discussions of hot topics and controversial issues. The program is held in 453 the conference room and is currently running at maximum capacity. A spring Book Group Night featured author Randy Susan Meyers and attracted sixty -five participants from local and area book groups. Reading Public Library Foundation/Helen Nigro Speaker Series supported a third season of The American Voices book discussions led by Ann Murphy. New in 2010 were two evenings of dinner and discussions which attracted enthusiastic crowds for Indian and Chinese foods and books. Website Web highlights include the launch of our Twitter presence and Facebook page, and development of an "Adult Service" page, a need -to -know -now "In the News" page and completion of the RPL Foundation page. Many new additions & enhancements were made to the Kids section of the library website, notably the highly- visited For Babies & Toddlers page and bi- weekly lists of new children's books & media. Customers can subscribe to these lists. A parents' page which highlights our new Autism /Spectrum - related materials was also a useful new addition. We introduced our new reader's advisory page Books, Movies and Music, offering users: easy access to booklists from award winners to hot new titles; the ability to check our catalog and reserve titles; links to great reader resources; and multiple options to receive automated updates. Young Adults Teen Summer Program: Teen librarians visited twelve sixth -grade classrooms to promote summer reading activities at Reading Public Library. 199 teens joined the program and read a total of 755 books. Teens also enjoyed a Pizza Taste Off and a Summer Survivor event that had them competing in special events throughout the library! Volunteens: 27 teen completed 355 volunteer hours. Volunteen work included: Scanning, indexing, updating statistical databases, compiling evaluations, collating handouts, inputting summer reading forms, and assisting at all teen programming. Teen Librarians facilitated a successful two -day middle school visit with author Kathleen Benner Duble, including an evening visit to Reading Public Library. Children New services were added in 2010 in addition to the established round of story times, school visits, vacation programs, films, and book'discussion groups. Babytime Playgroups meet twice monthly and offer opportunities for learning, resource sharing and socialization. Something on Sundays targets families on a day when there can be more time spent together. Family Storytimes and the LEGO Creation Club have been drawing enthusiastic crowds. French for Kids was a new series run as a Girl Scout Gold Award Project. As part of the huge Summer Reading Program, "It's Reading Cats and Dogs," we added two new programs which were a howling success! 454 100 children signed up for Paws to Read, to read to therapy dogs; increasing their enjoyment with books and skill in reading. The Art Contest encouraged young artists to create their perfect pet. In all, over 1000 children participated in the Summer Reading Program, reading for a record 16,252 hours, with 5277 children attending 91 programs during the 10 week period. Reading Library is a partner in a federal grant to enhance resources and services to Families with Autism. The grant provided funding for staff training that we offered to other Town departments who serve the public. The library also added Autism/Spectrum- related resources to our Parents Collection that have been well- received by special education professionals and parents. We expanded the Graphic Novel collection and created a cozy seating area where children could enjoy those materials. The new Playaway format finally released children's book titles and we purchased a nice collection which flew off the shelves! With a nice donation from the Reading Co- operative Bank, we expanded our extremely popular collection of Picture Book Backpacks. These convenient collections are almost always checked out! Building Study The Library commenced a comprehensive building analysis and feasibility study in 2010. The study was the result of a long -range planning process that identified several pressing needs associated with the current condition of the Library. The Library Trustees were unanimous in their commitment to improving conditions while preserving the landmark building for future generations. At the same time the Trustees were concluding their planning, in January 2010, the State announced a new and enhanced round of grant funding for library construction projects, including funding for renovations and additions. History The Highland School Building was built by Reading architect Horace Wadlin in 1894 and served as an elementary school until the 1960's. In 1984, after a major redesign by Mark Mitchell Architects, the building was converted for use as a library. The building is on the National Historic Register. Study Several steps were undertaken to identify present and future needs and provide sufficient information for developing a plan for the building. A Programmer was hired and produced a preliminary report. An architectural team was selected to analyze existing conditions and develop ideas and schematic drawings based on the information gathered from expert analysis, engineers, geotechnical study, and the Programmer's report. Trustees & Building Committee While the architects and their consultants were working, the Trustees met regularly with representatives of the community to review plans and set priorities. 455 The members of the Library Building Committee are: Sharlene Reynolds -Santo Joseph Huggins Vicki Yablonsky Karyn Storti Nancy Aberman David Hutchinson Richard Curtis Cherrie Dubois Jeffrey Doucette Bill Hecht Ruth Urell John Brzezenski Advisory: Dennis Smith Kaitlin Menzie Historical Commission Facilities Director Trustee Trustee Reading Public Library Staff Trustee Trustee Trustee Trustee Reading Public Library Foundation President Library Director Past President, Reading Public Library Foundation Reading Memorial High School Reading Memorial High School Goals of Library Building Program Create Space for Fix • Children's programs and learning areas • Children's general &special collections • Teens for studying, reading, gathering, computers, and books • Increase in resource sharing / delivery / outreach / homebound • Volunteers work spaces • . Space for Friends & Foundation official activities and archives • Meeting room is too small and not equipped for multi - purpose functions Conference room is too small and not equipped for multi - purpose functions • Need silent study, small group spaces, and tutoring areas ' • Need more places for people to sit, work on laptops, sit at desks /study carrels • Building envelope repairs: masonry, chimneys, downspouts, gutters, windows, roof • Lighting (interior and exterior) • HVAC — poor distribution, hot and cold areas, inefficient & ineffective • Safety and accessibility issues • Technology infrastructure and power distribution • Solve adjacency problems — e.g. — teens next to elders currently • No staff presence in some large areas of current building • Address security /growth issues, improve sight lines, more browsing and seating space • Parking/pedestrian and car traffic issues • Make library accessible from front (Middlesex Avenue) • Out of date and inadequate staff work spaces 456 VALUES • Sustainability and Low Environmental Impact • Preservation • Community: The library is a destination - people visit with one another, they meet, they discuss, parents bring toddlers, tutoring for adults, children, and after- school and summers • Marketing collections and services: display spaces, make it easier to browse and to see; more books need to be displayed cover -out • Flexibility: collections change, need more flexibility in design and furnishings • Welcoming & comfortable "Shabby chic" not stuffy and polished — just like home atmosphere • Neighborhood feeling, bright, daylight, open views • Efficient and practical, smart use of space, not elaborate, not fussy, and easily maintained • Build for growth and increasing usage Proposal At the conclusion of the Building Study, the Library filed a grant proposal to seek state funding for a 7,596 SF addition and an extensive renovation to the existing building to provide full access, updated lighting, traffic flow, security, HVAC, and wiring and to build in more flexible spaces for future growth, changes in services, and increasing usage. The Library Trustees will make a proposal to Town Meeting in April, 2011, to support the plans for the design and, if successful, will ask for a full vote from the community in the Fall, 2011. 2010 Highlights • Job Search Skills Series draws record participation • First -ever Podcasts recorded and mounted in partnership with Walkable Reading for self - guided walking tours of several historical homes in the area • Environmental Literacy "Change Makes a Difference" federal grant awarded • Corinne Fisher inducted into the Massachusetts Library Association Hall of fame for her outstanding leadership in Children's Services • Allison Sloan named Paralibrarian of the Year by Library Journal for her work on advocating for recognition of the contributions of Paralibrarians throughout the profession • Two beautiful old trees on the library lawn were destroyed by disease and removed • Staff Day tour of the new Cambridge Public Library and the Print -on- Demand service at the Harvard Book Store • Ashley Waring had an article published in the well- respected children's reviewing journal, The Horn Book. • Mary McIntire celebrated her 25`h anniversary with the Reading Library! • We said sad goodbyes to : Mary DeSisto in Technical Services, Jackie Storti, longtime Friend and loyal Book Store manager, and Nancy Smethurst, who retired as Administrative Secretary 457 The Number Story Volunteer Service Hours In- house, i.e., excluding Friends, Foundation, etc.) 2,020 Magazine subscriptions 305 Collection: Books 107,992 Video, DVDs, CDs 19,200 Meeting Room Bookings 1,324 Reference Consultations 62,904 Program Attendance Adults & Young Adults 4,541 Children's 13,704 Circulation 506,594 Registered borrowers (90% of Town population) 21,672 E- Statistics RPL website: 91,861 Visitors 187,360 Visits (sessions) to our websites 336,253 Pageviews (viewed pages) 5 most popular websites: 189,763 Home page (www.readingpl.org) 20,830 Patron's account (www.readingpl.org/myaccount) 12,835 Children's website (www.readingpi.org/kids 12,167 Teens website (www.readingpl.or teens) 9,935 Library resources website (www.readingpl.orelresearch- learning)* M. Financials State, trust income, grants, and other sources of outside support for the library comprise 6% of the library budget. Municipal funding accounts for 94 %. The library is part of a consortium that is supported by state aid for technological infrastructure, licensing, and continuous upgrades. The library relies on the state for many electronic resources, professional development and essential staff continuing education in all facets of technology and evolving services. The library relies on other libraries for a substantial portion of its lending (interlibrary loan). The library relies on private donors and its Friends and Foundation for 100% of its programming budget and many major improvements (computer lab, meeting room a -v system, .additional computers, etc.). As income from the state, trust interest, gifts, and grants become less reliable, we turn increasingly for support from the Reading Public Library Friends and Reading Public 459 Museum Passes, 2010 250 �' s 1 200 150 - 100 I" SO in o N N - N N N! N N p ; _O z Financials State, trust income, grants, and other sources of outside support for the library comprise 6% of the library budget. Municipal funding accounts for 94 %. The library is part of a consortium that is supported by state aid for technological infrastructure, licensing, and continuous upgrades. The library relies on the state for many electronic resources, professional development and essential staff continuing education in all facets of technology and evolving services. The library relies on other libraries for a substantial portion of its lending (interlibrary loan). The library relies on private donors and its Friends and Foundation for 100% of its programming budget and many major improvements (computer lab, meeting room a -v system, .additional computers, etc.). As income from the state, trust interest, gifts, and grants become less reliable, we turn increasingly for support from the Reading Public Library Friends and Reading Public 459 Library Foundation to support all the important programs and classes and special initiatives that make the Reading Public Library a valuable and relevant community resource. We trust that our support groups and town funding will see us through this lean time so that we can remain a strong and solid source for adult enrichment, family literacy, and children's education and entertainment. Library Revenue FY2010 Municipal Appropriation $1,225,328 State Aid $23,472 Friends & Foundation $14,500 Trust & Endowment Income $1,972 Gifts $11,552 Grants $21,199 Revolving Fund $8,760 Capital (Building Study) $85,000 TOTAL $1,391,783 Library Expenditures FY2010 I.1 Reading Public Library Board of Trustees Richard H. Curtis, Vice - Chairman David P. Hutchinson, Chairman Karyn A. Storti, Secretary Jeffrey J. Doucette Cherrie Dubois Victoria Yablonsky Friends of the Reading Public Library Johanna Anderson, House Tour Suzy Axelson, President Jean Clark, Recording Secretary Eleanor Delaney, At Large Jenny DiMuzio, Music Series Cherrie Dubois, House Tour Lynne Freeman, Music Series Terry Hale, Photo Contest Cathy Hoodlet, At Large Beth Klepeis, Treasurer Karen O'Connell, Book Sale Room Anne Schofield, Membership Carol Silva, , Ass't Treasurer Dorota Socha, Staff Liaison Joanne Swanson, At Large Shari Therrien, Newsletter Reading Public Library Foundation Inc. William Hecht, Sr. President Robert Nordstrand, Vice President Amy Coumounduros, Treasurer Bruce Austin, Secretary 461 John Brzezenski Lynne Cameron Neil Cohen Richard Curtis Gerald Fiore Russell Graham Eugene Nigro Maria Silvaggi Reading Public Library Staff Director — Ruth S. Urell Assistant Director — Dorota Socha Administrative Assistant — Kathryn Melesciuc Reference Division Division Head — Lorraine Barry Adult & Elder Services Librarian — Nancy Aberman Local History Librarian — Rachel Baumgartner Young Adult Librarians — Susan Beauregard, Amy Lannon Promotional Services Librarian — Kathleen Miksis Reference Librarians — Eileen Barrett, Danielle Kimerer Technical Services Division Head — Jamie Penney Senior Library Associate — Allison DaSilva Senior Technician — Dawn Colford. Page — Judy Newton Circulation Division Division Head — Michelle A. Filleul Senior Library Associate - Patrice A. O'Donnell Technicians — Donna Beaulieu Dawn Didham Colford Maureen Conwell Mary Ellen Downey Susan R. Haggerty Louise Hetherington Carol Macomber Joanne H. Perna Christine Rutigliano Danielle Kimerer Pages— Neftali Gonzalez Patrick Holland Nancy Hunt 462 Lisa Li Rebecca Maitland Children's Room: Division Head — Corinne Fisher Children's Librarians — Brenda Wettergreen, Rachel Baumgartner, Ashley Waring, Carol Bender, Kathryn Geoffrion Scannell Library Associate — Mary McIntire Pages Kathleen Bowe Meaghan F. Kinton Judy A. Newton Ellen Garrison Meredith Lawrence Teresa Teixeira Custodian — John Davis 463 COMPOST SCHEDULE Oct. and Nov. 2011 Monday Oct 3 8:00am - 2:30 pm A. Pas uariello 781- 944 -4212 Monday Oct 3 8:00am -2:30 m A.S eranza 781 - 872 -1088 Friday Oct 7 8:00am - 2:30 pm Dick Rizzo 781 - 944 -0099 Friday Oct 7 8:00am - 2:30 pm Dave Guarino 781 - 944 -6032 Monday Oct 10 8:00am - 2:30 pm Holiday Monday Oct 10 8:00am - 2:30 pm Holiday Friday Oct 14 8:00am -2:30 m Dick Rizzo 781 - 944 -0099 Friday Oct 14 8:00am -2:30 m Dave Guarino 781- 944 -6032 Monday Oct 17 8:00am - 2:30 pm A. Pas uariello 781 - 944 -4212 Monday Oct 17 8:00am - 2:30 pm A.S eranza 781 - 872 -1088 Friday Oct 21 8:00am - 2:30 pm Dick Rizzo 781- 944 -0099 Friday Oct 21 8:00am - 2:30 pm Dave Guarino 781 - 944 -6032 Monday Oct 24 8:00am - 2:30 pm A. Pas uariello 781- 944 -4212 Monday Oct 24 8:00am - 2:30 pm A.S eranza 781 - 872 -1088 Friday Oct 28 8:00am - 2:30 pm Dick Rizzo 781 - 944 -0099 Friday Oct 28 8:00am - 2:30 pm Dave Guarino 781 - 944 -6032 Monday Oct 31 8:00am - 2:30 pm A. Pas uariello 781 - 944 -4212 Monday Oct 31 8:00am - 2:30 pm Helena Tibbo 781 - 944 -8439 Friday Nov 4 8:00am - 2:30 pm A.S eranza 781 - 872 -1088 Friday Nov 4 8:00am - 2:30 pm Dave Guarino 781 - 944 -6032 Monday Nov 7 8:00am - 2:30 pm A.S eranza 781 - 872 -1088 Monday Nov 7 8:00am - 2:30 pm A. Pas uariello 781- 944 -4212 Friday Nov 11 8:00am - 2:30 pm A.S eranza 781 - 872 -1088 Friday Nov 11 8:00am - 2:30 pm Dick Rizzo 781 - 944 -0099 Monday Nov 14 8:00am - 2:30 pm Dick Rizzo 781 - 944 -0099 Monday Nov 14 8:00am - 2:30 pm A. Pas uariello 781 - 944 -4212 Friday Nov 18 8:00am - 2:30 pm Dick Rizzo 781 - 944 -0099 Friday Nov 18 8:00am - 2:30 pm Dave Guarino 781 - 944 -6032 Monday Nov 21 8:00am - 2:30 pm Dave Guarino 781 - 944 -6032 Monday Nov 21 8:00am - 2:30 pm A. Pas uariello 781 - 944 -4212 Friday Nov 25 8:00am - 2:30 pm A.S eranza 781 - 944 -4212 Friday Nov 25 8:00am - 2:30 pm Dave Guarino 781 - 944 -6032 Monday Nov 28 8:00am - 2:30 pm Dick Rizzo 781 - 944 -0099 Monday Nov 28 8:00am.- 2:30 pm IA. Pas uariello 781 - 944 -4212 READING FIRE DEPARTMENT The Reading Fire Department' is responsible for four major functions: fire suppression, fire prevention, the emergency medical system and emergency management. This Department is also responsible for coordinating and applying for all reimbursements for State and Federal disaster declarations. In 2010 we have been able to expand the level of service we offer to the community and this has been achieved by aggressively pursuing grants and through the capital plan. The Reading Fire Department provides emergency medical treatment at the Advanced Life Support level (ALS) of care to sick and injured patients. This is the highest level of pre- hospital care available and we are continually expanding this program as the budget permits. In 2010 we added ALS equipment to the fire apparatus that responds out of the Main Street Fire Station. This has enhanced our ability to treat patients who are acutely ill or injured. Emergency management continues to expand in importance. The primary goal for Emergency Management is to identify areas of vulnerability to the community, to prepare for all disasters whether natural or manmade, to coordinate the response of a wide range of agencies and assist in the recovery phase. A secondary goal is to ensure the Town of Reading is in compliance with all Federal and State requirements to enable the community to remain eligible to receive reimbursement for Federal and State disaster declarations. The Town of Reading is and always has been in full compliance with all Federal and State requirements. Regional Initiatives The Reading Fire Department is participating in a study that is examining the feasibility and cost factors associated with creating a regional public safety dispatch facility. The communities involved in the project include the Fire and Police Departments of Stoneham, Wakefield, Melrose and the Middlesex Sherriff's Office. We also have personnel who are members of regional response teams. Two Lieutenants and two Firefighters serve as members of the Essex County Technical Rescue Team and one Firefighter serves on the State Hazardous Materials Team. Emergency Activity In 2010 this Department responded to2,768 emergency incidents of which 1,808 were requests for medical assistance and 958 were requests for fire and other emergency responses. We responded to 284 fire incidents that were required to be reported to the State Fire Marshal, of these, 159 were classified as structure fires. The leading fire cause in Reading was cooking related and this is consistent with State data. The Department responded to 1,808 requests for emergency medical treatment and transported 1,024 patients. On January 25, 2010 just after 6:00 PM we responded to an explosion in an occupied home located at 22 Manning Street. One occupant was injured and was treated and transported to a local hospital. Our investigation determined the explosion occurred as a result of a buildup of natural gas in the home due to a gas leak in the street. As a result of this incident, National Grid has replaced approximately 2,200 feet of gas main on Manning Street, Pleasant Street from Gardner to Manning, Smith Avenue and Eaton Street from Smith Avenue to Pleasant Street. EM Emergency Medical Services The Reading Fire Department provides an Advanced Life Support Level (ALS) of care to the community and this allows Reading Firefighters to treat patients with a wide variety of medications and sophisticated treatment techniques. This level of care is essential to patients who are experiencing a medical emergency that is an immediate threat to their lives. Our emergency medical program is coordinated by Firefighter Joseph Lapolla and Firefighter Scott Myette. The Reading Fire Department responded to 1,810 medical incidents in 2010 and transported 1,022 patients. Of the patients transported, approximately 60% required Advanced Life Support treatment. A review of emergency medical response by category indicates the four highest medical responses are for trauma, general malaise, cardiac disorders and respiratory disorders. In 2010 we implemented several advancements to improve our ability to deliver emergency care to acutely ill patients. With a $60,750 grant from the Assistance to Firefighter Grant Program we were able to purchase three new 12 lead defibrillator monitors and replace all our semi automatic defibrillators. The new 12 lead defibrillator monitors have allowed us to complete our expansion of our ALS program to all our fire apparatus. , This expansion of ALS equipment to our fire apparatus at the Main Street Fire Station gave our personnel the tools they needed to revive a 49 year old woman was who was in cardiac arrest on the morning of December 21, 2010. The 12 lead defibrillator monitor on Engine 1 was used by one of our Firefighter Paramedics to diagnose the patient's condition and administer two shocks. The ALS level treatment restored a normal rhythm to the patient's heart. Patient care was transferred to our ambulance and treatment continued emoute to the hospital. Our follow up with the receiving hospital two days later indicated the patient was awake, orientated and was not experiencing any deficits as a result of the cardiac arrest. We have added new medications on the ambulance such as nebulized epinephrine for pediatric croup and implemented new EMS reporting software. The new system has allowed us to expand our oversight of our EMS program. This will to improve quality control and patient care and will allow us to comply with mandatory EMS Reporting to the State. Fire Prevention Lieutenant Paul Jackson is assigned the position of Day Officer. The Day Officer is responsible to ensure all life safety systems for new construction and renovations are designed and installed properly. This requires pre - construction meetings, plan review, code research and continual site visits to ensure proper installation. In 2010 several building renovations were monitored and 976 inspections were completed including. Building renovations and construction projects receive a code review and construction monitoring. In May 2010, Town Meeting accepted MGL 148 Section 26I. This law requires residential buildings with four or more units which are constructed new, or substantially altered to constitute the equivalence of new construction, to be equipped with automatic sprinkler systems in accordance with the Massachusetts State Building Code. Acceptance of this statute will improve the life safety of the occupants in new and renovated large residential buildings. 465 For existing buildings, the Day Officer is responsible to ensure all life safety systems are maintained properly. Other areas of responsibility include ensuring the safety and code compliance of flammable and combustible product storage and coordinating the maintenance of Department vehicles. Lieutenant Jackson is involved in school safety initiatives. He is an active member of the NEMLEC (North East Metropolitan Law Enforcement Counsel) Stars Program. This program is designed to assist school systems to prepare and respond to a wide variety of threats to the school environment. SAFE and Community Education Firefighter John Jenks coordinates the Reading Fire Department's S.A.F.E. Program. This fire safety education program is delivered in the Reading Public School System and continues to receive a high level of support from School Administrators and children. This program is funded by a $4,500 grant provided by the State. Our SAFE program features an in -house developed age appropriate curriculum for each grade level K through 5. Reading Firefighters trained as S.A.F.E educators visit each school classroom of kindergarten through grade 5 to deliver the fire prevention and anti - smoking. message. Firefighters use a new specially designed trailer that is shared by the Metrofrre District to present a very real fire scenario to the students. Using this training aid, the children are taught life saving skills in a controlled setting that is not possible to duplicate in the classroom. The S.A.F.E. Trailer is available to the Reading Fire Department and 33 other communities in the greater Boston area free of charge. Reading Emergency Management Agency Emergency Management is an active component of the Department. Housed within Reading's Emergency Management Agency are two separate functions: Emergency Management and the Local Emergency Planning Committee. Reading is also part of the North East Homeland Security Region ( NERAC). NERAC is one of the 5 Massachusetts homeland security regions created by the Executive Office of Public Safety. Federal and State legislation requires every community in the country to have a Local Emergency Planning Committee (LEPC). The LEPC identifies areas where the population is most at risk from a hazardous materials release, facilities and transportation routes that contain hazardous materials and resources that would be used to mitigate an incident. The Reading Fire Department has developed a Hazardous Materials Emergency Plan to meet both Federal and State statutory planning requirements. The Fire Chief is the Local Emergency Planning Committee Chairman for the Town of Reading. To pool resources, the Town of Reading has joined with eleven other communities and formed the Mystic Regional Emergency Planning Committee. The Mystic Regional Emergency Planning Committee is designed to facilitate the sharing of resources in the event of an emergency and has attained Full Certification Status by the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency. IM This year we completed a planning initiative to develop a Town wide Continuity of Operations Plan and a Continuity of Government Plan. These plans are designed to assist all Departments of the Town to recover from a disaster that impacts our operations. The plan identifies a secession plan and key areas of operation for each Department. In 2010 we improved and strengthened our ability to provide emergency shelters to our residents. Through a $17,490 grant from the Northeast Homeland Security Council we purchased emergency supplies that improve the speed and efficiency in which we can move our emergency supplies to the shelter. Additionally we had all our emergency shelters surveyed by a member of the Red Cross. This action allows us to be able to use Red Cross Staff in the event we need to open a shelter and predetermines the number of people the shelter will handle and the amenities offered. Emergency Management was involved in the boil water order that was issued by the Massachusetts Water Resource Authority on Saturday, May 1, 2010 that lasted until Tuesday, May 4, 2010. In response to this incident, representatives of all Town and School Departments met together and developed a plan to distribute bottled water for residents and School buildings. The response placed the Town of Reading's emergency response planning into operation and required participation from all Town Departments. The response, participation and cooperation from all Departments was excellent. In March of 2010 severe rainstorms struck the Town and damaged several Town and School Buildings. The Reading Fire Department coordinated the request for reimbursement from FEMA for damages to Town and School buildings and as a result received a reimbursement of $56,555 from FEMA for the cost of the emergency response and damages to public buildings. Fire Alarm The municipal fire alarm system in Reading is in excellent condition. This is a direct result of the planning, care and maintenance given to the system by our dedicated Fire Alarm Technicians, Brian Ryan and Bruce Ayer. When appropriate, we are connecting new and remodeled buildings to the municipal fire alarm system to ensure a rapid response to an incident. Personnel Firefighter Robert Loring was recognized as the Reading Firefighter of the Year at the Reading/North Reading Chamber of Commerce Citizen Awards Dinner held on Wednesday, March 31, 2010. Firefighter Loring was selected by Department members for his response as an emergency medical volunteer to victims of the Haiti earthquake. Firefighter Loring serves as a volunteer with Medical Teams International and he spent two weeks in Haiti providing medical treatment to the victims of the disaster. Other Initiatives Firefighter Scott Myette coordinates the Reading Fire Department's Muscular Dystrophy fund raising efforts and he was notified that the Reading Fire Department has won the Per Capita Award for Muscular Dystrophy Association this year. The award was given because the Reading Fire Department raised the most money per capita in the State. CM Conclusion Over the last year we have strived to make advancements in all areas of the Department. We have increased the level of training for our personnel, introduced new technology and equipment and aggressively pursued resources through public safety grants. The Advanced Life Support Program has been expanded to all fire apparatus and continues to provide Reading residents with the highest level of emergency medical care in this area. The condition of our fire apparatus is excellent and this increases our efficiency and capability at the scene of emergency. I would like to thank all Town Officers, Boards, Departments, members of the Reading Fire Department and especially the citizens of Reading for their continued high level of support and assistance. Respectfully submitted, Gregory J. Bums Chief of Fire Department Chief of Department Captains Kenneth N. Campbell Paul F. Guarino Lieutenants Paul D. Jackson David T. Ballou Richard A. Puopolo Firefighters Matthew McSheehy Daniel Cahoon Michael Holmes David Roy Robert McCarthy Patrick Wallace Brian Ryan Stephen Pelrine Robert Beck Stephen Murphy David Robidoux Anthony Delsignore Secretary Resigned position Reading Fire Department Roster- Gregory J. Burns Philip B. Boisvert Peter L. Marchetti Richard L.S. Nelson Mark F. Dwyer David Gentile Michael Belmonte William VanHom Lisa Palermo Michael Wood Scott Dole John Jenks Eric Blackman Paul Roy Derek Loftus Dana Ballou Thomas McCarthy Cynthia M. Keenan *Hired to fill vacancy Sean Devlin Scott Myette Bruce Ayer Paul Dalton Ryan Buckley Joseph Lapolla Paul Damocogno Garrett Antanavica David Ferreira Christopher Germain Robert Loring Stephen Binari *Robert Drake ^Retired ,M Fire Department Statistics for 2010 Permit Fees collected $11,979 Ambulance Fees Collected $506,783 Fire and Emergency Responses 958 Emergency Ambulance Calls 1810 Inspections 976 ,M READING POLICE,DEPARTMENT Mission and Value Statement The Reading Police Department is committed to providing the highest level of public safety and service to the citizens and business people within the community. The members of the Department are empowered to enforce the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and the By -laws of the Town of Reading to ensure that the peace and tranquility of our neighborhoods are maintained and that crime and the fear of crime are reduced. We emphasize and value integrity, honesty, impartiality and professionalism from our members in order to create an environment that values differences and fosters fairness and flexibility in our mission. We encourage citizen input and interaction that will assist us in developing sound partnerships between the community and police. Working together we can protect our future and enhance the quality of life for everyone within the town. The Reading Police Department, and the community as a whole, experienced growth, change and transformation in calendar year 2010. More personnel changes occurred within the Police Department including one new Command Staff promotion and one new police officer was hired to fill an existing opening. This report summarizes the participation, activities, sponsorships, enhancements, accomplishments, and other notable events of the Reading Police Department in Calendar year 2010. Personnel Changes The following personnel changes and adjustments were experienced by the Police Department in calendar year 2010. February • Sgt. Richard Abate was promoted to Sergeant, assigned to the Night Patrol Division. March 2010 Officer Corey Santasky was assigned as the School Resource Officer. Officer Justin Martel was assigned as Acting Safety Officer. April 2010 • Officers Michael Lee and Christine Amendola deployed with their Army National Guard Military Police Unit to Afghanistan. • Recruit Officer Mark Mullen was hired and began training at the MBTA Police Academy in Quincy, MA. October 2010 ■ Officer Mark Mullen graduated from the MBTA Police Academy. Awards and recognitions March 2010 ■ The following police officers and dispatcher were honored as the Reading Police Departments "2009 Officer of, the Year" at the Reading/North Reading Chamber of Commerce Dinner; Officers Matthew Edson, David Savio, Sean Wilson, Ian Nelson, Corey Santasky, Robert MacHugh and Dispatcher Debra Haynes. This group award was 470 presented for the life saving actions taken when they manually lifted a car off its owner after it fell off car jacks while he worked under it. May 2010 ■ The Board of Selectmen recognized National Police Memorial Week. Community Policing The Reading Police Department continues to work closely with the community and other Town Departments, as well as State and Federal Agencies. The Police Department strongly promotes the philosophy of "working with the community ". The Department sponsors or participates in a number of community events and/or programs, the following are a number of those. • The Police Department continues to be an active member of the Reading Coalition Against Substance Abuse (RCASA). Chief James Cormier and School Resource Office Corey Santasky are active members of the RCASA. • The Police Department was able to collaborate with the RCASA to be awarded grant funding that enables the Department to conduct alcohol compliance checks. The Detective Division has worked closely with the RCASA to be trained and implement alcohol compliance checks throughout the community. The Police Department, working with RCASA, is able to boast 100% compliance in our checks. • The Police Department is represented on the Human Relations Advisory Committee. (HRAC) Chief Cormier. The Rape Aggression Defense (RAD) program which is a self defense course designed specifically for women, has been and continues to be one of the Reading Police Department's most successful programs. Two Basic Adult RAD classes were held, graduating 52 women. The Police Department in partnership with The Reading Public Schools expanded the RAD program by offering RadKIDS. This course is designed specifically for boys and girls in the 5 to 11 year range. Both programs cover a multitude of topics including stranger danger, intemet safety, good touch and bad touch, bullying, gun safety, and anti abduction techniques. Two radKIDS classes were offered, graduating 27 boys and girls between the ages of 5 and 11 years of age. Sgt. Clark, Sgt. Abate, Detective Iapicca, Detective Halloran, Officer Lavita, Officer Nelson, Officer Amendola and Officer Stasiak are the dedicated instructors • In June, police officers & their families participated in the Challenger Softball game, where they are afforded an opportunity to interact with children with special needs in a relaxed and fun atmosphere. • Also in June, the Department participated in Friends and Family Day held at Birch Meadow. Officer Collins. The Department participates annually in the Library's Vehicle Day in August, where children of all ages get to enjoy the Town vehicles of the community. Officers Collins, Picco. • Throughout the year, the Department participated in the Governors' Highway Safety Bureau's "Click -it or Ticket" program. This program is an intensified traffic enforcement effort subsidized by a grant that targets specific traffic issues, such as seat belt use, or impaired operation. Lt. Stamatis, Sgt McKenna. • In October, the Department, in conjunction with its labor unions, organized its annual Senior Ham and Bean Supper at the Senior Center. Officer Collins. 471 • In December, the Department, in conjunction with its labor unions, organized the 30th annual Children's Holiday Party at Austin Preparatory School. Again collaborating with the Free Masons (Reading Lodge) to offer the Child Identification Program (CHIP) providing over 80 identification kits. Officer Collins. • The Department's Web Site http:// www. ci .reading.ma.us/Pages/ReadingMA Police /index is very successful and offers a variety of information for the public. Lt. Stamatis. • Safety Officer Martel gave safety talks to the following schools and groups: • joshua Eaton School; Topic- Safety Day. • Barrows School; Topic - Summer Camp Safety Day for children with autism. • Birch Meadow School; Topic - Safety Talk. • Coolidge Middle School; Topic- Career Day, Summer Camp Safety, Summer Camp Bullying. • Little Treasure's School; Topic- Safety Talk on Notifying People Where You Are Going, Halloween Safety and book reading with the children. • Elderberry Lane complex; Topic- Senior Safety and Telephone Scams • In response to the community's ongoing concerns with traffic enforcement, the Police Department utilized grant funding to augment specific traffic enforcement efforts throughout the year. • The Police Department was actively involved in the planning and successful implementation of the second annual Fall Street Faire in September. The downtown was cordoned off to provide a street festival in the square and down Haven St. The event was declared a huge success and is expected to be repeated going forward. Patrol Division The Reading Police Patrol Division is the core of policing services in the Town of Reading. The Patrol Division falls under the command of Lieutenant David Stamatis during daytime operations and Lieutenant Peter Garchinsky on nights. The Patrol Division is comprised of 2 Sergeants and 10 Patrol Officers during the day; and 4 Sergeants and 12 Patrol Officers on nights. The Patrol Division is the most visible section of the police department, providing around the clock service to the citizens and visitors to Reading. They are the uniformed Officers who provide the first line of defense for the public's safety. Each law enforcement patrol officer works to protect life and property, uphold the civil rights of individuals, preserve public peace, provide citizen assistance, enforce criminal and motor vehicle laws, and respond to emergency situations. These are dedicated and committed professionals who place their lives and well being in jeopardy for the citizens of Reading on a daily basis. The Patrol Division currently consists of 8 supervisors and 22 sworn officers. It currently operates a fleet of 5 Ford Crown Victoria's as well as a Ford Explorer and Expedition. In addition to standard patrol the Reading Police Department's Patrol Division also employs a. motorcycle and 7 pedal bikes. The men and women of the Patrol Division are responsible for enforcing state and municipal laws and regulations designed to protect life and property; maintain order in an assigned district or beat; patrol the community to preserve the peace and to prevent crime; take criminal reports 472 and interview witnesses and suspects; apprehend fugitives and criminals; collect evidence and give testimony in court; conduct investigations for all misdemeanor and many felony cases; direct traffic, issue traffic tickets, investigate accidents, and make arrests; participate in crime prevention, public information, and safety programs. Patrol officers maintain closer contact with the public than any other section of the police department. Most likely, the first person you will see when you are in need of the police will be the patrol officer. The men and women of the Reading Police Department's Patrol Division take great pride in serving the citizens of Reading. It is important to realize that in a split second, the most inconsequential and routine activity can develop into a potentially hazardous situation. Without question, the Patrol Division is the backbone of the police department. In 2010, the Patrol Division issued 4,496 moving violations, made 213 arrests and answered 12,576 calls for service throughout the Reading Community. Detective Division The Detective Division is the liaison of the Police Department with the Reading Public Schools as well as the Northeast Regional Vocational School in Wakefield. School Resource Officer Corey Santasky was the Division's primary liaison in 2010. SRO Santasky was selected as SRO in March of 2010, to replace Richard Abate who was promoted to the rank of Sergeant. Outlined are a number of the Detective Division's activities for 2010 • Actively participated in the Criminal Based Justice System; this system brings together the Reading Police Department, Reading Public Schools, Austin Preparatory High School, The Middlesex County District Attorneys Office and the Probation Department to share information. • Member of the Middlesex Partnership for Youth - Project Alliance. This is a program sponsored by the Middlesex County District Attorney's office that provides educational opportunities for law enforcement, schools and other professionals in the areas relative to school and juvenile issues. • Member of the Woburn Court Substance Abuse Initiative, linking the seven communities that fall under the jurisdiction of Woburn District Court to combat the substance abuse issue in the area. Through this initiative, the Heroin Education Awareness Task Force (H.E.A.T.) was developed. • Member of the NEMLEC Detective Group, a regional detective group incorporating over 40 cities and towns in the region, that freely exchanges information of interest. • Participating member of the Domestic Abuse Roundtable; a meeting of the Middlesex District Attorney's office and the seven Woburn District Court police agencies to exchange and update information regarding domestic violence. • Participating member of the Juvenile Fire Setters, educational information regarding juvenile fire setters. • Worked in conjunction with the Reading Coalition Against Substance Abuse to conduct many alcohol compliance checks of all pouring establishments and liquor stores in Town. • Members of the Detective Division attended many training programs in the areas of alcohol compliance enforcement, search warrant preparation, domestic violence, criminal, drug and narcotics investigatory techniques and prosecution. 473 • Detectives worked in conjunction with Reading Coalition Against Substance Abuse Director Erica McNamara to develop and maintain the "RX Round -up" prescription collection program. • Sgt. Detective Segalla and SRO Santasky attended a weeklong "CADCA" (Community Anti -Drug Collations of America) conference on Drug Free Communities in Phoenix, Arizona. • The Detective Division is exploring many options in utilizing social media to distribute information to the public. Public Safety Dispatch The Reading Public Safety Dispatchers provide, through communications, a lifeline for the community, Police Officers and Firefighters. Eight full time dispatchers and one per diem dispatcher are under the direct supervision of the Head Dispatcher and under the command of the Day Shift Patrol Division Commander Lt. David Stamatis. Dispatchers receive requests for information and services, then triage those request based on available resources, and disseminate those request to the emergency personnel in the field. Dispatchers greet the public entering the police station and provide a valuable service to our community. Each year, Dispatchers attend various training seminars to expand their knowledge and provide a higher level of service. Dispatchers recorded 32,703 calls for service in 2010 and issued 3713 Community Access Stickers. The Dispatch Corps are the face of Reading Public Safety. In most cases they are the first interaction the public has with a Public Safety agency. Over the past year, there have been no changes in the staffing level of the Communications Center which builds on the stability of the division. Crossing Guards The school crossing guards are part-time civilian personnel. Currently there are twenty, permanently assigned crossing guards and eight spares that fill in when a regular crossing guard is unable to cover their post. They are under the direct supervision, coordination and control of Acting Safety Officer Justin Martel while Officer Michael Lee is deployed in Afghanistan. Each crossing guard plays an essential role in ensuring the safe commute of children to and from school. They also serve as an extra set of eyes and ears for the police department and the community as well. These crossing guards have proven to be devoted to their duties and are a great asset to the Town of Reading. Animal Control The Animal Control Officer is Ronald Bums. He works 13 hours per week and is on call for emergency situations. There were more than 350 calls for service received by the Animal Control Officer. There were 9 dog bites over the year resulting in injuries to humans. There were 5 dog to dog bites resulting in veterinary care. There were 6 bites over the year resulting from animal of unknown ownership (5 dogs and I cat). There were 7 cat bites to humans reported. Those that tested negative for rabies were quarantined for 10 days. There were over 30 coyote sightings and missing cat calls reported. Over 271 fines and citations were issued to residents for failure to keep their dog on a leash, failure to license their dog, and for biting. The majority of the calls were received for neighbors complaining about other dogs. 474 The Animal Control Officer is authorized to isolate and confine domestic animals suspected of being exposed to rabies. Acting according to state regulations and guidelines, Animal Control Officers must: ■ Investigate reports of domestic animals exposed to rabies. • Determine if the domestic animal has or may have been exposed to a rabid animal, and if the domestic animal has been properly vaccinated. ■ Make an evaluation of the exposure of the vaccinated animal and prescribe the appropriate action according to state regulations. • Obtain permission to euthanize exposed, unvaccinated animals from their owners or from the Massachusetts Department of Food and Agriculture (MDFA). Carry out euthanasia permitted by the animal owner or MDFA. ■ Collect the head of the euthanatized animal and deliver or send it to MDPH State Laboratory Institute if the animal has bitten or otherwise exposed a human or domestic animal. ■ Inspect residential kennels that house 4 or more dogs. ■ Ensure that vaccinate domestic animals receive a booster vaccination if needed, and that the animal remains under appropriate strict confinement or isolation. ■ Contact local officials when exposed domestic animals have exposed humans. Although the Animal control Officer is not responsible for handling wildlife calls, he evaluates such calls and assists where possible. He provides contact numbers for the appropriate State or private agency to handle wildlife issues beyond the Town's control. Parking Enforcement Officer The Parking Enforcement Officer is Ronald Burns. He works 18 hours per week. The major responsibilities of the Parking Enforcement Officer are: ■ 'Identify and cite motorists who violate Readings parking regulations and reduce opportunities for violations to be committed through preventive patrols of all parking areas. Tally and inventory tickets daily. • Identify parking problem areas within the town and forward this information to the Safety Officer. • Perform related duties as required. Total citations issued by the Parking Enforcement Officer in 2010 are 1,582. • Total income from parking citations is $43,540. 84% of the citations were paid. • 11 % of the citations were marked for non - payment. The following is the Department Roster, a statistical analysis of our enforcement efforts and a record of revenues generated by our department for calendar year 2010. 475 READING POLICE DEPARTMENT - 2010 ROSTER Chief James W. Cormier Lieutenants Executive Officer Lt. Richard W. Robbins Lt. David M. Stamatis Sergeants Bruce F. Russell John T. McKenna Mark J. O'Brien David J. Clark Lt. Peter C. Garchinsky Francis G. Duclos Richard P. Abate Detective Division Sgt. Detective Mark Segalla Detectives: Michael D. Saunders, Derek Holmes, Pasquale Iapicca, Michelle Halloran School Resource Officer Corey P. Santasky Support Services Community Service Officer Safety. Officer Armorer James P. Collins Justin Martel (Acting) Michael R. Lee (Military Leave) Christopher Picco Patrol Officers Christine Amendola (Military Leave) Joseph Belmonte Michael C. Bouvier Kevin M. Brown Jr. Anthony F. Caturello Erik Drauschke John C. Edson Matthew C. Edson Michael P. Fitzgerald Keith D. Hurley Christopher E. Jones Salvi Lavita Robert MacHugh Jr Justin P. Martel Mark Mullen Ian A. Nelson Corey Santasky David -Savio Patrick Silva Kristen Stasiak Christopher Voegelin Sean M. Wilson READING POLICE DEPARTMENT 2010 ANCILLARY PERSONNEL Business Administrator Andrew Scribner- MacLean Clerks ` Administrative Assistant Victoria Cummings 476 Principal Clerk Joanne Power Dispatchers Head Dispatcher Victoria Avery Dispatchers Christopher Finneganj Debra Haynes I Ryan Mahoney Joseph Pagnotta John Rawcliffe I Regina Saunders I Susan Tapley Matthew Vatcher School Crossing Guards Cindy Asci Dick Baker Mildred Barton Cheryl Buckman Doug Cowell Bob DeWolfe Art Dickensen Peg Faulkner Gerry Intonti Lucy Intonti Tina Lantz Leon Leighton Marsha Leighton Joe Lopiccolo Louann MacKinnon Kris McNeil Don Pierce Dick Prudente Patricia Tilton Rosemary Violante Spare School Crossing Guards: Bob Bent I Maryann LaFleur Allan Sletterink George Snow Richard Stoez Lynne Upton I Joe Veno $ 337.50 ■ Police Reports Copied Animal Control Officer / Parking Enforcement Officer Ronald Burns Service Statistics calendar year 2010: • Arrests 213 • Protective Custody 32 ■ Motor Vehicle Citations 4496 ■ Parking Violations 1582 • Detective Criminal Investigations 162 ■ Automobile Crashes Investigated 446 Fees Collected calendar year 2010: • License to Carry Permits $ 1,687.50 • Firearm Identification Cards $ 337.50 ■ Police Reports Copied $ 1,942.50 • Parking Fines $43,540.00 ■ Administrative Fees for details $31,914.86. ■ Community Access Stickers $79,680.00 ■ Parking Space Rentals $36,950.00 ■ . Civil Motor Vehicle Infractions $50,449.20 ■ Community Room Rental fee $ 190.00 ■ Motor Vehicle Lease Surcharge $ 2,178.00 Conclusion: To summarize our Mission Statement, we are empowered to enforce the laws of our land, but in order to do this appropriately and adequately we have to work with the community. Providing the community with the highest level of police service is a goal that will require dedication, hard work and a strong commitment to and from our community. I want to thank the citizens of our community for their support and cooperation. Working with the community, your police department will accomplish its mission. Respectfully submitted, James W. Cormier Chief of Police Em. READING COALITION AGAINST SUBSTANCE ABUSE Key Milestones • Expanded the youth leadership crew and engaging local parents. • Strengthened police enforcement to reduce minors' access to alcohol. • Modified policies implemented on school issues. • Launched prescription disposal program. • Passed Town by -law to prohibit public consumption of marijuana. • Improved local data collection. • Increased understanding amongst youth, parents and residents of environmental strategies and multi- sector collaboration to reduce substance abuse. Board of Directors The board met monthly at the Reading Police Department Community Room throughout the fiscal year. Board members grappled with challenging issues this past fiscal year and worked to raise the profile of the coalition. RCASA leaders provided support for School Policy changes which led to the implementation of the School Breathalyzer /Search & Seizure Policies by the School Committee. Student Representatives provided valuable status reports on their tobacco prevention project and other Youth Crew initiatives. Board members served on a variety of workgroups and committees to accomplish critical tasks including data gathering, outreach, and leadership development. Coalition leaders appointed the nominating committee to fill vacant slots and recruit members. A report of the roster changes and motions related to by -laws was provided at the FY2010 Annual Meeting. We mourned the loss of Patrick Schettini, charter member of RCASA and former Superintendent of Schools in January 2010. Youth Crew leaders delivered a moving speech in honor or Mr. Schettini's valuable contributions to the coalition. Awards RCASA Underage Drinking Town Hall Event, awards were presented to three coalition leaders Pastor Pam Paquette. April 2010, the "Outstanding Youth Advocate" including Sgt. Richard Abate, Elaine Webb and Northeast Regional Tobacco Prevention Advocate Award, May 2010 - Timothy O'Sullivan, RCASA Youth Crew, was presented with an award for regional youth leadership by the 84 - MA Tobacco Control Program. The event was televised on Channel 5 -WCVB. Reading Memorial High School Ceremony for Senior Awards, May 2010 - The awards for "Outstanding Youth Leadership` were presented to six RCASA youth leaders including Taylor McLelland, Dan Pomerleau, Tim O'Sullivan, Alex Grizzell, Courtney Farrar and Will Cunningham. 479 Reading MHS Graduation Ceremony, June 2010 - The awards for "Outstanding Contributions to Reading Memorial High School Health & Wellness" were presented to Maxwell Lawton and Shawna -Leigh Morton by Tom Zaya, Chair of the Wellness Department on behalf of RCASA. President's Volunteer Service Awards, Annual Meeting, September 2010- The awards for President's Volunteer Service were presented by the Board of Selectman and School Committee at the RCASA Annual Meeting in 2010. • Nancy -Linn Swain was honored with "The President's Volunteer Service Bronze Award" and the "The President's Volunteer Service Silver Award ". • Barbara Meade, the Chairperson for the Board of Health was honored with "The President's Volunteer Service Bronze Award." Official town proclamations for the 2009 Red Ribbon Week and 2010 Recovery Month were issued by the Board of Selectman. Co mmittees/W orkgrou ps The Executive Board comprised of the Town Manager, Police Chief, Superintendent and RCASA President met bi- weekly with the RCASA Director to provide guidance. The Data Workgroup (DWG) The workgroup included sector representatives from school, police, and evaluation. The DWG worked with the Director and met quarterly to support data collection. The leaders created pathways for staff to access additional school, police and town data. The table below outlines new data collected: Type Source Comments Death Health Dept/ Director conducted a manual review of 1,600 death Certificates Clerk's certificates from 2005 -2010 Records School High School Principal Freedman provided all substance abuse Disciplinary related incidents from 2005 -2010 Records ( Police Data Reading Detective Halloran ran all substance abuse and Police related incidents from 2005 -2010. Manual review of Detective's key cases. Division -- _- .._... - -- Fire Data - -- _ - - - - Fire Dept. -- - - -- _ -- - -- ._._.....------.. Pvt. Lapolla and Capt. Guarino gathered data for all overdose calls and any cases involving Narcan i.e. indicator of opiate overdose. i I School Data ( School Dept. i Tom Zaya and wellness teachers administered the 2009 YRBS survey and shared results with RCASA. Tobacco I MA Tobacco Ron Beauregard, regional representative provided Compliance Control compliance rates for the last 5 years. Program Other , Youth Crew Youth Crew leaders conducted a survey of 40 stores Tobacco regarding availability of other tobacco products. Products Survey The DWG obtained permission to host a joint meeting of the. Board of Selectman, Board of Health and School Committee to receive the final DWG report on September 30, 2010. Special thanks to Chief James Cormier, Sgt. Det. Mark Segalla, Det. Michelle Halloran, Sgt. Richard Abate, Supt. John Doherty, Principal Elinor Freedman, Sara Grinnell, Chris Caruso, Town Manager Peter Hechenbleikner, Nancy -Linn Swain, Erica McNamara, Officer Corey Santasky, Thomas Zaya, Darlene Foley, Ron Beauregard, Larry Ramdin, Capt. Paul Guarino, Pvt. Joe Lapolla, Connie DeBenedetto and the RCASA Youth Crew Leaders. The Risk Behavior Workgroup (RBW) The focus of this group was to develop ways to educate the school community on multiple risk behaviors including substance abuse. The RBW presented the results of the 2009 Reading Youth Risk Behavior Survey to the School Committee in the fall of 2009. A series of smaller presentations were conducted with PTOs in the school district. The 2009 state and national results were compiled into comparison charts. The RBW included adults and students from the high school. The group sponsored an in- service training for faculty on Sexual Assault & Children in the last fiscal year. An experienced panel of speakers from law enforcement and SANE (Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner Program) provided valuable information for adults that work with young people to better identify and refer victims of childhood sexual assault. Information was also shared on the links between childhood trauma and substance abuse. Special thanks to Sgt. Detective Mark Segalla, Detective Michelle Halloran, and Sgt. Richard Abate for their expertise in developing this training. The workgoup also planned the I" Annual Health & Wellness Day at the Reading Memorial High School in the spring of 2010. This special day featured in- service training, student workshops, and health fair. The project also included an evening parent presentation on Social Host Liability. The event reached over 900 high school students and 200 8`h grade students. Special thanks to Tom Zaya, Event Chair and RCASA youth leaders for their hard work in EU planning and executing this event. The Reading Public Schools and "Middlesex Partnerships for Youth" provided the parent presentation. The Youth Crew comprised of 35 members focused on youth leadership, media campaign development, outreach, and prevention products: The Youth Crew launched a Student Club at Reading Memorial High School in November of 2009. Youth Crew representatives conducted a speaking engagement at a local elementary school for Red Ribbon Week. They conducted an in- depth research project on "other tobacco products" and presented their research to key town stakeholders. They participated in local, regional and state -wide training with the Mass Youth Against Tobacco and MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving). They established connections to state and national networks by developing student chapters. The Student Club earned chapter status with the Mass Youth Against Tobacco's `84' Initiative in the fall of 2009. The "84" represents the eighty -four percent of Massachusetts youth that choose not to use tobacco. The Student Club also established a SADD chapter in the fall of 2010. In addition to special events, the Youth Crew leaders met every other Sunday for five hrs throughout the school year and two afternoons a week during the summer to develop their projects. The Student'Club met every Tuesday at Reading Memorial High School throughout the school year. They conducted a tobacco prevention project and co- organized the first Health & Wellness Day. The club was featured in the high school yearbook for the first time and ended their school year with an ice cream social. The advisors for the club included RCASA Staff, Chair of the Wellness Department and the School Resource Officer. Staff: Erica McNamara, RCASA Director, and Connie DeBenedetto, RCASA Outreach Coordinator. Personnel/Consultants: JBS Professional Services (municipal and law enforcement training) - Sara Grinnell (Evaluation Services) - Youth (dialogues, prevention campaigns and underage operatives) Coalition Progress and Highlights Objective # 1: Implement strategic plan and mobilize the community to support the RCASA mission. Results: • RCASA staff and Youth Crew reached 2,351 individuals compared to 868 people in FY09. Obiective # 2: Monitor fiscal and reporting obligatiotis Results: • Completed federal Drug Free Communities reports and all required reports for the Health Resources in Action mini grant on tobacco research. Obiective # 3: Coordinate community needs assessment and data collection Results: M • Reviewed more than 2,500 surveys and/or evaluations to expand the RCASA community needs assessment. Objective # 4: Facilitate meetings, community forums, and groups Results: • Co- sponsored the I" Annual Health & Wellness Day and Social Host Liability workshop, 1,140 students, faculty and parents. Objective # 5: Communicate progress of coalition activities Results: • Staff generated 40 press releases, news features, or fact sheets which yielded 18 articles. • Staff worked with youth leaders to develop 4 e- newsletters for coalition members. 90% of content developed by youth leaders. EM DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Director's Report T would like to thank the Board of Selectmen and Town Manager for their help and support this past year. In these times of dwindling resources, and ever increasing expenses, it certainly is a challenge maintaining the current level of services we provide to the residents of Reading, yet in 2010 we were, for the most part, able to do just that. In addition, I would like to thank all department employees for their continued support, cooperation, hard work, dedication, and demonstrated pride, which is evident in the excellent daily service and programs they provide and projects they complete. Department personnel continue to be actively involved as members, liaisons, or staff consultants to a number of boards and committees, including the Fall Faire Committee, Municipal Building Committee, Town Cemetery Board, Town Forest Committee, etc. We provided support and assistance to other Town Departments with various projects and programs throughout the year, several of which are outlined in this report. The department had another busy year in 2010 with numerous projects and programs, while still providing outstanding customer service that has become a trademark of the department. Specific goals that were realized include the renegotiation of a new multi -year solid waste rubbish/recycling contract with current contractor JRM, 5 -ye4r extension to our contract with our disposal contractor Covanta, and revision of our snowplow contract hiring procedures from a bid to a set -rate process. Over the next year we will continue to look to make improvements and efficiencies, with specific reference to the 2008 DPW Management study as an outline guide, issues to include vehicle maintenance, project tracking, and employee training. All this work requires major teamwork/group effort to accomplish. It is a credit to ALL employees that these major, high profile, projects and programs were completed in a timely, cost effective manner, while at the same time providing the daily, routine type tasks needed and expected by our residents, our customers. We are confident, that in the year ahead, this department will continue to build upon its established foundation of excellence. - Administration Comment The Administration Division supported the Department with procurement administration, water and sewer billing, budget preparation and coordination, departmental personnel and payroll 484 services, accounts payable processing, cemetery administration services and responses to public inquiries and concerns over all Public Works areas of responsibility. Significant projects included ➢ Procurement and management of over 25 contracts throughout the public works divisions including highway projects and supplies, water and sewer main projects, rubbish/recycling and snow removal. ➢ 2010 was the fifth and final year of a five year contract for our Town -wide solid waste collection and curbside recycling ending in July 2011. The Town chose to extend the contract for an additional 5 year term with our contract vendor, JRM. The new contract will terminate in 2016. The town's vendor, JRM, offered new program changes beginning in October 2010 featuring mandatory recycling with a 4- barrel limit, free bulk - waste pickup, and TV /CRT and appliance pickups arranged through their office. ➢ The town renewed its contract with Covanta for rubbish disposal through June 2015 at a competitive rate. ➢ Coordinated two Household Hazardous Waste Day collection events with the Town of Wakefield. ➢ USI Services completed the first year of their contract with an option year to install new water, meters. This is the fourth year of the water meter replacement program. All residents will receive new water meters by 2012. ➢ Provided procurement assistance to other Town Departments and Divisions including quotes /contracts for the Library Services, Community Services, and the Technical Division. ➢ Overall facilitation of the Water Conservation Rebate Program: Appointment scheduling, rebate processing and tracking of high - efficiency washing machines, low -flow toilets, and irrigation system rain sensors, and rain barrels. Coordination of program was brought in- house, allowing greater flexibility, and saving thousands of dollars for the town. ➢ Coordination of The Street Sign Lottery — a unique opportunity to sponsor, purchase, or take a chance on a piece of Reading memorabilia. ➢ Increased recycling efforts through continued media and educational initiatives have resulted in additional residential, condominium, and school groups joining in our recycling efforts, thereby reducing our disposal tonnage. In 2010, every Reading school joined the recycling effort with red bins in every classroom, and dumpsters for cardboard and paper. This has led to significant savings for the town. Emphasis continues on providing public information, responding to inquiries and concerns, and improving all areas of public communications. 485 Cemetery Division Interments — 100 Interments for all years — 14,626 Markers set — 13 Foundations — 25 Monuments re -set — 40 Sale of Lots Forest Glen — 5 lots sold in the Urn Garden. Total for all years — 2056 lots, 798 single graves. Charles Lawn — 3 lots, 6 single and veterans' graves — Total for all years — 492 lots, 253 single and veterans graves. Wood End — 22 lots and 4 single grave — Total for all years — 372 lots, 31 single graves. Cooperation from other divisions of Public Works was outstanding and much appreciated. The Board of Cemetery Trustees has been very supportive of all the numerous programs and goals of this division Custodian of Veteran's Graves Interments — WWII — 19 Korea — 3 Vietnam — 2 Peacetime - 1 Total of all veteran's interred.— 1,736 As has been the custom for many years, all veteran's graves were decorated with a flag and a potted flower for Memorial Day. Engineering Division The Engineering Division provides engineering services to all Departments within the Town of Reading. The Division is responsible for preparation of plans, contract documents, specifications and estimates; survey layout, inspection, design and construction management of Town construction projects; upkeep of traffic markings; review of subdivision plans and site plans for accuracy and conformance with the subdivision and site plan rules and regulations; review of conservation submittals, preparation of subdivision and conservation bond estimates, inspection of subdivision construction and the administration of the pavement management program and the Chapter 90 roadway improvement program. The Division also provides technical assistance and guidance on various Town projects, performs traffic studies, regulates and inspects private construction activities within Town roadways; and is responsible for the maintenance of all records concerning the subdivision of land, roadway, water, sewer and drainage construction, town maps and the issuance of various permits. During the year the following construction projects were completed: la Roadway Improvements Pinevale Avenue, Juniper Circle, Bear Hill Road, North Street, Temple Street, Harrison Street, Haverhill Street (Timberneck Drive to Wakefield Street), Marla Lane (Forest Street to Spruce Road), Arlington Street and Killam Elementary School., Parks & Playgrounds unds Memorial Park Improvements. Sewer: California Road sewer replacement. Railroad Quiet Zone Compliance Installed traversable medians on New Crossing Road and Willow Street. Sidewalks and Curbs Temple Street, Washington Street adjacent to Park Street, Bancroft Avenue and Woburn Street handicap ramps, High Street Train Depot island expansion and Morgan Park curbing. Project designs, field surveys, plans and studies developed by the staff included . Wood End and Charles Lawn Cemetery lot layouts; 41 -43 Wilson Street detention basin improvements for Reading Housing; Colburn Road drainage extension; Causeway Road roadway acceptance and improvements; Birch Meadow Drive\Arthur B. Lord school zone alterations; property rights plans at Birch Meadow Drive \School Complex, Symonds Way, Summer Avenue and Bear Hill Road; playground improvement master plans at Joshua Eaton, Barrows Elementary School and Washington Park; Joshua Eaton field grade improvements; Cemetery Garage Site Evaluation Report; Walkers Brook Drive roadway and Parker Turf Field conservation compliance as- builts; Haverhill Street water improvements; Harrison Street and Temple Street roadway projects; Library site plan; and Mattera Cabin septic system evaluation. Drain studies were performed at 22 Pasture Road, 10 Hillside Road, 252 Haverhill Street, 6 Hemlock Road, and Beaver Road; and secured $7,100 MAPC grant for the installation of 12 bike racks at 10 locations within the Town. Survey for initial plan preparation and construction layout was also performed for the following rp oiects California. Road Sewer Improvements; Memorial Park Improvements; Temple Street and Harrison Street Roadway Improvements; Killam School Pavement Improvements and the Causeway Road Street Acceptance Improvements. Contract documents were developed for the annual loam and seed, traffic markings, roadway crack sealing, pavement restoration projects and the California Road Sewer Improvement project. Traffic studies were performed on Ash Street and Franklin Street. A consultant was also hired to develop conceptual plans to extend the downtown streetscape improvements to Haven Street, High Street and Washington Street area. Plans were reviewed and recommendations were submitted to the state consultants on the Safe Routes to Schools sidewalk and curb improvement project. 487 The division continued its efforts to elevate the West Street Roadway Improvement Project to the funded project list of the States Transportation Improvement Plan through meetings with Metropolitan Planning Organization and MassDOT officials. Comments from all divisions of Mass. Highway Department have been received and work continues in obtaining temporary rights of entry from property owners along the project corridor. The division worked with the Town's consultant in completing the sewer station evaluation study, the final sewer 1/I study report and made recommendations of future sewer improvements to be performed under the MWRA 1/I Local Assistance Program. Work continued with the NPDES Phase II Storm Water program with the preparation and submission of the annual compliance report; mapping, inspection and updating of the outfall database; distribution of storm water awareness information, and flyers, via the Town newsletter Your Community Connection, Weekly Notes, Newsletter, RCTV and the Town's website. The Engineering Division performed inspections of utility installations and repairs; dig safe mark outs Town wide; and for gas main installations on Manning Street, Pleasant Street, Eaton Street, Smith Avenue, California Road, Pennsylvania Avenue, Virginia Road and Indiana Avenue. Performed site inspections of private development projects at 11 Oak Street, Sam's Bistro at 107 Main Street, Perfecto's Cafe at 285 Main Street, Grumpy Doyle's at 530 Main Street, One General Way, Oak Tree Development at 30 Haven Street; and Sailor Tom's Way, Benjafnin Lane and Kylie Drive subdivisions. The Division also witnessed 10 soil evaluations for private projects. The Engineering Division issued permits and performed construction inspection for 24 new sewer connections, 13 new water connections, 11 permits for the disconnection, repair or reuse of existing sewer. connections, 9 permits for the maintenance or repair of water services, 109 street opening permits to National Grid for repairs, new gas services and main installations, 30 street opening permits within Town right -of -ways, 2 curb cut permits, 1 street/sidewalk occupancy permits and 49 of the new Jackie's Law trench excavation permits. Highway Division The Highway Division at the Public Works Facility consists of fifteen employees, three. are Mechanics one is a Dispatcher and the eleven that are left maintain the infrastructure of the Town of Reading. The regular projects such as street sweeping, catch basin repairs (59), roadside cutting, sidewalk and street maintenance, tree lawn repair, mixing and sifting loam and compost, traffic control, and cleaning of catch basins and ditches continued by priority and need. Street sweeping was started on March 22, 2010 and finished on May 7, 2010. Miscellaneous Placed and filled planters for Adopt -An -Island program, placed mosquito control tablets in the catch basins and detention areas for the Health Department. Held Hazardous Waste Day, Adopt - A- Family distributions in November and December, Equipment Day at the Library and the 488 Town's annual Friends & Family Day. Picked up TV'S /CRT'S once a month, provided support for the annual Fall Street Faire, did traffic control for Christmas on the common and the Halloween Parade. Vehicle Maintenance Repaired and serviced the equipment from Police, Fire, School, Building Maintenance, Council on Aging, and Public Works Departments. Also continued to take waste oil from the public during the week and on Saturdays, and did emergency in -the -field repairs as needed. Snow and Ice During the winter season of 2009 - 2010 DPW plowed five storms and sanded seventeen times. Special Projects ➢ Installed drain line and catch basins on Colburn Road and Memorial Park. ➢ Did fieldwork and drainage at Eaton School. ➢ Installed drainage, sidewalks, and hot top berm at Killam School. ➢ Paved Lewis Street and Hancock Street. ➢ Skim coated sections of Van Norden Road, Wakefield Street, County Road, Forest Street, and the entrance to Birch Meadow School. ➢ Dug test pits for engineering ➢ Did trail work for the Trails Committee ➢ Worked at Mattera Cabin. ➢ Installed hot top berm at Grainger Avenue, Shelby Road, Perkins Avenue, Longview Avenue and Prospect Avenue. ➢ Raised the structures on Pinevale Avenue for paving. ➢ Reworked the Detention Area at Wilson and Pleasant Streets. Forestry - Tree Warden's Report Ninety -seven hazardous trees were removed. These trees were dead or in a dangerous condition as to be a threat to public safety. Seventy hazardous tree stumps were removed from the tree lawns, parks, schools and playgrounds for public safety. One hundred and one trees were trimmed. Dead wood and low branches were removed from the public trees as requested or observed. Twenty -one trees were planted by the town as street trees. The varieties included Zelcova, and Linden. Thirty -seven trees were planted as part,of Memorial Park renovations. Varieties included Pear, Cherry, Magnolia, Plum and Dogwood. The Compost Center on Strout Avenue continues to accept brush and leaves from residents. 