My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-09-16 Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes
TownOfReading
>
Public Access
>
Minutes
>
Zoning Board of Appeals
>
2010-2019
>
2010
>
2010-09-16 Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2011 5:05:09 PM
Creation date
2/28/2011 1:35:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
,--To Vj ~ ~ t-ek K <br />Town of Reading <br />ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br />Minutes of September 16, 2010 <br />Members Present: Clark Petschek, Chairman <br />John Jarema <br />Robert Redfern <br />John Miles <br />Jeffrey Perkins <br />Damase Caouette <br />Kristin Cataldo <br />Members Absent: <br />Itj JJ. <br />"201, 0 CT 2 ~ A : 0b <br />A meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals was held in the Selectmen's Meeting Room-of the <br />Town Hall, 16 Lowell Street, Reading, Massachusetts, at 7:00 P.M. Also in attendance was Glen <br />Redmond, Commissioner of Buildings, and Ellen Doucette, Town Counsel. <br />Case # 10-03 <br />A continuation of a Public Hearing on the petition of Debra Shontz-Stackpole who seeks a <br />Variance and an appeal from a decision of the Building Inspector under Section 5.1.2 of the <br />Zoning By-laws in order to determine that Lot C2, 186 Summer Avenue is a pre-existing, non- <br />conforming, grandfathered lot. If this lot is determined to not be grandfathered, then this is also a <br />request for a Variance under Section 5.1.2 for the property located at Lot C, 186 Summer <br />Avenue in Reading, MA. <br />Attorney Steven Cicatelli reviewed the history of the property and the case to date. He said he <br />and Town Counsel disagreed on the interpretation of the bylaws and he wants the Board to <br />interpret the bylaw. <br />Town Counsel said she had already addressed the issues that Attorney Cicatelli raised in her <br />written responses of December 2009 that were previously circulated to the Board and the <br />petitioner. She noted that the section Attorney Cicatelli raised in support of the petition would <br />only apply to non-conforming lots prior to 1942 and therefore is not relevant to this case. <br />Members of the Board discussed extensively the petition and asked questions of Attorney <br />Cicatelli and Town Counsel. Ms. Stackpole offered additional comments. <br />Bobbie Botticelli of 55 Chapel Hill Drive offered comments in support of the petition. <br />The Chairman read two emails that were received from abutters in opposition to the petition who <br />expressed their concerns, that this lot might be considered a buildable lot. <br />ZBA Meeting, September 16, 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.