Laserfiche WebLink
Inspector had to deny the building permit application due to the increase in the maximum lot <br />coverage. <br />The Board questioned the setback of 6' from the lot line and the final maximum lot coverage. <br />There was some question as to whether the required criteria were met to issue a Variance. There <br />was also a question that this above-ground pool could be removed and an in-ground pool could <br />be installed without coming back to the Zoning Board. <br />The uniqueness of this lot was. not demonstrated and no hardship was presented either. Some <br />questions were asked regarding the impact on abutting properties from the discharge system. A <br />report from the Town Engineer to the Board should be submitted. <br />The owner said there was no objection from abutters and they did have an above-ground pool at <br />this location in the past. <br />The Board needs additional information submitted by the Applicant and more information from <br />the Town Engineer. The Applicant will submit additional information in time to be reviewed by <br />the Board. <br />On a motion by Jeffrey Perkins, seconded by Robert Redfern, the Zoning Board of Appeals <br />moved to continue the hearing to January 6, 2011 at the request of the Applicant. <br />The vote was 5-0-0 (Petschek, Perkins, Jarema, Redfern, Caouette). <br />Y, Adjournment <br />On a motion by Jeffrey Perkins, seconded by Kristin Cataldo, the Zoning Board of Appeals <br />moved to adjourn the meeting. <br />The vote was 6-0-0 (Petschek, Perkins, Jarema, Redfern, Cataldo, Caouette). <br />Respectfully submi <br />a eel M. Knigh <br />Recording Secret <br />ZBA Meeting, December 2, 2011 2 <br />