43,141 cars entered the Compost Center in 2010. Residents are required to purchase stickers for use of the compost center. The holiday lighting put up by the tree crew in the Downtown was once again very successful. There were 20,000 colored bulbs installed on the common. RMLD donated 40 strands of the new LED lights. 489 The Town of Reading was awarded "Tree City USA" for the Twenty -fifth consecutive year by the National Arbor Day Foundation. Five hundred Colorado Spruce trees were purchased and distributed to all the fifth graders. Thanks to the Reading Rotary Club that has sponsored and assisted in this program to make "Arbor Day 2010" a success in Reading. A special thanks to all the committees and commissions working toward the preservation of Reading's public shade trees. Parks The division continues to maintain 80 acres of grassed area throughout the town, as well as the facilities within the parks and schools. This includes the renovation as well as continued maintenance of all the ball fields on school or parks grounds. The division maintains sixteen tennis and basketball courts, the tot lots, and the skating rinks. The Division maintains the grounds for all municipal as well as school buildings. The division also assists all Town departments, committees and commissions with tree maintenance, snow and ice removal and election set -up. Water Distribution A total of 10 new water services were installed, 13 old water services were replaced, repaired 29 water service leaks, repaired 10 broken water mains, replaced 5 old fire hydrants, repaired 12 broken fire hydrants, rebuilt 52 fire hydrants, a total of approximately 500' of new water mains were added to the distribution system, disconnected 5 water services for house demolition, replaced 2 water main gate valves, replaced 65 old water services from the water main to the sidewalk shut off for Chapter 90 road reconstruction, installed meter vault bypass and new water meter for Summit Towers complex, replaced 1 pump at Lothrop Road booster station. Responded to boil water order issued by MWRA, assisted Wakefield. Water Division with temporary water feed at Brook Street, assisted with Friends & Family Day and Vehicle Day at Reading Library, inspected the installation of water mains at Johnson Woods project, continued cross connection control program, flushed water mains in northern section of town, all drinking fountains and town irrigation systems turned on in spring and turned off and winterized in fall, 2 seasonal laborers painted and lubricated hydrants over 1/4 of the Town, completed annual water inventory, learned and seeded all water jobs, hot topped water and sewer trenches, checked and maintained 2 water booster stations daily, cleaned and maintained the grounds, cutting grass, etc. at the Auburn Street tank site. Lowered and raised water gate boxes for construction jobs, conducted a leak detection survey, assisted Highway Division during snow plowing operations, removed snow from business district, churches and schools, shoveled snow from fire hydrants. The Town's water conservation program awarded rebates for 275 energy efficient washing machines, 42 water saving toilets, 2 irrigation rain sensors and 60 rain barrels. 490 Meter Room The regular quarterly water meter reading cycle was supported, 436 work orders were received and completed, 231 bill to dates readings were taken, 3 meters were removed, 2 meters were reset, 11 meters tested correct, 1 meter tested incorrect and 1,372 old meters were replaced with new water meters. Sewer Distribution Approximately 20,285 feet of sewer mains were cleaned and T.V. inspected, 406 sewer main joints were tested and 115 sewer main joints were sealed, 26 sewer laterals were tested and sealed, performed root control treatment on 13,385' of sewer mains, replaced 4 sewer manhole frames and covers, removed corroded catwalk and installed new gate valve at Charles Street sewer station, repaired 1 broken sewer main, removed grease buildup in sewer mains on Salem Street and Bay State Road, responded to numerous sewer backups due to heavy rainstorms on March 14`h and March 29`h. Cleaned wet wells at all sewer stations, checked and maintained 12 sewer stations daily, cleaned approximately 1/4 of the sanitary sewer main system, cleaned and maintained the grounds, cut grass, trimmed bushes, etc around the sewer stations, completed work orders regarding leaks, broken gates etc., exercised emergency generator weekly, completed the annual sewer inventory. Also assisted Highway Division during snow plowing operations, removed snow from business district, churches and schools, shoveled snow from fire hydrants. Water Supply Division General The contract for construction services for the deconstruction of the water treatment facility and construction of the emergency water supply awarded to S E A Consultants, Inc. of Cambridge, MA for $91,400.00. Project was 100% completed. The contract for the deconstruction of the water treatment facility and construction of the emergency water supply awarded to McConnell Enterprises, Inc. of Essex, MA for $1,164,000.00. Project was 100% completed. Required lead and copper sampling continued for the second year of the current cycle of yearly sampling for a three -year period. Thirty specifically targeted homes were again sampled with all results falling below the lead limit of 15 parts per billion (ppb) and 1,300 ppb for copper. The DPW Water Conservation Program continued with great success. hr 2010, there were over $63,000 in rebates to residents and over $404,000 since the programs inception. The program incorporates emphasis on rebates for low flow washing machines, toilets, irrigation system rain sensors, and rain barrels, along with free home and irrigation system water use audits and reports and home water saving devices for residents available at the DPW office at no additional charge. The school educational programs phase continued with Meg Tabasco, Education Coordinator for 491 the MWRA, making presentations to all 3`d grade classes in Town focusing on water supply and conservation. The Town received final payment of the $125,000 settlement in the litigation against AGFA Corporation for reimbursement of expenditures related to the investigation of the low levels of chlorinated volatile organic contaminants found in the Revay Well, which were suggested to have been attributed to the AGFA facility on Industrial Way in Wilmington. As required by the August 6, 2006, Administrative Consent Order (ACO) the Town entered into, with (DEP), the Town continued to retain ownership and control of the Zone I (400' radius) and protection of the Zone II (well recharge area) of the emergency water supply wells and well field. As a condition of the DEP ACO, the water supply wells and well field continued to be maintained as an emergency water supply to pump water to the distribution system with disinfection capabilities. Supply Operated and maintained water supply valve, vault, SCADA and security systems, and emergency water supply wells, pump station and all emergency power equipment. Collected and delivered to laboratory for analysis over 500 water system water quality samples. A total of 641.7 million gallons of water was purchased from the MWRA and delivered to the distribution system in 2010. The highest single days' consumption was 3.15 million gallons on July 8, 2010. The highest weeks' consumption was for the period July 4, 2010 to July 10, 2010 an amount of 19.57 million gallons, and the highest month was July with an amount of 73.9 million gallons. Average daily usage for 2010 was 1.76 million gallons. The average daily per capita use (use by each individual) for 2010 was 51 gallons per person per day. The MWRA in conjunction with the Water Supply Division compiled and mailed the twelfth annual drinking water report to all customers in June. Continued working with the MWRA on the first phase of their Northern Intermediate High service area redundancy pipeline to the Reading water supply system. J MA 2010 MWRA WATER PURCHASED MONTH MILLION GALLONS DAYS AVERAGE DAY JANUARY 48.36 31 1.56 FEBRUARY 42.55 28 1.52 MARCH 46.68 31 1.51 APRIL 46.34 30 1.54 MAY 57.36 31 1.85 JUNE 61.94 30 2.06 JULY 74.54 31 2.40 AUGUST 69.77 31 2.25 SEPTEMBER 57.57 ' 30 1.92 OCTOBER 47.75 31 1.54 NOVEMBER 43.80 30 1.46 DECEMBER 45.06 31 1.45 TOTAL 641.72 365 1.76 2010 RAINFALL RECORDS hiip://www.mass.gov/dcr/watersupply/rainfalU MONTH MEASURED RAINFALL & MELTED SNOW ACCUMULATED RAINFALL & MELTED SNOW DCR POSTED NORMAL RAINFALL & MELTED SNOW JANUARY 3.87 3.87 3.62 FEBRUARY 6.01 9.88 3.25 MARCH 18.02 27.90 4.01 APRIL 2.05 29.95 3.76 MAY 2.90 32.85 3.56 JUNE 2.91 35.76 3.51 JULY 2.80 38.56 3.51 AUGUST 4.46 43.02 3.57 SEPTEMBER 3.23 46.25 3.60 OCTOBER 5.31 51.56 3.68 NOVEMBER 1 3.92 55.48 4.03 DECEMBER 4.06 59.54 3.88 TOTALS 1 59.54 59.54 43.98 Total precipitation in 2010s measured at the DPW, 75 New Crossing Road was 59.54 ", which is 15.56" above the Department of Conservation and Recreation (DCR) composite normal for the northeast region as posted on February 10, 2011. Monthly normal values computed by DCR are based on averages for the entire period of record for northeast region stations having the longest period of record and are located in Concord, Lawrence and Waltham. U *j DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS & RECREATION DIVISION Mission Statement The mission of the Reading Recreation Division is to provide the community with year round recreational activities. Recreation programs are broad based to meet the recreational needs of all segments of the population. The Recreation Division must continually update and modify its programming to meet the current needs of the community. As the community's participation and awareness of local recreational programs increase, so does their expectation of Recreation Division programs. The Recreation Division must be ready to anticipate and adapt to these growing expectations and trends. Division Overview 2010 saw many successes for the Recreation Division, its staff and the Recreation Committee. For the second consecutive year the full -time staff has remained constant. Therefore there were no breaks in the progress of continuity. In the Recreation industry, this is a pretty big deal for the public to recognize the faces of the Town Recreation Staff. It provides residents with comfort of familiar faces and the confidence that the staff is invested into the community. The Recreation Division continues to offer a high level and volume of programming each year. Spread over three seasons, Reading Recreation is offering programs that suit almost any demographic. The division watches trends closely, trying to match the needs of the public to the hottest programs available. There are still many challenges awaiting the Recreation Division in 2011, some are old challenges that changed their form and others are new challenges that must be met with open eyes, creativity and perseverance. Projects The Memorial Park project was started in the early part of 2010, featuring a reshaped skating area and newly renovated basketball and tennis courts. The project was completed in October with a ribbon cutting ceremony featuring Nelson and Rita Burbank, who donated virtually all of the funds for the big project, doing the ribbon cutting honors. The park now features a walkway around most of the park, a paved parking area on Salem Street and sidewalk and curbing on Harrison Street. Through the cooperation and donation of Reading Cooperative Bank and resident donors, several cast iron benches, sport benches and 35 + trees were installed around the park. In August, Killam Elementary School received a much needed face lift to their playground. The new playground featured green rubber mulch for safety, a teeter totter and some great slides. It also boasts play equipment that encourages young kids to use upper body strength. The playground was funded mainly by the Capital Improvement Fund with the PTO donating approximately $12,000. Two small baseball diamond infields were renovated in November as well as the Tennis Court Field and the A Field at Joshua Eaton. For many years these fields have had lips and edges created by the years of over use. Reading Youth Baseball paid entirely for the renovations. .E A master plan for Joshua Eaton School was developed. The plan features an extended parking area, better defined play areas and handi -cap accessibility for the lower fields and play area. A batting cage was proposed and approved, however it was removed from the plan once an engineering plan was drawn and estimates were received. The cost of the cage was greater than the use value. Progress continues to move forward with the Mattera Cabin at 1481 Main Street. The Conservation Administrator has worked closely with the North East Regional Vocational School students on renovation projects. The Town is supplying the funding and the students are supplying the labor. As we open 2011, the Cabin is close to being finished. It is anticipated that the Cabin will open sometime in Spring 2011. Programming and open hours are currently being worked out. Programming Winter /Spring Reading Recreation highlights the following programs for the Winter /Spring season: • Spring Soccer Doctor Clinic • "Spring Ball" Basketball Clinic with high school Basketball Coach Kim Penny • Reading Baseball School — Pitching and Hitting with Coach Pete Moscariello • Spring Tennis Clinics for Youths and Adults • Challenger Biddy Basketball for Children with Special Needs • Saturday Morning Sports Series • Challenger All -Sports • 4th Season of the Junior Baseball League • Kids Just Love Crafts • Top Secret Science • Baby Sitting Course • Crafts programs for Adults • Fencing for Youth - Adults The Winter /Spring season featured many great programs for participants of all ages. The 4th season of Junior League Baseball (formerly known as Itty Bitty Baseball) proved again to be successful with over 200 participants. This program continues to grow each year and has become a mainstay and integral part of the Recreation Division's programming line -up. The Recreation Division has partnered with Reading Youth Baseball to offer the participants a program suitable for 5, 6 and 7 year olds. Reading Youth Baseball will handle the "older" young kids while the Recreation Division will take the 5 and 6 year olds. This program was previously run privately. One of the major acquisitions for the year was landing the Reading T -Ball program. The spring season also saw many successful programs including the popular Reading Baseball School which is run by Peter Moscariello as well as Rocket Volleyball with Coach Michelle Hopkinson. 495 The Egg Hunt had to be postponed due to poor weather on two occasions and was ultimately cancelled altogether. The Recreation Division continues to offer programs such as a baby sitting class from the staff of Winchester Hospital as well as Fencing for all ages. The Recreation Division believes that recreation is more than just the typical four major sports and can include enrichment type programs. One of the programs that really picked up steam was in our adult programming area. Zumba and Cardio, Core and More busted onto the scene in 2010. Headed by certified trainer Jennifer Tortalano, these two programs broke 40 students with out a sweat. Reading Recreation also brought back two old favorite programs: Horsemanship for adults and youth and Golf for Kids. These programs had taken a hiatus approximately two years ago and have returned. Saturday AM Sports is still dominating SAT AM's for most kids. This program is led by Jim Sullivan, John Bruno and our high school and college staff. The program offers one hour sections for T -Ball, Soccer and Basketball. Summer The Summer Camp program averaged approximately 70% capacity in summer 2010. This was down approximately 5% from the previous year, however careful staffing saw the Recreation Division actually generate commensurate revenue to the prior year. The program was still a great success with over 600 kids taking part over 9 weeks. Thanks to Program Coordinator Jim Sullivan, and the hard work of the summer camp staff, the program was a success. The Recreation Division introduced theme weeks for each week of camp which were very popular. Jamie Walsh continued as camp director of the 4`h — 8`h grade participants and staff. John Bruno served as the director of the K — 3rd grades. Working under the guidance of Jim Sullivan, they steered the program in its many directions. This year's camp staff saw approximately 90% returning staff. The paraprofessional staff was as strong as ever this year and did a great job. We continue to look for students that enjoy working with children. We hope that the Recreation Summer camp will begin its rise to 80 and 90 percent capacity again in 2011. The Recreation Division continued with the Lego Robotics course. This program was designed and run by three local high school, students. The course fused the popular building toy Lego with an engineering computer program to create robots that could be programmed to stop and turn based on calculations and sensors. The Recreation Division saw virtually exact parallel numbers in many of the sports clinics from the previous year. These sport clinics continue to thrive. Successful clinics and programs included: • Challenger Little League Baseball • Volleyball Clinics • Tiny Tot Soccer • Basketball Clinics for Boys and Girls • Reading Baseball Clinics • Super Sports (3 Sessions) • Kids Crafts • Tennis Clinics The Recreation Division introduced some new afternoon programs and used signing -up for camp as a discount opportunity tied into the new programs. Event -ful hosted several one -day programs including Jedi Training, Legos and American Girl. Each of these programs were well attended and very popular. The Recreation Division also offered discounts for those that participated in camp and our afternoon street hockey and basketball leagues. The Recreation Division hosted Wednesday Night All- Comers Track Meets again this past summer. Participants were happy to have this fun, yet inexpensive, program back. Each week there were 25 plus participants. One of the great traditions in Reading continued this past summer with the "Theater on the Green" and "Touch of Class" concert series. "Theater on the Green" had a successful turnout this summer each Wednesday afternoon, five concerts highlighted by "Wayne from Maine ", and Prop Comic Lucky Bob. These concerts were very well attended by approximately 75 — 125 ` people each Wednesday. Due to Memorial Park being under construction, the kid concerts were held at Welch's Island at Birch Meadow. This is a shady grove of trees in the center of the Birch Meadow complex that worked out nicely. The "Touch of Class" concerts included Reading staple "Bob Bachelor's Totem Pole Orchestra ", "Four Guys in Tuxes" and Reading's own "Steven Savio" among the five concerts. The concert series also featured the Classifieds and the Reading Civic Concert Band. Between donations that were collected during each of the concerts and sponsorships from Friends of Reading Recreation, the Recreation Division was able to run these concerts at minimal cost. The concerts were moved to the Common and front lawn of Town Hall. This turned out to be a very good location and attracted more people than the remote location of Memorial Park. The Summer also featured Fireworks in Reading. On Friends and Family Day, Reading Recreation partnered with Friends of Reading Recreation for the second consecutive year to put on a great display of fireworks. Working closely with the Reading Fire and Police Departments, the show was enjoyable for all. The fireworks were shot from the outfield at Morton Field and could be seen for miles around. The estimated crowd was approximately 3000 — 3500 people. A spectacular event! Finally, the Reading Recreation Division sponsored its 20th Annual Reading Tennis Open. The Tournament was a success once again this year with over 100 players participating. All proceeds go to the RMHS tennis program and new equipment for the Town courts. For the first time, the Tournament was held on the new "Reading Community Tennis Courts at Bancroft Ave ". The program is run by Kate Kaminer and Lorraine Salter from Friends of Reading Tennis. Gregg Luongo again served as the Recreation Tennis Professional for the 8`° year. Gregg did a good job working with both kids and adults as well as working without the major tennis court SUM area. Tennis enrollment increased by approximately 60% for the year. We attribute this new enthusiasm for.tennis with the new courts. Many kids enjoyed the clinics so much that they signed up for more than one week. Fall /Winter The Fall/Winter season for the Reading Recreation Division produced many programming opportunities. The Recreation Division offered a host of programs such as Baseball, Basketball, Flag Football, Video Game Creating, Karate and an Art program among others. The Recreation Division again offered a Junior /Senior Volleyball program for 4'h — 8`h grade students. The program had close to 70 participants and seems to grow each year. The program was run by RMHS Varsity Coach Michelle Hopkinson and several high school volleyball players. We will continue to look for ways to enhance this program and take advantage of its popularity. The Recreation Division continued to offer a Fencing program with Olympic Coach Michael Tarascio. The program was open and populated by students from 3`d grade — adults. The program is offered on Mondays and Fridays allowing students that owned their own equipment. to participate on both days. The Recreation Division continued the Fall sections of the Saturday Morning Sports Series. This program continues to be a very important program to the Recreation Division as it gives young families exposure to what they can expect from the Town's Recreation program. It is truly a building block for a strong base of participation. These programs are for 3 - 5 year olds. All the typical Saturday AM sports programs were generally filled. The classes are. run by Recreation Program Coordinator, Jim Sullivan along with John Bruno and seasonal staff. The Halloween Parade had over 250 participants this year and was hosted by the Recreation Division in conjunction with the Friends of Reading Recreation at Coolidge Middle School. Jordan's Furniture donated popcorn for the event and The Goddard School sponsored the pizza and gave away trick or treat bags. The Travel Basketball program in 2010 featured over 180 participants with 15 travel teams competing in three different leagues. These teams are selected by coaches with input from the Recreation Staff and Recreation Committee after a two -day competitive try-out. Virtually every player that signs up makes a team, unless there are not enough coaches and players. The teams are coached by volunteer parents and friends of the Recreation Division. Supplementing this program is the middle school in -town basketball program on Sunday Nights. This is an intramural program that features kids of all ability. The h1 -Town program is staffed by various high school students and is supervised by Lauren Dodge and John Bruno. The numbers of the Travel Basketball program were up this year by 3 teams. Sunday basketball underwent a change for the 2 "d year in a row. The program added a K — I" Grade developmental division in addition to the already popular 2nd grade - 5`h grade players. John Bruno and Lauren Dodge were hired to be the supervisors of Sunday Basketball. They have done an outstanding job showing the ability to handle parent questions, work with kids and supervise the referees. Twelve high school students were hired to work this program. Sunday Basketball had approximately 380 participants this year. This is a jump of approximately 65 %. Sunday Basketball continues to be one of the most important programs for the Recreation Division. The Recreation Division will continue to look for ways to enhance the program. The "After School Learn to Ski Program" was cancelled this year for the first time since its inception in the early 90's. This program has been trending down for the past 5 years. Skiing has been cut from many folks' budgets. Special Needs Programming Special Needs programming this year was offered by The Arc of East Middlesex Recreation in conjunction with the Recreation Division. Programs such as aquatics, social club and social dances were offered. The Arc offered successful programs such as Special Olympic training, bowling, teen groups, and social clubs to name a few. The participants are asked at the end of each session to fill out an evaluation form to give feedback. Margaret Veronelli ran the Challenger Little League and Bowling programs this past summer and fall. The programs both did very well with participation. Challenger Soccer was managed by Ralph D'Amico once again and had a very successful run in the Unified Olympics with a huge come - from - behind win! Challenger Little League will be taken over by Katya Farrel in Spring 2011. The Recreation Division also continued offering Special Skates at the Burbank Ice Arena. This program is headed by Karen Ghirardi. The Division continues to look for other programming areas to expand into. The Recreation Division also runs continuous sections of Challenger All- Sports. This program is run by Lynn Mahoney. She lines up groups each week to volunteer. The program is run for free and Ms. Mahoney does all of the coordination. Brochure and Advertising Reading Recreation continues the mailing of Reading Recreation Magazine to every household in Reading, three times a year. The magazine features Adult and Community Education programming in the back as a flipbook in the fall and winter publications. Participating agencies include Recreation, Police Department, Fire Department, Library Services, Elder Services, YMCA, Creative Arts, RCASA, Friends of Reading Recreation and various in -town organizations. The magazine also features interest articles for the community to keep them connected to what's happening around Town. The Recreation Division staff has worked hard to put out a quality magazine that the public will look forward to receiving and reading each season. Reading Recreation continues to post all of its programming and important information on www.readingma.gov /recreation. There is information on all current programs, up- coming events, and contact information, including links, to many of the sports organizations websites. There is also a news link that folks can sign up for and receive any new items posted. The site is generally maintained by the Recreation Division Clerk and is updated on a daily /weekly basis. This will become even more important as the Recreation Division decides how to move forward with on- line registration. The Recreation Division continues to have success with "Notes from the Reading Recreation Division" that is placed on Ed -Line to the schools seasonally. These flyers have received a 499 positive response from the community. We will continue with this undertaking as well as continue to send press releases to our local media outlets. Another source of media we will look to take advantage of is Facebook, an excellent way to get info out quickly and at no cost. Personnel Jim Sullivan begins his fifth year as Program Coordinator. "Coach Jim," as his participants refer to him, in a short period of time, has become a vital part of the Recreation Division's operation. Jim's leadership and diligence has helped programs such as Sunday Basketball, Summer Camp and Junior League Baseball prosper. He continues to look for new programs and ideas to enhance the division. Jim's work with the SAT AM sports series is the chief reason the program has become so successful. The feedback we get indicates how much the kids and parents appreciate Jim's hard work Clerk Sue Simeola enters her third year with the Recreation Division and has made a positive impact on the operation of the Recreation Division. She has successfully managed the deposits and accounts receivables for Recreation, making that process virtually seamless. She has done an excellent job keeping the website up -to -date with programs, news and notes as well as Recreation Committee meeting minutes and agendas. Sue handles much of the face to face customers for the Recreation Division/DPW as well as serving as the frontline for our phone system. Sue has quickly become the backbone of the Recreation Division. Administration John Feudo begins his ninth year as Recreation Administrator. John, under the direction of the Recreation Committee, continues to manage the scheduling of all town fields and oversees the everyday operations of the Recreation Division. Permits are issued for every field in Town. Reading Recreation will continue to work with the local Youth and Adult sports organizations in maximizing field space. Over the past four years, Capital and Master Planning have become a very high priority for the Recreation Division and the Town. John has worked with many volunteer groups to design master plans that are functional and advantageous for the Town. It should be noted that having a full service engineering department on site has made this process possible. There is a constant flow of information streaming from Recreation to Engineering to make these plans possible for public viewing. Reading Recreation is continuously looking for available land for the development of new recreational facilities. A comprehensive capital plan has been developed to include tennis courts, basketball courts and backstop replacement over the next twelve years. The Recreation Administrator continues to work with leaders of the sports organizations to develop other field opportunities with what is already provided. The Reading Recreation Division and the Recreation Committee continue to develop policies that will increase the effectiveness and efficiency of each of Reading Recreation's programs. Reading Recreation has been glad to offer the public over 200 recreational programs throughout the past year. Reading Recreation hopes to meet the communities changing recreational needs while providing them with a combination of safe, fun, and educational programs. Suggestions of new programs are welcomed and encouraged. 500 READING PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2010 ANNUAL REPORT John F. Doherty, Ed.D. Mary C. DeLai Superintendent Director of Finance & Operations Patricia de Garavilla Elizabeth Conway Assistant Superintendent Human Resources Administrator School Department This report represents the activities, accomplishments and events of note that occurred in the Reading Public Schools during the 2010 calendar year. Leadership Change • Superintendent Patrick Schettini.passed away in late December 2009 • John Doherty appointed Acting Superintendent and formally appointed Superintendent of Schools in January • Chris Caruso was elected Chair of the Reading School Committee for the 2010 -2011 school year. • Chuck Robinson was elected Vice Chair of the Reading School Committee. • Patricia deGaravilla was appointed Assistant Superintendent. • Kimberlee Oliveira was appointed as Director of Pupil Services • Karen Feeney was appointed Interim Principal at the Joshua Eaton School Notable Events • Reading Public Schools hosted the 2 "a Annual Blueprint for Educational Excellence National Institute attended by over 800 teachers and administrators from all over the country. All district staff participated — Many teachers presented workshops in all areas of curriculum. • Reading Public Schools held the 5 t annual Artsfest which showcased student artwork, drama and musical performance • The Reading Public Schools is in the second year of the Federal American History grant totaling $999,818 over three years. The district is in partnership with Danvers, Dracut, Haverhill, Lowell, North Reading, Stoneham, Wakefield and Wilmington. • The Class of 2010 experienced an extraordinary level of success in their efforts to matriculate into our nation's most academically challenging programs. The following is a report on their plans: 83.3 % - Four Year Colleges, 6.4% - Two Year Colleges, 1.4% - Business /Technical/Prep Schools, 4.0% - work, 0.7% Armed Services, Undecided — 3.4% and 0.3% - Other. :1111 • Once again the Reading Memorial High School students have attained scores that place the school within the top echelon of all high schools in the Commonwealth. Once again all of the seniors in the class of 2010 met the MCAS graduation requirement. • Several faculty and staff members were recognized by local and national educational and professional organizations for outstanding achievement. • A group of teachers /administrators traveled to the Blue Ribbon Conference and participated in several presentations. • Reading Public Schools and RCASA host first annual Health & Wellness Education Day. • Middle School students successfully compete in local, state and national competitions including National Science Olympiad, Wordmasters Challenge, District Music competitions and writing contests. • The district continues to upgrade technology with the addition of Smartboards and other forms of technology. • Our elementary students participate in the LEGOS Robotic League competition. • Safe Routes to school program sponsored by the MA Department of Transportation is adopted by several schools. • Birch Meadow is focusing on 215` century skills with Smartboards in every classroom and the use of technology to communicate with parents via a principal's blog and twitter: • The Barrows School continues with the "STARS" Program Students that Act Responsibly Shine. • Several schools continue the Curriculum Initiatives — Open Circle and Differentiated Instruction with many teachers participating in professional development activities and workshops. • The Joshua Eaton School hosted a Technology Showcase where parents and educators were able to see technology at work in the building. • Pillars of Character Program continue to be strong in the Killam community — TRRFCC Walk -a -thon and Citizenship Assembly honoring WW II veterans. • Killam holds "A Day at Killam" for parents designed to familiarize parents with several programs. • Wood End School continues to focus on character development and positive student 502 decision through consistent positive reinforcement. • Technology at Wood End continues to expand with the addition of Smartboards and dedicated computers • Several students participated in the School Games Day sponsored by the Special Olympics • The Pupil Services Department continues to work, in conjunction with regular education, in the creation of internal programs and supports to assist students access the curriculum, and on their goal of controlling out of district costs by developing new programs. Reading School Committee Chris Caruso, Chair Leadership There were several changes in leadership of the Reading School Committee. Chuck Robinson was re- elected for a three -year tern. Hal Croft defeated Elaine Webb and was elected to his first three year term. At the committee's annual reorganization in June, Chris Caruso was elected as Chair, and, Chuck Robinson, Vice Chair. Other members of the committee are Lisa Gibbs, Karen Janowski, David Michaud and Hal Croft. Budget The School Committee engaged in a comprehensive process of establishing FY11 budget. Numerous meetings were conducted to discuss the various priorities and how the budget should support the District mission and goals. The final budget, while below the initial recommended budget put forth by the Superintendent, met the guidelines as proposed by the Finance Committee. At the Annual Town Meeting that commenced in April the following school department budget was approved. Budget Summary Fiscal Year 2010 Recommended Budget Administration $835,401 Regular Day $21,533,335 Special Needs $9,245,257 Other School Services $1,200,744 Custodial/Maintenance $3,575,550 Total $36,390,308 503 Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) Reading's statewide prominence in the MCAS rankings continued in 2010 as Reading placed in the top 20% of all Massachusetts districts in MCAS performance. This represents a significant accomplishment for a system that continues to spend below the state average on per pupil spending. This achievement continues to define Reading as a school system that always gets more performance for less money. We continue to be a frugal district that sets high expectation, and achieves these goals through a collaborative effort of the administration, the teachers, the students, and the parents. This is certainly a model to be envied throughout the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The School Committee is very proud of our accomplishments in this regard and sees this as the standard for accountability ... high scores, low cost. Student Enrollment As students returned to school in September of 2010, it is apparent that with the construction done our students are staying in the school system. We have seen increases at all levels this year. Student enrollment in the fall of 2010(FY2011) stood at 4,418 students. See chart below. Reading Public Schools Student Enrollment FY2011 Elementary Schools K -5 2,040 Middle Schools 6 — 8 1,083 High School 9 —12 1,246 Special Education *49 Total 4,418 * This is the number of enrollees in our "substantially separate" Special Education classrooms. Reading students who receive full - time Special Education services outside of Reading are not counted in this chart. Achievements Reading Memorial High School graduated 298 young men and women in 2009. While many of our graduating seniors are attending some of the most prestigious universities in the country, all are moving into the future with a solid portfolio of skills, which will help their success in any environment they choose. While we naturally point to acceptances at schools like Tufts and Amherst as an indication of our system's success, it is the goal of the School Committee, and a better measure of success that we find appropriate placements for all of our students, that will further prepare them to be productive, contributing citizens of our country. In addition to the success of our graduates, we can continue to take pride in the success of our students at all levels. Our athletic programs continue to be one of the best in Massachusetts, with our student athletes demonstrating athleticism, academic achievement, and above all, sportsmanship. Our students take part in a number of statewide competitions, including the Science Olympiad program, National History Day, Drama Fest, and numerous Band competitions. Our success at all levels is almost too numerous to repeat but continues to reflect on the efforts of the students, staff, and parents. We are always indebted to those in the GYIi! community who provide the additional support when the school department cannot. It is this support from our PTO's, the Boosters, the Band and Drama Parents support organizations, the Reading Technology and Educational Fund, just to name a few, that provide that added support and encouragement that fosters a sense community and promotes participation and success. Reading Memorial High School Principal, Elinor A. Freedman Reading Memorial High School continues to thrive under the strong leadership team of Principal Elinor A. Freedman, Assistant Principal Patricia J. Puglisi, and Assistant Principal Michael J. Scarpitto. The process of school improvement is on -going at RMHS. The following goals were identified as areas of focus in.the 2010 -2011 RMHS School Improvement Plan: • Through ongoing curricular team collaboration and examination of data, teachers will develop educational opportunities that will advance student learning of curricular content and 21st century skills within a challenging standards -based curriculum. • Educate the school community about factors contributing to a safe, healthy, respectful and socially responsible school environment. • Increase opportunities for the school's connection to the community and student volunteerism within the community. Faculty have devoted numerous professional hours to integrate class lessons with a school rich in technological resources including SMART Board expertise and an ever growing array of technological tools as a way to help students develop critical thinking skills and creative abilities to meet the demands of the 21 st century. Learning within and outside of the classroom continues to flourish with the expanded use of online resources, presentation tools, databases, and collaborative work spaces. RMHS students also take advantage of online learning opportunities through our association with Virtual High School. RMHS continues to dedicate use of professional development time to facilitate sustained collaboration both within and across disciplines. As a result, exciting academic opportunities respond to student needs and interest including a co- taught History of Epidemic Disease course connecting social studies and scientific curricula, science offerings in Conceptual Physics, Honors Engineering and planning in progress for Environmental Science, enhanced Web 2.0 Computer Applications as a course offering and embedded across the curriculum, and an exciting new Computer Programming elective. An Advisory Program and the .Upper Connections (peer mentoring) Program for freshmen have enhanced the transition of our newest students to the high school. Project -based assessment strategies are employed across the curriculum with corresponding school wide standards based assessment rubrics designed to enhance student learning. Global awareness has been highlighted with ongoing French and Spanish exchanges; faculty led cultural study and service learning travel opportunities, and an anticipated new connection in January 2011 with visitors from Beijing, China. In its P year of operation, the Reading Cooperative Bank RMHS branch provides our students with an authentic learning opportunity that connects academic study with real world experiences. An expanded Career & Community Service Internship Program takes students beyond the 505 physical walls of our school to apply their leaming. Partnerships with local cable station RCTV and RISE Preschool provide internship opportunities with real curricular connections. A unique Senior Project pilot program couples travel to Iceland with advanced investigation into ecology and geography. Expansion of Senior Project opportunities are planned for implementation for next year. 1, RMHS PROUD HIGHLIGHTS: HONORS & DEPARTMENTAL ACHIEVEMENTS Reading Memorial High School has many proud highlights academically and in extracurricular activities. Reading students and staff are busy in and outside of the classroom. • In February 2010 the Reading Schools, Project Challenge, and the Celebration of Inclusive Schools presented a powerful school and community presentation by Dr. Michael Fowlin psychologist, actor, and poet. This presentation contributed to, the ongoing efforts of the school community to build a safe and healthy school climate for all students. • The _Anti-Defamation League's A World of Difference program, a peer training initiative for the sustenance of positive school climate, was introduced at RMHS in the fall of 2010 with 30 students chosen to pilot this educational initiative in both freshman advisory classes and middle schools. Graduation 2010 Valedictorian: Nathan Tyrell Salutatorian: Eric Pratt National Merit Scholars 2010 James Collins Eric Pratt National Merit Commended Scholars Fall 2010 for 2011 Scholarship Competition Jared Beaulieu Matthew Conway Ellen Garrison Hanhee Jung Meredith Lawrence Mark Mauriello Micayla Oniskey David Tyler Matthew West Samuel Wilson Class of 2010 College Placement Four Year Colleges (245) 83.0% Two Year Colleges (26) 09.0% Prep School (4) 01.3% Technical School (2) 00.7% 506 Work (9) 03.0% Undecided (8) 02.7% Armed Forces /Service Academy .(2) 00.7% • 1801 applications were processed by the Guidance Department for the Class of 2010. • Class of 2010 acceptances numbered among the following Bates College Johns Hopkins University Boston College Princeton University Boston University Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Brandeis University Smith College Colby College Tufts University Colgate University University of Pennsylvania Cornell University University of Rochester Dartmouth College Villanova University George Washington University Physics (E and M) 30% ... and many others. Guidance • A very successful 27`h annual College Fair was held in October 2010 at the Shriners Auditorium. Representatives from 200 schools, colleges and universities attended to present information to students and parents from ten school communities, including RMHS. • Evening meetings for parents of seniors and juniors were hosted by the Guidance Department covering topics such as graduation requirements, standardized testing dates . and deadlines, financial aid information, post - secondary application process and a timetable of important events. Attendance numbered over two hundred parents /guardians at each evening. . • A large group of students took one or more Advanced Placement Examinations in May of 2010. In total, 123 students took 262 exams. The College Board recognizes the percentage of students who score a "3" or higher as a good indicator of both the equity and the excellence of the AP program at RMHS. The percentage of those students who scored a °3" or better were: Biology 79% French Language 100% Calculus AB 100% Physics (E and M) 30% Calculus BC 100% Physics (Mech.) 88% Chemistry 95% Spanish Language 82% English Literature 97% Statistics 88% European History 87% Studio Art 100% • Eighty -four RMHS students qualified for free tuition to.a Massachusetts state college or university for their achievement at the Advanced and Proficient levels on MCAS exams in the John and Abigail Adams Scholarship Program. 507 • The Senior Developmental Guidance Program took place in January 2010 in the format of an alumni panel. Fourteen members of the RMHS graduating Classes of 2008 and 2009 returned to RMHS to speak with the seniors about their college experiences. Issues such as time management, workload, roommate concerns, homesickness, free time, and many others were addressed. • The first annual Career Day was held in May 2010 at RMHS. This day, planned for members of the Class of 2011, provided each student with the opportunity to hear from professionals about what kinds of roles exist in different career fields, required education, current hiring trends and future demand, and workplace environments. Welluess • The first annual Health and Wellness Education Day, co- sponsored by the RMHS Wellness Department and the Reading Coalition Against Substance Abuse, was held last March for all students in grades 8 -12 with a variety of age- appropriate health and wellness related presentations and exhibitions. A parent component featured a Middlesex County Assistant District Attorney presentation on Social Host Liability Laws. English • Teachers of English 11: The Power of Narrative led students in an ambitious journalism project. Using a grant from the Reading Technology in Education Foundation, the teachers engaged their students in producing audio broadcasts focusing on some aspect of life in Reading. Five professional journalists came to RMHS to consult with students about their projects. The best projects were shared on a website. • One hundred students in grade nine attended a performance of Shakespeare's Macbeth. The performance was funded by Reading Cultural Council and held at Austin Prep. • Two students were recognized as winners of the PEN New England writing competition hosted by the New England Institute of Art. e Two students had work selected by the American Society of News Editors for online publication in the National Edition of my.hsj.org - a prominent scholastic news website. The school newspaper The Orbit continues to be published online. • The New Currency, the RMHS literary magazine, debuted an online edition in fall 2010. Foreign Language • Cultural exchanges continued with French students traveling to Rouen, France and Spanish scholars visiting Madrid, Spain. The Spanish Club took a cultural tour of Hispanic culture themed events in New York, and plans were made for a February 2011 trip to Puerto Rico • .Saturnalia celebrations were held for Latin classes, with projects presented annually in December and January. 61001 • RMHS Foreign Language teachers presented on topics relating to technology integration at the EduCon 2.1 Conference in Philadelphia. • 110 students took the National Latin Exam in March, winning many medals. • 6 AP French and 28 AP Spanish students took AP exams in May; it was a record number for the Spanish exam. • Hispanic Heritage Month was celebrated in October 2010, with guests of honors including consuls of Spain, Dominican Republic and Venezuela and guest speakers from local universities.. • A chapter of the National Spanish Honor Society, the Mario Llosa Vargas Chapter of Sociedad Hispanica Honoraria, was established in the fall of 2010. Science Department • The RMHS Science Club took 4`h place at the Massachusetts Science Olympiad held at Framingham State in March 2010. • The Young Engineers Club finished a two year project during which they built a working biodiesel reactor which converts waste vegetable oil into diesel fuel. The group travelled to Russell Orchards in Ipswich and was able to successfully test their product in the farm tractors. • The Honors Field Biology and Ecology courses visited the Audubon Center on Plum Island where they were able to observe both a salt marsh and a maritime forest and the Rockport State Park to complete tidal pool studies. • A.C.E (Alliance for Climate Education) visited RMHS for a multimedia presentation discussing climate change and suggestions as to how to make a difference in your community. • Biology classes attended Boston University's City Lab to participate in lab experiments using gel electrophoresis techniques. • Fifteen students went to the Eastern Shore of Virginia for a Habitat for Humanity Service Leaning Project. • Faculty accompanied a group of students to explore Southern Iceland this summer as part of a pilot program supporting a Senior Project Based Course. The group was able to visit geothermal and volcanic locations associated with Icelandic geologic hot spots and tectonic plate boundaries. Social Studies • A historical and cultural guided tour took RMHS students to Greece and Italy in the summer of 2010. 509 • The Field Seminar Program in Elementary and Early Childhood Education was enhanced by the addition of a monthly speaker series, introducing students interested in the field of education to a range of topics from professionals in the field._ • The Teaching American History Grant provided rich professional development for members of the social studies department. • A RMHS sophomore was selected to participate in the Hugh O'Brien Youth Leadership Program at Bentley University in spring 2010. • RMHS students represented the school at the statewide Student Government Day, the regional Student Advisory Council to the Board of Education, and the James Otis Lecture Series of the State House. • RMHS History students continue to participate in the National History Day program. One National History Day project advanced to state and national competition in 2010. • A RMHS faculty member was a lead teacher for a Primary Source class for Teaching American History. • The RMHS Social Studies integrated world and American history model served as a model for the Hudson MA school system's adoption of a similar curricular model. Fine and Performing Arts • Outstanding plays and musical performances highlighted the year. During the winter of 2010 the Drama Club presented The Boys Next Door and The Elephant Man, a spring performance of Into the Woods, and during the fall of 2010 the Drama Club presented The Scarlet Pimpernel. • In spring 2010 Artsfest highlighted the talents of RMHS visual artists. • Sixteen RMHS artists earned recognition as Boston Globe Scholastic Art Competition honorees. • The Marching and Jazz Bands earned medal recognition in NESBA and MICCA competitions for musicianship, visual effects, and color guard performances. • RMHS students were accepted to All- District and All -State events in both vocal and instrumental categories. • Improvisation, playwriting, and Shakespeare groups enhanced creative venues for the talents of RMHS students. • RMHS photography students were invited to exhibit their work at the Griffin Museum of Photography in Winchester. 510 Business and Technology • The Business and Technology curriculum continues to be enhanced to include current concepts supporting 2155 century skills. • Web 2.0 applications are featured in course offerings which included a new Computer Programming elective. • RMHS students studying marketing took top honors in the online fall Stock Market Game. • RMHS continues to provide online learning opportunities for students through their association with Virtual High School. Twenty -seven RMHS students took advantage of this educational option in the fall of 2010. Among the courses opted for by RMHS students were Mandarin, ,AP Computer Programming, Journalism in the Digital Age, Forensics, and Pre - Veterinary Medicine. • The RMHS branch of the Reading Cooperative Bank continues to provide RMHS students with authentic career skills. • Internship opportunities for RMHS students to connect academic learning with real world applications have been enhanced with a Carecr /Community Service Internship opportunity for seniors. Library Media Center • In November 2010, the Media Center offered "Web 2.0 is About Verbs: Create, Collaborate, & Connect," a workshop for parents which examined the characteristics of what we now refer to as "Web 2.0," specifically how social networking, user - generated content, and the personalization of the world wide web is transforming teaching and learning. Mathematics • RMHS students continue to excel on perform at high levels on state and national assessments. *-Technology integration continues to infuse mathematics instruction with faculty professional development in such applications as use of the SMART Document camera, Autograph, and TI- NSpire graphing calculators. • A RMHS math teacher presented a workshop on the use of the SMART Recorder in the Classroom at the national Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence National Conference in December 2010. New Faculty Joining the RMHS community in September 2010 were the following faculty members: Kent Hatton Physics Elaine Picard Physics 511 Giulio Binaghi Martin Stibolt Leia Richardson Magalie Rowe Patricia Banda Elizabeth Dalby Arthur W. Coolidge Middle School Principal, Craig Martin Foreign Language English English Foreign Language Special Ed Teacher Biology Introduction The mission of Coolidge Middle School is to create a challenging and respectful environment for all students and to provide the varied experiences necessary for becoming confident, independent learners. The Arthur W. Coolidge Middle School continues to strengthen this mission by fostering a "learning community" for all, including staff, students, and parents. Our school community is characterized by a shared mission and vision, collective inquiry that accompanies a constant striving to improve, an organizational structure of collaborative teams that share a common purpose, a willingness to try new approaches, and annual self - assessment to examine results. As we continue striving to successfully address the social, physical, intellectual, and emotional needs of all our students, we look forward to accomplishing the new goals set forth in our School Improvement Plan - while at the same time; we celebrate our successes of the . previous year. Below are just a few of the highlights. Student Activities and Programs After School Activities With the support of the PTO, Coolidge continued this year to offer a wide range of before and after school activities for students. In addition to activities such as peer leaders, flag football, chime choir, and newspaper, we also added a before school "fitness club" and a "library advisory board." The "A.M. Fit Club," created by Paula Graham and open to all students, is a supervised open workout, including cardio- fitness, strength and conditioning training, Wii, and DDR activities. The Coolidge Library Advisory Board (Coolidge LAB for short) was created by Christine Steinhauser and is a student group that writes book, movie, TV and music reviews for the Coolidge Middle School Library blog ( http : / /coolidgems.wordpress.com/). They also create Book Trailers (30 -60 second commercial -like videos) to upload to the blog as well. Thanks to all the Coolidge staff members who helped make all the student extracurricular activities possible! And thanks also to the continued support of the Coolidge PTO. Holocaust Survivor, Edgar Krasa, Visits Coolidge In November, Coolidge was honored to welcome Holocaust survivor, Edgar Krasa, to Coolidge to speak with our 8th graders. Mr. Krasa presented his personal story to students, as told in the anthology I Refused to Die: Stories of Boston Area Holocaust Survivors and Soldiers who Liberated the Concentration Camps of World War IT Susie Davidson, editor of this anthology, also attended the assembly at Coolidge. To supplement this program, Coolidge also borrowed 12 posters from the Simon Wiesenthal Courage to Remember collection. These works included 512 Kristallnacht: The Night of Broken Glass, The World Turned Upside Down: The Warsaw Ghetto, The Final Solution: 1941 -1945, The Enduring Spirit: Art of the Holocaust, Bitterness and Hope: The Legacy of the Holocaust, Remembrance and Vigilance, and others. We'd like to express our deep gratitude to Mr. Krasa and Ms. Davidson for visiting Coolidge and sharing this very important story with our students. Our thanks also to Coolidge English Teachers, Erica LeBow and Jennalee Anderson... and to Coolidge parent Linda Snow Dockser for coordinating this wonderful opportunity. "Welcome to Coolidge" for Incoming 6`h Grade In August, we once again offered our acclaimed transition program, "Welcome to Coolidge," for incoming 6`h grade students. This program prepares students for a stress -free start to the school year. Participants get to know some staff members, become comfortable with the building layout, locate their locker (and learn how to open a combination lock), and know what is expected of a sixth grade student. They get to review their middle school schedule, participate in team building activities, and learn important study skills. Over a hundred students were enrolled, and students not only learned useful information... also (and most importantly) had a great time. "Nature's Classroom" at Prindle Pond Over 100 Coolidge 7`h graders participated in our 18th annual Nature's Classroom program at Prindle Pond during April break. Many thanks to Mr. Sprague (who coordinated the five day trip) and to all the staff and parent chaperones who helped make this such, a wonderful experience for all the students. Walk to School Day Coolidge promoted walking, biking, and carpooling to school by again participating in the international "Walk to School Day." On this day, students all over the world were walking to school. Walk to School events strive to create safer routes for walking and bicycling, and emphasize the importance of issues such as increasing physical activity among children, pedestrian safety, traffic congestion, concern for the environment, and building connections among families, schools, and community. In addition to eliminating the safety concerns and congestion on Birch Meadow Drive, these efforts can help to promote both a cleaner environment and healthier children. "Understanding Disabilities" Presentation In March, Coolidge was proud to welcome Karen Gaffney, an accomplished long - distance swimmer and president of the Karen Gaffney Foundation, who gave a talk titled "Re- writing the Data," about how people can overcome limitations. Ms. Gaffney, who has Down syndrome, made a historic 9 -mile swim across Lake Tahoe, has swum the English Channel as part of a relay team, and recently swam Boston Harbor. Through the work of her foundation and her talks around the country, she is changing attitudes and helping to change lives. We are grateful to Ms. Gaffney for sharing her experiences and for inspiring our students. Meteorologist Barry Burbank Visits Coolidge In October, Coolidge's Team Pegasus welcomed guest speaker, Barry Burbank, a WBZ -TV meteorologist. Mr. Burbank spoke with students about weather forecasting, extreme weather, and 513 weather instruments. Thanks to WBZ and to Mr. Burbank for making this possible for our students! Student Mentors Marie Pink, our Assistant Principal, coordinated and expanded a very successful student mentor program. This program consists of high school volunteers who come to Coolidge at dismissal time, one or more days a week, to mentor Coolidge students. This program has helped many middle school students achieve at a higher academic level and has promoted great connections between the two schools. Coolidge Volunteers Coolidge has also created a core group of student volunteers who assist with various tasks throughout the school. Tasks include such items as shelving books in the library, organizing various meeting spaces throughout the building, watering plants, cleaning fish tanks, making sure computers are shut down each day, posting announcements on the school sign, tutoring younger students, and many others. Thanks to Assistant Principal Marie Pink for coordinating this great program! Coolidge Drama Presents "Willy Wonka" This year, Coolidge Drama produced the musical Roald Dahl's Willy Wonka Junior, and it was a great success. Congratulations to Director Lori Mandolese and to all the cast and crew. Their impressive talents brought the Wonka magic to life for all of us! "You Don't Know Me Until You Know Me" In February, Coolidge participated and supported the program "You Don't Know Me Until You Know Me" by Dr. Michael Fowlin. This powerful program became a centerpiece of the Coolidge's "Project Challenge" initiatives, and it prompted enormous discussion and reflection throughout the year. Coolidge's "Project Challenge" initiatives are designed to encourage students and all members of the school community to promote a positive and accepting school climate. The Coolidge Challenge, as indicated in our School Handbook is as follows: "As members of the Coolidge Middle School community, we shall promote, in both our words and actions, a climate of acceptance, kindness, and respect for all; a safe learning environment, free from violence or unkind words, and filled instead with civility and teamwork; a commitment to community and to serving our fellow citizens; a responsibility to develop our skills and to commit our efforts to solving challenges faced by our community, by our nation, and by our ' world; and an understanding that our daily choices can shape our attitudes, our achievements, and our future." Programs such as Dr. Fowlin's "You Don't Know Me Until You Know Me" inspire everyone to strive to meet that challenge every day. Annual "Olympiad Day" In February, Coolidge once again held our school -wide Olympiad. This day has become a wonderful tradition at Coolidge for many years, and brings the entire school community together. Thanks to all the parent volunteers, to all the students, to all the staff, and to Mr. McCarthy and his committee for once again coordinating a very successful and enjoyable day! 514 C Family Math & Science Night In March, Coolidge presented its 14`h annual Family Math & Science Night for Grades 5, 6, 7, 8 students and their family members. Hundreds of students and parents enjoyed a fun evening of math, science, engineering, and technology activities. It also provided an excellent transition activity for the fall's entering 6`h graders. Special thanks to Coolidge teacher Andrea Bruno for coordinating this night, and to all the parents who volunteered their time and efforts to make the evening a success. Career Day In June, the Coolidge community participated in its 4h annual "Career Day" for our students. It was a great day, and we'd like to thank the parents who coordinated the entire event as well as the many community volunteers who gave up their time to present to students. Over thirty jobs were represented, giving students the opportunity to learn more about many professions. Our hope is that students were inspired to think more about certain career fields and that all kids made the important connection between their present education and their future aspirations. Advanced Problem Solving & Applications Coolidge (and Parker) Middle School enhanced the Math program by again offering Algebra 1 to the strongest 7`h grade Math students and then, this year, by developing a new "hybrid" advanced math course for 81h graders, "Advanced Problem Solving & Applications." . Student Honors Coolidge was proud that many students were again recognized for their various talents in various programs and/or competitions throughout the year. Just a few examples include... Science Olympiad Team: State Champs At the annual state Science Olympiad tournament in March, the Coolidge Science Team earned First Place and successfully defended their title as Massachusetts State Champion. As a result, the Coolidge Science Team earned the honor of representing Massachusetts in May at the National Science Olympiad competition at the University of Illinois. At the National Tournament at the University of Illinois, the team earned a 16th place finish, placing the Coolidge Science Olympiad Team in the top quarter of the top 1 % of all Science Olympiad Teams in the country. Congratulations to Head Coach Paul Guidetti and assistants John McCarthy and Karawan Meade, to all the event coaches, to all the parents, and to every student of the Coolidge Science Olympiad Team! . Jazz Band Receives Gold Medal Congratulations to the Middle School Jazz Band for receiving a gold medal at the Massachusetts Association for Jazz Education's Middle School Festival, which was held at Reading Memorial High School in May. Three students, Ada Li, Greg McCrae, and Jon Asgeirsson were also recognized for outstanding musicianship, and Sam Powers won the award for most outstanding soloist in the festival. Members of the Reading Middle School Jazz Band were: Nathan Rose, Catherine Newell, Logan Katsoufis, Sam Powers, Chirag Patel, Noah Singer (saxophones); Alex Sahagian, Diana Le (guitar); Jisoo Choi, Ada Li (piano); Jon Asgeirsson, Walter Greeley, Ryan Freidmann, Andrew Costello, Peter O'Connor, Griffin Killian (trumpets); Dan Staffer, Nathan 515 Strack, Tim Kane (trombones); Matt Holmes (bass); Greg McCrae, Maria Garbarino (drums). Congratulations to all the students and to director, Mr. Mulligan! Student Artists Several sixth grade students from Coolidge had their artwork on display at the Wenham museum in Wenham, MA. These students created animal paintings in their art class and were selected to have their work on public display. Congratulations to Adam Andrade, Olivia Cronin - Golomb, Michael Dente, Rachel Doherty, Samantha Kramer, Melanie La, Juliann Leblanc, Kerry Lordan, and Cynthia Yang for their hard work and creativity! Junior District Music Festival After January auditions from more than 90 public and private schools, twenty -two Reading students (nine from Coolidge) were selected to participate in the Northeast Massachusetts District Junior Music Festival, a prestigious Massachusetts Music Educators' Association event. The program, for students in grades six through nine, is offered by the M.M.E.A. as an enrichment opportunity, providing a musical experience to talented young people. The students were selected to perform in the Junior District Concert Band, Orchestra, Boys' Chorus, and Girls' Chorus. They rehearsed with guest conductors and then performed in a concert at Lowell High School in Lowell, MA in March. Coolidge participants were: Jon Asgeirsson (8 -boys' chorus), Jacob Camenker (8 -boys' chorus), Marissa Lawrence (8- girls' chorus), Nick Miller (8- boys' chorus), Catherine Newell (7 -band), Alex Percy (6 -boys' chorus), Julia Sidman (8- girls' chorus), Nathan Strack (8- band), and Sydney Willwerth (7- girls' chorus). Congratulations to everyone on this achievement! Geography Bee Ten students qualified to participate in the annual Coolidge Geography Bee (Catherine Newall, Andrew Grottkau, Brett Blomquist, Patrick Baynes, Tyler D'Ambrosio, Julia Stackhouse, Stephen Carpinito, Julia Driscoll, Patrick Leverone, and Joseph Perna). Coolidge Geography Bee champion, Ryan Margossian, also qualified for the 2010 Massachusetts State Geography . Bee (sponsored by the National Geographic Society). "Make a Difference" Award Coolidge 7th grader, Brian Fogarty, was a recipient of the "Make A Difference Award" from the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library. The Kennedy Library recognized middle school students this year for making a difference in their communities, and Brian Fogarty was nominated by a staff member for possessing strong leadership skills and for being a valuable team player. At the time, Brian was president of the seventh grade class, and he dedicated several extra hours a week performing various duties for the Student Council. He provided, for instance, the necessary leadership to coordinate the Student Council's tree donation to the annual Festival of Trees. He also helped to coordinate Coolidge's involvement with the annual Walk for Hunger, and he organized various fundraising activities to benefit such causes as Haiti Relief. These are just some examples of how Brian distinguished himself by going above and beyond in service of his school and community. The "Make A Difference Award" was presented to Brian in March at the 2010 Award Ceremony at the Kennedy Library in Boston. 516 Lego League Competition Coolidge again hosted Reading's annual competition of the FIRST Lego League. Sixteen teams participated, made up of 104 students from grades four through eight, including 5 teams this year made up of 32 middle school students from both Coolidge and Parker. There were also over 40 volunteer coaches and coordinators. Teams were given a challenge based on this year's theme "Smart Move," focusing on today's transportation challenges; and students were organized into teams who then designed robots to complete specific tasks. Each team competed in two rounds of robot missions and also presented a skit based on a completed research project. The winning . middle school team this year was the "Super Speedy Six" coached by Laura McDonagh, Niloo Hennings, and Doug O'Flaherty, and made up of team members: Meg O'Flagherty, Emma McDonagh, Noah Hennings, Tori Grimmer, Will Politano, and Parker Webb. Congratulations to these students and to all the students who participated in the competition. Wordmasters Two students representing Coolidge Middle School won highest honors in the December 2010 WordMasters Challenge —a national Language Arts competition entered by approximately 220,000 students annually, which consists of three separate meets held at intervals during the school year. Competing in the difficult Blue Division of the Challenge, 7ch graders Natalie Rotstein and Mary Beth Marcucella both earned perfect scores in the year's first meet. In the entire country, only 120 seventh graders (out of 27,000) achieved at this level. Others at the school who also achieved outstanding results in the meet included 7`h graders: Jack Emilius, Mike Dente, Liam O'Neill, Parker Webb, Zach Forbes, Will Connery, Ryan Forbes, Dan Sullivan, Haley D'Entremont, Matt Garofoli, Morgan Flynn, Emily McKenna, Noah Fandel, Jenna Goldman- McFail, Chris Fitzpatrick, and Cynthia Yang; and 81h graders: James Marcucella, Andrew Grottkau, Sharon Grosso, Catherine Newell, Jennie Dockser, Brian Kraft, Sean Hanlon, and Chris Pappey. Congratulations to these students! Charity and Community Awareness Coolidge students again participated in many charitable and humanitarian efforts, benefiting a variety of organizations. Below arejust a few examples from the year... Thanks from Troops in Afghanistan For the past five years, Coolidge has collected items and sent "care packages" from Coolidge to our troops who are stationed overseas. Coolidge Teacher, Amy Kasprzak, and "Team Infinity" have coordinated the efforts; and Ms. Kasprzak's brother, Major Robert Pawlak, currently overseas in Afghanistan, has helped by giving her addresses of people stationed in remote locations. In November, we were surprised by a very long distance phone call from Captain Robert Williams, and in a follow -up email letter with photos, he expressed heartfelt and very enthusiastic thanks from all of his team in a very remote section of Afghanistan. Captain Williams wrote, "On behalf of the Nagahan Village Stability Team I would like to express our deepest appreciation for your care package that we received on 26 Oct 2010. Your thoughts and well wishes have added,a few more smiles to our daily routine, and possible a few more cavities as well! As deployed soldiers we always have our loved ones and family back home with us. We carry photos, email when we can, and make the occasional phone calls in order to feel just a little closer to those things we cherish and miss while we are deployed. These are things we plan for, and we accept as part of our duty. Unexpected, uncontrolled, unsolicited acts of kindness from 517 those friends we have yet to meet however are not planned for, and the impact is enormous. Your actions are truly reflective of a compassionate and caring School Staff and Student body." We have since received other emails andinotes from U. S. troops who have received packages from Coolidge. In total, Coolidge shipped out twelve boxes, with a total weight of 568 lbs, to our troops in Afghanistan. Each box ranged from 40 — 50 lbs and had a little bit of everything in it. Major Robert Pawlak provided twelve addresses for remote locations along the Pakistan border and in the Helmand province. Thanks to all the teachers of Team Infinity for coordinating this effort, and thanks to all the students for such wonderful participation! Coolidge Earns 1" Place in "Coats for Kids" The Coolidge Peer Leaders coordinated a coat collection drive in the winter for the annual "Coats for Kids" program, sponsored by Anton's Cleaners; and they were all very excited a few months later to receive a letter from Anton's President, Charles A. Anton, informing us that Coolidge Middle School "led the School Rewards program with a I" place win!" Winners were determined by the number of coats collected per students enrolled, and as the 1st place winner, Coolidge received $1200 of furnishings from Jordan's Furniture, a $250 gift certificate redeemable at Paul's TV, a $250 cash prize, a sundae party for the entire school. Great job to all of the student Peer Leaders and to Peer Leader faculty advisors Marlene Lifshin and Becky Mandell for their tremendous efforts in coordinating the drive ... and also of course to all the students, staff, and families in the Coolidge community who made the drive such a success. With your help, we were able to provide a much needed coat to many people this winter ... and to show all the students here at Coolidge that their efforts continue to make a positive difference in people's lives. Coolidge's efforts for the "Coats for Kids" program were featured in the Globe North section of the Sunday Boston Globe in March. "Hoops for Heart' In March, Coolidge held its 2nd annual "Hoops for Heart" event and raised over $12,000 for the American Heart Association! Thanks to the many students who participated in the basketball tournament and to everyone who made the Coolidge day such a tremendous success! Special thanks as well to Mr. Huizenga who coordinated the event and to all the staff who helped make this a day full of school spirit. While encouraging community service, the "Hoops for Heart" day is also an educational program, with messages of staying tobacco free, eating right, and exercising regularly —all while raising dollars critical