Laserfiche WebLink
CPDC Minutes of 11/1/2010 <br />%NS asked if there would be rental restrictions on the condominium owners. Mr. Blute replied that <br />homeowner rights cannot be restricted but the Homeowner Association document can specify guidelines <br />on short-term leases. <br />NS asked if the parking under the buildings would be below grade as shown in the submitted.building <br />renderings. He emphasized that the formal application should show what the buildings would actually <br />look like. Mr. Blute said the grading plans were not yet complete. <br />GK reminded the Board that when National Development made its proposal there was an expectation <br />that there would be more mixed-use and that the southeast district (quadrant "D") would contain a non- <br />residential use. He expressed concern over the proximity, scale and number of buildings proposed and <br />noted that although the town would have some control over the design of those buildings within the <br />GSGD quadrant (through the GSGD's design guidelines), he asked what if any control the town would <br />have on the buildings in the other quadrants. Also, would the town have any control over site features, <br />topography, etc. The Board noted that there are no-build setbacks, buffer zones, and height restrictions <br />in place across the entire site. <br />Public Comment <br />Some abutters expressed concern that the proposed pedestrian access to South Street may disrupt their <br />neighborhood. Mr. Mastroianni noted that a key feature of the Development Agreement is to provide <br />public access to the surrounding neighborhood. He also noted that each individual abutter's property <br />:would be reviewed with regards to meeting the abutter's buffer needs. <br />Joan Neary of 355 South Street also expressed concern over the size, proximity, and style of the <br />buildings. <br />Tim O'Connor of 96 Curtis Street: noting that construction would be done in stages by quadrant, Mr. <br />O'Connor expressed concern that at some future date Pulte Homes might decide residential units are no <br />longer profitable and construct office or retail in one or more of the quadrants. The Board noted that <br />such a change would have to be approved by the CPDC and possibly other Boards and Commissions. <br />Tony D'Arezzo, 130 John Street asked if there were plans for an MBTA bus stop at the site. Mr. Blute <br />said there were no plans for a bus stop at the present. <br />No action was taken by the Board <br />Request for a Minor Modification to an approved Site Plan Review Waiver <br />1321 Main Street <br />The request was to be allowed to reduce both the length of the center landscaping island and <br />proportionately the amount of landscaping on the site agreed to in the waiver. Jack Sullivan, engineer for <br />the applicant, was present. He explained that although the Board had. approved reduced curbcut widths <br />the Massachusetts Department of Transportation has repeatedly rejected his client's request to reduce <br />the widths. In fact, the Mass DOT has determined the curbcut must be approximately 80 feet wide which <br />.is wider than they are today. The only way to widen the curbcut is to reduce the island. The applicant <br />'still intends to repave and restripe the parking lot and add what landscaping he can. <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />