Laserfiche WebLink
C16-a <br />Ad Hoc Downtown Parkin Committee Meeting T 0 kviq E R K <br />Larch 22, 2007 R ; , I N G ,1'i ~ S . <br />P I GO <br />The meeting convened at 7:.30 pm in the Town Hall Berger Room, 18 Lowell. Stre ea ing I1 K <br />Present were Chairman Gil Rodrigues (GIL); Members George Katsoufis (GK.; Tom. Quintal (TQ), David <br />Talbot (DT) and Julie Thu rlow (JT). <br />Also in attendance were Town residents: Adele Blunt, Rick Shaffer and Donna Barnes. <br />1 Minutes. <br />The minutes from the meeting of February 8, 20,07 were discussed and approved (4-0-1)- <br />2 Public comments <br />Adele made the comment that commercially leased on-street spaces along High street north of Woburn <br />street should be made available at 7.00 am instead: of the current 3.30 am. <br />Donna shared her experience with a flyer distributed by the owner of 2 Haven Street announcing the <br />availability of 12 commercially !eased spaces (possibly numbered H25-H37). it was commonly agreed <br />that these spaces were initially leased for the use of future building tenants. <br />Rick voiced his opinion that for 50 years the parking problem was acknowledged but during the last 10 <br />years it is exacerbated with the development of Reading Cooperative Bank and 2 Haven Street. In his <br />estimate, there. are 110-120 parking spaces. that.these two developments never had to build and-that the. <br />Town has had to accommodate. Julie said that a mains reason for this observation is that there are fewer <br />vacancies in the downtown compared to what was before 10 years. Discussion was held about how <br />Article #25 of the Spring. 2007 Town Meeting warrant attempts tomake requirements far mixed-use- <br />developments and requirements for commercial developments equivalent. Julie replied that keeping the <br />300-foot exemption in place maintains values in the downtown. David added that the Town cannot afford <br />another development-to the magnitude of 2 Haven Street- that utilizes 100% public parking for its users <br />(public lots and on-street). Tom agreed and said that the downtown has a saturated employee parking <br />demand. For Julie, this scenario is unlikely since current market conditions (with respect to commercial <br />parking) would not allow this type of investment. it was commonly agreed that parking shortage hurts <br />businesses. George said that zoning needs to be revisited at some paint and in the manner that <br />employee and customer parking requirements are not lumped: in one requirement in the bylaw, while <br />examining a possible tiered system of requirements in support of small businesses' viability. <br />Motion: made by David and second by Tom for the Committee to adopt the following statement: <br />„Continuing the "304-foct exemption" in the zoning bylaw, as written today; presents a serious <br />risk of worsening today`s already tight downtown parking:. supply.. While the Parking Task Force <br />takes no position on Article 25, the Task Force recommends that the Board of Selectmen <br />undertake a study to make appropriate bylaw changes to remove this risk." <br />Votes- 3 in favor,. 2 against for reasons of not having studied the matter and not wanting to imply a <br />change of the bylaw.. <br />Result: The motion did not carry through (4 votes in favor needed). <br />~R <br />