to the development of lifesaving research. "Pennies for Peace" Project i At the beginning of 2010, Coolidge embarked on an exciting project, centered on the best - selling book by Greg Mortensen, titled Three Cups of Tea. The "Pennies for Peace" project is a service-, learning program designed to broaden students' cultural horizons while teaching them also about their capacities as philanthropists — one penny at a time. Pennies for Peace is a program of Central Asia Institute (CAI), founded by Greg Mortensen, author of the #1 New York Times bestseller, Three Cups of Tea. CAI is a nonprofit organization that promotes and provides community -based education and literacy programs, especially for girls, in remote mountain regions of Central Asia. . All Coolidge students, along with staff members, read the critically acclaimed book Three Cups of Tea (young adult version) from January to March and collected pennies (and other donations) 518 to help build schools in Afghanistan. In February, we were then honored to welcome Congressman John F. Tierney to Coolidge, who met with a group of student representatives from all grade levels about Coolidge's current "Pennies for Peace" project. Congressman Tierney also presented a slide show of photos from his own visits to Afghanistan and Pakistan. Later in May, Coolidge was then invited to personally present the funds that we raised to CAI founder Greg Mortenson, when he visited Salem, Massachusetts to receive the "Salem Award for Human Rights and Social Justice." Several North Shore schools who had been conducting "Pennies for Peace" programs were invited to attend the event, and teacher, Mary Anne Cuscuna (who helped coordinate the Coolidge project) and Coolidge 7`h grader, Sharon Grosso, proudly represented Coolidge Middle School at the Salem ceremony. The Salem Award is given each year to keep alive the lessons of the Salem witch trials of 1692 and to. recognize individuals whose commitment to social justice and hyman rights has alleviated discrimination and promoted tolerance. This year's recipient, Greg Mortenson, reminded us that "the greatest legacy we can give our children is a legacy of peace," and Coolidge was proud to support that mission. Thanksgiving Food Drive The Coolidge family once again supported the Reading Food Pantry as part of our annual Thanksgiving Assembly. Coolidge "Team Voyager" coordinated the food drive and assembly this year, and dozens of boxes of food and necessities were again donated to the Reading Food Pantry. Thanks to all the staff and students who made the assembly and food drive so successful, and especially for giving so many people something to be thankful for during the holiday season. Walk for Hunger Again this year, members of the Coolidge community participated in the annual "Walk for Hunger" in Boston. Congratulations to the Student Council (who coordinated Coolidge's participation) for walking over 10.5 miles and for raising over $600 for Project Bread. Approximately 42,000 people came to the Boston Common that day, and according to the Project Bread press release, raised "$3.8 million to provide food for 400 emergency food programs in 135 Massachusetts cities and towns. These funds will provide a hot meal or a bag of groceries for out -of -work families next winter." We at Coolidge commend all who participated! "Mission of Deeds" Thanks Coolidge Coolidge received a letter of thanks from the Reading "Mission of Deeds," expressing their appreciation to Chorus Director, Jenny DiMuzio, and to the entire Coolidge community for the December linens drive at the Coolidge Winter Concert. As a result of the drive, the Mission of Deeds received seven large boxes of assorted linens, many of them new. For each new bed that is given to a client, the Mission of Deeds also provides a comforter, blanket, and set of sheets, along with other assorted linens for the home. The Coolidge linens drive was a great help to this effort. Thanks to all the Coolidge students, staff, and parents for making this drive successful. Professional Development and School Improvement Efforts The Coolidge community again coordinated and/or participated in many initiatives -as part of our annual self - assessment and continuous improvement efforts. Below are just a few examples from the year... NN School Improvement Survey As part of our annual school improvement process and in effort to create a renewed improvement plan for our school, the Coolidge School Council again gathered input from the school community and this year also facilitated.an online survey among staff and parents. As topics for reflection in this process, the school traditionally examines all the various educational categories as set forth by Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence, and this past year, we focused on one key category ( "Challenging Standards and Curriculum ") for the survey. The 10 question survey was easily completed online and prompted much valuable input. Participants were asked several questions, and they answered by indicating "strongly .agree, agree, slightly agree, slightly disagree, disagree, strongly disagree, or don't know /unsure." Here is a brief sampling of results: When asked if overall, Coolidge's curriculum and academic standards currently promote high levels of achievement among students, 93.4% agreed at some level, 4.6% disagreed at some level, and 1.9% were unsure. When asked if Coolidge's curriculum and academic expectations effectively addressed the needs of struggling learners, 52.4% agreed at some level, 16.8% disagreed at some level, and 30.8% were unsure. When asked if Coolidge's curriculum and academic expectations effectively address the needs of more advanced or exceptionally strong learners, 60.7% agreed at some level, 21.4% disagreed at some level, and 17.8% were unsure. The complete breakdown of the survey results were posted on our Edline page. After the results were collected, we then incorporated this important input into the goals and action steps of our updated School Improvement Plan (also available on our Edline page). Weekly CMS Announcements In addition to the weekly "Coolidge Comet, which was published on Edline for the school community, Coolidge also began publishing the "CMS Announcements" every week, with updated news about the school, students, and upcoming school programs. In order to keep the entire school community well informed, Coolidge families receive an email each week through our Edline service, alerting them to the weekly updates and providing a link to the weekly online publications. RTEF Grants Awarded to Coolidge Coolidge was the recipient of two grants from the Reading Technology and Education Foundation (RTEF). Our gratitude is extended to RTEF for funding the purchase of an "iPod Lab" for our Library Media Center, which includes 15 iPod Nanos with docking/charging station, and also a Netbook computer for classroom online programs. Blue Ribbon National Institute and Coolidge Site Visit The Reading Public Schools was proud to again partner with Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence and SMART Technologies, Inc. to present our second annual Blueprint for Educational Excellence National Institute on April 15`h and 16`h. The Institute featured local and national educators attending high quality professional development opportunities and visiting classrooms throughout the district. Along with the 500 staff members of the Reading Public Schools, approximately 300 other educators from around the country attended. Coolidge was also proud to host a site visit to our school for approximately 50 visiting educators, and we received very positive feedback. 520 Mr. Smith Featured in Blue Ribbon Profile Coolidge Math teacher, Charlie Smith, was the subject of a Blue Ribbon Teacher Profile and was featured on the Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence website: "Blue Ribbon School Zone." Mr. Smith's commitment to children and his enthusiastic style of math instruction is featured on the site, complete with an article, comments by former students, and a video about pi and Mr. Smith's annual celebration of "Charlie Brown Day." Congratulations, Mr. Smith! Be sure to check out the profile at the below link: http:// www .brschoolzone.com/forum/topies /calculus - explained State Assessment Results When most middle schools in Massachusetts are now considered "underperforming" (according to established state guidelines), Coolidge was proud that MCAS scores remained strong and that the school once again even achieved AYP for all groups. While the school's goal has always been simply to help all students succeed and to continue to make personal progress (as opposed to achieving any particular status on a state test), it is gratifying to see that the school's efforts and initiatives have proven successful for so many children. Such initiatives as.our math support classes, our after- school "P.A.S.S." classes, and our various homework and mentoring programs have helped many struggling students and have even served as models for other schools. Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence: Coolidge Middle School was proud to again be featured at the 2010 Blue Ribbon Schools "Blueprint for Excellence" national conference. As a national "Lighthouse School," Coolidge gave three presentations at the conference, and Principal Craig Martin was the Master of Ceremonies for the conference. Coolidge staff members also had the opportunity to attend numerous workshops and to connect with professional colleagues from outstanding schools across the nation. Science Department Receives Grant Congratulations to Coolidge Science Teacher, Sarah Marchant, who together with her Science department colleagues John McCarthy and Betsy Withum, were the recipients of a $2000 ING "Unsung Heroes Award" for Coolidge Middle School. ING accepted the team's grant proposal to support the development of an engineering initiative (Building for the Future) to be implemented during their 7`h and 81h grade team periods. The grant will fund the purchase of bridge- building supplies for the students and professional development for the teachers. At a fall PTO meeting, Alison Rayment, a representative from ING presented Sarah Marchant with the $2000 check. On behalf of all the students at Coolidge, thank you to Ms. Marchant, Mr. McCarthy, and Ms. Withum! Professional Conferences Coolidge staff members also attended' and/or presented at other professional conferences, such as the New England League of Middle Schools (NELMS) annual conference, the New England Social Studies conference, the National Middle School Association (NMSA) conference, and others. 521 Walter S. Parker Middle School Principal, Douglas Lyons Introduction The Walter S. Parker Middle School continually works to improve through a process which addresses three main areas of need; curriculum, instruction and assessment, school climate, and shared leadership. Staff, parents, students and community members are working together to build a school community which focuses on the needs of pre- adolescents and adolescents, educationally, socially and emotionally. Part of this process is to reach out to the Reading community and beyond as we continue the Parker tradition of being a school which values life- long learning, and service to the community. School Improvement Plan The School Improvement Plan (SIP) was written by the Principal and the School Site Council in the spring and fall of 2010. The School Site Council is comprised of five parents, three teachers, the assistant principal and the principal. The plan correlates directly to the new District Improvement Goals and the new district vision statement, "...Preparing Reading's Youth to Be Respectful and Productive Citizens of a Global Society..." The focus of the 2010 -2011 Parker School Improvement Plans is: Improving Teaching, Learning and the Demonstration of 21st Century Skills; Communication, School Culture and Shared Leadership; including student's social /emotional safety and development. The school improvement goals are SMART Goals and are a product of the collaborative work completed with the Administrative Council and teacher leaders in the summer. The goals are as follows: 1. Teachers will collaborate to expand, share and teach engaging lessons that require students to develop and practice their creativity and innovation skills; their critical thinking and problem solving skills; as well as their communication and literacy skills. 2. We will continue to create and refine ways that demonstrate and communicate in a given interval of time, indicators, artifacts, student work and performances that exhibit student progress in all content areas. 3. We will ensure a safe, healthy, and sustainable learning environment where all members are expected to be respectful and socially responsible. The administration reviews and reports out monthly to the school site council on the achievement and the progress toward our school goals. Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence Parker Middle School is a Blue Ribbon School of Excellence, Lighthouse School. The award is given to schools that have scored in the distinguished category in all nine of the BR `Categories for Improvement.' The nine areas .are: Student. Focus and Support; School Organization and Culture; Challenging Standards and Curriculum; Active Teaching and Learning; Technology Integration; Professional Community; Leadership and Educational Vitality; School, Family, and Community Partnerships; Indicators of Success. The Walter S. Parker Middle School administration and teacher leaders continue to use the Blue Ribbon Principles as a primary document to review and assess programs and structures annually. Parker teachers and 522 administrators continue to attend the Blue Ribbon National Conference. In addition, Parker teachers and administrators attend and present annually at the Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence National Institute hosted in Reading in the spring. This year Parker will host a visiting team of approximately 45 teachers and administrators attending the national conference where we will share and demonstrate our use of technology in the classrooms. Turning Points and School Reform Initiative The Turning Points report from the Carnegie Foundation is a result of over fifteen years of research done in middle schools on how pre - adolescents and adolescents learn best. The report has a list of principles and practices that middle schools should adhere to if they are to address the educational, social, and emotional needs, of students who are "in the middle" between elementary school and high school. Parker Middle School is in its seventh year of membership in the National Turning Points Network located at the Center for Collaborative Education in Boston, MA. Some of the changes that resulted from our collaborative work with SRI and the TP Network address the needs of student achievement, student assessment, school climate, classroom culture, shared leadership, collaboration, communication, and staff development. New England League of Middle Schools - NELMS As a member of the New England League of Middle Schools - NELMS, the Parker community has had many opportunities to go to conferences and workshops to increase the knowledge in our building around research pertaining to middle schools, and teaching and learning. In the fall of 2008, Parker was again determined to be a NELMS Spotlight School. As a result of this distinction, we continue to host visiting teams of teachers and administrators who hope to replicate some of the structures and professional learning practices to improve student learning in their home schools. In the spring two teams from Parker will again be presenting at the NELMS Conference in Rhode Island. Professional Development and Adult Learning A fundamental part of the professional development and the success that Parker Middle School has had, and will continue to have, is directly due to teacher learning, and teachers teaching one another. There are numerous opportunities for teachers to learn about Facilitative leadership, Critical Friends Groups, inquiry math, classroom discourse, differentiated instruction, project based learning, engaged learning, data analysis, literacy models, numeracy, Smartboard technology, blogs, wikis, podcasting, Moodle, Excel, Inspiration, MassOne, Kurzweil, United Steaming, health and wellness, pragmatics, Glogster, alternative assessment, Lab Classrooms, Edline, Gradequick, drug awareness, curriculum mapping, restraint, safety, as well as Bullying Training. The offerings listed above are professional development offerings at the school and district level. In addition, the district has stream -lined professional development to be completed during the school day when possible and to follow the cohort model to best utilize and support teachers while learning and incorporating new methodologies into curricula areas. A significant learning opportunity that has impacted technology integration into classrooms at Parker is the Expanding the Boundaries to Teaching and Learning Course taught by the Superintendent and teacher 523 leaders. This is a year long course where teachers and administrators learn and experience new technologies together. The Instructional Leadership Team comprised of teacher leaders and administrators have continued to lead, coordinate and plan opportunities for teachers to learn with one another. A focus for us this year _continues to be helping students and teachers make their work and their practice public. Specifically in regard to student work we use the phrase "...creating work for an audience greater than one..." As students and teachers share their work with others they get feedback and gain a sense of clarity and confidence through the process. We have widened the focus to include common language and opportunities for students to give and share feedback and also post the changes to the work that they are publishing or making public. In addition we have continued, developing in -house experts and opportunities for teachers to teach and learn from one another. We have developed a Professional Development Model called `Open Space' where teachers, during early release time, faculty meetings and in- service days attend sessions or presentations to learn more about a topic they can incorporate into their lessons, or use to better engage or assess students. The concept of teachers teaching and learning from one another is invaluable because it allows teachers to make relationships and continually share and receive feedback as they work to integrate technology and make changes in their pedagogy. This professional learning model has had a profoundly positive impact on our school culture. Middle Schools and District Committee Work (Parker and Coolidge) District Curriculum, Safety, Diversity, Bullying, Special Education, and Data Committees meet on the first Wednesday of every month to map curriculum, to discuss what teaching and learning looks like at each school, as well as how we can collaborate to meet the social and emotional needs of our students. Committees commonly refer to and review, state and national standards and current research including 2151 Century Skills to inform decision making and the agenda for each meeting. In addition, academic departments from both middle schools have been meeting regularly with elementary and high school teachers in vertical teams, to increase their knowledge -base in pedagogy. On -line learning has continued with the use of Moodle as our on -line learning platform for the Advanced Problem Solving Mathematics Course offered to eighth graders with teachers from each middle school communicating and collaborating to refine the course. The 6th grade English Language Arts teachers and the District Instructional Specialist continue to share best practices to teach and support struggling readers at the middle level. In addition, the teachers have fully incorporated Guided Reading, Wordly Wise and part of the new grammar program. The Social Studies teachers continue to refine their curriculum maps while the eighth grade teachers, having completed a second year of the new curriculum which focused on: World Civilizations from the fall of the Roman Empire through the Enlightenment. Other departments that meet regularly to improve curriculum and pedagogy include Math, ELA, Art, Wellness and Physical Education, Music, Foreign Language and Special Education. 524 The Instructional Leadership Team and Critical Friends Groups -CFG's The Parker Instructional Leadership Team (ILT) is in its seventh year advising the school in areas of curriculum, instruction, assessment, professional development and collaborative leadership. Every working team in the school has a representative on the ILT. Twelve staff members, and both principals, are on the team which meets monthly to plan professional learning opportunities for staff. We work to deepen our knowledge and understanding of the Blue Ribbon Standards for School Improvement and TP Principles as well as come to consensus on school change. The ILT has created opportunities for teachers to look at their assignments, student work and assessments and to share their work to better engage students in their learning. The ILT has helped us reach our goal of increasing leadership capacity within the building. In addition to the ILT, we have a Team Leader for every team and department in the building. An off -shoot of the ILT is the Critical Friends Groups (or PLC's) facilitated by teacher leaders who are trained CFG Coaches/Facilitators. The CFG's meet monthly to help members of the groups increase their knowledge of educational theory and research, and use protocols to help put what they know into best practices. Additionally, Team Leaders meet monthly, and as needed, to address issues of school and team management. Students are put into leadership roles by becoming Student council Members, Peer Leaders and Core Value advisors. Core Values We are in our sixth year focusing on our Core Values of Kindness, Community and Personal Best. The 2010 goal was to participate in the District Bullying Committee to work collaboratively to develop the District Bullying Draft Plan, which can be found at: http: / /www.edline. net / files/_ KBE65_/ e299c5640696cibd3745a49013852ec4 /Antibullying_Pl an_Draft.pdf Additionally, we have created a year -long curriculum that includes materials, lessons and training from the Second Step Program, the Aggressors, Victims and Bystanders Program, On- Line Safety Training as well as the Let's Get Real Curriculum. These lessons will be implemented during monthly, school -wide sessions where we could discuss and practice our Core Values as a community. Students and the Core Value Committee members meet monthly to analyze data, make suggestions for speakers, and reflect and revise activities as needed. Special Education and Guidance Procedures and Services Special Education continues to be a major area of focus for us at Parker. Currently, 20% of our student - population is on Individual Education Programs. The Language Based Learning Disabilities Program (the LLD Program) for the district is at Parker Middle School. Students in the special Education sub -group did not make Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in 2010 in ELA and Mathematics. We continue to individualize teaching and academic support in the LLD Program and Learning Centers for students with disabilities. To better meet the needs of students, the master scheduled was changed in September 2010, moving math teachers off -team to decrease teacher to student ratios and to also allow math teachers to meet the needs of students with disabilities. 525 Special Education Teachers have worked with regular education teachers to best create accommodations and modifications for students to allow them to access the curriculum. Based on data analysis and progress monitoring, additional classes and electives, teachers have been able to work more closely with students with disabilities. Student Goals, Measured Benchmarks and Service grids on Individual Education Programs are being revised to further meet the needs of each student. All 6`h grade Special Education faculty met with their counterparts at the elementary level several times to assure a smooth transition for incoming 5`h graders. And finally, a plan was created and implemented to train educational assistants in Special Education research and strategies, and the use of technology in the classroom. The Guidance Department continues to test and support students with disabilities. Additionally, our School Psychologists continue to collaborate with teachers and parents to create and devise individualized plans for students to access the curriculum. The counselors also schedule individual and group sessions for students with special issues such as recently divorced families, school avoidance, anxiety, sickness, death, and social issues /pressures. Technology Integration and Planning A balanced, District Technology Plan that supports hardware, software and learning opportunities for teachers and students has been the key to teachers learning new technologies and integrating them into the curriculum. A school -wide technology committee led by the school's technology Integration Specialist and the principal makes key decisions about the purchase and use of technology at Parker. A prioritized list of needs was developed and shared with the district and the PTO. Faculty have been integrating iPods, cell phones, Smartboards, Edline, Web -Based Grade Quick, document cameras, Wiki's, Blogs, Quia, Moodle, Edmodo, Glogster and other video and media into the school day at Parker. Additional support from the district has allowed us to add one more mobile lab, and Special Education has added assistive technology to support Learning Centers and the LLD Programs. We have obtained through the regular school budget, Special Education, RTEF grants, and money from the PTO, new Smartboards, several document cameras, an iPod Learning Lab, Flip Cameras, and a dozen net books. Our Parker News Live Studio has been upgraded and is now using video streaming to broadcast daily notices and upcoming events to our school every morning. Teachers continue to take the Expanding the Boundaries Course and we continue to use the Open Space Model to train each other and students in the use of these new technologies. Staff and students have learned skills including computer research, databases, Microsoft Office, Inspiration, Kurzweil, VHS, Glogster, blogs, wikis, podcasting, United Streaming, Advanced Smartboard, etc. Improved Home /School Communication With the help of the Team Leaders, School Council and the PTO, we have improved communication within the school and with community as large. For the sixth year, all teams held parent coffees, a chance for teachers to talk informally with parents. Student schedules were mailed to all homes and uploaded onto Edline in August. The PTO and School Council worked 526 together to communicate safety issues to parents, particularly in the areas Bullying and the development of the new District Bullying Plan. Edline, the Weekly Update to Teachers and Parents, the Parker PTO Facebook Page, the Principal's Blog have all expanded this year. We currently communicate with more than 93% of our parents electronically. Students all receive a school e -mail address and are trained on Edline, the Library page, databases to do research as well as teacher and class pages to access class information daily. Increased Educational and Enrichment Activities Summer programs were held at Parker this summer, some created and implemented by Parker staff, others as part of the Reading Enrichment Summer Academy. One was the Pragmatics Camp where students learned social skills for classroom use. Another was the Introduction to Parker, an activity based program where incoming 6`h grade students learned about the school and its programs. Also, staff and parents met regularly to provide enrichment and health assemblies for students, and to plan and revise the annual field trips. The following enrichment activities and trips are planned and have taken or will take place in the 2010 -2011 school year. • . The French Trip - 8th Grade • Nature's Classroom - 7th Grade • Eco -Club to Costa Rica - 8`h Grade • Twain House Trip - 7`h Grade • Little Farm Trip — 6`h Grade • Challenger Trip — 6`h Grade • Merrimack Valley Repertoire Theatre — 8th Grade • Stoneham Theatre — 7th Grade • Plum Island Trip — 6`h Grade • Washington D.C. — 8`h Grade Peer leaders and Student Council continued to work as key members of the school community who work to improve school climate and do community service. The after - school enrichment program expanded this year and includes Anime Art, Art Studio, Basketball, Board Games, Clay Club, Color Guard, Knitting and Crocheting Basics, Dodge Ball, Field Hockey, Flag Football, Flash Animation,, Floor Hockey, French Club, Gymnastics, Hip Hop, Jazz Club, Homework Club, Knitting, Math Team, Science Creativity Club, Scholastic Art Preparation, Eco- Science Club, SIMCity Science, Spanish Club, Stamping & Scrapbooking, the Talent Show, the on -line student newspaper (the Quill) and Whiffleball. New Staff We welcome seven new teachers to the Parker staff this year. Robyn Ferrazzani is transferring from Killam Elementary School to assume our Library Media position. Bethany Nazzaro will be teaching seventh grade LLD and she joins us from the Carroll School. Andrew Spinali will be teaching seventh grade ELA on the Costa Team; he joins us after a one year internship at the North Hampton Middle School in New Hampshire. Leanne Ebert will be our new half time special education teacher in grade eight; she joins us after being home for a bit of time raising her three daughters ages five, three and one. Grace Therriault will be teaching in the seventh 527 grade learning center and joins us from Lowell Community Charter School. Auriana Halsey will be teaching special education in grade six and seven. She joins us from Summit Academy in Worcester. And Jeff Zilch will be teaching Social Studies, joining the sixth grade Jordan Team. Jeff joins us from Birchland Park Middle School in East Longmeadow Mass. Each new teacher has experience in the classroom, and a demonstrated commitment to student learning. We are excited and think that our new teachers will complement our staff and contribute greatly to our school community. A.M. Barrows Elementary School Principal, Karen Callan Through the guidance from the Massachusetts State Frameworks, Barrows students are taught a comprehensive curriculum that will prepare them for their future. Extensive work in Reading, Writing, Mathematics, as well as exposure to various topics in Science and Social Studies, has given the Barrows "Shining Stars" an excellent foundation for learning. Demographics Barrows currently has a population of 400+ students ranging from K- 5.There are three classrooms of each grade level, including one full -day kindergarten class. In September, Barrows added a class of kindergarten children who are on the autism spectrum. With this additional class, Barrows now hosts 25+ spectrum children in all classrooms. With the population continuing to grow, Barrows classrooms and additional spaces are all being used on daily basis for teaching space. Staffing The Barrows School wished a sad farewell to one of our second grade teachers, Mrs. Adele Pekins, who retired after 30+ years teaching in Reading. Ms. Heather Mustone was hired to fill Mrs. Pekins' second grade. Additionally, Ms. Kelly Atherton and Mrs. Leslie Scully joined the Developmental Learning Center .(autism program). Through movement.within the system, Barrows also welcomed several new para- educators. Technology One of Barrows' goals is to work towards 1:1 computing. We began this process many years ago with the Writers. This year we were able, through the generosity of the PTO and additional sources, purchase 25 net books for classroom use. Students are able work in collaboration with others and individually on research projects with these mini - computers. Younger children are able to obtain needed practice in reading and math through the net books. Forty -five MP3 players began to replace outdated listening centers. Continued use of the Smart Boards and various sound systems are continuing to expose our students to 215` century skills. Additionally, further development and use of wikis, and blogs have been added to each classroom as various communication vehicles. Students are able to obtain information, including homework assignments, long -range assignments and general information from their class wikis and web - sites. Finally, Edline, Reading's online web site, has proved to be vital as a means of communication with parents and the community. 