Laserfiche WebLink
The existing showroom would remain so. There is 65% impervious cover on the <br />site; 35% open space. Reading zoning requires 40% open space in the district. <br />Parking is not an issue on the property; the number of spots is way above the <br />number that the By-Laws require. The client would like to have the 65% <br />impervious cover remain. The majority of the property is in Wakefield. <br />The Applicant has spoken with Mr. Dickinson and has requested the Mass <br />Highway PWED plan for the area. <br />Mr. Milisci interpreted that if there is a property that crosses a municipal <br />boundary, they treat it as one parcel and go to the stricter town for compliance <br />with by-laws. <br />The older building is about 40 years old; the younger service building is about 20 <br />years old. The older building is at a 50.2' setback from Walkers Brook Drive. <br />PD would like to know what the Town should get in return for allowing less <br />than open space requirements. Does Reading give something to Wakefield? He <br />would also like to see what the back of the building is going to be. <br />Public Comment <br />-Ruth Clay, 438 Summer Ave: interested in the proposed expansion and the <br />intentions for future use. She is concerned about what is underneath the slabs <br />that were put below the floor in order to reconstruct it. <br />RH mentioned that the Applicant may want to talk to Joe Delaney, Town <br />-1 Engineer. PD agrees. <br />There is a $1.8 million PWED from the State for public works improvements to <br />Walkers Brook Drive. <br />CR will give the Applicant a copy of the plan. <br />The Applicant would like to know who they go to first for the open space <br />waiver; the CPDC or the ZBA. CR advised that the applicant go to the ZBA first. <br />RH wondered if the project is doable with 60% impervious cover, and what the <br />Applicant would give back to the Town in return for a waiver. <br />Brian Milisci questioned whether the open space is grandfathered. <br />NS asked if there would be new signage, but the Applicant doesn't believe so. <br />ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW <br />Site Plan Modification -143 Main Street, Angelo Ciano <br />Attorney Josh Latham is present to represent the Applicant, Angelo Ciano. <br />There is a proposed modification to the approved site plan use; the second floor <br />over the house will be a residential dwelling instead of the office space. This <br />changes necessary parking from 9 to 7 spaces. <br />Mr. Latham has spoken to Glen Redmond, Building Inspector. <br />RH made a comment about encouraging mixed use, especially on South Main <br />Street; he also mentioned that they need to go to the ZBA. <br />CAMy Documents\CPDC\Agenda-Minutes\Minutes 5.19.03.doc <br />