Laserfiche WebLink
Town of Reading <br /> r Meeting Minutes <br /> 'Jielllto� �,/ <br /> Board - committee - Commission - Council: <br /> Audit Committee <br /> Date: 2019-06-12 Time: 7:00 PM <br /> Building: Reading Town Hall Location: Berger Room <br /> Address: 16 Lowell Street <br /> Purpose: FY18 Audit Results and FY19 Audit Planning <br /> Attendees: Members - Present: <br /> Erik Burkhart, Mark Dockser, Nick Boiven, Phil B. Pacino, Elaine Webb and <br /> Stephen Herrick <br /> Members - Not Present: <br /> Others Present: <br /> Sharon Angstrom and Scott McIntire <br /> Minutes Respectfully Submitted By: Sharon Angstrom <br /> Topics of Discussion: <br /> Mr. Burkhart called the meeting to order and asked the Committee if they had an <br /> opportunity to review the minutes from June 13, 2018. Mr. Boivin made a motion to accept <br /> the minutes as written which was seconded by Mr. Dockser. The Audit Committee voted 1- <br /> 0-3 to accept the minutes as written, only one member, Steve Herrick was present at the <br /> last meeting all other abstained. <br /> Mr. Burkhart instructed Mr. McIntire to begin the review of the FY18 audit results. Mr. <br /> McIntire started by saying that in his opinion the audit went very well. He pointed out that <br /> no material journal entries were proposed and that the records are in good working order. <br /> He noted that the auditor's opinion is found on pages 1-3 of the financial statements. He <br /> stated the opinion is that the financial statements present fairly in all material respects, the <br /> financial position of governmental and business-type activities of the Town of Reading. <br /> Mr. McIntire then directs the Committee Members to turn to page 4 where the Manager <br /> Discussion and Analysis begins. He points out that this section gives a snapshot of the <br /> General Fund. It is a great resource as it summarizes the key elements of the General Fund. <br /> Mr. McIntire then directs the Committee to turn to pages 15-17. He notes that the <br /> Statement of Net Position and The Statement of Activities provide a long-term perspective. <br /> He points out on the Statement of Net Position the unrestricted is $-63.6 million for <br /> governmental funds -$28.08 million overall with enterprise funds included. The negative <br /> balance is attributable to the net pension and OPEB liabilities of $24.4 million (pension) and <br /> $60.2 million (OPEB) respectively for governmental and $36.7 million (pension) and $68.8 <br /> million (OPEB) with enterprise funds included. McIntire points out that although these <br /> liabilities are large they are lower than many of our peer communities. He also comments <br /> that the pension liability did not change drastically. The OPEB liability changed drastically <br /> due to GASB 75, a new accounting standard that was implemented in FY18, which requires <br /> the entire OPEB liability to appear on the Balance Sheet. Prior to GASB 75, only the <br /> shortfalls from the OPEB annual required liability were shown on the Balance Sheet. Mr. <br /> Page 1 1 <br />