My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2007-02-08 ad Hoc Parking Task Force Minutes
TownOfReading
>
Public Access
>
Minutes
>
ad Hoc - Downtown Parking Committee
>
2000-2009
>
2007
>
2007-02-08 ad Hoc Parking Task Force Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2010 2:51:39 PM
Creation date
8/19/2010 2:39:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes of Ad Hoc Parking Task Force r s <br />February 8, 2007.M i F <br />glled <br />There being a quorum present, the meeting of the Adhoc P1MADJaMIN"'Odrigues <br />to order by Gil Rodrigues, Chairman, at 7:10 PM. Present (GR), Vice Chairman Jack Russell (JR); and members George Katsoufis (GK), David <br />Talbot (DT), Julie Thurlow (JT), and George Rio (GR). Absent was member Tom <br />Quintal (TQ). Also present were Town Manager Peter Hechenbleikner (PH), Board of <br />Selectmen Chairman Ben Tafoya (BT), and Selectman Rick Schubert (RS). <br />GR started the meeting with a general plea to find common ground on the parking issue. <br />He noted that this task would be considerably easier following resolution of the 16 <br />Sanborn issue. GR added that we need to come up with concrete recommendations for <br />parking and for parking-alternatives. <br />JR moved to approve the Dec. 20 minutes. GK seconded. <br />Amend minutes to strike second sentence of fourth paragraph. <br />Moved GK/seconded DT. Motion carried 6-0 <br />Amend minutes to reflect that the vote on customer parking, had been unanimous. <br />Moved GK/seconded DT Motion carried 6-0 <br />Motion to approve minutes, with amendments, carried 6-0. There was general discussion <br />that the context and meaning of the numbers is important, and that future motion <br />language should be ironed out prior to voting, to avoid confusion and misunderstanding. <br />There was general discussion for how to plan for potential future growth of parking <br />demand, beyond the estimates already made. GK said we need to look at scenarios <br />including CPDC projections over the next 5 or 10 years, and the impacts of the housing <br />plan. JR asked whether there might be any basis for saying that 10 years from now, we <br />will have a certain number of residents and can plan for that. <br />DT asked why we would need to project for future development, if those developments <br />provided their own parking. PH said zoning allows 3-story mixed use development with <br />no strict model for the exact nature of such development. He said there is an argument <br />for having central parking facilities rather than onsite parking. <br />BT cited the parking shortfall arrived at by the Task Force and made a two-fold <br />suggestion. 1: That the Task Force should suggest the Town immediately start <br />professional-level look at a structured parking solutions, 2: That the Task Force then <br />continue its work by pursuing alternatives. DT suggested that in addition to pushing <br />forward on structured parking, equal attention and investment be paid to alternatives to <br />parking, especially incentives for transportation alternatives. There was general <br />discussion that both approaches would be necessary. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.