528 Lifelong Guidelines and Lifeskills We are in our third year of implementing our character education program entitled, Lifelong Guidelines and Lifeskills. We continue to focus on the fifteen Lifeskills. This year the students took on the responsibility of preparing and teaching the other children about the Lifeskill of the month. Through songs, skits, poetry and literature, the third, fourth and fifth grade students taught their peers about Courage, Curiosity and Friendship. Each month long theme is carried out in day to day activities and recognition. This program helps to enhance the Bullying Prevention initiative at Barrows. All of the skills help our children to learn character traits that will benefit them throughout their lives. This program, developed by Susan Kolevik, is felt daily throughout our school. Safety and Security Barrows, like the other schools, continued to emphasize safety in daily activities. This year we added Shelter -in -Place and Lockdown drills to our regular Fire drills. Additionally, the Barrows safety committee continues to train staff in procedures and protocols that will benefit the school as a whole. Before /After School Program Barrows began a before and after school program in September. This program has provided a safe and enriching environment for child care for the Barrows children. The program is run by Barrows Para- Educators and other qualified personnel. Through games, activities, inside and outside play; the children are able to stay at school and not have to travel to another location for after - school care. We look forward to this program growing in the years to come. Community Outreach Barrows continues to keep Community Outreach as a primary focus for our all children. Our young students are learning to be future leaders through the Student Council. The advisors; Mrs. Pamela Boston and Ms. Tricia Harbour guide the students in many outreach projects including St. Jude Math- a -Thon, food drives, coat collections, and mitten drives. The major project of the Student Council was the Pajama Drive in January. Over 100+ pairs of pajamas and many books were donated to be given to the Pajama Program for children in need. The excitement of the Barrows children of wearing pajamas to school on this special day was displayed on every child's face. The new event Season's Seating raised over $300.00 for Reading's Adopt -A- Family Program. Outreach is important to all of us at Barrows. In conclusion, Barrows has continued to be a vital and exciting learning environment. We embrace the teaching of the twenty -first century, but continue to hold fast to the basic philosophies of learning. We continue to strive for excellence in all we do and will continue to during the next year. Birch Meadow Elementary School Principal, Eric Sprung Birch Meadow Elementary School is pleased to present the many achievements from the past school year and certainly have much to look forward to in 2011. According to state testing data, the school has seen many student improvements in the past year. In_ addition, district testing 529 indicates students in Grades K — 5 are showing solid gains in reading fluency and comprehension. These positive gains are a credit to the Birch Meadow staff. We are pleased to have many new instructional staff in the areas of special education, classroom teachers, and tutors. Blue Ribbon Award Winner This year Birch Meadow had the privilege of being an award winner at the National Blue Ribbon conference. The schools participation in the Blue Ribbon survey and the Blue Ribbon improvement process allowed us to receive the Points of Light award. Parents, teachers, and students have been participating in the improvement process as we brainstorm and share ideas for continuous improvement. MCAS data Birch Meadow school spent many hours working to improve overall student achievement. Birch Meadow staff showed a commitment to teaching and Birch Meadow students were engaged in learning opportunities. This allowed Birch Meadow to show high levels of improvement based on the MCAS growth model at the state level. We continue to offer students a challenging curriculum, enrichment opportunities, and remediation to support student leaming and prepare students for the MCAS test. Summer Improvements Birch Meadow had the privilege of receiving a new heating and ventilation system due to the town -wide supported energy service contract. This new heating system has allowed improved heating, air -flow within classrooms, and comfort. New boilers and unit ventilators in the classrooms have proven to be beneficial during the winter months. In addition to improving the environment in the classrooms the cost saving for the town has already been significant. Along with the town support, this summer the PTO purchased a number of items to support Birch Meadow. The PTO purchased digital and flip cameras, Netbooks, and a Senteo response system. Character Education The staff, students, and families continue to believe in our school motto of "Learn, Achieve, Believe TOGETHER ". The motto helps us focus on our monthly character traits. Each trait is presented to the students during a whole school assembly. Subsequently, students observed following the traits during the next month earn a Birchie Bear as a reward for their positive behaviors. In addition, a book program titled "One School, One Book", highlights the character trait and provides a read aloud opportunity to reinforce our school values. Students at Birch Meadow also receive "Principal Superstar" awards as they display exemplary behavior or academic success. The Birch Meadow School Council is coordinating the Birch Meadow Cares program. The program involves matching grade levels with charitable organizations. Our school council members have assigned each grade level a charity partner. The program offers students an opportunity to learn about their organization and subsequently, to participate in hands -on experiences to support their cause. In addition, we believe this opportunity will help students see 530 the benefit of helping others. At the end of the year, each grade level will present their organization and charity work in an all school assembly. Currently each grade level will be working with the following organization or group: Kindergarten — Birthdaywishes.org; Grade 1 — Reading Senior Center; Grade 2 — Service Men and Women overseas; Grade 3 — Reading Food Pantry; Grade 4 — Jimmy Fund and Children's Hospital; Grade 5 — Heifer Foundation. Technology Communication Technology continues to be an integral part of the Birch Meadow community. Parents are becoming more familiar with the use of Edline as a way to highlight school events. The principal and teachers use blogging, wikis, voice thread, photo story, and many other innovative technology features that highlight student work and school accomplishments. Students are engaged in 2151 century learning as they use computers to share information and create projects for their classrooms. This year we are planning a technology showcase which will highlight how technology is used in the classroom. Parents will be invited to attend this event. Parent Support Parents are an integral part of Birch Meadow's success. We have an active PTO which sponsors a Spooky Fun fair, parent auction, Multi - Cultural Pot Luck Dinner, enrichment programs, author visits, and more. Each of these events is run strictly by volunteers. It is a pleasure to have volunteers in the cafeteria, library, classrooms, and the office. We feel lucky to have their support. The parent W.A.S.H. committee addresses issues related to wellness, allergies, safety and health. Members include the school principal, school nurse and parent volunteers. We discuss ways to provide "safe foods" and create food friendly environments so students with dietary restrictions are able to fully participate in school events. We promote the safety of the Birch Meadow Community in and around the school area and we encourage the physical well being of students at the Birch Meadow School. Student Council The student council is made up of 4th and 5th grade students who lead us in programming and school initiatives. The council has sponsored movie nights, coats for kid's drives, they run a school store, have raised funds for charities, and have created a video describing Birch Meadow School. This group is run by the assistant principal meeting weekly to advocate for the student community. Joshua Eaton School Interim Principal, Karen Feeney The Joshua Eaton School is proud of its accomplishments during 2010. There has been a continuous focus on promoting excellence in all areas from academics to extracurricular activities to school community involvement. Curriculum and Instruction All teachers participated in a variety of professional development opportunities that supported school goals. This summer Jody Carregal and Karen Feeney completed a graduate course for 531 Professional Learning Communities (PLCs). They are working with the entire staff to develop these learning communities within the school that will focus on teachers analyzing data to improve their instruction. A main focus for professional development was technology. Teachers attended SMARTBoard trainings and participated in courses and workshops to learn how to implement new technology such as blogs and wikis for instruction. The school was thrilled to receive funding from the PTO to purchase laptops and Netbooks. Our order of Netbooks will now be called the CALF, which is a smaller version of the COW (Computers on Wheels). These additional tools will allow more students to integrate technology to enhance their learning. This year a new grammar program was implemented district wide to support students' writing skills. Also, in grades 4 and 5, students are using a new spelling program this year. We are also able to obtain more accurate information regarding students' reading progress through the use of the updated DIBELS Next and a new benchmark reading assessment. The April Blue Ribbon Institute was held in Reading when over 350 educators from Massachusetts, and as far away as Texas, attended. Educators who took part in this institute visited district schools and attended learning workshops that were taught by Reading teachers, including many from Joshua Eaton. Community Outreach Our 12`h Annual Veterans Day Assembly was a wonderful tribute to our special guests. Over 75 veterans enjoyed the .performances of the Joshua Eaton students and the now retired "Singing State Trooper" Dan Clark. The students sang several songs and recited poems in honor of the veterans. Students Joshua Liberman and Olivia Ventola served as emcees and fourth grader Aymon Langlois sang "America the Beautiful" as a solo during the program. Over 200 grandparents and local senior citizens attended the 13`h annual Senior Tea and enjoyed the performance of more than 100 students with an entertaining selection of songs as directed by music teacher Alicia McKenney. The entire school community is proud of the wonderful spirit of giving at Eaton. Through the efforts of our PTO and Student Council, students supported the less fortunate in the community through contributions for Thanksgiving food baskets and other drives such as the coat drive. Over $1,000 was donated to the Northeast Veterans Outreach Center in Haverhill from the student penny drive and a family donation. Parental Involvement Joshua Eaton is most fortunate to have many dedicated parent volunteers. The PTO, under the leadership of Presidents Maura Rhodes (2009) and Kysa Lovvoll (2010), raised thousands of dollars to support enrichment activities for student learning and provided many fun social events for families. Annual activities such as the Back to School Picnic, Halloween Howl, Ice Cream Social, and Movie Night were all big hits with parents and children alike. 532 The School Advisory Council (SAC), comprised of the Principal and parent and teacher representatives, focused on the School Improvement Plan goals, particularly for parental support. SAC sponsored a parent program to educate parents on Bullying. The District Attorney's office presented a workshop which included an overview on the anti - bullying law as well as the different forms of bullying. The members of the Council for 2010 were parent representatives Brian Snell, Leslie Raymond, and Heather Tenney. The teacher representatives were Maureen Lynch and Linda Lydecker. A Playground Committee was formed to work with the Town of Reading to design the new playground that is scheduled to be installed in July 2011. Students Joshua Eaton students showed great school spirit through their involvement in classroom and extracurricular activities. School community and student recognition were incorporated into all - school assemblies which featured monthly character goals. Parent Lori Hodin again coordinated the national Math Olympiad'program at Joshua Eaton. Over 60 3`d, 4 ", and 5`h graders participated in the weekly team meetings and competitions. Student Eric Caligiuri was the first place winner for the school with Erik Bonnabeau finishing second. Joshua Eaton School finished in the top 20% of all schools participating in the country. Teachers Debi Kinton, Lauren Fusco, and Linda Lydecker served as coaches along with student volunteers from Parker Middle School. Students in grades 3, 4, and 5 also had the opportunity to participate in the weekly school chorus conducted by Mrs. McKenney. In March the students were invited for a second year to perform at a Lowell Devils hockey game at Tsongas Arena. Teachers Anne Manna, Alicia McKenney, and Debi Kinton oversaw the Student Council. Our students were involved in school wide projects such as buddy reading, spirit days, fundraising and taking on leadership roles within the school. A large number of students participated in the Lego Robotics program that was coordinated by Parent David Ventola. They enjoyed designing projects to meet the team challenge they received and participating in the first annual district -wide competition with students from other local elementary schools. Faculty and Staff All teachers participated in building committees that address various aspects of school improvement such as school culture, technology, and challenging standards and curriculum. Nichole Firmani obtained her professional status as a teacher. With Nichole's achievement, all the teachers at Joshua Eaton are recognized as professional status teachers in the Reading district. - 533 Joshua Eaton teachers attended the Blue Ribbon Schools of Excellence National Conference. The National Conference was held in Orlando, Florida. Teachers Marie Kiley and Sarah Sansom presented a workshop for teachers from across the country. Joshua Eaton School is proud of its students, teachers and.staff, and parent community. Together we have created a wonderful learning environment for our students as we prepare them for their futures in today's global society. This year Joshua Eaton had several staff members move on to new roles both in and out of the district. Patricia de Garavilla was named the Assistant Superintendent of Schools. Karen Feeney will serve as Interim Principal for the 2010 -2011 school year. Fifth grade teacher Christopher Heath was hired as the principal of the Clapp- Goodyear School in Woburn. Becky Flynn, Reading Specialist, accepted a teaching position in New Hampshire. Anne Manna, kindergarten teacher, was appointed Assistant Principal for this year. We wish everyone great success in their new roles. J.W. Killam Elementary School Principal, Catherine A. Giles The J.W. Killam Elementary School has enjoyed a very exciting and successful 2010 year. As the year comes to a close, we reflect on the year's highlights and all of our wonderful accomplishments. The Mission of the J.W. Killam Elementary School community is to support and motivate our students to achieve their personal best in challenging, relevant, and supportive learning environments that prepare them for future academic and social success. Trustworthiness, Respect, Responsibility, Fairness, Caring, Citizenship (T.R.R.F.C.C.) New Staff Members The additions to this year's staff include Ms. Kate Carlow and Mr. Jeffrey Clemons joined our Grade 4 team; Ms. Julia Paone, Student Support Teacher; Ms. Jennie Simopoulos, our library media specialist; Brittany Bauman, long term music substitute, and special education paraeducators, Mrs. Ann Marie Johnson, transferred from Wood End at the beginning of the year, and Erline Trites and Lisa Blasi both transferred back to Killam during the fall from Birch Meadow. Curriculum Night This year's Welcome Back/Curriculum Nights were scheduled for September 15`h for all grades. This night was very informative and will help to get parents and students back into the swing of school routines! PTO In September parents welcomed teachers back to school with a Welcome Back Luncheon and in May a Teacher Appreciation Week was celebrated by a luncheon. 534 Last year the Killam PTO recognized the need to change the structure of its organization. We created 10 teams and grouped PTO events /activities together that share similar characteristics. This new organization chart is called TEAM T.R.R.F.C.C. — When we work as a TEAM, Together Everyone Achieves More! The idea is that each of the 10 teams will have a team leader — these 10 people share some of the responsibilities that used to fall to the President/Vice President. Team leaders work to keep the PTO running smoothly, primarily by supporting committee chairs and communicating with the principal. October was the first of five PTO meetings this year. Dr. Doherty joined us for the first half of the meeting. The priorities obtained from these forums will help Dr. Doherty begin to build our fiscal budget for next year. In February Dr. Doherty was the guest speaker and discussed the impact of the FYI proposed budget and answer any questions parents had. In March the discussion included Blue Ribbon Conference Preparations, chair positions and calendar and event for next year. In April the discussion included the proposed calendar and budget for next year and the events at Killam for the Blue Ribbons Conference. Our second annual Halloween party hosted by PTO parents was held on Saturday, Oct. 30 from 6 -8 PM., and was a huge success. An end of year PTO picnic was held on June 4 and enjoyed by many families. At the final business meeting in May, the PTO was able to donate $5,000.00 to Killam to purchase additional technology as was prioritized by teachers and keep additional funds in reserve for technology maintenance. ABCD Forms Our staff worked hard to develop school wide positive behavior plan for all staff members to use when students make choices that are unacceptable. This plan helps students to learn to be responsible for their actions and be proactive in an attempt to make a better choice or solving the problem. The document was created in the form of a letter that students will complete with the staff member who witnessed the unacceptable behavior. The letter A represents antecedent, the B represents the behavior, the C represents the logical consequence, and the D represents the do- about-it to fix the problem. Awards Three students, one in each of the Grade 3 classes, were winners in the annual Epilepsy Art and Essay Contest for Benjamin and were awarded Savings Bond at a School Committee Meeting. Two students from Killam were honored as winners for their artwork encouraging students not to smoke in the Anti- Tobacco Poster Contest by the Massachusetts Medical Society at the State House in Boston. Beautification Day Our third annual beautification day was held in May at the Killam School. Classes reported outside to help clean up and "beautify" their assigned areas. So many parents volunteered their man or woman power to shovel mulch, deliver wheelbarrows full of mulch, garden and weed. Our school grounds have never looked better. 535 Bucket Filling Recognition This year we are excited to share a few new bucket filling recognition programs at Killam. The Golden Dustpan Award is presented to the classroom that demonstrated TRRFCC bucket filling behaviors by helping to keep their classroom extra clean. Mr. Ricardo will surprise this class by placing the Golden Dustpan in the classroom on Friday morning and displayed in the classroom for the next week. The Golden Centerpiece Award is presented to a Dining Hall table on Friday who displayed TRRFCC bucket filling behaviors in the Dining Hall during the week. Mrs. Giles' Bucket Filling Phone Call of The Week is made to one family each week to recognize a student who demonstrates TRRFCC bucket filling behaviors that week. It is important for our students and families to remember that principals can make positive phone call home too! Blue Ribbon Conference In April, we hosted a fantastic learning environment for the site visit for the annual Blue Ribbon Conference on April 15`h. It takes a school community to prepare for something of that magnitude and we did it! Emails were received from administrators and teachers from all over the country thanking us for providing them with one of the most meaningful professional development opportunities of their careers and for sharing all the great things we do at Killam with them. They were so impressed with the high level of parental involvement, the home like environment of the school and classrooms, and the level of maturity of all our students. Two of our T.R.R.F.C.C. Killam teachers, Jo -Ellen McGinnity and Melissa Hotchkiss attended this year's Blue Ribbon National Conference in December. Since we have no funds to support professional development in our school budget, Jo -Ellen and Melissa funded the costs of this conference on their own! Book Fair Our annual Book Fair was held in November with the theme of "Here's To Our Heroes! Reading Saves The Day! ". The book fair presented a great opportunity to both expose children to a wide variety of books and raise approximately $3,000.00 for the Killam community with an additional $786.00 credit for Ms. Simopoulous to purchase more books for our media center. Box Tops for Education Students are encouraged to bring in box tops found on many packages household grocery items and cleaning products raising a total amount this year of $1,475.00! Many parents also supported our school through the Stop & Shop A+ Bonus Bucks program raising $421.51 in cash for the Killam School. Conferences Parent /Teacher Conference Day was held on Friday, November 19`h. The home /school connection is essential for student success. Parents are encouraged to celebrate all of their school successes... as each day is a wonderful leaming experience. 09M DR. Seuss /Read Across America Day! "The sun did not shine, it was too wet to play," and our T.R.R.F.C.C. Killam students were ready for a Seussical Day! The week of March 2 "d was celebrated all week for Read Across America Day. This year, in honor of this special day, staff and students dressed in "cat" attire (that is - red, white, and black or Seuss -wear) and read some of our favorite Dr. Seuss stories. We even had three character stuffed animals that visit and spend the day with classes every day. Enrichment Programs In January Grade 2 students welcomed the Native American Perspectives Program geared to promoting an appreciation and better understanding of America's natural environment and historic past, erecting a tipi and listening to a presenter dressed in clothing of the western plains of the 1800's. Grade 3 students welcomed rangers for the Army Core of Engineers who came in to talk about Lewis & Clark's expedition, the reason they came and how they lived. Grade 4 students welcomed author Steven Krasner. During their writing workshop they wrote a crime mystery while learning about visual words, creating characters, and writing revision techniques. Grade 4 students visited the Lowell Mills and enhancing their studies about Yankees and Immigrants. Grade 1 students welcomed Michael Bergen, Top Secret Science, to their classrooms for a fun -filled program packed with learning, experimenting, and laughing. Grade 2 students welcomed Dan Cripps, Native American Perspectives to enhance their studies of Native Americans. In February Grade 2 students visited the Peabody Museum at Harvard University in Cambridge to explore cultural diversity and history among native peoples in the Northeast, Northwest, Southwest and the Arctic. Through guided discover, students investigated food, clothing and homes to understand how environment influences people and their cultures. Grade 3 students welcomed Meteorologist from WBZ TV, Barry Burbank, learning about predicting the weather and the different types of weather we experience in New England, showing all the weather maps on TV by standing in front of a green screen, and showed a video of examples of extreme weather. A picture of Killam students was shown on WBZ the next morning. In March the enrichment programs this month included Kindergarten students field trip to the Museum of Science exploring many mysteries of our natural world through touch, smell and sight in the Discovery Center; Grade 1 field trip to the Stoneham Theatre to see the Dinosaur Musical; and Grade 4 visited the vernal pool at Ruth Gosselin's house on Haverhill Street that is visited three times during the school year; and Grade 5 field trip to the Old South Meeting House at Faneuil Hall in Boston participating in an interactive National Parks Program at starting at Faneuil Hall. In April the Grade 1 students visited the Stoneham Theater to see The Dinosaur Musical, a musical about Quincy a 14 year old Tyrannosaurs who forms an unlikely_ friendship with a Parasaurolophus who teaches him the power of working together. Grade 2 students welcomed New Hampshire based Hampstead Stage Company for a lively performance of Frances Hodgson Burnett's "The Secret Garden ", an enchanting story about a young orphan girl, Mary Lennox, who comes to live with her uncle in the English countryside. Through her curiosity and determination, Mary finds a garden filled with memories that had been locked away for years. This heartfelt story shares its message of hope, healing and friendship. Grade 4 students 537 welcomed Techsploration and saw first hand how simple machines work. Grade 5 students performed "Tea is Brewing" for all parents recreating the debate portraying Patriots and Loyalists including Paul Revere, John Hancock, Samuel Adam, Nathaniel Noyes, Josiah Quincy and Francis Roth just to name a few. In May the enrichment programs for Kindergarten students participated in a tide pool Explore the Ocean World. Grade 1 students were visited by the Museum of Science Traveling Program an interactive presentation of animal behaviors and their habitats. Barbara O'Connor, author of How To Steal A Dog "visited" some Grade 4 and 5 students in our media center via Skype. The students went face to face with her live via the computer and internet to ask questions about her book. In June Grade 2 students welcomed Bugworks an educational company that specializes in science programs featuring live insects and other arthropods. Grade 3 welcomed Beekeepers; Grade 4 welcomed Museum of Science Animal Adaptations; Grade 5 welcomed the Launching to Legend Program learning about the history, bravery and tradition that is the USS Constitution and also welcomed Paul Zambella, MA Crime Lab Forensic Scientist presenting hands on presentation of forensic science. In October our Grade 2 students took a walking field trip to the Town Hall, Reading Post Office, Police Station, and the Fire Station to get an up close look at how the different organization in our community work together. The Reading Fire Department visited our school on October 14th to talk to the children about fire safety. Children in Grade K -1 had a chance to go through a portable house to learn some fire safety tips for the home and Grade 2 -4 had a general fire safety assembly. Grade 5 will have an outdoor fire safety program in the spring. In November Grade 3 students welcomed Michael Bergen of Top Secret Science for a fun filled program on electricity, and Grades 1 and 3 enjoyed a performance of the Prince and the Pauper at the Killam School. All School Anti - Bullying Assembly by Ooch Two separate assemblies for Grades K -I students and Grades 3 -5 students were held on October 18`h. This was a very entertaining program relating important messages how students can handle bullying situations and have good self - esteem. Highlights The District Arts Festival was held for the Blueprint for Success National Institute; Kindergarten Screening was held for students entering in the 2011 school year; trees for Arbor.Day were distributed to Grade 5 students and Grade 3 students received thesauruses from Rotary members; and our students performed a first time choral musical concert directed by Brittany Bauman. Grade 2. students, once again this year, collected funds to be sent to an orphanage in Africa as part of their Caring unit; Girl Scouts troops collected can goods and money for the Reading Food Pantry, socks for needy children, and pet supplies for an animal shelter. Kindergarten students collected pillows and blankets for The Mission of Deeds located in Reading for needy families, and coats were collected and sent to Anton Cleaners for the "Coats for Kids" program providing needy families with warm winter coats. 538 Killam News Live Again this year, the Killam News Live morning segments will be run through Ms. Simopoulos in the media center. Using a web -based program called UStream, all teachers will be able to log on and see the mini news show each morning. Fifth graders will begin by being our newscasters and we will move down through the grades during the course of the school year. Our news segments will include (depending on the day of the week) reciting our school pledge and the pledge of allegiance, singing a patriotic song, saying a T.R.R.F.C.C. piece of advice, announcing student birthdays, and sometimes, a "how -to" clip of a brain -based exercise for students to do in class! We hope that we will be able to share some of our newscasts with parents who are activated on Edline, as all news shows will be set on private. KOALA The first session of KOALA began on November 1st. There were many classes planned for the students such as Magic, Nature Joumaling, Top Secret Science, Volleyball, Yoga, Spanish, Mural Design, Lego Mania, Chess, Keyboarding and Balloon Making. Three separate sessions were held during the school year. Learning Fair Our Annual Learning Fair was held in April that included our Blue Ribbon Photo Story Presentation in our Dining Hall created by our Grade 5 technology crew, classroom visitations of students' work and creativity, with jump rope skills demonstrations in the gym. Donations of one cent to fill our pickle jar counting your jumps were donated to the American Heart Association and concluding with a musical performance in the Dining Hall LEGO Robotics Everyone had a great time at the Lego Robotics end of season event held in January. Students learned a lot about this year's challenge on transportation and how hard but rewarding it is to program the robot. A number of Killam parents were thanked for all their dedication as coaches. Lockdown Drill During the month of November, we will hold our first lockdown drill of the year. This drill helps to prepare staff and students for an emergency in the building that would require us to "lock down" the building by securing all classrooms and offices. We would use a lockdown if there were an incident either within the school or in the neighborhood requiring these precautions. This drill was planned with help from The Reading Police Department (RPD) and The Reading Fire Department. RPD School Resource Officer Cory Santasky oversaw the drill. , MCAS Testing started in March for Grades 3 -5 in Reading and English Language Arts (ELA). This year staff members offered prep classes in the Language Arts Before School session that were so well attended and also offered the Math Before School session to help students prepare for MCAS testing. In May students in Grades 3 -5 continued with this year's MCAS assessments in the areas of Social Studies and Science. 539 MI Theory As part of our brain -based school improvement project, we have done lots of research on the Multiple Intelligences Theory and various learning styles. Our teachers have been talking with your children about the various intelligences. This has been done so that we can stretch their learning and help them to understand that while learning comes so easy and natural, some teaming can be a challenge, but with perseverance, it will be done! T.R.R.F.F.C. Monthly Assemblies Each month a different grade level hosted an all school assembly discussing and teaching all they have learned about Citizenship, Responsibility, Fairness, Respect, Trustworthiness, and Caring. There were invited guests in the community who were honored each month for contributing to society, essays written, video presentations, and songs. Pick Your Seat Day The last Friday of every month students can pay $.25 for their choice to sit with a friend at lunch. The proceeds are being donated to the Food Panty this year. Playground Day The brand new Killam Playground was installed in late August and ready for all students to use and enjoy thanks to the purchase of a leaf for the Killam Giving Tree by many parents, students, staff, and the town's contribution. Recycling Students will continue to recycle paper, plastic and books again this year to keep Killam green. School Council Our School Council held its first meeting on October 12th. Dr. Doherty joined the meeting to receive information for the upcoming school year. It is the goal of this committee to work closely with the Killam staff to be sure that we work towards accomplishing all of the goals in our School Improvement Plan. This is a great way for parents to learn about the school, its community, and its goals for the upcoming school year. At our last school council meeting, we determined that, as a school community, we had achieved approximately 95% of the goals we had set for ourselves this year in our school improvement plan. We also began to brainstorm future goals for the 2010 -2011 school years. Our focus remained on improving curriculum and instruction, increasing parental involvement/PTO participation, moving forward with 2151 Century technology, and school safety. Student Service Squad This year we are �roud to offer our second year of our Student Service Squad Killam student program to our 3` , 4`h, and 51h grade students. Our Service Squad replaced the existing Student Council as it allows for many students to participate in this program rather than just six per grade level. Killam Service Squad members must be very responsible. As a member of our T.R.R.F.C.C. Service Squad students will be assigned a "job" (which best suits their teaming style) and be required to report as this job requires and carry out their specific responsibilities. Service Squad members are also required to attend monthly meetings, which will be held on the second Thursday of the month. 540 Some Service Squad jobs will include: sorting and distributing office mail, empting recycling bins around the school, watering plants, caring for WOW Center (weather permitting), washing common area tables, delivering supplies, reporting important school -wide events to students, filming important events /activities at Killam School, being a Playground Pal, and whatever we can think of that will help to make Killam even more T.R.R.F.C.C.! Understanding Disabilities The Understanding Disabilities program continued this year with volunteers working with students in Grades 1 -4 to help children see beyond people's disabilities and focus on the ways that we are all the same inside. Through the use of books, videos, and hands on activities, the program helps children gain a grater understanding of what it might be like to do things in a different way. The program stresses all that people with disabilities can do and promotes a culture of inclusion and acceptance. Understanding Disabilities recently received a grant from the Harpley Foundation for the purchase and development of an autism unit. Walk- For - Character A Success! In September we held our annual Walk- for - Character afternoon on September 22nd. The kids participated in six stations including TRRFCC Walk, Obstacle course, "Multiple Intelligences" Hopscotch, Finger printing, TRRFCC time with Simon and topped off by a refreshing Popsicle snack! The children also learned about giving and did a truly terrific job collecting coins for "Killam Cares" to support Adopt -a- Family, Festival of Trees and Killam Beautification Day. As noted, many excited learning opportunities and events occurred during the 2010 calendar year at the J.W. Killam Elementary School. We are looking forward to 2011 to continue ourjoumey on the Road to Excellence! Wood End Elementary School Principal, Richard E. Davidson Wood End Elementary School "officially" opened its doors in September 2005 for the first time as the fifth elementary school in Reading. It is hard to believe that we are now well into the middle of our sixth year as new elementary school. While we can no longer state that-we are a new school, it is important to recognize that this year will be the first year that all of our students will only have known Wood End as their elementary school. No longer will we be considered a "redistricted" school, but this year finally has become our own "community" school. Blue Ribbon Light House School Recognition It was a pleasure and privilege last year to be recognized as a Blue Ribbon Light House School of distinction. It is a recognition that goes to a school that has exhibited programming excellence in providing student focus and support, organization and culture, providing challenging standards and curriculum, active teaching and learning, technology integration, leadership, professional development, and school community and family partnership. Wood End was one of four schools in the country to receive the recognition. 541 High Level of Parent Involvement We continue to be very thankful for the very high level of parent involvement throughout the school and while not wanting to offend anyone, I would be remiss if I didn't recognize our PTO and the support they have shown for our three year technology plan. This year, thanks to the generosity of our PTO all of our Special Needs programs have access to the latest instructional SMARTBoard technology by purchasing the board for our Learning Center last summer. They clearly recognize the importance of technology as a tool for learning. They continue to support outstanding enrichment programs and fund field trips for all out grade levels. Most importantly, they clearly understand that their sole purpose is to do what is best for the children and families of Wood End and it shows every day. I want to recognize our school based Safety Committee, who have continued to support our Walk to School Wednesday's, now in its fourth year. They also were instrumental in planning and helping to implement and launch our very successful Placard Pick -up System which greatly enhanced safety for everyone at the busiest time of day. They have been essential in helping us to keep safety our first priority at Wood End through their newsletters, bulletins, and simply through daily conversations. It is an understatement to say that one of the major strengths of Wood End, as it is with all the schools in Reading is the extremely high level of parent involvement and support. Our PTO is an outstanding organization, which contributes to the quality of live in so many ways here at Wood End. While they do raise significant funds for enrichment programs, field trips, library enhancements, and technology, they also enhance our instructional program by their involvement in their children's classrooms and by volunteering to be a part of our School Council and other important school based committees. They readily offer support to teachers whenever the need arises. Bullying Prevention Program As a school we continue to be committed to enhancing the physical and mental health of all children, which includes the prevention of any type of bullying and teasing. In order to hold true to this commitment we have continued a "Social Competency Skills Committee" at our school with membership that includes principal, teachers, specialists, and assistants. Our goal is to develop and oversee a program that supports, educates, and celebrates positive decision making by students in a climate that practices zero indifference to bullying and teasing. Our responsibility is to keep the focus fresh and meaningful for all who work and learn here at Wood End. This year we have continued to expand our use of the Open Circle program in all of the classrooms. With the support of our PTO every teacher has now been trained in the Open Circle curriculum. We continue to meet our goal of providing training for all classroom teachers. The program continues to provide a common language and a common set of expectations for all students and adults. This year we will add a parent training component conducted by our School Psychologist. We have expanded our All School Meetings so that every Friday there is time to meet with smaller groups or individual grade levels to focus on trust building activities, and to further connect with the Open Circle curriculum which is being taught in each classroom through .M regular class meetings. This year will continue that focus but will also expand student leadership opportunities and provide increased experiences involving community service. Curriculum As a district and as a school we continue to be pleased about our continuing curriculum enhancements. This year we are entering our fifth year of the Wilson's Fundation Phonics Program which has, proven to be helpful to beginning readers as well improve students writing and spelling skills. Further, the John Collins Writing Program continues to provide consistency in terms of expectations and a common language and common framework for writing. In support of current research regarding the development of reading skills we have continued the Response To Intervention program (RTI) at the first grade level where struggling students are identified through assessments and a focused direct method of delivering needed skills is taught to them everyday and expanded it to the Kindergarten level. This year we have continued a flexible grouping model for first graders where all first graders at taught reading skills and engaged at their instructional level. This year. we have expanded the flexible group Reading model to grades two and three. Our math program continues to provide appropriate challenges for all students. It encourages students to think mathematically and recognize applications of math concepts to everyday life. It is also closely aligned with the Massachusetts State Frameworks. Five years ago we implemented a new Social Studies Program from Harcourt School Publishers called Horizons at the fourth and fifth grade level. It is a text -based program for these grade levels and is rich with resources and supplemental materials that strongly recognize the importance of technology in everyday learning. Our Science program is a hands -on "kit" based curriculum which teaches important concepts of physical, earth, and life sciences. The program, at all levels, stresses, observations, measurement, journal writing, teaming, and hands on experimentation. In an effort to continually review and improve our curriculum four years ago we began a system of review through a mapping of our math program and have now completed a similar effort with language arts program. The district has also continued its K -12 Vertical Science Team that has reviewed current science program and instructional practices and has developed the essential standards for K -12 science instruction. Last year we adopted an "Engineering is Elementary" module at the fourth and fifth grades with emphasis on exploration, and application of fundamental engineering concepts. Library Media As a new school we continue to be very excited about our library media facility. It is beautiful in its design and located in a central place in the school. Indeed, the library media center is seen as the hub and heart of our school setting. Reading is fortunate in that each school has its own full - time library media specialist and at Wood End we have continued the use of flexible scheduling, which allows all students and faculty access to the library when they have the need. At any time of the day, upon entering the library you will see students, library staff, teaching staff, or parent 543 volunteers interacting and supporting each other in various research projects, reading a story to children, completing supervised internet searches, children reading books, or simply checking books in or out. It is a very busy place and quickly has become a central hub of learning at our school. We are also very proud of the technology that has been added to the Library Media Center. We currently have a very up -to -date computer lab and have added a SMARTBoard as a central focal point for integration of technology into the curriculum. Technology In April of 2006, Wood End received a very generous donation from The Pfizer Corporation of over twenty -five used computers, monitors, and related peripherals. The computers were used to establish a much needed computer lab for students in our Library Media Center. In addition we received a small grant from the Reading Technology Foundation which allowed us to purchase a digital camera and one Smart Board, which was placed in a fifth grade classroom. Four years ago we also received funding from the district for technology which allowed us to add additional computer systems to the fourth and fifth grade classrooms. Three years ago our PTO rose funding to support the purchase for three additional SMARTBoards and dedicated computers to be used in the two remaining fifth grades and one to be placed in the Library Media Center. Two years ago funding was provided by the school district to purchase three additional SMARTBoards that were placed in our fourth grades and the PTO funded the purchase of three dedicated laptops for each of the new SMARTBoards. We are very excited the continued support of technology by the central office and our very generous PTO. Last year, the PTO purchased two additional SMARTBoards and a very generous donation from a parent allowed us to provide SMARTBoards for all our second grade classrooms. Last year funding was provided by both our PTO and district to purchase three additional boards for our first grades next year. This means that currently all regular education classrooms have SMARTBoard technology available to them. This year the district and PTO purchases three additional SMARTBoards for our three special education programs. Our goal next year is to provide the same level of technology to our Are and Music programs. Professional Development As a district and as a school we are committed to the concept of continued learning. We are also committed to supporting our professional staff at all levels. Consequently, an enormous amount of energy, planning, and in- service is provided for teachers in Reading. The mentor program, for example, provides support for new teachers and is an essential requirement if new teachers are to succeed in Reading. In- service is also provided in all areas of the curriculum to all teachers on a regular basis throughout the year and as well as during the summer months. In December of last year and this year over twenty K -12 members of the teaching staff and administration attended the Blue Ribbon Schools Conference in Orlando Florida. The purpose of participating in the conference was to meet and talk with teachers from many different parts of the country. At this conference over twenty two states were represented and teachers from as far away as China also attended. Last year we were very proud of the fact that Wood End was honored at the conference by being named a school of distinction and selected as one out of four schools across the country to be a 2009 Blue Ribbon Light House School of Excellence. 