Laserfiche WebLink
RE( 1A D <br />IERK <br />~~i rat kd A } $ S s <br />MEMBERS PRESENT: <br />TOWN OF READING <br />ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS <br />MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 19, 1998 <br />STEPHEN TUCKER, CHAIRMAN <br />JOHN COOTE <br />CHRISTOPHER VACCARO <br />JOHN JAREMA <br />i Pa % <br />A meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals was held in the Selectmen's Meeting Room of the Town Hall, <br />16 Lowell Street, Reading, Massachusetts at 7:OOPM Mr. Tucker swore in, those present that would be <br />addressing the Board this evening. <br />The first Public Hearing was on the petition of Denise Cimino who seeks a Variance under Section 5.1.2. of <br />the Zoning By-Laws in order to construct a front canopy over the entrance area on the property located at <br />29 Richards Road in Reading, Massachusetts. (Case #98-01) <br />Ms. Lenise Cimino represented herself, and she was the only person present at the hearing. Ms. Cimino <br />requests a Variance in order to construct an overhead canopy over her front entrance. She stated that she <br />purchased the house three years ago and has had continuous problems with water coming down over the <br />front door. Two years ago, she put on a new roof and had the gutters sealed. This has not helped the <br />problem and she has put on a new steel and storm door. She stated that the storm door would have to be <br />replaced. Both her roofer and carpenter told Ms. Cimino that she does not have sufficient overhang. <br />Mr. Jarema explained to Ms. Cimino the criteria needed to obtain a Variance. Ms. Cimino addressed one <br />item, the hardship issue, stating that the new roof cost $4,000 and the new screen door cost over $200, <br />which she now has to replace. Ms. Cimino presented her plans to the Board. The Board discussed the <br />possibility of issuing a finding under Section 6 instead of a Variance. <br />At 7:57PM, a motion was made, seconded and unanimously voted to grant a finding to Denise Cimino, 29 <br />Richards Road, under Section 6 of the Massachusetts General Laws, to allow an extension of the eaves, the <br />proposed canopy over the stoop, which would protect the safety of those entering and existing, which is not <br />to exceed 5' x 6' and it is not to be enclosed. <br />VOTE 3-0 (passed) <br />Ms. Cimino requested to withdraw her request for a Variance without prejudice. <br />At T58PM, a motion was made, seconded and unanimously voted to allow withdrawal without prejudice. <br />VOTE 3-0 (passed) <br />At 8:OOPM, a motion was made and seconded to adjourn, and the Board voted unanimously to do so. <br />VOTE 3-0 (passed) <br />Respectfully submitted by Carolyn Walsh, Recording Secretary to the Zoning Board of Appeals. <br />Signed: <br />Date: <br />Approved: <br />