544 A Celebration of the Art's Last May Wood End celebrated our fifth annual art and music night. Together over three hundred children, staff, parents, and school committee enjoyed an evening of program, song, and a display of student artwork that represented all the students in the school. Mr. Mosier and Ms. Papanikolaou and a small army of volunteers began in February to collect and organize student artwork from across the school. It was a wonderful celebration and tribute to the importance the arts play in the education of young children. Fifth Young Authors' Day Our fifth annual Young Authors' Day was held last June where students from all grade levels shared their original stories and poems that they had written during the year. Parents joined staff to create small groups of primary and intermediate age children in which the children shared their original and creative writings with peers: It was an outstanding to the importance of writing and creativity. Open Invitation In closing, I would like to extend an open invitation to members of the Reading Community to visit our /your school. Please feel free to call me, Principal Richard E. Davidson at 781 - 942 -5420 or email me at RDavidson@reading.k12.ma.us with any questions, comments or to arrange a visit. Thank you for this wonderful school and for your continued support. Pupil Services Department Director, Kim Oliveira The Reading Public School system is committed to the provision of quality education for all students and offers an array of support services and programs in all of our schools. The Pupil Services Department, including special education, guidance, nursing, and English language learners, offers a broad range of support services to students who meet mandated eligibility criteria. Staff, students and families have access to School Psychologists, Special Education Teachers, Therapists and Consultants. Our office is staffed with two secretaries, five Team Chairpersons, and one Director. A Team Chairperson is assigned to supervise, support and service the needs of students, staff, and families at each of the levels from preschool -age 22 in programs both in and out of district. At the conclusion of last year, Ms. Jean McGah retired from her position. We thank her for her many years of dedicated service to the families of Reading. We are pleased to announce that Mrs. Sarah Lanzo, former teacher in the DLC program at Barrows Elementary, has joined our staff as Ms. Mc Gab's replacement. Mrs. Lanzo brings a wealth of knowledge of autism spectrum disorders, best practices in special education, and State and Federal special education laws and regulations to our team. Program Development Due in large part to the extensive efforts of our Team Chairpersons, we are able to continue our efforts to create appropriate programs which allow students to be educated in their community and return from out of district placements. In the school year 2007 -2008, 73 students were placed out of district. This year we have 53 students placed in programs outside of Reading. It is also 545 important to note that we have many students from other districts currently tuitioned into our programs. This is a testament to the high quality of services and supports we are able to provide in these programs while allowing opportunities for inclusion with same age peers. The summer of 2010 marked the beginning of our inclusive extended year program for students with and without disabilities. The program was well attended and plans are underway for another successful season ahead! Please look for information in the community beginning in early March. In fall 2010, the DLC (Developmental Learning Center) Program at Barrows School extended to the kindergarten level in order to improve continuity of services and to minimize transitions for students with Autism Spectrum Disorders who require more intensive services than their home school can provide. We are currently in the process of evaluating program needs and staffing for the 2011 -2012 school year in an effort to provide early transition information to staff, students and parents. ' New for the 2010 -2011 school year, the RISE preschool program has a satellite classroom within the Joshua Eaton Elementary School. This classroom is the first step towards a vision of inclusive neighborhood schools for even our youngest students. In January 2011, the RISE Preschool program also introduced a full -day pilot program which provides an inclusive educational experience for our youngest students. This program is co- taught in the afternoon by two special education teachers which allows for increased opportunities for individualized and small group instruction. The goal is to continue to offer this program in the fall with options of two, three, and five full days to parents in addition to the traditional half day programming currently in place. The District is in the process of hiring a behavioral health coordinator who will work with students, families and staff district -wide to further the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education's (DESE) Behavioral Health Initiative. his person will assist with the proactive planning and coordination of efforts focused on meeting the increasing social, emotional and behavioral challenges and needs of our student population. For our students with hearing impairments or central auditory processing disabilities, we have contracted with an outside consultant to oversee the equipment and services provided to ensure optimal use and effectiveness. This contract allows us to gain instant access to loaner equipment in the event that a device needs repair and eliminates the disruption to the student. Professional Development In order to build the capacity of our staff to improve the quality of services and programs, our teachers, therapists, and paraprofessionals participate in extensive professional development and training throughout the year. The goal of our office over the next 3 -5 years will be to emphasize increased collaboration and partnership between regular education and special education staff in order to build unified systems of support. Professional development will continue to target the areas of inclusive practices, co- teaching models, and universal design for learning. 546 The Reading Public School System is currently partnering with CAST (Center for Applied Special Technologies). CAST has been provided with grant funded research opportunities and we are fortunate to be chosen as a host site to conduct these studies. Currently students and teachers in our DLC program are participating in "Building Comprehension through Social Understanding (BCSU)," a study which focuses on bringing together the work on theory of mind and emotion understanding, evidence -based practices for teaching students with ASD, evidence- based practices for teaching reading comprehension, and the principles of Universal Design for Learning (UDL). Teacher and therapists will partake in specialty trainings which further their knowledge and improve upon their practice. The Pupil Services Department offers a continuum of programs and services to ensure system- wide collaboration and coordination, Preschool through age 22. e. are committed to strong professional development and training and we take pride in innovative and creative program development. We are very proud of our organization, our schools and our students. If you need assistance from the Reading Public Schools Pupil Services Department, you are welcome to contact us at 781-942-9129. 547 SCHOOL DEPARTMENT LN FN POSITION SCHOOL/ DEPARTMENT , RETIREMENTS DALY MARC SCHOOL FACILITIES DISTRICT DRISCOLL PATRICIA PARAPROFESSIONAL BARROWS ELEM. SCHOOL HENNESSY SUSAN TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS HUGHES BARBARA SPECIAL EDUCATION DISTRICT MCGAH JEAN SPECIAL EDUCATION IDISTRICT PERKINS ADELE TEACHER IBARROWS ELEM. SCHOOL SHEA . CLAIRE SECRETARY READING MEMORIAL HS SOLOMON DOROTHY FOOD SERVICE KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL SWEENEY NANCY TEACHER KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL NEW HIRES AMICO SARAH EXTENDED DAY DISTRICT ATHERTON KELLY TEACHER BARROWS ELEM. SCHOOL BANDA PATRICIA TEACHER SUPPORT READING MEMORIAL HS BARIONE STEPHEN COACH ATHLETICS BARRAFORD. CHRISTINA FOOD SERVICE DISTRICT BAUMAN BRITTANY TEACHER KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL BEMISTER MARK COACH ATHLETICS BENNETT CAROLYN EXTENDED DAY DISTRICT BILODEAU KRISTEN TEACHER WOOD END ELEM. SCHOOL BINAGHI GIULIO TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS CARLOW KATE TEACHER KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL CARROLL MEGHAN TEACHER COOLIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL CARUSO ANDREA TUTOR JOSHUA EATON ELEM.SCH. CHAMPAGNE ALYSSA TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS CLEMONS JEFFREY TEACHER KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL COLLINS PAUL FOOD SERVICE DRIVR DISTRICT CRONIN NICOLE TUTOR BIRCH MEADOW ELEM. SCH. DALBY ELIZABETH TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS DECOLOGERO ADELE EXTENDED DAY DISTRICT DEYERMENJIAN KARA COACH ATHLETICS DIMATTEI COLLEEN PARAPROFESSIONAL PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL DOHERTY JOANN PARAPROFESSIONAL COOLIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL DONLON ALISON PARAPROFESSIONAL BIRCH MEADOW ELEM. SCH. DUNN MICHELE PARAPROFESSIONAL RISE PRE - SCHOOL EBERT LEANNE TEACHER PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL FEELEY DIANE FOOD SERVICE PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL GARRITY KIMBERLY EXTENDED DAY DISTRICT GILLIS TIMOTHY FACILITIES PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL GUALTIERI AMY EXTENDED DAY DISTRICT HAGOPIAN JENNIFER EXTENDED DAY DISTRICT HALSEY AURIANA TEACHER PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL HATTON KENT TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS HENNESSY KELLY COACH ATHLETICS JENNIE SIMOPOULOS TEACHER KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL JOHNSON KRISTIN COACH ATHLETICS JOHNSON ANNA PARAPROFESSIONAL KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL JOGS SUZANNE FOOD SERVICE PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL KAMINSKI MATTHEW TEACHER BIRCH MEADOW ELEM. SCH. KANE MICHELLE COACH ATHLETICS b SCHOOL DEPARTMENT NEW HIRES, CONT. LN FN POSITION SCHOOL/ DEPARTMENT KEEGAN LISA FOOD SERVICE KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL KOURBALI RACHID FACILITIES PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL LANDRY - WEBSTER CAROL EXTENDED DAY DISTRICT LANIGAN JILLENE EXTENDED DAY DISTRICT MAATTALA JOHN TEACHER . COOLIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL MAVROPOULOS SHEILA FOOD SERVICE READING MEMORIAL HS MCGOWAN KELLY EXTENDED DAY DISTRICT MCKENNA JILL EXTENDED DAY DISTRICT MENDOZA LIZANDRO TECHNOLOGY SERVCS DISTRICT MOYNAGH JOHN TEACHER SUPPORT READING MEMORIAL HS MUSTONE HEATHER TEACHER BARROWS ELEM. SCHOOL NAZZARO BETHANY TEACHER PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL NIHAN TIMOTHY PARAPROFESSIONAL WOOD END ELEM. SCHOOL NORCROSS LISA TEACHER WOOD END ELEM. SCHOOL NORCROSS LISA MEDIA SPECIALIST WOOD END ELEM. SCHOOL OLEARY SUSAN PARAPROFESSIONAL BARROWS ELEM. SCHOOL OLIVIERA KIMBERLY DIRECTOR PPS DISTRICT O'ROURKE JENNIFER TEACHER BARROWS ELEM. SCHOOL PAONE JULIA TEACHER KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL PERRINO JACQUELINE EXTENDED DAY DISTRICT PICARD ELAINE TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS PIERCE KRISTA COACH ATHLETICS POTHIER RACHEL COACH ATHLETICS RICHARDSON LEIA TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS RILEY AMANDA EXTENDED DAY DISTRICT ROBINSON JEFFREY PARAPROFESSIONAL READING MEMORIAL HS ROWE MAGALIE TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS ROY SCOTT COACH ATHLETICS SHOEMAKER JENNIFER EXTENDED DAY DISTRICT SIMOPOULOS JENNIE MEDIA SPECIALIST KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL SLADE LINDA FOOD SERVICE PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL SNOW MARIANNE EXTENDED DAY DISTRICT SORABELLA MICHELE FOOD SERVICE JOSHUA EATON ELEM.SCH. SPINALI ANDREW TEACHER PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL STEIN ZACHERY COACH ATHLETICS STIBOLT MARTIN TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS THERRIAULT GRACE TEACHER PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL TIERNEY LINDA PARAPROFESSIONAL RISE PRE - SCHOOL TWOMEY CHRISTOPHER TEACHER PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL VERITY KRISTIN TEACHER BIRCH MEADOW ELEM. SCH. ZILCH JEFFREY TEACHER PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL RESIGNATIONSI REDUCTIONS ACKERMAN EMILEE COACH ATHLETICS BACKLER ELIZABETH TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS BEAULIEU LAURA TUTOR BIRCH MEADOW ELEM. SCH. BEMIS BRIAN TEACHER BIRCH MEADOW ELEM. SCH. BENOIT EILEEN FOOD SERVICE DISTRICT BURCHILL ERIN TEACHER KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL BURGOYNE AMY TEACHER KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL .W SCHOOL DEPARTMENT RESIGNATIONS/ REDUCTIONS, CONT.1 LN FN POSITION SCHOOL/ DEPARTMENT BURKE KERRY COACH ATHLETICS CURLEY ERIN TEACHER SUPPORT BIRCH MEADOW ELEM. SCH. DOHERTY LAURIE ADMIN. SUPP. DISTRICT DOLAN COLLEEN DIRECTOR PPS DISTRICT DRANE SYDNEY PARAPROFESSIONAL KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL DRISCOLL CAITLIN COACH I ATHLETICS DULL CHARMAINE TEACHER PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL ERAMO ROSA TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS FLANDERS DEBORAH ADMIN. ASST. DISTRICT FLYNN REBECCA TEACHER EATON ELEM. SCHOOL FURBUSH DAN FOOD SERVICE DRIVR DISTRICT GALLIARD KEITH TEACHER KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL GAROFALO JOHN COACH ATHLETICS GEORGOPOULOS CONSTANTINE TEACHER PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL HARRINGTON MARY COACH ATHLETICS HARRINGTON KRISTEN SPECIAL ED SUPPORT WOOD END ELEM. SCHOOL HEATH CHRISTOPHER ITEACHER EATON ELEM. SCHOOL HINTLIAN MARY ITUTOR EATON ELEM. SCHOOL KENNEDY KATELIN COACH ATHLETICS KOURBALI HOURIA FOOD SERVICE DISTRICT LANDAU ALISSA TUTOR BIRCH MEADOW ELEM. SCH. LINEHAN MARK TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS MALTZMAN SARAH TEACHER COOLIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL MARDEN HERBERT CUSTODIAN KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL MULLIGAN KRISTIN TEACHER KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL NICIEWSKY ELLEN ITEACHER PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL PAXHIA JORDAN ITEACHER KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL PEACH CHERYL FOOD SERVICE PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL PROULX LINDA TEACHER BIRCH MEADOW ELEM. SCH. RIO SANDRA PARAPROFESSIONAL EATON ELEM. SCHOOL ROBINSON JEFFREY PARAPROFESSIONAL READING MEMORIAL HS SCALFANI JANICE PARAPROFESSIONAL PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL SCHWARTZ JULIE FOOD SERVICE DISTRICT SKINNER RENEE PARAPROFESSIONAL READING MEMORIAL HS SOLARI JOANNA PARAPROFESSIONAL COOLIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL SPRAGUE JEREMY TEACHER COOLIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL SPRY JESSICA COACH ATHLETICS STEMPECK SHEILA PARAPROFESSIONAL PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL SU VIVIAN PSYCHOLOGIST KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL TAYLOR JANICE FOOD SERVICE DISTRICT THOMAS CHRISTOPHER TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS WHITE JOHN TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS YOUNG KRISTINA LIBRARY MEDIA WOOD END ZANOWSKI LAURA TEACHER SUPPORT READING MEMORIAL HS LEAVES OF ABSENCE BLACK BRIENNE TEACHER PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL BORSETTI ALICIA TEACHER WOOD END ELEM. SCHOOL BORSINI KERI SECRETARY ATHLETICS BRENNER JANE SECRETARY SPECIAL EDUCATION 550 SCHOOL DEPARTMENT LEAVES OF ABSENCE CONT. LN FN POSITION SCHOOL/ DEPARTMENT BRUNO ANDREA TEACHER COOLIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL BURGOYNE AMY TEACHER KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL CLOONAN DONNA NURSE BIRCH MEADOW ELEM. SCH. CONNOR HEATHER TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS DEBENEDETTO CONCHETTA TEACHER COOLIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL DIMUZIO JENNIFER TEACHER COOLIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL DION MARY CHRISTINE TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS DONOHUE PATRICE SPEECH / LANGUAGE RISE DOWNING ANNE MARIE TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS ENCARNACAO KARESA TEACHER BARROWS ELEM. SCHOOL ESTEVAO LISA FOOD SERVICE EATON ELEM. SCHOOL GILMAN MAUREEN TEACHER KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL GIROURAD PAMELA TEACHER SPECIAL EDUCATION GOLDNER MICHELLE OCCUPATIONAL THER. KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL GOODNOW MICHELLE TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS GRAY JENNIFER TEACHER PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRIFFIN VICTORIA DIRECTOR RISE PRE - SCHOOL GRIMALDI JENNIFER TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS HART MEAGHAN TEACHER BARROWS ELEM. SCHOOL HILDRETH DARCY PARAPROFESSIONAL BARROWS ELEM. SCHOOL IRMER KAREN TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS KLEIN JANET TEACHER COOLIDGE MIDDLE SCHOOL KWIATEK DEBORAH INSTRCTNL SPECLST DISTRICT LAMONTAGNE EMILY TEACHER WOOD END ELEM. SCHOOL LATIMER VERONIQUE TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS LEONARD JEANNETTE TEACHER BARROWS ELEM. SCHOOL MAHONEY KARLA TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS MAURO KARA TEAM CHAIR SPECIAL EDUCATION MAZIARZ MALGORZATA FOOD SERVICE READING MEMORIAL HS MCCARTHY JULIE TEACHER PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL MCVETY BRIAN TEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS MILES BRENDA TEACHER BARROWS ELEM. SCHOOL NATALE ANTHONY TEACHER PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL QUINLAN COURTNEY TEACHER BIRCH MEADOW ELEM. SCH. RANKIS CRYATAL TEACHER WOOD END ELEM. SCHOOL RAUCCI ELENA TEACHER KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL REEVE JOAN PARAPROFESSIONAL PARKER MIDDLE SCHOOL SLATER BETH TEACHER BIRCH MEADOW ELEM. SCH. SPANG ELISE READING SPECIALIST BIRCH MEADOW ELEM. SCH. STONE - WEINREB JULIE PARAPROFESSIONAL WOOD END ELEM, SCHOOL SWEENEY NANCY TEACHER KILLAM ELEM. SCHOOL TUREN DAVID CUSTODIAN BIRCH MEADOW ELEM. SCH. VACCARO PHILIP ATHLETIC DIRECTOR READING MEMORIAL HS WARSHAUER MARGARET LIBRARY MEDIA BIRCH MEADOW ELEM. SCH. WILLIAMS JAUDRA ITEACHER READING MEMORIAL HS 551 NORTHEAST METROPOLITAN REGIONAL VOCATIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Outstanding Student Award Paul Manning from Malden, a student in the Graphic Communications program, was chosen as Northeast's nominee at the State Awards Dinner for Outstanding Vocational Technical Students. The event is co- sponsored by the Massachusetts Association of Vocational Administrators and the Massachusetts Vocational Association. National Technical Honor Society The Northeast Chapter of the National Technical Honor Society held its annual Induction Ceremony in March. At the ceremony, 6 seniors and 48 juniors were inducted. These students joined the previously inducted members to bring the Technical Honor Society Chapter to 81 members for the 2009 -2010 school year. National Honor Society The Annual Induction Ceremony to the Northeast Chapter of the National Honor Society "Artisans" was held in March. At the ceremony, 6 seniors, 24 juniors, and 8 sophomores were inducted for the 2008 -2009 school year bringing the total membership to 58. Student Advisory Representative to the School Committee Mark Fonseca, a senior from Woburn, was elected as the Student Representative to the School Committee for the 2009 -2010 school year. Scholarship Committee The Northeast Awards and Scholarship Committee presented awards and scholarships to 69 deserving students at the Ninth Annual Senior Recognition Night. A total of $27,900 was presented to Northeast students who will be working in their vocational field, entering trade apprentice programs, or going on to one, two, or four -year programs at accredited colleges, universities, and trade schools. These awards and scholarships provide the students the opportunities to purchase tools and equipment, as well as to assist in offsetting the expenses of educational institutions. Peer Mediation Program Our Northeast Peer Mediation Center continues to help reduce problems at Northeast. The mediation process is successful in resolving conflicts concerning rumors, threats, name - calling, teasing, harassment, hazing, and physical fights. Northeast has a full -time coordinator and 35 trained junior and senior peer mediators. A trained mediator is a neutral person not involved in the dispute and through the mediation process, helps people come to their own agreement about how they want to resolve their conflict. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Plan Development The Professional Development Subcommittee of.the Perkins /Title I Local Plan Committee gives direction to the District for the planning ofprofessional development activities. This Subcommittee 552 ensures that planned activities focus on the district goals and priorities. The members of this school year 2009 -2010 Subcommittee included academic and career /technical teachers and counselors who served as the "High School That Work" (HSTW) Leadership Team. This Team reported to the District Administrator responsible for professional development. They assist in the coordination and evaluation of these activities, aligning available professional development resources with district goals, and serve as a resource for the School Council for the development of the School Improvement Plan. In an effort to promote professional leaming that is both relevant and sustained, this Subcommittee reviewed professional development models and activities recommended by the other Subcommittees of the Local Plan, the HSTW State Coordinator and the National Staff Development Council. Priority was given to professional development activities that address the needs identified by the core indicator data. Plan development priorities include: • Coordinating a professional development program that meets the needs of both beginning and veteran teachers and emphasizes content -based offerings while addressing the topics of teaching to your strengths, parental concerns, special education issues, English language learner strategies, classroom management techniques, and other effective practices that improve student learning and achievement; • Pursuing models for delivering professional development to best accomplish plan priorities, • Fostering a professional learning community that encourages teachers to work together, eliminates barriers to common planning time, and encourages educators to solicit feedback from each other to improve their practices; • Exploring activities that increase school -wide teacher knowledge of the educational activities occurring in each department within the school; The Subcommittee evaluates the success of their actions by evaluating the products and deliverables created during the professional learning activities; by evaluating the impact of the professional development activities on the core indicators for each subgroup and special population addressed; and by analyzing the follow -up data collected from teacher surveys, especially the 2010 HSTW survey. 2009 -2010 Goals • Establish an on -line option for professional learning that will allow for increased availability and variety of topics. • Increase the technology skill level of the staff. • Provide strategies to improve student learning and achievement. 2009 -2010 Objectives included • Enhanced access to the "Knowledge Delivery System (KDS)" of on -line professional development offerings in both the content and pedagogy areas. • Training of all staff for accessing IEP and 504 data via the school wide, online X -2 grading program. Continued X -2 training for enhanced on -line rank book, attendance, and conduct entries in preparation for the goal of opening the Student Portals during SY2011. • Increased access to and training for utilizing interactive technology in the classrooms 553 including but not limited to TI Inspire Math technology, Sympodiums, and smart boards. • Site -based staff trainings for integrating and supporting English language Learners in the classroom, including career - technical educational settings. • HSTW Leadership Team participation in their Feb. 2010 National Conference: Quality Teaching: Creating Schools that Engage Students Intellectually, Emotionally, Behaviorally, and Socially. • Revision of Northeast's Common Course Syllabi. • Literacy Goals for Higher Student Achievement. • Pilot implementation of "The Power of I" grading program. 2010 Summer Transition Program Over 200 members of the Class of 2014 took part in the 10th season of the 2010 Summer Transition Program. Incoming 9`h grade students participated in English Language Arts and Mathematics academic programs daily as well as two career /technical programs per week. English Language Arts programming introduced students to writing autobiographical essays, poetry, and journal entries reviewing their career /technical experiences. Career /technical areas explored by incoming 9`h grade students included: Automotive Technology, Automotive Collision Repair, Cosmetology, Design & Visual, Drafting & Design, Graphic Communications, Electrical, & Plumbing. Poetry submissions, complemented by student photographs, were compiled in the 2010 "Career Oriented Enrichment" publication that was then distributed to all participants and staff. Mathematics lessons included project -based assignments utilizing graphing calculators, motion detectors, and surveying materials. As in the past, an English Immersion Program was also offered to assist Second Language Learners with transitioning from middle 'school to our career /technical high school. Students also began their 4 -Year Career Plan during a session in the Career Center. The Career Center offered our new students an opportunity to evaluate their skills and work values on the Kuder website (Kuder.com). This information, along with discussions on the Exploratory Program and the Shop Selection Process, encouraged students to begin setting goals for a successful high school experience, including an introduction to considering career options. Funding for this program was provided through Title 1, IDEA, and the Carl D. Perkins Occupational Education Act Federal grants. Summer Enrichment Program Approximately 40 enrolled Northeast students from Grades 10, 11, and 12 participated in the 2010 Summer Enrichment Program. This program offers supplemental preparation for the MCAS State Assessments. Students were actively engaged in Mathematics, English Language Arts, and Science curricula. A Team Building component also allowed students to enhance cooperative learning and communication skills necessary for negotiating secondary, post- secondary college and/or career experiences. Funding for this program was provided by the Academic Support Grant sponsored by the Commonwealth of MassachusettsDepartment of Elementary and Secondary Education. 554 SUPPORT SERVICES The Northeast Student Services staff offers support and counseling to all students through individual and group counseling, specialized workshops and presentations, health services, and mediation services. All faculty guidance counselors are certified as School Adjustment Counselors and are qualified to handle the wide range of student issues. One School Adjustment Counselor is bilingual (Spanish- speaking). The School Psychologist works to establish and provide psychological testing and maintains a small individual and/or group caseload. The Career Counselor and Career Teacher provide career awareness and career development services to students enrolled in non - traditional vocational areas. Two School Nurses provide health services and a Peer Mediation Coordinator implements a Peer Mediation Program. Support groups are established each year based on student needs. Groups for pregnant and parenting teens, grieving students, Latino students, Asian students, gay /lesbian students and others have all been offered at different times depending on need and student interest. Anger management support is offered by the School Psychologist in an effort to provide students with the ability to understand and manage anger appropriately. The School Adjustment Counselors provide individual counseling support and crisis intervention to all students as needed. They will provide support to homeless students, assessing their special needs and coordinating with the Homeless Liaison (Administrator of Student Services). They also are responsible for developing and monitoring Section 504 Accommodation Plans in conjunction with the Administrator of Student Services. School Adjustment Counselors collaborate with school personnel, family members, doctors, psychiatrists, outside therapists, social workers, police and court personnel, and others. A specific linkage is established with Riverside Community Care in Wakefield to refer families seeking outside counseling services. In addition, Tri-City Mental Health Services of Malden serves as our crisis intervention linkage for emergency mental health services in the community. The Bilingual School Adjustment Counselor provides native language support (Spanish) as needed to limited English proficient students and families across all issues. She provides specific support to the English Language Education program at Northeast, but supports other Northeast Latino students and families as needed. Translation services (oral and written) and interpreting services are often required for parent communication throughout the building, and as needed, this counselor coordinates with all departments to assist. Referrals are made to a Spanish - speaking Psychologist for testing as needed for Special Education evaluation. The School Psychologist supports the counseling staff on a consultation basis and works directly with the Special Education Department to assess all students in need of evaluation. The Psychologist also serves as a consultant to the Administration and to the teaching faculty regarding at -risk students, assisting with crisis intervention services and offering individual and group counseling and support on an as needed basis. Career counseling and the college application process are a large part of all of the counselors' roles. The Career Center is the focal area for a well - planned four -year career development program that 555 prepares all Northeast students for their individually chosen career paths. The curriculum focuses on career assessment; career information and requirements; employability and entrepreneurial skills; interviewing skills; portfolios; and resume preparation. By providing assessments to evaluate skills, interests, and work values, the Career Counselors work with the School Adjustment Counselors to assist freshmen in their vocational selection process and upper class students with linkages to post- secondary education and employment opportunities. The Career Counselor provides directed support to those students who are enrolled in career areas that are considered non - traditional for their gender. Students have the opportunity to participate in support groups, specialized presentations, and field trips that prepare them to understand the benefits of non - traditional choices, to manage challenges in each occupation and to understand the required post - secondary linkages to achieve their goals. The School Nurses have coordinated support services for pregnant and parenting teens with outside providers affiliated with local hospitals. In addition, they provide support to students with chronic medical conditions, coordinating with parents, doctors, nurses, etc. The School Nurses work closely with the School Adjustment Counselors to coordinate assistance when mental health needs arise. They also work closely with the Deans when emergency medical evaluations are required. The Peer Mediation Coordinator at Northeast operates a Peer Mediation Program where upper class students undergo twenty hours of specialized training in mediation skills and implement a program to work out arising conflicts between students. This is a very positive prevention program that contributes to the development of a positive school climate as students learn to come to their own agreements about how to solve their conflict. In addition to the support provided by the counseling staff, the Special Education Department offers a TEAM meeting process that promotes monitoring of student progress and educational support. Each Special Education student is assigned a Liaison who is a teacher in the Special Education Department who oversees progress in relation to the Individual Education Program, communicating with parents, teachers, and counselors to help all students achieve success. The KICK -OFF Mentoring Program is a freshmen transition program that matches junior and senior mentors with small groups of freshmen students. The KICK -OFF Mentors run the Freshmen Orientation day for freshmen and then meet with their groups throughout the year to offer support and to deliver positive lessons that promote a positive school climate. The mentors are trained in a leadership climate by the student services staff, developing a core of approximately 140 peer leaders from I Ith and 12`h grades. The Peer Tutoring program provides educational assistance to students having difficulty with one or more academic subjects. Students who have been successful in specific subject areas and who have participated in training, volunteer their time to assist others in the library one afternoon per week. The tutoring program is designed to supplement after school assistance provided by the academic and vocational teachers. The program benefits go beyond the student achievement as the relationships formed by the tutors and students help to break down barriers between different grade and age groups and develop friendships that would not have had a chance to form. Academic and 556 vocational teachers offer support and assistance to the Peer tutoring program. Special school -wide workshops and presentations are offered through the year for different groups of students. Each year, all freshmen participate in group workshops focusing on harassment and bullying and gender equity issues. Large group assemblies and presentations have been offered focusing on goal setting and acts of kindness, substance abuse, teen dating issues, tolerance, character building, and others. Different groups in the building such as SADD have sponsored workshops. On a larger scale, the student service emphasis is on communication — communication with students and with parents. Mid -term progress reports are sent to parents each quarter and report cards are sent home four times per year. E -mail communication is welcomed and progress update meetings are held as needed. Parents are asked to be involved with all class scheduling activities. Post - graduate planning information is shared through career assessment and planning activities. Career Plans are sent home annually for parent review. Language development is communicated for limited - English proficient students through assessment data and parent meetings. It is our goal to service all students equitably while attending specifically to those who have specific life challenges. GRANTS RECEIVED IN FY 2010 Entitlement and Allocation Grants Title H, Part A: Improving Educator Quality, Fund Code: 140 The purpose of this federal grant program is to increase student achievement through comprehensive district initiatives that focus on the preparation, training, recruitment, and retention of highly qualified educators. These initiatives should be aligned with Massachusetts' reform efforts and should help districts meet the NCLB goals and requirements for highly qualified teachers, instructional paraprofessionals in Title I targeted assistance and school wide programs, and high - quality professional development. The goal is to improve the overall quality of all educators, including administrators, within the district. Title II, Part D: Enhancing Education Through Technology, Fund Code: 160 Title II Part D: This federal grant program is intended to help school districts improve student achievement through the use of technology in their schools; and encourages high - quality professional development that uses research -based instructional strategies to integrate technology effectively into the instruction. At least 25% of the grant funds must be used for ongoing high- quality technology professional development for teachers, principals, administrators, and school library media personnel to further the use of technology in the classroom or library media centers. Other uses of grant funding include allowing school districts to participate in MassONE online professional development and using technology effectively to increase communication with parents and promote parental involvement. Federal Special Education Entitlement, Fund Code: 240 The purpose of this federal entitlement grant program is to provide funds to ensure that eligible students with disabilities receive a free and appropriate public education that includes special 557 education and related services designed to meet their individual needs. The priority is to serve eligible students with special education services and activities deemed essential for student success in school. Services and activities must ensure compliance with state special education laws and regulations and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act - 2004 (IDEA- 2004). Title I, Part A, Fund Code: 305 Title I, as reauthorized under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, provides resources to local school districts to assist low achieving students in high poverty schools to meet the state's challenging academic standards. Funds may be used to provide academic, instructional, and support services for eligible students, professional development activities for staff, support for parent involvement activities, and the purchase of appropriate supplies and materials. The priorities of Title I are to strengthen the core programs in schools and provide academic and/or support services to low achieving students at the preschool, elementary, middle, and high school levels in support of NCLB goals; provide programs based on scientifically -based research that enable participating students to achieve the learning standards of the state curriculum frameworks; elevate significantly the quality of instruction by providing staff with substantial opportunities for professional development; and involve parents in the development of and participation in the program, activities, and procedures for parents and students to improve student achievement. Northeast maintains a School -Wide Title 1 designation. Perkins Act Allocation Grant Program — Secondary, Fund Code: 400 The purpose of this federal grant program is to assist school districts in improving secondary programs that meet the definition of career and technical education under the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006 P.L. 109-270 (Perkins IV). Perkins IV allocation funds must be used in accordance with Perkins IV and the Massachusetts Perkins IV Manual. Required and permissive allocation fund uses are identified in the Manual. A portion of allocation funds must be used for professional development. Academic Support Services Allocation Grant (summer), Fund Code: 625 The goal of this state - funded grant program is to enhance academic support services needed to meet the Competency Determination required for high school graduation for students in the Classes of 2003 -2013 who have performed in the Level 1: Warning/Failing (Scaled Score = Less than 220) or Level 2: Needs Improvement (Scaled Score = 220 -238) categories on their most recent English language arts and/or mathematics MCAS or re- tests. Summer programs may serve students in the Class of 2014 transitioning into high school that have scored at Levels 1 and/or 2 on their most recent English language arts and/or mathematics MCAS. These services are to supplement currently funded local, state, and federal programs. Summer Academic Support Enhancement Grant, Fund Code: 625 -B The purpose of this state - funded supplementary summer program is to enhance academic support in English language arts (ELA), mathematics, and science and technology /engineering for students in the classes of 2003 -2013 who are participating in MCAS Academic Support programs, in order to help these students meet the Competency Determination for a high school diploma. Programs will develop and pilot replicable models through Professional Learning Communities and/or additional, increased, or enhanced services. These services are to supplement currently funded local, state, and federal programs. 558 ARRA and SFSF Allocation Grants The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) —IDEA, Fund Code 760 ARRA Purpose: The overall purposes of the ARRA federal grant programs are to fund activities that will advance ARRA's short-term economic goals by investing quickly to save and create jobs and to fund activities that support ARRA's long -term economic goals by: investing wisely; funding activities designed to strengthen education; drive reforms; and improve results for students. Activities funded through the ARRA -IDEA grant must be designed to help ensure that students with disabilities have access to a free and appropriate education (FAPE) to meet each student's unique needs and to prepare each student for further education, employment, and independent living. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) — Title I, Fund Code 770 ARRA Purpose: The overall purposes of the ARRA federal grant programs are to stimulate the economy in the short term and invest in education and other public services to ensure the long -term economic health of the nation. ARRA funds must be spent quickly to save and create jobs, and at the same time must be invested wisely in activities designed to strengthen education, drive reforms, and improve results for students. Title I, as reauthorized under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB), provides supplemental resources to local school districts in order to help improve teaching and learning for students in high poverty schools most at risk of failing to meet the state's academic achievement standards. Activities funded through the ARRA -Title I grants must be designed to help improve education for at -risk students and close achievement gaps. Districts are expected to focus ARRA -Title I funds on strategic investments that will yield outcomes extending beyond the grant period. ARRA State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF), Fund Code: 780 The State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (SFSF) program, which is funded through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009, is a one -time appropriation the U.S. Department of Education (ED) is awarding to Governors to help stabilize state and local budgets in order to minimize and avoid reductions in education and other essential services. Education Jobs, Fund Code: 206 The Education Jobs Fund Program (Ed Jobs) is a new, one -time appropriation the U.S. Department of Education (ED) is awarding to Governors to save or create education jobs for the 2010 -2011 school year. Jobs funded under this program include those that provide educational and related services for early childhood, elementary, and,secondary education. A school district must use its funds only for compensation and benefits, and other expenses, such as support services, necessary to retain existing employees, to recall or rehire former employees, and to hire new employees, in order to provide early childhood, elementary, or secondary educational and related services. For purposes of this program, the phrase "compensation and benefits, and other expenses, such as support services" includes, among other things, salaries, performance bonuses, health insurance, retirement benefits, incentives for early retirement, pension fund contributions, tuition reimbursement, student loan repayment assistance, transportation subsidies, and reimbursement for childcare expenses. 559 SUMMER PROGRAMS Northeast Metro Tech Summer Programs enjoyed another successful campaign since its inception in 1988. Over the years both the Summer School and Computer Program have experienced remarkable growth. This year the summer programs serviced approximately 300 students combined. The Northeast Summer School serviced high school students in six different academic areas including Math, Science, English, Social Studies, Language, and Vocational Related. The goals of promoting a positive learning atmosphere, retention, and promotion, as well as providing skills to assist each student at the next grade level are paramount objectives behind the philosophical make- up of our summer school. Our summer program also continued to expand into the vocational enrichment and certification program areas, including Dental Assisting, Dental Radiology, and Basic Welding. These programs were not only extremely successful, but gives both students and adults an opportunity to explore and begin new careers. The popular Northeast Summer Computer Program completed a successful 22nd year. Its objective of making learning fun had the counselors teach the participants skills that they can use during their school year while enjoying doing it. These programs can help strengthen reading and math skills, and expand their general knowledge of the computer. Outstanding Power Point presentations and the introduction of "Movie Maker Program" were an exciting part of this year's computer program, along with swimming and diving instruction. COMMUNITY EDUCATION PROGRAM The Community Education Program is a broad base collaborative community initiative assisting learners of all kinds complete their education and achieve economic self - sufficiency through empowerment skills, health care, support services and meaningful employment. Our vision is to deliver educational experience in a positive environment that will enable Northeast to reach new heights together with our lifelong learning community. The focus of the Community Education Program is to offer programs that meet the demands of our learning populations. In doing this we give people the opportunity to improve employment skills, fulfill life long goals, or enrich their lives with social activities. With the most qualified instructors, and state of the art labs Northeast strives to maintain the highest standards of education. During the summer of 2010 emphasis was placed on technology upgrades such as brochure modification, new state of the art web site construction, and the introduction of new programs. 2010 GRADUATES The 2009 -10 school year represents the thirty- seventh class to matriculate at Northeast Metropolitan Regional Vocational School. Northeast graduated 273 students in the class of 2009. Breakdown of graduates' status after graduation is as follows: Employed 73 Attending 4 year college 73 Entering Military Service 12 Attending 2 year college 99 560 Other 1 Apprentice school 15 * * It should be noted that 68% of the graduating class went on to further their education either in a two or four year college or in an apprentice program. 272 members of the graduating class either entered military service are employed or seeking further education, that figure represents 99.6% of the class of 2010. SPECIAL NEEDS ENROLLMENT Special Needs enrollment for the 2009 -10 school year continued to represent a fair share of the total school enrollment with students. The 330 Special Needs students represent 26% of the school population. DISTRICT SCHOOL COMMITTEE ELECTION OF OFFICERS At the Annual Organizational Meeting of the District School Committee on January 14, 2010 the following members were re- elected Officers of the Northeast District School Committee: Chairman Michael T. Wall, of Chelsea Vice Chairman Henry A. Hooton, of Melrose Secretary Peter A. Rossetti, Jr. of Saugus Treasurer Paul L. Sweeney of North Reading Assoc. Treasurer Anthony E. DeTeso of Stoneham Northeast was saddened by the passing of Associate Treasurer Anthony DeTeso after many years of service to his community and the Northeast School Committee. Stoneham appointed Lang Means to fill the vacancy. North Reading Representative to the School Committee Paul Sweeney resigned effective 10/6/10 and Judith Dyment was appointed to fill the remainder of his term for North Reading. At the November 2010 elections Jeanne Feeley of Reading and Larry Means of Stoneham were both elected to fill the remainder of the School Committee term of office. Further organizational changes to the School Committee Officers were made: Larry Means, Stoneham was elected Treasurer and Vincent Carisella, Wakefield was elected Associate Treasurer. CONCLUSION As Northeast celebrates its fortieth year of Vocational/Technical Excellence to its twelve member communities, its aim is to continue to offer the latest in vocational/technical and academic education by maintaining a high level of performance. This high level of performance also encompasses continued improvement in academic achievement with regard to MCAS. The Northeast Class of 2010 had a 98% pass rate of the MCAS Test by graduation. Northeast is continually updating curriculum and continues to offer MCAS Enrichment Classes for those students in need of additional preparation for the MCAS, which included Science beginning with the Class of 2010. Northeast also provides a Summer Enrichment Program for the incoming freshmen. The school continues to offer students the finest education with which to build a successful career through the latest in equipment, 561 software, and technology offered in all vocational programs no matter which career path they have chosen. The Career Center which was added last year is where students have access to laptops to develop career plans, learn of all business aspects of their industries, prepare comprehensive portfolios, resumes, and college plans with the assistance of our Career /Guidance Counselors. This placed Northeast a step ahead of all other schools in Career Technical Education. Evidence of our past success is reflected in the students that have graduated from Northeast Metro Tech. The Alumni's stories of success and their readiness and willingness to help school officials by speaking at recruiting sessions at the local schools as well as recruiting graduates for employment is proof of their dedication to Northeast. Northeast currently has 20 alumni employed at the school. Testimonials as to the success of our graduates continue to be received which makes us proud to have contributed in some small way to their accomplishments. Once again, I am proud to have represented Reading as a member of the Northeast Metropolitan Regional Vocational District School Committee. I will continue to serve as the guardian of funds allocated from the community to this educational institution and assist in and provide counsel to the school in maintaining the highest standards of educational excellence possible. Respectfully submitted, Jeanne M. Feeley Northeast School Committee Reading, Representative 562 NORTHEAST METROPOLITAN REGIONAL VOCATIONAL SCHOOL ENROLLMENT HISTORY CITY/TOWN S.Y. S.Y. S.Y. S.Y. S.Y. S.Y. SY SY SY SY SY DISTRICT 00 -01 01 -02 02 -03 03 -04 04 -05 05 -06 06 -07 07 -08 08 -09 09 -10 10 -11 Chelsea 236 276 240 268 258 221 203 198 206 190 195 Malden 206 172 150 157 175 215 238 234 222 216 215 Melrose 28 19 30 40 36 56 64 64 48 45 62 North Reading 14 21 27 29 30 28 40 38 37 37 36 Reading 23 23 22 22 25 19 26 26 26 28 23 Revere 267 270 277 272 256 241 242 238 244 238 234 Saugus 128 129 139 148 139 146 137 .138 161 174 191 Stoneham 39 40 36 28 37 34 46 44 46 52 54 Wakefield 52 41 39 34 36 59 65 61 84 91 98 Winchester 8 8 9 9 6 7 9 9 7 11 13 Winthrop 27 35 40 40 37 41 45 44 55 65 58 Woburn 64 74 87 85 107 99 97 97 70 59 55 TOTALS 1092 1108 1096 1132 1142 1166 1212 1191 1206 1206 1234 NON DISTRICT 37 27 40 44 48 43 47 53 39 42 31 GRAND TOTAL 1129 1135 1136 1176 1190 1209 1259 1244 1245 1248 1265 SPECIAL NEEDS ENROLLMENT 214 233 273 275 287 320 342 333 323 330 331 % SPECIAL NEED ENROLLMENT 21% 21% 24% 23% 24% 26% 27% 27% 26% 26% 26% 12/13/2010 563 NORTHEAST METROPOLITAN REGIONAL VOCATIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT COMPARISON OF ASSESSMENTS NET ASSESSMENTS BUDGET BUDGET VARIANCE VARIANCE CHELSEA FY2009 FY2010 $ % GROSS BUDGET $19,937,541 $19,074,606 $ (862,935) - 4.3282% LESS REVENUES $819,540 $593,928 $ (225,612) - 27.53% Chapter 70 Aid $7,766,451 $7,611,122 $ (155,329) -2.00% E & D $ 300,000 - $ 300,000 3000.00% Transportation $736,262 $504,348 $ (231,914) - 31.50% TOTAL REVENUES $8,802,713 $8,115,470 $ (974,283) - 11.07% NET ASSESSMENTS $11,134,828 $10,959,136 $ (175,692) -1.58% .. CHELSEA $735,495 $705,265 $(30,230) 4.11% MALDEN $1,466,650 $1,541,515 $74,865 5.10% MELROSE $819,540 $593,928 $ (225,612) - 27.53% NO. READING $398,445 $428,649 $30,204 7.58% READING $391,688 $306,776 $(84,912) - 21.68% REVERE $1,829,999 $1,701,970 $(128,029) -7.00% SAUGUS $2,027,147 $2,213,601 $186,454 9.20% STONEHAM $632,978 $629,071 $(3,907) -0.62% WAKEFIELD $975,387 $1,127,514 $152,127 15.60% WINCHESTER $79,903 $93,132 $13,229 16.56% WINTHROP $569,241 $638,729 $69,488 12.21% WOBURN $1,208,355 $978,986 $(229,369) - 18.98% TOTAL $11,134,828 $10,959,136 $ (175,692) -1.58% STUDENTS STUDENTS PERCENT OF FY2009 FY2010. VARIANCE CONTRIBUTION CHELSEA 205 206 1 17.081260% MALDEN 218 222 4 18.407960% MELROSE 68 48 -20 3.980100% NO. READING 34 37 3 3.067993% READING 33 26 -7 2.155887% REVERE 242 244 2 20.232172% SAUGUS 145 161 16 13.349917% STONEHAM 46 46 0 3.814262% WAKEFIELD 72 84 12 6.965174% WINCHESTER 6 7 1 0.580431% WINTHROP 51 55 4 4.560531% WOBURN 86 70 -16 5.804312% TOTAL 1206 1206 0 100.00% 564 Northeast Metropolitan Regional Vocational School District Combined Balance Sheet — All Fund Types and Account Groups June 30, 2010 565 Fiduciary Account Groups Governmental Fund Types Fund Type* Special Trust and General Fixed General Revenue Agency Assets Assets Cash $ 820,942 $ 23,838 $ 89,421 $ Accounts Receivable 2,382,494 175,999 - Fixed Assets 6,733,392 Total Assets $ 3,203,436 $199,837 $ 89,421 $ 6,733,392 Liabilities Accounts Payable $ 173,359 $ 37,893 $ - $ Claims Incurred Not Reported - - 446,483 Accrued Salary 879,380 37,538 - Accrued Sick and Vacation 251,016 Total Liabilities $1303,755 $ 75,431 $446,483 Fund Equity Investment in General Fixed Assets $ - $ - $ - $ 6,733,392 Fund Balances: Reserve for Encumbrances 207,856 Reserve for Insurance - - (496,157) - Undesignated 1,691,825 124,406 139,095 - Total Fund Equity 1,899,681 124,406 (357,062) 6,733,392 Total Liabilities & Fund Equity $ 3,203,436 $199,837 $ 89,421 $ 6,733,392 565 Northeast Metropolitan Regional Vocational School District Special Revenue Funds June 30, 2010 Undesignated Fund Balance Amount Adult Education $(197,502) Building Usage 149,657 Athletics 4,750 Cafeteria (48,353) School Choice 169,123 Auto Body 221 Auto Tech 1,015 Shining Knights 1,914 Day Care 26,239 Culinary 933 Cosmetology (952) Graphics 14,855 Carpentry 2,352 .Metal Fabrication 154 Total $ 124,406 Northeast Metropolitan Regional Vocational School District Trust and Agency Fund June 30, 2010 Undesignated Fund Balance Amount Student Activity $ 95,238 Scholarship 43,857 Total $ 139,095 566 APPOINTED AND ELECTED TOWN BOARDS, COMMITTEES & COMMISSIONS (December 21, 2010) Title #Positions Term Orie Date Term Aypt'2 Auth 192 Woburn Street EXP Animal Control Appeals Committee 3 3 years BOS Susan Giacalone, Secretary 9 Orchard Park Drive (09) 2012 Tina Ohlson, Chairman 200 Forest Street (08) 2011 John Miles 532 West Street 09 2013 Audit Committee 7 3 years (08) 2011 Robert A. Redfern David Greenfield 192 Woburn Street (09) 2013 FinCom Marsie West 3 Whitehall Lane (10) 2011 FinCom Stephen Herrick 9 Dividence Road (05) 2012 BOS Chuck Robinson 81 Prospect Street (06) 2011 Sch. Com. Lisa Gibbs 9 Priscilla Road (04) 2012 Sch. Com. Phil Pacino 5 Washington Street (03) 2011 RMLD Camille Anthony 26 Orchard Park Drive (04) 2013 BOS Board of Appeals 5+2 3 years John Miles 532 West Street (08) 2011 Robert A. Redfern 54 Prospect Street (01) 2012 John A. Jarema 797 Main Street (78) 2013 Jeffrey D. Perkins, V. Chr. 1 Coolidge Road (08) 2012 Clark W. Petschek, Chairman 659 Haverhill Street (06) 2011 Kristin Marie Cataldo (Assoc.) 46 Sunset Rock Lane (10) 2013 Damase Caouette (Associate) 11 Field Pond Drive (09 ) 2011 Board of Assessors 3 3 years Elected Ralph Colorusso, V. Chr. 31 Enos Circle (00) April' 13 Fred A. McGrane, Secretary 16 Catherine Avenue (09) April' 11 Robert I. Nordstrand, Chair. 384 Franklin Street (69) April' 12 Board of Cemetery Trustees 6 3 years BOS Mary R. Vincent 17 Indiana Avenue (94) 2012 Olive B. Hecht 73 Martin Road (08) 2011 William C. Brown, Sec. 28 Martin Road (96) 2012 Janet Baronian, Chairman 75 Mill Street (99) 2011 Ronald Stortz, V. Chr. 538 Summer Ave. (04) 2013 Elise M. Ciregna 48 Pearl Street (07 ) 2013 BOS — Board of Selectmen; T. Mgr. — Town Manager; Mod. — Town Moderator; B.V. of O. — By virtue of office; Sch. Com. — School Committee; FChr. - Finance Committee Chairman; E. by E. — Elected by Employees. *All terms expire June 30 of year noted, unless indicated otherwise. 567 Title #Positions Term Orie Date Term I App Auth 93 Grand Street I Lxg Board of Health 3 3 years BOS Colleen Seferian, V. Chr. 56 Vine Street (99) 2011 Barbara A. Meade, Chairman 1 I Ash Hill Road (01) 2012 David Singer 66 Prospect St. (03) 2013 Board of Library Trustees 6 3 years BOS Elected Victoria V. Yablonsky 93 Grand Street (02) April' 11 David P. Hutchinson, Chr. 41 Harvard Street (05) April' 11 Jeffrey Doucette 30 Vale Road (09) April' 12 Richard H. Curtis, V. Chr. 15 Holly Road (07) April' 13 Cherrie Dubois 9 Meadow Brook Lane (07) April' 13 Kar n Storti, Secretary 31 Green St. (03) A ril'12 Board of Registrars 4 3 years z f,om each major BOS Harry Simmons 17 Pine Ridge Road (06) 2011 Gloria R. Hulse 107 Sanborn Lane (92) 2012 Krissandra Holmes 77 Redgate Lane (06) 2013 Laura Gemme 16 Lowell Street (09) Indef. B.V. of O. Board of Selectmen 5 3 years Elected Stephen Goldy 42 Berkeley Street (06) April'] 3 Ben Tafoya 40 Oak Street (05) April' 1 I James E. Bonazoli, Chairman 100 Grove Street (05) April' 11 Camille W. Anthony, V. Chr. 26 Orchard Park Drive (94) April' 12 Richard W. Schubert, Sec. 119 Winthrop Ave. (01) A ril'13 Bylaw Committee 5' 3 years Appt. Com Philip B. Pacino, Chairman 5 Washington Street (86) 2013 Unit D6 Dolores S. Carroll, Secretary 37 Johanna Drive (87) 2011 John H. Russell 91 Spruce Road -(91) 2012 Vacancy (. ) 2011 Ronald T. O'Keefe, Jr. 44 Batchelder Road (06) 2012 Bylaw Committee Appointment Committee Philip B. Pacino 5 Washington St., Unit D6 Chair Bylaw Com. James Bonazoli 100 Grove Street Chair BOS Alan Foulds 9 Ide Street Town Moderator BOS — Board of Selectmen; T. Mgr. — Town Manager; Mod. — Town Moderator; B.V. of O. — By virtue of office; Sch. Com. — School Committee; FChr. — Finance Committee Chairman; E. by E. — Elected by Employees. 'All terms expire June 30 of year noted, unless indicated otherwise. SM Title #Positions I Term I Orig Date Term I Appt,Q Auth I Exg Celebration Committee 5 3 years BOS Tony Capobianco Kurt Habel 832 Main Street (99) 2012 BOS Rita Robertson 9 Elm Street (02) 2011 Mod. Mark Cardono, Chairman 26 Boswell Road (99) 2011 Historical Bob McLaughlin 14 Galvin Circle (02) 2010 Library Everett Blodgett 99 Prescott Street (00) 2012 Sch. Com. Cities for Climate Protection Program Committee 5 3 years BOS Tony Capobianco 8 Gould Street (10) 2013 Joan Boegel 3 Highland Street (10) 2012 Stephanie Anderberg, Sec. 181 Lowell Street (06) 2011 Ronald Daddario 97 Summer Avenue (10) 2011 Ray Porter, Chairman 529 Franklin Street (07) 2012 Gina Snyder (Associate) 11 Jadem Terrace (06) 2011 David L. Williams (Associate) 258 Haverhill Street (08) 2011 Ronald K. Taupier (Associate) 51 Redgate Lane (10) 2011 Tracy Sopchak (Associate) 642 Haverhill Street (06) 2011 Michele Benson (Associate) 128 Eastway (06) 2011 Commissioners of Trust Funds 3 3 years BOS Elizabeth W. Klepeis, Chr. 68 Tennyson Road (05) 2011 Neil L. Cohen 73 Hillcrest Road (07) 2012 John J. Daly, V. Chr. 163 Woburn Street (95) 2013 Camille Anthony 26 Orchard Park Drive (07) 2011 Nancy Heffernan 16 Lowell Street (06) Indef. BVO Community Planning & Development Commission 5 3 years BOS Joseph E. Patterson, Secretary 18 Granger (08) 2011 Paul Bolger 23 Lindsay Lane (10) 2012 Nicholas Safina 221 South Street (06) 2013 John Weston, Chairman 10 Winthrop Ave. (07) 2013 David B. Tuttle 27 Heather Drive (06) 2011 George Katsoufis (Associate) 9 Berkeley Street 06) 2011 Conservation Commission 7 3 yrs BOS William Hecht, Chr. 73 Martin Road (03) 2011 Tina Ohlson 200 Forest Street (08) 2011 Brian F. Sullivan 145 Lowell Street (10) 2012 Jamie Maughan, V. Chr. 263 Woburn Street (10) 2013 Brian J. Tucker 9 Longwood Road (09) 2012 Annika Scanlon 3 Copeland Avenue (06) 2013 Barbara Stewart 52 County Road 06 2012 BOS — Board of Selectmen; T. Mgr. — Town Manager; Mod. — Town Moderator; B.V. of O. — By virtue of office; Sch. Com. — School Committee; FChr. — Finance Committee Chairman; E. by E. — Elected by Employees. *All terms expire June 30 of year noted, unless indicated otherwise. 569 Title _ #Positions Term-:. OriE ` Term Appt'H Auth Date . E x2 Constables Up to 4 3 years BOS Thomas H. Freeman P.O. Box 825 (93) 2012 Sally M. Hoyt 221 West Street (72) 2011 John Della Paolera 533 Summer Avenue (07) 2011 Alan Ulrich 55 Hancock Street .(04) 2013 Contributory Retirement 5 3 years BOS Board 23 Van Norden Road (06) 2012 Frank Driscoll 7 Ordway Terrace 2011 E. by E. Joe Veno, Chairman 11 Rock Street 2013 E. by E. Marguerite Bosnian North Reading (06) 2012 Gail LaPointe, Town Acct. 16 Lowell Street Inde£ B.V. of O. Richard Foley 68 Tennyson Road 12/11 BOS Thomas A. Clough 172 Summer Avenue 2012 Board Council on Aging 10 3 years BOS Margaret Havey 23 Van Norden Road (06) 2012 Steve Oston, Chairman 68 Sturges Road (07) 2013 Sally M. Hoyt 221 West Street (04) 2013 Marguerite Bosnian 46 Putnam Road (06) 2012 Erica Lynne Deane, Secretary 124 Franklin Street (09) 2012 Carol Oniskey, V. Chr. 7 Strawberry Hill Lane (08) 2011 Carole N. Scrima 709 Gazebo Circle (04) 2013 Gina Nelson 6 Hurlburt Road (08) 2012 Stacy Bertocchi 250 High Street (05) 2011 Dorothy Derosa 1005 Gazebo Circle (10) 2011 Cultural Council 7 3 years 6 max BOS Lorraine Horn, Treasurer 99 Beaver Road (06) 2013 Vicky Schubert, Chr. 119 Winthrop Avenue , (06) 2012 Margaret E. Caouette, V. Chr. 11 Field Pond Drive (08) 2011 Susan G. Fay 56 Grey Coach Road (08) 2011 Lynne A. Cassinari, Secretary 78 Hartshorn Street (08) 2012 Alice Armstrong 340 Summer Avenue (08) 2011 Joan Marshman 77 Ash Street (10) 2013 Custodian of Soldier's And 1 up to 5 years Sailor's Graves Francis P. Driscoll 7 Ordway Terrace (92) 2013 BOS BOS — Board of Selectmen; T. Mgr. — Town Manager; Mod. — Town Moderator; B.V. of O. — By virtue of office; Sch. Com. — School Committee; FChr. — Finance Committee Chairman; E. by E. — Elected by Employees. 'All terms expire June 30 of year noted, unless indicated otherwise. 570 Title #Positions I Term I Oriii Date Term I Appt,E Auth I Exp Economic Development 5 3 years :I Russell Graham 68 Maple Ridge (06) 2011 George A. Rio. 11 Estate Lane (08) 2012 Sheila Clarke, V. Chr. 536 Haverhill St. (06) 2011 Michelle R. Williams. 31 Melbourne Avenue (07) 2013 Meghan Young - Tafoya, Chr. 40 Oak Street (06) 2013 Ben Yoder (Associate) 94 Oak Street (10) 2011 Michelle Ferullo (Associate) 46 Howard Street (10) 2011 Maria Higgins (Associate) 57 Avalon Road (10) 2011 John Russell (Associate) 91 Spruce Road (06) 2011 Finance Committee 9 3 years 9 years max Appointment Com Paula Perry 40 Beaver Road (10) 2011 Barry Berman 54 Longview (07) 2011 David Greenfield, Vice Chair 192 Woburn Street (05) 2011 Kevin Leyne 34 Larch Lane (09) 2012 Bryan Walsh 58 Grand Street (09) 2012 Francis Fardy 55 Grand Street (10) 2013 Mark Dockser 110 Beaver Road (10) 2013 Harold S. Torman 77 Sunnyside Ave. (03) 2013 Marsie K. West, Chairman 3 Whitehall Lane (03) 2012 FinCom 3 1 year Appointment Committee Alan E. Foulds, Chairman 9 Ide Street Indef. Moderator Marsie West 3 Whitehall Lane Indef. Fin. Chr. James Bonazoli 100 Grove Street Indef Chr. BOS Historical Commission 5+ 3 years Associates BOS Virginia M. Adams 59 Azalea Circle (78) 2011 Mark Cardono 26 Boswell Road (98) 2013 Roberta M. Sullivan, Treasurer 76 Minot Street (96) 2011 Kathryn Greenfield, Chr. 192 Woburn St. (05) 2012 Sharlene Reynolds Santo, 46 Wakefield St. (99) 2011 Secretary (Associate) Angela Binda 10 Orchard Park Drive (08) 2013 BOS — Board of Selectmen; T. Mgr. — Town Manager; Mod. — Town Moderator; B.V. of O. — By virtue of office; Sch. Com. — School Committee; FChr. — Finance Committee Chairman; E. by E. — Elected by Employees. *All terms expire June 30 of year noted, unless indicated otherwise. 571 Title #Positions Term Orig Date Term Appt'g Auth (08) I Ex Housing Authority 5 5 years - BOS Kevin F. Mulvey, 67 Whittier Road (08) 2013 Karen Flammia, Chairman 19 Vista Ave. (00) 2015 Mary E. Connors 52 Sanborn St. Apt. 103 (96) 2012 Diane Cohen, Vice Chair 51 Redgate Lane (04) 2011 State James Cormier (Police) 15 Union Street (05) Appts Timothy Kelley, Treasurer 84 Woburn Street (96 2014 Human Relations Advisory Committee 7 3 years - BOS Margaret Soli 19 James Road (01) 2011 Lori Hodin 385 Summer Avenue (07) 2013 Karen Janowski (School) 30 Azalea Circle (08) 2011 Charles McDonald (BOS) 41 Canterbury Drive (03) 2012 James Cormier (Police) 15 Union Street (05) 2013 Monique Pillow Gnanaratnam 873 Main Street (08) 2012 Margaret LeLacheur 47 County Road (09) 2013 Randall Jones (Associate) 1 Cross Street (07) 2011 Landbank Committee 3 3 years BOS Vacancy ( ) 2011 Vacancy ( ) 2013 Edward G. Smethurst, Chr. 86 Gleason Road (88) 2012 MBTA Advisory Board 1 Indef Town Mgr Bob LeLacheur 16 Lowell Street Metropolitan Area Planning 1 + . 3 years BOS Council Alternate Steven Sadwick 138 Prospect Street (05) 2011 Vacancy (Alternate) ( ) 2011 Moderator 1 year Elected Alan Foulds 9 Ide Street April 11 Municipal Light Board 5 3 years Elected Philip B. Pacino, Secretary 5 Washington St. Unit (87) April 13 D6 Gina M. Snyder 11 Jadem Terrace (10) April 13 Richard S. Hahn, V. Chr. 29 Buckingham Drive (05) April 12 Robert Soli, Secretary 19 James Road (02) April 11 Mary Ellen O'Neill, Chairman 125 Summer Ave. (06) Aril 12 BOS - Board of Selectmen; T. Mgr. - Town Manager; Mod. - Town Moderator; B.V. of O. - By virtue of office; Sch. Com. - School Committee; FChr. - Finance Committee Chairman; E. by E. - Elected by Employees. *All terms expire June 30 of year noted, unless indicated otherwise. 572 Title #Positions Term I Orie Date , Term Exg Appt,Q Auth (03) Mystic Valley Elder Services, 2 3 years Inc Dawn Foloupolos 16 Lowell Street 9/30/10 COA Rheta C. McKinley 4 Elderberry Lane 211 9/30/12 BOS North Suburban Planning 4 BOS Council Ben Tafoya 40 Oak Street (07) 2013 George Katsoufis (BOS Alt.) 9 Berkeley Street (08) 2013 Vacancy ( ) 2012 CPDC Vacancy (CPDC Alt.) ( ) 2012 RCTV Board of Directors 2 3 years BOS & Nancy Linn Swain 35 Minot Street (03) Sch Com Edward Smethurst 86 Gleason Road (08) 2011 BOS Chris Caruso 77 Hartshorn Street (08) 2011 Sch. Com. Joe Lachiana 8 Grove Street 10) 2012 BOS Reading Ice Arena Authority 1 3 years BOS Carl McFadden 33 Wakefield Street (10) 2011 RMLD Citizen Advisory 1 3 years BOS Board Vacancy ( ) 2011 Recreation Committee 8 + 1 Sch. 3 years Com. + Alt. BOS Nancy Linn Swain 35 Minot Street (03) 2012 Michael DiPetro 23 Sanborn Lane (04) 2013 Christopher Campbell 12 Overlook Road (93) 2011 Mary Anne Kozlowski 16 Weston Road (03) 2011 Francis Driscoll, V. Chr. 7 Ordway Terrace (04) 2013 Beth Claroni 32 Emerald Drive (06) 2011 Sch. Com. Catherine R. Kaminer 37 Warren Avenue (88) 2013 Mary Ellen Stolecki, Chr. 33 Lewis Street (00) 2012 John Winne (Associate) 29 Clover Circle (97) 2011 Adam Chase (Associate) 8 Gardner Road (08) 2011 Joseph Rossetti (Associate) 4 Crosby Road (09) 2011 Eric Hughes 18 Small Lane (08) 2012 f Regional School District 1 4 years Elected Committee Marie B. Ferrari 20 Crosby Road 09) Nov` 12 BOS — Board of Selectmen; T. Mgr. — Town Manager; Mod. — Town Moderator; B.V. of 0. — By virtue of office; Sch. Com. — School Committee; FChr. — Finance Committee Chairman; E. by E. — Elected by Employees. *All terms expire June 30 of year noted, unless indicated otherwise. 573 Title #Positions Term I OriR Term I Appt,E Auth Peter G. Coumounduros Date I Exg Rules Committee 8 1 year No more an I ban e Precinct Member Ronald T. O'Keefe (Precinct 1) 44 Batchelder Road (08) Peter G. Coumounduros 24 Smith Avenue (01) (Precinct 2) (06) April 12 Francis P. Driscoll (Precinct 3) 7 Ordway Terrace (08) Nancy Graham (Precinct 4) 26 Holly Road (10) Janice Jones (Precinct 5) 22 Mount Vernon St. (08) James Mulvey (Precinct 6) 8 Palmer Hill Avenue (10) Denise D. Wyer (Precinct 7) 228 Forest Street (08) Karen Gately Herrick (Precinct 9 Dividence Road (10) School Committee 6 3 years Elected Karen T. Janowski 30 Azalea Circle (08) April 11 Christopher Caruso, Chairman 77 Hartshorn Street (06) April 12 David Michaud 54 Hanscom Ave. (06) April 12 Charles Robinson, V. Chair 81 Prospect Street (07) April 13 Lisa Gibbs 9 Priscilla Road (04) April 11 Harold A. Croft 27 Linnea Lane (10) April 13 Sick Bank Committee 9 3 years Nancy Aberman 64 Middlesex Ave. 2012 T. Mgr. Margaret A. Campbell, Chr. 16 Lowell Street 2013 T. Mgr. Marie Ammer 16 Lowell Street 2011 T. Mgr. Vacancy (Dispatcher) 15 Union Street 2011 Union Peter Garchinsky (Police Sup.) 15 Union Street 2011 Union Tom Ward (DPW) 16 Lowell Street 2012 Union Peter Tassi 16 Lowell Street 2011 T. Mgr. Pat Iapicca (Police Patrol) 15 Union Street 2011 Union James D'Entremont(Eng. /WTP) 16 Lowell Street 2013 Union Telecommunications and 5 3 years BOS, Technology Advisory Committee Vacancy ( ) 2013 Vacancy ( ) 2011 Bill Cowie 110 Van Norden Road (05) . 2012 Vacancy ( ) 2013 Scott Busnach 29 Gavin Circle (08) 2011 BOS - Board of Selectmen; T. Mgr. - Town Manager; Mod. - Town Moderator; B.V. of O. - By virtue of office; Sch. Com. - School Committee; FChr. - Finance Committee Chairman; E. by E. - Elected by Employees. `All terms expire June 30 of year noted, unless indicated otherwise. 574 Title #Positions Term Or1E Date Term Appt'Q . Auth I ExR Town Forest Committee 5 3 years ) BOS George B. Perry, II, Chairman 230 Franklin Street (76) 2012 Louis deBrigard, V. Chr. 37 Auburn Street (02) 2011 Patrice A. Todisco 483 Franklin Street (08) 2013 Mark Wetzel 163 County Road (10) 2013 Thomas Gardiner (Associate) 182 Franklin Street (10) 2011 Trails Committee 5 3 years BOS Thomas S. Gardiner, Chairman 182 Franklin Street (08) 2012 Joan A. Hoyt, Secretary 89 Oakland Road (08) 2013 Susan Giacalone 9 Orchard Park Drive (08) 2012 David Williams 117 Oak Street (08) 2013 Alan Rosh 232 Van Norden Road (08) 2011 Matthew DesMeules (Associate) 75 Green Street, Unit 1 (10) 2011 John E. Parsons (Associate) 3 C Street (08) 2011 Volunteer Appointment BOS Subcommittee Camille Anthony 26 Orchard Park Drive . (10) 2011 Stephen Goldy 42 Berkeley Street (10) 2011 West Street Historic District Commission 5 3 years BOS Virginia Adams 59 Azalea Circle (09) 2012 Priscilla Poehler 43 Bancroft Avenue (09) 2012 Richard Schubert, Chairman 119 Winthrop Avenue (09) 2011 Everett Blodgett 99 Prescott Street (09) 2013 Stephen O'Shea 257 West Street (09) 2013 Ilene Bornstein (Alternate) 80 Haystack Road (09) 2011 Sharlene Reynolds 46 Wakefield Street (09) 2011 Santo(Altemate BOS — Board of Selectmen; T. Mgr. — Town Manager; Mod. — Town Moderator; B.V. of O. — By virtue of office; Sch. Com. — School Committee; FChr. — Finance Committee Chairman; E. by E. — Elected by Employees. *All terms expire June 30 of year noted, unless indicated otherwise. 575